20181033 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2021_20210609

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20181033 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 06/09/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -6/9/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
rJ Stream 17 Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Paul Wiesner [e-mail]
Project Information
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20181033 Version:*1
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Owen Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Site
County: Transylvania
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As-Built Plans
File Upload: Owen Farms_100064_MY0_2021.pdf 17.89MB
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Paul Wiesner
Signature:*

.: , f % .ill f I
_al r Il
- it
r ' "'
▪ ';_71,
law,':--f - - ESA"`.'--
r _ `
- r Final MY0 Monitoring Report
▪ - . m. ,. ... - Owen Farms Mitigation Site
- ,: , - p� Transylvania County, NC
;, -E NCDMS Project No. 100064
° NCDMS Contract No. 7532
NCDMS RFP No. 16-007334
(Issued 9/8/2017)
USACE ID: SAW-2018-01165
DWR ID: 20181033
French Broad River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06010105
June 7, 2021
Data Collected: February, 2021
Prepared for: Prepared by:
NDivisionC DepartmentofMitigoftation EnvironmentalServices Quality HDR Engineering
555 Fa etteville Street,Suite 900
1652 Mail Service CenterIM)
Raleigh,NC 27601-3034
nRaleigh,NC 27699 1652 LMG Contributing Staff:Ben Furr,Ryan Smith,Alex DiGeronimo,
Chris Smith,Yvette Mariotte,Kevin Williams
This As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register,Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters,
Volume 3,Chapter 2,Section§332.8,paragraphs(c)(2)through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services IN-Lieu Fee instrument signed and dated July 28,2010.

tLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DINIEY4 company
May 31, 2021
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
NCDEQ— Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Re: MYO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Comments
Owen Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
French Broad River Basin; CU#06010105—Transylvania County
DMS Project ID No. 100064
Contract No. 7532
Mr. Wiesner,
As per your letter dated May 21, 2021, we have reviewed and addressed the Department of Mitigation
Services' (DMS) review comments as follows:
1. Report Cover: Please include the project's DWR# on the report cover: DWR# 20181033.
Please also include the issuance date of the RFP on the report cover: RFP 16-007334 Issued
9/8/2017).
RE: Comply. The DWR number and RFP number has been added to the cover.
2. General; Monitoring; Monitoring Photo Points: Per recent IRT discussion, DMS recommends
adding photo points at each crossing location within the project to document crossing stability
and function during the monitoring term.
RE: Comply. Photo points have been added at all crossings and will be monitored throughout
the monitoring period.
3. General; Section 1.3.1 - Project Structure; Table 4 Project Assets: The draft report notes that
as-built stream lengths shown in Table 4 were produced using the thalweg generated in the as-
built survey. As-built stream lengths should be based on the centerline of the restored or
enhancement streams generated from the as-built survey data. Please revise the report and
table accordingly. In the report text(Section 1.3.1 or Section 5.0), please update and describe/
explain any differences from the IRT approved mitigation plan centerline lengths and the as-
built centerline lengths provided.
RE: Comply. The As-Built centerlines and stationing produced by the PLS who conducted the
survey have been utilized to calculate credits. Table 4 has been updated to reflect that the As-
Built centerline lengths match the lengths and stationing proposed in the Mitigation Plan.
Sections 1.3.1 and Section 5.0 no longer mention any discrepancies in stream lengths.
4. Section 1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach: In the report text, please also
note the type of fencing installed to exclude livestock from the conservation easement.
RE: Comply. Section 1.3 now includes text that describes the type of fencing utilized and that it
is compliant with NRCS cattle fencing specifications.
1
www.lmgroup.net•Phone:[phone]•Fax:[phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court—Suite 120,Raleigh,NC 27604

LMG
SAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
5. Section 5.0 As-Built State: In the report text, please document and discuss any monitoring
feature updates or locations that have changed from what was presented in the IRT approved
mitigation plan.
RE:Comply. All monitoring feature location changes have been outlined in Section 5.1 and 5.2.
6. Section 5.0 As-Built State/Section 5.2 Verification of planting: Based on a review of the planting
record drawings, several species were eliminated from the IRT approved mitigation plan and
several species amounts (% composition)were changed. Please discuss the planting changes
in the report text and explain why the changes were made (ie. availability, site conditions, etc.).
RE: Comply. Discussion has been added to Section 5.2 regarding the planting composition
changes. Table 4. As-Built Planting Changes Summary has also been added to outline all
changes and planting substitutions.
Appendix A—Table 4_Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits: Total project stream credits in
the table should be updated to 5,043.893 SMUs so the report matches the DMS accounting
system and project credit ledger. Total wetland credits currently match the DMS accounting
system and credit ledger.
RE: Comply. Table 4 Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits now reflects 5,043.893 SMUs.
8. Appendix A—Table 4_Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits: West Fork French Broad River
(Ell section) indicates 705' for the Mitigation Plan length and 658' for the as-built length. This
section is an Ell section where no stream work was conducted other than two soil lifts. The 47'
difference between the Mitigation Plan and as-built lengths leads the reader to believe that there
was a change in pattern or loss in stream length in this section when this did not occur. This
may be attributed to the as-built lengths generated from the thalweg as-built data. As noted in
the earlier comment, please review and update the as-built lengths and table as necessary.
RE: The Ell length for WFFBR now reflects the correct length based on the As-Built centerline
stationing which now matches the 705'outlined in the Mitigation Plan.
9. Appendix A— Table 4_Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits: DMS recommends adding a
note to Table 4 indicating that all crossings and utility easements have been removed from credit
calculations or adding table comments for the applicable reaches.
RE: Comply. The note has been added to Table 5 (updated table number).
10. Appendix A—Table 4_Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits: UT 1 and UT 5 show an " * "
but no footnote is included. Please remove or include the applicable footnote/s.
RE: Comply. Footnote has been added(see response to Comment 9).
11. Appendix A— Table 6: Please update the Completion/ Delivery date for the As-built (Year 0
Monitoring-Baseline) report.
RE: Comply. Completion/Delivery data has been updated.
12. Appendix A — All Figures: The IRT has requested that the mapping legend asset colors and
symbols remain consistent throughout the life of the project. The mapping legend asset colors
and symbols in the draft MYO report differ from what is presented in the IRT approved mitigation
plan. If HDR believes that the mapping legend asset colors and symbols presented in the draft
MYO report better represent the project, please briefly discuss and note the change in the report
2
www.lmgroup.net•Phone: [phone] •Fax: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court—Suite 120,Raleigh,NC 27604

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DINIEY4 company
text. The mapping legend asset colors and symbols should remain consistent in all future
monitoring reports.
RE: Comply. The colors of the assets in Figures 2 &3 have been updated to be consistent with
what was presented in the Asset Map of the Mitigation Plan.
13. Appendix A — All Figures: DMS recommends showing non-credit areas (utility line ROWs &
crossings) as a separate color(no credit). A majority of the small crossings show a break while
the crossing on the mainstem shows the stream within the crossing. Please be consistent and
revise as necessary.
RE: Comply. Non-credited areas are now shown on Figures 2 & 3 in orange.
14. Appendix A — All Figures: As specified in Table 4, UT4 has a mitigation ratio of 2.5:1 and is
mislabeled/colored in the figures. Please QA/QC all figures to confirm that they are consistent
with Table 4 and the IRT approved mitigation plan.
RE: Comply. UT 4 is now reflected as having a mitigation ratio of 2.5:1 in Figures 2.0& 3.1-3.9
15. Appendix A— Figure 2.0 Project Asset Map &As-Built Monitoring Plan View: Please label all
project streams and wetland assets on the Project Asset Map to identify the stream segments
and wetland areas presented in Table 4 (Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits). Project
reaches and wetlands areas should also be labeled on figure 3.1.
Please also review the as-built monitoring plan view maps to confirm that all project streams
and wetland assets areas are labeled. As an example, UT7 is not labeled on figure 3.5. Asset
labeling should also be utilized in all future monitoring report figures.
RE: Comply. All assets have been labeled in Figures 2.0 &3.1 —3.9.
16. Appendix A — As-Built Monitoring Plan View Figures: Please review and confirm that the
stationing shown on the as-built monitoring plan view maps is accurate and matches the
longitudinal profiles provided. There appears to be minor discrepancies for UT3; UT4; and UT6.
Please review all stationing shown on the maps&record drawings to confirm they are consistent
with the longitudinal profiles and cross sections provided in the report. Please update as
necessary.
RE: Comply. The longitudinal profile stationing has been updated to match the plan view figures
for UT3, UT4, and UT6.
17. Appendix B — Table 9: Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary: Two (1&2) footnote
references are included in the table but no footnotes are included. Please remove or include
the applicable footnote/s.
RE: Comply. Footnote references have been removed from Table 9.
18. Appendix B — Longitudinal Profiles: Please include the longitudinal profile for the applicable
portions of UT7 (restoration). It is missing in the draft MY0 report provided.
RE: Comply. The UT 7 longitudinal profile is now included as Figure 4.12.
19. Record Drawings: Please show the utility lines/utility easements on the record drawings.
RE: Comply. Utility lines and utility easements are now shown on the record drawings.
3
www.lmgroup.net•Phone:[phone]•Fax:[phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court—Suite 120,Raleigh,NC 27604

tLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
20. Record Drawings: A majority of the project conservation easement is fenced and the installed
fencing is shown on the record drawings. Please also include any as-built witness post/
easement marking locations on the Record Drawings where fencing was not installed along the
conservation easement.
RE: Comply. Witness Post locations are now represented in the Record Drawings.
Digital Support File Comments:
21. The feature for Wetland Group 1 has an area of 1.412 compared to the reported area of 1.540
acres. Please review and address this difference. Please update the digital support files as
necessary.
RE: The shapefile for Wetland Group 1 has been replaced and has an area of 1.54 acres.
22. Please organize the stream asset features so that individual records in the attribute table reflect
individual records in the asset table and include reach names in the submitted shapefile. It
appears that there may be differences in feature lengths relative to lengths reported in the asset
table (e.g. UT2A, feature length of 589 ft vs asset table length of 546 ft). Please review and
address any differences.
RE: The shapefile for Streams has been replaced and UT2A now has a feature length of 546
ft.
23. It looks like the profile figure for UT7 was not included in the report but was included in the
profiles and cross sections spreadsheet. Please update as necessary.
RE: Comply. The profile figure for UT 7 has been included in the report.
24. Please note that the color formatting of the cells in Table 10 differ from DMS template which
was approved by the IRT and selected to meet ADA requirements for colorblindness. Please
refer to the most recent monitoring report template and update the report and digital support
files as necessary.
RE: Comply. Table 11 (updated table number) now matches the DMS template.
25. Please review the mitigation plan stream features for UT2A, which has a feature length of 615
ft compared to the asset table length of 546 ft. The mitigation plan feature for Wetland Group 1
also has an area of 1.412 vs the reported area of 1.540. GIS stream and wetland asset
shapefile features should match the creditable footages/acreages reported in the project asset
table.
RE: Comply. See responses to Comment 21 & 22.
26. If available, please include existing conditions features in the revised digital submittal.
RE: Comply. A Micro Station drawing containing the pre-construction alignments and wetland
boundaries has been included in the folder titled `Pre-Construction DGNs'.
27. Please provide PDFs of any permits or associated permit correspondence acquired during
design development that wasn't submitted during the Mitigation Plan development (i.e. FEMA
Floodplain Compliance permit; DEQ Land Quality permit; etc.). This should be included in a
separate "Project Permits" folder in the final digital submittal.
4
www.lmgroup.net•Phone: [phone] •Fax:[phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court—Suite 120,Raleigh,NC 27604

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DINIEY#company
RE: Comply. PDFs of all permits has been included in the digital submittal under the `Permits'
folder.
28. Please provide the stand alone as-built .pdf and .dwg files with the final electronic submittal.
This as-built survey should bear a Professional Land Surveyor(PLS)seal. The .pdf is included;
however, the .dwg file/s are missing. Please review and update as necessary.
RE: Comply. The .dwg files provided by Kee Surveying and Mapping have been included in
the folder titled `As-Built Plansheets'.
29. Please provide the final standalone HDR design plan .pdf and .dwg files with the final digital
submittal. The design plan should bear a Professional Engineer's seal.
RE: The standalone HDR Mitigation Plansheets as submitted in the approved Mitigation Plan
as a PDF in the folder titled `Mitigation Plans'. A DGN containing the design file has been
included in the same folder.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call
(843.830.1536).
Sincerely,
Land Management Group
/a,\p 45)-S
Alex DiGeronimo
5
www.lmgroup.net•Phone:[phone]•Fax:[phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court—Suite 120,Raleigh,NC 27604

EnOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Executive Summary
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services(DMS)contracted
HDR to restore, enhance, and preserve 8,565 linear feet(pre-construction length)of stream including the
West Fork French Broad River (WFFBR, Index # 6-5-(0.5)) and 14 (fourteen) unnamed headwater
tributaries, as well as restore 1.32 acres of wetland and enhance 1.54 acres of wetland within the Owen
Farms Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") to assist in fulfilling stream and wetland
mitigation needs in the watershed. The Site is located approximately 3 miles north of Lake Toxaway in
Transylvania County, NC. The Site is located within the 06010105010020 14-digit Hydrologic Unit (HUC),
of the French Broad River Basin (8-digit HUC 06010105).The North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality(NCDEQ)classifies the WFFBR as a Class B;Trout water as it flows through the Site. WFFBR receives
a designation of High Quality Waters (HQW) approximately three miles downstream of the Site.
The Site is comprised of one property owned by Troy Owen Farms, LLLP (PIN #8524-24-1875-000). The
Natural Heritage Program (NHP) has identified the Big Pisgah Mountain/Dismal Falls natural area as a
Significant Natural Heritage Area located approximately 1.5 miles from the Site. The Site is also
immediately adjacent by the Pisgah National Forest. Based on a review of records from the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office(NCSHPO),there are no properties listed on the National Register within
one mile of the Site. NCSHPO determined the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic
structures (HDR 2020).
Primary goals for the Site, are detailed in the Owen Farms Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan (HDR 2020) and
outlined in Table 1 of this report.
Monitoring Components and Duration
The first year monitoring report will be submitted in December 2021. Monitoring will continue for seven
years or until agreed upon success criteria is achieved, with a report submitted at the beginning of
December for each monitoring year. Annual monitoring in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 include surveys of
morphological conditions for the restored stream, representative surveys of vegetation, data collection
of static groundwater levels throughout the Site, and an annual monitoring report that compiles and
analyzes data to determine success levels.Annual monitoring in years 4 and 6 includes visual assessment
of streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers, collection of groundwater data, and an annual monitoring
report that summarizes visual assessments and groundwater data.

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Contents
Executive Summary
1.0 Project Goals, Background, and Attributes 1
1.1 Location and Setting 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach 4
1.3.1. Project Structure 4
1.3.2. WFFBR Restoration and Enhancement 4
1.3.3. UT 5 Restoration 5
1.3.4. UT 7 Restoration and Enhancement 6
1.3.5. UT 8 Restoration 6
1.3.6. Other Unnamed Tributaries Enhancement 6
1.3.7. Other Unnamed Tributaries Preservation 8
1.3.8. Wetland Rehabilitation and Re-establishment 8
1.3.9. Wetland Enhancement 8
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data 8
2.0 Success Criteria 9
2.1 Streams 9
2.1.1. Stream Dimension 9
2.1.2. Stream Pattern and Profile 9
2.1.3. Substrate and Sediment Transport 9
2.1.4. Hydraulics 9
2.2 Vegetation 10
2.3 Wetlands 10
3.0 Monitoring Plan Guidelines 10
3.1 As-Built Monitoring 10
3.2 Annual Monitoring Plan Components 11
4.0 Maintenance and Adaptive Management Plans 14
5.0 As-Built State 14
5.1 Morphological State of the Channel 14
5.2 Verification of Plantings 14
5.3 Stream and Wetland Gauges 15
6.0 References 16
Transylvania County, NC Page i June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figures
Figure 1. Location Map(Appendix A)
Figure 2. Project Asset Map (Appendix A)
Figures 3.1 -3.9 As-Built Monitoring Plan View(Appendix A)
Figures 4.1 —4.12 As-Built Profile Plots (Appendix B)
Figures 5.1 —5.14 Monitoring Cross Section Plots(Appendix B)
Figures 6.1 —6.28 Vegetation Plot Photographs and Site Aerial Photographs (Appendix C)
Tables
Table 1. Project Goals and Objectives(Section 1.2)
Table 2. Monitoring Plan (Section 3.2)
Table 3. Monitoring Plan Components (Section 3.2)
Table 4.As-Built Planting Changes Summary(Section 5.2.1)
Table 5. Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits(Appendix A)
Table 6. Project Attributes(Appendix A)
Table 7. Project Activity and Reporting History(Appendix A)
Table 8. Project Contacts Table(Appendix A)
Table 9. Baseline Stream Data Summary(Appendix B)
Table 10. Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary(Appendix B)
Table 11. Vegetation Plot Data (Appendix C)
Appendices
Appendix A—General Tables and Figures
Appendix B—Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Appendix C—Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D—Record Drawings
Transylvania County, NC Page ii June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
1.0 Project Goals, Background, and Attributes
1.1 Location and Setting
The Site is located approximately 3 miles north of Lake Toxaway in Transylvania County, NC(Figure 1).
Directions from Asheville, NC:
From Asheville, NC: Travel on 1-26 east to exit 40 (NC-280 W/Airport Road) and merge on to NC-280 W,
continue for 15.9 miles; continue straight onto US-64 W(NC-280 W becomes US-64 W),go 3.9 miles;turn
right to stay on US-64 W; continue on US-64 W for 14.9 miles; turn right on Blue Ridge Road, continue for
5.4 miles and the Site entrance will be on the left.
The Site is located in the Blue Ridge Belt Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Site provides many ecological functional uplifts within the French Broad River Basin. Project goals
were established based on the French Broad RBRP (NCEEP 2009), and on-site data collected during the
existing conditions survey. Site specific goals and objectives were developed to provide the highest
practical potential for functional uplift based on NC SAM and NC WAM analyses of streams and wetlands
on-site. Table 1 summarizes the functions targeted for uplift and the goals and objectives that were
achieved to provide the proposed uplift.
Transylvania County, NC Page 1 June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 1. Project Goals and Objectives
Goals Objectives
(1)Hydrology
(2)Flood Flow • Restore UT 5,UT 7,and UT 8 as primarily a Priority I
restoration where bankfull and larger flows can access
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation
the floodplain
• Restore WFFBR as Priority II with a floodplain bench
(4) Floodplain Access • Provide/enhance flood attenuation
ranging from 15'to 100'wide on each side of the
• Restore riparian habitat channel
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer • Restore/enhance wetlands
• Plant native vegetation along stream banks and adjacent
(4) Microtopography
riparian corridor(including wetlands)
(3)Stream Stability • Construct stable dimension,pattern,and profile on
WFFBR,UT 5,UT 7,and UT 8
(4)Channel Stability • Install fencing to exclude cattle from streams,wetlands,
• Restore/enhance streams within the
and riparian corridors
Sediment Transport Site so that they are neither aggrading •
(4) p Plant native vegetation along stream banks and adjacent
nor degrading.
riparian corridor(including wetlands)
(4)Stream Geomorphology • Seed newly constructed channels with native substrate
harvested from the existing channels
Wetland Surface Storage and Retention • Restore wetland hydrology by raising the inverts of
• Restore/enhance wetlands within the adjacent,incised tributaries
Wetland Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Site to remove hydrologic impairments • Remove spoil and overburden from relic wetland areas
• Plant native vegetation in wetlands
Transylvania County, NC Page 2 June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Targeted Functions Goals Objectives
(1)Water Quality
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation • Plant native vegetation along stream banks and adjacent
riparian corridor(including wetlands)
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration • Install fencing to exclude cattle from streams,wetlands,
and riparian corridors
(3)Thermoregulation • Restore/enhance wetlands
• Reduce sediment,nutrient and other • Restore UT 5,UT 7,and UT 8 as primarily a Priority I
(2)Indicators of Stressors pollutant sources that affect water restoration where bankfull and larger flows can access
quality the floodplain,allowing adjacent wetlands to treat
• Restore riparian habitat nutrients and filter sediment
• Restore WFFBR as Priority II with a floodplain bench
Wetland Pathogen Change,Particulate Change, ranging from 15'to 100'wide on each side of the
and Soluble Change channel
• Remove agricultural equipment from streams by
converting existing fords on UT 1 and UT 2A to culverted
crossings
(1)Habitat
(2)In-stream Habitat
• Plant native vegetation along stream banks and adjacent
(3)Stream Stability
riparian corridor(including wetlands)
• Construct rock habitat structures for Eastern hellbender
(3)In-stream Habitat • Restoring and enhancing aquatic,semi-
• Restore/enhance wetlands and create floodplain pools in
aquatic,and riparian habitat abandoned channel of WFFBR
(2)Stream side Habitat • Restoring and connecting riparian
• Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation
habitat with adjacent natural habitats
(3)Stream-side Habitat easement
• Permanently protecting the Site from
• Introduce woody material through toe wood and log sills
undesirable uses
(3)Thermoregulation on restored channels
• Restore sinuous gravel bed channels that promote riffles
Wetland Physical Structure,Landscape Patch and pools
Structure and Vegetation Composition
Transylvania County, NC Page 3 June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
1.3.1. Project Structure
Approximately 3,180 linear feet(post-construction length) of stream has been restored, 5,172 linear feet
of stream has been enhanced (125 linear feet of Enhancement I; 5,047 linear feet of Enhancement II), and
423 linear feet of stream has been preserved at the Site. 1.40 acres of wetlands has been enhanced, 0.35
acres of wetlands have been re-established, and 0.97 acres of wetlands have been rehabilitated at the
Site. Table 5 provides a summary of project components and mitigation credits (Appendix A). The
constructed alignment of each restored channel followed the alignment proposed in the Mitigation Plan.
Locations of each Site component are depicted in Figure 2 (Appendix A).
1.3.2. WFFBR Restoration and Enhancement
Priority II restoration of pattern, profile, dimension, and riparian buffer was conducted for 1,799 linear
feet of WFFBR (127 feet that flows through a powerline easement and 60 feet that flows through a ford
crossing have been excluded from this total). Prior to restoration, WFFBR routinely experienced bank
erosion leading to deposition of sediment and nutrient loading to on-site and downstream receiving
waters. Restoration efforts consisted of restoring bank height ratios to 1.0; stabilizing channel banks by
restoring a more natural and stable dimension and plan form while maintaining portions of the existing
alignment where feasible; meandering the channel back to the low point of the valley; providing overbank
flood relief through the creation of bankfull benches through excavation (benches) and fill (abandoned
channel areas); installation of wood and rock structures for grade control and habitat improvement;
seeding riffles with existing, native channel material for immediate restoration of the hyporheic zone;
restoration of a vegetated riparian buffer; and removal of agricultural operations from the channel and
riparian buffer through fencing. The proposed channel was designed as a moderate width to depth ratio,
C4-type channel that conveys a bankfull discharge of approximately 300 cfs.
Fencing along the easement of the restored WFFBR limits agricultural operation crossing to the installed
ford at station (STA) 23+90.The ford crossing is not contained within the conservation easement.
A combination of woven wire and four strand barbed wire exclusionary fencing was installed along the
easement boundary to exclude cattle and clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowners.
All fencing installed as part of project construction is in accordance with NRCS woven wire and barbed
wire fencing specifications. A riparian buffer populated with native vegetative species was planted within
the proposed conservation easement. HDR had all trees 12 inches and greater within the buffer was
surveyed. The survey was used during stream channel design to ensure that mature tree disturbance is
limited to the greatest practical extent possible during construction. Any portion of the existing buffer
that was removed to facilitate restoration of WFFBR was replanted with native vegetation.
Hellbender habitat was installed throughout the restored reach of WFFBR. Five(5) in channel habitat rock
structures were installed in runs and glides of WFFBR. Habitat was also incorporated into the installed
toewood along the channel by using large logs to create pockets within the brush that could be used as
cover by hellbenders.
Bedrock along the channel invert between STA 21+83 and 22+50 necessitated the need to modify the
designed channel. Bedrock elevation through this portion of WFFBR averaged approximately one foot
Transylvania County, NC Page 4 June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
higher than the proposed riffle elevation. Boulder toes and soil lifts were utilized to stabilize stream banks
where bedrock directed concentrated flow along the left toe of the channel. The channel was also
widened slightly from design width to compensate for bankfull cross sectional area lost along the channel
invert. Revised bankfull widths through this section of WFFBR resulted from tying the new channel into
sections of stable bank throughout the bedrock area along the pre-construction alignment. Downstream,
bedrock along the pool invert between STA 25+95 and 26+19 is directing concentrated flow along the left
bank.
WFFBR was enhanced from STA 29+86 to 36+91 by installing soil lifts with toewood to stabilize eroding
banks along the left side of the channel. Exclusionary fencing was also installed to remove cattle from the
stream and adjacent riparian buffer. The buffer along the left overbank area was restored by planting
native vegetation. The downstream 705 linear feet of WFFBR received Enhancement II. This portion of
WFFBR is relatively stable with the exception of portions of the left bank which were stabilized using soil
lifts with toe wood. WFFBR was also enhanced by installing exclusionary fencing to remove cattle from
the stream channel and the adjacent riparian buffer. The buffer along the left overbank area was restored
by planting native vegetation.
Repairs
Earthwork was completed and the Site was demobilized October 7th, 2020. After construction was
completed, two 10-year storm events took place in the month of October(October 10th and October 29th,
2020). Rack lines indicated that flow overtopped the banks by more than 3 feet. WFFBR suffered
substantial bank loss between STA 10+00 and 16+50, and severe floodplain scour along the inside of
meander bends between STA 10+00 and 28+50. In December of 2020, the Contractor re-mobilized to the
Site to complete repair work and add additional stabilization measures. Soil lifts were installed along the
right bank of WFFBR from STA 10+67 to 11+35,and along the left bank from STA 12+59 to 13+25 and from
STA 15+28 to 16+31. As part of Site repairs, the floodplain bench was widened between STA 10+00 and
19+10 to decrease shear stress along the channel during high flow events. Cut material from floodplain
widening was utilized to build soil lifts and fill in areas that experienced floodplain scour. Throughout the
inside of meander bends, coir fiber matting was installed along the floodplain bench to provide additional
stabilization until native grasses are able to establish. At the upstream extent of the project, fencing that
originally crossed WFFBR was removed to prevent debris jams. The fencing immediately upstream and
downstream of the ford crossing was also replaced with sections that can easily rip away and be replaced
to prevent debris jams from causing bank or floodplain erosion. Repair items can be seen in the Record
Drawings (Appendix D).
1.3.3. UT 5 Restoration
Stream channel restoration of pattern, profile, dimension, and riparian buffer was constructed for
approximately 827 linear feet of UT 5 (72 linear feet that flows under a powerline easement has been
excluded from this total). Prior to construction UT 5 had been ponded immediately downstream of a
culverted road crossing. Downstream of the pond the stream had been straightened and channelized
which created a relatively uniform plan and bed form. Bankfull flows were entrenched in the existing
channel and were abandoned from the historic floodplain. Restoration activities on UT 5 included draining
of the pond, dam removal,and meandering the channel back to the low point of the valley through Priority
I restoration. Bankfull flows are now able to access the historic floodplain and adjacent wetlands.
Transylvania County, NC

