20180859 Ver 2_Modification Request_20210602

Staff Review Form
Updated September 4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
6* Yes r No
ID#* Version* 1
20180859
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnsonl
Select Reviewing Office:*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
r
No
How much is
owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:*
✓ For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
✓ New Project
✓ Modification/New Project with Existing ID
✓ More Information Response
✓ Other Agency Comments
✓ Pre -Application Submittal
✓ Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
✓ Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as we will not
be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form is used in
accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project
proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency" and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section
121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click here to read
more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or here to view the form.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form (18).pdf 53.59KB
Date for Meeting Request 4/30/2021
ID# 20180859 Version 2
Project Contact Information
Name: Aliisa Harjuniemi
Who is submitting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #:
20180859
20170001 (no dashes)
Project Name: Cottage Green Subdivision
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
a No
Existing Version:
1
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)

Union
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
2018-0076.Cottage Green
16.95MB
Subdividion.5.28.21.NWP29 Mod.pdf
Only pdf or krre files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
Please find attached the request for NWP29 permit modification for the Cottage Green Subdivision (SAW-
2018-00646; DWR# 18-0859 ).
Sign and Submit
P By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
( 52.14 rP frlslr satyr
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2018 - 00646
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder n Assign Action ID Number in ORM n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Cottage Green Subdivision
2. Work Type: Private n Institutional n Government n Commercial n
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The purpose of the project is to develop the property for a single-family subdivision. This is a
modification request to a previously issued Nationwide Permit.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: HWY 601 Development LLC; POC: Mr. Charles Saleh
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Ms. Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW-2018-00646
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
located southeast of the Highway 601 and East Highway 74 intersection, in Union County, North
Carolina. 34.966515, -80.501867
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 09125134 and 09158001
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Union
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Monroe
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Richardson Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
n Regional General Permit #
n Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
n No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

ki,
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Date: May 28, 2021
Subject: Permit Modification Request to Nationwide Permit No. 29
Cottage Green Subdivision
Union County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds and Mr. Johnson,
The Cottage Green Site (Union County Tax Parcel Nos. 09125134 and 09158001) is approximately 75 acres
in extent and is located southeast of the Highway 601 and East Highway 74 intersection, in Union County,
North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2, Attachment A). Hwy 601 Development, LLC, has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. An executed
Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment B).
The purpose of the project is to develop the property for a single-family subdivision. USACE and NCDEQ
have previously issued the 404 and 401 permits for this project. However, due to the presence of rock that
would make the construction of foundations for the originally proposed bottomless culvert design both more
challenging and expensive, the applicant proposes utilizing a 72" RCP culvert at this location. This would
result in 108 linear feet of additional permanent impacts and 20 linear feet of temporary impacts due to the
dewatering system. The project also proposes one additional open cut waterline crossing (15 If temporary
impacts).
The previously authorized and now completed impacts totaled 105 linear feet of permanent stream impacts
as measured in May 2021 (76 If of culvert and 29 If of rip rap), 0.05 acre of permanent wetland impacts, and
40 linear feet of temporary impacts due to temporary construction access.
The new cumulative impacts for this project total 213 If (0.018 ac.) of permanent stream impacts (184 If for
culvert and 29 for rip rap) and 75 If of temporary stream impacts (40 If for construction access, 20 If for
dewatering and 15 If for waterline crossing). The permanent wetland impacts total 0.05 acre. The previous
permit verifications are attached (SAW-2018-00646, DWR# 18-0859).
CWS is submitting an updated Pre -Construction Notification pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29 to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
associated with developing the property for a single-family residential subdivision.
A copy of the PCN application is being provided to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) with a check of $570 for the 401 Water Quality Certification approval fee.

Cottage Green Subdivision
Transmittal Letter
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
DESCRIPTION
Attachment A - Figures 1-7
Attachment B - Agent Authorization Form
Attachment C - General Permit Verification and PJD (SAW-2018-00646)
Attachment D - Water Quality Certification (DWR# 18-0859)
Attachment E - Proposed Impacts
Attachment F - Protected Species Habitat Assessment
Attachment G - SHPO Letter
Attachment H - Photopage (Photographs 1-19)
Please do not hesitate to contact Aliisa Harjuniemi at 980-259-1222 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Manager
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Page 2 of 2

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
0 Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes 0 No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑Yes III No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑Yes El No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes 0 No
lg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes 0 No
lh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Cottage Green Subdivision
2b. County:
Union
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
City of Monroe
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
HVVY 601 Development LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Charles Saleh
3d. Street address:
520 Eagleton Downs Drive Suite D
3e. City, state, zip:
Pineville, NC 28134
3f. Telephone no.:
704-907-6767
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Aliisa Harjuniemi
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
980-259-1222
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
09125134 and 09158001
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.966515° Longitude: -80.501867°
1 c. Property size:
75 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Richardson Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin Pee Dee 03040105 (HUC)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of an active construction site and undeveloped forest. On -site elevations range from 500-590 feet
above mean sea level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of mixed forest, shrub/scrub, and woody wetlands
(Figure 3). According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS)
Web Soil Survey of Union County (Figure 4) and the NRCS Historic Soil Survey for Union County (Figure 5), current and historic
on -site soils consist of seven different soil types (Figure 4). Of the on -site soils, none are listed on the Web Soil Survey as
containing hydric inclusions. A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts one potential freshwater pond occurring on site (Figure 6).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.77 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,979 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a single-family residential subdivision. This project will provide residential housing for
the Union County area to meet the growing demand for housing due to population growth.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: (see next page)
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e.
The purpose of the project is to develop the property for a single-family subdivision. USACE and NCDEQ have
previously issued the 404 and 401 permits for this project. However, due to the presence of rock that would
make the construction of foundations for the originally proposed bottomless culvert design both more
challenging and expensive, the applicant proposes utilizing a 72" RCP culvert at this location.
This would result in 108 linear feet of additional permanent impacts and 20 linear feet of temporary impacts
due to the dewatering system. The project also proposes one additional open cut waterline crossing (15 If
temporary impacts).
The previously authorized and now completed impacts totaled 105 linear feet of permanent stream impacts as
measured in May 2021 (76 If of culvert and 29 If of rip rap), 0.05 acre of permanent wetland impacts, and 40
linear feet of temporary impacts due to temporary construction access.
The new cumulative impacts for this project total 213 If (0.018 ac.) of permanent stream impacts (184 If for
culvert and 29 for rip rap) and 75 If of temporary stream impacts (40 If for construction access, 20 If for
dewatering and 15 If for waterline crossing). The permanent wetland impacts total 0.05 acre.
The proposed new impacts and previously authorized impacts are depicted in the Attachment E.
Typical inspected and regularly maintained mechanized equipment will be used for construction activities in
jurisdictional waters.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 20
9

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary❑Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Daniel Roberts
Agency/Consultant Company:
Carolina Wetland Services
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination dated 10.22.2018 is included in the Attachment C (SAW-2018-00646).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A Nationwide Permit Verification dated 10.22.2018 is included in the Attachment C (SAW-2018-00646). Water Quality
Certification dated 7.16.2018 is included as Attachment D (DWR# 18-0859).
The previously authorized and now completed impacts totaled 105 linear feet of permanent stream impacts as measured in
May 2021 (76 If of culvert and 29 If of rip rap), 0.05 acre of permanent wetland impacts, and 40 linear feet of temporary impacts
due to temporary construction access.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑x Wetlands ❑x Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f. Area
of
impact
(acres)
W1
p
Fill
Headwater
Yes
404
0.05
W2
_
W3
-
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.05
2h. Comments:
The permanent wetland impacts total 0.05 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
T
Temporary Access
Road
Stream B
INT
Corps
4
40
S2
P
Culvert
Stream SC
INT
Corps
3
76
S3
T
Fill
Stream SC
INT
Corps
3
29
S4
P
Culvert
Stream B
PER
Corps
5
108
S5
T
Dewatering
Stream B
PER
Corps
5
20
S6
T
Open Cut Waterline
Crossing
Stream B
INT
Corps
4
15
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
288 If
3i. Comments: The cumulative stream impacts for this project total 213 If (0.018 ac.) of permanent stream impacts (184 If for
culvert and 29 for rip rap) and 75 If of temporary stream impacts (40 If for construction access, 20 If for dewatering and 15 If for
waterline crossing).
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
_
Choose One
Choose
02
_
Choose One
Choose
03
_
Choose One
Choose
04
_
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
_
Yes/No
B2
_
Yes/No
B3
_
Yes/No
B4
_
Yes/No
B5
-
Yes/No
B6
-
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
In order to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the Cottage Green Subdivision site was delineated
prior to developing the site plan, and the proposed site plan was designed to avoid the jurisdictional features to the maximum
extent practicable. On -site waters of the U.S. were delineated, and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination site visit occurred
on April 27, 2018 (SAW-2018-00646). The configuration and density of the project has been designed to avoid waters of the
U.S. to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting project goals.
Originally, the project proposed only one road crossing with culvert. The second crossing was originally designed as a
bottomless culvert. However, due to the presence of rock that would make the construction of foundations for the originally
proposed bottomless culvert design both more challenging and expensive, the applicant proposes utilizing a 72" RCP culvert at
this location. Additionally, the construction cost for the bottomless culvert has increased during the past 2.5 years from the
original permit approval and the bottomless culverts also have higher maintenance costs.
The proposed road crossings were designed to cross streams at a near perpendicular angle. The proposed culvert will be buried
1' below the exiting grade to facilitate the aquatic life movements.
No Build Alternative
To minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build" alternative was considered. The
property is being purchased for the purpose of providing more residential housing to meet the growth and demand of an area in
Monroe experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project goals of providing necessary
housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. (Continued)
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Silt fence will be
installed around the jurisdictional features, outside of the avoided wetlands and streams. Construction activities and impacts to
on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit No. 29 and Water Quality Certificate
No. 4139. All work will be constructed in the dry and all temporary fill will be removed following the work.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes
❑x No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>25%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes
❑ No
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan is being designed in accordance with the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Monroe
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Monroe
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑x Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑x No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑Yes ❑x No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. WII this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑Yes ❑x No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a single and complete project that will implement appropriate stormwater control measures and not result in
cumulative impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated off -site at the Monroe WWTP.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑Yes ❑x No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑Yes ❑x No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the project vicinity, and prior
to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for
Mecklenburg County. In addition, CWS performed a data review and habitat assessment for this property. The results of
the desktop review and habitat assessment are included in the Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
(Attachment F).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑Yes ❑x No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on September 20, 2018 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the
project. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service a Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's
webpage and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits. In their response letter
dated October 18, 2018 SHPO states that they have no comments on the project as proposed. A copy of the SHPO's
response letter is attached (Attachment G).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑x Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
There will be no change in elevation within the FEMA floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Nos. 371054400J and 3710545400J
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Ms. Aliisa Harjuniemi
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid
only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
5.28.21
Date
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT A:
Figures 1-7

State Location Extent
Kentucky
Tennessee
Virginia
4644, 114
istaktOza
Georgia
North -Carolina
top.,gir
144 I
040
South Carolina
srtkFr►e$t � ortrop
-
es
,
403 LEy"d
Monti
Country
C tub
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2018.
Legend
5,000 2,500
Wingate N
Project Limits (75 ac.)
5,000 Feet
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet
4/5/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
M LS
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAR❑LINA
WETLAND SERV10ES
Vicinity Map
Cottage Green
Union County
Monroe, North Carolina
FIGURE NO.
1
of
7
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \JD\ArcGIS\Figurel_Viscinity.mxd

