20210415 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210527

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 4, 2021 Ver 4
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes ( No
Change cnly 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20210415 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Daniel Farm Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
What amout is owed?*
F $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\sagoss
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
5/27/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Beaverdam Branch
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.51930 -78.56867
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes G No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes G No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes f• No

ID#
20210415
Version
1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
2/22/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upped button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Fie type nest be FCF
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
(7 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
I— Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
( No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
I7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I- Regional General Permit (RGP)
I— Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes ('No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
I— Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
( Yes r No
55.98KB
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
S'Yes rNo
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Daniels Farm SOA 051821.pdf 150.35KB
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes 0- No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
GYesa No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
I7 Owner I— Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
s Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC
✓ Yes S No
✓ Yes S No
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Bk 05073 Pg 0079

2c. Contact Person:
Lanny Clifton
2d.Address
Street Address
1075 Country Club Rd
Address Line 2
(Sty State / Province / Region
Smithfield NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27577 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Rd
Address Line 2
❑ty
Selma
Postal / Zip Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization.pdf
State/ Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
278.59KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(rf apprcpriate)
Daniel Farm
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Benson, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
162400-84-4154
2c. Project Address
Street Address
12700ANCHwy 210
Address Line 2
2b. Property size:
+/- 72 Acres
Oty State/ Province/ legion
Benson NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27504 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Beaverdam Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*

C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010903
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Daniel Farm subdivision is located on Hwy 210 in Johnston County, NC (see Figure 1 Location Map). The northern portion of the project (Daniel Farm North) has been cleared and
is currently under construction.
Prior to clearing and grading, the property was agricultural use. Adjacent properties are comprised primarily of single-family residential subdivisions and/or agricultural use. Aerial
photos of the site (2016 and 2018) are included with this submittal.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
C Yes C No C Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
03 USGS DFN.pdf 171.08KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
04 NRCS DFN.pdf 790.17KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
13.558
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4,827
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To construct a single-family residential subdivision with required infrastructure, utilities, and amenities, to meet high demand in the western Johnston County area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The Daniel Farm subdivision is multi -phase single family residential subdivision, located on NC Hwy 210 in Johnston County, NC. The subdivision is being constructed in 3 phases. For
permitting purposes, the Daniel Farm Subdivision will consist of Daniel Farm North, Daniel Farm South, and the Buffkin Tract. This submittal is requesting after -the -fact authorization for
impacts associated with construction of the Daniel Farm North phase of the project.
Daniel Farm North consist of approximately 72 acres, prior to development of the property. The project area is located entirely on the north side of Hwy 210.
The parcel was originally delineated in 2015. Potentially jurisdictional features included 2 wetlands, 2 streams, and 2 farm ponds on the project site. JD Info is included with this
submittal.
Subdivision plans including lot layouts, utilities, stormwater, and erosion & sediment control were prepared and approved by Johnston County Public Utilities in 2017. Roadway and utility
construction began in 2018 and have been completed. Lots were recorded beginning in 2019. Early phases of the subdivision have been completed, houses have been constructed
and are presently occupied.
During construction of Daniel Farm North, the following impacts occurred:
Permanent wetland impacts occurred during construction of Street B (as shown on attached E&SC plans), which extends along the western boundary throughout the subdivision.
Construction of this roadway will permanently impact and remove 0.10 acres of wetlands, situated near the headwaters of an intermittent stream (Wetland I and Stream 2 on the JD
delineation map). This impact will allow the roadway to continue into developable uplands and provide access to at least 16 additional lots.
Temporary stream and wetland impacts occurred Stream 2 and Wetland I during the construction of a sewer collection line. This construction also required permanent conversion of
forested wetland to herbaceous wetland within a permanently maintained utility corridor (Stream 2). The temporary impacts have been completed and restored.
Two farm ponds on the site were determined to be isolated and have been converted to stormwater management ponds. Verification of the isolated determination is included in the JD
Packet.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
04 Daniel Farm Site Plan w Impacts.pdf 836.99KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
6 Yes C No
Comments:
Site was first delineated in 2015
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary C Approved C Not Verified C Unknown C N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2015-01037
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
C Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR

2015 - Site visit w/D.Shaeffer; concurrence with wetlands as shown
2017 - Site visit w/S.Daley; concurrence of isolated farm ponds
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Daniel Farm Approved & Preliminary JD Packet for PCN 052621.pdf 10.12MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes C. No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Daniel Farm Subdivision will be permitted in three phases: Daniel Farm North, Daniel Farm South, and the Buffkin Tract.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
NWP 29 will be used for all three phases of the subdivision.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
I7 Wetlands fJ Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition * (?)
2g. Impact
area *
1
Road Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.099
(acres)
2
Sewer Corridor
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.053
(acres)
3
Sewer Corridor
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.064
(acres)
4
Sewer Corridor
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
5
Sewer Corridor
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.039
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.157
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.256
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.099
2i. Comments:
Sewer corridor impacts are temporary and wetlands have been restored; however forested wetlands have been converted to herbaceous wetlands as
part of the permanently maintained corridor.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
(7)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Sewer Construction
Temporary
Other
Stream 2
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
S2
Sewer Construction
Temporary
Other
Stream 3
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
50
3j. Comments:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
50
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site design, streams and wetlands were delineated in order to minimize impacts.
Permanent wetland impacts (Impact #1) is required for the construction of a roadway which provides access to 16 developable upland lots. This impact
occurs at the top of the wetland, avoiding severing of the wetland.
The sewer corridor is located to provide access for the subdivision while avoiding the bottomland hardwood forest wetland (Wetland I) along Stream 1
and the associated riparian buffer.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction work was conducted under an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan approved by Johnston County Public Utilities. (Attached in
Miscellaneous)
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
( Yes rNo
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
fJ DWR 17 Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
17 Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Water & Land Solutions
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Riparian wetland 0.36
Attach Receipt and/or letter
Daniels Farm SOA 051821.pdf 150.35KB
3c. Comments
Mitigation is proposed at 2:1 ratio for road fill impacts ).10 acre) and 1:1 ratio for corridor conversion impacts (0.16 acre).
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
✓ Yes (No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
( Yes rNo
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
17 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes ( No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes ( No

