HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120997 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20130412FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
UT TO HAW BECKOM RESTORTION SITE
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 92694, Contract No. 004545)
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
n -
�C RED/
:70 13 AUG 1 2011
i
August 2012 NC E:-.!DSYSTEM
DENR _ yU� T i ENHANCE .1ENT PROGRAM
s �►r 'atiands -�,�
---.3 ' te? &anch
FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
UT TO HAW BECKOM RESTORTION SITE
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 92694, Contract No. 004545)
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Ave.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Design Firm:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Ave.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
r~
H 'Cc»Tstei»
Table of Contents
1 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 0 METHODOLOGY 3
2 1 Stream Assessment 3
2 2 Vegetation Assessment 3
3 0 REFERENCES 4
List of Figures
Figure l Vicinity Map Appendix A
Figure 2 Current Conditions Plan View Appendix B
List of Tables
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Appendix A
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Appendix A
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Appendix A
Table 4
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix A
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Appendix B
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Appendix C
Table 7
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Appendix C
Table 8
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Appendix C
Table 9
Verification of Bankfull Events
Appendix E
Appendices
APPENDIX A PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2 Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 8 Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D STREAM DATA
Fixed - Station Photos
APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Data
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Table of Contents
I
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) has completed stream and wetland
enhancement and preservation at the UT to Haw Beckom Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the
"Site ") to assist in fulfilling stream and wetland mitigation goals in the area The Site is located
approximately 4 miles north of Burlington, in Alamance County, North Carolina This portion of
Alamance County is located within Cape Fear River Basin Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03030002030010 This report (compiled based on EEP's Procedural Guidance and Content
Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Version 13 dated 1/15/10) summarizes data for year 2 (2012)
monitoring
Site drainage features provide water quality function to an approximately 385 -acre (0 6- square mile)
watershed The Site is located within a NCEEP Targeted Local Watershed, in addition, this Site was
identified for preservation as part of Site 15 (Travis & Tickle 15 2) in the 2008 NCEEP Little Alamance
and Travis and Tickle Creek Local Watershed Plan (pages 72 -73) Site streams drain to a section of the
Haw River, which is currently on North Carolina's 2010 final 303(d) list for impaired
ecological /biological integrity of benthic communities
Prior to construction, Site land use consisted of cleared pasture for livestock grazing and disturbed forest
Site streams were characterized by eroding stream banks and a riparian buffer dominated by active
livestock pasture and disturbed forest
The primary goals of this mitigation project were obtained through removal of livestock from streams,
buffers, and wetlands, reforestation of pasture land with native species, and installation of forded
crossings to safely move animals and equipment across the Site The goals of this project focused on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat and
include the following
• Reducing nonpoint sources of pollution by 1) fencing livestock from stream channels, buffers,
and wetlands, 2) ceasing the application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers, and
3) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to streams and wetlands to treat surface runoff prior to
entering Site streams and ultimately the Haw River
• Reducing sedimentation /siltation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing
bank erosion associated with livestock hoof shear on Site streams, b) filtering surface runoff and
reducing particulate matter deposition into tributaries, and c) providing a forested vegetative
buffer adjacent to Site streams and wetlands
• Promoting floodwater attenuation and improving stream stability by revegetating Site floodplams
to reduce floodwater velocities through increased frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing
Site floodplains
• Providing increased habitat for aquatic wildlife by 1) increasing organic matter, carbon export,
and woody debris in the stream corridor and 2) restoring shade to Site open waters
• Providing wildlife habitat including a minimum of a 50 -foot forested riparian corridor from the
top of each stream bank within a region of the state increasingly dissected by
residential /agricultural land use
• Protecting a Site identified in the 2008 Piedmont Triad Council of Government Little Alamance,
Travis, and Tickle Creek Watersheds Restoration Plan (PTCG 2008) for preservation due to its
location within a remote, rural area with increasing development pressure and appeal to
developers
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina page 1
This project was constructed between December 23, 2010 and January 6, 2011 All stream channels have
a minimum of a 50 -foot wide riparian buffer from the top of each stream bank, which was verified in the
field on January 22, 2011 The project consisted of enhancement (level II) of 2200 linear feet of stream
and enhancement of 1 75 acres of riparian wetlands by removing livestock and reforesting with native
species The project includes preservation of 1465 linear feet of perennial stream and 0 05 acre of
riparian wetlands Site activities provide 1173 Stream Mitigation Units and 0 89 riparian riverme
