20061905 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130101

Mason Property Wetland Mitigation Pro ect (�1
1q05
EEP ID (IMS #) 92328
FDP Contract Number D06001
USACE Action ID # SAW- 2007 -59 -148
DWQ Project# N/A
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Project Set tin and Classifications
County
Hyde County
General Location
Rose Bay
Basin
Tar- Pamlico
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
8.5.1 Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
USGS Hydro Unit
03020105
NCDW Sub -basin
03 -03 -08
Cowardin Classification
PEM, PSS PFO
Thermal Regime
Warm
Trout Water
No
Project Performers
Source Agency
EEP
Provider
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Designer
Ecotone, Inc.
Monitoring Firm
Woods, Water and Wildlife, Inc.
Channel Remediation
Woods, Water and Wildlife, Inc.
Plant Remediation
Carolina Silvics, Inc
Property Interest Holder
EEP
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report
WETLAND
Project Activities and Timeline
Activity or Report
Date
of Delivery
Restoration Plan
June 2006
Final Design -90%
June 2006
Construction
May 2007
Temporary S & E mix applied
May 2007
Permanent seed mix applied
May 2007
Containerized and Bare Root Planting
May 2007
Mit. Plan/As -built
December 2008
Supplemental Planting
February 2008
Year 1 monitoring
January 2009
Year 2 monitoring
January 2010
Supplemental Planting
March 2010
Year 3 monitoring
December 2010
Year 4 monitoring
September 2011
Year 5 monitoring
Janua 2013
Page 1 of 16

Project Setting and Background Summary
The Mason Property Wetland Mitigation Site is a riverine and non - riverine wetland restoration project located on U S Rt 264 at Rose Bay in Hyde
County, North Carolina It was constructed by Albemarle Restorations, LLC, under contract with EEP to provide compensatory wetland mitigation
credits in the Tar - Pamlico River Basin Construction activities, in accordance with the approved restoration plan, began March 14, 2007, and were
completed on May 14, 2007 The resulting features include a main swamp run and adjacent areas of lower elevation that retain flood water for
extended periods Tree and shrub planting on the project site occurred in May, 2007 using bare -root seedlings and containerized stock from a species
list that produced a diverse species mix across the site and throughout the various elevations Supplemental planting was done in 2009 and again in
2010 in specific areas on the site to increase stocking levels that were suffering due to prolonged periods of inundation and salt water intrusion
Hydrologic and vegetation monitoring began in 2008 after construction and tree planting was completed Six water level monitoring gauges were
located at varying elevations throughout the riverine and non - riverine wetland areas of the site to measure subsurface water elevations Two
additional gauges are located in the adjacent reference areas
Although construction was completed in May of 2007 and tree planting occurred immediately after, initial stocking levels were inadequate which
caused the baseline monitoring year to be put off until 2008 Supplemental planting done in February 2008 brought stocking up to an adequate level,
so 2008 is the baseline year for monitoring The site is subject to prolonged periods of relatively deep standing water, typically from November until
May or June each season It is also subject to salt water intrusion during wind - driven tidal surges like those seen in hurricanes and coastal storms
Both of these situations have been a serious problem for planted tree and shrub survival and growth
Considering the current status of the Mason Property, EEP is requesting the IRT review the data of the site to this point and provide feedback on the
current status of assets within the site and any contingencies that should be completed
Goals and Obiectives:
The intent of the Mason Property Mitigation Project was to create both riverine and non - riverine wetland systems that will accomplish several goals
Primary among those goals is the establishment of functioning wetlands that will aid in flood attenuation and improve water quality on site and
downstream. The project is to serve as compensation for wetland loss in the Tar - Pamlico River Basin The restoration plan was developed and
implemented to eliminate pattern drainage and restore topography and hydrology that more closely resembled that of similar undisturbed land
Construction resulted in the development of a broad, frequently flooded swamp run following the historical path as evidenced by aerial photographs
and signature topography Subsequent planting was designed to restore a wetland forest ecosystem that is typically found in the immediate area
characteristic of similar soils, topography and hydrology
The specific project goals and objectives include-
1) Provide flood flow attenuation
2) Water quality improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention and reduction
3) Slow over bank flow rates and provide storage and desynchronization of flood waters
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 2 of 16

