The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20040325 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20130415Dq -03Z V1 Barra Farms Regional Mitigation Bank — Phase II Annual Monitoring Report — Year 2 (Section One) Cumberland County, NC Cape Fear River Basin (Cataloging Unit #03030005) Prepared for: Southern Produce Distributors, Inc. Stewart Precythe 111 West Center Street N P.O. Box 130 Faison, NC 28341 ArK t 2 01, 33 Prepared by. NR WATER UALITY ands s - -k • nyabp Branco L M G LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP -- _nzronmcnrai Cun sulrontz Wilmington, N.C. March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. ..............................1 2.0. PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................. ..............................2 3.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS .............................................................. ..............................2 A. WETLAND RESTORATION SUCCESS CRITERIA ....................................... ..............................3 B. NON- RIPARIAN WETLAND ENHANCEMENT SUCCESS CRITERIA .......... ..............................4 4.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 2) ........................................................ ..............................5 A. VEGETATION MONITORING ........................................................................ ..............................5 B. HYDROLOGIC MONITORING ....................................................................... ..............................8 1. SUMMARY OF PRECIPITATION ............................................................... ..............................8 2. GROWING SEASON CONSIDERATIONS ................................................. ..............................8 3. YEAR 2 ANNUAL MONITORING ............................................................... ..............................9 5.0 CONCLUSION ......... ............................... LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES 12 Figure1 ......................................................................................................... ............................... Vicinity Map Figure2 .............................................................................................. ............................... Project Phase Map Figure3 ..................................................................................... ............................... Ditch /Plug Location Map Figure 4 ............................................................................ ............................... Section 1 (Well and Plot) Map Table 1 ...................... ............................... .........................Annual Monitoring Data Sheets, Year 1 - Planted Table 1A ........................................... ............................... Annual Monitoring Data Sheets, Year 1 - Volunteer Table 2A ................................ ............................... Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring (Feb01- Nov30) Table 26 ................................ ............................... Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring (Marl5- Nov20) AppendixA ........................................................................................... ............................... Site Photographs Appendix B ................................. ............................... Individual Plot Data Sheets (Year 2 Monitoring - 2012) Appendix C ............................................... ............................... Hydrographs (March 2011 - December 2012) Appendix D ........................................... ............................... North Carolina Drought Monitoring Status Maps Appendix E ......................................................................... ............................... -P-al.mer Drought Index Maps i A p.q 7 (0` LIN 3 avHrt? �5uirY a_ d9 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of the Bank Sponsor (Mr Stewart Precythe), Land Management Group (LMG) has completed Year 2 annual monitoring of the first section (291 28 acres) of the Barra Farms Regional Mitigation Bank — Phase II The Barra Farms — Phase II project consists of four sections totaling 1,838 acres of land formerly consisting of nearly an entire headwater Carolina Bay and pine savannah wetland system in the Cape Fear River Basin (USGS 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit 03030005, DWQ Subbasin 03- 06 -16) The following Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) is specific to Section One Of the 291 acres in Section One, thirty -three (33) acres consist of non - riparian (i a Carolina Bay) wetland restoration, thirty -one (31) acres consist of non - riparian pocosin wetland enhancement, and 225 acres consists of pocosin wetland preservation Construction of this section was completed in March 2011 Work included earthwork, planting of characteristic non - riparian pocosin trees and the installation of monitoring devices Per the approved restoration plan, monitoring of the site includes the assessment of both hydrologic and vegetative conditions over the course of a seven year monitoring period Following the completion of the earthwork, a total of seven (7) permanent 010 acre plots were established throughout the planted and restored (i a former) 3 -ac roadway corridor A total of thirteen (13) automated shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed within the 291 -ac project area Of these wells, seven (7) were