Wetland Mitigation Units The Site will be protected by a permanent conservation easement held by the
State of North Carolina
Success criteria for stream enhancement will include 1) success of riparian vegetation, 2) bank stability,
and 3) documentation of two bankfull channel events One bankfull event was documented to date during
year 3 monitoring (2012) for a total of three documented bankfull events with at least one event
documented to occur in each monitoring year
Vegetation success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the
first three monitoring years Subsequently, 290 stems per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260 stems
per acre in year 5 Stem counts will be based on an average of the evaluated vegetation plots Based on
the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 737 stems per acre surviving in year 2
(2012) The dominant species identified at the Site were planted stems of cherrybark oak (Quercus
pagoda), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxu), and American elm (Ulmus americana) In addition,
each individual vegetation plot met success criteria when counting planted stems alone
In general herbaceous grasses within the Site, primarily tearthumb (Polygonum sagittatum) in wetter areas
and fescue (Festuca sp ) in drier areas, is vigorous and overtopping many of the smaller planted trees As
a result some of the smaller trees died due to grasses and some of the larger trees died over the summer of
2011 from dry, hot conditions Despite these conditions, the majority of living planted trees are doing
well These issues should continue to be monitored closely in subsequent monitoring years The Site was
replanted as part of planting warranty on November 1, 2011 including 369 bare root seedlings were
planted in Swamp Forest areas and 28 bare root seedlings were planted in floodplain areas of the Site
Planted species and number of stems of each are as follows
Swamp Forest (bare root trees)
45 swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxu)
135 sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
99 American elm (Ulmus americana)
90 willow oak (Quercus phellos)
TOTAL 369 trees
Floodplain (bare root trees)
13 sycamore (Platanus occidentahs)
10 American elm (Ulmus americana)
5 silky dogwood (Corpus amomum)
TOTAL 28 trees
Success criteria for wetland enhancement will include success of riparian vegetation Wetland
enhancement areas are jurisdictional, therefore, hydrology is not being monitored
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina page 2
Beaver continue to be active within the upstream portion of the Site APHIS personnel are providing
beaver management and continue to trap at the Site Beaver dam locations are depicted on the attached
figure Proactive measures to control beaver should continue, as necessary
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and
figures within this report's appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found
in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEPs website
All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Stream Assessment
Annual stream monitoring will include vegetation survival (Section 2 2 Vegetation Assessment) and a
photographic record of post - construction conditions Photographs of the enhancement (level II) reach
will be taken for each year of the monitoring period In addition, visual assessments of the stream will be
conducted by walking the length of stream and bankfull flow events will be documented during the
monitoring pei iod
2.2 Vegetation Assessment
Five vegetation plots were established and marked after construction with four foot metal U -bar post
demarking the corners with a ten foot, three - quarter inch PVC at the origin The plots are 10 meters
square and are located randomly within the Site These plots were surveyed in June 2012 for the year 2
(2012) monitoring season using the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (Lee et al
2008) (http //cvs bio unc edu /methods htm), results are included in Appendix C The taxonomic standard
for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding
Areas (Weakley 2008)
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina page 3
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 2 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities (online) Available
http //www nceep net /services /lwps/ cape_ fear /RBRP %20Cape %2OFear %202008 pdf [June
2010] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2010 Final North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2010 Integrated 5- 303(d) Report) (online)
Availablehttp //portal ncdenr org/c /document_ library/ get_ file�uuid= 7820714e- d00c- 4efO -85d0-
047a097e9c43 &groupld =38364 [January 13, 2011] North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team (NCWFAT) 2008 NC Wetland Assessment
Method (NCWAM) User Manual North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team,
Raleigh, North Carolina
Piedmont Triad Council of Government (PTCG) 2008 Little Alamance, Travis, & Tickle Creek
Watersheds Restoration Plan Available
http //www nceep net / services /lwps/ Little_ Alamance/LATT_FinalWatershedPlan pdf [Jan 2011]
Piedmont Triad Council of Government, Greensboro, North Carolina
Schafale, M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina
Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Raleigh,
North Carolina
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al )
2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
United States Environmental Protection Agency ( USEPA) 1990 Mitigation Site Type Classification
(MIST) USEPA Workshop, August 13 -15, 1989 EPA Region IV and Hardwood Research
Cooperative, NCSU, Raleigh, North Carolina
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974 State of North Carolina
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina page 4
APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure I Vicinity Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Site Location
36.1503 0N, 79.4644 °W
(NAD83/WGS84)
From Burlington
- Take NC -62 N for — 2.5 miles
- Turn left on Union Ridge Road
- Take first left on Greenwood Drive
- After 2.0 miles, turn right on Mansfield Road
- Site is on left
- Permission from landowner required
0 1 mi. 4 mi.