4) Alleviate downstream flooding issues by lessening the effect of pulse or flashy flows
5) Provide shading through forest cover to reduce algae growth and associated low dissolved oxygen levels in surface water moving through
the site
6) The production and export of food sources
7) The creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities
Success Criteria
Vegetation: The vegetation success criterion was developed in accordance with the CVS -EEP protocol The Mason project was planned to include
various topographies and a contiguous plant community consistent with those found naturally occurring along swamp runs and associated broad
hardwood flats. The species mix was based on the vegetation noted at the reference site and all species are classified from FAC to OBL The site was
originally planted at a rate of 275 stems per acre in May of 2007 In February of 2008, an additional 175 stems per acre were installed bringing the
total stocking at the start of the 2008 growing season to 450 stems per acre In March of 2010 an additional 2,700 containerized trees were added to
bolster stocking levels in areas that appeared to be suffering from salt water damage caused by backflow over the outlet plug during periods of
abnormally high tide. The success criterion in year 5 is to have a minimum of 260 live stems per acre
Tree mortality was an issue early in the project but supplemental planting with larger stock solved the problem Hurricane Irene in 2011 caused
severe, acute tree mortality over much of the site with the exception of the non - riverine area in the northwest corner, which showed less severe
damage Immediately prior to Irene though, the stem count and tree growth were actually very good and it appeared as though the planted stems
might have finally successfully colonized the site But the amount and duration of salt water put on the site by Irene proved to be very toxic to the
planted stems
Hydrology: The hydrologic success criterion is to achieve a minimum of 21 consecutive days where the groundwater level is within 12 inches of the
soil surface during the growing season. The growing season for this site is from March 11 to November 27, a period of 261 days (WETS Table for
Belhaven, Beaufort County, NC) Success for any particular monitoring location is to show soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for 21
consecutive days during that period
Minimum hydrologic requirements have not been an issue on the Mason project As previously stated, the site is prone to prolonged flooding and
salt water intrusion caused by tidal surges During Hurricane Irene in 2011, recorded water levels on the project site reached approximately four feet
in above - ground depth Although the flooding was very short lived, it was primarily salt water pushed in from nearby Rose Bay and lasted long
enough to have caused substantial tree mortality on the project and reference site. Widespread salt damage was readily visible in the entire Rose Bay
area
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 3 of 16

MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Pre -
Non-
Stream Mitigation
Riverine
Construction
Mitigation
Watershed
As Built
Mitigation
Mitigation
Restoration Type
Acres/Linear
Approach
Acreage
Acres/
Ratio
Units
Buffer
Feet
0
Linear Feet
20
SMU/WMU
Riverine Wetland
0 0 acres
R
16 0 acres
1 1
16 0 WMUs
Non- Rtvenne
Wetland
0 0 linear feet
R
20 0 Acres
1 1
20 0 WMUs
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 4 of 16
Non-
Stream Mitigation
Riverine
Riverine
Total
Riparian
Units (SMU)
Wetland Units
Wetland
Wetland
Nutrient Offset
Units
Buffer
0
16
20
36
0
0
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 4 of 16

y' fi
i
W .
Oy
O
�V
NON- VVE-FLANDS,(20,AQ
i -
FIGURE 1: ASSET MAP
MONITORING REPORT YEAR #5
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 5 of 16