paired with vegetation plots along the restored roadway corridor, four (4) were installed within the enhancement areas in proximity to the plugged lateral ditching, and two (2) were installed in the middle of the blocks (outside of lateral ditching influence) representing the reference pocosin wetland area on the mitigation site An additional well (Well 5A) was installed on February 8th, 2012 in order to determine if roadbed material was influencing the groundwater levels within Plot #5 Wells have collected data from March 2011 through the present Annual monitoring was conducted in September 2012 at each of the seven (7) plots A total of 583 individuals of the planted species were counted throughout the seven (7) plots, which correlates to an average of 833 stems /acre within the project area (Table 2) Of the twelve (12) restoration and enhancement wells, eight (8) have met the targeted wetland hydrology during the second growing season In light of the drought conditions throughout the early 2012 growing season (and Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 1 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) associated lack of hydrologic input subsequent to ditch backfilling /plugging), groundwater hydrology still appears to have been sufficiently recharged across much of the site as evidenced by the hydrologic data collected through 2012 2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Section One of the Barra Farm Phase II Restoration Project (encompassing 291 acres of the 1,838 -ac project area) was initiated in March 2011 (Figure 1) Refer to Figure 2 for a depiction of the four sections of Phase II and corresponding mitigation type and quantity Of the 291 acres, 33 acres consist of non- nparian (i a Carolina Bay) wetland restoration, 31 acres consist of non - riparian pocosin wetland enhancement, while the balance (225 acres) consists of pocosin wetland preservation Restoration activities included earthwork (grading and removal of central access road, partial backfilling of roadside ditches, disking of access road, installation of clay plugs, etc ), planting of characteristic non - riparian pocosin trees, and the installation of groundwater monitoring devices (Figure 3) Work was completed in accordance with the approved restoration plan (entitled Barra Farms Phase 11 Wetland Mitigation Bank Wetland Mitigation Plan, revision dated July 19, 2010), the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Nationwide Permit 27 (Action ID# 2009 - 00189) with attached conditions (issued September 20, 2010), and the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ Project #04 -0325, Ver 2) with attached conditions (issued September 23, 2010) 3.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Annual monitoring is being conducted near the end of each growing season for a period of seven years This monitoring includes both a vegetative and hydrologic component per the approved restoration plan The vegetative component for Section One includes an assessment of the conditions within each of the seven (7) permanent monitoring plots that have been established throughout the project area (Figure 4) Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 2 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) The hydrologic component of the monitoring employs a total of fourteen (14) shallow groundwater monitoring wells which record water table levels on a daily basis (Figure 4) Data from this equipment are downloaded every three months (i a once quarterly) and graphed with appropriate local precipitation totals and WETS table information to determine if the site has met the established hydrologic success criteria The success criteria for both components of the annual monitoring are defined below Note that the target communities in Section One of the project are discussed in Section 28 A. Wetland Restoration Success Criteria The wetland restoration effort will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related to vegetative density and wetland hydrology Please note that individuals of non - planted characteristic wetland species may volunteer into the restored area Suitable volunteers serve as indicators of appropriate hydrologic regimes and provide increased diversity This diversity in plant species is essential to restoring the microhabitats and varied food sources present in natural wetland systems Therefore, suitable volunteers may be counted towards the established success criteria upon discretion of the IRT The proposed success criteria for the restored areas of Barra 11 are 1 Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 320 trees per acre at the end of three years (post - planting), 260 trees per acre at the end of five years, and 210 (seven- year old) character canopy tree species per acre at the end of seven years The IRT may allow for the counting of acceptable volunteer species toward the 210 -tree per acre density upon the review and evaluation of the annual monitoring data 2 If, within the first three years, any species exhibits greater than 50% mortality, the species will either be re- planted or an acceptable replacement species will be planted in its place 3 No single volunteer species (most notably red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise more than 50% of the total composition at Year 2 or Year 3 If this occurs, remedial action, as approved by the Interagency Review Team, may be required During Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 3 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Year 