20200016 Ver 2_DRAFT MP for IRT Review_June 2021(REV)_20210609

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20200016 Version*2
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 06/09/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -6/9/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
rJ Stream 17 Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Kelly Phillips [e-mail]
Project Information
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20200016 Version:*2
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
County: Montgomery
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: CrossCreekRanch DRAFT MP for IRT Review June
27.62MB
2021(REV).pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Kelly Phillips
Signature:*
xe/ Paps

"R � � k ;"ywn:x Elea � V f b ,,-- -
S - >w'a 6 m 3 e JP f I 74x o 4`
.�.�" ,.� ""�1 e. 4-rg
sv A♦ ryy� .'� ,� '
.� F.
j""Arilier .4 I 1,4 .11, %,41•14,1 °
ti
_ - ..
MITIGATION PLAN CROSS CREEK RANCH MITIGATION SITE
Montgomery County, NC
DRAFT FOR IRT REVIEW NCDEQ Contract No. 7879-01
DMS ID No. 100138
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040104
May 7, 2021 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-00051
RFP#: 16-007879—Issued May 6, 2019
DWR#: 20200016
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN
CROSS CREEK RANCH MITIGATION SITE
Montgomery County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7879
DMS ID No. 100138
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040104
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-00051
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 W Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
This mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section §332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.
Contributing Staff:
Jeff Keaton, Project Manager Suri Solis,Stream Design and Construction
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge Documents
Ian Eckardt, PWS, Wetland Delineations Nicole Millns, PE, Lead Quality Assurance
Abigail Vieira, PE, Lead Designer Carlynn Walker, Lead Scientist

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
April 13, 2021
Mr. Kelly Phillips
US Army Corps of Engineers—Wilmington District
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Response to IRT Comments
NCDMS Project No. 100138
DWR No: 20200016
USACE ID: SAW-2020-00051
NCDEQ Contract No. 7879-01
Dear Mr. Phillips:
On March 22, 2021, Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) received your comments on the Mitigation
Plan for the Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site. Each of the comments stated in your letter and our
responses are provided below.
1. Report Cover:Please make the following edits to the report cover(s):
• Add the DWR#(20200016)
• Add the RFP issuance date(RFP 16-007879—issued 5/6/2019);and,
• Update the contract#to 7879-01.
Wildlands Response:The DWR, RFP issue date, and contract number have been added/updated
on the report cover.
2. General:Please include the plan set as an Appendix in the revised mitigation plan. The revised
mitigation plan should be one(1)final consolidated document.
Wildlands Response:The plan set has been included as Appendix 11 in the mitigation plan.
3. General/Report text:In the report text, please describe the project fencing to be installed and
reference the fencing plan provided in the plan set(appendices). Please also briefly describe how
livestock will get drinking water when excluded from the property streams(well, livestock drinkers,
etc).
Wildlands Response:Section 6.10 has been added to the report to discuss the fencing plan and
how livestock will get drinking water once excluded from the property streams.
4. Section 3.4: The scientific name of Chinese privet not listed, Ligustrum sinense;please add
Wildlands Response:The scientific name for Chinese privet has been added.
5. General/Section 3.5:Site Access, Utilities, and Site Constraints:Due to concerns with aquatic species
passage, the IRT has recently noted that use of RCP is preferable to HDPE.
Wildlands Response:The proposed HDPE culvert has been changed to CMP.
14,40. Wildlands Engineering,Inc. [phone]• 312 W Millbrook Rd.,Suite 225 • Raleigh,NC 27607

6. Section 3.5-Site Access, Utilities and Site Constraints: This section notes that the project will
include installation of two-HDPE culverts with the design criteria of passing the 2-year flow event.
Due to aquatic life passage concerns, consider adding channel substrate as a permanent design
element and consider using alternate materials to HDPE.
Wildlands Response:The proposed HDPE culvert has been changed to CMP.
7. Section 6.5.2 Competence Analysis: This section indicates that the largest particles will be mobilized
in some cases but not others. Viable sediment transport is not clearly indicated. Please clarify if the
intent is for the largest particles to be consistently mobilized and the specify how this is suitable to
the design.
Wildlands Response:The sediment transport section has been updated to show that there will
be viable sediment transport at the site.
8. It would be helpful to include the NCSAM/WAM results in Tables 5 and 6.
Wildlands Response:The NCSAM/WAM rating were added to Tables 5 and 6.
9. Section 6.6 Stream Design Implementation: UT3 Reach 1 has a small drainage area and the
proposed design includes raising the stream bed using boulder structures. Does WEI believe there is a
risk of hydrology loss on this or any of the other project reaches?All project reaches that are
identified as perennial are expected to essentially flow year-round. Please confirm and address in the
report text. Does WEI believe that flow gages are warranted during the monitoring period?
Wildlands Response: Wildlands does not believe there is a risk for hydrology loss on UT3 given
that the stream fed by a spring upstream from the tie-in point. Section 6.6 in the report has
been updated to address this issue. A crest gage will be installed and monitored along UT3 to
ensure that flow is not lost.
10. Section 6.8 Wetland Design Implementation: The statement that describes the stream as being
perched to retain overbank event hydrologic inputs may be misinterpreted as stated to read as
artificial manipulation.
Wildlands Response:The statement has been reworded to clarify the proposed approach for
wetland 3.
11. Section 6.8 Wetland Design Implementation:Please note there may be a discrepancy in the
jurisdictional state of the pond to be removed to generate wetland credit. The jurisdictional table
included in Appendix 4 lists the pond as a wetland resource;however, the maps indicate this feature
as open water. Suggest clarifying the justification for re-establishment as opposed to re-habilitation.
This comment is intended to proactively address the IRT post contract note(items 14—on-site
meeting 1/13/2020) regarding credit scheme for the pond, re-establishment, or re-habilitation.
Wildlands Response: Wildlands believes that the jurisdictional table in Appendix 5 is incorrect
and that the pond should be classified as a non-wetland resource. We have reached out to the
reviewer at the Corps in order to clarify the classification.
A discussion has been added to section 6.8 addressing the justification for re-establishment as
opposed to re-habilitation.
12. Section 6.9 Vegetation Plan:At a minimum please include a summary of proposed species and
target communities in the Mitigation Plan Document.

Wildlands Response:The text states that piedmont/mountain alluvial forest and
piedmont/mountain bottomland forest are the target community types for the vegetation plan.
Additional information on proposed species has been added to Section 6.9.
13. Section 6.9 Vegetation and Planting Plan&Appendix 7—Invasive Vegetation Treatment Plan:
Please also discuss how undesirable orchard grasses and fescue will be treated within the
conservation easement during construction and post construction.
Wildlands Response:Treatment techniques for orchard grasses and fescue have been added to
Table 1 in Appendix 7—Invasive Vegetation Treatment Plan. Section 6.9 references the invasive
species plan in Appendix 7.
14. Section 7. Performance Standards:Please note that this project will be subject to 2016 IRT guidance
(to include height requirements, community species requirements etc.) Please note that item 7 of
1/13/2020 on-site meeting minutes IRT post contract site visit indicated that if the soils identified in
the hydric soils investigation resulted in differing soils;differing performance standards may be
required. The extent of the Roanoke and Wehadkee is not included in the Appendix 4 map of hydric
soil investigation but the taxonomy warrants some discussion and justification of a single standard.
Wildlands Response: Height requirements have been added to the performance standards in
Table 18.
After reading this comment and reviewing the meeting minutes from 1/13/2020, we have
decided to adjust the performance standards for wetlands proposed for re-establishment.
Performance standards will be assigned based on the soil type identified by the licensed soil
scientist. Updated performance standards can be found in Sections 6.7.3 and 7.0.
15. Section 7.0 Performance Standards&Section 8.0 Monitoring Plan:Please consider utilizing the
most recent DMS templates and guidance for the as-built survey;record drawings;MY0 report and
future monitoring reports(MY1-MY7). These templates and guidance were updated in October 2020
and are available on the DMS website here:https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-
services/dms-ven dors/rfp-forms-templates
Wildlands Response:Wildlands will use the most recent DMS templates and guidance for the
as-built survey, record drawings, MVO and future monitoring reports.
16. Section 7.0 Performance Standards/Section 8.0 Monitoring Plan:In the revised report,please note
that all volunteer stems or supplemental plantings must be present in the plot data for two years to
be included as meeting the established vegetation performance standards.
Wildlands Response:A note was added to Table 17 in the report stating that"All volunteer
stems or supplemental plantings must be present in the plot data for two years to be included
as meeting the established vegetation performance standards."
17. Section 7.0 Performance Standards: "If all stream, vegetation, and hydrologic performance criteria
have been successfully met and at least four bankfull events have occurred during separate years,
Wildlands may propose to terminate stream, wetland, and/or vegetation monitoring after five years
with written approval from the USACE and North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT)."DMS
recommends removing this statement. WEI should plan to monitor the site for the full 7-year term.
Wildlands Response:The statement was removed from the report.
18. Section 11. Determination of Credits: There are no buffer credits proposed for this project.

Wildlands Response: Correct. We have changed the last sentence of the paragraph in case that
was confusing.
19. Section 11. Determination of Credits:In the Post Contract IRT minutes the areas of expanded buffer
were noted and it was requested that these areas be highlighted in the mitigation plan. Please
highlight the expanded buffer areas mentioned in this section on a figure, or describe in more detail,
and reference in this section.
Wildlands Response: A discussion of the expanded buffer areas has been added to Section 6.1
and referenced again in Section 11.
Tables and Figures
1. Table 1:Please enters site coordinates in decimal degrees.
Wildlands Response: Site coordinates have been updated to decimal degrees.
2. Table 4:Stream classifications are not included in Table 1 with a note that indicates not applicable;
however, both existing and proposed classifications appear in morphology tables that appear later in
the document. Please update for consistency.
Wildlands Response:Table 4 shows the stream classification for restoration and enhancement I
reaches for both existing and proposed conditions. A stream classification for Clarks Creek was
not provided because it is proposed for enhancement II.The table has been updated to show
"Not Classified" for Clarks Creek.
3. Table 4:It is not necessary to include UT to Big Branch in the table as it is non-credit generating
reach. Consider removing the reach from the table.
Wildlands Response: UT to Big Branch has been removed from the table.
4. Table 9:Describes livestock from stream channels "as needed". Describe locations or designate on
map.
Wildlands Response: "As needed" has been removed from the table. Additional fencing
information has been added in Section 6.10.
5. Table 18:Please include the vegetation height requirement in the performance standard column and
confirm that the Table is consistent with information presented in Table 17.
Wildlands Response: Vegetation height has been added to Table 19 (formerly 18) and is
consistent with the information presented in Table 18 (formerly 17).
6. Table 19:DMS recommends more than two (2) random vegetation plots in the monitoring plan.
Random plots should not make up more than 50%of the total required plots.
Wildlands Response: The monitoring plan has been updated to show five (5) random
vegetation plots.
7. Table 20:Suggest limiting the responsibilities in this table to those that are codified in the easement
document.
Wildlands Response: We are unsure about what you want us to remove.There is no mention of
signs in the easement document so reference to signage was removed.
8. Table 21 Project Asset Table: WEI should use the most recent (October 2020) "Mitigation site
project Mitigation Quantities and Credits" template table for the project assets/credits.The

template is available on the DMS website here: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-
services/dms-vendors/rfp-forms-templates. The excel table template should be utilized to avoid
rounding issues with the final mitigation plan assets and the DMS asset accounting system (CRM).
Wildlands Response: The most recent project assets/credits table was provided with the
original submittal on February 10, 2021 in the background tables folder. The table in the report
has been replaced with the most recent project assets/credits table.
9. Table 21 Project Asset Table: The designation of riparian riverine for all wetlands conflicts with the
listed hydrology sources in the text of the document and the soil series as mapped by the soil
scientist; suggest removing the riverine descriptor and just identifying as riparian.
Wildlands Response: The table has been updated to identify all wetlands as riparian.
10. Figure 10- Concept Map: Please label the assets presented in Table 21 (Project Asset Table) on the
concept map or provide a separate project asset map that clearly identifies the project assets
presented in Table 21.
Wildlands Response: All assets discussed in Table 21 have been labeled on the concept map.
11. Figure 10- Concept Map: Please add the two proposed culverts to the stream crossings.
Wildlands Response: The two proposed culverts have been added to the stream crossings.
Appendices
1. Appendix 2: Please provide project site boundaries on the aerial photographs provided. If project
site boundaries cannot be included, please add a statement to the individual photo (similar to the
1993 aerial provided).
Wildlands Response: A statement has been added to each aerial indicating that the site
boundary is not included and that Big Branch is not located on the aerials.
2. Appendix 6:The IRT post contract meeting minutes provided in the draft report are not the most
recent/final provided to the IRT. Please update the Appendix and provide the final meeting minutes
issued on 1/22/2020 (attached). Please also include the 2/24/20 response email from Todd Tugwell.
Lastly; please review and confirm that the draft mitigation plan conforms with the final IRT meeting
minutes and follow-up USACE comments and documentation provided in the Appendix. As an
example, the meeting minutes note that the crossing on UT1B will be moved to the upper extent of
UT1B; however,the draft mitigation plan provided to DMS shows the crossing located in the middle
of the reach. Please document and explain any variations in the revised mitigation plan.
Wildlands Response: The final meeting minutes issued on 1/22/2020 and the email response
from Todd Tugwell on 2/24/2020 have been included in Appendix 6.
A statement has been added to section 6.6 discussing why the culvert location was changed on
UT1B.
There are no other deviations from the meeting minutes.
3. Appendix 7:The Invasive treatment plan does not mention marsh dewflower (Murdannia keisak),
which is listed in section 3.4., pg. 3; please add.
Wildlands Response: Marsh dewflower has been added to the invasive species treatment plan.

4. Appendix 7 Figurel: Seems to only want to monitor invasive plants after construction, except for
privet, when treatment is brought up for Fall 2022,they only suggest preservation reaches. Why not
restoration reaches?
Wildlands Response Figure 1 has been updated to match information in Table 2 in Appendix 7.
Text in the Appendix along with wording in Table 2 have been revised to more clearly state that
management of invasive species along restoration reaches will occur during construction
through the mechanical removal by construction equipment, which will remove the initial
invasive species populations. Post construction, the restoration reaches will be monitored for
emerging invasive species issues and treated accordingly.
Preliminary Plan Set
1. Title Sheet: Kelly Phillips is the DMS PM for the project; please update the title sheet. Please also
update the contract#to 7879-01.
Wildlands Response: The title sheet has been updated, accordingly.
2. UT1 Reach 2:The restoration priority level appears to be priority I with the exception of the priority
II cut for the culvert crossing on UT1. Please indicate the P1/PII cut areas on the sheet(s)for the
culvert on UT1 Reach 2 and any other PII locations at the site.
Wildlands Response: PI/PII areas near culverts have been labeled in the plans.
3. Wetland Plan Sheets: Please label the proposed wetland areas on the wetland plan set sheets for
consistency with the project assets presented in Table 21 (Project Asset Table).
Wildlands Response: The proposed wetland areas have been labeled in the plans to match
Table 21 (now 22) in the report.
Digital Submittal
1. Groundwater Gage Data: Please submit the data used to create the existing conditions groundwater
gage Figures.
Wildlands Response: The groundwater well and rain data used to create the figures was
provided with the original submittal on February 10, 2021 in the background tables folder. It is
included in the last tab of the excel spreadsheet titled Required-DMS-Mit-Plan-Tables-Cross
Creek 100138. An alternate format can be provided upon request.
Please contact me at 919-851-9986 x103 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jeff Keaton, PE
Project Manager

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION 1
3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
3.1 Watershed Conditions 2
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover 2
3.3 Geology and Soils 3
3.4 Existing Vegetation 3
3.5 Site Access, Utilities, and Site Constraints 4
3.6 Project Resources-Streams 4
3.7 Project Resources-Wetlands 8
3.8 Potential for Functional Uplift and Project Justification 10
4.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS 10
4.1 401/404 11
4.2 Biological and Cultural Resources 11
4.3 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass 11
5.0 MITIGATION SITE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 12
6.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN 13
6.1 Stream Design Approach Overview 13
6.2 Reference Streams 13
6.3 Design Discharge Analysis 14
6.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters 14
6.5 Sediment Transport Analysis 16
6.6 Stream Design Implementation 16
6.7 Wetland Design Approach Overview 18
6.8 Wetland Design Implementation 20
6.9 Vegetation and Planting Plan 21
6.10 Fencing Plan 22
6.11 Project Risk and Uncertainties 22
7.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 22
8.0 MONITORING PLAN 23
9.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 26
10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 26
11.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS 27
12.0 REFERENCES 30
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page i May 7,2021

TABLES
Table 1: Project Background Information 1
Table 2: Project Watershed Summary Information 2
Table 3: Project Soil Types 3
Table 4: Project Resources Part 1—Streams 8
Table 5: Project Resources Part 2—Streams 8
Table 6: Project Resources—Wetlands 9
Table 7: Regulatory Considerations 10
Table 8: Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands 11
Table 9: Mitigation Goals and Objectives 12
Table 10: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters 13
Table 11: Summary of Design Discharge Analysis 14
Table 12: Summary of Morphological Parameters for Big Branch 14
Table 13: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT1 15
Table 14: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT3 15
Table 15: Results of Competence Analysis 16
Table 16: Existing Groundwater Monitoring Gage Data and Analysis Results 19
Table 17: Wetland Performance Standards 20
Table 18: Summary of Performance Standards 23
Table 19: Monitoring Plan 24
Table 20: Monitoring Plan 25
Table 21: Long-term Management Plan 26
Table 22: Project Asset and Components Table 28
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Watershed Map
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5 Soils Map
Figure 6 Existing Conditions Map
Figure 7 FEMA Map
Figure 8 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Figure 9 Discharge Analysis Graph
Figure 10 Concept Map
Figure 11 Proposed Monitoring Components Map
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
Appendix 2 Historic Aerials
Appendix 3 DWR, NCSAM, and NCWAM Identification Forms
Appendix 4 Supplementary Design Information
Appendix 5 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix 6 Categorical Exclusion and Resource Agency Correspondence
Appendix 7 Invasives Species Plan
Appendix 8 Maintenance Plan
Appendix 9 Credit Release Schedule
Appendix 10 Financial Assurances
Appendix 11 Preliminary Design Plans
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page ii May 7,2021

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Montgomery County approximately 1.5 miles
northwest of Mount Gilead and 4.5 miles east of Norwood (Figure 1).This stream and wetland
mitigation project involves wetland rehabilitation and re-establishment as well as restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of Clarks Creek, Big Branch, and several unnamed tributaries.The Site is
located within the Clarks Creek targeted local watershed Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040104020020
and was selected to provide mitigation credit in the Yadkin 04 service area.
Four tributaries to Clarks Creek(Big Branch, UT1, UT1B, and UT3) flow through the Site, as depicted in
Figure 2. The Site streams are in various stages of impairment related to the current and historical
agricultural land uses.The project proposes to restore, enhance, and preserve 14,245 existing linear feet
(LF) of streams, re-establish 4.366 acres of wetlands, and rehabilitate 0.467 acres of existing wetlands.
The work proposed on the Site will provide 9,243.517 stream credits and 4.833 wetland credits. The Site
will be protected in perpetuity by a 63.9-acre conservation easement as outlined in the Site Protection
Instrument (Appendix 1).
Table 1: Project Background Information
Project Information
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
County Montgomery
Project Area(acres) 63.9
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 35.232211,-80.02425
Planted Acreage(acres of woody stems planted) 43.5
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The Site drains to the Pee Dee River,just downstream of the Norwood Dam on Lake Tillery.The Pee Dee
River is classified as water supply V(WS-V) and Class B. WS-V is generally a water supply that drains to a
drinking water supply. Class B waters are protected for primary and secondary human recreation.
The Site was selected based on its potential to support the goals and objectives of the current
conservation and watershed planning documents outlined below:
• The 2009 Lower Yadkin-Pee Dee River Restoration Priorities (RBRP) lists the following specific
goals: continuation of watershed improvement projects, protection of natural resources, and
the development of management strategies for stormwater impacts. The RBRP specifically
states that implementing projects within the targeted local watershed would result in ecological
uplift given that several animal operations already existing within the watershed and that
significant population growth is expected in the watershed.The 2014 North Carolina Integrated
Report lists Clarks Creek as a 303(d) impaired stream with an overall category rating of 5,
meaning the stream does not meet the criteria in almost all categories.
• The 2015 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission's (NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP)
notes that excessive sedimentation and nutrient inputs are primary causes of stream habitat
degradation in the Yadkin River Basin.
Restoration of the Site streams will directly and indirectly address stressors identified in the RBRP and
the WAP by excluding livestock, creating stable stream banks, and restoring a forest in a buffer currently
used for grazing livestock.These actions will reduce fecal, nutrient, and sediment inputs to project
streams, and ultimately to the Pee Dee River, as well as reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on
the Site.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 1 May 7,2021

3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Conditions
The Site watershed (Figure 3) is in the central portion of the Pee Dee basin 03040104 (Pee Dee 04). It is
situated in the rural countryside in Montgomery County near Mt. Gilead, NC.Table 2 summarizes the
overall project watershed information.
Table 2: Project Watershed Summary Information
Project Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Ecoregion Carolina Slate Belt
River Basin Pee Dee
USGS HUC(8 digit, 14 digit) 03040104,03040104020020
NCDWR Sub-basin 03-07-10
Project Drainage Area(acres) 16,3371
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 0.7%
2011 NLCD Land Use Classification
Forest 71%
Agricultural 24%
Developed 5%
1. This represents the Clarks Creek drainage area,which includes Big Branch, UT1,and UT1B. UT3 is
a separate drainage area which drains to Clarks Creek downstream of the project area.
The watershed of Clarks Creek extends north of the Site and has a gently sloped valley. It encompasses
the drainage areas of Big Branch, UT1, and UT1B, which all drain to Clarks Creek within the Site
boundary. Historical aerials in Google Earth dating back to 1994 reveal that the watershed has
historically been rural and dominated by forest use. Several areas in the lower part of the watershed
have been cleared for pastureland and agricultural purposes. Furthermore,timbering practices have
been occurring in the watershed dating back to 1994 and as recent as 2018 when approximately 300
acres of forested lands was cleared in the watershed. Very few residential developments are present in
the watershed and there are no signs of impending land use changes or development pressures.
UT3 is a small, headwater stream that originates on-site. It is the only Site stream that does not drain to
Clarks Creek within the Site.The upper part of the watershed is predominately pastureland and has a
narrow,forested riparian corridor.The lower part of the watershed is entirely forested.
Overall, land use within the project watershed indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology,
sediment supply, and nutrient and pollutant delivery have not varied widely over time. With lack of
developmental pressure, watershed processes and stressors from outside of the project limits are likely
to remain consistent throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of the project.
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover
The Site is currently an active farm composed of cattle pastures and previously deforested timber areas.
A review of historic aerials from 1955 to 2018 shows that onsite streams have existed in their same
approximate location for the last 65 years (Appendix 2).There have been minor changes to land
management during this period, but generally the Site has been managed in agriculture and timber,
consistent with current land use. A farm pond proposed for removal can be seen in the 1955 aerial.The
riparian buffers along UT1 and UT1B were clear cut sometime prior to 1955, and while some
revegetation has occurred,these riparian zones have remained in this general condition since the initial
clearing. Additionally,the riparian buffers adjacent to Big Branch and Clarks Creek and the forested area
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 2 May 7,2021

upstream of UT1 were cleared between 2013 and 2014. Based on aerial imagery, it appears that a
minimum 50-ft riparian buffer was left on the streams where these clearing activities occurred.
The existing farming activities within the floodplains and wetlands along with timbering activities
adjacent to Site streams are the most likely causes of channel instability and degraded habitat and water
quality conditions at the Site.Trampling of banks from cattle, cattle waste in the streams, runoff from
unpaved farm roads, and increased sediment supplies from timbering activities have contributed to the
degradation of instream habitat.
3.3 Geology and Soils
The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province.The Piedmont
Province is characterized by rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges, with elevations ranging from
300 to 1500 feet above sea level (Figure 4).The Carolina Slate Belt is composed of heated and deformed
volcanic and sedimentary rocks and is known for the numerous abandoned gold mines and prospects.
The underlying geology of the Site is mapped as Metamudstone and meta-argillite—Tillery formation
(CZmd1).The Tillery formation mostly consists of laminated siltstones and mudstones that
metamorphosed to greenschist facies.
The project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Montgomery County. Project area soils are described
below in Table 3. Figure 5 provides a soil map of the Site.
Table 3: Project Soil Types
Soil Name Description
BdC—Badin-Tarrus Complex,8-15%Slopes
BdD—Badin-Tarrus Complex, 15-25%Slopes
BeB2—Badin Tarrus Complex,2 8%Slopes, This series consists of moderately deep,well drained,moderately
Moderately Eroded permeable soils with medium runoff potential.These soils are
BeC2—Badin Tarrus Complex,8 15%Slopes, typically found on hillslopes located along ridges in the Piedmont.
Moderately Eroded
This soils series consists of very deep,somewhat poorly drained,
CnA—Chenneby Silt Loam,0-2%Slopes, moderately permeable soils.These soils are typically found in loamy
Frequently Flooded and silty sediments along floodplains and depressions and are
subject to occasional or frequent flooding and ponding.
GoE—Goldston-Badin Complex, 15-45% This soils series consists of shallow,well drained to excessively
Slopes drained, moderately rapidly permeable soils.These soils are typically
found on hillslopes along ridges in the Piedmont.
OkA—Oakboro Silt Loam,0 2%Slopes, This series consists of deep, moderately well drained and somewhat
Occasionally Flooded poorly drained soils.These soils are typically found on nearly level
narrow floodplains along perennial and intermittent streams.
ShA—Shellbluff Silt Loam,0 2%Slopes, This soils series consists of very deep,well drained to moderately
Occasionally Flooded drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in fluvial
sediments.They are typically found along floodplains.
TeB—Tillery Silt Loam,0-6%Slopes, Rarely This soil series consists of very deep,moderately well drained,
Flooded moderate permeable soils that are found on stream terraces.
Source:Soil Survey of Montgomery County,North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
3.4 Existing Vegetation
Project streams flow through a mixture of pasture, early successional forest, and mature forest.The
natural communities represented within the conservation easement include piedmont/mountain
bottomland forest as well as piedmont/mountain alluvial forest.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 3 May 7,2021

Within the easement area,former pasture areas are dominated by an herbaceous layer of both native
and non-native pasture grasses including fescues, dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), and Brazilian
vervain (Verbena braziliensis). Successional and mature forest sections within the easement contain a
mixture of common native and invasive species within the herbaceous, understory, and canopy layers.
Prominent native species within the herbaceous layer include common bottlebrush grass (Elymus
hystrix), river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium), deer tongue witch grass (Dicanthelium clandestinum),
leathery rush (Juncus coriaceus), soft rush (Juncus effuses), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida). Within the
understory layer prominent native species include black willow (Salix nigra),winged elm (Ulmus alata),
American holly(Ilex opaca), red maple (Acer rubrum), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Prominent
native canopy species include black walnut(Juglans nigra), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sugarberry(Celtis
laevigata),American elm (Ulmus americana), and persimmon (Diospyros virginiana).
The most prominent invasive species identified within the conservation easement include Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), marsh
dewflower(Murdannia keisak),tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and princesstree (Paulownia
tomentosa). While populations of privet are found on all project streams, mature Chinese privet
dominates the streambanks and wet areas along UT1, UT1B, and Clarks Creek. Populations of multiflora
rose,tree of heaven and princesstree are more scattered and usually consist of only a few mature
plants. Marsh dewflower is an aquatic invasive species that spreads quickly through fragmentation and
disturbance and is especially prevalent in stream crossings and areas where cattle have access to the
stream.
3.5 Site Access, Utilities, and Site Constraints
There will be two internal easement breaks for crossings at the Site (Figure 10).The first crossing will be
60-ft wide and located on UT1B.Two-CMP culverts will be installed to pass the 2-year storm.The
landowner wants this crossing to usable for a public road in the future if the property is ever subdivided.
The second crossing is located on UT1 Reach 2.This 100-ft wide crossing will consist of two concrete
boxed culverts that will also pass the 2-year flow.The areas in these crossings are not proposed for
credit. Maintenance of the crossings will be the responsibility of the landowner once the project is
closed by the regulatory agencies (IRT) and transferred to NCDEQ stewardship.The Site will be
accessible for construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from NC-73 (Figure 2).
Two overhead powerlines, owned by Duke Energy, intersect the Site.The first powerline runs north to
south and transects UT1 Reach 2 just upstream of the existing culvert crossing (Figure 2).This powerline
will be relocated through the proposed internal crossing 2 (Figure 10).The second powerline parallels
NC-73 on the south side and crosses the property boundary at the upstream extent of Big Branch. Both
powerlines have a 30-ft wide easement associated with them.
3.6 Project Resources—Streams
There are six jurisdictional stream channels on site: Clarks Creek, Big Branch, UT to Big Branch, UT1,
UT1B, and UT3 (Figure 2).The streams are discussed in the sections below.Tables 4 and 5 provide
detailed summaries of each reach. Existing streams and cross section locations are illustrated in Figure 6.
NCSAM field assessment forms with the rating calculator outputs and NCDWR stream identification
forms are in Appendix 3. Surveyed cross sections and geomorphic summaries are in Appendix 4.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 4 May 7,2021

Clarks Creek { ,
� n sus �F �'• -"'f_ ;-
Clarks Creek flows under NC-73 and through an i` �
adjacent parcel before entering the Site limits. '` `
Upstream of its confluence with UT1,the right
floodplain of Clarks Creek is currently in pasture •
with some evidence of cattle activity and grazing.
The left floodplain is currently in an early .'
successional stage of reforestation. Bedform along
Clarks Creek is dominated by angular bedrock,
boulder, cobble, and gravel material. The y }
hardened bed material has prevented the stream <�
from downcutting and provides a stable vertical Clarks Creek
profile with minor stream incision. Clarks Creek
exhibits some laterally instability, primarily due to
the lack of vegetation along the banks. Active bank erosion was noted at isolated locations along the
reach.
Downstream of its confluence with UT1, Clarks Creek turns and continues flowing south towards Big
Branch in a similar geomorphic condition (vertically stable and dominated by large, hardened bed
material,with isolated areas of bank erosion).The right floodplain is fenced from the adjacent cattle
pasture and the left floodplain is currently fallow, and vegetation within the riparian corridor is
dominated by invasive Chinese privet. A previously breached or failed dam can be seen along this
portion of the reach. Downstream of the confluence with Big Branch, Clarks Creek turns southwest and
flows toward the property boundary. n
Big Branch ,
Big Branch flows west into the proposed project I
boundaryfrom a concrete box culvert under NC- , w r
73.The bed of the existing culvert is perched
above the existing channel bed, creating a `` '
blockage for aquatic species to move upstream at
low flow.
Downstream of the culvert, Big Branch flows r
through an unconfined valley with a narrower
sR p ,c, r. }
vegetated corridor, moderate sinuosity, and -
moderate slope. Bedform is dominated by larger Big Branch
cobbles and gravels consistent with the geology
typically found in the Carolina Slate Belt. Supply of fine sediments to the reach is low, with minimal
observed sediment accumulation in the channel.The stream is laterally unstable and incised, with an
entrenchment ratio ranging from 1.2 to 2.1. Active bank erosion impacting channel function was
observed at multiple locations and along the majority of outer meander bends. Ditching to drain the
right floodplain was observed along Big Branch upstream of its confluence with Clarks Creek. While
cattle impacts along Big Branch are minimal, overall channel function has been heavily degraded by
adjacent agricultural land use and timbering activities.
UT to Big Branch
UT to Big Branch is a short, headwater tributary that originates within the project boundary and flows
east toward Big Branch. Similar to other reaches, vegetation beyond the riparian corridor was logged
and allowed to revegetate. Cattle do not currently have access to UT to Big Branch.The stream is incised
near its confluence with Big Branch. No work is proposed on UT to Big Branch except to tie the stream
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 5 May 7,2021

into the restored Big Branch;therefore, it is not proposed for credit generation and not discussed in the
sections below.
UT1 Reach 1 e
{
UT1 Reach 1 begins just downstream of a currently
failing culvert and headcut and flows southeast to
its confluence with UT1B. At the upstream extent, ;� � .`
the channel is actively eroding and incising.
Bedform along the reach is marginal, with some _ FA
gravel and cobble size material and riffle pool
sequences.The stream flows through an �{ "
unconfined alluvial valley with a moderate slope.
Cattle currently have access to the entirety of UT1
Reach 1 and impacts including cattle paths, •
trampled banks,wallow areas, and erosion from UT1 Reach 1
hoof shear were observed along the reach. Supply
of fine sediments in the channel ranges from low
to moderate, with most sources coming from bank trampling due to cattle and timbering activities
upstream of the reach. Riparian corridor and floodplain vegetation are a mix of maintained pasture and
invasive species. A series of ditches have been dug along UT1 Reach 1 to drain the adjacent wetlands in
the floodplain. Floodplain connection is limited along the reach, with some sections that have access the
floodplain at high flows and other areas confined to an entrenched section of channel. Coarse bed
material is contributing to vertical stability, but the lack of adequate bank vegetation has created a
laterally unstable stream system. Currently, an existing dirt farm road ford crosses the channel just
upstream of its confluence with UT1B.
UT1 Reach 2 r t' lc e i , -,;
UT1 Reach 2 begins at the confluence of UT1 Reach 1 with ' fi ` ; `
UT1B and flows south under an existing farm road before its
confluence with Clarks Creek.The channel condition upstream
of the farm road is similar to UT1 Reach 1,with moderate
bedform and vertical stability, but poor lateral stability. �.
Floodplain and riparian corridor vegetation are dominated bye` ,. " ' u
invasive species.The existing culverted farm road crossing is �� r
failing and in need of repair or replacement. Downstream of
the farm road crossing,the channel has incised down to =w
bedrock, which is now providing grade control. Vegetation j 1QiNt
✓
along this section continues to be made up primarily of r �y
invasive species and lateral stability is still lacking. Cattle have = ",
access to UT1 Reach 2 upstream of the existing farm road V
crossing but are fenced out downstream of the road. Supply of UT1 Reach 2
fine sediments is low, coming mostly from eroding banks and
upstream timbering activities.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 6 May 7,2021

UT1B originates off the project parcel and flows 144, /'�
south through an existing box culvert onto the Site
toward its confluence with UT1 Reach 1. UT1B
flows through a moderately confined alluvial valley
with a moderate slope. Supply of fine sediments is ;`,; = i
low and mostly comes from on-site sources such ,.
as actively eroding and cattle trampled banks.The f` �.,
floodplain vegetation along the reach consists of w =," -
maintained pasture with a narrow riparian
corridor primarily made up of invasive vegetation. °+ `
Cattle have access to the entirety of UT1B and UT1B
impacts including wallow areas and cattle paths
were observed along the reach. Channel bedform
is consistent with other streams on Site with larger material creating some vertical stability. However, a
lack of adequate riparian vegetation combined with the current cattle access have created a laterally
unstable system with downstream meander migration and actively eroding meander bends. In areas
lacking hardened bed material,the stream has begun to incise and isolate itself from the active
floodplain. Similar to UT1 Reach 1, ditches can be seen draining the downstream floodplain areas of
UT1B.
UT3
UT3 is a spring fed, headwater stream which UT3 Reach 1
originates on Site downstream from an existing
culverted farm path crossing.The upper part of
the reach is severely incised and completely
disconnected from its floodplain and the substrate
is mainly composed of conglomerate saprolite or
bedrock. Fine sediments supply is low at the
upstream extent but slightly increases further -
downstream due to runoff from adjacent fields �. '
and active bank erosion. As UT3 flows towards the
property boundary, it oscillates between stable . 'o�
and unstable, with several observed headcuts and t `
localized areas of bank erosion.There is a failed
farm pond dam approximately one third of the way down the reach where the stream is actively
headcutting and eroding through legacy pond bed sediments. Downstream of the failed dam,the reach
is moderately incised and eroding. Bedform diversity is high in stable sections of the reach but
deteriorates downstream of any active headcuts. Similarly, lateral stability is good for the majority of the
reach, outside of areas downstream of headcuts and/or in short lengths of incised stream.The riparian
buffer is mostly forested but dominated by invasive species such as Chinese privet,tree of heaven, and
multiflora rose.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 7 May 7,2021

Table 4: Project Resources Part 1—Streams
Parameter Clarks Creek Big Branch
Reach Length(If) 3,479 2,044
Valley Confinement(confined, Unconfined Unconfined
moderately confined,unconfined)
Drainage Area(acres) 16,337 1,464
Perennial,Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Class. C C
Existing Not Classified C4/1
Stream Classification'
Proposed Not Classified C4/1
Evolutionary Trend(Simon) V II
FEMA Zone Classification AE None
NCSAM Rating High High
Table 5: Project Resources Part 2—Streams
Parameter UT1 Reach 1 UT1 Reach 2 UT1B UT3
Reach Length(If) 2,886 718 1,571 3,611
Valley Confinement(confined, Moderately Moderately
moderately confined,unconfined) confined Unconfined confined Confined
Drainage Area(acres) 365 725 348 96
Perennial,Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial Perennial Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Class. C C C C
Stream Classification) Existing E4/1 G3c/1 B4c/1 F1
Proposed C4/1 C4/1 C4/1 B4
Evolutionary Trend(Simon) III IV IV III
FEMA Zone Classification None
NCSAM Rating Low Low Low Low
1. The Rosgen classification system(Rosgen,1994)is for natural streams and Simon Channel Evolution Model(Simon,1989)
is for natural streams that have been channelized.These channels have been heavily manipulated for agricultural purposes
and may not fit the classification category or channel evolution as described by these models.Results of the classification
and model are provided for illustrative purposes only.Reaches not slated for restoration or enhancement I were not
classified(NC).
3.7 Project Resources-Wetlands
Wildlands delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within and adjacent to the Site in August 2020.
Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the USACE Routine On-Site Determination Method.This
method is defined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers (Corps)Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent
Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement.The results of the delineation indicate that there
are 20 jurisdictional wetlands and one open water feature located within the assessment area (Figure 6).
The wetlands (Wetlands A—T)total 1.03 acres (ac) and range in size from 0.004 to 0.16 ac.
Approximately 0.80 ac were classified as headwater forest wetlands, and 0.24 ac were classified as
bottomland hardwood forest wetlands. Existing wetland data is summarized in Table 6.The preliminary
jurisdictional determination report was approved by the Corps on November 13, 2020.The notification
of jurisdictional determination can be found in Appendix 5.
Existing wetlands were evaluated using the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM).The
rapid assessment method evaluates field conditions relative to reference conditions to generate
function ratings for specific wetland types. Using the NCWAM dichotomous key and best professional
judgement, existing wetlands were classified based on the reference wetland type if the area was not
disturbed.All wetlands received an overall NCWAM rating of low, except for wetland K which scored a
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 8 May 7,2021

medium. When compared to reference conditions, Site wetlands scored low for water quality and
habitat function and low to medium for hydrology. Wetland K scored a medium for hydrology, high for
water quality, and low for habitat function.The typically low scores in all three functions (hydrology,
water quality, and habitat) are a result of cattle grazing, lack of native vegetative communities, and poor
connectivity to other natural areas. NCWAM field assessment forms and the rating calculator outputs
are included in Appendix 3.
Existing wetlands exhibit indicators of wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils.
Wetland hydrology indicators observed at the Site include pockets of inundation, saturation within the
upper 12 inches of the soil profile, iron deposits, oxidized rhizospheres,water-stained leaves, drift
deposits, and iron deposits. Soils within the wetlands exhibit one of the following hydric soil indicators:
depleted matrix, redox dark surface, or depleted dark surface. Dominant hydrophytic vegetation species
within the wetlands include green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), American elm (Ulmus americana),
Sallow sedge (Carux lurida), cut grass (Leersia oryzoides), soft rush (Juncus effusus), swamp rose mallow
(Hibiscus moscheutos), and tall rye grass (Schedonorus arundinaceus).
Table 6: Project Resources—Wetlands
Wetland Mapped Soil Soil Hydric Source of NCWAM
Wetland Area(ac) Type Series Drainage Class Status Hydrology Rating
A 0.075 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
Badin-Tarrus Well-
B 0.129 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater Low
Silt Loam well-drained
C 0.004 Tillery Silt Loam Moderately well- Yes Groundwater Low
drained
D 0.036 Tillery Silt Loam Moderately well- Yes Groundwater Low
drained
Badin-Tarrus Well-
E 0.102 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater Low
Silt Loam well-drained
Badin-Tarrus Well-
F 0.103 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater Low
Silt Loam well-drained
G 0.051 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Riparian Complex
Badin-Tarrus Well-
H 0.162 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater Low
Silt Loam well-drained
I 0.004 Tillery Silt Loam Moderately well Yes Groundwater Low
drained
J 0.041 Tillery Silt Loam Moderately well- Yes Groundwater Low
drained
Badin-Tarrus Well-
K 0.022 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater Medium
Silt Loam well-drained
L 0.008 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
M 0.039 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
N 0.076 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 9 May 7,2021

Wetland Mapped Soil Soil Hydric Source of NCWAM
Wetland Area(ac) Type Series Drainage Class Status Hydrology Rating
0 0.024 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
P 0.004 Shellbluff Silt Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Loam
Q 0.063 Tillery Silt Loam Moderately well- Yes Groundwater Low
drained
R 0.028 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
S 0.028 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
T 0.032 Badin-Tarrus Well-drained No Groundwater Low
Complex
Open Badin-Tarrus Well-
Water 1 0.741 Complex/Tillery drained/Moderately No/Yes Groundwater N/A
Silt Loam well-drained
3.8 Potential for Functional Uplift and Project Justification
The primary stressors at the Site are cattle access to streams, removal or narrowing of riparian buffers,
and runoff from agricultural fields.These stressors have led to degradation of the Site streams,which is
made apparent by stream bank erosion, poor aquatic habitat, and formation of headcuts and
subsequent disconnection of streams from their floodplains. Functional uplift at the Site can be achieved
through the following measures:
• Restoring degraded stream channels to reduce erosion and reconnect streams to riparian
wetlands to restore hydrologic connection;
• Planting riparian buffers to shade streams, help stabilize streams, and filter runoff and overbank
flows;
• Providing grade control in streams to eliminate headcuts;
• Cattle exclusion; and
• Protecting the Site with a conservation easement.
These project components are described in Section 5.0 in terms of goals, objectives, and outcomes for
the project and in greater detail in Section 6.0.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Table 7 is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site.These considerations are expanded upon
in Sections 4.1-4.3.
Table 7: Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes No PCN1
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes No PCN1
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix 6
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix 6
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
1. PJD confirmed by USACE on 11/13/2020. PCN to be provided to IRT with Final Mitigation Plan.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 10 May 7,2021

4.1 401/404
Wetlands A, B, C, D, H, and I are small wetlands located within the existing stream channel and will be
partially impacted by stream realignment. Open water feature 1 is an existing agricultural pond that will
be drained and converted to wetland.
Wetlands on the Site that are within the conservation easement and outside of the limits of disturbance
will be flagged with safety fence during construction to prevent unintended impacts.This will be
denoted in the final construction plans.
Table 8 estimates the anticipated impacts to wetland areas and open water features on this project.
Impacts generated from grading activities in the floodplain have not been determined at this phase.
These impacts will be minimized, where possible, and will be submitted in the Final Mitigation Plan.The
Pre-Construction Notification, including this data, will be submitted to the IRT with the Final Mitigation
Plan.
Table 8:Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands
Jurisdictional Permanent(P)Impact
Classification Acreage
Feature Type of Activity Impact Area(acres)
A Headwater Forest 0.075 Stream realignment 0.001
B Headwater Forest 0.129 Stream realignment 0.013
C Headwater Forest 0.004 Stream realignment 0.001
D Headwater Forest 0.036 Stream realignment 0.003
H Headwater Forest 0.162 Stream realignment 0.007
I Headwater Forest 0.004 Stream realignment 0.004
Open Water 1 Pond 0.741 Pond removal 0.740
4.2 Biological and Cultural Resources
A Categorical Exclusion for the Site was submitted to DMS on August 21, 2020 and approved on August
25, 2020.This document included investigation into the presence of threatened and endangered species
on Site protected under The Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as any historical resources
protected under The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.The biological conclusion for the Site,
per the Categorical Exclusion research and response by US Fish and Wildlife Service, is that the project
will have no effect on proposed and listed species and designated critical habitat.All correspondence
with USFWS and a list of Threatened and Endangered Species in Montgomery County, NC is included in
Appendix 6.The conclusion for cultural resources per the Categorical Exclusion research and response
by the State Historic Preservation Office is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by
this project. For additional information and regulatory communications please refer to the Categorical
Exclusion document in Appendix 6.
4.3 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
The Site is represented on the Montgomery County Flood Maps 3710659400J and 3710659300J. Clarks
Creek is mapped in a Zone AE Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and the downstream extents of Big
Branch and UT1 Reach 2 are included in Clarks Creek's mapped floodplain (Figure 7). UT1 Reach 1, UT1B,
UT3, and UT to Big Branch do not have designated SFHAs.The enhancement II activities proposed for
Clarks Creek include bank stabilization, removal of invasive species, and planting of the riparian corridor.
Wildlands will coordinate with the Montgomery County floodplain administrator to obtain the
appropriate floodplain development permit for the project and to determine whether or not a no-rise or
LOMR/CLOMR is needed.
The proposed stream designs associated with the Site have little to no risk of potential hydrologic
trespass for the following reasons:
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 11 May 7,2021

• UT3 originates on-site;
• Clarks Creek is proposed for enhancement only and bed elevations will not be adjusted;
• UT1 restoration begins approximately 1,000 LF downstream of the property boundary;
• Big Branch and UT1B are not deeply incised at the upstream extents, so the restored profiles will
tie-in with minimal backwater effects.
5.0 MITIGATION SITE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The major goals of the proposed stream mitigation project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Yadkin River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level.
Project goals are desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement and/or visual
assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals.The project will be
monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Sections 7 and 8 of this report.
Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined in Table 9.
Table 9: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal Objective CU-Wide RBRP Stressors/Sources Addressed
Exclude livestock Install fencing to exclude livestock from Reduce sediment from agriculture/bank
from stream stream channels, riparian areas, proposed erosion. Protection of natural resources
channels. wetland areas and/or remove livestock from within TLW. Reduction of nutrients to 303(d)
adjacent fields. receiving waters.
Restore and Convert active cattle pasture and previously
maintained agricultural areas to forested
enhance native Sediment from agriculture/bank erosion.
riparian buffers along all Site streams and
floodplain and wetlands.Treat invasive vegetation along Poor riparian buffer vegetation. Protection of
wetland natural resources within TLW.
stream corridors. Protect and enhance
vegetation. existing forested riparian buffers.
Reconstruct stream channels slated for Sediment from agriculture.
Improve the restoration with stable dimensions and Moderate to severe bank erosion.
appropriate depth relative to the existing Channelization and sedimentation.
stability of stream floodplain.Add bank revetments and Protection of natural resources within TLW.
channels.
instream structures to protect restored/ Reduction of sediment to 303(d) receiving
enhanced streams. waters.
Install habitat features such as constructed
Improve instream steps,cover logs, and brush toes on Protection and enhancement of natural
and wetland restored reaches.Add woody materials/ resources within TLW. Reduction of nutrients
habitat. LWD to channel beds. Construct pools of and sediment to 303(d) receiving waters.
varying depth. Remove farm pond and re-
establish forested riparian wetland habitat.
Restore wetland Restore wetlands through re-establishment Protection and enhancement of natural
function and of hydrology. Remove the drainage effects resources within TLW. Reduction of nutrients
hydrology. of agricultural ditching and maintenance. and sediment to 303(d) receiving waters.
Reduce sediment Sediment from agriculture. Poor riparian
Restore riparian stream corridor and pocket
and nutrient input wetland areas to slow and filter runoff from buffer vegetation. Protection of natural
from adjacent adjacent agricultural fields. resources within TLW. Reduction of sediment
agricultural fields and nutrients to 303(d) receiving waters.
Permanently Sediment from agriculture.
protect the project Establish a conservation easement on the Poor riparian buffer vegetation. Protection of
site from harmful Site. Exclude livestock and remove an natural resources within TLW. Reduction of
uses.
existing impoundment from the Site. nutrients and sediment to 303(d) receiving
waters.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 12 May 7,2021

6.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
6.1 Stream Design Approach Overview
The design approach for the Site was developed to maximize the goals and objectives described in
Section 5, which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 3.8.The design is
also intended to provide the expected outcomes in Section 5,though these are not tied to performance
criteria. Stream restoration, enhancement II, and preservation approaches are proposed at the Site.
Restoration activities include reconstructing the channel with a more stable dimension, pattern, and
profile and reconnecting streams to their floodplains. Instream structures will be constructed to help
maintain stable channel morphology and improve aquatic habitat. Generally, enhancement II activities
will primarily consist of fencing out livestock, repairing localized bank erosion, stabilizing headcuts,
planting a native riparian buffer, and treating invasive species.The exception is an enhancement II
section of UT3 that will receive a greater level of treatment(described in Section 6.6). Preservation
activities will include removing invasive species and fencing out cattle. Riparian buffers will be restored
by converting pastureland to forested canopy, removing invasive species, and planting native
vegetation.The entire project area will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement.Two
expanded buffer areas proposed along the right floodplain of Clarks Creek will be incorporated into the
conservation easement.These extended buffer areas are adjacent to non-project streams and are not
proposed for credit.The first area is located between NC-73 and the start of enhancement II on Clarks
Creek.The second area begins at the downstream extent of enhancement II on Clarks Creek and ends at
the property line.
The design approach for this Site utilized a combination of analog and analytical approaches for stream
restoration and relies on prior experience and observations. Reference reaches were identified to serve
as the basis for design parameters in combination with past project experience in the Piedmont, site
constraints, and best professional judgement. Channels were sized based on design discharge hydrologic
analysis,which uses a combination of empirical and analytical data as described within this report.
Designs were then verified and/or modified based on sediment transport analysis.
6.2 Reference Streams
Nine reference reaches were identified for this Site and used to support the stream design (Figure 8).
These reference reaches were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage
area,valley slope, morphology, and bed material. Reference reach information is provided in Table 10.
Geomorphic parameters for these reference reaches are summarized in Appendix 4.Three additional
reference reaches were used along with those in Table 10 to create the reference reach regional curve
for the discharge analysis discussion below in Section 6.3.
Table 10:Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters
Design Stream Big Branch UT1 UT1B UT3
Reach 1 Reach 1 Reach 1
Reference Stream Stream Type C4 C4 C4 C4 B4
Foust Upstream C4 x x x x
Long Branch C/E4 x
Collins Creek E4 x
Spencer Creek 2 E4 x x x
UT to Varnals Creek C4/E4 x x x
UT to Sandy Run B4c x
Spencer Creek 3 E4b x
Pilot Mountain Trib B4 x
UT to Richland Creek C4/E4 x x x
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 13 May 7,2021

6.3 Design Discharge Analysis
Stream restoration reaches on the Site will be hydraulically connected to their existing floodplains to
allow for energy dissipation and prevent erosion. In order to achieve this, a design discharge must be
selected that allows for frequent overbank events.The following methods were used to develop design
discharges for the restoration reaches:
• Published regional curve data from the NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (Harman et al., 1999);
• Regional flood frequency analysis performed by Wildlands using U.S. Geological Survey(USGS)
gage sites;
• Site specific reference reach data;
• Existing bankfull indicators from surveyed cross sections.
Results for the design discharge analysis are shown in Table 11 and illustrated in Figure 9.The selected
design discharge for each reach falls between the 1.5-year flood event from the Wildlands Regional
USGS Flood Frequency analysis and the site-specific reference reach curve.
Table 11:Summary of Design Discharge Analysis
Big UT1 UT3
UT1B
Branch Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 1
DA(acres) 1,464 365 725 348 20
DA(sq.mi.) 2.29 0.57 1.13 0.54 0.03
NC Piedmont Regional Curve(cfs) 162 59 97 57 7
Wildlands Regional 1.2-year event 51 16 28 15 1
Flood Frequency
Analysis(cfs) 1.5-year event 143 51 85 49 6
Site Specific Reference Reach Curve 144 52 86 50 6
Max Q from Manning's Eq.from XS survey(cfs) 157 59 55 41 6
Final Design Q(cfs) 144 52 85 49 6
6.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Reference reach data was the primary source of information used to develop the morphological
parameters for each of the restoration reaches. Ranges of pattern parameters were developed within
the reference range with some exceptions based on best professional judgement and knowledge from
previous projects. Tables 12-14 summarize the key morphological parameters for Big Branch, UT1,
UT1B, and UT3. Complete design morphological parameters are included in Appendix 4.
Table 12:Summary of Morphological Parameters for Big Branch
Existing References Proposed
Parameter Foust Collins
Big Branch Upstream Long Branch Creek Big Branch
Contributing Drainage Area 1,466 896 954 1,075 1,466
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification G4c/1 C4 C/E4 E4 C4/1
Design Discharge Width(ft) 15.8 18.5- 19.4 14.8- 18.6 11.9-20.1 24
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 1.8 1.3- 1.4 1.3-2.1 1.6-2.7 1.4
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 28.5 23.9-24.1 25-34.6 32.9 34
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 3.9 2.9-3.7 3.6-4.0 3.9 4.2
Design Discharge(cfs) 136 95.2 101- 124 150 144
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.0070 0.0090 0.0040 0.0030 0.0083
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 14 May 7,2021

Existing References Proposed
Parameter Foust Collins
Big Branch Upstream Long Branch Creek Big Branch
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 1.3 - 1.2
Width/Depth Ratio 8.8 13.9- 14.2 7.9- 13.8 4.4- 12.1 16.9
Bank Height Ratio 2.3 1.0 1.2- 1.5 1.0- 1.1 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.6-3.4 >3.4 2.0-3.0 >2.2
Reachwide d50(mm) 45 61 41.6 - -
Table 13:Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT1
Existing References Proposed
Parameter UT1 UT1 Spencer UT to UT to UT1 UT1
Reach 1 Reach 2 UT1B Creek 2 Varnals Richland UT1B
Reach 1 Reach 2
Creek
Contributing
Drainage Area 346 725 348 614 262 621 346 725 348
(acres)
Channel/Reach E4/1 G3c/1 B4c/1 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/1 C4/1 C4/1
Classification
Design Discharge 10.3 11.6 11.7 10.7- 11.2 9.3- 10.5 13.3- 15.2 14.5 20 15.2
Width(ft)
Design Discharge
Depth(ft) 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.6- 1.8 1.1- 1.2 1.1- 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.0
Design Discharge 13.3 11.9 10.7 17.8- 19.7 10.3- 12.3 16.5- 17.5 13.8 23.3 14.7
Area(ft2)
Design Discharge 4.4 4.6 3.8 4.9-5.4 4.4-5.2 4.2-4.5 3.8 3.6 3.4
Velocity(ft/s)
Design Discharge 52 85 49 97 54 69-79 52 85 49
(cfs)
Water Surface Slope 0.0130 0.0160 0.0130 0.0050 0.0170 0.0140 0.0118 0.0080 0.0092
(ft/ft)
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2
Width/Depth Ratio 8.0 11.2 12.9 5.8-7.1 8.1-9.3 10.1- 13.9 15.3 17.2 15.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 4.6 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 1.2 1.6 5.5- 10 5.7- 10 >2.5 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2
Reachwide d50(mm) 33 68 14 8.8 15 1 - - -
Table 14:Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT3
Existing References Proposed
Parameter UT to Sandy Spencer Pilot
UT3 Reach 1 UT3 Reach 1
Run Creek 3 Mountain Trib
Contributing Drainage Area 6 96 237 173 6
(acres)
Channel/Reach Classification F1 B4c E4b B4 B4
Design Discharge Width(ft) 6.4 7.3-7.8 6.3-9.3 8.6 5.7
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.3 0.7-0.8 0.8- 1.0 0.7 0.4
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 2.0 5.7-6.2 6.6-8.7 6.0 2.3
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 1.8 3.4 5.0 5.3 3.7
Design Discharge(cfs) 10 20 35 32 10
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 15 May 7,2021

Existing References Proposed
Parameter UT to Sandy Spencer Pilot
UT3 Reach 1 UT3 Reach 1
Run Creek 3 Mountain Trib
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.029 0.015 0.019 0.0378 0.0327
Sinuosity 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.2 1.1
Width/Depth Ratio 20.6 6.6-9.8 7.9-9.3 12.5 14.6
Bank Height Ratio 2.4 1.7-2.6 1..0 1.0 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.6-2.1 1.7-4.3 1.5 >1.4
Reachwide d50(mm) - 19 11 9 -
6.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
To gain a better understanding of the quantity of sediment supplied to the project streams and how it is
transported through the system,Wildlands performed a qualitative assessment of the sediment supply
and sources in the project watershed based on visual inspection and review of historic aerial photos.
Wildlands also performed a competence analysis to analyze the ability of the proposed streams to
transport certain sizes of sediment and to support material sizing for constructed riffles.
6.5.1 Sediment Supply
The qualitative watershed assessment indicates that the watershed is stable and unlikely to change
significantly in the near future. However, occasional clearcutting is expected to occur. Sediment load to
the project streams is expected to be low and stable given the forested and rural nature of the
watershed and consistent land use. Visual assessment of streams does not indicate significant bar
formation and there are no other signs of a high sediment supply coming from the watershed.The focus
of the sediment transport analysis is therefore based on an evaluation of stream competence.
6.5.2 Competence Analysis
Competence analyses were performed during design for each of the restoration reaches by comparing
shear stress associated with the design bankfull discharge, proposed channel dimensions, and proposed
channel slopes with the size distribution of the existing bed load.The analysis utilized standard
equations based on a methodology using the Shields (1936) curve and Andrews (1984) equation
described by Rosgen (2001). Results show that the design channels are capable of moving the maximum
size particle during bankfull flow events. In order to provide stable grade control and maintain channel
stability, riffle material will be sized so that the largest particle does not move.
Table 15:Results of Competence Analysis
UT1 UT3
Big Branch UT1B
Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 1
Dbkf(ft) 1.4 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.4
Schan (ft/ft) 0.0083 0.0133 0.0102 0.0092 0.034
Bankfull Shear Stress,t(lb/so ft) 0.72 0.73 0.70 0.54 0.72
Largest particle from bar sample(mm) 53 30 77 47 60
Movable particle size(mm) 55.0 56.1 54.0 41.1 55.5
6.6 Stream Design Implementation
Restoration, enhancement II, and preservation approaches will be implemented throughout the Site.
Further details on proposed design approaches are discussed below and illustrated in Figure 10.The
preliminary design plans can be found in Appendix 11.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 16 May 7,2021

Big Branch
Big Branch will be restored as a C4/1 stream using a priority 1 restoration approach in which the channel
elevations will be raised so that the top of bank will be at the elevation of the existing floodplain.The
reach will begin at the existing box culvert at NC-73 where rock pipe outlet protection will be installed to
dissipate energy during higher flows and help prevent erosion. Per NCIRT guidance in the post-contract
site meeting minutes found in Appendix 6,the elevation of the riffle immediately downstream of the
culvert will be raised slightly to eliminate the perched condition of the pipe and allow for aquatic
organism passage upstream through the culvert during low flows.The first 63 LF of Big Branch is outside
of the proposed conservation easement and within the Duke Energy right of way.This short section will
be restored in order to fix the perched culvert but is not proposed for credit.
Downstream of the right of way, Big Branch will gently meander through a 250 ft wide, unconfined
valley before flowing into the open floodplain of Clarks Creek. For the last 600 LF,the right floodplain of
Big Branch becomes broader and flatter and the stream will meander alongside wetland 3,which is
proposed for re-establishment(see Section 6.7). Bankfull elevations will maintain floodplain connections
and hydrate the riparian wetland. Downstream of the proposed wetland re-establishment area, several
steep riffles will drop Big Branch down to its confluence with Clarks Creek.
Instream structures along Big Branch will consist of native material,jazz, and angled log riffles in the
upper portion of the reach. Chunky riffles will be implemented in the steep sections where the slope of
Big Branch increases to tie into Clarks Creek. Having varying riffle types will add diversity and variation to
the channel. All meander bends will be constructed with brush toe revetments to prevent erosion and
provide pool habitat.J-hooks will be strategically placed in several locations to provide grade control
and help prevent erosion by redirecting flow around tighter meander bends.
UT1
UT1 Reach 1 will be restored as a C4 stream using a priority 1 restoration approach.The reach will begin
upstream of the existing failed culvert, which will be removed, and meander through a moderately
confined valley before entering a wide and unconfined valley. Reach 1 will then flow adjacent to
proposed wetland 2, which includes an old farm pond that will be drained and converted to riparian
floodplain wetland (see Section 6.7 below for more information on wetlands approaches). Downstream
of proposed wetland 2,the valley steepens and UT1 Reach 1 will switch from a riffle-pool
geomorphology to a step-pool channel (B stream type) as it approaches its confluence with UT1B.
UT1 Reach 2 will begin at the confluence of UT1 and UT1B and be restored as a C4 stream. In the first
200 LF, UT1 Reach 2 transitions from a priority 1 to a priority 2 approach as it passes through proposed
crossing 2. In the priority 2 section, a new floodplain will be established at a lower elevation to reduce
channel entrenchment. Downstream of the crossing, UT1 Reach 2 will quickly come back up to grade
and meander as a priority 1 stream before beginning a series of step-pool formations as it drops down
to Clarks Creek.
Instream structures along UT1 will consist of native material, chunky, and angled log constructed riffles.
Having varying riffle types will add diversity and variation to the channel. A combination of boulder and
log steps will be used in the step-pool sections to drop grade and provide adequate grade control. Select
meander bends will be constructed with brush toe revetments to reduce erosion and provide pool
habitat. Log vanes will be strategically placed to help prevent erosion by redirecting flow around tighter
meander bends. Several log sills will be installed to provide grade control at the end of steep riffles.
UT1B
UT1B will be restored as a C4 stream using a priority 1 restoration approach.The reach will begin at the
existing box culvert where rock pipe outlet protection will be installed downstream to dissipate energy
during higher flows and help prevent erosion. NCIRT guidance in the post-contract site meeting minutes
found in Appendix 6 notes that the crossing on UT1B will be moved to the upper extent of UT1B.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 17 May 7,2021

