Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061780 Ver 1_Closeout Report_2013040106 nod Floogie Mitigation Project EEP ID (IMS #) 92486 FDP CONTRACT NUMBER D06011 USACE ACTION ID # DWQ 404# CLOSEOUT REPORT Stream and Wetland Project Setting & Classifications County Bertie General Location Windsor Basin: Roanoke Ph sio ra hic Region: Coastal Plains Ecore ion: Coastal Flatwoods USGS Hydro Unit: 03010107160050 NCDWQ Sub - basin: 03 -02 -10 Wetland Classification Riparian Thermal Regime: Warm Trout Water: No Monitoring Year 3 September 2010 Beaver removal 2010 Project Performers October 2011 Source Agency: EEP Provider: EBX -Neuse I, LLC Designer: WK Dickson & Co., Inc. Monitoring Firm WK Dickson & Co., Inc. Channel Remediation WK Dickson & Co., Inc. Plant remediation WK Dickson & Co., Inc. Property Interest Holder DENR Stewardship Overall Project Activities and Timeline Milestone Month -Year Project Instituted Aril 2006 Permitted July 2007 Construction Completed February 2008 As -built survey Aril 2008 Monitoring Year -1 August 2008 Beaver removal 2008 Monitoring Year -2 September 2009 Beaver removal 2009 Monitoring Year 3 September 2010 Beaver removal 2010 Monitoring Year 4 October 2011 Beaver removal 2011 Monitoring Year 5 August 2012 Beaver removal 2012 Supplemental Planting near beaver dams and privet spraying along old channel December 2012 Closeout Submission Aril 2013 s, Project Setting and Background Summary This stream and wetland mitigation project was developed to provide stream and wetland mitigation units for the NC EEP full delivery process Previous stream conditions demonstrated significant degradation with a high degree of incision as a result of straightening and channelization performed to promote agricultural activities Historically, a small Coastal Plain swamp existed within the floodplain of Flat Swamp Creek Restoration of the stream included establishment Of stable cross - sectional geometry, restoration of planform sinuosity, and increased streambed diversity Wetland restoration included plugging existing ditches, opening ditches outside the restoration area to promote infiltration, restoring microtopography, planting wetlands species, and relocating an existing road outside of the easement While the site has not required supplemental planting to meet vegetative success criteria, efforts have been made to control beaver populations which have been flooding the site in years 4 and 5 Goals and Objectives • Produce a minimum of 11,149 stream mitigation units (SMU) and 25 19 riparian wetland mitigation units (WMU) to the NCEEP • Maximize the improvements of riparian and aquatic habitats and water quality through ecological restoration Success Criteria Wetland Hydrology Restoration of the water table to within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 7% of the growing season continuously (approximately 16 days) During periods of low rainfall, the restoration gauge hydroperiod must exceed that of the reference gauges, provided the gauges exceed 5% of the growing season, to be deemed successful Stream and Wetland Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three monitoring enod Vegetation Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five momtormg penod A maximum of 20 percent of the site species composition may be comprised of non - invasive volunteers A photo log will be maintained over the monitonng period and must demonstrate maturation of planted vegetation and volunteer h dro h tic species Stream Bankfull events a minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the five -year monitoring period Cross - Sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type channels The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable Bedforms observed should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels Photographs will be used to evaluate stream characteristics Sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates within the restored stream channel shall be conducted in Year 1, Year 3, and Year 5 of post-restoration monitoring Restoration Mitigation Watershed As-Built Linear TMitigation Ratio Mitigation Units Reach Approach Acreage Footage/ Acreage (SMU/WMU) STREA, RI Stream 1381 2800 1 1 2800 Restoration R2 Stream 1482 2500 1 1 2500 Restoration R3 Stream 1616 2400 1 1 2400 Restoration R4 Stream 2148 2771 1 1 2771 Restoration IA Headwater Valley 539 322 1 1 322 Restoration 1B Headwater Valley 179 356 1 1 356 Restoration W C ETvg-&-XQ_ _,xk Area I Riparian Wetland 1 1456 25 19 1 1 25 19 Restoration ... - - E .1 ITUROOMMORIffill ; 1 !1! . M go an—fikTHYPeNEW . Mitt anon [I 1,7nirffgralffig,=� Stream Mitigation Units 11,149 (SMU) Wetland Mitigation Units 25 19 (WMLJ) /trsan llMUr /Mntru 0 -mvr OF 2010 NC OneMap Aerial Photography -.. earo.x:e� �> y��tr, »e • �r � Assets Map, -- �a�.z =r./ QED—! I 0 250 500 1.000 1,600 2.000 Feet Floogie Mitigation Site 'ewaw v m _.coc F_a�, 1 inch = 1,000 feet ®`" -acxr- ®lreta�a��txaeon Proiecl Area SOIL SEMES LEGEND Hydnc Sods Non+tycim Soft GOA OotlsDVOSWI/b 0e 3%sepq w wlwrt. wybr swybam ESA E.un tint IM anW Aa *. O to S % a�pa Q Orw.Mm - b.m R. R- -W, Lr U'I-V" +--W bw y.E vltf-.r br.n. M1RawMMAnaC 2010 Bing Aerial Photography LEGEND Rcoor Ro.r o - soo - I.S00 :. Soils Map eu 1 inch = 1,000 feet ' 4 Ripanlan WeWanO Restoration Area , •.., 1 � Stream Restoratpn !; ExretingWetlandBoundary ` as ti 1 . leuR4ryrwwOMnlaO nWnal USGS Quadrangle Map eEoNDR- Floogie Site Q aa« a loon 2 O soon � ��.,.•«�. Fop RIKrMOn t inch = 2,000 feet 0 Proiecl Area SOIL SEMES LEGEND Hydnc Sods Non+tycim Soft GOA OotlsDVOSWI/b 0e 3%sepq w wlwrt. wybr swybam ESA E.un tint IM anW Aa *. O to S % a�pa Q Orw.Mm - b.m R. R- -W, Lr U'I-V" +--W bw y.E vltf-.r br.n. M1RawMMAnaC 2010 Bing Aerial Photography LEGEND Rcoor Ro.r o - soo - I.S00 :. Soils Map :waw.wnRSs FIOOgie $I�e 1 inch = 1,000 feet SO— Ream seemenv O creel ca„oe . — Hea 1,, to • wmw, q Wall � Figure 7b - - - -- Hea�waler 1B NCD T R— R-11 O Easement 175 350 ' °° Feet Current Conditions Map — R-ea<h 3 R �, s�elaae lR — �wabmenm Pfaneny Area 1 inch = 350 feet Floogie Mitigation Site —ReMh° ®Imasrvae ,nftAroa (Prrvetl 51ream Observal'gn Areas Eaislinp NptlanAe Cmss Sec- Ez ~w. R......n 0 175 350 700 Feet 1 inch = 350 feet Figure 7a Current Conditions Map Floogie Mitigation Site S(rearn Reach Segment, O Cre.t Gaups Headwater to • MaNlorinp Well Head —, lB NCDOT Road. Reacht QEn—enl Reach 3 - V getallon Plol, Reac1 3 S,pbmental Planting Area Reach < ®Ima__ Control Arne ,e) Stream Obce—I —Area. E,Iling Wedantls � Cross Sections � Wellantl 0.e,toralion 175 350 1 inch = 350 feet Figure 7c 700 W Feet Current Conditions Map Floogie Mitigation Site Shea. Reach Sepmenb O Crnel Gaune HeaEwabr 1A • AbnAOnrp YYOII - - - -- 1R MCO l R,I* =e.—ler Rexn 1 Q Easement Rexn 2 - Na�ebbon Hole Raxn 3 Suppbmenbl Hxeny Area Rexn 9 ®Invaenee --1 Area IRmell � smam oe.emmlon aeae ®EnabO wenanae C.. Sxtlwu N§Ibrtl R.MOtabin 0 • Floogie Reach 1-2 STA. 15+50- STA. 25150 •gym -r..1 -Y-2 -Y..3 -Y... -Y.. W. Sf.. LTI, - In 47 ■ + + x + X X+ 43 41 m 30 37 1550 1630 1750 two 1950 2830 Ilse SIM 2356 24" 2350 Cba=d D' Floogie Reach 3 STA. 47 +50 30 - STA. 63+00 —A.Diih —Y-1 —Y-2 —Y-3 —Y-4 —Y-5 —Wd.