20110834 Ver 2_401 Application_20130413

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST- MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20005
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542 -0005
. 5090.11.2
BEMD
APR 0 4 2013
From: Commanding General, Marine Corps Installations East -
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lej•eune
To: Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps 4f
Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenift I
Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn; Brad Shaver
SUBJ: RE- APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERU£ FOR -THE• - , •�-
HADNOT POINT /FRENCH CREEK UTILITIES PROJECT (Action ID
2011 1732)
Encl: (1) Pre - Construction Notification Form for the Hadnot
Point and French Creek Utilities (P -1264) on Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune
1. The enclosed application is being re- submitted for your
approval of a previously authorized project that allowed the
discharge of fill into Section 404 wetlands to replace and
upgrade Hadnot Point and French Creek Utilities.
2. This work was previously permitted at a point when there was
less than two years remaining on the 5 year, Nationwide Permit
(NWP) verification. A NWP 12 authorization (Action ID 2011
1732) was issued for this project December 2011. It expired
last March 18 2012, but all NWPs were re- authorized by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers on March 19 2012 providing another year
to complete the work. However, there is still work authorized
by the Hadnot Point and French Creek Utility permit that was not
completed by the expiration date of verification, March 2013.
3. The point of contact for this project is Mr. Mart' orenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, G -F, at (910)451 -7
email martin.korenek @usmc.mil.
Sincerely, 4)o �V
dOHN R. TOWNSONry
Director, Environmental Manage
By direction of the
Commanding Officer
Copy to:
NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section 5 copies with $570.00 application fee

• q
..r. T.
i, "�
_a.
P i

20 zsc15101 17697077 000040 - 000040- 000040
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING VOUCHER NO: 3DFLO18
SERVICE - CLEVELAND CENTER 04/11/13
PO BOX 998013 CONTRACT NO
CLEVELAND, OH 44199 N6247013LTA00
DATE PAID: 04/11/13 PAID BY DSSN: 8522
R" CHECK: 17697077
m i
SINGLE PIECE
NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALI
NAVFAC ATLANTIC CODE FNM12
6506 HAMPTON BLVD
NORFOLK VA 23508 1278
INVOICE INVOICE AMOUNT ( +)INTEREST
DATE NUMBER DUE AMOUNT
040213 1 570.00 00
TOTAL CHECK AMOUNT
REMARKS:
APPLIED VID MJ 130410
PAYING OFFICE: OPLOC CLEVELAND (NORFOLK)
FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL: 1- 800 - 756 -4571
IN THE EVENT OF OVERPAYMENT, REMIT TO:
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING
SERVICE - CLEVELAND CENTER
POST OFFICE BOX 998013
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44199
* ** NOTICE * **
(- )DISCOUNT INVOICE AMT
DEDUCTION PAID
.nn 570 on
570.00
DFAS -CL NORFOLK ACCOUNTS
"THE DEBT COLLECTION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996" (PUBLIC LAW 104 -134) REQUIRES THAT
PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTORS /VENDORS BE MADE VIA ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER (EFT)
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,1999. COMPLETION OF A VENDOR PROFILE IN THE CENTRAL
CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CCR) DATABASE FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS LAW.
REGISTRATION FORMS AND DETAILED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND AT WEBSITE:
http: / /www.ccr.gov OR BY CALLING (888) 227 -2423 OR INTERNATIONAL AT
(269) 961 -4725.

y�oF wArE9Q9
o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification Form
A. AppBeant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ® Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 12 or General Permit (GP) number. N/A
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
French Creek - Hadnot Point Utility Improvements
2b. County:
Onslow
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d. Subdivision name:
WA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
USMC - Camp Lejeune
D
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
APR 2 1
3d. Street address:
WA
r6b'R 001-
3e. City, state, zip:
N/A
3f. Telephone no.:
N/A
3g. Fax no.: I
N/A
3h. Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
�D