2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes
✓ NA- project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
17 Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
I7 Phase II fJ NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Johnston County Public Utilities
Comments:
Johnston County Stormwater approval attached in Miscellaneous.
r No
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
✓ Yes rNo
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
C' Yes r No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Impacts were shown on Erosion & Sediment Control plans approved by Johnston County Public Utilities. Construction was done under approved E&SC
plans, which applicant misunderstood provide authorization.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
C Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Additional impacts will likely be required as part of construction of Daniel Farm South and Buffkin Tract; however, the site plans will provide avoidance
and minimization as much as possible.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes rNo
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes ( No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes r No
r No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS IPAC Report

Consultation Documentation Upload
T&E Packet.pdf 6.24MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
C- Yes f No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
There are no essential fish habitats in Johnston County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C Yes GNo
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO. Note: a house was situated on the property which appears on the NC SHPO map, however this residence was deemed ineligible in 2015
due to heavy alterations.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
NCSHPO packet.pdf 4.93MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
C- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Johnston County GIS Services and Floodmaps.com
Miscellaneous "�
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Daniel Farm Phases Map.pdf
Daniel Farm North _ SEC Approvals.pdf
451 19KB
1MB
Signature
*
I7 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
Date
5/27/2021

0
Figure
3
USGS Topographic Map
Edmondson Quadrangle
Source: TNM/USGS Mapping Services
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
.4)
aror:Y s
05/24/21
By: MRR

Figure
4
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Soil Survey of Johnston County
Map Sheet 5
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
05/24/21
By: MRR

/
NC HWY 210
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #1 (ROADWAY
CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0994 AC.
11 1
I
I
II
11
D WAGE 27i'7IFj , 4/
r-\-1 1 17/0 , ' I
m ZI1^1 4,111,0,,
\ II/i/i/II I I I
W WII /\N\\II\I1Z I//,//////////II\I' /
\ \ 2O PERMANENT{ PUBLICI
Ni--"DRAINAGE EASEMENT
T PA:, T P
` u1r�sE`, - T
llI
1 N
III \
ll,
22O PERMANENT- PUBLI I
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
It
ill
11
I
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
www.ncocc.org
1-800-632-4949
SOME WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND CABLE
SERVICES COULD EXIST ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE THAT
MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE PROPER UTILITY IN ADVANCE TO
LOCATE THESE SERVICES.
SURVEY INFORMATION:
All survey information/data shown, and/or represented in these
construction drawings has been provided by a Professional Land
Surveyor and is not the work of Dalton Engineering and Associates, PA.
- 240 -
OND 2
NOT
DICTIO
T� ///, --I
I'I 2 I\ /5//
I\ .4—o /
11 \ „/ /'
1 1 /
F-----ac�a_n
X
I \ \ `
" rs�
1 S\\ \
I
-
- r ,
I \ \I
- '
1 \\ \
-6�k
1 - \ \ .
' 45
-r
1
-_ SOT PERM
L -UBLI----‘�H
DRAIN -
EASEMENT L
1.r 1
I --' �
46 / �9,
1 63 \
1
/ I°'z
D
'\v \ \
W , ,
/ '' I
(W\ \ \ I
W
1,
/ 48 /'
/
/ / / 7 2o` PERMANENT
o
N
\ ,
\
F 6 \ , \,
\ 1
PUBLIC - -c- }
_V
\2>
/ / DRAINAGE
EASEMENT _ \
;, ---
/
/
/' 60 \ '
/ I�
I / /
i
/
/
I- - -
50 /
/'
/ 59 \ \ "\\ \I
, /
' / /
/
�o ,-
/2, /,'
j//' S8` I 1
20-` PERMANENT
PUBLIC
L~'
_ �- - DRAINAGE
EASEMENT 1 -L, 1
1,77-77
" I
_ "-- I
I
I I '
I 1 / ///
1 / /
, ,{
' / II
1
53 I
// / �� // / /, 1
/
o --
I/' // / / /' //i
/ / /
- , / I
-r
S4//
, I /
/ / ,/ ;/1
/I
/'' ,/ 1
/'',' S/ ,/ // /'1
, n - - 20 PERMANENT
9T18a,r / , , '
Tr --a
/ 1
/
/ /
/ / /
/ / /
"20 PERMANENT PUBLIC -
WETLAND 1
\+1/_\ w \
\ I
\V I\
a
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #2 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0528 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1
(STREAM 2) — 31 L.F.
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
(NOTE: MEASURED
FROM TOP OF BANK)
STREAM 1
I I I I x ?30
"""'',,--__\\\ \ \ \` '
_ \\\\\\\1
___ "C\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\ `\ \y ��
\\ \\'
-L3.--Z_ �.S' \\\I\`1\I \\\\4 �s,
-\- \ - �,, I 11111 1
\ -L_/ > I I I I I 1 I
\/ \1
, , \' � 1 1 1 1.1 // / iiii ,v1::,/ ;---:_:///:, <-:;,-,/--4,/t:6,(1/.:‘,//..
/
1 1 / /
/ I / \V /
.T. yiP
wl� /
/ / / / / 1 y.' /
/ / ' I/"I
1
/ ' j /' -1- . 1 \\
`'.20�,- PERMAA/NENr Pu9Uc 1 \ \
DRAIdAG EASEMENT-1--\ I \ .
IN s
2drPERMAl NF-PUBLIC -- ▪ \
/ 1U I I / --�--- T___{
/ 1.11 I / 1 1
le ill Z'
II / I° �1 / I? 1--1 /
/
11 ,_QQW� / IZWI /
I I /
1Z WI fM Rail
�/ / IW ZI / / _ 12a Lai.
�1
/ /--�J�NaIc/'- /' /' IagII
�_/
,� 1 --� - Fop1
— P�'LNENT� P
�
NC HWy 210 - 60 JJ
'�/W
PUBLIC --
^�—
SCALE: 1" = 100'
/
/
245- —
\
•
•
•
•
\
- `�.--
- ` sr,
��st>\
\1, � ��
\ r(,1
,// / • HT
n• i
,///'"/ /
/
i�1 \/�,\ ,/ , /i�/
/ /
/ I I
',/ / Pug ' ,,;_,' ,' ,' ,/' /' All
P� Er< / -- ,' / / Ii'
/` Zyj �� /' i 7 7,' /`',, ,' ,' ,' / / ' /I //
--/ 7 /�i ' / /, 7' 77' ,� / 7 7 , III
/ice//''/ _'_ "� / -_ -'�----_- '��UII
��f' // .'.__ i235 •-- _---- II
1 /WETLAND J=__ --�1 \\,;/
1 /' , / _ , � _ 20 _ ""\\ \ \II,
/ / / / --"---
I \`\ \ 1 ull
I hill
I II
PI I
I
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #4 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0002 AC.
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #5 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0389 AC.
11
\ I
I
I
I
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0644 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 2
(STREAM 3) — 26 L.F.
POND 1
NOT JURISDICTIONAL
/ / / '1
, \ \`\11 / /' I 1/ / /'' 71
1\ \ \\\1 / / i / / / / /
�\ \ \ // 1 1 // / // // / 1
\\\ \' / /' _'' / / / 1
/ —I I/ / 11
' / /,, 1 I ,'�'/'1I
\\ , 1, /,:,,,,:l>,,)10:
/, I- I„ "" �`, ,/I
i / // /,///, Ih -
�'"j// �bi /__
"7'',' / ,''''1 -1" ----
/ 1 — r
Y- - - ' 11111 f 265 I
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
AREA
1
0.0994 AC.
2
0.0528 AC.
3
0.0644 AC.
4
0.0002 AC.
5
0.0389 AC.
TOTAL
0.2558 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
LENGTH
1
31 L.F.
2
26 L.F.
TOTAL
57 L.F.
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
FOR THE
DANIEL FARM SUBDIVISION
PLEASANT GROVE TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
[phone]
Fax [phone]
0
50
100
200
300
Job: 15006
Date: 3/8/21
Revision:
File: 1 5006_Master.dwg
Drawn: WJB
Sheet: 1 OF 1

