20061013 Ver 1_401 Application_20060606

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 22, 2006
S&EC Project # 9405. W3
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. f +l % `- rt 1 U 1
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614 ~ ~ ~~~
- ~ •--
Re: Glenn View Station
Durham, NC
~~,
On behalf of the owner, Cimland, LLC Attn: S. Craig Morrison, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the
N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede under Nationwide Permit 39
and General Water Quality Certification 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or
require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Glenn View Station
Project T e Commercial Develo ment
Owner / A licant Cimland LLC Attn: S. Crai Morrison
Coun Durham
Nearest Town Durham
Waterbod Name UT to Ellerbe Creek
Basin /Sub-basin Neuse River Basin• 03-04-01
Index Number 27-5 0.7
Class WS-IV;NSW
USGS Catalo in Unit 03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.145
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.256
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.401
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 768 LF*
*Permanent impacts to important/perennial streams total only 10 LF of the tota1768 LF
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map
Durham County Soil Survey Vicinity Map
Overall Site Plan (full size 2 sheets -DWQ only)
Overall Site Plan (11 X 17 2 sheets)
Impact Maps (6 sheets)
Neuse Buffer Determination Letter
Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan
$475 Application Fee to DWQ
f ' ~ :~~
a~~r.
~~ .. ;[. n9.i!"7.3
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

