Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210987 Ver 1_Ocean Outfall #2 EPCN Packet_20210604United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh ES Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 May 24, 2021 Steve Trowell North Carolina Department of Transportation 113 Airport Drive, Suite 100 Edenton, North Carolina 27932 Dear Mr. Trowell: This letter is in response to your letter of May 21, 2021 which provided the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) that the repairs to three ocean outfalls for Curlew, Conch, and Martin Streets in Nags Head, Dare County may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect the federally listed green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas), leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta), hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Kemp’s ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii), piping plover (Charadrius melodus), and red knot (Calidris canutus rufa). These comments are provided in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). The work sites occur within public beaches near residential structures and receive high pedestrian traffic. According to your submitted information, NCDOT expects that repair work at each outfall will last no longer than two days, and all work will occur during daylight hours only. Work is anticipated to occur in the summer of 2021 during sea turtle nesting season. NCDOT commits to conducting a turtle crawl survey each morning prior to work taking place. If any sea turtle crawl is observed, NCDOT will stop work and consult with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) prior to any further work taking place. Due to the limited scope of the project and the commitment to conduct sea turtle crawl surveys, the Service concurs with your conclusion that the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect sea turtle species, piping plover, and red knot. However, in the unlikely event that a sea turtle crawl is observed near the project location, we advise that the Service should be contacted in addition to contacting the NCWRC. The presence of a sea turtle crawl is unlikely to result in a long-term delay of the project, but appropriate measures may need to take place to avoid take of the species. We believe that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat 2 determined that may be affected by this identified action. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at gary_jordan@fws.gov . Sincerely, Pete Benjamin Field Supervisor Electronic copy: Kyle Barnes, USACE, Washington, NC Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC Robert Castello, NCDOT, Edenton, NC Paul Williams, NCDOT, Edenton, NC May 26 2021 DWR: I contacted Mr. Garcy Ward by phone on May 25 2021 to ask about the 401 certification requirements for the proposed repair described in this PCN and he stated that written concurrence was not required for this work. I explained that I could not submit the application because of the PMR requirements. He instructed me to type this word document and attach it to the app. Steve Trowell Environmental Specialist II North Carolina Department of Transportation From:Jordan, Gary To:Trowell, Steve J Cc:Castello, Robert C; Williams, Paul C Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Nags Head Ocean Outfall Repair Date:Wednesday, June 2, 2021 3:40:46 PM CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Steve, No problem. The concurrence letter is still valid. I will document this clarification in my files. Thanks for letting me know. Gary Jordan Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Liaison to NCDOT U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Email: gary_jordan@fws.gov From: Trowell, Steve J <sjtrowell@ncdot.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 2:15 PM To: Jordan, Gary <gary_jordan@fws.gov> Cc: Castello, Robert C <rccastello@ncdot.gov>; Williams, Paul C <pcwilliams2@ncdot.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Nags Head Ocean Outfall Repair This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. Gary: Per our phone conversation this afternoon concerning my 21 May 2021 correspondence seeking concurrence on “May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” determination for potential impacts to Sea Turtles, Piping Plovers and Red Knots for repairs to three different adjacent ocean outfalls in the Town of Nags Head. You responded with a letter dated 24 May 2021. In my correspondence I miss labeled the name of the ocean outfall titled outfall no. 5 at Martin Street. The coordinates for this location are correct but the correct name for this location is not no. 5 at Martin Street but rather ocean outfall no. 2 at Mile Post 12.7. I attached a topo quad map of the location. Sorry for the confusion. If you have any questions please let me know. ----___ = = ------_ _ _ _ EX 1ST ING WOOD p ILES------_d' ----------===--=====-11--Dl-� - , - --,-.,,-_ II II SYMBOLS PROPOSED CROSS SECTION EXISTING CROSS SECTION '--ti Ui --or EX !STING 27 ,, RCP R­ti lJ -17--11 lJ -Fl ti lJ PLAN VIEUT DETAILED DRAWING \ I \ I \ I I I I I I \ I \ I \ I \ \ EXISTING PIPE ELEVATION WILL BE MAI NT AI NED OCEAN OUTFALL RESET EXISTING PIPE COLLARS AND REPLACE COLLAR HARDWARE EXISTING WOOD PILES TO REMAIN IN PLACE #2 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 1 113 AIRPORT DR. EDENTON, NC 27932 (252) 482-1850 WBS#: DATE: �---Jez _ ___,I COUNTY: DARE QUAD: KITTY HAWK BASIN: PASQUOTANK SHEET #: 1SP.10281.5 MAY 19, 2021 OF 1 SUBJECT: REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE TO Mile Post 12.7 OUTFALL #2 LAT. 35.958840 N LONG. = 75.623428 W lJ DRAWN BY: K. BROWN SCALE: 1" 20' Ocean Outfall No. 2Mile Post 12.735.95 884°-75 .623428° NCDOT GIS Unit, C opyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society,i-cubed Repair/Maintenance Ocean Outfall No. 2Mile Post 12.7Dare County Quad Name:Roanoke Island NE 0 0.4 0.80.2 Miles Ü Soil Map—Dare County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/2/2021 Page 1 of 33978800397900039792003979400397960039798003980000398020039804003980600398080039788003979000397920039794003979600397980039800003980200398040039806003980800443000443200443400443600443800444000444200444400 443000 443200 443400 443600 443800 444000 444200 444400 35° 58' 14'' N 75° 37' 58'' W35° 58' 14'' N75° 36' 55'' W35° 57' 6'' N 75° 37' 58'' W35° 57' 6'' N 75° 36' 55'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84 0 450 900 1800 2700 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Meters Map Scale: 1:10,200 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Dare County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 20, Jun 2, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 31, 2009—Oct 19, 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Dare County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/2/2021 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI BnD Beaches-Newhan complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes 20.9 4.6% CoB Corolla fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded 7.9 1.7% CrB Corolla-Duckston complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded 4.0 0.9% DtA Duckston fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 15.5 3.4% DuE Dune land, 2 to 40 percent slopes 48.9 10.7% DwE Dune land-Newhan complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes 36.7 8.0% NeC Newhan fine sand, 0 to 10 percent slopes 6.5 1.4% NhC Newhan-Corolla complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes 26.2 5.7% NuC Newhan-Urban land complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes 46.5 10.2% W Water 244.0 53.4% Totals for Area of Interest 457.1 100.0% Soil Map—Dare County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/2/2021 Page 3 of 3