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
The channel was designed as a moderate width to depth ratio C4-type channel through a relatively steep
valley (0.027 ft/ft). Short pool to pool spacing (averaging near 4.2 bankfull widths) and grade control
structures are utilized throughout the restored channel in an attempt to dissipate energy(through pools)
and maintain a relatively low bankfull slope of 0.006 ft/ft between drops. The low bankfull slope is
required to transport sediment and flow such that, over time, the stream neither aggrades nor degrades.
No crossings are located on UT 5 within the conservation easement, ensuring stability of UT 5 to its
confluence with WFFBR within the conservation easement.
The denuded and regularly maintained riparian buffer was restored by planting native vegetation within
the conservation easement. Restoration of the riparian buffer promotes terrestrial, aquatic, and
semiaquatic foraging, propagation, and cover habitat. Additionally, the restored buffer connects UT 5's
riparian corridor with WFFBR's restored wooded riparian buffer and enhances the floodplain's ability to
uptake nutrients and settle other pollutants from high flow events.
1.3.4. UT 7 Restoration and Enhancement
Stream channel pattern, profile, dimension, and riparian buffer was restored for approximately 417 linear
feet of UT 7. The downstream extent of the channel had been modified and relocated from its natural
valley position to a point at which it flowed adjacent to an existing hill slope. UT 7 has been restored
through Priority I restoration away from its previous location back through the low point of its natural
valley which was utilized as pasture. Mitigation activities also included stabilizing channel banks, restoring
a more natural and stable plan form,installation of wood and rock structures for grade control and habitat
improvement, restoration of a vegetated riparian buffer, and removal of agricultural operations from the
channel and riparian buffer through fencing.
Approximately 439 linear feet of UT 7 was enhanced (Enhancement II), beginning at the easement
boundary, and extending to the beginning of restoration. Woven wire fencing was installed along the
easement boundary to exclude cattle from the channel and clearly demarcate the easement boundary for
the landowners. The existing, degraded buffer was planted with native vegetative species to restore
natural vegetative structure and composition. Following enhancement activities, UT 7 now exhibits a
minimum riparian buffer between 50 feet and 75 feet wide off of the left and right banks throughout the
majority of the enhancement reach.
1.3.5. UT 8 Restoration
Stream channel restoration of pattern, profile, dimension, and riparian buffer was constructed for
approximately 137 linear feet of UT 8.WFFBR has been diverted away from its pre-construction alignment,
which required the extension of UT 8 to converge with WFFBR. The extended channel now flows through
a filled portion of the abandoned WFFBR until the point of their new convergence within WFFBR's
constructed floodplain. Channel pattern, profile,and dimension were designed to ensure that the channel
will convey flow and transport sediment in a way where the channel will neither aggrade nor degrade.
Additional mitigation activities included installation of wood and rock structures for grade control and
habitat improvement, and restoration of a vegetated riparian buffer.
1.3.6. Other Unnamed Tributaries Enhancement
UT 1 -Approximately 764 feet of UT 1 (excluding 25 feet that flows through an agricultural crossing) has
been enhanced (Enhancement II) as part of mitigation activities. Prior to construction, a mature riparian
buffer averaging 10 to 20 feet wide already existed, but cattle had full access to UT 1. Woven wire fencing
Transylvania County, NC Page 6 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
was installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle from UT 1 and clearly demarcate the
easement boundary for the landowners. Native vegetative species were planted from the edge of the
existing wooded buffer to the easement boundary. Following enhancement activities, UT 1 now exhibits
a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of the left and right banks throughout the easement.
The existing ford crossing on UT 1 was replaced with a culvert crossing. A single 24 inch Corrugated Metal
Pipe (CMP)was installed at the culvert crossing.
UT 2, UT 2A, and UT 2B — Approximately 923 feet of UT 2 (excluding 20 feet that flows through an
agricultural crossing), 546 feet of UT 2A (excluding 24 feet that flows through an agricultural crossing),
and 75 feet of UT 2B has been enhanced (Enhancement II) as part of mitigation activities. Prior to
construction cattle would routinely access this area of the Site for water and shade, which resulted in
frequent inputs of nutrients and fecal matter, and degradation of the riparian buffer. Woven wire fencing
was installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle from UT 2, UT 2A, and UT 2B, and clearly
demarcate the easement boundary for the landowners. The buffer has been planted with native
vegetative species to restore natural vegetative structure and composition. Following enhancement
activities, UT 2, UT 2A, and UT 2B now exhibit a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of the left
and right banks throughout the easement. Portions of the buffer along UT 2 and UT 2A exceed 50 feet in
width. The ford on UT 2A has been replaced with a culvert crossing and the previous culvert crossing on
UT 2 has been replaced with a new culvert crossing. A single 24 inch CMP has been installed at each
crossing.
UT 3—Approximately 125 feet of UT 3 has been enhanced (Enhancement I)as part of mitigation activities.
Enhancement measures consisted of grading stream bed and banks and installing a rock step structure to
stabilize UT 3 as it converges with WFFBR.Woven wire fencing was installed along the easement boundary
to exclude cattle from UT 3 and clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowner. A riparian
buffer has been planted with native vegetative species on both sides of UT 3. UT 3 now exhibits a
minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of the left and right banks.
UT 4—Approximately 809 linear feet of UT 4(excluding 30 feet that flows through an agricultural crossing)
has been enhanced (Enhancement II)as part of mitigation activities. Prior to construction cattle routinely
accessed UT 4 for water and shade, which resulted in frequent inputs of nutrients and fecal matter, and
degradation of the narrow riparian area adjacent to the stream. The riparian buffer in some areas along
UT 4 consisted of a single tree buffer before planting. In addition, WFFBR was diverted away from its
original alignment, which required the extension of UT 4 to converge with WFFBR. Approximately 146
linear feet of UT 4 was constructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile to connect UT 4 with
WFFBR. Woven wire fencing was installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle from UT 4 and
clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowner. A riparian buffer populated with native
vegetative species has been planted on both sides of UT 4. Following enhancement activities, UT 4 now
exhibits a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of the left and right banks. The existing culvert
crossing on UT 4 has been replaced with a new culvert crossing. A single 36 inch CMP has been installed
at the crossing.
UT 4A — Approximately 472 linear feet of UT 4A was enhanced (Enhancement II) as part of mitigation
activities. Prior to construction cattle routinely accessed UT 4A for water and shade, which resulted in
frequent inputs of nutrients and fecal matter,and degradation of the riparian area adjacent to the stream.
Woven wire fencing has been installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle from UT 4A and
Transylvania County, NC Page 7 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowner. Additionally, approximately 72 linear feet
of UT 4A were stabilized with rock step structures near the convergence with UT 4. A riparian buffer
populated with native vegetative species has been planted on the left side of UT 4A. Following
enhancement activities, UT 4A now exhibits a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of the left
bank and 50 to 75 feet wide off of the right bank.
UT 4B—Approximately 178 linear feet of UT 4B was enhanced (Enhancement II) as part of the mitigation
activities. A mature riparian buffer is present on both sides of the channel however prior to construction
cattle had full access to UT 4B. Woven wire fencing has been installed along the easement boundary to
exclude cattle from UT 4B and clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowner. Following
enhancement activities, UT 4B exhibits a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet wide off of both sides of
the channel.
UT 7B -Approximately 136 linear feet of UT 7B was enhanced (Enhancement II) as part of the mitigation
activities. A riparian buffer has been planted through the reach and woven wire fencing has been installed
along the easement boundary to exclude cattle from the channel and clearly demarcate the easement for
the landowner. Following enhancement activities, UT 7B exhibits a minimum riparian buffer 30 to 50 feet
wide off of both sides of the channel.
1.3.7. Other Unnamed Tribu.
Approximately 114 linear feet of UT 6, 206 linear feet of UT 6A, 103 linear feet of UT 7A have been
preserved within the Site's boundaries. All of the preserved streams are fully functional and were in
danger of disturbance from agricultural practices if not protected.
1.3.8. Wetland Rehabilitation and Re-establishment
Approximately 0.17 acres adjacent to W3 (excluding 0.10 acres of relic wetland within the powerline
easement) and 0.18 acres adjacent to W5A/B were re-established and reconnected to the existing
wetlands (Figure 2). Re-establishment of these relic wetlands included removing spoil piles and
overburden material, restoring wetland hydrology by raising the inverts of adjacent, previously incised
tributaries, and replanting with native vegetative species.
Approximately 0.97 acres (excluding 0.22 acres of relic wetland within the powerline easement) of W3
that previously served as part of the cattle pasture has been rehabilitated at the Site. Rehabilitation
activities included planting the wetland with native vegetation, installation of exclusionary cattle fencing,
and restoration of UT 5 which has increased the frequency of floodwaters reaching W3.
1.3.9. Wetland Enhancement
W1, W2, W4, and W5A/B through W9 were enhanced via the installation of exclusionary cattle fencing
and planting of native hydrophytic vegetation. In the As-Built state approximately 1.40 acres of wetland
has been enhanced across the Site. The reduction in Wetland Group 1 is a result of a mistake at the
Mitigation Plan stage that did not account for the UT 2 and UT 3 top of banks through the wetland areas,
and a miscalculation of enhancement area along the left bank near STA 22+00 of WFFBR. The corrected
enhancement area is reflected in the As-Built column of Table 5 and Figures 2 and 3.1—3.9 (Appendix A).
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
HDR provided engineering and design services for the Site. Land Management Group was contracted to
provide construction oversight services for the Site. Construction began on June 8th, 2020 and earthwork
Transylvania County, NC

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
was completed and the Site was demobilized October 7th, 2020.The Site experienced two, 10 year storm
events, once on October 10th and again on October 29th, 2020. Repair activities were completed on
January 15th, 2021. Site planting was completed on January 22, 2021. Baseline monitoring field data
collection occurred in February of 2021.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 6 through 8 (Appendix A).
2.0 Success Criteria
Site performance standards and required remediation actions are based on the Wilmington District
Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update (USACE et al. 2016). Performance standards for
stream morphology, hydrology,and vegetation are discussed below. Installed project monitoring features
are depicted on the As-Built Monitoring Plan View maps (Figures 3.1—3.9, Appendix A).
2.1 Streams
Restored stream reaches will be monitored for geomorphic activity. Annual fall/winter monitoring will
include development of channel cross-sections on riffles and pools (Monitoring Years 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7) in
addition to visual observation of channel stability(Monitoring Years 1 through 7).
2.1.1. Stream Dimension
A stable cross-section and hydrologic access to the floodplain throughout the monitoring period will
generally represent success in dimensional stability. Riffle cross-sections should remain stable and show
little change in bankfull area, bank-height ratio, and width to depth ratio. Some changes in dimension
(such as lowering of bankfull width-to-depth ratio) should be expected. Riffle sections should generally
maintain a Bank Height Ratio (BHR) approaching 1.0 — 1.2, with some variation in this ratio naturally
occurring, and display an entrenchment ratio of no less than 2.2. Both ratios should display no more than
10 percent change from year-to-year. Based on current DMS guidance regarding BHR, years that exhibit
deposition in the channel may yield BHR ratios that are less than 1.0. Pool sections naturally adjust based
on recent flows and time between flows. No individual measurements should exceed 15 percent variance
over as-built conditions over the monitoring time frame.
2.1.2. Stream Pattern and Profile
Pattern features should show little adjustment over the standard 7 year monitoring period. The profile
should not demonstrate significant trends towards degradation or aggradation over a significant portion
of a reach. Visual assessment and photo documentation will be used to indicate that streams are
remaining stable and do not indicate a trend toward vertical or lateral instability. Longitudinal profile
survey will be conducted during the as-built survey but will not be conducted during the seven-year
monitoring period unless a trend towards vertical or lateral instability is observed.
2.1.3. Substrate and Sediment Transport
There should be an absence of any significant trend in the aggradational or depositional potential of the
channel.
2.1.4. Hydraulics
All stream channels will maintain an ordinary high water mark(OHWM)through monitoring. Continuous
surface water flow within tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive
Transylvania County, NC Page 9 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
days during the prescribed monitoring period. A minimum of four bankfull events must be documented
within the 7 year monitoring period. The four bankfull events shall occur within separate years.
2.2 Vegetation
Vegetation requirements state that there must be a minimum of 320 planted stems per acre surviving
after year three, 260 stems per acre after year five,and 210 stems per acre after year seven. Trees should
average 6 feet in height at year five and 8 feet in height at year seven. Bog Complex communities may
exhibit areas with low stem density that are dominated by herbaceous species, which is acceptable for
this community type. In addition, Bog Complex communities will be planted with a high percentage of
shrub species,which are not expected to reach the height requirements listed above for trees.Volunteers
must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons before being included in performance standards
in Year 5 and Year 7. For any tree stem to count toward success, it may be either planted or volunteer,
but it must be a species from the approved planting list included in the Mitigation Plan. Other species not
included on the planting list or in the stated documentation may be considered by the IRT on a case-by-
case basis. Additionally, any single species can only account for up to 50% of the required number of
stems within any vegetation plot. Should the performance criteria outlined above not be met during the
monitoring period, HDR will provide DMS with an Adaptive Management Plan,detailing corrective actions
and/or maintenance actions proposed and an implementation schedule for said actions, planned to meet
the criteria. Upon review and approval of said corrective measures by DMS and the IRT, HDR will
implement the necessary corrective measures.
2.3 Wetlands
Final performance criteria for wetland hydrology will be a groundwater level within 12 inches of the soil
surface for a minimum of 12% (25 consecutive days) of the growing season (April 7 through October 30,
206 days). Wetland hydrology performance standards are based on the Lake Toxaway WETS table and
the wetland saturation range for Ela soils as presented in the Wetland Saturation Threshold Table. Ela
soils were used to determine the wetland saturation range because soil borings taken on-site showed a
hydric soil with the associated taxonomic subgroup Fluvaquentic Humaquept, which corresponds to the
Ela soil series. Both tables are provided in the Site's mitigation plan (HDR 2020). In the event of non-
typical years of climatic conditions, groundwater monitoring data may be compared to on-site reference
groundwater data; however, reference gauge data will not be tied to success criteria.
3.0 Monitoring Plan Guidelines
3.1 As-Built Monitoring
As-built surveys have been conducted upon completion of channel construction to document baseline
conditions. The as-built surveys include all measurements typically documented during subsequent
channel geomorphological surveys. A longitudinal profile of the thalweg,water surface, bankfull, and top
of bank, were collected during the as-built survey of the constructed channel to compare with future
geomorphological data, if necessary. Longitudinal profiles will not be required during routine channel
stability monitoring (years 1 through 7) unless the monitoring efforts demonstrate channel bank or bed
instability, in which case additional longitudinal profiles may be required along channel reaches of concern
to track changes in the channel and demonstrate stability.
Vegetation data has been collected as part of the baseline monitoring and recorded in accordance with
the NCDMS Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data, and Content Requirements (NCDMS 2020).
Transylvania County, NC Page 10 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Seventeen permanent vegetation plots and three random vegetation plots have been established
throughout the Site.
3.2 Annual Monitoring Plan Components
Annual monitoring reports will be produced and submitted to DMS by December 1st of the year for which
monitoring was conducted.The Site will be monitored annually for a duration of 7 years.The seventh year
monitoring report will include a Closeout Report that provides an assessment of monitoring data collected
from the entire monitoring period. Fixed cross-sections and vegetation plots will be used as permanent
photo points throughout the monitoring period.Tables 2 and 3 outline all of the monitoring components,
methods, quantity, and frequency of data to be collected for the Site. A visual representation of all
monitoring devices can be found in the As-Built Monitoring Plan View maps (Figure 3, Appendix A).
Transylvania County, NC Page 11 June 7,2021

F Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 2. Monitoring Plan
Treatment Performance Standards Monitoring Metric Outcome Functional Uplift
Entrenchment Ratios should be>_2.2. Stable stream Reduction of nutrients
BHR should not exceed 1.2.BHR and sediment to
Restore/enhance streams channels with
Restore a stable dimension, should not change more than 10%in Cross-section downstream
within the Site so that entrenchment
pattern,and profile. Install any given monitoring interval. monitoring and visual locations,reduction of
they are neither ratios over 2.2
aggrading nor degrading fencing to exclude cattle. Riffle section W/D ratios should inspections. and BHRs shear stress,and
remain within the range of the below 1.2. improved hydraulic
appropriate stream type. function.
Restore several existing streams Increase attenuation
as primarily a Priority I Flow gauges(Pressure Bankfull events of floodwaters,
Provide/enhance flood restoration where bankfull and Four bankfull events in separate within increase
attenuation. larger flows can access the monitoring years. transducers),and visual monitoring biogeochemical
floodplain. Construct floodplain inspection. period. cycling and recharge
bench on WFFBR. riparian wetlands.
Minimum of 320 stems/ac present at Planted stems
MY-3.Minimum of 260 stems/ac meet density Treatment of nutrient
Vegetation plots will be
Restore native vegetation to the present at MY-5.Minimum of 210 and vigor enriched surface
Restore/enhance aquatic, monitored annually
stream channel banks, stems/ac present at MY-7. Trees requirements runoff from adjacent
semi-aquatic,and riparian between July 1st and
wetlands,and the adjacent should average 6 feet in height at MY- in MY7,with pastureland,increased
habitat. riparian corridor. 5 and 8 feet in height at MY-7.Bog leaf fall using the CVS volunteer trees bank stability and
Complex communities may exhibit protocol. also growing increased habitat.
lower stem density and height. on site.
Reconstruct above bankfull Restoration of riparian
Restore/Enhance Groundwater elevation within 12 habitat,treatment of
Wetlands within the Site stream channel flows to riparian Wetlands
inches of the ground surface for at Groundwater nutrient enriched
wetlands and re-grade meeting
to remove hydrologic least 12%of the growing season monitoring gauges. runoff from adjacent
impairments topography to remove spoil and (April 7-October 30). criteria pastureland,increased
overburden material.
flood attenuation.
Restore and connect No Protect Site from
riparian habitat with Conservation easement encroachment encroachment in
adjacent natural establishment. Prevent Easement Encroachment. Visual inspection. into the conservation
conservation
communities. easement.
easement.
Transylvania County, NC Page 12 June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 3. Monitoring Plan Components
Monitoring I Quantit!M Frequency Notes
Method
Dimension Riffle Cross UT 5(2) Years 1,2,
Sections UT 7(1) 3,5&7
UT 8(1)
WFFBR(4)
Pool Cross UT 5(2) Years 1,2, Bank pins may be installed in areas of concern.
Sections UT 7(1) 3,5&7
UT 8(1)
WFFBR(2)
Pattern Visual None twice per Bank pins may be installed in areas of concern
year
Profile Visual None twice per Additional profile measurements may be required if
year problems are identified during the monitoring period
Substrate Visual None Annual There should be an absence of any significant trend in the
aggradational or depositional potential of the channel
Surface Water Flow Gage UT 5(1) twice per Measuring devices will be inspected/downloaded at each
Hydrology (Pressure UT 7(1) year site visit to document occurrence of bankfull events and
Transducer) UT 8(1) ensure device function
WFFBR(1)
Groundwater Groundwater 5 Site Annual Data will be downloaded at each site visit.
Hydrology Gages gauges,
2 Reference
Gauges
Vegetation CVS Level 2 Vegetation Years 1,2, Vegetation will be monitored using the Carolina
plots will be 3,5&7 Vegetation Survey(CVS)protocols. GPS coordinates and
placed on orientation of random plots will be provided in the annual
"2%of the monitoring reports and plot locations will be depicted on
planted area the Current Condition Plan View maps.
(17
permanent,
10x10 meter
plots;3
random
plots of
equal size)
Invasive and Visual twice per Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation and the
nuisance year occurrence of beaver dams and approximate inundation
vegetation limits will be mapped
Project Visual twice per Fence damage,vegetation damage,boundary
Boundary year encroachments,etc.will be mapped
Culverts and Visual Twice per Blockages and/or erosion around culverts and crossings
Crossings year will be mapped and noted in monitoring reports.
Transylvania County, NC Page 13 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
4.0 Maintenance and Adaptive Management Plans
In the event the mitigation site or a component of the mitigation Site fails to achieve the necessary
performance standards, HDR will notify DMS and work with DMS to develop contingency plans and
remedial actions. Although all pre-existing beaver dams at the Site appeared inactive and have since been
removed, potential beaver activity will be closely monitored.A beaver control plan will be developed and
implemented if hydrologic modification from beaver dams jeopardizes Site success.
5.0 As-Built State
This section documents the as-built/baseline condition. Appendices B and C include Tables 9, 10, and 11
which detail specific geomorphic and vegetative data in relation to the as-built conditions. As-
built/baseline record drawings are included in Appendix D.
5.1 Morphological State of the Channel
Upon completion of grading and structure installation, a baseline survey was performed for the entire
restored length of stream and included 14 cross-sections. Overall,the majority of the cross sections were
installed in the locations proposed in the Mitigation Plan except for five of the fourteen cross sections.
The cross sections moved are as follows: Cross Section 10 was moved approximately 56 feet downstream
to STA 13+81 (UT 5); Cross Section 11 was moved approximately 74 feet upstream to STA 16+26 (UT 5);
Cross Section 12 was moved approximately 48 feet upstream to STA 17+51 (UT 5); Cross Section 13 was
moved approximately 109 feet downstream to STA 11+84 (UT 7); and Cross Section 14 was moved
approximately 67 feet downstream to STA 12+85(UT 7). Baseline morphologic data is summarized in Table
9 and Table 10 in Appendix B. Plots of the profiles are shown in Figure 4 of Appendix B. Cross-section plots
and photos can also be found in Appendix B. Cross-section photos were taken facing the downstream
direction.
5.2 Verification of Plantings
An initial evaluation of planted stems was performed per guidelines established in NCDMS Annual
Monitoring Report Format, Data, and Content Requirements (NCDMS 2020)to verify planting methods
were successful and to determine species composition and density. Seventeen permanent vegetation
plots were established across the Site and 3 random vegetation plots will be sampled each year. Overall,
the majority of the permanent vegetation plots were installed as proposed in the Mitigation Plan except
for five of the seventeen plots.The changes are as follows: Vegetation Plots 1 and 2 were installed as 5
by 20 meter plots to fit within the planted area along the buffer;Vegetation Plot 12 was moved
immediately across UT 5 approximately 10 feet from the right top of bank; Vegetation Plot 18 was
moved across UT 7 approximately 10 feet from the left top of bank of WFFBR; and Vegetation Plot 20
was installed approximately 180 feet south into the planted area along UT 7. Vegetation plot locations
can be found in Figure 3 of Appendix A. Baseline vegetation plot data can be found in Table 11 in
Appendix C. Plot photos are also located in Appendix C. Initial stem count measurements indicate an
average of 698 planted stems per acre (excluding live stakes) across the Site. In addition, each individual
plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone.
The As-Built planting list varies slightly from the list proposed in the Mitigation Plan due to limited
availability of certain species. A summary of the planting list revisions can be found in the table below.
The final As-Built Planting List can be found in Appendix C.
Transylvania County, NC Page 14 June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 4.As-Built Planting Changes Summary
Species Planting Revision Reason for Revision Net Change
(%)
Zone 1:Streamside Assemblage
Tag Alder(Alnus serrulata) Reduced Limited Species Availability -10%
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) Added Replaced Reduced Tag alder Quantity +10%
Zone 2:Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest
Mountain silverbell (Halesia tetraptera) Removed Species Unavailable -5%
Flowering Dogwood (Corpus florida) Increased Replace Mountain silverbell quantity +5%
Zone 3:Swamp Forest-Bog Complex
Tag Alder(Alnus serrulata) Reduced Limited Species Availability -10%
Possumhaw viburnum(Viburnum nudum) Removed Species Unavailable -20%
Mountain holly(Ilex montana) Removed Species Unavailable -10%
Swamp rose(Rosa palustris) Removed Species Unavailable -5%
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) Added Replace reduced/removed quantity +20%
Spicebush(Lindera benzoin) Added Replace reduced/removed quantity +15%
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) Added Replace reduced/removed quantity +10%
Zone 4:Montane Alluvial Forest
Sweet birch(Betula lenta) Removed Species Unavailable -10%
All remaining species in Zone 4 Increased by"1.6% Replaced Reduced Sweet birch Quantity +10%
5.3 Stream and Wetland Gauges
Four pressure transducer flow gauges have been installed across the Site, one in each restoration reach
(UT 5, UT 7, UT 8, and WFFBR). Measuring devices will be inspected/downloaded at each site visit to
document occurrence of bankfull events and ensure device function. Flow gauge and groundwater gauge
locations are documented in the As-Built Monitoring Plan View located in Appendix A.
Five groundwater gauges have been installed across the Site. One groundwater gauge was installed in
Wetland Group 1,two groundwater gauges have been installed in Wetland Group 2,and two groundwater
gauges have been installed in Wetland Group 3. Groundwater gauges will be inspected/downloaded at
each site visit to document wetland hydrology and ensure device function.
Transylvania County, NC Page 15 June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
6.0References
HDR Engineering 2020. Mitigation Plan Owen Farms Mitigation Site.Transylvania County, North Carolina.
January 31, 2020.
NCDENR. Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2013.Survey Requirements for Full Delivery Projects.
https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspubl is/Mitigation_Services/Document_Management_
Li bra ry/Guida nce_a nd_Tem plate_Documents/2013_08_13_FD_SurveySpecs.pdf
NCDEQ. Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2020.Annual Monitoring Report
Format, Data, and Content Requirements October 2020.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Library/Guid
ance%20and%20Template%20Documents/DMSMonitoringReportTemplateOct2020.pdf
North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team (WFAT). 2016. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) User Manual, Version 5.0 (February 2016). 290 pp
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team (SFAT). 2015. N. C. Stream Assessment Method (NC
SAM) User Manual, Version 2.1 (August 2015). 350 pp
Rosgen, David. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs Colorado.
Schafale, Michael P., Weakley,Alan S. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina. 1990.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE), North Carolina Interagency Review Team(NCIRT).2016. Wilmington
District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1984. Lake Toxaway Quadrangle, North Carolina, 7.5 Minute
Series (Topographic). Washington, D. C.
Transylvania County, NC Page 16 June 7, 2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