1:158,400
Source: 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, pp.18 & 38.
r`.
N
Access Site from Mansfield Road
Contact Jerry Beckom (336) 260 -4824
prior to entering property
eo
o%
Q'Qa �a
�`a9s
0
Ic
a
o Greenwood
4o
a
Burlington
Axiom Environmental SITE LOCATION
Enterprise 677 R , 27607 UT TO HAW (BECKOM) SITE (EEP #92694)
AW (919) 215 -1M Alamance County, North Carolina
Aram Env✓enmenWl.IM.
WGL
FIGURE
CLF
2009
1
ivary
09 -025
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, EEP Project No. 92964
Mitigation Credits
Data Collection Complete
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Offset
Phosphorus Nutrient
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
—
—
—
—
Totals
—
1173 SMUs
—
0 89 WMUs
—
—
—
—
Pro ect Com onents
Project
Component/ Reach
ID
Station/Location
Existing Footage
Approach
Restoration
or Restoration
E urvalent
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
—
1550
—
Enhancement (Level II)/
1550
25 1
Main Channel
—
635
—
Preservation
635
5 1
—
1 5
—
Enhancement (Level II
15
2 5 1
UTl
—
665
—
Preservation
665
51
Um
—
635
—
Enhancement (Level 11)
635
25 l
UT3
—
165
—
Preservation
165
51
Wetland 1
—
1 15
—
Enhancement
1 15
21
Wetland 2
—
025
—
Enhancement
025
2 1
Wetland 3
—
005
—
Enhancement
005
2 1
Wetland 4
—
015
—
Enhancement
015
21
Wetland 5
—
005
—
Enhancement
005
2 1
Wetland 6
—
010
—
Enhancement
010
2 1
Wetland 7
—
001
—
Preservation
001
1 5 1
Wetland 8
—
004
—
Preservation
004
5 1
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream linear footage)
Rrvenne Ripanan Wetland
(acreage)
Planted Riparian Buffer (acreage)
Enhancement (Level 11)
2200
—
—
Enhancement
—
1 75
—
Preservation
1465
005
—
Totals
3665
18
51
Mitigation Units
1173 SMUs
0 89 WMUs
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, EEP Project No. 92964
Activity or Report
Data Collection Complete
Completion or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
March 2010
March 2010
Sod Amendments, Site Planting, & Baseline Monitoring Document
January 2011
January 2011
Year 1 2011 Annual Monitoring
September 2011
October 2011
Year 2 (2012) Annual Morutonng
June 2012
August 2012
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site, EEP Project No. 92964
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh,NC 27603
Designer
Grant Lewis (919- 215 -1693)
Riverworks Inc
PO Box 31768
Raleigh NC 27622
Planting and Soil Amendment Contractor
George Morris 919 -459 -9043
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
ITT to Haw (Reckom) Site. EEP Proiect No. 92964
Project Information
name
UT to Haw Beckom
—Project
County
Alamance
Area
10 acres
—Project
Coordinates
36 1503 °N, -79 4644 °W
—Project
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sto ra hic Province
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030002
USGS H drolo is Unit 14-digit 03030002030010
DWQ Sub -Basin
03 -06 -02
Drainage Area
385 acres
—Project
Project Drainage Area Percentage Impervious Surface
<5
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover, Hardwood Swamps
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Main Channel
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
of reach (linear feet)
2185
680
635
165
—Length
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drama a area (acres)
150
75
50
30
NCDWQ stream identification score
42
51
1 60
1 68
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -V
Morphological Description (stream e)
-
-
trend
-Evolutionary
mapped sods
Local Alluvial Land
—Underlying
class
Poorly drained
—Drainage
Soil H dnc status
H dnc
Sloe
009 feet
005 feet
025 feet
024 feet
FEMA classification
-
-
-
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
1 <5
<5
<5
<5
Wetland Sum mar Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Weiland 2