Legend
Project Limits (75 ac.)
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): MONROE AND WINGATE, NC (2017).
1
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
DRAWN BY:
4/5/2018
MLS
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAR❑ LI NA
WETLAND SERVICES
USGS Topographic Map
Cottage Green
Union Couny
Monroe, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \JD\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd
FIGURE NO.
2
of
7

REFERENCE: BACKGROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2017.
BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2018.
Legend
1 Project Limits (75 ac.)
Roads
Tax Parcels
1,000
500
0
.II I�
1,000 Feet
‘ 4+I l r
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
4/5/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
MLS
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAROLINA
WETL.ANO SERVICES
Aerial Map
Oakton Subdivision Site
Union Couny
Monroe, North Carolina
FIGURE NO.
3
of
7
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial.mxd

Soil Unit Name and Description
Badin channe silt loam, 2 to 8 .ercent slo.es
Badin channery silly clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Badin-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Cid channe silt loam, 1 to 5 .ercent slo
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Goldston-Badin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Tarrus .ravel) silt loam, 2 to 8 .ercent sloes
311
EIMMEIEM
Coverage (%)
0'
IMEMZEIEM
2.50
0.80
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY, NC, DATED 2018.
4.70
18.70
100.0
Legend
Roads
C Project Limits (75 ac.)
1,000 Feet
1,000
500
0
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
4/5/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
MLS
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CARO LI NA
WETLAND SERVICES
USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey FIGURE NO.
of Union County
Cottage Green
Union County
Monroe, North Carolina
4
of
7
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \JDWrcGIS\Figure4_CurrentSoils.mxd

Monroe
, I gh Sch
1 • 1iA oaf
94C Hwy 601
9uC
GSE
HaC
Soil Unit Name and Description
BaB Badin channe silt loam. 2 to 8 .ercent sloes
BdB2
BuC
CmB
GoE
GsC
TaB
ti,
Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Badin-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes
Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Goldston-Badin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Tarrus .ravel) silt loam, 2 to 8 .ercent slo.es
E Old Hwy 74
Crns-`
'rrriB
Hydric
No
Total Coverage
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS HISTORIC SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY, NC, SHEETS 23, 24 ,28, AND 29, DATED 1996
muri 11 t
CSA'
ria13r
Old Pigstand Mine Rd
Legend
2,000 1,000
ECd62
Rock
2,000 Feet
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
3/8/2018
DRAWN BY:
MLS
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey
of Union County
Cottage Green
Union County
Monroe, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure5_HistoricSoils.mxd
FIGURE NO.
5
of
7

REFERENCE: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROIVDED BY UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, ACCESSED 2017.
BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2017.
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
DATE:
3/22/2018
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
w
(9
J
J_
F-
in
w
W
ti/ram _(F7'-------m-------?
Legend
Project Limits (75 ac.)
Roads
National Wetland Inventory
72
o
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
National Wetland Inventory
Cottage Green
Union County
Monroe, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure6_NWI.mxd
FIGURE NO.
6
of
7

Px.rO[ 9^S^0I,R O 9LOR8I nag .puls^0O a oaa 0a.. Oweay %u0L^s^o0�a�u0 umay\�O

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT B:
Agent Authorization Form

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Charles Saleh, representing HWY 601 Development LLC, hereby certify that I have authorized
Aliisa Harjuniemi of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands
determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Union County
Parcel IDs
Applicant Name
Applicant Address
09125134 and 09158001
HWY 601 Development LLC
POC: Charles Salehr
520 Eagleton Downs Drive Suite D
Pineville, NC 28134
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized signature
June 1,2021
Date
Agent's signature
5.28.21
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT C:
General Permit Verification and PJD (SAW-2018-00646)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2018-00646 County: Union U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Monroe
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: HWY 601 Development LLC
William Laffodav
Address: 520 Eagleton Downs Drive, Suite D
Pineville, NC 28134
Telephone Number: 704-907-6767
E-mail. chksaleh(d(gmail.com
Size (acres) 75 Nearest Town Monroe
Nearest Waterway Richardson Creek River Basin Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 34.9665
Longitude: -80.5018
Location description: The project area is located directly east of the intersection of Pa2eland Highway and East Old Highway
74. PINs: 09125134 and 09158001.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the grading and placement of fill material in 0.05 acre of
wetlands and 160 linear feet of stream to facilitate the construction of a single-family residential development. The project
would result in the loss of 0.05 acre of wetlands for lot grading, the loss of 120 linear feet of stream for the installation of a
culvert and roadway, and permanent impacts to 40 linear feet for rock dissipation pads at the up and down stream ends of the
culvert.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 29. Residential Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 6/18/2018, and the enclosed plans Sheets 1-18 dated 5/29/2018. Any violation of
the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration
order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or david.l.shaeffer(d,usace.army.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Digitally signed by SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA,
cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date: 2018.10.22 16:53:15 -0400'
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022
Date: 10/22/2018

SAW-2018-00646
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any work
in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued DATE. Action ID: FILE NUMBER.
Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 10/22/2018.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
f. r.02,7 � mne�o�E��, 3 ���.E..Eao.�o�a� — 3
Corps Regulatory Official: �o u
David L. Shaeffer
Date of JD: 10/22/2018
Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2018-00646
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Daniel Roberts
Address: 550 Eat Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177
E-mail. Daniel(acws-inc.net

Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00646 County: Union
Permittee: HWY 601 Development LLC, William Laffoday
Project Name: Cottage Green Residential Subdivision
Date Verification Issued: 10/22/2018
Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
or
[e-mail]
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

11.3,9,1111.3.3.VEMMVA0,11.1411
(NO • La...-,6z
=096,,,,TILIX.13,19 KINOUld
SlAV1ngA/09 9NINg3ATION3
:gel
„AI tiatif, Anil eiti
. Aga fowl, alizis We)
M 1
KM WHI lin!' E
INatioN IEEE ILEA
1 urzoti__-1IIINmat
. tin istalloasslil lag ;Iasi'
wolf rtiENFI,mi 0=1
NOCSIAIRI
019
31%1 'acomow JO IUD
0V011 SHOIS KM& 9 109 JAM Sfl
(NODIVO 109 MO
ismazio a OVIIOD
NVM ICALLNOJ Norsoaz amv 'anymna 'omiavap

SCALE 1 "=40'
2�43
NAG OECB
STABILIZATION
BLANKET
07/
EXIST. SS
SEWER MH
TOP=498.00
EL: 486.31
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
/
NOTE: SANITARY SEWER
AERIAL CROSSING PLAN
DESCRIPTION:
GRAY PROJECT NO:
EXHIBIT A
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY: REG
_ JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP J
OF BANK= i
-'` + 5 FEET WIDE i
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A PILGRIM ROAD- GREENVILLE, SGz9M,
PIE (ADO 29}3oz-FAX: (86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.COM
EXISTING
WETLAND TO
REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
SHEET TITLE
SEWER AERIAL PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBITA
5/29/2018
Page 2 of 18

SCALE 1 "= 50' HOR/Z
SCALE 1"= 10 ' INERT.
510
500
490
STACKABLE
PIERS TO
SUPPORT
AERIAL SEWER
480
r )
129.36'
8" DIP © 0.50% ,
s
36'
LIMITS OF WETLANDS
N (o N N N N
M Cr)N 06 CO
r
i
i
MIM
r —
8"DIP ©0.50%
146.62'
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
NOTE- SANITARY SEWER
AER/AL CROSSING PROFILE
DESCRIPTION -
EXHIBIT A 9
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE.:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY. DJG
CHECKED BY. REG
GRIP
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A :GRIM- ROAD • GLLE, SGz96o�
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAX: (8(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
SHEET
SEWER AERIAL PROFILE \fg/
PROJECT NAME'
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, N C
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWNG NO:
EXHIBIT Al
5/29/2018
Page 3 of 18

TOP OF PLACED RIPRAP
SHALL MATCH GRADE
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
WITHIN STREAM BANKS.
EXISTING/FINISHED
GRADE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC,
INSTALL PER
MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATRIONS
RIPRAP TO BE INSTALLED
TO THE HIGH WATER MARK
OF THE CREEK OR EDGE OF
WETLAND AREA
PLACE RIPRAP
20' WIDE
CENTERED OVER
PIPELINE
RIPRAP
WETLAND/CORPS
JURISDICTION
SEE
PLAN
HIGH WATER MARK/ EDGE
OF WETLANDS
NOTES:
1. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE FW 500 OR APPROVED EQUAL.
2. RIPRAP SHALL BE HARD QUARRY OR FIELD STONE AND SHALL BE OF SUCH
QUALITY THAT IT WILL NOT DISINTEGRATE ON EXPOSURE TO WATER OR
WEATHERING. STONE FOR HAND PLACING TO A THICKNESS OF 12 INCHES SHALL
RANGE IN WEIGHT FROM A MINIMUM OF 25 POUNDS TO A MAXIMUM OF 150
POUNDS. AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF THE STONE PIECES SHALL WEIGH MORE THAN
60 POUNDS. THE STONE PIECES, EXCEPT SPALLS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
DIMENSION OF AT LEAST 12 INCHES.
3. HEAVY DUTY RIPRAP SHALL BE USED AND PLACED AT A THICKNESS OF 24"
MINIMUM, WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. HEAVY DUTY RIPRAP SHALL BE d50= 9"
WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 12", AVERAGE SIZE IS 9", MINIMUM SIZE OF 6" AT LEAST
50% OF THE STONE PIECE SHALL BE LARGER THAN 9".
4. THE SLOPE UPON WHICH THE RIPRAP IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE WORKED TO
PROVIDE A CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM JUST ABOVE THE PIER TO THE HIGH WATER
MARK OF THE CREEK OR EDGE OF WETLANDS. DEPRESSIONS SHALL BE FILLED IN
AND PROPERLY COMPACTED.
5. RIPRAP PLACEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND PROGRESS
UPWARD. EACH PIECE SHALL BE PLACED BY HAND PERPENDICULAR TO THE
SLOPE AND SHALL BE FIRMLY EMBEDDED AGAINST THE SLOPE AND ADJOINING
PIECES. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE LARGER PIECES SHALL BE FILLED WITH
SPALLS OF SUITABLE SIZE WHICH SHALL BE RAMMED INTO PLACE. THE FINISHED
SURFACE SHALL PRESENT AN EVEN, TIGHT SURFACE TRUE TO LINE, GRADE AND
SECTION.
RIPRAP STABILIZATION AT SEWER
AERIAL CROSSING DETAIL
(N.T.S.)
NOTE:
SANITARY SEWER AERIAL
CROSSING EMBANKMENT SECT/ON
DESCRIPTION -
EXHIBIT A2
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY.
DJG
CHECKED BY.
REG
GRA Y
LWGINEERING CONSULTANTS
PILGRIM- ROAD - GRLE,SCz96,
PIE(86.N 29T3o2l-FAX:(86(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRA.NGINEERING.COM
SHEET
SEWER AERIAL SECTION DETAIL
PROJECT NAME'
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OFMONROE, N C
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT A2
5/29/2018
Page 4 of 18

