20210567 Ver 1_DCM Correspondence_20210607

Strickland, Bev
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 9:33 AM
To: Harrison, James A; Snider, Holley; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US); Dunn, Maria T.
Subject: RE: Wiley Jones
Morning Jimmy,
It's my belief that due to the historic disturbance from shrimpers that the shell is mostly loose shell and any possible
clusters could be moved. That can be conditioned and could be in the event of any dredge footprint requested in the
future. I have a call into Brad to try and set up a field visit to verify depths and look for shellfish resource. If that gets
scheduled I will you know.
Thanks for the update,
Gregg
From: Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 9:24 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW
CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Wiley Jones
Good morning Gregg,
DMF would be amenable to allowing this shift in location of the structure based on the information provided.
This allowance would mainly depend on the potential presence of significant quantities of actively growing
shellfish within the footprint. If it's just shell structure and no actively growing species (or just a few
individuals/clusters), DMF will not have significant concerns with the proposed condition. There is the
possibility that, if there are small clusters or singles growing, these could be relocated or avoided in the final
design (i.e. positioning piles away from observed shellfish). Thanks Gregg!
Jimmy
Jimmy Harrison
habitat and Lnkancement jection
NC Division of Marine risheries
[e-mail]
252-9-18-5855 (Office)
1

757-272-5250 (Mokide - rreJerrecl)
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:16 PM
To: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Wiley Jones
No. This will be done via permit condition(s). The agent is not very pleased of the DCM determination at this
time. Further calculations is about a 21 foot reduction in overall length to get it to the green similar pier line.
Gregg
From: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:08 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Wiley Jones
Gregg,
Has the applicant submitted a revised plan drawing for review?
Thanks,
Holley Snider .., ,><((((°>•..•.,,..><((((°>.•"-
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Phone: [phone]
°RrIEC15,
aBwmn«a a EiV•IFORP14414111 oaaai
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:58 AM
2

To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>;
Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: Wiley Jones
Hey all,
DCM has made a similar pier call that will pull the proposed pier back some to the green line indicated above to limit
interference with the historical and established use of the area. Standard lighting and marking of the pier will also be
conditioned. At this time it is unknown if the applicant will request dredging in the future. Distances (red lines) are
164ft off marsh and 195ft off terminus of eastern bulkhead.
Let me know if this changes any comments and please let me know of any comments forthcoming.
Thanks,
Gregg
3