303
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS `" '
~~~J~1013
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
II.

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check h { ~`_~ ~ ~~ a`'/;,T ~' , ;`;
E ~' .:~ , ! '. 1
Applicant Information ~~

~i `~.
1. Owner/Applicant Information ;,~;,~,: ~ ~~,;, ~.; , ,~ ,;
Name: Cimland, LLC ~'~T`-''"'` "`; `~ "~' ' ` r ,~,~'`'`
Mailing Address: Attn: S. Craig Momson
2330 Operations Drive
Durham NC 27705
Telephone Number: 919-382-2888 ext. 109 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sclark~a,sandec.com
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Glenn View Station
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0843-04-60-7183: 0843-04-60-1082; 0842-02-
69-8951; 0842-02-69-5728; 0842-02-79-2586. 0842-02-79-1499. 0842-02-79-1470. 0842-
02-79-1330; 0842-02-69-2332. 0842-02-68-9897; 0842-02-68-7887; 0842-02-68-3679
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): 40 West to I-85 North to
Exit 181; right onto Glenn School Road subject property on the right
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0293 °N 78.8427 °W
6. Property size (acres): ~57 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Ellerbe Creek (03-04-01; 27-5-(0.7)• WS-
IV; NSW
8. River Basin:_ Neuse Basin (USGS 03020201)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:11h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently undeveloped and forested. The eg neral
Page 2 of 10

land use surrounding the property includes some residential and commercial as well as the I-
85 transportation corridor.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is a commercial development with permanent impacts resulting from the
installation of three road crossings, two road widenings and lot fill for the necessary parking
lots and retail buildings. Heavy equipment typically used for construction will be employed
for this project.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to supply a
commercial shopping area for the new and existing residential area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On August 11, 2005, Mr. Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleig~i Re ig'onal
Office conducted an on-site determination for the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules (15 A
NCAC 2B .0233) to the streams on the subject property (see attached letter, . The map sued
(see attached) by Mr. Kulz also indicates the perennial and intermittent features on the subject
property. S&EC completed the detailed wetland delineation for the entire site on Ju1~28, 2005.
Currently, the survey map has been submitted to the USACE for si~ature and approval.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future uermit requests are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 10

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed permanent impacts include
0.256 acres of wetland fill 768 linear feet of stream channel of which 10 linear feet is
perennial/important stream channel 1 504 square feet of "Exempt" Neuse Buffer Impacts
X853 sa. ft. in Zone 1 and 651 sq ft in Zone 2) and 40 919 square feet of "Allowable" Neuse
Buffer Impacts (24,507 sq. ft. in Zone 1 and 16 412 sq ft in Zone 21
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and fl~~ding_
Wetland Im act
P
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Flood lain
P
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream

linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
( )
#3 Permanent Fill Riparian No 0 0.193
#5 Permanent Fill Riparian No 0 0.023
#6 Permanent Fill Riparian No -~60 0.040
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.256
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.656
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea~e_ multiply length X w;rlth then rliv;rlP by d3 Sin
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Im act linear feet (acres

Pipe Extension
(permanent) 10
#1 UT Ellerbe Creek Concurrent Perennial t6' 0.001
Dewatering (10)
(temporary)
#2 UT Ellerbe Creek Fill (permanent) Intermittent 3'-5' 339 0.072
Pipe Extension
(permanent) 32
#4 UT Ellerbe Creek Concurrent Intermittent 3'-5' 0.034
Dewatering (32)
(temporary)
#5 UT Ellerbe Creek Culvert Intermittent 3'-5' 125 0.008
#7 UT Ellerbe Creek Culvert Intermittent 3'-5' 131 0.015
#8 UT Ellerbe Creek Culvert Intermittent 3'-5' 131 0.015
Page 4 of 10

768*
(permanent)
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) (temPoriry 0.145
concun•ent
dewatering)
*Permanent impacts to important/perennial streams total only 10 LF of the tota1768 LF
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on ma
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
acres
N/A N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): 0.145
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.256
O en Water Im act (acres : 0
Total Irn act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.401
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 768 LF*
*Permanent impacts to important/perennial streams total only 10 LF of the tota1768 LF
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no isolated waters on the subject property.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Page 5 of 10

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed road widening
(impact #1 and #4) were necessitated by the need for turning lanes into the subject property In
both cases, the Qpe extensions and resultant impacts were minimal (10 linear feet and 32 linear
feet respectivelyl and will have concurrent de-watering for the pipe placement The road
crossings (impact #2 and #5) were planned over intermittent/unimportant stream channels and
placed perpendicular to the channel Headwalls will be used to further minimize impacts to the
