20070624 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130401

Jarmans Oak Restoration Site
EEP ID (IMS #) 92550
FDP CONTRACT NUMBER — D06069 -A
USACE ACTION ID # SAW 2007 - 1793 -067
DWQ 401# 07 -0624
CLOSEOUT REPORT
STREAM AND WETLAND
fin. 2jj
Project Settino & Classifications
County
Onslow
General Location
Richlands
Basin:
White Oak
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Coastal Plains
Ecore ion:
September 2007
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030001010010
NCDWQ Sub - basin:
03 -05 -02
Wetland Classification
Carolina Flatwoods
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Monitoring Year 4
October 2011
Supplemental Planting
February 2012
Project Performers
November 2012
Source Agency:
EEP
Provider:
Restoration Systems
Designer:
Axiom Environmental
Monitoring Firm
Axiom Environmental
Construction
Backwater Environmental
Plant remediation
Carolina Silvics
Property Interest Holder
DENR Stewardship
Overall Proiect Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
July 2006
Permitted
June 2007
Construction Completed
September 2007
As -built survey
November 2007
Monitoring Year -1
November 2008
Minor Channel Repair
February 2009
Monitoring Year -2
August 2009
Monitoring Year 3
August 2010
Monitoring Year 4
October 2011
Supplemental Planting
February 2012
Monitoring Year 5
November 2012
Closeout Submission
Aril 2013

Project Setting and Background Summary
Restoration Systems, L L C (Restoration Systems) has completed restoration of stream and riverme wetlands at the Jarmans Oak Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the
"Site ") to assist the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in fulfilling stream and wetland mitigation goals in the region The Site, located less than 2 miles east of the Onslow /Duplm
County line and approximately 3 miles west of the Town of Richlands in Onslow County, will provide a minimum of 6640 Stream Mitigation Units and 12 riverme Wetland Mitigation Units
Prior to construction, the entire Site was utilized for row crop production In order to maximize useable field acreage streams were channelized and riparian vegetation was removed Site streams
were subject to contamination from the broadcast application of agricultural chemicals Site agricultural practices contributed to degraded water quality, unstable channel characteristics (stream
entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse), and decreased wetland function Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific project structures,
and monitoring features are detailed in the monitoring plan view Site features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross - sections), stream profile and pattern, wetland hydrology, and
photographic documentation were monitored
The Site achieved the defined (or targeted) success criteria, with saturation (free water) within one foot of the soil surface for a minimum of 8 percent of the growing season, for all Site groundwater
gauges in the Fifth Monitoring Year (Year 2012) In addition, all vegetation plots within the Site were above the required 260 stems per acre with an average of 500 planted tree stems per acre in the
Fifth Monitoring Year (Year 2012) Areas between vegetation plots 1 -5 affected by inundation as a result of beaver activity in early 2011 were replanted before the start of the 2012 growing season
resulting in an increase in planted stems in plots 1 -2 and 4 -5 Beaver management is now ongoing and planted trees are doing very well
Goals and Objectives
The primary goals of this stream and wetland restoration project focus on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat and will be accomplished by
• Removing nonpomt and point sources of pollution associated with agriculture including a)cessation of broadcasting fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural chemicals into and adjacent to
Site streams and b) restoration of a forested riparian buffer adjacent to streams to treat surface runoff
• Reducing sedimentation within onsjte and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing bank erosion associated with vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site streams and b)
planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to Site streams
Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment loads by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by natural in- stream habitat
and grade /bank stabilization structures
• Promoting floodwater attenuation by a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to the abandoned floodplain terrace, b) restoring secondary, dredged, straightened, and entrenched tributaries,
thereby reducing floodwater velocities within smaller catchment basins, c) increasing storage capacity for floodwaters within the Site, and d) revegetating Site floodplains to increase frictional
resistance on floodwaters
• Restoring onsite wetlands, thereby promoting flood storage, nutrient cycling, and aquatic wildlife habitat
• Improving aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in-stream structures
• Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area developed for agricultural production
Page 2 of 20

Success Criteria
Vegetative Success
Success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre of Character Tree Species must be surviving in the first three monitoring years Subsequently, 290 Character Tree Species per acre
must be surviving in year 4 and 260 Character Tree Species per acre in year 5
Stream Success Criteria
The channel configuration will be measured on an annual basis in order to track changes in channel geometry and profile These data will be utilized to determine the success in restoring stream
channel stability Specifically, the width -to -depth ratio should characterize an E -type or borderline E -/C -type channel, bank - height ratios indicative of a stable or moderately unstable channel, and
minimal changes in cross - sectional area, channel width, and /or bank erosion along the monitoring reach In addition, channel abandonment and /or shoot cutoffs must not occur and sinuosity values
must remain relatively constant The field indicator of bankfull will be described in each monitoring year and indicated on a representative channel cross - section figure If the stream channel is down -
cutting or the channel width is enlarging due to bank erosion, additional bank or slope stabilization methods will be employed
Wetland Success Criteria
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for at least 8 percent of the growing season (17 consecutive days), within Muckalee soils (riverme wetlands), during average
climatic conditions The growing season extends from April 8 to November 5 (212 days) The target hydrological value is based on DRAINMOD simulations for 42 years of rainfall data in an old field
stage In addition, these areas are expected to support hydrophytic vegetation, if wetland parameters are marginal, a jurisdictional determination will be performed for vegetation and soils in these
areas (Environmental Laboratory 1987)
Page 3 of 20

MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Stream Mitigation Units
Restoration
Segment /Reach
Pre —
Construction
(acreage/linear
feet
Mitigation
Approach
Watershed
Acreage
As -Built Linear
Footage /Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Mitigation Units
(SMU/WMU)
STREAM��
WMU
6900
14.05
0
14.05
0
0
Main Tributary
4321
R
378
4709
1.0
4709
Main Tributary
526
E
378
526
2.5
210
Southern UT east
352
R
38
1013
1.0
1013
Southern UT east
486
E
38
486
2.5
194
Southern UT (west)
595
R
77
696
1.0
696
Southern UT west
193
E
77
193
2.5
77
WETLAND
®�
Riverine Wetlands
0
R
378
11
1.0
11.0
Riverine Wetlands
6.1
E
378
6.1
3.0
3.05
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Stream Mitigation Units
Riverine
Non - riverine
Total
Wetland
Riparian Buffer
Nutrient Offset
(SMU)
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
WMU
6900
14.05
0
14.05
0
0
Page 4 of 20

N
�Vvest
(swakVd— —App— F=A=
Southern
Me
IS
T ,--,a ry
,r.,
MITIGATION UNIT TOTAL$
a
�oftd
F
L"..d
17D 340
6w
FATIGATION ASSETS
JARMANS OAK RESTORATION SITE
Z-20131
PNLFIFMRE
I
Onslow County, North Carolina
6
A
27.1
em
Southern
'a
Tributary
�Vvest
Southern
s
Z4
Z �),
T ,--,a ry
,r.,
F
Page 5 of 20
Legend
CC33
=or�—T-� ON.
"Sol A
0 265 53WO 1,060 1,5w 2 120
Feet

N
WI Legend
Mk Mucks
Legend
AuS A
Approximnaft location
.0 soil
of beaver
nnartagen-vt
Profile
C3
11 141 290
Legend
AREAS OF NOTE
I " VU4UCLFj"GURE
JARMANS OAK RESTORATION SITE
Onslow County, North Carolina
"'16
0
140 280 560 940 1,120
Feet
...... SOILS
JARMANS OAK RESTORATION SITE
Onslow County, North Carolina
a6 om
N
Legend
Approximnaft location
of beaver
nnartagen-vt
C3
11 141 290
180 610 1,160
Feet
AREAS OF NOTE
I " VU4UCLFj"GURE
JARMANS OAK RESTORATION SITE
Onslow County, North Carolina
"'16
J
Page 6 of 20

J-0,* O'k umb I - Xh' I kiflk
11.5 t
£j xzi
OA S. ICA IPA I" IF. "A MA ICA
Oh— a—,
I—', Oak R. I XS3 P.W
A
-"A
M. 31. ICA
J—.', -k R—b I X%3 P-1
"A
A
61. Ph ICA IPA ICA is. 3" M.
96-11 1
J—',O,k lt~► 1- X-W RiMt
8.0 §A ICA 0.0 ICA if.. AC 35.. J0.0 OA
J—*. O.L R." 2 - VNI r.W
NA
ICA,
"A
OA 0 ICA 11.0 2. 25... MA 3"
I. RA WA IPA ICA 2i; its
J—'. Oak Reath I - X%Z RN&
Cip
IJ NA ICA If.. ICA 39.4 AA J.1
W—.((-,
c 1u
L
SA I- MA 2S.. ISA FIA P.
CCA
7..
I... Ia.., •AA -'.. I... 35A
Fg-
IPA
94A
4 HA
SA ICA 15.0 X. ISA
Page 7 of 20
J.—W. flak R.-b 2 XU RWk
—INA j
INA
KA B.MA
KA
.A ISA ICA SSA NA JSA
J—W. (Jok Rtb 3 - XM PC.I
IPA
CFA,
KA
HJ
.A U ICA If's 2" ISA 36A 3"
Dw—.(wl