B: Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.6622 Longitude: - 77.327
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Cogdels Creek, Wallace Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
SC, NSW (Cogdels Creek) & SB, NSW (Wallace Creek)
2c. River basin:
White Oak River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located on US Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune. Landuse is for military training, roadways, and utility
right -of -ways. Much of the adjacent land is undeveloped forested areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
About 5 acres of wetlands are present in the project corridor.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
About 300 feet of stream is present in the project corridor.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is to install improvements to water systems and sewer systems at MCB Camp Lejeune. See attched project
descriptions at the end of this Form.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Additional information at the end of this PCN Form.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: See additional information at end of Form.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
See additional information attached to the end of this Form.
6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all. prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
No Impact
Forested
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
No Impact
Forested
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0
W3 ❑ P [IT
No Impact
Forested
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
No Impact
Forested
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
No Impact
Forested
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
No Impact
Forested
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
I ❑ DWQ
0.0
2g. Total wetland impacts
1.102
2h. Comments: See Additional Information for additional wetland impact areas Permanent Impacts are 0.392 acres.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ® T
Utility Installation
UT to Cogdels Ck
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3
10
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
31L Total stream and tributary impacts
10
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑ P ®T
Wallace Creek
Trestle Removal
Tributary
0.124
02 ❑PQT
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
0.124
4g. Comments: Temporary impacts will occur from the removal of the wood trestle supporting the force main.
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments: WA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba Q Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 Impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
132 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
Q No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: N/A There are no buffer impacts associated with this project.
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Utilities have been placed in existing right -of -ways where other utilities currently exist, to the extent practicable. Additionally, if
wetlands were located adjacent to utility installation It was moved to minimize impacts. Extensive use of silt fence to minimze
potental impact from construction activities. See additional information for more minimization efforts. The horizontal drilling
staging area was moved to avoid impacts to Wetland 9.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Additional Information
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity WA
3c. Comments: N/A.
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
WA linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.4 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
.0 acres
4h. Comments: WA
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
[�N/A If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
N/A
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation Is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
< 1 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No -See additional information
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
WA
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
USMC Base
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered °yes° to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered °yes° to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: Final EIS dated December 2009 - US Marines Corps Grow the Force
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered °yes° to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
® Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered °yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered °no,° provide a short narrative description.
Cumulative Impact Analysis provided in December 2009 EIS
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project will not involve the generation of wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field Surveys and MCB GIS data. See additional information attached to the end of this PCN Form
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS. See additional Information attached to the end of this PCN Form.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Review of MCB GIS data
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Instalation of utilities is below ground. No increase in elevation of
ground surface.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Maps
MAR 2 8 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applican eSignature
Date
(Agent's signature Is valid only If a rization letter from the applicant
ipv;ecdc.)
is
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AECOM
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
French Creek and Hadnot Point Utilities
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
A permanent incremental increase of Marine Corps personnel is currently underway at Marine Corps
Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune (Base) under the Grow the Force initiative. A force addition of
approximately 7,000 marines is proposed at the Base. To support this growth, the USMC is proposing
a combination of (1) new infrastructure construction (e.g. buildings, roads, utility lines/equipment); (2)
demolition and/or upgrades to existing infrastructure; and (3) relocating existing units and personnel to
consolidate and better support combat missions. At the Base, the USMC proposes to expand and
replace existing utilities at Hadnot Point and French Creek as a component of these development
activities. These utility expansions are to address current deficiencies as well as in support of new
facilities that are proposed for construction under Base expansion as documented in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) USMC Grow the Force in North Carolina (December 2009).
3e. Describe the overall project In detail, Including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of a number of different utility improvements which are described as follows.
WATER
!rlWTI 17, 9 17. ...ham=
A new 12 -inch water main will be installed along JC Smith Road from Gonzalez Boulevard to the
intersection of JC Smith Road and 0 Street and approximately 400 feet north of JC Smith Road on
Gonzalez Boulevard. The 12 -inch water main will be located along the north side of JC Smith Road.
The crossing of Cogdels Creek will be done using horizontal directional drilling to avoid impacts to the
creek. This water main connection will provide a connection between the Hadnot Point and the
French Creek water distribution systems.
Wallace Creek Water Main Relocation
There is an existing 12 -inch water main that crosses Wallace Creek on a wooden trestle which
parallels the Seth Williams Boulevard Bridge. Two 16 -inch force mains and two 6 -inch
telecommunication conduits also share the trestle. The trestle is being demolished and the water
main, the force mains, and telecommunication conduits will be relocated off the trestle. The water
main and the sewer lines will be relocated under the creek by means of horizontal directional drilling to
avoid impacts to the creek. The two telecommunication conduits will be relocated onto the Seth
Williams Bridge.
Connection of Raw Water Mains
There is an existing 18 -inch ductile iron raw water main that extends along McHugh Boulevard from
the Building 20 Water Treatment Plant to Sneads Ferry Road that has not been used for several
years. Another 30 -inch main parallels Sneads Ferry Road. The 18 -inch main will be placed back into
service and connected with the 30 -inch main near the intersection of Sneads Ferry Road and McHugh
Boulevard to allow the transmission of raw water to either the Building 20 Water Treatment Plant or to
the Building 670 Water Plant There are no wetland impacts associated with this portion of the
project