&.f- 46 44 X + +X + x 42 x Y+ X+ " 4 40 V 9 38 VrN v 36 31 4750 4950 5130 5350 3550 5730 5950 6130 6310 6530 Cbm" DM=ft (a) Floogie Reach 4 STA. 87+50. STA. 94+50 —Y-1 —Y-3 —Y..3 —wdsfi— 4 LTA X ItTo X + 39 x X 9 32 w 8750 1100 SM W <0 9130 9130 9350 (1..-d ni.aur lei Floaek, Cr SMion I, I'M 48 47 - d 46 1 44 43 l I 0 10 20 JO 40 50 ,.. •i , Vldth (0) �BdAii Oehnm —AHIn6 —Y-1 —Ys2 —Y-1 - -Y >4 —Y- FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM 50 49 — —_ 41 .. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ---- 43 0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b Wid16 (ft) -- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3 SrcBOn 4, kiM, AY 48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __.... I 46 44 14 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao Wlddl (ft) —Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5 9r 4' 14 9 � W43 J2 JI 10 0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70 WId1h (ft) —B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3 P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool w floo*. Crap Sft-Uon J, toot u Jt 16 -- C 4S - —_ 41 W 42 .. .. i. _ ... ............. 0 10 2a 30 40 1p 60 mdlh Ift) — �FlmdPrme.Vn �A�6.foI1 F.l�valim �AS&ti0 —YQI —Ym2 —Y-1 —Yw4 �Ye' JO a 10 T M 40 le WId1h (B 1 — BwMWIFkWm —A,B k Ywl Yw2 —Ym3 —Yw4 Ym4 FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM 50 49 — —_ 41 .. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ---- 43 0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b Wid16 (ft) -- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3 SrcBOn 4, kiM, AY 48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __.... I 46 44 14 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao Wlddl (ft) —Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5 9r 4' 14 9 � W43 J2 JI 10 0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70 WId1h (ft) —B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3 P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool w FloeRle. C— %mth. S, RWk J' 46 45 c -- a 42 41 0 10 2a 30 40 1p 60 mdlh Ift) — �FlmdPrme.Vn �A�6.foI1 F.l�valim �AS&ti0 —YQI —Ym2 —Y-1 —Yw4 �Ye' FlnoRlr, Crn6P SKI" 2, PJM 50 49 — —_ 41 .. _ ------ ._. ._.. ._. _ ............. _ ... .. .......... ---- ---- 43 0 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 b Wid16 (ft) -- -Hood Pn4n Arn — BathiOFJr m —A.BWP —Y :1 —Yt2 —Yw3 —Y-4 �YIr3 SrcBOn 4, kiM, AY 48 _.. . _... �.. .. .... _.._ ..... _._... _ _. __.... I 46 44 14 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 r-0 '0 ao Wlddl (ft) —Fbod P—Arn —.Wk --A.11 —Y-3 - - -Yi.4 —Yn5 9r 4' 14 9 � W43 J2 JI 10 0 10 20 30 40 s. 6a 70 WId1h (ft) —B dAHElerrloo —A Bw —Ywl —1 "-2 —Ytar3 P7ooglr, Cro, S-Ifon 6, Fool w Floogk, Cr m% Section 7, Riffle 45 –�i :i►r 6 6 += 41 40 0 10 30 30 1n 50 - W Idih I I1) —Kw,]Pray Ara —HOW1,1119mnm —AS8udl —Yml —Ym' —YMI Ym Floozie, Cross Section 9, RMk 4' 46 45 41 40 0 10 .ii LI 40 511 AO Wift at) �PlpO P'aOe Ara �IW#NO FJeMa —A Wit —Yml —Ym2 —Ym3 —Y-4 �Ym! FWogk. CI Satim 11, RBIk 4s C 44 _.:...... 41 M G 4' 41 43 0 10 20 30 40 6o W." (Im - ............... ._ - -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- .___: _ __ —Fk,w I, —Ara Me41 F2wma �A'bnl �Yml -lm' Ym3 -- Ym4 Floogie, Cress Sorlbn 8, Pool 45 lE J1 EZa F e. 41 40 0 l0 20 so 4o sA � Width (R) �B�d:fWl Flmrion —Ar11M —Y— —Ym2 -- -l-4 —Y—! Floogk. Mn Sectbn I0, 1'od 45 44 43 - ....._ ..... - -_ C 6 4 y 40 A � , 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 20 so ni widen (g) —SM"Il Ek mon —A B&dl Ymi —Ym2 m Ym3 —Ym4 YmS Flwrt, C» SWdiii; 1; PINT Is j II ........... ... �.._..... - ..... _.__. ___ ._.... ... .........._. -. – .'. 4. f 40 .__._ -•_._ -.. .._.... -. -._ -._ p p 0 l0 30 O0 40 5o 60 70 80 Wide, (n) — eaaNO,�na �ASgsit mm.Yml ��Ym2 ssssa.Ym7 +�Ym4 �Ym3 rMqol• U w Iked- Il. PW fl 42 loe t0 )6 e In 20 to +n 'n 6o to w,,m W need,, Cron Section IS. Rifle +I 1 AI 2 +o i is 51 -- - i, o to :o In a so hh w sn cro �FtaeA PlaneMr — ewnsln �rf —n.a.n �r «I -+ r,.l mgr «] --r.rf �r «s Flood,. Ccofe $a'fon IJ. RFIYI, E W b tt +1 .i. r. ware (a) — R.ahm,Am =INWk ERAm —ArlWl —Y «1 �Y «l —Y«) - ^ -T �Yrf5 Q +1 a c n A m t n B emolk CFO" Salton 16. Pool n to 211 )a +o f, nn YO w,ft (a) f— hm).fs hl<huw —A.AW —Y «1 —Y «2 —YQI -- -1 —Y «) PMe %a Cm Secu" 17, ewl 12 N e: 31 x r W � t5 I N 0 20 ID 30 N 30 00 "00 Wldb (B1 —B+okWM— —AlduAl —Ymi —Yar7 —Y-3 �Ymt �YmT tl Q 19 � x xr i.i N u N Fk t. CWu Sadw 19, P" 0 10 so 00 00 '0 t0 W.dh lll, �B9e1000 �99ia .:,e�A —Ym -+YW —/w1 lma �Ym: FM/R C9 Set11m 1F, FJM 92 �p YN - -.... ...... _..._._._.. ... — V t N , N B 10 N 7B 00 So e0 ✓9 .. W,em (fl) —FIo ProeA- —IW*U � —M.bu —Yml —1m2 —1-1 Yor9 Year; V n"ot. [Tm Set/m 28, am N 2010 2011 2012 CG1 17 CG1 - CG1 9a CG1 CG2 CG1 CG2 Number of Bankfull 2 2 c? 01 4 6 5 3 2 w NA Eve nts >9 , Maximum Height -- 1.6 2.1 2.6 r Above Bankfull (feet) 10 - .. _..... _.. --- __ 10 o l0 20 to 40 :o 00 .. 0o W.4& M) �B9k§AEkwkm —B,� —1 -- 1'n Y -9 V 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CG1 CG2 CG1 CG2 CG1 CG2 CG1 CG2 CG1 CG2 Number of Bankfull 2 2 4 4 6 5 3 2 1 NA Eve nts Maximum Height 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.6 1.1 Above Bankfull (feet) V Parameter Cross Section 1 Pool Cross Section 2 Riffle Cross Section 3 Pool Cross Section 4 Riffle Dimension Base MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width ft 168 169 172 189 198 172 164 190 204 186 178 169 193 188 188 200 189 194 224 199 203 169 176 173 Flood prone Width ft 730 708 709 71 0 710 710 793 774 769 776 776 776 775 768 764 770 770 770 727 65 1 675 713 71 3 71 3 BF Cross Sectional Area ft 34 1 339 33 5 346 326 322 187 21 3 226 209 194 200 490 41 2 420 407 421 41 9 262 224 21 9 192 200 21 1 BF Mean Depth ft 20 20 19 18 16 19 11 11 11 11 11 12 25 22 22 20 22 22 12 11 11 11 11 12 BF Max Depth ft 38 37 37 37 36 34 24 25 25 23 24 24 49 48 46 45 45 43 29 26 25 22 23 26 Width/De thRatio 83 84 89 103 120 91 145 170 184 165 163 143 76 86 85 98 85 90 192 176 188 148 156 142 Entrenchment Ratio 43 30 41 38 36 41 48 41 38 42 44 46 40 41 41 39 41 40 32 33 33 42 40 41 Wetted Perimeter ft 18 9 189 192 209 21 8 194 172 197 21 I 192 18 5 17 7 22 2 21 6 21 2 224 21 1 21 7 23 3 206 21 1 175 184 183 Hydraulic radius ft 1 8 1 8 1 7 1 7 1 5 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ] 0 1 1 2 2 1 9 20 1 8 20 1 9 1 1 l 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 Parameter Cross Section 5 Riffle Cross Section 6 Pool Cross Section 7 Riffle Cross Section 8 Pool uBase Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width 11) 167 165 169 183 174 171 174 181 177 234 208 177 185 203 177 187 195 202 192 200 209 218 209 188 Flood prone Width ft 694 662 659 662 662 665 690 66 9 61 3 673 673 673 622 61 1 576 597 597 597 602 600 594 601 60 1 60 1 BF Cross Sectional Area 164 158 154 13 7 160 141 288 297 297 300 334 288 167 193 173 175 249 25 5 260 264 276 278 298 289 BF Mean Depth ft 10 10 09 07 09 08 17 16 17 13 16 16 09 09 10 