L.
,, t�s ;- ti �'i ,i � rti _AI- r -7�r - ._s 'µa - - �`.e'� '�� 40i .' � r ' r iti Sy s . LEGEND f
•'. }f 11..V16.... :> •+ i,•!ior • 3� ■ Stream Restoration(1:1)(3,180 Credits)
�T ' 311-4F
�r; • "'77�r �j� >•, 1'. Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1)(83.3 Credits)
_ . * w 'ifs ' • 1, . -ti"
y 'e.', 1. ;, •'*t i •. r ��'.' .,�: .t�•. t.r :;'f-, •?.. - V '•.., —Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1)(205.2 Credits)
j' '`' s ► AL •• ~� r L 4T• L � —Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1)(1,360.9 Credits)
/d{.,1 ► , + T•l •! t ; pr. ::::::::: :: :::r::
.�a. y Y )
4.
T . ". - -,. h . ; • '' . . Stream Preservation(10:1)(42.3 Credits)
- '1 * it _ . Non-Creditable Stream
' - ° ._ ', Easement Boundary Y
•
``r' i, 8 •• kb
Utility Easement
lt
•• .�• J . A Groundwater Gauges R
1‘‘. .4,
�—. 11:1_ I X ti i __, yR- •!d ♦ Rain Gauge 1
fir ' s �{ 45..
' 'y.- +' y^11'. , • Flow Gauges
• 1
N
� * 13 xs9 UT5 !' Cross Sections
siN4 Permanent Vegetation Plot li
rN 400.
1111111177-.113144-1111.
- Random Vegetation Plot
3e..o Wetland Re-establishment(0.350 Credits)
Wetland Rehabilitation(0.647 Credits)
Wetland Enhancement(0.698 Credits)
r.
o
4(3 •�41111") 1,.., River +
W1 .XS3 A- . XS12
t'a . 410,1
*446.. - lir.- \ 10 f rt', b
I/If ' , „
* . . ,. N.
‘4,..,..4, -,.,,, 4
+ ,-� ; •
V�2A , �,00 W1 7 '� UT7B .; v
r10 i+ •, `Y ay -,y
JC . r_
J 1` r.�r d .rr •r:. 20 .
•
tt 7111A
*Az 4.,Plai;:t.. **A 1044 ci. 1 , ` ,..' i 6 - 0:4•., rairk- - ____ :,
t ' f
Y. f '}' 'k ti'• ��11�� �• , .Ail' 'yi�.[. �r � ►t _ At iC �r D m it. , '
:....-4-.•',,�is' .iit,� T s. A,•� rr�. 7'• F `, 'a 7 " .?�'!:-{ „,h . ■i+r,r ` 6 �j[�.y ':a; �.. '�} ' '• �` •
tt
ar•-r {At 4' •• Sr� ��. F .. • 1.• "ii �:f! + •k A. �r 11 w . .r`Sfi� �C ,'` • r 1
r N�'�� /, , -t I. y�r 5 I" r /It 411 We kFre , /;
•3� rJ � ' '' �•'.• ��llP � '$; _co 61M.: ' x �'�, •>t a IM .4" ..i 0 L stFo< As _c .
t 41
ir
ili,
• 1,...,,,,, ., .,,, 3.14, , I'-411•,, .;',... -,10: la, ...-3f W ~-.., •—. . - N. * 4: AS;9041111611:10:2111' '..- ..• . 4 :4. 6.1?.. .-. 1:411.411 a ' let ,, • [''' . .4, . ':.Arfie .914, it.
A. , ‘,..r. , ....;`,.-.. 4 *... 4,.... . *mg r ,.„• , .
'{ a \ r lr, ,• ^.' 'fa ime .i.,� mith
"�Il-•{.1 yam.r l,v� •• • ri���+' •1`" }j' ��,� 4u, lit • 1[11 �$ r ■
: .. . O.
4, ri, pir• r1• 1.r ►[Au ' v ► �1 '; :�:Y •ji i r ,�"N'� �� +' J• j 1 �y y3
. ,
� � i 7 ;.J s ,y� .r: si `'A.. •- � ,Y+ Y' nos.'��� .• •
+ .� •
�y� '''t• •� � '�i,,,Atii ' �'1� � ('; � � s 7�+ i •.• r -- i.r .y�1 V'F� '=•1.
r ice► y i� y �.' • ' . ' ' 't ' 4 ' Q � •+ e ''Al...,• ► .a -. 4 I •
• 4" 1f Sit. •� - YFi o 0 0 0 0 0
''� 4 ` •� `F ' - - %. �• '. .r` a D o o e e o 0 o D D o D o o y
.�1i. .:r ,:' ._+ +, . ', • i. S a C�3u� DPI•b , G C Lr1 Q�]�r3 Cnl D� �D° M G°1�uv�G3fID ���nl �nIO�fll�5 �C�xn�n fn��y
PROJECT ASSET MAP
F)1
I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
1,400 FIGURE 2.0
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

�' r '. f> ,., ► fr JI`.�.- --r ,.,'y :i,.t' .11al�i�i�W► .. .
'`''* ' �.i ; r ,, ;Itt, :.•.4:. ,.:q ailr'pa= ' '""may 1l.::':.�If .i;,�c •,•-- LEGEND
Ir' .t' 4., 'v. ,.,+R`T 4 4e •••r •• cr. r ar' ;Ife .R ' 1'+ ig •4--. Y -i
�J • 4/}, ' III :�_ y fir fr• ..i,r-" QV. . • Stream Restoration(1:1) _ Easement Boundary I—► Monitoring Photo Direction Soil lift with Toe Wood Log Structure
.* y �j` � .��- .:, S-r:r� i - ��T'i _ ' •.....
. ►C!' •�, y , ' ~f,t s t ,'S{, i��i..i�l��
} !� + Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1)t
Fence Line Permanent Vegetation Plot Iiiiiiiuii Floodplain Interceptor 1•
• `# ' ,' : •''1r '� ` r+�1C ;.�_ pp4• f_yr, , HellbenderHabitat i
•
_ y� 4, -T+h „� i • crS Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1) Utility Easement Random Vegetation Plot _�. Rip-Rapf 'a' ' �; . � a Rock Step Structures
lc*p 'f g.' , • '-',.•;, r ' ' Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1) Constructed Top of Bank Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.,1:1) �• Bedrock
ly .Y.. ' .' < Rock Cross Vane
•r
y r��i ��' , '• • _ '• • t ... ......16
I• n fir.• • p Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1) A Groundwater Gauges Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1) Cross Sections
IP
•''�'`{ IVO "�, Stream Enhancement II(4:1) O Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1) Culvert
?�:: r n r. it]; . Rain Gauge
a' #,', • _ y` • . -• r I �; ' `' %�'� i. •1i '"`4=: •; a- Stream Preservation(10:1) O Soil Lift Ford
'� . - r4• , Flow Gauges
�- • 1 i _ .• Non-Creditable Stream lllIII I Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
t • #' t i
M1.T=. 7 ,.i, �i •..� 7.w ` '4- !. ,Ark.. ,-,•r.,tir •,
iitise„ . . 4 ,-
r iw.. a, r
• I Figure 3.2 ; ` r 1 • •.
.. .. ., .,. - . „,',,I.,,-•• . ,.,:t-..
-- r •li.-i t'l-i,t:., ,,- ". Ii. ..... . ir
�.< �,. ' �. s t" j 1 Figure 3.6 1 ",104.;.:i„i.;,..‘i... „._.,._..„,.
,'
„,_,..,-..., _ ,-._,.,
r4. 4 . At
. ....i
'-• 1"Ars-:"..:Awirp..4. -4/ZI iiimog •e,, ,........ ./..11' . 141(41 . , ,... 4, i 4" •X' ..i' 40' ..
•.� • ,..—At : 1 I I „ , 1..;•.. , r�
•
• r: ,. - • * `- f Figure 3.3 �Q,7 I Cl. i
i ..
14.0..4.,0..f1. ,
•
i :, ■a.•....Prrirrr.r 1 j \s s •,•ate••+ w: 1 1 1 _ure 3.7•- ;.._ eip
. :
.L.,
: .
'" • t- �; ! I• to, ti%.,. -a. ... .. . i i.,..:. '.;'44'FitC41711r, f.* •- i.;AC - rr W1 '44‘ i i r.
-
A. i.11 si I
itliir A r: I u �. �•. I I t
•� + at ' n;Y • iiii A 4 f I i := W6A ------� -- ..._..._..!...--------. --------- ------• UT B .
i i apik•e ... • e .4. !
4„r . .,..., 4, , •,:l.-..., „, .... .. . .•-P.. .......---- .... „ : A. - .--401., fp 4,..-.0: i
'`. * •-. •
.j..'4.4, e-• r• am..f< •w Ji.'`• 0 1 1- I
• x
l i •, . J 15. '4,.
{�k, "k" t-: •► '' ••' :.t f .i r'-.,-i.'- IPA, � ' t- '�..� I I i II
• , ;: -r. ■....,, a • s.` _ ' j 1 i 1 ..._... IA" 5 •
Ill a
0. 4.. -Iir.-7•$;;PA.. 7, e.... . ' . ' : I A** t I
/ t ‘' ''t 1—..7! ...„ i
-',/:-•••••••!,`..rli` . ,'-ft.\• .- •''..4-,IP r:-0-41 "t:',;;elle 4 qiihiltilleflA .4.1111e 1 : - t 4..3.1. V% ..•- ....4 . ' _ ...
il
44
+� Ir ,t • ,; ,.a....r......a1. : ...` A• >� -.a + t : •''' k `• �. •'1
. —b ` - l nT - ...T..y ...'S . rr . ..._ .._.. �- sA :: S V •, _ ' -� i
7 N, � 4. NP- „. -1, -" _or • •' k is. . Y '. "'.' f ro e`•, ': © 'obi Broad,. } y. i s
�. .. r ti• • '� + .,ir - ., I..y 1 ? �(l!P ra. • �'. • .�� � e J ■ -� O� ^sIt ForkFet _
ff.,+ r., • • } L. _' . (' � ,+ ti,. ,-s *, ''� _AcK 0' . - 44 fii.T y. s in
t .
i•., i' . ` • ":441 11 * N' :. 7 ,•.i; # i' `, .. �T 1, �.T ,E •x' Cere 3.5 j
i. fir` :�' " -* ‘11 :4$, �r , ,�{} `. " .. .+'; kill !' i , �'n t*• '. .+,•1 �� f Figure 3.4 s sr.' , 4� 1 ,ic Y _...-----F-._...-----..._.. .:i... .1
`. ,z 3 r N► 3. i, •'`� '�ii3%• Figure 3.9 ^_• ;�=m+; .1tot "t���ri:�,,.►�tf �y '` _... ------- ------..._... • •• ,• ------- ; ' ,. .� -ia:. .-- lk r
4b. * ice• - � L --•-•--•--..._.. .::_::._•-•--•--..._•-•—.•--...—•-•--•-_: :_ .•--•--.:
k.
A AS—BUILT MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
Feet 1,500 FIGURE 3.1
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

' j - - • r - —t — �-_4r�# -r . ,. - >�� `rrWsa
6.14 .' �.! . r •, . : i - LEGEND
■ r / • _ , f #
*' . 1ir • � ..� —�-- , r . Stream Restoration(1:1) _ Easement Boundary Monitoring Photo Direction Soil lift with Toe Wood C 1 i Log Structure
•. •• I • \+ + i / K+ , 0 * ! Iii +M Stream Enhancement 1.5:1 111111 Fence Line Permanent Vegetation Plot IIIIIII��III Flood lain Interceptor UUU
I ( ) g urum� P P
J , y r �SI� Hellbender Habitat
J . '
+ • • ' ��■• r 444.S� _ Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1) Utility_Easement Random Vegetation Plot Bedrock
44,
■ 4 ` 11 ■ ■�` Rock Step Structures
'II s J.
,,,,iIF . ; I T E ' ; Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1) Constructed Top of Bank Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.,1:1) Cross Sections
F r ;, I, ♦ ■ ' r Rock Cross Vane
■ svir O — Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1) A Groundwater Gauges Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1) Culvert
01
* r • * Stream Enhancement II(4:1) OWetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1) Ford
i : ai = �,!+, Rain Gauge..
'../. ■, Y ti + Stream Preservation(10:1) II. Soil Lift
A, '
�� - 0% • • • Flow Gauges
i r r • r muuulll
�_ Non-Creditable Stream kiiiiim Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
e
or . .
' / ., r'
ir
11C
T.. O F.
! ��., •
�; RL •. 1 it
, up, r; : : \ ,,,,,
/ ,..• ....- .,,,i --
•
1111
4b.iii \
IllikIL.1144114"1:
ram.
• "i„ cif a \
is
: .
_ -- I 1{{ It -.•...
444
_ —� . — -
s _
' 1 16113° I - __
,'
r :�s /l_ ' r li !A *7 ,. ill i i w3
kw-_ '
■ - exciAit .C 3Lei, 0 0".1 a o-'124014m, a o : 3o C nl Ckh LjejEA,Lgoag,Aaffia3Ro9 liaH,gm fM©m P C 1a ?7
A MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
0 Feet 360 FIGURE 3.2
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

\)si ., . ---''mn..1111111111511111
•
1 �� - 12 4-- VV3 0
J r . �, '• LEGEND
j , ' • VV3 .
/ + •r a / •� \ ■ _ . �� rill- Stream Restoration(1:1)
• 17 • • . 1�
�� -i 1- G o ■ F �j Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1)
W3 Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1)
■ f 'CD - y _ � • / •4•n .Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1)
4.4
G If ._
II r , 1 Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1)
•
�� i- ' r"■0./� ; Stream Enhancement II(4:1)
_ - s �ij t r i■ ■ • T . Stream Preservation(10:1)(424 FT)
F •J(3 �� 'y f'•'~"'ram • Non-Creditable Stream
4
•_ _ 1 fl f I _ - Easement Boundary
40,04k
• Fence Line
. _ �,,.► ' '1 . � • �r •4 Utility_Easement
M r •a Constructed Top of Bank
W `. �■
_ A Groundwater_gauges
•
1 • f - O Rain Gauge
0 i Flow Gauges
p 1 t i W3 • -+ Monitoring Photo Direction
•
10 �' •' .. f, 00 • • Permanent Vegetation Plot
1 f'' .,,,�'''N .. f
„► 01111/1104
•\,, - Random Vegetation Plot
■ �!• •i
t :r I N • Wetland Re-establishment RR,Re-est.,1:1
■ • + • r �� ), 0- 1 ; P '° - Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1)
•
el ■
•.
:A1�+ • ' •
l�� 4 •1 •& _ Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1)
�. `,L \ ‘1 ; • Soil Lift
• f ■ r Si,• 4. �yy��
r 1 i y . it a' • r■ f r i ` 1111111111Y Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
t I
• • , I 0 Soil lift with Toe Wood
. 4 , ■ i i .Aft :ilni....i.
•,� r` . -41111110- © Floodplain Interceptor
41.4
ir' * ..�br.• �� �• ,i - � ��� , 'h.. `lit , _ • Rip-Rap
'. ,j .• ••* e • �1�� OQ ti A.
s ® :::::: r
Jr A+lr';/•#V r rrrr.r.r • • r
r■.• r' .3 �""may s
• 'r's 4g • ■ ' r • •. , •�.,, •'�IIh. Culvert
"1,„„ ty ,�4 •
■ y' ig
y. • �. Ford
/ . - - 14
-•,,,.. + �; �r / Rock Step Structures
I. ► 1 L+ r
`. i • �E i= Rock Cross Vane
■
• i •• i - ■
• , ■;?• 11Lf«7,`\! s al Log Structure
4 +
' ' t t- • *. , V s ■ , Hellbender Habitat
,r. ++ -
111\II:
:' —
• r , r
•_to lb 4., -ti
o a Esr', D o IGIobe, eoEv + o o .oh' A°bu Ce,uar_A, sAR.1109 nH,tm sh6 em war Caranuary
F)1 A AS-BUILT MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
Feet 410 FIGURE 3.3
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

w ► • 7T
� , Ar�► `'�►tr ► ra . • . ! LEGEND
si'++++ r' I '►. 111- 1 1����►►.► •, . r.� = r • . Stream Restoration(1:1) ♦ Rain Gauge Cross Sections
*is, ` 1.` ■ ►��►4•ri. _ Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1) • — Culvert
•.•++r _ + ►.►►►►►' , �i- t 41 �' = + I • •� f 1 ( ) • Flow Gauges
�• ' ►s % ./ • Stream Enhancement II 2.3:1 l0r Ford
+ ■ +� •; itopo
■ • ■ f I.
Monitoring Photo Direction
�����.►•► ►N ,` r ( ■' } Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1) illi ► kiN •'. f ! Permanent Vegetation Plot Log Structure
ft. ,(v • • L �� , Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1)
/AAA \ toss �i +'� ' � ..i•,l Random::::nt
•
• ! r (, Hellbender Habitat
` � •' . Stream Enhancement II(4:1)lip ", .,. Wetland (RR,Re-est.,1:1)
". ' \' ��f' '\,y ■ - Stream Preservation(10:1) 4:1 Rock Step Structures
• . • •••rit AN., Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1)
�,+'..` +J - — Non-Creditable Stream
• `. 4 Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1) < Rock Cross Vane
• 'r 15 dR'V \•+ �, • _ Easement Boundary Soil Lift
■
y' F • �s� 111111 Fence Line
•- �',li ` 111111g1111 Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
.' \: h`p UtilityEasement
• . ■ - Soil lift with Toe Wood
• _ \•+., ' Constructed Top of Bank
' _ _ \ = U 1.1.1!�I Floodplain Interceptor
•' ���, A Groundwater Gauges ' Bedrock
,i '.N 4
* `L6 a
',, # W4 •� 1 �.
s ,
- • --z L . 6 I te.:11,1
•
mo- . %NO ,••••• ' t, 1
' •
iiitilte
• - V .•.
VI .a P. ..
\ . ...........-.....
i.„4" . • *.........
grip ,, " z 1'o ,
Q s; ■
1IL Not . • ...de
` IN, 1
lit
4 y ..
•'+'1/4 . - -114 ..i,„ • A ,s,
%lir\ '1 1 iii,,,,
•
,,,,,,,,,,, . ,
Iv ii,i, -
�' kr. . . .`° '••�... • .\ 11
French Br er �f � � 6 + �% • w
# �y` ;� ► mooAll. •
-.... 0
WsSt •ork o } . M
..e., vilir ip•11. . . V
• • it tip olio
0 l • ,
It
lit
AP dip it 11, . I,. . A.. . .. •• i ii, dr tit iiiiiip
11# it Iv . it
i ieve
42 , ,r,„„. _
, .
1474$ . • 4111'
• . • ili % ' ' b''
Ili ,____ _410/, lip.jt4..d.__.__._jligi 1111,11) al. ir
ore
110
4e, a • li" %-
V • 1111 I ',_ • 1,..• 02 41141111141, • Opp
.c, , „I. r . I toil ile . . . \\• ...
•
• t +- r . i III 41111 1. _ .f • �aEA o . ao-,G-.E , o to©ME.( ADD�o•�°° ume,G.a.e0RlLo0um,gm,th6eoaM Lr rru� J
■ m AS—BUILT MONITORING PLAN VIEW
r I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
Feet 390 FIGURE 3.4
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

I, w
• LEGEND
• - i • W5
i A.. Stream Restoration(1:1)
- -
�� Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1)
20 ,\' Enhancement II(2.3:1)
W5 i i I Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1)
* _ Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1)
.j� W5B Enhancement II(4:1)
• iffilli
•
Stream Preservation(10:1)
r.' 46 Non-Creditable Stream
111104 it
. IF'` _ Easement Boundary
111111 Fence Line
1 19 ��1� UtilityEasement
-, • W5Constructed Top of Bank
:._ ,�;_ n Groundwater Gauges
. O 11 40.,
O- Flow Gauges
;I. '
are
_ �� ell r ::::::vegetaon
,iir'llyjrilliel'at . /..4....:,,.,.____ -... • .11,
Plot
W5 •
* _y I w Random Vegetation Plot
Pb Y..�;;:;:= i * 6 ■ , —► Monitoring Photo Direction
lir
■ .......in,... �� ,Adr, r + • ...
II Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.,1:1)
•
a is
ti
I � - ,I ii. . , Wetland Rehabilitation (RR,Rehab,1.5:1)
r�■ �' • rV Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1)
' a "�..�`' I� +� IMI Soil Lift
...., Apr oo r
IIIIIIIIIII Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
+'~ O110 ` ) Soil lift with Toe Wood
1. O ' milli Floodplain Interceptor
, tom (0'
French Broad River Bedrock
+ W est F ork T
,�„�,,,' rrj = , i ‘
Cross Sections
• I lir
— + , ; A14130 1 • I 114 A
4 •Culvert
II 1 20 :tructure
W+ wil■o
r a : r [ fMill
. 4 .
, 4.
_ 1: Hellbender Habitat
II
,,,,it..... . .
P % Rock Step Structures
+ 4 iiht _.
Rock Cross Vane
k_ ....„ _ . . 11
".
111/ w t
4," iit •
—a .tiM tai— .
. lir
r* }, .
Triliggilr % i fr
Jill Il 6 i
o 1111114, phirAglki ,(.1 %. 4.1 111)"
• •
i I"' • I I" exolio, a IStA '. 0AoG-0Ev=,Etlialcdtar "e rki,Cnl ce,WEA,Mgg89Aa.coaRIM,IG ,, Cint4.0118JserCowdoll *
A. AS-BUILT MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
0 Feet 260 FIGURE 3.5
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