AECOM
Raw Water Main Replacement
The existing 18 -inch raw water main on Holcomb Boulevard is asbestos cement pipe. This pipe will
be removed and replaced with a new ductile pipe. The asbestos cement pipe and fittings will be
property disposed of at an off -site facility. The pipe will be the same size as the existing pipe and will
connect from Building 20 along Holcomb Boulevard to a point near the intersection of Sneads Ferry
Road. In addition, the existing 18 -inch raw water main along Holcomb Boulevard between Sneads
Ferry Road and Brewster Boulevard will be replaced with a 24 -inch ductile iron water main. The 24-
inch line will accommodate the flows for the future mega water plant which will be located near the
intersection of Holcomb Boulevard and Sneads Ferry Road. There will be no impacts to wetlands or
streams associated with this portion of the project
Water Meter Replacement
2
Water flows to and from the housing areas through multiple connections and water usages are not
metered, but are estimated'for billing purposes. Past efforts to meter the flows through master meters
have not been successful and were eventually abandoned. The existing non - functional meters will be
located and replaced with a series of new master meters and an automatic accounting system will be
developed that will allow for accurate measurement of water usages. This project will include the
installation of 29 water meters that range in size from 5/8 -inch to 8 -inch. There are no wetland
impacts associated with this portion of the project
SANITARY SEWER
The design scope for the Hadnot Point and French Creek Cantonment Area (HP -FC) Sanitary Sewer
Collection System is to provide a gravity sewer collection system network that will allow for the
abandonment of as many of the existing wastewater lift stations as possible. There are presently 47 lift
stations within the two areas.
French Creek Collection Svstern and Sewer Services to Area 1700
A network of gravity sewer mains will be constructed throughout the HP -FC Cantonment Area. Lift
station 1229 will be replaced with a submersible pump station. Lift stations 590, 635, 745, and SPT3C
will receive improvements.
A 24 -inch gravity sewer main will be installed along the south side of JC Smith Road connecting PS
590 to PS 315. This new sewer main will cross over Cogdels Creek. A 12 -inch gravity sewer main
will be installed in the southwest comer of the French Creek area to connect FC 599 and FC 315.
This sewer main will run north from FC 599 between the structures FC573 and FC574 and then follow
HM Smith Boulevard to the manhole at FC 315.
A new centrally located lift station will be constructed near the intersection of the proposed Gonzalez
Boulevard extension and the tank trail. Gravity sewer mains will be installed to connect this area to
the rest of the sewer system. Where possible, new gravity sewer mains will be installed using
horizontal directional drilling techniques for wetland and stream crossings to minimize impacts to
these sensitive resources.
Four new gravity mains will connect the new lift station: Gonzalez Boulevard North, Gonzalez
Boulevard South, Tank Trail West, and Tank Trail East The Gonzalez Boulevard North sanitary sewer
main will parallel the Gonzalez Boulevard extension to the intersection with the Birch Street extension.