culvert crossing. It should be noted that Impact #2 is on anon-buffered intermittent/unimportant
stream channel. Topography constraints necessitated fill in the channel in order to construct the
retail building and the re uired parking lot. The proposed wetland impacts Impact #3 #5 and
#6) are due to fill reauired for the retail buildings and the necessary parking lots as well a road
crossing to access the middle of the property In addition a portion of the wetland associated
with Impact #5 is within the Neuse River Buffer This impact is linked with the road crossing
discussed above.
The road crossings for Impact #7 and #8 are unnecessary however the Durham Planning
Department has a requirement that states all parcels must front a public R-O-W Durham has
stated that they will not require the crossings if DWO and/or the USAGE deny them For that
reason, we are requesting that these crossings be denied as the.proposed road cul-de-sacs
next to Interstate I-85 and serves no purpose. Additionally, the Northwestern portion of
the property is not being developed and therefore no road is needed And finally, the
parcel to the extreme north of the subiect property has access through the proposed road
crossing enumerated in Impact #5.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Page 6 of 10

If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt~p•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
For impacts to wetlands and streams navment into the NCEEP is proposed to satisfy the
mitigation necessary for this project
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.256
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No
Page 7 of 10

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact #1 ("Exempt"1
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 853 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 651 1.5 N/A
Total 1,504 N/A
*During the pipe placement and concurrent 10 linear feet of dewatering, there will be 754 sq. ft. of Zone 1 impact and 629 sq. ft.
of Zone 2 impact that will be "temporary" in nature. All the impact areas will be revegetated once the pipe is in and construction
is complete.
Impact #4 ("Allowable"1
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 1,794 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 1,218 1.5 N/A
Total 3,012 N/A
impact #5 ("Allowahle"1 `~
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Minus wetlands in
bu er s uare eet Remaining buffer
Im act s uare eet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 7,749 347 7,402 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 5,173 634 4,539 1.5 N/A
Total 12,922 981 11,941 N/A
Page 8 of 10

Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 7,862 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 5,918 1.5 N/A
Total 13,780 N/A

Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 7,449 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 4,737 1.5 N/A
Total 12,186 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. As all of the impacts are either "exempt" or
"allowable." no rii,arian buffer mitigation is proposed. Should it be dete__rmined that buffer
mitigation is required the client proposes payment to the NC EEP to satisfy any buffer
mitigation requirements.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The impervious surface for this project will be
approximately 69.9% which will reauire a stormwater manas?ement plan. Attached, please find a
preliminary Stormwater Management Plan for the project An appropriately sized area has been
set aside for an extended detention wetland however final design has not been completed at this
time. We are requesting that a conditiona1401 be issued that would reauire the submittal
and approval of a Stormwater management elan before any proposed impacts take place.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into the City of Durham's sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Page 9 of 10

Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Qualit oY n April 10, 2004, version 2.1. While it does suggest that commercial development can
result in cumulative impacts, this proposed development is small in nature and is within a
landscape that is already commercial in nature Also future growth would be limited by the
proximity of Interstate 85 to the north of the subject property It is not expected that the
proposed commercial development will induce any additional future gxowth that is not already
occurring in this area. Additionally the stormwater treatment facilities are being desired to
meet DWQ's design standards and therefore, it is not expected that there will be any resultant
downstream water quality degradation We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Cd
~•~ /26©
Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

M~R-10-2006 FP,I 1004 f:M ClMARRON HOMES FAk N0. ]9193820~1G F, 0l
Envlranrnental Consultants, pA
Rusd Raltash, ~la~ t~coligsri 2761a Pbooc: (919j $~S9Q0 Fu: (419) 8~6 967
All H~ To l3o Fi(lod 1» By The Curr_,Sttt Landovvtra- or, Municipal OfFicial
Address: ,~ 330 4(aC~~'JpKJ.s D~j~ _
Phone: 9/ 9 - 3ff~ ~'~ DLO .~
Project Name/Deseriptiort: Sz~rS~i~eet-
Date: ~), f 0 L~
'Ibe Dcparmncat of the Army
l).S. Army Corps of Eaaaars, Wiht,iugcors District
P.O. Boz 1890
WilmittgWn, NC 28402
Arm: ~ /'; c. a 1 S.~~J el
Field Off:ee: 2~r 'r
~ ~ -r-
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Coc~cem:
SBfECProjectit QLj~~, wL
1, tht current landowner or municipal official, het+eby designate and autlzoriu Soi11~ Enviroaraetttal Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent ist the processing of permit applications, to famish upon rogtust supplemental
infornnaRion in support of applications, dc. from this day forward. The ~~ day of Mr.~'c i~