4 and Year 5, no single volunteer species, comprising 50% of the total composition, may be more than twice the height of the planted species If this occurs, remedial action, as approved by the IRT, may be required to be implemented The need to conduct additional volunteer sampling after Year 5 will be determined by the IRT 4 The hydrologic criterion is premised on the specific community to be restored a for the pocosin community, the hydrologic cntenon will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 15% of the growing season Hydrology monitoring shall be undertaken from Web through 30Nov of each monitoring year On Web, soil temperature at three of the monitoring plots will be measured at 12 inches below the soil surface and documented within the monitoring report Should earlier monitoring be considered, the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual Earlier monitoring must be approved by the U S Army Corps of Engineers prior to commencement b for the wet pine savannah community, the hydrologic cntenon will be the establishment of a static water table at or within 12" of the soil surface for 6% of the growing season Hydrology monitoring shall be undertaken from Web through 30Nov of each monitoring year On Web, soil temperature at three of the monitoring plots will be measured at 12 inches below the soil surface and documented within the monitoring report Should earlier monitoring be considered, the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual Earlier monitoring must be approved by the U S Army Corps of Engineers prior to commencement B. Non - Riparian Wetland Enhancement Success Criteria A total of 31 ac of pocosin habitat has been targeted for wetland enhancement in Section One These areas are located directly adjacent to those targeted for restoration in forested sections of Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 4 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) the tract As these areas currently maintain a suitable density of appropriate vegetative species, enhancement will occur by re- establishing the characteristic groundwater hydrology Natural hydropenods had been previously compromised by the lateral ditches and collector canals (pre - restoration) Completion of the earthwork (e g removal of roadbeds and plugging of outlet ditches), has resulted in the re- establishment of hydropenods more characteristic of relatively undisturbed pocosin habitat The hydrologic success criterion for these areas is identical to the pocosin wetland restoration portion of the project The hydrologic criterion for the non- npanan pocosin enhancement will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12" of the soil surface for 15% of the growing season. Hydrology monitoring shall be undertaken from Web through 30Nov of each monitoring year Soil temperatures will be measured at 12 inches below the sod surface at three restoration wells (as indicated within the restoration success cntena) Should earlier monitoring be considered, the project sponsor must also document biological activity on the site pursuant to the applicable Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual Earlier monitoring must be approved by the U S Army Corps of Engineers prior to commencement 4.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 2) A. Vegetation Monitoring A total of 583 individuals of the planted species were counted throughout the seven (7) plots, which correlated to an average of 833 - stems /acre within the project area (Table 2) Bald cypress was the most abundant woody species, with a total of 223 individuals Other planted species such as black gum, pond pine, and Atlantic white cedar were also prevalent within the monitored plots In addition to the planted species, numerous volunteers were also observed within each plot A majority of these individuals were representative of the target vegetative communities, including red bay (Persea palustns), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and loblolly bay (Gordorna lasianthus) Shrub species such as fetterbush (Lyonta lucida) and sweet pepper bush (Clethra alrnfolia) were also observed Table 2 and Table 2A provide species composition by plot for both planted and Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 5 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) volunteer species, respectively It should be noted that red maple (Acer rubrum) trees are prevalent in the adjacent, existing wetland areas Based upon monitoring during Year 2, it is apparent that red maple will be volunteering into the restored, planted area The density of the red maple will continue to be monitored Overall, it is likely that the vegetative composition (including planted and observed volunteers) will be characteristic of the target Carolina bay wetland community If it appears as though red maples are adversely affecting the survivorship of planted species, then the Sponsor will consult with the IRT for implementation of appropriate contingency measures (i e targeted herbicide application) if deemed appropriate Of particular note during Year 2 annual monitoring was the decreased density of herbaceous vegetation in the plots During Year 1 monitoring, many plots exhibited dense herbaceous growth (Pan►cum spp) covering the smaller planted seedlings While most planted tree seedlings remained unaffected by the dense herbaceous growth, some of the smaller planted material (particularly pond pine (P►nus serohna) seedlings) was susceptible to mortality between planting and Year 1 monitoring