310438_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210505

0 Division of"Water Resources 61; ro ;
Tacilitiy Number' '� ►-�3 CO pivision.of Soil and WAter°Conservat�o�i'." "
0 Other Agency. _
Type of Visit: TRoutine
pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Avg Departure Time: �-9 �-- County: QL)N Region:
Farm Name: b ocpS�o,� 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: \a 1� 1 �"� C AS�b�� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 13\ \\ C -,A�
Certified Operator: 9% \ k C pSkGv�,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacify Pop.'
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish ---to40
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: f�%, S
Certification Number:
Latitude:
'Design • Current ,
Wet roultry ` , ,.Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design sCurrent"
Dry Poultry Capacity °Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design - Current .
Cattle Capacity ' 'Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow.
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�To
❑ NA
❑ NE

Facility Number: - L- jDate of Inspection:, —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes WNo
�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): S ,S
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 (`%j �0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EJ/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes EX/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PIINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes /❑/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): vj , 5
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
_7--- 7_�1__ - L„__ L-1 ___.
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes F3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes v N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 6/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
r1 I_ /1 TT- = AT A = kTT:

Facility Number: 3 - 43 Date of Inspection: $—S --a i
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [J]No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [D"No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional naues as necessary).
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
E24A ❑ NE
C>- Lt of
❑ Yes 2- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ["No ❑ NA ❑ NE
51-id'y %5 Ley, Cit"'cm t sihce_ +1"e Svro/ Y
5
we5 Cq?h-C�-
+o
-t V, -'S "a I,
?).n
,
vas,,--ej eS
C'e-SV"4 61
d S
Tcv►S
Cr-r -