• , .'ti LEGEND
r _ •
- Stream Restoration(1:1) _ Easement Boundary Soil Lift !!i!IIII Floodplain Interceptor % Rock Step Structures
Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1) 111111 Fence Line Permanent Vegetation Plot 1 . Bedrock
Rock Cross Vane
- Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1) Utility Easement M Random Vegetation Plot Cross Sections
• mi
- Stream Enhancement II 2.5:1 Constructed Topof Bank °�����i Soil Lift with Boulder Toe 40 Culvert
( ) 11111111111
I °, F • , Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1) A Groundwater Gauges Soil lift with Toe Wood P�i 1 Ford
•.! - ' - Stream Enhancement II(4:1) ♦ Rain Gauge Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.,1:1) Log Structure
Z.
IL Stream Preservation(10:1) • Flow Gauges Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1) to
Hellbender Habitat
•
Non-Creditable Stream Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1)
Monitoring Photo Direction
ittmviti 4 .-
14r1.7111.1111111ks ,I
/411 `- . •
wii
f ...._ AI 1 r 0
%V 0
S• . r •
_ les .` •
,........_:...1%.--: :,...:;AA*7,4,1, VLI .....11111laii .
- • Ibler 1
AIIIIr
' e • . Ilh 1.4144 410," •
,� �illhIL
4:0114101.10:4A r . 4-
* ,.....,•••••..m.••• ....00 '16 \ - 11F4
VV3 , 1 1,;
.a .rya
e r • •
4111) 111111411-111 °,
•
• . ,,, ,00 OW*
j4 -
i.e;T.
1144
-
W3 /� It
' •
� _ ,
12 v
4-- n _
up `�� —
s4
J �,s
• � _ *`a
.. W3 _•.
..• qr. ,.�—...—.. a44
■ 44
VV3 } •A 1 a •a=aa
ik — _
f °,4444y f
pit*
V 1 =a A D o 0 o u C irl�nlP o 0 4 ° o o �o D ���o °� ��o ©Ho el ©�� P�0o GUlGU7l L
s .
A MONITORING PLAN VIEW
F)1
I I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
0 Feet 375 FIGURE 3.6
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

LEGEND 1 , - t' +. ' I Nob ■
I
-Stream Restoration(1:1) • ,
•III:
` ti -11
Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1) • 4 ■ l `r `• r• ' 4.44(
_ e r
/ ■�
Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1) I - .
-Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1) • • :74st '
iiiil
Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1) r • • : '
Stream Enhancement II(4:1) r ' ,Aft/4 . In:
--' $ 11biteeir"NI
` + .
Stream Preservation(10:1) • ��•• C • .11I
• ' _f
Non-Creditable Stream - •
• •I . c74 r .lV•I1 l Nb 1 ‘%-
Easement Boundary • 1/4Qi0 ~.
iO._
'.111, ii 4 .7Al
1/41/4 r * , f { •
■ ■ ■ Fence Line . h. !� ; it
Utility Easement 1 Qi}` V .
sr
Constructed Top of Bank - ` - r - `�,.0 +1, P •
' ale
AGroundwater Gauges • Ili !? 0� ■ • •
♦ Rain Gauge _ ���cz' ■ ■� '� /44 • •
9 Flow Gauges - , 1 a
1111161 •
—► Monitoring Photo Direction 1•V:% % ■r I •• }a.
Permanent Vegetation Plot • .• ■elit i y r .` ir..
•
frit
Random Vegetation Plot , • • • Jr • •
- , ,,i • I IF.%
•S .
`Soil Lift _
11111111 Soil Lift with Boulder Toe
_ •
10
- Soil lift with Toe Wood • • r
4110, • • 1 r ■ •
Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.,1:1) . 1 1 1 • . i
•
Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1) ..• •r d -� ■ •
• I 441*.yesi
i i�
Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh,2:1) • 4 :e
' ilL
i
1 % t! , . 44 t
IIIII111 Flood lain Interceptor • • - 1
•
® Bedrock TM-713alit -
p ' A I V ■
Cross Sections I
• `�
• rr W5 '
:::stePstructures
•it ii• 1 1 • • iii.
• ; f
z .-• • 1411 ire .
•
Rock Cross Vane • �F i "' r • ," •
6.41
•
ft
ii Log Structure W5 ( • r • \t. lit
kti•, •t.
ilt
♦ W5 •
•a•t .6r
Hellbender Habitat ■ ,
* •
1 • !
' A _ t
'm 0 Villi' i V,
. • %a;•411.. •
S13 0 • N.,
40
0 *Of.
W5 sou e=a lagl,DbritIttebtia9SadVA,r -oo .o 11. ocN u ono LII8FiA,U ,, R1D,IAN,gm,sh6 eon -_:.,aLecaiiiihiuttky
F)1
A MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
0 Feet 375 FIGURE 3.7
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

gllir
LEGEND `lam • •
' 'it.tr �Y
it. ' - ik
•
-Stream Restoration(1:1) •,' L • . ' p/'
Stream Enhancement I(1.5:1) ^_ -,.-•711r„. I••• .f olfiiki ' „le _ ;~
VIIIi
Stream Enhancement II(2.3:1) • +�• �. • • .
•f r d
Stream Enhancement II(2.5:1) r
Stream Enhancement II(3.5:1) 1: ■ _ • e{• '.#6i;I' - ..•.Au.. • ■ • _
Stream Enhancement II(4:1) ,, I r . • ; i P.'Stream Preservation(10:1) i • _` •
C.
Non-Creditable Stream ,• a. ' .ram_ ��'L*),N• y ,, '• - y : �. •
Easement Boundary f .� 1""+;• ` - r-- • T ... . ■ �! '• �;`1% .a - 1 _ I.
11111 Fence Line •7_ ,� r-S.�, -:= r "r .-. 4r . •► `' r %, ' 111.
;
•
Utility Easement • •' • .f M. .'till rli Me•••J• - - ► I.
+ l ��
Constructed Top of Bank a f • P. f: . .14A).rl, r#.. s _ - •
1 • '
iilli
•\ Groundwater Gauges + vs R - l 111►r>�i�_■ •• _ ,
.•.* y i • 1tllllllfa.Z� 'r r •
O Rain Gauge&BaroTroll •• _ 11. ••••, r yr�11111r11r ' ..�■ W1
• Flow Gauges ' '- '.l� .- • 1i11► lllllllllliii .q_. •W1
Permanent Vegetation Plot Y r
i �'
g _ i ,
/ • i ••
- Random Vegetation Plot �,., 'r f + • • .4. . 4 : f -. i + i ■ ::; .
�. 1 ' r
I. Monitoring Photo Direction �} ti •- "R �•� .07 ' '= • �F•;
- Soil Lift i 5„ i #i+±<< r:• yti ,` h • it • i ' r r • 1' : ,11.
li
s.
�• �,'
®Soil Lift with Boulder Toe �• i �� �, Fr . ', .;. J �., • • •
;, Soil lift with Toe Wood r • P , e • •s. r ■ �.
Wetland Re-establishment(RR,Re-est.1: _ • 7' ��`+� .l, �• •{'• •. • ,• •
•r- . : ��� r� `
I I Wetland Rehabilitation(RR,Rehab,1.5:1) • *jI �` `� `•f {44.�}1 • I; • :•••.• ri�' , - -:, , Egg ti �_
�� Wetland Enhancement(RR,Enh 2:1) 7i. � �� ?." '1 r�•+ii , •;_ l- _ - ' W1 t •r -
®Floodplain Interceptor 44 + r � ;- •:•• �,• .' ; `r f
® �f. 1' 2 3 .. tip' • • V�'. r �'+
Bedrock .j�rn •
_ r r•�. I. .:i 't- t; r• • •"`t f•
Cross Sections •' ` • `a .; ► r ,
•
tiCulvert •
w••- ''� la_ ,i• �• * �,• . ,....1I l .! •
•,' �• • 3'Y-.'.+tl
11 Ford ' + 1• �i'�•• `l• 'reft 4. .
• '1 / '•� �. .-•r �' ..,
i +•'�.' . �. ..,. :!! ��' _ , { 4 [ :�. -rRr
Rock Step Structures 4111/1144•1 • • ' 7l r4 - }r'••k•J r •'- •ti , • f r. '• 'f IIPS„...
•
C Rock Cross Vane '�• -
. .. iiiilip ...:
di Log Structure # ,t.%MI r ■ ? I `4# I i r i• ••�N ,,•rr• y a ►� .. /-�:7: _ y` r ■ ri t'+i
g Hellbender Habitat Sall. ! • + f ••. • k I {. IS t ~y�r`f 4 .. -' yd Jo.
_ --.. ri.
�. � f.r r,•'r .•I ' .
. • J:.>..,46..;,Pit., . .• ...- 41.„..
.i.itt.,.4 ., .. .
„,
„,#4. ..
..
. 6:111.1
. AIIILP4 41.45‘si 474' . '.„,,,,,.
'II
itilvoi.„
I lait ,- it 14', .'IT Apr4zi. ....-0!:„ .; ...., •
, 0, ,,,,. ,,
i .• ~ _ • �~ L i1 ', tilt f F } ! � : '+t• R ....! * 4, ,2. 12 . ifr, ',." •'. .. 1hr' , 1' 1 •• •r.��R• l ;:r
:41";:411".:-.4(
; •^ :'"..7. � �� .i4s �R•-:.1.
' •
1. •
,4 4
''� "] 4. • • + !♦1.+ 1'- •�• • 'yr ' rye • d 7,.. •
,•._y lr�rrnea �. '
..t:•'',.-1....,°,.' ..,4: ,oitirx....7 . , :
i.
•
0 . r.‘,
•
4.
I. ...- 44 11:11 ‘ .111 • . . °/. 4 1 ./.., . 14 * . .4( '4 4,,AL. r .\
4 ."' 4 • VI:, illAlti ..e, ‘•1 '; • ‘, 41100% . .4' --"Vt ft - '" .
rai
•
. k , A
. ,. A
14, L. •Olti.
' '' r' .• •. f'-...(#7
i .•r -ems ► :/"M. 1 !. ' ilk
; + jr 0". S i ,� it �'tit.4,* r' ►) , 14*- i
•
t' �' i� �ti t a .i.y,� - `y+f" ,fir . - i .
iii
4110114 it
ylosi o e o o P� o 0 0 $�.D D o D o 0
= A- •f`•i' •` % I. if:. . , .�s3 y� (� .r. : ti y d y'D�i IGG I b C C C iUt�rl C JP Boo MEW'A b Q 'v D � GdlCfo�b�nlo I tfini0©��3 �C�rn�nGu����%
I-. A AS-BUILT MONITORING PLAN VIEW
I I OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
0 Feet 670 FIGURE 3.8
OWEN FARMS AS-BUILT REPORT

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 5.Owen Farms Mitigation Site(DMS Project No.100064)Project Mitigation Quantities a"1 r. 4it
Original
Mitigation Original Original Original
Plan As-Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Ft/Ac Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
m
West Fork French Broad River 1799.000 1799.000 Cold R 1.00000 1,799.000 Full channel Restoration,buffer planting,livestock exclusion,permanent easement
(WFFBR)*
West Fork French Broad River 705.000 705.000 Cold Ell 2.50000 282.000 Bank stabilization along the left bank,buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and
(WFFBR) permanent easement
UT 1* 764.000 764.000 Cold Ell 4.00000 191.000 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 2 923.000 923.000 Cold Ell 3.50000 263.714 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 2A* 546.000 546.000 Cold Ell 2.50000 218.400 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 2B 75.000 75.000 Cold Ell 2.50000 30.000 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 3 125.000 125.000 Cold El 1.50000 83.333 Stabilization of channel dimension and profile,buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and
permanent easement
UT4* 809.000 809.000 Cold Ell 2.50000 323.600 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 4A 472.000 472.000 Cold Ell 2.30000 205.217 Stabilization of channel dimension and profile near confluence with UT 4,buffer
planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 4B 178.000 178.000 Cold Ell 4.00000 44.500 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 5* 827.000 827.000 Cold R 1.00000 827.000 Full channel Restoration,buffer planting,livestock exclusion,permanent easement
UT 6 114.000 114.000 Cold P 10.00000 11.400 Preservation
UT 6A 206.000 206.000 Cold P 10.00000 20.600 Preservation
UT 7 417.000 417.000 Cold R 1.00000 417.000 Full channel Restoration,buffer planting,livestock exclusion,permanent easement
UT 7 439.000 439.000 Cold Ell 3.50000 125.429 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 7A 103.000 103.000 Cold P 10.00000 10.300 Preservation
UT 7B 136.000 136.000 Cold Ell 2.50000 54.400 Buffer planting,livestock exclusion,and permanent easement
UT 8 137.000 137.000 Cold R 1.00000 137.000 Full channel Restoration near confluence with WFFBR,buffer planting,livestock
exclusion,permanent easement
Total: 5,043.893
Wetland
Wetland Group 1(W1-W9) 1.540 1.396 R E 2.00000 0.770 Planting,livestock exclusion,permanent easement
Wetland Group 2(W3 and W5) 0.350 0.350 R REE 1.00000 0.350 Raising invert of adjacent tributaries and filling abandoned channels;livestock
exclusion,planting,and removal of spoil
Wetland Group 3(W3) 0.970 0.970 R RH 1.50000 0.647 Planting,livestock exclusion,permanent easement;restoring adjacent tributaries to
increase frequency of floodwaters accessing wetland
Total: 1.767
*Length of streams flowing through utility easements or agricultural crossings has been deducted from As-Built and Original Mitigation Plan footage and credits
Project Credits
Stream Riparian Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Wetland Wetland Marsh
Restoration N/A N/A 3,180.000 N/A N/A N/A
Re-establishment 0.350 N/A N/A
Rehabilitation 0.647 N/A N/A
Enhancement 0.770 N/A N/A
Enhancement I N/A N/A 83.333
Enhancement ii N/A N/A 1,738.260
Creation N/A N/A N/A
Preservation N/A N/A 42.300 N/A N/A
Totals N/A N/A 5,043.893 1.767 N/A N/A
Total Stream Credit 5,043.893
Total Wetland Credit 1.767
Transylvania County, NC June 7, 2021

E.) Owen Farms Mitigation Sited DMS Project No. 100064
Final MYO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
f 6 Drnia-
Project Attribute Table
Project Name Owen Farms Mitigation Site
County Transylvania
Project Area (acres) 25
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude decimal degrees) 35.183902,-82.937970
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Blue Ridge Mountains
River Basin French Broad
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit I 06010105 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit I 06010105010020
DWR Sub-basin 0601010501
Project Drainage Area (acres) 3,795
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2
Land Use Classification Agricultural/Pasture
Reach Summary Information
Parameters WFFB UT 4 UT 5 UT 6
Pre-project length(feet) 1,975 731 652 114
Post-project(feet) 1,799 809 827 114
Valley confinement(Confined,moderately confined,unconfined) Unconfined Confined Confined Confined
Drainage area (acres) 3,795 30.6 44.8 21.7
Perennial, Intermittent,Ephemeral Perennial Perennial Perennial Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification B;Tr B B B
Dominant Stream Classification(existing) B4 B4 B4 B4
Dominant Stream Classification(proposed) C4 C4 C4 C4
Dominant Evolutionary class(Simon)if applicable
Reach Summary Information Continued
Parameters UT 7 UT 8
Pre-project length(feet) 372 49
Post-project(feet) 417 137
Valley confinement(Confined,moderately confined, unconfined) Confined Confined
Drainage area (acres) 41 198
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Perennial Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification B B
Dominant Stream Classification(existing) B4 B4
Dominant Stream Classification(proposed) C4 C4
Dominant Evolutionary class(Simon)if applicable
Wetland Summary Information
Wetland Group 1(W1 Wetland Group 3
Parameters W9) Wetland Group 2(W3&W5) (W3)
Pre-project(acres) 1.54 0.35 0.97
Post-project(acres) 1.40 0.35 0.97
Wetland Type(non-riparian,riparian) Riparian Riverine Riparian Riverine Riparian Riverine
Mapped Soil Series Ela Ela Ela
Soil Hydric Status A7,F3,F6 F3,F6 F3,F6
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes Yes PCN
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes Yes PCN
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes CE
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes CE
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA or CAMA) No N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Transylvania County, NC ?7, 2021

I' ) Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 7. Project Activity and Reporting History
Data Completion
Activity or Report Collection or Delivery
Complete
Mitigation Plan January 2020 January 2020
Final Design—Planting and Construction Plans January 2020 February 2020
Construction --- October 7, 2020
Repair Activities Complete --- January 15, 2021
Bare Root and Livestake Plantings for Entire Project --- January 22, 2021
Area
Mitigation Plan/As-built(Year 0 Monitoring-Baseline) February 25, 2021 June 7, 2021
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Table 8. Project Contacts Table
Designer HDR Engineering
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-3034
Primary project design POC Vickie Miller(919) 232-6600
Construction Contractor Land Mechanics Design, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Construction Contractor POC Lloyd Glover(919) 639-6132
Planting Contractor Land Mechanics Design, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Planting Contractor POC Lloyd Glover [phone]
Monitoring Performers Land Management Group, Inc
3101 Poplarwood Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Stream Monitoring POC Land Management Group, Inc
3101 Poplarwood Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Alex DiGeronimo [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Land Management Group, Inc
3101 Poplarwood Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Alex DiGeronimo [phone]
Transylvania County, NC

r:
WOLF MOUN TAWI a
LEGEND
1 .e
1 ,r
Parcel Boundary 1
�* " [r ?e2 N
Conservation Easement ...1 , 1 a�� -,4,
/ ry
•
(fir �� ..
I `i
0 Miles 1 Cr I
66
9
} ' ; �� r . ta" TANASEEIRIDGE
�GreeV. -f- s. w c%elf
i
0:- b
4.
Ga lat..yC
Balsam Grc
T anasee G, _ 7
( f'r.-
r
To% 1 Bra0;en Mountain Cook
a Mountin n
n 0 I
/ Nt.i1'''':I:lyj -_,t'kirr ti Ra'
../
eel �e64F 7. t Gressmine
yci a r L,,GRd Mountain .
6�
,r i}xN i
J`
I cI•k2t
I ifitkriSri— zo.l'ir''
Walnut Cone Mountain
CJtf/o Gr.._ Cry` r.1+• A
vevt a4-.. ` a L..atno,lq;�
ep
- ._
3 f
a.
1
./ Indis+►C✓e f
Co
F
It ICIuntaln6 I?rehtana R+tlge
` G'olae n Rci
M
Hogback olnta^n I
Green/ t... I' ,
c..tuxay UT
d
Lake rs'
L
�yb / tux away
Lake Toxaway
G J ' - Country Club Old C)
er a OT /1
kip a
Sapphire r • '`- -"-
F J' • r,,_ ')ry R s Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmiin, Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO, USGS,
�P/��`' off, N,i ' FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey, Esri
f P� Burls Burlingame .. Cre+nt Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), (c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and
/�e country
�' the GIS User Community
ry
LOCATION MAP Im)1
OWEN FARMS MITIGATION SITE
FIGURE 1
PATH:Z:IHOR PROJECTSIOWEN FARMS17.0 GIS17.1 MAP DOCSI7.1.5 MIT PLAN FIGURESIFIGURE 1-LOCATION MAP.MXD-USER:A00061-DATE:312312021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Appendix B — Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MYO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 9_Basel
West Fork French Broad River UT 5
Monitoring Baseline Monitoring Baseline
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition(applicaple) Design (MYO) Pre-Existing Condition(applicaple) Design (MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 28.78 38.38 38.47 47.90 3 30.00 30.00 27.52 39.11 4 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 1 8.50 8.50 8.94 10.08 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 47.89 56.15 51.56 69.00 3 93.00 93.00 96.35 430.60 4 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 1 100.00 100.00 60.41 491.41 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.89 2.12 2.07 2.41 3 2.14 2.14 1.81 3.54 4 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 1 0.63 0.63 0.43 0.53 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.93 3.14 3.20 3.28 3 2.63 2.63 2.43 4.76 4 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 69.31 79.83 79.56 90.63 3 69.60 69.60 49.82 138.26 4 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 1 5.00 5.00 4.37 4.75 2
Width/Depth Ratio 11.94 18.62 18.58 25.34 3 14.00 14.00 11.05 15.20 4 6.64 6.64 6.64 6.64 1 13.50 13.50 16.87 23.44 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.25 1.49 1.44 1.79 3 3.10 3.10 3.50 14.23 4 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1 11.80 11.80 5.99 54.94 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.70 1.90 1.80 2.19 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 83 83 83 40 40 40
Rosgen Classification B4/F4 C4 C4 B4 C4 C4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 300 300 300 10 10 10
Sinuosity(ft) 1.06 1.12 1.14 1.08 1.14 1.14
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0034 0.0034 0.0036 0.012 0.006 0.007
UT 7 UT 8
Monitoring Baseline Monitoring Baseline
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition(applicaple) Design (MYO) Pre-Existing Condition(applicaple) Design (MY0)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.71 4.71 4.71 4.71 1 9.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 1 11.60 11.60 11.60 11.60 1 12.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 12.80 12.80 12.80 12.80 1 130.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 1 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 1 30.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 1 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 1 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 1 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00 1 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 1 1.11 1.11 0.00 0.00 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 2.69 2.69 2.69 2.69 1 5.60 5.60 0.00 0.00 1 8.19 8.19 8.19 8.19 1 10.30 10.30 0.00 0.00 1
Width/Depth Ratio 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 1 13.50 13.50 0.00 0.00 1 16.30 16.30 16.30 16.30 1 13.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 1 14.40 14.40 0.00 0.00 1 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47 1 2.50 2.50 0.00 0.00 1
Bank Height Ratio 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 1 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1 2.79 2.79 2.79 2.79 1 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 61.7 61.7 61.7 76.8 76.8 76.8
Rosgen Classification B4 C4 C4 B4 C4 C4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 13 13 13 45 45 45
Sinuosity(ft) 1.00 1.24 1.26 1.03 1.09 1.10
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.0246 0.0054 0.0057 0.0379 0.0110 0.0112
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

Im) Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MYO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Owen Farms Mitigation Site/DMS:100064 - West Fork French Broad River(WFFBR),UT 5,UT 7,UT 8
Cross Section 1(Pool-WFFBR) Cross Section 2(Riffle-WFFBR) Cross Section 3(Riffle-WFFBR) Cross Section 4(Pool-WFFBR) Cross Section 5(Riffle-WFFBR)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2696.15 2694.46 2690.79
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2692.85 2692.68 2691.17 2689.58 2688.36
LTOB Elevation 2696.45 2696.15 2694.46 2693.64 2690.79
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 3.60 3.47 3.29 4.06 2.43
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 58.72 61.32 65.45 71.83 49.82
Cross Section 6(Riffle-WFFBR) Cross Section 7(Riffle-UT 8) Cross Section 8(Pool-UT 8) Cross Section 9(Pool-UT 5) Cross Section 10(Riffle-UT 5)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2691.20 2696.64 2705.97 2702.02
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2686.44 2695.39 2694.42 2703.98 2701.21
LTOB Elevation 2691.20 2696.64 2696.50 2705.97 2702.02
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 4.76 1.25 2.08 1.99 0.81
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 138.26 8.14 14.19 10.89 4.37
Cross Section 11(Pool-UT 5) Cross Section 12(Riffle-UT 5) Cross Section 13(Pool-UT 7) Cross Section 14(Riffle-UT 7)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2697.47 2694.13 2689.90
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2696.66 2692.78 2689.68 2689.18
LTOB Elevation 2697.47 2694.13 2691.25 2689.90
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 0.81 1.35 1.57 0.72
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 4.75 7.83 8.77 4.56
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

FNOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.1 West Fork French Broad River - Longitudinal Profile
-4 Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 ♦ Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 • Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures -Cross Sections
2700.0 1 1 -_-
I
2699.0 XS 1
2698.0 r XS 2
- 2697.0 I, ■♦ ♦♦ A ■ ♦ ♦ A ■ ■ ■
2696.0 ■ • ■ ♦ • ■ ■ •■ ♦ ♦ ♦• ♦ a . ■♦♦ 4 ■; As ♦■it i■ q■ ■ ■ ■ : • ■
2695.0 �o �• i ♦ ♦ ♦ MA ~■♦■ ♦ 1■ ill
♦■
aas 2694.0 --AD
•
"' 2693.0 • 1 0--
2692.0 •
No.......4,------"4'
2691.0
2690.0
10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 16+00.00 17+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Figure 4.2 West Fork French Broad River - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
-I Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 - Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 • Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures -Cross Sections
2697.0 ` XS 3
2696.0
2695.0 i+ • ♦ A
A
♦ ♦ ♦ 4. ♦ ♦ ■ XS 4
2694.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ AM ♦ ♦ U♦ ■ ♦■ ■ ■ ■ •■ •♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ■ ■ a ■ • AA ■ ■ ■
c 2693.0 ♦ ♦ • ♦ � ■♦ 1 • ■♦ Y Ai ♦� .0 ■ • ■ ■ ■
• • • • • •
w 2691.0
2690.0
2689.0
2688.0
17+00.00 18+00.00 19+00.00 20+00.00 21+00.00 22+00.00 23+00.00 24+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Transylvania County, NC June 7, 2021

FN Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.3 West Fork French Broad River Profile Cont.
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 I Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 -Cross Sections
2694.0
XS 5
2693.0 1
-2692.0 ♦ ■ ■♦ ■ A , ■♦ ■♦ ♦ •■ •♦ ♦�■ • ■ A 1 •♦ �♦ ■ ♦ ♦ ♦ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
2691.0 •♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦■ ■ ♦ ■ M ■ ■♦ III
2690.0 • . ip___- •-•-•--
as
Z 2689.0 �. • • • • • •
W
2688.0
2687.0
2686.0
24+00.00 25+00.00 26+00.00 27+00.00 28+00.00 29+00.00 30+00.00 31+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Figure 4.4 West Fork French Broad River Profile Cont.
- Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 -Cross Section
2694.0 - - ----- -
-
2693.0 IM ■ ■
2692.0
.. 2691.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
2690.0 ■
2689.0
v 2688.0 • y
"' 2687.0
2686.0 ♦ 0I �♦
2685.0 I XS 6 H-
+-
2684.0 I
31+00.00 32+00.00 33+00.00 34+00.00 35+00.00 36+00.00
Sta.(ft)
L
Transylvania County, NC June 7, 2021

FNOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.5 UT 5 - Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 ♦ Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 • Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures —Cross Sections
2716.0
2714.0 ■ y
Al !
2712.0 •A • -
. ♦ XS 9
0 2710.0 —
!
v 2708.0 ti�— •
W 2706.0
M Mk
2704.0 E,
2702.0 I —
10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00
Sta.(ft)
I
Figure 4.6 UT 5 - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 a Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 tBaseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures —Cross Sections
2708.0 XS 10 1-
2706.0 —
2704.0
•
2702.0
ca
IP ■
�� y
w 2700.0 — ■
2698.0
2696.0
13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 16+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

FNOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.7 UT 5 - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 tBaseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures —Cross Sections
2702.0
[xs 11
2700.0 — —
2698.0 — — XS 12
♦■ ■
c 2696.0 — I
0
I v 2694.0 — ■ram• ■ It •
•
W
2692.0 —
•
2690.0 — -
2688.0
16+00.00 17+00.00 18+00.00 19+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Figure 4.8 UT 8 - Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 • Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures —Cross Section
2698.5
2698.0 XS7
2697.5
Y 2697.0 ■
2696.5 ■ ■ ♦ ■ ■♦ ■ ■ ■
•
•
2696.0 •
m
v 2695.5
"' 2695.0
2694.5 • •
2694.0
•
2693.5
10+00.00 10+50.00 11+00.00
Sta.(ft)
I
Transylvania County, NC June 7, 2021

FnOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.9 UT 3 - Longitudinal Profile
_ Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF- 2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface- 2/25/2021 Structures
2696.0 - —
A •
2695.0 - — •—
,2694.0 - —
c
2693.0
fa
•
w 2692.0 �� - • • •
IL— •-
2691.0
2690.0 —
09+80.00 10+00.00 10+20.00
Sta.(ft)
Figure 4.10 UT 4 - Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF- 2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 - Baseline Water Surface- 2/25/2021 Structures
2699.0 -
2698.0 - •
2697.0 ♦ a
•
7. 2696.0 - ♦ ♦ ♦ A ■
c 2695.0 ♦ ■ •
• m� ♦ ■
v 2694.0 - 4-- r •
•
w 2693.0 -
2692.0 - • 41.— •
2691.0
2690.0
09+90.00 10+90.00
Sta. (ft)
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

FNOwen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 4.11 UT 6 - Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 • Structures
2692.0
—
2691.5
2691.0 A-
2690.5
•
2690.0
c 2689.5 • • ♦ •
2689.0 • •
ai 2688.5
W
2688.0 ■
2687.5
2687.0
2686.5
09+70.00 10+20.00
Sta.(ft)
Figure 4.12 UT 7 - Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Water Surface-2/25/2021 Baseline Thalweg-2/25/2021 Baseline RTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 Baseline LTOB/BKF-2/25/2021 • Structures —Cross Sections
2698.0 - 1—
2696.0 �
_
♦ XS 13 XS 14
2694.0
c 2692.0
• ,■ ' r . 6 A.
v 2690.0 ♦ ��
•
w ♦ ♦� ♦
2688.0 ♦ � � •
2686.0 • •
2684.0
10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00
Sta.(ft)
Transylvania County, NC June 7, 2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figures 5.1—5.14 Monitoring Cross Section Plots
Figure 5.1 Cross Section 1
River Basin French Broad 1 Date&� ime Wed.Feb 24 2021.14.10 32 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 1 L"ds xs2 -
XS ID XS 1 (WFFBR) 6 '-
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795
Date 2/25/2021 ;•4 ; :'
, .. a ``
Field Crew Kee Surveying 1 !'
XS-1 Pool (WFFBR) 1 t',�:, ., _---- .
tBaseline-225/2021 —— Bankfull-2252021 � ' `�� _ -�}f - - _---- - to
2698.0 '~ t ...w� x- -i-
i
z696.0 •2695.0 2694.0 -
2693.0
2692.0
2691.0 _ •
,2690.0 .. _ �. _- -
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 1A -
Distance(ft) - • - —�
ry�I -
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2692.85
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2696.45
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 3.60
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 58.72
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.2 Cross Section 2
River Basin French Broad e- 7&, .: -• , •..Feb24.2021.14:12:29EST
Watershed 06010105010020 ;�' —� • ---.
XS ID XS 2 (WFFBR) - R _
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795 '
Date 2/25/2021 t __
Field Crew Kee Surveying r ') "' +. $ t e"
1 V...
XS-2 Riffle(WFFBR) _
Baseline-2/25/2021 —— Bankfull-2/25/2021 - '_
2700.0 ---f'a."'n.n.-_ _ . - •--
2699.0 �.-- • - � !- i �.j'-_—ice - .S 2
698.0
2697.0
E.2695.0F. _
i 4 z`
'�
2692.0 ti -
2691.0
2690.0 ' ' i 4 '
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 • -
Distance(ft) .. ' -
r Cross Section 2(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2696.15
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2692.68
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2696.15
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 3.47
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 61.32
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

01 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.3 Cross Section 3
River Basin French Broad Date&Time Wed.Feb 24.2021. •47 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 tk ds xs5
XS ID XS 3 (WFFBR)
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795 `
Date 2/25/2021 ' ;
Field Crew Kee Surveying - R.
XS-3 Riffle(WFFBR) •
��:. r��—s+ � - -_,_ i
Baseline-225/2021 -- Bankfull-2/25/2021 - _ 14e, ' •2700.0
1
3t
2699.0
2698.0 -:-1 .~"
-
2697.0 _
— .1.
2696.0
2695.0 '♦ yi -iC yi - _ -.
F, 4-.--4—•—•—\.........._/.- _......-
w z69a.o `X - - -
y� •
r
i' 1111‘ 4111*" -... OlitIP" ..
2690.0 -{ - -` .,yi - _ Tof • F . ,y -Y 1=,.,-- --
on 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 -.
Distance(ft) �W_ y; :
•r Cross Section 3(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2694.46
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2691.17
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2694.46
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 3.29
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 65.45
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.4 Cross Section 4
River Basin French Broad Date Time wed Deb 2L 2021 ,L 2e 26 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 tk ds xs5
XS ID XS 4 (WFFBR)
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795
Date 2/25/2021 '
Field Crew Kee Surveying
XS-4 Pool (WFFBR) — —
Baseline-225/2021 -- Bankfull-2252021
2698.0 _ - -_- 's -
2697.0 A n 't
_ t,2696.0
c
2695.0 4, • , •- ?'
d
W 2692.0 �� �
•
2691.0
2690.0 y.. _ 1 i . / :4.---�, • '-'.. b
.Y _ . a` ''.A- -^1ymay`.aG1 •,
2689.0 -
2688.0 CYO '^ _
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 - AillkS
Distance(ft) 1'1 t
r mr Cross Section 4(Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2689.58
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2693.64
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 4.06
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 71.83
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.5 Cross Section 5
River Basin French Broad
Watershed 06010105010020
XS ID XS 5 (WFFBR)
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795
Date 2/25/2021
Field Crew Kee Surveying
—
XS-5 Riffle(WFFBR)
Baseline-225/2021 —— Bankfull-2252021 v _ -•=�z.- � .�_ --ti- __`may-- - -
Z
r fir•. _
2696.0 - - _ _ _ _
f G —2695.0
e 2693.0
W 2692.0
2691.0 . .. '- -
2690.0 1 - ✓ -
`-
2689.0 + Y'
2688.0 -- - • • i..3 ,-14. '.0.�
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 - - -
•
Distance(ft) — F-
Cross Section 5(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2690.79
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2688.36
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2690.79
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 2.43
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 49.82
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

01 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.6 Cross Section 6
River Basin French Broad 4 F> r : r'---' 1t:=..;_ . •
Watershed 06010105010020 \� , ` ,'
XS ID XS 6 (WFFBR) y � f 1
Drainage Area (Acres) 3,795 .;,j
Date 2/25/2021 I ,,
Field Crew Kee Surveying '1 . '
XS-6 Riffle(WFFBR) l• '
Baseline-2/25/2021 -- Bankfull 111������_021 - i 7"� . F � J t =w ��1^ ^ '
2694.0 r r ;,y�`::, ,.r. 74 II. -, — _ --- !1 �
'. -- '' ---.'..!:;64,....1-.. __. ..
z69z.o _ --- e — _ _^4_
z z69o.o - L -- - �:-. -
W z688.0 'f• , �.:ri ' '
z687.0 - -' r:''.'?('.
�C `� ; Y- �ti tip- + V - . .►'"i aC :' .
...t
z686.oyi _ lr �. - :py � ,^ ~
z685.o n � fRF !`.' k Y i.c.`�� ri'V, _
- - _ r. rs+ -F � .Y4 '4119 _ - _ . 1
2684.0 ..j:- - _ - - ` 1-4-. 10' .v "!- 4,-.
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 f, . V'i `;5,a)
Distance(ft) ✓ � -
I
r Cross Section 6(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2691.20
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2686.44
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2691.20
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 4.76
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 138.26
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.7 Cross Section 7
River Basin French Broad ,
Watershed 06010105010020 I. .s 7 -
XSID XS 7 (UT 8) .4
y:
Drainage Area (Acres) 198 . _
Date 2/25/2021 .•\
Vie^
Field Crew Kee Surveying si . .
XS-7 Riffle(UT 8) 1 i -- —�_ - . ,..,. _.. .
tBaseline-225/2021 -- Bankfull-2252021 , - ,_-,.
2699.0 - t."''• . ��,yr .0.
/}y1
z696.s � � -- -� - A� �- iil� E.• -v
�_ _ -A � } - l o
•
69s2s t -. e - • ti p
2695.0
2694.5 - tv ma _ ., • �5-�► PAS,. _ aZ
�.cr_.
2694.0 - h. f•.� .-'.J t- . •may
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 • _li , - £. �. y, -, -�
Distance(ft) -- - _ -
_ - - •1
•.t ~ •Ta i�
r Cross Section 7(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2696.64
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2695.39
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2696.64
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 1.25
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 8.14
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.8 Cross Section 8
River Basin French Broad -: -- 2 z0 1.t4-09 47 s'
Watershed 06010105010020 •"
XS ID XS 8 (UT 8)
Drainage Area (Acres) 198 � ;
Date 2/25/2021 ' _ rf"_l I � !�=_ � '1 f.
Field Crew Kee Surveying -- _
XS-8 Pool (UT 8) i ,...-r,,,,,,,...;‘,...,,,,:. ,- N
n.4
Baseline-225/2021 —— Bankfull-2/25/2021 '1.
2698.0 G. _ -7:..'..
2697.5 - _
z697.0, _ __,,.... _ ..\\I--e's.,..........4 •
y'
•gz696.o n - ~{-
/ - - ' `• - - .tea
2694.5 •.
2693.5 • _ - '
N.2693.0 k - f `►,
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 y - • Ji/' . -
Distance(ft) -.w _ --'•
t d
r NA...,.. :.
r Cross Section 8(Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2694.42
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2696.50
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 2.08
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 14.19
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.9 Cross Section 9
River Basin French Broad Date&Time Wed.Feb 24.2021. 1
Watershed 06010105010020 (k ds a(xs7 -
XS ID XS 9 (UT 5)
Drainage Area (Acres) 44.8 ��
Date 2/25/2021 - - 'L""A - - ice
Field Crew Kee Surveying - __
- - _ `' r _ _
XS-9 Pool (UT 5) ` ...rti
Baseline-225/2021 -- Bankfull-2252021 - I_ '
2707.0 • -- `r •. a-
2706.08 �...- ------ 'yrr>v1.-4.„ .. :- .-r r ,f ;A%
•
w 2705.o A li, j. '•�� •/ •.T ♦ r� y`'
f
y t f ' j }t' ,f 4'
�"� ram Y
'`� It
♦sf , O..,-+- - r,l f _Y
noz.oqq0
.00 50 100 15.0 200 25.0 300 35.0 400 45.0 - _-F--
11
Distance(ft) •'! / - !• c- ,c�grj ��L t{{*,C�L}�a
i•.s-."T`.‘:n!'!.s` _. r ;e* . + .A44 ki t .;s atcgth-V4+C ii•"�iS
Cross Section 9(Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2703.98
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2705.97
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 1.99
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 10.89
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

01 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.10 Cross Section 10
River Basin French Broad Date&Time:Wed.Feb 24.2021.14:31:11 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 tk cis at xs8 -
XS ID XS 10 (UT 5)
Drainage Area (Acres) 44.8 - .3r .- - _
Date 2/25/2021 ,', ,rTr.‘ - •—• •• _..., ;---- "" ;}'
Field Crew Kee Surveying
XS-10 Riffle(UT 5) -
Baseline-225/2021 -- Bankfull-2252021ir
2704.5 - ` .. Y ` � - - `«i
h -
2703.5 _ J�TTr _ ]---
"� �.1'
e 2703.0 ,+�y_ > §` rt -. -
2701.5 ',54-e..• i lk , .• t `� _� r y' -
f r. y A►2700.5 - / = : � f jr tyJ ; r-. 4-
2700.0 / y.ir .} It
4. .! "
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
- -
-
Distance(D) �1 yid
Cross Section 10(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2702.02
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2701.21
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2702.02
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 0.81
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 4.37
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.11 Cross Section 11
River Basin French Broad Date&Time Wed.Feb 24.2021.14:33.54 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 k ds at xs1O
XSID XS11 (UT5)
Drainage Area (Acres) 44.8
Date 2/25/2021 -- . r
Field Crew Kee Surveying ---316 7,7 '` •
_ _
XS-11 Pool (UT 5) • av _ , . _- - `{
Baseline-225/2021 —— Bankfull-2252021 - P '• — -
2700.0 -- - 4 • ~ ,� - - _
•
•
2699.5 ^ Y `•'- _ .;R
2698s k -n _A--
y r
2696.0 '.'N _ 5 p t-
2695.5 yY1
2695.0 ` 4� ; lq k } .
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 ,• .yy :'-� q
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Ban kfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Ban kfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2696.66
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2697.47
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 0.81
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 4.75
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.12 Cross Section 12
River Basin French Broad Date&Time-Wed.Feb 24.2021.14,32:42 EST
Watershed 06010105010020 Ik ds at Xss
XSID XS12 (UT5) •
Drainage Area (Acres) 44.8 _ _ ' r
K
Date 2/25/2021 ' .�->{ -.sd► r - -- �..,.-. ,..,-: --
Field Crew Kee Surveying Y � ,_
—
XS-12 Riffle(UT 5) a 'y . :r
Baseline-225/2021 —— Bankfull-2/25/2021 " c - �' _ - - �'"-
a.
2695.5 4__ Y - 1 _ _ —-y
j P�
6
W 2693.0
r
2692.5 - - 5 gyp► -L r �'`
_;L-�/ r • - --
2691.5 •1
-
r T y
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 - - - I11111
y
Distance(D) _
r Cross Section 12(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2694.13
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2692.78
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2694.13
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 1.35
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 7.83
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F17 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
J` Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.13 Cross Section 13
River Basin French Broad ma, Ti e,'Wea,Feb 24 2021 15 CC 43 EST -
Watershed 06010105010020 iI ds a'C:5(3'
XS ID XS 13 (UT 7)
Drainage Area (Acres) 41 : 1 ,.,-
Date 2/25/2021 '� " g,,4-4 lf :'.•;✓,- • .
Field Crew Kee Surveying • , • • • -— _ ..
XS-13 Pool (UT 7)
Baseline-2/25/2021 —— Bankfull-2/25/2021 - - - '? +! =„+: •'
4.
2693.5 ` - -i�J i,~ _` �.- -r.^'��P •
2693.0
"'tom%►`:
269zs - "rr-• "
W 2691.0
2690.5 -
2690.0 _-
•2689.5 - •
- s
2689.0 - ;d
_ _ �.'
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 _ -'r - tom` V' `
Distance(R) .k. _. F v
r Cross Section 13(Pool)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area --
Bank Height Ratio --
Thalweg Elevation 2689.68
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2691.25
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 1.57
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 8.77
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

1.)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figure 5.14 Cross Section 14
Date&Time Wed-Feb 2L-2021 15 02 77.EST . ?4,✓ ' f ;
River Basin French Broad
Watershed 06010105010020 k ds a xs1 L. ' �-` 's "
k
XSID XS14 (UT7) ) .3
Drainage Area (Acres) 41 11 '
Date 2/25/2021 •:i •
Field Crew Kee Surveying }. ` •
XS-14 Riffle(UT 7) I _
Baseline-2/25/2021 -- Bankfull-2/25/2021 _ 'A "•
> -
2692.0 4-1
- - P -*.
'-t w * _ .r- -Wit',
2691.5 . /
- _ _ - ' V-- - - - k
2691.0
2690.5 - - � W S yyy Ai
2690.0 - r fit- Y -,4_ -i -t: --- -
o
:;*- . _ , , ,..,„, ..._ •. . .„,„,,_, - .,_.,,,,,„„, .. ...,,,,
•
2689.0
2688.5 -' ..ft! w „-.
2688.0 .�p _.-
2687.5 \ y.S . -
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 - '
-
Distance(ft) _ _ t '' .• 4 -
r Cross Section 14(Riffle)
Dimensions Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)-Based on As Built-Bankfull Area 2689.90
Bank Height Ratio 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 2689.18
Low Top Of Bank Elevation 2689.90
Low Top of Bank Max Depth (ft) 0.72
Low Top Of Bank Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 4.56
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F)1 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Table 11. Vegetation Plot Data
Planted Acreage 14.26
Date of Initial Plant 2021-01-22
Date(s)of Supplemental Plant(s) #N/A
Date(s)Mowing !IN/A
Date of Current Survey 2021-02-23
Plot size(ACRES) 0.0247
Tree/ Indicator Veg Plot 1F Veg Plot 2 F Veg Plot 3 F Veg Plot 4 F Veg Plot 5F Veg Plot 6F Veg Plot 7 F Veg Plot 8 F Veg Plot 9 F Veg Plot 10 F Veg Plot 12 F Veg Plot 13 F Veg Plot 14 F Veg Plot 15F Veg Plot 17 F Veg Plot 18 F Veg Plot 20 F Veg Plot 11 Veg Plot 16 Veg Plot 19
Scientific Name Common Name R R R
Shrub Status
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Total Total Total
Alnus serrulata hazel alder Tree OBL 4 4 2
Aronia arbutifolia red chokeberry Shrub FACW 4 4 1
Betula alleghaniensis yellow birch Tree FAC 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 2 6 6 2 2 6 6
Betula nigra river birch Tree FACW 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 6 6 3 3 6 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 2 2
Carya cordiformis bitternut hickory Tree FACU 2 2 5 5 6 6 3 3
Carya ovata shagbark hickory Tree FACU 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 6 6 2 2 1
Species Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub OBL 3 3 3
Included in
Approved Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub FACW 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mitigation Cornus florida flowering dogwood Tree FACU 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 2
Plan Hamamelisvirginiana Americanwitchhazel Tree FACU 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 1 1 4 4 1 1 3 3 1
Linden benzoin northern spicebush Tree FAC 4 4 3
Liriodendrontulipifea tuliptree Tree FACU 2 2 6 6 3 3 5 5 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 1 1 3 3 6 6 7 4
Platanusoccidentalis American sycamore Tree FACW 2 2 1 1 3 3 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 7 7 2 2 5 5 5 5 7 2
Quercus alba white oak Tree FACU 2 2 1 1 5 5 2 2 5 5 6 6 4 4 9 9 5 5 5 5 9
Sambucuscanadensis American black elderberry Tree 2 2 4
Ulmus americana American elm Tree FACW 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sum Performance Standard 13 13 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 19 18 18 17 17 19 19 22 22 19 19 16 16 18 18 17 17 13 18 16
Current Year Stem Count 13 17 17 17 16 18 18 17 19 18 17 19 22 19 16 18 17 13 18 16
Mitigation Stems/Acre 526 I 688 I 688 I 688 I 648 I 729 I 729 I 688 I 769 I 729 I 688 I 769 I 891 I 769 I 648 I 729 I 688 526 729 648
Plan Species Count 8 6 6 7 5 5 6 7 6 5 5 4 8 6 5 6 4 5 5 4
Performance Dominant Species Composition(%) 23 35 29 29 38 33 22 35 26 50 24 32 27 37 25 33 35 31 39 56
Standard Average Plot Height 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
%Invasives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Current year Stem Count 13 17 17 17 16 18 18 17 19 18 17 19 22 19 16 18 17 13 18 16
Port Stems/Acre 526 688 688 688 648 729 729 688 769 729 688 769 891 769 648 729 688 526 729 648
Mitigation Species Count 8 6 6 7 5 5 6 7 6 5 5 4 8 6 5 6 4 5 5 4
Plan
Performance Dominant Species Composition(%) 23 35 29 29 38 33 22 35 26 50 24 32 27 37 25 33 35 31 39 56
Standard Average Plot Height 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
%Invasives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meeting Success Criteria
Not Meeting Success Criteria
Transylvania County, NC
June 7, 2021