However,the landowner does not want the culvert in this location. Instead, UT1B will gently meander
for approximately 400 LF before flowing through the proposed crossing 1. Downstream of the crossing,
UT1B will meander for an additional 400 LF before the valley steepens and the reach transitions to a
step-pool geomorphology. A short series of boulder and log steps will help UT1B drop grade for 160 LF
before the valley flattens out and UT1B gently meanders towards its confluence with UT1.
Instream structures along UT1B will consist of native material, chunky, and angled log constructed
riffles. Boulder and log steps will be constructed in the step-pool sections to allow for large drops and
grade control. Log sills will provide grade control on steeper riffles and rock sills will help set the crest
elevation of riffles immediately downstream of culverts to prevent perching and allow for aquatic
organism passage. Select meander bends will have brush toe revetments to reduce erosion, encourage
pool maintenance, and provide pool habitat. Log vanes will be strategically placed to help prevent
erosion by redirecting flow around tighter meander bends.
UT3
Based on guidance from the IRT after the post-contract site meeting, UT3 will consist of three different
reaches with varying approaches (See email correspondence in Appendix 6). UT3 Reach 1 will be
restored as a B4 stream with a step-pool morphology using a priority 1 approach. Restoration of the
reach will begin just upstream of the existing culvert, which is proposed for removal.The existing
channel is severely incised, so the channel will be raised several feet in order to connect the reach to its
original floodplain. Hydrology is not expected to be lost give that UT3 is a spring fed system and the
spring is located upstream of the tie-in point. Since the valley is confined, sinuosity is low (<1.1), and the
proposed alignment meanders within the existing channel. Floodprone areas will be designed,where
possible,to allow energy to dissipate during higher flows. Proposed boulder cascades, boulder steps,
and log steps will allow for large grade drops in steeper sections, while also providing grade control.
UT3 Reach 2 is proposed for enhancement II and will begin at the downstream extent of Reach 1.
Several eroding banks will be stabilized by grading them back at a 3:1 slope and native vegetation will be
planted. Log sills will be used to stabilize headcuts and prevent them from moving further upstream. A
short 220 LF section of the reach will be realigned through the failed dam and new valley will be graded.
UT3 Reach 3 is proposed for preservation and no instream channel work is proposed. Localized
treatment of invasive species and planting of native vegetation will occur in the floodplain.
6.7 Wetland Design Approach Overview
The proposed wetland restoration at the Site includes the re-establishment of previously manipulated
riparian wetland areas and the rehabilitation of existing jurisdictional wetland features. Areas proposed
for wetland re-establishment contain evidence of relic hydric soils which indicate these areas were
previously wetlands prior to agricultural and hydrologic manipulation. Wetland rehabilitation areas are
existing jurisdictional wetlands that are currently lacking some function due to current hydrologic or
vegetation alterations.
6.7.1 Jurisdictional Investigation
As outlined in Section 3.7 and in Table 6 of this report, Wildlands investigated potential waters of the
United States within the project area.These areas were delineated using the USACE routine On-Site
Determination method presented in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and
subsequent Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement.The preliminary jurisdictional
determination report was approved by the Corps on November 13, 2020 and is included in Appendix 5.
NCWAM scores are shown in Table 6, above, and the forms can be found in Appendix 3.
6.7.2 Hydric Soils Investigation
A licensed soil scientist (LSS) was contracted to confirm the presence and extents of hydric soils at the
Site within areas proposed for wetland restoration.The LSS visited the Site on two separate occasions
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 18 May 7,2021

(August 1, 2019 and October 20, 2020) and performed 40 soil borings throughout potential wetland
restoration areas.The soils investigation observed predominately Roanoke and Wehadkee soil series in
the proposed wetland re-establishment and rehabilitation areas, as opposed to the Tillery soils series
and Badin-Tarrus complex found in the NRCS web soil survey. More specifically, Roanoke soils were
observed in proposed wetland 2 and Wehadkee soils were observed in proposed wetlands 1 and 3.The
soil borings showed that hydric soils met the F3 (depleted matrix) and F19 (Piedmont floodplain soils)
indicators. Depth to hydric soils indicators were less than 10 inches below the soil surface within areas
proposed for wetland restoration.A complete copy of the hydric soil investigation report can be found
in Appendix 4.
6.7.3 Hydrologic Monitoring and Evaluation
Eight groundwater gages were installed to evaluate the existing hydrologic conditions of the Site and
help support the wetland design approach discussed below in Section 6.8 (Figure 6). Gages were
strategically placed to allow evaluation of the water table across the proposed wetland areas.
Groundwater gages one through seven were placed in areas proposed for wetland re-establishment.
Groundwater gage eight was placed in existing wetland Q, which is proposed for rehabilitation.
The defined growing season based on the Montgomery County WETS table for 50%probability of soil
temperatures greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit is March 17 through November 20,which represents
a 248-day growing season. According to Table 1 in the Notification of Issuance of Guidance for
Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for the Wilmington District(October 24,
2016),the wetland saturation threshold ranges 9%to 12%for Roanoke soils and 12%to 16%for
Wehadkee soils. Based on the LSS report,the current guidance, and the anticipated growing season, it is
estimated that approximately 22 to 40 consecutive days of saturation within 12 inches of the soil surface
is required to develop hydrologic conditions for adequate wetland processes to occur. Wildlands
evaluated data from the installed groundwater gages based on the above parameters for the 2020
growing season data collected.
Groundwater gages collected data at the Site between March 7, 2020 and January 5, 2021.Table 16
shows an evaluation of saturation periods from the existing groundwater gages. Full hydrologic data
from the existing groundwater gages can be found in Appendix 4.
Table 16: Existing Groundwater Monitoring Gage Data and Analysis Results
Consecutive Days in Consecutive Percent
Growing Season Wells Met Growing Season Wells Met Evaluated
Gage Groundwater Depth Groundwater Depth Wetland Approach
Criterion Under Normal Criterion Under Normal Dates
Rainfall Conditions(Days) Rainfall Conditions(%)
1 57 22.9% Re-establishment1
2 24 9.6% Re-establishment
3 25 10.0% Re-establishment
4 11 4.4% 3/7/20 to Re-establishment
5 14 5.6% 9/10/20 Re-establishment
6 16 6.4% Re-establishment
7 25 10.0% Re-establishment
8 19 7.6% Rehabilitation'
1Groundwater gage 1 is located in between two existing wetland areas proposed for rehabilitation
'Goundwater gage 8 is located near the boundary of wetland re-establishment and rehabilitation
Given the extended saturation periods observed during the 2020 growing season, historic rainfall data
established by the Montgomery County WETS table were downloaded and analyzed (Appendix 4).
Rainfall patterns for 2020 show that April, May, September, and November were close to or exceeded
the 70% rainfall exceedance threshold during the growing season. Since the 2020 growing season was
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 19 May 7,2021

unusually wet,the level of hydrology observed from the installed groundwater gages is not expected in
subsequent years.
Based on the hydrologic evaluation and hydric soils investigation discussed above, varying performance
standards are proposed at the Site and outlined below in Table 17.
Table 17:Wetland Performance Standards
Saturation Consecutive Days of
Approach Wetland Threshold Saturation within 12"of Soil
Surface
1 and 3 12% 30
Re-establishment 2 10% 25
Rehabilitation A, B, D, E, F,G, H,and Q 11% 27
Overall,the gage data collected shows that groundwater within proposed wetland restoration areas is
generally shallow and that adequate hydrology to support wetland processes is possible with Site
manipulations. Furthermore,the presence of active and relic shallow hydric soil indicators identified by
the LSS suggests that the Site has the capability of supporting and maintaining a wetland hydrologic
regime.These findings are supported by the jurisdictional delineation of pocketed wetland areas
throughout the existing riparian floodplain despite altered hydrologic conditions.
6.8 Wetland Design Implementation
The major factors limiting wetland processes at the Site are cattle access, agricultural ditching, historic
manipulation of hydrology, and management of the riparian buffer. Moderate stream incision along
portions of several reaches also contributes to poor hydrologic function of the wetlands.The proposed
wetland design approaches will address these factors by excluding cattle,filling in agricultural ditches,
removing an existing farm pond, planting a native riparian buffer and removing invasive species.
Proposed stream restoration measures, which involve realigning channels closer to wetlands and raising
stream bed profiles,will hydrologically reconnect streams to the adjacent floodplain wetlands.
Wetlands 1, 2, and 3 are located along UT1 Reach 1 and Big Branch and are proposed for restoration
through re-establishment (Figure 10). Re-establishment will begin no less than a full bankfull width from
the edge of the proposed stream top of bank to compensate for the natural draw down that occurs
between wetlands and streams. All wetlands will be disked and roughed to mechanically remove
invasive species, such as broomsedge (Andropgon virginicus).
Wetland 1 is located between existing wetlands D and E and has hydric indictors at or just below the soil
surface and groundwater gages typically met the wetland saturation criterion during the 2020 growing
season (Appendix 4). Meandering the channel near the wetland and raising the stream bed will improve
the hydrologic regime of the wetland. Ditch like features that run along the toe of the adjacent hillslope
in wetland E as well as in the middle of Wetland 1 will be filled to the elevation of surrounding area.The
wetlands will also be disked and roughened to mechanically remove invasive species.
Hydric soils were observed in Wetland 2 at the soil surface and as deep as nine inches below the soil
surface. Existing gages in the wetland (gages 3, 4, and 5)typically did not meet the threshold saturation
criterion during the 2020 growing season, with recorded consecutive inundation periods as low as 11-
days. In addition to disking and roughening the area,the wetland area will be graded no deeper than
eight inches in order to help restore the hydrologic regime. Cross sections through the wetland showing
the approximate proposed grading can be found on sheets 2.1 to 2.5 within the plans.This approach,
along with realigning UT1 closer to the wetland and raising the stream bed elevation up to one and a
half feet will help reconnect the wetland and stream system.
The existing farm pond within the wetland 2 boundary will be converted to a riparian wetland as a
method of re-establishment.The pond is rarely dry, with a steady groundwater source most likely
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 20 May 7,2021

supplied by a spring seep. Evaluation of the pond shows that it has severe water quality issues and is not
a valuable jurisdictional feature. Cattle have been observed in the pond on several occasions and the
berm around the edge indicates it has been manipulated in the past to hold back water. Wetlands along
the pond fringe suggest that without the manipulation,the pond would most likely be a wetland
feature. Based on this evaluation, Wildlands believes the uplift for the pond justifies re-establishment.
Water will be released from the pond to help rehydrate the relic wetland and the surrounding berm
regraded to match the existing valley topography. A groundwater seep upstream of proposed wetland 2
will be routed into the wetland and allowed to naturally infiltrate the area.
Wetland 3 has observed hydric indicators in the top nine inches of the soil,with several soil borings
showing hydric indicators at the soil surface. Existing gages in the wetland (gages 6 and 7) show
consecutive inundation periods of 16 and 25-days, respectively, suggesting the proposed wetland area is
struggling to meet the threshold saturation criterion. Proposed activities in the wetland include disking
and roughening the area and grading down no more than eight inches in order to meet the bottom
elevation of wetland Q, proposed for rehabilitation. Several agricultural ditches that transect the
wetland will be filled to the elevation of the surrounding wetland area. Restoration along Big Branch will
involve raising the bed of the channel to prioritize the overbank flooding regime and enhance floodplain
connection.
Wetlands A, B, D, E, F, G, H, and Q are existing wetlands on the Site that are proposed for rehabilitation
based on hydrologic uplift from the restoration of adjacent stream channels.These wetlands are not
fully functioning due to cattle access and/or hydrologic and vegetation alterations. Minor grading will
occur in wetland Q,which transects Wetland 3, but no other grading activities will occur in these
wetlands.These wetlands will benefit from cattle exclusion by fencing, removal of invasive species,
planting of native vegetation, and increased hydrologic conditions. Restoration of adjacent stream
channels will increase streambed elevations, raising the water table and restoring stream and floodplain
connection.
6.9 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Currently the natural communities that exist on the site include piedmont/mountain bottomland forest
and piedmont/mountain alluvial forest.The objective of the planting plan is to establish, over time, a
minimum 50-foot thriving riparian buffer composed of native tree species and targeting healthy
piedmont/mountain alluvial forest and piedmont/mountain bottomland forest community types.The
restored buffer will improve riparian habitat, help the restored stream remain stable, shade the
streams, and provide a source for large woody debris and organic material to the streams.
Non-forested areas within the conservation easement will be planted with early and late successional
native vegetation (a mixture of trees and shrubs).The specific species composition to be planted was
selected based on the community type, occurrence of species in the riparian buffers adjacent to the Site,
and best professional judgement on species established and anticipated Site conditions in the early year
following project implementation. Selected species include River Birch (Betula nigra), Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), American Elm (Ulmus americana), Sugarberry(Celtis Laevigata), Swamp
Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii), Pawpaw (Asimina tribola), and Strawberry Bush (Euonymus
americana). In addition to planting riparian buffers, streambanks will be planted with a combination of
live stakes and herbaceous plugs. Permanent herbaceous seed will be spread on streambanks,
floodplain areas, and disturbed areas within the project easement.The complete planting plan is found
in the preliminary design plans (Appendix 11).
Invasive species within the conservation easement will be treated using a combination of different
techniques. Where feasible, invasive species will be mechanically removed during construction. On
enhancement II and preservation reaches, invasive species will be controlled using a variety of methods
based on species, size, extent, and professional judgement.The extent of invasive species coverage will
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 21 May 7,2021

be monitored, mapped, and controlled as necessary throughout the required monitoring period. Please
refer to Appendix 7 for the invasive species plan. Additional monitoring and maintenance issues
regarding vegetation are in Sections 8 and 9 and Appendix 8.
To help ensure tree growth and survival, soil amendments may be added to areas of the floodplain
throughout the Site where material is removed. Soil tests will be performed in areas of cut and fertilizer
and lime will be applied based on results. Additionally,topsoil will be stockpiled, and reapplied before
permanent seeding and planting activities take place.
6.10 Fencing Plan
Wildlands current understanding is that the landowner will maintain cattle on this Site after the project
is constructed. In this case,fencing will be installed where livestock have access to the streams in order
to protect Site resources, including wetlands, riparian areas, and streams. Woven wire fencing will be
installed along the easement at a one-foot offset and five strand high tensile fencing will be installed at
crossings and where the easement crosses the proposed stream. A short section along Clarks Creek that
floods often will have high tensile fencing installed instead of woven wire.Two existing cattle waterers
and one well located outside of the proposed conservation easement will remain.The water lines for
the waterers will be rerouted through the internal crossings along UT1B and UT1 Reach 2.The proposed
fencing plan can be found in the preliminary design plans located in Appendix 11. If the landowner
removes all livestock from the site,fencing will not be necessary and will not be constructed.
6.11 Project Risk and Uncertainties
In general,the project has low risk.The rural nature of the watershed and lack of potential for future
land development suggest that there is very little risk to changes in land use in the project watersheds.
Forested areas in the watershed could be cut for timber and/or turned into pastureland. However, given
the size of Clarks Creek's watershed (25 square miles), most of the activities that might take place in the
upper portion of the watershed will have little to no impact on the Site streams.
Foreseeable problems that may arise on the Site include easement encroachments, damage from large
floods, beaver activity, and the spreading of invasive species.The easement boundary will be fenced
where cattle currently have access. High visibility signs will be installed along the easement boundary to
reduce chances of encroachment where fencing is not installed. If necessary, Wildlands will install horse
tape between signs to show the easement boundary. Grade control structures and bank revetments will
be installed to reduce erosion potential during high flows. Beaver activity will be addressed on an as-
needed basis. Wildlands will contract with USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services (APHIS)to
remove beaver from the Site and dismantle the dams. Invasive species have been observed on the site
(Section 3.4). Wildlands' invasive species plan requires ongoing treatment of invasive species on Site
throughout the monitoring period.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the DMS
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (June 2017) and the October 2016 IRT
Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to
assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components are proposed
for stream morphology, hydrology, vegetation, and wetland hydrology.The stream restoration reaches
of the project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology,vegetation, and
geomorphology.The enhancement II reaches will be assigned specific performance criteria components
for vegetation only. Wetland restoration will be assigned specific performance criteria components for
hydrology. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the (up to) seven years of post-
construction monitoring. Performance standards are summarized in Table 18.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 22 May 7,2021

Table 18:Summary of Performance Standards
Parameter Monitoring Feature Performance Standard
Dimension Cross-Section Survey BHR<1.2; ER>2.2 for C/E channels; ER>1.4 for B channels
Pattern and Profile Visual Assessment Should indicate stream stability
Substrate Pebble Counts Coarser material in riffles;finer particles in pools
Photo • Cross-Section Photos No excessive erosion or degradation of banks
Documentation • Photo Points No mid-channel bars,Stable grade control
Hydrology Gage/Transducer Four bankfull events during the 7-year period; in separate years
MY3 success criteria: 320 planted stems per acre
MY5 success criteria:260 planted stems per acre,average of 7
Vegetation1 Vegetation Plots feet in height in each plot.
MY7 success criteria:210 planted stems per acre,average of 10
feet in height in each plot.
Wetland Re-establishment:
• Wetlands 1 and 3-Saturation criterion of 12%of the 248-day
growing season, representing 30 consecutive days of
inundation
Z • Wetland 2 - Saturation criterion of 10% of the 248-day
Wetlands Groundwater Well
growing season, representing 25 consecutive days of
inundation
Wetland Rehabilitation: Saturation criterion of 11% of the 248-
day growing season, representing 27 consecutive days of
inundation
Invasive Species Visual Assessment Invasives no more than 5%by area in easement
Visual Assessment CCPV No signs of encroachment,stream instability, increased invasive
species
1A11 volunteer stems or supplemental plantings must be present in the plot data for two years to be included as
meeting the established vegetation performance standards.
2Refer to 6.7.3 for an in-depth discussion of the wetland saturation thresholds for Site soils.
8.0 MONITORING PLAN
The Site monitoring plan has been developed to ensure that the required performance standards are
met, and project goals and objectives are achieved. Project monitoring requirements are shown in Table
20. Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Table 19. Approximate locations of the
proposed monitoring components are illustrated in Figure 11.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 23 May 7,2021

Table 19: Monitoring Plan
Goal Objective Performance Standard Monitoring Metric
Install and improve livestock Fence conservation
Exclude livestock fencing as needed to exclude easement to exclude
livestock from stream channels, livestock or remove livestock
from stream Visual assessment
riparian areas, proposed from adjacent land. Install
channels.
wetland areas and/or remove fenced and gated culvert
livestock from adjacent fields. crossings as needed.
MY3 success criteria: 320
planted stems per acre,
Convert active cattle pasture MY5 success criteria: 260
and previously maintained planted stems per acre, One hundred square
Restore and agricultural areas to forested average of 7 feet in height in
enhance native riparian buffers along all Site each plot. meter vegetation plots
will be placed on 2%of
floodplain and streams and wetlands.Treat MY7 success criteria: 210 the planted area of the
wetland invasive vegetation along planted stems per acre, project and monitored
vegetation. stream corridors. Protect and average of 10 feet in height annually.
enhance existing forested in each plot.
riparian buffers. Note:shrub and subcanopy
species will be omitted from
average height calculations
Reconstruct stream channels
Entrenchment ratio over 2.2
slated for restoration with
for C/E or 1.4 for B
stable dimensions and
Improve the restoration reaches and bank Cross-section
stability of stream appropriate depth relative to height ratio below 1.2 with monitoring and visual
the existing floodplain.Add
channels. bank revetments and instream visual assessments showing inspections.
structures to protect restored/ progression towards
enhanced streams. stability.
Install habitat features such as
constructed steps,cover logs,
and brush toes on restored
Improve instream reaches.Add woody materials/ There is no required
and wetland LWD to channel beds. Construct performance standard for N/A
habitat. pools of varying depth. Remove this metric.
farm pond and re-establish
forested riparian wetland
habitat.
Free groundwater surface
Restore wetlands through re- within 12 inches of the Groundwater gages will
Restore wetland establishment of hydrology. ground surface for a be placed in wetland
function and Remove the drainage effects of minimum of 11%(27 re-establishment and
hydrology. agricultural ditching and consecutive days)of the rehabilitation areas and
maintenance. growing season for monitored annually.
Montgomery County.
Reduce sediment Restore riparian stream corridor
and nutrient input and pocket wetland areas to There is no required
from adjacent slow and filter runoff from
performance standard for N/A
agricultural fields adjacent agricultural fields. this metric.
Permanently
protect the project Establish a conservation Prevent easement
site from harmful easement on the Site. encroachment. Visual Assessment
uses.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 24 May 7,2021

Table 20: Monitoring Plan
Quantity/Length by Reach
Parameter Monitoring Feature Clarks Big UT1 UT3 Frequency Notes
Creek Branch Reach 1 Reach 2 UT1B Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3
Riffle Cross-sections 2 3 1 2 1 Year 1,2,3,5,
Dimension and 7 1
Pool Cross-sections 2 3 0 1 1
Pattern Pattern N/A
2
Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A
Substrate Reach wide(RW) 1 1 1 1 1 Year 1,2,3,5, 3
Pebble Count and 7
Crest Gage(CG)
Hydrology and/or Transducer 1 1 1 1 Semi-Annual 4
(SG)
Year 1,2,3,5,
Vegetation CVS Level 2 24 Fixed,5 Random and 7 5,6
Wetlands Groundwater Well 9 7
Visual Assessment Yes Semi-Annual
Exotic and nuisance
Semi-Annual 8
vegetation
Project Boundary Semi-Annual 9
Reference Photos Photographs 35 Annual
1. Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location.Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,including top of bank,bankfull,edge of water,
and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits.Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only,unless observations
indicate widespread lack of vertical stability(greater than 10%of reach is affected)and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only.Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide substrate
monitoring.
4. Crest gages will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually,evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible.
5. Vegetation monitoring will follow CVS protocols.
6. The number and location of vegetation plots was determined using the area of planted acreage proposed for crediting.
7. Groundwater wells will be inspected and downloaded quarterly or semi-annually.
8. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped
9. Locations of vegetation damage,boundary encroachments,etc.will be mapped.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 25 May 7,2021

LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program.This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for
the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the
conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly basis
until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an
endowment system within the non-reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund
Account.The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General
Statue GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of
stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to identify boundary markings as
needed. Any livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility the owner
of the underlying fee to maintain.
The Site Protection Instrument can be found in Appendix 1.
Table 21: Long-term Management Plan
Long-Term Management Activity Long-Term Manager Responsibility Landowner Responsibility
The long-term manager will be
responsible for conducting annual
inspections and for undertaking
actions that are reasonably calculated The landowner shall contact the
The Site will be protected in its to swiftly correct the conditions long-term manager if clarification
entirety and managed under the constituting a breach.The USACE,and is needed regarding the
terms outlined in the recorded their authorized agents,shall have the restrictions associated with the
conservation easement.
right to enter and inspect the Site and recorded conservation easement.
to take actions necessary to verify
compliance with the conservation
easement.
10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of Site construction, Wildlands will implement the post-construction monitoring
defined in Sections 8 and 9. Project maintenance will be performed during the monitoring years to
address minor issues as necessary (Appendix 8). If, during the course of annual monitoring, it is
determined the site's ability to achieve site performance standards are jeopardized, DMS will notify the
USACE of the need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action.The Plan of Corrective Action may be
prepared using in-house technical staff or may require engineering and consulting services. Once the
Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized DMS will:
• Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
• Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the USACE.
• Obtain other permits as necessary.
• Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
• Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions.This document shall depict the
extent and nature of the work performed.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 26 May 7,2021

11.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
The final stream credits associated with the Site are listed in Table 22.The credit ratios proposed for the
Site are based on discussions with the Interagency Review Team (IRT):
1. Stream restoration is proposed at a credit ratio of 1:1 to reflect the moderate to severe channel
incision and erosion that will require repair through channel realignment, profile adjustments,
and structure placement.
2. Enhancement II is proposed at different ratios throughout the Site to reflect different stressors
and levels of proposed treatment. UT3 Reach 2 is proposed at a 3:1 credit ratio to reflect the
moderate incision and areas of severe erosion that will require repair. Clarks Creek is proposed
at a 4:1 credit ratio to acknowledge that the stream requires only spot stabilization and buffer
planting and is not currently accessed by cattle.
3. Stream preservation is proposed at a credit ratio of 10:1.
4. Wetland re-establishment, which includes the converted existing pond area, is proposed at a 1:1
credit ratio for areas with relic hydric soils that have been historically manipulated.
5. Wetland rehabilitation is proposed at 1.5:1 to acknowledge the impacts that cattle, invasive
species, and ditching have had on wetland hydrology, vegetation, and overall function.
6. No credit is sought for stream restoration activities in internal easement crossings or utility
right-of-ways.
Buffers proposed throughout the Site meet the minimum required 50-foot standard width for Piedmont
streams, and in most cases, exceed it. The expanded buffer areas previously discussed in Section 6.1 are
not proposed for credit.
The credit release schedule can be found in Appendix 9.
tiod Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 27 May 7,2021

Table 22: Project Asset and Components Table
Original As-Built Original
Original Original
Mitigation Plan Footage or Mitigation
Project Segment Footage/ Acreage Mitigation Restoration Ratio Credits Comments
Acreage Category Level (X:1)
Clarks Creek 3,479 Warm ElI 4 869.750
Big Branch Not for 64 Warm R 1 0.000 DOT ROW
Credit
Big Branch 2,133 Warm R 1 2,133.000
UT1 Reach 1 2,821 Warm R 1 2,821.000
UT1 Reach 2 164 Warm R 1 164.000
UT1 Reach 2 Not for 100 Warm R 1 0.000 Culvert Crossing
Credit
UT1 Reach 2 423 Warm R 1 423.000
UT1B 373 Warm R 1 373.000
UT1B- Not for Credit 62 Warm R 1 0.000 Culvert Crossing
UT1B 868 Warm R 1 868.000
UT3- Not for Credit 33 Warm R 1 0.000 Non-Jurisdictional
UT3 Reach 1 748 Warm R 1 748.000
UT3 Reach 2 2,432 Warm ElI 3 810.667
UT3 Reach 3 331 Warm P 10 33.100
Wetland 1 0.442 Riparian R 1 0.422
Wetland 21 2.163 Riparian R 1 2.163
Wetland 3 1.781 Riparian R 1 1.781
Wetland A 0.075 Riparian RH 1.5 0.05
Wetland B 0.116 Riparian RH 1.5 0.077
Wetland D 0.033 Riparian RH 1.5 0.022
Wetland E 0.102 Riparian RH 1.5 0.068
Wetland F 0.103 Riparian RH 1.5 0.069
Wetland G 0.051 Riparian RH 1.5 0.034
Wetland H 0.158 Riparian RH 1.5 0.105
Wetland Q 0.063 Riparian RH 1.5 0.042
kki Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 28 May 7,2021

Project Credits
Stream Riparian Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level
Warm Cool Cold Wetland Wetland Marsh
Restoration2 7,530.000
Re-establishment 4.366
Rehabilitation 0.467
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II 1,680.417
Creation
Preservation 33.100
Totals 9,243.517 4.833
Note:
1. Wetland 2 boundary includes conversion of the existing farm pond to wetland.
2. Crossing lengths have been removed from restoration footage.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 29 May 7,2021

12.0 REFERENCES
Harman, W.H., et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resources
Management. 1996. Rapid Stream Assessment Technique(RSAT)Field Methods. Montgomery County,
Maryland.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Web Soil Survey of Montgomery County.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009. Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration
Priorities.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed Planning/Yadkin River Basin/2009%20
Upper%20Yadkin%2ORBRP Final%20Final%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality(NCDWQ), 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2015. North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan. Raleigh, NC.
http://ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Conserving/documents/2015WildlifeActionPlan/NC-WAP-2015-All-
Documents.pdf
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001.
Simon, A. 1989.A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2016. Federal Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of
Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District.
October 24, 2016.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014. Endangered Species,Threatened Species, Federal
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site DRAFT Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 30 April 13,2021

y . ' . ' . : 030400401007:
\--i li
• - •rr�"f� r . /• l • 03040104040020
,;�J(I v Uwharrie National Forest Uwharrie National Forest —`
` i �r� NC DMS Easement _-
1l l i•� ' ` S-tip
03040:1 - -
/Randle House �• •,'03040104020010: , i
o ► r' 1 j . . . . . . . i . . . • NC DMS Easement `
�' it;
frIrt/ ' 1 "111 Project Location 1
/1° ,,,,
4r4 �A
r.
s% .`.:iir 1ri f.,, - IN. Jordan Field Airport
) -.! lr:a -
Norwood N'J •♦ N . rr • : !' I `
I ,/ y� Lake Tillery �'�
l�'fti / Mount Glad Downtown Historic District
' •`` ? 33040104040030 '
(
- 1 1 Mt.Gilead i /�I
riThr
I `
` Three—Rivers Land Trust Easement /
i
0304010506008o Q Yadkin/Middle Pee Dee ,
I
03040104010030 `Oto
' I.
��� River Aquatic Ha^bitat 0
Fork Beaver Ponds
• spgN`r f 03040104020040
•77 _ � l Catawba Lands Conservancy
Ir 030401050 18 060`...�4's'4, ,t / Easement-The Fork ' I \
4 *ft. 00.
‘i',. '/ A_ - MONTGOM ERY` /
/ ,• RICH MOND
/••-•
Project Location i _ _i Hydrologic Unit Code(14-Digit) NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
Five Mile Radius : : : : Water Supply Watershed o 303d Listed Streams
L.._.! County n Targeted Local Watersheds Water Features
= Municipalities r/ Local Watershed Plans © Airports
M Yadkin River Basin (03040104) NC Historic Preservation Areas
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
030_40,104061030 .j . -9L7 I �I"03040104070020
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
W I L D LAND S 0 0.75 1.5 Miles Yadkin River Basin 03040104
014ENGINEERING I I I I I I•Plll 1,
Montgomery County, NC

Project Location n~ al�� ' Pr .* r , „ .
i • /`•. r . i �-
Proposed Conservation Easement _.
t ;t0 - .....„� 4.
Existing Wetlands . •� ■ I �. BIG BRANCH •
—I Existing Pond ; �.: . • I ..- - ��
•
Existing Utility Easement • f '
1 • a-I:, �f
rf"L
,f .-�- ` I %. - - -
•
Project Streams i—, r ! . 4/ I ` " -. Z• , 1
Non Project Streams - V 1 •• • 2
+ ____= Existing Farm Road • ti: •=`_"'A, _ Nit- -_ I + \ Q +`'
[� •A
-- Existing Utility Line `4,- -,...,• ► ' '
�4,• •4 1
•` •`fir ��, ',
0`1.
\Ia k
ins _ .0,,_
* r' `�� # I! i Existing Culvert
4 ;+ �� i- _ \ Crossing _. 4t___,il• - ~� .\
r s• ► [ ;
i`ti J.` �� y r jtr �►ii � �
1/2
fl w
r fl
--, t li •:.•._,_ "'''''' •.1, ' '117tesitivisitars.... \\
# hi%
i
_ - it Imo' �� �� "h r , ir�'af;ii ' '\
Ilk A
%tis - ' 1. - .' . :A. _- -,2•1,, t:, ._ ' (, , ,�..
.r• �• i +•� s• � • r .a+. �. ! ri `4 lk 4 T^ y 3!b f_•lRt. V.
.. .wl0rrr >>• Mg*, •i. * J a .L .`•.• �1. - r- ., f y xr'�`` .:;�s. ,, ,t, t..t
_ a • -a- k � . • 'rT „r •.� + �''.. - , •�s - i1R••ti w1, • •yr ^r'-.;T�-14,, ;.r.' - :` `,1 •
:..,„
.A .",1'7 r " • i. n rti.'' •, .} "f • . t •r ` 1 f t - `Y ,..1�:'r.,S ..01.- • :-' �.1
s.
.-a - %r '.? i_ � "R ••.a w i' .".? .i. L''.' I. �;1;111, •-[M r.r a ::fit i�';_fi -
!h. _ +, y L }:; .ems`:��+1 R- ""-F- - r•�,,.� � �`i,: .`•.t..
rt{ \ ` 7't t ` r R .,•.: „a .*,: :;c- y 2019 eria/Photography
. .-.�� ?.....--' ,•,.. � ►~ 's•' - .,per-r -•.'..,;a. - \
Figure 2 Site Map
Ie, W I L D L A N D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
I I I I I
Montgomery County, NC

:
Watersheds . " _ ' \ -� .y . ` .,`;.. - - - - pocky Cre
VI
Subwatersheds `' "», ..E
•t
Project Streams -. -
Non Project Streams , 14
taLOR* < '
Topographic Contours (4) / • 7 c�1
ti f
] f
J
11.11/
' 'j •. —
, .t-
i' �, Clarks Creek (16,337 ac)
'• •R' Fork f
/
'c .t�S
IE 'c;s°'- aiiii
e. KII,e �,:J''
11 ksV
1:
g,Q
w,"r
Ille ,, . _. , _ IV'
'' 1., Big Branch (1 ,464 AC)
-J
y'
Mal►• • g
4, r
' •Clarks Creek (16,337 AC)
-41 .. k%•&"
•
' UT1 B (348 AC) \. jf J.r '
UT1 (725 AC) $.. If �li �� -
614*
. , T' ANy�.f�'/i _7'F- a4' : i
S' •li �' ":f a
`� +li1 , F •!r 1 ,r(s' fir
• i 44 . �k ,.. �'.i 4f y'' 4- tit
�[• ' ity :WI /. �R. :..: Big Branch (1 ,464 AC)
•
i. pItr �p � :Oh
y 1tp , is
s•.. .Ai• . •-R
1 ... . 4. ,'. :.:. UT3 (96 AC) , ,,
1
A.
s�_ !'f f
,t e .
11 .I.
• .ti:e �y
.I ...1 .` - 'icy,
S 14 � C •f,
mn; .,
i
ius2019 Aerial Pfotography t
5 , j ,,r wiz'. +.. ---.---.I-.2 • ii�7--.. - A_ . -I.. ..:.uit- --iFrsi ' r1 1'...f.i.•••••,•.L=:1
Figure 3 Watershed Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I N Yadkin River Basin 03040104
Montgomery County, NC

Ilial iF,- --N, \ Z ger I
1,—_i Proposed Conservation Easement 1 • •
t•;� t \
ip f NC 73
44171 .\*,%s ( I
Nir--------- ._,-- .
---..--\,.......f\j , , ;----____„,,,,, \s. ♦ --- -i,,,...---\
• , A II�1 1
• .
tik,
r
\ \
• ,,t, L''.11,,,.... ..."zy,..... c"--,
114.1
_./4.4, ,
ram ( ` * i ♦ , crI,, (._ c.,...
- 1p.
•
..„.) sp C
_e/...>":-..
',...,__ ,..) fi ......- ......"
-...„.;_____jril * .*- 0 \\ - -."---- .- ' 4::)Cr"\ ------\
8. ..irp000cilir. -. .- - L - \.,..,..\y"
-N\---\\x,
rl
______,:i7.---,,---7:\_,) t...... =_Iii 1 ,
.---5 ,____, ,..
; 1.-"D., .
2 ?-----":".%
, -^i
,_„
„............,
c.:,......,_ „... _.........„... ....
c---
.......c .... , ". „.....,,,,,
„:„.
3/4......... /, -(\,..i .
..\ \ ,
• • \:). ."
tn)
3;01..)
t. #1 ........ ...:....01: :::......,..... . .‘8
n'"'"? • •••
(4g(c.:::3
it
NJ
A a 350-, 0
Mount Gilead West, NC USGS US Topo 7.5 - Minute Topographic Quadrangle � �! Y+
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
WILDLANllS 0 350 700 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
ENGINEERING I I I I
Montgomery County, NC

Project Location 4 '.� +:mt.& ;� :1 •` ra
"'yam` •
41 +.! w_•. o
',__; Proposed Conservation Easements '
'.4- --h •.■ *`' Ne 73 -.WC-- i
BdC Badin Tarrus Complex, 8 15%Slopes �a � ` " ���.AT • ' UT to i ,.,.,
BdD Badin Tarrus Complex, 15 25%Slopes • �`/y ` ,'�f -- BIG BRANCH i _ ' htt '• ' _
' •�Y ' ']',. . .' 1, '•,
BeB2- Badin Tarrus Complex, 2-8%Slopes, Moderately Eroded r +' " , --4 4 •, - �; •� I}*'." '. U ti ,
''CC r•>S` ^`4• +a►• • k4 r� fed ,;p rx ,
BeC2-Badin-Tarrus Complex, 8-15%Slopes, Moderately Eroded A.. . • 1 r`ti- } , � , ,+ c :. r,,
A •• • I c
CnA-Chenneby Silt Loam,0 to 2%Slopes, Frequently Flooded ;, •' •
``r � j;;.% , "
GoE Goldston Badin Complex, 15 45%Slopes , CC OkA i`. _. {' -, _
R $ Y* . • '-met..:
OkA-Oakboro Silt Loam,0-2%Slopes, Frequently Flooded - ..- <" m .` .,K.;
11 r
ShA-Shellbluff Silt Loam, 0 to 2%Slopes, Occasionally Flooded • • r" % "� CD
'
TeB Tillery Silt Loam,0 6%Slopes, Rarely Flooded • r c_.,� y �. •. �. 4 r'• }. y V"Irt'
Existing Pond 'f eC '� _ .+yfi:z• i}�, ,• t �� %�" ';:
iii
— Project Streams ti. N` "� ,r 4 •.� � • _
•` -•- `' , .V i j7 V Li• ! - ' am ~,
Non Project Streams ♦� Go „� 1 , t"
., ♦: •
OkA TeB::�' r. 'T.. BdD Oz-..t.:_zit.,,,,tf.v.:.__
+ �- v, -�- TeB -� 'l.---•,,z..� w `• GoE
.it..M'- gb•AI01. i' i .„„,
lib $1
:: V. • 1 .„ � si- -- AI ♦ / TeB
R.
IhAt-t `'� * ''1?- ` '•. • i -
d
41),,,, II'
��' Tti -r - -• BeC2 *...: I !
BeC2 •�. s. : . .3 i iy► ,111- ! w►;•f'
M? - 4. �R•'t ; lbil* `yf •tee4 :.,
7._.
.. , ,.....„,.t .. , .
.„,,,, . . ..,,,,,, . ,
„ _
•
„ _
1 O ! ci'; ti �.-,. %.,BeB2 ; � � _� :,� ate ilk ' :,..5 _. r. *. 1 Y::
-PC kit. 44116
- 4''' ''''e'ile.
BeB2 / t '' BdC ,4y c --- •: Q '• '°
f
'.i �j i, ,. 'tt - -%�:, Iry A [mid 1[ i, ti_ 4'.‘• Rs • **I' r.%.4likvirit‘- Loriili'ff. 11 . 1'. - . NI 46 '.... •,•'-.... C-• . ..T -. '
,11 \
.yam .S • r4 V - :-1 j•-.3 ti *"' '.-, 0..- ' r ••, • •,:vy, '#.•. ;' .'y..
•
AlICI
Figure 5 Soils Map
WI L E DN LANi D S \ Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
G N E R I N G 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
I I I I I Montgomery County, NC

F vs
Project Property * • ,�. voiloigoilwrr - '-r-1 _ Y iii • ? "�' ; `
r Proposed Conservation Easement �4 _ - "� :- r
EEZ :ement
•
•
� y y % I 4
O ,
Project Streams ,1 I `-,\., • . _ r: - '•4z' T
; : 't-. s . L
— Non-Project Streams ,e- ' . 4 - I • �' • r \� V - -
s•Existing Conditions Cross-Sections i s", ; le•`*?._ '� I ...IL �`" - Q i` r=�1
__= Existing Farm Road q� * , CO y�
-- Existing Utility Line 'S� �7:tiy1. `�. -k m _ ,. • TM'
Ditch ' hi. �. �, 4 , i'-1. i ` _ .. .. . }
Existing Culvert 4 / M 1�"'1� '+'' ;`
❑ Existing Ford K' . ��N~ \ �.,ii �n- !�
•
-+- Existing Groundwater Gauge (GWG) 't• •
��'�•,•f ��_._ _ .�" �`'I-S 1, � •
GWG 7
*irimpReach Break L. • rr •• ` 4
4* if -.=_ 1 z -it CEO. ,.�;.
its E "'Alt` ;.4 / \ ,\ i _ ,;�•GWG 6./
a �..; Q
Y �� ,�: . 4 Reach - ` ,,,jt�%
��:�;�,;rI��:,� X j Wit, A
�\ ,fir• �rr�,��. reyniodelo` _ , - ,� `•
+ *` - Y1. • �. >3 Sa`�'` i
•
y1' \ :t.
�Y- ` D` F/ ' it Failed Dam A . . ti:
—G 3. ]! f1 t �. .. a
Reach 1 - N. ~.:- tit ti r,,i 77..-i ts*":' V.... i.-i,,,. .1.,.-d, e , ---'
. t. .., lih 14. -,----- .446: k lifrici s,
It iiliiivoliorit. if
* 41_11%jihrisw.- •:'... lit. ' •••,•'-:"..44,;.;S:e. '.`-'''''` L. • ,.`.. . .
II Ilk
♦. �• 4%+ •r-1 �•� j l j
-... S-,tSIU Cn - '4 .14; Ix '41 *N !&,c--.,._,,,[1r,,,-:, 4-i . ., r • • - N;•• - • '• '• S.-4."4 '''')'''' '
•
IV Sir-41'A
. . . -
. .„,....,....., i.,
I ` _ ' r 4 � ,,,.
f�` .� '-it .....*' :
*" ;. - }r . ,ref.
111 N• • ..Nio * . . Failed Dam . / � a • •
^ ' {
:-.f‘cf.‘. ._ 61c* lit , .....
Figure 6 Existing Conditions Map
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
W I LD LAN D S 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104 keof ENGINEERING I I I I I
Montgomery County, NC

"1,4"41"6..44-6*. ll*Itel.t''44'ir. . •-'4: -- .'e.
= Project Location '�- ,'' ' 4 s ' ' G..-
Proposed Conservation Easement 411 . r' • , ......+� . Ne-}7•13 --- _ ..,,, 'S.�lnsr,. .,
Existing Wetlands *•
. BIG BRANCH Nye ...
��.,
Existing Pond ••-` =~•,,�t_`ia ,.4• 't•• y272.6 _.. • - -
..
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard +':-' '>r`
Zone AE �� •` Si. � 14 t �_•Y _
Zone AE (Floodway) ?:r ` ti� ��. . 1 �`•• V -- f
Y • I
FIRM Panels • N � ;.
FIRM Cross-Section ~'y
�_ • I 4. m .
Project Streams 1._ - ` •
Non Project Streams • _` i� r � I Y
\ - \dAtikr* ;Ai_ . / '"`1 a1�. ..
/ i .
si44 , ,... _ _ wo. -
- -?' a ~� y ,ice. _ l.r�''' i G '+ ID '? i �,-r•.4 _••
It
1llir f • ` �.. 4. ^S }' -
•
-4.31( le* - ,
• ;mom_ ▪ a •` fi
•
- I ; �•* • PANEL r ti6 e1,
- -.. z .tat. - 3710659400J • `- ?` .ten• . e,
•:ri r':'4-` "," • �'', �,1/2/2008 - `.. -9-A
ti _ ■• '
- C�
i,‘,S 400INK9/414 . - • . • • , lin lepp. , ,.
ilk
•
- PANEL
•. 3710659300J - .
x .••
R i,.�' ,` '.� . ' • •�� -^ �, Ga 1/2/2008
:r i ,Y'• .It•- my ''. 4•• ` 4 l' .,`r.
iiit.tAi'l.'
1,\N4,- ...,.:.. VrvIN4Pit N• _ . _...•i. ,. . • v„6, :,,,,•
•- Vv. 1"), . : 'r:),"36";- let„......+A.. Ntl' ' ,,' ' '4,,...0 •' --, ,FT-ir \-:
* • ' AP . , a, ,
'-►.. Tyr•,
� " • F ,- ~ • �• ` 2019 Aerial Pho graphy
Figure 7 FEMA Map
I► W I L D LAN D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Montgomery County, NC

Reference Reach '?' f:-6-
. `
•rr- VIRGINIA
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
.
r J'
~� ..""' r- l• rF�I ,-' r. Lynchburg
\ -.,.e.' t \ -;4066 ftr, - P• . - ••
l•I , I I ,I .
MountoW
Lake'
Dan Rivas
Bristol 1 —, N.,: Danville
- - — - _.� _ _ -- John r'
rt
Cherol,es Pilot Mountain Tributary
N abarLA
Forest
f — A
rl
/ % i�, F',-
i a S - Long Branch
r ?r rr, 0 ` Winston-
o •5316tt
0 UT to Varnals Creek eensboro
c 4:'e=rr Durham
G Lenoir High Point
' F Foust Upstream
Piegrtt atteliug 'Lake Morganton PIEDMONT ? Raleigh
-F6reiet .formes Brookford Statesville
Salisburyf754tt A.
Collins Creek
Lake Moore Spencer Creek 78 ft
2269 ft Norrtlar] r
Lake 94 949 ft UT to Richland Creek]RTH•i
Lure UT to Sandy Branch CAROLINA
UN h e
Shelby Natio al A Coharie
'9rcr ro RA£ Charlotte Fore Sdtsa
— — — _ —` Spencer Creek Reach 3
` Fort Bragg
Military
(I Reservation
Spartanburg Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Fayetteville
Rockingham
:nville
Lumbee Sdtsa ' [
Sdtsa \ Lumberton a°'
•A
C \
r, \
Greenwood Florence
Lake Murray �F
it Columbia
Figure 8 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
ktWILDLANDS 0 15 30 Miles Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING l i I I I Yadkin River Basin 03040104
Montgomery County, NC

North Carolina Piedmont Regional Curve: Bankfull Discharge
1000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
— f' -- —
—
—
100
N
a)
y= 79.944xo.7338
U
N R2= 0.9635
oI I
10 -- y= 89.039x°'223
R2= 0.9069
1 ,
0.1 1 10
Drainage Area (square miles)
♦ Rural Piedmont Data Rural Upper 95% Limit
—— Rural Lower 95% Limit Regional Piedmont Calculator 1.2-yr Predictions
X Select Reference Reaches for Curve ■ Surveyed Project Reaches (Manning's Eqn.)
Final Design Discharges Power(Rural Piedmont Data)
Power(Select Reference Reaches for Curve)
Figure 9 Discharge Analysis Graph
Oar,.W I L D L A N D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING Yadkin River Basin 03040104
Montgomery County, NC

75-
Project Location _ 'u i - M1 «' .‘ r r _4.0•
1._—. Proposed Conservation Easement ?` •- ., •• �sci = `r le a • ,
Existing Utility Easement -L�--- y ' + �- UT to
,a t AR F If' . BI BRAN H
EEL Relocated Utility Easement -- 10 'r ti• - . ?� . :4 �:.
' 1.
'// Internal Crossing ` ��
F1 Wetland Re-establishment �_+. • �' z y'ra ;r � z
�Y
liZ Wetland Rehabilitation �� i ' 1 ' • x' ''jam 's��'{.; •'.f!:
-Stream Restoration 4.a� .;a ":? ?''� '. '$•
Stream Enhancement II �`� �x • '
S r't'. -.e -. -r Ski i`';. -•--....
Stream Preservation ■4. y„y.#�
Internal Crossing 1 - , '*' ., �� '• •;
-Stream -Not for Credit 60' wide _ - L _' ., 0 y �: S�':,-}
J C A5 �,l•:.
•
Non Project Streams c„ � ar •
Ditches To Be Filled `' • `' -,, " s• �� + 7 '
Reach Break 10- • ,* .
Proposed Wetland 3
sL.
Proposed Culverts �► *Il 1. • -' f;. = ,
' :!'`� o.
Proposed Wetland 1 ��-' r�:• r n.- _.��, ( . ' •. . :- Q r
iE ` \ V • a ---.
IA,
•
.14 B It ' Nit Internal Crossing 2 - '
,
4 - ••
Proposed Wetland 2 100' Wide -• - i ,
•
s 1 i
P - Utility line to be relocated �<
O through Crossing 2 �.fj
•
- • Existing Pond To Be Converted ..� ��1-- •
To Riparian Wetland I 4 4 T• ,- �►, i T;�,�, '
i , Remove Existing Culvert �� . ,•, :7..'yy;� • ' „� a �.?►;
- •;' , r. 3 ill. ,Yrf��' 1 ` , iA's''.N. ; Ott�4. ^- ._ ~
'.''1r.....s.1110111fr- ....' 1‘ - GaillthN — ,
Ihr 1110/141* lik- *Iv.10 11,10.7.4.,';,4..,. , .. ).....,.._,..,,,_::::...i.,4.....,;,: itj.:'-F_, 1;k:.:: .
r.
_ ON •) ti _ r•.. - '-�_.. LAL-L'L'W + • r,•YL�• .(• - IY
•
i yr V s•.,-0
' Remove Existing Culvert . , r � a" ..
.4% ` i 2019 Aerial Photogra.by •Figure 10 Concept Map
WILD LAN D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
I I I
Montgomery County, NC

r,...-.-"--;
ti ; .... - w •. ''' • , BIG BRANCH ..-11440441
'� t_Y J;
X
r `,, x ''`• i ' • tea';"-x. ,k: .r,... . Cr '
left
14T
+ram 3 \ ...... S1.L . . 0 . . 6 ), - . _ ..r-c. _ , it, , , \ • i, .:,4,.. - : .._ . .‘. ,...-,.,,w14:;‘ zg„Nr7-itii. ,. • x
I% _ \Niii
`L 't•4
,,
- .' # G' x . - I . _ • �.g Y Proposed Wetland 3 Z
= _ _ AA" I O '"1. Ate ._
��� -, • lira
it-b- -
U.Ftb J f' tt �;�~ ' ar - PL• C x •
ir Proposed Wetland 1 / • , �Z �:_ O . `�T �.\ - i •
``.• 'z ,T =vy• • +�� •• '��x • O / tt7:0441,Nic
` i fr3O —#- O 5' •-ra Project Location • F -• ,'. ‘"• �,• _'� -... .b:rat } X_ b� Pr �i_lt, r - •
1._ Proposed Conservation Easement = .r K • ' •j ` * Y. 4's '
•
Existing Utility Easement '`:*1.x•-•:'fib lit, r % e ��i
Mink Relocated Utility Easement Z`; +r"+ ►" �rgt • "'rrr,"' ,p
E1 Wetland Re-establishment �' ��' s
SM Wetland Rehabilitation • • :•e-ile 144
.
•
��� Internal Crossing .+ _ 'k .;. 0'� ', 4* �' •. �• `� ►'��
Stream Restoration *, ��.. 'ram_, . .. . + . _. \�ry,
•Stream Enhancement II �" ``
Stream Preservation 9 _ , lik`4 _ _
Stream -Not for Credit ',xa'� - x `� ;' t 4 ,.•. .. ,,\,:`
Non-Project Streams • . x 3 .4 y •-•4'�_ •, ! • ` .'�1.�q•; • '; r
Cross-Sections s4 /. _ - z k • ,' r_ +
❑ Fixed Vegetation Plot > ;_ . "`� _ `';:_- t ,� , 7 01
. '4;•;,
❑ 'r' �• ► '. ' ` • Reach 3 �: �
Random Vegetation Plot �• _ * - }
Photo Point •�. i , + [ x ., .
x
+ Groundwater Gauge (GWG) �`� ;s. � ti �'' • . ,, - .
Crest Gauge1.1
VA '►
Reach Break ..
' �+t- tZ�' '; _� -� '�'�� oAp 'er \ 2019Aerial Photography
Figure 11 Proposed Monitoring Components Map
W I L D LAN D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 450 900 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
I I I I I
Montgomery County, NC

Appendix 1

Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 1. Parcels are optioned for easement purchase by Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands). Upon transfer of lands to Wildlands, a conservation easement will be
recorded on the parcels and includes streams and wetlands being restored and preserved along with
their corresponding riparian buffers.
Table 1:Site Protection Instrument
Memorandum of Option
Current Under Option Conservation Easement Acreage to
Landowner PIN County to Purchase be
Deed Book(DB)and Page
by Wildlands? Protected
Number(PG)
Cross Creek 659400503458 Montgomery Yes BK 748 PG 397 21.44
Ranch Family LP
Cross Creek 659400211254 Montgomery Yes BK 748 PG 397 42.23
Ranch Family LP
All site protection instruments require 60-day advance notification to the USACE and or DMS prior to
any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by
the State.
4" Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 1
DMS ID No.100138 Page 1

Appendix 2

. 1 '.er,' IN,':\' •,.'.Vit• ' ''• ,
. ''. • ' .'.V ',,.. j 'h ,. . r,
-t• . —
. s' ' '. .• .‘ '';% " '' 4a•:"'
.,. .. . -',14. ' • •4.'*/.._ -..Abr. 'k
1 t i''' ' . 1 ill i 1 I .'' '4' A,... ...•.
0•Sp. .1'
. 1% • `, =76' • .001' ,. 4' 0
. .
• .. ,_ .... • •I•
•r ...1 rt . — ,
Ir
. ' rr' * .„i„ .:•• ..
' . • L. V I
),
r r
• . • •
- • ` ., .
•-. — i_ NT
-- •-. '
.•
I '-- - f • ,e.%
j 7
t -,- 3',.. ,'a,. ,.ei • . - , ,
= • , / -
• t,
r
-. .- ' f.. /r 0 ' ,'-• j A .. r
I i
t
. : 1/ •., •44 a '`.... I
.. •• rr 1 ' I,/.
. . .
' r I _ • :., , 4
. ,
• ..-:e;f'1 ' 4
.• .6.41 i
.,
• 1 ' •41' '' V } ' -".
...
--ii,......_ I
„ • ?o _ : 0- ..-',. ,
- 14.. ' '1\ -14. •
. i
1 *
. ,
/` ,
•• ' . if. .) , .. w • -
4 • ' 1, l• . . •
--.,.. :•,,,, ' . • , "Ter -!-_,,,. 4.:. I r r• ,
. te,, , • i i
/ ''''...\ .
.....,,........). ' 410
. . ,
,_ . • ,. ,
\ 1 . • -
lir 1\ -•-• " ' if 1,r--,r '-'---_ , •:: ' if:, : I ' lit
." #. •
— • -• _ . I ‘ ,.. ; i;
1. 1
. . e,
_ .., i
.., „
,V
•.... _. , . f '•r
•
,. ., •
. .
--....... . ,
. ..0. . .
, .
' • 1.}1 , d
41,.. -• _
• ,(,..
% , 7 • •
N. •-,, irj .-• I
,.;
1104, .,,, • • i
i r .,,, , , : • . ..;„. 17. in if
. .1.,..
. r '
, ..
• ...," , - ''Ai.; 4, ,-...-. . :
.....yr..4.0ri, . _.,&. — .., . '•
/ .
. . .
:= • . .
--
\ / .
•dft-- - _, .
--111111
.-) 1-
..--
.., ,,,.
' - •
-
• ,i ree r••• . . .. . - .
. ,,,,flit: ' :i o . ....,. .
. ,
-
•
. '.-
' e . •J . - .
1 ,1 ,
..... 1
'r.
. .
N..
' g .
. A ....„d
.• • ..: , . "..t.
•
.0•'.• .A,
•
• . —. .
Ol• if
• ,
INQUIRY#:5729696.5 ., Subject boundary not shown because it
YEAR: 1955 A. N exceeds image extent or image is not
georeferenced.
CI =500' EDR Big Branch not shown on image

: • � — 4- —4. . . , Iv .
¥ i . yN
. 1 i- . , ,
. /• . , \/_.
• \ 4 . ` - ' m . .
"! . ` . : ..
.• • . _ •. •
• , s - ` y
\ , /\
: . •
\ * � . -
% . /. - : i z w '& '
~ - - / .
/ • \ :� _ �- % m
-•, . . •
"• k 4 \ `
\ `
_ -. / . a �! . \, ' .
: ` � 4 .
AO ,..,.
■ w
a y -i tom: @ ` , ' f
' .
dl
3.
/ . , ot,
INQUIRY#:929696s A N Subject boundary not shown because it
exceeds image extent«image isnot
YEAR: 1m1 georeferenced.
1 =mE 'EDR Big Branch not shown on image

r
„ S 0
p * , 0 y . J. ry,, _ e
* .. '' - N' •am..•
y. : .' a . ' R wL ,. :L r�-
AO I
• A ,per• ~ '
•
• i y'r �s; Y ' e � ..'.? �' vfI � e, . . ky
r 0'. t R r
t.
04.
. 1 . _ _ . . ......0„. .„,
r •
. , -II.
i f ' :R' iar.
6 Oa
. .
it
' Or 419/111 si _.
r�,
s
•
fS I '• r�y
•
sivi4i,
•
INQt14RY#:5729696.5 Subject boundary not shown because it
i N ,. _. , ..
;::... exceeds image extent or image is not
YEAR:_1964 georeferenced.
I =500' EDR Big Branch not shown on image

at+` , '¢. , •'`._ ,"ram _e - ,4"."
.4441 a I;
" '� ` fin! .. Y �' ` c N ;
* ow
',r ---#444140, ,i.,,--- Astir
•
e (4 ?? { ci-x " I if • y
•
,..,,..,.. ,-,.. ..‘• tpX„,,,
t - ' e
I ► ,t
NitI
,..4 io,_ ,..t.,:4,..,,.L Ai_ ' ., . ttl irl. illit
a- xt . ;ttfaoisiti,
-• Ik �IM�- a A ° w --y..• '�.t+•�� f t ,1 �� 1"1 I, - . `� "'f i
trip
.407,,,, • -- ..,
-.)ts . ' .707,....„1,‘,,,,1 .,1, 1*. .1...i,' 41b. ,,,,,1.!I:4'.:`,..41,7'4,,-‘ ;,ir:,.:::7,,-...'
t . ,,kilt"
lik' '' 4 •lit ,-.0,. ,
„.,,,c,-,-,„ f, , ... „..
, ,. . ‘: i ,,,...,
pc % , .„141„ . ti,
soi, v .,..„„- ,,, .:, .. .
,. ..a•<eNT•W . • '4.
sr
1 ik ...•
, „.. • �. ti "ter . -
. . . + i tom, .. ' •
, .
,•,
, , ,
. , ,,, ,„,„..,„ ..
‘.
‘ iit f t .4'
' Ili " -Apr *4'r
lit
'44-,fir• `� t* y ti
VC i
ott,z4
• ' ♦ ' i , i +
•
\ t} I`ram4�j *�; ty,Y �y•# ?� a r R
t 744 tO 4 t , \\A /I • —- '...A
.`j 4.+ TnJ' +r• r ,ram• •• -� A- \
1 §,,,
1.' tittilir. -...4`',
AS*,vi .-. •.#1,4.. ',.. , 1, .e.• . . "ktikliwar. Nic „11.....:x.k.fr< ‘ 4. 2.,
• i•'R#� �. 1 • e . ,
INQUIRY#:5729696.5 .t : � s a Subject boundary not shown because it
N �*•
` f ��,` = exceeds image extent or image is not
YEAR 1993 yf•'' �� _°�` ''h+ georeferenced.
I =500' FOR . : a .` Big Branch not shown on image

R . e 4: wit, ,:',i...
r i -2 f,4.10 4 4 . . r '4 N- •.1.7:
le. s5 h jj
i .
f. ti �: 4 - ri.
ea
:t f
tr. �.� LI
-art .a.lle g:'
1 _• a �e• r � y.} ,{��
�• i
` r - ■ 41, W _ -� .t. ate- • �f•.
I . " I' . 1 04 a .4,4,
.."., ...,0
,,
i. t,.... . „ •
.. 4.. . . 4, . 1
. .
-.t. .. .4 .. . ...
46 .
c,, ...it4,41t,T.„,....,......)„, • z... ....
•
1, _t .3'^ , 4. '',,V,... Alift;L
AR r
"% • " d
• • ,f P .L YF?
. Sr.cjt.�. .r ' •may-•y, -v- ' '# r �. � ,x �`•
•
•frt'','' • •', . •L,:' ;:,Vic;'-- .r * :� , -
v - .44 ' • +'fey 2r. 4Irr Y +
f.Kti a-� .. - _ - - `�gf. i _ S
40.
.e My I`�i.L r ♦.
• t _ ri. .. '
A.
. ',CPC i . .%,;. I
N....
. i ii•itol• . • .... .
. „.
•,. . .
• , • 0. ••• • ' . .
1NQU RY#:5729696.5 i
,tiiit
! Subject boundary not shown because it
j. ,,; exceeds image extent or image is not
YEAR: 2006 ,georeferenced.
}
+ =500' FOR ` iY- *- • Big Branch not shown on image

-\ d - 1, el - 10X_ Ar'-' o'''ILO -'2
c 4E4- lto t Y -, 4.):14.4."...•
,(1.1$1,..:::',,E4.:$, ii , , . .4 .
,-.4 -if.•• ,P.,1.-tc• -.• • . :.• ,. -...05,4).axgriv..4'..',.,'... •:'4 it;144'
, � _ . Mk ,,4�,�t
i, 1 �Y`y: ,'e
,Afil,v, o r 4`z, 'A
lb
:tu y_1r!..c5-41 L xa Mti
v.
#iiiit.
.' 4.:‘,',... (...:...$•• il r'''..,.... , ', A 4 i - .e.! 4/ ;4 ,I . .. , ..•... ., .
t?1 /
4kJ Ems , • ,; !� -.�� ,� �• •� � }t.411' Y ...i.)..e•7:4,,,ty - IF , _,-- •-Pc I',d:"1... ' ge „ %%Zs.
„„:4,„,.,ii.k. A. .„,, ...., , i,,. . . .1 - ‘•••,-;• . ' - • • •••' r •'' ' ....A, .....-;.
- „,i.f... , n44,,,,,ti. , ,41 , ‘.... i 4 lit -- ',- • • ." il' ' . — : •slit,: • • ' 4,41 •':.4.
tr.
:.''...- ' . • .. - „,.•, ik - • —(" - ..*It -:. . . -e I
..f .....,4,
. . ...,,... ..... ,
ti.....,,,w.....)„.
. .t,,,, )
, 4 4. ...iik. , , I . d, i,
rt, 11•11*. --.-,
- : • Kiri. i.1'),
.1.11-F,A•i,40.•.-I 1/ 0-
f �4 M . ` 'l-0 it4..4.‘... .
■ t-- .,.e l Ot'.- i..,..;/. -.,4.. 1rd ' •• ' .'. ., ' . •4", . Y . • • ,iic;44• It'. , .
illitiita
iT'v
,tt i
s4•
i,
, .14;, .* �., ti. �'*. Sri 4'` 'i.; f !e.
,, t .. .-- gi • ...'4":1'. 1 j 'l'. )'
4.
talk
• 4 7. . .. , 0, i. _.. . :j :ill
f
.- . ' ..k I!IC' 0: . -,,t_ ,,k : ,ici..; . _..,,t,,
'] 1, •.
..
N if• :, `f • 11
41: ili, 4, 1.4 t ., b I.'w ,,,,.,... lw: ' /..... .''4:-10.41: .',4'#.1::17:::-1.
(,,. . '., '....-''''''r'l' ::.('''., 1....rA P'''• WM t, ' '' :te
•
4 y'• •;;{ -'',: .0 :'y>.;1;.-- •1j;':1'.,;,i: •r' '*• °' + ry
;,
r• P 1�:;S4. C f .Y r `;^n:;; .d i.: - H' ; y f '],r �f I�tF
f 4 §'. �?•i. aY. (7+i" i ,`'r `�k','" r tr' ► �i f al.y, l ` }7 1 • .M}• .,l},' .# I.." iL'••li ti' r,? }ti:-.:. ;ter. i l�'4 ' 'ti f • • ! • 31 f 4,r:ti T,. }r .` eYF•
h. 114
' } i Subject bounds not shown because it
INQUIRY#:5729696.5 '-'fir: 4 • r• .;, . • 1 boundary
X exceeds image extent or image is not
YEAR: 2012 _ , ,+,zed• Big Brancher not
,
+ =500' CEOR `' Big not shown on image

k4 -' .. „, . . .- . ‘. • -)P 6 , .
-� '� /It r lkfi•i�y
• . •
•
. ik Si . . ,, lit ) ,
14 ,
n
, .. .114..141N, ,
_. . . ,,„
..., ..i.
. ,. ,„, . ,z;s1A
_ ,
' F .-,• !L.- ' 4!!!II>f.4
S .,, A
• � `t' . ,i
f•- - •rLie _0,.•...:� • .A •.lam. -7 ' ar -
lk
— . )N. '- .... . .'' ' ' •a ' c,-..- - .. -..]
•r ; [._s(A4 ,,: 'f1,1*.° ',.*,0A1144A,i..-11...31,1W''‘Ir•1.. .., • • •. : 1_• ' .
,•v. •• -17„ a-r,h z gP . . ,‘ ,
Ail r L .
• i.
s fa.,,..
a.i 3 • - L s` yi'z 1
. ..... - .6. , - i -; 4 :LA.%..),„,..7„. „,,,, 1 ... •. . F.'''. Sr. )114111: :' ••1. *
' li 0 pit re..."4141 ,iii. ..,. 3.,, '_M 1•:c., ..*
t.
'`
ilt
t ' _
,. . .tykittrik,',.^14 Ali V. 44 sr ..
- tie% .
- a At _ A a :444( 4. ."1%••` s
Th• =ii^ r .. �aiyylr
tt•c4jftc $
- i y
eta • ■ • *' • ., x
, tiVIr" V
i S-,S'4'.' •. ,ti 1 ..'Cr , ;+ f` rr;'i {jrJ •;j14' , 11 „L?. ■ 41
i
n i
1NQU1RY#:5729696.5 d.•,,•r� �� '' + q' „ - - Subject boundary not shown because it
' ` exceeds image extent or image is not
YEAR: 2016 N , !;- ;. 4- • ` .georeferenced.
=500' � EOR • - '' Big Branch not shown on image
-r

Appendix 3

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2. Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: C.Walker/Wildlands Engineering
5.County: Montgomery 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Clarks Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.224191,-80.022463
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): Clarks Creek 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 3500
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): r Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): J. Is assessment reach a swamp stream.
14. Feature type: Perennial flow r Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: rL 7,Mountains(M) Piedmont(P) fInner Coastal Plain(I) 7,Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic L
valley shape(skip for a
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) r"Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) E.7,Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? re::Yes No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water I Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed ( r I r III r III r HIV re V)
r Essential Fish Habitat I Primary Nursery Area ! High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish 303(d)List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
✓ Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
✓ Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? Yes -"No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
r.-A Water throughout assessment reach.
r 7,6 No flow,water in pools only.
r_IC No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
�.�B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
L"...A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
r.'B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
rA Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
r„.▪B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
A <10%of channel unstable
E....6 10 to 25%of channel unstable
▪ >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
r.7,A r."A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B r B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect

reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
7,C flC Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
✓ B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
✓ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓ D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
✓ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
✓ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
✓ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
✓ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
✓ I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
f� J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
ElA Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
Eyes ENo Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a.EYes n No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
I., A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w E F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) H E G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in E H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o r I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) m E J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
I D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.Eyes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
F. A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
[+ B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent, Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)_>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder(256—4096 mm)
n Cobble(64—256 mm)
Gravel(2—64 mm)
n Sand(.062—2 mm)
n Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
n Detritus
Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.EYes MNo Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.MYes r.No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ',Other:

12b. Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
✓ 1' Adult frogs
r I-Aquatic reptiles
▪ F Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
▪ F Beetles(including water pennies)
▪ F Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
▪ I-Asian clam(Corbicula)
E F Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
(- F Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
▪ Dipterans(true flies)
(- r Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
▪ r Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
▪ I- Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ r Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
▪ r Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
✓ r Other fish
✓ P Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
▪ r Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
r r Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
A rd,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
▪B N B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction, livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
EA EA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
EB :B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
EY EY Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N r�N
C J L J
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
I-✓ A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
✓ B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
P E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
✓ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
C Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
N A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
▪B Degraded(example:scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.

Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
EA EA >-100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
E B J B E B M B From 50 to<100-feet wide
EC EC EC MC From 30 to<50-feet wide
E D E D E D E D From 10 to<30-feet wide
E E fl E E E E <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
r,A Mature forest
E▪B FB Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
EC EC Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
ED Maintained shrubs
":▪E n E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
EA EA EA EA MA EA Row crops
BBBBB EB Maintained turf
EC EC EC EC EC EC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
ED ED ED ED ED :D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
EA EA Medium to high stem density
B EB Low stem density
EC EC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
EA EA The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
E B E B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
EC The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
�A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
r.7,B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
::C r:C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.EYes No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. E,No Water nOther
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
�A <46 �B 46to<67 niC 67to<79 ED 79to<230 �E 230
Notes/Sketch:
24.'lots of privet'

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pa4 Assessor Name/OrganizationPJalker/Wildlands Engineer
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology HIGH
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport HIGH
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability HIGH
(3)In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2. Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: CW/CL
5.County: Montgomery 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Big Branch
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.230316,-80.020229
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): Big Branch R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 1000
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 4.3 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 21.9 assessment reach a swamp stream. r I""I
14. Feature type: Perennial flow r Intermittent flow LJ al Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ',Mountains(M) :• Piedmont(P) (Inner Coastal Plain(I) ',Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic L
valley shape(skip for a `•gib
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) r"Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) „•Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water I Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed ( II Ill HIV r•..,V)
r Essential Fish Habitat I Primary Nursery Area ! High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish 303(d)List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
✓ Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
✓ Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? Yes "No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
r•�A Water throughout assessment reach.
No flow,water in pools only.
r_IC No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
r•"„B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
Lr-7.A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
r•"„B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
7I A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
7,7.B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
A <10%of channel unstable
E....6 10 to 25%of channel unstable
•�C >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
7.A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
ri."B r•'B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect

reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
7,C flC Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
✓ B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓ D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
✓ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
✓ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
✓ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
✓ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
✓ I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
f� J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
n.A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
EC No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a.EYes E No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
I A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w E F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) H T E G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in E H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o r I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) m E J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
I D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.Eyes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
P A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
1 B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent, Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)_>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
r, Boulder(256—4096 mm)
n Cobble(64—256 mm)
r r Gravel(2—64 mm)
n Sand(.062—2 mm)
n Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
n Detritus
Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.EYes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.EYes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ',Other:

12b.EYes E.-,No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
✓ r Adult frogs
E I-Aquatic reptiles
• I-Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
• I- Beetles(including water pennies)
✓ F Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
✓ r Asian clam(Corbicula)
• I-Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r r- Dipterans(true flies)
r F- Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
✓ r Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
✓ r Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ r Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
✓ r Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
✓ r Other fish
✓ r Salamanders/tadpoles
✓ r Snails
✓ F Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
✓ r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
• rd,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
EV:iB NB Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
• C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction, livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
EA EA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
Er]B E:B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
• C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
rdN EN
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
✓ B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
✓C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
I D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
✓ E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
✓ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
C Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
EV:iA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded(example:scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.

Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A >-100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
EB EB EB CB From 50 to<100-feet wide
C nC C m C From 30 to<50-feet wide
niD D nD From 10 to<30-feet wide
E E E E <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
MA Mature forest
E▪B MB Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
D Maintained shrubs
▪E rd E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
MA MA flA flA flA flA Row crops
r,B B r,B nB riB Maintained turf
C 'CC flC nC flC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
nD D r,D nD nD nD Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
EA EA Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
nC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
EA EA The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
M B M B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
nC The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition-First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
"jA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
EB EB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
::C r:C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity-assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.EYes ENo Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. r,No Water nOther
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
r,A <46 nB 46to<67 nC 67to<79 ri,D 79to<230 r:E 230
Notes/Sketch:
4."bank erosion" 7.J"a little fowling" 17."cut down/incised over time!' 24."Privet'

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pb3 Assessor Name/Organization Lanza/Wildlands Engineeri
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4)Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport HIGH
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1.Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2.Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: C.Walker/Wildlands Engineering
5.County: Montgomery 6.Nearest named water body
7.River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Clarks Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.23373,-80.026049
STREAM INFORMATION:(depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): UT1 R1 10.Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 2500
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 2.5 ri Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 10.3 13.Is assessment reach a swamp stream? C Yes (' No
14.Feature type: a Perennial flow (' Intermittent flow ('Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15.NC SAM Zone: C Mountains(M) a Piedmont(P) (' Inner Coastal Plain(I) r Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16.Estimated geomorphic L j
valley shape(skip for C a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip (`Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) ('Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) a Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) (`Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? r Yes C No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
El Section 10 water fI Classified Trout Waters fI Water Supply Watershed ( I ('II C III C IV C V)
El Essential Fish Habitat fI Primary Nursery Area fI High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
El Publicly owned property n NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect n Nutrient Sensitive Waters
ElAnadromous fish n 303(d)List fI CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
Ei Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
El Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? C Yes a No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(i A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow,water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
( A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples:undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
( B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
(i A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
( B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
(I A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
C A <10%of channel unstable
C B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
C >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
( A r A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
". B 4 B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
CC C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access

[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
n IA Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
✓l B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
[IC Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓I D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
El E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
FI F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
FIG Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
I—I H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
El I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
El J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams,D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
C' A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
r Yes . No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a.r Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b.Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
[IA Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w rl F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) F flG Submerged aquatic vegetation
rl B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o EI H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation r 0 El I Sand bottom
ITC Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r EIJ 5%vertical bank along the marsh
�I D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots U El K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
fI E Little or no habitat
REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.r Yes is No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
CIA Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
17.01 B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
ITC Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent,Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)=>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%,Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
(' (i r i^ (' Bedrock/saprolite
✓ r r r r Boulder(256—4096 mm)
✓ r r r r Cobble(64—256 mm)
✓ r r a r Gravel(2—64 mm)
a r r r r Sand(.062—2 mm)
✓ r. r r r Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
C' Detritus
C� r r r r Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.r Yes Si No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.r Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. r No Water r Other:
12b.r Yes r No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and'taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
EI El Adult frogs
n El Aquatic reptiles
EI El Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)

EI El Beetles(including water pennies)
Fl Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
rlAsian clam(Corbicula)
m Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
rl Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
✓ rl Dipterans(true flies)
Fl Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
✓ El Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
✓ El Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ El Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
✓ El Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
✓ El Other fish
Fl Salamanders/tadpoles
✓ El Snails
✓ El Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
rlTipulid larvae
flWorms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
C A 4 A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B r B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
( C C'C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction,livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
A C'A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
▪ C (i C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
�i Y ay Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r N C N
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
✓IA Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
FIB Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
✓IC Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
Fl D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
FIE Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
El F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
rIA Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
✓l B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
✓lC Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
✓l D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
✓l E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
Fl F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
r A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
r B Degraded(example:scattered trees)
r C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A r A C A r A >_100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
r B C B C B B From 50 to<100-feet wide
r C C C C C r C From 30 to<50-feet wide
C D C D r D C D From 10 to<30-feet wide
C E (' E ('E r E <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19(Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB

r A c A Mature forest
B (i B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C (' C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
r D r D Maintained shrubs
r E r E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: 11
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
CA r A A C A r A CA Row crops
r B r B C B C B C B r B Maintained turf
r C r C r C cc CC r C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
G_, D r D irirD OD (VD Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
C A r A Medium to high stem density
(6 B (? B Low stem density
r C r C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
A 4 A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
B r B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition-First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r A r A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
r B (i B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C r C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity-assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.r Yes r No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. r No Water (6 Other: NA
25b.Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
r A <46 r B 46 to<67 r C 67 to<79 r D 79 to<230 r E >- 230
Notes/Sketch:
10."NA"

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pb3 Assessor Name/OrganizationPJalker/Wildlands Engineer
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4)Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport HIGH
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2. Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: C.Walker/Wildlands Engineering
5.County: Montgomery 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Clarks Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.232493,-80.024689
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): UT1 R2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 600
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 6 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 19.1 assessment reach a swamp stream. L� L�
14. Feature type: Perennial flow r Intermittent flow L_J al Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: rL 7,Mountains(M) Piedmont(P) f Inner Coastal Plain(I) 7„7.Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic L
valley shape(skip for a `•gib
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) r"Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) 7,Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? re::Yes No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water I Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed ( I III III HIV re]V)
r Essential Fish Habitat I Primary Nursery Area ! High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish 303(d)List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
✓ Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
✓ Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? Yes -"No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
r.-A Water throughout assessment reach.
r 7,6 No flow,water in pools only.
r_IC No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
�.�B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
L"...A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
r.'B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
7,7.B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
<10%of channel unstable
E....6 10 to 25%of channel unstable
.�C >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
',A 7„7.A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
r•-"B r•-"B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect

reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
7,C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
I B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
▪ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓ D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
✓ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
✓ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
✓ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
✓ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
I— I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
✓ J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
2.A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
EC No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ',Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) cal G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in - H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o ,— I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) m f J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
iv D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 — K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
I., A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
r B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent, Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)_>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r. Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder(256—4096 mm)
n Cobble(64—256 mm)
Gravel(2—64 mm)
n Sand(.062—2 mm)
n Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
n Detritus
n Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.EYes ENo Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.EYes El No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. r 7.No Water r 7.Other:

12b.EYes E.-,No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
✓ r Adult frogs
r I-Aquatic reptiles
r I-Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
r— Beetles(including water pennies)
r r- Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
r I-Asian clam(Corbicula)
✓ 170 Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
- Dipterans(true flies)
r r- Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
✓ r Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
✓ I- Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ r Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
✓ r Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
✓ r Other fish
✓ r Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
✓ r Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
✓ r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
• rd,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
EV:iB NB Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
• C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction, livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
EA EA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
Er]B E:B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
• C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
rdN EN
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
✓ B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
✓C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
✓ D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
✓ E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
✓ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
C Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
EV:iA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded(example:scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.

Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
EA E,A EA E,A >-100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
E B E B E B E B From 50 to<100-feet wide
EC EC EC EC From 30 to<50-feet wide
ED ED ED ED From 10 to<30-feet wide
E E E E E E E <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
A Mature forest
E▪B r.I.B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
EC EC Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
ED Maintained shrubs
":▪E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
EA EA r,A EA MA EA Row crops
• B B B B B Maintained turf
• niC C niC C niC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
ED nip ED ED D ED Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
EA EA Medium to high stem density
E.B EB Low stem density
E.0 EC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
• EA The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
E B E B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
r,C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition-First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
�A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
r.7,B MB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
::C r:C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity-assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.EYes No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. r.,No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
�A <46 B 46 to<67 C 67 to<79 ri,D 79 to<230 E 230
Notes/Sketch:
4."Down cut,eroded banks" 12b."scuds" 24"priv"

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pb3 Assessor Name/OrganizationPJalker/Wildlands Engineer
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4)Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2. Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: C.Walker/Wildlands eng
5.County: Montgomery 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Clarks Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.23373,-80.026049
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): UT1 b 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 1400
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 3.4 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 15.2 3. Is assessment reach a swamp stream.
14. Feature type: Perennial flow r Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: rL 7,Mountains(M) r._Pied mont(P) f Inner Coastal Plain(I) 7.Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic L
valley shape(skip for ra `•gib
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) r"Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) 7,Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes r No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water I Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed ( r�I r III r III r HIV re V)
r Essential Fish Habitat I Primary Nursery Area ! High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish 303(d)List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
r Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? Yes "No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
NA Water throughout assessment reach.
r 7,6 No flow,water in pools only.
r_IC No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
:."B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
:;"..:A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
�.'A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
nA <10%of channel unstable
E....6 10 to 25%of channel unstable
NC >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
A r,",A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
r•"B r•"B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect

reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
7,C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
I B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
▪ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓ D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
✓ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
✓ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
✓ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
✓ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
I— I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
✓ J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
2.A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
EC No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ',Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
i A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) cal G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in - H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o ,— I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) m f J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 — K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
I., A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
r B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent, Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)_>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r. Bedrock/saprolite
r Boulder(256—4096 mm)
n Cobble(64—256 mm)
Gravel(2—64 mm)
n Sand(.062—2 mm)
n Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
n Detritus
n Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.EYes r,No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.EYes El No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. r 7.No Water r 7.Other:

12b.EYes E.-,No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
✓ r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r r- Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
r— Beetles(including water pennies)
r r- Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
r r- Asian clam(Corbicula)
• r Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
- Dipterans(true flies)
r r- Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
✓ r Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
✓ r Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ r Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
✓ r Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
✓ r Other fish
✓ 17 Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
✓ r Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
✓ r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
• rd,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
EV:iB NB Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
• C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction, livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
EA EA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
Er]B E:B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
• C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
rdN EN
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
✓A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
✓ B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
✓C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
✓ D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
✓ E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
✓ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
C Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
nA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
EV:iB Degraded(example:scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.

Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
EA E,A EA E,A >-100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
E B E B E B E B From 50 to<100-feet wide
EC C C EC From 30 to<50-feet wide
E D nip E D nip From 10 to<30-feet wide
E E E E NE NE <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
A Mature forest
E▪B r.I.B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
EC EC Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
ED Maintained shrubs
":▪E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
EA EA r,A EA MA EA Row crops
BBBBB EB Maintained turf
• niC C niC C niC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D ND ND ND ND ND Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
EA EA Medium to high stem density
E.B NB Low stem density
E.0 EC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
• EA The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
EB EB The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
• EC The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition-First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
"A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity-assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.EYes No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. r.,No Water r.Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
�A <46 B 46 to<67 C 67 to<79 E D 79 to<230 E 230
Notes/Sketch:

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pb3 Assessor Name/Organization C.Walker/Wildlands eng
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM
(2)Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4)Microtopography NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Cross Creek Mitigation Site 2. Date of evaluation: 4/22/2020
3.Applicant/owner name: Wildlands Engineering 4.Assessor name/organization: C.Walker/Wildlands Engineering
5.County: Montgomery 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Clarks Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.227883,-80.02984
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): UT3 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 3400
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 7 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 assessment reach a swamp stream.
14. Feature type: M Perennial flow .'Intermittent flow L_J al Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: rL 7,Mountains(M) r._Pied mont(P) f Inner Coastal Plain(I) r,7.Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic L
valley shape(skip for a `•gib
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) 727,Size 2 (0.1 to<0.5 mi2) r,7.Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) r,7.Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes r No If Yes,check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water I Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed ( r�I r III r III r HIV re V)
r Essential Fish Habitat I Primary Nursery Area ! High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish 303(d)List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
r Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat(list species):
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
NA Water throughout assessment reach.
No flow,water in pools only.
r_IC No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
E."A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates).
"B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
NA A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
r.'A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples:channel down-cutting,existing damming,
over widening,active aggradation,dredging,and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability,not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
<10%of channel unstable
E....6 10 to 25%of channel unstable
NC >25%of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction-streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
A r,",A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B r B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples:berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect

reference interaction(examples:limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
• r▪ ,.:',C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples:causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:
impoundments,intensive mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
I B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
▪ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
✓ D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
✓ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the"Notes/Sketch"
section.
✓ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
✓ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
✓ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc.)
I— I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
✓ J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
2.A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
EC No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
Yes :..1No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ',Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach(examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation,mining,excavation,in-stream hardening[for example,rip-rap],recent dredging,and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
i A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) cal G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in - H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o ,— I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) m f J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
D 5%undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 — K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
I., A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
r B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=
absent, Rare(R)=present but<_10%,Common(C)_>10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)_>70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r. ' Bedrock/saprolite
✓ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
n Cobble(64—256 mm)
✓ Gravel(2—64 mm)
n Sand(.062—2 mm)
n Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
n Detritus
n Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d.EYes ENo Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.EYes 'No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. r 7,No Water r 7.Other:

12b.EYes E.-,No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach(look in riffles,pools,then snags)? If Yes,check
all that apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for size 3 and 4 streams.
✓ r Adult frogs
E I-Aquatic reptiles
• I-Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
• I- Beetles(including water pennies)
✓ r Caddisfly larvae(Trichoptera[T])
r r Asian clam(Corbicula)
✓ I Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
✓ r Dipterans(true flies)
✓ r Mayfly larvae(Ephemeroptera[E])
r r- Megaloptera(alderfly,fishily,dobsonfly larvae)
r r- Midges/mosquito larvae
✓ r Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
✓ r Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
▪ r Other fish
• r Salamanders/tadpoles
I r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae(Plecoptera[P])
✓ r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
• rd,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
EV:iB NB Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
• rd,c Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples include: ditches,fill,
soil,compaction, livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
EA EA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep• B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
• E:C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
• EN
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
I✓A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
✓ B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
✓C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area(beaver dam,bottom-release dam)
I D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
✓ E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
✓ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex: watertight dam,sediment deposit)
C Urban stream(>-24%impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
EV:iA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded(example:scattered trees)
nC Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.

Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
EA E,A >-100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
E B J B E B E B From 50 to<100-feet wide
EC EC EC C From 30 to<50-feet wide
• flD D rD From 10 to<30-feet wide
E E fl E E E E <10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
7,A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
MC Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
ED Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
EA EA rA EA MA EA Row crops
B rB B rB r,B rB Maintained turf
• rC C C C rC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D :D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
EA MA Medium to high stem density
EB EB Low stem density
EC EC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10-feet wide.
LB RB
• EA The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
E B E B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C rC The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition-First 100 feet of streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed(whichever comes first)as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
L IA "A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species,with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B M B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions,but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
EC Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity-assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.EYes No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. r,No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
r,A <46 B 46 to<67 C 67 to<79 r,D 79 to<230 E 230
Notes/Sketch:
2."perched pipe/culvert at start of reach" "photos start upstream" 6."extremely incised" 7.next to F"in upper portions of reach" 9."ir

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cross Creek Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 4/22/2020
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization Nalker/Wildlands Engineer
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography NA NA
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands A-F
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.234985/-80.030150
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
®C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
EYes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ®F From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
O 1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E EE < 10acres
®F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1to4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands A-F Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands G and H
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.234504/-80.028599
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ❑A Not severely altered
❑B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
EYes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
®E ®E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E EE < 10acres
®F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_. ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands G and H Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands I and J
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.23468/-80.029026
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
®B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
EYes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ®F From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E EE < 10acres
®F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands I and J Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetland K
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.235765/-80.027051
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ❑A Not severely altered
❑B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F OF OF >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
®C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
EYes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to<30 feet
®G ®G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E EE < 10acres
®F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_. ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e I A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland K Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands L-N
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/Carlynn Walker
(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.2351 98/-80.026477
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F OF OF >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ®G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
• Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
• Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
• ®K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
®F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
• Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands L-N Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/Carlynn
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Walker(WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands 0 and P
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.234438/-80.022476
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
®B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
®B ®B ®B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F OF OF >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
®D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<_ 15-feet wide ®> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
▪Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ®F From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
O 1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ®A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
®C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1to4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
o ®A ®A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_. ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e I A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands 0 and P Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetland Q
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.230268/-80.022068
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ❑A Not severely altered
❑B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_20%coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F OF OF >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
®K ®K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
®F ®F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland Q Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 7/9/2020
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc. (WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetlands R, S, &T
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization I. Eckardt/C.Walker(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Clarks Creek
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040104
County Montgomery NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.23314/-80.033407
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease,storm damage,salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing,clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
• Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F OF OF >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
®D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to<30 feet
®G ®G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation (<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
O 1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ®A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
®D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1to4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_. ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
u) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
_e I A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
(C\ y � �.\`1 i ` 1 (( ( 1 rli .
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetlands R, S, &T Date of Assessment 7/9/2020
I. Eckardt/C.Walker
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization (WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 _-------
Date: 4.Ja R J lei Project/Site: �- a Latitude: 35.224.840
rn,r.5 h„., 5:+c
Evaluator: I Ecd,.,0 dt/C-. W.r.k i.C4 County: /'•},,,-+a c•r - Longitude: -60,0.11$6 0
Total Points: Stream Determination{atsivu@ Other Cli.►k S ire*k
Stream rs et feast intermitter:I '5
rf 2 19 or`perennral if a 30' Ephemeral Intermittent Aerennlal eg Quad Name:
A.Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1.3.r7 ) Absent Weak - Moderate Sing
r 1'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg _ 0 CD 2 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence _ 2 -Or-
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 Q 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1 _ 2
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2
___1;43------
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 _ �] 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0
CZ
*artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions In manual
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= l a }
12.Presence of Basetlow 0 1 2 .
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria _ 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 1 0.5 0 '
15,Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 Ut 1.5 i
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1'5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 t
C. Biology (Subtotal= 13.2 S ) ,
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
S
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed �'33 2 _ 1 r �0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 -' 1 2 ( 'J
21.Aquatic Mollusks CD 1 2 -
22.Fish 0 0.5 1
411114 _.
23.Crayfish 0 F (0.§.) 1 1
_24.Amphibians 0.5 1 .
25.Algae n 1 1.5
26,Wetland plants in streambed .J4.04.I wrs.l--- LFACW=0.75' OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual. ��++
Notes: S�r� J cd S I. s --i.rJ r'..a- .+-1 (5.) 5'E»c Tt.rj Ls ') a-..I . .t-IP 1, r) i�' 1 J
Sketch:
,

NC DVS' Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
J `'ass C+tail l Latitude: 35.a36;`�U
Date: q ' Pro ectlSite: ,� +„,_r,_, 5:4e
'I
Evaluator: "rGt 6.7j4" Longitude: - 80,O 3�+40
ty: 1p ,,,y
Total Points: Stream Determination(clrcie a Other UT 1
Stream rs at least setarm tfent y{ 7
if 19 ar perennial ii�30' Ephemeral Intermittent Pere_ e g Quad Name:
z -
7
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= ,-14....), ) Absent Weak _ Moderate Strong
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg 0 �
1 il2. 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 4J
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
T 5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 _.. C , 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 , 2 3
F 8. Headcuts 0) 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 _ 1 7.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 L 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 L es=3
d artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= g )
12.Presence of Baseflow s 0 1 (2) . 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter _ �1 r 0.5 0 _
_ 15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 �u•51 _ 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles _ 0 0.5 ( 11.--''` 1.5
17.Sail-based evidence of high water table? No=0
C. Biology (Subtotal= it,5 )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 2 F 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 t�1) 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks - 1 2 3
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 Cl J
23.Crayfish - (0] 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians - 0 (1 1.5
25.Algae _ 0 0.5 • c 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0,75; OBL=1. Other=0
-....--
*Perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual. `
}� E.�1•eL r !tom r wti WGr t� 1p uSa�l]W �"�r)v� r.�t r
Notes: bst.,e. w• ., r�� , .
06S4',w OA& SwdxMw...4rr l 0. • ,..,h •e. 4e -4, 1.. 4r..ic 1 tsr i
a r+. E1eI i a.nj s .JLr.l Lie) sy...II 'Af , I.;z..,3s +,..1 pLk+ preee.+ w1, ri441•5
Sketch: . 1

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.I I
Date: _ 3 ,4 . Project/Site: . • Latitude: ;C.;1/4 11,1110
Evaluator. County: Longitude: ..80.cL +10
Total Points: Stream Determination(circle one) Other
t
Stream is el least lraermatant t * Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial , e.g Quad Name:
it a 19 Or• renal&if 130' -
A. Geomorphofo_gyjSubtotal= ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank - 0 I Z 3 -
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 - 3 -
3 In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence - _
4,Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
r 5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 ', 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0. 1 2 3
8- Headcuts 0 1 2 3.
9.Grade control 0 0.5 1 1;
5 -
Natural valley 0 0.5 1 -~i-� 1-.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 , Yes=3
artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =• • ) 1
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1) 2 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 1.5 1 - 0.5 0
15.Sediment an plants or debris 1] 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 1 , 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal= - - ) r
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 , 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 - 2P 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2-) 3-
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5)
23.Crayfish - �0. 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 i 1 1-5
_25.Algae 0 ( 0.5 1 -1 1.5
26_Wetland plants in strearnbed 1 FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=Q J
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual. ••--------
k,►u .
Notes: • .• .• b.r _,
,)v V�, ` - • . .r`..4; ., •• �Lr\I rfr,,n
Sketch: ; ✓}1

NC DIVA Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: f ' ! eCtis Project/Site: .1-'0/..1 errs li4 .A....4 1. Latitude: J.rL3 `.Z
Evaluator. T. County: l'1;.-t-;l..1s,y Longitude: - 'G. Q 35015
Total Points:
Straem is at least informrttent 33.5 Stream Determination(circle one) Other t,1 T -j
+tZ f9 or perennial rrz 30' Ephemeral intermittent.Perenniarf u 9 Quad Name:
A. Geomorpholoq Subtotal = Absent Weak _ Moderate Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 1 2 3
3.1n-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, f
2 ;'31 ripple-pool sequence 0 1
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 s 2 3
I5.Activerrelict flaodptain 0 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 ji 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 01 � 1 2 3
8. Headcufs 0 1 2 31
9.Grade control 0 0.5 C1-/ 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 D 5 1 i 1 5)
11.Second or greater order channel , No=0l -
-
Yes=3
e artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= -7•-•S )
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 CV 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3 -
14.Leaf litter 1_5 1 0,5 0
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 ' 0. 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 +0,5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? Na=0 I Y)
C. Biology (Subtotal= 1.5 ) _
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed C3 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(nose diversity and abundance) 0 1 _U. 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 I 3
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish A.
0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0 5 �1] 1.5
25.Algae 0 } 1 ...___1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5*er=0) OD ac
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual,
Notes: ,.,,« l 4, -1 3 .. -Cf;er: 1 + l 14. I. a ' 1 • In•-." J
`. r.i , .. a 1_„ of I lo" r.r.
� n r
.rr� ��• cra[f w c...Ivr•.4. Wt.i lucre law j rale.t r, 4'fe j 6 f.w �l�nr`
Sketch: P l

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Y r 2 g/ l 9 Project/Site: % asp Ce"" +...L Latitude: 35, ; .t 8g0
Evaluator. w .I„,,,rf.6» !F _r.:‘1. I.4* County: ;'1,.„..4„,..ar 1 Longitude: -gt].01g'1DG
Total Points:
Stream is at least rntennitter:l Stream Determination{clr Other 3 Ysr�na i"
if 19 or rannralrft 30' Ephemeral Intermittent,Perenntd e.g.Quad Name:
A. GeomorphologySubtotal= . ... Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 _ 1 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 i 1� • 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 6 1 2
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 )
^5.Active/relict floodplain _ 0 1 2 ()
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1 ,23 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2+ 3
8. Readouts CO) 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 1
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 5.'
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
I artificial ditches are not rated:see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 [J 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 6 _ 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 41.5 ....1 _ 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles F 0 _ 0.5 G..) 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes?3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 1.S )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed Ei3
2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
v
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 CD 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 c_D
23.Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians X 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1.5
rv28.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 r1,,.e
'perennial streams may also be Identiled using other methods.See p.35 el manual.
Notes: :�Je: -1 �. ,}S•F f,.:s Aral 3 �1Irg
Sketch:

NC DW►'Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �/ Profectlslte; C'eai Vtr.I- R4".1^ Latitude: 35. 0 in,+,s,.a sr+'is - ,
Evaluator. ` M-�. . , _ til.',i L.- County: Pl.,,{.1. c-• Longitude: -go.of epic
Total Points: Stream Det n lnation jclrcie one) Other ?'T '.• a., gr.-.4:
Stream is at+east intereVtent a Ephemeral'Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name:
,r a 19 orperennra++f2 30' -•- -----
A, Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1 t ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 frl
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.nffie-paot,step-pool. 0 , 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate _ 0 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 Cr 3
B.Depositional bars or benches 0 Cr 2 3
Ti)
7.Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 • 05�� 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 ?0.5 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel +;Na=b Yes=3
-4 artificial ditches are not rated:see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = = 5 )
12.Presence of Basefiow 0 1 3
13.iron oxidizing bacteria 0) 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 1,.. ..) 1 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 _ 1 1.5 .
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 (0.5 1 / 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 i Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal=, c•.: y
18.Fibrous roots in streambed ream c� 2 1 0
_19.Rooted upland plants in stbed c3) 2 1 _ 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) t _ 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 ~
22.Fish _ 0.5 1 1.5
.23.Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians + sc.+. wndi r 0 _ O.a) 1 1.5
25.Algae (0) 0.5 + 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 lei r,S,4.
'perenneai streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual. �7 r] I
Notes: n,-4, ..‘,1,el Ar.•r. a .+r,q 4t.�1 r.��.�^ �4.3 Ck. �ct� Q. . 6+Gl. C�_ pr 3k H =l
cep. G,,....}y,.�r� 3 n sl sr.Sr.44r.ea y��t ..Sl's.,el rc.wt1. �, 4 %IF- le of 'P.m-
Sketch: 4. .r0,�6...,4 rr...r.,�'.,

Appendix 4

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 1
XS 1 (UT1 Reach 1-Riffle)
98
97
96
95 • •
>
w
94
111.—""111\
93
92
91 ,
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width(ft)
Elevation(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions y. p.; ti
13.3 x-section area(ft.sq.) 50.0 W flood prone area(ft) = -•• 7' n • _'; -
r.Mi;:.
10.3 width(ft) 4.9 entrenchment ratio q t -
1.3 mean depth(ft) 2.4 low bank height(ft)
2.4 max depth(ft) 1.0 low bank height ratio - `
12.5 wetted perimeter(ft) •,:
1.1 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
8.0 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness
0.18 Darcy-Weisbach fric. y: '� ►'?
Bankfull Flow 4.4 resistance factor u/u* • rrr _
4.4 velocity(ft/s) 1.7 relative roughness
58.5 discharge rate(cfs) " ,•
0.76 Froude number Materials -f •
90 D50 Riffle(mm)
View Downstream
230 D84 Riffle(mm)
42 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 2
XS 2(UT1 Reach 1-Pool)
98
97 -
96 y •
95
94
*--\\***--•
93
• • of
92
91 ,
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions '
•
15.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) 50.0 W flood prone area(ft) pti
8.4 width(ft) 6.0 entrenchment ratios"
1.9 mean depth(ft) 2.6 low bank height(ft) •
2.6 max depth(ft) 1.0 low bank height ratio
11.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
•
4.4 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness
0.16 Darcy-Weisbach fric. '
Bankfull Flow 5.0 resistance factor u/u*
.
* } ^-E•' .
•
5.5 velocity(ft/s) 2.5 relative roughness
86.9 discharge rate(cfs) •
0.80 Froude number Materials - • ... -
90 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
230 D84 Riffle(mm)
58 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 3
XS 3(UT1 Reach 2-Riffle)
98
97
96
95 ►
94
c 93
0
.j 92
91
90
89
88 * • * t
87
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions ='
11.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) 13.8 W flood prone area(ft)
11.6 width(ft) 1.2 entrenchment ratio e;
1.0 mean depth(ft) 6.3 low bank height(ft) ` •
1.4 max depth(ft) 4.6 low bank height ratio -
� '
12.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.0 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance + —
11.2 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness • wiz
0.19 Darcy-Weisbachfric. » sr _ •
Bankfull Flow 5.4 resistance factor u/u* 3 '::r • 7
4.6 velocity(ft/s) 2.6 relative roughness '- ,;+ meµ.
54.5 discharge rate(cfs) .- , - 3•
0.82 Froude number Materials
52 D50 Riffle(mm)
120 D84 Riffle(mm) ' ...
47 threshold grain size(mm): View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 4
XS 4(UT1 Reach 2-Pool)
98
97
96
95 4
94
0 c Ho
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions
45.5 x-section area(ft.sq.) 20.7 W flood prone area(ft)
17.6 width(ft) 1.2 entrenchment ratio
2.6 mean depth(ft) 6.6 low bank height(ft) K;-k-
3.6 max depth(ft) 1.8 low bank height ratio
21.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
2.1 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
6.8 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness
0.14 Darcy-Weisbach fric. •
Bankfull Flow 7.5 resistance factor u/u*
7.8 velocity(ft/s) 6.6 relative roughness -r:
352.7 discharge rate(cfs)
0.94 Froude number Materials
52 D50 Riffle(mm) sr;
120 D84 Riffle(mm)
104 threshold grain size(mm): View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 5
XS 5(UT1b-Riffle)
97
96 -
95 4
4 94 -
93 -
92
91
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions • - ';Y. kk 4„�
10.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) 19.1 W flood prone area(ft) Ij ,;p -
4.
11.7 width(ft) 1.6 entrenchment ratio �F• "'4r'.` �{ i�
0.9 mean depth(ft) 3.1 low bank height(ft) ..
1.6 max depth(ft) 2.0 low bank height ratio
12.6 wetted perimeter(ft) •
-
0.8 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance • _
12.9 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness
0.20 Darcy-Weisbach fric.
Bankfull Flow 8.9 resistance factor u/u* '
3.8 velocity(ft/s) 9.9 relative roughness "iv- -
40.5 discharge rate(cfs)
0.73 Froude number Materials
13 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
28 D84 Riffle(mm)
34 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 6
XS 6(UT1b-Pool)
95
•
94 -
93
c
4 92
91
90 -
89
0 5 10 15 20 25
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions '.r,{ r �
, ti ' 1 aye
9.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) 30.0 W flood prone area(ft) �'. +y+ _
•
6.4 width(ft) 4.7 entrenchment ratio •"• '• `•'' y
1.5 mean depth(ft) 3.6 low bank height(ft)
2.1 max depth(ft) 1.7 low bank height ratio
8.4 wetted perimeter(ft) ,
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance ,
4.2 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness
0.18 Darcy-Weisbach fric.
't
Bankfull Flow 9.7 resistance factor u/u* `1
f.. .--•.
4.7 velocity(ft/s) 16.6 relative roughness ' t• w
45.7 discharge rate(cfs) • . - y
0.77 Froude number Materials =' , - .-,
13 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
28 D84 Riffle(mm)
46 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 7
XS 7(Big Branch-Riffle)
96
95
94
93
4 92
a, 91
90
89
88 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions
•v f i,
39.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) 50.0 W flood prone area(ft) i
23.3 width(ft) 2.1 entrenchment ratio • • 1.4 I
1.7 mean depth(ft) 7.0 low bank height(ft)
2.6 max depth(ft) 2.7 low bank height ratio
24.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.6 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance +
13.7 width-depth ratio 0.050 Manning's roughness __ `
0.25 Darcy-Weisbach fric. J
Bankfull Flow 6.1 resistance factor u/u* e
3.4 velocity(ft/s) 3.2 relative roughness ;.•, ,,, . y ►.
�t ^
136.9 discharge rate(cfs) •", ti "
-•,c .
0.48 Froude number Materials 11! � � „�=
48 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
160 D84 Riffle(mm)
35 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Contract No.100138
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 8
XS 8(Big Branch-Pool)
96
95 - 444........—•
94 -
fir--j
' 88
, ,
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Width(ft)
Elevation(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions -
42.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) 32.7 W flood prone area(ft) ^1� . 'F, 'i 4',t
17.3 width(ft) 1.9 entrenchment ratio i ' s' • -
2.5 mean depth(ft) 6.6 low bank height(ft)
3.7 max depth(ft) 1.8 low bank height ratio
20.2 wetted perimeter(ft)
2.1 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
7.0 width-depth ratio 0.050 Manning's roughness
0.23 Darcy-Weisbach fric. _
Bankfull Flow 5.9 resistance factor u/u* %. "= - —-
4.7 velocity(ft/s) 3.3 relative roughness a.i
200.4 discharge rate(cfs) Y _• • .F -
0.56 Froude number Materials ` ,
90 D50 Riffle(mm)
230 D84 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
59 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Contract No.100138
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 9
XS 9(Big Branch-Riffle)
96 -
95
94 -
dc 93 -
0 92 -
v"' 91 -
90 -
89 -
88
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions ..rc,... •1r;.-
28.5 x-section area(ft.sq.) 19.4 W flood prone area(ft) -
15.8 width(ft) 1.2 entrenchment ratio :ti `--"y- +.
1.8 mean depth(ft) 5.1 low bank height(ft) - -
2.2 max depth(ft) 2.3 low bank height ratio •
y 17.8 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.6 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance :. - _
8.8 width-depth ratio 0.050 Manning's roughness ' :
0.25 Darcy-Weisbach fric. 4 :
Bankfull Flow 7.4 resistance factor u/u* '` •
3.9 velocity(ft/s) 6.3 relative roughness •
_
110.0 discharge rate(cfs) R
0.54 Froude number Materials ,ir- - _
36 D50 Riffle(mm)
87 D84 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
44 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Contract No.100138
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 10
XS 10(Big Branch-Pool)
96
95
94
93
4 92
a, 91
90
89
88
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions • R.
47.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) 20.7 W flood prone area(ft) r _ ::gw
17.8 width(ft) 1.2 entrenchment ratio ':
2.7 mean depth(ft) 6.2 low bank height(ft)
3.7 max depth(ft) 1.7 low bank height ratio
21.1 wetted perimeter(ft) _ _
2.3 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
6.6 width-depth ratio 0.050 Manning's roughness
0.22 Darcy-Weisbach fric.
Bankfull Flow 8.4 resistance factor u/u*
4.9 velocity(ft/s) 9.4 relative roughness •
232.5 discharge rate(cfs) £�
0.57 Froude number Materials
36 D50 Riffle(mm)
View Downstream
87 D84 Riffle(mm)
62 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 11
XS 11 (UT3 Reach 1-Pool)
96
95
94 •
-
93
92
m 91
w 90
89
88
87
0 5 10 15 20 25
Width(ft)
Elevation(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions µ s
4.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) 7.1 W flood prone area(ft) -
3.5 width(ft) 2.0 entrenchment ratio •
1.4 mean depth(ft) 5.7 low bank height(ft)
2.1 max depth(ft) 2.7 low bank height ratio
5.8 wetted perimeter(ft) /"'
0.8 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
2.5 width-depth ratio 0.030 Manning's roughness
0.11 Darcy-Weisbach Eric. "'
Bankfull Flow 3.9 resistance factor u/u* • -
6.7 velocity(ft/s) 1.9 relative roughness •
33.1 discharge rate(cfs) rrt -.
1.29 Froude number Materials
90 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
230 D84 Riffle(mm)
59 threshold grain size(mm):

Cross-Section Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions 2020
Cross Section 12
XS 12(UT3 Reach 1-Riffle)
95
94
•
93 •
92
4 91
v 90
89
88
87
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Width(ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions :_ � ..•
2.0 x-section area(ft.sq.) 3.6 W flood prone area(ft) v 4• _
2.6 width(ft) 1.4 entrenchment ratio
0.8 mean depth(ft) 5.2 low bank height(ft) _
1.1 max depth(ft) 4.8 low bank height ratio
3.7 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) Flow Resistance
3.3 width-depth ratio 0.040 Manning's roughness - a
0.23 Darcy-Weisbach fric.
Bankfull Flow 2.6 resistance factor u/u*
3.8 velocity(ft/s) 1.0 relative roughness _
7.6 discharge rate(cfs) 'r• •
•
0.90 Froude number Materials
90 D50 Riffle(mm) View Downstream
230 D84 Riffle(mm)
39 threshold grain size(mm):

Existing Conditions Geomorphic Parameters
Big Branch Reach 1 Big Branch Reach 2 UT1 Reach 1 UT1 Reach 2 UT1B UT3 Reach 1
Parameter Notation Units
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
stream type C4/1 G4c/1 E4/1 G3c/1 B4c/1 F1
drainage area DA sq mi 2.1 2.3 0.54 1.13 0.54 0.01
bankfull cross-sectional area Abkf SF 34.4 28.5 13.3 11.9 10.7 2.0
average velocity during bankfull event vbkf fps 3.3 3.9 4.4 4.6 3.8 1.8
Cross Section
width at bankfull wbkf feet 21.4 15.8 10.3 11.6 11.7 6.4
maximum depth at bankfull dmax feet 2.4 2.2 2.4 1.4 1.6 1.0
mean depth at bankfull dbkf feet 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.3
bankfull width to depth ratio wbkf/dbkf 13.3 8.8 8.0 11.2 12.9 20.6
low bank height feet 7.0 5.1 2.4 6.3 3.1 2.4
bank height ratio BHR 3.0 2.3 1.0 4.6 2.0 2.4
floodprone area width Wfpa feet 50.0 19.4 50.0 13.8 19.1 8.7
entrenchment ratio ER 2.3 1.2 >2.2 1.2 1.6 1.3
Profile
max pool depth at bankfull dpool feet 2.4 3.7 2.6 3.6 2.1 2.1
pool depth ratio d pool/CI bkf 1.5 2.1 2.0 3.6 2.3 7.0
pool width at bankfull wpool feet 14.5 17.8 17.5 17.6 6.4 7.2
pool width ratio wpool/wbkf 0.7 1.1 1.7 1.5 0.5 1.1
bankfull pool cross-sectional area Apool SF 22.5 47.8 17.6 45.5 9.7 12.1
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf 0.7 1.7 1.3 3.8 0.9 6.1
pool-pool spacing p-p feet 35 88 69 104 28 117 57 89 23 122 52 191
pool-pool spacing ratio P-P/Wbkf 1.6 4.1 4.4 6.6 2.7 11.4 4.9 7.7 2.0 10.4 8.1 29.8
Slope
valley slope Svalley feet/foot 0.010 0.007 0.017 0.010 0.018 0.036
channel slope Schannel feet/foot 0.007 0.009 0.013 0.016 0.013 0.029
Pattern
sinuosity K 1.14 1.13 1.19 1.17 1.19 1.00
belt width wblt feet 28 64 68 19 59 33 59 18 66 -
meander width ratio wblt/wbkf 1.3 3.0 4.3 1.8 5.7 2.8 5.1 1.5 5.6 -
meander length Lm feet 139 237 220 51 152 96 125 50 145 -
meander length ratio Lm/wbkf 6.5 11 13.9 5.0 15 8.3 11 4.3 12 -
linear wavelength LW 96 194 171 44 124 80 34 56 -
linear wavelength ratio LW/wbkf 4.5 9 10.8 4.3 12 6.9 2.9 5 -
radius of curvature Rc feet 14 51 45 54 5 28 6 27 7 29 -
radius of curvature ratio RJ wbkf 0.7 2.4 2.8 3.4 0.5 2.7 0.5 2.3 0.6 2.5 -
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 4

Proposed Geomorphic Parameters
Big Branch UT1 Reach 1 UT1 Reach 2 UT1B UT3 Reach 1
Notation Units Typical Typical Typical Typical Typical
Section Min Max Section Min Max Section Min Max Section Min Max Section Min Max
Values Values Values Values Values
stream type C4/1 C4/1 C4/1 C4/1 B4
drainage area DA sq mi 2.29 0.57 1.13 0.54 0.01
design discharge Q cfs 144.0 - 52.0 - 85.0 - 49.0 - 6.0 -
bankfull cross-sectional area Abkf SF 34.0 - 13.8 - 23.3 - 14.7 - 1.9 -
average velocity during bankfull event vbkf fps 4.2 - 3.8 - 3.6 - 3.4 - 3.3 -
Cross Section
width at bankfull wbkf feet 24.0 - 14.5 - 20.0 - 15.2 - 5.2 -
maximum depth at bankfull dmax feet 2.0 - 1.3 - 1.5 - 1.3 - 0.5 -
mean depth at bankfull dbkf feet 1.4 - 1.0 - 1.2 - 1.0 - 0.4 -
bankfull width to depth ratio wbkf/dbkf 16.9 - 15.3 - 17.2 - 15.7 - 14.6 -
max depth ratio dmax/dbkf feet 1.4 - 1.4 - 1.3 - 1.3 - 1.4 -
bank height ratio BHR 1.0 - 1.0 - 1.0 - 1.0 - 1.0 -
floodprone area width wfpa feet - 52.8 120.0 - 31.9 72.5 - 44.0 100.0 - 33.4 76.0 - 7.3 11.4
entrenchment ratio ER - 2.2 5.0 - 2.2 5.0 - 2.2 5.0 - 2.2 5.0 - 1.4 2.2
Slope
valley slope Svalley feet/foot 0.0100 0.0160 0.0101 0.0110 0.0360
channel slope Schnl feet/foot 0.0083 0.0077 0.0091 0.0118 0.0123 0.0133 0.0080 0.0078 0.0133 0.0092 0.0085 0.0092 0.0327 0.0277 0.0360
Profile
riffle slope Sriffle feet/foot - 0.0115 0.0355 - 0.0172 0.0520 - 0.0109 0.0328 - 0.0118 0.0358 - 0.028 0.090
riffle slope ratio Sriffle/Schnl - 1.5 3.9 - 1.4 3.9 - 1.4 3.9 - 1.4 3.9 - 1.0 2.5
pool slope Sp feet/foot - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.0000 - 0.000 0.0000 - 0.000 0.0000 - 0.000 0.6000
pool slope ratio Sp/Schnl - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.0 0.60
pool-pool spacing Lp_p feet - 62 170 - 38 96 - 52 132 - 40 100 - 7.3 45.8
pool spacing ratio Lp_p/wbkf - 2.6 7.1 - 2.6 6.6 - 2.6 6.6 - 2.6 6.6 - 1.4 8.8
pool cross-sectional area Apool SF 100.4 78.2 102.0 38.7 31.7 41.3 38.7 53.5 69.8 38.7 33.8 44.1 6.0 3.7 7.4
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf 3.0 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.0 4.0
maximum pool depth dpool feet 5.5 4.3 5.7 3.5 2.9 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.7 3.5 2.9 3.9 1.5 0.7 1.8
pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf 3.9 3.0 4.0 3.7 3.0 4.0 3.7 3.0 4.0 3.7 3.0 4.0 4.2 2.0 5.0
pool width at bankfull wpool feet 32.0 28.8 36.0 19.8 17.4 23.2 19.8 24.0 32.0 19.8 18.2 24.3 7.0 5.7 7.8
pool width ratio wpoofwbkf 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.5
Pattern
sinuosity K 1.20 1.10 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.10 - -
belt width whit feet - 60 168 - 29 73 - 40 100 - 30 76 - - -
meander width ratio wblt/wbkf - 2.5 7 - 2.0 5.0 - 2.0 5.0 - 2.0 5.0 - - -
linear wavelength(formerly meander LW feet - 120 312 - 73 160 - 100 220 - 76 167 - - -
length)
linear wavelength ratio(formerly meander
LW/wbkf - 5.0 13.0 - 5.0 11.0 - 5.0 11.0 - 5.0 11.0 - - -
length ratio)
meander length Lm feet - 100 260 - 87 191 - 120 264 - 91 201 - - -
meander length ratio Lm/Wbkf - 4.2 10.8 - 6.0 13.2 - 6.0 13.2 - 6.0 13.2 - - -
radius of curvature Rc feet - 48 96 - 29 44 - 40 60 - 30 46 - - -
radius of curvature ratio RJ wbkf - 2.0 4.0 - 2.0 3.0 - 2.0 3.0 - 2.0 3.0 - - -
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 4

Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters
Foust Upstream Long Branch Collins Creek Spencer Creek 2 UT to Varnals UT to Sandy Spencer Pilot Mountain UT to Richland Creek
Notation Units Creek Run Creek 3 Trib Downstream
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
stream type C4 C/E4 E4 E4 C4/E4 B4c E4b B4 C4/E4
drainage area DA sq mi 1.4 1.49 1.68 0.96 0.41 0.15 0.37 0.27 0.97
design discharge Q cfs 95.2 101 124 115 150 97 54.0 20 35 32 69 79
bankfull cross-sectional area Abkf SF 23.9 24.1 25 34.6 32.9 17.8 19.7 10.3 12.3 5.7 6.2 6.6 8.7 6 16.5 17.5
average velocity during bankfull event Vbkf fps 2.9 3.7 3.6 4 3.9 4.9 5.4 4.4 5.2 3.4 5 5.3 4.2 4.5
Cross-Section
width at bankfull wbkf feet 18.5 19.4 14.8 18.6 11.9 20.1 10.7 11.2 9.3 10.5 7.3 7.8 6.3 9.3 8.6 13.3 15.2
maximum depth at bankfull dmax feet 1.8 2.1 1.9 2.9 3.3 4.2 2.1 2.6 1.5 1.7 1.1 1.4 1 1.2 1 1.8 2.1
mean depth at bankfull dbkf feet 1.3 1.4 1.3 2.1 1.6 2.7 1.60 1.80 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.1 1.3
bankfull width to depth ratio wbkf/dbkf 13.9 14.2 7.9 13.8 4.4 12.1 5.8 7.1 8.1 9.3 6.6 9.8 7.9 9.3 12.5 10.1 13.9
depth ratio d maid bkf feet 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.3 1.4 1.36 1.42 1.6 1.8 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7
bank height ratio BHR 1 1.2 1.5 1 1.1 1 1 1.7 2.6 1 1 1 1
floodprone area width wfpa feet 49 62.5 >50 60 60 114+ 60 100 12.2 15.6 14 125 13.3 >50
entrenchment ratio ER 2.6 3.4 >3.4 2.0 3 5.5 10 5.7 10 1.6 2.1 1.7 4.3 1.5 >2.5
Slope
valley slope Svalley feet/foot 0.0095 0.006 -- 0.011 0.020 0.02 0.022 0.0404 0.016
channel slope Schnl feet/foot 0.009 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.0378 0.0140
Profile
riffle slope Sriffle feet/foot 0.015 0.035 0.013 0.012 0.003 0.008 0.013 0.024 0.057 0.004 0.042 0.018 0.034 0.015 0.120 0.018 0.036
riffle slope ratio Sriffle/Schnl 1.7 3.9 3.3 3 -- 2.8 1.41 3.35 0.2 2.8 1.0 1.6 0.4 3.2 1.3 2.5
pool slope Sp feet/foot 0.0008 0.0034 0.0003 0.003 0 0.0007 0.0009 0 0.015 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
pool slope ratio Sp/Schnl 0.09 0.38 0.1 0.8 0 0.15 0.19 0 0.88 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.30 0.02 0.27
pool-to-pool spacing Lp_p feet 48.8 91.3 50 105 32 80 71 7.8 82.2 9.3 54.8 9.0 46.0 7.2 51.9 33.0 93.0
pool spacing ratio Lp_p/wbkf 2.6 4.7 3.4 7.1 1.6 6.7 6.3 6.6 0.5 5.6 1.3 7.0 1.4 4.9 0.8 6.0 2.5 6.1
pool cross-sectional area Apool SF 29.2 34.9 25.5 33.4 57.9 24.5 22 22.7 5.5 8.7 6.5 9.8 9.6 1.8 1.8
pool area ratio Apool/Abkf 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.4 1.6
maximum pool depth dpool feet 2.5 2.9 2.2 2.4 3.3 2.5 2.6 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.8 1.6 14.7 16.0
pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf 1.9 2.1 0.8 1.2 0.9 1.5 1.8 2 3.0 3.1 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.8 2.3 1.0 1.2
pool width at bankfull wpool feet 15.3 20.5 16.2 18.8 24.3 17.5 15.1 18.6 7.6 9.2 6.0 12.0 8 14.7 15.8
pool width ratio wpool/wbkf 0.8 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.6 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.9 0.9
Pattern
sinuosity K 1.05 1.3 -- 2.3 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.2 1.1
belt width wblt feet -- 60 -- 38 41 14.6 44.5 24.3 59.6 10.0 50.0 --
meander width ratio wbljwbkf -- -- 3.2 4.1 -- 3.4 3.6 1.0 3.0 3.3 7.6 1.6 5.4 --
linear wavelength Lm feet -- -- 66 191 -- 46 48 16.4 46.6 63.0 72.0 55.0 142.0 --
linear wavelength ratio Lm/wbkf -- -- 4.5 10.3 -- 4.1 4.4 1.1 3.2 8.6 9.2 8.7 15.3 --
meander length feet -- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- -- --- --- 53 178 --
meander length ratio -- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- -- --- --- 8.4 19.1 --
radius of curvature Rc feet -- -- 16 87 -- 11 15 8.3 47.3 13.7 29.4 12.0 85.0 --
radius of curvature ratio Re/wbkf -- -- 1.1 4.7 -- 1.3 1.4 0.6 3.2 1.9 3.8 1.9 9.1 --
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 4

S& Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
E
1010 Ruvru Ridgy Road • Raleigh. North C awli l.i 27614 • Plum,. i';1°));i k•-59OCJ • F . 1 119}846-9407
www.ti:uuiC:C,cnits
HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
5799 NC Highway 73, Mt. Gilead, NC
PIEDMONT
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. Eric Neuhaus
Wildlands
167-B Haywood Road,
Asheville, NC 28806
CO .t 0.t. A . 450047:fyiutto$C4otki \ .
�Fy x
pp WS� x� ri
I : 1)_
fir
V51 0) ',,i'
130 KEVIN Cr MARTIN "�e„`...e
"i, OOISB6f �? 1003
dyo—AL wenja N
I
November 9th, 2020
Revised December 24th, 2020
1

INTRODUCTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA(S&EC, PA) was retained to perform a preliminary evaluation to
assess the presence and extent of hydric soils onsite. Proposed Wetland Area 1 is mostly fescue grass
with some herbaceous vegetation intermixed. Proposed Wetland 2 contains an agricultural pond with
fescue grasses intermixed with herbaceous and woody vegetation outside the boundary of the pond.
Proposed Wetland Area 3 has been maintained in the past but currently has mostly herbaceous
vegetation with some small saplings intermixed. Proposed Wetland areas 1, 2, and 3 contained hydric soil
indicators F3 or F19 within 10" of the surface (see attached Figure A- Preliminary Soils Investigation
Map).
METHODOLOGY
On August 1st, 2019 S&EC, PA staff performed a hydric soil evaluation at the site.Additional soil borings
were performed on October 20, 2020. Hand auger borings were advanced on the property at locations as
appropriate to approximately estimate the location and extent of hydric soils within the project area (see
attached Figure A- Soil Borings Map). Each soil boring was evaluated to assess the presence or absence
of hydric soil indicators. Hydric soil indicators were identified utilizing the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils in the United States-A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils (Version 8.2, 2018).
All areas evaluated are mapped as the moderately well drained Tillery soil series (thermic Aquic
Hapludults) and a Badin (well drained, thermic Typic Hapludults)-Tarrus (well drained, thermic Typic
Kanhapludults) complex. However, hydric indicators were found within some areas containing each of
these mapped soil types. The areas containing hydric soil indicators were most like the Roanoke (Fine,
mixed, semiactive, thermic Typic Endoaquults) or Wehadkee (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, thermic
Fluvaquentic Endoaquept) soil series. Non hydric soils were also observed in these areas. Non-hydric
areas were generally observed near streams or at foot or toe slopes of adjacent uplands.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven soil borings were performed within the study area in August of 2019. Thirteen
additional soil borings were performed in October of 2020. Soil characteristics were evaluated
and all areas identified as containing hydric soils met the hydric soil criteria described below.
Soil boring locations are indicated on the attached Figure A—Soil Borings Map. The depth to and
type of hydric soil indicator at each boring is shown in the table on the Soil Borings Map.
Red Dots on the Map—are borings where hydric soil indicators were not observed in the top 10"
of the soil profile. Hydric indicators may have been observed below 10" of the soil surface
depending on the boring location (see the table on Figure A for further details).
Blue Plus Signs --are hydric soils areas containing a depleted matrix ((F3) indicator) within 10"
of current land surface (these borings may also have had the F19 indicator above the F3, see the
table on the soils map for details of where this occurred)
Orange Triangles- are hydric soils areas containing a Piedmont floodplain indicator F19 within
10" but not a depleted matrix F3 within 10" (these borings may have also had the F3 indicator
below the F19 indicator, see the table on Figure A for further details).
2

Indicator F3: Depleted Matrix
Technical Description: A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
(a) 2 in. (5 cm) if the 2 in. (5 cm) is entirely within the upper 6 in. (15 cm)
of the soil, or
(b) 6 in. (15 cm) starting within 10 in. (25 cm) of the soil surface.
Indicator F19: Piedmont Floodplain Soils
On flood plain, a mineral layer at least 15 cm (6 inches) thick, starting at a depth <25cm (10
inches) from the soil surface, with a matrix (60 percent or more of the volume) chroma of less
than 4 and 20 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft
masses or pore linings.
3

Soil Profile#1/ Boring Location 3
Hydric Soil Indicator: None
Series and Taxonomic Class: Shellbluff- Fine-silty, mixed, active,thermic Oxyaquic Dystrudepts
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-12 A 10YR 4/4 100 Silt Loam
12-24 Bw 10YR 4/3 90 10YR 6/6 10 C M Silty Clay
Loam
4

Soil Profile#2/ Boring Location 5
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class:Wehadkee- Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid,thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquept
Redox Features
Horizon Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color(moist) % Texture Notes
Color (moist) % Type Location
0-4 A 10YR 4/2 100 Silt Loam
4-16 Btg 10YR 6/2 90 7.5YR 6/8 20 C M Silty Clay Loam
5

Soil Profile#3/ Boring Location 11
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class:Wehadkee- Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid,thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquept
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-4 A 10YR 4/4 100 Silty Clay
4-25 Bw 10YR 6/1 60 7.5YR 6/8 40 C M Silty Clay
6

Soil Profile#4/ Boring Location 25
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class: Roanoke- Fine, mixed, semiactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-12 A 10YR 6/2 60 10YR 6/6 15 C M Silty Clay Compacted, unable to dig below
10YR 5/8 15 C M 12"
7.5YR 5/8 10 C M
7

Soil Profile#5/ Boring Location 27
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class: Roanoke- Fine, mixed, semiactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-24 A 10YR 6/2 100 Silty Clay
24-36 Bw 10YR 6/6 50 Silty Clay
10YR 6/2 50
8

Soil Profile#6/ Boring Location 29
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class:Wehadkee- Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid,thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquept
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-6 A 10YR 5/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Loam
6-17 Btg1 10YR 5/2 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Silt Loam Plinthite at 16"
17-26 Btg2 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 6/8 10 C M Silty Clay
Loam
26-34 Btg3 10YR 5/1 60 10YR 6/6 40 C M Silty Clay
Loam
9

Soil Profile#7/ Boring Location J4
Hydric Soil Indicator: F3a & F3b
Series and Taxonomic Class:Wehadkee- Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid,thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquept
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-2 A 7.5YR 3/1 100 Sandy Loam
2-5 Bt 10YR 5/3 60 10YR 5/2 20 D M Silty Clay
7.5YR 4/3 20 C M Loam
5-13 Btg 10YR 6/1 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M Silty Clay
Loam
10

Soil Profile#8/ Boring Location J13
Hydric Soil Indicator: F19
Series and Taxonomic Class: Chewacla - Fine-loamy, mixed, active,thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts
Horizon Matrix Redox Features
Depth Horizon Color % Texture Notes
(inches) (moist) Color (moist) % Type Location
0-14 A 2.5Y 6/3 75 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M Sandy Clay
10YR 7/1 5 D M Loam
11