09 13 13 14 13 13 13 1 1 11 BF Max Depth ft 20 20 19 18 20 18 34 34 1 34 28 32 32 14 17 16 16 21 22 25 25 24 23 21 23 Width/De thRatio 170 171 184 244 188 207 105 111 106 183 129 109 204 214 181 199 153 160 141 152 159 171 248 242 Entrenchment Ratio 42 40 39 36 38 39 40 37 35 29 32 38 34 30 33 32 31 30 31 30 28 28 22 23 Wetted Perimeter ft 17 2 170 173 188 178 176 190 197 193 246 22 1 21 7 189 212 187 19 1 203 209 202 209 220 22 7 27 7 24 2 Hydraulic radius ft) 10 09 09 07 09 08 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 2 1 5 13 09 09 09 09 12 12 13 1 3 13 12 1 1 1 1 Parameter Cross Section 9 Riffle Cross Section 10 Pool Cross Section 1 I Riffle Cross Section 12 Pool Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl�MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width ft 190 191 186 188 185 183 225 217 221 234 191 193 194 198 193 194 199 201 130 158 162 160 196 174 Flood prone Width ft 66 1 660 660 659 659 659 805 802 806 807 807 807 779 748 688 749 749 749 787 767 761 759 759 759 BF Cross Sectional Area 327 295 290 284 254 25 1 401 401 41 1 368 305 31 5 21 5 24 1 236 23 8 232 236 257 274 288 280 330 268 BF Mean Depth ft 1 7 15 1 6 1 5 14 1 4 1 8 1 8 19 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 1 12 1 2 1 1 09 1 0 20 1 7 1 8 1 8 1 7 1 5 BF Max Depth ft 29 27 26 26 24 25 38 37 37 1 34 29 32 27 28 1 27 27 26 27 39 39 39 39 40 37 Width/Depth Ratio 11 1 124 120 124 135 133 127 118 119 1 148 119 118 175 163 158 181 282 244 66 9U29 91 117 113 Entrenchment Ratio 35 34 35 35 36 36 36 37 37 35 42 41 40 38 36 36 29 31 61 4 39 39 43 Wetted Perimeter ft 20 1 20 1 19 6 19 9 19 4 19 2 24 2 23 8 24 2 24 6 20 1 20 5 20 5 20 6 20 1 21 6 26 4 24 6 15 3 17 18 1 21 5 19 3 H draulic radius ft 1 6 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 7 1 7 1 7 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 9 0 9 1 7 1 1 5 1 5 14 Parameter Cross Section 13 Pool Cross Section 14 Riffle Cross Section 15 Riffle Cross Section 16 Pool Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 197 192 185 228 225 182 188 184 196 198 195 196 175 170 189 180 176 160 197 239 236 231 225 226 Flood rove Width ft 698 700 700 700 700 700 638 63 3 636 634 633 63 3 668 668 620 666 669 665 608 607 606 608 607 606 BF Cross Sectional Area (W) 264 239 234 272 287 220 243 240 248 234 247 21 7 159 184 21 9 226 21 2 176 497 485 626 552 51 2 482 BF Mean Depth ft 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 13 13 1 1 09 1 1 09 1 1 12 13 12 11 25 20 21 24 23 21 BF Max Depth (ft) 27 26 26 25 26 24 22 22 23 20 21 20 15 28 1 29 29 30 29 50 50 48 46 44 43 Width/De thRatio 147 155 147 191 176 151 146 141 155 187 286 177 193 157 162 143 146 145 78 118 106 99 106 Entrenchment Ratio 35 36 38 31 31 38 34 34 32 30 24 32 38 39 33 37 38 42 31 25 26 27 27 Wetted Pertmeter(ft 20 4 199 194 23 5 23 I 189 195 191 204 21 3 270 202 179 182 20 1 193 194 180 223 263 256 J53 25 0 24 7 H draulic radius (ft 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 9 1 1 0 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 8 2 1 2 1 2 0 Parameter Cross Section 17 Pool Cross Section 18 Riffle Cross Section 19 Pool Cross Section 20 Riffle = Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY] MY2 MY3 MY43MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft ) 159 165 153 184 182 169 180 170 176 197 190 183 152 151 162 167 170 168 136 144 151 149 151 138 Flood prone Width (ft 74 1 71 0 744 74 1 74 1 74 1 763 76 1 763 769 770 769 816 819 820 816 819 81 5 972 969 969 97 I 976 971 BF Cross Sectional Area ft 51 1 499 503 558 560 527 565 51 7 533 593 584 556 463 450 466 477 463 467 325 350 366 397 372 356 BF Mean Depth ft 32 30 33 30 31 31 31 30 30 30 31 30 30 30 29 29 27 28 24 24 24 27 25 26 BF Max Depth ft 50 51 1 49 54 53 52 45 44 42 47 49 49 49 48 47 47 46 47 30 34 34 36 34 34 Width/Depth Ratio 50 55 47 61 59 54 57 56 58 66 62 60 50 51 57 58 63 61 57 59 63 56 62 53 Entrenchment Ratio 47 43 49 40 41 43 42 45 43 39 40 42 54 54 50 49 48 48 71 67 64 65 64 70 Wetted Perimeter (ft) 20 6 2-0-8— 19 3 22 6 229 21 4 222 213 21 5 244 236 22 7 193 188 195 20 1 203 203 161 17 1 178 177 183 168 Hydraulic radius ft 25 24 26 25 24 25 25 24 25 24 25 24 24 24 1 24 24 23 23 20 21 21 22 20 21 Reach 1 Parameter Baseline MY 1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 s Pattern Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Channel Beltwidth (ft) 3905 8672 6288 8494 15825 12372 8494 15825 123 72 8494 15825 12372 8494 15825 123 72 8494 158 25 123 72 Radius of Curvature ft 1826 2739 2282 2024 3026 2487 2024 3026 2487 2024 3026 2487 2024 3026 2487 2024 3026 2487 Meander Wavelength (11) 12425 171 16 147 70 275 87 36482 32022 275 87 36482 32022 .27587 36482 32022 27587 36482 320 22 275 87 36482 32022 Meander Width ratio 212 472 342 23 42 33 23 42 33 23 42 33 23 42 33 23 42 33 Profile Riffle length (ft 15 1 1032 390 200 470 288 200 470 288 200 47 0 28 8 20 0 47 0 28 8 200 470 28 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 00038 00177 00081 0 001 00281 00118 0 001 00281 00118 00051 00305 00191 00051 00305 00191 00051 00305 00191 Pool length ft 23 2 1394 526 21 7 874 454 21 7 874 454 21 7 874 454 21 7 874 454 21 7 874 454 Poolspacing ft 33 9 2508 653 295 155 8 73 5 295 1558 735 295 155 8 735 295 155 8 73 5 295 1558 73 5 Additional Reach Parameters Valley Length ft 1581 9 741 0 7410 7410 741 0 7410 Channel Length (ft 2200 10178 10178 10178 10178 10178 Sinuosity 14 14 14 14 14 14 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 000150 00007 00007 0000802 0000802 0000802 BF slope ft/ft 00009 000075 000075 000182 000182 000182 Ros en Classification C5 C5 C5 C5 C5 C5 Reach 2 Parameter Baseline MY MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Pattern x Min r Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max 6SMed Min Max Med Min Max Med Channel Beltwidth ft 3998 8878 6438 3998 8878 6438 3998 8878 6438 3998 8878 6438 3998 8878 6438 3998 8878 6438 Radius of Curvature ft 1869 2804 2336 1869 2804 2336 1869 2804 23 36 1869 2804 2336 1869 2804 2336 1869 2804 2336 Meander Wavelength (ft 12720 17522 151 21 12720 17522 15121 12720 17522 151 21 12720 175 22 15121 12720 17522 151 21 12720 17522 151 21 Meander Width ratio 2 12 472 342 2 12 472 342 212 472 342 2 12 472 342 2 12 472 342 2 12 472 342 Profile Riffle length (11) 282 975 491 282 975 49 1 282 975 491 282 975 49 1 28 2 97 5 49 1 975 49 1 Riffle slope ft/ft 0 0020 0 0096 0 0045 0 0020 0 0096 0 0045 0 0020 0 0096 0 0045 0 0020 0 0096 00045 00020 00096 00045 0 0096 0 0045 Pool length ft 194 1359 596 194 1359 596 194 13591 596 194 13591 596 194 1359 596 F35 1359 596 Pools spacing ft 352 195 1 1194 352 195 1 1194 35 2 195 1 1194 352 195 1 1194 352 195 1 1194 195 1 1194 Additional Reach Parameters Valley Length ft 7568 7568 7568 7568 7568 7568 Channel Length ft 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 Sinuosity 20 20 20 20 20 20 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 000140 000140 000140 0000802 0000802 0000802 BF sloe (ft/ft) 000075 000075 000075 0 001 0 001 0 001 Ros en Classification C5 C5 C5 C5 C5 C5 Reach 3 