HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061780 Ver 1_Closeout Report_2013040106 nod
Floogie Mitigation Project
EEP ID (IMS #) 92486
FDP CONTRACT NUMBER D06011
USACE ACTION ID #
DWQ 404#
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Stream and Wetland
Project Setting & Classifications
County
Bertie
General Location
Windsor
Basin:
Roanoke
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Coastal Plains
Ecore ion:
Coastal Flatwoods
USGS Hydro Unit:
03010107160050
NCDWQ Sub - basin:
03 -02 -10
Wetland Classification
Riparian
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Monitoring Year 3
September 2010
Beaver removal
2010
Project Performers
October 2011
Source Agency:
EEP
Provider:
EBX -Neuse I, LLC
Designer:
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Monitoring Firm
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Channel Remediation
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Plant remediation
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Property Interest Holder
DENR Stewardship
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
Aril 2006
Permitted
July 2007
Construction Completed
February 2008
As -built survey
Aril 2008
Monitoring Year -1
August 2008
Beaver removal
2008
Monitoring Year -2
September 2009
Beaver removal
2009
Monitoring Year 3
September 2010
Beaver removal
2010
Monitoring Year 4
October 2011
Beaver removal
2011
Monitoring Year 5
August 2012
Beaver removal
2012
Supplemental Planting near
beaver dams and privet
spraying along old channel
December 2012
Closeout Submission
Aril 2013
s,
Project Setting and Background Summary
This stream and wetland mitigation project was developed to provide stream and wetland mitigation units
for the NC EEP full delivery process Previous stream conditions demonstrated significant degradation
with a high degree of incision as a result of straightening and channelization performed to promote
agricultural activities Historically, a small Coastal Plain swamp existed within the floodplain of Flat
Swamp Creek Restoration of the stream included establishment Of stable cross - sectional geometry,
restoration of planform sinuosity, and increased streambed diversity Wetland restoration included
plugging existing ditches, opening ditches outside the restoration area to promote infiltration, restoring
microtopography, planting wetlands species, and relocating an existing road outside of the easement
While the site has not required supplemental planting to meet vegetative success criteria, efforts have
been made to control beaver populations which have been flooding the site in years 4 and 5
Goals and Objectives
• Produce a minimum of 11,149 stream mitigation units (SMU) and 25 19 riparian wetland
mitigation units (WMU) to the NCEEP
• Maximize the improvements of riparian and aquatic habitats and water quality through ecological
restoration
Success Criteria
Wetland Hydrology
Restoration of the water table to within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 7% of the growing
season continuously (approximately 16 days)
During periods of low rainfall, the restoration gauge hydroperiod must exceed that of the
reference gauges, provided the gauges exceed 5% of the growing season, to be deemed
successful
Stream and Wetland
Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three monitoring enod
Vegetation
Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five momtormg penod
A maximum of 20 percent of the site species composition may be comprised of non - invasive
volunteers
A photo log will be maintained over the monitonng period and must demonstrate maturation of
planted vegetation and volunteer h dro h tic species
Stream
Bankfull events a minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the five -year
monitoring period
Cross - Sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections shall be
classified using the Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type channels
The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable Bedforms
observed should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels
Photographs will be used to evaluate stream characteristics
Sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates within the restored stream channel shall be conducted in
Year 1, Year 3, and Year 5 of post-restoration monitoring
Restoration
Mitigation
Watershed
As-Built Linear
TMitigation Ratio
Mitigation Units
Reach
Approach
Acreage
Footage/ Acreage
(SMU/WMU)
STREA,
RI
Stream
1381
2800
1 1
2800
Restoration
R2
Stream
1482
2500
1 1
2500
Restoration
R3
Stream
1616
2400
1 1
2400
Restoration
R4
Stream
2148
2771
1 1
2771
Restoration
IA
Headwater Valley
539
322
1 1
322
Restoration
1B
Headwater Valley
179
356
1 1
356
Restoration
W C
ETvg-&-XQ_ _,xk
Area I
Riparian Wetland
1
1456 25 19
1 1
25 19
Restoration
... - - E .1
ITUROOMMORIffill ; 1 !1! .
M go an—fikTHYPeNEW
.
Mitt anon
[I 1,7nirffgralffig,=�
Stream Mitigation Units
11,149
(SMU)
Wetland Mitigation Units
25 19
(WMLJ)
/trsan llMUr /Mntru 0 -mvr OF
2010 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
-.. earo.x:e� �>
y��tr, »e
• �r
�
Assets Map,
-- �a�.z =r./
QED—! I
0 250 500 1.000 1,600 2.000
Feet
Floogie Mitigation Site
'ewaw v m
_.coc F_a�,
1 inch = 1,000 feet
®`"
-acxr-
®lreta�a��txaeon
Proiecl Area
SOIL SEMES LEGEND
Hydnc Sods
Non+tycim Soft GOA OotlsDVOSWI/b 0e 3%sepq w wlwrt. wybr swybam
ESA E.un tint IM anW Aa *. O to S % a�pa Q Orw.Mm - b.m R. R- -W,
Lr U'I-V" +--W bw y.E vltf-.r br.n. M1RawMMAnaC
2010 Bing Aerial Photography LEGEND
Rcoor Ro.r
o - soo - I.S00 :. Soils Map
eu
1 inch = 1,000 feet
'
4
Ripanlan WeWanO
Restoration Area
, •.., 1
�
Stream Restoratpn
!; ExretingWetlandBoundary
` as
ti
1
. leuR4ryrwwOMnlaO nWnal
USGS Quadrangle Map
eEoNDR-
Floogie Site
Q aa«
a
loon 2 O soon � ��.,.•«�.
Fop RIKrMOn
t inch = 2,000 feet
0
Proiecl Area
SOIL SEMES LEGEND
Hydnc Sods
Non+tycim Soft GOA OotlsDVOSWI/b 0e 3%sepq w wlwrt. wybr swybam
ESA E.un tint IM anW Aa *. O to S % a�pa Q Orw.Mm - b.m R. R- -W,
Lr U'I-V" +--W bw y.E vltf-.r br.n. M1RawMMAnaC
2010 Bing Aerial Photography LEGEND
Rcoor Ro.r
o - soo - I.S00 :. Soils Map
:waw.wnRSs
FIOOgie $I�e
1 inch = 1,000 feet
SO— Ream seemenv O creel ca„oe
. — Hea 1,, to • wmw, q Wall
� Figure 7b - - - -- Hea�waler 1B NCD T R—
R-11 O Easement
175 350 ' °° Feet Current Conditions Map — R-ea<h 3 R �, s�elaae lR
— �wabmenm Pfaneny Area
1 inch = 350 feet Floogie Mitigation Site —ReMh° ®Imasrvae ,nftAroa (Prrvetl
51ream Observal'gn Areas Eaislinp NptlanAe
Cmss Sec- Ez ~w. R......n
0 175 350 700
Feet
1 inch = 350 feet
Figure 7a
Current Conditions Map
Floogie Mitigation Site
S(rearn Reach Segment,
O Cre.t Gaups
Headwater to
• MaNlorinp Well
Head —, lB
NCDOT Road.