This notification supersodes any prtvious comcspandence concerning the agent for this project.
NbTiCily: Tbls asthorizattoq, for lisbWty attd prafessioaal courtesy reasoaa, !s vil(d Daly roc tov~mast sf8clds to
enter the property whsa aceowpsusled by Sdctl:C start: You sloal~ crdl S&EC oo ~trrsua=e a site meeting prior ca
v[aitiag rite alts. a~'r3~AC>~ ~ owrv~2.
~iMG.fn/O, 44G.
S. C!?~9/6 /9'b.~So~y' ,a.s•.Ksasfmgr~~~.
Print Property OwuCr's orMunieipsl Offic al's Namr l'r Owner's or Municipal OfFieial's i tore
tc: Ma. Cyaai Karoly : Mr. A,uron Cooper
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Eati'iraawiental CotaeWtant+, PA
2321 t.sabttoe Boulevard
Raleigh, NG 2",6Qa
i harlc~roe9ffice: 1$:
236 [xt'hiilip Cows, Suite C 38)7-F. l.awndak Dcivo
CnncArd, NG 28025 Cm~ena6om, NC 27455
('ftone; (7U0.172Q-4405 Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Faz:[phone]
AGENT AU?~iOR77.AT10N Ft'J}tM

IMM1111AM
!J1,7 TWA—
ArA
7x-7T
ML
9 S
,oject Number Map Title:
9405.W3 I
flGURf
,oject Manac3er:
c R*
School5C J, Glenn S&
��./
•
Durham EC

Project Number:
94O5.W3
Project Manager:
SC
Scale:
" = 2,000'
Date:
06/2 I /06
Map Title:
FIGURE I -USGS Map
Glenn School Road
Durham County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • (919} 846-9467
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Source:
Northeast Durham Quadrangle

fITE SUMMARY
M nwurt
. nn»1w..
m.you u
mem,cawr~~o.a
a.w.ic~`aa
~..m m~.wma..
w' IIa11.f. W14
11Mq®0¢. COwMCw
,~„~1,~ 1nu,~a~o°;°°,~
ruacrrowlrt rnrunwi wc¢
,~ aom
..awroowlm. wn.mwnaa
rn~rtaw~ uveea pslr lam
rK.rar.cpa: ae.Km lu. iaoy
ma> .su
xc nmam n uKm e.a1 iaa
r.aacrwxoa: nvKU lug iam
awm uoxv
ty pnltmq
.uua'lpmpa; iYO.4. Vli~am
41MV
ww nmu~ au.cn pal.am
rwlla.wmttm: ltvKm µ1. iaq
mama Il1aY
1. ~ tl0uma: aVKa pc! iq
. m1oaR 11 VKa 1.1111pq
HW[ IA111N
.a1a 1MaR roaxe µ0l laa
..mnonla uvKe ue. iw
on.m~ nauaa uv.ce 11.p~am
.rwc nowm avae la r loom
amuaua lnwe•
~K1"10'•ac no~nan yrlraan11~wi
~. wnan
~,< nay .;~„°`a,>..,a.am.am
AUIUANG fET6ACK3 FOA fC (D] ZONEf
~.mucUAb1WKMlh.
ucdlpa]Ywl:
EAEF COVERAGE CALCULARONf
laarouacwuae w,alr.cv.K.nea
uacoe~ nmam:
mm,aelc K. a+.a
1a
t110.La: !!olaa. Ul K.P..u4
f REE (PIECES:
uca«emom nla rol nmac
.ea vi w.
iam~
>'` -i
I ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN
002 wrt pima
HORVATH
• ASSOCIA IES
wn n.eeatita~
aum.wlo1ac11«x.ma
_ , Mc~~nue u~u~v.m
maq /,
3'r7'
~~
\'
,,~
''~ , ~ Gl6JN VIEW
~ ~ STATION
+\
\ • \ GEERSEREEi
,~"~~ ~ DURHAM
~\ FNN ~ NORiH CAROLINA
~~•\ ' \ fCH ~ ILLUSTRATIVE
SITE PLAN
~, ~ \ \ WITH R.O.W.
13`; , ~ \
~',. ~l
ad' ~~
04 ~,
',1 ~~ ;
.'~ '.1 .
MRM]e1q~Mi,'1 '1
11~ ~ ;
i_~_ ~I ,I
j ~
i I •
I. ~
f~
• I I
• I I
• I I
I I
- . MN 1r. a~Nlr.
wt MAY iJ. 2IXM
~ 0516
N
D002B
~i3

SITE SUMMARY
Nsxwr+c nml ~'
r nm Rf.a.
rn nNw,~
.n w._wr.cwxuuuN
'lglW IdRp, R
R. R,NR.N~.~~.
~~
RR~~ ~~.~
•MRR AIM MM
NtA lul,lndlNrq
~rwab w:co-+arx
bMml~ trLRrN
cn ua ~ IR,
nR[sclbxpp. NNrM Nsl Ne,
Feu°~
ruoOrrO Ws ,NNrco µrI Rf,.
RRIN
rM~EeS~~ Ysx6Mefllq
r 6kf„®1
URN
Rwr~. T Kap0ldq
rMWr IIVKdIUfIwN
~ 1RV
RorIR.
r.cwrro+ero wwcd Wr~l
I,MI Il1Rs
;M~`d kdurlR NNKd Wfm4,
r10vu1R msA[d luflW
rsRC WIRR
RW1~ WRv
IymRry msKdµel,wl
M,sNCrbro@ ysKP W„RA
1;w
r."Rnc ao wl w
r,R.mrro.«d RsMN UI,R,
N.a Ircnbnluriwn
f.RP4MedRR IJn NKalufiRR
.~ m~,h mv,~ ,,..,.W..~,
BUIIfHNG SETBACKS FOR CG (D) ZONES
IRM~. wlh bsYIwRLO%
1 WN4 vs.K~roMnRrow. GVnuuh [ply. YMN1iY.fli4w
TREE COVERAGE CAICUTATIONI
]AfY KI H
IrH COVPb HG.E®.
NOMO n fV
TREE SIIECES:
Rcwean,lisl ran,n~
cRnw
mv~r"icn'
~~xo
i
,W. Ro..R.N, n Nm, Ra ~ ~
__._ , . \ I
_ //l
__ 1 /
D ~.- r
- ASSOCIATES
.._ .. ' dKtanr
---r'\•C`~ ~`,\ - • I~s3mlN mlµ dM~51mYU:
.~ I I I` - - ,
I j ~ ~' l •~-''/,' '.~1: •RVRM N11R,0N/INI ~~
,,I I' ~;
~' ~ / I RETAIIi~ \ .~~ .
.y ~ r,• ~ AIL I I
.~•~ 50 ~ ~ ~ \1 GLENN VIEW
• ~'• i _ - IGN ; \~ ~; O STATION
~~~' ETAI ~ r ~ ,
/~ ~ ,I r; '
~~ ~ ~ GEER4REET
'~/ ~~~ ~ I DURHAM
~~~ '~ N NORTNCAROUNA
,y¢Of71Y06f/ATa.
OG110NIDIF; • ~ ~ ~ n~••
~,,,,,~~,~- ~ ILLUSTRATIVE
EJ(TENDED f f' _ \ 1 SITE PLAN
/ ,E..• DETENTION - I d • 1 ,
Gi) a .~ WETUIND ~ All E ,~~6 ~ 'y ,
A9• , -~~1'~, ,`~ wueaaTOEE + I ,'td ~ -Rdo. ,w...
S - ` DEId4Al1®ATW'S 1~~ J ~ F
- _ ; ,f ~F so
~~'
- \:~ RETAIIA ,` ~ r .'~~y f -~~'t L;
4 ~~~~, ~ ~ RETAIEE ' ~ }
'~S , i"~ I 1 ~• • • RRMOMMS1Q,l
RETAIl6 ETAIID ''~~i "°"
•i i~ ~ ,,. ~ -._ C. Q .~. ~~lir _~, 1~~
~ .•
' ~~ ~~ r
w ~~, j
..
__.. __•
_. -
' ~ -.
~ •
1 I" r ` \ _ ,
~ ~I ~
,.
1 ____/ / r
_,. ,
__--- _
- I I
~~ ' ~ l I
w
~. N _
• MLR ~N
ue
,....._ : , t ,. ,. ` :~ ~~~'Sl ~ g~ nun
~ p516
ILLUSTRATIVE SfTE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN ~'°"E°~ ^
rre rvtmr VOO~U

IMPACT MAPS
APPLICANT
CIMLAN D, LLC
LEER STREET PROPERTY
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
LENN SCHOOL RD /'rJ,00
~~~
~O G
~o ~~5
~~
~,~`~ SITE
~°
~~
~~~
~~
~~ a
D
~~~
4 ~,• ~
~O / O
ICINITY M P aND
NO SCALE
2330 OPERATIONS DRIVE
DURHAM, NC 27705
P: [phone]
1=: [phone]
SITE SUMMARY
*TOTAL TRACT AREA = 54.56 ACRES-2,376,851
*EXISTING ZONING: NC. RD
*EXISTING USE: COMMERCIAL, S.F. RESIDENTIAL,
UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL/
RESIDENTIAL USES
*PROPOSED ZONING: SC (D)
'WATERSHED: F/J-B OVERLAY
`RIVER BASIN: NEUSE
*IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,661,419 SF (69.9°1i;J
*PROPOSED USE: COMMERCIAL
`TOTAL BUILDING SF: 295,000SF - 345,000 SF
*SITE IS OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS
'SITE IS INSIDE UGA
......................
_ HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
16 GONSUETANT PUCE. SURE 201
WRHAM, NORTH CAROIMJA 27707
~9{9./90.1990 F919,{90.9957
537 MARKET STREET, SORE U10
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37102
1 123.266.1990 F x23.266.5700
www.horvalhassxlales.com
DRAWN BY;
PROJECT COVER SHEET ~~E~KEOe "'-----