�3� Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MYO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Figures 6.1 —6.28 Vegetation Plot Photographs and Site Aerial Photographs
}4 am, ,,.374.i.� M x '9t • 7 ..
Y �• � 11 . r
x 1 „ J .-�e;M V. �
3 f
;41...,:,.: . - .4w...,;,..„:.,0=4, ,,_,,:::„.;....-77 -- ',2,4','4'-'-':E.,`-i,-..,:,--'44
•
r�r Y !�
s." ..a --_ t . r`�._ - . _
-- •
6.1 Vegetation Plot 1 6.2 Vegetation Plot 2
g n
...i.,,,..
Al4` 4 ,Y •eR
4
•
fgd J- v+ ni + ,;,;4*-`"--,
m - -
F y �T'"r1 !dap kk� Ls� 4 " F "' fi 6•• ..
� � '?aa� ''1.�+'' r _ .� s.,'v�r• h�- .S!'� ':w 1e!•.s.' r �. ..
6.3 Vegetation Plot 3 6.4 Vegetation Plot 4
�. I! �! i� h '. AA" ia*�:
")mattp-'.'"„..;"- " -''..,,
a
�.
c� � 'w^, of
a �' 'A s�c�C`g- ,-,il' � ti _„ i 3 �'ram 5 �f"� .�"x' ••r . _-
-7-z...4-• '
y
6.5 Vegetation Plot 5 6.6 Vegetation Plot 6
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F31 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
i �p8
,..0 ",A 4:troac,
- -
r - -
- —f= .
v I 1.1
•
•,i r�-� as 0" "" "-
, ,.. -1..8...,:e:40,4:1%.„..,..-.,-_ -...:-, .,.;,..*_.,:l,,, ,,,r-v4- ,
it , „ 1-.. , iill ,,,!....„.4........ .t.„.... ,..,:,,,,t,„i„...,...:::,...,,,..t..2„,,,..,,. .5t ,...t ,. ...._.,
. ... .
,.. . tr....,,,...,,,c4 ,,,vi.,,,,a,:,.,.. ..,..,......., ,,.,t,......„„._ 1:,,7x.
, 414k.
,...5s-6.4,. .. .a.:* . ...,.._ .... ... , ...„.„. ,.,....:,...„,„. .. ... a.,."..... .
6.7 Vegetation Plot 6.8 Vegetation Plot 8
. -.--- '''- 1?•••• 1.3•16,41,"':' ,. , , iii
y. .. ,%.a; ,,,, ;ice-_.., .µ'
7ig•:��:" '�� do ". • r .�.::.� $ �. .a ' 7r:� _�..
•
- rt•a. aR,.��k �!s1;�.+r:i:§�sr-. Y-r_,Y�n � r. -• �}•
6.9 Vegetation Plot 9 6.10 Vegetation Plot 10
....11,3jr„.-.1.. , ,... ,
._..... . /:-. 1 ..1, T-41# ''''' '- - ...-r '1;'-' .4;ll'
1 ram' 'TiA-;qyz: 'vita` - R 'i ....
6.11 Vegetation Plot 11 6.12 Vegetation Plot 12
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F31 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I CMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
l+f
•-~ - 1 t, r` IN ' a
R*�-i -tip � _�, . . am , _ `•
♦� .,t�" 1 -y. - -sirf*sY`'--^5� �-.1y,. =.`"a'
= ,"'-^ -_• ,--- -�e ,-.�i --mow •,3�..r-v. -3w :'s r';'
w1 �- --. .. ' •w _ �M1 'rye. "�.
"0
6.13 Vegetation Plot 13 6.14 Vegetation Plot 14
Ir11111W:Ilit ti•••••' 'I'ii-rlt--'4*' ,..2-t 10! ,
tpit
,, 0. -'7' fib _' 1. 11MS wr *�T�-�.
tit r..4= ' +' ` ss e'a ,y
.; .,}; '; . - rr4r : i • "6.15 Vegetation Plot 15 6.16 Vegetation Plot 16
- - - ArZ
•
I YV1R'ti _
- :—is
+ram ���• -
�ti" •�.. .. -- -../
L. .G- "'i-, ti4
6.17 Vegetation Plot 17 6.18 Vegetation Plot 18
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F31 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
- s
I: ••• — ._ ,•...'_•iietirieritiiiiisvoifriii----, -:....—-44:4,-- '••••....- •.,.....
:•t. J• `.}'yam' . ••''L. - ,
6.19 Vegetation Plot 19 6.20 Vegetation Plot 20
,
...,..;„,.. .. • .1. . ,...:
i_oi.„ , ,._
.,., .. , ...
,,N _
,__ _ _ .,, ,, . _ , ,iJ , ,'
r. x k.
r � r d
.Alamilliii _ ,- , l ' ' '-'
6.21 Aerial overview looking downstream 6.22 Aerial overview of UT 3, UT4, and
West Fork French Broad River UT5 West Fork French Broad River
confluence
-,:., ,,y fie j yh o'
,:-.: ., ., _, _
,.
,_
:. _
.4k.a _ ; n a - L..� -
„ y , - Y! f.. - -
, . 1... _ , ,,,,..:.,41,....„....
., : . ,, ,,_,,,_.4„ .....„ ,
, _ ,. , - .. , ,r-. ,-.,.,..:.,-,-,,:::-.:,-,..-.. ... _.
6.23 Aerial overview of UT3 and UT5 6.24 Aerial overview of UT4, looking
West Fork French Broad confluence upstream
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

F31 Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MY0 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
cf - '- •r
• .. r�;
---,-_--Qs,- -i-•7:•"___,.., I, _ 27.,-"-- _--- .
., '4719,-'- '— "' - -', .,.-- hi- ( -._-(
r^1 1
= r F.r 00
...
6.25 Aerial overview of UT5, looking 6.26 Downstream view of ford crossing
downstream on West Fork French Broad River
'4; 'u ,- a. f ,,, 1 �hly 4 A �' •�¢,z, te" 1•,,,01°� -
�y,t .' �, .J�'O'.`•,� r � ram I �-., � � _ �..,.
', , i s �f
wa
0.' {
t . . , .
4
ib c3\ ,, *
6.27 Aerial overview of UT 7, 6.28 Aerial overview of UT8, looking
looking downstream upstream
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

Owen Farms Mitigation Site I DMS Project No.100064
Final MVO As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Appendix D — Record Drawings
Transylvania County, NC June 7,2021

1
STATE WEST FORK FRENCH SHEET
No.
Pol3TI Tl° 13, RECORD DRAWING N c BROAD RIVER 1
�� 4 E Cf
OWEN FARMS
e � 13.6 LEGEND
o :�►-
_ M I TI GATI ON SI TE
N�°#'8P6 y",r ��' 13p" °9ii 1/2" RBC (CROSS-SECTION
�ougr. a• t VII 1322
RI e M°un,.•
306 �A C REBAR)
,� '��� �� "'2�'109 L OCAT ON: TRAN2YL VAN A COUNTY NORT CAROL NA GAUGE (AS NOTED)
m � ROCK STEP STRUCTURE WI
fii 13°1 13DG /- 1
14 ' �'3° DAT: 25.182611 LONG: 82.9412889 RIP RAP
°�11,
till
LOG SILL
Muntain / R' 9 ➢9 9 99
25 11 04.89 82 96 24.97 ROCK STEP URE WI
1111.
°,, aa BOULDERS AND HELLBENDER
�� HABITAT
14' ill TYPE OF WORK: RECORD DRAW NOS ROCK CROSS VANE
• 2:3 ''r r4 ��� I , W/ HELLBENDER HABITAT
re 11 V� Ilt *11az BEGIN -UT8-
"'° • STA 10+00.00 • HELLBENDER HABITAT
°°"�115z END -UT8- •
V C \ Y V AP STA 11+36.80 BEGIN -UT5- • UTILITY POLE
END -UT3- STA 10+00.00 GUY ANCHOR
INDEX OF SHEETS BEGIN WEST FORK STA 10+25.23 SOIL LIFT
FRENCH BROAD RIVER SOIL LIFT W/ BOULDER TOE
TITLE SHEET RECORD DRAWINGS 1 ,1 1.!� SOIL LIFT W/ TOE WOOD
2 THRU 16 RESTORATION
STA 10+00.00 - ce - CONSERVATION EASEMENT
��-Illr - AS BUILT CENTERLINE
---11--- AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
Bf s - DESIGN CENTERLINE
��i 3�'' �® . BEGIN -UT7- DESIGN TOP OF BANK
°,\°.t.5 STA 10+00.00 DW OVERHEAD WIRE
- , FENCE
+� __ -, �®. _ �:�. _ GRAVEL
ctl:
q41111111.4111_1 ��� �_ � ���_ ' BEDROCK
��� 9 a - RIP RAP
� , C-I EXISTING WETLANDS
xX�_ CE BE IN -UT3- mil ' �'" '1. �'
x STA 10+00.00 '` 1011r �m > KISSING GATE
} �.
�1„� / IP
ONSERVATION EASEMENT
N (i)\; ,\\
E>�i WITNESS POST
, _ ��F- END -UT5-
�"� STA 18+99.09 m0,, .4, f / " \
/ ., I� � _� �.� DWR # 18-1033
N m `�/ \�Z. = f,, m° DMS ID # 100064
� DMS CONTRACT 7532
RECORD On has b \� USACE-SAW-2018-01165
pEY based cup d drawing ios been prepared T port. X�
based up information furnished by others. k� , tt a
sl While the'n form anon 's believed to be reliable, / / } v ` `
L n
y the Engineer cannot assure {g accuracy, and
",� 7
thus i not responsible the accuracy of this 3C �x /� b� ,g �����AI1111►����
nrdsma wing or been incorporated r° m nns ' __ a.�s� 1b CARD ♦.
record
which have been n rporaiedInto;�as ° a -J ��
result.dFiosabia��°9d°pe thisnie�er� document ��, END -UT7- � � �� ♦i
aeY before applying for any purpose.
6BEGIN -UT4A- X\�+ - 3� 3� STA 14+17.41 �•��;�F�S$�Q�ji••9 ®�:
/ \ STA 10+00.00 U a0 a� = �Q� 11
1 SURVEY 30 _ _ BROADEST R RIVER FORK FRENCH • SEAL
PREPARED BY: END STA 11+36.08 ENHANCEMENT II
r-
END WEST FORK FRENCH O:
KEE MAPPING & STA 36+91.02 _
-a END -UT4A- BROAD RIVER RESTORATION p •tite;fr7Ir•
;��
- SURVEYING -UT4-_ & BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II ,♦--- r) as
P.O. BOX 2566 STA 10+71.56 BTAI 10+00.00 BEGIN -UT6- STA 29+86.17 S/z6 -0,-1 a •i mitt"
9I • • ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 STA 9+59.71
N DRt.
Services, P.C.
(828) 575-9021 3101 N.C.Poplarwood 4
o License
Raleigh N.C. 27604
� License No. C-4174
Lo DESIGN DATA DESIGN GRAPHIC SCARES PROJECT LENGTH EXISTING:si
Prepared in the Office of:
o WEST FORK FRENCH UT 5 UT 7 UT 8 STREAM LENGTH
BROAD RIVER LENGTH
cl 50 25 0 50 00 WEST FORK FRENCH LMG
o� BROAD RIVER = 2,859.55 FT 2,691,02 FT
`) 1 1 1 DESIGN STREAM TYPE =C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE =C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE = C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE = C4
iii
E PLANS BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =64.29 BRoN KsFLA0L_ o REA (FTp) =5.35 B oNKUTIT,IINEo REA (FO) = 6,0 BnADNKsEc�iL AREA (FTB) = 11,08 -UT4- = 1,133.30 FT 136.08 FT
N CROSS-SECTIONED
LL ( ) BANKFULL WIDTH FT =8.5 BANKFULL WIDTH FT = 9.0 BANKFULL WIDTH FT = 12.0 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
10 5 0 10 20 BANKFULL WIDTH FT =30.0 ( ) ( ) C ) -UT4A- = 471.56 FT 71.56 FT
a
MAX DEPTH (FT) =268 MAX DEPTH (FT) =0,76 MAX DEPTH (FT) = 0.80 MAX DEPTH (FT) = 1.11 a DAVEY CO171 Sri
O 1 11 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO =14,0 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO =13,5 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO = 13.5 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO = 13,0 -UT5- - 652,00 FT 899,09 FT P Y
Z DRAINAGE AREA (MI 2) =5.50 DRAINAGE AREA (MI ) =0,07 DRAINAGE AREA (MI 2) = 0,06 DRAINAGE AREA (MI 2) = 0,31 for
2 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT)=0.00353 BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FTC 0.00569 BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT)= 0,00539 BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT)= 0.01096 -UT7- = 811.00 FT 417.41 FT
0
a 20 10 0 20 40 -UT8- = 49.00 FT 136.80 FT ��� HOR Engineering.ering,inc. °r the Carolinas
0
� I CHRISTOPHER L. SMITH Fayetteville N.C.ste9o0R°e9h.Nz76a,
U ` 1i11
N,C.B.ELS, License Number: F-0116
Ri . PROFILE (VERTICAL) PROJECT DESIGNER / ENGINEER

„,`,1111111►►/..s
RECORD DRAWING .�`,-,'..AR . /
RECORD DRAWINGS �' .. ..SSlQ°'•..-f •.
This record drawing has been prepared in part, 1.
based upon information furnished by others. ;CIL 9'.
While this information is believed to be reliable, •
SEAL
I ,
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and JC/'1L
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this t - -r
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
i �� �� ��
which may have been incorporated into it as a To 1
result. Those relying on this record document are �,' •' ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its �I, ._ _ : ���
accuracy before applying for any purpose. •......•• ',0
FENCE NOT INSTALLED •
���6���d ►I��1:�``\
ACROSS UT 8 DRG Services, P.C.
t.
UPSTREAM EXTENT TO Raleigh
Pop N.C. d 4
Raleigh .C. 27604
PREVENT DEBRIS \lk License No. C-4174
JAMS. CATTLE NOT
PRESENT ON ��-
UPSTREAM o �zLL
PROPOERTY. _ U w
Coms o o�z
o
co,cn
BEGIN UT8I o = z j =Q;
STA:10+00.00 � w w O ca�J
SOIL LIFT ADDED TO
STABILIZE LEFT BANK ¢ LL F2w
W z W am
Ox�� 'C�- FROM STA 12+60 13+28. �0 a q = z
0 \\ G J \ CC .1 1• r Z
a a N
Xi SOIL LIFT ADDED TO
CROSS SECTION#13 o
,141
cs
o STABILIZE LEFT BANK
J.
W
/ + x FROM STA 15+28- 16+40.
U Oo p O CROSS-SECTION#2 o
1 co h C ' 6) W
UPSTREAM ROCK / / cd _ �`!V \
. 4/1 r o Q
WALL NOT °` v.
CONSTRUCTED. LEFT f I lal-j0 ::,-:;ai _,: — W wo_
BANK TIED INTO ti 'jl,°= "� _'� s. o o tn
o N viz o�
EXISTING LEFT BANK r ?,,, y '�\ x� + � Wyl oQ o+
UPSTREAM OF ����',' ”: �� �
,y�> =
EASEMENT ,. - + _��;:_ ca- -
�J�TB-----TBv v ;p_ co �: �� � O� QO� ��
,s. w+
BOUNDARY. / ---? --- • _ '. J ��> '�
0 7 // 7 ::''b = z Q
N �XO / / 7 �X �\ _ V z o Q
N 0 '*/ 7X SO
_ i/
F► Cc Q
U O
in f / Q Ar. Q Q_iQ m I
/ O
> , zro
4:
W Z Z--15- .o 31 > mc 2 V o / ( v )II � ��
WEST 0v mE BEN � Qi ov uw. = � INTERSECTION BROADRCH oW o oW CC RIVER 1-1 END UT8 ���LOW \o / STA:11+36.80 CA y .3c
; ,?O-
WEST FORK FRENCH �' oW \ `
s BROAD RIVER oW' O$ \ o
--�/ STA:11+46.97 - t
�, 'oW 1 \ \ W
e BEGIN WEST FORK (/j °W \\ ` Q
FRENCH BROAD RIVER U /°W \� U N
STA:10+00.00 ^_ °w'0N f \\ o U Z
`Ti SOIL LIFT ADDED TO \ a
\ \
Ln STABILIZE RIGHT BANK /°W' , \ a o-
t / FENCE NOT INSTALLED o`N o
al ACROSS WFFBR FROM STA 10+71 - 11+43. \ •-
UPSTREAM EXTENT TO °w�
�I PREVENT DEBRIS �w�°W� +50 SEE SHED LO
JAMS. CATTLE NOT rCH`'NE STA 16 Cl
E PRESENT ON MA DATE:
6 ISN UPSTREAM OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 03-11-2021
cl AND EASEMENT
RECORD
3 'o PROPOERTY. DRAWING
k SHEET
o 2
DM ID#
x
N 100064

,_01111//14_
RECORD DRAWINGS A�'\\\ CARO7,,,
RECORD DRAWING based upon information furnished by others. �
This record drawing has been prepared in part, �� � - •....-, �er ••
While this information is believed to be reliable, � �> ���SS/0�•_1 i
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and 9
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this •Q SEAL ( �•
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
•
which may have beenincorporated into it as a - 0� 4 result. Those relying on this record document are it
advised to obtain independent verification of its ► ; CDZ
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
%M,l °_ � :- ���
r SHE-ET
DRG Services, P.C.
+J� SEE 3101 Poplarwood Ct.
.\\
Raleigh N.C. 27604
T�I LINE MTr\ + . License No. C 4174
MI-\ II r
L_ U z
O m�
r E
(CROSS-SECTION#4 QOw a)o (-///
SOIL LIFT ADDED TO o a 8
7
o+ N
STABILIZE LEFT BANK OF UT 5 w �N
N FROM STA 18+55- 18+66. ; o __
� O z Z `" w ow
�m
0 # 1
1 I c:::.,C n 11( )
CROSS-SECTION#3 �! " "�<s, , .I 18+50 Q d N
V42. w /�
M X11CC
A 3� l. w
)16161
M� �\� , 18+99.09 ��� h
>, \ 1. .e. \ v..L C4,... ‘..
,�XO 8X`S �� `co\ �� N
_, \ \ \ 4) N- ...(D
\ -t. + . .( 7 c,-;
L.‘7 \\' 0 107 .., t.... ,—
, / / ;
y OQ �Noc,
\II\\ ' \ .:: ••• c)- iy C-- ,„---\ <, 0 I-, -- .
sy:� ,;;<' BEGIN UT4 \S\S‘\\\\kkitW7'.-
RK FRENC w co��.: AD RIVER z Q+�N''n `,i _ �� / ,l;. STA:9+90.00 i (/l 00 0°' +s,;. OW Q
h :i
�z �Qa
k mrr
BEGIN UT3 .%��: 7
s.2ja• Q r
,s•:.!�‘ptiswI—z z
I STA:9+80.00 `X 1 0 w Q w
w
I 1 SOIL LIFTS 94-90 _ X .-5�—� o i l
oI\ I CONSTRUCTED ALONG ? 30 � �� CC
ci ENTIRETY OF LEFT AND 4 �s X
° RIGHT BANK TO x�
N PREVENT EROSION `_' °. in
o
° \ FROM PERPENDICULAR ��x SOIL LIFT ADDED TO W
_ ;\ FLOODPLAIN FLOW. I \ STABILIZE RIGHT BANK M
FROM STA 21+40-22+58. U
1 \N.,
a` Z o_
MMTMHMNE SEE SHEET 7 M O
iCL
Ui 0
0
Ln
E N
DATE.
acl
, 03-11-2021
O
y RECORD
f'fDRAWING
SHEET
cc
z DMS ID #
100064

.®'411 CA R o/'•.
.`� -'FESSIO' - -7
RECORD DRAWINGS .• '�
RECORD DRAWING
RAWING record drawing has been prepared in part, .Q� SEAL��'.
based upon information furnished by others. - •
While this information is believed to be reliable, �i�,:
the Engineer cannot assure Its accuracy, and 05 4
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this ► • � 0•
record drawing or for any errors or omissions �,�,�/1 .
which may have been incorporated into it as a °j�0•'.;/Fe ..`� �
result. Those relying on this record document are I��� •....•�•..• �O *-
advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose. I 0 ..
DR Services, P.C.
\\ 3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.0 27604
License No. C-4174
coS—
c,_,—
oN.
U9
LL
C0 Uz..
O a a,�
r -.F. E
Li O V o�z
a g C o N
O W 2,?.J
BOULDER TOE W/SOIL LIFT z ‘4i zo a) ui
ADDED TO STABILIZE LEFT
BANK DUE TO BEDROCK //O z cc-m
WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD RIVER 1 0--
ALONG INVERT (STA 22+12- BOULDER TOE W/SOIL END RESTORATION �C� z )2 i n,
23+42). LIFT ADDED TO z
STABILIZE LEFT BANK BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II Sze/�� one
BRUSH TOE W/SOIL LIFT DUE TO BEDROCK STO 00 E, n
ADDED TO STABILIZE LEFT THROUGH POOL (STA hF 9
BANK (STA 23+42-23+70). 25+95-26+19). �T `�O
X
.17
Cam— xrx CE X ec —X CE x x x x CC< x GE x x CC x x CC x C" 29x06•>> 40 / s 2s
m w N
3°1- O o
o x ,; °/ w 0_z Q
o al I FORD co 29x �/ (7 z 0 m
N1-9C-e------'X's........:7
J
CROSSING c/ cv S0 .4:• z Q o z
CID
xh I
Y4 .
��/ —i �� wr v)o
'CI cn
N \/ p _may — �'// O ' \'l :Jf♦ (/) �� �CI�
/
N O k o �G TB---- Ajo , \ \\\ i• 7 > zUU mQ
oi Tc-- 7/
N� WEST- \� fig! Q I- m
ti g ORK FR, I ..' z >-_1 w CD
s �O�O ii
_ ROq�pRIVERCH0 #:, � / '�i� czc W O Ln S :3' Q Yb �\ O x O m m`m k x V is v l /x CAI �&i ;.el/ 0) . / 7 Q
�� + _ 7 O m
k / �N ��TB�_� NTH �� (l 1'
O
co
a '< k _ N /
ROCK CROSS VANE W
L ' NOT INSTALLED AT
a �X X X Ox x i/ STA 29+55. BEDROCK Q in
' - - -O �j i PRESNT IMMEDIATELY �"1 u�
<T' / ( - - �� le,��� ��i •SS �m BELOW INVERT. U Q
_ ,_1e Lfi ��.� ; z CI_
v / I� TB le�----TB-----TP ,�' CL
p
__ TB RIGHT BANKTIED INTO
L-3-0--x--x_______3_3
.8,�' t� BEGIN UT6� STABLE EXISTING RIGHT Ln
N i % r ISTA:9+59.71 c\ i BANK AT STA 28+17. �`1�c-- i , I \\ SHADED AREA NOT DATE:
�I _ X ' ITB • �� CONSTRUCTED AS 03-11-2021
i� I C ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. RECORD
0 "i si_—1 i 3C ' 30 I� 3C DRAWING
1I ; 1 SHEET
iii
CL
1 Q 4
CC 1
oz DMS ID #
N
100064

�`'��1►CARO1''I
RECORD DRAWING RECORD DRAWINGS
.�`'���°•'['SSA *.'•• lf-%
This record drawing has been prepared in part, �� C, �/����•.
based upon information furnished by others. ��Q •� lit
While this information is believed to be reliable, :Q.
SEAL
the Engineer cannot assure Its accuracy, and
thus Is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions , _� 0507,44
which may have been Incorporated Into It as a
result. Those relying on this record document are ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its I�s, 4' ��
accuracy before applying for any purpose. II •_����� Cl
���
546ft-1 a 1)i►►�
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
U
ill ^T`1\ O co a,�
�C o p
C U J
A, Z W O c=�
♦ �� C W aw
ji /
'2�5p ••t "' GROUNDWATERGAUG 70 X0O z ce m
II
I U
I1\\ OO I 0 2."'n
OD
S - .
x Ef-x x CE x x�E---- � E x x CC x x OE x xCC \ •`o \ , J.
I
1
\ 1
CROSS-SECTION#12 \ I
c� o o w ,3 i !.=x k: 1-
0 \ i FWP
��r
00 SD �'N w �'13 TB ... ,dui..—:::=rtBi ilinew-;.._.. x 1c OO „Lce;:_:r= n iiurrect�;s r_.::=;iiaiiL�i!!_.._ ��x \,\y �� ��`O �/I/ t`. 1 z z ,rfl ;/L .
w oN w ���/ — �— _ - , '\NA. . Q o CLo'ciW —� .' ' W_ --TB-----TB� �_ �% -TB TB- W O `:;`;.. :r; o
csi Q ���� XGjO �� -✓/ //^��te -TB----WEST FORK FRENCH --- o9_---� 003 3`L le, -� BROAD RIVER M M1,0 �'�� \ 6x5 '_ : ..4'. Q mQc r ,-� FLOW INTERSECTION %%":, .- w Q wROSS SECTION#6yEND UT7 \ . `.. z rSTA:14+17.41 \ % �;:; ��z I
WEST FORK FRENCH 1 ' ''k''�''' O Q oc 3C '-p2 m:..s. L�3C _ BROAD RIVER \ 6kg ,. ,. Q 1-
o
3� 30 3 STA:35+97.06 \ 3 ' :'::,;: •ry C w
i 30 20 ='«:.r.% :
WP 3C 3C 30 3 <. 4
40...,14.!•„:„..i:,,,,,--,. o
QI END WEST FORK FRENCH ';?'•4»'`':'. U Ln
N BROAD RIVER ">?'->r`'`
o STA:36+91.02 :w t U z
,, «q _ o_
N
Q
oi CC
o 0
E
N
LLI DATE:
C
3
y RECORD
m
DRAWING
O SHEET
0
I DM ID N
N
100064