Reacht
QEn—enl
Reach 3
- V getallon Plol,
Reac1 3
S,pbmental Planting Area
Reach <
®Ima__ Control Arne ,e)
Stream Obce—I —Area.
E,Iling Wedantls
� Cross Sections
� Wellantl 0.e,toralion
175 350
1 inch = 350 feet
Figure 7c
700
W Feet Current Conditions Map
Floogie Mitigation Site
Shea. Reach Sepmenb
O Crnel Gaune
HeaEwabr 1A
• AbnAOnrp YYOII
- - - -- 1R
MCO l R,I*
=e.—ler
Rexn 1
Q Easement
Rexn 2
- Na�ebbon Hole
Raxn 3
Suppbmenbl Hxeny Area
Rexn 9
®Invaenee --1 Area IRmell
� smam oe.emmlon aeae
®EnabO wenanae
C.. Sxtlwu
N§Ibrtl R.MOtabin
0 •
Floogie
Reach 1-2 STA. 15+50- STA. 25150
•gym -r..1 -Y-2 -Y..3 -Y... -Y.. W. Sf.. LTI, - In
47
■ + +
x + X X+
43
41
m 30
37
1550 1630 1750 two 1950 2830 Ilse SIM 2356 24" 2350
Cba=d D'
Floogie
Reach 3 STA. 47 +50 30 - STA. 63+00
—A.Diih —Y-1 —Y-2 —Y-3 —Y-4 —Y-5 —Wd.&.f-
46
44 X + +X + x
42 x Y+ X+
" 4
40
V
9 38 VrN v
36
31
4750 4950 5130 5350 3550 5730 5950 6130 6310 6530
Cbm" DM=ft (a)
Floogie
Reach 4 STA. 87+50. STA. 94+50
—Y-1 —Y-3 —Y..3 —wdsfi— 4 LTA X ItTo
X +
39 x
X
9
32
w
8750 1100 SM W <0 9130 9130 9350
(1..-d ni.aur lei
Floaek, Cr SMion I, I'M
48
47 -
d 46
1 44
43 l
I
0 10 20 JO 40 50 ,.. •i ,
Vldth (0)
�BdAii Oehnm —AHIn6 —Y-1 —Ys2 —Y-1 - -Y >4 —Y-
FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM
50
49 — —_
41
.. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ----
43
0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b
Wid16 (ft)
-- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3
SrcBOn 4, kiM,
AY
48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __....
I
46
44
14
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao
Wlddl (ft)
—Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5
9r
4'
14
9 �
W43
J2
JI
10
0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70
WId1h (ft)
—B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3
P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool
w
floo*. Crap Sft-Uon J, toot
u
Jt
16
--
C 4S
- —_
41
W
42
.. .. i. _ ... .............
0 10 2a 30 40 1p 60
mdlh Ift)
—
�FlmdPrme.Vn �A�6.foI1 F.l�valim �AS&ti0 —YQI —Ym2 —Y-1 —Yw4 �Ye'
JO
a 10 T M 40 le
WId1h (B 1
— BwMWIFkWm —A,B k Ywl Yw2 —Ym3 —Yw4 Ym4
FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM
50
49 — —_
41
.. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ----
43
0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b
Wid16 (ft)
-- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3
SrcBOn 4, kiM,
AY
48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __....
I
46
44
14
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao
Wlddl (ft)
—Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5
9r
4'
14
9 �
W43
J2
JI
10
0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70
WId1h (ft)
—B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3
P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool
w
FloeRle. C— %mth. S, RWk
J'
46
45
c
--
a
42
41
0 10 2a 30 40 1p 60
mdlh Ift)
—
�FlmdPrme.Vn �A�6.foI1 F.l�valim �AS&ti0 —YQI —Ym2 —Y-1 —Yw4 �Ye'
FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM
50
49 — —_
41
.. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ----
43
0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b
Wid16 (ft)
-- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3
SrcBOn 4, kiM,
AY
48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __....
I
46
44
14
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao
Wlddl (ft)
—Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5
9r
4'
14
9 �
W43
J2
JI
10
0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70
WId1h (ft)
—B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3
P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool
w
Floogk, Cr m% Section 7, Riffle
45
–�i
:i►r
6
6 +=
41
40
0 10 30 30 1n 50 -
W Idih I I1)
—Kw,]Pray Ara —HOW1,1119mnm —AS8udl —Yml —Ym' —YMI Ym
Floozie, Cross Section 9, RMk
4'
46
45
41
40
0 10 .ii LI 40 511 AO
Wift at)
�PlpO P'aOe Ara �IW#NO FJeMa —A Wit —Yml —Ym2 —Ym3 —Y-4 �Ym!
FWogk. CI Satim 11, RBIk
4s
C 44
_.:......
41
M
G 4'
41
43
0 10 20 30 40 6o
W." (Im
- ............... ._ - -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- .___: _ __
—Fk,w I, —Ara Me41 F2wma �A'bnl �Yml -lm' Ym3 -- Ym4
Floogie, Cress Sorlbn 8, Pool
45
lE J1
EZa
F e.
41
40
0 l0 20 so 4o sA �
Width (R)
�B�d:fWl Flmrion —Ar11M —Y— —Ym2 -- -l-4 —Y—!
Floogk. Mn Sectbn I0, 1'od
45
44
43 - ....._ ..... - -_
C
6 4
y 40
A � ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 20 so ni
widen (g)
—SM"Il Ek mon —A B&dl Ymi —Ym2 m Ym3 —Ym4 YmS
Flwrt, C» SWdiii; 1; PINT
Is
j
II ........... ... �.._..... - ..... _.__. ___ ._.... ... .........._. -.
– .'.
4.
f
40 .__._ -•_._ -.. .._.... -. -._ -._
p
p
0 l0 30 O0 40 5o 60 70 80
Wide, (n)
— eaaNO,�na �ASgsit mm.Yml ��Ym2 ssssa.Ym7 +�Ym4 �Ym3
rMqol• U w Iked- Il. PW
fl
42
loe
t0
)6
e In 20 to +n 'n 6o to
w,,m W
need,, Cron Section IS. Rifle
+I
1
AI
2 +o
i
is
51 -- -
i,
o to :o In a so hh
w sn cro
�FtaeA PlaneMr — ewnsln �rf —n.a.n �r «I -+ r,.l mgr «] --r.rf �r «s
Flood,. Ccofe $a'fon IJ. RFIYI,
E
W b
tt
+1 .i. r.
ware (a)
— R.ahm,Am =INWk ERAm —ArlWl —Y «1 �Y «l —Y«) - ^ -T �Yrf5
Q
+1
a
c n
A m
t n
B
emolk CFO" Salton 16. Pool
n to 211 )a +o f, nn YO
w,ft (a)
f— hm).fs hl<huw —A.AW —Y «1 —Y «2 —YQI -- -1 —Y «)
PMe %a Cm Secu" 17, ewl
12
N
e: 31
x
r
W �
t5
I
N
0 20 ID 30 N 30 00 "00
Wldb (B1
—B+okWM— —AlduAl —Ymi —Yar7 —Y-3 �Ymt �YmT
tl
Q
19
� x
xr
i.i
N
u
N
Fk t. CWu Sadw 19, P"
0 10 so 00 00 '0 t0
W.dh lll,
�B9e1000 �99ia .:,e�A —Ym -+YW —/w1 lma �Ym:
FM/R C9 Set11m 1F, FJM
92
�p
YN - -.... ...... _..._._._.. ... —
V
t
N ,
N
B 10 N 7B 00 So e0 ✓9 ..