0 150 300 600
SCALE: 1"= 300'
= HORVATH
ASSOCIATE S
16 CONSULTANT PLACE SURE 201
'" fH/RMAM. NOQTN CAROLINA 27707
F 919.190.1990 F 919,40089$3
537 MARKET STREET, SURE 1L20
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 31402
F 423.266.4990 F {23.266.5700
wwwhorval auo a es.com
DRAWN BY:
OVERALL PROJECT SITE CHECKEDBY:,U -~--

~' ~:
r \//
~' ~\ '~
.` `
'W. ~... F ~ ~ ! ~ I
f I
~~'. l
~,,~
\~ ~~~ CHANNEL IMPACT AREA #2~`='
~__~
._
~~~ /
,,` L
~`.~\.~\ ..._ _ . I
__.- _ - ,.
_...... _- -- 1
~ ~-- ~\
'~' • ~
~E2 ~~1 ~
F~.~ ~'V
/'/ /~ ,
_~--

~- ..
~. ~ . ~ /~ e .*ey"~
~~
-.. i
._°---
1/ i
_ ~~
~'"i\~
~ ~ ~ 't
~- - / t
~ /
~__~; ~~.~~~// I BUFFER A~D CHANNEL ~~
_ 1 ~ ~ •~~'- -~~ ~-~ ~C \ ± IMPACT ~4REA #1 //
= "j \ ) i ANY REC~`U`IRED (
~~ ` "~~~~ ~ ~ ~ DEWATERING SHALL BE
~ ~ ~ ~ CONCURRIENT WITH PIPE (
ASPHALT ~ ~ ~ , PLACEMEf~I'~ I
EMENT WIDTH ~ ~ ~ ~ (
\\ \`>a` ~\~ 1, ~
~ ~ 1
1ST. 60' ROW ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1
`~----_~ ~ I ~ ~
\ \~ I ~ \
I

CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
NEUSE BUFFER CHANNEL NEUSE BUFFER CHANNEL
IMPACT TYPE IMPACTS IMPACT IMPACTS IMPACT
NO.

1
NB 853 SF 10 LF 754 SF 10 LF
Z 1 (0.019ac) 74 SF(0.0017ac) (0.017ac) 126 SF(0.0029ac)

NB 651 SF _ 629 SF ___
Z2 (0.014ac) (0.014ac)
,141 A
2 ___ _ ___
339 LF
N
0 50 100 200
N8 ZI-NEUSE RIVER BUFFERS ZONE I
SCALE: 1 ~~ = I OO~ NB
NEUSE RIVER BUFFERS ZONE 2
Zz
DRAW N BY:
HORVATH 'U -
IMPACT AREAS # 1 & 2 SITE PLAN CHECKEDBY:

16 CONSULTANT PLACE. SURE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
~ 919,~90.~990 F 919.90.8959

GEER STREET SCALE

' "=100' -

597 MARKET STREET, SUIfELL20
CXAITANOOGA, TENNESSEE 9762
GEER STREET AND GLENN SCHOOL ROAD DATE
06/21/06
__
-123.266.6990 E a29.2665700
DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NO
„~„~,.„,,,,a a,=o~b~t.~oli, , 0516

'~ ' ~---------- ~•,r --.--.--~ : '. BUFFER ANd CHANNEL
- ~ ~ ~` ~`
~ +,,, r
"^ ; ~' ~ `-~: ~, ~,.: IMPACT At}TEA #4
~ ~~' 6. -.,, ~ ';} F~\ ANY REQI~IRED
~- %~r'f~ ~ ~~ 70 1; `PJ,~~ DEWATF,.f~INGSH BE
~;,~~~% ` ~-- ~~ NFt ~ o i/+ 01~.`URR WITH PIPE
- i ~ i ~°~ \ P ENT
7 , ~ `.
ii `
~, . .
~ \ .~
Z ••
. ,~,
i ~;.-_. FER AND CHAIyN - 't*'~ / '_ ( ~`~ ~~ `~. }
r%, ~ -- ~-
'S~ .~`~`7 PACT AREA #5 - 1 r T -,~ ,; ~\1 n ~
/~ / ~ ~' ~ ~'~_- ~ caw ~ • , I
• ~
-. _. '.
.:
r} ! ` 7
•-
,~
x ' ~•
/ .~ ~- ~ ~
- . -~ y
.: -~
;`•-
- I/~ i ~ /• - ~ ~
_~_ .., '~i• ~~
- _ '•.,° ~,L. _- - __ - ~ it - ~{;y ~ / • • ~- M-~ ~ ',
.. WETLAND il~ItPA~T AREA #6 ,,~~,,-/// _ r _ , t ~
.~ t
• . • y.,-
..._- t WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3 ..-:y..~ ,.: ., t~ .+. ~i 1 Y ` ` ~ - -` `~ ~ ~~c~
. ~,- ~ _ ~ -
., .` .
- ~ 1
~,.'
{ ~ ~• W
-•- ~- -~ -
- _ _• -
-. -
~1, .- ~ = -
....,,~-
~.~•'~.~• jWETLANDS-JURISDICTIONALWETtANDS
I ~ ~ ~-. ~ I NB ZI-NEUSE RIVER BUFFERS ZONE 1
• •NB Z2 NEUSE RIVER BUFFERS ZONE 2
~I~~
NEUSE BUFFER MINUS REMAIN. CHANNEL JURIS.
IMPACT TYPE IMPACTS WETLANDS BUFFER IMPACT WETLANDS
Np, IN BUFFER IMPACT
8,396 SF
g WETLANDS - - -- ---- {0.1927ac)
1
794 SF 32 LF(0.4343ac}
4 NB Zi ,
(0.041 ac) --- --- 32 LF Of ----
CONCURRENT DEWATERING
1,218 SF

5
NBZ1 7,749 SF
(0.177ac) 347 SF
(O.OOSocI 7,402 SF
(0.169ac) 125 LF(0.0287ac} 347 SF
(0.008ac}
5,173 SF 634 SF 4,539 SF 634 SF
NBZ2 (0.118ac) (0.0146ac} (0.1042ac} -- (0.0146ac1
6 WETLANDS -- --- --- --- (0.040acJ
N NOTE: AREAS LISTED UNDER THE JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS COLUMN INCLUDE WETLANDS WffHIN NUESE BUFFERS.
0 ~ 1 ~ 2~ WETLANDS UNDER IMPACT AREA 3 DO NOi INCLUDE THE WETLANDS WITHIN THE NEUSE BUFFER UNDER IMPACT 5.
SCALE: I"= 100'
^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ r ^ • r • • ^ • ^ ^ ^ • • ^ • • ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^ • ^ ^ • • ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • • ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^
-__--
_-.. DRA N
.,
HORVATH IMPACT AREAS #3, 4, 5 & 6 SITE PLAN CHECKEDBY:JU ---
A S S O C I A T E S
- ~ 16 CONSUUANT PLACE SURE ZOl SCALE `
DURHAM. NORTH CAROLRIA 27707 G E E R STREET
F 914.190.4990 F 919.190.8951 -,--_- 1 x'=100' --
DATE
- 597 MARKETSTREET.SWIELL20 DEER STREET AND GLENN SCHOOL ROAD 06!09/06
CMATfANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37102 ---------
- F @3.266.1990 F 123.266.5700 PROJECT NO
ww99. orvathossoclates.com DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 0516