' , .` - y -5 1 ,.i+..,_-mot ._` .., ``. •.,:, , „ •..rtrl
Proposed Wetland 1 • * aT p' ^, Y ..0, , ,list:: a+• "t 1^s fi •' ,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.....1::::4rywtr�..
Soil Profile 6 a�*.
'' ! ,r;,. .:'` .` .-•I'l' A • . .'�• 4" .0'
• f •.i ! ` �,' Via;'. �'ti .,•` A. ��' f• ti.. . ,, ,
BH284 ► J01 t• . a r,. 'i + �''''%• • , s { ��;., 1
..
vIlJ02� a.�. Soil Profile 7 • •� ''■ ♦'� t § ~ ':� . '' .l{ -''a,;�'', •,,4'''`� ,p4-:1 t 1i`'1Mi.•;i''', t'� `�
BH29 ;I4.•• / } • kii • k i :,s . "1,'+"Y, irtx IS ►qii�
. 1r,., . .,:-. _,..-_._ , .,, • , .
BH26 A ��•-��.�_y a ''' • '',ti t: .'., ~1 + 1 i = ,�, . .
Vah
O '►•tip■ - a lit ; ,. .. - 304,1
. .. tir' i I;t ..� �+.,iY ,,.,•',1, ti'• •i,ti� •�••.42,, • . .1- %0` ,*.'-,;*1\ �
ti lett �� J04 J07 •108 ■� BBHH30- i a ••it i-{.� zt. ,.4L.4, ;, 7 ' •�'• ;.,`:' ,.t :r ±'�: r +pti y =
(Soil Profile 4 _ .....
• ;'i ;• .
l BH25+' BH�27 BH2O ;BH21 `.a ti r ..�� , v, :!` r. .P:', r�
BH23� •i BH22 �; '. '�' • • • �, .
�. OJ'10,,• _ � ,"i I. i F �1. ,.,� '. }‘1�' ' •i
Depth to BH24 ak ■ L` rt y P wrr A' •. ''�▪' s • : s.
Boring Hydric Soil Profile 'i:- , '"--4,-„...... -•- }�• 't t.
L4 R 1} f . - �• • .; . � , '�'.2. �r 1, •.1.
Indicator ,.. 10$ ��~� ,' It= • T .:? i; ; :'Z *
BH1 Non Hydric t • ��■ .Iv; . 4'- ••- .•. #''�," ; .
Y t. Soil Profile 5 t;
BH2 Non Hydric- • 4, ...a. `t, •� .� ~•.+ } �,'S.• I � t' •,` i t � �,:�i,(
BH3 Non Hydric Soil Profile 1 s ! • ;.• • �r •, + �.. �, fa . `�'7:�,e • •y �ks;� t _ p1Z1.
! A' rr
BH4 Non Hydric Pro osed Wetland 2 5 `+. _ ; r���/j• r''y y wl, ,
BHS 4"-F3 Soil Profile 2 ti q .
' ` '. o: tl ,.r11 F} • •,[• '
BH6 4" F3 ; r. *r L 0..rr■.•r+��r erri.+► ` •v* �t .. yi} tti 'F
BH7 Non Hydric- 4000.00.040.1, I ra , .,, +'; .,' i' 3+',-4 „ „, ,,,, „,: t [q fl ,...,, yt` {.;`; {
BH8 Non Hydric- • ; • '• a,a . • . . v L. - .•..a. ,M- ..:. .�? :,'_ i:'1
BH9 4"-F19 � ■ • °1w::3C,}
BH10 4"-F19 i '• ' , -% ' ,'�.. ::.rfp r eE� #�'.
BH11 4"-F3 SoilProfile3 . k jam, is ,ti ',W '•;i ;,?._
l BH12 Non Hydric- Y \a M ", •�`-5 4 • _r -t.. ',) 'i' . a
BH13 1" F3 ! ' - ;.•- :j +lip. '• "•.
BH14 9" F3 1 t �� i.,.• ....
BH15 Non Hydric- y 'Q 1 ..,
BH16 Non Hydric- • 'rs Soil Profile 1
BH2O 9"-F3
- 1,__` __ Project Area Wetland Soils C,�
\iiiiitire4_
BH21 9"-F3 BdD Badin Tarrus Complex, 15-25% FF` Soil Profile 3
BH22 Non Hydric \ Prop osed Wetland Re-establishmentMill
BH23 12"-F3 \\ Areas slopes, Hydric
BH24 10"-F3 - �.
BeC2 - Badin-Tarrus Complex, 8-15% ,i
BH16
BH25 9"-F3 Soil Profile 4 - BH15= 111 �`�
Existing Project Stream Slopes, ModeratelyEroded, Hydric }
BH26 Non Hydric- Y r i
BH27 0"-F3 Soil Profile 5 / !mg BH9 �"
BH28 0"-F3 • Soil Profile OkA Oakboro Silt Laom, 0 2% Slopes, BH14
- "ti , BH2 a, -BH13:. - - -
BH29 3"-F3 Soil Profile 6 Frequently Flooded } _ _ s- • ,e BH4
BH30 Non Hydric ■ �. BHS'
- Soil Borings and Hydric Indicator o ir, ,., '.
J01 Non Hydric Observed Within 10" of the Soil Surface TeB-Tillery Silt Loam, 0 6/ Slopes, BH1 BH6 BH8 =V
J02 1"-F19 - ■ Rarely Flooded, Hydric v BH10 J13 n Q
J03 Non Hydric- Q F19 1a I•
BH7 0 ��
J04 5"-F3 Soil Profile 7
J05 6"-F3
''F3
J06 6"-F3 0 .
J07 5"-F3 i. Soil Profile 8 ''
J08 Non Hydric- s a'J09 7"-F3 C Non Hydricto%'
. t
J10 Non Hydric ti ::.:.,N. s - Proposed Wetland 3
J11 0"-F3 *yellow circle indicates additional '.
J12 Non Hydric- boring from 10-20-2020 � ' ' ■ `Soil Profile 2
J13 0"-F19 Soil Profile 8 4a. • ' �•� '
Figure A- Preliminary Soils Investigation Map
O
W I L D L A N D S Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site lkii/Ily
ENGINEERING 0 225 450 Feet Yadkin River Basin 03040104
8t
I I I I I Montgomery County, NC

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#1
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 o o
a)co 0
a)
40 r o N 0 5.0
c‘i NI
c p O
Ni
30 - o ^ 0
c..
2 N
- o m
20 - \
57 days o 4.0
c -
10 - co • • w
w c
N
w 0 - � 3.0 al
w
QI
m 10 L Ccca-
5 -20 � 2.0
30 1\
40 1.0
-60 . 1.i ..1J.. L� 11 , . 11. I I
-60 I I I I IA . I' J�• I I "1 I 0.0
C - - T C — to a > V
11 Q co
- = [) o 0
2 Q (n z
Rainfall Gage#1 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#2
Existing Conditions-2020
o
60 - - m 0 6.0
v m
50 tO o cn O
� 0 � 0
Ni
40 0 o N 5.0
(3 0 -,
30 - o m o
co
20 -
24 days 1 " 4.0
-= 10 - • •
w =-
w 0
J ..�., 3.0
QI
a' 10 L
5 - Ik,
20 2.0
30 -
_k_1\.\,.
40 1.0
50
- . I.i J. L 1 I I 1 1J1 11� . ii I JI. Ii I L..I 1 i
-60 I I I I I I 1 ' - - 1 1 1 1 0.0
C _. i T C - to a > V
Ll N Q N N C O 0
Q Z
Rainfall Gage#2 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#3
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 - o o
m '^
o
40 `" o N0 5.0
NI
NO b0 0
30 0 ^ 30
O N
20 - o co —q_ - 4.0
25 days 25 days -
-= 10 f0 •• • L
N -
w
0 3.0 w
w — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — c
10 CC-20 \ 2.0
-30
-40 1.0
1\
I\
-60 _. I..1 _ .I11..i I__ i k1 , . 1 ll ..
60 I I I I I 1 I 0.0
C _. i T C — Up a > V
—, Ll 2 Q - ' (n C) ° 0
2 2 Q Z
Rainfall Gage#3 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#4
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 0 0
o to
a) m
40 i o N 0 5.0
c‘i NI
c p O
Ni
30 0 ^ 0
c
2 N
20 o co
11days ° 4.0
-= 10 f0 .—• w c
w N
w 0 - — 3.0 ,l
J
QI E
m -10 d\i ‘ 41\
ccca
5 -20 2.0
30 \KI
40 1.0
-50 I1.J .ii J. i I� I 1 �J� 11.E . . ii . 1 JI. Ii . I Li
-60 I I I I I I I ' I I 1 0.0
C - T C — to a > V
co Li Q 2 Q (n C z O 0
Rainfall Gage#4 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#5
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 o o
m co
a) m
40 - r o cc) 0 5.0
c‘i NI
c p O
Ni
30 - o ^c 30
..
O N
20 - co
` 14 days o 4.0
o
C 1 -p
10 _ m �• LL c
w N
w 0 - 3.0 T2
J
.kk
QI
m 10 L
-20 — L— — — — — 2
2.0
30 I ',
40 1.0
50 I.i J. �� 111 . 1111 �J� 11� . �� JI. II . .I I L..I-60 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 0.0
C - T C — to a > V
co Ll (D Q (D - ' (n C) ° 0
Q Z
Rainfall Gage 1#5 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#6
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 o o
a)co 0
a)
40 r o N 0 5.0
c‘i NI
c p O
Ni
30 - o ^ 0
c
2 N
LD 20 - o co
16 days ° 4.0
10 - `m SS c
Lu
w N
w 0 - 3.0 al
J
v 1 co
co
m 10 L 1kr cc
20 JNA—\1\\,
N 2.0
30
40 1.0
5
-60 .11.1 1., li 1 . 11, . , . 111. _ li �,I d i
0.0
I II II I I I I 1 I
C _. i T C — to a > V
11 Q co
-, -, = [) o 0
2 Q (n z
Rainfall Gage#6 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#7
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 0
co 0
v m
40 c o v5L11 o 5.0
c-N NI
30 ° oN eo 0
o 3 —
0
c.. N
20 - wm — (3 � 4.0
2 ° 25 days i o
-= 10 - m •
• c
—y w
i 0 - , r �_\\ktk 3.0 al
J ...,,..J`A�,/� ,,AA AA^
N v v� co
co
m 10 L � cc
5 -20 2.0
30 - —
40 1.0
-60 _li.il J. ll' 1 . I III ��I . JI. _ II . 0.0
I I 1
1 JL
I I 1 - 1 I 1 1 I
C _. i C — to a > V
ii ° Q ° ' (a) C) ° 0
2 Q z
Rainfall Gage#7 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.100138
Existing Conditions-2020
Cross Creek Ranch Groundwater Gage#8
Existing Conditions-2020
60 - - 6.0
50 0 0
a) a)
40 i o N 0 5.0
c‘i NI
c p O
Ni
30 - o ^ 0
c
2 N
LD 20 - o co
c ` 19 days 0 4.0
10 m •
• — w
w N
0 al
QI
m -10 1 ca
.E
V.444V\Ikt \k\—\1W ,
-20 � � \VI11\ 2.0
30 \
40 \ 1.0
-60 •1i.�l li L, 1 . I 1, . , III . . 11. • Ii . L i 0.0
I I II I I 1 I 1 I
C - T C — to a > V
co 11 Q co
-, -, = [) o 0
2 Q (n z
Rainfall Gage#8 — — Criteria Level

Cross Creek Ranch 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2020
10
9
8
7 -
c 6 -
c
0
0 5 -
4..
D.
V
N
a 4 -
3
2
1 -
0
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
Date
2020 30th Percentile -70th Percentile
Rainfall

Appendix 5

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2020-00051 County:Montgomery U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Mount Gilead West
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Wildlands Engineering
Ian Eckardt
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,suite 104
Charlotte,NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-517-4988
E-mail: ieckardt(a,wildlandseng.com
Size(acres) 113 Nearest Town Mount Gilead
Nearest Waterway Clarks Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040104 Coordinates Latitude:35.2322
Longitude:-80.0242
Location description:The project site is approximately 113 acres located adjacent to NC Hwy 73,near the town of Mount
Gilead,Montgomery County,North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
e There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The
waters,including wetlands have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 9/2/2020.Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining compensatory
mitigation.For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protection
measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may
request an approved JD,which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).
However,since the waters,including wetlands have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands at the project area,which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision.We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated.As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC §403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters,including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑We recommend you have the waters,including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑The waters,including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2020-00051
verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑The waters,including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact James Lastin2er at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or
James.C.Lastin2er(ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 11/13/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps'Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and request for appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin,Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Room 10M15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: �°'"`_car
Date of JD:11/13/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2020-00051
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cmapex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Property Owner: Cross Creek Family LP
Address: PO Box 43
Mt. Gilead,NC 27306
Telephone Number: 704-796-0222
E-mail:

Mik NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant:Wildlands Engineering,Ian Eckardt File Number: SAW-2020-00051 Date: 11/13/2020
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
❑X PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b)modify the permit to address some of your
objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT:You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice,means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
1
SECTION II -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting,and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However,you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr.Phillip Shannin,Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn:James Lastinger CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn:James Lastinger,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Phillip Shannin,Administrative
Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/13/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wildlands Engineering,Ian Eckardt, 1430 S.
Mint Street, suite 104,Charlotte,NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME,AND NUMBER: Wilmington District,Cross Creek Ranch
Mitigation site/NCDMS, SAW-2020-00051
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site is approximately
113 acres located adjacent to NC Hwy 73,near the town of Mount Gilead,Montgomery County,North
Carolina.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County: Montgomery City:Mount Gilead
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.2322 Longitude:-80.0242
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Clarks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Z Office (Desk) Determination. Date:November 13,2020
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number Latitude Longitude Estimated Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
(decimal (decimal amount of resources(i.e.,wetland which the aquatic resource
degrees) degrees) aquatic vs. non-wetland waters) "may be"subject(i.e.,
resources in Section 404 or Section
review area 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Clarks Creek 35.2278 -80.0218 5081 LF Non-wetland Section 404
UT1 35.2362 -80.0327 3577 LF Non-wetland Section 404
UT1B 35.2364 -80.0267 1570 LF Non-wetland Section 404
UT3 35.2340 -80.0350 3587 LF Non-wetland Section 404
Big Branch 35.2318 -80.0181 1999 LF Non-wetland Section 404
UT to Big Non-wetland Section 404
Branch 35.2321 -80.0180 75 LF
Wetland A 35.2362 -80.0322 0.075 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland B 35.2361 -80.0315 0.129 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland C 35.2357 -80.0310 0.004 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland D 35.2356 -80.0307 0.036 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland E 35.2356 -80.0304 0.102 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland F 35.2349 -80.0301 0.103 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland G 35.2341 -80.0295 0.051 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland H 35.2344 -80.0285 0.162 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland I 35.2346 -80.0290 0.004 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland J 35.2337 -80.0271 0.041 acre Wetland Section 404

Wetland K 35.2357 -80.0270 0.022 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland L 35.2354 -80.0266 0.008 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland M 35.2351 -80.0264 0.039 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland N 35.2347 -80.0261 0.076 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland 0 35.2344 -80.0224 0.024 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland P 35.2327 -80.0233 0.004 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland Q 35.2301 -80.0219 0.063 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland R 35.2331 -80.0334 0.028 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland S 35.2301 -80.0303 0.028 acre Wetland Section 404
Wetland T 35.2285 -80.0297 0.032 acre Wetland Section 404
Pond 35.2341 -80.0284 0.741 acre Wetland Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD,the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
®Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:attached
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.Datasheets:
®Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters'study:
®U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
▪USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
▪U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: Mount Gilead Quad
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:NRCS websoil survey
▪National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
▪FEMA/FIRMmaps: NC FIRM maps
❑100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2019 aerial
or Z Other(Name&Date): site photos undated
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
1.4.4-re.zo
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
11/13/2020 impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to fmalizing an action.

3 o Z•I q
0 a
j Om 2
• o O ou 4D U
N 2 2 � m o
•
(Y) o a L ,2z c
v0)
e' m
G�IJT v i
A =
Si
m o
I
,. /
a r //) '
a
o GRUEL F
GPR�S`' t
i
ti s r• ii
'z Y
q re
i'. .� o —
.. • A
0 0 —
lilt ._1,. 11.fr.:DIE o
N
�s_ . t
A o —
• .ram it. , m 9
•
( �,
r`
if,t �" v
:3 , I d _ v70
a - • Ifir' IOW
f 5 iff• r rT 3 3
i a a v 1 U
,., ap...., 41/ 4. f. .
a
13„fi o o Q o 0 0

•
rrr„ - a o- a) a U
rr5o
,A rno ° zz o`
',, /- k 2 E' ,.
r 6 To0 u
•r, - 8 -- Of -i-u 1111
v
f ff a V
Ma
./
r
♦S
5
4i
, Y 2a)1 RI
•
;fir, �.' • r
' r
• ` ir x , —S '.0
11
1, 1 i k
3 g O y f . sg, I �g
r /
%, : la
11
�!. o7 d goo
q ,„,.,,, -., 10 rt.
AtN. IN, 'fj.1%,f' ,* *
3 a a it
�I ; . . P
V �.Z
s= s= o r:i� _
v a /'•
h1 -- Z
II 3 a v t w
V
rvv v v v v v - _
o a0- aa o - v
a Q O Z w vl
p a
alle '�� l0 ® :1.1 I O • .O 0'
•l 9: 4

fl_ N a U
TIIHI
.t11
I.:-.
a 't o f
a N N F V
o v a 3 3 a - .i
3 z z
Y• E Y Y Y ° b° a /..
v v v v v
o n o v
a Q a O a a z w v,
11
•
1111.
2' . iiiiikaillipor ,
1
u. 'II
*
•
� ' A. A 1
I . ,
li
I', ,! t , .
- _,
„„ , 0
•,, '
. • „,„ ;
.':,. ,
• _i' i Y i J ,i O
e ,
F n f !!•
•• yi■ , I I
gip{ 1 ■
0 Is qV • ,
igi
lip{ • '•i ■ ^w
• gyp{ • �
ft
5(py9 1 ■ •
•
MI I '•• ■ - FBI W
v! .;
,_
a
E. �°
w 7N IL
IL

o- N a U
4-' 0
O i
r - .r O ° 0 S
E
1 - m T t m W
+� -' o m E
1, 9 Q m j a
v
' ..N LL V }
3e °
V
II
U
asp
k mi gi .
I
U
.
•
1 ° ' op
o �' .., . ,
+ {w m
4, i4 v• ; 0
E 13;x � .• - # .., /
0 —
a
7"Iir 0 c:)2' ,. h ,.
, .
; i 0 1 •
. _
0 .
i , : ,.. .....• ........:., r.,...
•
*It" * fl4A
E
- Tx.' ,r v�0
a a Z
v v 0 o Y �j
3 a a a -,L.
Z
0
a a v v E 1_ U'
00 it 3- p v i - a Z
a - Qw
o v ,, z Z v v
.Y 3 .Y .Y P w a E
o �
v a - m
v v v v v
o nöñ Y

Appendix 6

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 2
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
County Name: Montgomery County
DMS Number: 100138
Project Sponsor: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Project Contact Name: Kirsten Gimbert
Project Contact Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104,Charlotte,NC 28203
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
DMS Pro'ect Mana•er: Kelly Phillips
Project Description
The project includes stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation on Clarks Creek, Big Branch,
and multiple unnamed tributaries. Three areas of relic wetlands are proposed for re-establishment within
the floodplains of project streams. Clarks Creek drains to the Pee Dee River just downstream of the
Norwood Dam on Lake Tillery. The area surrounding the streams and channels proposed for stream and
wetland mitigation is currently an active farm composed of cattle pastures and previously deforested
timber areas.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
3/11/2020 Katy 17144:L .
Date DMS Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
3-//-2_o
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
8---2-5-2-0 Pow-aid G(). U4_zu)--
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ❑Yes
ElNo
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of ❑Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ❑Yes
Program? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ✓❑Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been ❑Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ❑✓ No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential ❑Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑Yes
waste sites within the project area? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
National Historic Preservation Act(Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of ❑Yes
Historic Places in the project area? ✓❑ No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? ✓❑Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ❑✓ Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ❑ No
*what the fair market value is believed to be? ❑ N/A
7 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act(AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of ❑Yes
Cherokee Indians? ❑✓ No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ❑Yes
Places? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Antiquities Act(AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects ❑Yes
of antiquity? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act(ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat ❑✓ Yes
listed for the county? ❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical ❑Yes
Habitat? ❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Is the project"likely to adversely affect"the species and/or"likely to adversely modify" ❑Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
8 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" ❑Yes
by the EBCI? ❑✓ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed ❑Yes
project? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred ❑Yes
sites? ❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally ❑✓ Yes
important farmland? ❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any ❑✓ Yes
water body? ❑ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, ❑Yes
outdoor recreation? ❑✓ No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the ❑Yes
project on EFH? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? ❑Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? ❑Yes
✓❑ No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ❑Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ❑Yes
❑✓ No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining ❑Yes
federal agency? ❑ No
❑✓ N/A
9 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation
Site Categorical Exclusion
SUMMARY

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act(CERCLA)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides a
Federal "Superfund"to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents,
spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.
As the Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project; an EDR Radius Map Report with
Geocheck was ordered for the site through Environmental Data Resources, Inc on February 7, 2020.
Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of the Federal, State, or
Tribal environmental databases searched by the EDR.
The Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix.The full report is available if
needed.
National Historic Preservation Act(Section 106)
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American
architecture, history, archaeology, and culture, and Section 106 mandates that federal agencies take
into account the effect of an undertaking on a property that is included in, or is eligible for inclusion in,
the National Register of Historic Places.
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) responded to a scoping letter requesting comment on the
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site on January 15, 2020. SHPO stated they were aware of"no historic
resources which would be affected by the project" and would have no further comment. All
correspondence related to Section 106 is included in the Appendix.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
These acts, collectively known as the Uniform Act, provide for uniform and equitable treatment of
persons displaced from their homes, businesses, non-profit associations, or farms by federal and
federally-assisted programs, and establish uniform and equitable land acquisition policies.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project that includes land acquisition. Notification of
the fair market value of the project property and the lack of condemnation authority by Wildlands was
included in the signed Option Agreements for the project properties. A copy of the relevant section of
each of the Option Agreements are included in the Appendix.
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies, in consultation with and with the assistance of the
Secretary of the Interior or of Commerce, as appropriate,to ensure that actions they authorize,fund or
carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for these species.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation database
(IPaC) list of endangered species for the site includes the Red-cockaded Woodpecker(Picoides borealis),
the Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and the Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata).
The USFWS does not currently list any Critical Habitat Designations for the Federally listed species
within Montgomery County nor are there any current known occurrences of the above listed species
within a 2-mile radius of the project site. Results from pedestrian surveys conducted on December 12,
2019 and August 19, 2020 indicated that the project area provides areas of suitable habitat for the
Schweinitz's sunflower and the smooth coneflower. Wildlands conclusions and determinations are
noted below and included in the Appendix.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS#100138 2

Schweinitz's Sunflower
Wildlands identified open areas and old pastures on the site, however, no populations resembling the
species were found during the pedestrian surveys. Wildlands determined the project will have "no
effect" on the Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth Coneflower
Wildlands identified open and disturbed areas on the site, however, no populations resembling the
species were found during the pedestrian surveys. Wildlands determined the project will have "no
effect" on the smooth coneflower.
To meet regulatory requirements, a self-certification letter was submitted through the USFWS IPaC
requesting comment from USFWS dated December 19, 2019. No response from the USFWS was
received within the 45-day response period. However, the USFWS responded to the public notice
issued on April 3, 2020 stating that the project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species
or their critical habitat.
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
The FPPA requires that, before taking or approving any federal action that would result in conversion of
farmland,the agency must examine the effects of the action using the criteria set forth in the FPPA, and,
if there are adverse effects, must consider alternatives to lessen them.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site includes the conversion of prime farmland. As such, Form AD-1006
has been completed and submitted to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The
completed form and correspondence documenting its submittal is included in the Appendix.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
The FWCA requires consultation with the USFWS and the appropriate state wildlife agency on projects
that alter or modify a water body. Reports and recommendations prepared by these agencies document
project effects on wildlife and identify measures that may be adopted to prevent loss or damage to
wildlife resources.
The Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site includes stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation.
Wildlands requested comment on the project from both the USFWS and the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) on December 19, 2019, respectively. No response from the USFWS was
received within the 45-day response period. However,the USFWS responded to the public notice issued
on April 3, 2020. NCWRC responded via email to the scoping letter on January 16, 2020 noting they have
no concerns with the project.
All correspondence with the two agencies is included in the appendix.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)
The MBTA makes it unlawful for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell,trade, ship, import, or
export any migratory bird.The indirect killing of birds by destroying their nests and eggs is covered by
the MBTA, so construction in nesting areas during nesting seasons can constitute a taking.
Wildlands requested comment on the Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site from the USFWS in regard to
migratory birds on December 19, 2019.The USFWS did not respond to the scoping letter. However,the
USFWS responded to the public notice issued on April 3, 2020. All correspondence with USFWS is
included in the Appendix.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
tart DMS#100138 3

Cross Creek Ranch
5700 NC 73
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Inquiry Number: 5963894.1s
February 07, 2020
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
EDIr Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edmet.com
FORM-NULL-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched_ PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC5963894.1 s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
5700 NC 73
MOUNT GILEAD, NC 27306
COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 35.2335040-35° 14' 0.61"
Longitude(West): 80.0279270-80° 1' 40.53"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 588454.1
UTM Y(Meters): 3899173.0
Elevation: 308 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5948325 MOUNT GILEAD WEST, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140920
Source: USDA
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
5700 NC 73
MOUNT GILEAD, NC 27306
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
5963894.1s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP .Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB) Listing
MINES MRDS . Mineral Resources Data System
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC5963894.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 5963894.1 S
Illhikll / f
"-----W.40 -.,r 6-74 --NRN%11
t
,,
I
•
' 41 /
it‘i*I41::://.1ti
A /Amiat , s6,_ 1/
4
)1
P / -
_ .;;Iiiiit
41
_ .._daiiiii . ... $0.16 *
- . ifir s ., ,..„ . 4
* Target Property 0 1i4 1/2 1 naves
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property = Indian Reservations BIA l',',1 Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than :\.7 Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants / Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
National Priority List Sites VA 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Dept.Defense Sites • National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide mapinformation.The
p Y
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Cross Creek Ranch CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 5700 NC 73 CONTACT: Andrea Eckardt
Mount Gilead NC 27306 INQUIRY#: 5963894.1s
LAT/LONG: 35.233504/80.027927 DATE: February 07,2020 10:12 am
Copyright g 2020 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP — 5963894.1 S
F,a, m
Pd
m
A
a
' k .
//
•
i
., /
•
V /
* Target Property 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Mlles
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property = Indian Reservations BIA l','.1 Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than /��/ Special Flood Hazard Area(1%) Disposal Sites
the target property
VA 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
A Manufactured Gas Plants • National Wetland Inventory
t Sensitive Receptors State Wetlands
l National Priority List Sites
Dept.Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Cross Creek Ranch CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 5700 NC 73 CONTACT: Andrea Eckardt
Mount Gilead NC 27306 INQUIRY#: 5963894.1s
LAT/LONG: 35.233504/80.027927 DATE: February 07,2020 10:13 am
Copyright g 2020 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

Pir
‘41,
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
December 19,2019
Renee Gledhill-Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-4617
Subject: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Montgomery County,North Carolina
Dear Ms.Gledhill-Earley,
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to
archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential stream and wetland restoration project on the Cross Creek
Ranch Mitigation Site located in Montgomery County,NC. A USGS Topographic Map and an Overview Site Map showing the
approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Mount Gilead West 7.5-Minute USGS
Topographic Quadrangle,and the site is located at latitude 35.235 longitude
-80.022.
The Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site is being developed to provide stream and wetland mitigation in the Yadkin River basin.
The project includes stream restoration,enhancement,and preservation on Clarks Creek,Big Branch,and multiple unnamed
tributaries.Three areas of relic wetlands are proposed for re-establishment within the floodplains of project streams.Clarks
Creek drains to the Pee Dee River just downstream of the Norwood Dam on Lake Tillery.The area surrounding the streams and
channels proposed for stream and wetland mitigation is currently an active farm composed of cattle pastures and previously
deforested timber areas.
The major goals of the stream and wetland mitigation project are to provide ecological and water quality enhancements to the
Yadkin River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level.This will be accomplished by excluding livestock
from stream channels,stabilizing eroding stream banks,restoring and enhancing native floodplain and wetland vegetation,
improving the stability of stream channels,improving instream and wetland habitat,reducing sediment and nutrient input from
adjacent agricultural fields,and permanently protecting and preserving the project site through establishing a conservation
easement.These actions will reduce fecal,nutrient,and sediment inputs to project streams,and ultimately to the Pee Dee
River,as well as reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on the project site.
No surveyed sites listed on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation office are located within a mile of the Site.The Mount
Gilead Downtown Historic District(HPO Site ID: MG0037)is the closest NC Historic Preservation Area and is located 2 miles
southeast of the Site.The NC Natural Heritage Program(NHP)Managed Areas referenced two Division of Mitigation Services
Easements,one national forest,one Catawba Lands Conservancy Easement,and one Three Rivers Land Trust Easement within
five miles of the Site. No other architectural structures or archaeological artifacts have been observed or noted during
preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes. We ask that you review the site based on the attached information to
determine the presence of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation.Please feel free to contact us with any questions that you
may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Gimbert,Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
704.941.9093
Attachment:
Figure 1 Site Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. (P)704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street,Suite 104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

I ;11 _.,,,,-trill
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
January 15, 2020
Kirsten Gimbert
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
1430 South Mint Street
Suite 104
Charlotte,NC 28203
Re: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site,Montgomery County,ER 19-5494
Dear Ms. Gimbert:
Thank you for your email of December 19,2019 concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator,at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(2k.-A_a_t_. w
amona Bartos,Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

3.9 Notices.All notices required by this agreement shall be in writing,shall be given only in accordance with
the provisions of this Section,shall be addressed to the Parties in the manner stated below,and shall be conclusively
deemed properly delivered: (a) upon receipt when hand delivered during normal business hours; (b) upon the day of
delivery if the notice has been deposited in an authorized receptacle of the United States Postal Service as first-class,
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid,with a return receipt requested; (c)one business day after the notice has
been deposited with either FedEx or United Parcel Service to be delivered by overnight delivery;or(d) if sent by email,
upon receipt of an acknowledgement email sent to the sender's email address in which the party receiving the email
notice acknowledges having received that email.An automatic"read receipt"is not acknowledgement for purposes of
this section 3.9.The addresses of the parties to receive notices are as follows:
TO BUYER: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street,Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Attention: Robert W. Bugg
Email: [e-mail]
TO SELLER: Bruce E. Hudson
PO Box 43
Mt Gilead,NC 27306
Email:[e-mail]
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this paragraph.
3.10 Assignment. Buyer has the right to assign this agreement without the consent of Seller. No assignment
shall be effective unless the assignee has delivered to Seller a written assumption of Buyer's obligations under this
agreement.Seller hereby releases Buyer from any obligations under this agreement arising after the effective date of
any assignment of this agreement by Buyer.
3.11 Value of Conservation Easement; No Power of Eminent Domain. In accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Buyer hereby notifies Seller that:(i) Buyer
believes that the fair market value of the Conservation Easement is an amount equal to the Purchase Price;and (ii)
Buyer does not have the power of eminent domain.
3.12 Modification;Waiver. No amendment of this agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and
signed by the parties.No waiver of satisfaction of a condition or failure to comply with an obligation under this
agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver,and no such waiver will
constitute a waiver of satisfaction of any other condition or failure to comply with any otherobligation.
3.13 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other to interpret or enforce any of the
terms of this agreement or because of the breach by the other party of any of the terms of this agreement,the losing
party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys'fees,expenses,court costs,litigation costs and any other
expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or defense of such action,whether or not the action is prosecuted
to a final judgment.
3.14 Memorandum of Option Agreement. Concurrently with the signing of this agreement, Buyer and Seller
agree to sign a Memorandum of Option that will be recorded against the Property in the Register of Deeds in the County
7
7-24-19 RWB
sSW1 Buyer
Seller

�EtyT OF T r u.a N
i6 h� FISH&N'nar.IFE
QP ^I�j S1E€VICh
o��=_ - United States Department of the Interior
�QR .� FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ,'' r.,,
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date.12/19/2019, REV 8.21 .2020
Self-Certification Letter
Project Name Cross Creek Ranch
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package,you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided,using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended(ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended(Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190,42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
if proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
ri "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
n "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat(Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016,Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required"determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore,we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the"may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species,proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available,this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions,you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures -project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Date: 12/19/2019, REV 8/21/2020
Species/Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7/Eagle Act Notes/Documentation
Determination
Red-cockaded Woodpecker No suitable habitat present No effect Field Survey conducted on December 12, 2019 determined no
(Picoides borealis) individual species or suitable habitat were found to exist. No
critical habitat has been designated by USFWS for this
species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Schweinitz's Sunflower Potential habitat present No effect Field Survey conducted on December 12, 2019 determined
(Helianthus schweinitzii) potential suitable habitat was found to exist.An additional field
survey was conducted on August 19, 2020 during the
blooming season of the plant and confirmed no individual
species were found to exist on the site. No critical habitat has
been designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Smooth Coneflower Potential habitat present No effect Field Survey conducted on December 12, 2019 determined
(Echinacea laevigata) potential suitable habitat was found to exist.An additional field
survey was conducted on August 19, 2020 during the
blooming season of the plant and confirmed no individual
species were found to exist on the site. No critical habitat has
been designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Bald Eagle Unlikely to disturb nesting No Eagle Act Permit Required Field Survey conducted on December 12, 2019 observed one
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) bald eagles subadult individual in flight, but no nests were found to exist.
Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element occurrences
exist within the proposed project area.
Critical Habitat No critical habitat present
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Senior Environmental Scientist 8/21/2020
Signature/Title Date

� L hSai keWILIillft
x = _. United States Department of the Interior �`��
is' . . -
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
" ,;} Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: December 05, 2019
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0323
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733
Project Name: Cross Creek Ranch
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species.A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

12/05/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species.As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect(i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect(i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html).Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service.Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

12/05/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

12/05/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

12/05/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0323
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733
Project Name: Cross Creek Ranch
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Stream &Wetland Mitigation Site
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.231242599350225N80.01907561073094W
_ 1/4ripS
Counties: Montgomery, NC

12/05/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-00733 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

„,„T of tti United States Department of the Interior
3'PCH
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
HRaleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
9 .s ' Raleigh,North Carolina 27606
April 20, 2020
Kim Browning
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Mitigation Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: NCDMS Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site/SAW-2020-00051/ Montgomery County
Dear Mrs. Browning:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the project advertised in the above
referenced Public Notice. The project, as advertised in the Public Notice, is expected to have
minimal adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Therefore, we have no objection to the
activity as described in the permit application.
In accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (ESA) and based on the
information provided, and other available information, it appears the action is not likely to
adversely affect federally listed species or their critical habitat as defined by the ESA. We believe
that the requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for this project. Please
remember that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information identifies
impacts of this action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered; (2) this action is modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a
new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
For your convenience a list of all federally protected endangered and threatened species in North
Carolina is now available on our website at<http://www.fws.gov/raleigh>. Our web page contains
a complete and updated list of federally protected species, and a list of federal species of concern
known to occur in each county in North Carolina.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed action.
Should you have any questions regarding the project, please contact Kathy Matthews at (919) 856-
4520, extension 27.
Sincerely,
for Pete Benjamin,
Field Supervisor
cc: NMFS, Beaufort, NC
EPA, Atlanta, GA
WRC, Raleigh

Kirsten Gimbert
From: Kirsten Gimbert
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 2:29 PM
To: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC
Subject: AD1006 FPPA Form-Cross Creek Ranch
Attachments: FPPA_AD1006 Cross Creek 2.21.2020.pdf
Milton,
Please find attached to the email the completed FPPA AD1006 Form for the Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site.
Thank You,
Kirsten Gimbert I Senior Environmental Scientist
M: 704.941.9093
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
1

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 1/3/20
Name Of Project Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Federal Agency Involved FHWA
Proposed Land Use Stream Restoration County And State Montgomery County, NC
PART II (To be completed by NRCS) Date Request Received By NRCS
Does the site contain prime, unique,statewide or local important farmland? Yes No Acres Irrigated Average Farm Size
(If no, the FPPA does not apply--do not complete additional parts of this form). V ❑ None 140 acres
Major Crop(s) Farmable Land In Govt.Jurisdiction Amount Of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
CORN Acres: 108,921 acres % 46 Acres: 92,266 acres %39
Name Of Land Evaluation System Used Name Of Local Site Assessment System Date Land Evaluation Returned By NRCS
Montgomery Co. LESA N/A February 13, 2020 by eMail
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Rating
Site A Site B Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 62.9
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site 62.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
PART IV(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 39.6
B. Total Acres Statewide And Local Important Farmland 20.4
C. Percentage Of Farmland In County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted 0.0651
D. Percentage Of Farmland In Govt.Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value 39.2
PART V(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion 48 0 0 0
Relative Value Of Farmland To Be Converted(Scale of 0 to 100 Points)
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Maximum
Site Assessment Criteria(These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(b) Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use 15 15
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use 10 10
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed 20 5
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government 20 20
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area 15 13
6. Distance To Urban Support Services 15 10
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average 10 0
8. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland 10 0
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services 5 5
10. On-Farm Investments 20 1
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services 10 0
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use 10 0
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 79 0 0 0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 48 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment(From Part VI above or a local 160 79 0 0 0
site assessment)
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2lines) 260 127 0 0 0
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Site Selected: Date Of Selection Yes ❑ No 0
Reason For Selection:
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006(10-83)
This form was electronically produced by National Production Services Staff

WILDLANDS
E NGINEER!NG
December 19,2019
Gabriela Garrison
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
Sandhills Depot
PO Box 149
Hoffman,NC 28347
Subject: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Montgomery County,North Carolina
Dear Ms.Garrison,
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to fish and
wildlife issues associated with a potential stream and wetland restoration project on the Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
located in Montgomery County,NC.A USGS Topographic Map and an Overview Site Map showing the approximate project area
are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Mount Gilead West 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle,
and the site is located at latitude 35.235 longitude.
The Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site is being developed to provide stream and wetland mitigation in the Yadkin River basin.
The project includes stream restoration,enhancement,and preservation on Clarks Creek,Big Branch,and multiple unnamed
tributaries.Three areas of relic wetlands are proposed for re-establishment within the floodplains of project streams.Clarks
Creek drains to the Pee Dee River just downstream of the Norwood Dam on Lake Tillery.The area surrounding the streams and
channels proposed for stream and wetland mitigation is currently an active farm composed of cattle pastures and previously
deforested timber areas.
The major goals of the stream and wetland mitigation project are to provide ecological and water quality enhancements to the
Yadkin River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level.This will be accomplished by excluding livestock
from stream channels,stabilizing eroding stream banks,restoring and enhancing native floodplain and wetland vegetation,
improving the stability of stream channels,improving instream and wetland habitat,reducing sediment and nutrient input from
adjacent agricultural fields,and permanently protecting and preserving the project site through establishing a conservation
easement.These actions will reduce fecal,nutrient,and sediment inputs to project streams,and ultimately to the Pee Dee
River,as well as reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on the project site.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation.Please feel free to contact us with any questions that you
may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Gimbert,Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
704.941.9093
Attachment:
Figure 1 Site Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. (P)704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street,Suite 104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

Kirsten Gimbert
From: Garrison, Gabriela <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday,January 16, 2020 1:31 PM
To: Kirsten Gimbert
Subject: Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Hello Ms. Gimbert,
I have reviewed the information you sent regarding the Cross Creek Mitigation Site in Montgomery County. I don't have
any concerns with this project at this time.
Thank you,
Gabriela
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Sandhills Depot, P.O. Box 149
Hoffman, NC 28347
Office and Cell:910-409-7350
[e-mail]
www.ncwildlife.org
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

V: 1 Proposed Conservation Easement = = Temporary Contruction Easement Path
L-.- p p Y _ , _
Q Project Parcels —Non-Project Stream
A Temporary Construction Easement Area — Project Stream
N.
a urn y o11111,tht .
f-rj ..4-4. - .. -,4 40r •I??•.k :..A.•
_- -• t. -•-*' gyp ����[
fir. � __• 4 • 'r"'ti . :__.. ♦,
111ipk %. ... - * II• ..... ' ,,,„,...' '•• „,.. 0 . „ - . . . .
.. .:
•
x n
•
1101
ij
ti)
n
A
m
m
i.019 Aerial Photography lkAirillikillik. ... ' .
II4Figure 1 Site Map
WI L D LA N D S 0 875 1,750 Feet Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
E M11 GIN E E R I N G I I I I I Yadkin River Basin 03040104
Montgomery County, NC

. r..,.....ar-4b. — -N,...........\\) \J v ) ....- lk F ,! •
v
L - j Proposed Conservation ` 1`
)1.4tiNi?")% . I.
\ . 1 i 4 , f,/ /
1111. 40V: . .. ,. . 4t
9 -6 1.211//f°6 'Nil) 1.1oki .i 27 .,...... ...... -41 4a.. . ) ! i \,.. ..1,1 .1 ii 1 i. ....
• a:\ i ‘ fibtih .
r-4 .,1, 0
dig ., -- `4t,.__,. . / 11 IritartriP."-i Ilk(
V/ .. ,011.1 re,,,:iffr.,,i . .il
In
e••••J'S r:4 lar *4
: .,
• I 1 .." / ,i/ \4111,N
N / ' 211. //1 ' 4;41:
•
4I (
• a ki,. f, ..ft"" • V
Q r
„ ,,.. .c.%
\ . •
.,-;„ ..
-...)h. ....NIII ‘c
.....---- .., . - - \ \,5,0
. ,
0 ..?ziok \
lik
11 ,) \‘, ;5---..._
) ,
ti . 4,\......\\,"
Pr v Ai,
\ \t\>
i , N• i I I ) ‘11S 1) 1 ! 4 '1 Vr 4
: rit . .. , i ‘!,'$., %,..........eiee
:iii. 1:\b' Aill t4*res: d Aigi.W.
--.14 1 0 ft
Mount Gilead West, NC USGS US Topo 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
�-gir W I L D LA N D 5 0 850 1,700 FeetI
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040104
Eh1GIfJEERItJG I I I I
Montgomery County, NC

111111
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
MEETING MINUTES
MEETING: Post Contract IRT Site Visit
CROSS CREEK RANCH Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040104; Montgomery County, NC
NCDMS Project No. 100138
USACE ID: SAW-2020-00051
NCDEQ Contract No. 7879-01
Wildlands Project No. 005-02186
DATE: On-site Meeting: Monday,January 13, 2020, 10:00 am
Meeting Notes Distributed:Wednesday,January 22, 2020
LOCATION: 5630 NC-73
Mt Gilead, NC 27306
Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Mac Haupt, NC Department of Environmental Quality
Erin Davis, NC Department of Environmental Quality
Paul Wiesner, Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS)
Kirsten Ullman, NCDMS
Kelly Phillips, NCDMS Project Manager
Casey Haywood, NCDMS
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands Engineering
John Hutton, Wildlands Engineering
Eric Neuhaus, Wildlands Engineering
Materials
• Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal dated 8/13/2019 in response to NCDMS RFP#16-007879
Overall Site Notes/Comments
1. The IRT appreciates the bigger project scale with few crossings/breaks and encourages expanded/wide
stream buffers when possible.
2. The IRT appreciates the additional buffer area at the upstream and downstream extent of Clarks Creek.
It was noted that these additional buffer areas should be highlighted within the mitigation plan.
3. Given the quantity and extent of invasive vegetation (primarily Chinese privet) within the project,
Wildlands needs to ensure strong language within the mitigation plan regarding treatment as well as a
detailed management plan for treatment long-term with the conservation easement.
4. With the exception of the potential of segmenting UT3 into different mitigation types,the IRT agreed
with the approaches and ratios on the project streams and wetlands.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 1
CROSS CREEK RANCH mitigation site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk

Meeting Notes
1. Wildlands gave a brief site overview before the walk which discussed stream and wetland approach and
general site conditions.
2. It was noted by Wildlands that upstream of UT1 (outside of the project area)the property owner
harvested timber in 2014 but left a forested buffer adjacent to stream.
3. The walk began at the upstream end of Big Branch. It was noted that the concrete box culvert passing
under NC-73 is perched and that Wildlands will set the upstream grade of Big Branch high enough to
eliminate the current perching of the existing culvert.
4. Work within the DOT right-of-way at the upstream end of Big Branch was discussed. Wildlands noted
that they would seek approval to work within the DOT right-of-way as required. It was noted that the
conservation easement would start approximately 30 feet downstream of the ROW.
5. The walk continued down Big Branch until its confluence with Clarks Creek. Bank height ratio along Big
Branch was discussed. It was noted that Wildlands needs to note/include discussion around incision,
instability,floodplain access, and hydrologic connection to the adjacent wetlands along Big Branch to
help justify restoration within the mitigation plan.
6. The group proceeded into proposed wetland 3 to look at the existing ditches and potential wetland soils.
Soil borings were taken in the southwest end and centrally within proposed wetland 3. Generally,the
IRT agreed with the licensed soils scientist hydric soils investigation provided with the proposal.
7. It was noted that if soils vary in type between proposed wetland 1, 2, and 3 after further soils
investigation; separate wetland hydrology performance standards may be required for separate wetland
areas.
8. The IRT noted the extensive amount of broomsedge (Andropgon virginicus)within proposed wetland 3.
Wildlands intends to disk and roughen the wetland area and mechanically remove the broomsedge.
9. Emphasis was placed on restoring the natural flooding regime of Big Branch and reconnecting the
stream and wetland systems to justify restoration approach of Big Branch.
10. The walk continued at the confluence of UT1 and UT1B areas of the site. It was noted that Crossing 2 will
be a 100' wide internal crossing and that the existing overhead electric line will be relocated to within
the internal crossing.
11. The site walk continued up UT1B.The IRT asked if the internal crossing (crossing#1 in the proposal)
could be relocated to the upstream extent of UT1B. Wildlands confirmed with the property owner that
this should not be an issue and intends on relocating the crossing based on this discussion.
12. UT1 was then walked from upstream to downstream. Potential hydric soils within proposed wetland 1 in
the left floodplain of UT1 were confirmed. It was noted by the IRT that re-aligning UT1 closer to
proposed wetland 1 would be ideal if possible.
13. Potential hydric soils were also confirmed within proposed wetland 2, along with seep hydrology source
which is currently in cattle wallow.
14. The IRT noted that proper approach and jurisdictional classification will be required for the pond
conversion to wetland. Wildlands understands the need to ensure proper jurisdictional classification of
the existing pond and associated pond conversion to wetland. Wildlands will provide information within
the mitigation plan that outlines the current pond jurisdiction, proposed restoration approach, evidence
of relic hydric soils (as available), and an associated crediting ratio to be evaluated by the IRT and
NCDMS.
15. The site walk continued with some spot visits to sections of Clarks Creek. The IRT agreed that with
major privet removal, spot erosion repairs, planting out the buffer, and given the size of the creek that
E2 at 4:1 was appropriate mitigation.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
CROSS CREEK RANCH mitigation site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk

16. The walk proceeded to the upstream extent of UT3. It was noted by Wildlands that if the jurisdictional
stream call was moved upstream, Wildlands would capture the entirety of the jurisdictional stream
within the proposed conservation easement.
17. UT3 was walked from upstream to downstream, and it was noted by the IRT that the reach is in varying
condition which will require fluctuating levels of treatment and design. Wildlands will provide a follow-
up memo including a map and table that outline lengths, approaches, and associated crediting ratios for
UT3 and provide it to NCDMS and the IRT for approval prior to major design efforts.
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. page 3
CROSS CREEK RANCH mitigation site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk

From: Tugwell,Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW(US)
To: Wiesner,Paul;Haupt,Mac; Davis.Erin B; Kim Browning
Cc: Phillips,Kelly D; Ullman, Kirsten J; Haywood,Casey;Shawn Wilkerson;John Hutton;Eric Neuhaus
Subject: [External]RE: Cross Creek Ranch Site_DMS#100138:Post Contract IRT Site Visit(1-13-2020)Meeting Minutes
Date: Friday,January 24,2020 2:46:28 PM
CAUTION:External email.Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Paul,
I looked over the minutes and they look OK. I would note that the JD needs to be done to confirm the existing
jurisdictional status and limits within the wetlands to confirm the approaches. Also,we will need to concur with the
approach within the pond,and whether the resulting credits will be R or RE,but I think we need more info on that
before we can make a decision.
Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.
Todd
Original Message
From:Wiesner,Paul[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday,January 22,2020 11:13 AM
To: Tugwell,Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW(US)<[e-mail]>;Haupt,Mac
<[e-mail]>;Davis,Erin B<[e-mail]>;Browning,Kimberly D CIV USARMY
CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
Cc:Phillips,Kelly D<[e-mail]>;Wiesner,Paul<[e-mail]>;Ullman,Kirsten J
<[e-mail]>;Haywood,Casey<[e-mail]>; Shawn Wilkerson
<[e-mail]>;John Hutton<[e-mail]>;Eric Neuhaus
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source]Cross Creek Ranch Site_DMS# 100138:Post Contract IRT Site Visit(1-13-2020)
Meeting Minutes
All:
The meeting minutes from the January 13,2020 IRT post contract site visit are attached for your review.
Please let us know if you have any additional comments,questions or concerns.
Thanks
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality

Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville,N.C.28801
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Jeff Keaton
To: Tugwell,Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW(US); Brownina, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW(USA); Davis.Erin B;
Haywood,Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW(USA);Wiesner. Paul; Phillips, Kelly D
Cc: Shawn Wilkerson;Abigail Vieira
Subject: RE: Cross Creek Ranch UT3 Approach Memo
Date: Friday,September 18, 2020 11:38:48 AM
Attachments: Figure 1. UT3 Concept Approach Map.pdf
Folks—After sending out the approach memo for UT3 at the Cross Creek Ranch site, we had a
follow-up conference call and email exchange with Kim, Erin, and Casey. The result of those
discussions is that we will propose three reaches for UT3. The first reach will be approximately 792
LF of restoration at the upstream end of the stream. The second reach will be 848 LF of"lumped"
enhancement II consisting of a few different sections with different treatments similar to what was
proposed in the memo. The lower 321 LF will be a short preservation reach. A map is attached to
show the three separate reaches. Each reach will be described in more detail in the upcoming draft
mitigation plan. Both Erin and Kim indicated that they would need to review the mitigation plan
before agreeing on credit ratios, so we will hold off on further discussion of proposed ratios until the
draft mit plan is submitted late this year. Erin and Kim did not think a final version of the memo was
necessary, so I'm sending this email as the final communication on this until the draft mit plan is
submitted. Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns. Thanks.
Jeff
From:Jeff Keaton
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 1:59 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly
D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Davis, Erin B
<[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul <[e-mail]>; Phillips, Kelly D
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Shawn Wilkerson <[e-mail]>; Abigail Vieira <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cross Creek Ranch UT3 Approach Memo
All —One of the outcomes of the Cross Creek Ranch post-contract site visit was a request by
members of the IRT that the treatments and crediting for the different sections of UT3 be planned
and discussed in a memo to be sent out to the IRT. Here is the comment from the post contract
meeting summary:
UT3 was walked from upstream to downstream, and it was noted by the IRT that the reach is in
varying condition which will require fluctuating levels of treatment and design. Wildlands will provide
a follow-up memo including a map and table that outline lengths, approaches, and associated
crediting ratios for UT3 and provide it to NCDMS and the IRT for approval prior to major design
efforts.
The follow-up memo is attached. We look forward to your feedback on this memo and specifically if
you agree with our proposed approach and crediting for the stream. Please let us know if we can
move forward with the 2.5:1 credit ratio for the entire UT3 stream and the treatments we have

proposed for that stream. Please feel free to contact me if we need to discuss. Thanks.
Jeff Keaton, PE I Senior Water Resources Engineer
0: 919.851.9986 x103 M: 919.302.6919
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

Appendix 7

Appendix 7 Invasive Vegetation Treatment Plan
The presence of invasive species on Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site is extensive throughout the
streambank zone of the project streams.The most prevalent species, Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense),
is spread throughout the length of the project. Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),tree of heaven
(Ailanthus altissima), and princess tree (Paulownia tomentosa) are also scattered along the existing
stream banks, but in much lower quantities.Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and lespedeza
(Lespedeza bicolor) also have scattered populations that will require ongoing treatment. Populations of
lespedeza within or adjacent to areas of disturbance will need to be treated aggressively and monitored
closely post construction.
A goal of this project is to treat and remove as many invasive plant populations as possible before and
during construction. During construction and post construction,the presence and extents of invasive
species will be monitored, and treatment of invasive species will continue as necessary throughout the
life of the project to ensure project stability and success of the riparian and streambank vegetation.
Generally,the treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 1 for common invasive species
found in riparian areas; however,the treatment may be changed based on the professional judgement
of the project engineer and steward. All invasive species treatments will be reported in each monitoring
report.
Table 1.Invasive Species Treatment Techniques
Invasive Species Recommended Treatment Technique
Small infestations of L.japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re-sprouts.
Japanese Large infestations of L.japonica will usually require a combination of cut stump and foliar
Honeysuckle herbicide treatments.Where vines have grown into the tree canopy,cut stems as close to
the ground as possible.Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted stem with a 25 percent
(Lonicera solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Groundcovers of L.japonica can be treated with a foliar
japonica) solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a
glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) in the late fall or
early winter. Backpack mist blowers can broadcast glyphosate as a 3-percent solution (12
ounces per 3-gallon mix) during winter for safety to dormant hardwoods.Summer
applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as other times and require a higher
percent solution.
For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,
apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a
Chinese Privet labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant,or fuel oil or diesel
(Ligustrum fuel (where permitted);or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere,apply Stalker* as a 6-to 9-
sinense) percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil
or mineral oil with a penetrant to young bark as a basal spray making certain to treat all
stems in a clump;or cut and immediately treat the stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5-
percent solution (20 ounces per 3-gallon mix)or Velpar L* as a 10-percent solution in water
(1 quart per 3-gallon mix)with a surfactant.When safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, immediately treat stump tops and sides with Garlon 3A or with a glyphosate
herbicide as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in water with a surfactant.
ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut-
stumps. For large stems, make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to
surrounding vegetation is desired,Garlon 3A or a glyphosate herbicide using dilutions and
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 1

Invasive Species Recommended Treatment Technique
cut-spacings specified on the herbicide label (anytime except March and April).An EZ-Ject
tree injector can help to reach the lower part of the main stem; otherwise,every branching
trunk can be hack-and-squirt injected.
Foliar treatment of large populations with 2%glyphosate or triclopyr solution.
For stems too tall for foliar sprays,apply basal sprays(January to February or May to
October) using Garton 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled
basal oil product,vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant.
Multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora) Cut stump treatment is time consuming,though effective. Cut large stems and immediately
treat the stump tops with a glyphosate herbicide as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-
gallon mix). ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores(safe to surrounding plants).
For large trees, make stem injections or hack and squirt using Garton 3A as a 25%solution
in water. For felled trees,apply the herbicides to stem and stump tops immediately after
cutting.Also,ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores(safe to surrounding plants).
For saplings,apply basal sprays mixed in a labeled basal oil product,vegetable oil or
Tree of Heaven mineral oil with a penetrant using Garton 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon
(Ailanthus mix).
altissima) For seedlings,thoroughly wet all leaves with Garton 4 as a 1-to 2-percent solution (4 to 8
ounces per 3-gallon mix)or Garton 3A as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix)
mixed in water with a surfactant.
Treatments most effective July—October.
Lespedeza Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant
(Lespedeza (July to September): Garlon 4 as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix),or Velpar
bicolor) Las a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
For large trees, make stem injections using Garlon 3A or a glyphosate herbicide in dilutions
and cut-spacings specified on the herbicide label (anytime except March and April). For
felled trees,apply these herbicides to stump tops immediately after cutting.Also,ORTHO
Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut-stumps and
Princesstree available in retail garden stores(safe to surrounding plants).
(Paulownia For saplings,apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon
tomentosa) mix) in a labeled basal oil product.
For seedlings and resprouts,thoroughly wet all leaves with a glyphosate herbicide,Garlon
3A, or Garlon 4 as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Treatment most effective July—October.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 2

Invasive Species Recommended Treatment Technique
Foliar applications—Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water
Asian Spiderwort, with a surfactant: 2-3%aquatic labeled glyphosate.
also known as
Marsh Dewflower Do not remove mechanically.Spiderwort spreads readily in disturbed areas through
(Murdannia kiesk) fragmentation and seed dispersal.
Undesirable orchard and fescue grasses will be mechanically removed during construction
Orchard grasses on large portions of the site. Following construction,these grasses will be treated where
and fescue they are impacting planted stems using a number of methods including herbicide ring
sprays, herbicide treatment and reseeding,and mechanical tree release.
Invasive species management will be conducted and monitored by Wildlands Engineering's Stewardship
team with cooperation and assistance from the project engineer and environmental science teams.
Management actions will be completed in accordance with an invasive species management plan that
will be continually updated by the site's lead steward to ensure accurate response to changing
conditions.This management plan outlines timing and details of planned management actions
throughout the length of the project along with an identification of species found on the project site.
The management plan can be found below in Table 2.
Table 2.Invasive Species Management Plan
Treatment Season Recommended Treatment Technique
• Site walk-create invasive species maps for pre-construction.
• Discuss any changes or updates to construction plan and timing.
Summer/Spring 2021 • Draft site prep plan/review planting plans.Take soil samples where necessary
once grading plan is available.
• Finalize site prep/planting plans.
Fall/Winter 2021 • Organize privet treatments for Enhancement/Preservation reaches to be
done in tandem with construction.
• Monitor disposal of large stands of privet in restoration areas.
During Construction • Manage privet treatment efforts on enhancement/preservation reaches.
• Post construction site walk.
• Update site maps accordingly.
Summer/Spring 2022
• Identify areas of concern and establish stewardship photo points to
document management efforts.
• Monitor for emergence of aquatic invasive species, map and plan treatments
appropriately.
• Monitor emergence of invasive species on restoration reaches where
previous invasive species populations existed before construction.Treat,as
necessary.
Fall/Winter 2022 2023 • Follow up treatments on preservation reaches where necessary.
■ Photo-document changes to the bank in these areas as privet dies and live
stakes take over.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2023 • Record photo points.
Winter 2023-2024 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2024 • Record photo points.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 3

Treatment Season Recommended Treatment Technique
Winter 2024-2025 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2025 • Record photo points.
Winter 2025-2026 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2026 • Record photo points.
Winter 2026-2027 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2027 • Record photo points.
Winter 2027-2028 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
• Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Summer 2028 • Record photo points.
Winter 2028-2028 • Follow up treatment of invasive plants,as necessary.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 4

Appendix 8

Appendix 8 Maintenance Plan
The site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met.These site inspections may identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
Table 1. Maintenance Plan
Component/Feature Maintenance through project close-out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping,securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental
installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel.Areas where
Stream storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance
to prevent bank erosion. If beaver become active on the site,Wildlands will
contract with the USDA to trap the beaver and remove the dams.
Routine wetland maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental
Wetlands installations of target vegetation within the wetland.Areas where storm water and
floodplain flows intercept the wetland may also require maintenance to prevent scour
that adversely and persistently threatens wetland habitat or function.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
Vegetation
supplemental planting, pruning, mulching,and fertilizing. Invasive plant species
requiring treatment per the Invasive Species Treatment Plan (Appendix 7)shall be
treated in accordance with that plan and with NC Department of Agriculture(NCDA)
rules and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence,
Site boundary marker, bollard, post,tree-blazing,or other means as allowed by site conditions
and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,damaged,or destroyed
will be repaired and/or replaced on an as-needed basis.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 8
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 1

Appendix 9

Appendix 9 Credit Release Schedule and Supporting Information
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as-built survey of the
mitigation site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary
Department of the Army(DA) authorization has been received for its construction or the District
Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA
authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project.The DE, in consultation with the
Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently
to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where some performance standards
have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may
be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the
specified performance standard.The release of project credits will be subject to the criteria described as
follows:
Table A:Credit Release Schedule—Stream Credits
Credit Monitoring Interim Total
Release Year Credit Release Activity Release Released
Milestone
1 0 Site Establishment 0% 0%
2 0 Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made 30% 30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan—see requirements below
3 1 Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 10% 40%
interim performance standards have been met
4 2 Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 10% 50%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 10%
5 3 interim performance standards have been met 60%
6 4* Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 50/ 65%
interim performance standards have been met (75%**)
7 5 Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 10% 75%
interim performance standards have been met (85%**)
8 6* Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 50/ 80%
interim performance standards have been met (90%**)
9 7 Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 100� 90%
interim performance standards have been met (100%**)
*Vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these monitoring years unless
otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
**10%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met
Table B:Credit Release Schedule—Wetland Credits
Credit Monitoring Interim Total
Release Year Credit Release Activity Release Released
Milestone
1 0 Site Establishment 0% 0%
2 0 Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made 30% 30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan—see requirements below
3 1 Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance 10% 40%
standards have been met
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 1

Credit Monitoring Interim Total
Release Year Credit Release Activity Release Released
Milestone
4 2 Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance 10% 50%
standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance o 65%
5 3 standards have been met 15/
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
6 4* standards have been met 5o 700�
�
7 5 Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance 15% 85%
standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
8 6* standards have been met 5o 900,'
�
9 7 Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance 10% 100%
standards have been met
*Vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these monitoring years unless
otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
1.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
For this NCDMS project, no initial release of credits is provided.To account for this,the 15%credit
release typically associated with the site establishment is held until completion of all initial physical and
biological improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation Plan. In order for NCDMS to receive the 30%
release (shown in Tables A and B as Milestone 2),they must comply with the credit release
requirements stated in Section IV(I)(3) of the approved NCDMS instrument.
1.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved.
The following conditions apply to credit release schedules:
a. A reserve of 10%of site's total stream credits will be release after four bankfull events have
occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards
are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period,
release of these reserve credits is at the discretion of the NCIRT.
b. After the second milestone,the credit releases are scheduled to occur on an annual basis,
assuming that the annual monitoring report has been provided to the USACE in accordance with
Section IV(General Monitoring Requirements) of this document, and that the monitoring report
demonstrates that interim performance standards are being met and that no other concerns
have been identified on-site during the visual monitoring. All credit releases require written
approval from the USACE.
c. The credits associated with the final credit release milestone will be released only upon a
determination by the USACE, in consultation with the NCIRT, of functional success as defined in
the Mitigation Plan.
As projects approach milestones associated with credit release,the DMS will submit a request for credit
release to the DE along with documentation substantiating achievement of criteria required for release
to occur.This documentation will be included with the annual monitoring report.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 2

Appendix 10

Appendix 10 Financial Assurances
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service's In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010,the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has provided
the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to
satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS.This commitment provides financial assurance for all
mitigation projects implemented by the program.
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Appendix 10
DMS ID No. 100138 Page 1