Parameter Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Pattern Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max�Med Min Max Med Min 3 Max `Med Channel Beltwidth ft 4106 9141 6623 832 2171 1526 832 2171 1526 832 2171 152 6 832 2171 1526 832 2171 1526 Radius of Curvature (ft) 19 17 2886 2401 141 31 7 205 141 31 7 205 141 317 205 141 31 7 205 141 317 205 Meander Wavelength (11) 13092 18030 155 51 221 9 4988 3256 2219 4988 3256 221 9 4988 3256 221 9 4988 3256 221 9 4988 3256 Meander Width ratio 212 472 342 20 53 37 20 53 37 20 53 37 20 53 37 20 53 37 Profile Riffle length (ft) 195 1958 347 102 570 227 10 2 57 0 22 7 102 570 227 102 570 227 102 570 227 Riffle slope ft/ft 0 0022 00297 00038 00003 00313 00118 00003 00313 00118 0 0108 00141 00117 0 0108 0 0141 00117 0 0108 00141 00117 Pool length ft) 134 1266 546 138 386 228 138 386 228 138 386 228 138 386 228 138 386 228 Pools spacing ft 224 20641 86 1 232 1683 53 1 232 1683 53 1 232 1683 53 1 232 1683 53 1 23 2 1683 53 1 Additional Reach Parameters Valley Length (ft) 24985 9668 9668 9668 9668 9668 Channel Length (ft 4110 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Sinuosity 17 18 18 18 18 18 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 000160 0 001 0 001 0 001 0 001 0 001 BF slope ft/ft) 00008 0 001 0 001 00012 00012 00012 Ros en Classificationi E5 E5 E5 E5 E5 E5 Reach 4 Parameter Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Pattern Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min m Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Channel Beltwidth (ft) 279 477 35 8 279 477 358 279 477 35 8 279 477 358 279 477 358 279 477 358 Radius of Curvature ft 8622 1878 1402 8622 1878 1402 8622 1878 1402 8622 1878 1402 8622 1878 1402 8622 1878 1402 Meander Wavelength ft 368 1 3919 3800 368 1 3919 3800 368 1 3919 3800 368 1 3919 3800 368 1 3919 3800 368 1 3919 3800 Meander Width ratio 09085 1 5523 06649 09085 1 5523 06649 09085 1 5523 06649 09085 1 5523 06649 09085 1 5523 0 6649 0 9085 1 5523 06649 Profile Riffle length (ft 41 9 80 1 636 41 9 80 1 636 41 9 80 1 636 419 80 1 636 41 9 80 1 636 419 80 1 63 6 Riffle sloe (ft/ft) 00016 00090 00064 00016 00090 00064 00016 00090 00064 00023 0 009 00046 00023 0 009 00046 00023 0 009 00046 Pool length ft 394 1576 7634 394 1576 7634 394 1576 7634 394 1576 7634 394 1576 7634 394 1576 7634 Pools acm ft 514 1279 884 1279 884 514 1279 884 51 4 1279 88 4 51 4 1279 884 514 1279 884 --514 Additional Reach Parameters Valley Length ft 6158 6158 6158 6158 6158 6158 Channel Length (ft) 6384 6384 6384 6384 6384 6384 Sinuosity 10 10 10 10 10 10 Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 00003 00003 00003 00006 00006 00006 BF slope ft/ft) 00002 00002 00002 0000766 0000766 0000766 Ros en Classification E5 E5 E5 E5 E5 E5 Results of 2012 Vegetation Monitoring — Planted Species by Plot Summary of Results p Species Wetand.Pol&-y %A63j trea"6a Bu ft fer SR.eal'ots " �v '' �`5,q��l a aC ✓M ��yk wx � ` m rSr J� raf "a .m 'iTFr�Mz cS. , n 55 53 53 51 51 510 Plot 2 60 46 49 40 39 39 *'747s Plot 3 �12�13�i14�15���16� r 2t 15 qh "17 f I Plot 4 69 58 61 57 55 56 560 Plot 5 65 57 �>ml�l.� 54 55 55 550 ,p,„�,�1'8��r Average 510.0 Bald 390 -560 y ". s'Ripa�rian _ Buffer. Plots�(�020 G ,� '.;� �a5u'hr.J7J��" ' }V'^I'�Pr acre) 4���'� L a w a a Plot 6 40 31 24 19 25 26 520 Plot 7 37 22 17 17 6 10 4 22 7 10 5 13 5 9 12 4 12 10 11 3 29 2 Cypress Plot 10 50 48 49 47 47 48 960 Plot 11 47 36 35 34 33 34 680 Plot 12 45 Green Ash 5 9 27 3 13 Plot 13 7 8 4 1 3 17 7 7 4 6 2 6 Hickory 39 1 Plot 15 48 43 41 39 35 38 760 Plot 16 49 48 41 42 40 41 820 Laurel 30 28 28 27 24 22 440 Plot 18 28 27 26 26 24 24 480 Average 684.6 Oak 2 1 1 2 1 5 Overcup 10 11 13 7 7 4 2 7 10 5 6 4 2 8 1 7 11 4 Oak Swamp Tupelo 18 8 4 20 16 8 4 7 4 7 6 9 5 7 11 11 4 Willow 10 I 6 4 12 4 4 7 8 25 i 7 7 8 7 10 9 9 r8 Oak Summary of Results "P rated w ¢'ouap „-pF” Stems i Stems Year 1 earl Stems fear 3 l Stems Year 4 Stems �' fear 5 - all 5 P}lots Plot 1 61 55 53 53 51 51 510 Plot 2 60 46 49 40 39 39 390 Plot 3 70 66 65 64 56 54 540 Plot 4 69 58 61 57 55 56 560 Plot 5 65 57 53 54 55 55 550 Average 510.0 Range 390 -560 y ". s'Ripa�rian _ Buffer. Plots�(�020 G ,� '.;� �a5u'hr.J7J��" ' }V'^I'�Pr acre) 4���'� L a w a a Plot 6 40 31 24 19 25 26 520 Plot 7 37 22 17 17 22 22 440 Plot 8 49 44 43 43 42 42 840 Plot 45 33 28 29 29 31 620 Plot 10 50 48 49 47 47 48 960 Plot 11 47 36 35 34 33 34 680 Plot 12 45 43 42 42 35 42 840 Plot 13 40 39 37 36 33 36 720 Plot 14 51 47 38 41 40 39 780 Plot 15 48 43 41 39 35 38 760 Plot 16 49 48 41 42 40 41 820 Plot 17 30 28 28 27 24 22 440 Plot 18 28 27 26 26 24 24 480 Average 684.6 Ran a 440 -960 Summary of Hydrology Monitoring Data 2008 -2012 " Gaugleis °� � ",��,�`Max Consecutive Fiydrop_enod( In sa'� Precipitation, F Ihial „�;li �� ;I�I�u�1r�h�6.€����i�lh'19,i %) ��� °', ' 7 20087a1,N,�6��„�q 09jji Tr,o „?U1�Q lu rlP N IT1, ' I �" s�200 2 "rte; 2012 Precipitation for Floogie Site 16 15 Growing Season 14 13 12 11 0 u 9 u C 8 L:. 7 6 ---- -- a5 4 LI 3 .. 2 - --- - - --- - -- _ -- - 1 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Months Growing Season � Windsor Daily Rainfall - - - - - -- 30th/70th Percentile - -6 Windsor Monthly Ramfal Summary Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data Results �tTAxdn -Vre-Colikfuction- Aif�r ence -Reach 2. Re6ch 4 Refe� _je Reference No No No No No No No No No No No No TRICHOPTERA P1110stomis Sp 3 1 1 3 3 Ironoquia puncialissima 2 Pycnopsyche sp - COLEOPTERA Enochrus sp Agabus sp (Larvae) I Hydaticus sp Peltodytes sp ODONATA Somalochlora sp Libellula sp Ischnura spp DIPTERA: MISC. Chrysops sp Prosimuhum sp Tipula sp 2 r77 -_ -'2008 ,� ti 2009' '�. 2013 = l � _ _ �' � �' = o. ..-n _ ;l" IucTr' f� 1- �_ . �=� 4 �y - � 1 _ � -,_' �I- IT� P�r� _ e _ - C- o _ n � ction �, ,��'�� .' •• Tom• �i ���R. m =r 'r�°, F r��• _ 1RM''� it- o - r � _ � ' r i riR_� _ v �c- 5 -g � � '�as ° � _r , �, _,� °' y>' � ,!� , i�`'�nR'.�- g #, `e -nr e.?y� ,- nl �;t'l`r ' - lil > rq'- _ _ - Y-- e ar 5 -� � t- - q — �, �41 a��x _ , d- _- a.� r � , , - lReference =tru1 p -s 5Rea3fi 2- _ -,Reach4 e- f e. rYenecae go-n- eacfi 2= ` eg , .a= � 4� - 4 h d + �, , ei.'�1Yrr. 