hrlrsS ON RNIs J - Xa RUIN,
su
Kf -
NA
NA
_ YIdNEM. U.NNJ
.46
NA
0.0 IA I.A ISA 3" SS.. M.
01 -41-1
..YrO.m �- waiuwl — \..xliwl +\.nla.ln -- n.11aul - .- \MllYla
J.rl.r'. ON RrM S - X81 ►W
M. -
E PlS
fad glum
'R./Iii [In.1raNN1
j +so l
1151
.A U INA IPA N.B J A
Dk—tf a1
!. fdY �SrNI +\w.11xW1 +� \s x 11.M1 —1's J IYIM — \LN IYaI �N� 3 WI31
995
99.0
985
298.0
e
£975
97.0
z
i % S
` 96.0
J.rw.S llfR Rr.rs J - X52 PW
nA
C NA
Nd
. a
7 .fJ
L ` YIOIR F1w. (mom.)
wl w
M !A IBA I9.0 20.0 25 .o 3..0 310
OYl..rrllrrll
.I.f+fIDn1 +Ywlllwt �\M t1uM +x111 }M - �-- M1tY11 t \Y.IIMDj
J.,.W.01.0. Re.rs! - Xs2 RRDr
fSA
i NA
.3J
i .Sd
u .SA ... arr NN.n091a1
.Id
..B SA NA IBA 20.. SSA M.
DW-41nO
J—,. ON R.NB f • XSI PW JuNr'. 02N K—b f - XSJ RN&
NA-
N3 NA
C
� Ni
C A . —__- — —__ —.LL Kl /
'164 NZA
1.J - - I' i NA
.B.B
.'SA
nA _. ____.. ... -_ -.. - ...B1nYla tYC'tllPrr•S _� .4.0 ___---
U U IRA 1!A NA -MA MA .A U IM 1!A SM SSA ME
ONNCr11M1
Dlwwelfull
W+I.Y�1 — Y�E1>wt +Ya.IYM �\'...Yrul + MIrIlY1 +p.l Olrb —r.. S1YM RNA
jwum '.ON Rm%B - X53 PW
w
sad �
.3A
Nd s.ula Lla.IrNw�1
s +La — -- — . — — --
.A SA NA IPA M.A SSA 3" MA
DMrnlJenl
Jarman•! Oak Prone - Reach 1
Jslsrs'. (3.s RNrs c. xsJ RRtle
NA
w Y
f!J
933
.3A
E .ss — -- -
j .31 Refrla [Y..I� N 1
3t .sA
92A - --__
M U IM IBA Su SRA MA
' 041rn 16r0
- Yfillll.'1 +- \..rlilw�+�llwti(1Mn. PwIr1AM- r9nuMlu +-1rrf Wlli
9fe
95.0
._.__ ..............
.. . . .. ......
945
0.0
100.0
2009 300.0 400.0 500.0 606.0 700.0 SODA
2007 Red Lirivibs 20081rdElentlDs -- 200911ed — 20102ed — 2011Red — 2012Red — 2012\1111er5arfsre

j
l—'a OBk PIMYr - RrHb 2
101.0
100.1
i
j N.B
9.0 IN.9
x00.0 30.0 4N.e 9NB dNe
TO.B
i
w4un(Onn
INIaNOnBBa �MBM[Inf11N �ANM —ANM —Al1aN - --AItM -AllWnn ]Nr.
Ja1)NA'S oak Prod Rncb J
NA
4
_
�
9)A
91_a
INA
I90A !NA tY.O WA
J9BA
DI.tOHrlNnl
` 3NSbNEbnaN '- tNBaN9JrnOn �^SONM �telOaN —1011bN —3BI]aN — AI)MlnsuW.
J. —..', U.I. Profd. - R.ech 4
99.0..
.
_... _.
s
_
,f
B.0
IN.O
SBO.O 100.0 400.0 9N.0 iN.O
700.0
wNlHf1lMI)
390SME1n+IW .__iON BN iIr�nW - �]NSaN —NIOW —All aN AIlM .. AltpLn 5vBer -
J09elee's (IOk ProON R—ba
94.0
L'
_--
e.i3
y
�
i
I
I
I
Me
0.0
IN.O
}OOA JN,O 400.0 90.0
Dblrr.1/ )
— 1N7M9A.up LION BW fA �Ibe — 10e9aN —PION —3B)1 Md - -A13bN - AI)Maln SelOn.
Page 9 of 20

Parameter
[SGS Gage Data
Pre - Existing
Condition
Project Reference
stream
Design
As -built
Dimension
Min I Max I Iced
Aifn
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
lied
Nils
Max
Med
BF Width ft
L'SGS gape data is
unavailable for this
project
(mm)
(min)
(it)---
5.6
9 -3
6
8
7
5
9.1
7.5
Floodprone Width fl
8
225
150
250
225
150
BF Cross Sectional Area W
5
11.6
3.8
6.5
3
59
4.9
BF Mean Depth R
0.9
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
BF Max Depth R
1.3
2.3
1
1.3
1.1
0.9
12
1.1
Wid&Depdi Ratio
7
74
14
8
16
12
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1
1
1 24
1 11
1 31
1 28
1
as
Bank Height Ratio
4
1
1
1
Wetted Perimet ft
Hydraulic radius ft
- --
- --
_
- --
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth R
No pattern of riffles
and pools due to
straightening activities
34
15
77
31
15
77
31
Radius of Curvature ft
16
15
44
21
15
44
21
Meander Wavel td ft
71
46
154
75
1 46
154
75
Meander Width ratio
37
2
7
4
1 2
7
4
Protlle
Riffle length ft
No pattern of riffles
and pools due to
straightening activiies
- --
- --
- --
Riffle slove &'ft
1 29%
0.17%10.97%10
57%10
17% 0.97%
0.57%
Pool lenartti, at
= --
- --
- --
Pool Spacing (ft
43
31
77
47
1 31 1 77
47
Substrate
d50
d84
Additional Reach Parameters
valley__-
Channel Le
_ --
Sinuosity
1.1 1.1
137
1 35
1.3
Water Stuface Slope (ft ft
0.49%
0.40%
0.44 °0
®
0.27%
BF slope R'ft
®
®
---
®
®
---
®
®
- --
®
®
- --
Rossten Classificatio
®
®
G6
®
®
E6
®®
CtEB
CrE6
R ... h I
Page 10 of 20
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®®
Page 10 of 20