Appendix 11

r v 1
Cross Creek Ranch Mitigation Site Q
Montgomery County, North Carolina w =z
v
for w ,
m
NC DEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
Sheet IndexzmN
Title Sheet 0.1
0
2, Project Overview 0.2-0.5
y/Q3, eC., General Notes and Symbols 0.6
T1j44
NStream Plan and Profile Sheets
Clarks Creek 1.1.1-1.1.5
.4 i
rt
Big Branch 1.2.1-1.2.6OmUT1 1.3.1 1.3.9 cJ� O
L� 1 c't
UT1B 1.4.1-1.4.4
Cu
Vi
� � 994F. UT3 1.5.01-1.5.18
T� Wetland Overview 2.1
zC
290
Wetland Plan 2.2-2.5
Planting Tables 3.0 v J
r"
SITE Planting Overview 3.1 �/ U H
Planting Plan 3.2-3.4
�c) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan To Be Added
yyORORo ,,,z-
..\� BEFORE YOU DIG! FencingPlan Overview 5.1 C
CALL 1-800-632-4949 c
RICH SOpRA N 0- N.C.ONE-CALL CENTER 0 - '
RD ITS THE LAW! Fencing Plan 5.2-5.4 U
Vicinity Map Details 6.01-6.10
Not to Scale
Project Directory
Engineering: Owner:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc DEQ NCDMS
Project Information License No.F-0831 1652 Mail Service Center
PRELIMINARY PLANS 312 W.Millbrook Rd,Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Stream Latitude Longitude Raleigh, NC 27609 Attention:Kelly Phillips
c Clarks Creek N35°14' 08.6" W80°01'20.7" ISSUED MAY 7, 2021 Jefferson Keaton,PE,Project Manager 919-707-8976
_ Big Branch N35°14'55.9" W80° Abigail Vieira,PE,Project Engineer 01' 59.7"
UT1 N35°14' 10.8" W80°01'59.7" NCDEQ Contract No.7879-01
UT1B N35°14' 12.1" W80°01'37.4" 919-851-9986 DMS ID No. 100138
UT3 N35°14' 03.1" W80°02' 09.5" Surveying:
Kee Mapping and Surveying,PA m
88 Central Avenue o a cnz
Asheville, NC 28801 8 r—i
3 Drew V.Duinkerken,PLS O
828-645-8275
LEEX v Z Y 3 9
O 9 a` O -]
J

r \ Y 1
DARIN YER YANG STEPHANIE STEWART,TRUSTEE FOR THE
XIONG YANG GAVEN M.ALEXANDER IRREVOCABLE TRUST
- - - - LEUR YANG AND WIFE, PIN:6594-00-33-3062 U7
- - - MAY HEUR DB:809 PG:881 N
PIN:6594-00-04-4244 STEPHANIE STEWART, _ Q 0 ,o-m
DB:816 PG:43 - MICHAEL TODD ALEXANDER AND Z Z
TRUSTEE FOR THE
DB:286 PG:486 / JEFFERY T.ALEXANDER z 1 rA°!
DB:319 PG:203 GAVEN M.ALEXANDER C PIN:6594-00-32-6717 t):
w o z
IRREVOCABLE TRUST \
DB:817 PG:660 u: DB:709 PG:722 z re)
PIN:6594-00-23-3526 \ d y �J)/\ Q -
DB:809 PG:881(TRACT 1) \ � � N � ��/ \ �z '��H�
0.4 S
"W
i' F EUGENE THOMAS BRUTON
\ �• PIN:6594-00-43-3283
u CF - i.. \ y\ DB:431 PG:237(TRACT 1) JESSIE LEE CHAPPELL(LIFE ESTATE)
i
a Cc+ I + n "'��,,,, N v\ I JEFFERY SCOTT CHAPPELL
CE �' �; F, 2.>� �4, PIN:6594-00-52-3160
DB:745 PG:164
3j �� liN cF -
\�J 0�'� `'^m � pJ�/ ��, •'* s, EUGENE THOMAS BRUTON ��
\ F w ( G o d•' �•�\ PIN:6594-00-61-2816
''-� dJ \� > UT u ,. /C wb.;� ' DB:496 PG:466 ^
,x ,( I , C+ 4\ u S Y
N, ` .- \� .,.� I KENNY A.THOMAS AND WIFE,
a
\ ®`:.. '�J\ , / �4� -1114,
• � PAM HOUSE THOMASNi
\\ \ u ; PIN:6594-00-51-7567
3.0 / 3J- i `� t ♦`', DB:248 PG:429
3J- 'ti J 4 k •
f I
1 `�' E-/ \ �'�'J \+� � I
rq� C,��II .� BROWDIS THOMAS AND WIFE,
CE�CE�CE` `_ ,� ,` \+�.' yAl} 1 1 P (J �//�� PIN:6594-00-51-9416
\ \J UT3 . ' 1 yn .( /i9` \ DB:175 PG:102
�� .�'AtF d�� 6 f
�J
<�"��- +� ` +\�, / Q '��\ CHURCH OF GOD OF
CE i �3 FACE / m CJ ♦roe PROPHECY
',,V / i'� .- 1_x��_ ��G .\ PIN:6594-00-61-1007
DB:244 PG:12 ,t
m $� f tea 'Oc...01,,� a
\�C 'y w-, :F\ '�-`a OBYNRENEEJOHNSO
\ R N
{•' u�� \ f ELF, • � \ PIN:6594-07-60-8873 O r ,
J 1 1♦i. DB:501 PG:1 V
n
D ( g®tip ... •bra I
J Q \� MARY WALSTON Z .�
\� \\ \ ,_,. �� /f S ,�/ \,,,,, PIN:6594-00-60-7158 �,
cam\� \\ '9��\T \ �� C�/y�\C GF' a �� \\♦G� DB:488 PG:496
y\ 0
\V f _�F X�.,� � GENEVA L.MILLER ,�y
rF �� 'C \ A-XS/^-- FEMA-XS PIN:6593-07-69-7983 (t
�� �J Z\f ��� ` DB:179 PG:663 j r , •
O _ — — \ CROSS CREEK RANCH • HA ✓// ,may v O
'� N I l FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP THOMAS AUTO SALES,INC.
rn,., I PIN:6594-00-21-1254& J \\ PIN:6593-07-69-9756 �,,,� a)
N1 6594-00-50-3458 \ \ �z/ �DB:304 PG:679(TRACT 1) U E
N �J DB:748 PG:397 m i' n
REF.DB:243 PG:351 = `�J \ J "' V7
No
l T 4�� U o
w I m \
` u
\ II I
HAROLD G.MCRAE AND WIFE,
CELIA B.MCRAE \ ,Q
Z PIN:6593-00-08-6636 \ / ,
DB:339 PG:230 a I I
\ / I GIBRALTAR SPINCO,INC. O.C.STAFFORD
b 111 Q PIN:6593-07-68-2246 PIN:6593-07-69-6640
h� //1� DB:617PG:476 DB:218PG:478
ti9 N
----- _ I Q
— IN 1 D
N o Q
3 2
O.
0' 300' 600' 900' _ O
1: ? (HORIZONTAL) E m m 9 i y
z m
N. / o J

'''''' Cl;)
�OuF Y 1
o STA.335+07 ,�", rye• \ p \
/ END UT1 `. �, �tix \'OO UF\
/ REACH 2(RESTORATION) ill ,n Jam ` \ OUF V)
STA.115+64 � 'np--,,,,,'N., Q
CLARKS CREEK -, je )10
(ENHANCEMENT II) �v '�7��F 4 o
// Ai*
yyS - b STA.100+08 �,7 OF ens)1_ W o z
dH3S_� Sys BEGIN CLARKS CREEK \\O Q. 0 0DO v
i b (BUFFER PROTECTION) ,,, G z H a
/ CE S :Ore
d� HS�_ NOT FOR CREDIT w
dH3
C�' T� Cl'iS / .. ��
( \ yl \�, \ F 1.1.1 _cE y—c /�
Cd �'� ) F2i \ \ -----CE
CE CE CE CE / ;•• . n
CROSS CREEK RANCH / a / fs �j CF CE�CE 7 ��nca�
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CF. / \ \ �'/ ...
�c
PIN:6594 00 21-1254& r / �p 1.1.2\ —. — �' / `' ��
6594-00 50-3458 \ ��, �J _ — .k ��'
I DB:748 PG:397 ��' d�' _ \© — m EUGENE THOMAS BRUTON - •C
REF.DB:243 PG:351 m / .c�, PIN:6594-00-43-3283 �."/�
.�- - 13 `''JF DB:431 PG:237(TRACT 1) •// A�
II s.-/ N /CyH3S 'p/ 9=f 33--s F S HA I .[�/\
/ / s\3J—F CLARKS CREEK Hy�/�\ 'c°���
„Lc-) ,../
P� / / �O \ �"� STA.104+25 1 i • I ae
I (� / END CLARKS CREEK I ,-,-,
ar c
/ T, `.� qF� - (BUFFER PROTECTION) /
1 �� "f,P NOT FOR CREDIT �'
/5 l I BEGIN CLARKS CREEK \
O •
-.
�, (ENHANCEMENT II) / .
A.
dH3S / /� 2 I
4 \
P NnVys d1§' CF / On N
lN
I CF �,SFyA /
6'S b'H3S� �� /j T ! ^�
T �,SFHP o O
m s
S' ,' - y9~'SFHA JESSIE LEE CHAPPELLtt
;"•I
Z'�'i — / ,,, / (LIFE ESTATE)
I N35 r� a d,,,§' 6 STA.139+05 C`` 7 / /; JEFFERY SCOTT CHAPPELL O U '6
Imo- d —� VH35�. y END CLARKS CREEK ` dH3S ¢ I `" / +�
dH3S dH3S '�' (ENHANCEMENT II) �, C / �/ n ° `, PINDB:745 G:16460
BEGIN CLARKS CREEK 0 FFF n, /
(BUFFER PROTECTION) x /
I NOT FOR CREDIT `" CE� / � j.Q J/ Z '�
/CE� ✓x�x 41.2.5b ° 'r�
cE/ _ 1.2J6 (�� `�, m ,B/ i/I �/ " O
Ie
�CECE CE CE CE - SFHP S3 A=SFH A SFHA \\ 11�` l \e'r4 j
•- �� ft 0 cy
y y S EUGENE THOMAS BRUTON �/ U E
�CE�CE 1P9. �O 3�� 3J-3j ?Sj CF Cy (� U iti OCE�CE . gF '7HP SFHA ` ��-O CF PIN:6594-00-61-2816
O / DB:496 PG:466 a
- - SFHP 3�---FiA �-SFHAf'r SFHA STA.221+96 y ��CF /�/,/.7 \\ Fs'j 0
-1\ �P END BIG BRANCH S \ •�� �/. \ O U
SF F (RESTORATION) ,> + dam" C \ cn
hq �' \ STA.133+39 fix, 7�S`; �- ////y./ \ O
CLARKS CREEK +.\ys CF / KENNY A.THOMAS AND WIFE, �"'1
", \ ENHANCEMENT II PAM HOUSE THOMAS U
STA.150+35 ,,,'• STA.133+39 ) \ �� C
END CLARKS CREEK \ JJ N FUT TO BIG BRANCH- \ PIN:6594-00-51-7567
(BUFFER PROTECTION) \ �, \ 6,F CONNECT TO BIG BRANCH \ DB:248 PG:429
NOT FOR CREDIT \ .dj Atlia3,
\ NOT FOR CREDIT \
CF J� / \ \
�J O i'
\ Cps
:19,3
' / •,
\''') \\\
\`-1 \ \ \;407
V BROWDIS THOMAS AND WIFE,
3 gj MAMIE LEE THOMAS
PIN:6594-00-51-9416
STA.200+64 DB:175 PG:102
GIBRALTAR SPINCO,INC. \ BEGIN BIG BRANCH pJ:.
PIN:6593-07-68-2246 \ (RESTORATION)/
_ DB:617 PG:476 CHURCH OF GOD OF
a. \ / ��, PROPHECY
:: PIN:6594-00-61-1007
/�� DB:244 PG:12 'L
71
o z
\ ROBYN RENEEJOHNSON
p PIN:6594-07-60-8873 •
\ \ , DB:501 PG:1
0F CD
' 150' 300' 450' ww
9 a
\V // (HORIZONTAL) e m
v z _ q a
o" o m
J

D YER YANG , Y
XI DARIN
NG YANG \ STEPHANIE STEWART,
g LEUR YANG ANDN WIFE, TRUSTEE FOR THE �O \
MAY HEUR
\ GAVEN M.CABLE TRUST / b \
\ PIN:6594-00-04-4244 IRREVOCABLE TRUST �� \ \ Q N
PIN:6594-00-33-3062
\ DB:816 PG:43 i
\ DB:286 PG:486 DB:809 PG:881 \\9 Z 4�.m
i
DB:319 PG:203 i 4 N! .
DB:817 PG:660 STEPHANIE STEWART,TRUSTEE FOR THE rj0 �� w --'2
z GAVEN M.ALEXANDER IRREVOCABLE TRUST MICHAEL TODD ALEXANDER AND .v� z o s
PIN:6594-00-23-3526 1 E F F E RY T.ALEXANDER '
PIN:6594-00-32-6717 d Q 0 — "
DB:809 PG:881(TRACT 1) rj i Z 'a
STA.300+00 x✓ O
BEGIN UT1 \ DB:709 PG:722 \• w
REACH 1(RESTORATION) \ '� ,,, "`-
_ _
dJ
I u\, x___,„.....,_N. x-x-
' rF V p STA.400+00
BEGIN UT1B
.>>J AxV •� (RESTORATION)
/ k
rNi
- w / INTERTA. NAL
I NTERNAL CROSSING
`?� x.� I m UT1B(RESTORATION) JF,�
3J b
/OJ
\ . . ,„,,..,,
OF STA.404 35 �, /
____:.:... .
\ INTERNAL CROSSING ++ / G J
\.,
\/\ UT1B(RESTORATION) 1� 1 \ O C`O
ct
JJ�, .
..
+ ,, N I �� OJ���
V ilk....Q------------k�x �� �� ct
410111 )` ), 0 u 1 c.,,, O
9 J P�
L---"•••41114161.."; 41A"-\ \ .>>
O O
// 7i
C't i 151 C)U
cs
404616514 1 I I I 4 4-„,:z ..,..,,,, ,, ) ''' or \
ul
// u)
93 \ vs \x OJ O
J -9 ����=30 \ N., Vpfit` O'NCO NTERNALC ROBBING I U
'�,�Jx- �,\x < ', f 1 UT1 REACH 2(RESTORATION)
/ -----_, Ih... ,ilt ' D
,---...„ J1SP: /' 1'3 1 A"V t A / /
\x�J / m l t )\ 1.0) 7://
CROSS CREEK RANCH ��� V � OJ O ;
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STA.413+03 �'�, • 3 "IV �C \��/+' x� bey: ,
P PIN:6594-00-21-1254& END UT1B � \ S
`, 6594-00-50-3458 (RESTORATION) J x��N. +�..0, yHj
DB:748PG:397 STA.328+21 O CO ®®�' +\ \
REF.DB:243 PG:351 END UT1
REACH 1(RESTORATION) I •
O
a
BEGIN UT1 Jk, / I vx \
REACH 2(RESTORATION) O CO / he CE CE'
STA.330+84 +�v\ \�CE
INTERNAL CROSSING of
-3 i UT1 REACH 2(RESTORATION) \.N= y
�` v�J + .03
�� �= ti
oJ��/
// .
3 �C STA.335+07 '�
Ci 0
J// END UT1 �� �,C7 V •
REACH 2(RESTORATION) F O
0' 100' 200' 300' O O STA.115+64 1 5 i Q/i,� E
s (HORIZONTAL) / '�C - CLARKS CREEK(ENHANCEMENT II) �/ P,S d ,
x J<c. / H 7 FE o o , m
0 0 r-j j n

r / Y 1
STA.507+81
END UT3 N
—30 3D 3D 3D 3D REACH 1(RESTORATION) N
/ 30�30J BEGIN/END UT3 Q v
3'0 - �+'Z\ REACH 2(ENHANCEMENT II) Z 0 o
3D \
�x 111 y 1.5.02 a 1.5.03 1S J z
�, .01 CE�CE�• .O7 \ t)I--t 1�H
cE CE—CE�CE—CE 9, JJ �Z S.�Ha
- v
�w
m CEO \ \37 37 3D 7
STA.500+33
BEGIN UT3 \ 'QS—�" L —x�x— x\\
REACH 1(RESTORATION) CF
\ 1.5.06 1S N G
F •O.> �03 0
SCE CE CE CE
\ ' t /
�F. N\, .�J OJ O
F 0� J /
r\
� J#K\
te/r°/
O
\ \ �m
0 �00 ,> \\J CROSS CREEK RANCH
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
II '\x PIN:6594-00-21-1254&
\
� `j \ � 'x 6594-00-50-3458 ft
�\ S ,� DB:748 PG:397 y
`jO� \ REF.DB:243 PG:351 ,-I O
Cs
,.\ cf)
rt
rF se) O
\(<, ?S.I N \37 37 OO
\ ,,`i JJ \ •
i-i
0, -N ____4„
\ 1 S 22 .13
S
H O
CE . 'J U O
C6,,,,,,,,, * .N\ !--
F 1�, U E
\CF\ 17
O f
U
s \
I J
\ tr STA.532+14
m \ \ END UT3
yj REACH 2(ENHANCEMENT II)
BEGIN UT3
E \ \ REACH 3(PRESERVATION)
e ^` / - / \CF \JJ
ct' `V / \ ,
\�F• 7 \JJ
/ HAROLD G.MCRAE AND WIFE, \ CF Iu
CELIA B.MCRAE
PIN:6593-00-08-6636 / m
DB:339 PG:230 / I Ri o ¢ z
u
cl
0' 100' 200' 300' CD
STA.535+44 v(Le
HORIZONTAL) END UT3 E m
u REACH 3(PRESERVATION) = d �'
o" s L O u m
J

r Y 1
q General Notes Construction Sequence
(To be included with final plans.) (To be included with final plans.)
Q
z o
�u'.
tnin)1_ L'ii 1
QZ 1st
m
Ni
ct
•CJ)▪ O
4 Cu
bA
▪ z
Existing Features Proposed Features u
100+00
—SFHA SFHA — SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ---+--- PROPOSED THALWEG 0���� ft O O
�.�.. .— _ CR HI FEMA CROSS SECTIONS EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE -����-���-���-����-���-���-���- PROPOSED BANKFULL ( -ALR, •� PROPOSED ANGLED LOG RIFFLE U Z
�•
0.0.0.0.0. SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.01
C—FEMA-.—_,e ,e — EXISTING TOP OF BANK C100) PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR ,—
EXISTING THALWEG PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR �-�-�-�-� a
• • PROPOSED CHUNKY RIFFLE a)
—x—x—x—x—x— EXISTING FENCE a—CE a PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CR-CH) ��������� tj
a-I
EXISTING STORM PIPE 1� PROPOSED CONSERVATION 0.0.0.0.0. SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.02 U E
III III III EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE U
100 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR —cE-ixcE-ixcE-ix—
EASEMENT INTERNAL CROSSING cn O
������ PROPOSED NATIVE MATERIAL RIFFLE (n bA
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR LOG VANE (CR-NM, �� �� � SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.01 O " '
-- -- EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.04 0.0.0.0.0
—oUE—OUE ouE—ouE— OVERHEAD UTILITY EASEMENT LOG SILL
SEE DETAIL 3,6.04 ������� PROPOSED JAll RIFFLE U
a� RIGHT OF WAY (cR-1z) • •
EXISTING TREE LINE ������������ � SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.01
CDCDCOCD
BOULDER SILL r r
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.04
� � EXISTING BEDROCK PROPOSED STREAM BANK GRADING
QOQ
EXISTING FARM ROAD LOG J-HOOK PROPOSED ROCK OUTLET
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.04
6.05
EXISTING ASPHALT ROAD ..j:ZaX
BOULDER STEP POOL X:44.::•:, �`.,
z Q1� SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET `T'":\��„��
EXISTING WETLAND 6.03 �•:• PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
� a � "����c������Z�a��� SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.05
�•/•f�� BOULDER CASCADE
r �••�.� ' SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.03
r EXISTING POND
I///A EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED CULVERT
�5R LOG STEP POOL
"LI \�/ SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET
47r EXISTING SPRING 6.02
o < z
EXISTING UTILITY POLE o
UTILITY CONDUIT •
O
X
1v Z 9 v
J

r
0 4' 8' 12' " r. ....\
cl
c9
280 280 (VERTICAL)
V) ,
0' 40' 80' 120'
275 275
( W:
w
270 270
..--
265 265
kLY
z••••c•Y
\,..--------------------------,_____-------260 - .....„________---------\,----- ------‘. ,_____________ ___ _______ _ _ ___....
260
EXISTING GROUND
255 255
2 ft
250 50
-1-- •--,
cf) 0
;-,
,ct
0 ...,)
2 •
245 45
104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00
•—1 r--) o
-i— — ;-,
, -- •__---
;-,
------- .- X-r‘' ---I
, (/)
Z1 1-- tt
A „„ • / 1 I /I !‘) ! 1 1_____i '---•-71), -) ), z-Z.J.--- ''s°- - 1-1
.--• ___- .\ )
rsirt 0
Z •
‘1, .
'`)-- 7
- \ , , , „ ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:
1. EXCLUDE CATTLE 1 -1' r 1
E
ct_......_
--,•-- _2.------CE-- - ' ' 0 ,- 2'-; . 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a) cl)--- --- ' / , ----, cE— 0 ..-•",<<• , „,..__,
-,___
• , CE, Z , , a • ; 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF
CI)
NATIVE VEGETATION (.5-1 E
-• -------/ •.__,_..-----------• „„ / '
-----' cE--c.,1-7:,7,— • .• i r,, <-,;, . ... , — f, : ''''7'-iir 1;1,_____'—i's5
,
• ,
'-4 __..,-----;=--CE-------- . . ,
CI) °
,.---,'
---1',7„-----_,
- ,/ ,--'"•,,,----..,,, • •..., ,---,/ >>,—.=--- c.E--- :.-s ., ,,-___..,!.. GRADE BACK BANKS
AT 3:1 SLOPE - 0 - '
`s,' •-• " e --\ '-' =-
, <,^
- - '( ci.._:_v_ft",_ -_, c;V35---_,___ ,---- -",--,•••• „S----i, •"---.,''‘),-( "" 1 1' ,-----:---=:'---- /
,,
1.. ___. , ,„,--.:GRADE BACK BANKS
---- ---'C'e s - 0 u -" ,"--'_ __ (7'‘, ...1 AT 3:1 SLOPE s,` _.; ,^) / \ -
, •,,,.. ; , ,-...•
S----1-
' ''.'
CE
dSN - ; •-_-,---
1----,`-2,-•,'1_1.,‘"---:"S'TREAM CENTERLINE- j--., r.„,`‘.,,-- orAirjarrir47.Saregifftrf_-,z.z1-_,32_,,,,,___-,,,,,„:'---,;.,V ,,I,,c_-,:',1 ce...,....__-- -'-') ii ' , ,-/---'
.)
" " .''""-)-er----3,1==-,.,.WI -\-.r' z-'-- 4- -°:.i.%.a,t,-M,Rze,_,".,.1=••'-',,--," --,3-k0(3-''' --______- -,:------------'.= ,„,`".`-- ‘,--‘1 i H`, • ^.-:?"' . __-, ,,
(1 f -------)
„
-- I \.,
-- -",;.;',..Lir,"•- ....--1 , --',-:,--1-7-1:-.,-z.-_-.
--- ----1-,•---' z--,=4"' ,o0 -- ,-, r) -_,. .% A--;
---'- ---- '1,--7.-----\ --- - ,--- •-• , .. __ _,--„,-,--- ----------- \,..-- „,,---- -- los
•_ • - •
n, „--',,---------) c,,_,,_" ,•_-_, --,, i: . ,_-.,,-2,,,,,. ,--f---TWO,,, ,r5J----"-----" — '""— --,
,;,..- - 7-:----•-• ,:-,-„, z ,,,,,,,,,, ,:. ,,-,5.,„ ,,,_____,,,, --, 47---_,
L----,- - —,. - %----,,,;,371iirr-'- ' ----- -;..-z,.,-,-I-,,z-,,--415,-t,-,.„---_,..,„:",--,,_______•,,
106+00 ---,,,' 107+00
_„-----,1:-__,-------,;- -„t„.5.,-.,--- --, ,,,, _
-----i
______ ,;----:.:-_,..,,,,--,--...,7.--_-----7,-,--,4,,'—-,-- --c-,•,', •-:
?
.----,
; • 4 -''''Zf'.-,f1--;':-',•./7,1, \ee,../,,'' 2
- ,Y, •-•;9\°0
NOT SURVEYED
• V fs-'2.,'_-----:----::2-,-=-`1;-:Ce-.-- ---"4/-- ..-•
..)A F•.,) ,....,---,'C., - 's 4.';‘' ,
of U ‘,.1-. V-"'.‘,-'' --•°''U ‘37'°-- "1 1'7, .1-e. 0-----‘',>, --.'7- '.',:/-\
-,,-
F.._6 \-----------S-------//, ‘` .-• -"-rEr'-i,--•"::.' '•)-s'; ,-----; l'`-.)..., °-- ‘--. '--,.1-•-• ,°,:s-rt " ,,, 1-, ,:j 30------30 \ ''
°
,-.
CLARKS CREEK
,.\/„ ,,,
- , ,-- \ •-,:, ,--;/IN,, i
_, -- -- -- (BUFFER PROTECTION) , _---
-
BEGIN CLARKS CREEK
_________30----3-•32 '..zz,"--;Li-r_/:-Z,--,Y '1•„; ,2,\, 4- ' '
":.."
... , ..-,270
(ENHANCEMENT II)
1 '-c.'.7,-":" 2 8 •
c,81
cl
STA.104+25 --30__.---.-.____,-.
1. 1/ ''- '-•'' --,.‘,:::. ,-- /4(1'--f
. • 30------ \--/i
II; _INE,Nzz4 A ' %,,,,,,_,"•'-',769______ , • 4 - E if-N, ,\ •
)(N.
/5—(,)_ ) • ). 1. 1
CHI CI. N,
--3o------- 1
30--- , ,,
C."
-....,---6
,, • i E oi-o,'
______.---
t
.‘ --;---, /_._ ' C.- t ,,-•
-‘-'"-----' ‘ (
- A . L -,,
;', • ,
' 1\
-. -, a , ,, v ',,,, ,--", rxr, 1..„ •) -l2{1-
<"7 6M
.I . ../‘... ___-- • ,-.-,... .,..., „, _, , \„, 7
- . - • .- "

r Y
280 280 °' 4' 8' 12'
(VERTICAL)
cn
0' 40' 80' 120' Q
(HORIZONTAL) 4 i �o ^
�ry"
275 275 ta) 1s�-L- v
QZ
--1w
270 270 m
Z
265 265
260 .. --�� — -- --- — 260 /�
EXISTING GROUNDJ —`l --- ------ ��y�—�_�i— ------ -- --.�� „���__ ✓� 11'1
255 255
250 250
ft
cn O
rt
245 245 O U
112+00 112+50 113+00 113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 117+00 117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 -I—
ii
'�rg; - ,' r ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: U U
s,;.; + 1- "/GRADE BACK BANKS - _ %( -,, 1
;.` .; oo _-AT3:ISLOPE I<. =%'_ ;' 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE x ct
_ 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a)
cn
``;, S' \` "' -_- -' `' 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF +-
' �t;;�I`'\ `� <" `rf - ,_ _ /STREAM CENTERLINE-NOT );%' _ % • __;_ NATIVE VEGETATION U
. :�\;% ,, ,f: _' �?.';`,_„ _ c,,,: SURVEYED ,_st,,'f .��r- �,
`� '�',';�-' , -O 'ire -T�:^ Cn 0
io
0
xQQI_ 5�, ,, 1,`„ 1 _-___268 '•J.\ ' tf`J ‘ti���;l,';/ ,J/ _ 's- - U 0
r o ]
P6Ys/ Ic
°ill\ R \\`;,v �; �N
�,�, / ;�.,;," 1?`' ` LARKS REEK - _ _ I/,,,,, _ .,,;;;s --_-_-...---_0_,_-_-_-_-,- _ _ �;-'"''--
BEGIN SURVEYED`, ') -0'''%h `\-, - f 7 .266 i�!' ma -( `',n;%;/'':! - "` '-= _ -'_,
C l`' STA. -- \ `;sky',1;(,:' 7 - TOP OF BANK-NOT /" _' _
/ _, - - STREAM CENTERLINE `;1• `};;,'.,.-'' ,. J''' V -_ v. ,.`°' '1; - -%
., I\I y,- END UT1 `r ,li"v\,, 1{I,( SURVEYED -
c �, o.
" .__ ,, q,;`,'. REACH 2(RESTORATION) -„,,,, ,,1,�;,,,p,,,j, -
o _i
• ` `I Ala`-.;• 1, _ - STA.115+64 _ _ ";�,.-o ,$;1;f, __ -/-�—-'___-__-
w " ' ``` =-- CLARKS CREEK i,4�, '.o ;r;:'. yo% L^� /' -- _ —-�>j/ --• _/j
° END SURVEYED" "st - •-'------ �9J.
.� _ S.` `,``•*`'- ENHANCEMENT II �/=s,� �-C ;1,1 i i' - \
_ \ 1`, � ( ) -TOP OF BANK •tr 'y. -`,1;� y!((1 '/�
c l. _ .�fi,, �=ham+ r/,'.•--n i 'V'` C- \!� -
= d BEGIN SURVEYED' ,,`? - `;k. - - ," ;?=__ 0 i / 1;'L ,,�');' ' 1_,-
., `J TOP OF BANK- iP:`.�: - ;,td _. _ j:'ice„_` 111'0 •;;r' P---'- - ' l \`
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE °� - - Q� `�'' y' -'�' = - -- -; / �n' -� - -- �� 'z
" WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) 'sp_ .=�, -~ =5:%;`=.'",..; �ss9' -- - - -- - 'a" o ,..‘,0 0•`\ o
`^r,,,xes.2- _Asj'",' 1c `_4 ;',V:`'� .i'';f ;,',"END SURVEYED -7n'-
11.
e,
-
' r
1. 1
_ 'v� :% �z; '� STREAM CENTERLINE _-
v
xN - _ _ - 3
,_: "c. -`---- 2`g`-' —- - :=f3 y, 1 ,AT 3'1 BACK`BAN _ 'i.1 o" _ o`
S _- ,�-:- _ -, ->, ®µ ' 'AT 3:1 SLOPE ❑ -_, 'i

r Y 1
0' 4' 8' 12'
(VERTICAL)
275 275CiD
0' 40' 80' 120' Q
(HORIZONTAL) Z(� p'o,^„
W IU •
270 270 v
i Z '�'Py F.a
H W
m
265 265
260 260 ��
- - 1'
255 - ---- 255
EXISTING GROUND
250 250
ft
245 245 a
a--I
Cr)•
O
0 U
Ct
240 240 ft Zy
120+50 121+00 121+50 122+00 122+50 123+00 123+50 124+00 124+50 125+00 125+50 126+00 126+50 127+00 127+50 128+00 128+50 O O
-1-' Z.., I -':'
I 1^ -- 7 u /
I
= - fir'
U
I, rrtt
n
yf> P = `• _ ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: U U
F - ----1- 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE E
d F
CF „ 265' ; 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES
:I �c i i :i „ _ i y_, i :y.. 4 _ 3. LOCLIZENATIVE VEGETATIONDr TING OF
,
-,A, I �FF - -- - :- - - -- `_
* OFF =i _, CAE CEO - 1 �i , -- _- REMOVE EXISTING FENCE ( O
,�1 1%= •�p"i r 'i • __ _ _-- __ - CE CE CE CE ,,.-_ :% + - I __
4tl • ` a WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) `,,
�:y, :-- - - - , - '' --__ ,z'' BEGIN SURVEYED / - _'�
N : _ _ __ _ - '•``-, ---TOP OF BANK h - - _ x '--7' _""t-- __
CLARKS CREEK- _'D -- _ ___ 1 -
'`c_ ' \��`: 'STREAM CENTERLINE- - ,fir �� "x�f - _ --i. - - - ---=__ /�
. J2 J;, "26 - - - e!� 4F= " __ '_ __ - +0-;'%'%:
_ •\\\- dk` - - NOT SURVEYED3 - -- - — "'x' __ " ,: 0
O o ::fir_` ---- .� _: �zs-%-s_-- 127+00 _ — `12$ __`
,
o i: , . ,_ ,sue;_ _ —
Ys=� f122+ `= 23+0 _ c=1 _ — --- 5 -- -: 1 -_`"="='-----__ ;t-=
HI C,S'' 10 _ `_1 _ - 1— F- / 12 +F00 _ \ - - _______--_ 'ri'€ -; --"-- _" --
v==
_
'
- - -- - _ - _--�=c=�=- '-' ' =-_- - -� -_"-'iY'�-c= - -- -- � -I 100
lea: , _ - _ - _" iB== '= -- - _ N
`�_ --27 - ---_--_ - _NOT SURVEYED '� ''' - c=_- = 9
= —r -3D =_- Cr)
1. 1
/ 5 y
}` ,mot .. 1 \l r(
•
I -- ` s��' � i
yl
1 1, E
Iii O ❑
1 ih l ^E.
J

r Y 1
0' 4' 8' 12'
(VERTICAL)
275 275cn
0' 40' 80' 120' Q
(HORIZONTAL) Z i o
;r!fl
irs)I- w YzF▪v
270 270 Q -`▪ .
I- Z H,1
m
265 265
260 260 ��
Ni
---
255 _ -----_ `' 255
EXISTING GROUND
250 250
245 245 a
cn O
rt
0 U
240 240 Zy
128+50 129+00 129+50 130+00 130+50 131+00 131+50 132+00 132+50 133+00 133+50 134+00 134+50 135+00 135+50 136+00 biD O O
o
-- ;:::::::_....„)./
'"�# 1.FILL OLD CHANNEL TYP •\:: ,— - ' Urt
-r - .'�::+'`✓sir,:=-tom - =� ft, ‘ ( ): '•,','• `::::-',``,`,`: "to• , _.
,:iz
* cC
_ _•\..•,. :is
c6
= ��c,�. • o; ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:
h �'' `r` +' to STA.221+96 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE
Q +i - % , •,- 46 �, ,..,„ ,, y``�;; END BIG BRANCH {F+ 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a�
BIG B =-_' G �.
4 ,i''• ,`, RAN VII �`• `;=w. (RESTORATION) • ;,�; M° 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF
�\ l._ *w,,,;. I STA.133+39 .-i NATIVE VEGETATION
• - '--�, _ T --, N6b�c:',,.. ; _• CLARKS CREEK U
}�` _ ,263' - ------ - _� '=`�q�� ,=ire • ENHANCEMENTII Q,
W, -__- - - ,BEGIN SURVEYED. - �\ \''f; �.. z,.,,a, ( ) :J\ _ 3• p'�:: �• :�.1—`� Cn
C'J - __" ,. STREAM CENTERLINE ",.// i '
t • il'/'r/' -� ire - `:� a:`°:'�2:."">:.•` �,.�s • :;�:: r
/GRADE BACK BANKS - -c-. �' cj
'��3Q'` ,�,�`��``,�� O� `` r
�� -r -_ AT 3:1 SLOPE i -j i, -- O``•, `,• 8•';. • ..
Z\' - __,-- ___ ° - - _ '' %i _ `'1-'0\ \ _ `"```▪ "'''END SURVEYED�:?• ;I
,'K,(f - _ - _ `\• ", /' _ -,1 i - _ i.ss.`: `",�c �," :TOP OF BANK }Q,,.
y\- - - "'- REMOVE EXISTING FENCE 1:--
_-_ - 1,,,j,!,!,,,,,,-::::',..,2, -, %�;` 1BEGINSURVEYED '°::k \`�� `� • C---1�_\ - _., -2 ;,�' S / - - TOP OFBANK - �.t:;.• �_ :, WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ___" ,- _ jv,�; V " ;�__,,.__ - `�JV` �k• �,`�`:�•` '4
__l +i 'F.._%=:' " --- >-,/', `.`` v.`:`'• . Y�`, Vijay' .'
w ,_; •�fer� - / - _ END SURVEYED
---' z --•- _ �I _ _ CV.
-, STREAM CENTERLINE -- � ��-
(' ___;!,; i300 .,4%cam ;�-__:.. .� ----
%; -____ _ '- _ '--A- :`• `_ it/' • 00")
use= _ -129+0 / '3',=,7-- ;, --- TOP OF BANK r- _ •�9 �J • ,2 _
' �'' '— - - ' sue`-- - -r-- - NOT SURVEYED 0 \ 0\ `• •
' �s`=i; ', STREAM CENTERLINE' �"�';• �_ I�
r--- •(%'�n ;.NOT SURVEYED /30/ - - = `-J o y
f-Y 7
_ 6 - " ` t- J-_ = •\ I \` `i P.`a0/ ,264, _ -''
' � 2 • ,
9 , • V Pe fi\ ' / -ti >,� -/ k. I

r Y
0' 4' 8' 12'
(VERTICAL)
EH
270 270Cn
0' 40' 80' 120' Q
(HORIZONTAL) Z(� p'o m
�U°`w
en.)7-1`7u'
Yz
265 265 Qz os° v
H'
zm
260 260
255 255 ��
250 250
EXISTING GROUND
245 245
rt
240 240 � �y
O
rt
0 U
235 235 ft Zy
136+00 136+50 137+00 137+50 138+00 138+50 139+00 139+50 140+00 140+50 141+00 O .0.
rt " - —"_ - i lI i I i - __ - r y" ••_ r// ilir�'�r�, " 11 r 11 - - ; v
1'• ;'• ':1:!':
C'irl
'ir
- O
" - ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:
- — - - 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE
U
2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES
3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF —'
- - NATIVE VEGETATION
•••••_:----,-,--z-r-zzlrij-,F.,..c-_,,,,,,:,-_,5:_11:-_7.,t-nekr-1-f,-,7"-:,,, :" ..;.-''-'1./,'/,,-',1,/,/,/,///:/,'.;;;'‘,;.\s`‘`,‘,`,'0,\.'`.`:---2,'-_-:_rf-j-1,-_-_,•-•::_-,-,1-,-==-7-7,:rz-,;_;,-.;,:-E.;:,===•:-,,,,-.:. .o.f_ad., <•;;--...:_-„,z5a..s.,::::::;,s:zz,
• STREAM
. -_ - - , ;�-_ -- ---- -.+��•::;..k�.:''4; :: CENTERUNENOT : aARKS
=-_=Yam=__�_ -_ - _ _____ __ --_-__=--- --_----_ 1,,.,,,;'I - -�"--=-= =- -= -----_==__==-___ -- _
?t°0 -= ?; s"_--_ -== 'ia„__ iu= =-__-_---__c-;-'-_ = c.139+00" „_-" o°:`">c:
-" ,`` --- ---. - }Q - i „egg.., '-_;"= �=fit
137+00 -_--- ---------.138 _ y.,_:a-sa=-_1 -__'- x� �v
_ .__ ram:=c :�:—<=-1___``.--:,'_- r' x._= __=:=2.__--__3f ;`=:'` _. •___ `,As,
x�a
1
--
1 ` ` (ENHANCEMENT II)
I\ \ _ -_ • _ , `TOP OF BANK- _- -" BEGIN CLARKS CREEK 1__"_" '`P.`
'� - _ • ,_•, BUFFERPROTECTION
_ NOT SURVEYED _ - (NOT FOR CREDIT) �,`+.
-3 6 = ' _= STA.139+05 _ - 0a
�3J=,
- - ,s - - „- "3D-L'-3J 3J�3J 3J 3J 3J J. ••
U.Y =1ti ``

f 280 280 Y
�o 0' 2' 4' 6'
+-m
o N (VERTICAL) (//���
N II
m W cn W
STA=200+00 ¢ w ± o-+, N 0' 20' 40' 60' e):Z
INVERT OUT= 273.20 `� w oN oN N ,n a ,n (HORIZONTAL) N rn u'.
II-II a-II m-,n m-,n- U'" .
Q > Q w PROPOSED BANKFULL N r EXISTING GROUND + N w o z
Vf W t~/1 W N o N �_OOrn v
W N N
II-II II-II- 11'
Q W / Z v
w j-R' 8
_ W N Lu
_ N J W N
.,.._...._ W 275 m
275 ""-'��-
.._...._...I_........f-._. ------ ---- /
it
270 \ i 270
Ni
STA=200+03
ELEV= 270.53
o m PROPOSED GRADE
o N
o N
N I
Q > v�`t W r W o ci
265 1- +-CO +-CO m-01 °1 265
V W 0p N p N
m r m N
0 0 ��..y
I I N N
Q W Q W -II V-II ^, `V
N N W
263 N W N W 263 ,--I
200+00 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=24' - BANKFULL WIDTH=32' O U
7' 10' 7' TOP OF BANK - 24.75' -- 4.5'-.-2.75' — TOP OF BANK ft y
PROPOSED 35:1 2 Dmax=2' 35.1 PROPOSED ^� PROPOSED 'T �y I
1i BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5'
GRADE I- 12' - GRADE 4'S'1 o BANKFULL
rt
BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH p�
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 5' �/ 0 C �'
II STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96 ,-- rt
U E
', J
OI
U
,,'', Q N _ ;BIG BRANCH 2jS I U
'''° ,'' / % , I EXISTING DUKE ENERGY __ _ _ I I
\,,,_ =u11)11 _ ''EXISTING 72"x 84"BOX p 30'UTILITY ROW _-_ C,Y✓� ----- _
\‘--' ) SJ11i1 U CULVERT 01 V '215 •' ^ 3xp0
'\-- 1 `a INV IN:273.57' 1- ,� /' i, =
-`�- z /INV OUT:273.20' _, .y� / �• ,% tt0.� _ - --
•
z; BEGIN BIG BRANCH o �, _„', , CR-NM itljjj!!.'
`'�I \"� ® (:%;'� (RESTORATION)NOT FOR CREDIT `�� i _ i!4!!+!!► '__." '-----
' ‘`i,n 2(1 _ `;STA.200+00 -' a_ ,...'y;"Eiljlr =- '_-- .
;TI"!
•./js4"� __Awamilma, • I!6 _; IA l Agee,
�,
,, I la • I
- �i, iu'.3z.,',4.i=i�1�7��- r.__ (CR-NM,/' !!Ot!' ., o - or,
_ � +;_Irr !}� pp +!1 I
,
,
x _
i„ -i;,;, g„ ����,, 1QaUM� _ .. _ - FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) �,
a _
1 , fl
ia �-•-...m,r,i4�b
;' I
1 � "' I I I,''';, �c '��/s8elau' 201+0p -"-_ ---" _ _- " G ` -- � c
>��3�� a ��0�!lOC� OlAi� ��1A
if 11 l0a1,aa�!lzee� o� IQ
6'131.'' EXISTING 72 x84 BOX ..�w '- �! �l�Z�/1141.41 w111,5PO4r ♦.hiF�# —
'�1, CULVERT s — "i��l�eleff - ai'!:4� �� I� m > ,
Y ,
•
•
iI INV IN:273.56' I. - a - �i•{?s, i•:.d►`�,_ o y
��_ ::p�11� I
i I INV OUT:273.20' `o ✓ _ _�w•a___ '' 'Ai�t?s i"r::���1,0-- C e` o. _ /�•�
i, ' q 0,.. '--27 : — — — „——'--_ _ ptK�NA"f, `� I — I z L i Ii { i I I I 5 �` "��i O J
z I d EXISTING 72"x 84"BOX Ids` ` • --_ - ',%%'/'�' i 1 A c' w �' _ •
�';�'' CULVERT I �t -- -_- 1, - •;�f,f, UT TO BIG BRANCH- I `r I
�" INV IN:273.52' _ ---- -3 (-�,.� Coft
n;/;i -CONNECT TO BIG BRANCH `, ' IQ v
�;; INV OUT:273.17' O �k'*/ `""It� NOT FOR CREDIT `- E
I i i , _ _ i�f i ---- _,
d z 3 v
,.,..„ ,,,, ,„
x _____
.._ _ _______

r Y -
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) (n
Ln
l0 INl.0 N
CO N m n
275 a ,a EXISTING GROUND 275 0' 20' 40' 60' �j 0 S
o N o N I�-� m m
N N
Q-> a-> (HORIZONTAL) -a
I— LU I— LU ± od ± od t):
I w I LU O N O N Z o L
2- ;
------ N N �(
- I ----- - ¢ ¢ PROPOSED BANKFULL z r~a.. ..�r� 0.9% w w �,'
-�... _...._.. --- ----- In l^ J
w w
---
270 I I I I i .._...._...._.... -\1 1 270
L
I
21%
I z-Ny`
PROPOSED GRADE ,.,
265 265
m m
N m 00 m
+ ,r; + lD Ol Ol
O O N N 00
+D , W ,T
N
N II IN II 0 8 8 8 ���....yy
Q J Q J �-II �-II `V
l~/1 W l~/1 Q W Q W ^, 1r�
H J H J + •1I
260 N w N w 11
260 ,--I
Cr) Li
204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=24' - BANKFULL WIDTH=32' O U
7' 10' 7' TOP OF BANK - 24.75' -- 4.5'-.--2.75' — TOP OF BANK ft y
PROPOSED 35:1 2 Dmax=2' 351 PROPOSED ^, PROPOSED 'T j
I
1i BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5'
GRADE I- 12' - GRADE q'S'1 o BANKFULL
BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH �
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 5' �/ 0 •
STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96 x U E
U
I _JJJ p-�ilrj� ryoiyi:- O
BIG BRANCH zn $
' ;ry�s�=� �._;_ ���; \
- _.yi ::-!Pines----- 207+005glryiii9iij� • U O
v ! nr�J„�,a i� \
-/„�, I o ----' - :��iiP�ii�-sip- � ����•����� \
•
/ // `
uy/ r i ��
ry%i %eeh __- --_-_ ____ �,�` i fi;tlilr. `J--- :::::::111s
'�.�.. _ 4�� �l+gl�l�O� 'r,d�`j,
•
•
7
-;pp�, o' • • ads.' ! -______===_=_ �`•:n s=,�
�vi °° -__- /' `- ® sN _____-s4`:_ yet••
:04 0•-'`: -'_ __--- - w.'_ Oe1uD� aT V lds_- -I=� lo�li'
�yy�1�� r_ j: - � hQr�y/ 1 VI - �-: = s�!
,': ,,1�a410.* v :; - >0, iie► .• ----- - -- -- • �iiii�!!„
1. `VoN 4- mot- 41•t�' ,•\ Fr
c I `2� �as� �3='----•
------ ` -- _,p4.Yl�Ss - - - �� %''- 1 �•SFH ___ - -'�'��-'`• r
•
-0-.==- -.. '4-e,P�� ..`\ --'::• �yr�re0;o+ --- _2 i --
• eeeep� 44, __ �i%ili..n
NI ��� -`` • //t FILL OLD CHANNEL TYP i ^� ,_S =
• ��®.ii- n� �`. %%jam:;,it -- (TYP) _ '., ------ 4 '
zo • y.. ./i �'L
!!, 'i�7!!rjjji� _ .4':11t""' _ REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
\ “; z N
zI ?iii".:.,5iii:,:_,:. ° .:u%icrirei%�e�i3' v' 6 z
� iiiiu?iiij iiOSiii�' n �n ue�,'j/l/ pf`�' WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) \�
J :..5, ;�'x•:!�i`�•riii'e.::?iii •.�ifi`..y;?';. N
ii a ii n / ---_ \�O'
•
�. �O �,Q - , N �
m
x I =-2j3 _- 15J' _-_ --- 3 z _ v

0' 2' 4' 6'
CO 0 a o
o0 ul
+i (VERTICAL)
Cq
0 1D 0 1D Q
N N N N
II-II II-II PROPOSED BANKFULL 0' 20' 40' 60'
z� �m
v~i w v~i w + IHoaizo lvraLl ?u'.270 W WN N EXISTING GROUND o N270 ::11:
oQz Pv_ II / 0 Pc
:: tim �ZF"a'\ ¢-w ¢-w .-I io
.. ../..— N w N w N N
/ I— ,-,-,
STO
2.1%
265 \ // i I 265
AS
, . \
PROPOSED GRADE
260 260
m o m o
+ m + m
O N O N
D D
N II N II O N O N
I- J I- J N N
V1 W V1 W ��..y
N_II " II ^^,, wrr�''l��
l~/1 W V1�W W •,—I
-1
256 256 p
208+00 208+50 209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH BAN KFU LL WIDTH=32' 0 U
24.75' -- 4.5'�-2.75'-� TOP OF BANK (� y 7' 10' 7' TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED 35:1 2 Dmax=2'
35.1 PROPOSED ^, PROPOSED
'T �y I
1i BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5'
GRADE I- 12' - GRADE 4'S'1 o BANKFULL
BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH �
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENTct
5' �/ 0
ct
STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96 x U
co
p I 1;'' - -- 2 2�s cn
6.
co i e�i aiiEiy��"=ii!Siii u3iu ii sii=)�!•hm `` `'` O
p I JJ :6:4...lisoft,77.,....
I�ii� t !i�iii!_`•i:-�(5iii�a=:�!IlSiii ���lii5j`=:", CV U O
Q BIGBRANCH -_11
s =.:�,,
I yui 1 ' ~!4Siiip=
W ;/ I i -VA `iii'' i� w
oe:., %.•.
Z \ '1 a► ..._... --... li.
������ Z
. __ --'"?,:--.40111tg Illip411"*" i -4) .
w
„-- , I 4141•00" alit / /
;c-
i •I = _
•
_ — ����' i -265'' - � ��' ; 4.•;Gi = _
x ;" • _tiz d•!i��iiq — .=265 0, =__ sa'___ 'I .
;�ngt = v--72111111---117 �ii � l,:, o0
jii_i' -- _ L. •° 11�jg15ii1=,,P; ' FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) _' rl5ii= _-_, 6 z
n,pErllSm�::=, ® - 4ni�ii�� sf-. +� '�gp �$$i `��� '' _=-_ _. `qi' y4n �i� o •
a "�z i7Jll ltiowikipi 111 / - • .+ * y-9 D , _— JIC�:: �\
- .....NS IIi�j6Fj„ V ..____:.,pF+aR■ x- x—r + I t `I
ii9�:! illii..�liTllt#:Iryh•r'._ 'A o° ./
/ I 1 cj� * N/ \_-'*/* 26`.9.� 26� P N 1I - I
` '9` __ �� REMOVE EXISTING FENCE- _
"}C�y�/+ -- __ WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ''t_ o s. o u m

r 270 270 Y
▪ 0 0' 2' 4' 6'
+_m
N• N (VERTICAL) cn
¢-w 0' 20' 40' 60'-------__ S Z Z °o rn ti
w (HoaizovraL)a s N a
toto vito v_ _ ° G1D N N , EXISTING GROUND ul o a[2 QrP
--
I ¢ w /PROPOSEDBANKFULL ¢ w N N NN Z a I n in --1 W
_ \ w w
265 ¢-> ¢ > 265 ',\
_...
2.2i
7---\ N N ./ \
260 260 `
PROPOSED GRADE
,• m oo m
+ 0 + 0
.-1 N .-1 N
N II N II ro
00 255 a-J ¢-J m-• o-.D -"'' o "'' 255
in w vv, w + 00 + 00 + N +
N N N N up N
N ..y
N-II N-II N II
N ��
II `V
¢ W •¢ W ¢ W ¢ W
In w ,n w ,n w ,n w
253 253 c▪n O
212+00 212+50 213+00 213+50 214+00 214+50 215+00 215+50 216+00 216+50
BANKFULL WIDTH=24' BANKFULL WIDTH=32' O U
T 10' T TOP OF BANK 24.75' 4.5'�-2.75'f TOP OF BANK ft "
PROPOSED 5:1 2 Dmax=2'
3 351 PROPOSED ^� PROPOSED '▪ �/-' E
1i BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5'
GRADE I 12' - GRADE 4'S'1 o BANKFULL
ct
BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH �
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 5' �/ O =
STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96
x U
6,7
i _ _ rt
\'
O ___ -
O -- BIG BRANCH --
N r 6g ti
�p� .,.. ---..._=---- � - I l
N I FILLOLDCHANNEL(TYP) `� _;__ 4u nrr-ll5uS✓
,-1 - ....4r v l r5 ' : , tu _ \'N y5 Ific �le �t� 00 _%nr �:'l� t�i 49� ti, 214+ y'-_ 2 �
UQ .t0 . �I -------------:' -___ Fr , \ • irr;; ` 2638:2.A \ ,:39 7 •— ♦ — --- /ce":-.yfi --- - __--_262-
r- 3' itt.T--- - " - = - - 5li` - ---- - - _
i _
--1 '' %%��� - ap©&'='i;-==='V! ,'",C♦,� \ -_ _---26 Z
W
1
n i ��Ei*9® 'L6 ! .tt♦,to _�1c---/--= ,Z 0- \ 'ti259 --` 4
a �}_-_ \��l ,�`�;/'�.��' I�tt7l�tl�Ai�.i �i R" -""'yi'- X \w;\`:S ..(CR-NM�` "6 _- \ •,- -- __-'-- _--
- �'; ,;;i., ��i1i�i®. -�.6 ti� ----- - /ems \\.-- -- - --
- ,,'S- 262
g1-- '- - 263-_" '"-:'"d4®!®i`ti®"it/ i _
\�patt. 13 _ \ /
_ — slit i *cam —— dp, d t.'` i Igo
--,%-=____ ®t1�1�� xlot ,-_,- - '\ �lit♦t�`` (CR-NM) = Igo
-7I _ i'�tri4 i —` --265_x- x_ tt�,�♦` \.\ ,'• lVa��tat
' ,x .._ .�iYi -----J __ i' \ d0Op vS` xi ttr9t�
•
Y !ii`!30: %:iii-.5iy15ii3iy� ° i \ t�'�Ai '1'!"b�,�y••.-....x� lhelP ...•
_ ro
::I i;_..j., i�:::-'i,-,H.T..l'_:.'.' 11.-•-'i•l=in i; l'ic t �\ '.qi dp x�x - _ m
•
--- - ' _--- ' \--,--l—::�s_` 210.••.j -tiijk lli:: o
3 --- --_-_- REMOVE EXISTING FENCE _ _ �� _ 4Siii'z� ,.___ \
`� 1 WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) -_ `----`-- "__ 'iii•i,L 'irii='dpr�ir-¢fali6i=ljl '.E,.?c15... 1
2 0.1r�iul�5ule e❑ Lift?-�3f _ ri
A : s ' t i
1
64
267---
0
S o
s
b J

r Y 1
0' 2' 4' 6'
m ti CD (VERTICAL) C!�
m COLn
o N o Q N
265 N-N N N 265 0' 20' 40' 60' �j
Q Q M .-I .i (HORIZONTAL) rya o
LU
w N w PROPOSED BANKFULL �_03 �_^� dI w u `�'
oz
N N N N Z L P v
II II II II Q
aw ¢ w zH
w w w
,,'I
260 II \\ I I
I ...— 260
1.4/
II
1
PROPOSED GRADE / STINGOUNDY \/ \ ,
255 \- 255
N L
N N 0 ,I I, I,N-II N II _ .� H
rt
N Q-�250 N w 250 .
rt
216+50 217+00 217+50 218+00 218+50 219+00 219+50 220+00 220+50
CD
BANKFULL WIDTH=24' - BAN KFU LL WIDTH=32' O U
T 10' T TOP OF BANK - 24.75' ►- 4.5'�-2.75'f TOP OF BANK ft y
PROPOSED 35:1 2 Dmax=2' 351 PROPOSED ^� PROPOSED X_C I
BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5'
GRADE rt
12' GRADE 4'S'1 o BANKFULL
BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH �
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 5' �/ O
STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96 x U
Cr)
rt
•
cn:_
,-�0, BIG BRANCH 62 ;;,jj U O
i ins':::.•- o��o:::.
-> ; cols` o�yxols
�r 1A-��ir% �` des
��y�i� a�N;: //
-` - � ,_ _ _ `:E)0 ::•.•0y ALL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) "� `�
x __ - \\� I /i/11 Ott
'.,',/; "VS': •C_
•
tiv
_ i __
- CR-CH
Itl`kLS - \ - .4� - ____ ___ _=c=r
gip! Ns
m�_- ittt ^ ��t �-- ibt r � lttZ.b -1; , I ,-- i.y to ,- ` - __-_---,
'..xedkestt
iC►t• ,'® _ _ -- 91� i•fi „,Ito
jM,opI�/ x � �"�,� xx_x ----0 ,�_ - � E_�" "� � rsjlttt� :-
p1 ot5iii u:';
-fit►C.?? "�"�" ----- --ol`?: ijuit�� � i
_------- REMOVE EXISTINA.
G FENCE' 'tt��ttttOtjtj► - .. - „%, , t'.4.•• ';`\y(o WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) '�tttt��tttt 1- /
ZL9 �N��ty:;;.�
Q *Op o`:::m`��A
/�/ 6 .flay,.�S; f�of0 kl.' _ \ m
I `N ,:.'.yi%s:p�jj<o6�� �::, o�•:::g'>i%S:��w�>�t! :o' I ' \C-'
Cl
pia :_ aao �kSO
--z51-1.
"I Il \ z
v
/; ;� �`/ �ao �

PROPOSEDBANKFULL 0 2 4 6 v
a o o
ti N (VERTICAL) �
ui
260 �_�_..-0.4% N.N 260 2
_....- ...- ., 0' 20' 40' 60' Z 0 �o
vaHi w vaHi w - _...._... IHoaizo lvraLl ,Li'' Y z 4'.
EXISTING GROUND
_ / 11)� o �a v
/ .+ m �Z �F"a
N N --1 w
\ m
\ H W
/ \ VIW
/------------\
255 255
\
=
\
PROPOSED GRADE 2.70 ��
250 250
r,-N o-N
+ _ + _
o u, .-I
N N N N
N II N II
Q W Q W
H'J HTJ
✓ W V W ct
^,
W
245 245Cr)"--1 '--
0
220+50 221+00 221+50 222+00
- BANKFULL WIDTH=24' - BANKFULL WIDTH=32' O U
7' 10' 7' TOP OF BANK - 24.75' -- 4.5'�-2.75'f TOP OF BANK (t y
PROPOSED 85:1 2 Dmax=2' 35.1 PROPOSED ^� PROPOSED 'Tj
I
BANKFULL PROPOSED 5.5' Dmax=5.5' •
GRADE 12' - GRADE 4'S1 o BANKFULL •
Ct BIG BRANCH BIG BRANCH p�
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 5' �/ O =
STA:200+00 TO 221+96 STA: 200+00 TO 221+96
x U E
rt
„ -_-_____-_-'--- --- - ----- _ _fi ---qE--_—-- --_ - ___ -_---_---- ___-_-_-_=-:::::__-_-_-_-___::::::_::-_-_-_-_____-_-_-_-_-_:,. ;--1
YY --- - '-2jS- ---_-- cE--'—CE _--__- = = _---_______ ----- - --_--_- - U E
_C- ---- _—__ - -
O -VHdS '___'_
N -265- - -----J - - -- _- - - - 2645i
270
U
-_ —__'F�� --__ ---_ -FILLOLD CHANNEL(TYP) --_-_; : :-.:-=:_-_-_---,,. - -^-�cF:- _Q --- BIG BRANCH---=_ - '"-==----------- _--------- _ =��_ __=--_ - _=_=_ -______ ��- :
- � �
6, ; 255- __ _ _
-11----_ _ -_ d _
-
-'�.; � '1►iila:;i' ;!�i'f�_- `` `v STA.221+96
,221+00-_ _. ... - `,,'.` - - -; -
a '�'',. i'' -_.,i��6 -�,,;-`r � `S�" END BIG BRANCH --- --_ -_ ---;--- --_-_-��-�--;
/ �'�. I-- i6�Q6�a6�6�Qa _ �..�_"� .�_===fig=��� (RESTORATION) _ __- ,-_ __ - 135
',:,v',7�Y /1.4 i/7 '`--_-------- '•-edeta ,l.1614,47",r�i�` cLARKS CREEK 13 _= _`m_ -_--__---
' e6' / ;itre4a'zzip.T416-, ', (ENHANCEMENT II) — 1 0 ? ,p 60"
%%may � � '' - —F
. 110,04
•
N
�® m
-,'-' /A y A Ilit 0 li , , -----,, 2 , \ ,
''..5 1171.--- , .,,, r;' ). . I hii I -T6_____TB___=_�T:_
7.4111
�< 4 �� a'. I ilitiii"---T7q-::::::::-C:----
o - RKS CREEK
I - REMOVE EXISTING FENCE �1 i m ,;��1� -'(,9q. -__ o y z
o WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ;I it;;I -25 mil/
u
Ail
u GRADE BACK BANKS I i N -,� x�x__ z
I AT3:ISLOPE ' "' 3 a o u m

Y
Pi0' 2' 4' 6'
o 0
c-I O (VERTICAL) (�
+ o Q
315 o-m-o 315 0' 20' 40' 60' �'
o m ^' ,-1 .-1 m .-1 /' !
PROPOSED BANKFULL 0 ,,,II m,
p II II N N (HORIZONTAL) �4I Z rn
�_m Q_w o_o U
LLI
II II II ' �'-�
,I. \ C w C w om om w .-1 m
i `_�, u u u u w n ti hl
/
ti +
y F- F- m m m-o LD-m
o m }
w w Q > II II m O
310 Z 1 \ N-W Q_W om `"' 310
__- 60 1 �/' _- F- w u u
_
.._. Qw
!
2.50 _10%_ ///���
EXISTING GROUND
-1.9% -..'.— J
1'
PROPOSED GRADE
305II 305
o-� 0
M MII ^ or,o W ro
oo
Q w Q w + w + w to to 0crO o m
H-W H ci_O c-1-o m_� l0_� + m Opp\ �_�
VI VI w o m o m + N + . T+ m + m m
m II m II N o N o o o m o m o
I I > I I > p m o m o m o m O m
Q-J Q-J m-11 m-II m-II m II m-IICt
V~t w V~t w W W I I w I I r W I I > rr
Q Q Q Q Q ?-I
V, W V, W N W t~/1 W t/1 W 4
300 300 0
rt
299+60 300+00 300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00 302+50 303+00 303+50 304+00
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' BANKFULL •WIDTH=19.8' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' 0 U
-I--)
6.T - 12' - 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' -- 2.3' 1.75'-f (t
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED f f PROPOSED �1
PROPOSED 31 31 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' ima�-i' Z BANKFULL GRADESED q.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
ct
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL ff TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2,9
STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 x UE
CE �3' i _ ` - C!
CF' , U E
1 u u ilq (n
315 ICI
n bA
' BEGIN UT1 _ V� - -- ______ ,�..1
,
\ REACH 1(RESTORATION) _-"- '�` '�" '�` '�" '�`I '�" U
v STA.300+00 _ fC --- - 5
0
.._...._.„....--------------7-----
�,s
UT1 10 �"
iiiiii,,:-,._,_.:._.:,
��,�1�I�� _ate®_ =1i0iz O O/ .' 30Q
z� \ 00
-----_-- ° REMOVE EXISTING -- �•j��`--__ �, ---:ple440)141,,le
1 `• •'1'••�` .(cR-NM, Ca-NM i 1�,
-- _ i4` - !,'' di _ -`.22"CMPCULVERTS Z* �\ _O=O=° �i� .\��U• l •.���r '.
15 •
=
I� 30� �.
�+ler
s0' O
— _ o3x� elt- I CYf
•
o
�' 0'14 �qs
\ 3
r
II
---- - \3Zs�� FILL O CHANNEL(TYP) _---- -`1;;ri!: . �!li�:_ N
32p - -_ '
__ _ - - � `` \ \ REMOVE EXISTING FENCE -- - — �305. - --- ` J W-
- _-` ,`` WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) • _____-- - 1J-i LZ 6 'z M�
e '_`____ \�i�TJ--•�•'" 'six _ \ /" - o t'J
_____—_,„ --... ----___ ___ --2,,,,,, . t \ s„oh * 0...
Q
- 1 __- _ _ - _,-- Ott-" _ _- v
1
G
33
- I L

Y
0' 2' 4' 6'
chi N (VERTICAL) (J)
�+ ,i PROPOSED BANKFULL N
o Q
310 m- < m 310 0' 20' 40' 60' y �'
I I I I E.0 N chi N 4 Z ,,I o
I— LLIN_W no
O_m u
II II u
kEl--, Ly
m m mI 00
....'i... _ I u u u u
\ I \ Q_> Q > 305 305 -1.9% \ I \ I"- _ -� N J N J
-2.6% ./ i��`i '�EXISTINGGROUND
-2.6, \ I _ _� - ------
I 2.6%
i
PROPOSED GRADE-7\ I
300 a, 300
N 4 /------------------
0
4 O
o-m
w m N LE, o LE,
I I w + N + N
Q
O Lr, 0
H--i 0-m 0-m
`^ w r^ II m II
Q w Q w N o N o ry
~-w ~-w -ti �'-ti ,0-E 00- E m m
v, v, v+, 0 v+, 0 oo i+o 0o a `' N `'
0 n, 0 m 0 n, 0 n, + m n m
II-> I-> I^-II i^-II or oY (t
< LE.iw < LE.iw Q w Q w II II II II C
11
295 VI I V' "' v~i w w Q w Q w •+r ' 1
�~i,-; v~,-; 295 '� O
304+00 304+50 305+00 305+50 306+00 306+50 307+00 307+50 308+00 rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' 0 U
-I- CD
6.7' 3.9' - - 12' - 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' -- 2.3' 1.75'-f (t
I TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK O
Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSEDPROPOSE)".....„1... ....3'
3•ZA 3'1 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' imax-i' Z BANKFULL GRADE
q.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
ft
ft
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 I 6 9, UT1-REACH 1 ft
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2.9'- �/ O
STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 x U ft
e; _ _-__
/ �:' �' REMOVE EXISTING FENCE O
�,. "1 p ----__ WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP)--_"- _J �-F�31_'`O-_ r , O
� �/rv°j E. c(% �
AI ,w. -- _"_306.- Alks ,w. AU J A,. Jh AU �,_-
- -
41
UT 305 "=
3p /.j
�,. EXTEND SWALE _��� _ �u, . �u, �,.
7:-),!..t'.613:4"1.1
4'1
o °'O .'\'�� �Ei---�E E ���F �ys ',:illk;___ 303"'' �l�ltit� • \n!�!..
11.
6. . E .\ `�e,1`J�-� J1. `Vsa �.` �bgli/ Epp
./ ��� •/ 4100 -""icvs`0. -z -_'I` ,'m` • ILIA.!►1 \• 'lig;//304�00` ''. :®.' ilil��' ,VR ;i+� O 96t i' •.':'r•/�� CR-NM 1 Z` / //A6/! • ® /a `` ��`�ile ��,0 Q1�11, i rCR-NM i��1� \
fl .�j��,, • I �+ ;c �1/I�1 J` -__c= _ I !`N,��e�/4► �"�Ser.'.f..1i-. l \. irk
_ �I���l�I��R��� s1rOV - _ _ _ - - -►fit4:, � 1` �cR-ALR�:'�e o-�.
0
--.. qie".4,,,,pw.....,,,„„gn,_..,..,er.„.- _,.-----.4.10,4411'Amr, ---ji ' , ---—--411,_!_-:
- \'Ok'....-- ,4vg. ..
, ,,,,, ..__„__„__„,,.‘„v
, _ ..f. ., �v
„. „-----___ _ _ __ 0.1.„,,.........,, ,__ ,.„
i= (�
b'
•
�E, i= - _ - -_ -FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP)-- ______--`__ =_ ``30S. p3; V o �`:. // '\ c
Z __ :308 jP. _ --- o CO•
,
o 31g`
'^ -- _ _`" 320 309---- -'
_
-
-
•
3�'p.
_3 � 20�� ' . z 3 v
3_ `315 30 a� �=" 32 7 � .