'E- `3 Rli,,.,` e- ' f� cas e , ` N�r' R,1VIe}.ou- a,��� c 2��-so, ,�- - e`�z� c a 4' h Reference RM1_ e aocnh 2 'Reacfi,4- " No No No No No No No No No No No No DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE Hydrobaenus sp - 4 19 2 1 30 4 - 3 - - - 2 Lcmnophyes sp - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Orthocladcus obumbratus - - _ 2 4 3 2 17 18 - - - Procladius sp - - - 3 - - - 1 - - - - Conchapelopia gr - - - - - - 4 - - - - - Psectrotanypus dyari - 1 - - - - - - - - - - Zaverhmyia sp 1 - - - - - - - - - - - Chironomus sp - - - - 1 - 9 1 - - - - Dicrotendipes simpsom - - - - - - l 1 - - - - Glyptotendipes sp - - - - - - - - - Polypedilum tritum - - - - - - 2 1 - - - - Phaenopsectra sp - - - - - - 3 - - - - - Trtbelos sp - - - - - - 6 - - 1 - - Paratanytarsus sp - - - - - - - OLIGOCHAETA Megadriles - - 1 - - - - - - - - 2 Limnodrilus ho meisteri 1 9 2 - - - - 1 2 1 1 5 Ilyodrilus templetom - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Aulodrilus pigueti - - - - - - Nais sp - - 1 - 2 - - - - - - - Deo sp - - - - - 2008 2009 2011 2013 Pre - Construction Year 1 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Taxon Reference Reach 2 Reach 4 Reference Reach 2 Reach 4 Reference Reach 2 Reach 4 Reference Reach 2 Reach 4 No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Ecclipidrilus sp - 5 - 6 - - - - Lumbriculus varie atus _ _ _ - - - - - 13 CRUSTACEA Procambarus sp 1 3 1 - - - - - - - - - Crangonyx sp 16 to 4 14 4 35 6 32 21 5 21 2 Caecidoteaforbesi 6 - 8 1 - 9 12 5 1 - - C. racovitzai 10 - 6 - - - - - - 2 - MOLLUSCA Menetus dilatatus - 1 7 - - - - - Sphaerium sp - - 1 - - 5 - 5 2 Pisidium sp - - - - - - - 8 1 - 7 Physa sp - - - - - 5 - OTHER Corixidae - - 2 - - - - - - I Taxa Richnesss 5 10 10 10 6 6 8 9 10 11 7 12 EPT Taxa Richness 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 - 1 2 NC Biotic Index 7.0 8.6 8.8 7.1 9.1 8 7.6 7.9 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.5 EEP Recommendations and Conclusions • All hydrology monitoring gauges recorded consecutive hydroperiods for at least 7 percent of the growing season for 2012 • The restored stream channel has remained stable and is providing the intended habitat and hydrologic functions All monitoring cross sections and longitudinal profile for 2012 showed very little adjustment in stream dimension over the previous year • Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of stems per acre on the site to be 636, with the range of stem density of 390 to 960 stems per acre All vegetation plots have achieved the success criterion of 260 trees per acre at monitoring year 5 • Benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring was conducted in January 2013 and the results are presented in the supplemental monitoring report Biotic index results show a slight improvement in water quality along Reach 2 and a steady improvement within Reach 4 The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory closure Contingencies None Example Pre - Existing Condition Photos Upstream culvert, Reach 1 at Brown School Reach 1 and 2 looking downstream during pre - Road during pre- construction phase. construction phase. Reach 3 looking upstream during pre- Reach 4 looking upstream during pre - construction phase. construction phase. Monitoring Phase Upstream culvert, Reach 1 at Brown School Reach 2 looking downstream during monitoring Road during monitoring phase. phase. Reach 3 looking downstream during monitoring Reach 4 looking downstream during monitoring phase. phase. Wetland Restoration Area during monitoring phase. Appendix A. Watershed Planning The Floogie Site is not within a watershed planning area Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes a portion of the following parcels. Grantor County Site Protection Deed Book & Acreage Instrument Page Number protected Dan W. Perry and wife, Mary H. Perry Bertie Conservation 875/762 1.036 Easement Elmer Byrum and wife, Conservation Mary E. Byrum Bertie Easement 875/770 12.586 Conservation Carolyn W. Lawrence Bertie Easement 879/138 47.211 Conservation Judy H. Pierce and Ann Pierce Hughes Bertie Easement 879/128 4.992 Conservation Louvenia Holley, et ux Bertie Easement 880/001 5.522 http: //www.nceep.net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92486 FlooRieSite.pdf LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action ID 2006 - 41469 -108 County Bertie USGS Quad Merry Hill GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property Owner / Authorized Agent Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Address Southeast Regional Office 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Telephone No • (919) 829 -9909 Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc ) The property is approximately 74.5 acres located west of NCSR 1348 Browns School Road), south of NCSR 1344 and north of NCSR 1301, southeast the community of Whites Crossroads, adiacent to Flat Swamp, in Bertie County, North Carolina. Description of protects area and activity Restoration and enhancement of former waters impacting 5,553 linear feet of existing channel, permanently impacting 1.21 acres of wetlands and temporarily impacting 3.34 acres of wetlands and 615 linear feet of stream channel. Note - See attached Additional Special Conditions. Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization Regional General Permit Number Nationwide Permit Number NW # 27 Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submtted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide perrrut, activities which have commenced (1 e, are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of'the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (919) 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the perimttee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pernut, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Bill Biddleeome,at (252) 975 -1616 ext 26 Corps Regulatory Official &4Z., Date 07/06/2007 Expiration Date of Verification 07/06/2009 The Wilrrungton District is comrrutted to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http //www saw usace army mil /WETLANDS /index html to complete the survey online Copy Furnished Page 1 of 2 Determination of Jurisdiction: ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1) ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification ❑ The. jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action Please reference .jurisdictional deterrmnation issued Action ID Basis of Jurisdictional Deterrmnanon This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is part of a broad continuum of wetlands connected to Flat Swamp a tributary to Hoegard Mill Creek which is a tributary to the Cashie River. Corps Regulatory Official d/d/ Date 07/06/2007 SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC, MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE Copy Furnished Daniel Ingram, WK Dickson 3101 John Humpries Wnyd Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Page 2 of 2 Additional Special Conditions Action I.D. # SAW - 2006 - 41469 -108 — Floogie Wetland and Stream Restoration a) This authorization in no way obligates the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to recognize this work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project b) This authorization in no way obligates the U S. Army Corps of Engineers to accept this project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or entity Action ID Number: SAW-200641469-108 County:Bertie Permittee: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Date Permit Issued: 7/6/2007 Project Manager: Biddlecome Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE POST OFFICE BOX 1000 WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889 Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension, modification, or revocation. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. Signature of Permittee Date 'The term "adjacent" means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S by man -made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent NC) � A IQ O �. � � ! ' PPI. � 1' ! • NS 1 � P G ` '�` _� Applicant Environmental Banc & Exchange File Number 2006- 41469 -108 Date 7/6/2007 Attached is. See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A ❑ permission) ❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B ❑ PERMIT DENIAL C ZI APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D ❑ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E q�,.,p„p AF��3i'"�� �� ral.xr� �xrxnea " rl °h,�.$rldse' ,8,ffi{+"'�"i�`P,'�".+b]!� '�+ � ^Gdrt,}'j.s a^•L � 9 _ "ir i --y r. ,h iii' 3"' yy ,P SFEC- �T-y�tOsN I Th9�e fiilloti�'ir �; ilentif es« },our ri�r tssand opftons,regat; mg�anmaclministrati� a appeal' o`t�thctwabo� =e' ° �s:R?.f�yRpn�_G �i'kA�'e4Vl'{nX{r� W �A""P w *y'.1i ' YaAwel ,I�'"F"1I3r,C� : C` M1ir ' 3' deciszan �Aaditignall ><nformatiWiiiavrbe,fbund;dt httpalw�tijai.usace arm} itYanet&nctioris cih /cecw�ire><:c�r ^�m5` ul' atignsatr3 '�3, "dF1RPartE3131��x ° A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or object to the permit • ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved Jurisdictional determinations associated with the perrrut • OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date,of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below B• PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit • APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered pemut (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice C- PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice D. APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information • ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD • APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD - �� It { ` _ i .. 4. y li T r h4E'WliadF<��Vw F ;. v < 1vvr"lJ t'..�iflY seai�2. SECTION, 11;'RtQIJES T FOR :A�PYE�hAGror�OBJECTIQNS' TO AN INITi�AL�PR�(O1r>~ERED "Pi�RMF 1T� ` ° -` REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS• (Describe your reasons for appeahng the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record ) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record PO4NT"O`F (0NTACTµE0k� -70U If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you and/or the appeal process you may contact may also contact. Bill Biddlecome Mr Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer US Army Corps of Engineers CESAD- ET -CO -R Regulatory Division, Washington Field Office U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division P O Box 1000 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15 Washington, NC 27889 (252) 975 -1616 ext 26 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801 RIGHT OF ENTRY. Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations Date Telephone number Signature of appellant or agent DIVISION ENGINEER: Commander U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490 Michael F Easley, Governor William G Ross Jr, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources August 22, 2007 Coleen H Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality DWQ Project # 06 -1780, Ver 2 Mr Norton Webster Bertie County Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC 909 Capability Drive, Suite 1300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Subject Property. Floogie Mitigation Site Flat Swamp Creek [030210,24-2-6-2, SW, C] Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Dear Mr Webster: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 4.55 acres of 404 /Wetland (1.21 acres permanent impact, and 3.34 acres temporary impact) and 6,285 linear feet of perennial stream (5,670 linear feet permanent, perennial stream impact, and 615 linear feet temporary, perennial stream impact), as described in your application dated June 7, 2007, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on June 12, 2007, to conduct the proposed stream restoration and wetland restoration at the site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3626 (GC3626). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW27 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in-your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you chaixge your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application If the �4; t4; property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and r; is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in - ' _0�,t , the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H 0506 (h) This approval requires you to follow the', conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below: 401'Ovdrsig 1'0Q Mail S 2321C`ia n a91�: 4n gual0l r � a � Press.ReviewEermiti V r� a' • 1 JI�F�S Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Page 2 of 4 August 22, 2007 The Additional Conditions of the Certification are: 1. Impacts Approved The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts- Type of Impact Amount Approved Units Reference 404/Wetland 4 55 [(acres) 1.21 acres permanent impact, and 3 34 acres PCN page 5 of 9 temporary impact Stream - 6,285 [(linear feet) 5,670 linear feet permanent, perennial PCN page 5 of 9 perennial stream impact, and 615 linear feet temporary, perennial stream impact] 2 No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so, that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. 3 Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards a The erosion and sediment control measures for the protect must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual b The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. c Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times 4 Sediment and Erosion Control Measures Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and thematural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project; Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Page 3 of 4 August 22, 2007 5 Protective Fencing The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing; 6. Stream Restoration and Wetland Restoration Plans You have our approval for your proposed final stream restoration and wetland restoration at the site with the requirement for Monitoring Level I as described within the point State/Federal agency Stream Mitigation Guidelines located at. h_" / /www saw usace army.mil/wetlands/Mitipation/stream mitigation.html The stream restoration and wetland restoration at the site must be constructed, maintained, and monitored according to the plans approved by this Office Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the approved plans or must receive written approval from this Office to make the repairs or adjustments The restored stream and wetland must be preserved in perpetuity by use of a conservation easement or other similar mechanism as part of the approved plans Additionally, the monitoring for this project should include sampling points at the upper, middle and lower restoration reaches, and from one location on the reference reach. Sampling should be conducted prior to beginning site activities, and then annually during years 3, 4 and 5 of the project 7. Macrobenthos Monitoring Plan Please provide a macrobenthos monitoring plan which will outline procedures and provide data points for the collection and analysis of macrobenthos during the Floogie project. All sampling activities should be conducted in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (July 2006, DWQ Biological Assessment Unit), and conducted by personnel who have a certificate of training for DWQ macroinvertebrate collection protocols. 