AECOM
3
The Gonzalez Boulevard South sewer main will parallel the Gonzalez Boulevard extension to the
intersection with McHugh Boulevard. This main will collect the wastewater presently flowing to station
116. The gravity main will continue across McHugh Boulevard to the existing pump station 511
behind Building 504.
The Tank Trail West sanitary sewer main will parallel the existing tank trail to the west side of Cogdels
Creek where it will split to the north and south to receive wastewater from the existing lift stations in
this area. Tank Trail East sanitary sewer main will parallel the existing tank trail to the east to receive
the wastewater from the existing lift station 148.
Lift` Station 590
This station is located at the intersection of O Street and JC Smith Road. Two back -up diesel pumps
will be installed at the lift station. The pumps will be free standing and installed outside without a
building. A single, dual wall, above ground, diesel fuel storage tank will be provided for the pumps.
The pumps will be controlled by way of a high water level float in the wet well. There are no wetland
impacts associated with the work at this Lift Station.
SPT3C- Wallace Creek Litt Station
This station is located on the north side of Parachute Tower Road. A back -up diesel pump will be
installed at the lift station. The pump will be free standing and installed outside without a building. A
single, dual wall, above ground, diesel fuel tank will be provided. The pump will be controlled by way
of a high water level float in the wet well. There are no wetland impacts associated with the work at
this Lift Station.
Lift Station PS 745, Force Main Replacement
This lift station is located on the west side of McHugh Boulevard north of Wallace Creek. The existing
Lift Station PS745 consists of two sewage lift stations located on the same site. Pumps at these two
stations will be replaced with larger capacity pumps to handle the additional wastewater flow.
Two force mains leave the lift stations and cross Wallace Creek on an above - the -water pipe trestle
along with a water main. The 12 -inch and 14 -inch force mains will be replaced with two (2) 16 -inch
force mains, installed under the creek by way of horizontal directional drilling. The new force mains will
follow McHugh Boulevard on the south side of Wallace Creek to the intersection of Birch Street, turn
onto Birch Street and then connect to the SPT3C pump station collection system. In addition, these
two force mains will be connected to the existing force mains that discharge into the PS 590 collection
system. On the north side of Wallace Creek, the new force mains will replace the existing force mains
to the pump station. The existing water main will also be relocated under the creek with directional
drilling. The trestle will be removed once the pipes have been relocated.
Piney Green Ut Station No. 635, Force Main Replacement
Due to periodic overflows of the manhole to this station, the pumps at the existing Piney Green Lift
Station were recently replaced with pumps having capacities greater than the originals. Although the
pump replacement increased the flow capacity from this station, it has not completely eliminated the
overflow problem. The existing 6-inch force main will be replaced with an 8 -inch main to further
increase the flow from this station.

AECOM
Lift Station 1229
This lift station is located in the parking lot of the Commissary adjacent to Birch Street The lift station
is outdated and will be replaced with a new submersible type station. There are no wetland impacts
associated with the replacement of this Lift Station.
As described above the project consists of the installation of water lines and wastewater collection
systems. Equipment for the installation of the underground utilities will consist primarily of trenching
equipment and directional boring equipment
Section 4 Jurisdictional Determination
Numerous wetland delineations and jurisdictional determinations have been performed within various
parts of the project area on the Base. Jurisdictional boundaries of these wetland areas were provided
to AECOM for inclusion on the Design Plans for planning, design, avoidance and minimization. The
following wetland jurisdictional determinations were utilized for this project
• The wetlands associated with the Cogdels Creek drainage north of McHugh Blvd. were
delineated by Tetra Tech in 2010 and a Jurisdictional Determination was issued by the
USACE on March 24, 2011 (Action Id. SAW-2010-01798).
• The wetlands associated with the Cogdels Creek drainage south of McHugh Blvd. were
delineated by Tetra Tech in 2010. A draft JD package was submitted to the USACE in April
2011 and is currently awaiting approval by the USACE.
• Wetlands to the north of Wallace Creek and along the west edge of Holcombe Blvd. were
delineated by GeoMarine in 2008 and a -JD was issued by the USACE on June 4, 2008
(Action Id. 2008 900).
• Wetlands to the south of Wallace Creek and along the west edge of Holcombe Blvd. were
delineated by GeoMarine in 2007 and a JD was issued by the USACE on October 22, 2007
(Action Id. 2007 - 3406 -067).
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2. Wetland Impacts
4
Wetland
Type of
Type of Wetland
Forested
Type of
Area of
Impact No.
Impact
Jurisdiction
Impact
(acres)
W7 ❑P ❑T
No Impact
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.0
W8 ®P ®T
Mech./Hand
Clearing
Scrub
No
Corps
0.005/0.004
W9 ❑P ❑T
No Impact
Emergent
No
Corps
0.0
W10 ❑P ❑T
No Impact
Emergent
No
Corps
0.0
W11 ®P ® T
C learin g
MCleari g
Emergent/Scrub
No
Corps
0.15/0.29
W12 ®P ®T
MechJHand
Emergent/Scrub
No
Corps
0.16/0.22

V=KO M
Wetland
Type of
Type of Wetland
Forested
Type of
Area of
Impact No.
Impact
Jurisdiction
Impact
(acres)
Clearing
W13 ®POT
Mech. /Hand
Clearing
Emergent/Scrub
No
Corps
0.005/0.03
W14 OP ®T
Mech./Hand
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.01
Clearing
W15 ®P ®T
MechJHand
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.05/0.09
Clearing
W16 OPOT
No Impacts
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.0
W17 OPOT
No Impacts
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.0
W18 OPOT
No Impacts
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.0
W19 OP ®T
Mech./Hand
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.001
Clearing
W20 ®P ®T
Mech./Hand
Scrub
No
Corps
0.01/0.02
Clearing
W21 ®P ®T
Mech. /Hand
Clearing
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.01/0.04
W22 ®P ®T
Mech./Hand
Clearing
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.002/0.005
W23 OPOT
No Impact
Forested
Yes
Corps
0.0
Perm. 0.392
Temp. 0.71
Total Acres
1.102
2h. Comments
Wetlands with no impacts shown for documentation of avoidance and minimization.
Permanent wetland impacts are based upon a 10 foot maintained cleared utility easement. In most
areas the wetlands while impacted by the removal of vegetation will remain jurisdictional areas
following installation of the utility.
Temporary impacts are based on a 30 -foot construction easement Temporary impacts will consist of
hand/mechanical clearing necessary to allow for access of construction equipment