,�41nn///11
RECORD DRAWINGS �SA.0 CARol ••
This record drawing has been prepared in art,
RECORD DRAWING p g e Py i ,: �. - ''Ss ''• --9
based upon rawin has
furnished b others. ♦ .•'
While this information is believed to be reliable,
•
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and i�� N��� Ill
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
t''' record drawing or for any errors or omissions Q %which may have been incorporated into it as a _ SEAL 1
result. Those relying on this record document are •J
advised to obtain independent verification of its r
wP accuracy before applying for any purpose. J
".1 O5/1 744 ��
cI •-....... \ �
/4) \4
�. D G�
i \ 0 Services, P.C.
Tg--� /� 3101 Poplarwood Ct.
/ V� License No. C27417 4
X
feE
//���� * X_X_X_X_X� o ci_
/ rJIO \ I X-X—X�X O ._
C)z L
��/ \ X�X�X 7----
m- w ,,,,
-
1 — 1 �r / U C7 E 0�
/ w
I I / \ li
•//i '4 i —cD
Z/
•
L.L.1 \ ____,./
zx v A p ` \\I \ \/ ) J
/ /\ �1 `�� \ / / / `�—
i, 1 L \-- -\ ) ,
w \ 1—
„ /1 O
\ \ �0 //� , m �I \�\ w w Q
\ \ \ \
_ / 1 wJ
\ \ i TB CB i / // Tc\
a\ w Z 0
I 1 /i �� TB--// ) A Z O Q Q
-. / \ \ \ O Q= z
\\ V' )(Sal V 4) Q O o 111
- 1
Cn wP 0 \ \ 4 / :, wL_Li N a
•
/ 1 i+ /j� � w D I I
'CI \
o / / 1 (!l Z O -
C \V \ x �• // / 1 Z U 1 I
\ � 4re \,j < _12 i-
1 I \�v - w La Q l I
y � \ LeJ La
� / I z
I / / . Ji / %''_ • \,`V/ O Im
E / I /— n�i+( �\ �\ wA Q
/ 1 C� �� x v\ Avg ,,,' w
X_X_X_ 1 1vv \ 1
k/ // / X�-1" O N I �\ o
o (� k \\��• „ // o
k Q
a / n vTB vv U o
1T1 4- --x l v "/'' ( \I Z
40 � XI
� ) / / / ��/X I I / /
U
�e>� / I z o_
. 0 I / /1 </ �m o Q i EL o
N I I ) I \ LL EL
s ( ��p JI ) / I\ �\
I n
c \ 1 '2A- __/ / DATE:
I /—�� 11
�i V 1 �� /� 03 11 2021
RECORD
�\ .I / 30 30 30 0 DRAWING
w m SHEET
s'EfwP \ wP 6
._ Ir11
DMS ID #
ow
ri 100064

RECORD DRAWINGS ��_0,01(�111;#11,��
This record drawing has been prepared in part, ��‘ "� CAROB 1,
Q based upon information furnished by others. ♦ _ �/�/�I
RECORDDRAWING While this information Is believed to be reliable, ����_' .SSI 0 • If
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and * C Fii'• •
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this ► 9
record drawing or for any errors or omissions ► Q SEAL
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are .�
advised to obtain independent verification of its - _ 050744
accuracy before applying for any purpose. .� ��
Sl G/A!°,iR �
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
x CE x—v CE— —K'E—mac— SEX x—Xi,-, N,—_D
EN-
0
oG
( `• W w m,
\ _ p T �OZ
\ ---- ---
NN•NY 1L.x.......
------30______:--------____--- = La - 0 cl."...'Cii
Luc ri W.
1 0 40z 2.`i'nZ
S<V � � ._18,�•,eU. �� S
\�Z ,4q��� _ OxN o
�� °� XC��L-CEXw o
BEGIN UT4AI _ 4, `�\ �x� -CE--_ -�� y� 1- z
STA:10+00.00 v co
SOX- - O m
1 0Q
iA QO z O
CV
0 1 ` 1
�Q 10+71.56 *�----Eu-----e�__ _ Q �� z o
N �11 ---&,--- FUT�n4' _ -_ el- �n o z
CV i
m �: END UT4A & e>'� qe`\ �N �.' /—--—� --� �w Q z
1 °' STA:10+71.56 I ---at/`\ " / Z
ev / `ei— �__ - w m Q
'� o
`m --l. i' 0 __91-- z
. y ,.-' i -7—x = - 1
Lo
g \ 0y ' / / —R� %2- R�R��-X-7l-- o
i v-(4 co .ei �c��—z�x W
1 F�Ow .'
o / U
'' (i c
0\ _Ea- Z
•
v -g1- = Z
-/
a-1 0 / /X
N �/ E n
EC
0
O1 / X/ N
���X DATE:
i 03-11-2021
�
a,I RECORD
.p DRAWING
\k
Ni SHEET
o �� DMS ID
N
00064

,�111111►►►►
RECORD DRAWINGS ��A.SN CARD ►,
This record drawing has been prepared In part, � �` /����
i.
based upon information furnished by others.
/C R DRAWING While this information is believed to be reliable, �/
RECORD v I v �� vJ the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and �� ��•
'•�������
di
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this (�
record drawing or for any errors or omissions ► •��CO 9 ••• vs
which may have been incorporated into It as a SEAL•
result. Those relying on this record document are -
advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose. 1 050744
•
•
,* ••..::.. • o.
Sl.'tbl�d9�i►1 11►►►`
'..^' `{;;ti;;r;.,, DRG Services, P.C.
,.1),;a..-21„ ;;;1., 3101 Poplarwood Ct.
+•r,<, ,,:-<.-.7ryk. Raleigh N.C. 27604
`..1 r+}v';"`";s4r; License No. C-4174
aq'4ti;.
P. U •—•
1.•:.:,;,,,�^:-."'.wt.-, LiC In J
...,*;...=:,:,...4.4•4., n 4E4 CC u_,,
re
7+ .-„....„,,,,,,,....,....,::::,.,.::,,,,....„:„....::::.....,:.:,......,,,,_„.,„
•
a \LODE LOD *v°�
/ <OD • �6✓.'' , '.,";.%'"`,:`.v+:4y;...5:k�?.^";+;ti, i.k,
•
CE CE CE CE <�� C <a� Cx Y ;,,,T: M b ::
J =z J
..::::: <oz 0<°—(-)<EL ±
i_:
"7:<„ (4,/ N')
CL
N -7---\
/ •"/ _T. _ _.... .., ...... 11.11111)
oO�"LOD_Str'eE' fltna C \ is
'c:,, z w oEl o
3 N (T ° ir
Q
O \ • Z
��X �C �v n BEGIN UT5 rs`,Y :" ',tr t":<:. w
CC
3 �� J� -X—ter— �c�-- —x 30 x x-- '3c x �C xxx= 30 x--- r� STA:10+00 ;. "m;35'`i{:
S `;mow— 00, ;q{ y=Y o
U OW E—Ow aoi '',;, w
o +
co 9 00 or OwU Ln
t - 0
o3-_______ao7 r O OW�OW-----________ Z
I OWE U Q
OW
OW- _ CL
N 0_ O
o0 Q
CC
NI OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0
td AND EASEMENT
6 m#
N
U
O DATE:
E
03-15-2021
`E
cI RECORD
3
DRAWING
0
U SHEET
N
_2
z DMS ID #
N
100064

..``v��lCAR o'''i,
RECORD DRAWING `c .* ��//I''
RECORD DRAWINGS O
This record drawing has been prepared in part, ::: i<p. $S�Qq, .
based upon information furnished b others.
While this information is believed to be reliable, SEAL
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this _ = _r.
record drawing or for any errors or omissions '1 , 05 7 . 44/ -
which may have been Incorporated into it n a � � � � •4:
result. Those relying on this record document are �I� 0 ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its
•
accuracy before applying for any purpose. � - ,...,.. . 10
S/a61�'d ,1°8;'..
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
ma
Lo
O �4
MA TCH� w
U z L
Er � a �
S Tq co
17+50 SE o • o
E THEET w z 40
CROSS-SECTION#10 5 z W m,-;,J
i EL 'cr)-.-.)
R • O c--
i s 4 w w
O�
Q ��� -4 2
pp}LL • E a
Ine
n_ n
OSX9L / �o
Mo� �� F—
CD o
00 Mo Z z
\� cL
O�(x ohs,'�' - �‘ MO O Q I-
�� n� � /- PRECIPITATION GAUGE O/T Q O z
Lo
a / i GROUNDWATER GAUGE MO z
'7N/Jil w z co
N ��\\� \ (n n U
r \�/ ; ` \\ M ZZ Q I
CC< z F—
1 M° w z
yl M,1 0,-, O? 1 N 1 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 1-
TS \1. // AND EASEMENT O
T4,/ . - <
I
�T E Ln
3,--X— 00 x x 30 x- x— 3—x x30 x x 0x x LJ
El Q
El U LF
t ui N U1
.iiz
QI U Q
J
N = CL
I=o
'O Qa`
N1 CC
n
0
0
cl N
6 DATE:
E
`m 03-15-2021
a
ac RECORD
DRAWING
s SHEET
N
'
a_
g
0 DMS ID $/
I
100064

„,`��\111II►//_,
RECORD DRAWING RECORD DRAWINGS . '��� CARo"'••
This record drawing has been prepared in part, ♦ Q
based upon information furnished by others. ���� •• ����Q4/ •� �I�
While this information is believed to be reliable, ♦ ' Q
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and .,� SEAL
record thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
.—..46411111 which may have been incorporated into it as a r
result. Those relying on this record document are i •: 05 7 4; ,�
advised to obtain independent verification of its }, ��
accuracy before applying for any purpose. j�///_40 �� �
S/a61,kd II°a;�•o
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
*I.?”,pen% z21r:. .•:+. „,w}!e:r..yti.y.,:txj.:,pia+. i.+y;,,;; cti
':Yj .µ.}•' 0•s`.'i:59.',4,•5tS5'•,!-li,l(•A,,�;•}..,iyit,•jhf:. v* i.i.:ths'!:e ix'^Cd.{....1::.� O N O
t:`j'+i w..fi: :'tk.'i''.v.�:':::Ito,.,••q,;;,!i et'.r:t'+gC't.:}}}u^fh.t:� 't,4':,.t'' ,•t'`':i^+,•'t1<1::.'trt•'t»J>;\.,.f r: �tili
:t ;.i. t..••I 2:i,t'« `:'i `y?t,l-t-tt :i Y'1 ttt•1�,A.:':t;, ittt.,ttttt.4,k:e °,f.tt,t;.1::' '':'j,i.r5'i,',,,,? @Z
}i(.;\.;`.l'j•y`i rz...: .:: .,r-: }'s u,;.t..,..., ';° u,:.zi;'�ti'X: .a:'.>;'': ' U
.ta-. ,.*q. h't:'',:+c'i :Y' .T *'�i ia. '+lA . :r.:
§- ..t.a , .t4'. "?. ..6.. .i.:`>J''. ,i`�o Y-' 7:3'.s: .t':.;nr `?.).4/,•• `:t.:.
1, ,{:t..,t:: .a.<i,'�.5. 'r,i: .t. ''y:.^.�•,.; :%s:.•, o-'r: .'.'S:;tu;c. '• O
'^'ta,lh' 4 „t,ii `.rod.}"'' ./. k.vri.,":. .'a.� �=�
^'t
Y: *w :i�'»".'Y�i`a: "C.- ... ., '•�:4, r'�A:!:i•:rr,r.,e.�`.i.,
.. +. .;p1,'."", zt:':u.,gtf: ,:•'!6„'y..,+,.,:t?•74 ;::. 1t,.. E
?y,• .,.a;;.:.q.t. =i;i'•, t.�r,?:}? ".',':+.. '".p..+, riF.k;•;.:
' :i r'%)t.^`•9.•z ,.}!X::' .�1•: Kr <,f."t.7•.. :,t i. .l,r.M1.. .:7.nr ,..,f:• }_..Y.:".+.'.`
•
'i •1?•: krj' hits ':4•10 c,7,,. '3::`t•'1 i!'\``+ ...:*t:h.`^:'J,t,..,,„•Y.�.k. ....+,:};'. W
}'•h.(r. ,)�:.. _atY,.1'tid`(.{. i..,.:.., eh?:t", ),. .Y.::i,,. .Xjr ..}�. pK
.ii1:'�t ,T.'ti_'4:�T'i �b x. if.s, „..t,.}. ::'P:n»S.h�':A. .a. \?+^ ,.:k: :,5 ": ' xr,'i+:?3:..:.t'.?`i:'.'.:'•. rs:?�i•i:.s,,}
a t';�;, O a. z
+✓-1 ":'£3 :i'lt1't::. '.:•'•, 'q'v%" :1'i"Gx'•.t`o.,... \i` ,P'j o
;,'i.' w6: '}:4i :s.✓v:,.'t :k, 7. i::>i.F:1,F'r ;f., :..z• a°."r:.\ Uo tn
µ:•,,. .:••,i.': "`F'' •tf n ;.(..,N' r'}'A'"1.-. O d C 6+ lJl-:t:t: •S t..s'.'�'(!`: isE' :t�.:t:. ;''•:,, .ic Lz
va �t,>,•,• .ta 'rf. 'xv%,':�`:;q,;"':: 1: k..•.,,..r<„ a.. ;.+;,;3 s, .:•.�.;;:. 1p:,',,... %:t V
•''S• tx.t.,;: .5::' x,.,>.'. , `%(: .>»:. 5 -1 :^r," •).. y.. ,.+:i:,;•`t,+ LL o
2 i ,ri. hy ri.".,+a:'r Of�
`+4re {<, .:: vst'.^n:iu:�"i't..c.., U
.,,'Lt.S, t.: r;`" H°;!'y 'r'T.n,t��,,,. `tix x:.r'•5}t'I r. i.•" ,.Jy.'1't5�4,";••R•:.,t'}:`u.:"+':,',)•,.•'„. ..
//�� .4," �d :i'�:•�i:). .t,;:'t;.'ti:"n:i'!?*i::•,,':�u.•C?.4 :,a..':.n,'.i• ,i'r f:�t F,;:.::.,•Kit r,!..�„o:}t'1'.'ti•.'.4,,•.r c�� ,7,yy�� •— _J:yS?w° ;M'''iii .''J.."•'Y:A."' Vim.. :;y.,
,,, .t,.. "':i.,); '+3. ?k; i,a,,.,.,._„ „ifia^t�:,.v.. +.y.r,:c..y.;..,.`�: ' ,�,v
?:;`" ,.,r' .'4,5 't.•, i:dpi'v& �iit"_:` r.,+`t+r.'° W
t;'?gin:J::+ .,f`:':xt j,4+ gy—_�__91 • .F. :,'C `7...'i?:';+',;,. .7Vl••••'''PVr+t,t.ny.,',•.i• ... N
't., +'•;,`' :§.:k:, / \ CE �, .:,. ,;,S td:;:t,• ..4',`•: -y;:i;:', i :rjsr:':.:�y•,. ;...: _ w c.-'�
h•-t•- ,/.••w,,• :r. / \ CE 1i':.;',!T. :5.^^;Pt ii,�.*t{ .}i. �4< bay J t. ?.: �J
r (.s r t \ w{� / _ ��s' \ CE ^r:.. z w Dui
Y 1 0\
i$ , {irr /' •'cgs' k \\ Z ¢ �LLm
r ttaa r4}r Wit '//i/ \_\\ /��,\—��\ ` \ 0 I R o .
aJ°Va '`' / ,,D \\ \• \ \\
•
=:tip';2%';e; _�' —BL--\ \\ \
o
Li
Nt 4-r.} ,,0.• \__ \ 1 ICROSS-SECTION#11 _�
•-1,i:,•cis. , �J / —ei \\ BEGIN UT7
io•'arx,e: j OQ�; r 13.? el cL
o
mSTACitt,:.)itt.t.MV*4.,..t. r.,,,,,,,
:10+00.00I Q O zR ,+' .. N \_ I\ei,, ''e, c4,.. ,—Eu—, ,,
;ia1 .'
y •t , .., _ 1
I
°" .'.:i'z';h aH____. ; /�iT4Y..•J"';ti,)',,, I \ \ 7 }�� F—
•f�t>''1t::`i�fi 3: \ \\ O ICI
0 1—
CZ
CD
( Izi
:2'g;"'t'a,s j'
:n ;`.v PROPOSED LOG SILL '7 J
El
„ti
REPLACED WITH
ui cNici)
'� ° ;;rt
ROCK SILL. x z
CC
vi
6
Ln
VI N
0
y DATE:
E
03-15-2021
LL
cl
ASBUILT
0 PLAN
SHEET
N
10
o D M S ID $/
x
iCi
100064

RECORD DRAWING ,.�`o,�� .. ,A,„
RECORD DRAWINGS �•`'_-oFESSIpy-_9 '?
This record drawing has been prepared in part, Q� 9 '�
based upon information furnished by others. SEAL .
While this information is believed to be reliable,
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and - 05 7 A 4
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this `t ;CD:
record drawing or for any errors or omissions S:which may have been incorporated into it as a ��• �'_
result. Those relying on this record document are °IA� ••� �_•' � ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its 0,4- • ........ . c, .
accuracy before applying for any purpose. , D I -v
s��blxpt
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
c ti
=Np
�U Li-
CZ
U z L
O a 2,-.
'�E
ROCK WALL NOT w
• o -co
INSTALLED AT o F.Z lei
�N
UPSTREM EXTENT. 1-1-IT
W i o •
c �
CHANNEL PROFILE
TIED IN WITH EXISTING o z . in Cm
PROFILE UPSTREAM o��
OF PROJECT o �� =n
BEDROCK PRESENT EL
BOUNDARY. ALONG INVERT. o
w ■ 1
n_ 2
2699 2699
n — — t"' ASBUILT LT TOBrBUILTRTTOB
w
2698 .' ,,,_ DESIGN BANKFULL H I I N 2698 —O m
z CC N J
- z
•
— -----
w —r — — — ---------- -----------------
2696 _ -__ -------�� _ _ 2696 z Z
n
w �`----CO CL
z w
•
•
•
Q 2694�f '1` �'-�-�- I U I — — — _ — U I '2694 Q O Z Z
7.
1........:—j.--_—/� ..\ �\ ;�� ----=- .._ SURFACE �� 2692 z m
2692 I DESIGN INVERT `�.�1.� I \ WATER/_/� ��� ^- O
/..� ASBUILT THALWEG \\� � z z m
I __ <Q _ z
N Q I-Q
2690 I I I 2690 L�N�J
m N a �D m N a 2 m N a ,0 m N a 2 m c N a 2 m c N a `. m N a 2 m c
o Z
a 2698 BEDROCK PRESENT BEDROCK PRESENT 2698 O I-
1
1 ALONG INVERT. ALONG INVERT. Q
EL
F, M
F Z ~ Z 1-
3 2696 zO l ASBUI_T RT TOB 0 I Oz Z I Z I 2696Cn
------ w I --- ----- I -_ W Q I 4 I z° O
0 2694 _____________ - '�_ — � � _______ (n ------ cwn I I �ASBUIL _TTOB ¢2Ln
_-_- 2694
DESIGN BANKFULL U1
L
QU O
2692 ���.—.—.—. •—.—.—.— —. .— .—.—.—.Z I I � :::
_ I —` Z CL�- /0 WATER , :N - _ ..pp �� � QASBUILT THALWEG /NI 1 i `�� - `\ /..` �� I� I.2688 EC
a 2688 mQ N ± m N m N m N m N N N m N N N N N N it
cii
N N N N N N N N N N N
N
yO LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD DATE:
E HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE 03-1 5-2021
LiI VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE
RECORD
DRAWING
'1 SHEET
N
0
o DMS ID
I
Ri
100064

RECORD DRAWING
®`♦♦��►C A R'S
RECORD DRAWINGS .`������ ��'��.'�.
This record drawing has been prepared in part, _•
`�EA *. I.
based upon information furnished by others. l Q�� 2� :
While this information is believed to be reliable, SEAL
I l
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and JC/'1L_
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this _ 05 7 'ir
record drawing or for any errors or omissions ;
which may have been incorporated into it as a �' ��
result. Those relying on this record document are ����', _` ��
advised to obtain Independent verification of its I��� .-. �_.�����
accuracy before applying for any purpose. 144- ...:.... �O♦♦V
G
5�2.6�xi� ii i,uIt
DRY Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
ti,_
=,...
NULL
1 U z L
O a.��
'1-'E
Li m.
O C r/'� oz.
L
w 4u 1r ail)uj
= W
a O C PI,
N W
•
z i a]
p Lo Z
CCU
Z Oh 2 LB
N
E (-1
-1-
BEDROCK PRESENT 1-
ALONG INVERT. o
2696 2E
OQ
in 5 wiz ul
2694 I � O I O I � -I 2E Cr)Z< �
z 0 w wASBUILT LT TOB ¢z Z O U m
oo C I ASBUILT RT TOB m o O Q CC T >
2692 i'--�..z.- _ _ o I Z I ____ U._____- --- 2E Q Y
d <__ — _ - -�- - 1 / U o z
. a�;-----�---- \` - -- U, _ _ z _, O Q
z z \ ---- - -- - _�-- --- �'� _ W z 1 w o
LP.m O W -- - L •�`� LL W z LL
2690-_ w DESIGN BANKFULL I I ,Y„ ?� 26 126 o °'
_ U) I QWw oU
N �' W ' 1-
m' Z Q
2688 .' v�CSI /� �_�_� �_ inQ >
NI DESIGN INVEK HbBUILT T 7 EW€l, _ _'/./� Z
s 2686 26 O I- 1_
�' iu a �o m iu a �o m iu a �o m iu a �o m iu a m m iu a �o m 2a w
E
N N N N N N Pa P., P., N N N N N N i i N '0'., N fill 16 1011 11U c. "-' 1Pl1 c'-' 1Pl1 loll 2'' n m LL
LL
LL EL
2694 2694
1 11
7 -- z
0
.) 2692 \ U] 2692 z
W W ASBUILT LT TOB / �1
17
m W I ASBUILT LT TOB- 1-
El 2690 U ASBUILT Z 2690 Lf�
�. /SURFACE - N
cn
c' WATER ASBUILT LT TOB
0 ASBUILT z
SURFACE ASBUILT 0 Q
v i 2688 WATER WAT TER \ 2688 = O
N1 -I�_ EC
2686 ��-� / _ 2686
p I /- 0
o _ ASBUILT THALWEG
Ln
of ASBUILTTHALWEG ASBUILT THALWEG I .\ N
;0 2684 2684
m m iu a �o u a o m u a �o m iu a m m iu
DATE.om m m m 03-15-2021 n mS m m n m m n m n n n
a, LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD RECORD
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE DRAWING
' VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE SHEET
U
N
e 12
a
owDMS ID $/
I
Ri 100064