mum-
ok
Ab A A.
� ♦ a g
ALRER MARLS RLSTOt AHONS, LLC scale: 1" -1000'
MASON SITE Proje No. 0574
NICTIAND RESTORATION. ct
STIMAM RESTORATION. FIGURE 2: VICIIv'IT1" A1.-�P
k VVN.DL "HABITAT CREATION Date: 1/22/2013 - - -- SHEET 1
b" C&JW STW&R Y7r- '0LLf. NC ]y4.M Drawn 0... C`KA
,2%MitJOaa9 VA.X,2WA 3n7-4Mi �I
Project Manager: AS
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 6 of 16
Oft Jk
4" dft
b ,
•
�.
Ar
_
E
A
~;
', PROJECT BO
` ►�
�.
%% r,: _ &
,
..
dft
4%
Im
Aft
�r
A -+
8M
-•
e
ok
Ab A A.
� ♦ a g
ALRER MARLS RLSTOt AHONS, LLC scale: 1" -1000'
MASON SITE Proje No. 0574
NICTIAND RESTORATION. ct
STIMAM RESTORATION. FIGURE 2: VICIIv'IT1" A1.-�P
k VVN.DL "HABITAT CREATION Date: 1/22/2013 - - -- SHEET 1
b" C&JW STW&R Y7r- '0LLf. NC ]y4.M Drawn 0... C`KA
,2%MitJOaa9 VA.X,2WA 3n7-4Mi �I
Project Manager: AS
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 6 of 16

Mason Mitigation Prgject Closeout Report Page 7 of 16

AA w
, aaAW
�LAh ru
iETAVON MONITORING PLOT
MONITORING GAUGE 44
MV VI I UK INU kJAWh 43 N
MON= 'GAU(;L #2
W-GETA NMONITORIN(i PLOT-#2
RAIN GAUGE
BACKUP MONITORING GAUCH
w
P10
FIGURE 4: CONTINGENCIES MAP
MONITORING REPORT YEAR #5
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 8 of 16
lyl am I

10
Start of growing
9 season
P.,
F
0
v
u
6
c
c
0
5
13
.Q
4
a
a
3
2
1
x
End of growing
season
w
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Totals 2009 Totals -°-°- 2010 Totals 2011 Totals — 2012 Totals 30th %A 70th %A

Figure 6 5 -year average of onsite rainfall vs normal expected range of rainfall Rainfall
during the beginning of the growing season over the five years the project was monitored
was somewhat below normal though it had little, if any effect on the hydrology of the
site.
Table 1 5 -Year On -Site Precipitation vs Historic Aver a es
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
5- r avg
30 %^
70 %^
Jan
205
241
473
292
214
285
327
494
Feb
433
069
355
278
255
278
214
373
Mar
090
261
3 88
296
330
273
3 11
479
Apr
678
099
069
171
270
257
192
412
May
231
397
1 52
1 00
903
3 57
281
543
June
135
334
435
303
1 52
272
354
542
July
289
3 14
3 17
397
873
438
408
641
Aug
5 84
934
627
2218
508
974
368
705
Sep
444
255
903
640
3 18
5 12
297
598
Oct
2 65
1 87
263
2 15
437
273
146
421
Nov
237
8 77
1 34
369
033
330
206
343
Dec
320
4 10
327
045
3 55
291
2 16
3 95
Mason Mitigation Protect Closeout Report Page 10 of 16