W,em (fl)
—FIo ProeA- —IW*U � —M.bu —Yml —1m2 —1-1 Yor9 Year;
V
n"ot. [Tm Set/m 28, am
N
2010
2011
2012
CG1
17
CG1
-
CG1
9a
CG1
CG2
CG1
CG2
Number of Bankfull
2
2
c? 01
4
6
5
3
2
w
NA
Eve nts
>9
,
Maximum Height
--
1.6
2.1
2.6
r
Above Bankfull (feet)
10
- .. _..... _.. --- __
10
o l0 20 to 40 :o 00 .. 0o
W.4& M)
�B9k§AEkwkm —B,� —1 -- 1'n Y -9
V
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
CG1
CG2
CG1
CG2
CG1
CG2
CG1
CG2
CG1
CG2
Number of Bankfull
2
2
4
4
6
5
3
2
1
NA
Eve nts
Maximum Height
1.2
1.6
2.1
2.6
1.1
Above Bankfull (feet)
V
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Pool
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
168
169
172
189
198
172
164
190
204
186
178
169
193
188
188
200
189
194
224
199
203
169
176
173
Flood prone Width ft
730
708
709
71 0
710
710
793
774
769
776
776
776
775
768
764
770
770
770
727
65 1
675
713
71 3
71 3
BF Cross Sectional Area ft
34 1
339
33 5
346
326
322
187
21 3
226
209
194
200
490
41 2
420
407
421
41 9
262
224
21 9
192
200
21 1
BF Mean Depth ft
20
20
19
18
16
19
11
11
11
11
11
12
25
22
22
20
22
22
12
11
11
11
11
12
BF Max Depth ft
38
37
37
37
36
34
24
25
25
23
24
24
49
48
46
45
45
43
29
26
25
22
23
26
Width/De thRatio
83
84
89
103
120
91
145
170
184
165
163
143
76
86
85
98
85
90
192
176
188
148
156
142
Entrenchment Ratio
43
30
41
38
36
41
48
41
38
42
44
46
40
41
41
39
41
40
32
33
33
42
40
41
Wetted Perimeter ft
18 9
189
192
209
21 8
194
172
197
21 I
192
18 5
17 7
22 2
21 6
21 2
224
21 1
21 7
23 3
206
21 1
175
184
183
Hydraulic radius ft
1 8
1 8
1 7
1 7
1 5
1 7
1 1
1 1
1 1
I I
] 0
1 1
2 2
1 9
20
1 8
20
1 9
1 1
l 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 2
Parameter
Cross Section 5
Riffle
Cross Section 6
Pool
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Cross Section 8
Pool
uBase
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width 11)
167
165
169
183
174
171
174
181
177
234
208
177
185
203
177
187
195
202
192
200
209
218
209
188
Flood prone Width ft
694
662
659
662
662
665
690
66 9
61 3
673
673
673
622
61 1
576
597
597
597
602
600
594
601
60 1
60 1
BF Cross Sectional Area
164
158
154
13 7
160
141
288
297
297
300
334
288
167
193
173
175
249
25 5
260
264
276
278
298
289
BF Mean Depth ft
10
10
09
07
09
08
17
16
17
13
16
16
09
09
10
09
13
13
14
13
13
13
1 1
11
BF Max Depth ft
20
20
19
18
20
18
34
34
1 34
28
32
32
14
17
16
16
21
22
25
25
24
23
21
23
Width/De thRatio
170
171
184
244
188
207
105
111
106
183
129
109
204
214
181
199
153
160
141
152
159
171
248
242
Entrenchment Ratio
42
40
39
36
38
39
40
37
35
29
32
38
34
30
33
32
31
30
31
30
28
28
22
23
Wetted Perimeter ft
17 2
170
173
188
178
176
190
197
193
246
22 1
21 7
189
212
187
19 1
203
209
202
209
220
22 7
27 7
24 2
Hydraulic radius ft)
10
09
09
07
09
08
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 2
1 5
13
09
09
09
09
12
12
13
1 3
13
12
1 1
1 1
Parameter
Cross Section 9
Riffle
Cross Section 10
Pool
Cross Section 1 I
Riffle
Cross Section 12
Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl�MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
190
191
186
188
185
183
225
217
221
234
191
193
194
198
193
194
199
201
130
158
162
160
196
174
Flood prone Width ft
66 1
660
660
659
659
659
805
802
806
807
807
807
779
748
688
749
749
749
787
767
761
759
759
759
BF Cross Sectional Area
327
295
290
284
254
25 1
401
401
41 1
368
305
31 5
21 5
24 1
236
23 8
232
236
257
274
288
280
330
268
BF Mean Depth ft
1 7
15
1 6
1 5
14
1 4
1 8
1 8
19
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 1
12
1 2
1 1
09
1 0
20
1 7
1 8
1 8
1 7
1 5
BF Max Depth ft
29
27
26
26
24
25
38
37
37 1
34
29
32
27
28 1
27
27
26
27
39
39
39
39
40
37
Width/Depth Ratio
11 1
124
120
124
135
133
127
118
119 1
148
119
118
175
163
158
181
282
244
66
9U29
91
117
113
Entrenchment Ratio
35
34
35
35
36
36
36
37
37
35
42
41
40
38
36
36
29
31
61
4
39
39
43
Wetted Perimeter ft
20 1
20 1
19 6
19 9
19 4
19 2
24 2
23 8
24 2
24 6
20 1
20 5
20 5
20 6
20 1
21 6
26 4
24 6
15 3
17
18 1
21 5
19 3
H draulic radius ft
1 6
1 5
1 5
1 4
1 3
1 3
1 7
1 7
1 7
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 1
0 9
0 9
1 7
1
1 5
1 5
14
Parameter
Cross Section 13
Pool
Cross Section 14
Riffle
Cross Section 15
Riffle
Cross Section 16
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width (ft)
197
192
185
228
225
182
188
184
196
198
195
196
175
170
189
180
176
160
197
239
236
231
225
226
Flood rove Width ft
698
700
700
700
700
700
638
63 3
636
634
633
63 3
668
668
620
666
669
665
608
607
606
608
607
606
BF Cross Sectional Area (W)
264
239
234
272
287
220
243
240
248
234
247
21 7
159
184
21 9
226
21 2
176
497
485
626
552
51 2
482
BF Mean Depth ft
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
13
13
1 1
09
1 1
09
1 1
12
13
12
11
25
20
21
24
23
21
BF Max Depth (ft)
27
26
26
25
26
24
22
22
23
20
21
20
15
28
1 29
29
30
29
50
50
48
46
44
43
Width/De thRatio
147
155
147
191
176
151
146
141
155
187
286
177
193
157
162
143
146
145
78
118
106
99
106
Entrenchment Ratio
35
36
38
31
31
38
34
34
32
30
24
32
38
39
33
37
38
42
31
25
26
27
27
Wetted Pertmeter(ft
20 4
199
194
23 5