Reach
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®®
MOM
�lsTbv�
IVWR,��®
00000�

R ... h t
Table 6. Verification of Bankfuil Eveuls
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo (if
Collection
Occurrence
Year 2 1009
available
March 2009
February 28-
Total of 2.28 inches of rain documented between
--
Yes/77 days
March 2, 2009
Feb 28 -March 2. 2009 at an onsite rain gauge
Yes 173 days
April 2009
April 14, 2009
Total of 3.01 inches of rain documented on April 14.
—
20 percent)
33 percent)
2009 at an onsite rain gauge
Yes/67 days
Yes /84 days
May 16 -18.
Total of 3.03 inches of rain documented between May
Yes/90 days
May 2009
_009
16- 18.2009 at an onsite rain Range
-
21 cent
November 11.
Greater than 3 inches of rain doctuueuted between
Yes /63 days
April 2010
X009
November 10 -12, 2009 as the result of Tropical Storm
—
(30 percent)
Ida.'
(9 cent)
19 rcent)
(34 percent)
Visual observations of overbank resulting from a 1.63
Yes / 65 days
April 2010
February 5.
inch rainfall event on February 5. 2010 that occurred
photos 1 -2
2010
after numerous rainfall events. within the 3 weeks prior.
10 percent)
16.3 percent)
21 rcent
that totaled 4.32 inches *.
Yes/60 days
Yes/64 days
August 26 -2'7.
Total of 8.78 inches of rain docuuented at an onsite rain
Yes /76 days
August 2011
(28 percent)
gauge between August 26-27.2011 as the result of
—
20 tcent
2011
Hurricane Irene.
"
tt®
®tat
®ttta�ttt��tttl
'7�tttl�tttl�ttt
'il♦m'
�
®
®
®
®ttt$��tt®'
tail 'gym'
m'
m'
®tlt�
tttt ®tat
®tttt�
tat ®tat
®tttt�
tttt�
tat ®ttt}�
tttt�
®
®t�
Il �®
t1�11�11
'a�%�]tlti�
®tils��
®tt��tt'.�tt`
sS�'
�ttE�i�
Table 6. Verification of Bankfuil Eveuls
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo (if
Collection
Occurrence
Year 2 1009
available
March 2009
February 28-
Total of 2.28 inches of rain documented between
--
Yes/77 days
March 2, 2009
Feb 28 -March 2. 2009 at an onsite rain gauge
Yes 173 days
April 2009
April 14, 2009
Total of 3.01 inches of rain documented on April 14.
—
20 percent)
33 percent)
2009 at an onsite rain gauge
Yes/67 days
Yes /84 days
May 16 -18.
Total of 3.03 inches of rain documented between May
Yes/90 days
May 2009
_009
16- 18.2009 at an onsite rain Range
-
21 cent
November 11.
Greater than 3 inches of rain doctuueuted between
Yes /63 days
April 2010
X009
November 10 -12, 2009 as the result of Tropical Storm
—
(30 percent)
Ida.'
(9 cent)
19 rcent)
(34 percent)
Visual observations of overbank resulting from a 1.63
Yes / 65 days
April 2010
February 5.
inch rainfall event on February 5. 2010 that occurred
photos 1 -2
2010
after numerous rainfall events. within the 3 weeks prior.
10 percent)
16.3 percent)
21 rcent
that totaled 4.32 inches *.
Yes/60 days
Yes/64 days
August 26 -2'7.
Total of 8.78 inches of rain docuuented at an onsite rain
Yes /76 days
August 2011
(28 percent)
gauge between August 26-27.2011 as the result of
—
20 tcent
2011
Hurricane Irene.
*Weathenmderaround 2010
Table 11. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
- Groundwater data is repotted through June 29, 2012 Data will continue to be collected throughout the remainder of the growing
season and wdl be mailable upon request.
Page 12 of 20
Success Criteria AchievedMa: Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 2008
Year 2 1009
Year 3 2010
Year 4 2011
Year (2012)*
1
Yes /81 days
Yes/77 days
Yes/25 days
Yes.144 days
Yes 173 days
(38 percent)
(36 percent)
(12 percent)
20 percent)
33 percent)
I
Yes/67 days
Yes /84 days
Yes/31 days
Yes 43 days
Yes/90 days
`
(32 percent)
(40 percent)
05 percent)
21 cent
43 percent)
3
Yes /63 days
Yes / 75 days
Yes /20 days
Yes'41 days
Yes73 days
(30 percent)
(35 percent)
(9 cent)
19 rcent)
(34 percent)
4
Yes / 65 days
Yes /7,6 days
Yesi21 days
Yes /35 days
Yes/45 days
(31 percent)
(36 ercent)
10 percent)
16.3 percent)
21 rcent
Ref 1
Yes/60 days
Yes/64 days
Yes/25 days
Yes /44 days
Yes /76 days
(28 percent)
(30 percent)
(12 percent)
20 tcent
36 percent)
- Groundwater data is repotted through June 29, 2012 Data will continue to be collected throughout the remainder of the growing
season and wdl be mailable upon request.
Page 12 of 20