Figure
1
Project Phases
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
1:12000
03/19/21
By: MRR

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. 4
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
la [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 1/12

5/13/2021 Johnston County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Johnston County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Carolina madtom Range by Basin
Neuse River waterdog Range by_
basin
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by Basin
Dwarf wedgemussel Range by
basin
Green floater
Tar River spinymussel Range by
basin
Yellow lance Range by basin
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Carolina bogmint
Michaux's sumac
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Noturus furiosus
Necturus lewisi
Picoides borealis
Fusconaia masoni
Alasmidonta heterodon
Lasmigona subviridis
Parvaspina steinstansana
Elliptio lanceolata
Lindera subcoriacea
Macbridea caroliniana
Rhus michauxii
BGPA Current
ARS Current
ARS Current
E Current
ARS Current
E Current
ARS Current
E Current
T Current
ARS Current
ARS Current
E Historical
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "Cl" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/johnston.html 1 /2

5/13/2021 Johnston County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/johnston.html 2/2

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 2/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
4
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAM E
STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 3/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
411.01
GIC)
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Critical habitats
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Proposed Endangered
\00.
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
Endangered
Threatened
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 4/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing 074
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestanda rdconservationmeasures.pdf
' 11.
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 5/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 106"
0-
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 6/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. 1
Breeding Season ( ) ik 4
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe . I
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Prairie Warbler _ _ _ _ _ _ _
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 7/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
--I 1--- ----
111 1111 1111 1111 11--------------
G�
cLii m i::i ---- ----
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 8/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
le -
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at sonne point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 9/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities In
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 10/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1A
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R4SBC
R5UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 11/12

5/13/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WBO6M25GXRFRPIEKJ3LGWAEGI I/resources 12/12

Danita Farm Dr
210
L
t
JT0833 Ben Langdon
House
11 d fr
Johnston County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susan Kluttz Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
July 20, 2015
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Vanessa Patrick
Human Environment Unit
NC Department of Transportation
FROM: Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
SUBJECT: Historic Structures Survey Report for Curve Improvements on NC 210 west of I-40,
W-5204D, PA 15-02-0053, Johnston County, ER 15-1560
We have reviewed the report prepared for the above -cited project, and concur that the James Monroe
Langdon House (JT0833) is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places due to
alterations to the house and other changes to the farm landscape.
In addition to preparing the report, the consultant prepared a survey file on the house, with a property report
generated from the database record as well as a complete set of photos of the property. It appears that the
written summary of the database record was adapted for the inventory list and history portions of the report,
and in the process some of the text of the history was misplaced in the report.
The four sentences at the beginning of the last paragraph on p. 17 of the report should stand as a discrete
second full paragraph on p. 21. Also, in the second paragraph of the architectural context, the word Smithfield is
missing from the second line (after "Hood -Strickland House in"). We would like these corrections made before
accepting the report for our library.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT [e-mail]
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