Wetland 3
Wetland 4
Wetland 5
Wetland 6
Wetland 7
Wetland 8
Size of Wetland (acres)
1 15 acres
0 25 acres
0 05 acres
0 15 acres
0 05 acres
0 10 acres
0 01 acres
0 04 acres
Wetland Type
Riparian
class
Poorly Drained
—Drainage
Soil H dnc Status
H dric
Source of Hydrology
Overbank and over -land flow
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont/Mountain Swamp Forest
P/M BHF-
P/M BHF*
Percent composition of exotic invasive ve etation
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0
0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved9
Supporting Document
Waters of the United States — Section 404
No
Waters of the United States — Section 401
No
Species Act
No
—Endangered
Historic Preservation Act
No
Coastal Mana >ement Zone Act CZMA / Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
FEMA Flood lain Compliance
No
Essential Fishenes Habitat
No
*Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Schafale and Weakley)
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2 Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
UT Haw Beckom (final)
EEP Project Number 92694
Alamance County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
August 2012
Appendices
Very Large Off -site Beaver Dam
Partially Breached
Beaver Dam
°h,w L.
f
4.
sY 3.
Photo
F,
M
'x
of
,"
r
'f
rlc.
N
Ii
�cok"tem
QF?�hont 4
t
D— by. FIGURE
ND /CLF
Axiom Environmental MONITORING PLAN VEIW
*a 216 Snow Ave. LIT TO HAW BECKOM SITE °ate
Raleigh, NC 27603 May 2012
(919)215-1693 Alamance County, North Carolina
Project
A— I:nVIrUMrwn4M. Inc
0 &025
Plot Origin
Latitude Longitude
1
36.15240 - 79.46400
t5 -
2
36.15191 - 79.46456
3 1
36.15096 1 - 79.46441
4
36.15005 - 79.46442
t
5
36.14950 - 79.46420
Photo Point
Latitude Longitude
1
36.14943 - 79.46399
2
36.15013 - 79.46427
3
36.15088
- 79.46457
4
36.15185
- 79.46444
5
36.15218 - 79.46426
Legend
• Crest Gauge
Vegetation Plot Origins
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
Swamp Forest
Steamside Assemblage
L -
_ Bottomland Hardwood
Streams
o Photo Points
0
45 90
180 270 360
Feet
QF?�hont 4
t
D— by. FIGURE
ND /CLF
Axiom Environmental MONITORING PLAN VEIW
*a 216 Snow Ave. LIT TO HAW BECKOM SITE °ate
Raleigh, NC 27603 May 2012
(919)215-1693 Alamance County, North Carolina
Project
A— I:nVIrUMrwn4M. Inc
0 &025
Table 5 Veaetation Condition Assessment
UT Haw Beckom /EEP Project Number 92694
Ptantart Arrannal 91
Facamant ArrPanPZ 10
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
4 Invasive Areas of Concern °
NA
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vecietation Catenory
Definitions
Threshold
De action
Pol ons
Acreage
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2 Low Stem Density Areas
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
i 31 i 1'_` "TOtaI
O
0 '00'
0%
r,
f 'W�t _ u�B.W 1�a I'nM15`i�ii3't3A7
i_M ^Ydia�
a9i�Ad.,�'C
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
NA
NA
NA
200
39 2%
Herbaceous vegetation within the Site is vigorous most noteably in the northern portion of the Site This hi
resulted in overtopping of smaller trees
y�
67
!` Cnm�datwaTotal
0;
200
392%
Facamant ArrPanPZ 10
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern °
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
aY '
NA
NA
5 Easement Encroachment Areas 3
NA
NA
NA
NA
UT Haw (Beckom) 2012 Year 2
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken June 2012
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 8 Total Planted and Natural Recruit Stems by Plot and Species
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County North Carolina Appendices
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
UT to Haw (Beckom) Site. EEP Proiect No. 92964
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc- Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