AECOM
Wetland 9 and 10 — There will be no impacts due to horizontal directional drilling of these wetlands.
Wetland 14 — Temporary impacts from the removal and demolition of existing pump station.
Wetland 20 — Impacts will be from clearing brush for aerial crossing.
D. Impact Avoidance and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measure taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing project
All minimization efforts described below.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through
construction techniques.
Directional drilling has been specified where possible for the installation of utility lines through
wetlands or across streams. This includes Wallace Creek at Wetland 3 (Sheet CU120), Un -named
Tributary at Wetland 6 (Sheet CU123), Wetlands 9, 10, and Wallace Creek (Sheet CU138), Wetland
18 (Sheet CU171).
Installation of water line adjacent to proposed Gonzalez Road extension bridge will be by directional
drilling.
6
Installation of the gravity sewer on the west side of the proposed Gonzalez Road extension bridge
was designed to be as close to the bridge as practicable and within the same fiootprint at the proposed
work bridge. Therefore, hand clearing required for the gravity sewer installation would also be
required for the work bridge.
The water line installed along Holcombe Blvd. was designed to avoid wetland areas by keeping it
within the cleared upland right -of -way.
Silt fence will be placed between all construction areas and wetlands to prevent impacts from
construction activities.
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan
Installation of the utility lines will occur under a General Stormwater Permit
F. Supplementary Information
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat
Federally Listed Species Potentially Occurring at MCB Camp Lejeune

AECOM
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Leatherback sea turtle
Dermochelys coriacea
Endangered
Loggerhead sea turtle
Caretta caretta
Threatened
Green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
Threatened
Piping plover
Charedrius meladus
Threatened
Red - cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Endangered
Seabeach amaranth
Amaranthus pumila
Threatened
Rough - leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Endangered
American alligator'
Alligator mississippiensis
Threatened
Although still listed as federally threatened the American alligator is considered recovered
Source: MCB Camp Lejeune 2007x.
While several Endangered Species are known to occur at Camp Lejeune, suitable habitat for those
species are not present in the project area. Extensive surveys for various federally - listed species
have occurred on the Base. The Base GIS data did not indicate any know occurrences of any
threatened or endangered species in or near the various utility corridors. Surveys of these areas by
AECOM biologists did not reveal any suitable habitat for any species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat
7
Wallace Creek at Seth Williams Blvd. (where the trestle is to be removed when the sewer and water
lines are installed beneath the creek) is designated Essential Fish Habitat — Habitat Areas of Particular
Concern (EFH -HAPC) for shrimp. Coastal inlets are given this designation because they are judged
to be particularly important to the long term productivity of shrimp. In addition, Wallace Creek to the
west of the utility crossing location is designated EFH -HAPC for snapper and grouper. Temporary
impacts to Wallace Creek may occur as a result of the removal of the existing aboveground water and
sewer lines and the associated wooden trestle. Installation of the new force main and water lines will
be by horizontal directional drilling beneath the creek bed, thereby eliminating any permanent impacts
to the Essential Fish Habitat
7. Wetland Restoration Plan
Wetland areas disturbed during installation of the utility lines will be restored. Topsoil will be replaced
on all disturbed areas and the areas returned to their original grade. The wetland areas will be
seeded with a permanent wetland seed mix as follows:
Species
Agrostis stolonifere
Carex vulpinoidea
EJymus virginicus
Helenium autumnale
Iris versicolor
Desmodium canader
Rudbeckfa hirta
Verbena hastata
Common Name
Creeping bentgrass
Fox sedge
Virginia wild rye
Sneezeweed
Blue flag
se Showy tick trefoil
Black -eyed susan
Blue vervain
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre
Percent
28
23
28
4
5
4
4
4

AECOM
A substitute seed mix may be utilized with the approval of Base Environmental personnel.