YAP:,Historic Architectural Resources Evaluation Report
Curve Improvements on NC 210 West of 1-40
•
Johnston County, North Carolina
TIP No. W-5204D
WBS No. 45334.1.4
Prepared for the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Human Environment Section
by
NEW SOUTH ASSOCIATES, INC.
JUNE 2015

Historic Architectural Resources Evaluation Report
Curve Improvements on NC 210 West of I-40
Johnston County, North Carolina
TIP No. W-5204D
WBS No. 45334.1.4
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598
by:
New South Associates, Inc.
6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue
Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083
Mary Pope Furr - Supervisor, Historic Architecture Group,
North Carolina Department of Transportation
:d4,.
Mary Beth Reed — Principal Investigator,
New South Associates
Ellen Turco — Historian and Co -Author,
New South Associates
June 24, 2015 • Final Report
New South Associates Technical Report #2488

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes curve improvements on
NC 210 west of I-40 in Johnston County (W-5204D). This project is subject to review under the
Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects (NCDOT/NCHPO/FHWA, 2007).
NCDOT architectural historians established an Area of Potential Effects (APE) and conducted a
preliminary investigation, identifying one property, the James Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon
House (JT 833), warranting additional study and eligibility evaluation.
The two-part Area of Potential Effects (APE) for this project is centered on the proximate, but
discontinuous, proposed construction locations on NC 210 approximately one -mile apart. The east
section of the APE, containing the subject property, begins approximately 0.5 miles west of the
I-40 and NC 210 interchange. It is 1,600 feet long, east to west, and extends 100 feet north and
south of the centerline. The western section of the APE is also 1,600 feet long, but is 200 feet wide
and contains no above -ground resources of concern.
In March 2015, NCDOT requested New South Associates, Inc. (New South) assess the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility of the James Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon
House (JT 833) and provide this report.
As a result of this study, for the purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, as amended, New South recommends the Langdon House not eligible for the
NRHP.
Table 1. Evaluated Resource
Survey Site Number
Resource Name
NRHP Eligibility
Recommendation
Criteria
JT 833
James Monroe (formerly Ben)
Langdon House
Not Eligible
None
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND METHODOLOGY 1
II. NATIONAL REGISTER EVALUATION OF THE JAMES MONROE (FORMERLY BEN)
LANGDON HOUSE 3
DESCRIPTION 3
HISTORY 17
ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT 23
INTEGRITY 23
EVALUATION 24
REFERENCES CITED 25
iii

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND METHODOLOGY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes curve improvements
on NC 210 west of I-40 in Johnston County (W-5204D) (Figure 1). This project is subject to
review under the Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects (NCDOT/NCHPO/
FHWA, 2007). NCDOT architectural historians established an Area of Potential Effects (APE)
Pursuant to 36 CFR Section 800.4(b) and identified one architectural resource, the James Monroe
(formerly Ben) Langdon House (JT 833), that might be affected by the undertaking. The Area of
Potential Effects (APE) for this project is discontiguous and consists of two sections on NC 210
approximately one mile apart. The east section of the APE, containing the subject property, begins
approximately 0.5 miles west of the I-40 and NC 210 interchange. It is 1,600 feet long, east to
west, and extends 100 feet north and south of the centerline. The western section of the APE is also
1,600 feet long, but is 200 feet wide and contains no above -ground resources of concern.
In March 2015, NCDOT requested New South Associates, Inc. (New South) intensively survey the
Langdon House and prepare a report assessing the property's eligibility for the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP). The Langdon House was surveyed in 1982 during the Johnston County
comprehensive architectural survey. At that time, the property name "Ben Langdon House" was
assigned. Research conducted for this evaluation report indicated that James Monroe Langdon was
the builder and long-time occupant. For purposes of historical accuracy, the property is referred to
as the James Monroe Langdon House or the Langdon House herein.
New South senior architectural historian Ellen Turco visited the Langdon House on April 27, 2015.
The property was visually inspected and the exterior, associated outbuildings and setting were
documented through written notes and digital photographs. An on -site interview was conducted
with Frank Matthews, the son of the current owner, Daniel G. Matthews, and the great grandson of
James Monroe Langdon. Research was conducted at the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office and the Johnston County Heritage Center. The historical development, architecture, and
cultural significance of the Langdon House was assessed and evaluated within its respective
contexts according to the established NRHP criteria.
The results of this intensive -level investigation and NRHP evaluation are presented in the following
chapters of this report. This report complies with the basic requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended; the Department of Transportation Act of
1966, as amended; the Depai tiuent of Transportation regulations and procedures (23 CFR 771 and
Technical Advisory T 6640.8A); the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations on the
Protection of Historic Properties (36 CFR 800); and NCDOT's Historic Architectural Resources,
Survey Procedures and Report Guidelines.
1

Figure 1. Project Location, APE, and Location of James Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon House
(JT 833)
Curve Improvements on NC 210 West 0 JT0833
of 1-40, Johnston County
(T.I.P. Number W-5204D;
WBS No. 45334.1.4).
Eligibility Evaluation for James
Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon House
New South Associates, 2015
1APE
Project Location/
Subject Parcel
0
I �
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Kilometers
0.5 Miles
2

