NC0028916_Pretreatment Compliance_20100317

A7C.1:6
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins - Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 17, 2010
Grey Walls
Town of Troy
444 North Main Street
Troy, North Carolina 27371
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
Town of Troy WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0028916
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Walls:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection Report for the inspection that was conducted on March 10,
2010 with Linda Walls (Pretreatment Coordinator for the Town of
Troy). The report indicates that Troy WWTP continues to -meet the
pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0904 (b) for
Modified Pretreatment Programs. You are commended for your
continued success in maintaining your program. If you have any
questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
(Dale . o ep z.
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: PERCS - Pretreatment Unit
R Files'
225 Green St., Suite 714,-Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer
One.
NorthCaroli_na
Naturally

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Troy
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Linda Walls
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 07/08/2009 Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
NI
Main Program Permit Number
1 N 1 CIO 10 1 21 81911161
MM/DD/YY
1031101101
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
l P 1 1 S 1 1 1 1
(TYPI) (INSP) (FACC
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
0
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
if Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders?
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22.
23.
24.
26.
❑ Y ES E NO
❑ YES C NO
Limits: .
Reporting:
ilished:
0
0
0
0
❑YES 1 NO
Is STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate?
All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? El YES ❑ NO
IfNO to23 -26, list violations
YES ❑ NO
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES El NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files. verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files, complete with supporting documents and cope of PERCS Approval Letter. and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date in file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
12/30/2008
EI Yes E No
02/18/2009
Yes ❑ No
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
12/15/2009
/1 Yes ] No
12/23/2009
/1 Yes ❑ No
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/07/2009
/1 Yes n No
12/15/2009
►1 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
12/07/2009
® Yes E. No
12/21/2009
i1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
12/07/2009
/S Yes ❑ No
12/21/2009
/1 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Capel, Inc.
2.
3.
30. IUP Number
0002
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
y Yes ❑ No
eff. 03/18/09
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
01/01/2014
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
N/A
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
iI Yes ❑ No
01/02/2009
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
0 Yes ❑ No
07/08/2009
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. •Yes ►5No
b. ■Yes No
a. •Yes •No
b. ■Yes •No
a. "'Yes No
b. ■Yes ■No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. _iYes ■No
03/30/2009
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ■Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. •Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
/i4 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
r _I Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi
Sampling as Required by IUP
-Annual Period, Did the S1U Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A,
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
including flow?POTW collects all samples
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit
all reports
®Ycs❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N,/'A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
on time? All reports go to the POTW
42a. For categorical Ws with Combined. Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by lUP?
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits. does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
' Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
None this year
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
ElYcs❑No❑N/A
❑Ycs❑No❑N/A
❑Ycs❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations? All sampling was performed by the POTW, and
the POTW receives the laboratory results
Days?
aware
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30
c. II applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming
of SiU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes /Z1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs. Penalties. timing_ etc.)?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoION/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.nYesflNo N/A
a.rlYes❑Nor_lN/A
a.nYesDNo❑N/A
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
l 1pdaled 7/25/07 Page 2

b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The PT Coordinator said that Capel did not need a Slug Control Plan because there was nothing to spill at the SIU.
2. The following were the industries that had local permits:
• North Carolina Southern Correctional
• North Carolina Correctional
• Montgomery School
• Uwharrie Landfill
• International Automotive Components (IAC), formerly Collins and Aikman.
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7125/07 Page 3

•
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: `NO INDUSTRIAL INSPECTION PERFORMED
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: The files appeared to be in good order.
Requirements: None
Recommendations: None
NOD: ❑ YES ►1 NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory �, Marginal
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lo
UnSatisfactory
March 17, 2010
PCI REVIEWED BY: Belinda Henson -61/b 2Ith1ATE: March 18, 2010
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 4

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I NI 2 151 31 NC0028916 111 121 10/03/10 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
18I PI 19I sl 201 1
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 166
Remarks
211 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA — Reserved-
67I 2.0 169 70I 3 I 711 I 721 NI 731 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Troy WWTP
650 Glen Rd
Troy NC 27371
Entry Time/Date
11:00 AM 10/03/10
Permit Effective Date
10/01/01
Exit Time/Date
01:00 PM 10/03/10
Permit Expiration Date
14/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Joseph Edward Shields/ORC/910-572-3661/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
E. Gray Walls,444 N Main St Troy NC 27371//910-572-7841/9105723663 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and S ire(_ s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
FRO NQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/ 3 / `7 g �J/
Dale Lopez I�J 1)
.
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES
NC0028916
11 121
yr/mo/day
10/03/10
17
Inspection Type
18I P
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection that was
conducted on March 10, 2010 with Linda Walls (Pretreatment Coordinator for the Town of Troy). The
report indicates that Troy WWTP continues to meet the pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC
2H .0904 (b) for Modified Pretreatment Programs. You are commended for your continued success in
maintaining your program. FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The PT Coordinator said that Capel did not need a Slug Control Plan because there was nothing to
spill at the SIU.
2. The following were the industries that had local permits:
• North Carolina Southern Correctional
North Carolina Correctional
• Montgomery School
• Uwharrie Landfill
• International Automotive Components (IAC), formerly Collins and Aikman.
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: The files appeared to be in good order.
Page # 2