8 Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650 Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing You must act within 60 MT— Environmental = Banc & Exchange, LLC Page 4 of 4 August 22, 2007 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.0 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G S. 150B. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919- 733- 1786 /1 SZ y Coleen H Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality CHS/ jm Enclosures- GC3626 Certificate of Completion cc USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office Kyle Barnes, DWQ Washington Regional Office DLR Washington Regional Office File Copy Central Files Daniel Ingram, WK Dickson, 3101 John Humphries Wynd, Raleigh, NC 27612 Filename 061780Ver2Floog ,eM►t,gat,on(Berhe )401 Certification of Completion DWQ Project No.: County- Applicant: Project Name. Date of Issuance of Certification or Authorization: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650 This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these Applicant's Certifcation I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Date: Agent's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials Signature Date If this project was designed by a Certified Professional I, , as a duly registered Professional (i e, Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials Signature. Registration No Date eA WQC #3626 GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR STREAM RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT AND STABILIZATION PROJECTS AND WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND CREATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING THOSE ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 13 (BANK STABILIZATION) AND 27 (AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION, ESTABLISHMENT AND ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES) AND REGIONAL PERMIT 197800080 (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BULKHEADS) This General Certification is issued in conformity With the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H 0500 and 15A NCAC 2B 0200 for the discharge of fill material to waters as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (13) and (27) of the Corps of Engineers regulations (i a Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27) and Regional Permit 197800080 The category of activities shall include stream bank stabilization or stream restoration activity as long as impacts to waters or significant wetlands are minimized This Certification replaces Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3399 issued March 2003 and ,WQC Number 3495 issued March 28, 2003 This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers reauthorize Nationwide Permits 13 or 27 or Regional Permit 197800080 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217 if conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth Conditions of Certification Wetland and /or riparian area restoration and creation projects which are for compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit (and not including projects that only involve stream restoration or enhancement work described in condition nos 2 and 3 below) that are proposed under this General Certification require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality. All applications for written DWQ approval will be reviewed and a response will be prepared within 30 days of stamped receipt of the application in the Division of Water Quality's Central Office in Raleigh This 30 -day period does not include time spent by the application or DWQ's response within US Postal Service or North Carolina's Mail Service Center mail systems; Wetland and riparian area restoration and creabon projects (not including projects that involve work in or impacts to streams) which are not for compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit proposed under this General Certification do not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality In these cases, the applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of project specifications before the impact occurs If the Division determines that the project would not result in an ecologically viable wetland and riparian area, then the Division shall prepare a response to notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of DWQ's receipt of the notification In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal procedures, s 2 Proposed stream restoration projects (as defined and limited below), that'do not h disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or , compensatory mitigation credit do not require written a plica ion to,and approval „ P ry g _ q P -.per ,�••�n- from the Division of Water Quality, and,'therefoi—Wkdo notFrequire payment,of,an WQC #3626 application fee to the Division of Water Quality Projects that are intended for compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit, that are intended to resolve a violation, or that are in association with a development project shall require an application, fee, and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered or degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and floodprone areas to its natural or referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed conditions This biological and chemical integrity, including transport of water and sediment is produced by the stream's watershed In order to achieve dynamic equilibrium The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed restoration plans and specifications before the impact occurs If the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream restoration, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of receipt of the application. In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal procedures, 3 Stream enhancement projects (as defined and limited below), that do not disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit and do not include any stream channel relocation, do not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality, and, therefore, do not require payment of an application fee to the Division of Water Quality Projects that are intended for compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit, that are intended to resolve a violation, or that are In association with a development project shall require an application, fee, and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality 4. Stream enhancement is defined as the process of implementing stream rehabilitation practices In order to improve water quality and /or,ecological function These practices must only be conducted on streams that are