II. NATIONAL REGISTER EVALUATION OF THE JAMES MONROE
(FORMERLY BEN) LANGDON HOUSE
Resource Name
James Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon House
HPO Survey Site #
JT 833
Location
12741 NC 210, Benson, Johnston County
PIN
162400-83-5620
Date(s) of Construction
Circa 1885; circa 1943; 2002
Recommendation
Not Eligible for NRHP
DESCRIPTION
SETTING
The James Monroe Langdon House is located in Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
approximately eight miles north of Benson, the county seat. The irregularly shaped parcel,
containing 67 acres, is positioned on the north and south sides NC 210 approximately 0.5 miles
west of the interchange with I-40 (Figure 2). The landscape contains cleared cattle pasture, woods,
three farm ponds, and two dwelling sites (Figure 3). The historic house site of James Monroe
Langdon is situated at the parcel's eastern edge on the north side of NC 210. The house is close
to the road and faces south. A low stone and concrete wall defines the front yard and runs parallel
with the road (figure 4). Mature plantings include oak and pecan trees, as well as crepe myrtles.
Behind the house are a circa-1900 washhouse and an above ground oil storage tank (Figure 5). A
storage barn, tobacco pack house and concrete block farm supply store immediately east of the
house are accessed by an unpaved circular driveway off of NC 210 (Figure 6). On the south side
of NC 210, is a circa-1970 brick Ranch House (Figure 7). East of the Ranch house is a chicken
house, which was inaccessible.
3

Figure 2. James Monroe (formerly Ben) Langdon House Parcel Aerial Photograph and Site
1
$•.
C
Parcel Boundary
0 250 500 Feet
II I I
0 50 100 150 Meters
1999 Dwelling
Storage Barn
Farm Supply Store and
Sweet Potato Warehouse
Pack House
House
Chicken House
4

Figure 3. Farm Pond and Pasture Looking North
Figure 4. Looking East on NC 210. Red Shed Roof is Farm Supply Store.
5

Figure 5. View of Rear Yard Looking South
Figure 6. Tobacco Pack House and Farm Supply Complex
6

Figure 7. Circa 1970 brick Ranch House built by Shelton Matthews
7

INVENTORY LIST
James Monroe Langdon House; Circa 1885; Circa 1943; 2002
The Langdon House reached its present day appearance in two stages (Figures 8-13). The earliest
part of the house was built around 1885 by James Monroe Langdon. His son, Thomas "Tommy"
Sirius Langdon, built a gabled rear kitchen addition with an engaged side porch in the 1940s
(Frank Matthews personal communication). The circa-1885 section is a frame, one-story, side -
gable dwelling with a gabled front wing, a composition that gives the house an L-form. Original
stylistic details are restrained and limited to paired eave modillions and slightly arched window
openings, which impart an Italianate flavor. Other than these decorative embellishments, the house
is finished with simple treatments common to vernacular country houses of the late nineteenth
century: wood weatherboard siding, plain corner boards, a wide frieze and gable ends with returns
and quatrefoil eave vents. The original wood window sashes were removed in 2002 and replaced
with vinyl windows with muntin grilles in a fourteen -over -nine configuration on the circa 1885
section and a six -over -six configuration on the kitchen addition (Figure 14). There are two double -
shouldered end chimneys; the east one was rebuilt in the 1940s. The house sits on continuous brick
foundation. Composite shingles cover the roof.
The dwelling has three shed -roofed porches: one across the front and two on the east side. All
of the porches display turned wood posts and turned balustrades dating from 2002 (Figure 15).
These replaced foliated wrought iron posts dating to the 1940s (Butchko 1982a). The design of the
original porch posts and balustrades is unknown. The house has a total of five entries, an unusual
number for a house of this small size. Family lore holds that the rooms of the front wing were
let to circuit preachers and local schoolteachers and the multiple doors allowed these rooms to be
accessed directly from the outside (Frank Matthews, personal communication, 2015). All of the
original entries, two under the front porch and a third one under the side porch, are set in surrounds
composed of three -light transoms and four -light paired sidelights over raised panels (Figure
16). The front porch entries, one on the main block and one on the front wing, are arranged at a
90-degree angle. The south -facing main entry has a louvered wood storm door. The installation
of a simulated six -over -six vinyl window over a panel converted the west -facing front wing entry
into to a window opening in 2002 (Figure 17). The 1940s west entry on the front wing is sheltered
by an arched pent supported by an assembly of faux rafter ends and sawn brackets (Figure 18). All
entries have six -panel doors that date from the 1940s renovation.
The interior was not accessed but the informant states it was heavily remodeled in 2002.
Wash House; circa 1900
This front -gabled frame wash house has weatherboard siding and a metal roof with exposed rafter
ends. A brick heating flue projects from the roof (Figure 19).
8

Figure 8. Front/South Side
Figure 9. West Side
9

Figure 10. West Side of 1940s Kitchen Addition
Figure 11. Rear/North Sid
10

Figure 12. Rear/North and West Side
Figure 13. West Side and Front/South Side
11

Figure 14. Typical Vinyl Replacement Window on Circa 1885 Section

Figure 15. Replacement Posts and Balustrade on Front Porch.
13

Figure 16. Main front Entry Door on South Side
14

Figure 17. Original West Entry of Front Wing, altered in 2002.
Figure 18. Circa 1940s Entry on West Side of Front Wing
15