23 I
189
195
191
204
21 3
270
202
179
182
20 1
193
194
180
223
263
256
J53
25 0
24 7
H draulic radius (ft
1 3
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 3
1 2
1 1
0 9
1 1
0 9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 0
2 2
1 8
2 1
2 1
2 0
Parameter
Cross Section 17
Pool
Cross Section 18
Riffle
Cross Section 19
Pool
Cross Section 20
Riffle
=
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY43MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width (ft )
159
165
153
184
182
169
180
170
176
197
190
183
152
151
162
167
170
168
136
144
151
149
151
138
Flood prone Width (ft
74 1
71 0
744
74 1
74 1
74 1
763
76 1
763
769
770
769
816
819
820
816
819
81 5
972
969
969
97 I
976
971
BF Cross Sectional Area ft
51 1
499
503
558
560
527
565
51 7
533
593
584
556
463
450
466
477
463
467
325
350
366
397
372
356
BF Mean Depth ft
32
30
33
30
31
31
31
30
30
30
31
30
30
30
29
29
27
28
24
24
24
27
25
26
BF Max Depth ft
50
51
1 49
54
53
52
45
44
42
47
49
49
49
48
47
47
46
47
30
34
34
36
34
34
Width/Depth Ratio
50
55
47
61
59
54
57
56
58
66
62
60
50
51
57
58
63
61
57
59
63
56
62
53
Entrenchment Ratio
47
43
49
40
41
43
42
45
43
39
40
42
54
54
50
49
48
48
71
67
64
65
64
70
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
20 6
2-0-8—
19 3
22 6
229
21 4
222
213
21 5
244
236
22 7
193
188
195
20 1
203
203
161
17 1
178
177
183
168
Hydraulic radius ft
25
24
26
25
24
25
25
24
25
24
25
24
24
24
1 24
24
23
23
20
21
21
22
20
21
Reach 1
Parameter
Baseline
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
s
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
3905
8672
6288
8494
15825
12372
8494
15825
123 72
8494
15825
12372
8494
15825
123 72
8494
158 25
123 72
Radius of Curvature ft
1826
2739
2282
2024
3026
2487
2024
3026
2487
2024
3026
2487
2024
3026
2487
2024
3026
2487
Meander Wavelength (11)
12425
171 16
147 70
275 87
36482
32022
275 87
36482
32022
.27587
36482
32022
27587
36482
320 22
275 87
36482
32022
Meander Width ratio
212
472
342
23
42
33
23
42
33
23
42
33
23
42
33
23
42
33
Profile
Riffle length (ft
15 1
1032
390
200
470
288
200
470
288
200
47 0
28 8
20 0
47 0
28 8
200
470
28 8
Riffle slope ft/ft
00038
00177
00081
0 001
00281
00118
0 001
00281
00118
00051
00305
00191
00051
00305
00191
00051
00305
00191
Pool length ft
23 2
1394
526
21 7
874
454
21 7
874
454
21 7
874
454
21 7
874
454
21 7
874
454
Poolspacing ft
33 9
2508
653
295
155 8
73 5
295
1558
735
295
155 8
735
295
155 8
73 5
295
1558
73 5
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
1581 9
741 0
7410
7410
741 0
7410
Channel Length (ft
2200
10178
10178
10178
10178
10178
Sinuosity
14
14
14
14
14
14
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
000150
00007
00007
0000802
0000802
0000802
BF slope ft/ft
00009
000075
000075
000182
000182
000182
Ros en Classification
C5
C5
C5
C5
C5
C5
Reach 2
Parameter
Baseline
MY
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Pattern
x Min r
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
6SMed
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Channel Beltwidth ft
3998
8878
6438
3998
8878
6438
3998
8878
6438
3998
8878
6438
3998
8878
6438
3998
8878
6438
Radius of Curvature ft
1869
2804
2336
1869
2804
2336
1869
2804
23 36
1869
2804
2336
1869
2804
2336
1869
2804
2336
Meander Wavelength (ft
12720
17522
151 21
12720
17522
15121
12720
17522
151 21
12720
175 22
15121
12720
17522
151 21
12720
17522
151 21
Meander Width ratio
2 12
472
342
2 12
472
342
212
472
342
2 12
472
342
2 12
472
342
2 12
472
342
Profile
Riffle length (11)
282
975
491
282
975
49 1
282
975
491
282
975
49 1
28 2
97 5
49 1
975
49 1
Riffle slope ft/ft
0 0020
0 0096
0 0045
0 0020
0 0096
0 0045
0 0020
0 0096
0 0045
0 0020
0 0096
00045
00020
00096
00045
0 0096
0 0045
Pool length ft
194
1359
596
194
1359
596
194
13591
596
194
13591
596
194
1359
596
F35
1359
596
Pools spacing ft
352
195 1
1194
352
195 1
1194
35 2
195 1
1194
352
195 1
1194
352
195 1
1194
195 1
1194
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
7568
7568
7568
7568
7568
7568
Channel Length ft
1550
1550
1550
1550
1550
1550
Sinuosity
20
20
20
20
20
20
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
000140
000140
000140
0000802
0000802
0000802
BF sloe (ft/ft)
000075
000075
000075
0 001
0 001
0 001
Ros en Classification
C5
C5
C5
C5
C5
C5
Reach 3
Parameter
Baseline
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max�Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
3 Max
`Med
Channel Beltwidth ft
4106
9141
6623
832
2171
1526
832
2171
1526
832
2171
152 6
832
2171
1526
832
2171
1526
Radius of Curvature (ft)
19 17
2886
2401
141
31 7
205
141
31 7
205
141
317
205
141
31 7
205
141
317
205
Meander Wavelength (11)
13092
18030
155 51
221 9
4988
3256
2219
4988
3256
221 9
4988
3256
221 9
4988
3256
221 9
4988
3256
Meander Width ratio
212
472
342
20
53
37
20
53
37
20
53
37
20
53
37
20
53
37
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
195
1958
347
102
570
227
10 2
57 0
22 7
102
570
227
102
570
227
102
570
227
Riffle slope ft/ft
0 0022
00297
00038
00003
00313
00118
00003
00313
00118
0 0108
00141
00117
0 0108