RECORD DRAWING .�`o��� °��ti'%
RECORD DRAWINGS .�� -•._SS/0 ,9
This record drawing has been prepared in part, • �•C\ ��'.
based upon information furnished by others.
While this information is believed to be reliable, ' SEAL ��.
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and r�
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this _ 05 7 , A --
record drawing or for any errors or omissions `t :��
which may have been incorporated into it as a ��
result. Those relying on this record document are ���� � �����
advised to obtain independent verification of its ��-• •
accuracy before applying for any purpose. �j�� •••=••• ����
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
2716 2716
I I u3,-(0
�o
IIi IIi � �
`2714 �� = 2714 Uz L
U
•-- � ASBUILT LT TOB O
�/
:::
✓- - •\ � f\ :::
\, 401
%/ . = W J
/ ASBUILT < FA'
��-r SURFACE w z w°'e. •
03
:::
DESIGNBANKFULL N
j - � 2706
_ \_y` q, ASBUILTRTTOB u CC
MIM
2704 ASBUILT THALWEG - � O 2704
o
2702 �� 2702
DESIGN INVERT ' ,� -� CC z
2700 I \/ I � \ 2700 Cr)
Q
O U
_ z 1
OQ1-
Q 2698 I I 2696 Q z
N c N a a m iu a �o m iu a �o m iu a �o m iu a u� O O
7. 4 + 4 4 4 4 + + + + N + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + + 4
94 94 94 94 12 12 12 12 12 =O r m
w1- m
o �O , Ln
2702 2702 O 1-
N I 1,)o
O Z Q
N
Eli �, DESIGN BANKFULL Q z
2700 ---� ACDUILT LT TOD o 2700 w
- --- -- - / # z r
a 2698 � - I ASBUILT 0 1-
w I 2696
�- -��� SURFACE '9 Q
E ��-s-�i �\` WATER
� Li
cis u_ O
26% I C.) I 2696
N Cn
3 ASBUILT THALWEG \ ASBUILT RT TDB
O
Ln
0 2694 �� - —s _ - _ 2694
_ +� Q
D_ 2692 2692 U Ln
CC �I DESIGN INVERT
N 2690 I -� 2690 = 0_
<o u•• a• m o N a a m o N a 7 m iu a 7 m iu a �o m
CC
nI LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT5
o HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE
0i VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE Ln
N
0
''' DATE:
E
cis 03-15-2021
tl
c
a, RECORD
DRAWING
s SHEET
N
0 3
cc o DMS ID $/
I
ri 100064

viiii ill
. A%-\\\FARO/.I#
RECORD DRAWING RECORD DRAWINGS o •( . 'V •
This record drawing has been prepared in part, t`� • •��S10 .1
based upon information furnished by others. m •• ,_ i
While this information is believed to be reliable, •Q� ����17.0
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions _ 05 7 , 4
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are ♦ •_ ,�; ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its io��••e� ,, '• ��
accuracy before applying for any purpose. ♦ '-• •U ••-• �♦
2730 2730 544711J14 I r-i i ����♦♦
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
ASBUILT
License No. C-4174
2726\ SURFACE 2728
♦ WATER fn-co
�♦ m
♦ cti,-
♦ —ASBUILT RT TOB o
2726 p, ,\\ 2726 w U z
�♦__ ___f O ��
\♦ ASBUILT LT TOB Li
w a, Z
Ucon. P •
2696 2696 2724 I - 2724 I:4 a c a>c
■illiali�. O o -N
I � 1y� J
EL
2694���� 2694 2722 I 2722 = &y O =
ASBUILT RT TOB MILT• I z I I- < w inACE E.ESIGN BANKFULL DESIGN INVERT ` I
2692 12111 2692 2720 2720 LE 01 ,`n
niirrim. ASBUILT THALWEG -\, — DESIGN BANKFULL Q '�
DESIGN INVERT MENEM 2718 N
0_
26902718 2690 w
m o T.,F. ASBUILT THALWEG 0_ MIM
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT3 2716 1 2716
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE .1 + + cTi
. 1-
VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE F. F. F. 0)
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT4A 2696 DESIGN BANKFULL 2696
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE ro 7r I ASBULT RT TOB 0 O
z
VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE 2697 2697 w
_N -
�! _ I O 1-
DESBAN FULL p -p 1�z Q
wl ASBUILT LT TO1 z O m o
z
2695 ` -IV Z. (fJ 2695 O~ 1- Q
ASBUI T col J —.— Q z m
SURF CE co �\2O l Q CL o
o
9. 2693 WATE U I INVERT ` ASBUILT THALWEG 2693 _W Q
'o *o *o *o *o ± N ± CL , a
ASBUILT LT TOB '" F. F. F. O 0 L
0
2697 _-` 2697 2692 2692
CV - _ LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT8 z Q ,-
,--z: 2696 - ASBUILT LT TOB 2696 _ice - HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE Q Q °
En - DESIGN ASBUILT RT TOB 1- >
ri BANKFULL \ / ASBUILT VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE w
7 `I ..DESIGN 2690 �\ W T RCL 2690 Z z 0
a �� y� -=INVERT
2694 1� '� `_�_ _ 2694 Q z
LI ��'' \ t �—IDNVEGT N 0
a ASBUILT THALWEG `�\- ASBUILT RT TOB 2688 268e
LI
cis 2692 ASBUILT \ 2692 _`\_ CC
��`�.
. SURFACE �- ASBUILT THALWEG
WATER '-----_____>•. 2686 2686
m 2690 77
`\\'2G9� Q' Q' ± N F.
O
U o 0
Ln
a _ _ _ _ LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT6
m HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE J
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT4
m VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE Q
El HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE 0 rn
.t VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE NIz
CA
0_
a 0_O
`a_
NI CC
o Ln
0
N
y DATE:
cis 03-15-2021
tl
cl RECORD
3 DRAWING
O
SHEET
N
14
cc o DMS ID $/
x
Ri 100064

RECORD DRAWING REGARD DRAWINGS -
This record drawing has been prepared in part, $ .3•• ��SS/0� "q�°I
based upon information furnished by others. > Q� •V 'e o
While this Information is believed to be reliable, 9. ►
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and .Q SEAL thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions - o� 4it
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are ► CD:
advised to obtain independent verification of its -V-7 •' - ���
accuracy before applying for any purpose. I _el;,_ _.
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwood Ct.
Raleigh N.C. 27604
License No. C-4174
cti,—
.ONO
NULL
L_ U
',-,E
m.
O C r/'� o�z
v Lei a. C C
5
w w 44'
z w
a O c PA'
N L
z Q_'Lc.a]
q p L.U
LE O .T3
z .a
2698 2698 z
N
W
E,
ASBUILT 71
2696\ SURFACE It, 2696
`-----'_ `\ WATER �I a
ASBUILT LT TOB U' 1.7 O
2694t./.---------___.-..„---- `` N I 02694�` - ,,,((( I F w O Q
U z z
W EL -
• '-� ` U' co
O
2692 - - �- B c I 2692 C z Z
ASBUILTTHALWEG � .`-�- -- zOa
UI Z _
2690 ` `�L--�- __ __ . ,•_.. 2690 Q 0
\���---1111— •-..,... O w
N DESIGN INVERT __ — = _ _ w
2688 1- �'�_ 2688
N I I - z o o
O Z Q
CV
rEZ: V EL Q 2 20
CV
En 2686 2686 Q I— j
o, Li��I I
a z m
o Li Z
_c 2684 2684 O I-
L' o 0 •0 0 0
N Y �D m N Y - m • N Y �D m N Y �D m N
.a .tea .N-, .N., .N-, .N., .ma .m., .ma .m., .ma .aa .aa
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE-UT7 Li
3 cn
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE
O VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE
m O
o N
Q W
J
0 Q
El Ln
.t N Cr)
z
¢I U Q
01
vi z 0_
O I0_o
'
EC
NI
0
U Ln
0
N
i, DATE:
E
cis 03-15-2021
W
c1
a, RECORD
0� DRAWING
SHEET
N
0
cc o DMS ID $/
I
Ri 100064

RECORD DRAWING REGARD DRAWINGS - •..
This record drawing has been prepared in part, �� �� �SSid 'F1 S
based upon information furnished by others. •• Q •• i
While this Information is believed to be reliable, :� ►
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and •Q SEAL •
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions _ ��
which may have been incorporated into it as a �v
result. Those relying on this record document are ► • ,�; ��
advised to obtain independent verification of its �� %,4 . �,
LEGEND accuracy before applying for any purpose 0 •_•U•• •••••_,�
CrS
• CROSS—SECTION REBAR SI,16 Alibilu►►►%
DRG Services, P.C.
3101 Poplarwoad Ct.
Ra2696 2696 License N.C.C27417 4
2695 AS61III T 2695 N
ASBUILT ASBUILT 1 GROUND LINE o o
2698 2698 2698 ` 2698 2696 2696 2694 / 2694
c,RuurvD LINE GROUND LINE ■,.BUILT z U z L
2697 2697 2697 .-. 2697 2695 e ROUND L 2695 2693 2693 rn G
/ 2694 2692 2692 F T m Z
2696 1 2696 2696 2696 2694 --_Ak lamb U
% I� ■ENE/JE■ 0 C7 p 2695 1 11FC N 2696 2696 2695 2693 2693 2691 2691 LL
■EU• U o H ��,U
GROUND LINE •
2694 1 2694 2694 2694 2692 a 2690 DF�IC;N 2690 W 44 EL N J
uUND LINE GROUND LINE = wuj
5=J
2693 2693 DESIGN 2693 / 2693 2691 �� 2691 2689 2689 Q C F iii
GROUND LINE ■■■■■■■ z < " Q LL L.U
2692 2692 2692 2692 2696 2690 2688 2688
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 41(-0 2 .T3
CROSS-SECTION#1-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD CROSS-SECTION#2-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD CROSS-SECTION#3-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD CROSS-SECTION#4-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD Q N
HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE w n
VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE
O
1_
2696 2696 2694 2694 O
W
ASBUILT
2695 2695 2693 2693 O
C,KUUNU LINE Q
ASBUILT CC z
2694 2694 2692 1 2692 2708 2]68 W ELr I GROUND LINE o
2693 1 ASBUILT 1 2693 2691 2691 2707 2707 W Z Qcn
Z
C KUU\IU UNE 1 , ASBUILT o
Z _
2692 ; 2692 2690 2690 vos` 2706 2704 GROUND LINE 2704 2700 2796 O Q I- U
N ' I ® �® O 0 Z m
Q
2691 2691 2689 2689 2]05 2]05 2703 2]63 2699 2699 Q O Z
o IMM� O Cr)r m
O2690 /DESIGN 2696 2688 / 2688 2]64 2]64 2702 z]6z 2698 2698 Z W z c,
I GROUND LINE / DESIGN ��IO o
2689 2689 2687 2687 DESIGN 2703 2703 GROUND LINE 2701 \ 2701 DESIGN DESIGN 2697 .a■ I� 2697 O 0 U z
\\...
KI \ GROUND LINE GROUND LINE GROUND LI EN.■ z z Q
2688 2688 2686 2686 2702 2702 2700 2700 2696 2696
N
Er) L,_I— j n
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?r
CROSS-SECTION#5-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD CROSS-SECTION#6-WEST FORK FRENCH BROAD CROSS-SECTION#7-UT5 CROSS-SECTION#8-UT5 CROSS-SECTION#9-UT5 w>z o
sI HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE E
L' VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE
Q
E W
ll W
w' W
G
I O
O Ln
Q LW
2694 2694 J
e
I
U Ln
t 2693 _DE:ACN 2693 DESIGN (f)CN Cn
GROUND LINE GROUND LINE Z
Q 2696 2696 2692 2692 2692 2692 2698 2698 2698 I k 2698 r , Q
OE .��u LINE
N 2695 ■E 269 E 2691 r 2691 2691 2691 2697 2697 2697 . 2697 Z [L
a
E 2694 ...�2694 2690 \ 2699 2690 2690 2696 2696 2696 �k‘1.'2696 <O
cl-iLn �//--- /�l
(fl 2693 EC
Iii'J—.2693 2689 2689 GROUND LINE 2689 2689 2695 2696 ASBUILT zsss •I4 I ■2695 C_/
o DESIGN \ ASBUILT GROUND LINT �`
U 2692 ■`a 2692GROUND LINE �■�■ /n
GROUND LINE 2sss 2688 z6sa z68fi 2694 2694 2694 2694
oIo DESIGN ASBUILT N
° b GROUND LINE o I o o GROUND LINE
'm o -1' � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0
DATE:
CROSS-SECTION#10-UT5 CROSS-SECTION#11-UT7 CROSS-SECTION#12-UT7 CROSS-SECTION#13-UT8 CROSS-SECTION#14-UT8 03-15-2021
aI HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=20'FULL SIZE,1"=40'HALF SIZE RECORD
VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE VERTICAL SCALE:1"=2'FULL SIZE,1"=4'HALF SIZE DRAWING
s SHEET
N
0 6
o DMS ID $/
x
Ri 100064

1
>>3PTA ECT 1P 0 \ \ O R OORO OR O O/ \ O O N.ATE
C WEST FORK FRENCH SHEET o.
LO 31TI N BROAD RIVER PL-1
/XI2131 310 1326 O O O - O R O�sle=e�a ' oil, O O O O O O
09 i' '
' ` LEGEND
°1oun{oln° a .. 305 - 1322� ��� ARDWOOD
r � � � �'* 1312 13a9
� OCATONo TRANOOAN A COUNTY, NORT CAROB NA
1301STREAMSIDE
13 s13 j ASSEMBLAGE
`13°9 7,813 LF
r 31a OTe 35.183611 OOe 82. 9413889
�a �//' 7.21 A LANDO NTAIIN
'°��`� '.' *Illit' " 35 11 ' 04.89" 82 50 34.97" 7.21 AC
Sfi6
ta SWAMP FOREST/
:.-•_•-•. BOG COMPLEX
t
�°IP
4
y� ��''�°H'°K' �14� TOE OF WORKe RECORD DRAW OS r 1.99 AC
' ,44 )rigoritj
1 62 BEGIN -UT8- NTANE
ALLUVIAL FOREST
1152 2� "° STA 10+00.00
END -UT8-
•• 5.06 AC
` �, - -
EXISTING
V C \ Y V A P STA 11+36.80 END -UT3- BEGIN -UT5- ,1 WETLANDS
STA 10+00.00
BEGIN WEST FORK STA 10+25.23
INDEX OF SHEETS FRENCH BROAD RIVER
/ TITLE SHEET PL 1 RESTORATION
RECORD DRAWINGS PL 2 STA 10+00.00
.,,- BEGIN -UT7-
/ •� //j STA 10+00.00
4:0'.'Oe
•
� '' . BEGIN -UT3- I•�j �� •�%" 1.1.:. ..
:::,
?'I iii? P STA 10+00.00 ;�.,•,���i 4 CJ n
..„,:„...,,,
O ..:. :�:� • jf44fEND T /
� ..Ki ••• -4 STA 1899.09! / i%�' DWR # 18-1033
\ oo. / :•::o
RECORD DRAWINGS m° ' �' :�f / �• DMS CONTRACT 7532
This record drawing o hos been prepared In port, '' ---- -:••_.s ; 41, �••
El
b eel Whil the E thus l eearddrawing ar rar E which , � �•,'I� //� / ��// � G ult. Those relying been
this record document as '� � ���� �` C�� '�
advised to obtain independent verification of itsfe BEGIN -UT4A- �0 END -UT7- .���',N O/, i
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
/ ` STA 10+00.00 I ••� 3� 3� a STA 14+17.41 ��.`��: rt$$��'••�'9'�.
P PLANTING L 0nr 3� m 3� 3� 3o END WEST FORK FRENCH :Q� N9l
ci
COMPLETED BY: END -UT4- BROAD RIVER SEAL
STA 11+36.08 END WEST FORK FRENCH ENHANCEMENT II •. 0507.44 . o
KEE MAPPING & STA 35+97.06 ,� � ��,
BROAD RIVER RESTORATION . c1g.'( ;`
a SURVEYING END -UT4A- BEGIN -UT4- & BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II ���O•••DIG�.P`�
P.O. BOX 2566 STA 10+71.56 BEGIN -UT6- STA 29+86.17 S7Zbltd0Ci11,,,,►►,
STA 10+00.00 STA 9+59.71 DRG Services, P.C.
91 • • ASHEVILLE, NC 28802
`6 (828) 575-9021 Raleigh 3101 hPN.C. 27604
o License No. C-4174
U GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH EXISTING DEsicNPOTR°AM Prepared in the Office of:
b WEST FORK FRENCH UT 5 UT 7 UT 8 STREAM LENGTH
BROAD RIVER LENGTH
U 50 25 0 50 100 WEST FORK FRENCH LM G
of BROAD RIVER = 2,859.55 FT 2,691.02 FT
CL e DESIGN STREAM TYPE =C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE =C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE = C4 DESIGN STREAM TYPE = C4
BANKFULL AREA (FTr) =64.29 BANKFULL AREA (FTr) =5.35 BANKFULL AREA (FTr) = 6.0 BANKFULL AREA (FTr) = 11.08 -UT4- = 1,133.30 FT 136.08 FT
PLANS CROSS-SECTIONED CROSS-SECTIONED CROSS-SECTIONED CROSS-SECTIONED
cl 10 5 0 10 20 BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =30.0 BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =8,5 BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) = 9.0 BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) = 12.0 -UT4A- = 471.56 FT 71,56 FT LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a, MAX DEPTH (FT) =268 MAX DEPTH (FT) =0,76 MAX DEPTH (FT) = 0.80 MAX DEPTH (FT) = 1.11 a DAVEYI company
iiiWIDTH / DEPTH RATIO =14.0 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO =13.5 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO = 13.5 WIDTH / DEPTH RATIO = 13.0 -UT5- - 652.00 FT 899.09 FT
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) DRAINAGE AREA (MI ) =0,00 DRAINAGE AREA
SLOPE(FT)FT 0.00569 BANKFULL SAINAGE REA LOPE(FIT/FT)= 0.00539 BANKFULL SREA LOPE(FIT/FT)= 0.01096 - for
) BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT)=0.00353 ( � � -UT7- - 811.00 FT 417.41 FT
a 20 10 0 20 40 -UT8- = 49.00 FT 136.80 FT �1� HDR Engineering, Inc.of the Carolinas
II CHRIST0PHER L. SMITH J N. B.E.LFayett.S.e s 900NRaleigh,N.C.17601
p / \ N.C.B.E.LS. License Number: F-0116
Ri \. J PROFILE (VERTICAL) PROJECT DESIGNER L ENGINEER

...
,,`„IIII►I►I,,,I
RECORD DRAWING .�`ap\ CAR... 4•
#
:.�`� •••..SSIp ..1 %.1
'c*SEAL9' ;
•• 05744
• o
NOTES: LIVE STAKE DETAIL NOTE: �°#��• 0 _ �
•
•
1.PLACE ONE LIVE STAKE AT TOP OF SCALE:NTS ♦�' '•••" o�.
BANKFULL CHANNEL AND THEN THE STAKING MAY BE REQUIRED THROUGH ‘.4--.
.........
• ��
NEXT LIVE STAKE AT THE TOE OF MATTING,ROCK OR COMPACTED SOILS. 'J O` D I ��
BANKFULL CHANNEL IN AN ALTERNATING A STARTER HOLE MAY BE REQUIRED. S/.6 j�a y►111101
PATTERN. ERG Services, P.C.
LIVE STAKES 3101 Poplarwood Ct.
2.LIVE STAKES SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED
Raleighe N.C. -4127604
4FT.APART. SQUARE CUT License
Feet of Stream Bank Unit Plant Spacing N o. C 41 74
Zone 1:Streamside Assemblage 3.LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL
7,813 ft Type" 4 ft APPROXIMATELY f OF LIVE STAKE IS BUDS m-CO
WITHIN GROUND. (FACING UPWARD) c ti
Common Name Scientific Name %Composition #Planted 4.IF STARTER HOLE IS NEEDED.MINIMIZE 'i Li
Black willow Sallx ni Pa L 25 489 AIR POCKET. STREAMBED EXISTING/ z ti
LIVE CUTTING PROPOSED U -CD
Tag alder Alnus serrulata L -ai- 15 -M. 293 5.UTILIZE ALL ON SITE TRANSPLANT (1/2"-11'DIA) 2-3 FT. GROUND U_ .Lw m
MATERIALS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE 0 g
Silky dogwood Corpus amomum L 25 489 OWNER.ONCE SOURCE OF TRANSPLANT ly r (�P. Z
MATERIAL HAS BEEN HARVESTED,THEN ANGLE CUT 0 V OK t c
Elderberry I Sambucus canadensis R 10 196 I UTILIZE LIVE STAKING. 30^-45^ c7 g
Sycamore I Platanus occidentalis R 25 489 O z yj
BANK STABILIZATION = W ��
uj
TOTAL 1,956 W LIVE STAKES = ".' .. .
LIVE STAKE z ` 'z u_ 2 T
Zone 2:Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Area Plant Spacing ^¢ w�m
0 U
Forest 7.21 cc B ft (411 =6/
Common Name Scientific Name %Composition #Planted d
PLANTING DETAILS
Tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera R 15 737 Ct
River birch Betulanlgra R 15 737 SEEDLING/ LINER BAREROOT PLANTING DETAIL a i
Sycamore Platanusaccidentalis R 20 982 PLANTING METHOD
Shagbark hickory Caryaovata R 15 737 HEALING IN USING A SHOVEL
American elm Uimus Americana R 10 491 1.LOCATE A HEALING-IN SITE
IN A SHADY,WELL PROTECTED
~
Flowering dogwood Carnus flarPda R 10 0 491 AREA. O
Bitternut hickory Carya cordiformis R 15 737 2.EXCAVATE A FLAT BOTTOM \<4.1
HTRENCH 12IN.DEEP AND1I� O
r . A fi b PROVIDE DRAINAGE. 41 en - -11ar �GG��I. IL,II=IIIIIIII-11- wz Q
TOTAL 4,913 ,�G"G . 1- z
f�°.Z� Hz z
.fin o ILL
Area Plant Spacing `�.�G nnilim r111m_i n_> I I Lillrlm OQ a
Q Zone 3:Swamp Forest-Bog Complex p 1 I I 1111� II-IIp IIKIIKIILII' II' II: J
M 1.99 ac 8ft �p =i=i=_ 1 %ImliCa . 1-
"���� 2.REMOVE SOIL FROM HOLE
Common Name Scientific Name R %Composition #Planted 1.DIG HOLE WITH SHOVEL C I- o 1-
TO APPROPRIATE DEPTH WITH SHOVEL.HOLE SHALL -z z o
Silky willow Bollix setter; R 15 204 3.BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND WIDTH FOR SEEDLING. NOT BE MADE BY COMPACTING w
N WITH 2IN.OF COMPOST. SOIL AWAY FROM THE HOLE. z r 0
N Tag alder Alnus serrulata R �ii• 1 0 1 1 36 PLACE A 2IN.LAYER OF z z
COMPOST AT A SLOPING .. (nC D I-
CV F,., I...,.IL,..,,,..,. 1'IL ,,.J I is 271 ANGLE AT ONE END OF i.t a '"r:' �z O Q
iD THE TRENCH. GJ , :-' z Q v
3 Red chokeberry Aranlaarbutlfolia R 15 204 i�\N,si. t . <w Q
N Silky dogwood Cornus amomum R 15 204 pG; i w Q
ipiG VM a rr ir= 1i"1iK�r n-rr''n z
0_ kl__..1_:..L_ii, it......._..1_.,_ n 18 126 ,�i mimi{ 11. 11=1 IIKII IIKI1=11. 11= W r
IIKIIKII II Ir. II: 11 IIKII I=1r. 11
s MUM n=1 u�11Kn11n11ni1 �a� z
6 CM_. ,- ___ ❑�_ 1 sLb 1 C W ��� nKnKn a n_n:
a �-- �i..G >r 1n 1n rn uKKK1rnglrn'n O Q
' Buttanbush Cephalanthus occidentals R 20 271 4.PLACE A SINGLE LAYER 3.REMOVE SHOVEL AND 4.FILL HOLE WITH SOIL. < I-
m OF PLANTS AGAINST THE
LL Spicebush Lindero benmin R 15 204TAMP SOIL TO REMOVE
SLOPING END SO THAT PLACE SEEDLING AT CORRECT DEPTH. AIR POCKETS. CL z
3 Elderberry Sambucus canadensls R 10 136 THE ROOT COLLAR IS AT WATER THOROUGHLY.
O GROUND LEVEL. (n
TOTAL 1,358
0 LO
Area Plant Spacing
Zone 4:Montane Alluvial Forest LL.1
5.06ac gft
a Common Name Scientific %Composition #Planted PLANTING NOTES: U N
Sycamore Piatanus accidentalis R �r 16.6 t 575 PLANTING BAG a-!
Q DURING PLANTING,SEEDLINGS ��% (� Q
I Yellow birch Betula aiieghanlensis R 1.3 16.6 t 575 5.PLACE A 21N.LAYER OF SHALL BE KEPT IN A MOIST = J
N COMPOST OVER THE CANVAS BAG OR SIMILAR = CL
White oak Quercus alba R -P- 21.6 '�9 744 ROOTS MAINTAINING CONTAINER TO PREVENT THE CL
A SLOPING ANGLE. 'a ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING. QO
a Tuliptree Liriodendron tali i era R Zf 16.6 � 5751r
Pf 1."'".. , �
i c ROOT PRUNING
'n ] R.LI I ,...,,k,Imo,,,,. R 1B J4.f ��� '-c�� ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT CS
p ipG`G��' PRUNED,IF NECESSARY,SO THAT
River birch Betula nigra R 16.6 -saw- 575 ipG��G NO ROOTS EXTEND MORE THAN
U s4� 241NCHES(241N.)BELOW THE Lt)
ci Witch hazel Hamamelis virginiana R �� 1 2 -s 403 ROOT COLLAR.
N
y TOTAL 3,447
m *Live Stake(L),Bare Root R 6.REPEAT LAYERS OF DATE:
{ PLANTS AND COMPOST 03-11-2021
cl AS NECESSARY AND
3 WATER THOROUGHLY. RECORD
O TREE REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED DRAWING
-,1 8'ON CENTER,RANDOMAPPROXIMATELY 260 PLANTSING P R
f ACRE.
SHEET
a PL-2
DMS ID#
x
N 100064