Figure 19. Wash House
16

Tobacco Pack House; 1920
This front -gable tobacco pack house has a large partially enclosed shed projecting off the east side.
The pack house is covered with weatherboard siding, has a 5-V metal roof, and rests on partially
continuous concrete block foundation. There are three entry doors across the front and hayloft
opening centered in the gable. All openings have plywood doors. The frame shed was added at an
unknown date sometime prior to 1965. It is open across the back and the roof and rear wall are
sheathed with 5-V metal (Figures 20 and 21).
Farm Supply Store; 1960s; 2005
This three -bay, flat roofed, concrete block building was built in two stages. The west two bays
were erected first for use as a farm supply store. The east bay was added shortly afterwards as a
place to store sweet potatoes. The end bays have almost full -height garage doors; the center bay
is a customer entry and is sheltered by a recently constructed frame shed. A metal frieze wraps
around all four sides. The roofing material was not visible (Figures 22 and 23).
Storage Barn; circa 1980
The roof and walls of this gabled storage barn are sheathed in 5-V metal. Sliding doors cover the
bays on the south side (Figure 24).
Ranch House; Circa 1970
This side -gable, three-part, brick Ranch has a number of Colonial Revival -style features such as
nine -over -nine windows with flat arches, a dentil cornice and a recessed entry with a transom over
double leaf six -panel doors (see Figure 7).
HISTORY
James Monroe Langdon (1854-1928) built this one-story Italianate-influenced dwelling around
1885. Langdon, a farmer, married Eliza Jane Coats in 1876 (U.S. Census Bureau 1900; 1910)
(Figure 25). The couple erected the house within the first decade after their marriage.
In the 1960s, Shelton Langdon erected the concrete block farm supply store east of the historic
dwelling. A few years later, he added another bay to the building to store sweet potatoes. In 1968,
Shelton and his first wife, Werneth Stephenson, divorced and a few years later he married Ann
King. His second marriage was the impetus to build the Colonial Revival -style Ranch house on
the south side of NC 210. Shelton died of a brain tumor at the age of 44 in 1974. His son, Mitchell,
was left the home place (Frank Matthews, personal communication 2015). The U.S. Census of
1900 recorded the pair in Pleasant Grove Township with their nine children: Della, Francis, Grover
17

Figure 20. Wash House
Figure 21. Tobacco Pack House South Side
18

Figure 22. Tobacco Pack House North Side
Figure 23. Farm Supply Store, South Side
19

Figure 24. Farm Supply Store, North Side
20

Figure 25. James Monroe Langdon and Eliza Jane Coats Langdon, Date Unknown.
Source: Ancestry.com
Cleveland, Flora, Zacheriah (named after James Monroe Langdon's father), Eliza, James, William
and Lucy. The couple had 12 children in total and in 1901, their youngest son, Thomas "Tommy"
Sirios Langdon was born (Frank Matthews, personal communication, 2015; U.S. Census Bureau
1900, 1910).
All of the Langdon children were given shares of James Monroe Langdon's 1,000-acre farm.
Tommy Langdon received the tract with the circa-1885 home place. He married Nellie Vita Coats
(1902-1943) in 1923 and the couple raised two children, Thomas Shelton, who went by Shelton,
and Loleta, in the house. The family farmed tobacco, corn, and hogs (Frank Matthews, personal
communication, 2015). Several frame outbuildings from this era survived northeast of the house
into the 1980s but are longer standing (Butchko 1982a) (Figure 26). Nellie died at the age of 44
in 1943. Shortly after her passing, Tommy expanded the family home by adding the rear kitchen
addition, which replaced an earlier detached kitchen. Other modifications made at that time were
the rebuilding of the east chimney and the front and side porches, the addition of a new pented
entry on the west side of the house, and the replacement of the perimeter foundation piers with a
continuous brick foundation. Thomas was married for a second time, to Betsey Stewart, in 1948.
In the mid-1970s, the Langdon farm went into foreclosure. In order to keep the land in the
family, Loleta Langdon Matthews and her husband Daniel Gray Matthews, bought the farm on
the courthouse steps. The Matthews resided in Clayton and used the Langdon family home as a
21

Figure 26. 1965 Aerial Photograph Showing Langdon Farm. Source: Johnston County
Heritage Center
0 250 500 Feet
0 50 100 150 Meters
Source: Johnston County Heritage Center
Unidentified Farm Buildings,
Now Demolished
1
Farm, Supply Store,and --_-
"° Sweet Potato Warehouse
22

country retreat. Around 2002, the couple renovated the interior and replaced the original windows
with the current vinyl ones. Loleta Langdon Matthews passed away in 2007 in the house in which
she was born (Frank Matthews, personal communication 2015). Daniel Gray Matthews retains
ownership of the property but does not reside in the house. The house is vacant but well maintained
by the Matthews' son, Frank, who lives on the farm in a house he built in 1999 on a separate parcel
north of the historic house. Frank Matthews operates Legacy Farms and Cattle, LLC. He raises
free-range livestock and sells meat, organic produce, and Christmas trees at a seasonal farmers
market that occupies the farm store building. A number of popular public events are held at the
farm such as Easter egg hunts, hayrides, build -a -scarecrow events, and chili cookoffs (Legacy
Farms and Cattle 2015).
ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT
The James Monroe Langdon House is one-story, gabled, L-form house. Surviving features of the
house illustrate how the Italianate style filtered down from its pure form to late -nineteenth century
rural Johnston County. It was first popularized in England where it developed as a spirited reaction
to the classicism that had prevailed for two centuries, which was interpreted in America through the
Federal and Greek Revival styles. It was popular nationally from about 1840 to1885, in part due
to the architectural pattern books published by architectural designers Andrew Jackson Downing
and Samuel Sloan. The style has several characteristic features that were used to embellish hipped,
gabled, and flat roofed buildings, such as broad eaves with elaborate bracketed cornices, cupolas or
towers, and narrow windows often with arched tops or elaborate hoods (McAlester and McAlester
1983:283-284, 302).
Good and intact examples of vernacular Italianate architecture survive in Johnston County. Six are
on the State Study List (SL) and one, the Hood -Strickland House in (JT 319; NRHP 1990), is listed in
the NRHP. One notable example is the Josephus Johnson Farm (JT 231; SL 1982). Built in 1870 in
rural Elevation Township, the house shares some similarities with the Langdon House most notably
its irregular, asymmetrical exterior, modillion cornice, gable end returns, Greek Revival entries and
arched window openings. The Johnson House retains three elaborate porches with chamfered posts
with pierced brackets and a turned balustrade. The interior remains intact (Butchko 1982b).
INTEGRITY
In order to be eligible for the NRHP, a property must possesses several, and usually most, of
the seven aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association (Joeckel 2001:44). The James Monroe Langdon House does not retain enough of these
qualities to convey historic significance.
The house remains on its original site in an agrarian setting; however, its workmanship and materials
are less intact. It was modified in the 1940s with the construction of a rear kitchen addition, removal
23