not experiencing severe aggradation or erosion Stream enhancement does not include the relocation of the stream channel Stream enhancement bank stabilization techniques include the use of woody vegetation as the primary means of long term stability, and "soft" techniques such as root wads that encourage the establishment of dense woody vegetation Stream enhancement techniques do not typically include the use of stream bank or bed hardening techniques such as rip -rap or other rock, gabion, block or concrete structures However, enhancement activities may also include the placement of in stream habitat or grade control structures such as cross vanes, J- hook vanes, and wing deflectors that do not affect the overall dimension, pattern, or profile of a stable stream The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed enhancement plans and specifications before the impact occurs if the stream enhancement project disturbs greater than 500 feet of stream bank or if the project proposes the use of in stream structures. If the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream enhancement, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing with an explanation within 30 days of receipt of the notification to require application and payment of the appropriate fee, 5 Stream stabilization projects that include the use of any structure or fill in the existing stream bed or disturb greater that 500 feet of stream bank that are proposed under this General Certification require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality R 0 , WQC #3626 Stream stabilization is defined as the in -place stabilization of an eroding stream bank using measures that consist primarily of "hard" engineering, such as but not limited to concrete lining, rip rap or other rock, and gabions The use of "hard" engineering will not be considered as stream restoration or enhancement, Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 213 0200 Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification New development activities located in the protected 50 -foot wide riparian areas (whether junsdictional wetlands or not) within the Neuse and Tar - Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B 0200 All new development shall be located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management practices, 7 In order for the above conditions to be valid, any plans not requiring written concurrence to use this Certification must be built according to the plans provided to the Division of Water Quality If written concurrence is required, then the project must be built and maintained according to the plans approved by the written concurrence and Certification from the Division of Water Quality, Appropnate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment r Control Planning and Design Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" �¢ whichever is more appropnate (available from the Division of Land Resources at the DENR Regional and Central Offices) shall be designed, installed and maintained property to assure compliance witti the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ, 25 NTUs in all saltwater classes and all lakes and reservoirs, 10 NTUs in DWQ - classified trout waters), 9 All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the onginal grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or delegated program has released the project, 10 Any rip -rap shall be of such a size and density so as not to be able to be carried off by wave or current action and consist of clean rock or masonry material free of debris or toxic pollutants Rip -rap shall not be installed in the streambed except in specific areas required for velocity control and to ensure structural integrity of bank stabilization measures If rip -rap is to be installed within the streambed, the amount and location must be approved In writing by the Division of Land Resources and Division of Water Quality However rock vanes, wing deflectors, and similar structures for grade control and bank protection are acceptable, 11 Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with freshwaters of the state until the concrete has hardened, 12 If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision Is issued by the State Clearinghouse, �Y WQC #3626 13 Additional site- specific conditions may be added to projects which require written concurrence under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent standards, 14 Projects with any impacts to streams, wetlands, and /or waters that have received a Notice of Violation from the Division of Land Resources and/or the Division of Water Quality are required to submit a complete application and receive written concurrence to use this Certification regardless of the proposed impact amount to streams, wetlands, and waters, 15 Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or the notification sent to DWQ; 16 Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices a Erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained In accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual b Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. G For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual d Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act e Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times 17 No Impacts Beyond those to Application No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - construction Notification All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur 18 No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally delegated program has released the project N WQC #3626 Non - compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project shall result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality including state or federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species or degrade the waters so that existing uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded. Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. WQC # 3626 5 Effective date: 19 March 2007 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY By At,, �u Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Mitigation Project Name Floogie Site EEP IMS ID 92486 River Basin ROANOKE Cataloging Unit 03010107 ADolied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1.1 3'1 2 1 5:1 1 1 3'1 2 1 5 1 1 1 3'1 9 1 5 1 1.1 3 1 n 5 1 1 1 1.1 J T Information as of 3/17/2013 _ - a0 o v z o z u o z W oE! za L 2 cOiw L Y Ly u v E 8 W y t0 A 4 yN U a z0 m y 1p� p� O z O z `d o L o a O z Beginning Balance (feet and acres) 11,149.00 25.19 NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits feet and acres): Not Applicable EEP Debits feet and acres): DWO Permits USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name 2003 -10719 B -4027 0.28 2006 -32018 B -4188 0.08 2005 -1765 1994 -00453 R -2404A 4.05 2005 -10376 B -1303 0.09 2008 -01801 -158 B -4578 010 2006 - 41005 -158 SR 1417 - Division 1 0.02 2002 -10390 B -4026 0.10 2003 -10021 B -4434 0.22 Remaining Balance (feet and acres) 11,149.0 120.2651 Information as of 3/17/2013