Y
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) Ct)
N CI)N N CI)
N
r" n N PROPOSED BANKFULL Q
305 o-N o N 305 0' 20' 40' 60' �'
z° :ns-m
II II II II N �a r -gUak.
w ¢ W N_cr N_� EXISTING GROUND (HORIZONTAL) ��a w Y z
+ w + w oz
v' LU v' w o a' o °' z eo
m N m N \ Ql Z ry_
Q Q V
V
I--WVI J Vt J \ "0Lm �1m
\,'1.2%- \ W W II II II II m'
... — Q W Q w , l0 r-1CI) l0 �'���
_�\\_ Vt--, N--, m_N m-N m-<-
300 \� \---N i —-.- --1.3% ---` iu 300
/ -..
I j
I N.
I -2.0% LLI
. ...
PROPOSED GRADE \ / -2.6%
J
295 295
ti
m a m
ca+ N co m
O N O N
m 11 m F!;
F!;
m_I I M-11 M—11 11—I I rt
Q w Q w Q w Q w
290 N W N W N W N W 290 •,--I
308+00 308+50 309+00 309+50 310+00 310+50 311+00 311+50 312+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' 0 U
a--)
3.9' 6.7' 3.9' - - 12' 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' ►- 2.3' 1.75'-f ft
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSED -I
PROPOSED 3•1 I 3'1 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' imax-i' 2 BANKFULL GRADESED 4.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL ff TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2.9'—..-1 �/ C
U STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 x E
ct
309 Cf ___gf ,LE-_" __ - -
-----�-- --- 308�',Q' - - _ -— __- -- ,w. yw. ._- yw. ,w.-_=m` 'x` Al _"sL` Al I C!•)
3p6 305"/` a -30
0 =-
3 "
m
''°':
I -REMOVE EXISTING FENCE - / '..,>:--...:s l'`,. I
.._1i. WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) „. ,�I, ... „m.- �;' - ��������' /
p2' _ --- UT1 — .•�•.
i L�ii I•' 3 ----- ,w.��' ALL z;w. yw. ,w. ALL ,w. yw. -- ••♦ ,`40.%-• I'—.
•
� O ;_ ,�. /,iw. , R-ALR, .. 0 I _________ __ - /
/�� , CR-ALR •
.0101,
7.
,� "�ipe.•1� -- 07--- o sI 0,,,_Y'.•••• g09 .44 �` .-. -. -'_ _,0 .. A.,/�--. _ � _------ 5--- -----
tip
•
J }I ♦• \ �.i1�1l� _ '°'0 ,�,R►�'370 �o. `' :::- i ----------------------------------
'la, 2 '�-_' o �,297 O
p M
' = Cr
9
I FILL OLD CHAN-NEL(TYP) ♦��.'- �'�•• -„ _ w �:� 299
W,�// pti -
3 -- - _ ---------- - z
300
CO
• _� 3p3
Q 3° _ :_ — 1 Q ' 9 r—I
C 30
C
305
r -" o 0
-

Y 1
0' 2' 4' 6'
o m
+ ,i (VERTICAL) (f)
N m 01 N
300 ¢-� ti-� NI 300 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 a
VIm N A—, N (HORIZO MAL) '6
LU II II-W II-II ^'N N N PROPOSED BANKFULL dra)l-
w z z
ut w Q W m m < m Z srnut � ti mti m .?°Wm_N m_NV' -
u u a II c) o N N iz �H=
Q W Q W + N N 'r
+ l W
_...�^`-1.2 0 `---- —� `^ W `^ W , N ci N ''
• m m
-s .. N. II II II II
vi vi .n m .n m
W W m N m N
-2.4 0 - II II II II
295 \ \ • -... - 1.3% _- ---- `\\` ¢vl W ¢-vl W295
2.31 ., j
r----------\i si
2\ i/ l i \
Ni
EXISTING GROUND
290 N i-!....' cn N'D 7 290
o m + m
N 01 N 01
,y N ,y N
w w PROPOSED GRADE
m rn m
H _, H _, + N + N
V1�w V1 rw N-01 m_01
c-I N c-I N al 01 m 01
M II M II W • + c-I m m N N
> > m m a •m 01 m co m '' o 01 O.
Q-J Q_J �_N �_N N_ • c,_ • l+o_••
W0
V~1 w V~1 w m II m II + + O N W V+1 cO
I I > I I > N N m N m N
V~1 w V~1 w m_II m_II II-� II-> rtr
Q w Q w
u V
285 11 ' 11 I I I 285
312+00 312+50 313+00 313+50 314+00 314+50 315+00 315+50 316+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' .2 U
_.
3.9' 6.7' 3.9' - - 12' - 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' 2.3' 1.75'-f (t
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSED I
PROPOSED 31 A 31 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' imax-i' Z BANKFULL GRADESED 4.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL ff TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2.9'—..-1 �/ C
STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 ii:
E ct
/
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE ,' __- ,2g3'- ;-1U
/ WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ' '-�� Q
.
- 296-______---
•
•
/ '-S _ _ r(CR-NM) 1' ,y`Q.��::\ 0y/" / /� '''�l441�0� �7'/:- - y'''' : ,x V!'
m .__ l ,�0 �.i Q �� CR-NM '�' \ /!' 4!'!O'y� ';�., y �11
F i !!,`.�.( i \ 4 *� _ �1144 ate► .;,�,; =1.• "o 7 17
2 295 L- =_ __ �.41 - - ----___�-`244Pi • - .9Vi.•' , /i.
g
j
--",-' 0/ ,, '--- --_=-:::"-Z-Z- --=';7-r-3„' ------.--:-„ __-'.:k-:.060tk-,_----,..-. ---29.2..,-:_._ 4,01" .fin-_-_ - ._ "."--/ --- 4/ ,
- ti/ •
= 296 ; i: i • ==________-
M -'Lg 1 e_ '`314+00 nil!:, ----- ,,9\!1
� • ----- mar:_-... (ii._::.
�(� --' _:,;��iie�i__,.,_... \\ FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP)
„1
Au .. �, _ \?
M
Q _
3 •` 3��, __---______ • <-- ------- 295-___ \\� E ,n
f - 05_� — --_-�.- _ _ ,�. „u. ,�. „u. ,�. „u. �snr_ „u. k d z 3
_ -ZgR I 3o m

Y
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) (t)
m w m w PROPOSED BANKFULL Q N
295 iv"+o-o' ,00 o' ^ 295 0' 20' 40' 60' Z 0 a
m 00
m ENO o m
II II II II r Oi W I, (HORIZONTAL)
. rn
-, ¢ -, m , w 0 0 m o EXISTING GROUND ty
o z
N W N W II II m N N ci �o ci ``� v
Z 0 eorn
Q > I I I I 00 00 _ .. G
N W ¢ W m "1 m n1 O N N 1- Z F a
Vt W II II II II + r +
,-IC)
O Fy w
W Q W
N � N
m N m N
w r N m
� .._� _O a� �— W II II II II cO N
<
>
<
>
01 W
O
o \i/ \
I \... < U,290 \ .... ...�...��\.. ` -, 290
\ I ,
, ,
\..._, , ,
/ -2.>% 'Y
icl
PROPOSED GRADE
285 285
N N
,o 00N ,o N
W ,O
m II m-II N- �_
I I > I I > +
+ Go
Q � Q � •^-1 nq , oo
r., ti m m m ca ca
Vf_W VI_W m-II m_ m_ . N_m �_� �_�
Q Q 00 N 00 N + N + N
I— —iLLI I— —i m II m II N N
II w II w III-II II II (rr�
Q w Q LU CD
11
316+00 316+50 317+00 317+50 318+00 318+50 319+00 319+50 320+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' 0 U
a--
3.9' 6.7' 3.9' - - 12' - 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' -- 2.3' 1.75'-.-
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK (�
ft O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSED I �I
PROPOSED 3:1 A 31 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' imax-i' 2 BANKFULL GR:DALE.SED q,5:1 o BANKFULL r-I
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
rt
rt
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL ff YICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2,9' �/
STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 x U E
ct
I / ------ 294 - C - _ a) �-I
�ni '-293- --- '- -------= �$-290' -ft' __X
CE ,..
�� 289` x_ U O
1� 19ti' _--___--FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP)_--- ,,'' ___ I O
U
2g9'' < '
-'\ 11�0 111r�� 14„ \28$ a
i ;��_��: UT1 4
��� ::::
. ,
//J ,11...„,ovi-3,..
1�7L. -- I
�'4 illy __ , „,.. \
,.,„,
_, -
e� �a ro noe+ ❑ za �8�
„......,.... ,..
"platkiti .r K-4... 12t,'N',.\ .,/ --::.??,:7:/k•7"A.'''',N;-/:1 WO der,'00...
i --'' oik r Or ;44;off' %•GM _;�� �, -•.,111
/ i �_ •bpi N =4i.�ri Oi'______ ___� ��OA� �.. (CR-N M) m �co
.'• .4°.H.�� • I
-4.-itir. Tp4• 1, , ,/,/„--- /r Q, ,t,s -•• .. 4*, -• .•• 4.1.W-,•,••• I
•
•
.} • �G�r
'H - -t-e �i,Nr! ••(CR-NM) •• N4. 9x !use, „. ; o
l
a
O
%X,
-' _ �i 'A;I':. �, �GiiY i I ``moo �'. �I M c
Q - G.cs =__ 1 _....-I o�t �1��Rtl. ::p,, I Q
IW M
J m o z/ t'J
=I W ry�J W W W W W yl'' W LIJ
C Il
j / E m
I v 2 9
,may
( 1-1-I J . J

Y 1
EN
a EN0, 2, 4, 6,
.o O-W 10-10 N-l0
m ' + N + N PROPOSED BANKFULL (VERTICAL)
O W N W N
Q m N m N
290� n VI � II II II II O 290 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 o m
Q W Q W N o N O EXISTING GROUND Z Z
ON-c W N-W N-W N-� N'� (HORIZONTAL) II U o.
m N m N m N O W �11 w 1' v
II II II II II II L.0
m \ ea)FBI t o f
00
\ 1 Z H a
.. _ W W II II IN N 00
N W
N I-
\ .. ��_.=_ N W II II N W O ^ m
\ — LJ \ — -- H II II + .-I
\_ ,2.7p \ T�... ... _ _ --_ ------_ N W Q W N , Ol N
m co
285 \� '2.S o ._.. l� _ ——_ W N n `� 285
\ I —.../. \ W Q W
_ N_W
2.2%
I /
PROPOSED GRADE I Ni
m o \�'—� '2.50
280 +-a .� .�o w N \ 280
w \m o w
II___ N_N NN
Q mII m IIJ II II NW c0
VI W W W •
00 N• 0 N
I- -I I- -1 + +
Vf-W Vf-W N_00 N_00
Q_J Q_J ,_� �_N N_. N �
ul W ul W + O + O + 00
N N N N +
rn
m
275 I W 275 '_
320+00 320+50 321+00 321+50 322+00 322+50 323+00 323+50 324+00 0
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' C U
-I—)3.9' 6.T 3.9' - — 12' — 1.8' — 6' — 15.75' -- 2.3' 1.75'-f (t
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSED �I
PROPOSED 31 31 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' ima�-i' 1.:),
BANKFULL GRADESED 4.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
ft
rt
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
rt
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2,9 +�/ O
STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 U x E
ROAD = /
CE --E EXISTING FARM +�
/'CEO LI
•
x—x—x—x—x =x — �x
" "—"—"—x—x--�x—x—x—x_--, x x x-1.'2' _ j FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) /
EXISTING ROAD TO BE / --28s ___
DECOMMISSIONED J 00
N ="- •`, / U o
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) REMOVE EXISTING FENCE `, - _
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) UT1 _ --"_ -_ �,sP'. I
.. '28.E -_. /'i��..`\;;;;; `,;;` '� N W/
-- - 322+00 ; I�', '� '' -/�=:.::L285114
ti y \-..;.:112--g
✓' ii ..,:.._r
•
- .e:^`�renr- _285 - ._...•_ AO.
����. �� �' '�.,�r�a�i 32. 00,
\ �nl '"�1� -ill 1 ��. •i:'• -•••�J�� 7� 741'-')
,tot ,;ice % • '
•
� - _ •mot '.a x�. •tt 44 I y , • ('i;
•
iii,
L./,c ice._ ``\ , <____ ______ •!•,� _ __/ '
%'� ® _� a-� 3k• op
' �. ' � '. • i ---- _ 28
alb:: ..
. 0�� �1 321+00._- �__� _`- _Z8\ Z8S-=;x' ///,i i1 • m /M _
' __ ----
\ 285 ` , Q
cdu
V1-12.` '' -292----- _-- _ --_ Erco
/ o Cr)
�- _/REMOVEESTING) , (,�FARM POND x /Q
x ; '- - '�:� ice\ 2 `r`J�3J'�3J�3J�3J'�3J� / 2 z 2 o u us,
„ _ ,' = ce ice' ,} \\`. `. `,fr°,'\ 3J�'3J `i

r" m N ryp i.y mi, N t o /
O N N N Cr I-- W .-I I
+ a.;
+ + + m N
N N + Ol W c0 Ol
0' 2' 4' 6'
m N m-N rn r, 7r N co 1p
II II ^ N N
II II II II II II M N + W (VERTICAL)
Q > Q W Q W Q W I I N N N W
,w _ W W W m °y'`^ w v' w `^ w Q_J II-II v+i-� m a 0' 20' 40' 60' I-� N
�' \ N W Q W m N + N I�-�Z U o ol m
/ ....
LU
J ° ° N N 0 m PROPOSED BANKFULL (NORIZOIvraL) ..1 N rn u.
280r. / ��_'3 Q_W m_N O 4 280 YU
�, ) N W II II W r N N A� O z `�.
/ W Q W M N m Ol �V W - v
—� N_W II_II � m Z o eoa
Q 0 v
Q > m O ,n iz IE73
v., W II II N c Hy o,
���-- W ¢-w Ln IN EXISTING GROUND m
Vf W m N 01 N
-2..50 •N, Qw N
H J LU m_N +-ci CO N
Vt II II N ^ m N
Q > II II N I� N O
�� Vf W QW m N l0_l0
��`� .'2.So W H II II r O
'-----------------------------\
O
275 `_--__- N W i— w N-N 275
N —_�_`` W Q W M N
LLI
` �
N N } N 2.50 \ — —_— N\m NQ- < /
1,1
~ J '
/1 W NQ > N o
1
II > + W �� 1
Q r, N
, ' `^ II PROPOSED GRADE _ . .6%
Q > o a I
,n w + a•
w o
270 N-N + •
a 1 i\ 270
m NN
>
� •
Q mII + r
~_W _W N-N
t/1 Q
W m
i- -1M 11 O N
Vt W > NQ N N O r O N O 4
~ w _ + +Vi m11 o o i o + m
WN NN r- N r- WII > N N
Q
STA=327+65
N_w _II _II _II _II
Q > Q > Q > ¢ Lu ELEV= 268.60 a
F F � F
266 �+ W vl W vl W �+ W 266 •' 11
-
324+00 324+50 325+00 325+50 326+00 326+50 327+00 327+50 328+00
Ct
BANKFULL WIDTH=14.5' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' - BANKFULL WIDTH=19.8' 0 U
-1-
3.9' 6.7' 3.9' - - 12' 1.8' - 6' - 15.75' ►- 2.3' 1.75'-f (�
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK , O
1 3' Dmax-1.3' PROPOSED PROPOSED �1
PROPOSED 31 A 31 BANKFULL PROPOSED
GRADE 7 25' GRADE 1 3' imax-i' Z BANKFULL GRADE o'4.5:1 o BANKFULL
PROPOSED 4: 1 3.5' Dmax=3.5' '
ft
UT1-REACH 1 UT1-REACH 1 6 9, UT1-REACH 1
cri
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL ff TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT 2.9'—..-1 �/ C
U STA:300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 STA: 300+00 TO 328+10 x E
rt
N N\ I /emu-'
•
\"\ / �'"\, EXISTING ROAD TO BE I I CR ALR U E
O
„``- `x\ \"\ DECOMMISSIONED ( '�" I• ���a P��, `
/ .I,W� �'\, ,\N\, WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) J lb•• ' ���
�.I'/ \,\ �A^ EXIST/ . \' Alit X,i
\ NG FA RR, .fix\ \ ��ii� \
��. •0. _ - REMOVE EXISTING FENCE •
',ROAD `�� k � •t�:4 •
'� (CR CH)• I '�`\
',j;,�, I , WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) N\, -- :!�oir♦,
v ), I ® / \, �\ •
fir:p. � '
'. D 1 \x 6" Ran•. �a:���
0410
-----„6:,,
279 �`` 325+00���-Au._-� �����%��iv. �N�� �/
• Ar
1 i \
II ^Z .474
` x \` ,, k 2
�/ 278 - ® `'! f: ' - ø_��•� .'� ` "fr•, '
•
0.
/ FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) I BEGIN UT1 'tx'7Q__, c
oI 1`;;'' \ ^„I` _ ti' '^� `, -" STA.31�TY I17 \F N
/• // .,Iw.` 2j8_ __-`� ti ._ \`�`\1 -" "-: --_______ ?�,; 273 - I LLI 6-
Ii
` l v N �_ \ ! 275_ F—
IQN
X \ J II N ``' ` '1/ �'�� ' \\` `\\\\ �\ 2
3 Vti

(7 01l v`"i PROPOSED ROAD v`"i 0' 2' 4' 6'
cc a CROSSING cc a
V V (VERTICAL) (�
/IELEV:275.42 o /� N
Q N Q m N v
EXISTING GROUND cc¢ il-¢ 0' 20' 40' 60' Iz z m o
Z Z (HORIZONTAL) '6
275 Ln m -`^ -`^ 275 Y u
0 o w o z
w m a x X Qll 6 v` v
m N m Nuo V V I--Z F.1
II II II II N N �°__ < > < > m PROPOSED 6'X 4' L, CoW \ I--I
_Jy---- �_J u_u + i
- v Q W REINFORCED CONCRETE __ o ti m oo PROPOSED BANKFULL
,I wLLI
N w DOUBLE BOXCULVERT-\,I m x t��,�
I / w x SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.09 1 II ¢_> - rmn_N rmn_N ago
I I I \ N °J I u II II II II ,-I m \
I I \ STA=329+79 11 I �+ w ¢ W ¢ l N l0
_.).. I \ ELEV. 268.66 -- ^^,-T--,d..� I vi w vi w r^ N
r^
................
............................
r I ..._...._...._. ..._, ° .................. .....l;.i iii:iiiiii g':".":":'P".ae,T,,:_
.........................
AS
I I ) x .riri:orir..:riir.:rirr:�:nrr: : STA=330+86 x w
y .ii i'. .:' Y: 's
----- -.- ------1-':
I
I F - 267.81 / ,,, I
_1. �'-' \ u - ii.1;:::iiiiiiii:ii_iii:iii: u7--------...____________ ______\ j8% 1 \ -
i .
%5:�r'ir'r'i:%5:�ir.:r.r.:n.:rirr.:� � ....1 \ r %Sri%�:%5rrr: _..........\ \a, /
'is:ii: iiiiiliiii:;iiiiiii:iiiii: ., 1.9%PROPOSED CULVERT I /-x�PROPOSED GRADE /V INV:267.3 1\ // mPROPOSED CULVERT\\ I //INV:266.8 /
x �/ x
1j V
00 o CI) aes In STA=331+27N- w- `°- `°+-a-+-a ELEV= 64.27+ � � + vi + vi oo N oo N N mmNroN
Xnt N NNx m m^ u i^ u `n II `n ° u_>_u_> u Ct
STA=331+48J
STA=332+33_ _w >_ ¢ ¢
Q w Q Q w Q
N W N W N W N W w w ELEV= 264.27
261 '1 "' I "' ELEVI= 263.221 261 '�
I cp O
328+00 328+50 329+00 329+50 330+00 330+50 331+00 331+50 332+00 332+50
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=20' - BANKFULL WIDTH=27.3' 0 U
TOP OF BANK � TOP OF BANK a--, ,�
4.5' 11' 4.5' - 20.25' 4.8' 2.25'- (t
I
rO I
PROPOSED 4.5 Dmax=4.5 c�PROPOSED 4BANKFULL 1--I
UT1-REACH 2 UT1-REACH 2 ft O
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT H-4.65'
STA:328+10 TO 334+78 STA:328+10 TO 334+78 x U E
Y� ° I v Q /,,p> i Gt ;�
' +� REMOVE EXISTING FENCE l{ -' OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO BE --_, N ��' E/ `- I �"'�
``�; ,,,,,,/-
WITHIN EASEMENT TYP 1' 0' � -27 ` '
( ) w RELOCATED WITHIN INTERNAL "' ' 0'� x
1 ' Nk \ ° 0 m "EASEMENT BREAK UTILITY&WATERLINEONDUIS / I _ C�/C I cn 0
N \ I \ SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.09 I�`z:. ' 1 3 /.lx x—x—x_x__ --'Z-t i +'
- \ +\ I m O CF x ti' I a/' GE —x r—i _x_x_ I (�) O
``��.14,S \+\+ \+ , A m C w `'RI .6 i _, )V x x_xv �I
' I r_______
I_x-
„ ai Ills} .
a� •11 11.�. O _-----272--- _
_____
pC"^7a.� 1
ti,
' x7
.11 nil,:: i_:'iiiS!:
sys.,,, ::,.;11,1010,111x f o i� x ) vwi. Ala .::=a1?.._.
‘„
\ a': it '• ... - \x �•�•�. 'O (CR-NM, U I 1 �I q ' ,' %JJJJ
- )I �i' II ' i
♦SC••• - .' h••t••.,',pc-, / ( m I ,PROPOSED 6'x 4' x i ,y f•
;r; --=�-- SSO••. REINFORCED CONCRETE i• i•��. --__---
•
�••��• t°� 1.06•1%� '= �x '--DOUBLE BOXCULVERT 1\ (CR-NM) �••�•=��
••.71V.041141••4il ------ �/! ��t'•• , ._ �' •,➢fit•- �...
•tt�d�,i _ <- G•'.••• .I ;, x� '`I -SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.09 7. '' p4 p•••�
• h 2\® • -__ •1i��---�___ - x� J :, n. STA.330+84 -.yz. �•I�
O•A4% ;', _--�` `=�-�' �!' ;-�•i•s — \'�:', n X ;;i' 'x� �'�� `' `.\ INTERNAL CROSSING �' ry'3''�j-��� I
__-^ ,2Bg'_ -- '-T—_ ate_ �l'l \ - `�_`a x;x L"i _ - 26g_, x UT1 �•�A•�•I� • I
!ire= --;�a�__-_ STA.328+21 - F ,,;i •*••••�
-•.'V�yv = - :;5d� )c�� ;;'4-�- 64. REACH 2(RESTORATION) i�y'yp�•� O
,94 , -;^� _. END UT1 e: ill
o *•• ,,;6 (RESTORATION) ,---__:::::-:::--,-**,_,,,.--Au,
a t 1 i ��`' -,��5 330+ 'C - / ,f 1 11- - i i ',••6:•:- .� •
I+
s . REACH 1 RESTORATION 11 . dW•• 00 C. 1 • • i 1 • •o••
�A:;,,: ,'`J STA. UT1 m d�1 i1¢5:: . ',1•••�Oti �t �'' _ _s,. _ •1.. - q t��•i N
�.�Oi 1", BEGIN UT1 °'?;41 ,11 - ,7 z 41•a At�QI-' --__ .IPs. 20-%.-,� \'`� xx �� �•♦ I
mn . ink ••• �r o • s • • .,00. �. M
O` REACH 2 RESTORATION ice'�e � � �Q � D �• '
,,, (RESTORATION) —x •Drs' �•fL,4T ••O331+ • h 74)C I
i", STA.413+03 O ry,-1: 71,--_tt.-%-
,, t�r��_y�_��_�l(�.•6n 0p•••1 i i::�i'.. Q
',, END UT1B(RESTORATION) --�, mcr.-4- .\�, ��s • • •��A�•�i�@•���i i - �y��irs I(~
M`TT /x`Yx�*' STA.329+84 x� 1A qiY _� �N� _ -- : •Ate: o �. � �•�i4?:S..v ° i
===4-}x INTERNAL •CROSSING m 268 _��•l.�,... '•t`Z• i'O4.- I �/'�
`,EXISTING CULVERT `, `.��`„1 .i.•,i„s'ki ;;S.�!"' z z
� iP� I x TO BE REMOVED @\, JJ ,�;''@ '•""L�"
1 EXISTING ROAD TO BE „� REACH 2(RESTORATION) ` �\`,\.I�, I I �j, A i I J
y\ m DECOMMISSIONED _ =� ; (i FILL OLDCHANNEL(TYP) _ •
2 N WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) O `n `` / C"`�`�.,26 r`�,,, - ��I_'; --2 G IU Cr)t'J
� f \ m { g x`• END UT1 ;=- "- 26 I—
s_ I O x - 1- / �;�`g-270 PRIORITY II 9 CQ
GCS '---- --- / X if I �'{, `,Z •Ty9l STA.330+83 .��.� - _- -- - -- F�_ z a ..
-11
��� jj __JEXISTINGFARMROAD ) 274--A 1 '^ -Spyx - __ - __ -- -a. o" a ❑ ° m

oo Y
°+' rc' EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL m 0' 2' 4' 6'
a ;II::
-N �
u u + m ,
(VERTICAL) C//-1�
Q w m Ny
■ N-w m N a n F-� `O rn o
270 II II m-� 270 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 �?o m
m
N -, m N ^ ^ (HORIZO MAL) II ry rn w
w QW m-m �1 =z
w
`^ w m N m m1111)a Z °t P v
u u m_N Q� Leo �
N � O
/II II + N "w
N-J mN aim
I I ! w II II N O
I Q W M
265 �I I N-,wi, r, `� 265
iI / II II
Q w w m
N w � �
m N
I r A - \
m
II II
PROPOSED GRADE
ir ,Irr,,,\
. ,1 )Alii_ /^"---\\
1 i -I
260 \_q l% 260 AS
ci N '
N N ,
+ rn m
+ lm0 N
m N m
m II m
II
V.1 w N w + r' ti mN ti 00 m oo 4 00
I o +
ii rn- m a STA=334+37
w mN ro N N
Q II ELEV= 258.331- w
Vt-w II i
IQI-W IQI—W
Q LU J
N JLLI J
11
255 I 255 O
332+50 333+00 333+50 334+00 334+50 335+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=20' BANKFULL WIDTH=27.3' 0 U
TOP OF BANK � TOP OF BANK a � ,�
4.5' 11' 4.5' - 20.25' 4.8' 2.25'- (�
I
ODx=1.5' PROPOSED 7
BANKFULL ' '
PROPOSED Z �1 �, PROPOSED
PROPOSED
GRADE ' GRADE 4.5: 4.5 Dmax=4.5 co Z
BANKFULL
10 r-I rt
ct
UT1-REACH 2 UT1-REACH 2 ft O
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT H-4.65'
STA:328+10 TO 334+78 STA:328+10 TO 334+78 x U E
ct
CE _ r'xx�` : l 1 II 1,';',,1I i�w __ �,
-Ns
_CEO E ;` ` (_ ;11' ^
��, -,x • .T'_� ' _ei'C��`'__ _ _ _�i'iilln �IIQ (n WJ
\ ,,
/x/' _ __ ;;_ --( � O +
REEK
\ �.� REMOVE EXISTING,FENCE �x I '. '`1'7=� e R
\ ---%�� x WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) +� `�' '` ° ��,_
22,
�� j00 • g.:
Ai* '11): '''
./ UT1 t
111
---23-':=C-'''-a-:11-14-;--33-7:.':4-----ra==kr7-C--;:l.-;.7--'3.314.• IS, -- 14
ilne'�Inimn�n���wm�n'��c�::. I 26�`````: fat /�./I/w� %
cell!_,ip_` `� nr - _ _- o Eu,o,;:= >_ _
0. 11 `� 'ti66, ¢_ �"�' .SC``� _ _ - a �:�'' }\ �� 11
ll�nit /�C333 - _" -'N '' -\..
``•' _ __LGiis:; Ya 7^,', �`NMI 6+00.__ _
�i�it���tOi����Qr,_� G �� ye' It�lltl���iit��ts4 s= ,0��: : - — _ •
___"""-" �t�tC�#.. f _;\ - �yifiri,*�� 33`® , I' ` px0` ---- fi�gg.. i®i --- 260 /
/�/I1 ,2I \\1,,,, =265= " -'265 r .�_,--
\ - , `\\\ '\' '-- -' _ ,p- miti-iitireir,'"3-11 .2`...03 .Act�e 3-Rae`` -
\\ ,`�, c,
V.W.t,„ ie . •- es, "
,i..„._ -Itrettswirrow.- _-__.--„,:,,,,;_;_r_r-,_,.____ _
U
i\ qi
N ,_-___ ';' (IBM i �`-."- STA.335+07 -- --_-'2
i
END UT1 _ - '
G\ `�' ° "- f`�� _:- REACH 2 RESTORATION - a
�i\ "� /�'�� � '`� x/ STA.115+64 H`
(n __-
2
-_-_ =, i (ENHANCEMENTT -
,ter x �P CLARKS CREEK ,
0
- ,� _ 3:1 '
_ x 5F II) "GRADE BACK
A
�\ r '' /% / --- - _, - BANKS _-
% \/ ,�R' /►�.
��=269_ - - - SLOPEl'J
��\ -_-:.:„265::-.„ _ �H �i ' 7 i -- —''V
\ q,, 3 \ •
�J �x✓'
LP O A�� %I 6°''' FILLOLDCHANNEL(TYP)--�`;11 (' 1 'P ;"" 3jy� _r'-- E m y
x :i--"wW_;,;%, ,L�O ti1ti ��� jx/xhyx J\�J,, .,
, „- , ; __�4) six , , \AJ'' o`

EXISTING ROAD V.
ELEVATION AT CROSSING 0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) V)
295 !- 295 0' 20' 40' 60' Q N
CO o EXISTING GROUND Z,z !o 1 m,
I ' N 1� (HORIZONTAL)
N°`w
-o +_ 1p 11� m-lD J,z
O o N a m I� m en ii)''1_,Z 1.t rn
N II_II �_N �_N N-VI N L. ��
II II ¢ > II II II II + ^ + N. Z �, F:a
¢ w N w ¢ w ¢ w 0 W 0 W I--
NJ VI J VI J Cr ~w
w w w II-II II-II
i' �\ ¢ w ¢ '>" .-I
o /PROPOSEDBANKFULL z LJ7� m
\ VI J VI J N 0,g N
\ I-` - - - '4-N '4-N
\ I `�--` II II II II , 0
290 \\ _.. I-�LIJ VI m 290
J CV
I- LIJ
(L5%
2.0%
285 285
ELEV= 285.85
o 8-8 8—� 8 8-8 a m o w o 0
II II o 00 o 00 o 00 o 00 STA=403+43
II II W �_II -II �_II �-II ELEV= 282.63 (t
¢-J—¢ II II II II
VI w v~i w ¢ J ¢ J ¢ J ¢ J
I �, w V w VIw VIw 11 1• 1
280 280 •
399+50 400+00 400+50 401+00 401+50 402+00 402+50 403+00 403+50
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=15.2' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' O U
-I--
3.9' 7.4' 3.9' - - 12' 3' 6' - 17.1' 2' 1.9'
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK fa--, O I
1.3Dmax=13'PROPOSEDPROPI OPOSEDNKFULL !-•
UT1B UT1B UT1B
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL I' TS - TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT
STA:400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 2'9 ' U E
x
_ - -_ I
EXISTING BUILDING 1 + -" -I-_- E ,..,
- ___ \* CE L
I ; •, / _ 290 Ems( U O
• ' /
iw/ : 1 i \i c,' \ '_ I
1 I`. N� -
1 EXISTING 72"X 44"BOX .i•*0: - *;:—•., / ---II-- �_-= _ -
I CULVERT TO REMAIN ' \ , ,- '1 (CR-NM) '" "" \��
+ INV IN:288.30' 1 �; :% -` :
i w INV. OUT:288.40' ,, �-_ • ��0 ���i 1 ` .p�`a',� UT16 ---- ------- ____
I I° I. iv; mit, --- ,IJ - <�q 1k0 �"���� '*lb�. _-- --_
' 1 a«dam gi'. _ _•'z J t0'4 Y�i" .. xi,' yi:.. I�
:" _-= ,,, 400+00 �.--... F -\- •�®��yar�� '. ,,./`/ i�0oe, �. FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP)
piii4i0i` �_ • 0nu x 06- \--- d jr
gar.::_ = - / O
�._va.` .. _ --ii�e:•.._.. :l �';�Eililn./ �• x - • 'im;:!-'
I`. 1�''-'(CR-NM) • + 1 '•l♦,O ' ----"" --__---287______' - ../ 3
•
BEGIN UT1B x "_ ---------- CR-CH) \ ll�,� _ _ '`:•-`.
u 4N►1 288_____ - *0 �e�(RESTORATION) x/: \ i ' _tee�� i' 0
,I STA.400+00 `, - :-' �1��� _..•.-. -"=- �a I,��• A
IY �*- REMOVE EXISTING FENCE �88, ���� �I�w�ti�� u` ▪ WITHIN EASEMENT TYP •- '-� ������i i
i / , ___--- 9- ••��'-- �� �.• '• -d'
iii ' • Q
,
•
C; ' / ------___6„. •
•
3 r` �8 ' Iz
3J`3J`3J/ _3J - • II - -- -_-_ I U
/ ---
�3J �3J ��� o 1 a o
I �'�9_ J

NPROPOSED ROAD 0' 2' 4' 6'
0 CROSSING
v+ ELEV:288.5in
0
(VERTICAL) cn
o z Q
z a N 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 o
0
zZ mm
(HORIZONTAL( t I rn
+ 290 dIw Y z i
290 �� U� ��z °s°`v
PROPOSED 2-42" mo z mo PROPOSED BANKFULL
CMP CULVERTS + a cc II + ?°°
—SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.9 a-� Z¢—.-� o 0 o Ql Z H
II II —N II II + + a
o� io m Liom H'
m-a N-J va~i-J a-� a-� N .-I m,
o w w II II II II + `� N o EXISTING GROUND
ICI II Q W I. Q W p +
Q W N
I-
oo VI
. -1 Q 1 II II lD I�
1%
N - _.l to-I j Q_w +-o
- - y -, H lD W
N w N
\
285 \ -1.6% - / \ _1.1% --- ¢_w 285
kLY
PROPOSED \ / -2.4% ^
CULVERT \ / r•
INV:284.00 \N`//\___/ II • I��
I I
PROPOSED CULVERT 2.q%
INV:283.5I
280 • PROPOSED GRADE t
/I 280
STA=404+29 STA=404+40 \/
—Li-, ELEV= 281.62 ELEV= 281.62
N
m+
ON 0-00E-� I�-lD lD
o OW O N o II Lio N
II o co o co
-v ft
~ir' ii-� �-� ¢-� ¢-� STA=406+88
ELEV= 278.38 r-I
276 - w v~i w in w in w I I 276 •(f) 11
0
403+50 404+00 404+50 405+00 405+50 406+00 406+50 407+00
Ct
BAN KFULL WIDTH=15.2' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' BAN KFULL WIDTH=21' O U
3.9' 7.4' 3.9' - - 12' 3' 6' - 17.1' 2' 1.9'
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK I
I
1.3Dm =13'PROPOSEDPROPax=3' Dmax=3.8' h PROPOSEDPROPNKFULL Hi
UT1B UT1B UT1Brt
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL I' TS - TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT
STA:400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 2'9 - x U E
- 1` t= --------
=
---------
› `Z,-_- x INTERNAL CROSSING - _ ___--' ='"- i0` 2g2� '"" i0` ""+Q U
__>UT1B(RESTORATION)
EXTEND SWALE ;-' ,ul,./ ,n. ,Iw.�
x
' n ulw
\ --=- Iiii- ------------------ - TO UT1B
m 1.11
II
.err':a:�'..4.::,• ------
_ �;iiiwela@':� � ��\ '' UT1B-- '�` IZ
-_ _ . . (CR-NM PROPOSED 2 42" ,Iu,. J
\c��j!'�,� ______ CMP CULVERTS - -285 /'' I=
�I QQ�'a1��•`� SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.10 x ;oli►jry: V
•-`1;•, -,... sz -At? 40„,--_ "\ REMOVE EXISTING FENCE -w%�jji ��406+00 � ... I Q
I _�--- n �, WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) - --__-' _ • fQ1tet ------ ------------ ------
' 1• •�
` ` � ' � �(CR-CH) ,• • ►
•
,w.c--21 Ai" �It•�,y+' \ •Odl•`444" (CR-CH)W ,w x " , x t _
m S- • .' --
x -. i,-a—- ►,ail... 2gR' _ t� 0 T i
s '�Ch I I STA.404+35 k '(CR-NM),�'-'�\ �LR.ltltp� - :,2lMniaiir _ :: _ _ __ �-
I {''
Q ='n INTERNAL CROSSING a./3�u_r_l@f'_6 --- _ c
' UT1B(RESTORATION) f ---------------------' ------- �� '" -'' -
_
_� 0
v ,
28
C
2gS_' 2&
I z k i To I iii
FIL CHANNEL(TYP) - I o m •xUt -__ _-
3 mQ �3J x Q
2I �90. 3J� z
m" 284 o x J 3J J—a;

f 285 ^ 285 .Y. ,
Pi r•V± °�+' HI
+ `i 0' 2' 4' 6'
o_� PROPOSED o_N o-N �_1n
(VERTICAL) Ci)
a `� BANKFULL II II o m N
Q 1 Q 1 N lf.+
N-J N-w N-w II 0-^ c-� 0' 20' 40' 60' Q
__ W Q w a ^' + EXISTING GROUND z 0 �o m
'l.l% �, /---- v1LU Q-,, N +_� (HORIZOIvraLl �l� %.N°�r-*-
...I_. �.. - �\ N I I-11 O N N �I--i z O t a
Qw
1 -1.6% W •
v~i w II 11 m Lf1 iD Q .eon
-�` Q_w O_N �_lf1
�.. ? LL/1 w II II O N n 0 Z a
_-1.9% __ _ _ _
280 11 1 '2.6% / 3 Z oo _`__\ v1 W Q > 11
r^.1 m N 280 w ,
I W
1 ` \ ` " N w+ m II II O+ m to D7
•
n N of
1 1 �. Z�o `-_� II O ^ Q w N +
\\ I ``���` W N-N W ICI-II N
Q w
\1 PROPOSED GRADE •• -3.2% -�`_N J N ,; II II
J
?'7 W �, N W
I ^
275 Y
275 �'3.,%I 1 1'
II � up 2.9 p
_ up LU up • _��Q_J m-I�—up + I� W
in W } OD + OD 0 I. m •
CON coN + lD
O O I n
o-N m-^
II—� II w
Q 11 w Q 11 w 1- w 11 ti ro
1- w 1- w Q w O▪ N } Ln
V1rW_V1W w �-11 0-N m-0 ^ W
v m ,
Q w 11 +
1 : 11 D7 n N
270 `^-"' ¢-J -`" ^'11 270
t~/1 W Q w 11
`/1-"' ¢in STA=410+39
ELEV= 270.26
268 268 O
407+00 407+50 408+00 408+50 409+00 409+50 410+00 410+50
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=15.2' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' O U
-I--"
3.9' 7.4' 3.9' - - 12' ►- 3' 6' - 17.1' 2' 1.9' bc
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK a--1 -I-) I
1.3Dmax=13'PROPOSEDPROPI OPOSEDPROP
76' GRADE GRADE 4.5;1 p' BANKFULL ,
UT1B UT1B + UT1B
ft
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL I' TS — TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT C
STA:400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 2'9 -.-1 x U E
285 _ __
i
i
+ -
O
i
77 �
+/ �.4 nw - .a-r - 44----"-- --'m`I -
, •• y
„, „ ,
,, ,,,
;El ,`-' �' ��i�1!•--- .' (CR-CH, 4 111� r 409E 00� _ 7_.._
+ \ '',;',�': '�' /Cr
• l %
• O n�::
I�II�I / 1 —,ill. pl . . /+ "O Y.®�'/iz;'..
(CR-ALR,`` AritiV-�• 28I- 11 n� `, ' /�C .I..
I 1.• x-- FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) 1 */` /�',/I'i x 2v - -
ive-- ---'x�x �� III ./ %i;' ,/; y'l
Obi _ i 'S-,% '
______ ___ _==z_�4Qr- -- �x , + tip;'; ,i-
` Fri- -- __-`' + ', I '/' /, /
6'1 -- - ---`- 1`;_ -__ _ �`\�, i 'i__ _- _- • \``� +max /+ % /,1," 407r/- ,.
`Pp �� REMOVE EXISTING FENCE:= -277_ •/ •
_ 1 I IR ;� WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) -- - -- y.
•
s11 1` '/ , ' 19.E/ 'i'11 1; ``}' /'-- --\\�z,•,` E m y
`1` ' �� "-lam t y i O c O

f 280 280 V 1
0' 2' 4' 6'
m (VERTICAL) C!�
+ N PROPOSED BANKFULL Q
o_,
a " a 0' 20' 40' 60' z 0 �o m
II II p lD (HORIZONTAL)
'6 ry?Fu
I--J -N �_� W es'U.-.
G N w Y vW NZO OOT-J ¢_� �1� r ,T EXISTING GROUNDirs):1
Q 0 =5-_ E
•
•
-, o oN d d
-H w
\ N •7 N
275 m o 275 C
mo •o\ o\ -- -
•
•
II II
-- a w
-2.56 -... Iw t&260
270 -2.6 0 270 ��
STA=410+53
ELEV= 270.26 PROPOSED GRADE
m m
ti 0 ti
.0 o o
N _N
265 a II a II + 0 �+ 265
II W II ct W N N N N
Ct
v~i rw v~i rw Q-j Q-j
263 263 o
410+50 411+00 411+50 412+00 412+50 413+00 413+20
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=15.2' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' BANKFULL WIDTH=21' o U
-I-- CD
3.9' 7.4' 3.9' - - 12' 3' 6' - 17.1' ►- 2' 1.9' ft bc
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK a--3 O I
1.3Dmax=13'PROPOSEDPROPI OPOSEDNKFULL UT1B UT1B S E5
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:SHALLOW POOL I' TS -1 TYPICAL SECTION:POOL WITH REVETMENT C
STA:400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 STA: 400+00 TO 413+03 2'9 ' x U E
rt
�`-a` a "�Ill:::�.a� 329+00��._ • _ '
+ =x="max—x,z—x ti ti� ni14,�..7; i— R.i�.a.�.\ O
O - x —x—x—x—x �:-1° • i" 1�1•I�t�i1C1llo�.ry1!•t�t`" lI
___ _ _ urea —. _ + �.;- : . ,1,�::.:
I-F-L, __°"_ v -` ___-- x-x-x-- iit. 13r• ;4iilni.?'%401.-�
''a,- Z.i1 z
'LL I i ,';'" \ -----7\ 44:,'"A A,2<Cz)1
v
/... ,\ .•1",,•,,, ,',.,,,,'1,..,e.., ,. ,, ,
-
3 4_-,,., _,.,_
_ -.
.... 41.,,'1-t.1‘1
: •. •
&„
-i I,v;x \ 1 \:,,- !iVl'ri - --:---_- �� --- -:,-.-----
----
- _ 272
/2 k' \\ '/,,Oo 4 .
2�0`` _ i•aRp -F- _ ©,///,
Q I t_•/ 1• �1/11/ ••�..��`•.` -__-= 3 03 i j®/; -----" .'O OG�---'
21
/
//b1/ \ __ • ••`Q �' i00.411 -I p••4I 1.,,,.,,;,, 9 OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO \d� 4'Op
_ - I.r0r --L5 • ,f.`Z2 �.' 46%tet•lN 4 BE RELOCATED WITHIN
O 9
• .,I��IIj1 / (CR-NM, `\x2jS • �•/► 0 _ _ 4�1*DP . j - \0/y
o 'I �,� \; .•• -�•, ` „..,. 1�1•i•�► oo�•,Off T. b INTERNAL EASEMENT BREAK
g \, <AiiNli.. �� iiL►j�.• -_:ate .;-2 =_- -273
,/<. \x "N/iC$ ` r !i`ii`� � _�`� 2j0 ``; END UT1B 3
q ,\ /'�- s%f i di,' '-, (RESTORATION)
I _\\ $;' ;;;'+ STA.328+21
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE *\ �0� %%�i3- END UT1 c
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ``/�x—x—x—x— `�� 1 •`Z.,.'' REACH 1(RESTORATION)
✓ ,:,.u�ir�ii , /; _ BEGIN UT1
/ % _ REACH 2(RESTORATION) '°
26 �y tib,. �� o
° EXISTING ROAD TO BE ,, __ ✓ o
3 DECOMMISSIONED WITHIN /---- .\ I 7 �I
EASEMENT(TYP) - - I ,ti 27 ' —,—.—f--"— =-_ •
!M/ / /' ,J-x-'- LS' x x1,,� x x :1, ' �O f E _ C�

/370 0-� ti-� N-� -� -Pi .4 370 Y
+ D + • + m +
o m o to o up o o w a N
/\_ -- -- II II
Q > Ln m m m �n m o 0 1 2 3
cn
i N w ¢ w_ a w ¢ w ¢ w L m PROPOSED BANKFULL (VERTICAL) Q N
\ I '
\ ¢ w 0' 10' 20' 30' Z z ,, o-m
—../..
• — \ 1 0 m O m ,°�' m EXISTING GROUND dire) z °r v
• 5. +_o N q-
lV Q w Q w m m 00o Z [�
/--_ v~
w v~i w ii ii o too °o ,n �'�
365 • ¢-w -`�' a.�, 365 m
--- w ¢ w o� m to m
w a w 0 m
40- N J
-2.30o w u u
` w
ti-, PROPOSED GRADE \ N. 4, % �.
360 `^-u 0 0 \ / l - `-- --_ 360 '/�\)�
ii w O m \ l \ /�— — •
1'
I- w
0 w ii:
+ r,O mo_II w /
0-w
N , 0, , W
O O °0 0
+-O-+-O
om om p m N
`fl II `n II `^ II N N ul m
355 : w—"-w C Lf, +,-m 0-• ul-• 355
to w to w IA w o' II o m o m STA=501+37
JII�_� ELEV= 356.66 ft
t^ w ¢ LLIJ ¢ J STA=501+96
353 `� "' NI w ELEV= 356.66 353 a
499+50 500+00 500+50 501+00 501+50 502+00 0
�BANKFULL WIDTH=5.2'—..- BANKFULL WIDTH=7' 0 U
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK -I—)2.2' 1.5'— 3' 1' 3'
0.5' 3; Dmax=0.5' 2 .._...._. .. O
PROPOSED 11.5' Dmax=1.5' ,L1 PROPOSED Z
PROPOSED 2.6' '0
GRADE BANKFULL GRADE BAN BANKFULL m
UT3-REACH 1 UT3-REACH 1 3.5' rt
Fe
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:500+00 TO 507+81 STA:500+00 TO 507+81 U E
;REMOVE EXISTING FENCING _ _ _---- II O
�p'- WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) _" ___.—--_1---
I 3 / 365"-- I U
STA.500+00 j/ -
I l BEGIN UT3 _-----UT3-------"'- __'----- - - - - --------II_-
,r'„ I REACH 1(RESTORATION) , ' -"- '- -- - -„— .—"I�
/'' NOT FOR CREDIT _-- x_x — = x— "—
___ LSP1:: ------
_ - ___-_-___=__-__-__-- _--
1-1-1----:::---1::::::I:::::-----
y�� r
`-_ - ,..O*�.h�,,ii — LSP -----i' _ - �, // • .`. -�11y�i_ ._a • ______
LSP - .giii�•��i'..'Ii
m`,_ LSP ® —` .._...._. _...._...._...-- ',I N
REMOVE EXISTING 'm --- I \. N
12"RCP CULVERT I' I FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) i
I STA.500+33 z 6
z
•
- BEGIN UT3 Oi
ecH' = � •
REACH 1(RESTORATION) ;p6,
II BEGIN CREDIT `r
T •
Q fi m
C v
z
__ m J

r N ^ IN m Y \
E, LEI
N 1f
O W ry N O
'' o� "' o� m o� "'Ln + PROPOSED BANKFULL 0' 1' 2' 3'
u u u u
¢ Q p m (VERTICAL)
t~%1 to w v~i II II W1M
"' "' ¢ > + `^ o 0 0' 10' 20' 30' z
1 Lu o m + ,n EXISTING GROUND N w
360 w `^ ii o m N m 360 IHoaizoNra�l U
m z °t v
v~i w ¢_J o- m +_ Nt5 illih, �- a�i
1n u u m vmi n N i z '�'' H a
w
¢ w o m v o
�n ti W
`^ m o ^,
_ a_J �_m p_m
J__ / ..._... w
355 �\/ \11 _ _ _ _ _ /^—\ 355 /�
-- Y
lik •-....
— 13
PROPOSED GRADE /��o I \
II0 cn
\
Ti _... 1I /N v1 v1 0 \ I oa +-io a 1m _o a / \¢ w \Nw _ o_m / \ /— r
6.%.V1 w
w
350 N-w 1f1 io-�\L- m / \ 1 350
+ r• m ----o-1n./ \ /
^' `^ ^' `^ + �' STA=503+75 I
on a o' u o-"'11 ^' ELEV= 350.58 \
oo
¢ w ¢ w . > V
m
v1 "' `/1'"' ii1 w -m -.-; STA=503+80 co-o
11 w o m ELEV= 350.58 ,-- o "1
o m
H _ I I V
V1W Q-w I¢I->
tH/1 w IH/1 w �
346 346 0
rt
502+00 502+50 503+00 503+50 504+00
�BANKFULLWIDTH=5.2'� BANKFULL WIDTH=7' O U
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK }' ,"
1.5' 2.2' 3' 1' 3'
0.5' 3; Dmax=0. ' .2 .._...._. .. Z
O
1 3.1 . ...
PROPOSED 11.5' Dmax=1.5' ,L1 PROPOSED '�
GRADE BANKFULL GRADEPROPO
BANKFULL Cr)
PROPOSED 2.6'
rt
UT3-REACH 1 UT3-REACH 1 3.5' ��
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:500+00 TO 507+81 STA:500+00 TO 507+81 UE
I c!)
aI 1 0
NI _' _ I u
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) 355,,-'
z 1 bo' "UT3 :f'
JIII 3
U1 f — _
" w W/f.�:: iii_tsii :;Sll � (CR-CH)-
,,----,-,1-1:::_-_-'::xL---- -
_ —� __
II x—x _
p� "so4nj
° I _ ii•-_ - -_ _ _-'__ -- --_-__ ___ ___-______ __ --_-_-_—
— 1---- ____ % _ ;; I o
Co c
FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) Lfl
---- IIIIAjii�... \ -3S 1<
N
N I 1 z0.
° 1z 3 I 1 I�
1 •
-
22
1 Ia
+�
z v v
1
1 � ° J

r •o - Y 1
—o
LII CO
�_
CO N n
¢ > o ^I 0 1 2 3 V Lc
111 rn II (VERTICAL) ry
355 "' ¢_wLa-^� +-a 355 0 �,
N w ¢ > o co co co ^ 0' 10' 20' 30' 'Z z %N o
V1 w Q > o o-06
ti CO
(HORIZONTAL) w o'z-.
m m o+ o Z _2,2°1-0„,„ .„
w II II II II 0_CE 0_m od
ur p
--, N N II II O coo w
� w w N J m �_� PROPOSED BANKFULL -
\ - 1~/1 - II II 1l1
ro
\ - /^\ 1./1W II II n o
350 \ / \ N-w o-m m a 350
N.
. ,
.... z„......,,,k1---74s
/ / il1 \\ - -
o� \, PROPOSED GRADE ..
o
345 -u a a N \ IL _ _ -'''- - 345
¢11 w o m a ��1./1-w II-w 0-m
(At ' II
1./1 w II W CO W�,/ \ /
EXISTING GROUND a_J +_N_�_� o m \ /
V1 w °+ Q CO \ /
0 m 0 m •cr •cc m
0
' ' O� m + • m W -
II > II > II II to-� - n M 0 \ ---_
Q Q ¢ W o m + 1f1 + 1f1 ---____---"--
1-t/1 w t~/1 w I- _ II II 0 m o m
V1 w
¢-J `^_II ^_II STA=505+75Ct
,/ ,,, ¢ w ¢ w ELEV= 343.35 STA=505+97 �„
t~/1 w t~/1 w ELEV= 342.74 �
340 I 340 O
504+00 504+50 505+00 505+50 506+00
rt
�BANKFULL WIDTH=5.2'— BANKFULL WIDTH=7' O U
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK }'
2.2' 3' 1' 3' I—
0.5' 3; •
Dmax=0.5' 2 .._...._. .. O
Z
PROPOSED 11.5' Dmax=1.5' ,L1 PROPOSED '0
GRADEPROPO BANKFULL GRADE
BANKFULL Cr) ft
PROPOSED 2.6'
UT3-REACH 1 E
UT3-REACH 1 3.5' ct
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:500+00 TO 507+81 STA:500+00 TO 507+81 U
,- 355' O r�
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING O `J ,Cy
�' %" WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP)' __-_"_ - -��"--
- _ - FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) I cn O
UT3 3s -- - ----• I� o
cLLI
y,_S_
r v. ® LL
1'�
.�y
0.
zI •
_ r 6 z O
Fd
3 --
L. �1 SS
C
C.- - --- - _ --- -
_
L
I =

350 I I 350 V.
Pi lID a PROPOSED BANKFULL
r^ w m 0 1 2 3
o
cn
m CO O� (VERTICAL)
v VI CO
~i LO
o CO /EXISTINGGROUND 0' 10' 20' 30' IT %N o
w Q-LO o�-m Ln_.-I W
N W II II (HORIZONTAL( Y
Q w o
Z o s rn
� �E.I
W Z
co w
I— w O o o --1345 `� w g,-m + LT-, 345
o m m VI m
Ln o CO
CO W
Q-w II-II ^-�
N J Q w O 1-11 m ul 00
/ � �' _ __I W N �j II II
/ Q-w -m
/// \ _ �./ \ N II II N N
1-11
\ / \ _ //l \ W CO O
Q W
LO u
ZLY
zThN
340 \ / \ / \ „ 340
\/ \ _
PROPOSED GRADE1 ,,
m a
0
_.4.,-,,:6____
o m m m
p -m Nr,Q >
-
~ w v 11 + p
v II >
w _
o m
Q J
II
, W >
Q w
335 in_w o-m—�-m rN.l-, a m 335
N m N m N m N m
o m o m o m o m
Q Q Q ? Q
333 in w in w in w in w 333 •'--i
506+00 506+50 507+00 507+50 508+00
rt
�BANKFULL WIDTH=5.2'� BANKFULL WIDTH=7' o U
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK -I-)3' 1' 3'
0.5' 3; Dmax=0. ' 2 .._...._. .. o O
PROPOSED 11.5' Dmax=1.5' ,L1 PROPOSED Z '�
GRADE BANKFULL GRADESED BANKFULL m
rt
PROPOSED 2.6'
UT3-REACH 1 UT3-REACH 1 I 3.5' U S
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:500+00 TO 507+81 STA:500+00 TO 507+81 U E
1 Io
/ : to p
._ . +- REMOVE EXISTING FENCING U
------ - WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ______------------=---------- --- ------ IL/)---
, Q
— x
„—x—" _ _ a�"max ---- r
- -x,- _------- _ ----'- ® k_ I
\ +-/ _/ -.-`` - _---"---- - - -_- _ - : i.?a./2.3;c!i/R ri/�.- c-, `�x,��x _ RA =_-IU--.
9' '
y_� ''�. GRADE BACK BANKS
I► '. :1 SLOPE I
a \ � --- _ =„` ,'' � :--_�-----_-.= �'cj i�'� _ __-_ _ - "max
' ' i' - i ice- _ — • 3
r, -"'" • - ?/-�' "�� "---...Taal-pm.," is�3-�� --i--- -- ---- - /% l ) 40 �-x.�
r
•
\ 50800',_
,5 .' -- ----- ------' FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP)-- - ``340,- ,(
/J Y 1
�J9),`j; - ,345 i
S
61 'lam/ ------ REACH:!� ________________ 1(RESTORATION) --- o O
BEGIN UT3 ¢' •
d>,\ - REACH 2(ENHANCEMENT II) I
O
r-i
\ ! J