0 0141
00117
0 0108
00141
00117
Pool length ft)
134
1266
546
138
386
228
138
386
228
138
386
228
138
386
228
138
386
228
Pools spacing ft
224
20641
86 1
232
1683
53 1
232
1683
53 1
232
1683
53 1
232
1683
53 1
23 2
1683
53 1
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
24985
9668
9668
9668
9668
9668
Channel Length (ft
4110
1750
1750
1750
1750
1750
Sinuosity
17
18
18
18
18
18
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
000160
0 001
0 001
0 001
0 001
0 001
BF slope ft/ft)
00008
0 001
0 001
00012
00012
00012
Ros en Classificationi
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
Reach 4
Parameter
Baseline
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min m
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
279
477
35 8
279
477
358
279
477
35 8
279
477
358
279
477
358
279
477
358
Radius of Curvature ft
8622
1878
1402
8622
1878
1402
8622
1878
1402
8622
1878
1402
8622
1878
1402
8622
1878
1402
Meander Wavelength ft
368 1
3919
3800
368 1
3919
3800
368 1
3919
3800
368 1
3919
3800
368 1
3919
3800
368 1
3919
3800
Meander Width ratio
09085
1 5523
06649
09085
1 5523
06649
09085
1 5523
06649
09085
1 5523
06649
09085
1 5523
0 6649
0 9085
1 5523
06649
Profile
Riffle length (ft
41 9
80 1
636
41 9
80 1
636
41 9
80 1
636
419
80 1
636
41 9
80 1
636
419
80 1
63 6
Riffle sloe (ft/ft)
00016
00090
00064
00016
00090
00064
00016
00090
00064
00023
0 009
00046
00023
0 009
00046
00023
0 009
00046
Pool length ft
394
1576
7634
394
1576
7634
394
1576
7634
394
1576
7634
394
1576
7634
394
1576
7634
Pools acm ft
514
1279
884
1279
884
514
1279
884
51 4
1279
88 4
51 4
1279
884
514
1279
884
--514
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
6158
6158
6158
6158
6158
6158
Channel Length (ft)
6384
6384
6384
6384
6384
6384
Sinuosity
10
10
10
10
10
10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
00003
00003
00003
00006
00006
00006
BF slope ft/ft)
00002
00002
00002
0000766
0000766
0000766
Ros en Classification
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
Results of 2012 Vegetation Monitoring — Planted Species by Plot
Summary of Results
p
Species
Wetand.Pol&-y
%A63j trea"6a Bu ft fer
SR.eal'ots
" �v '' �`5,q��l a aC ✓M ��yk
wx
� `
m rSr
J� raf "a .m 'iTFr�Mz
cS. ,
n
55
53
53
51
51
510
Plot 2
60
46
49
40
39
39
*'747s
Plot 3
�12�13�i14�15���16�
r
2t
15
qh
"17
f I
Plot 4
69
58
61
57
55
56
560
Plot 5
65
57
�>ml�l.�
54
55
55
550
,p,„�,�1'8��r
Average
510.0
Bald
390 -560
y ".
s'Ripa�rian
_
Buffer. Plots�(�020
G ,�
'.;� �a5u'hr.J7J��" ' }V'^I'�Pr
acre) 4���'� L
a w
a a
Plot 6
40
31
24
19
25
26
520
Plot 7
37
22
17
17
6
10
4
22
7
10
5
13
5
9
12
4
12
10
11
3
29
2
Cypress
Plot 10
50
48
49
47
47
48
960
Plot 11
47
36
35
34
33
34
680
Plot 12
45
Green Ash
5
9
27
3
13
Plot 13
7
8
4
1
3
17
7
7
4
6
2
6
Hickory
39
1
Plot 15
48
43
41
39
35
38
760
Plot 16
49
48
41
42
40
41
820
Laurel
30
28
28
27
24
22
440
Plot 18
28
27
26
26
24
24
480
Average
684.6
Oak
2
1
1
2
1
5
Overcup
10
11
13
7
7
4
2
7
10
5
6
4
2
8
1
7
11
4
Oak
Swamp
Tupelo
18
8
4
20
16
8
4
7
4
7
6
9
5
7
11
11
4
Willow
10
I
6
4
12
4
4
7
8
25
i
7
7
8
7
10
9
9
r8
Oak
Summary of Results
"P rated
w
¢'ouap „-pF”
Stems i Stems
Year 1 earl
Stems
fear 3
l Stems
Year 4
Stems
�' fear 5
-
all 5
P}lots
Plot 1
61
55
53
53
51
51
510
Plot 2
60
46
49
40
39
39
390
Plot 3
70
66
65
64
56
54
540
Plot 4
69
58
61
57
55
56
560
Plot 5
65
57
53
54
55
55
550
Average
510.0
Range
390 -560
y ".
s'Ripa�rian
_
Buffer. Plots�(�020
G ,�
'.;� �a5u'hr.J7J��" ' }V'^I'�Pr
acre) 4���'� L
a w
a a
Plot 6
40
31
24
19
25
26
520
Plot 7
37
22
17
17
22
22
440
Plot 8
49
44
43
43
42
42
840
Plot
45
33
28
29
29
31
620
Plot 10
50
48
49
47
47
48
960
Plot 11
47
36
35
34
33
34
680
Plot 12
45
43
42
42
35
42
840
Plot 13
40
39
37
36
33
36
720
Plot 14
51
47
38
41
40
39
780
Plot 15
48
43
41
39
35
38
760
Plot 16
49
48
41
42
40
41
820
Plot 17
30
28
28
27
24
22
440
Plot 18
28
27
26
26
24
24
480
Average
684.6
Ran a
440 -960
Summary of Hydrology Monitoring Data 2008 -2012
"
Gaugleis °�
� ",��,�`Max
Consecutive Fiydrop_enod(
In
sa'� Precipitation,
F Ihial „�;li ��
;I�I�u�1r�h�6.€����i�lh'19,i
%) ���
°',
' 7 20087a1,N,�6��„�q
09jji
Tr,o „?U1�Q lu
rlP N IT1, ' I
�" s�200 2 "rte;
2012 Precipitation for Floogie Site
16
15
Growing Season
14
13
12
11
0
u 9
u
C 8
L:.
7
6
---- --
a5
4
LI
3
..
2
-
--- - - --- - --
_ -- -
1
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Growing Season � Windsor Daily Rainfall - - - - - -- 30th/70th Percentile - -6 Windsor Monthly Ramfal
Summary Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data Results
�tTAxdn
-Vre-Colikfuction-
Aif�r ence
-Reach 2.
Re6ch 4
Refe�
_je
Reference
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
TRICHOPTERA
P1110stomis Sp
3
1
1
3
3
Ironoquia
puncialissima
2
Pycnopsyche sp
-
COLEOPTERA
Enochrus sp
Agabus sp (Larvae)
I
Hydaticus sp
Peltodytes sp
ODONATA
Somalochlora sp
Libellula sp
Ischnura spp
DIPTERA: MISC.
Chrysops sp
Prosimuhum sp
Tipula sp
2
r77
-_
-'2008
,� ti 2009'
'�.
2013 =
l � _ _ �' �
�' = o. ..-n
_
;l" IucTr' f� 1- �_ .
�=�
4 �y - � 1 _ � -,_' �I- IT� P�r� _ e _ - C- o _ n � ction
�, ,��'�� .'