However, there was limited mortality of pond pine between Year 1 and Year 2 monitoring Mortality during Year 1 was likely attributed to a combination of dense herbaceous growth (particularly relative to the height of planted stems) and drought conditions during the growing season The combination of planted species and acceptable volunteers suggest that the site is progressing well towards the target community During the Year 2 monitoring event, each of the 7 plots exceeded the minimum success criteria and contained a variety of shrub and tree species This diversity of species will likely continue through the duration of the project due to the abundant native seed source and natural dispersal patterns These results are also encouraging given the drought conditions that followed the initial planting in March 2011 and that continued to persist until the mid -2012 growing season Monitoring data from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources Drought Monitoring website classified the drought for the early 2012 growing season as a First level drought The site returned to normal conditions from June through October, but returned to First level drought in November and December Refer to Appendix A for photographs of current site conditions and Appendix B for information regarding individual plot totals Refer to Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 6 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Appendix D for NC Division of Water Resources Drought Maps and Appendix E for Palmer Drought Indices TABLE 1. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET (YEAR 2) - PLANTED SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 PLOT 7 TOTAL Bald Cypress 14 52 26 50 37 25 19 223 Black Gum 61 13 29 9 9 1 7 129 Atlantic White Cedar 53 17 12 9 13 17 20 141 Pond Pine 5 29 20 4 17 12r 3 90 f TOTALy`;, X133Ty�a11;'> 2 a '" r "487 ' X72 ° <i a� ,76' F�55� 494y�l 583 TABLE IA. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET (YEAR 2) - VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 PLOT 7 TOTAL Water Oak 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Cherrybark Oak 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Red Bay 10 2 0 6 4 1 2 25 Loblolly Bay 0 0 0 3 0 40 40 83 Sweet Bay 15 21 12 7 5 12 4 76 Fetterbush 0 0 0 0 20 7 3 30 Sweet Pepper Bush 7 0 5 9 9 15 5 50 Highbush Blueberry 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Gallberry 15 0 0 0 0 0 5 20 Dusty Zenobia 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 24 American tits 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 10 Red Maple 40 60 20 25 20 25 20 210 Sweet Gum 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 x eft OTA TL` F; - >103 $ 37rf; =� ., 51 68 �,106�84 ' 533 Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 7 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) B. Hydrologic Monitoring 1 Summary of Precipitation According to regional drought indices (including the North Carolina Division of Water Resources Drought Status Monitoring Program and the Palmer Drought Index), the Barra Farms project area experienced drought conditions during the early growing season through June 2012 (or July 2012 according to the Palmer Drought Index) The NC Drought Status Maps indicate "1St Level Drought" conditions from January through May Palmer Drought Index maps indicate "Severe Drought" from January through April 2012 and "Moderate Drought' from May through July 2012 Both indices document normal rainfall conditions from August through October According to the WETS long- term climatic data, mean annual rainfall for Fayetteville, NC is 46 94 inches The WETS long -term climactic data (i e WETS table (1933- 2002)) identify a 30% chance of less than 42 42 inches and a 30% chance of more than 5014 inches (i a rainfall less than 42 42 inches is considered below normal and rainfall greater than 5014 inches is considered above normal) The nearest CRONOS Station (KFAY) recorded 4101 inches for the year, which indicates below normal rainfall for the year ( <30th percentile) The available North Carolina Drought Status Maps (NC DWR) for 2012 are included in Appendix D The Palmer Drought Indices are included in Appendix E Both appendices are provided digitally on the enclosed CD 2 Growing Season Considerations As identified in the approved mitigation plan, and based upon recent federal guidance regarding the length of the growing season in the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (as detailed in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region), biological indicators and soil temperature data often indicate that the growing season of a particular county may be longer than that identified in WETS tables As a result, the state Interagency Review Team (IRT) has recommended the use of a growing season beginning February 1 and ending November 30 of each year (unless site - specific data indicate otherwise) However, the WETS - defined growing season for the nearest station (Fayetteville, NC) is March 15 through November 20 (determined via long -term climatic data) Supplemental tables (evaluating hydropenods from March 15 through November 20) are provided for informational purposes Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 8 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) 3 Year 2 Annual Mondonng Per the approved mitigation plan, a total of thirteen (13) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed throughout the site at the outset of the monitoring (March 2011) These wells included seven (7) restoration