- --
/ - -
/ v ��- - — 1
l l -
/ _ _^-,
ss — • ---
--- -j -�— \ \ \ N —
/ — _--_ —__--- --_ -, /1\ \\ \ \
\ _ --i -- — --- -
�_ --�/� —/-- / 1\:--\•— —
\/—r — — —� - — — /// -/ - / / I ,gyp—�-
-- i i �__-�//- /- / nT — _ 95 -
-/ — — i -- - 1\ --- �_ --
-- '— — — %— _ �� - EXISTING �
�j0�- -- —�-- — -- -- 492.1 STREAM/BANKS — — —
-- _ =�_ _ x TO REMAIN
=f►- / — ` — UNDISTURBED
GJURISDICTIO- NAL \ \ \ l X—
� �_ \ j
1 STREAM TOP . — //
OF BANK=� /
/ 5 FEET WIDE .6...Ard
/ - - d50=9" RIPRAP
STABILIZATION
IN NON -JD
DITCH OUTLET
/ / - - (SEE DETAIL)
/ /
•
/ . r.`°..//x/*. /
- --` SS
/
t••• / SS
/
/ / ss -
/ / 55/— _ /
/ SS;----
�..-
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
_ — \ ♦ • N — \
SILT FENCING
ROWS
- L *`---/\ \�\
� s
• ++`�` SS \ — - \ / \\\
+ \-, \
s/Ilwl /� 'G sS` , z .9"�
k\ \ Ss +
. c. ` �O
-ems•`
\
--\\, ,PGNQNO: 1\./
- \ /�
NOTE: POND NO. 1 RIPRAP OUTLET
PROTECTION AT POND OUTFALL
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT B1
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY: DJG
CHECKED BY: REG
GRAY
EYGINEERING CONSULTANTS
3 PILGRIM- ROAD -GREENVILLE, SG 33M,
PIE atb3)3333o3 - FAX: (SDP 333,8783
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
SHEET TITLE:
POND NO. 1 RIPRAP OUTLET PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT B1
5/29/2018
Page 5 of 18

\��\ \ ''.' \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \
1II\4 \ \
\' \ \ �\
\\ �.\ \\\ i1\\ \ 1\ \\ 11
\ \ \\\ 1
\ \ \ \ \ ( 1\\\ \ \ \
\11/4\\�► \\\\\\\\\\
5N\\ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \\ \\ \\
\\\ \ i\ \ 1 III\ \ \\\
\\\\:\\\\
�� "\d50=R\\ \\
\ STABI9"LIZATIONIPRAP
IN NEW POND 1 ` -
OUTLET
(SEE DETAIL)
NOTE: POND NO. 2 RIPRAP OUTLET
PROTECTION AT POND OUTFALL
DESCRIPTION:
GRAY PROJECT NO:
EXHIBIT B2
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
�\ l• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ I I .\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \
St# \( 1\ \\\\\\ \
1
� ;� \i'��\\\\ \ 0 \ � � \ \ \\\ \\\\\\\ \ \ \\
\ \ \ \��1 ' -
\\. \\\ \\\ \ \.\ 1 I \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ /�
1 \\\\\\\\ %\ \\ `\ \ \\ \ \ SC4LE 1
\\ 1\1 \\1\\\� \ \ \ \ �\ \� \
\\ I\\ �\ \ \ \
\\ \\\1\ \\\,v \\ \\\\ \� ���� -
\ \ \\IIJ %•\ .�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ — — — _—_—_— — — — —
\ 1 \ \\\�V\��\ ���—� ----
EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A PILGRIM- ROAD -GR (86LR SGz96o�
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAXX::(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
N. N.
\ \
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP
OF BANK=
5 FEET WIDE
11=4QY
— — — — — —
526.7
527 3. x
SILT FENCING
ROW
—
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
f
x
TOP—OCHER=\538.00_
x
527.
SHEET TITLE:
POND NO. 2 RIPRAP OUTLET PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT B2
5/29/2018
Page 6 of 18

SCALE 1 "=40'
/
/
500.1
x _ /
d50=9" RIPRAP
STABILIZATION
IN NEW POND
OUTLET
(SEE DETAIL)
EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS I I
TO REMAIN 1
UNDISTURBED
\I 1
• \I I
•
7
/
SILT FENCING
ROW
\ ♦ I
♦� JURISDICTIONAL
♦ STREAM TOP
♦ OF BANK=
♦♦ 5 FEET WIDE
4 \
�♦ .
\ ..- ^4♦
\. \ 1*.
\ \\ ♦*.
\ I /\ 1
\ 1 1 1
\ : 1
\ I /
♦♦ \ \ I
�♦
a, \\
c- _■
.\\ I
OM
\\"y. \ ,x
\\
\\\\\\\ \\Vf\1\ (\
\\\\ \ \ \\ * \�`�
\ \\\ \\ 1�. �4
\\\\\ \\ \\ \\\♦\
\ \\\�\\\�\ x\
\\\\\\ \\\)
\ \\ \ \\ ^\\\\\
\ \ \ \\\} \\ \\1 \
\1 \ \\ 1 �\ 1\\\\\\ \ \ 1, \
\\ I.\ 10\\\\ \
1 \ l l It11\ 1111 \\ \
)11 III I11\ 1\ \ \
I II1ISI
I1111I 1 1
1 ii IIIt1111 111 \
1 II111I 1111 11 \ \
1 0111\0\ \\. 1
/
/
NOTE: POND NO. 3 RIPRAP OUTLET
PROTECTION AT POND OUTFALL
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT B3
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
/
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A PILGRIM- ROAD -GR (86LR SGz9M,
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAXX::(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
..........
i_
•••�
.j/•'-- /
i
I
i
/ -MIN.'VbLUM.E-=23,5,249 S©
A ' - A — —
/
/ / /
i
/
r
A
1
SHEET TITLE:
POND NO. 3 RIPRAP OUTLET PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT B3
5/29/2018
Page 7 of 18

TOP OF PLACED RIPRAP
SHALL MATCH GRADE
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
WITHIN STREAM BANKS.
EXISTING/FINISHED PLACE RIPRAP
GRADE 20' WIDE
CENTERED OVER
I11-III IIIi I�Tlll l I_II PIPELINE
,
1111
y11.;111
11 II JURISDICTION
11E111—
'11�111
I=III=1ll III=
RIPRAP
WETLAND/CORPS
3i
SEE
PLAN
EOTEXTILE FABRIC,
INSTALL PER
MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATRIONS
HIGH WATER MARK/ EDGE
OF WETLANDS
RIPRAP TO BE INSTALLED
TO THE HIGH WATER MARK
OF THE CREEK OR EDGE OF
WETLAND AREA
NOTES:
1. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI FILTERWEAVE FW 500 OR APPROVED EQUAL.
2. RIPRAP SHALL BE HARD QUARRY OR FIELD STONE AND SHALL BE OF SUCH
QUALITY THAT IT WILL NOT DISINTEGRATE ON EXPOSURE TO WATER OR
WEATHERING. STONE FOR HAND PLACING TO A THICKNESS OF 12 INCHES SHALL
RANGE IN WEIGHT FROM A MINIMUM OF 25 POUNDS TO A MAXIMUM OF 150
POUNDS. AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF THE STONE PIECES SHALL WEIGH MORE THAN
60 POUNDS. THE STONE PIECES, EXCEPT SPALLS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
DIMENSION OF AT LEAST 9 INCHES.
3. HEAVY DUTY RIPRAP SHALL BE USED AND PLACED AT A THICKNESS OF 24"
MINIMUM, WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. HEAVY DUTY RIPRAP SHALL BE d50= 9"
WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 12", AVERAGE SIZE IS 9", MINIMUM SIZE OF 6" AT LEAST
50% OF THE STONE PIECE SHALL BE LARGER THAN 9".
4. THE SLOPE UPON WHICH THE RIPRAP IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE WORKED TO
PROVIDE A CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM POND OUTFALL PIPE TO THE HIGH WATER
MARK OF THE CREEK OR EDGE OF WETLANDS. DEPRESSIONS SHALL BE FILLED IN
AND PROPERLY COMPACTED.
5. RIPRAP PLACEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND PROGRESS
UPWARD. EACH PIECE SHALL BE PLACED BY HAND PERPENDICULAR TO THE
SLOPE AND SHALL BE FIRMLY EMBEDDED AGAINST THE SLOPE AND ADJOINING
PIECES. THE SPACE BETWEEN THE LARGER PIECES SHALL BE FILLED WITH
SPALLS OF SUITABLE SIZE WHICH SHALL BE RAMMED INTO PLACE. THE FINISHED
SURFACE SHALL PRESENT AN EVEN, TIGHT SURFACE TRUE TO LINE, GRADE AND
SECTION.
RIPRAP POND OUTFALL STABILIZATION
DETAIL
(N.T.S.)
NOTE: RIPRAP POND OUTFALL SECTION
DESCRIPTION: EXH/BIT B4
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY.
DJG
CHECKED BY.
REG
GRIP
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
PILGRIM ROAD- GREENVILLE, SCz96o,
PIE (860 29T3o2l -FAX: (86.N 297,87
WWW.GRA.NGINEERING.COM
SHEET
TITLE:
POND OUTFALL SECTION DETAIL
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, N C
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT B4
5/29/2018
Page 8 of 18

La
NATURAL GRADE 1
NCDOT CLASS I RIP -RAP \\
ID' MIN
A
WIDTH
.....................
III-
.
I
- —
III
T W2 / _
WI
-I I-1
' I I I-1 I H —I I I III —III I H I I —III —III —I I I I H
LAYER OF 1.2 MAX SLOPE
NOTE : MIN H = 2/3 PIPE (p FILTER FABRIC MATCH EXISTING GRADED
- ,,
_- _ -
SECTION A -A PLAN
RIP -RAP APRON
FOR FLARED END SECTION
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS :
A. BOTTOM GRADE SHALL BE 0.0 X.
B. ODE SLOPES 2:1 OR FLATTER.
C. SIDEWALLS SHALL EXTEND UP AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS BUT
NOT LESS THAN TWO-THIRDS THE PIPE DIAMETER.
D. THERE SHALL BE NO OVERFALL FROM THE END OF THE APRON USE USDA NOMOGRAPH
FROM NC SEDIMENT AND
EROSION CONTROL
MANUAL FOR DESIGN DATA
TO THE SURFACE OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL THE AREA TO BE
PAVED 0R RIP -RAPPED SHALL BE UNDERCUT 50 THAT THE INVERT
CURET
Le
WI
w2
Pr
H
OF THE APRON SHALL BE AT THE SAME GRADE (FLUSH) WITH
THE SURFACE OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL THE APRON SHALL
HAVE A CUTOFF TO TOE WALL AT THE DOWNSTREAM END.
E. APRON DIMENSIONS AND RIP -RAP SIZE OR CONCRETE THICKNESS
MUST BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
F. THE WIDTH OF THE END OF THE APRON SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE
BOTTOM WIDTH OF THE RECEIVING CHANNEL AT THE OUTLET
PIPE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, OR 3 TIMES THE DIAMETER. P Dee (w. fig axe Pee 110 SEDIMENT ND EROSION COMM MANUAL'
G. THE PLACING OF FILL, EITHER L005E OR COMPACTED IN 1HE dmPx - IA x 450
RECEIVING CHANNEL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. T - to x
Le -.2d OF Oi PIP PIP APRON. MN
H. NO BENDS OR CURVES IN THE HORIZONAL ALIGNMENT OF W7 - DID OF APRON. Doi
THE APRON WILL BE PERMITTED. W2 END 6 RAPED SECTION
I. FILTER FABRIC TO BE MIRAFI 500 OR APPROVED EQUAL
J. THICKNESS OF RIP -RAP TO BE 1' OR AS NOTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
cREVISIONS
FILE, xncymae-Iwurnciam®.dAspaa
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
4 Yt P
CITY OF MONROE
ITS DRAWN BY: AM DATE: O(f-07-01
'
4"10/04
NOTES/FORMAT
°""'L`°"T
RIP RAP APRON FOR F.E.
WON °° °'T "°"'"°�
2
05/08
ADD TARE
.
S
CHECKED BY: 1NL
SCALE: N.T.S.
v
PRLRAABDBP.
c~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DETAIL 03.05.O1J
STRUCTURE NO.
DIA
L
W-1
W-2
T
Dso
C.Y.
SO
18"
23'
4.5'
24.5'
25"
9"
26
UO
18"
50'
25'
25'
22"
9"
21
YO
18"
25'
25'
25'
22"
9"
21
NOTE: RIPRAP POND OUTLET
PROTECTION DETAIL
G >
SHEET
TITLE:
CITY RIPRAP DETAIL
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, N C
DESCRIPTION: EXH/B/TB5
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-01-2018
DWG REF:
2017068-SS
DRAWING NO:
DRAWN BY.. DJG
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
3P.(86 "ROAD �GPAX.- P8 2.-.87'
WWW.GRAYENGINEFRING.COM
ADDENDUM NO:
F
EXHIBIT B V
CHECKED BY. REG
5/29/2018
Page 9 of 18