••
Tom• �i
���R. m =r
'r�°, F
r��• _
1RM''�
it- o - r � _ �
' r i riR_�
_ v
�c-
5 -g
� � '�as °
� _r , �, _,�
°' y>'
� ,!� , i�`'�nR'.�- g
#,
`e -nr e.?y�
,-
nl �;t'l`r
' - lil >
rq'- _
_ - Y-- e ar 5 -� � t- - q —
�,
�41
a��x
_ , d- _-
a.� r � , ,
-
lReference
=tru1
p -s
5Rea3fi 2-
_
-,Reach4
e- f e. rYenecae
go-n-
eacfi 2=
`
eg , .a= � 4� -
4 h d +
�, ,
ei.'�1Yrr. 'E- `3
Rli,,.,` e- ' f� cas e ,
`
N�r'
R,1VIe}.ou- a,��� c 2��-so,
,�- -
e`�z�
c a
4'
h
Reference
RM1_ e aocnh
2
'Reacfi,4-
"
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
DIPTERA
CHIRONOMIDAE
Hydrobaenus sp
-
4
19
2
1 30
4
-
3
-
-
-
2
Lcmnophyes sp
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Orthocladcus
obumbratus
-
-
_
2
4
3
2
17
18
-
-
-
Procladius sp
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
Conchapelopia gr
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
Psectrotanypus dyari
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Zaverhmyia sp
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Chironomus sp
-
-
-
-
1
-
9
1
-
-
-
-
Dicrotendipes simpsom
-
-
-
-
-
-
l
1
-
-
-
-
Glyptotendipes sp
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Polypedilum tritum
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
1
-
-
-
-
Phaenopsectra sp
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
Trtbelos sp
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
1
-
-
Paratanytarsus sp
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OLIGOCHAETA
Megadriles
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
Limnodrilus
ho meisteri
1
9
2
-
-
-
-
1
2
1
1
5
Ilyodrilus templetom
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Aulodrilus pigueti
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nais sp
-
-
1
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Deo sp
-
-
-
-
-
2008
2009
2011
2013
Pre - Construction
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Taxon
Reference
Reach 2
Reach 4
Reference
Reach 2
Reach 4
Reference
Reach 2
Reach 4
Reference
Reach 2
Reach 4
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Ecclipidrilus sp
-
5
-
6
-
-
-
-
Lumbriculus
varie atus
_
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
13
CRUSTACEA
Procambarus sp
1
3
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Crangonyx sp
16
to
4
14
4
35
6
32
21
5
21
2
Caecidoteaforbesi
6
-
8
1
-
9
12
5
1
-
-
C. racovitzai
10
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
MOLLUSCA
Menetus dilatatus
-
1
7
-
-
-
-
-
Sphaerium sp
-
-
1
-
-
5
-
5
2
Pisidium sp
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
1
-
7
Physa sp
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
OTHER
Corixidae
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
Taxa Richnesss
5
10
10
10
6
6
8
9
10
11
7
12
EPT Taxa Richness
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
-
1
2
NC Biotic Index
7.0
8.6
8.8
7.1
9.1
8
7.6
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.8
7.5
EEP Recommendations and Conclusions
• All hydrology monitoring gauges recorded consecutive hydroperiods for at least 7 percent of
the growing season for 2012
• The restored stream channel has remained stable and is providing the intended habitat and
hydrologic functions All monitoring cross sections and longitudinal profile for 2012 showed
very little adjustment in stream dimension over the previous year
• Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of stems per acre on the site to be
636, with the range of stem density of 390 to 960 stems per acre All vegetation plots have
achieved the success criterion of 260 trees per acre at monitoring year 5
• Benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring was conducted in January 2013 and the results are
presented in the supplemental monitoring report Biotic index results show a slight
improvement in water quality along Reach 2 and a steady improvement within Reach 4
The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory
closure
Contingencies
None
Example Pre - Existing Condition Photos
Upstream culvert, Reach 1 at Brown School Reach 1 and 2 looking downstream during pre -
Road during pre- construction phase. construction phase.
Reach 3 looking upstream during pre- Reach 4 looking upstream during pre -
construction phase. construction phase.
Monitoring Phase
Upstream culvert, Reach 1 at Brown School Reach 2 looking downstream during monitoring
Road during monitoring phase. phase.
Reach 3 looking downstream during monitoring Reach 4 looking downstream during monitoring
phase. phase.
Wetland Restoration Area during monitoring
phase.
Appendix A. Watershed Planning
The Floogie Site is not within a watershed planning area
Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes a portion of the following parcels.
Grantor
County
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Instrument
Page Number
protected
Dan W. Perry and wife,
Mary H. Perry
Bertie
Conservation
875/762
1.036
Easement
Elmer Byrum and wife,
Conservation
Mary E. Byrum
Bertie
Easement
875/770
12.586
Conservation
Carolyn W. Lawrence
Bertie
Easement
879/138
47.211
Conservation
Judy H. Pierce and
Ann Pierce Hughes
Bertie
Easement
879/128
4.992
Conservation
Louvenia Holley, et ux
Bertie
Easement
880/001
5.522
http: //www.nceep.net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92486 FlooRieSite.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID 2006 - 41469 -108 County Bertie USGS Quad Merry Hill
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Address Southeast Regional Office
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Telephone No • (919) 829 -9909
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc ) The property is approximately 74.5 acres
located west of NCSR 1348 Browns School Road), south of NCSR 1344 and north of NCSR 1301, southeast the
community of Whites Crossroads, adiacent to Flat Swamp, in Bertie County, North Carolina.
Description of protects area and activity Restoration and enhancement of former waters impacting 5,553 linear feet
of existing channel, permanently impacting 1.21 acres of wetlands and temporarily impacting 3.34 acres of
wetlands and 615 linear feet of stream channel. Note - See attached Additional Special Conditions.
Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization Regional General Permit Number
Nationwide Permit Number NW # 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submtted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide perrrut, activities which have commenced (1 e, are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of'the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (919) 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the perimttee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pernut, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Bill Biddleeome,at (252) 975 -1616 ext 26
Corps Regulatory Official &4Z., Date 07/06/2007
Expiration Date of Verification 07/06/2009
The Wilrrungton District is comrrutted to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http //www saw usace army mil /WETLANDS /index html to
complete the survey online
Copy Furnished
Page 1 of 2
Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
❑ The. jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action Please reference
.jurisdictional deterrmnation issued Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Deterrmnanon This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation
Manual and is part of a broad continuum of wetlands connected to Flat Swamp a tributary to Hoegard Mill Creek which is a
tributary to the Cashie River.
Corps Regulatory Official d/d/
Date 07/06/2007
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC, MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE
Copy Furnished
Daniel Ingram,
WK Dickson
3101 John Humpries Wnyd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Page 2 of 2
Additional Special Conditions
Action I.D. # SAW - 2006 - 41469 -108 — Floogie Wetland and Stream Restoration
a) This authorization in no way obligates the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to
recognize this work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project
b) This authorization in no way obligates the U S. Army Corps of Engineers to accept
this project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or
entity
Action ID Number: SAW-200641469-108 County:Bertie
Permittee: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Date Permit Issued: 7/6/2007
Project Manager: Biddlecome
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
POST OFFICE BOX 1000
WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date
'The term "adjacent" means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S by man -made dikes or barriers, natural river
berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent
NC) � A IQ O �. � � ! ' PPI. � 1' ! • NS 1 � P G ` '�`
_�
Applicant
Environmental Banc & Exchange File Number 2006- 41469 -108
Date 7/6/2007
Attached
is.