ITT to Haw (Rpeknm) Bite_ F.F,P Prniect No. 92964
Report Prepared By
Corn Faquin
Date Prepared
7/18/2012 9 58
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2012 -A mdb
database location
C \Axiom \Business \CVS
computer name
CORRI -PC
file size
49704960
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes
Prof, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems,
and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
92694
project Name
LIT Haw (Beckom)
Description
buffer and wetland mitigation
River Basin
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
5
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Table 8. Total Planted and Natural Recruits Stems by Plot and Species
UT to Haw (Beckom)
Current Plot Data (MY2 2012)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E92694- AXE -0001
E92694- AXE -0002
E92694- AXE -0003
E92694- AXE -0004
E92694- AXE -0005
MY2 (2012)
MY1 (2011)
MYO (2011)
Pnol-S
P -all IT
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
5
5
5
41
5
5
46
6
6
31
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
2
21
2
1
1
1
4
41
4
11
1
1
3
31
3
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
3
35
38
21
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
51
5
51
1
1
1
3
3
4
9
9
10
9
9
9
11
11
11
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
5
3
8
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
21
2
2
1
1
1
6
61
8
1
1
1
5
S
5
15
15
17
7
71
7
12
12
12
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
201
20
20
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
21
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
5
5
19
19
19
18
18
18
11
111
11
Quercus minima
dwarf live oak
Shrub
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
31
31
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
14
14
14
17
17
17
23
23
23
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
8
8
8
10
10
10
Ulmus
elm
Tree
3
2
1
17
23
2
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
ITree
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
8
8
8
18
18
18
15
15
15
16
16
16
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
20
20
20
12
12
56
20
20
29
19
19
28
20
20
74
91
91
207
85
85
135
108
108
108
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.12
0.12
7
7
7
5
5
7
7
7
9
7
7
11
5
5
9
10
10
15
11
11
14
9
9
9
809.4
809.4
809.4
485.6
485.6
2266
809.4
809.41
1174
768.9
768.9
1133
809.4
809.4
2995
736.51736.51
16751
6881
6881
1093
874.11
874.1
874.1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted stems excluding livestakes
P -all= Planted stems including livestakes
T = Planted stems and natural recruits
Total includes stems of natural recruits
APPENDIX D
STREAM DATA
Fixed- Station Photos
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Momtonng Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County North Carolina Appendices
UT Haw (Beckom) 2012 Year 2
Fixed - Station Photos
Taken June 7, 2012
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events
ITT to Flaw (Reckom) Site_ REP Proiect No. 92964
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available
Total of 2 83 mches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days
September 30, 2011
June 28, 2011
June 27 -28, 2011)
--
Total of 3 61 inches* of rain reported to fall over 4 days
September 30, 2011
September 24, 2011
(September 21 -24, 2011) with an additional 0 85 inches* of
--
rain the following 3 days (Se to 25 -27, 2011)
Total of 4 84 inches* of rain reported to fall over 3 days
July 18, 2012
July 11, 2012
(July 9 -11, 2012)
--
* Reported at KBUY Weather Station in Burlington
UT Haw Beckom (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2012)
EEP Protect Number 92694 August 2012
Alamance County, North Carolina Appendices