b33.00 I VV 6 0
5OBW \�•�\N \
\\ \\\\\ \ \ \
♦ \ \ \\ \\ \\ .
♦♦ \ \ \I \\ \\\ 1\\\ _
\\ \ \ \\\\\\\ \�_
\ \ — \
8.Q'
01C .I
:ARY
loLJT
TAIL)
NOTE:
529.00BW
534.00
\
EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
\
\ \
\ \ 532.00TW
\ \ 518.00BW
\ \ \
• 0Is"1 b.00T6-k
/ 7114 S.F.
�6AG j
44.3 540.30TG /
-sI532.00TW
PERMANENT BOTTOMLESS ARCH
CULVERT FOR NEW ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT C1
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
\ \ \
\ \ `\♦,;i�'
\ ♦♦4
\
SILT FENCING \ \ 4 \
\ ROW \\♦ \ + \
\ \ ,. \\\ \ \\ LIMITS OF
\ �\�♦\ \ \ \
� \\ \DISTURBANCE •
- \ N.N.
, SILT FENCING \ \ \ ` \♦♦� \ \
\ ` • \ ROWS \ \\ \
\� ; \\
\\ \
14.1 \ �� \`
RETAINING WAL
WITH EROSION
BLANKET ON
SLOPES
H \
CULVERT
iI1\♦
1 1
til \ I ♦' ' . \
( \ \\
\♦♦' SILT FENCING \ ;`\
\ \\� \ rr R1W\ \ \\\\\\�`
\\ \ \ \ \ \ $\ 1 1 \ \ \ \`
g` \\\\ \ •ii \ \\ 1 \
\\\\\\`\` \\ ♦♦\ \ \ \ \`\ \
c� \♦\ \ \ \ \ \
:� �, SILTOFENCING
\ \
/" ► _! {' ROWS \ \
• \� \ \ \ 1 \\ \\\\\ \\\�,1s \ \\ \ \
y/�`�FZ�II �\ \\` \ \\\\\\\ �_�\\ \\ \
� i\`"` \ \ \ ` \ \ \\\ 1.,:/ i ♦* \ \ \
\ 3 \ \\ 5\O;OOBW \\ \\ \ / \ \ \\\\ \ \
��` ` \ \�\\\\ \\ \ J\\ —\ \♦♦ \ \
+\ \ \\\ \\\ \\ \ \\
1 l \ \ `\♦`1
o> � \ • \ 1 SILT FENCING \ \\ \\ �� / 11 \ \ \ N
�� ♦ ROWS \ \
�\ \ \ \ , \ \\ \\\\ _\/ , \ \
6 ; \ \ JURISDICTIONAL , \ , 1 I _
` ♦ STREAM TOP J ` — _� _
`\ OF BANK = JI / l / \�
\ 5FEET WIDE (\ /\ _ / \
` \\ \ \\\
\\ \ \\ \\\\ \`_//I ' \_ -,
\\\\ \\ 1\ ,"\ ��
1
1/ 9
to
542.901
1
\6
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A PILGRIM ROAD--FAXvILLE, SG2$6o�
PH: (SDO �97-AO,-FAX: (86.0 2$7,87
WWW.GRAYRNGINRRRING.COM
\`.
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
SHEET TITLE:
BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERT PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT Cl
5/29/2018
Page 10 of 18

ALUMNI"' STRUCTURAL PLATE SINGE RADILE ARCH 20. SPAN X Sa' RI$E 0
76.5 LF LENGTH..150' PLATE THICKNESS. TYPE IV RIB 27'O.C.
MIN FILL 2.5 FT
MA% FILL 11.0 FT
COTTAGE GREEN
MONROE, NC
L
FINISHED I OPEN ARER41ylA $O FT
ROAD ELEV. II\\\+
574 FINISHED GRADE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
52� TOP OF STRUCTURE
6 FLANGE PLATE
MCUULAR alnCK
WALL
EXISTING EXISTING
GRADE 519 ± GRADE 520 ±
TOP OF
ITOP=516± I
ITOP=514± I
BOTTOM
OF 100 IR STORM
FOOTING STREAM ELEV 518±
BOTTOM 517 ±
_ 8•
T
- - - - -
9° BATTER FOR
MODULAR BLOCK
WALL -
l
7B'�
(EXISTING
EXISTING
STREAM 518 ±
TREAM 515±
NOTE: PERMANENT BOTTOMLESS ARCH
PROFILE - NO CHANGE TO STREAM ELEVATION
'
-
G
SHEET TITLE:
BOTTOMLESS ARCH PROFILE VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT C2
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-01-2018
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
DRAWING NO:
DRAWN BY: DJG
ENGINEERINGCONSULTANIS
P PIZs r 1.11 3-Faz (8.03y s,83
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.COM
ADDENDUM NO:
^/
EXHIBIT C L
CHECKED BY: REG
5/29/2018
Page 11 of 18

_ --- t-- — —/
--_ - —— -- --
«««««<y< ««yc«««“.txt,'«ci««««««-a«.< «• <I :.S«< «««_<C«<uS<<c«dL 2<a««««<•.«L«<:««<,kK«y«t ««««
— — _ — «' I — _ o` —
_ — — _ — — — �\ - yX� \ \ — — �10
-- \_-�1 �.- — -- \
_ _ — LIMITS OF = -� —
_ — 3� ME m X mAm'�ai ��aTi m X — ar-�9 _ — _ _ — = _ DISTURBANCE — — —
-
- - -_ -- --- r- _ = -
EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
LD MIND
1NMI
L_
-fix—X
x
nnn c c
- 6-4_ -
6000 S.F.
NOTE: TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PLAN
UNTIL PERMANENT CROSSING INSTALLED
•••,.� - - ------ -z--
WASHED
STONE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL) - AFTER USE RESTORE
ORIGINAL CONTOURS
END 24" RCP
t53,PIPE, IE530.75
9 EROSION 1"
' CONTROL STONE
9
�i
�MEIa,�
w
6000 S.F.
14 An
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT D1
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
GRA Y
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A :(S64 fROAD- GREENVILAR SGz96o�
(SDO PH: �9,-3Oz -FAX: (86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP
OF BANK =
5 FEET WIDE
SHEET TITLE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT D1
5/29/2018
Page 12 of 18

STREAM
1. ADDITIONAL
BASED
2. MINIMUM
REFERENCE:
WASHED or STONE
',W./a,
1.
2.
NOTES
REMOVE
(NOT TO
AS A MINIMUM.
PEAK FLOW
ENSURE
OF THE
RECEIVING
CULVERT
STONE
BANK
1
THE STRUCTURE WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED.
EXCEED 1 YEAR).
DESIGN THE STRUCTURE TO PASS 2 YEAR
WITHOUT OVERTOPPING.
THAT DESIGN FLOW VELOCITY AT THE OUTLET
CROSSING STRUCTURE IS NON -EROSIVE FOR THE
STREAM CHANNEL.
IS BACKFlLLED WITH STONE.
I11=II 1 1f Ii l 3.
II II II=11=P 3
I II II II II=.It O
11 II II II II: Ih 4"
II II. II II II II'
I II II II II IG
II 11:=11 II II 4.
II II. II II II
•II If=11 II • ���R_ -_
__
-."►ZI.N..,...
,;,.• . ' 1 Ly��_�..�-�
4
BANK
IIII .1IIII1
C ►• a.i1i1i1•1i/�iti
iiia ICI
., *:-
L ' LQ,
. � '•.•...._•L Y.- LYLY
,i v!�
.`i.
6• WASHED SHED
UNE CREEK BOTTOM WITH
FILTER FABRIC.•..•..•
TOP
I
IINIIII1-1
iv,
. IIIIIIII
•Y
ININIIII
NINIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII ,
IIIIII
-I ►I
�.�/
II II IIII
NI:
1�1
.• II II II. II II II II II I � � •T •T
,
II II IL II II II II II. P � Zar&i,
-II II II II. II II II II -II' "xi. r
-11 II II II: II -II II II 11=I1I1 11 IIII II IIII II I1I1: II 1I1I=II 1111 II I II I II-If=
II-
.
II -
NOTES:
MEASURES MAY BE REQURIED PER THE CITY ENGINEER
ON SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS.
PIPE LENGTH IS 20'.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
• • •
1/2 PIPE DIA. OR 12-
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
.-=
__
000044400 -IP RAP
RIP RAP
CLASS B
=
•••-k•l•e•l•a-i-4-0-4
••••••••••••••000•••
•••••••••••••••••••••••1
1•••••••••••••••••••0•001
ENGINEER TO SIZE PIPE (SEE NOTE 2)
PROVIDE PIPE SIZE, INVERTS. SLOPE AND MATERIAL
FOR EACH CROSSING.
-1
C REVISIONS
at 1, .
4
�Z}klY
'
c
STREAM CROSSING
(TEMPORARY)
CITY OF MONROE
wiramaxmy NO
FILE: [Maw-Details/DetailMmual/Details
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DRAWN BY: D KO DATE: Os/2005
CHECKED BY: JNL SCALE: N.T.S.
PREPARED
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DETAIL 03.22.01 1
NOTE: TEMPORARY STREAM
CROSSING DETAIL
' ~
•
G ,P
SHEET
CITY TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING DETAIL
DESCRIPTION- EXHIBIT D2
PROJECT NAME
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, N C
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-01-2018
DWG REF:
2017068-SS
DRAWING NO:
^/
EXHIBIT DL
DRAWN BY. DJG
LNGINEERINGCONSULTANTS
3PIE((sb029j AD 7GPAX.- v8 q)297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINERRING.COM
CHECKED BY. REG
ADDENDUM NO:
5/29/2018
Page 13 of 18

NOCSIM
UNAI
SL TI LISNOO ONIN33NION3
\\\\\ \\\
3N 1011Now dO A,II3
OVOI MIIO.IS HIM. V I09 AMH SA
NIOISIAIaHnS
(Ai0M° 109 1u ll)
maau9 a9VUOD
Nv1a 1noaxvis
h+-1
v1
C)

— — - - -
EXISTING
\ LIMITS OF STREAM/BANKS
DISTURBANCE TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
c«<«««««<S««<, «<:<ee«sc«S«st<`<c
69
6000 S.F.
0.14 AC.
76' NEW 24" RCP
PIPE CULVERT
TOTAL 120 FEET "
STREAM IMPACT
20' NEW RIPRAP
OUTLET
PROTECTION
D50=9" SIZE
7k
6701 S�F
0.15 AC.
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP
OF BANK =
2 FEET WIDE
NOTE: PERMANENT 24" RCP PIPE CULVERT
UNDER NEW ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT El
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
DJG
REG
/ \/
SILT FENCING
. ROW
24' NEW RIPRAP
OUTLET
PROTECTION
D50=9" SIZE
542.6E
SILT FENCING
ROWS
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
it. I
•
GRAY
LWGLVEERING CONSULTANTS
A :PILGRIMROAD-GR (86LR SGz96o�
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAXX::(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
536.4
r - \
-
538.5
SCALE 1 "=40'
X -X-
_72-
5-637 S. F_
0A 3 AQ-
76
9245 S.
-Q.21AC
SHEET TITLE:
24" RCP CULVERT PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT El
5/29/2018
Page 15 of 18