Table 5. Planted Species and Reference Forest Ecosystem
Planted Species
Reference Species
River birch (Betula i»gra)
Red maple (4cer rubrum)
Sugarbetry (Celtis laerigata)
L-onwood (Ca inns carohniana)
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
Pignut hickory (Carta glabra)
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsrlranica)
Dogwood (Corms sp.)
Swainp black gtun (Nrssa bfflora)
Ash (Fraxinns sp.)
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Chenybark oak (Quercus pagodaefolia)
Sweetgtun (Li uidarnbar shraci ua)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
Yellow popI ax (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
White oak (Quercus alba)
Elderbeny (Sambucus canadensis)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
324
Laurel oak (Quercus lauri olio)
283
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
405
Chenybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
Table 12. Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems /Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 2009)
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
Year 5 (2012)
1
283
283
162
121
324
i
526
526
567
567
607
3
324
364
324
324
283
4
405
445
364
364
526
5
647
648
486
243
445
6
405
405
405
405
405
7
324
324
324
364
364
8
324
405
405
405
405
9
202
405
405
324
324
10
809
729
809
728
728
11
890
972
971
971
971
12
324
526
486
445
445
13
445
567
526
486
486
14
688
688
688
688
688
Average of All
Plots (1 -14)
471
520
494
460
500
Page 13 of 20

EEP Recommendation and Conclusion
The Site achieved the defined (or targeted) success criteria, with saturation (free water) within one
foot of the soil surface for a minimum of 8 percent of the growing season, for all Site groundwater
gauges in the Fifth Monitoring Year (Year 2012) A summary of groundwater gauge data In
addition, all vegetation plots within the Site were above the required 260 stems per acre with an
average of 500 planted tree stems per acre in the Fifth Monitoring Year (Year 2012)
The stream monitoring data indicate that the stream assets have remained stable and have met its
defined success criteria
EEP recommends closure of the Jarmans Oak Restoration Site at 6900 SMUs and 14 05 WMUs
Contingencies
N/A
Page 14 of 20

Jarmans Oak 11 reconstruction Conditions
Page 15 of 20

Jarmans Oak Post Construction
Page 16 of 20

APPENDIX A - Watershed Planning Summary
92550 — Jarmans Oak
The Jarmans Oak project is located in RUC 030300010 100 10, the Upper New River watershed, and
is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2010 White Oak RBRP. Nearly half of the
streams in this watershed lacks adequately functioning riparian buffers. About 44% of the land here
is agricultural including 32 permitted livestock operations. The watershed drains into the lower New
River which is 303(d)- listed due to several standards violations including chlorophyll -a, copper,
Enterrococcus, and high pH (DWQ, 2010). EEP has an additional project adjacent to this site called
Crowns West that was closed out in 2012.
According to the White Oak RBRP (NCEEP, 20L0), goals are to "protect and improve water quality
throughout the Basin by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs into streams ... to protect shellfish
harvesting waters ... to support efforts to restore local watersheds in the White Oak River Basin," and
to "support implementation of the NC Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP, Street et al, 2005)."
Per the TLW goals, the Jarmans Oak project helps to reduce inputs to the stream and provides habitat
for spawning fish species in support of the CHPP.
NE
GOYNM W1t1
N*d She _-
11Y whte Oak -ri
Id.cr lWP
White Oak 03030001 J--O,*
Pmpd M.
EEP Watershed Planning Areas &
Watershed Projects
�fF IEFtI
jr-
1
Le end
o` EEP Project sites
by Phase
■ Design
• Construction
• Monrtonng
• aose Out
Long Term Mgmt
N Q Counties
Municipalities
yy E C38-digit CUs
= 14 dig HIJ
8 — Major Hydrography
o CVVMTF
wan
0 5 10 20 Miles • 319
1 I I I I I EEPLOP
- EEPTLW
HC8. Mach 21112.
Page 17 of 20

APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation
project includes a portion of the following parcels
http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92550 JarmansOak pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be
transferred to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic
inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement
are upheld
Page 18 of 20
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
MR Hogs
Onslow
Conservation
2804/713
6
Easement
Eric Rose Quinn et al
Onslow
Conservation
2804/738
29 530
Easement
http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92550 JarmansOak pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be
transferred to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic
inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement
are upheld
Page 18 of 20