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3' 07
345 345
(VERTICAL)
�ti
0' 10' 20' 30' z( �o o o
%N�w
(HORIZONTAL) ta)'' -1 1 d�L�
26r:
i_ Z F j
w
340 340
ziy
335 ————— 335
EXISTING GROUND
330 330
•r�-1
cJ') O
ct
o
328 328 U
508+00 508+50 509+00 509+50 510+00 (t '�
0▪ O O
z
- TREATMENT:
ENHANCEMENT II U
E
1 EXCLUDE CATTLE
-x�l / \ 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a c)
h /
` = / 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF U
"� ;' /x/ \ NATIVE VEGETATION
- '\-----,,� _, ____340----- REMOVE EXISTING FENCING ;% /x %//
F'`, max_,_ WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) __ j % i
SOg x %x
IOO a +max
UT U
♦ `_;ai _ate__________ _
010-
l _______ - _ —-- R _T
GRADE BACK BANKS_--_ _------ _ _ _ ---- 16�a / — \ \\ MM \,
elAT3:1SLOPE `., _ _, �� 1 '_ -----e S� ' e/�' : -si-_-- s ♦------ \-
":
.
i
3 O
m
I
I - ------__ GRADE BACK BANKS --- - - _"---''-- \
'__/ 0,_ AT3:1SLOPE __ _ I__.
_ -------" -----\ Y—
_
l- s4 `
CD
F -_
Z
4S. u l
Z ` v
K. ''
x

r Y - ,
0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL)
�oUti
0' 10' 20' 30' zz z ��o
(HORIZONTAL) 1 -
340 340 t5 I--i z °s
N Q0
_ _ E=:
\ --1'
335 335 AS
EXISTING GROUND -- ------- —
330 330
rt
c 1 0
ct
o
325 325 U
510+00 510+50 511+00 511+50 512+00 (t '�
0O O
z
v m H
tt
/ _ __
Ct--------
/ _'' __x-- RTREATMENT:' T ENHANCEMENT II U
/ —x _-_= 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE ,y ct
/ _ _ -_-335- __——.—"Tx—x 3 OF
2 TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a
/ — —_—x—. 1 LOCALIZED PLANTING
-- NATIVE VEGETATION
t—x—x— -x-"-, -----' U
-'
' o
------ U
_ to ---
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) I s�•
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING
/Ta,,
N
oQ 1 ,
ie___ _ — I,:'
/ w a_ - - / e<' J
r
' :,,,
"Ye
I
PLACE SILL AS DIRECTED -Ta- re f to
10 a O BY ENGINEER re die-__ — — =---er-----------
O =fie__ \'e '' e t
LIII
iDIRECTED
Ir
___ - BY ENGINE
ER
' ,_ / --_- i Z c
U
Q/ I~ PA Ri adz
3 Z{ o
/ O
3
O -
-
-
-
E
Z 3 9 v
O 9 a` O -]
J

r Y 1
PROPOSED BANKFULL 0' 1' 2' 3' V)
335 m m 335 z 0
o m a o a 0' 10' 20' 30' % a o
-m -� —� M / �N (HORIZONTAL) y U v�
N eloz
II II rn Ln "n + od m / z °s rn
w In N J N J
m / mo Wz Fa
w w N J /
ti
1-' Q w
uN
330 \ 0 7% / 330
--- — -- -----1.4%
_3.6
EXISTING GROUND � / — ^�71,
<L
PROPOSED GRADE
325 325
m m m
+ I� + I� m o
m_N-m_N ^7_
m m 0m m
Q_J—Q_> �_ I m▪_m (_a? m_N
I- I- Q w v\ + +
V1 W V1 W 1- w II  m M m M
Q w Ln
-II Ct
0w II-, w II
Q J Q J
320 'n w N w 320
512+00 512+50 513+00 513+50 514+00
Ct
BANKFULL WIDTH=6.3' BANKFULL WIDTH=8.3' O U
—1.8' 2.7' 1.8' TOP OF BANK 3.8' 0.7' 3.8' TOP OF BANK ft "
0.6' 3:1 Dmax-0.6' .... .... .... ... .... .... ....
3.1
PROPOSED , 1.9' Dmax=1.9' PROPOSED 'i
PROPOSED/ I 3.15' BANKFULL PROPOSED 1 0-1 BANKFULL m
GRADE GRADE P''
UT3-REACH 2 UT3-REACH 2 [ 4.15'
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:513+05 TO 515+72 STA:513+05 TO 515+72 x U E
ct
j \3J'1`.
``S 3,,,_
/ U E
J�J
/ ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:
%�_�( / 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE
2. TREAT
IVE
ES
.3''S- - '-- ,�Lx—x'�""' —"—' "—"— "�K, x— ,J / 3. LOCALIZED PLANTINGIOF U
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING = — — x—x \ � NATIVE VEGETATION
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) _ ----- _----
i. —x — ��
'x —— UT3 " -
I
= -- ---- --_-
-x-x- �,....1• �,> /41
-re / 3 �i�-ii GO'—'�� �
" �\ � S100 _•�C __ \ }` /S
: \ l
---- ,/ 1 '''''',:‘,c•, ,\\ T•.11 ",
_ / �
cl ' —
I (CR-NM) I • \ II� --cl \ /
OI i / /
I X°\ '' a, 0 1
0
\\'qn- I I it I om /! u J
x i� \i! FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) I I\ it // z _ v
d _A / o" a o m
;'\ , 1J . J

r Y
° up \ 0' 1' 2' 3'
cn
N
N \ (VERTICAL)
m \
N., + `. PROPOSED BANKFULL 0' 10' 20' 30' 'TIz `� o
330 `r, , "'-
II II \ _m �'m N ,yw330 (HORIZONTAL) YUwQw \\ Q 1 ,�-I N I� m ty-1L'r-'Z l 1.,_ v
LU \\N-W II II ,�i-ro
m al ur
Z Ig=
\\ Q w II II ry O Ol a
\ N w Qw ,n_m __N r, ..r,
��\ N II II ,n ro + N m
_ �� w a LLj II II ,n m
��` n w a w
\�\ II II
N w Q w
T4+23
325 325
1 ., . _...._. ,._...._...._
._________
, . .._...._
_ _....2.o% , -,',"*r
\_ -- ,� _ y
oo m
PROPOSED GRADE
320 + N ^ EXISTING GROUND 320
,-▪I m ro m
n +
.-II ,mayM 0
F- w
t~n w > + N 1. 0N N ,f.
a L.,, m m
~ " ' II 11 N M ,,r M
Q w II II Ct
v~i-w Q-w Q-w
,n w ,n w a--, •,--I
316 316 '� C
514+00 514+50 515+00 515+50 516+00
rt
BANKFULL WIDTH=6.3' BANKFULL WIDTH=8.3' o U
—1.8' 2.7' 1.8' TOP OF BANK 3.8' 0.T 3.8' TOP OF BANK
3.
PROPOSED 2, 1.9' Dmax=1.9' 1 PROPOSED 't
PROPOSED1 I 3.15' BANKFULL PROPOSED 1 1 BANKFULL ,- m
GRADE GRADE ct
UT3-REACH 2 UT3-REACH 2 1 4.15' ft 0
TYPICAL SECTION:RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION:POOL
STA:513+05 TO 515+72 STA:513+05 TO 515+72 ,-- U E
an
Ict
/A
___
I i - ;-/ I ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: cn
��, I\\ ;;-' -;; REMOVE EXISTING FENCING _________ _ - / /,\ E 1. A EXCLUDE CATTLET � ��,.i
\\ ",--- -;--' ;=' WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP).________ __ ____ 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES O
- ---- 3 OF U
/,, LOCALIZED PLANTING
I UT3 _—x—x—x—"—"— _ NATIVE VEGETATION
,,� { — ,;-x_x= 325 ,-'''�, _:
o _ __ _ GRADE BACK BANKS .-
\ \ \ \ m .; ' --' ------ __ --- AT 3:1 SLOPE
x x
,
Atm
of
_ = _____
- --- - s(CR-CH) \ , x° �? . ♦ ...._.. TR-----kB ' TB --r g r ,
I76+\ rlia -- . ipGCPi�i — — `\�� `- -TB 00`,, /4/e \ � - _ _
I : i. -e O � A
El 'F � � O� --- ' -- -`_ PLACE SILL AS DIRECTED - 0 �.
- �-i l \\ I — ',, _ BY ENGINEER _ I+'�.
00•
�� Iz 6 z 0
U I II 1'�ri 'i FILL OLD CHANNEL(TYP) \\\ I J o ��
I / I ` __ Q A.' _ m
�t ' 1 I i ;i; �v e
\ , I Ilii `� i v Z 3 v
I
N.
I I
I,' 1 \ a o O s

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL) cn
�o�ti
0' 10' 20' 30'
z z ��o
(HORIZONTAU 1 W y z .s)325 325 I--i z °s
Q g
iz E ;;
H'
m
320 ---------------------------- 320 t&
EXISTING GROUND
315 315
ct
ct
310 310 U
CD
516+00 516+50 517+00 517+50 518+00 C '�
0O
z
•
i i ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:
,---' ___ _-- =
• ----'-"' - 325- -------------32 ct
._- 3 I 1 EXCLUDE CATTLE U
II 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a
i :- 3. OF
325.,-
NATIVE VEGETATION
1 ' LOCALIZED PLANTING
= _
=- I o-
_
=" UT3, U
,
---------------------------------- PLACE SILL AS DIRECTED -
*R. BY ENGINEER -----------------%- "
5�6+pp. _ TB---- T�
00
-T9�!1`\`x`� _ - - TB TB
I•
I
TB TB TB- '1S - __-___ T _ _�__ _S_ TB TB TB____- --__
5 +
'I§ —`TB Tg SB __
TB
- ____ �'✓ i \a —ie"
,-fB'----TB ---- -- WWI / �' ,te'
O
m +I B- _ _ -_. •
,� Lfl • /0i �:r / FLff
<I l a''GRADE BACK BANKS / �� --320---- I-
N I • AT3:1SLOPE / / ---,--
-
,.,.., .. ,,,,,::321-
II i; II _
E
X v Z 2 9 v
3 9 a` O U
J

� n 1. 2- 3'
(V�—)
n 10' or 30'
~~�N—" �~ 0��
3'n 39� ��
�
-----__�-------- --------` �� ~
``
315 315 `+
------ ---------------------- ----
�sxo _r/wnnnnowo —.._.__ ____________ ~/
310 310
305 305 _
,zo~nn ,zo~,n ,zs~nn ,zs~,n ,,n~nn
� __
� ENHANCEMENT nTREATMENT:
z. EXCLUDE CATTLE
—_ .----- ' z. TREAT INVASIVE spcocs m
\ ---- ----_'' r----'-- // —'--' \ a� uoo^uzcop�xmr/moop
----- ,/ .^' ' � cn
- —`—' ' NATIVE VEGETATION''
BY ENGINEER
GRADE BACK BANKS
AT 3:1 SLOPE
------------
-------------------
BY ENGINEER
GRADE BACK BANKS
AT
-------------
----------------
\ul
�\ '
—^ "
U �
"

r Y
P. 0' 1' 2' 3' U7
(VERTICAL)
0' 10' 20' 30' P e o
�w
(HORIZONTAL) tai) Y d�L�
V' ry.1 N
IZ
I-1 w
315 315 m
310 —__
310 .� )
EXISTING GROUND i y
305 305
rt
ct
302 302 Cu
520+00 520+50 521+00 521+50 522+00 (t
0 O
z
Cr)
rt
ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: U
__ 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE ct
i
' IIO
\
' \ ._—— 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF
2 I IES
i _ ______ ___- -
_ -_315 NATIVE VEGETATION
\ _ I\ U o
_+ ; " �,
---
\ -315 ---------- -- GRADE BACK BANKS• IW O O
I
AT3:ISLOPE
-
UT3 =_ "------
-,,,iiir, - 411114-11:0 , ,,, , / ,--1 _____ ,
pp---i `_TB TB TB JE.`----TB ` + 1.. . __- O \ ` ,
•
s\s
01! „ IP'ifr - ------ ---
QI \+ = re t_T "
N I GRADE BACK BANKS._______ - \
AT 3:1 SLOPE \ PLACE SILL AS DIRECTED , -- I
BY ENGINEER GRADE BACK'BANKS 'V-Ta-- _rg____
QI `..75 \ AT3:1SLOPE �'3 I
1.11 \+
c
z
Y I \
u J
2I REMOVE EXISTING FENCING \+\ o ¢
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) I`�', o z
Z tK. ' v
x
J

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL)
oti
0' 10' 20' 30' zz z „ o��o
%Nsw
(HORIZONTAL) ta, 'L'Z 1,)1A
V' I'HIAN
I-I w
310 310 m
305 \ 305 4 )
y
EXISTING GROUND ---------
300 300
ct
•CJ) O
Cu
297 297 �
522+00 522+50 523+00 523+50 524+00 (.' '" Cll
0O O
z
f ft ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: U
/ I 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE y
% 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES ct
3p8 I 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF
/ NATIVE VEGETATION U O
o/ — _
ry 3 UT3 _ ,. U O
\#\,
o
/ -_' "/---,L___ --,__ __-_tee-->_,Bi- - GRADE BACK BANKS ---- III
-
(.)/ i <e - J AT 3:1 SLOPE _
0 = Io
•
S ,a ,,te'� —Te—�; N
:ta 0' I w
r/ ay--- ,=Ta____ Z
/ \ -, :6'1 "je — a II 1 N
3 / ----- I 0 6 z
•
j_=" mO I I
/ I •
v Z m , v
J

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3'
310 310
(VERTICAL) 2
I—I ,
�o�ti
0' 10' 20' 30' z`z o
%N�w
(HORIZONTAL) t I-1 W I Z d L�
6 r:
\-1 .w
305 305
/ -....1/
EXISTING GROUND
300 300
ft
295 295 a
•r,-I
rl
293 293 0
524+00 524+50 525+00 525+50 526+00 ( '�
0O O
z b.
v H
;_
I _ /' MENT,,,� ;-" ;" _ -- - ENHANCEMENT II TREAT U
i
�1 ---
} 3 OF
1 EXCLUDE CATTLE
2 TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a)
NI p NATIVE VEGETATION U O
LOCALIZED PLANTING
G //� o
I --'' __3p5 ' Q
Jf /' �,
u UT3 - __ -- __
_ � — --- -- /_,
---
BANKS/
_ --------- // , _ AT 3.1 SLOPE
T43____-TB
GRADE BACK BA
,
- -=TSB' \ -__� -_ - _iH_--- TB --
\ -TB TB TB TB TB- �-TB�-
9',Q \ —i — 525+00 _
'.- TB T
w . _ Te_____ i_____"
�B-- —Tg—_z,,re__- T _re 52 +00—
_ -irH:__, -TB---- iB �No H_- � GRADE BACK BANKS \\ -- - - ---
'AT 3:1 SLOPE _-_ -----
-- ---- ------ ----- 30
I
z
I0
i •
/
v 1v Z w 3 9 --

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3' U7
(VERTICAL) 2
I-I �
Z° ,o-ti
%N�w
0' 10' 20' 30' ,e r,og o
(HORIZONTAL) t) j'Z'
305 305 °s
Q6
IZ Ha
H W
300 --------- ---- ---- 300 I
EXISTING GROUND
295 295
czt
c▪J) O
Cuct
290 290
526+00 526+50 527+00 527+50 528+00 (t '�
0▪ O Iz
m
--- - rt
rt
_-_-_"--' ' -;' - 302--------------- ___ —3J 33 33 TREATMENT:ENHANCEMENT II TREAT U
ct
3��/ 3 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE
f __- - 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES
01 =-- --
I 3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF ;
_ -- _= I NATIVE VEGETATION U E
+1
�I -;= 3 0
1
Q I GRADE BACK BANKS UT I
o' - AT 3:1 SLOPE / U
Doti O
w I�
Z Al/
=I In
U7 di, \IIl1 _ _�11}k-'c. di, Illy' i=_ r - r r �I�li h
_2 —_=1 __ _,527+00 e 2
o —TB_ c LB TB____ -
w
� _` �� l� TB_ __ � rb, -_ M I�
m / i -'' _ �_�_�_� '
�' q0 e. �Bse; 1=
o - -=Ta--- _ U
il
- 52 IFi1 '7r
IIl -_\ �Ter
_ ---;re GRADE BACK BANKS
AT3:1SLOPE ' _ — es$ e
I
s OZ re
a re
--- - �- I
+
-re_ _� — 52 +QQ_C 3�3. - ---- `T ¢ z
If)61
•
____ _ I fi
Z t K. 3 9 v
O 9 a` O � �
..I

r V. 1
0' 1' 2' 3'
(VERTICAL)
Pi
0' 10' 20' 30' z` ,9Z f1
(HORIZONTAL) ta)< I''
Y �
V 4 LT
i_ Z
F j
.w
300 300 z m 295 EXISTING GROUND 295
290 290
ct
cJ� O
rt
287 287 Cu
528+00 528+50 529+00 529+50 530+00 (� �"�
•b�bA CO O
z
v H
�rt
OI ct
Io ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: ft U
I I 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE
N Moo I 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES a)
00
�I I�rn 3. LOCNATIVE VEGETALIZED TION ION TING OF U
Q O
';\ INcn
zI UT3 Iz ;--I O
U7-1 I� I U
ar _ IQ
�� ti9$ 2
e 0295
B B I $'
--___i0 ,-,--T �' a, `re, \ +oo __—re_ _ ,�``�c` \ 'S tpO�.
I ,-,—TB � -- _ ' �/ i / ' L 1, "
o '-;t .TB' �rH, \ ire` �_l ' -__�_ 1 `&` T-� ,
�_ e
-» too te'' ♦_-___ %1 `
,
52 2-_1
_ _-_ ____ B;. \� n�to �~
B
v,
ie' i ,
------- DE BACK BANKS
- ---' SLOPE
I m �'
,
-'30
I 0 a/ ¢ z
- 1 0
•
1 I I v
E
Z ` 9 v
cl
J

r Y -
0' 1' 2' 3'
cn
(VERTICAL)
ti
0' 10' 20' 30' z �o�
z o
%N��w
(HORIZONTA(HORIZONTAL) el< ",.''
Y d Z �L
, ry T N
i_ Z F,,
.w
295 295 m
EXISTING GROUND) ///�����
290 --- ----- 290 .� )
285 285
ca
c1 O
rt
282 282 Cu
530+00 530+50 531+00 531+50 532+00 (' '""�
0O O
z
m
/ ct
--- 0
'I ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT: U
/ GRADE BACK BANKS - _% - -- _ _ ___ 1. EXCLUDE CATTLE E
AT 3:1 SLOPE 295 I 2. TREAT INVASIVE SPECIES
3. LOCALIZED PLANTING OF a)
-; ; I NATIVE VEGETATION U E
UT3 I I
U o
M ,
- ;--_---___--�-61—_ -_81- •-_ _•� e i,re1� e;'
4;
�l ---_- - _Y
Li I
m ___ ° "-' _ _ ____ _ _ _
O .` Ir _ _
r
o 1
81
lirl
/ I I��
- / --- ,\\\ ----- I !1 c
/ IJ
/ I •
Q
12
v
v v Z 3 9 t
,
J

r Y 1
0' 1' 2' 3' U7
(VERTICAL)
z �o�ti
0' 10' 20' 30' z z i o
%N�w
(HORIZONTAL) y z295295tni)<1-1'7.'
°s
Qg _ _ v
Hw
m
290 290 — -- ------------
e ^
EXISTING GROUND Y
285 285
rt
rt
280 �
280 Cu
532+00 532+50 533+00 533+50 534+00 (t '
0O I
z
H
�v U T 3 m
i
; ' _ _ U o
,
532 i _ --- --I — _ a a e
-___ ---_------- _
-eI ',---81-----ei----- _------ '-= — -
—ei-----_
STA.532+13 --- -
N END UT3 =_ - %�i` \ `Te
I REACH 2(ENHANCEMENT II) __ O
` BEGIN UT3 _ ____—---- \ �
0
e \re` k0
REACH 3(PRESERVATION) `�� `� /``�j
v)I gig \ \ ,C\r-J
\‘:
.I `'\s\ '''1\ / \C';�\
m
I
- __ 0 e m
I
X
Z o 9 v
J

r v
0. 1 2' 3'
cn ,
(VERTICAL)
0' 10' 20' 30' 4( n'o•27-,72
z
(HORIZONTAL) ens)I- t -0)i
295 295
.-
2
290 290 ,z•,,S,
N____--
- ---—-----------
----____
EXISTING GROUND - --
285 285
rt
+- •—,
cf) 0
rt
Cu
280 280
534+00 534+50 535+00 535+50
b-C ;•-i
•—i 0 o
;-.
+-' Z
-0
E5
/3°' \ .•'''f ' 4 , Ct 0
, ,
,
' U
E
____. „...........
I (I ,,/
, ,,
, , , / „ /, ,„ , r' cr
: , r / , i / / / U E/ i
' Cn °
I
---------.--._______Z
,-"----- • , ,, ,/ ; ;•-i
, „_,....,..
----_____„,--- --- ,
I .- .•--.__ ,,
,,„,-- ,----- ....„,---
„,--._ /(''.,\,
._...,.._ ,
--, _,_.---
t-'-'
UT37 --
Ib
-- ---- ----- — .--
• „---- „.- 7 •,, )7,2 i i ..------., ----_____ ,,___ _ - __.•
STA.535+44
- 290
--------
------ -- REACH 3 / i(PRESERVATION)
__ ---'--- e .
----___
----H. ...---
-r
? ---- ____ -----1 ---- '--___
. 0 \
1 + °
--°1----_°---, - °°.
CO °‘
----°--_,,, _.---- ---' -______
.,-"" „----- „----- ,---
,,--- - _,--- --_,„-- °
°
V Z
--- ---- -----
-----------'
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING---- -------__
„ •__---
/
..„. ,'
WITHIN EASEMENT(TYP) ____-- „7 ,,,-• „1 eo X„-• P,g <- ,_,
, 7
2 •:...) _„- r8 I' l
------ , --• --
.
• ,„,- If)
..
__
/ „ .
7 ___-------__---
------- . ,
. .) . .1

X X '' '' '' ''/ X Proposed Wetland Re-Establishment
CF ��° IP
•� , v / u u - - - - u Q
— \ N i
k. \., •.. \• z0 �o�m
(F --__-- + + + + + - Proposed Wetland Rehabilitationt)<
\\ \ \ 1j xT \ - + + + + + w U rn w
\J •\i C!^ CC �\ I \�\', m OJ •
"®•• & GWG# Existing Groundwater Gauge 1_z g 6
VJ •.•..— I� CE r r�x \C ' F\\\ YYY ' a
'�i
\ .ram '.\\ 11 / \♦ F g m
� TZ " OJT •\ OG Wetland Ditch Plug 3J •'�./� O w /- See Detail 3,Sheet 6.05
\3J I CROSS SECTION 1 •I .• 4,1
\�� u
1.
�`) , C, CROSS SECTION 2 \\ 4J � OJ0 u, / / . ty�.�.
cy..,>,) -------..._-,,,,i \ i. t:/.\ V. c'f,‘
-,0 , , , , , .••• --... \ \ ,..,‘
1 )49g
u
)' ,.\.'..: ,-, /e / ) iE
•
L� \3j �J --.:;\\+\\��/ �I \NCO I \�\ h
7 \ \ >0O kG
,,,),/ 3J \l11 . O I / d o\\ ct
J \ �' ` ..1 'fit I
\ CROSS SECTION 3 \ + 'oil' •
N J 3J \ a /
1 / °O ct
\ \3J__________\ n \3J\ .y CE u / rn O;. U
/
c
- \l m\\ C J\ c
cf \\y oO i \ c / /\
J ✓CE J +
o �\
o \f\\:),\
F �, F
\ 0 oklo \ \ cn o
\ \ O�\ o O
\ U
m �\ J \'NCO yJ \.\ m �r� LF./
\ 2 �
c� `I \ yJ f m �\��``\G
\ \ k7
I J F \ \ O F �,)1
\ \ )\ c.... ce.„,_ 7 ,., __-1- .• 7
c'e \ \ .,x cez ,)• Z
,, \i N \
rF J ��/
y \ \ \ ' % I�j/4 O\ c
I J\ \\ r \ 1. 1
z
P' \ u dJ �`\ �� ' •
m \ \ r\ /'\
0' 150' 300' 450' ` I J \ `\ jl 1\ • �n CROSS SECTION 4 _ ` `I
(HORIZONTAL) I U \ \ /"RJ I I e m y
u \ \ 3z

r
cn Ln
WETLAND CROSS SECTION 1
- , -g•rc)°'.
310 , 310
/
Z
/
--1 w
/
/
/
305 / 305
/
EXISTING GROUND
/
-.._.
300
300 ''..c.-----------....___
/
1 ,
A
295 PROPOSED GRADE 295 cILC.
290 290
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
rt
+- ,•_-4
.,--,
cf) 0
;-,
ct
0 U
+- e—
,
/ % 7 c- • -_-2---:=-:.-_-_--- --- ---__ ----- ---__ ----__ -320------------ -------- ---- ------ __ ,
•,-i 0 r_i
-F-
.„-
-- ------ -------_-_-----ff-----------------------------------2-------------------------- -------- - -.---------- -----:-------"\.,„..,,':\`.`,,,,..,.:-\,•,\\.„...„--'\-,`-;,•.\',:\-\,\‘‘,,.,.\,-::::,\,:!,i1...`,;1./,I1.0\-,'..-.-\.,\;\-L„,L-I,'-_L_-;_,i_`---,----_;-,-,,-------,.-'-----!-`-----'-----,-_/-;_--_---__-___-___--_--_-"-_---_---_---:--„-—-_-„------_---------------------------------------------.------_---:---_--:----:---"-----------:----_-_--,--:_-_----,---:-----.-----------_----------------_----------------_--------------------,-----r-----_------E-----------_---"---:---=-----:-------%--------,------_-----.------c------'-,-----;------.-------:--:----:e.-:-\--_----;,-:---->,.--------r--_,-----'---t_-'---__-----__----_----------__------_----_-----_------------C--:--------_---_-!------:---------------e------'--6---------------_-----------------
----:--:-----:_G--:---I--:---..-.--7--22-------:-:-----=-\-------iy-i--0--0_-,-_----_--------------:--,--_--_:---_--:--:----_-:_-:---:---_----,_--__--_------,-----..---.-------._----
_---_.--;-----.-.-.---y---,------s---e-----'.---,-----------------------------'----_--------------_--_-_-_-
\_---_-.----#---_I-_-_:----_-,-_-_-_-----_-----_----,„------,--
_-_---__---_------_-_-----------.:--1__:-----_-----------_---_---_-_-„-__----_---„ ,••„•-,r_-_-.,..,,.,.
-_
..;;,..
Z
— - _ _ - 310 - i„---------- ------- -- - --------_ ------ -- ------ -- -. 1 /, . _
- ---------- : -- --- . r ___- \ — - -1------------------- ----- -- - ____-- S0•-
cc
0 cl)
-•
,, ; `. \ 1 i 1 • 1 I // V giii, = — — .-- .-- ,,-,-- ------------------______ UT1 ::------------_ -- _49.44,02- 1.31-9, -- --C ------ - -------- ----- , 0 0 c6' ------------
,' --- ,•';'/ , 1 , i , , , / _ , r-- ,..-c -,-___
U '
,--
----' '•„..' / 1 i ; 4,.) % 1 I/,' ,' ' eE
_-+- + ±_- -___ • ---- ,,./(' a.) a)
.a.--
----
:'• •GWG2" ZX
, ' ,/+ + '4- WETLAND B + + i-- - '• :2;--0.--,...f4. x x z"--x_x__X_X X-0-7- + + +....,-F--- + X X.. '
/ C6- r;•-ii =
,--- +,'"+ + + + .-+ + .4--.,/--- • - „--- -GWG 1 '- X X X X trX"-X,.X _....-
-----
,--- , ••-••., \. „-.4-' -X.- X X X Xt_O__Z--0 X X X(jp-' „_„,J; 4- 11" ')-4-++ + X X X,-4X '
...1 t
cn
cn b-13
.----
0000000___0' 000 -
--------t------- ,--,-,,-,/,,-4 '-------------- -
i .• 4.,:.: \..\ . ,,,x_r x,:x_•-:-.0.,, / / ,---_,:_-_,,- ; ; :‘'-;,-,,7 , Z Z %,WP-AND 1 i Z Z Z Z Zfii Z Z. ___------„,,
-
0 -F-
----------_.-- _,,i,„---;,-"Vil,','"-c , . T . •
r...!,-. _• ,,,t,i, .. _ •... •. , .,,"- • ' - - - + 00000 , ..•-•••• ,' ,, 00 , , ,
;--1
.,
U 0
. :. _. ''' '- -,a'r4-;-'.';41:404' -"- -",-' ..774.,' •‘ :1'•:5=--.-Z_-:,--_,...%
1 .•
i .... „ , •.__-' -
A*Pi:Ai ft-'''':- ,/-,---_-_--------,-------------------------------2,-----_-2-7.7-.:--:::--::--„ 1
•-... -;.,. ;,_ - _ - \
,.---.
.‘ 4,\• -41fkr"' _ „ .• .--‹ ___--- -__-- -_
•-, ;1 e7 "5-'... ,-t.-_,!=-:__-.,-, ----, ------------- . __7
6 •••\, .•\ .
• , - — _ _ _ _
-'''" "• '"'- 10444-------"--',/,',;------ ----..--;; -_-_---_-_-_-_-_- ,.;-_-_-_-_-_-:-- -,-;-:-_-_,-,- --_,,,,-._---- --.. --__-----___--- •-- -____ -__-___ -_„ ----------- _----------_-____
- - J I ....„, • -..._
‘L.-_ .._,.__ • / .. ' '-'''-- lit .-'<-;>:'i;;712:': e ';:,:::::_ -.:-___.:.•:\S_., .ii",::._-Z-f,,Z.Z-‘,..., ,,,.'Q,S_,....s:-.. -:1'''''''''..:'•..4 5 \\-1.;--2 7..::--:-:2:21--..i—::::-.:s:::2--------2-----:ff-E-_Z--::::::::-:--------..-<'`.. `‘ \
•••' ,69-. 4.Et' _ 4.-C.A.f. . ', " , ,': —,- _, - -'=.1' .- .97', - - : ,,,, ': .= — - --------- ,,, __ „ . • „
' ‘._ • r _ i I'' ,r ---43111,414:'<.:,,> 5:,0e;://j :,', --3.= •., ali'-''''-'''*,.:-,-,' ''-v:-:'•\•-• •‘-..;i- - :*:\::;xS s;•.;•2,\--,,---:-:,:-\,'' -' - 7? :
i - -- 7 - 2: 310_ -S--11.-._1-:-1
-1--1--1-:------1-1--,--;47:-1-;-- 5:-2.------:::: :-:Z:-:-'•-::-:''•-‘••‘,'\'„—'- - -- - 1 +;4-+ _ ,
+k : - : -+- +' -L
-::---
1 1 ---=-"1"'::------- _-_:-.3-3.:-2----_--- ----- -- P-;--:--------://2//,',/,---•r,/: .-,-- ., -------:-. 30:-..\\,'-'••••.• .\\, ,, . , ----- „--,-- ,--„----------------------------. .,.', Z-L----.- .______---:•:•:-:••'•:--=:;' ---3-'3ZS:-:•:--.;',, '' +. -F,1-,-F 4+ ' '
-,3:---_-_-'/,/// ---"-" " 2 ' „----335---2:-.,',=,','- ''-;•'':',=', •\'''=,s.;:':=‘,..•,`,\.'-'----- ---"-- N,<D---------;--:-.- --------- ---------i-,:-:----------'''-'---- -4.- ‘‘":---"'-'''' ' :':-ZZ'''-''''''''' ' ----..' ' ',... +
.72---„;',--7-7:=:•2:ff1::r/r1:-..-------2::;;C--:----- --;---1------"---------. \\ -;-- ‘‘‘ . ••'s\\‘"\\\-'‘‘ N'--.2- -1 T---;:::,--:-_2---„-_-_------ ---_--------__-_--------.,',..:----:::----,1'---.: ::::::•-..:•:' :',ilij '''-','.-„--- ---„ - -------, .--
-'
i ':-----r---±--=a-17,-:----'- "--_-;_:.------;•- --t..7_-:-":7-;====1:1-'; '----_,=_--_:2--ffr--:--:5::-1=7„:-- -_,,:_-_-----_Z,,', _=_-, :_.•____---1_____-- ,'•,„\ , ,.1=‘ , .,,)))),1,),, ___,,i ,„,,,,, , :-_:-_,T'_ -- --',__ ,._<--s_-:z,.,.L_:-c"s _::-_f'_ ':.: :s.::-_,'_',..'
----------%=------- ?;'-::- /----:--:=_--- ':----'''---------------r.::---7-- - ------------------- '' \'' ; 1 C , _,--.::--( ._==' ,:-:,--=1/ ---,'-';' f--1,------- -,,--, . ,,. ',,__-: \ 's-7-7,_:1:,-=/-1;'-,,:-,',.:;,-._ .':',';.1'.\,• \\\‘.\\,`„S---- "I''--„' ,
, --__ __.„ -
c,8'T:1 -• ''
`'-= -- -," ,-",--------',-_-.--------„'-----:-- -----7__:--------„7-==-7.----------------.------------
8 C\I
C\I-,„
0 40' 80' 120' , ,
L.H.
(HORIZONTAL)
.) . .i
,

r v -,
-c,:,
,
,,
WETLAND CROSS SECTION 2
2 '2'
305 305 4` 1:;,-,il'i
ens)7-1`7 - :if0)o
2 g -.
.-
300 300 295 ---"----. 10" 295
EXISTING GROUND
_____- 201-
_----
,--
- -
290 HORIZONTAL 290
N-'`,__i Z-S•Y
...1/
PROPOSED GRADE
285 285
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
—,--
---- • /., , , 1 , x
-„, • , ct
ri40,... E__----, ,, ___.- , Z.„_ (_„----.__ \ / `, DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.06 FOR
CU
,__,, ---___-:-. ___ _____-_-_-_-_-- __-- .„--, • , ,, ,, ,, ., 4 _ . ..--.— .,,,-.—!-„,,_._.___-_x_x_x_t.7.—,._._._-,.-_____....7_.,,,_,_,,,_x_x_Lx_x_ , INSTRUCTIONS ON SWALE -1-/
;•—/—,-_,_ ,—i
__ X' •,-i
-' /' .,,,/ i / ,--- '------ „-' \ s;-j '--------„---___ --______--- ___ ' ----- ,' --/ ''.• -•L')° ' -----V \ •'. -_ '.
\ ----.. , '" CONSTRUCTION.GRADING OF SWALE Cr) 0
_ _ ''' --" "- 'l','I' '•-' • '
--- (---.----/-!-C'E---• '', '
-._ ..,
- ----- ;•-i
WILL BE PROVIDED IN FINAL PLANS.
U Ct
------ - --- --- Or / s' . ' ' ' -CE ---- -' -' r i 44Y- — 4'' --,V _....
2. POND DEWATERING AND FILL MATERIAL 0
---- ---' .E.-1--,-„..----ct __ j$ ) \ f CROSSSECTION 2 -_-:-_-_----- _.-1...--",..T.4 ;; -firoe "-- ' =:.„, ; \ ‘,,*"....-------......• fYc,3 . i C2-- :--`,_..-,-----\
.• /` -N ) '',11 -1 ', :i.‘..:--='-`--,:,:,,,.... t \ `.,.,...•'r-It.Vcl. INSTRUCTIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN
CE ---------------:-..-----;,----.------ '), .P.Ns'''C, '1 '.'':-%, 2,-'' 1, / .•=c•••....\ ' .. j \\V .••':.......,-r'f-f.--,7;"-...':,:.:;„__."...-.' . \..---.•..s-...-,r----- •• ,
. /...,---) ..... .k..11) .'./ J 'C''''f!1/47F:71----:"^- ' ."'•:::-•-;=, \
,
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
, ZXXV 2"----,_ '' cE---;3"-- , / , `-.7‘ ...-••.1‘10 ::--,.„ SHEETS PROVIDED IN FINAL PLANS. b-C ;--i
-„ x GWG 2 V I C'k' --CEr''--- ,, ,1 ! _ ,
, , \
„,),,t.z - s__,...
,,,--,,,,--------, -.1 -.. _
C- i *.C\AIM* . C*1441ii-- '-HE -_ --- ....'''' '-; ''.„ '''''--__ c„.1
.„ „--
-z
_„-- --____--
% _/,'":=°:" '' •• \ .• ./ + 4. + + ifit:IVO ---,,,-,-„ ,,,„, i , . • -,._ f./ V,:8'..,.. ?: X c'i
1 • '‘) ?",9, '' '
X WETLAND 1 X 0 ,-----' /- ---;-•--- -A's, -',. .••-- .
- - -,'' -' --' -'•'' WETLAND H y
111* 1 ti '-ti
X X X,'X X X X'' /41-A..';:":.... .• ..:..„,.,'•.'+'‘+`,++ 1- ,'lc-al'-i."--17-54:77-71-a"=1-,:, :P, 69°,6 \ \•„ '\„ ) ) \ '`„
t
C'• ,r;at 44AT-'\,•. /
+ + 7i- , •=-'=.4 ,-- --Awe*--:!?_-_,e;:t:*!Lf?--,, -„,-,-:.„-; , , \ ‘., .. , „ ,,\ ,, ,
I
I rt (f) 1-1 1 ', '''"'-',----Au.VrVe .4-Vcr, ;6.i.' ' • Y Y Y r Y Y ' + + '- '4-- ""Y --Y -Y ' '-''",' ` ' 'D----.3D '-
7.....,.>_ :.;._<•.. --•.7•,•,',-•-.../.li . ,-, .•' .....,,t" -- / y y . . o"f,,,c 'Y % % r % % %+' + + e„..-., .,..x.-,x•-• z „- „- , -.._ ; ,----- .
U
_ •,.._ L_ :•„,._•__.
i • ,---,,.1"-,•-•4',' ,-• f z z x x 4, `11 , z z x •,,,x o ' k+ + ''', , -, 7 X 0 X."4-0-',';', X \X %;'. \ \, '--_ ,f.7.,.., \ \ 's ----- --, 337--_-__-- --:: ,— L..)
L 4_.A,1 .• -----...:,?;- 1••••:„Ir----, . , , ..
- :-4,11 2---:,,_ .5,---..41' •:\-:77.T.-===,-_=E--7=s= •----4't-----.5 --.._, -, •-;••• - W X-OP:V ,1; r, , ,‘ -- --„ ---- „------------ ,::::-------,___::-: :----- ;--i
---.,-, a) (3)
_-..V-r-:""-..---!:':---7:.:-.-.H•ff-- -=- ..--- .fi ;--0---- ',,4 x 1 ,A,::: x ,7,'x 0 0 x x x 0 x + + ,,, A9,-0 x •/: 0'0 x ‘x 0'' ‘ -.. \ 1 --------------------1: -2.-- ---::- -- ;--i
c _--,_ ----
7, , ',(-x x x x zi x x x ' x g: x x ' x x x x x x v + +4 ''.x,' ,- -x x z.%x x x x x ' .1.. , ----'s, ''---- --------------_ „---: --„--,---,. U
ci) 0
A,414k,.," •-zz x xfi)
____, ...,.... ..„ ..„.
..„
- -/ --- x--- ''',y,_,-1GwG 5 0 0 x x ‘lz--ss,0,' x --'n--'g-"-Y-x x x 0 0 x's,x x • 3- I:P.7-1e," oix x 0 0 TR,'i.-7,-0-0 x,-* ',/,--7:-•--' ;i ,\\ --- -------,---„ --- '---------- ----„'-„'--, 0 ' '
•::=`s + +/*WETLAND F -- / --- \-- ,
'5',_Z Z Z 41DZ.,Z Z Z Z Z Z Z :WETLAND 2% Z Z Z Z Z Z Z k Z Z,VV/Z e" ,Z V,<Z Z Z %,Z Z Z Z ' --Z ,,'Ki" , ,, 1 ..,____,,--290--- s „_,, ,-""-
.. U 1°
Z X\,'< Z Z Z 0- Z Z Z Z Z ,-----------, ••„------\„ '',., \-----..------- , -'-'"--------,
I
.,_-_`.2_.:•.:::,•.:::::::::::•.':.:,._ '•• • ---.Z X i< Z Z X X 0 Z Z X X ,',; ;2-XX X 7-....... ,ji3O z z o,..x o z\K x x x x_z,_-;---5-0---- „' /,',----9----, ,-----,'N \ ---
2,9,5,
:--- ,-.' Z X Z Z X - - - - X X X 77'4,,
x ,•c. x x x x x x ,-53_,•4 X VZ,:X, X-5 ---_ ,„4ta• , X -;";•V ---'\ ', -
7-2
------ ---------'-''\:'''‘. \ '' X ',.. X X X X X X X '''X -' ';, -------=-----------------\ ,,__--:-F.E'-.3:,--::_ :-----....
1:._:: :-,?:::, -.'.:, ..:,'-,:,‘,..,y,-,..::,,,,,,..,•-__ -- , s-, ---, -.‘ N., -X X X , X4_X-,X- fr-Xi--G_- - z_A, „.,;,,,,,-;::____--:---„•,4114,,,,,,,-,- 3D_=-,--77.-__ ..,, „--- ,- ._...- , _.,„ •-•\ ,
" ",•.'--._ - - ---... -, --„ -, ,
'-'''-":: :''. 1:: :‘§, •‘,',.,,‘; ,•,-_,S--_-_____ *5-,:-..., '„ '-, ,,,,ss, ', --Xg-,ZX XX XZ ' /r X /-'11,a)/_-,-___--13_5_:-.-..:----',.--,,:,,-.1---_.,-;-2_-----29,5.----____---,!•,n---___-----",:...-/-„,,„.,--
DEWATER POND„ -
SEE NOTE 2
1:--_-:
A
:r :-•.1--:;,,y•;\;•;,:,•';.:,;\,\ss•;•-•,\;', ----I:---..,'\,2 s, \ '•-:;s, \c, \ \ ',--_„ gp---7,- --___ I ( 4, 01,:,, /7,-,-i-,----_-_-_-_----11---,-,-„', ,',:•,:',----7_,+,,__
I
tioStx /
-?,
C.\
,..
\ -..::-.--- „ -------_____. -- i fc,,,„,,,, , ,REROUTE EXISTING SWALE
,--,--
WETLANDG
cl 2 8 Cr)
•
-.-
0 50' 100' 150' ,.
(HORIZONTAL)
‘`.. .) . .1

r Y -
WETLAND CROSS SECTION 3 Q n
�o
N 9 w
300 300 ta)<
I w u
Z L v
/
w
295 /' 295
/
\/ \ PROPOSED GRADE
290 // \\ 290
\ / -/ HORIZONTAL --__- ---- 1
285 \\ /r -'--- 285
Ni
EXISTING GROUND
280 280
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
,
^,
r - - -- __' x— —t-.x—�x—x—x—,-x— x—,-Tx—x —x—„�.—x—„�— _ NOTES: +-
i • ";•, _ - _ �0,'29 '�( ,:f { / 1. SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.06 FOR O
= o . ., = INSTRUCTIONS ON SWALE I
E-
ems=,
--"_- 3°0 = --/ ,q. 2__ -- -CEO--i %'/ __ _= _' �', -- CONSTRUCTION.GRADING OF SWALE
, / CROSS SECTION 2 �__='- --
1 ,--= 4E - ``i-�•�\ .� , ! �', -;•� WILL BE PROVIDED IN FINAL PLANS
= / '/, \c '` =.CE�' o------- v�7 s- i o; • y • • r" � j� - 2. POND DEWATERING AND FILL MATERIAL (�F
• :' _ - --
/. '/. '/. % „" - _ j - ,,,, , , ._ _- INSTRUCTIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN
/GWG 2 V I C'F�=f£�CE of \ o u' _-`"- c � ,'r'"" I' EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL +' O m
, „
-'y' -.
• SHEETS PROVIDED IN FINAL PLANS. �, ct
•WETLAND 1 '/. '/,,� ----- i --�. _ ,;�'__- •_•-_- \ -- / WETLAND H fr;, ---am_- ---=__-_ J"- .� ,1 `�'N �� V
� t +-, t o
,
`------_ - �d�-• Irr
-/,/_�. --~`^(,.;, /. '/. '/. 18.. ç ' ; iiJ
'/. '/ '/ '1 '/ '/. % ' ":f 'J/. %.f/." Z '/. 54 "\N`,,\ BSJ�-3J<� r I-� U
vim, • -_s 4 _-__"—. -' • _ , , , / , , , , , , .N% +t + , i cow t -- _
_;,` ,"';- ',;'/ / / / / / / / / y i i ;1 i i G i i i i l +++,'/ ' 4 `" //,- / i /'/ i i /'%, i XI' , 1 • _---_ ---- - _ - r , o
.. _ WG4, _ v
---- t t;' WETLAND F----^Y_'/, '/, '/, 'r.�/, '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, `WETLAND 2'/, % '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, �V '/, '/, %'''/,;;'/,41 / '/,%'/, '/, '/,• '/, '/, '/, '/, '/,_'/.-'/ %''%''' ':�'3i' .`-290---.\ O
U
-
--� `` , '/, '/,•Y.'/, '/, '/, '/, '/, '/, V '/, '/, /, '--, 295 --- -:___--". �;, -
__ ��' .� , '/,-'f:.'/,GWG 3/ '/, '/, % '/, '/,,fy;� ', - ---- _ -_295--' =-
�:� -- ,• • , '/, '/, ,�., / '/, '/, % '/,\✓;%;,� ---- Z ;--- __-I'`----- DEWATER POND -
{
_ ft yy{yy _ __ SEE NOTE 2
- `\ \ J_____ -_--m'� / -.o.__ '
_ o, . */ z/ S: /
r '310" -••CROSS SECTION 3
-?, 's\s\\\:\:\\\\I\\\\1).s\‘‘'''1-' 'sr's\21'„)._):\ \\\:\ (i,_-\11 / \\,_\'''-:::---'' _„.,----r
), ' 04,ro i 1 1 1(i ,, 5 ,,--__. „. ,s, \:,,,---,-
,„‘„,.. ,,\ \
,,,\ \
,, ___ ______
, ,
\,:t_ . \,, i‘„\\ �\ - ,, _ `)`�`�\`;`,``. :\\\_ ___ ~�L. /le'At.
1/ REROUTE EXISTING SWALE
`•` __ __ __ 'THROUGH WETLAND 2-
L.
-- - •` - _ ittf� / SEE NOTE 1 .
'L.' s''' '''::,\I's.‘•\:--,\‘,--_'-, '., :•‘,'•:'-----,',---',-,__-,2---,: `- ',' '. \'' /-- la- = 4 4,/,//,/," //I,' \
61
` - ' �, o 8 S
•
';` . . r, , , , i . N
0' 50' 100' 150'7, 2 _
(HORIZONTAL) E w
v Z ).1) v
O 9 a` O M �
J

r Y
WETLAND CROSS SECTION 4 Q
z` �o
i!
270 270 ta)
�w � w
o �
QZ Is�v
7 fv
EXISTING GROUND _ � '
H W
265
50:1 HORIZONTAL f --'-----_
50:1 -____
- -__- --\---7-- \
260
PROPOSED GRADE \\ I /^
\ I
255 255 /"N. y
250 250
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50
/ I II I"\ \ ., --1,` CE \\`��/4 y''�!': t �'i/,�; ?�i�%,'%i:%;:i:L ct
ct
d.
1":
cu
---..-,'7', 1 s 'I i - .____, __„--- ,,,-- , x x x : ..?-- - • ',',', ,' /,'-,11/,'',1,;,1/41,,,',,,' .,--i
;I
rr r-
; .1 \ �\ .n. % % %/'/ % :GWG ' % 'ii 4 ' ,�'i1",,Il\lil1:III:I ,--
rt
I- I � r WETLAND
it „TI" ,I,,,. %I'� 'li i'I',,,Iii,l
r /S�'/. �.--y% '/. ,26. /. '/. '/. '/.'z--5:'I'/. --'/ 'IQ/%!/'• , ;ry ,lhi1'1ii1; .' 4 O di
'', '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/.% '/. '', '/. '/. '/. '/. ..X % '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. _q \ \\\\
�_ `_' / / '� GWG 8 '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. %" ,`.6-_G_- '/. '/. '/.,.fl.` '/. '/. '/. '/. '/._-z--!_�', '/i 4r44..
�, �9� i ',m'' I 1'`,,,///1 /,117,1,%(%'\(\r‘t'''":':\
`` J
C/___ `/ ,,:,'--q- '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/.•.'/r-/'/''f-='/ '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. ,'/ '/. 1' i r !/;' %_ 11`1, rt
'/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. / +---' - '/. '/. '/. '/. '/.7-1 '/. '/, , - > j' 1 I 1 a)
i '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ '/ / $ / '/ '/ '/.• \I\• I if
/. '/. '/. S /. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. . 3+00 I. 1;'i (n
-=-- _ WETLAND3' ., T FilIl Kv j;l/i' i-
/. 'y f6 H..% '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. =__ 4+00 .4 11 1;1j''111 ,' U O
-- '\ / '/. '/. '/. '/. '/. 'f.•.'/. '/. '/. '/. GWG 6 000 / .1 { 1 I ,'1( �I'/j/'
! (- CROSS SECTION 11'1i) , , • - - • ‘,11‘;r 1;
Ca„� -
, „ $1 I ql 0. \ ,',\,\:\v,1„\\\,\\\,',„4,1,,tw,;iii,
.
'
k'a_ I\i 1` '14'\ `1\i\\1
1 , S FILL EXISTING • • v'�1" I ,`�4„`�i�``''
-„ yr -----s:::::::-:n:
:c_-__-` _ x -----' ° 111'''""1\`I t',1;\ 1'1, 1I
�= REEK
-�'__s_ a_-c=�_r___ _---;;rs+ �`'�_,., \ __ x DITCH _ - `), •,, 1\I,,p,I ,II; 1,
_''1c\ -,,''cam --- __ '_ti``, \x • ,�_• ' \ `\1',,, \, `,,I,, 1jI 1li '
-'/-R.'-�` 1rB - ---- d,\'i 111 ,1\,i;li\iI,' I Ll,n'I"111'il1;;
.;`,``\ .-TB' _-_re- _ "� `X _ " \„ Ii I.' l �```�?`11`'`��II I: ,P1, 11'n II
(` � ^ \ \�x I \ i 1 \ �`i1`„`9 l 1 Ill\',1,1„1 ';1,1,,I
, \'•�` \\ •r- era- ---,,,- 0
\ \ r ;: ,'iU' �'�' 1 I 'II�'�iil,lri'''�`'",
\\ \1i \ _ '4 - - `'°(y AtIfik(- \ I II`\I1 \I" I, '11'l Q z
\ \ ,\, ,\, \ - ' /'1 I- - --_ --. �.,`.`'�. ` I\\„1\lilt ii",i I ll\\,\lili\I,i1\ il\,\1
3J -- _ `- ` .. „\'p„'^I\l\I 1 ,,,,i,1�I 1,,,,11\1,11\,\I
`\ \`` : \�\\\ `, \ - --''-/, Te` `�. ', 0' S0' 100' 150'
r aS0'_?- r` " ` \'1p\\I\\i\Innv, 11 i\;;1,1;,II1Zr„'\
\r' so'' ` `� ',11 1\ ,ll\ (HORIZONTAL) °�
q� aid; \„p,.� r / V'i! 1,\'vAtA,'1\11' m
33
`__- -` :\elo \d mod\ 1 I 1 11 Ii,\I"'PI\`\\1\'„lii 3 3' 3- u

v
c9 WPM.
'° Zone 1-Streambank Planting Zone 1
(See Detail 2,Sheet 6.07)
Streambank Planting Zone 1 Streambank Planting Zone 2 Q
Live Stakes Live Stakes 4 0 o
Zone 2-Streambank PlantingZone 2 `�`°�
Wetland Indicator Species Common Name Indiv.Spacing Size Stratum Wetland Indicator Status %of Stems d, °�v.
Species Common Name Indiv.Spacing Size Stratum Status %of Stems (See Detail 3,Sheet 6.07) _w Y z
Corn us amomum Silky Dogwood 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub FACW 15% Z °o s a v
Salix nigra Black Willow 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Canopy OBL 50% �io.,
Salix sericea Silky Willow 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub OBL 50% Q 0 — —
Cornus amomum SilkyDogwood 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub FACW 10%
Zone 3-Buffer PlantingZone i z a
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub OBL 15%occidentalis / (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) 'W _
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub OBL 5% Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub FAC 20% m
Salix sericea Silky Willow 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub OBL 25% 100%
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 6-8ft 0.5"-1.5"cal. Shrub FAC 10% - Zone 4-Wetland Planting Zone
Herbaceous Plugs r - (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07)
100% Juncos effucus Common Rush 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 30%
Herbaceous Plugs Carex lurida Lurid Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 10%
Zone 5-Permanent Seeding Outside Easement
Juncos effucus Common Rush 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 40%
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 20%
Carex lurida Lurid Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 10% Carex lupulina Hop Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 20% ��
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 10% Note:Non-hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 20% and will be planted as needed to achieve target density.
Carex lupulina Hop Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 10% Buffer planting will occur within the Limits of Disturbance ^
100% L
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 15%
Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 15% ,C
vl
100% _
r
jjjj/1 Wetland Planting Zone-Zone 4
Bare Root
Species Common Name Ind iv.Spacing Caliper Size Stratum Wetland Indicator Status %of Stems
Buffer Planting Zone-Zone 3
Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 15%
Bare Root Betula nigra River Birch 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 15%
Species Common Name Indiv.Spacing Caliper Size Stratum Wetland Indicator %of Stems Ulmus americana American Elm 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 15%
Statusft
Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 15% Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 15% a
Betula nigra River Birch 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 15% Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 10% •r�-I O
Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 10% Alnusserrulata Tag Alder 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Sub-Canopy OBL 10%
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 10% Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Sub-Canopy FAC 5% r ,
Ct
Asimina tribola Pawpaw 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Sub-Canopy FAC 5% Cephalanthus Buttonbush 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Shrub FAC 5% O V
occidentalis
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 10% ft a--'
Salix nigra Black Willow 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy OBL 5%
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 10% y 0
Nyssa biflora Swamp Gum 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 5%
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FACW 10% Z
100% 421
Ulmusrubra Slippery Elm 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Canopy FAC 10% •
,�\ [Ct
Herbaceous Plugs
Euonymus americanus Strawberry Bush 6-12ft 0.25"-1.0" Shrub FAC 5% Species Common Name Indiv.Spacing Size Stratum Wetland Indicator Status %of Stems C, r b!J
100% Juncos effucus Common Rush 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 30% ft
�"�
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb FACW 25% `�/ ro Ct
Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 25%
Carex lurida Lurid Sedge 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 10% ;-,
Peltandra virginica Arrow Arum 3-5ft 1.0"-2.0"plug Herb OBL 10% ;a.)
--i
Permanent Seeding Outside Easement-Zone 5 100% U E
Approved Dates Species Name Common Name Stratum Density(lbs/acre) cn
0 All Year Festuca arundinacea Tall Fescue Herb 40 a
All Year Dactylis glomerata Orchardgrass Herb 40 U 0
All Year Trifolium pratense Medium Red Clover Herb 5
All Year Trifolium repens White Ladino Cover Herb 5
90
Permanent Riparian Seeding Permanent Wetland Seeding Temporary Seeding
Pure Live Seed(20 lbs/acre) Pure Live Seed(20 lbs/acre) Pure Live Seed
Approved Dates Species Name Common Name Stratum Wetland Indicator Status Density(lbs/acre) Approved Dates Species Name Common Name Stratum Wetland Indicator Status Density(lbs/acre) Density
Approved Dates Species Name Common Name Stratum All-Year Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem Herb FACU 3.0 All-Year Coleataenia anceps Beaked Panicgrass Herb FAC 3.0 (lbs/acre)
All-Year Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed Susan Herb FACU 1.0 All-Year Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge Herb OBL 2.0 Aug 15-May 1 Avena sativa Winter Oats Herb 30
All-Year Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge Herb OBL 1.0 All-Year Carex lurida Lurid Sedge Herb OBL 0.5 Aug 15-May 1 Secale cereale Rye Grain Herb 110
A
All-Year Panicum clandestinum Deertongue Herb FAC 3.0 All-Year Elymus virginicus Virginia Wildrye Herb FACW 4.0 May 1-Aug 15 Urochloa ramosa Browntop Millet Herb 50
All-Year Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye Herb FACW 3.0 All-Year Panicum clandestinum Deertongue Herb FAC 3.0 All Year Trifolium pratense Medium Red Clover Herb 5
All-Year Sorghastrum nutans Indiangrass Herb FACU 2.0 All-Year Bidens aristosa Bur-Marigold Herb FACW 1.0 All Year Trifolium repens White Ladino Clover Herb 5
All-Year Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf coreopsis Herb FACU 1.0 All-Year Panicum virgatum Switchgrass Herb FAC 1.0 200
All-Year Bidens aristosa Bur-marigold Herb FACW 1.0 All-Year Polygonum pensylvanicum Smartweed Herb FAC 1.0 c
All-Year Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem Herb FAC 1.0 All-Year Panicum dichotomiflorum Panicgrass Herb FACW 1.0
All-Year Helianthus angustifolius Narrowleaf Sunflower Herb FACW 1.0 All-Year Tripsacum dactyloides Eastern Gamagrass Herb FACW 0.5
g6 z
All-Year Coreopsis tinctoria Plains Coreopsis Herb FAC 1.0 All-Year Helianthus angustifolius Narrowleaf Sunflower Herb FACW 1.0 CD3 All-Year Panicum virgatum Swtichgrass Herb FAC 2.0 All-Year Juncos effucus Common Rush Herb FACW 0.5 •
20.0 All-Year Chasmanthium latifolium River Oats Herb FACU 0.5 Cr)
All-Year Peltandra virginica Arrow Arum Herb OBL 1.0
20.0 E
Z 9 v
x
J

r Y 1
- z� �o
,,,,,,,l,.., 14.3.-
\N. t.)7-12z °tli
3.3 \\ N
W
• •• ��
'
1 1 `/ .a �L
.
Air44,4 /
44,---,<<, ,,, / . . ..,- \
',. <011114 ...----3 \\
CJ) O
ct
o
' r /. \,1/4
(y b� O0 2
z .,-,
\ t (...„, \ / \ r.,/'t 0 .5
m ��
. UAi" .
O
i - °
RI
\ \
\ /9kuw
Zone 1-Streambank Planting Zone 1 y
(See Detail 2,Sheet 6.07) i
o'
m
Zone 2-Streambank Planting Zone 2 .
(See Detail 3,Sheet 6.07)
cz, N
jZone 3-Buffer Planting Zone _ _
A (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) _
_ _ _ _ / O c
Zone 4-Wetland Planting Zone
- (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) n
Pi
61
Zone 5-Permanent Seeding Outside Easement o o ¢ z
•
Note:Non-hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated 0' 300' 600' 900'
and will be planted as needed to achieve target density. E
Buffer planting will occur within the Limits of Disturbance (HORIZONTAL) z _ J

Air: O n F\
o _o
\ \ moV�d0 C/O zQ 5$
Z �m
/ ,.,),/.2 0&,6.,. trai)1_ Li; 1 ',.,
/ .....„,C.11. . i 7 ryry
O -1w
i
I Air
Airl7Aiir At.:' ti
( /4/ '
�O
J •
•
c ��1) JJ �/ �33 33-30 3J 3 I ,� j
.4.
0 I pc
I (*
�� ...,_ ____NN
/ V I� p CLARKS CREEK
7
\ 4,
J. /4
\ (-,...)
i ; 40 �� `,r, . I\ .:,.
,L,
\ .0 .
0 .\ 7Alir • 2
up
x
i .... ‘9 .0001:"."' ,/4" ;-i
% 39-
per( a) t
,I on►/ I if \
U
` �. \ to
i cn o���v / Off•v
J� \
\\\
Zone 1-Stre,Sheet Planting Zone 1 •
a (See Detail 2,Sheet 6.07)
\ j��ii" O
o' �, CC`
_ Zone 2-Streambank Planting Zone 2 I
Em (See Detail 3,Sheet 6.07) \ /
p:
_ j �/ Zone 3-Buffer Planting Zone ` /
(See Detail l,Sheet 6.07) \
Zone 4-Wetland Planting Zone ` c
4, -Z• ,°,
(See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) `
g
Zone 5-Permanent Seeding Outside Easement � ¢
cicl N
Note:Non-hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated
\ ',�c
- and will be planted as needed to achieve target density. 0' 150' 300' 450'
Buffer planting will occur within the Limits of Disturbance \ / E
u \ (HORIZO MAL) m
_
3 9 a o u m
J

r \ \ `\ Y 1
\ -
/ b N
o\
\ z
` t.4'W I Ni w\------
\ �O \ Qz °r°i v
0 8
\ � \ iz '�' ryHa
\,., -,4 ..
F,',
_ _ _
_ -----
• _ ,... ____ ________,.
-i,,c, -
_ _ ,----
_______ ____
_ _ _ _ __
_ _
, _ _ ______—
. ......„ •_____„
\ 4 /�i�/..
4 9-...r
\ \ -411114110',4 .
•
33\3 �I ICLIfII�tr0 .�..A.o�� qC
00000i v000a. °
��� Q��No///�„ice-_-- �D�i„id.. //4\
czt
U
/ /cs
\ �i .% // ct
./ice .,, •
,1/ �'., /��,, % / •to + ° as
. // ,-• i,.
up
Zone 1-Streambank Planting Zone 1 , ___ /74 '� 0C
See Detail 2 Sheet 6.07 G / i
Zone 2-Streambank Planting Zone 2 �'4 j j �C x
(See Detail 3,Sheet 6.07) ,� ___ , j
Zone 3-Buffer Planting Zone �/, 40vt/ �i /' r
������� (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) �I ',
- Zone 4-Wetland Planting Zone / . ,,, ', U
- (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) /////
/ ` •
.
Zone 5-Permanent Seeding Outside Easement ;
• o
Note:Non-hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated / %pA.A.p��y-
and will beplanted as needed to achieve target density. �" %. •QO...:a®G•..
g .ram a.0141.�
Buffer plantingwill occur within the Limits of Disturbance V ��'AYAWVA��
.r..000i. ��i♦ CE
OJT ° 'voo..zs. vw \
.00ia/.VS z Cf
/ c ovi...m 'i
..v F
co f
3
S/C
/ R
CREEK e//
J� o ' PK
Ck
3 o
•
f /o A
0 100 200 300 o Co u
s .
(HORIZONTAL)
x J// I ❑" z ❑ u m
0 o u /h

r Y 1
w
�� / •
t).,
ri
os�
I � CE�CE�CE\ I z ___ a;/ �CE� � cF �E I
CE
CE CE ��///♦ .
cF ///
F
Sri/b���O%/IiiAra , �ii� .
\� / /ff,
G /
F /
O
SCE CE CE CE,/ •
O
O Q.
dJ
\ m
O
rF �J �m
rt
cc,
U\ \ o
37 3J\0 cF \ It
CE '13 c
F U
ce \J O
cn 0
F \ U o
\ JJ
F \
\ J
F` \
a \ J
\
, �� R
Zone 1-Streambank Planting Zone 1 / — \ v
(See Detail 2,Sheet 6.07) ,
O'
Zone 2-Streambank Planting Zone 2 ''\,,,,,
\ \
el (See Detail 3,Sheet 6.07)
C C' �J
� � Zone 3-Buffer Planting Zone \ \(, dj
(See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) \ F\ _
CF
Zone 4-Wetland Planting Zone \
- (See Detail 1,Sheet 6.07) /
,,2 I ,;A6 z
61
Note:Non-hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated I •
and will be planted as needed to achieve target density.uffer planting will occur within the Limits of Disturbance u Cr)`-
b 0' 100' 200' 300'
(HORIZONTAL m m
z q
" 9 a o , m

r Y 1
__ ____ 2 '`ul ti z� i'-1°!'i
il
az °��i
\ ..o0 1- _ ;.1H.
5.3 \`\
Altill _ —
1 •�•
. ,..
,,,s,
,..• .,„‘, _, .„.
.,<Q,
. s ,
..
. .
._
, , , „, .
, />,
, ., ‘, -
3
. , 4/c NN
, -,-0#--. A;),,, --if, „!..N
a U �\ rt
. z s..\-:•\
ct
\ 0 :.-1:7-'' ( \ rse,
' \ /
c� �_ j
\ , .P \ rs /' / //� .6 I
� �� \cF
1- 7 \ --
„ \ � \ U E
NA) cno
\ \ / cn b-C
/ten _ /,>>' i )
U
` u \ \
W 1 m � —
o •
•• 19xu� \• \
• / i \
t
Ei
\___________ I N
i °
PROPOSED WOVEN WIRE FENCE O
0 0 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN
SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.08
PA PROPOSED 5 STRAND HIGH TENSILE FENCE /I -".o''.'0
o ¢ Z
o.
0 0 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN o
'' ^^ SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 •
' `^1
\, \ PROPOSED DOUBLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE _ — /
•/ ' �° SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 •� 0' 300' 600' 900' v
R. (HORIZONTAL) E a
R. PROPOSED SINGLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE ' -2 ro
110 SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 A ° a o

d O I I
x 1
t • • •• U7
j I m I • Q v
12'STEEL GATE ,; I z 0 �o m
• /. �� SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 • Z .�N o
w
ti dw Yv
� 12'STEEL GATE � .�� I dr)�w o z
�� J SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 =03 ..� "' Q z 00 c
I. • �'
Hw
d J •m
12'STEEL GATE / .c l
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 e ---P
0 •
3
/0 0( \ .••••
• •/'
o
/
o
II
'Si
•
/
• O
/
'O m
• • /• I
/ WI
0 7.
44, It
•
Cc
•
•
Cc
• 1 • (-4, j rr)^ cf) 0
rt
\ 12'STEEL GATE �� F Q o U
• SEE DETAIL 4, 1 }'
• SHEET 6.08 / j I.., _ c6
i \ o.st si.
Ii
\ •
. W
.* :\\
'1 \ :C) :
\ / G
BRCF cFgNcN Cf ::c
N
U CD CD
wU
II I
cC\ CE - I ,
CF \ U\ . U
\ _,...-,
30 � cfCE\ o \ \ cn
c � J \ \� O
�� \JJ cfCE_________!" U I
3 \
\ E/CE/ z3s �O/ JJ\JJ •
C .5'6/ \JJ
30
\ 6/ \\ JJ---______ OC
CE/ N
3J\3J`// ,
CE J
J •
_ N •
PROPOSED WOVEN WIRE FENCE \
-Z.
O O 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN N
SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.08 c
PROPOSED 5 STRAND HIGH TENSILE FENCE
❑ ❑ 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN N.
m > '
61 SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 \ c. ¢
PROPOSED DOUBLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE N.
` •
SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 /\
PROPOSED SINGLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE 0' 150' 300' 450' .. _
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 (HORIZONTAL) E
z _ 3 9 v
LL
N

q \ \ -
.„. \ _ / b
\ \O Z� o
z m��
i �O YUrnw
• oZ'
HIGH TENSILE \ \---- d \ Q 0 ��
\ N � - rj0 1z --jHa
FENCE TO BE / \• --,w
INSTALLED ACROSS • \ CONNECT TO EXISTING FENCE
STREAM 4. , `\ _ _ ` \ 111 0 ....,�''`.�-� ,-';-,',
SEE DETAIL 2, — — \ f 0C
SHEET 6.08 _ -
\x re
12'STEEL GATE / • _ ��
SEE DETAIL 4,
•
SHEET 6.08 �� "• ,_ /'�
12'STEEL GATE u '�Y)
` • SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08
• 2-10'STEEL GATE u
• SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08
\' /, 2-10'STEEL GATE
II \ (it/ SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 p\�
• ,,,.., 12'STEEL GATE F, /
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 „or �'• ❑ pJ
v. */'� XI 30 ��O
• HIGH TENSILE FENCE TO BE /�� , G� pJ
12'STEEL GATE • ,. INSTALLED ALONG ROAD1:1 '
Ct
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 \,\,,,
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 �//
•r
• \x�> 0 NCO CIS
�, 12'STEEL GATE //
11"11400, e*fix SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.08 < U
OJ O
I 12'STEEL GATE • / - 2)
v �� `, SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET p0
�. 6.08 `- _
" ` .\` • OJ`�'// V ice b1J
a
----------------
\``x / �c •
OJ O
e ) '! ., 0 / U E
PROPOSED WOVEN WIRE FENCE
O O 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN a x�'�,\� .. /j HIGH TENSILE FENCE TO BE C
SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.08 ., lor INSTALLED ALONG ROAD Cn bA
�' SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 C
PROPOSED 5 STRAND HIGH TENSILE FENCE a \�" - ' OJO
•
❑ ❑ 0 ALONG CE WHERE SHOWN x x U
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 �`j-�`/\x�+ ° /�/
PROPOSED DOUBLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE \\'� O NCO " 2-10'STEEL GATE
SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 j SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08
//�� PROPOSED SINGLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE x\x\`- J�" �T
�o SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 �,�•- O O ,o jik / 12'STEEL GATE
P �, _ ,No \°' % x SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08
x\x�`. / �/1�®,:
O e `/ 07
12'STEEL GATE
�� •
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08�p :;/* •
/ • •
N
2-10'STEEL GATE / / \• CREEK
SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 /,,. \ CLARKS _
OO OJT O / \
`� ROAD TO BE WIDENED A, /
m• �
\.
Z CO
\ �O
x /
/ I-r.)
0' 100' 200' 300' 0 NCO
(HORIZONTAL) / I \ '
Z o
pp . J