570
560
550
540
PRO PO
RIPRAP
520
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
PROPDSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
ROADWAY
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
XISTING
[..STREMCHANNEL
PROPOSE
D 120 LF OF
STREAM IMPACT
FOR
NEW CULVERT/RIPRAP
APRONTS
ED 24' - D5C=9"'
OUTLET PROTECTION
PROPOSED
STORM
76'-24"
DRAIN CULVERT
RCP@1.84°
ACR
SS ROAD
PROPOSED
RIPRAP
20' - C50=9"'
OUTLET PROTECTIOI
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70
PROFILE - NEW 24" RCP CULVERT
SCALE 1 "=20'
570
560
550
540
530
520
NOTE: PERMANENT 24" RCP PIPE CULVERT
UNDER NEW ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT E2
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY: REG
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
PILGRIM- ROAD - GRLE,SCz96,
PIE(86.N 29T3o2l-FAX:(86(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRA.NGINEERING.COM
SHEET TITLE:
24" RCP CULVERT PROFILE VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT E2
5/29/2018
Page 16 of 18

\ \\ EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
EXISTING
WETLAND TO
REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
SILT FENCING
ROWS
—�— —\\ / /
497.2 \
UNDISTURBED
NEW FILL SLOPE
IMPACT TO
WETLAND, PLUS
35 LF WETLAND
\
2\\
1.0.544
NOTE: ALTERNATE #1
KEEP LOTS, ADD FILL, IMPACT = 0.048 AC.
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT F1
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
X
ty1.1
G Y
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A PILGRIM- LE, SGz96o�
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAXX::(86(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
J i \
497.7— \ \
497.3
4.Q8.6
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
•
7-
6
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL
12" PERFORATED CPP
WRAPPED IN FILTER
FABRIC AND IN STONE
(FRENCH DRAIN) PRIOR TO
ANY FILL OVER THI S AREA
<0
SHEET TITLE:
ALT #1 WETLAND IMPACT WITH FILL 0.048 AC.
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT F1
5/29/2018
Page 17 of 18

\ _ / / / '/// ////
._ /jam/ / //// / / 1 1 \
\\ \ \ \ \ \ = EXISTING l X497.�
EXISTING
WETLAND TO
REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
NEW RETAINING
WALL TO
REDUCE IMPACT
TO WETLAND
504.50TW
\.00B
497.2 \ —
X
504.50TW
494.50 B W
10.o. _ 4 \ /
97.3
/ / 504.50TWI 2 5.
502.00B
-yc
«<< «««,tom""•■MIRE
<,s«
NOTE: ALTERNATE #2
KEEP LOTS, ADD WALL, IMPACT = 0.048 AC.
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT F2
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
ALT #2
WETLAND
IMPACT 0.048
AC.
GAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT S
PILGRIM!ROAD • GREEMCIILLE, S29607
(S
ED: BS4)4) s9rxu,7 • EA%: (.4) 297-5.7
n14RatcxavEnvINsc.CD 1
8.6
_//
-_SC iLE =1-
\ \ \
\ ' \\
\ \ \\
X
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
4
•
�
44---
\6722S.F.
0E 15 Ae
SHEET TITLE:
ALT #2 WETLAND IMPACT WITH FILL 0.048 AC.
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
DRAWING NO:
EXHIBIT F2
5/29/2018
Page 18 of 18

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
i
Applicant:
Laffoday
HWY 601 Development LLC, William
File Number: SAW-2018-00646
Date: 10/22/2018
Attached is:
See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
/1
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
or
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. i
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
review of the administrative record,
the Corps memorandum for the
officer has determined is needed to
or analyses to the record.
is already in the administrative
information that the review
Corps may add new information
the location of information that
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 10/22/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: HWY 601 Development LLC, William Laffoday, 520
Eagleton Downs Drive, Suite D, Pineville, NC 28134
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Cottage Green Residential
Subdivision, SAW-2018-00646
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located at directly east
of the intersection of Pageland Highway and East Old Highway 74. PINs: 09125134 and 09158001.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Union City: Monroe
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 34.9665 Longitude: -80.5018
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Richardson Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 4/27/2018 by Corps
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
reviewresources
area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
(i.e.,
wetland vs. non
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Stream
A
34.967330
-80.506299
644 If
(0.08 ac)
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
Stream
B
34.966096
-80.503752
1,168 If
(0.13 ac)
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
Stream
C
34.968154
-80.500701
803 If
(0.09 ac)
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
Stream
SC
34.963509
-80.499971
364 If
(0.03 ac)
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
Wetland
AA
34.968089
-80.500113
0.03 ac
Wetland
Waters
Section 404
Wetland
BB
34.963704
-80.50000
0.09 ac
Wetland
Waters
Section 404
Wetland
WA
34.967145
-80.506737
0.01 ac
Wetland
Waters
Section 404
Wetland
WB
34.966961
-80.504299
0.06 ac
Wetland
Waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 7 dated 4/27/2018
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD,
ou=PKI, ou=USA,
cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date: 2018.10.22 16:47:47-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
10/22/2018 (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

S30,A I3S ❑NV-U3A&
VNI10e1V3
Pxw'OI La 4IVSIN.V90f,IrS.N..9,99^S.91.Omo-8I0Zs1 8110a8I0a.9.0.N.I,%u,,,NO9s.9.0.9.199
.evo
11-Z
0 O3903190 19maIN n01u03
zra NMV90
8LOZ/LZ/17
9L00-810Z
ON 1091'09d SND
300100£ = 4uu!
a awaS
eu!Iaeo UPON 'aauoW
I4uno3 uoiuf
u88.10 abeuoo
saiaepuno8 Ieuoi}o!pspnr

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT D:
Water Quality Certification (DWR# 18-0859)

ROY COOPER
covettior
MICHAEL S. REGAN
seadaly
LINDA CULPEPPER
interim Dire far
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
16 July 2018
DWR# 18-0859
Union County
Mr. William Laffoday and Charles Saleh
520 Eagleton Downs Dr., Ste. D
Pineville, NC 28134
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Cottage Green Development
Dear Mr. Laffoday & Saleh:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those conditions listed
below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated June 18, 2018 and received by the Division
of Water Resources (the Division) on June 19, 2018 and subsequent information on July 16, 2018.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality
General Certification Number 4139 which can be viewed on our web site at
https:/1deq.nc.gov/aboutldivisions/water-resourceslwater-resources-permitslwastewater-branch1401-
wetlands-buffer-permits1401-401-isolated-wetlands-waters-program The General Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with
your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the Certification are
reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the Certification, you must
also comply with the following conditions:
1. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a
new application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet,
compensatory mitigation may be required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given
a copy of the Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507
2. Several alternatives were provided for the wetland impact associated with lots 42 & 43. Figure
F4 indicates the project can be completed without impacting a wetland by omitting these two
= Nothing Compares ----
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1611 Mail Service Center 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919-707-9000

lots. This meets the requirement for avoidance and minimization and is acceptable at this
location.
3. A temporary culvert is proposed during construction. This shall be allowed for a period of six
months. The Division shall be notified upon the installation of the culvert and notified upon its
removal or request for extension of the time period.
4. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved
impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)
5. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
40 linear ft.
(culvert)
120 linear ft.
Wetland
0 acre
0.0 acre
6. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion
control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This
includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
7. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be matted.
15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
8. Stormwater BMPs are required. Please provide documentation showing that water quality from
the development will not be impaired. A storm water management plan in lieu of such
documentation is acceptable if approved by a delegated or state authority. 15A NCAC 2H .1000
9. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the
potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations,
scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
10. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is recommended
where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it
shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR.
11. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of
the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
12. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit
drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2)
and (c)(2)
13. The permittee shall report any violations of this Certification to the Division of Water Resources
within 24 hours of discovery.. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
14. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 4011Wetlands Unit of the Division. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)

This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 150B
by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative Hearings
(hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by
calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A
petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee
is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm,
excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one (1)
copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
if sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-
663-1699.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: David Shaeffer, Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte, email
Daniel Roberts, CWS, email
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
MRO, Land Quality