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGiNEE RS �
1�J1� ,a 0 � � �)Ol
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 20071793 067 County: Onslo USGS Quad 'c hl ads- �+
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Restoration Systems, LLC Interested Party NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Address: alto: Rand:j<ll Turner attn: Guy Pearce
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 107 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604 Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone No. • 919 -755 -9490 9-19- 715 -1656
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The project site, known as Jai ans Oak
M'ti ation Site , will 14ke plagg in three me 1 tributaries of he New Rive three mil west of Ri hlai to
the north side of 13ithway 24, Onslow Cgunty, Norill Carolina
Description of projects area and activity: Authorization to impact approximately 6.471 linear feet of stream to
facilitate the restoratioit/enhgngement of 7,65-3 linear feet of stream and 17.1 acres of riverine wetlands,
Applicable Law. Z Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization. Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: NW -27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted restoration plan dated December 2006. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from
your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and /or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and /or modified terms acid conditions The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NW
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Fedora],
State or local approvals /permits.
It there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pernut, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910- 251 -4611
Corps Regulatory Official lLW& Date: June 1, 2007
Expiration Date of Verification: June 1. 2009
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit hop• / /www saw usace army mil /WETLAND,S /index hti;r to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished:
cc. Mickey Sugg, USACE- Wilmington Field Office

ACTION ID # SAW - 20071793 067
PERMIT AND GENERAL CONDITIONS
See attached for NWP 27.
NQRTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUAIA TY
GENE 3AI. CERTIOCATIO Cly ODMITIONE
For the most recent General Certification conditions, call the NC Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401
Certification Unit at (919) 733 -1786 or access the following website:
ho: / /h2 enr.state .nc.us /ncwetlands /certs html
STATE CONSISTENCY
Consistent.

Action EM 20071793 067
y egial Cgndltlons:
1. The permittee must notify our office when restoration construction is to start.
2. Authorization of this work in no way obligates the US Corps of Engineers to recognize this project
as a mitigation bank or as compensation for any past or future permitted impacts.
3. Our office does not recognize as valid any reference to mitigation "credits ", or any other issues
associated with a mitigation bank or mitigation for any past or future permitted impacts.
** Additionally, please be reminded that the permittee will be responsible for the maintenance of this
project after all work is completed. If, at any time, erosion occurs as the result of this project, the
permittee will be responsible, at our discretion, for the removal of the sediment.
Regional Conditions:
NWP 427 -- Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and Enhancement Activities.
1. If you are under contract to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) and
are supplying a Pre - construction Notification (PCN) for impacts associated with a mitigation
project that will be used to supply mitigation credits to EEP, the PCN must include a cover letter
from the NCEEP stating that they have reviewed and approved your restoration plan.
Corps of Engineers Representative: ldvk 14A Date:

Action ID Number:20071793 067 County:Ons o
Permittee: Restoration systems, LL(]
Date Permit Issued: June 1. 2907
Project Manager: ha er
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WILMINGTON REGULATORY F IE LD OFFICE
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402 -1890
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Array Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Fermittee
Date

WQC #3626
_GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR STREAM RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT AND
STABlLlZA "fiON PROJECTS AND WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESTOMTION AND
PERMIT 19 00080 (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINT914ANCE OE BULKHEADSy
This General Certification is Issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401, Public
Laws 92 -500 and 96 -217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and 15A NCAC 213.0200 for the discharge of fill
material to waters as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (6) (13) and (27) of the Corps of
Engineers regulations (!.e. Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27) and Regional Permit
197800080 The category of activities shall Include stream bank stabilization or stream
restoration activity as long as Impacts to waters or significant wetlands are minimized. This
Certiflcation replaces Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3399 issued March 2003 and
WQC Number 3495 issued March 28, 2003 This WQC Is rescinded when the Corps of
Engineers reauthorize Nationwide Permits 13 or 27 or Regional Permit 197800080 or when
deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217
if conducted to accordance with the conditions set forth.
Conditions of Certification,
Wetland and/or riparian area restoration and creation projects which are for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit (and not Including
projects that only Involve stream restoration or enhancement work described In
condition nos 2 and 3 below) that are proposed under this General Certification
require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality. All
applications for written DWQ approval will be reviewed and a response will be
prepared within 30 days of stamped receipt of the application In the Division of
Water Quality's Central Office In Raleigh, This 30 -day period does not Include time
spent by the application or DWQ's response within US Postal Service or North
Carolina's Mall Service Center mall systems;
Weiland and riparian area restoration and creation projects (not Including projects
that involve work in or Impacts to streams) which are not for compensatory
mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit proposed under this General
Certification do not require written application to and approval from the Division of
Water Quality. In these cases, the applicant is required to notify the Division in
writing with three copies of project specifications before the Impact occurs If the
Division determines that the project would not result in an ecologically viable wetland
and riparian area, then the Division shall prepare a response to notify the applicant
in writing within 30 days of DWQ's receipt of the notification In such cases, the
applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate
feo, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal
procedures;
2, Proposed stream restoration projects (as defined and limited below), that do not
disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit do not require written application to and approval
from the Division of Water Quality, and, therefore, do not require payment of an