12'STEEL GATE
g j SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 '
e
40 U7
12'STEEL GATE '' Q v
,Z
o m�
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 0 -ry�� T
QZOL wN
0 2, v Z H
• .2\'''''\ '' , ,-]
•
•
HIGH TENSILE FENCE TO BE \ ' e •' - a �'
INSTALLED ACROSS STREAM
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 \
\ _
G
•
,C.*
•
•
•
\ -\
• \ \�
•
,x rt
\ ▪ o
\ o U
▪ o
12'STEEL GATE •
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 / J V HCr) tJ
•_ CI)\ • O
U Ct
w
a
a) ai
U E
o fU
12'STEEL GATE
° SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08
1
- -------,„,
\ .
—
NPROPOSED WOVEN WIRE FENCE / "r
O 0 0 1'OFFSET FROM CE WHERE SHOWN \
SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.08 \ • \ ..
PROPOSED 5 STRAND HIGH TENSILE FENCE \ • \ _
0 0 0 ALONG CE WHERE SHOWN �� c
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 6.08 \ , 1
PROPOSED DOUBLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE /
SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.08 \ �� ¢ z �
3 PROPOSED SINGLE 2"TUBE STEEL GATE / 2 V:
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 6.08 AI ' ^
0' 100' 200' 300' u l
Lei (HORIZONTAL)
P E
v Z K ' v
O 9 a` O
•

f SEE PLAN/PROFILE V. ,
qRIFFLE MATERIAL TABLE FOR LENGTH
N REACH BOTTOM WIDTH(FT) RIFFLE THICKNESS(IN) RIFFLE MATERIAL STONE SIZE B
(%OF MATRIX) TOP OF BANK(TYP) Q N
BIG BRANCH 10 18 CLASS A(40%),CLASS B(50%),CLASS 1(10%) TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION Z 0
UT1 REACH 1 6.7 12 CLASS A(40%),CLASS B(60%) PER PROFILE Z m I o
%Nw
UT1 REACH 2 11 18 CLASS A(40%),CLASS B(60%) �� w Y z
UT1B 7.4 12 CLASS A(60%),CLASS B(40%) g&g& 1 z eon "
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION C"'0 - ., v
UT3 2.2 12 CLASS A(40%),CLASS B(40%),#57 STONE(20%) PER PROFILE z H a
NOTES: RIFFLE BOTTOM �^'"'
A A,
1.ALL RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN LIFTS AT A THICKNESS NOT TO EXCEED DMAX. FLOW WIDTH PER m
�..- � TYPICAL SECTIONS
TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
LOG MATERIAL TABLE FOR LOG VANES,LOG 1-HOOKS,AND LOG SILLS
REACH MINIMUM REQUIRED LOG DIAMETER(IN) MINIMUM REQUIRED LOG LENGTH(FT)
BIG BRANCH 18 25
UT1 REACH 2 12 17
UT1 REACH 2 12 21 Plan View
UT1B 12 17 B'
UT3 12 12 Y
TOP OF BANK(TYP) EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR
HEAD OF RIFFLE V V 0.3'UP BANK RIFFLE ELEVATION
FLOW f
W RIFFLE TAIL OF RIFFLE
BOULDER MATERIAL TABLE-ALL BOULDER STRUCTURES
REACH MINIMUM REQUIRED BOULDER DIAMETER(FT) ,A 4 \`"^` `•` \ \\\ A \ POOL .'�'\/� /\'�
BIG BRANCH 1.5 X 1.5 X 1 � \ \, \��'\ \\\ TOP OF BANK
UT1REACH2 1X1X1
UT1 REACH 2 1X1X1 ONSITE SALVAGED STONE TOE OF SLOPE
UT1B 1 X 1 X 1 Profile View A-A' Section B-B'
UT3 1X1X1 ct
a
NOTES:
1. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE MATERIAL CP 0
1 Material Sizing Tables 2 Native Material Riffle STONE SIZING AND THICKNESS. rt
}-� 2. COBBLE/GRAVEL CAN BE SALVAGED ON-SITE OR O U
6.01 Not to Scale )--( )--( )--( r 6.01 Not to Scale CONSIST OF ROUGH UNHEWN QUARRY STONE.
��__(-)(�_(-)(_��� 3. ONSITE SALVAGED STONE SHALL BE
HETEROGENEOUS AND WELL MIXED.
(CR-N M) y O
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION A (n
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION PER PROFILE ��� TOP OF BANK(TYP) i
PER PROFILE } _} TOE OF SLOPE(TYP) _
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION •6•-N)
THALWEG PER PROFILE IPZ`OIPZ.�1� ( Q
TOP OF BANK ONSITE ONE SALVAGED A TOE OF SLOPE(TYP) (CR-ALR) (cR-Jz) J1Ø
( )12"DIAMETER ORGREATER TYP FLOW NORMAWATEko/ HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONMAXSURFAPER PROFILETAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONTOP OF BANK TYP 'S"'Ii ( ) ONSITESALVAGEDPER PROFILE . I U E
TOP OF BANK STONE LSEE NOTE FOR BURY INTO BANK to O
� f-•-•- 1�_•11_•1_•. B Cn
�,� �� LOG SIZE TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION 3'MIN.(TYP) ; • z �11
�i�� 2 f FLOW PER PROFILE • '� ONSITE SALVAGED O
5'MIN. 1.Ox RIFFLE ��`� `%�s® _ -r IllIill el
(TYP) I
7. - \' ���.00\�\\ ® ., ,1 -• �-=0 STONE U
DMAX WOVEN ,/. . " ����Y_,
FILTER FABRIC 5'MIN.Profile View A-A' • • (TYP) NON WOVEN WOVEN FILTER FABRIC FORBURY INTO BANKONSITE SALVAGED 5'MIN.(TYP) STONE FILTER FABRIC FOR LOG� �� - STRUCTURE TYP EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL/ / ( )0.3'UP BANKBRUSH PACK OR Profile View A-A'HERBACEOUS PLUG• , p (TYP)
I-• ,Z ROCK VANE MAY USED
TOE OF SLOPE -:•' ) "��I,- �,' IN PLACE OF ROCK AT
TOP OF BANK TYP �IR��ria I -pE-� ENGINEER'S DISCRETION
\�`v\�`�`�`�`� 0�_4� L\ L\ La ) = = = : EXCAVATE SMALL POOLS 41 '1
�„� AMR; lOx RIFFLE DMAX IN DEPTH 1_•�: It
�. �.o�o DOWNSTREAM LOG STRUCTURE EXPOSED EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL "�_�'� •'
o • • • • 0.3'UPBANK
.4
S r \n ,\r. ,\,a ,\,a \ \\ UNTIL CENTER OF CHANNEL '�
��4,0Z' - OF IMBEDDED LOGS 1 •-•�
MIN.5'(TYP) _ MIN.5'(TYP) B � �� � TOE OF TOP OF BANK(TYP) r \ KG
.I� 1� • ./x. /x. * SLOPE
Log Section B-B' TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION A'
�� PER PROFILE
NOTES: ��,.' .. `
�� -�-.- Plan View
11 1. BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE OF s" T\ � />. NOTES:
ANGLED LOGS WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER. 1,,--
,, B z LOG i LOG 1. STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN SIZE AND TYPE WITHIN EACH RIFFLE
2. MINIMUM ONE LOG PER 10 LF OF RIFFLE LENGTH OR ONE TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION 3 3 2. ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR LOGS AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. 0 6
--
LOG PER 0.3'OF DROP,WHICHEVER IS LESSER. PER PROFILE 3. EACH LOG SHALL BE ANGLED UPSTREAM TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND z � i
3. SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.01 FOR MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER. A Log Section B-B' DOWNWARD IN THE CHANNEL BED AS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL. O
4. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE MATERIAL STONE SIZING 4. LOGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 18 INCHES AND AT LEAST 15 FEET LONG •
AND THICKNESS. 3 Angled Log Riffle 4 Jazz Riffle ON BIG BRANCH.
5. IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT WILL BE SHOWN IN THE 6.01 Plan View 6.01 5. IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT WILL BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS.REFER TO DETAIL 3 -
Not to Scale Not to Scale c
PLANS.REFER TO DETAIL 3 SHEET 6.04 FOR THIS FINAL SHEET 6.04 FOR THIS FINAL STRUCTURE. `° v
x z
STRUCTURE. 6. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE MATERIAL STONE SIZING AND THICKNESS. o" �E o u m

r Y -
NOTES: SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR LENGTH
1. LARGER MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF CLASS 1
STONE OR SALVAGED ONSITE BOULDERS OF TOP OF BANK(TYP) B
MINIMUM SIZE 0.5'X1.0'X1.5'. Q
2. THE MAXIMUM DIMENSION OF THE BOULDER Z �o m
SHALL NOT EXCEED THREE TIMES THE MINIMUM Z N I w
DIMENSION.
3. THE LAYOUT OF THE BOULDERS IS SHOWN IN THE HEAD OF RIFFLE TAIL OF RIFFLE 1 t g r @
DETAIL.MAXIMUM 3"OF BOULDER SHALL BE ELEVATION ELEVATION Q .eo
v
PLACED ABOVE THE RIFFLE BED MATERIAL TO PER PROFILE PER PROFILE 1 Z —j"y H a
CREATE CONCENTRATED FLOW PATHS AND FLOW w
MICRO-POOLS THROUGH THE RIFFLE TO IA
ENHANCE INSTREAM HABITAT.
4. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE STONE
SIZING AND THICKNESS. TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
5. COBBLE/GRAVEL CAN BE SALVAGED ON-SITE OR >
CONSIST OF ROUGH UNHEWN QUARRY STONE.
KEY LARGER MATERIAL INTO BANKS B_ ON SITE SALVAGED STONE
INTERMITTENTLY ALONG RIFFLE LENGTH
TO PREVENT PREFERENTIAL FLOW Plan View
ALONG TOE OF SLOPE
SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR Y Y
RIFFLE ELEVATION
ONSITE SALVAGED SEE NOTE FOR TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
STONE LARGER MATERIAL SEE NOTE FOR
SIZE LARGER MATERIAL SIZE
FLOW 3"MAX TOP OF BANK(TYP)
3"MAX
KEY LARGER MATERIAL OTHER LARGER
INTERMITTENTLY ALONG MATERIAL MIN.
RIFFLE LENGTH 18"FROM
Profile View A-A' TOE OF SLOPE (t
RIFFLE MATERIAL:PLACE TO a
MAINTAIN THALWEG WITHIN Section B-B' O
CENTRAL 2/3 OF CHANNEL CIS 0
ct
1 Chunky Riffle ct
o U
6.02 Not to Scale
(CR-CH) -I--) O
SEE TYPICAL SECTION ,�
FOR POOL WIDTH � •ct
SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR A B I u
STEP ELEVATION LOG STEP(TYP) LSP j rft �
FLOW r
_ TOP OF BANK(TYP) 'x
— �•11\ — — _ — — EXTEND BACKFILL
IIIII' "" \ I`'I�I 1 STREAMBED f MIN.3'TO SEAL AND SEE
III IC ��e I E PROTECT LOG STEP PLAN/PROFILE r ,
11=� �I: .:: V
�11 n' ��I� —III
TOE OF -iii FOR SCOUR
o °Oo•� o 000'oo' SLOPE(TYP) — — Cn C
oo°°oo°III °oopO • (i SEE PLAN/PROFILE j I� •i�-.� )ll — — POOL DEPTH c
o•a°,V�'I� ° oo°o II SCOUR FOR STEP HEIGHT -11111-111ll 111 °°° ° Q
FLOW SCOUR -- ° o00..11ll SCOUR_ — pO ig. II, II I II TI° II II II II II iga8°
POOL opOo°O elh� POOL °oo°o° it POOL =III I1 1411=1E11=111E11=11 0
°opOO°III I o° a I, _- mil 11M111 II =11�1 = [11[1 U
°O o° i
pOo 03 pOoopOo• EXTEND FILTER FABRIC = ' Ail II..,II II II II II II II 1
MIN.5'UPSTREAM =11111EllpiimAi
SEE PLAN/PROFILE
,• a �i WOVEN FILTER FABRIC FOR STEP LENGTH
71�� IIIII6
� _ � �I1Lilay' — — � II ..... —________ _ -------
WELL GRADED MIX OF
ADD BRUSH PACK OR ONSITE SALVAGED STONE
MIN.3'OF BACKFILL WITH HERBACEOUS PLUG
ONSITE SALVAGED STONE A' PER DIRECTION OF B� LOG STEP(TYP)
ENGINEER Profile View
Step Pool Plan View
NOTES:
A 1. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER.
cl 2. FOOTER LOGS TO BE ADDED AS NECESSARY IF POOL DEPTH IS CHANNEL MORE THAN HEADER LOG DIAMETER. BOTTOM WIDTH _
3. THE TOP EDGE OF FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE FOLDED AND NAILED CONNECT TO
TO HEADER LOG. TOP OF BANK(TYP1 EXISTING GROUND
4. SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR LOCATION AND ELEVATION . .i ,��gg Z'Z 1
OF INDIVIDUAL STEPS.STEP HEIGHTS ON UT1 VARY BETWEEN 0.5 1 c
AND 0.8 FEET.STEP HEIGHTS ON UT1B AND UT3 VARY BETWEEN , /, 5 SEE NOTE FOR LOG SIZE
0.5 AND 1.OFEET. i i i i i i i i i
5. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE MATERIAL STONE SIZING HEADER LOG ,
U" AND THICKNESS. EMBED LOG MIN. _ _ FOOTER LOG ONSITE SALVAGED ,, y' z
6. A MINIMUM OF 16 INCHES OF ONSITE SALVAGED STONE SHALL 5'INTO BANK STONE Section B-B'
3 BE PLACED OVER FILTER FABRIC UPSTREAM OF THE LOG STEP. STEP ELEVATION Riffle Cross Section O
PER PROFILE(TYP)
Section A-A' /1
Step Cross Section 2 Log Step Pool \L�
o 6.02 Not to Scale "
X
Z 9 v
Oc` 3 3 -n
o

r Y -
SEE TYPICAL SECTION
FOR POOL WIDTH
E.
—A — B
SEE PLAN/PROFILE Q
FOR STEP ELEVATION BOULDER STEP(TYP) Z 0 ,',l'm m
FLOW 't -��w
_ _ lore------ — n TOP OF BANK(TYP) ��
\_ — STREA y EXTEND BACKFILL MIN.3' t w o- z
+ MBED°°° — TO SEAL AND PROTECT SEE Z eo_ "
• BOULDER STEP PLAN/PROFILE Q i ; H a
ATI I°°i°a" FOR SCOUR
op00•c MO 0000°000 - - - r POOL DEPTH H W
�� o SEE PLAN/PROFILE_ II A.
FLOW SCOUR '-- °o 0.w •Ooo°;� SCOUR FOR STEP HEIGHT IIAIL,,TIATAITAIl All TI II ° II II m
POOL o°° 7 SCOUR o 000 , POOL -11=111II,,111„,�i II ° - P _ _ _ _
°°
o° POOL o o• II— — -
°o° •O°o�• _ ll1,, II Il .11yl —HAM II II —HAM —HAM II
o°°Oo� °'Qo°oO� EXTEND FILTER FABRIC 'i=IIIII-1ll„
o °. _ ,oa„°o °_ TOE OF MIN.5'UPSTREAM '�III 1111
�� — �1 SLOPE(TYP) SEE PLAN/PROFILE y —III
NON WOVEN FOR STEP LENGTH
FILTER FABRIC
El - 6
WELL GRADED MIX OF A,
MIN.3'OF BACKFILL WITH ONSITE SALVAGED STONE Profile View
ONSITE SALVAGED STONE
A —
B BOULDER STEP ///'''��;
NOTES: (TYP) .� )
1. BOULDERS CAN BE SALVAGED ON-SITE OR CONSIST OF ROUGH UNHEWN Step Pool Plan View y
QUARRY STONE.
2. BOULDERS SHALL BE SOUND,DENSE,AND FREE OF FRACTURES.
3. BOULDERS SHALL BE BLOCKY IN SHAPE SUCH THAT THEY ARE STACKABLE.
4. THE MINIMUM INTERMEDIATE AXIS SHALL MEET THE DIMENSIONS
SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE IN DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01.THE MAXIMUM TOP OF BANK
DIMENSION OF THE BOULDER SHALL NOT EXCEED THREE TIMES THE SEE PLAN PROFILE
MINIMUM DIMENSION. FOR STEP ELEVATION
5. THE LAYOUT OF THE BOULDERS IS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. CONNECT TO
6. SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING GROUND
INDIVIDUAL STEPS.STEP HEIGHTS ON UT1 AND UT1 B VARY BETWEEN 0.5 �" z'I 11
AND 0.8 FEET.STEP HEIGHTS ON UT3 VARY BETWEEN 0.5 AND 1.0 FEET.
7. BOULDERS SHALL BE ARRANGED SUCH THAT VOID SPACES ARE ELIMINATED
OR REDUCED.ANY REMAINING VOID SPACES BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE
CHINKED WITH SMALLER,ONSITE SALVAGED STONE. EXTEND 2 BOULDERS ONSITE SALVAGED
8. ALL ONSITE SALVAGED STONE SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS AND WELL BEYOND TOP OF BANK STONE Section B-B'
ct
MIXED.IF ONSITE SALVAGED STONE IS NOT AVAILABLE,QUARRY STONE Section A-A' Riffle Cross Section Cli
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. Step Cross Section
9. A MINIMUM OF 16 INCHES OF SALVAGED ON-SITE STONE SHALL BE PLACED CA O
OVER FILTER FABRIC UPSTREAM OF THE BOULDER STEP.
1 Boulder Step Pool Cu
6.03 Not to Scale
O
•. z
TOP OF BOULDER ‘,•.),'+,'4,•.),edip �;
SHALL MATCH ? � '5 - rt
EXISTING GRADE
AIL _ PO-4
u 1_ wee --
• I, SEE TYPICAL SECTION
�II.,, SEE TYPICAL FOR DEPTH -- FOR POOL WIDTH f""
411 1 _ • r , O
Aft, - USE VARIABLE SIZE DOUBLE STACK BOULDER AT �(n
BOULDERS TO CREATE — A B TOP OF BANK START OF CASCADE O E
MULTIPLE FLOWPATHS - -- i~
BACKFILL WITH ONSITE SALVAGED STONE — — — — U
1 ON SITE SALVAGED STONE --
Section A-A'
r�..� TOE OF BANK `:Oh4 �• SFFp/ 1
BOULDER AT BASE OF CASCADE SHALL `�. _ 1 • '(O N/p
�- CASCADE HEIGHT VARIES
EXTEND TO TOP OF BANK _-1` s it •� '°- 'P S< RO,c
i�1' 1 �, OPe /4e PER PROFILE
FLOW ! �•�- SCOUR �'7f�7f—_IIK
L ,,i . NON WOVEN II II II II II
HEADER BOULDER '� II 1 �? POOL FILTER FABRIC II =11 =11 II` �•
.��-4-4� ►
TOP OF BANK �f�' � Ir� �I� ��� �
I TI TIC rl •-i11101 .„ II 1=
?'1 SEE TYPICAL 1 EXISTING SOIL �fI�f-1fF ' -� �f __
T. — - \i II aialial-11a11a11a11a11 1 IIII1 ,.,i.T�,,-77.,—T�-_
\ CASCADE ` — — / EXCAVATE TO ACHIEVE SEE PLAN/PROFILE
3 —
N APPROPRIATE SUBGRADEFOR SCOUR POOL DEPTH
a l� 1 NON WOVEN
3 FOOTER BOULDER �`---�/C• A' B' FILTER FABRIC
cl Profile
Section B-B' Cascade Sequence Plan View
• NOTES:
1.BOULDERS CAN BE SALVAGED ON-SITE OR CONSIST OF ROUGH UNHEWN QUARRY STONE. =
• 2.BOULDERS SHALL BE SOUND,DENSE,AND FREE OF FRACTURES. c
3.BOULDERS SHALL BE BLOCKY IN SHAPE SUCH THAT THEY ARE STACKABLE.
• 4.SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR MINIMUM BOULDER SIZING.THE MAXIMUM DIMENSION OF THE BOULDER SHALL NOT EXCEED o ¢ ,
THREE TIMES THE MINIMUM DIMENSION. r8 z
3 5.THE LAYOUT OF THE BOULDERS IS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. O
6.BOULDERS SHALL BE ARRANGED SUCH THAT VOID SPACES ARE ELIMINATED OR REDUCED.ANY REMAINING VOID SPACES BETWEEN 2 Boulder Cascade ••
BOULDERS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH SMALLER,ONSITE SALVAGED STONE. 6.03 Not to Scale
7.ALL ONSITE SALVAGED STONE SHALL BE HETEROGENOUS AND WELL MIXED.IF ONSITE SALVAGED STONE IS NOT AVAILABLE, v
QUARRY STONE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. a `v
x 3 z o L u us,
J

r Y 1
EXTEND ONSITE SALVAGED �`O
ROCK TOWARDS BANK PARALLEL BACKFILL WITH ONSITE Q
WITH LOG ELEVATION a..�D �'
A. \ �Q SALVAGED STONE 'Z z `�$��'
Q
�.�\ �G� pitoc,.9
1Q,,' HEADER LOG d'w z l�j'' ensiwSEE PLANS FOR �,�� P4 ���• FOOTER LOG z 8�°POOL WIDTH p'(P � � O Ojryw�, �`"I I Q 0 -°`��� .Air I Off' O� ��,J�j��ti�tij��� � �l i z ,' �"a
ONSITE SALVAGED STONE SIMILAR IN SIZE di It
.%t'-- �O¢ ?�j�`y i2��.'�`7iX�J'L=III_® �,'"�- 44- '6QI. i TO ABC,CLASS A,AND CLASS B MIX B'
Anett,t� WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
i•0e•eil..! RJQ��� BURY LOG INTO EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
/a1- /•I- /�I- °i ,,P STREAMBED
4jC ito �� �0 O i> - 5'MIN.UPSTREAM
ON SITE SALVAGED STONE 'y'/fiI,/.I,4,da I- -I SEE PLANS FOR POOL WIDTH _ SCOUR
SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC, P. .. I. 1" / / /�
CLASS A,AND CLASS B MIX �;/�;�/ ;, SEE PLANS FOR \�\�\\�\\�\/\ /��\ �\\��\ B POOL ` STABILIZE ONE BOULDER Section A-A'
/.I. 1.0. /.I `y /
,. ,. . . POOL LENGTH /�\��/\/T��/���/\/ ON EACH SIDE
/.�//.�//.�//., NON WOVEN
A �0 �0 lit
�, A' FILTER FABRIC y
Ly
I / / I / IMIN 5'BURIED ^
7N WOO ��� Section A-A'
INTO BANK Y Y
V•/�I.r.IaIM/ EXCAVATE POOL TOP OF BANK(TYP)
,�;/t SO. PER PROFILE Y y
TOP OF BANK(TYP) /1 `/•o I Plan View� (SiL
TOP OF BANK(TYP) =��`E TOE OF H
- � SLOPE(TYP)
DIMENSIONS(TYP) HEADER LOG ----
1t FLOW
SEE NOTE FOR LOG SIZE
Plan View DIMENSIONS UT1 R1 BIG BRANCH
X(FT) 14 20 FOOTER LOG TAIL OF RIFFLE
Y(FT) 3.4 5.4 ELEVATIONPER PROFILE
H(FT) 0.4 0.6
B(DEGREE) 25 25 Section B-B ft
NOTES: S(%) VARIES 3.0-5.0
1. IF NECESSARY,ONSITE SALVAGED •r-1---I O
STONE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH CI) 0
QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE. NOTES: l
2. THE AVERAGE THICKNESS OF ONSITE Rock Outlet 'vvv 1. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER. O r ,
• V
SALVAGED STONE ON THE BANKS OF _- 2. SEE TABLE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS.
THE POOL SHALL BE 6 INCHES. �� Log Vane 3. ON SMALLER STREAMS,THE STABILIZATION BOULDERS
Not to Scale • i 2
>'.� MAY BE REMOVED PER ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
6.04 Not to Scale
z
ADD BRUSH TOE ASct
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER C n > > E
1- 1- O
BACKFILL WITH ONSITE n/ r ,
w ISALVAGEDSTONE
- V
HEADER LOG m O 2�
N 0
BACKFILL WITH ONSITE FLOW �,,,�
• SALVAGED STONE �� 0 O A a) tj
POOL LENGTH PER PROFILE 1- O� U E
ll STREAMBED 5' Y� K cn 0
A \• ll lll lll lll o C� _ \\ ��� 0 - '
fin jjllljjJ ICI jjIII II-IIIM goo II-POOL DEPTH PER PROFILE r�
POOL llll.:.11lll.:.11lN=111N°0 o°ooeo-� li-Ill ii-ii B' A, B .�. i ?. v
ii ii-iii ii-iii ii ii_m i , EXTENDFILTER_II
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC TO BE INSTALLED
SILL ELEVATION FABRIC 5'MIN. TO TWICE THE RIFFLE DEPTH
ENTIRE LENGTH OF LOG >, WOVEN FILTER FABRIC FOOTER LOG PER PROFILE UPSTREAM OR A MINIMUM OF 3'
A EXTEND FILTER FABRIC Plan View Section A-A'
SILL ELEVATION 5'MIN UPSTREAM
PER PROFILE(TYP)
`� Profile View
o oQ
BACKFILL WITH ONSITE '�f ci TOP OF BANK
SALVAGED STONE O� ?�
�O� ��P A CHANNEL SILL ELEVATION
O - PER PROFILE
BOTTOM WIDTH
3 TY TOP OF BANK PI HEADER ROCK
Plan View '
\� SEE NOTE FOR LOG SIZE FOOTER ROCK
2'MIN.
HEADER LOG IFFOOTERED
EMBED 5'INTO
EMBED LOG MIN. - FOOTER LOG BANK(TYP)
5'INTO BANK Section B-B' c
NOTES: SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE(TYP)
1. SEE DETAIL I SHEET 6.01 FOR MINIMUM LOG m
DIAMETER AND LENGTH. Section A-A' o a z
2. FOOTER LOGS TO BE ADDED AS NECESSARY WHERE
cl cl 71.1
POOL DEPTH IS MORE THAN HEADER LOG DIAMETER 2 8O
(UT1,UT1B,AND SOMETIMES UT3).
3. THE TOP EDGE OF FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE FOLDED NOTES:AND NAILED TO HEADER LOG. 3 Log Sill 4 Boulder Sill 1. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01 FOR BOULDER DIMENSIONS.
6.04 Not to Scale 6.04 Not to Scale
v z _ 3 9 v
J

r Y 1
Q
4 J,o
Z N rn
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS - � '''1_
� �
�w oz,v z °.�
DENSELY PACKED SOIL BACKFILL C-0 = _ w
WOODY DEBRIS EROSION CONTROL i 1 z a
-j H
A MATTING 6" - TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL) H
/,-/ /\/ EROSION CONTROL MATTING
�� ELEV.0.3 ABOVE /•. /♦//\//\\ /\/\////// /�
EXTEND BRUSH DOWNSTREAM /\/\/�/�
TOE BEYOND HEAD RIFFLE INVERT / /. "\
-S.t° OF RIFFLE.SEE DENSELY PACKED BRUSH,WOODY DEBRIS,AND SOIL /� ///
pF�PN�` NOTE FOR .114'MINIMUM / /\�//\�/\// r\
-s e fie\ LENGTHS % I i.I TOE OF SLOPE / //%/\j/�\\//\/
�pF p N `del w /\////\ \\<//\//1 /' '�
OFS�OeE Q L ELEV.6"BELOW NATIVE SOIL MIN EXTEND I
-SOC" N�`.��e\ A' POOL DEPTH BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED
FLUSH WITH BANK
Plan View Section A-A'
NOTES:
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3'OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL).
2. EXTEND BRUSH TOE 5'BEYOND HEAD OF RIFFLE ON ALL STREAMS.
3. INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS,WHICH SHALL CONSIST OF
SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID (t
SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER. Q) .
4. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND IS r�-I O
INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM. C 0
1 Brush Toe 5. INSTALL MATTING OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS. (t
6.05 Not to Scale 6. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING TO TYPICAL ''lL Cu
SECTION DIMENSIONS. W-.,
7. SEED,MULCH AND WRAP EROSION CONTROL MATTING UP OVER BACKFILL. � 1IL I
O
s.o' Z
TOP OF FOOTER ROCK ,-I
AT CHANNEL r •'�
0 TOP OF DITCH(TYP) CJ I
INVERT ELEVATION \ //\/\\ // Ni...„ \/ \ //\/\\/
y— O 0 ��\/ \ \%\\/j\%\-\ \j\\/%\%\ \\/
d i\\�\\/,„›\\ \\/i\i\\�\\/i\i� ct p �1
A :\\\ \\%\\%\\/ \ \ i\\i\\/ \i\\�\\\\ A'
11 6 HEADER ROCK EXISTING DITCH FLOW \ \..\\/��/\"/\\/\\/ \/\ \ \\/\\/ \\/ \\ a
H2._..d
TOE OF SLOPE I I FOOTER ROCK \�\�\\/\\�%\%\\j\ \\//\\/%\\/\\%\\ \ r ,
iZ ,' / -ip. of� Cf Cf r, 60 /\%\\%\\/\�. ),;)\\//� \\�-\%. ).) \\�\%\\%\\ BOTTOM OF DITCH(TYP) VCn 0
c= '�) 1�♦'♦�1�♦'♦�♦ ' 40fj DITCH BACKFILL0
�✓r♦rri✓r♦r ���"� TOP OFDITCH(TYP)
� / G�O�i.�.G Plan View O
INVERT ELEVATION 1
. LJ
j(' SCOUR PER PROFILE CLAY PLUG
2
��' POOL NONWOVEN
� :E./1 FILTER FABRIC BACKFILL WITH ONSITE CLAY MATERIAL PLACED IN 6"TO 8"LIFTS
%k SALVAGED STONE
i/// EXCAVATE POOL 5'MIN. EACH LIFT SHOULD BE A SHEEP'S FOOT TROLLER OR SIMILAR
USING
q PER DIRECTION
p OF THE ENGINEER Section A-A'
: '''
4,f o TRIM FILTER FABRIC NON WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
=�`j' O BELOW GRADED SURFACE
a ! / n
Y = ! O y DITCH BACKFILL
J= m z INVERT ELEVATION
In o j BANK TIE IN PER PROFILE(TYP) \
~ -- TOP OF BANK(TYP) /\/\\ \ 6"TO 8"LIFT
j EXISTING DITCH FLOW \/ " \/\//
,e PLACE HEADER BOULDER _ _ - _ .SLOB p S = FLAW \\\/\j\\jam��
o"
TO PREVENT LOG —_ .i�.i� ./\/\\\\\ ,\i-
FROM SHIFTING `� = ��
SEE NOTE FOR LOG SIZE
Plan View
Profile B-B' 8.0'
EXISTING DITCH BOTTOM
DIMENSIONS(TYP)
Profile A-A'
el DIMENSIONS BIG BRANCH NOTES: o ¢ /'�
X(FT) 20 1. CLAY MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED Y ENGINEER O
OR ON-SITE INSPECTOR.
NOTES: Y(FT) 5.4 2. ALL WOODY AND HERBACEOUS VEGETATION
1. MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER IS 18 INCHES FOR BIG Log HOOK H(FT) 0.6 MUST BE REMOVED FROM AREA TO BE n
BRANCH(DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01). 23 Wetland Ditch Plug PLUGGED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. _ �✓
2. MINIMUM BOULDER DIMENSION IS 1.5'X 1.5'X 1' 6.05 Not to Scale B(DEGREE) 25 6.05 Not to Scale 3. PLUG SHOULD EXTEND FROM TOP OF DITCH "
`1',.
x 3. SEE TABLE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSION.(DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.01). S(%) VARIES 3.0-5.0 TO TOP OF DITCH WITHIN THE DITCH CROSS LL m a
v
z ,,
SECTION. o" ,a o 1, m
J

r Y 1
} 1 EROSION CONTROL PROPOSED END
MIN.2'(TYP) MATTING GRADE PER PLANS cq
II SWALE TOP OF BANK(TYP) Q N
PROPOSED START = 51,I.;i.fril•.i* 4 z o f m
:4* r
GRADE PER PLANS • ;;�. Ca
v
TO
�I I, © r� O r� r. w
I c
i IF" SWALE TOP OF BANK(TYP)
MIN.2'(TYP) 1,
II I THALWEG SEE NOTE FOR RIFFLE
INFORMATION
/ Plan View
SEE WETLAND PLAN FOR / MIN.12" ,
LOCATION OF GRADE JJJ DIAMETER LOG
CONTROL LOG Y
PROPOSED START
GRADE PER PLANS EROSION CONTROL
THALWEG MATTING
LIVE STAKE OFFSET 1-2' '�
TOP OF BANK 5'WIDTH FROM TOP OF BANK
FLOW MIN.12" TIE TO PROPOSED GRADE(TYP)
w DIAMETER LOG ,1
0.3'MAX. PROPOSED END TOP OF BANK(TYP) �+ _
.._.� GRADE PER PLANS \//\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\ 4n �� /\/\\/\\/\\/\ \\/\\/\\/:\
�4444‘iZ I/ \\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\ \\/\\\/\\\/\\\\\\\ \\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\/\\\/
5'MIN. WOVEN SEE NOTE FOR
(TYP) FILTER FABRIC ONSITE SALVAGED SEE NOTE FOR RIFFLE SWALE DEPTH
STONE INFORMATION THALWEG HERBACEOUS PLUGS
BETWEEN THALWEG AND
TOP OF BANK(TYP) ft
Section A-A' Section B-B' NOTES:
1. DEPTH OF SWALE VARIES. MAXIMUM DEPTH SHALL NOT
EXCEED 0.5'. C
2. SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET 6.01 FOR RIFFLE MATERIAL STONE SIZING
AND THICKNESS-REFER TO UT1 REACH 1 IN TABLE. rt
3. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE,HANDLING, 0 U
1 Wetland Swale AND INSTALLATION OF HERBACEOUS PLUGS AND LIVE STAKES. -
SEE DETAIL 3,SHEET 6.07 FOR ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION OF
6.06 Not to Scale HERBACEOUS PLUG AND LIVE STAKE INSTALLATION. O
z
SCt
Ct O
U
u E
cn
3
S
cl
o z
Z t 3 ' v
x
J

r V. 1
BUFFER WIDTH DIBBLE BAR TOP OF
VARIES BANK EROSION CONTROL
e a PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A MATTING
,' BANKFULL BLADE WITH ATRIANGULAR CROSS n
SECTION AND SHALL BE 12"LONG, _ 2� � �I 4"WIDE,AND 1"THICK AT CENTER. ZO �▪o�m
RESTORED 'n HERBACEOUS PLUGS Z m
�Nrn
CHANNEL ' AT NORMAL BASEFLOW r 11:31/1-
u Y TOE(TYP) /���/ w o z
ROOTING PRUNING Q\p TOE OF SLOPE• �� ~ �' G
SPACING PER Z ▪ N''
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED TO \\/)\• w
PLANTING PLAN AN APPROPRIATE LENGTH TO TOE OF BASEFLOW W.S. _ \.•
Section View PREVENTJ-ROOTING. SLOPE `�
/�/�/ lfi\.Y '
0
O 0
0
O O LINEAR SPACING Section View
4'SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS Zone 1(Clarks Creek&Big Branch)
6'SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
.ry ' .A �' *:;p �, �;! ' ;;;�Xy 3'SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS
r `, `' k), Ike 3'SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES,2 ROWS
\\ ,\\ `\ BUDS(NODES)POINTED UPWARD\ \ \ � ♦\ \ \ \"A \ �\ \ \K.Sj� Plan View
1111111111111111111111
jer
It �,�e�,,/�ifi,� ,�i,, � � � ',��i,,\ ,�i,, y�%.� ?�,�e�,,/�ifi,� r�iT•'r�� � �c \ . Z �� r�`'/5�, � * Zone 1(Clarks Creek&Big Branch) ��
?i.'�i�YOX�X�� Ce.yii.�' .'G'.Y�i.Z 7i.2`�L'�i� i.Z�'a• L .'G'.Y�iX�� Ce.yii.�' �X�iX�S 7i.2`�d. i.Z e ����i,,'�i�.�i.Z 7i.2`�L D'%i'�i ?i'O z-11"DIAMETER
INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR PUSH THE DIBBLE,OR PULL BACK ON THE HANDLE TO REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR
SHOVEL,STRAIGHT DOWN SHOVEL,AND PUSH THE SHOVEL,SEVERAL INCHES IN SHOVEL,DOWN TO THE CLOSE THE BOTTOM OF THE SHOVEL,AND CLOSE AND FIRM BASE CUT AT 45°
INTO THE SOIL TO THE FULL SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP INTO FRONT OF THE SEEDLING FULL DEPTH OF THE BLADE. PLANTING HOLD.THEN PUSH UP THE OPENING WITH YOUR A A, -FA A TOP OF BANK
DEPTH OF THE BLADE AND THE PLANTING HOLE.PULL THE AND PUSH THE BLADE FORWARD TO CLOSE THE TOP, HEEL.BE CAREFUL TO AVOID 3' H-3'-1
PULL BACK ON THE HANDLE SEEDLING BACK UP TO THE HALFWAY INTO THE SOIL. ELIMINATING AIR POCKETS DAMAGING THE SEEDLING. A —t_ ,y, A
TO OPEN THE PLANTING CORRECT PLANTING DEPTH TWIST AND PUSH THE AROUND THE ROOT. 1— LIVE STAKE(TYP)
HOLE.(DO NOT ROCK THE (THE ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE HANDLE FORWARD TO 2 SHOVEL BACK AND FORTH 1-3"BELOW THE SOIL CLOSE THE TOP OF THE SLIT a1 1 ROW,6'SPACINGRIFFLE o 0 0 0 0 o o (RIFFLE) Live Stake Detail
AS THIS CAUSES SOIL IN THE SURFACE).GENTLY SHAKE THE TO HOLD THE SEEDLING IN I 3'-"-I 2 ROWS,3X3'STAGGERED SPACING(POOL) H3'-'1
PLANTING HOLE TO BE SEEDLING TO ALLOW THE PLACE.
COMPACTED,INHIBITING ROOTS TO STRAIGHTEN OUT.
ROOT GROWTH. DO NOT TWIST OR SPIN THE Stream Bank View TOE OF STREAM BANK SLOPE(RIFFLE), NOTES:
SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE ROOTS Zone 1(Clarks Creek&Big Branch) OR EDGE OF WATER(POOL) 1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLAN VIEW
DETAILS BY REACH SHOWN ABOVE
ft
HERBACEOUS PLUG(TYP) 2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE,
1 ROW,3-4'SPACING HANDLING AND INSTALLATION.
NOTES: 3. FORM PILOT HOLE IN HARD SOIL OR STONY O
1. ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER CONDITIONS TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO LIVE STAKES. ;,,,I
PLANTING AREA SHALL BE DISKED,ASz
REQUIRED,PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. LIVEE LENGTHT OF THEE LIVE STAKE, L DEPTHE AT LEASTEA g 0 r ,
THE LIVE PLANTED IN AREAS AS 0 V
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY ®Bare Root Planting 2 Zone 1 Streambank Planting SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. },
HANDLED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO • Not to Scale 6.07 Not to Scale 5. INSTALL DORMANT PRIOR TO LEAF OUT. DEPICTED (t '"
INSURE SURVIVAL.
CONDITION WITH LEAVES NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF biD ;--1
STAKES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. 0 ,'
z •
Cll
TOP OF BANK
LIVE STAKE OFFSET 1-2' � S t
FROM TOP OF BANK ft O �..,
LOG OR tt
ROCK SILL x U
a
BUDS(NODES) F�1 E
<<p� POINTED UPWARD to O
TOE OF to
SLOPE 1-11"DIAMETER O
LINEAR SPACING 2-3'LIVE STAKE U
BASE CUT AT 45° TAPERED AT BOTTOM
W 6'SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
6'SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS +
Plan View Live Stake Detail
Zone 2(UT1,UT1B,&UT3)
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLAN VIEW EROSION CONTROL MATTING LIVE STAKE OFFSET 1-2'
DETAILS BY REACH SHOWN ABOVE FROM TOP OF BANK(TYP)
3 2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE,
cl HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. ,HERBACEOUS PLUGS BETWEEN
• 3. FORM PILOT HOLE IN HARD SOIL OR STONY NORMAL BASEFLOW AND TOP
• CONDITIONS TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO LIVE STAKES. OF BANK(TYP) pp�.
4. LIVE STAKES TO BE INSTALLED TO A DEPTH AT LEAST 3 p /`
THE LENGTH OF THE LIVE STAKE,PLANTED IN AREAS AS / \
SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. TOE OF SLOPE \ c
5. INSTALL DORMANT PRIOR TO LEAF OUT. DEPICTED BASEFLOW W.S. _
CONDITION WITH LEAVES NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF \�
STAKES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. \\\
6. ZONE 2 HERBACEOUS PLUGS TO BE PLANTED ALONG x• �� o ¢ z
OUTSIDE BENDS WHERE BANK REVETMENT Section View
3 STRUCTURES ARE NOT SHOWN AND PLANTED ABOVE Zone 2(UT1,UT1B,&UT3) O
tl AND BELOW LOG AND ROCK SILLS AS SHOWN. •
3 Zone 2 Streambank Planting v -
e
6.07 Not to Scale w m
z
X o L, o u us,
J

r Y -
5"x5"WOOD BRACE POSTS 5"x5"WOOD BRACE POSTS N
4"x4"HORIZONTAL 4"x4"HORIZONTAL Q
TOP BRACE
B
CE
1 4 POINT BARBED / / p TOP BARBEDRB v
i \' 4 POINT �� 1 11 D :l'cl E
5"x 5' WOOD BRACE POSTS 1/1 WIRE /// I��i%� 5"x 5"WOOD BRACE POSTS 1\ WIRE / W Y U°�
�l; //
4 POINT lid 115,\ i�/j11�/� 4 POINT ION /I w o z
f BARBED WI' 11111111141 004• 0�%0011j1/ja_ BARBED WI' _ ta) v
arm; _ r I m "44111\1\\\1\1\1�1\0i������P EPPP."' 4"x4"HORIZONTAL '•41141= I' `Ij --'''
4"x4' HORIZONTAL lerl
TOP BRACE 1 -s 1 --_-" •4'-11" x 1I11111111111111111 % % % �p/ Al-/; TOP BRACE 4-11 .'p' m
lan ull ......m I .= _ Y\ �1\1\1\1\j11111%1%�1/ �5� i�p '�^ m 11-�_II-__II \I \�_ \11�-s' J,p. 1 1/'"
1t
1111 ' GROUND ..`. 1 #9 WIRE __ j 8'-0" \%\41��\�Ilp////// -OR+ NE �(;y ' GROUND " 49 WIRE ` �+ �(}-I
/\1�11—'ram LINE I. TWISTED/ / ,�/\i ` \1\111111/I��/////�' O\ / �/ /\I LINE I TWISTED I// $0 L /\'\X II /�-//6 Ox��/ �✓
\./V \//\//\//\�/\//\//\q L//\//\/g<.K W/\�/1 8'°' ` \��G'' ///:- 6''Is \./V \//\�/\//\//\//\//\q h//\//\�/W/\�/\�/\�/7 lk< e'o„M -\ � —B I- ,�``N
I I I I I I 3'-1" ro =(q/V' a' I I I I I I 3'-1" ro �� a'�
U U \ 1I1 / II II II \ 111 /
U LJ LJ 1 5"x 5"CORNER U u u 1 s',s'C©RNER.
8'-0"MIN 8'-0"MIN WOOD BRACE POST W I�8'-0"MIN 8'-0"MIN—I WOOD PLACE POST W
LINE BRACES CORNER BRACE F- I(I�II LINE BRACES CORNER BRACE `- �y
(MAXIM UM SPACING 330') USE WHEN CORNER ANGLE IS I5°OR GREATER 1 1I" II II (MAXUkUpA SPACING 3300 USE WHEN CORNER ANGLE IS I5°OR GREATER lrji" n
/1 yMINU lUlMIN '�^lkl
1 Y
4 POINT BARBED WIRE 4 POINT BARBED WIRE
ALTERNATE TYPES OF STAPLES ALTERNATE TYPES OF STAPLES
5"x 5"WOOD BRACE POSTS ,x 5"x 5"WOOD BRACE POSTS
4"x4"HORIZONTAL USE ONE#95TAPLE OR TWO#16 STAPLES 4' 4'HORIZONTAL USE ONE#95TAPLE OR TWO#16 STAPLES
LINE POST 4"x4"HORIZONTAL AT EACH POINT OF ATTACHMENT. TUNE POST
4"x4"HORIZONTAL AT EACH POINT OF ATTACHMENT.
_ rTOP BRACE ' A 1 x X X - TOP BRACE '
— X X X + X +
_10 1_ x x x
4'-11" \' ' 1 C- x x x x
42" i 4'-11" 4'-11'10" 4'-11„
10"
1-c 49 WIRE 1 8,_0" 7,_6„ „ J 49 WIRE $,_0„
/ //�y�'yi-TWISTED 1�� HIGH TENSILE WIRE TWISTED
/\> I�\//2\//\//2\//\//X/�\//X/2\//X/2\//�\//�/i I�\//2\"!S GROUND \//�\/� I7//� S'a'.y \/%\/%\/%\/%\%\/�%\�%\/�%\/�%\/�%\/�%\�%`I �\/�%\'GROUND \//j\/d t`//�
2'-7"I I I I NE 113'-1" 2'-7"1 I I I NE 113'-1"
I
1 1 LJ 16,_6„ U 8'-0"MIN I 1 1 LJ 16,_6„ LI 8,_0„MIN - 1
I�TYPICAL SPACING ALL LINE POSTS 'I" I-.—TYPICAL SPACING ALL LINE POSTS
END OR GATE BRACES END OR GATE BRACES Cn O
ct
Cu Woven Wire Fence-Permanent CE Fencing 0 0 Five-Strand Wire Fence-CE Crossing
,Not to Scale f= Not toScale
yJ cn
D
GATE POST 2"PAINTED �.y
GATE POST 2"PAINTED GATE POST /� o TUBE STEEL GATE GATE POST r S •
b1J
TUBE STEEL GATE dl/ \\\ CURVED TO FIT ?-I
HI-115�„ DIAMETER OF FRAME rt O '�
- CURVED TO FIT
-ral=11
�� DIAMETER OF \ �° w
11
� 11 BOLT HING
GENERAL NOTES: GROUND LINE Bolt Hinge Hinge Clamp r�
(2 Required) (2 Required) V
�� 10'GATE ALL POSTS AND BRACES MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR SQUARE AT THE r a r,i Q
`�" ` //////X \//////////\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\/�.4 � OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR,PROVIDED THE SAME TYPE IS USED 1 1,'I ' I. Hinge Assembly
Y^ r' \r Kb THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. O - '
Jr
GROUND LINE Lj 1 I`7_i J
_ -I DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF ROUND OR EDGE �i I
rJ POST SPACING 12'GATE POST ANCHOR J POST SPACING 20' ILJ: DIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS AND BRACES. GATE POST ANCHOR Li U
14
ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END,CORNER OR GATE POSTS.PLACE GENERAL NOTES:
Access Gate LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 300'AND AT THE END Access Gate
OF THE WIRE ROLL.
ALL POSTS AND BRACES MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR SQUARE ATTHE
THE 300'INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE ENGINEER ON CURVES OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR,PROVIDED THE SAME TYPE IS USED
WHERE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE IS GREATER THAN 3 DEGREES. E THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
1-5/8"
NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1"MINIMUM FOR HORIZONTAL BRACES. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF ROUND OR EDGE
PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d NAILS AT 5, DIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS AND BRACES.
"' "" ""' EACH END OF ALL BRACES.
ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END,CORNER OR GATE POSTS.PLACE
Bolt Hinge PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST.DRAW ALL BRACE WIRE - LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 300'AND ATTHE END
r•
(2 Required) .. TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH POST. I -1 OF THE WIRE ROLL.
3'MIN I '. 3'MIN
a 7j INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPT THAT ON THE 300'INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE ENGINEER ON CURVES
CURVED TO FIT i I.�.I I I HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER THAN THREE DEGREES(3')INSTALL _� WHERE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE IS GREATER THAN 3 DEGREES.
DIAMETER OF FRAME THE FENCE TO PULL AGAINST ALL POSTS.SEE NCDOT STD.866.02 'I I`
o 18'MIN I 18"MIN k. NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1"MINIMUM FOR HORIZONTAL BRACES.
y FOR FENCING AT DITCH CROSSINGS,BREAKS IN GRADES AND R/W
le
CURVED TO FIT DIAMETER OF 1,_ I BREAKS. PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d NAILS AT
J0�-- moo u 1_ EACH END OF ALL BRACES.
-
_ BOLT HING USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.HINGE ASSEMBLY
Hinge Clamp Detail of Gate AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED.SUBSTITUTION MAY BE SUBJECT TO Detail of Gate PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST.DRAW ALL BRACE WIRE
(2 Required) Post Anchor APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.USED 2"PAINTED STEEL PIPE FOR Post Anchor TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH POST.
GATE FRAME EXCEPTAS SHOWN HERE.
Hinge Assembly INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPT THAT ON GATE POST: ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE MEETING THE GATE POST: HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER THAN THREE DEGREES(3")INSTALL c
APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOT LIMITED THE FENCE TO PULL AGAINST ALL POSTS.SEE NCDOT STD.866.02
USE CLASS"B"CONCRETE AT GATE POSTS OR TO THE EXAMPLES SHOWN HEREON. USE CLASS"B"CONCRETE AT GATE POSTS OR FOR FENCING AT DITCH CROSSINGS,BREAKS IN GRADES AND R/W
WHERE REQUIRED BY SOIL CONDITIONS.CONCRETE WHERE REQUIRED BY SOIL CONDITIONS.CONCRETE BREAKS. m
MAY ALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTING POSTS TO MAY ALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTING POSTS TO o Q z M
THEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH. THEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH. USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.HINGE ASSEMBLY �/�,J
cl cl AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED.SUBSTITUTION MAY BE SUBJECT TO o 8O
7,,7Tube
7 7Tube
7 APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.USED 2"PAINTED STEEL PIPE FOR
3 Double Steel Gates Single Steel Gate GATE FRAME EXCEPT AS SHOWN HERE. `n•
Double 2" 2" ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE MEETING THE mil./
6.08 Not to Scale a Not toScale APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOT LIMITED d
TO THE EXAMPLES SHOWN HEREON. 5
X v Z 3 9 v
O 9 a` O O ;
J

r Y 1
cn
INSTALL CONDUIT Z z p on
TIE ROAD INTO GRADE PER ENDS 3 FEET ABOVE , °v.
INSTALL CONDUIT GRADING SHOWN ON PLANS GRADE AND CAP tra):W _z
ENDS 3 FEET ABOVE z ;�� v
GRADE AND CAP Q 0 _ _ "c
15' OVERFLOW CHANNEL ROAD CREST 30' i Z H a
TOP 4"ABC STONE w
TIE ROAD INTO GRADE PER OVERFLOW TYPE 2 WOVEN r CREST EL.275.42'
GRADING SHOWN ON PLANS EL.:274.92' FILTER FABRIC
- _ - -1 EXISTING GRADE
L T. T� TY TC TW TY 0 TZ TZ TY - - �� II
- - - _�- --- -_ _- _- �1.4.1 :aiLZQ:T�l Z40."11".-'- __ _ � .411 ' 3'MIN.COVER)�•�0�0�i� _- _ _ — ���o� -- ii �fi II \� \��\r..
��_���� -- __ -- -—--- _----- -- -- - :OVER CON DU IT . - \` r ii .\ i\ 'C i iii\ i\�\\ \ i_14 iy\
'\ii:.\ i ,iy \ i\!i\\�"� \\�i\i�i �i�� i\i��\�`�� J'��y` \'�C➢\�'�iniC�i",�i`\���\��Y ��i i\i\ \i iL i i.i vet
.....
�`��`f��`F��`f_-.�`f.�ti_��T=�T��`f_��`f_��`F�i �_��� \�' �i�\ \i i�i�\ i i\\ \\i i�'v\ �\\i\�\�\y\\��i\y\�\\i i\ \�y\i„�4 ��\y\\
i\i\ y\i�\\� \i3i:7\\�\\i7 \ 'CS\- �j\ \i> i4\ '''' -'\' :\ '-'7\ \ l 'Ae� -h - ��7,„..� \ \ \ i...%.\\�,\i\ i�i\\ �i i\\ , \i\
\ii \y�``\\\\��� \ i\� *\''`X \i \\\i\\_i \ i A :.ten '"'ems;- .�\v\ \ �� I \\ ----- vt��tc�.t��tvt��x��c��tvt� \,
3 I N_ \ v� \-,- \�\ `�. )i\,��\\/ i \i\\�. \\ \yam\\
>\ �� \ �\3A� i�\��'�\i\ i\��= \� \ i \ ��..u.7+�.� ��\iii � �\i\\ �'i\ �\\y\\i\\�\y���\\ \i\i J� _- _\3��MIN.BETWEEN���\\i\�i\i\i� \'t.m��.i�... ii��-\\�� �i\�"�i� \ - %`\�\`�
��:��-�..___..^.,..---- �..� iii\�i•-\ i \\i.c? \\��\\�i\ \\,,, \,\\�\��i\\�,\\ --\\� ice\\ \\\,.,,, �i\i\\, \' i\\\�\y\\\ ii\\a��-- CULVERT AND \i�i\�� �\i\���i\i\\ ..*\,,\" \ \\\i��l..,„\ .3.�^..�.��� 1 yB�\i��'. '/�[`'
`mac�.i\ \�\% i" �,\\%i\i\\i\\i \i\\ i\\\ i%\-*-` 1'DEEP 50/50 MIX CLASS A AND CLASS B i\,*„."\.' \\� ,i��\�\�\� \\\iG�i\\� i\,2.0' '\i\: CONDUIT �i\\i\\�i\„-„,„-...\\i\ii\\�\i\Ci\\ \\i\ i\\ice\i\ \\ i\\ �"�\!\ )\ Y
'\\��\ \%\,�i\\i\\�\�\ \����\\��i�y�\ ��y\\ RIP RAP PER GRADES SHOWN ON PLANS\i\i\\ice�,�w�\\� 50/50MIX'CLASSAAND„,\t -- \\' -��\ \\ �,� �\ \' \ � yi\i\'\\
.\\ ii\�\ � � i\\\�i i�\i\\ �%� CLASS B RIP RAP PER�i\y�\\ _ i\�\\�i�\�\1�\� \�\��\w�y�\\\i�\\\ \i��."i\ \l�ii\i�i\\i\\//\\� �\\\ \�i \i\i\ 2'MIN.COVER FOR
3'MIN.COVER FOR 4" SCH 80 PVC PIPE FOR/ \\,C\'V".."-\\i��\\\i\\i\\�\\,�\`\\�i\\‹��\i\\�\�\\�\\\\\�'Y \\��\ GRADES SHOWN ON PLANS\����\\ % \\ \ ,SELECT FILL APPROVED BY ENGINEER,PLACED IN .t."\���\\`\\ WATERLINE CONDUIT /��
UTILITY CONDUIT FUTURE UTILITY --Vs"s"\w\k.!�\ \\���\�\i\�-\\A':".."- .---- w\�y���%\\\\\�\�i��\ \\����\\�� •�•�•-' , • • �' \\\�\\.�%LIFTS OF 4"TO 6",AASHTO CLASS II MATERIAL
\,\\\�l\l\i�- \\�\\- \"* \ A.,-\ •��\\�� y�\�� `yi \\�i\y\�7 S, \Y.�.\\.\�\ \i\\ \��\,�i\\i\\f\ �iA�\ \\,\\ ',,\'iy Y�\��'-\\\ FU URE WATERLPNEE FOR
EMBED CULVER 12"AS SHOWN ON
PROFILE.BACKFILL WITH 50/50 6"MIN.BEDDING
MIX CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL. #57 STONE
6'X 4'REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT
INV.EL.:267.29'U/S
INV.EL.:266.81'D/S
ca
▪ Li
rt
0 U
▪ O
up
ca o , Q
x U
u E
cn
u
CULVERT PLAN VIEW TO BE INCLUDED WITH FINAL PLANS
3
S
m
o � z
61
CD
•
1 UT1 Stream Culvert Crossing E
u 6.09 Not to Scale - ro a °'
o z,, o` a s,
J

Y
m
emu"
s
Yzl
ROAD CREST 20' Al
I—I Z
HLT,
TOP 4"ABC STONE
TIE ROAD INTO GRADE PER CREST EL.288.5'
GRADING SHOWN ON PLANS
TIE ROAD INTO GRADE PER
GRADING SHOWN ON PLANS
\\ // /i\\ _12 MIN.COVER- —— _TYPE 2 WOVEN- —— — —— —� ' l
\\\i��\\ \%\\\�\ \\%%\\/\%\\%%\ \�\ OVER PIPE — --- FILTER FABRIC T/ T \� %/\ j\/
\\�///\ //\/\\ /\/ 50/50 MIX CLASS A AND,/ \/ — �.T—. � \\j\\/ \j\\/ \ \\\%�
\\�\\�\\\\����\����� �j\� GRADES SH OWN ON PCLASS B RIP L PER ANS\j\ 11110,,,41
\/' — — \\ %\\/ — — — \�\ \\%\\ /% �\j\\�j\\��\\%\ \� �\
\ \%%%\\/% %\ / . ----- - \\j.\ /\/ '\7 %\\�%j\EXISTING GROUND \�\�\\%\\ \
\\�6 MIN.BEDDING \//\ .CCASSYLL44TWASSYLL A.
\%\\/ %\%\\%\\/%\ \\ \\/\\j\\j' SELECT FILL APPROVED BY\\/\/i\\/\,\\/<\\/k%\\�\\\
\
% \\�\\\<\\-ENGINEER,P LACE D I N LI FTS O F 4" %\\\� A
TO 6",AASHTO CLASS II MATERIAL
EMBED CULVER 6"AS SHOWN ON
PROFILE.BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL. 42"CMP CULVERT
INV.EL.:284.00'U/S
INV.EL.:283.53'D/S
•
c_r O
0 U
a- =
p
ct
U �
II
CULVERT PLAN VIEW TO BE INCLUDED WITH FINAL PLANS
< z O
2
•
1 UT1B Stream Culvert Crossing
6.10 Not to Scale