Table 2 Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring Data
5% of growing season is 13 days, 8% is 21 days
Note 1 Salt damage to data logger caused data to be unreliable
Note 2 Constant bear damage made data unreliable
Note 3 Data logger pulled due to excessive silting in gauge
Gauge 4* Bear damage made part of the data unreliable Hydroperiod likely longer
Over the monitoring period, four of the stainless steel water level data loggers were damaged due
to exposure to salt water. Examination by the manufacturer verified the cause for the equipment
failure Some of the data was recovered and usable, some of it was not
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 11 of 16
Longest hydrologic
er►od in da s and % of Growing Season
Gauge
Year 12008
Year 2 2009
Year 3 2010
Year 4 2011
Year 5 2012
Das
%
Das
%
Das
%
Days
%
Days
%
1
99
38
143
55
30
12
79
30
Note 1
2
86
33
91
35
47
18
54
21
Note 2
3
95
36
79
30
49
19
70
27
196 75
4
88
34
133
51
48
18
56
21
21 8*
5
92
35
91
35
47
18
56
21
Note 1
6
93
36
118
45
48
18
72
28
101 j 39
7 e
158
61
119
46
261
100
56
121
Note 3
8 Re
41
16
1 129
49
47
18
1 40
15
158 61
5% of growing season is 13 days, 8% is 21 days
Note 1 Salt damage to data logger caused data to be unreliable
Note 2 Constant bear damage made data unreliable
Note 3 Data logger pulled due to excessive silting in gauge
Gauge 4* Bear damage made part of the data unreliable Hydroperiod likely longer
Over the monitoring period, four of the stainless steel water level data loggers were damaged due
to exposure to salt water. Examination by the manufacturer verified the cause for the equipment
failure Some of the data was recovered and usable, some of it was not
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 11 of 16

Table 3 Planting schedule
Quantity
Botanical Name
Common Name
Percent
of Total
Trees
5769
Taxodium dtsttchum
Bald cypress
36
675
Ace? rubrum
Red Maple
4
675
N ssa au uatica
Water tupelo
4
675
N ssa bif7ora
Swamp black gum
4
4419
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
27
675
Oue?cus bicolor
Swamp white oak
1 4
328
Sahx nigra
Water oak
2
13216
Total tree stems
82
Shrubs
328 Alnus serrulata
328
C rdla raceme ora
Blueberry
2
328
Cleth?a alnt olta
Fetterbush
2
328
/tea wi tmca
Virginia sweets ue
2
328
M rrca cen era
Wax myrtle
2
328
Magnolia v?r tmana
Sweet bay
2
982
1 Baccharts haltnt oha
High tide bush 1
6
328
1 Ce halanthus occtdentahs
Buttonbush
2
2950 Total shrub stems
25
16166 Total of all stems
Table 4. Tree Survival
Plot
Stems per acre for these ears:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
1
364
445
454
412
0
2
324
445
371
330
206
3
243
405
495
495
41
4
40
405
371
330
82
Table 3 shows the original planting schedule from 2008 and includes the first supplemental planting that brought the starting plant density up to 450
stems per acre In 2010, an additional 150 stems per acre were added due to high mortality caused by excessive flooding and salt water damage The
poor survival numbers in Table 4 for 2012 area direct result from Hurricane Irene in 2011 Most of the stems in the riverine and many in the non -
riverine areas were so burned by salt that they simply could not survive Plot 2 is the farthest from the outlet in the northwest corner of the project
and is higher in the landscape than the other plots making it slightly less vulnerable to salt damage.
Mason Mitigation Protect Closeout Report Page 12 of 16

EEP Recommendations and Conclusions
Since the first year of monitoring, the site has been subject to prolonged periods of flooding and is vulnerable
to salt water intrusion during severe tidal surges caused by coastal and tropical storms
In the first years of monitoring, tree mortality was problematic but supplemental planting with larger stock
solved the problem Hurricane Irene in 2011 caused severe, acute tree mortality over much of the site with the
exception of the non - riverine area in the northwestern corner which showed less severe damage Immediately
prior to Irene, the stem count and tree growth was progressing well and it appeared as though the planted stems
had successfully colonized the site. However, the volume and duration of salt water that came onto the site
during Irene proved to be toxic to both planted and natural stems
The shortest hydroperiod recorded over the 5 -year monitoring period was 30 days at Gauge 1 in 2009, which
was 12% of the growing season (discounting the questionable data from Gauge 4 in 2012)
The Mason Property Wetland Mitigation Site has completed 5 years of monitoring Gauge data indicates that
the site has well exceeded the targeted success criteria of 12 5% However, due to wetness of the site and salt
intrusion from tropical storms, woody vegetation survival has struggled.
EEP is requesting IRT review of the site to determine current status of assets and discuss option for site
remediation _
Contingencies
Site contingencies will be based upon discussion and findings during the IRT site review
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 13 of 16