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
❑
permission)
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
ZI
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
q�,.,p„p AF��3i'"�� �� ral.xr� �xrxnea " rl °h,�.$rldse' ,8,ffi{+"'�"i�`P,'�".+b]!� '�+ � ^Gdrt,}'j.s a^•L � 9 _ "ir i --y r. ,h iii' 3"' yy ,P
SFEC- �T-y�tOsN I Th9�e fiilloti�'ir �; ilentif es« },our ri�r tssand opftons,regat; mg�anmaclministrati� a appeal' o`t�thctwabo� =e'
°
�s:R?.f�yRpn�_G �i'kA�'e4Vl'{nX{r� W �A""P w
*y'.1i ' YaAwel ,I�'"F"1I3r,C� : C` M1ir '
3'
deciszan �Aaditignall ><nformatiWiiiavrbe,fbund;dt httpalw�tijai.usace arm} itYanet&nctioris cih /cecw�ire><:c�r
^�m5`
ul' atignsatr3 '�3, "dF1RPartE3131��x °
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved Jurisdictional determinations associated with the perrrut
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date,of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below
B• PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered pemut (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice
C- PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice
D. APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
-
�� It
{ ` _ i .. 4. y li T r h4E'WliadF<��Vw F ;. v <
1vvr"lJ t'..�iflY seai�2.
SECTION, 11;'RtQIJES T FOR :A�PYE�hAGror�OBJECTIQNS' TO AN INITi�AL�PR�(O1r>~ERED "Pi�RMF 1T� ` ° -`
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS• (Describe your reasons for appeahng the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
PO4NT"O`F (0NTACTµE0k� -70U
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact
may also contact.
Bill Biddlecome
Mr Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
US Army Corps of Engineers
CESAD- ET -CO -R
Regulatory Division, Washington Field Office
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
P O Box 1000
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Washington, NC 27889 (252) 975 -1616 ext 26
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY. Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490
Michael F Easley, Governor
William G Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 22, 2007
Coleen H Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 06 -1780, Ver 2
Mr Norton Webster Bertie County
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Drive, Suite 1300
Raleigh, NC 27606
Subject Property. Floogie Mitigation Site
Flat Swamp Creek [030210,24-2-6-2, SW, C]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr Webster:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 4.55 acres of 404 /Wetland (1.21 acres permanent impact,
and 3.34 acres temporary impact) and 6,285 linear feet of perennial stream (5,670 linear feet
permanent, perennial stream impact, and 615 linear feet temporary, perennial stream impact), as
described in your application dated June 7, 2007, and received by the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) on June 12, 2007, to conduct the proposed stream restoration and wetland restoration at
the site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3626 (GC3626). The Certification(s) allows you
to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW27 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in-your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you chaixge
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application If the �4; t4;
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and r;
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in - ' _0�,t ,
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H 0506 (h) This approval requires you to follow the',
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below:
401'Ovdrsig
1'0Q Mail S
2321C`ia
n a91�:
4n gual0l
r �
a �
Press.ReviewEermiti
V r�
a' • 1 JI�F�S
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Page 2 of 4
August 22, 2007
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts-
Type of Impact
Amount Approved Units
Reference
404/Wetland
4 55 [(acres) 1.21 acres permanent impact, and 3 34 acres
PCN page 5 of 9
temporary impact
Stream -
6,285 [(linear feet) 5,670 linear feet permanent, perennial
PCN page 5 of 9
perennial
stream impact, and 615 linear feet temporary, perennial
stream impact]
2 No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so, that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3 Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards
a The erosion and sediment control measures for the protect must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual
b The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times
4 Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and thematural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Page 3 of 4
August 22, 2007
5 Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing;
6. Stream Restoration and Wetland Restoration Plans
You have our approval for your proposed final stream restoration and wetland restoration
at the site with the requirement for Monitoring Level I as described within the point
State/Federal agency Stream Mitigation Guidelines located at.
h_" / /www saw usace army.mil/wetlands/Mitipation/stream mitigation.html The stream
restoration and wetland restoration at the site must be constructed, maintained, and
monitored according to the plans approved by this Office Any repairs or adjustments to
the site must be made according to the approved plans or must receive written approval
from this Office to make the repairs or adjustments The restored stream and wetland
must be preserved in perpetuity by use of a conservation easement or other similar
mechanism as part of the approved plans Additionally, the monitoring for this project
should include sampling points at the upper, middle and lower restoration reaches, and
from one location on the reference reach. Sampling should be conducted prior to
beginning site activities, and then annually during years 3, 4 and 5 of the project
7. Macrobenthos Monitoring Plan
Please provide a macrobenthos monitoring plan which will outline procedures and
provide data points for the collection and analysis of macrobenthos during the Floogie
project. All sampling activities should be conducted in accordance with the Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (July 2006, DWQ Biological
Assessment Unit), and conducted by personnel who have a certificate of training for
DWQ macroinvertebrate collection protocols.
8 Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing You must act within 60
MT—
Environmental
= Banc & Exchange, LLC
Page 4 of 4
August 22, 2007
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.0 27699 -6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the
approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The
Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-
733- 1786 /1
SZ y
Coleen H Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
CHS/ jm
Enclosures- GC3626
Certificate of Completion
cc USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
Kyle Barnes, DWQ Washington Regional Office
DLR Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Daniel Ingram, WK Dickson, 3101 John Humphries Wynd, Raleigh, NC 27612
Filename 061780Ver2Floog ,eM►t,gat,on(Berhe )401
Certification of Completion
DWQ Project No.: County-
Applicant:
Project Name.