of the original porch treatments, and the rebuilding of the foundation and one chimney, and again
in 2002 when the porch supports were changed for a second time and the original windows were
removed. The porch and window alterations are significant losses of materials and workmanship
and the result is that the Italianate design of the dwelling is no longer strongly evident. The addition
and changes to the chimney and foundation are less significant detractions. The property is owned
by a descendant of James Monroe Langdon so it retains its historical associations with the family.
EVALUATION
Properties can be eligible for the NRHP if they are associated with a significant event or pattern
of events that have made contributions to history at the local, state, or national level. The James
Monroe Langdon House was not found to be associated with any such events or historical trends.
The house was the seat of a family -owned farm in the nineteenth century. The farm was divided
into several smaller farms in the twentieth century. No nineteenth-century agricultural buildings
were documented. Tobacco was the prevalent crop in the first half of twentieth century, and while
the tobacco pack house remains intact, no tobacco barns or crop field patterns were documented.
Today, the landscape reflects the property's uses for cattle production and agritoursim. Therefore,
the James Monroe Langdon House is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A.
Research conducted for this project did not identify members of the Langdon family as significant
within community, state, or national historic contexts. Therefore, the James Monroe Langdon
House is recommended not eligible under Criterion B.
Properties may be eligible under Criterion C if they embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,
period, or method of construction, or represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic value.
The James Monroe Langdon House is a one-story, L-plan dwelling with altered shed porches and a
later gabled rear addition. The surviving modillion cornice and arched window openings are what
remain of the house's Italianate-style decorative features. At least seven Italianate houses survive
in the county. One has been listed in the NRHP and the quality and integrity of six others has
been recognized with placement on the Study List. The James Monroe Langdon House does not
compare well with other Italianate houses in Johnston County. Therefore, James Monroe Langdon
House is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C.
It is unlikely that additional study of this property would yield any unretrieved data not discoverable
through informant interviews and documentary sources. Therefore, the James Monroe Langdon
House is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion D.
24

REFERENCES CITED
Butchko, Tom
1982a Survey File: Ben Langdon House (JT 833). Report available from the North Carolina
Division of Archives and History, State Historic Preservation Office, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
1982b Survey File: Josephus Johnson House and Farm (JT 231). Report available from
the North Carolina Division of Archives and History, State Historic Preservation
Office, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Joeckel, Jeff
2001 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, National Register of
Historic Places Bulletin (NRB 15). December. Electronic document, http://www.
nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/, accessed August 8, 2014.
Legacy Farms and Cattle
2015 Legacy Farms and Cattle. Electronic document, http://www.legacyfarmsandcattle.
net/, accessed May 1, 2015.
Matthews, Frank
2015 Interview with Ellen Turco, March.
McAlester, Virginia and A. Lee McAlester
1983 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
U.S. Census Bureau
1900 12th (1900) Federal Census of the United States, Population Schedule. Online
database. Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, Provo, Utah.
1910 Thirteenth (1910) United States Federal Census. Online database. Ancestry.com
Operations, Inc, Provo, Utah.
25

fMinth2n
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
POST OFFICE BOX 2263
SMITHFIELD, N.C. 27577
[phone]
July 12,2017
LETTER OF APPROVAL
Daniel Lan Development, LLC.
Attn: Doug Jones
1029 Country Club Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
RE: Project Name: Daniel Farm Subdivision — Phase 1
Project ID: JC# 17-054-P
Disturbed Acres Approved: 14.0 acres
Stream Classification: Middle Creek (C, NSW)
Submitted By: Dalton Engineering, PA
Submittal Date: May 24, 2017
Dear Mr. Jones:
Johnston County has reviewed the referenced erosion and sedimentation control plan, finds the plan
acceptable, and hereby issues this Letter of Approval. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years
following the date of approval, if no -disturbing activity has been undertaken as required by Title 1 5A
NCAC 4B .0129.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES Construction Stormwater
General Permit NCG010000. You are required to comply with all the requirements and conditions of this
permit.
The enclosed Certificate of Approval must be posted at the job site. Title.15A NCAC 4B .0118(a)
requires that a copy of the approved erosion control plan be on Bleat the job site. Also, the letter gives
the notice required by G.S. 113A — 61.1 (a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with
the approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance oriented, requiring protection of
existing natural resources and adjoining properties. lf, following the commencement of this project, it is
determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Stature 1 13A-51 through 66), this
office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the
Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is condition upon your compliance with Federal, State, and Local
water quality laws, regulations, and rules. This approval does not supersede any other permit or approval.
Printed on rscyeled paper It

Please note that this approval is based in part on
Responsibility Fore, which you provided. You
change in the information included on the form.
starting date for this project. In addition, please
conference.
Sincerely,
Carlos Bagley, PE
Environmental Manager
Letter of Approval
Daniel Farm Phase 1
JC# 17-054-P
7/12/17
the accuracy of the information provided in the Financial
are requested to file an amended form if there is any
You are required to notify this office of the proposed
notify us if you plan to have a preconstruction
Enclosures: Certificate of Approval, NPDES Permit, Combined Self -Inspection Report
Cc: Jerry T. Dalton, PE — Dalton Engineering & Associates, PA via email