Pre - Construction Photos — 2007
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 14 of 16

Post - Construction Photos 2008
Mason Mitigation Project Closeout Report Page 15 of 16

APPENDIX A: Watershed Summary
The Mason Farm Project
The Mason Farm project is in Hyde County, roughly 5 miles northwest of the town of Swan
Quarter in the Tar - Pamlico River Bann It is located within HUC 03020105030010, the
Germantown Bay watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2010
Tar - Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan, as well as in the 2004 RBRP plan
(http / /portal ncdenr org/web/eep/rbEps/tar-pamlico Currently, the EEP has no other project
located within this TLW The project site drains into nearby Rose Bay, which then flows into
the Pamlico River where it opens up into Pamlico Sound about 6 miles to the south. The 2010
RBRP plan states that roughly 47% of streams and ditches in this TLW have non - forested
buffers, 62% is forested wetland, and 4% is designated conservation land Roughly 4% of the
streams here are designated 303(d) impaired waters There are no HQWs or ORWs found in this
TLW, though 10% is designated a SNHA and 14 NHEOs are located here Eighteen percent of
the watershed is in agriculture, though there are no permitted animal operations Roughly 18%
of the HUC is open water with nearly 10 square miles of designated fish nursery habitat and 12
square miles of closed shellfishmg waters The RBRP recommends projects in this TLW that
help return highly ditched portions of the watershed to more natural conditions, as well as those
that establish riparian buffers along degraded portions of streams and ditches. The more general
basin -wide goals are to promote nutrient and sediment reduction through agricultural and
municipal practices, support restoration /preservation projects, and to protect, expand, and
connect Natural Heritage Areas and other conservation lands
The Mason Farm project involved riparian and non - riparian wetland restoration from row crop
agriculture back to a natural condition adjacent to a meandering, low- gradient stream In the
process, drainage ditches were filled and extensive native wetland tree and shrub species were
planted The project contributes to the general river basin and TLW - specific water quality
improvement goals as it removed drainage ditches and re- established functioning wetlands in an
agricultural setting The restoration will greatly improve overall nutrient removal capacity,
which should reduce the volume of pollutants draining into the Pamlico River and Sound

Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes a portion of the following parcels.
http: / /www.nceei).net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92328 MasonFarm.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Hyde
Conservation
220/637
36.079
Easement
http: / /www.nceei).net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92328 MasonFarm.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.

3 Project Closeout
(Tar- Pamlico 0302(

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P 0 Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889 -1000
IN REPLY REFER:F2
January 10, 2007
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. SAW- 2007 -59 -148 / Nationwide Permit No. 27 (Wetland Restoration)
Mr Scott McGill
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
P.O Box 204
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Dear Mr McGill.
This correspondence confirms our receipt of your preconstruction notification dated
December 4, 2006, requesting Department of the Army (DA) authorization to implement the
restoration plan entitled, Mason Property Wetland Mitigation, Hyde County, North Carolina
This work will be undertaken on a 36 -acre site located north of U S. Highway 264 in the
community of Rose Bay, adjacent to Rose Bay Creek, Hyde County, North Carolina
Accordingly, for the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, lists nationwide
permits Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities in waters of the United States associated with
the restoration of former waters, the enhancement of degraded tidal and non -tidal wetlands and
riparian areas, the creation of tidal and non -tidal wetlands and riparian areas and the restoration
and enhancement of non -tidal streams and non -tidal open water areas on private lands
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the attached General Conditions and the following Special Conditions
a This authorization in no way obligates the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to recognize this
work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project
b This authorization in no way obligates the U S Army Corps of Engineers to accept this
project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or entity.
This verification is valid until the NWP 1s modified, reissued, or revoked All of the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007 It is
incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs We will issue a public notice

when the NWPs are reissued Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit
You should contact Ms Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, telephone
(919) 733 -9721, regarding Section 401 Water Quality Certification This nationwide permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local approval
Thank you for your time and cooperation Questions or comments may be addressed to me at
the Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26
Sincerely,
/k*4.- J kArwe
William J Biddlecome
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure)
Mr. Ronald J Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr Pete Benjamin
U S Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636 -3726
Mr Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