~b~ `/
i
.~
~, _,,'.
~ ~~`~ Ji
i
~ `~~ ~ /~
P• • /~,J
/~ ~i
~~ % i
/~ ~~.
~ iT
/ I
~ it
1
i~ i I
-J I
i---J - I
.~ '^
_ .'
~_~j__ ~ L7 1.8 ~~-•~r 195.0
~ ~6 .... _ _. ,.
~ ~ ~ _ I __..__
~' - -'-'` ~` ~ ~ OUTPARGEt~~~
! ~
` ` Bf~FFER AND'~HANNL! ~ ~,
TT ~ T
~ i i~ IIV~PACT, ARE.~!~#8 ~~i - '',
,~ ~ i ,
. ,
~~ ~~d .
1 t ~ ..... ;~,
~ 1 ,M.~....d ~,.,~
~~_-
\ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ _
'J ~ ~ ' _ - ~+ + +
L r-:' ~+~+ + + +
I ~ ~.' ~ ' +-~ ~
~ `~ ~~ ~ i -
;a ~.' C' _ ~ ~ ~ ---
~ ~•~
-'' ~, BUFFER AND CHANNEL '~ ~~-- ~ - ~ ',
~f ~ ~ ____ _ IMPACT, AREA #7 ~ ~ _~ ~i3' a '
_- --i . / ~ ~ -•
-~-' ~ j ~ / ' ~~ i
~- -`
._. .
/ '- '-'
-- , .
1
.. ; i ~ _.t. ,~

i
a -
`',~ ~.
?~.. /
~ =.
-~ `:
1
..
.~ ~ ..~~
~'
-. ,~ 1
' ~`
~' `_
~~
NB ZI-NEUSE RIVER BUffERS ZONE I
T~.'~~~. NB 12 NEUSE RIVER BUFFERS ZONE 2
N
0 50 100 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
......................
HORVATH
ASSOCIATE S
16 CONSULTANT PUCE, SUITE 201
- ~ CNIRHAM. NORTN CAROLWA 27707
t 919.190.1990 F 919.190.8953
537 MARKET STREET. SURE LL20
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 31102
~ 120.266.1990 f 123.266.5700
www, orva assoc a es.com
NEUSE BUFFER CHANNEL 1URIS.
IMPACT TYPE IMPACTS IMPACT WETLANDS
NO. SF ONLY

7
NB 7,862 SF 131 LF
Z 1 (0.180ac) 675 SF(O.OI Sac)

N6 5,918 SF
---
Z2 (0.135ac)

8
NB 7,449 SF
7 131 LF
Z1 (0.1
1ac) 583SF(0.013ac1

NB 4,737 SF
108
0
---~
Z2 .
ac)
(
DRA W N BY:
IMPACT AREAS #7 & 8 SITE PLAN CNECI:ED6 ~U

FUT
RO .
W ROW
ROW

i i j i~
'~ i ~ I I t

' I ~
t j ' ~ i I
I '
j

E I
-_.___.f._._.~..t~.-~ ~ ~
r

HEADWALL ~ 1 +

I I '

; _~ ~

1 ~ ~ ~
i
~
~-

~

~
I
I I` I i
I I ~

1

~

~ ~
'
I I I
, ~ ~

~
~~

1

,

{
d i I I
~ I I' I
t
2t~ BI~R P
Ok 1 F~ T

IPE (I
DEL

V.
W I

i
1 ,
~
,
I ~ j ~
}

-4 0 -20 0 20 4 0
a~~J
o so ioa 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
......................
HORVATH
ASSOCIATE S
- 16 CONSULTANT PLACE SURE 201
-- DURHAM. NORTH CAROLMIA 27707
~~ ~ 919A90.{990 F 919.190A953
............................................ ..........
DRAWN BY:
CULVERT PROFILE FOR ROADWAYS CHECKeoaM'u-----
537 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1120
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 77102
a23 266A990 F 123.266.57IX7
WWW ONOTIS4SSOC101 GS.CORI

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
August 26, 2005
Mr. Aaron Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
NOV
By: Soil & Environmental Consullanls,
BASIN:
Neuse River X
(15A NCAC 2B .0233)
Incident #
Project Name
Glenn School Road South -Durham
L5 lul
AUG 3 0 2005
CO OS-222
Durham
Buffer Determination X
Call
Location/Directions: Site is located in northeast Durham, on the west side of the intersection of Glenn School Road
and Junction Road.
Subject Stream:
UT to Ellerbe Creek
Date of Determination: 8/11/05
Feature Start Buffer
GPS Points (if provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Survey Located on
USGS
Topogra hic
A Subject Throughout X X
B Subject Throughout X
C Subject Throughout X
D Plot Subject X
Tl:is on-site determination shall expire five (S) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and tltat
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director s/call be referred to the Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly ,DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified tl:at the 60-day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream a~:d adjacent landowners) is notified of
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Tar-Pamlico
(15A NCAC 2B .0259)
,~
EI iii
phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

8/26/2005
Page 2 of 2
this decision. DWQ recommends tl:at the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, wltich conforms to
Chapter I SOB of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
will:in 60 days.
T/ie (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, a~:d
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding tlee subject property (stated
above). Tleis project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441. ~
CC: File Copy
Central Files
DWQ 401/Wetlands Office
Joe Pearce -Durham County
~~~~[
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center N~LIEPY
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