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT E:
Proposed Impacts

CITY OF M ON ROE STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES
/ \ - Q
I
\ erooAvy / 1
/ 7
/ / \ fb 6 ;Q '
A S� \ 61 �
I
/ / �]���l N Va \ V. / Fr "/,f I ,il,`( �\\ \ � @
'- �\ R"�� I
[� ` \ l/f/If
/
METHODS SHALL DETAIL MANUAIN L NCET. WFFH THE CITY OF
1. ALL ROADWAY STANDARD
MONROE STANDARD SPEC&ICATIONS AND DETAIL MANUAL AND THE NCDGT
SPECIFICATIONS A.
SFANDABD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES LATEST EDITION EXCEPT
WHEN OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL STORM DRAINPIPES SHALL BE PLACED TO PROPER GRADE AND ALIGNMENT PER
APPROVED PLANS
3 NO CRACKED OR BROKEN PIPES SHALL BE PLACED OR ACCEPTED IN CONSTRUCTION OF
THE PROTECT.
4. ALL CATCH BASINS 3'fi DEEP OR MORE SHALL HAVE STEPS PLACED AT t'-2'ON CENTER
5. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PLACED AROUND DRAINAGE INLETS AND
•�
\
Authorized and Completed
W1. Permanent Wetland Tetlan,l
1 U
/1 I!\\\\
/-.,���,�„
I �,/ �1 ��_-� �- �� /1
/'V
1
CATCH BASINS.
5 ALL PIPES INSTORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CUT OFF FLUSH WITH THE
/
6. ^
Impact 05 aC )VV
--=@
• Vy
_` `_i
\
L
INS]. WALL
T ALL T. STRUCTURE G
BESMOOTHSAND OUTSTOAVOID
INS].ECTICA
`I `tr9g V` N
M4R�cp �``�'
�VVSheet 60
-
\` `�/\V_
/- (
,/r //
- ^ 1
C
DEBUCTUEUSI
MORTARCTURESOMA IONS TO VOIDF EBINS UP
OBSTRUCTINGR1.11.RFLO MANUFACTURER
Z zpNE '
f u
" '�
�
/ / ��/ _�
a. ALL TAIL DITCHES SHALL HAVE POSITVE DRAINAGE WITH A MINIMUM 1.OX SLOPE
—1
�
=
—
-` sv 1,
'®� `pk,IN2o
�.� / !/ice ,,'r !
3.44 / � 44:6 Y•
�•^/J�� ��
�
0' t.
'
9. THEDEVELOPER SHALL EQUIREOBTAIN TO COMEFSTTEDRAINAGEEASETS OR PROVIDE
PROPERTY OWNERS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE Ilv&ROVEMENLS OR PROVIDE
POSITNE DRAINAGE FLOW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONPLAN APPROVAL.
-
--C-
�
l■M
YW '
, - ®-,R- -J
'%�� /// /7 ]
i
�.: —
`��_
l�I'
-
10. ALL CONCRETEFOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BEAMCVIMUM OF 3600 PSI EXCEPT
- i Y -
J/
,' '/.„.^" AllEf®
�/
�y'
�
WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED.
f.+
', d
' /��,�.••)
yam'
,,.,'v,VI•
_
, 2.��
j�i�'Ak
l� tit
�'
/ Q 1.,. /gym P
%4
11. IF THE DEVELOPER WISHES TO USE ANY PRE- CAST STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
\ \� ..�ffi-�
+t \•(
/_ /Jim
' 2�
f 4
�///1t /$ I. ® �
�l��l
r
®� _-
WITHIN PROPOSED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY HE MUST SUBMIT A PROFESSIONAL
V .✓
.':— 1 =
�_ ^ Wit` �i;-i
./ T.1 f l li �f i
��'� }
nI
New
Im acts
ENGINEER CERTIFICATION FOR THE STRUCTURE. ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE CERTIFIED
TO ADEQUATELY CARRY H2O LOADING. PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEERING
DIRECTOR BE OBTM.D IN TO INCORPORATE PRE CAST STORM
_
\3 -.,_I r
� �
/ � y � ..
•�'ft1` '.i1.
��%d/( �' pp" �'
gym_
_ C�
15 hll temporary impa
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES INA PROPOL SED STREETRIGHT OFWAY.
...4,
-
A^
{
,�- -.`V ®/rs 1 �1(f
/ \. _� <� + \\. ` ..0
/ ,\ri, 4A ^.2 _0
1 _ `, '
\ 1 I
2���1
i..°I_.r!m/
{.2.� -'
.. _'
,..
�/6.`-~F- it
S� I
_ �.
+ f
_
I
-_
(
��
-
1• 6
-
06: impact
(open cut Waterline
12 STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE BE CUT
ESIGNAING TED KNOCK SHALL
OR ALTERED WITHOUT APROFESSIONAL ENGNEER OF ADEQUATE
THE A.
ALTERATION OF THE SLRUCLUREEXCEPT
Zvi
ey/M —_,i
\ .l lI m `
�R�(j��\.
A.'.
(
m ® fi
Q)
PROVERTIFICATION
WHERE DLOAD
PROVIDED
WHEREDESIGNATED"KNOCK-OUT'PANELSARE PR
PA
1 1 I
la \—� -'
\
� ���
, R.
�,s ,I®--
_ �
crossm
g
Qy
^\\\ \I1
�\ ® \ \ �
,7�
a
.
All disturbed areas will
13. UNDERNO BE PERMITTED TO RISE INUNBACKFILLED
22.J,\ N.`�i,�. ''''R
'4 - _.
���1
`
!�
F
� / ���
(i=�
./ gi girii1
���
restored back to y�re-
r
AFTERCIRCUMSTANCES HAS BE NWAT.PLAC
TRENCHES AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEENPLACED
\\\�.,� m \
\ ; j �® �\\
�\
-_^�lVlly�
1'11\ ' %��� 1
(� /�/
Authorized and
Completed
II
i
�
isturbauce contours,
with biodegradable
14. THE LAYING OF PIPE IN THE FINISHED TRENCH SHALL BE STARTED AT THE LOWEST
POINT AND LAID UPGRADE THE BELL SHALL BE LAID UPGRADE
\ \
II �\ 4` `�i
vv�\ � v ��,
\ \ ('\�'S \
\ \ \\ \ \\ a {
R
1 I 1
; l 1 i ( 1r
;�vC �"I 1 ¢V'lv l�R
y �� '� t\`\`\ ' `
r �
\��>t'\
/�
�, m
' / lf$
� d
(Temporary Access)
�1
S1. 40 if temporaryr
l�
lIlcoir
_stabih`Led
$ %iatijle
matnng, seeded with
riylar'ari seed jru i'� and
i'D
°a Too
15. SURVEY STAKING AND PROPOSED GRADES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH PLANS AND
FIELD CONDITIONS
16. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE ALLOWED TO TAKE PLACE BEYOND THE
FLOODPLAIN LINE OR THE STREAM BUFFER LINE WHICHEVER IS GREATER WTTHOUTA
PERMIT ISSUED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER$ THE NORTH CAROLINA
\\ ��\ • \ \r y�
`v vv�
Z
\ �+1e /
s Y P.
j1 `/' �/•
impacts
,
a
live Staked
'@'k
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE CITY OF MONROE
1 ' \ s v'Tc
` � °\�
K l/
`\`\v+'
�0,4
'a�/'
- Sheets and 3
1�
-
t��
;�
New hn acts
"..._
y .,
\" ���'v` +tat '
® _
S4: 1081f
j !�
``'
,, s® ,.. ®
z == '—`=-
\�% �, =.c=
}�
°t
_; "�_ E _ _ _"`__ _gig
Y '
permanent impact
\AV',
, v
-- _ -
-
(72"RCP)
l� --- _Y _
-= ti/
-
\
<`_
S5: 201f temporary
..
�•
y
im act
+ _
p�`s
- Sheets
Sheets 7 9
z,
:
v �. ��a
,, off
. off %% 1it
,a ���
� �'
=-
\• + Authorized
��
"° �.� \
and
Completed
__!
-w ^"% 1
®
i
U
/
- - - -
-
\
\ \\ti
V� \\
(Road Crossing)
S2: 761f Culvert
S3: 261f rip rap
Sheets 4 and 5
\a,
�`
%' In
m 4jv V \ �I
,, ,
' , v " _
' ',' ;
, ,,,,,/ �/r
' j
,/,
. ‘ 1 , __1� �11,u:,,,II'I
J\\ \
`ate s
'
\\"A�/'
\.. `++
r may-
lids
Iq\\
�.,.,
<n 'IQ i
CV--
B�Rb
0 150' 300'
SCALE: 1" = 150'
(
ISSUED TOC, OF MONROE FOR REVIE
ISSUED TO CITY OF MONROE FOR REVIE
ISSUED TO CI, OF MONROE FOR REVIE
RALL SITE PLAN TO OWNER
RALL SITE PLAN TO CITY OF MONROE
STORM WATER PLANS TO CITY OF MONROE
J
IPEOJECT MANAGER: DJ-G\
DRAWN BY:
CJR
PROJECT DATE: 1/18/18
SCALE: I'•=100•
JOB No.: 2017068
PLOT DATE: 4/50/21
Sheet
1of9
JC

_ --- t-- — —/
--_ -
—— -- --
«««««<y< ««yc«««“.tx .'«ci«««««««<tC< «• <I :.S«< «««_<C«<uS<oc«d2<aL««««<•.«L«<:««<,k««««K«y«t
— — _ — «' I — _ ` —
— — — — l ` — — — �\ XyX� \ \ — — �1D
-- \_-�1 �.- -- -- \
_ _ — LIMITS OF =4C —
ME m X mAm'�ai ��aTi m X — ar-�9 _ — _ _ — = _ DISTURBANCE — — --
--- ---
- --- r- _ = -
EXISTING
STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
LD MIND
1NMI
L_
-fix—X
x
- 6-4_ -
6000 S.F.
NOTE: TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PLAN
UNTIL PERMANENT CROSSING INSTALLED
•••,.� - - ------ -z--
WASHED
STONE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL) - AFTER USE RESTORE
ORIGINAL CONTOURS
END 24" RCP
t53,PIPE, IE530.75
9 EROSION 1"
' CONTROL STONE
9
�i
�MEIa,�
w
6000 S.F.
14 An
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT D1
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
GRA Y
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
A :(S64 fROAD- GREENVILAR SGz96o�
(SDO PH: �9,-3Oz -FAX: (86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP
OF BANK =
5 FEET WIDE
SHEET TITLE
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
Sheet 2 of 9
5/29/2018

STREAM
1. ADDITIONAL
BASED
2. MINIMUM
REFERENCE:
WASHED or STONE
',W./a,
1.
2.
NOTES
REMOVE
(NOT TO
AS A MINIMUM.
PEAK FLOW
ENSURE
OF THE
RECEIVING
CULVERT
STONE
BANK
1
THE STRUCTURE WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED.
EXCEED 1 YEAR).
DESIGN THE STRUCTURE TO PASS 2 YEAR
WITHOUT OVERTOPPING.
THAT DESIGN FLOW VELOCITY AT THE OUTLET
CROSSING STRUCTURE IS NON -EROSIVE FOR THE
STREAM CHANNEL.
IS BACKFlLLED WITH STONE.
I11=II 1 1f Ii l 3.
II II II=11=P 3
I II II II II=.It O
11 II II II II: Ih 4"
II II. II II II II'
I II II II II IG
II 11:=11 II II 4.
II II. II II II
•II If=11 II • ���R_ -_
__
-."►ZI.N..,...
,;,.• . ' 1 Ly��_�..�-�
4
BANK
IIII .1IIII1
C ►• a.i1i1i1•1i/�iti
iiia ICI
., *:-
L ' LQ,
. � '•.•...._•L Y.- LYLY
,i v!�
.`i.
8• WASHED SHED
UNE CREEK BOTTOM WITH
FILTER FABRIC.•..•..•
TOP
I
IINIIII1-1
iv,
. IIIIIIII
•Y
ININIIII
NINIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIIIII ,
IIIIII
-I ►I
�.�/
II II IIII
NI:
1�1
.• II II II. II II II II II I � � •T •T
II II IL II II II II II. P �1..1.� ,
-II II II II. II II II II -II' "xi. r
-11 II II II: II -II II II 11=I1I1 11 IIII II IIII II I1I1: II 1I1I=II 1111 II I II I II-If=
II-
.
II -
NOTES:
MEASURES MAY BE REQURIED PER THE CITY ENGINEER
ON SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS.
PIPE LENGTH IS 20'.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
•••
1/2 PIPE DIA. OR 12-
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
.-=
__
000044400 -IP RAP
RIP RAP
CLASS B
=
•••-k•l•e•l•a-i-4-0-4
••••••••••••••000•••
•••••••••••••••••••••••1
1•••••••••••••••••••0•001
ENGINEER TO SIZE PIPE (SEE NOTE 2)
PROVIDE PIPE SIZE, INVERTS. SLOPE AND MATERIAL
FOR EACH CROSSING.
-1
C REVISIONS
at 1, .
4
�Z}klY
'
c
STREAM CROSSING
(TEMPORARY)
CITY OF MONROE
UMW COUIVIT NO
FILE: [Maw-Details/DetailMmual/Details
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DRAWN BY: D KO DATE: Os/2005
CHECKED BY: JNL SCALE: N.T.S.
PREPARED
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DETAIL 03.22.01 1
NOTE: TEMPORARY STREAM
CROSSING DETAIL
•'�
t:e
G
SHEET
CITY TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING DE ,I
DESCRIPTION -EXHIBIT D2
PROJECT NAME
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, N C
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-0 / 2018
DWG REF:
2017068-SS
Sheet
3 of 9
DRAWN BY: DJG
LWGINEERINGCONSULTANTS
3PI rs 9r3o 7-F va q)z'97,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.COM
CHECKED BY. REG
ADDENDUM NO:
5/29/2018

69
6000 S.F.
0.14 AC.
— — — — —
I _ — V t \
EXISTING
\ STREAM/BANKS
TO REMAIN
\ii,
UNDISTURBED
/
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
78
7770 S.F.
0.1'8\AC.
76' NEW 24" RCP
PIPE CULVERT
TOTAL 120 FEET "
STREAM IMPACT
536.4 , _1
\ / I
I ° r <538.5
,_ SCALE 1"=40'
-�-..� r. LDDNMLo�
•...1.-
J -tp� XX .
20' NEW RIPRAP
OUTLET
PROTECTION
D50=9" SIZE
7k
6701 S�F
0.15 AC.
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM TOP
OF BANK =
2 FEET WIDE
NOTE: PERMANENT 24" RCP PIPE CULVERT
UNDER NEW ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT El
GRAY PROJECT NO: 2017068D
DATE: 06-01-2018
DRAWN BY: DJG
CHECKED BY: REG
/ \/
SILT FENCING
. ROW
24' NEW RIPRAP
OUTLET
PROTECTION
D50=9" SIZE
SILT FENCING
ROWS
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
GRAY
LWGLVEERING CONSULTANTS
A :PILGRIM- ROAD -GR (86LR SGz96o�
PH: (SDO �9,-3Oz -FAXX::(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRAYENGINEERING.GOM
<� -
_72
5-637 S.F_
0A 3 AQ-
As -built 2021: 761f '00
stream impacts due
to culvert, 291f due
to rip rap
76
9245 S.
-0.21AC
SHEET TITLE:
24" RCP CULVERT PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
Sheet 4of9'
5/29/2018