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
POST OFFICE BOX 2263
SMITHFIELD, N.C. 27577
[phone]
April 30, 2018
LETTER OF APPROVAL
Daniel Lan Development, LLC.
Attn: Lanny Clifton
2701 Polenta Road
Clayton, NC 27520
RE: Project Name: Daniel Farm Sewer Outfall
Project ID: JC# 17-054-P
Disturbed Acres Approved: 1.84 acres
Stream Classification: Middle Creek (C, NSW)
Submitted By: Dalton Engineering, PA
Submittal Date: April 17, 2018
Dear Mr. Jones:
Johnston County has reviewed the referenced erosion and sedimentation control plan, finds the plan
acceptable, and hereby issues this Letter of Approval. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years
following the date of approval, if no -disturbing activity hasbeen undertaken as required by Title 15A
NCAC 4B .0129.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES Construction Stormwater
General Permit NCG010000. You are required to comply with all the requirements and conditions of this
perm it.
The enclosed Certificate of Approval must be posted at the job site. Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) requires
that a copy of the approved erosion control plan be on file at the job site. Also, the letter gives the
notice required by G.S. 113A — 61.1 (a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with the
approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance oriented, requiring protection of
existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the commencement of this project, it is
determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of
the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Stature 113A-51 through 66),
this office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance
with the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is condition upon your compliance with Federal, State, and Local
water quality laws, regulations, and rules. This approval does not supersede any other permit or
approval.
Printed on recycled paper tit,

Letter of Approval
Daniel Farm Sewer Outfall
JC# 17-054-P
4/30/18
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there
is any change in the information included on the form. You are required to notify this office of the
proposed starting date for this project. In addition, please notify us if you plan to have a
preconstruction conference.
Sincerely,
C.
Chandra C. Farmer, PE
Director of Utilities
Enclosures: Certificate of Approval, NPDES Permit, Combined Self -Inspection Report
cc: Jerry T. Dalton, PE — Dalton Engineering & Associates, PA
Doug Jones — Daniel Lan Development, LLC, 1029 Country Club Rd, Smithfield
Charles Pender --Johnston County

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
POST OFFICE BOX 2263
SMITHFIELD, N.C. 27577
[phone]
July 12, 2017
Daniel Lan Development, LLC.
Attn: Doug Jones
1 029 Countty Chub Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
Re: Daniel Farm Subdivision -- Phase 1
Stormwater Management Statement and Plan
Dear Mr. Jones:
We have reviewed the Stormwater Management Plan and calculations submitted for the proposed
River Oaks subdivision. Based upon the information submitted, the stormwater management plan
has been approved with the following stipulations:
1. Please provide a copy of the recorded restrictive covenants and a note on the Final Plat
limiting the impervious area on each lot to 3,700 sq. ft. The impervious area limit is
based on 60 lots.
2. Please provide a copy of the recorded restrictive covenants noting who will be
responsible for maintenance of all drainage facilities located outside of the proposed
NCDOT right of way.
3. Please indicate all drainage easements, riparian buffers, jurisdictional wetlands, and flood
hazard areas on the Final Plat.
4. A stormwater certification by the engineer of record will be required at the completion of
the project. A letter of credit or bond certified by the engineer of record must he
submitted for any outstanding work prior to the Final Plat.
5. Due to the amount of impervious area proposed for the project, the developer will be
required to provide 6.00 acres in a conservation easement and show this on the Final Plat
or participate in the Land Dedication Program and contribute $585.93 per lot at the time
of recordation.
Please be reminded that no land disturbing activities may begin on this site until all other
necessary approvals are obtained. A copy of this letter will be forwarded to the Planning
Office for their files. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact inc
at [phone] or by email at carlos.bagleyiiijohnstonnc.com.
Sincerely,
Carlos BagFey, PE,
Environmental Manager
Cc: Berry Gray Johnston County Planning Department via email
Jerry T. Dalton, PE — Dalton Engineering & Associates, PA via email
Printed on recyrted paper

WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
WLS Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Statement of Availability May 18, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chris Hopper
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: DANIELS FARM NORTH
This document confirms that DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC (Applicant) for the DANIELS
FARM NORTH (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.36 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits from the Water & Land Solutions, LLC sponsored WLS Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank,
specifically 0.36 wetland credits from the Hollowell Site, in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official
Bank Sponsor, Water & Land Solutions, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for
reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 252-423-0880.
Best Regards,
Sammy Jo Hinnant
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615

WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
WLS Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Statement of Availability May 18, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chris Hopper
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: DANIELS FARM NORTH
This document confirms that DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC (Applicant) for the DANIELS
FARM NORTH (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.36 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits from the Water & Land Solutions, LLC sponsored WLS Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank,
specifically 0.36 wetland credits from the Hollowell Site, in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official
Bank Sponsor, Water & Land Solutions, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for
reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 252-423-0880.
Best Regards,
Sammy Jo Hinnant
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615

March 20, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN
numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041
and 163400-73-6001..
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Lanny Clifton
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210415
Version*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 2/22/2021
Contact Name * Wyatt Brown
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * Daniel Farm North
Project Owner* Daniel -Lan Development, LLC
Project County* Johnston
Owner Address: Street Address
1075 Country Club Road
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / Region
Smithfield NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27577 USA
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes ( No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit I— Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes ( No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Stephanie Goss
Please give a brief project description below.*
Daniel Farm North is the north phase of the Daniel Farm single-family
residential Subdivision. Future plans include development of Daniel
Farm South.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

3/4/2021
3/5/2021
3/8/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Daniel Farm Lot 1.pdf 130.08KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 2/22/2021