Mr John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Ms Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Mr. Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc Albemarle Restorations, LLC
PO Boxy
Jarrettsville, Maryland 21084
Mr Guy C. Pearce
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652

Mitigation Project Name Mason Farm
EEP IMS ID 92328
River Basin TAR - PAMLICO
Cataloging Unit 03020105
Armlled Credit Ratios 1 1 1 5'1 2 5'1 5'1 1 1 3 1 2 1 5'1 1 1 3'1 2 1 5'1 1'1 3 1 ?1 5 1 1 1 3 1 n ,, 1 1 1 1 1
Information as of 3/17/2013
1
O
N m
_
LYU
eC
gK
K:
W O
:.
•e o
z
C
c o
n
e
oU
z
C O
E
v
o
z
C O
'c
n 2 v
z
O
N o o v
O
A v
o
V
N
n v
o
U W
O
v Z
U
d N
z' Oc
rD
d
O z
z
O
o °.
a
U
Z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
16.00
20.00
595,134.00
T Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2002 -1232
1993 -03531
R -2539C
0.52
2002 -0388
2006 - 40635 -148
SR 1109 - Division 1
0.18
Statewide ILF Credit Purchase
0.28
9.26
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
1 10.041
1
1 111
595,134.00
Information as of 3/17/2013
1

Tim Baumgartner
NC EEP
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Green Square Building
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604
Office = 919 - 707 -8543
Cell = 919 - 218 -2557
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

Kulz, Eric
From: Tugwell, Todd SAW [Todd Tugwell @usace army mil]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1 38 PM
To: Fritz Rohde (Fritz Rohde @noaa gov), Beter, Dale E SAW, bowers todd @epa gov, Crumbley,
Tyler SAW, Karoly, Cyndi, Cox, David R, Emily_Jernigan @fws gov, Kulz, Eric, Gibby, Jean B
SAW, Jones, Scott SAW, Kathryn_Matthews @fws gov, Montgomery, Lori, Marella Buncick
(Marella_Buncick @fws gov), McLendon, Scott C SAW, Sollod, Steve, Wilson, Travis W,
Wicker, Henry M JR SAW, Sugg, Mickey T SAW
Cc: Baumgartner, Tim
Subject: FW DRAFT closeout list 2013 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats NONE
Here is a draft list of the sites for closeout this year A total of 35, with 14 Coastal, 14 Piedmont, and 7 Mountain sites
This list will likely change a bit
Thanks,
Todd
From: Baumgartner, Tim jmailto:tim baumgartnerOncdenr.gov
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11.34 AM
To: Tugwell, Todd SAW; Crumbley, Tyler SAW; Sollod, Steve; Kulz, Eric; Sollod, Steve; Kathryn Matthews(o)fws.gov
Cc: Haupt, Mac
Subject: DRAFT closeout list 2013
All,
Please take into account this Is DRAFT and not final for 2013
Thanks
Tim
92487
Armstrong Property
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92530
Beaverdam Swamp
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92210
Blounts Creek
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92517
Brown Marsh Swamp
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92547
Cutawhiskie creek
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92544
Duke Swamp
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92486
Floogie Site
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92230
Harrell Site
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal I
92550
Jarmans Oak
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92328
Mason Farm
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
92234
Simpson Wetland
Baumgartner
2013
Coastal
251
Mill Branch
Miguez
2013
Coastal
312
123
Roquist
East Tarboro Canal (G)
Smith
Kemp
_ 2013
2013
_ Coastal
Coastal