570
560
550
540
PRO PO
RIPRAP
520
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
PROPDSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
ROADWAY
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
XISTING
[..STREMCHANNEL
PROPOSE
D 120 LF OF
STREAM IMPACT
FOR
NEW CULVERT/RIPRAP
APRONTS
ED 24' - D5C=9"'
OUTLET PROTECTION
PROPOSED
STORM
76'-24"
DRAIN CULVERT
RCP@1.84°
ACR
SS ROAD
PROPOSED
RIPRAP
20' - C50=9"'
OUTLET PROTECTIOI
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70
PROFILE - NEW 24" RCP CULVERT
SCALE 1 "=20'
570
560
550
540
530
520
NOTE: PERMANENT 24" RCP PIPE CULVERT
UNDER NEW ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT E2
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY: REG
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
PILGRIM- ROAD - GRLE,SCz96,
PIE(86.N 29T3o2l-FAX:(86(86.N 297,87
WWW.GRA.NGINEERING.COM
SHEET TITLE:
24" RCP CULVERT PROFILE VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2017068-D9
ADDENDUM NO:
Sheet 5 of 9
5/29/2018

/ ' //// // /
•
\ \ \ \ \ \ — - -_ — --_- - - �i// // - - -
•
EXISTING _ - — _ %� - - - - 497.E / / / _
\\ • _STREAM/BANKS — X — — `—
/ TO REMAIN _—
/ \EXISTING UNDISTURBED
WETLAND TO
REMAIN
UNDISTURBED -
\ \ \
1 SILT FENCING \ \— —
ROWS \
_ 1504.50TWIi5
+t0
03.00B —
— •
---
•
X
497.2
--i -- r--- -/
� = \\\
NEW RETAINING ) �\ \\
WALL TO / — ` — / / \ \\ \\
/ REDUCE IMPACT / A VA
TO WETLAND 504.50TW 10.0' / — / \ /497.3 \ •• \` \\
8.5� 494.50BW / — 504.5OTW X ` ` \\
\ — — ' 502.00BVV� 2.5' \ \ \
— —
.� `. \ \`
504.50TW
\.00B
/ 12.00B
NOTE: ALTERNATE #2
KEEP LOTS, ADD WALL, IMPACT = 0.048 AC.
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT F2
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2017068D
DATE:
06-01-2018
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
ALT #2
WETLAND
IMPACT 0.048
AC.
GAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT S
PILGRIM!ROAD • GREEMCIILLE, S29607
(S
ED: BS4)4) s9rxu,7 • EA, (.4) 297-5.7
n14RatcxavEnvINsc.CD 1
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
'nA
\6722 S.F.
0�15 ACC
SHEET TITLE:
ALT #2 WETLAND IMPACT WITH FILL 0.048 AC.
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF: ._
2017068-D9 Sheet 6 of 9
ADDENDUM NO:
5/29/2018

SCALE 1 "=40'
LOCATION MAP (N.T.S)
\\ \\‘., \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \�\� \ \ \ \
\
\ \\� \\�\���\ \ \♦
\ \ ;
HEADWALL
15
4
\__ \
\ 53410FL � \ \ \ \\\ \ \�—
\\\ \
\ \
529.00BW
\\\ \V \
\\ \ 1IgtELLIIIN
•
LOT 54
FFE=541.00
GFE=540.33
PAD=540.00
514.5±EG
EMBED
513.5±1 N
ti
LOT 55
FFE=543.25
GFE=542.58
PAD=542.25
STREAM IMPACT
480.90 SF (0.011 AC.)
\ 44\ \\ \ .N\\;\\\\\ \\\\
\ \\
\ \
\ \ �\ 539.28TG `) \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\
\\ \ \ / .. J
\ \ �•\ \\1Y(\\ \ \\\ \\ \\ / / I\l �� \
\\ \ \\ \;; \I:\I\\�j\11 /II :\\ ,J = ~.----
\ \\\ \\\\\ \\\l\ -/ 1 \/,_\*".-
\\
0.011 AC.
STREAM E
IMPACT
/ /
I542.90TG 1%
I 1F.P.21�
\ \ I
\ \ \
l\
\\ll�\\\1\\
\\ \ \ \\ \ I \ \
\ \
\ I 1 !♦\ \ \ \ , \ \ \�
l \\ 1108'-72" RCP
\I CULVERT @4.44% \
\ \\ \
\\
1 \� \ \ \\
HEADWALL \ \ \ \ 1•
\ \ \Ir
�� . \ \ \\
V" • \ \\
\ \ \\\\\\ \ \\519.3±EG\ •\ \ \\ \ \
EMBED \ �•1 \ \ \ \
1 �\\i\\ \\ \\\ \\\\'s\\\ \ \
\�\ \\\\�.a„ „. 1
I 1 \lr�lll\\\ \\�\
/ JII I I \ \ \
\
1 I i
NOTE: PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING PLAN
PROPOSED 108 LF IMPACT FOR 72" RCP
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT C1-R
GRAY PROJECT NO:
2021013D
DATE:
05-20-2021
DRAWN BY:
DJG
CHECKED BY:
REG
GRAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
i82 6M HUAU • GFL'L'NFILLL', 5'L'296o,
PH:: (8(864) 29i-8o27. FAX: (864) 297,87
WWW GHAYENGZNEEHZNG. COM
SHEET TITLE:
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING PLAN VIEW
PROJECT NAME:
COTTAGE GREEN SUBDIVISION
HWY 601 (PAGELAND HIGHWAY)
CITY OF MONROE, NC
DWG REF:
2021013-D3
ADDENDUM NO
Sheet 7of9
ED

550
540
530
520
510
IH EADWALL
EXISTING
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
ELEVATION 514.5
505 -
PROPOSED PIPE INVERT
ELEVATION 513.5
500 I I 1 I 1 I
18" PVC WATERLINE
PROPOSED
ASPHALT ROADWAY
PROPOSED
15" RCP STORM DRAIN
CULVERT INVERT TO BE
EMBEDDED INTO STREAM
CHANNEL AT LEAST 12
INCHES TO PREVENT
BACKWATER EFFECT
UPSTREAM
8" PVC SANITARY
IE = 525.81
PROPOSED 108 LF
72" RCP @4.44%
1
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
ELEVATION 519.3
PROPOSED PIPE INVERT
ELEVATION 518.3
'MPACT=0.011 AC STREAM BED IMPACT
111111"-
550
540
1
HEADWALL
- 530
I
520
510
505
500
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
SECTION A —A CULVERT PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=10' (HORIZ. & VERT.) Sheet 8 of 9

550
540
530
520
510
505
777777777221-.
PROPOSED
ASPHALT ROADWAY
PROPOSED
15" RCP STORM DRAIN
/////7Z////
PROPOSED 8" PVC
SANITARY SEWER LINE
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED 108 LF
72" RCP @4.44%
EXISTING
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM
TYPICAL CULVERT SECTION,
INVERT TO BE EMBEDDED
INTO STREAM CHANNEL AT
LEAST 12 INCHES TO
PREVENT BACKWATER
EFFECT UPSTREAM
EXISTING
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM
EXISTING
GRADE
550
540
530
520
510
505
500 I I I I I I I I III! 500
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
SECTION B—B CULVERT CROSSING
SCALE: 1 "=10' (HORIZ. & VERT.)
Sheet 9 of 9

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT F:
Protected Species Habitat Assessment

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
March 20, 2018
Mr. Charles Saleh, PE
HWY 601 Development, LLC
521 Eagleton Downs Drive, Suite D
Pineville, NC 28134
Subject:
Dear Mr. Saleh,
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Oakton Subdivision Site
Union County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
HWY 601 Development, LLC. has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
a protected species habitat assessment for the Oakton Subdivision Site. The Oakton
Subdivision Site (Union County Tax Parcel Nos. 09125134 and 09158001) is approximately 75
acres in extent and is located southeast of the Highway 601 and East Highway 74 intersection,
in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Methods
In -office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of
Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Union County'. In addition, CWS
performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data
Explorer2 on March 13, 2018 to determine if any recorded occurrences of federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitats are located within the project
limits.
Typical habitat requirements for listed species was discerned from multiple USFWS3 and
NCNHP4 online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles,
recovery plans, NCNHP's Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office. Accessed March 13, 2018. Endangered and Threatened Species
and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2018. Biotics Database. Division of Land and Water Stewardship. Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina..
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. http://www.fws.gov/nces/es/plant_survey.html. Accessed March 13, 2018.
Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natural
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 5

Oakton Subdivision Site March 20, 2018
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0076
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
Union County' and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities
supportive of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).
Field Survey
CWS scientists Gregg Antemann, PWS, Christine Giest, PWS, Daniel Roberts, Project Scientist,
Dan Zurlo, Staff Scientist II, and Megan Shelton, Staff Scientist I, conducted a pedestrian habitat
assessment of the project area on March 5 and 20, 2018. Potential habitat for potentially
occurring federally -protected species that was identified during the desktop review was
assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or biological features essential to the
conservation of the applicable species. Additionally, during the pedestrian habitat assessment,
areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected species; however, formal surveys were
not conducted. Identification references for natural communities include the National Land
Cover Database 2011 Legend.'
Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer response, there are no current records of
federally -protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the project limits
(Attachment A). The USFWS lists three federally protected species for Union County (Table 1).
An official species list has not been obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally -Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
Oakton Subdivision Site, Union County, NC.
Major Group
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status*
Record Status
Plant
Helianthus
schweinitzii
Schweinitz's
Sunflower
E
Current
Animal
Lasmigona
decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
E
Current
Animal
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's Sumac
T
Historic
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened
Four terrestrial community types were identified within the project area during the field survey.
These community types consist of mixed forests, woody wetlands, shrub/scrub land, and
maintained open areas (Figure 3). Of the identified on -site community types, the boundaries
between the mixed forests, shrub/scrub land, and maintained open areas are potential habitat
for federally threatened or endangered species that could potentially occur within the project
limits. A brief description of each species habitat requirements and determination of effect
findings are listed below by species.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the piedmont of North and
5 United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North Carolina. Accessed 03/13/18.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
6 Multi -Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. 2011. National Land Cover Database 2011 Legend. Accessed 03/13/18.
Source: <https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php>
Page 2 of 5

