Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130452 Ver 1_Application_20130429 Page 1 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the C orps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fe e program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter fr om mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty co astal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: 17BP.10R.17 Bridge 356 on SR 2133 (Sandy Ridge Rd) over Little Richardson Creek 2b. County: Union 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Monroe 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 17BP.10R.17 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Depart ment of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Louis Mitchell, PE 3d. Street address: 716 West Main Street 3e. City, state, zip: Albemarle, NC 28001 3f. Telephone no.: 704-983-4400 3g. Fax no.: 704-982-3146 3h. Email address: lmitchell@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 3 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.906208 Longitude: - 80.522154 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: NA 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, e tc.) to proposed project: Little Richardson Creek 13-17-36-4-(0.5) 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receivi ng water: WS-IV 2c. River basin: Yadkin – Pee Dee 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site an d the general land use in the vicinity of the proje ct at the time of this application: The site consists of a structurally deficient bridg e along a two lane section of state road. Land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily agricultural with some residen tial. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existin g wetlands on the property: No wetlands within project limits. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all exi sting streams (intermittent and perennial) on the p roperty: Little Richardson Creek bisects the project alignme nt. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to replace bridge 356 which is considered structurally deficient. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, includi ng the type of equipment to be used: The existing 20’ wide bridge will be replaced with a 46 foot long (length along skew) double barrel bo x culvert along the same alignment. Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction. Standard road building equipm ent such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determina tions by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: USACE and NCDWQ determinations made as part of NCDOT bridge scoping meeting on Dec 2, 2011 . Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determina tion, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional area s? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictio nal determinations or State determinations and atta ch documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested o r obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the pa st? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help fi le” instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Page 5 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your pr oject (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area i mpacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b . Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W2 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g . Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impac ts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the si te, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g . Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T *Culvert Little Richardson Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 15 46 S2 P T Bank Stabilization for Culvert Little Richardson Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 15 54 S3 P T Dewatering for Construction Little Richardson Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 15 133 S4 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S5 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S6 P T PER INT Corps DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 100 (P) 133 (T) 3i. Comments: *Culvert Size: 12 foot x 5 foot – 46 foot long (length along skew). The proposed burial depth of t he culvert is 18” in the left barrel and 6” in the right barrel. The proposed burial depths are sufficient to maint ain low flows but do not meet the 12” burial requirement specified in Regional Co ndition 3.6. Because of the shallow depth to rock on the right side of the culvert achieving a burial of 12” would require the excavation of rock or the addition of a third barr el. The addition of a third barrel would require greater permanent impacts to t he stream as a result of additional widening for cu lvert placement and Page 6 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version longer bank stabilization impacts. Because the low flow can be maintained with a 6” burial depth and deeper burial would cause additional adverse impacts to the aquatic env ironment we request a waiver from Regional Conditio n 3.6 in association with this culvert placement. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estu aries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impa cts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T O2 P T O3 P T O4 P T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complet e the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 7 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then indivi dually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a . Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Yes No B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid o r minimize the proposed impacts in designing projec t. At the onset of the design phase of this project po ssibility of utilizing a bottomless culvert was exa mined. It was determined that a bottomless culvert could not be utilized at this location. The depth to rock was not shallow e nough on the right side to meet current NCDOT design standards for bottomless culverts. Impacts to the stream will be minimized b y constructing the new culvert on the alignment of the existing bridge . This avoids the need for a temporary structure t o facilitate traffic and keeps the overall linear extent of impact to a mini mum. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or mi nimize the proposed impacts through construction te chniques. An off-site detour will be utilized to serve local tra ffic eliminating the need for a temporary crossing. Impacts to the stream will be minimized by dewateri ng the construction area following the removal of t he existing bridge. A stream flow management plan will be implemented pri or to clearing and excavating for the placement of the culvert. Dewatering will be accomplished through the install ation of impervious dikes upstream and downstream o f the proposed structure. A bypass pipe will be laid along the st ream bed to carry stream flow through the dewatered construction zone. The total dewatered stream length will be 133 linear fe et. Flooding from storms will be pumped out throug h silt bags and discharged into the nearest sediment basin. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigatio n for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the Stat e? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all th at apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used fo r this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) T ype Quantity Page 8 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Prog ram 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is att ached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 46 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 squar e feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 a cres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: It is anticipated that the USACE will require 2:1 mitigation for the 46 feet of culvert impact, or 92 feet total. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitiga tion Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation pla n, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buff er Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a p rotected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to pr ivate mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (re quired by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buf fers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rul es? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? I f no, explain why. Comments: Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of t his project? NA 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Managem ent Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Mana gement Plan, then provide a brief, narrative descri ption of the plan: The project will be completed in accordance with the NCDOT BMP manual to the maximum extent pra cticable. Construction stormwater management will comply with NCS 000250. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is th is project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stor mwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan wit h proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented storm water management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: NPDES NCS 000250 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan wit h proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the ap propriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 10 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of publ ic (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the pr oject require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEP A)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the doc ument review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Minimum Criteria Checklist Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Wate r or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the ab ove questions, provide an explanation of the violat ion(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby d ownstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qu alitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysi s in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provi de a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will nei ther influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detai led indirect of cumulative effects study will not b e necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods a nd disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wast ewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. NA Page 11 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habit at (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Enda ngered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you hav e contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whet her your site would impact Endangered Species or De signated Critical Habitat? A review of GIS NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) e lemental occurrence data from NHP was completed. I t was found that bridge 356 is greater than one mile away from any NHP elemental occurrences. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area desi gnated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whet her your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corp s Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or c ultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation o r properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whet her your site would impact historic or archeologica l resources? An Archaeology - No Survey Required Form was comple ted by NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist. A Historic - No Survey Required Form was completed by NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 10 0-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirem ents: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodpla in determination? FEMA Maps Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorizatio n letter from the applicant is provided.) Date 1 of 4 MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST The following questions provide direction in determ ining when the Department is required to prepare environmental documents for sta te-funded construction and maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either “Yes” or “No”. Complete Part D of the checklist wh en Minimum Criteria Rule categories #8, 12(i), or #15 are used. TIP Project No.: 17BP.10R.17 State Project No.: 17BP.10R.17 Project Location: Bridge 356 on SR 2133 (Sandy Ridge Rd) over Little Richardson Creek, Monroe, Union County, NC (34.906208, - 80.522154) Project Description: The purpose of the project is to replace bridge 356 which is considered structurally deficient. The existing 20 ’ wide bridge will be replaced with two 12’ x 5’ – 36’ long box culverts along the same ali gnment. Traffic will be detoured off- site during construction. Standard road building e quipment such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit Special Project Information: 2 of 4 PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA YES NO Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer. 1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity a llowed under the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental do cumentation is not required? x If the answer to number 1 is “no”, then the project does not qualify as a minimum criteria project. A state environmental as sessment is required. If yes, under which category? ______#9 _____ If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used comple te Part D of this checklist. PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS Items 2 – 4 to be completed by the Engineer. 2. Could th e proposed activity cause significant changes in la nd use concentrations that would be expected to create adv erse air quality impacts? x 3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts o r cumulative impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the environment? x 4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department? x Item 5 -8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer . 5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adver se effect on wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuari es; parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized s cenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value? x 6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence o f a species on the Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list? x 7. Could the proposed activity cause significant chang es in land use concentrations that would be expected to create adv erse water quality or ground water impacts? x 3 of 4 Y ES NO 8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a signifi cant adverse effect on long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfi sh, wildlife, or their natural habitats x If any questions 2 through 8 are answered “yes”, th e proposed project may not qualify as a Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental as sessment (EA) may be required. For assistance, contact: Manager, Project Development and Environmental Anal ysis Branch P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611 (919) 733 –3141 Fax: (919) 733-9794 PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATI ONS Items 9 - 12 to be completed by Division Environmental Office r. YES NO 9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered s pecies, or its habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed acti on? x 10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent fill in waters of the United States? x 11. Does the project require the placement of a signifi cant amount of fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland eco systems, such as mountain bogs or pine savannahs? x 12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Enviro nmental Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act? x Items 13 – 15 to be completed by the Engineer. 13. Does the project require stream relocation or chann el changes? x Cultural Resources 14. Will the project have an “effect” on a property or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? x 15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of add itional right of way from publicly owned parkland or recreational ar eas? x Questions in Part “C” are designed to assist the En gineer and the Division Environmental Officer in determining whether a permit or consulta tion with a state or federal resource agency may be required. If any questions in Part “C” are answered “yes”, follow the appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginnin g project construction. 4 of 4 PART D:( To be completed when either category #8, #12(i), or #15 of the rules are used.) Items 16 - 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Office r. 16. Project length: 17. Right of Way width: 18. Project complet ion date: 19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground surface: 20. Total acres of wetland impacts: 21. Total linear feet of stream impacts: 22. Project purpose: If Part D of the checklist is completed, send a cop y of the entire checklist document to: Don G. Lee State Roadside Environmental Engineer Mail Service Center 1557 Raleigh, NC 27699-1557 (919) 733-2920 Fax (919) 733-9810 Email: dlee@dot.state.nc.us Prepar ed by: Chris Flowers Date: 10/16/2012 Consultant – SEPI Engineering & Construction Reviewed by: Date: Lead Engineer Date: Division Environmental Officer Parcel Name Deed Book Page # 1Eldon Seth Spurlock & Belinda R. Fincher3757628 2Danny Jr. and Ashley R. Gibson5342889 3Mary L. Roberts1859402 4John D and Greta B. Balls0328447 Adjacent Owner Information Bridge 356 Location S a n d y R i d g e G r e e n f i e l d B r u c e T h o m a s W . G . M e d l i n Figure 2 - USGS Project Name: NC Bridge Group N - Bridge 356 SEPI Project #: EN12.006.00 Map Created: June 27, 2012 Map Created by: AMC Data Source: USGS Quadrangle: Monroe NC Bridge Group N - 356 . 03006009001,200 150 Feet Bridge 356 Area M e d l i n W o l f P o n d S t a c k A u s t i n M u l l i s G r i f f i t h M a g n u m D a i r y H w y - 6 0 1 T o m W i l i a m s W . G . M e d l i n J o e C o l l i n s B u f o r d S h o r t C u t U n k n o w n C h a r l i e W i l l i a m s W o l f P o n d U n k n o w n Roads Bridge 356 Location S a n d y R i d g e G r e e n f i e l d Figure 3- Soil Map Units Project Name: 356 Bridge SEPI Project #: EN 12.006.00 Map Created: June 27, 2012 Map Created by: HA Data Source: USDA Replacement of 356 Bridge over Little Richardson Cr eek Union County, NC .03006009001,200 150 Feet Roads Soil Map Units BdB2- Badin channery silty clay loam ChA- Chewacla silt loam BdB2 BdB2 ChA Bridge 356 Location H w y - 6 0 1 W o l f P o n d S t a c k M e d l i n B e l k M i l l H w y -7 4 W h i t e S t o r e C a m d e n W a l k u p G i l b o a J a c k D a v i s S t i t t M a i n R o o s e v e l t O l d P a r g e l a n d - M o n r o e W h i t m o r e O l d M o n r o e M a r s h v i l l e S a n d y R i d g e N a s h M u l l i s F r a n k l i n P h i f e r O l d H i g h w a y E l m A r m f i e l d M i l l E d w a r d s F o r e s t H i l l S c h o o l J u g B r o o m e H a y n e M a g n u m D a i r y M a u r i c e M a c E d o n i a C h u r c h F a u l k s C h u r c h W i l s o n M a y e B i v e n s S e c r e s t H a r g e t t e C a n a l S u m m e r l i n D a i r y R a p e S u n s e t S u t h e r l a n d U n k n o w n H i g h w a y 7 4 M i l l e r F a i r l e y M a s o n M o r g a n M i l l B o y t e R o c k R e s t R u s s e l l P o p e M t P l e a s a n t C h u r c h S y c a m o r e G r o v e P a r k B r o o m e Q u a r r y O l d H i g h w a y 7 4 S a r a H i n s o n T r o y M e d l i n W i n d s o r T o m W i l i a m s P a g e l a n d M o u n t a i n S p r i n g C h u r c h W . G . M e d l i n S m i t h P i g g M a t o x x M u s s e l W h i t e S y n d e r s S t o r e G r e e n f i e l d H a s t y C i n d y B e l m o n t C h u r c h B r o o k s H e l m s E f i r d T o d d R u s t y T u r n e r Z e b G o o d m a n T r i n i t y C h u r c h L o v e E a r l G r i f f i n M c M a n u s C o t t o n M a r i o n L e e C h a n e y A r c h i e H i l l s i d e T h r e e K n o t s S m i t h T o w n W a l n ut A c o r n P a r k e r J o e G r i f f i n K e s w i c k M o u n t a i n O l d P a g e l a n d - M o n r o e L a k e v i e w C h a r l i e W i l l i a m s U n i o n C a s t l e b r o o k R o s a F a u l k P e a r l C u t h b e r t s o n E x c e l l H i n s o n M c R o r i e J a m e s W i s h b o n e W r e n H i l l C o l l e g e Q u a i l R u n P a r k s M e d l i n E u d y A l d a O a k S u t t o n M a r t h a E v a C l u b V i c t o r i a n N e a l V f w L y n n P o l k E rv i n T h o m a s N a s h S y n d e r s S t o r e U n k n o w n U n k n o w n U n k n o w n U n k n o w n U n k n o w n S y n d e r s S t o r e U n k n o w n U n k n o w n Figure 4 - Vicinity Project Name: NC Bridge Group N - Bridge 356 SEPI Project #: EN12.006.00 Map Created: June 27, 2012 Map Created by: AMC Data Source: NCDOT NC Bridge Group N - 356 . 00.511.52 0.25 Miles Roads Monroe Wingate 17 B P . 1 0 R 1 7 - B r i d g e 3 5 6 – U n i o n C o u n t y Ph o t o 1 Ph o t o 3 Ph o t o 2 Ph o t o 4 17 B P . 1 0 R 1 7 - B r i d g e 3 5 6 – U n i o n C o u n t y Ph o t o 5