a ~ ~,,
~
V
~ ,
~4:., i r ex `` ~^~.

~ ~,
sa`
~ ~~` `.~~ ~k.
- o
~i±

N ;~
ti"

~ Y .j i
~S

[.... a
~'~' n! M l~+.
4 '
..
~
~
~.c~
+F~ ~ ~
No~ Figure 1 - USGS Map
9405 W
Glenn School Road
TP ject Mgr.: Durham County, NC
Scale:
1" = 2,000'
02124/05 Northeast Durham Quadrangle

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandE .com
~ l~ OS
~~

- - --WsE ~- "f - - I t -~ , 'Wse - "
I `\ °~. r
t s6:~ Rq . W C Gu~-. ` ~' - ;; r ~ .WsC
,B ~ ~ ~ ,
Fi: \, ~Gu~ k .~y~ ~,
- s r~- ~- -, CC ~ .o
~, 4,~IJsC r ~ Wh ,- 'WsC Cr6.*" ~ ~ ~ ~`
~, •4i ~ ~ 4t i ~}NsC t ~ " s~` 1 ~ ,,~ s ! "~ . ,~ ~kVs~ - r { . '
-4'4 ~~.. , 1 ~ ~i rye
\,~ +ts N/sE CrC ,tiIYsC } ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ *,~z~' ~
Y S'AIA r ~*r ! s sC f '
~~~ ~ ~ f ~, ,_ ~ ~fC + red'. ~~ - r j .
~ y 'vScS. ~~ i~ _. `'~' .~S` h 4 ~~5~~.:. 'r / ~SC ~ S ~ ~ f % { ~ ~* ~1 ~_
~i.F:? Y ,J/(j I ~i .F f?~ ~ -::, h .'ki W56 ~ Ry ~~.~ ~ ~' V~5G :VY56 4 I x ~ ~• : ~ DUTHER rj.
~.,.. ~!!..:; l ,~+ ~ k..i •..f-, ~ `~Ir6 ~ ~ 7 ,~11 ii':' 4 1"'..`..r' W56
~~ `~. ; :WsC Ws8 ~ ~''~ ~ ~~
/I ~ ~
a" ~ ~ l
+ 1 -
a: - b~ ~~ ''* Cr6 U~ ..- ~ ~ 1NsC- ~ r,~r Cr6 -` .s. ` .. ..- W~ ~ ; °E
4 u
/ ~ ` ' Y
4 ~~- i 'r W P ~ C I~'
/ Y " # 'T" ~ r z ~ lSr` C1 ri ~~ yF ! T ,~~SB i .
f qtr s,A. .tr HI~B, Y x. W #s ~: * r ~vC2.1; ~ ~{r rx
i ,_f i
;,I h xi t t r
}~^ F ~~.. a '.1st <. t ~' *' ~" i _ ~ - ~A
~ --'-rte .. ;rr 7r r.. 7 1 3: j vT"' ,.,- ;Y'r5C ~ ~.*.:- C~+ ~IS_Z fF .,~~ Y r- ~.~ WS~;~~ r
Ur Ws6 )f i ~ r 1 ~ { ~t '~r ~` ~w ~~ ,.r ~•r l`'~.: `s..d °'~I
•~ ~-7 " ~' 4.. b- ,.,~. ,y a•~r' , _:~ r •-~ ~, :thy :`.
~ ~- ~~ r ~.- ! 5~ k~ cA~~' ~~. .~'
Ur W56 ~ r U. _ ti'`rC~: ~ ^F' a~'' 4 ,~~ r' w , ~:a
~ Ur ~~~ ~ -.` ~. WsC ~'" `'s ~`'
i r CrB~~ / ~ / Ws8 b t' a r ..
~ f
y +1• f [4 ~ f '~k ws6 t E ?~:r
{~t ~~ ~~ ]F S! ie. t Y`/SC ~S .i,t+F 3~ ~. lE' -~„ ,.f S f,lF~ f ~"~•
+~; 4~ .1• ~~9-`. ,~`rv 2 `3-E f + d ~ hoc ~ ~ `r 1i r
~~,i ~s .'' Ff.Si.W~E r `~t ;lffr. ,.. ~'. ;.; T ~'~r `#~t~ ~ ~ ~~ ~{~~° ~Y
(1y ~ ' '
~ ~ . ~ i .4 ,,;} ~ WSC x s- ~1 ry~ Cr6 y>y '. L~ r
,e ~` h W W i ~ -
>~~ ' ' f"~ ws6 Ct '
~ ~~ t ~'K- ~ ~~ to i ~ -..
~ ~:'~ ~ ,~ +. ~ Cr6 '~ a t
,. fi~r,t. i- ` _ <i. e f .
-F~ `~ ~~ - r t r
3`.` .S ! ! t R .~i.
9405 W No. Figure 2 -Soil Survey Map -
Glenn School Road ~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project Mgr.: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
TP Durham County, NC (919} 846-5900 • (919} 846-9467
Web Page: www.SandEC.co
Scale:
1" = 1,320' ~~~ ~~
02/25/05 Durham County Soil Survey

r 1 l r-
_ae )~
~~
a ~ °-
~ms~rf~ )
l o Z m m m m ~ f
D ~ (pii N N Z
(~ om ° m ~. ~ ~ l
' - < n
i ~~ N 3 N ~~
~ y~ 0 i 8 m
~ = m » m ~
B~
2 > H -=1 ^ -ZI y,
,~ ~ mp .. ~ N ~ ~ +L
~ 3 ~
D u u
v. _
I t1 ~ c ~ c
r o `m ~ m g ~
~_ n n g
A ~ ~ d -~ 3
~ ° ° C) ~ ~ a
n m g m 3
~ ' _ Z ~ 0
C C ° C C 'tl
T N C N
( > m y m > ~
m A m A l7 VJ
n
j o z~ a tr n 3
S:
;~ o ~ ~ ~'~
~ o ~ 3 0-
ti prime(
~ u ,
~ .. \~ _
C 2 r
..
a ~
9 -~~~ s a T.;;
E 4' 0
~ soazs ~V ~ o
a_Z ~~ p
o~~~$ ~ ?n
e~~~ a K'o
~ ~
.~~~~ a *o
V e E ' ¢ ~ >
II I\ L ILL ~ ,~
\ ~~\ ` 1 ~f, \ =~
'~,~ ~~, -
II
V \\~
°'="
G~

,~
~~

~~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
+ 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 8465900 • [phone]
Web Page. www.SandEC.com
March 12, 2004
xK
o,
Wetland Sketch Map
___ .. _...I _.._. __.
Project Manager: i Project Number:
Tod Preuninger 9405.W1
Scaie: Glenn Schooi Road
1 ° = 200•
- Durham Co., NC
Prepared by:
James Dasher I

June 21, 2006
To Whom It May Concern:
We are in the process of obtaining a retorting for property at the southeast corner of Glenn
cl~ e"~n°ers School Road and I-85. There is a small triangular parcel which we do not own which is
gOf"°rs located at the middle of our northern bounds with I-85.
t_andscope ~rctytects rY
The Durham Planning Department has requested that we provide a pudic Right-of-Way to a
317 sf parcel adjacent to I-85. Durham has a requirement which states that all parcels must
front on a pudic ROW. The ROW of way will have to cross over two streams to access the
pare! in question. Due to the size ~ the parcel it is unusade for any development as a stand
alone parcel and the ROW of wdl serve no benefit This parcel was seated during the
acquisition of the land for the 1-85 corridor. It appears that the property owner was
compensated for the land at the time twt the parcel remained under the ownership of the
original owner.
Thank you for your assistance. !f you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, /
L
~~~~
Michael J. uk, RtA
Horvath 'ates
North Carolina
I ~ Consuttanf Place. Suite 201
Durham. NC 27707
p 919-490-4940 f 914-490-8953
Tennessee
537 Morket Sheet, Suite 1120
Chattanooga. TN 37402
p 423-266-4990 t 423-266-5700