Oakton Subdivision Site March 20, 2018
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0076
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since 1991.
The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission line
right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human -maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Schweintz's occurs frequently (Over 70%) in Tatum and Herndon, both
ultisols, and in Goldston, an inceptisol. Major characteristics of soils associated with
suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats
or gentle slopes, soils that are clay like in both composition and texture (and often with
substantial rock fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those
which vary over the course of the year from very wet to very dry'.
Biological Analysis:
CWS biologist conducted a pedestrian survey to transect potential on -site habitat for this
species within the maintained open areas in the northeast portion of the site and
shrub/scrub land in the western portion of the site (Figure 3; Photographs 1 and 2,
Attachment B). The desktop review and field survey assessment determined that the
maintained open areas and shrub/scrub land have the proper soils, slopes, and
occasional disturbances, however, there were large amounts of invasive species such as
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) in
these areas. Additionally, land use history derived from Google Earth historical aerial
imagery suggests these areas have been mechanically cleared and tilled, which would
have reduced suitability of the habitat for species persistence. Soil types in these
communities consist of mostly Badin Channery silt loam with 10 percent minor
components of Goldston and Tatum. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower or other
Helianthus species were observed during the pedestrian habitat assessment on March 5
or 20, 2018. Based on these findings, CWS concludes that supportive habitat is not
present within the project area due to large amounts of invasive species, non -conducive
historical land use, and no known population records of the species occurring within one
mile of the project area in the NHP database. These findings lead CWS to conclude
that the project will not affect Schweinitz's sunflower.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Habitat Description:
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly -serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. It has been listed as
an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 1989.9 It is
found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations occurring in
North Carolina. Michaux's sumac prefers sandy or rocky open woods with basic soils,
as well as highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of artificially -maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1852.pdf.
8 https://fibres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Smith_uncg_0154M_10042.pdf
9 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;Determination of Endangered
Status for Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac). http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1601.pdf.
Page 3 of 5

Oakton Subdivision Site March 20, 2018
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2018-0076
The NCNHP lists this species as historic in Union, as the last observation occurred more
than 20 years ago. Additionally, on -site soils consist of acidic silty soils that are not
suitable for Michaux's sumac. Based on the desktop review and pedestrian habitat
assessment, no potential habitat for Michaux's sumac is present within the project limits.
No individuals of Michaux's sumac were observed during the field assessment on March
5 or 20, 2018. Therefore, due to lack of suitable habitat, the proposed project will
have no effect on Michaux's sumac.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known to only occur within Goose Creek, the Pee Dee River
system, and Waxhaw Creek in the Catawba River system. The species exists in very low
abundances, usually within 6 feet of shorelines, throughout its known range. The
general habitat requirements for the Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers
to small streams, often burrowed into stable, clay banks between the root systems of
trees, or in runs along steep banks with moderate current. Recently, the Carolina
heelsplitter has been found in sections of streams containing bedrock with perpendicular
crevices filled with sand and gravel, and with wide riparian buffers.10
Biological Analysis:
A pedestrian review of potential on -site habitat for Carolina heelsplitter was conducted
for Stream A during the site visit on March 5, 2018. On -site perennial Stream A contains
frequent canopy gaps, moderately eroded clay banks, a weak to moderate shallow
current, slightly turbid waters, and a weak bank root system of invasive shrubs (Figure 3,
Photograph 3, Attachment B). Additionally, the furthest downstream portion of Stream A
on the site is culverted beneath E. Old Highway 74 at the western extent of the site,
limiting the biological connectivity of Stream A to downstream waters. On -site streams
are not located within the Goose Creek or Waxhaw Creek watersheds. Stream A is
located in the Richardson Creek watershed. Richardson Creek comes to a confluence
with the Rocky River over 20 river miles upstream of Goose Creek and suitable
biological connectivity of cool, clean, and clear streams from Stream A to these
downstream waters does not exist. These findings lead CWS to conclude this project
will have no effect on the Carolina heelsplitter.
Determinations
Based on the literature search and the results of the on -site assessment for suitable habitat of
federally -protected endangered, threatened, and candidate species, it has been determined that
suitable habitat is not present within the project limits for Schweinitz's sunflower, Michaux's
sumac, or Carolina heelsplitter. CWS has concluded that activities within the project area will
not directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of Schweinitz's sunflower, Michaux's
1° NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compliance%20Guides%20and%20Procedures/TE%20Animal%20Habitat%
20Descriptions%20Mar_6_2015.pdf
Page 4 of 5

Oakton Subdivision Site
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
March 20, 2018
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
sumac, or Carolina heelsplitter. Biological determinations requirements for federally protected
species are summarized in Table 2 (below).
Table 2. Bioloaical Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status*
Effect on Listed
Species
Biological
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's Sunflower
E
No Effect
No
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
E
No Effect
No
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's Sumac
T
No Effect
No
E - Endangered, T - Threatened
A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS's initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency's determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Daniel Roberts at 865-679-8953 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Tdii4 C124j
Daniel Roberts
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, CE, PWS
Consulting Group Manager
Attachments: Figure 1: USGS Site Location
Figure 2: Current USDA-NRCS Soil Map of Union County
Figure 3: Community Types
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-4)
Page 5 of 5

SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
3/8/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
M LS
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
CAR❑LINA
WETLAND SERVICES
USGS Site Location
Oakton Subdivision Site
Union Couny
Monroe, North Carolina
FIGURE NO.
1
of
3
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \JD\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

BaB
BdB2
Soil Unit Name and Description
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Badin-Urban land com.lex, 8 to 15 .ercent slo.es
Cid chamery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes
Godstonvery channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent sbpes
Godston-Badin com.lex, 8 to 15 .ercent sloes
Tarrus gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Coverage (%)
EIMMEIEM
m®
NEEMEM
_ r
r r EC
0.80
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY, NC, DATED 2014.
18.70
100.0
1,000
Legend
Project Limits (75 ac.)
Roads
500
0
1,000 Feet
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
3/8/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
MLS
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
t;
CAROLINA
WETLAND 5ERV]CE5
USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey FIGURE NO.
of Union County
Oakton Subdivision Site
Union Couny
Monroe, North Carolina
2
of
3
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive \2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \JD\ArcGIS\Figure4_CurrentSoils.mxd

REFERENCE: BACKGROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2017.
BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2017.
N
r
Legend
Project Limits (75 ac.)
Communitty
Forested
Shrub Scrub
Woody Wetlands
Perennial Stream
Roads
N Photo Location and Direction
1
600
300
0
600 Feet
A
SCALE:
1 inch = 600 feet
DATE:
3/21/2018
CWS PROJECT NO:
2018-0076
DRAWN BY:
JDR
COORDINATES:
34.965515, -80.501867
CHECKED BY:
CAG
LAR❑ LI NA
WETLAN ❑ SERVICES
Community Types
Oakton Subdivision Site
Union Couny
Monroe, North Carolina
FIGURE NO.
3
of
3
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2018\2018 Consulting Projects\2018-0076 Oakton Subdivision Site \PETS\ArcGIS\Figure3_CommunityMap.rrad

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
March 13, 2018
Dan Zurlo
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: Oakton Subdivision; 2018-0076
Dear Dan Zurlo:
NCNHDE-5567
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS:
1651 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651
Telephone: [phone]
xvrw.ncnhp.org
LOCATION:
121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603

c3
0
U
d
0
W
O
iTs
0
E
N
0
f3
L
N
N
Q C ti
"0 0_O
0 O 00
cN i �
co >
(C_aN6.
-0 CO O•
z
co 0 U c3
co-c3'0 2
c 0 O
a
cri
9-
t�
z
w
c.)
0
c.)
c.)
0
c
w
E
w
LLJ
w
a)
9-
w
9-
z
ti
(o
1)
Lu
z
U
z
N
a)
^L
0
a)
t�
O
iTs
Ll�
0
E
w
0
L
a)
a)
E
c)
0
N
c.)0
0
c.)
c.)
0
a)
E
a)
LLJ
O Y
• mic
f3
_0 C
O c3
• N
f3 N
• al
LL '
0
E
0
L.1
Scientific Name
0
LLI
Occurrence
c.)
.E
0
0
x O
co L
H 0
c3
N CO
N V N
CD CD CD
_>
O 0
c
0) 0 N 0)
C - (6 C
(6 C Ct (6
-o -o
c- c
W 'CO W
o C oco
N 0 N co 0
•U C i �U
O 0 0 0
0 • U U
O 0 0
(v5 (vs
W W W
2009-05-12
Savannah Lilliput
Toxolasma pullus
2009-05-12
Eastern Creekshell
Villosa delumbis
2009-04-28
Carolina Creekshell
Villosa vaughaniana
CO
O CO Ln
6) O LD
CO CO N
0 0 0
(6 (6 (6
co To co To co To
LL. • Nl LL. Nl LL. Nl
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
s://ncnhde.natureserve.or

NCNHDE-5567: Oakton Subdivision
CO
§
\❑ ❑
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary

Oakton Subdivision Site
Attachment B: Representative Photographs
March 20, 2018
CWS Project No. 2018-0063
Photograph 1. View of maintained open area, investigated for Schweinitz's sunflower habitat, facing west
Photograph 2. View of shrub/scrub land, investigated for Schweinitz's sunflower habitat, facing southeast.
Photopage 1 of 2

Oakton Subdivision Site
Attachment B: Representative Photographs
March 20, 2018
CWS Project No. 2018-0063
Photograph 3. View of shrub/scrub land, investigated for Schweinitz's sunflower habitat, facing south.
Photograph 4. View of investigated Carolina heelsplitter habitat, facing downstream.
Photopage 2 of 2

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT G:
SHPO Letter

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
October 18, 2018
David Shaeffer
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Office
Re: Develop Cottage Green Subdivision, 1739 Pageland Highway, Monroe, Union County, ER 18-3065
Dear Mr. Shaeffer:
Thank you for your email of September 20, 2018, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
12e,u24_ )11_tek‘kAll-Wt16-
✓Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Cottage Green Subdivision May 28, 2021
Attachments CWS Project No. 2018-0076
ATTACHMENT H:
Photopage (Photographs 1-19)

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 1. View of Stream A, facing downstream.
Photograph 2. View of Wetland WA, facing west.
Photopage 1 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 3. View of a non -jurisdictional upland (DP4), facing east.
Photograph 4. View of non jurisdictional feature SCP1-SCP3, facing south.
Photopage 2 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 5. View of Wetland WB, facing west.
Photograph 6. View of Stream B, facing upstream.
Photopage 3 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 7. View of Stream B, facing upstream.
Photograph 8. View of Stream SC, facing upstream.
Photopage 4 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 9. View of Stream SC, facing upstream.
Photograph 10. View of non -jurisdictional upland area (DP7 and SCP13), facing south.
Photopage 5 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 11. View of Pond A, facing northeast.
Photograph 12. View of Wetland BB, facing south.
Photopage 6 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 13. View of Stream C, facing downstream.
Photograph 14. View of Wetland AA, facing northwest.
Photopage 7 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 15. View of non jurisdictional feature SCP6, facing west.
Photograph 16. View of a non -jurisdictional upland (DP5), facing north.
Photopage 8 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 17. View of non jurisdictional feature SCP7, facing west.
Photograph 18. View of non -jurisdictional feature/upland (DP6) SCP8, facing east.
Photopage 9 of 10

Cottage Green Subdivision
Attachment H: Photopage
May 28, 2021
CWS Project No. 2018-0076
Photograph 19. View of S2 at Stream B, existing ford location for temporary construction
crossing.
Photopage 10 of 10

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20180859
Version*
2
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/30/2021
Contact Name * Aliisa Harjuniemi
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * Cottage Green Subdivision
Project Owner* HWY 601 Development LLC; POC: Charles Saleh
Project County* Union
Owner Address: Street Address
520 Eagleton Downs Drive Suite D
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / Region
Pineville NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
28134 US
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
l 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit l Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
20180859
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*

The Cottage Green Subdivision is approximately 75 acres in extent
and is located southeast of the Highway 601 and East Highway 74
intersection, in Union County, NC.
The purpose of the project is to develop the property into a
residential development. HWY 601 Development LLC has previously
obtained 404 and 401 permits for this projects. The previous impacts
included 160 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.05 acre of wetland
impacts.
HWY 601 Development LLC is requesting to add one additional
stream crossing for a proposed road. This crossing was originally
planned to be a bottomless culvert. The location of the additional
crossing is shown in the attached site plan.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/30/2021