WQC #3626
application fee to the Division of Water Quality Pioiects that are intended for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit, that are intended to
resolve a violation, or that are In association with a development pioJect shall require
an application, fee, and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality.
Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered or
degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and floodprone areas to
Its natural or referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed
conditions. This biological and chemical Integrity, including transport of water and
sediment Is produced by the stream's watershed in order to achieve dynamic
equilibrium. The applicant is required to notify the Division In writing with three
copies of detailed restoration plans and specifications before the Impact occurs. If
the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream
restoration, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of
receipt of the application. In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a
formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to
process the application through normal procedures;
Stream enhancement projects (as defined and limited below), that do not disturb
wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit and do not include any stream channel relocation, do
not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality,
and, therefore, do not require payment of an applicatlon fee to the Division of Water
Quality. Projects that are Intended for compensatory mitigation or compensatory
mitigation credit, that are Intended to resolve a violation, or that are in association
with a development project shall require an application, fee, and written concurrence
from the Division of Water Quality
4. Stream enhancement is defined as the process of implementing stream
rehabilitation practices In order to Improve water quality and/or ecological function.
These practices must only be conducted on streams that are not experiencing
severe aggradation or erosion. Stream enhancement does not include the relocation
of the stream channel. Stream enhancement bank stabilization techniques Include
the use of woody vegetation as the primary means of long term stability, and "soft"
techniques such as root wads that encourage the establishment of dense woody
vegetation. Stream enhancement techniques do not typically include the use of
stream bank or bed hardening techniques such as rlp -rap or other rock, gabion,
block or concrete structures, However, enhancement activities may also Include the
placement of in stream habitat or grade control structures such as cross vanes, j-
hook vanes, and wing deflectors that do not affect the overall dimension, pattern, or
profile of a stable stream
The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed
enhancement plans and specifications before the Impact occurs if the stream
enhancement project disturbs greater than 500 feet of stream bank or if the project
proposes the use of in stream structures, if the Division determines that the project
does not meet the above definition of stream enhancement, then the Division shall
notify the applicant in writing with an explanation within 30 days of receipt of the
notification to require application and payment of the appropriate fee;
5 Stream stabilization projects that Include the use of any structure or fill In the existing
stream bed or disturb greater that 500 feet of stream bank that are proposed under
this General Certification require written application to and approval from the
Division of Water Quality

WOC #3626
Stream stabilization is defined as the in -place stabilization of an eroding stream
bank using measures that consist primarily of "hard" engineering, such as but not
limited to concrete lining, rip rap or other rock, and gablons. The use of "hard"
engineering will not be considered as stream restoration or enhancement;
Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico of Randleman River Basins
(or any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules] in
effect at the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification
from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0200. Activities listed as "exempt'
from these rules do not need to apply for written concurrence under this
Certification. New development activities located in the protected 50 -foot wide
riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not) within the Neuse and Tar -
Pamllco River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B 0200. All new development shall be located,
designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water
quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
7. In order for the above conditions to be valid, any plans not requiring written
concurrence to use this Certification must be built according to the plans provided to
the Division of Water Quality. If written concurrence Is required, then the project
must be built and maintained according to the plans approved by the written
concurrence and Certification from the Division of Water Quality;
8. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined In the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment •►t
Control Planning and Design Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual'
whichever is more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources at the
DENR Regional and Central Offices) shall be designed, Installed and maintained
properly to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard
(50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs In DWQ - classified trout
waters),
9. All sediment and erosion control measures placed In wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or
delegated program has released the project,
10 Any rip -rap shall be of such a size and density so as not to be able to be carried off
by wave or current action and consist of clean rock or masonry material free of
debris or toxic pollutants. Rip -rap shall not be Installed in the streambed except In
specific areas required for velocity control and to ensure structural Integrity of bank
stabilization measures. If rip -rap is to be Installed within the streambed, the amount
and location must be-approved in wrlting by the Division of Land Resources and
Division of Water Quality. However rock vanes, wing deflectors, and similar
structures for grade control and bank protection are acceptable,
11, Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming Into contact
with freshwaters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
12. If an environmental document Is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding
of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;

WQC #3626
13 Additional site - specific conditions may be added to projects which require written
concurrence under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable
water quality and effluent standards;
14 Projects with any impacts to streams, wetlands, and /or waters that have received a
Notice of Violation from the Division of Land Resources and /or the Division of Water
Quality are required to submit a complete application and receive written
concurrence to use this Certification regardless of the proposed Impact amount to
streams, wetlands, and waters,
15 Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an Individual project shall
expire three years fiom the date of the cover letter from DWQ or the notification sent
to DWQ,
16, Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices.
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, Installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices.
a. Erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version
of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual.
b Design, Installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
bortow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, Including contractor -owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, Installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mlning Manual.
d. Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act
e. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times
17. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparlan
areas beyond the footprint of the Impacts depicted In the Pre - construction
Notification Ail construction activities, Including the design, Installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur.
18. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures In Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to
the maximum extent pracbcabie. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices In wetlands and waters Is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project