Date of Issuance of Certification or Authorization:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650 This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer It is not necessary to send
certificates from all of these
Applicant's Certifcation
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature Date:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials
Signature
Date
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, , as a duly registered Professional (i e, Engineer,
Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically,
weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials
Signature. Registration No Date
eA
WQC #3626
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR STREAM RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT AND
STABILIZATION PROJECTS AND WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND
CREATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING THOSE ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 13 (BANK STABILIZATION) AND 27 (AQUATIC HABITAT
RESTORATION, ESTABLISHMENT AND ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES) AND REGIONAL
PERMIT 197800080 (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BULKHEADS)
This General Certification is issued in conformity With the requirements of Section 401, Public
Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H 0500 and 15A NCAC 2B 0200 for the discharge of fill
material to waters as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (13) and (27) of the Corps of
Engineers regulations (i a Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27) and Regional Permit
197800080 The category of activities shall include stream bank stabilization or stream
restoration activity as long as impacts to waters or significant wetlands are minimized This
Certification replaces Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3399 issued March 2003 and
,WQC Number 3495 issued March 28, 2003 This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of
Engineers reauthorize Nationwide Permits 13 or 27 or Regional Permit 197800080 or when
deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth
Conditions of Certification
Wetland and /or riparian area restoration and creation projects which are for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit (and not including
projects that only involve stream restoration or enhancement work described in
condition nos 2 and 3 below) that are proposed under this General Certification
require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality. All
applications for written DWQ approval will be reviewed and a response will be
prepared within 30 days of stamped receipt of the application in the Division of
Water Quality's Central Office in Raleigh This 30 -day period does not include time
spent by the application or DWQ's response within US Postal Service or North
Carolina's Mail Service Center mail systems;
Wetland and riparian area restoration and creabon projects (not including projects
that involve work in or impacts to streams) which are not for compensatory
mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit proposed under this General
Certification do not require written application to and approval from the Division of
Water Quality In these cases, the applicant is required to notify the Division in
writing with three copies of project specifications before the impact occurs If the
Division determines that the project would not result in an ecologically viable wetland
and riparian area, then the Division shall prepare a response to notify the applicant
in writing within 30 days of DWQ's receipt of the notification In such cases, the
applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate
fee, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal
procedures,
s
2 Proposed stream restoration projects (as defined and limited below), that'do not
h
disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or ,
compensatory mitigation credit do not require written a plica ion to,and approval
„ P ry g _ q P -.per ,�••�n-
from the Division of Water Quality, and,'therefoi—Wkdo notFrequire payment,of,an
WQC #3626
application fee to the Division of Water Quality Projects that are intended for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit, that are intended to
resolve a violation, or that are in association with a development project shall require
an application, fee, and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality
Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered or
degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and floodprone areas to
its natural or referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed
conditions This biological and chemical integrity, including transport of water and
sediment is produced by the stream's watershed In order to achieve dynamic
equilibrium The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three
copies of detailed restoration plans and specifications before the impact occurs If
the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream
restoration, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of
receipt of the application. In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a
formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to
process the application through normal procedures,
3 Stream enhancement projects (as defined and limited below), that do not disturb
wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit and do not include any stream channel relocation, do
not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality,
and, therefore, do not require payment of an application fee to the Division of Water
Quality Projects that are intended for compensatory mitigation or compensatory
mitigation credit, that are intended to resolve a violation, or that are In association
with a development project shall require an application, fee, and written concurrence
from the Division of Water Quality
4. Stream enhancement is defined as the process of implementing stream
rehabilitation practices In order to improve water quality and /or,ecological function
These practices must only be conducted on streams that are not experiencing
severe aggradation or erosion Stream enhancement does not include the relocation
of the stream channel Stream enhancement bank stabilization techniques include
the use of woody vegetation as the primary means of long term stability, and "soft"
techniques such as root wads that encourage the establishment of dense woody
vegetation Stream enhancement techniques do not typically include the use of
stream bank or bed hardening techniques such as rip -rap or other rock, gabion,
block or concrete structures However, enhancement activities may also include the
placement of in stream habitat or grade control structures such as cross vanes, J-
hook vanes, and wing deflectors that do not affect the overall dimension, pattern, or
profile of a stable stream
The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed
enhancement plans and specifications before the impact occurs if the stream
enhancement project disturbs greater than 500 feet of stream bank or if the project
proposes the use of in stream structures. If the Division determines that the project
does not meet the above definition of stream enhancement, then the Division shall
notify the applicant in writing with an explanation within 30 days of receipt of the
notification to require application and payment of the appropriate fee,
5 Stream stabilization projects that include the use of any structure or fill in the existing
stream bed or disturb greater that 500 feet of stream bank that are proposed under
this General Certification require written application to and approval from the
Division of Water Quality
R
0 ,
WQC #3626
Stream stabilization is defined as the in -place stabilization of an eroding stream
bank using measures that consist primarily of "hard" engineering, such as but not
limited to concrete lining, rip rap or other rock, and gabions The use of "hard"
engineering will not be considered as stream restoration or enhancement,
Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico or Randleman River Basins
(or any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in
effect at the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification
from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 213 0200 Activities listed as "exempt"
from these rules do not need to apply for written concurrence under this
Certification New development activities located in the protected 50 -foot wide
riparian areas (whether junsdictional wetlands or not) within the Neuse and Tar -
Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B 0200 All new development shall be located,
designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water
quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices,
7 In order for the above conditions to be valid, any plans not requiring written
concurrence to use this Certification must be built according to the plans provided to
the Division of Water Quality If written concurrence is required, then the project
must be built and maintained according to the plans approved by the written
concurrence and Certification from the Division of Water Quality,
Appropnate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment r
Control Planning and Design Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" �¢
whichever is more appropnate (available from the Division of Land Resources at the
DENR Regional and Central Offices) shall be designed, installed and maintained
property to assure compliance witti the appropriate turbidity water quality standard
(50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ, 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes and all lakes and reservoirs, 10 NTUs in DWQ - classified trout
waters),
9 All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the onginal grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or
delegated program has released the project,
10 Any rip -rap shall be of such a size and density so as not to be able to be carried off
by wave or current action and consist of clean rock or masonry material free of
debris or toxic pollutants Rip -rap shall not be installed in the streambed except in
specific areas required for velocity control and to ensure structural integrity of bank
stabilization measures If rip -rap is to be installed within the streambed, the amount
and location must be approved In writing by the Division of Land Resources and
Division of Water Quality However rock vanes, wing deflectors, and similar
structures for grade control and bank protection are acceptable,
11 Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with freshwaters of the state until the concrete has hardened,
12 If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding
of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision Is issued by the State
Clearinghouse,
�Y
WQC #3626
13 Additional site- specific conditions may be added to projects which require written
concurrence under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable
water quality and effluent standards,
14 Projects with any impacts to streams, wetlands, and /or waters that have received a
Notice of Violation from the Division of Land Resources and/or the Division of Water
Quality are required to submit a complete application and receive written
concurrence to use this Certification regardless of the proposed impact amount to
streams, wetlands, and waters,
15 Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall
expire three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or the notification sent
to DWQ;
16 Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices
a Erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained In accordance with the most recent version
of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual
b Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
G For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual
d Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act
e Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times
17 No Impacts Beyond those to Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - construction
Notification All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur
18 No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to
the maximum extent practicable If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project
N
WQC #3626
Non - compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project shall result
in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
WQC # 3626
5
Effective date: 19 March 2007
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
At,, �u
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
Mitigation Project Name Floogie Site
EEP IMS ID 92486
River Basin ROANOKE
Cataloging Unit 03010107
ADolied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1.1 3'1 2 1 5:1 1 1 3'1 2 1 5 1 1 1 3'1 9 1 5 1 1.1 3 1 n 5 1 1 1 1.1
J
T
Information as of 3/17/2013
_
-
a0
o v
z
o
z
u
o
z W
oE!
za
L
2
cOiw
L Y Ly
u
v
E
8 W
y t0
A 4
yN
U a
z0
m
y 1p�
p�
O
z
O
z
`d
o
L o
a
O
z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
11,149.00
25.19
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits feet and acres):
Not Applicable
EEP Debits feet and acres):
DWO Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2003 -10719
B -4027
0.28
2006 -32018
B -4188
0.08
2005 -1765
1994 -00453
R -2404A
4.05
2005 -10376
B -1303
0.09
2008 -01801 -158
B -4578
010
2006 - 41005 -158
SR 1417 - Division 1
0.02
2002 -10390
B -4026
0.10
2003 -10021
B -4434
0.22
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
11,149.0
120.2651
Information as of 3/17/2013