20130423 Ver 1_Application_20130417

STA 1'I? OF NOR'I'II CAROLINA
DEPART ME'NI' OI' TRANRPOIO A I ION
PAT McCRORY P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611-5202
GOVERNOR PHONE- 919- 733 -2520
April 17, 2013
Mr. Monte Matthews
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
?0/
109
TONY TATA
SrCRETARY
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 27; 0 1 3 0 4 2 3
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject: Nationwide Permit 414
SR 1362 (Waterwheel Road)
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Project Number: 1 IC.099077 (DWQ Permit Fee: $240)
Dear Mr. Matthews:
The NC Department of Transportation is scheduled to grade, drain, base and pave SR 1362,
Waterwheel Road in Yadkin County. Total project length is approximately 0.75 miles.
Impervious surface area will increase by about 036 acres This project will require the
replacement of one wet pipe carrying an intermittent spring. The bridge at station 14 +00 will
remain. Impacts are shown below:
Stream impacts:
12 +58 18 "x 35' 18 "x 50' 10 40 65
--T -
Permanent Fill /Riprap Impacts = 25 feet fatal project Impacts ° 65 feet
The replacement of the above noted wet pipe will require temporary dewatering. An impervious
sandbag dike will be constructed upstream of the existing culvert to create a small pool. It is
possible that the dike alone will hold the spring back. If not, clean water will temporarily be
pumped around the construction area and will be discharged downstream. Any dirty water
located inside of the constriction area will be pumped into a silt bag if necessary. Once the new
P. O. Boaz 250, N WILKESBOR0, NC 28659
PHONE [phone] FAN (336) 667 -4549

Mr Monte Matthews
SR 1362, Waterwheel Road, Yadkin
Page 2
April 17, 2013
pipe is in place, the impervious dike will be removed and preconstruction streambed elevations
will be restored.
The wet pipe at station 12 +58 carries a low flow UT to Williams Creek (Class: C). This project
was reviewed for the presence of threatened and endangered species on March 27, 2013. This
project will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plant or animal species. Historic
compliance work will be scheduled and concurrence with the State Historic Preservation Office
will be obtained if required.
The project impacts are not significant in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water
quality uses. Stormwater will be routed through grass or rock lined ditches, depending on the
ditch line slope. Pipe sizes used will be the minimum necessary to create a safe roadway. By
utilizing the erosion control measures outlined in the attachments to this application, downstream
water quality standards will be protected. Overall water quality in the area will be improved by
paving the ABC travel lanes. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets with proposed erosion control
measures, a marked county map, a marked topography map and photographs
By copy of this electronic letter, it is requested that Mrs. Marla Chambers with the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit
application with a copy sent to me.
By copy of this electronic letter, it is requested that the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands
Unit, issue the appropriate permit for construction of this project. It is requested that any
comments related to the 401 certification be forwarded directly to me with a copy sent to the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
We would like to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please
let me know. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
It � �
Heath Slaughter
Division Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Amy Chapman, Division of Water Quality

Mr. Monte Mattliews
SR 1362, Watemlicel Road, Yadkin
[gage 3
April 17, 2013
Amy Euliss, Division of Water Quality
Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer
Brandon Whitaker, PE, District Engineer
John Hughes, County Maintenance Engineer
Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer
Chase Threlkeld, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Technician

o�0F WALk9QG
O Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
[:] Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
SR 1362, Waterwheel Road
2b. County:
Yadkin
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Jonesville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
11C.099077
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NCDOT
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
801 Statesville Road
3e. City, state, zip:
North Wilkesboro, NC 28659
3f. Telephone no.:
336- 903 -9202
3g. Fax no.:
336-667 -4549
3h. Email address:
hslaughter @ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.24101 Longitude: - 80.75816
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
4.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
UT to Williams Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Unpaved road in a rural area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Upgrade roadway.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached cover letter.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
El Yes No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
2f.
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
known)
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non -404, other)
Area of impact
(acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if
Temporary T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W1 E] P El
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
El Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
El Corps
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f• 39•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
length
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWO — non -404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Piping, Riprap &
Dewatering
UT #1 to Williams
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2
65
El PER PER
❑
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
El PER
El Corps
SS E3 P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
[I Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and
triibutary impacts
65
3i. Comments: 15 pipe 10 riprap 40 dewater
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d,
4e.
Open water
impact number —
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
of pond
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
im act
re wired?
❑Yes
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The pipe lengths are the minimum needed to improve roadway.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. if yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Secondary Road Project
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
M Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008,Version

& Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
GIS and visual observation
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
WRC will comment
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Project submitted to HEU
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? ncfloodmaps
J. Heath Slaughter
4/17113
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's gnature
(Agent's nature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

0
r
CC
a
7
N
J/
r
J
1 �y
m� b�l h v ♦ tt k
p. O
al
`Z mIto
tn
N N mho 7
8
04
d �+
2- j ✓^ O 4 9 ry 9 � SAp g
v t m HI N
N WI OL Q W to H �I d, OI
Q
LY.W 1 6 a �i ^I
0't
r •5 N��J� a�
1 % n �, fi a• e m
ful19
a 7 � ,mot
m• A 9 t; rd i 95r ml
Ml
co
rtDl m 'I' O� t T y 4
I W r � ml � �I 1• pl .
I Ip q ,OODI fJ1 \ hI1 � O<�+
m ^ W 1 a n �� •�- ? ' VI
O
tt r
1 0I �) \ qI ` O g 3$ �I q I tW9 Nt q
go co
i a I cq �I� ' S
•t Q �I n
.•.r ° ,� k �f � W r .�
a
2 m
It
m WI
gar
N0113 01 A i
NDn3 01
J �
V
`\ R
t
1�� � ♦� 9 ^� InI

PROJECT: 11C.099014
ROAD: SR 1362 "WATERWHEEL RD."
COUNTY: YADKIN
TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY
PLAN SCALE: NO SCALE
SHEET 1 OF 2
DATE: APRIL 3, 2013
STREAM NAME: UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO
WILLIAMS CREEK (3' average stream width)
Characteristics of Williams Creek
Classification: C
CENTERLINE
PROPOSED R/W
, ROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT --
EXISTING EDGE OF ROADWAY — — — — — — —
NEW PIPE
EXISTING PIPE F _
STOCKPILE AREA IN ROADWAY
WITH SILT FENCE LOCATED ON
LOWER SIDE
DEWATERING WILL BE
PERFORMED ACCORDING TO
BMP FOR PUMPING OPERATIONS
WILL AMS JREEK
'Classification i
Std. # Description Symbol
1605.01 Temporary Silt Fence ... ............ .
1606.01 Special Sediment Control Fence ..........
1622.01 Temporary Berms and Slope Drains ................... `—' `—
1630.02 Silt Basin Type B .......................
1630.03 Temporary Silt Ditch ................. Tsu
1630.05 Temporary Diversion ............................ -- TD --
1630.06 Special Stilling Basin
1632.03 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type C ...........
1633.01 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type -A ................
1634.02 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type- B ......................
1635.01 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type -A ............ f �
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type -A with °
Matting and Polyacrylamide (PAM) .... • . • • • • • • .
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type -B .. . .......................0
Wattle..................... ....... ..............................�
Infiltration Basin ............................
Wattle with Polyacrylamide (PAM). _ _ .. .........
Existing Pipe: 18" x 35' H�APR Of
Is on a 64° Skew at 2.4 %. ING
P1510 12++82.52
Q ■ 9T 42' 58J" ILTI
L ■ 119,58'
T • Sour
R ■ IQr00'
Proposed New Pipe:
18" x 50'@ Sta. 12 +58.7
Is on a 590 Skew at 1.8 %.
(Each end to be buried 4 ")
Place Matting for Erosion Control
on Slopes Adjacent to Permitted CONDUCTED BY: SB, CE
Wetlands as Work Allows. DRAWN BY: C. BAUGUE'
INSTALL PIPE(S) IN JURISDICTIONAL AREAS ACCORDING TO
NC DOT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (4.2) FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES MANUAL.

PROJECT: 11C.099014
ROAD: SR 1362 "WATERWHEEL RD."
COUNTY: YADKIN
TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY
PLAN SCALE: NO SCALE
SHEET 2 OF 2
DATE: APRIL 3, 2013
STREAM NAME: UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO
WILLIAMS CREEK (3' average stream width)
Characteristics of Williams Creek
Classification: C
wri,
5 10 15 20 J5 30 35 40 45 50
C/L of New Alignment
Proposed New Pipe:
18" x 50'@ Sta. 12 +58.7
Is on a 59° Skew at 1.8 %.
(Each end to be buried 4 ")
SURVEY DATE: 4/2/2013
CONDUCTED BY: SB, CB
"emporary erosion control devices are not shown, but will be installed as needed DRAWN B1': C. BAUGUESS