WQC #3626
Non - compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project shall result
In revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and /or civil
penalties
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed In the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality
Effective date: 19 March 2007
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
4,�
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQG # 3626

Mr, John Preyer
Restoration Systems, L LC
I I01 Haynes Street, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Michael r Easley, Governor
Wilhom G Ross Ji , Secretary
Noah Cniolmn Department of Fnvironment and Natural Resources
June 4, 2007
Subject Property Jarmans Oak Mitigation Site
Ut to New River [030502,19-(l), C, NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr Preyer,
Coleen H Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project 9 07 -0624
Onslow County
You have out approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 6,471 linear feet of perennial stream, as described in your application dated
April 9, 2007, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on April 9, 2007, to conduct the
proposed stream and riparian buffer restoration, After reviewing your application, we have decided that
the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3626 (GC3626). The
Certiiication(s) allows you to use Nationwide Peimit(s) NW27 when issued by the US Almy Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any othet required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your pioject including (but not limited to) Ei osion and
Sediment Contiol, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or LAMA Permit,
This approval is for the purpose and design that you desci ibed in your application. If you change your
pioject, you must notify us and you may be requited to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now of in the future) exceed one act a of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 21-1 0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
I Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts
^�
Amount Approved (Units)
Plan Location or
Reference
Stream - perennial
6,471 linear feet
PCN page 4 of 8
401 Oversight/Express Review Peinutung Unit
1650 Mail Servi" Centei, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
2321 Ciabtrec I3oulevaid, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Cniolma 27604
Phone [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet It t ) /llo,enr.stn[Lne.us[ncvtet ai g
An Equal Opportunity /Aflumative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumei Paper

Restoration Systems, LLC
Page 2 of 3
June 4, 2007
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur,
3 )Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards;
a The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
,Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
storinwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times
4 Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control treasures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing;
6. Stream Stab ihzation /Stream Restoration Plans
You have our approval for your proposed final stream and ripai ian buffer iestoi ation plans with
the requirement for Monitoring Level I as described within the joint State /Federal agency Stream
Mitigation Guidelines located at-
ha ://www.saw.usace.ati-nv,i-niI/wetlands/iiiiiij ation /stream mitigationAtnil The stream and
i 1parian buffer restoration must be constructed, maintained, and monitored according to the plans
approved by this Office Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the
approved plans or must receive written approval from this Office to make the repairs or
adjustments. The restored stream must be preserved in perpetuity by use of a conservation
easement or other similar mechanism as part of the approved plans.

Restoration Systems, LLC
Page 3 of 3
June 4, 2007
7. Get tificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Watoi Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Catolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may iesult in
criminal and /or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the Noith Caiolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referied in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to ieview as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-713-1786,
Since a y,
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
CHS / {/m
Enclosures GC 3626
Certificate of Completion
cc, USAGE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Joanne Steenhuis, DWQ Wilmington Regional Office
DLR Wilmington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
rilename 070624JnimansOnkMitigationSite (Onslow)401

Certification of Cam Teflon
DWQ ProiectNo -,
Applicant:
Pro j ect Name:
Date of Issuance of Weiland Permit:
County.
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Perrnitt.7ng Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699.1650. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send
certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Cer dfacation
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
And other supporting materials.
Signature: - -_ -- - Date:
Agent's Certification
T, � , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature-
Date:
If this prgject was designed by a Certffled Professional
I, as a duly registered Professional — (Le., Engineer,
Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically,
weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state chat, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials,
Signature: . Registration No. Date

Mitigation Project Name Jarmans Oak
EEP IMS ID 92550
River Basin WHITE Oak
Cataloging Unit 03030001
Aoolied Credit Ratios 1'1 1 5 1 9 5'1 511 1'1 3 1 21 5'1 1'1 3'1 2 1 5'1 1'1 3'1 2'1 5'1 1'1 3'1 n 5'1 1'1 1 1
Information as of 3/17/2013
N
K
C C
o
C N
m E
'DC
N
'c« O
z O oN :
n C
'cN o_
U
z
C c E W
'
'd C L C
O
z
W
C O
'c '«
'd C d i'
O d
z
ry ._
omO
¢
a
'N a «
o
m E
o O u C c
W
m..
qo 2
U a
K �,
Z y5 p
m
O
Z
Q
z
n
L
0.
Q
z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
6,418.00
1,205.00
11.00
6.10
0.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2003 -1327
1997 -01755
NCDOT TIP U -2734 -
Military Cutoff
1,804.00
1.45
2004 -0198
1995 -03519
R -2514A
390.00
2.39
2005 -01215
SR 1725 - Division 3
24.00
2008 - 01973 -067
NC 53 - Division 3
24.00
2010 -0362
2001 -00919
U -4007
2,278.00
2011 -00400
SR 1728 - Division 3
22.00
Statewide IMF Credit Purchase
16.00
6.476
3.248
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
11,860.00
11,205.00
1
0.684
2.852
0.00
Information as of 3/17/2013