~i1
HORVATH
Civil Engineers
Planners
t.andscape Architects GLENN VIEW STATI O N
PREIIMlNARY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
. Glenn View Station
Geer Street and Junction Road
Durham, North Carolina
Horvath Associates Project Number: 0516
May 23, 2006
~t mat
Prepared for: Cimland, LLC
2330 Qperations Drive
Durham, North Carolina 27705
Phone: [phone]
Prepared by: Horvath Associates, P.A.
Engineers -Planners -Landscape Architects
P.O. Box 51806
Durham, North Carolina 27717
[phone]

f b Consultant Place. Suite 201
Dvrhpm, NC 277Q7
p 9i9.490.499Q / 1919,490.8953
537 Market Street Suite 1L20
Chottanooga. TN 37402
p 423.266.4990 / f 423.266.5700

GLENN VIEW STATION
PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Genercl Descrinrtion
Glenn View Station is a proposed shopping center to be located south of
Interstate 85, north of Geer Street and west of Junction Road. The 55.51
acre property is currently zoned NC RD and the proposed zoning is SC (Dj.
The project is to consist of the shopping center buildings, parking and
utilities. The project is located in the F/J-B Watershed Protection District
and the Neuse River Basin. The high-density option will be utilized,
allowing the impervious percentage to exceed 24% and limiting the
impervious percentage to 70~. All impervious surfaces associated with
the project will be treated for 85% TSS removal. The owner of the property
is currently in the process of applying for permits to impact stream buffers
and wetlands. This narrative and accompanying calculations are to serve
as the preliminary stormwater management plan for the project.
Water Quality
All impervious surfaces will be treated for 85~ TSS removal. This will be
accomplished with a central extended detention wetland. Areas of the
property that don't drain to the central extended detention wetland will
be treated with other extended detention wetlands or by stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMP's) as described by the latest approved
version of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Best Management
Practices- Manual. The current site plan has the entire site draining to one
central wetland. This is the most efficient manner to treat the entire
project.
The extended detention wetland has been preliminarily graded and
.designed such that it will appropriately treat the impervious area that is
an#icipated to drain into the wetland. Preliminary surface area
calculations are included with this report that show the actual surface
area provided is greater than the surface area required. The impervious
area reported in the calculation is based upon measurement of the
ac#ual footprint of the impervious area based upon the latest proposed
site plan footprint. With City/County of Durham setback, buffer and
landscaping requa~ements, it would be difficult to exceed the amount of
impervious surfaces reported in the calculation.

1 2- and 10-Yecr Peck Flow Detention
Per Durham County Ordinance, the peak flow resulting from the 1-, 2-and
10-year storm events will be detained below that of the pre-development
peak flow. The proposed stormwater Extended Detention Wetland will be
utilized to provide this detention.
Conclusion
85~ TSS removal and peak flow detention will be provided to treat all
impervious surfaces associated with the site using an Extended Detention
Wetland.

Ext Det Wetland SA Calc.xls
Wetland #1
Stormwater Wetland Surface Area Reaulr+eme~ts
Project Name: Glenn View Station
Job Number: 0516
Date: 5/23/2006
Pond Drafnane Area Descrfatfon =_>
Total DA = 38.82 acres
ImperviousArea = 33.00 atxes
DA % impervious = 85.0%
SA ! DA ratfo calautadons ~>
Average depth of pond = 3.00 feet
SA / OA ratios for drainage areas and depth (NCDENR, 1998):
3.00 3.00 4.00
Lower Limit ~> 80.0% 3.36% 2.78%
Ca/CYi value ~> 85.0°/6 3.55% 3.55% 2.94%
Upper Umft =-~ 90.tJ% 3.74°l0 3.10°/a
Therefore, SA / DA required for this configuration = 3.55%
Pond Surface Area Reaufr fa~~>
John E Schrum, P.E.
5/23/2006
Pond SA Required = 60035 SF
Pond 5A Provided = 65765 SF