wells, four (4) enhancement wells, and two (2) reference wells Subsequent to ditch backfilling and plugging, static water levels gradually increased and rates of discharge from the site decreased During the first monitoring season, eleven (11) of the thirteen (13) wells met the hydrologic success despite the moderate to severe drought during the growing season During the Year 2 monitoring (2012), four of the seven restoration wells met the hydrologic success criterion despite the severe to moderate drought during the early to mid - growing season (Table 3A) All four enhancement wells met the hydrologic criterion and one of the two reference wells met the hydrologic criterion It should be noted that when analyzed under the WETS - defined growing season (March 15- November 20), every well exhibited a minimum hydropenod of 5% of the growing season Undisturbed pocosin wetlands exhibit hydropenods of variable duration as evidenced by the two reference wells located on -site Both reference wells are located within mapped Croatan sod units of the Carolina bay However, one reference well exhibited a hydropenod of 9% (equivalent to 22 consecutive days) while the other reference well exhibited a 25% hydropenod (equivalent to 72 consecutive days) This may be attributed to variations in microtopography or soil texture of the specific well location Hydrology has been documented to vary across the site pending the location of wells within the bay, but appear to be consistent with non- nverine pocosin wetlands typically occurring on the outer Coastal Plain It should be noted that the wells which did not meet the hydrologic criterion exhibited similar hydroperiods to Reference Well #1 This is believed to be a result of a severe groundwater deficit and severe drought during the early to mid - growing season Overall, observed discharge rates (as depicted by the slope of the hydrograph) are characteristic of reduced drainage and increased hydrologic residency Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 9 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Table 2A. Summary of Year 2 Hydrologic Monitoring (Section 1 South — Restoration) 2012 Growing Season (February 1— November 30) Well Number Total Number of days within 12" (Jan 1 thru Dec 31) Longest Number Of Consecutive Days Meeting Wetland Hydrology Criteria (in growing season) Dates of Longest Number of Consecutive Days Meeting Wetland Hydrology Criteria Percentage of Growing Season 15% Success n Criteria (45 Day D >5 • o 12 5/0 125 . - 25% 25- o 75/0 >75% 1 59 18 May 29 -June 15 6 No X -- -- -- 2 148 45 May 17 -June 30 15 Yes -- X -- -- 3 146 46 May 17-July 1 15 Yes -- X -- -- 4 156 48 May 17-July 3 16 Yes -- X -- -- 5 44 17 May 30 —June 15 6 No X -- -- -- 5A 77 34 May 17 —June 19 11 No X -- -- -- 6 139 48 May 17-July 3 16 Yes -- X -- -- 7 40 12 May 30 —Jun 10 4 No -- -- -- -- Enhancement 1 185 69 February 20-April 28 23 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 2 195 71 February 20-April 30 25 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 3 175 69 February 20-April 28 20 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 4 165 58 March 3- April 29 20 Yes -- X -- -- Reference 1 85 22 July 11 —August 1 9 No X -- -- -- Reference 2 198 72 February 20-May 1 25 Yes -- X -- -- Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 10 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Table 2B. Summary of Year 2 Hydrologic Monitoring (Section 1 South — Restoration) 2012 Growing Season (March 15 — November 20) Well Number Total Number of days within 12" (Jan 1 thru Dec 31 ) Longest Number Of Consecutive Days Meeting Wetland Hydrology Criteria (in growing season Dates of Longest Number of Consecutive Days Meeting Wetland Hydrology Criteria Percentage of Growing Season 15% Success Criteria (37 Days) >5 0 125% 12.5 - 0 25/0 25- 75/0 >75% 1 59 18 May 29 -June 15 7 No X -- -- -- 2 148 45 May 17 -June 30 18 Yes -- X -- -- 3 146 46 May 17-July 1 18 Yes -- X -- -- 4 156 48 May 17-July 3 19 Yes -- X -- -- 5 44 17 May 30 —June 15 7 No X -- -- -- 5A 77 34 May 17 —June 19 14 No -- X -- -- 6 139 48 May 17-July 3 19 Yes -- X -- -- 7 40 12 May 30 —Jun 10 5 No X -- -- -- Enhancement 1 185 57 July 11 -September 5 23 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 2 195 62 July 11 — September 10 25 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 3 175 49 May 17-July 4 20 Yes -- X -- -- Enhancement 4 165 51 May 17-July 6 20 Yes -- X -- -- Reference 1 85 22 July 11—August 1 9 No X -- -- -- Reference 2 198 63 July 11 -September 11 25 Yes -- X -- -- Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 11 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Prior to the Year 2 growing season, Well #5A was installed within Plot #5 to compare to Well #5 hydrologic data During the Year 1 monitoring period, data from Well #5 appeared to be inconsistent with observed conditions of the area Readings were believed to be influenced by the material of the underlying road bed which has a layer of impermeable material potentially influencing lateral groundwater movement Observations from unlined bore holes suggested this may be the case Although Well #5A did not meet the 15% success criteria, data collected during the Year 2 monitoring period show a 100% increase in consecutive days within 12- inches of the surface as compared to Well #5 These data, in combination with unlined borehole observations, suggest that material within the roadbed may be influencing lateral groundwater movement in the vicinity of Well #5 A summary of these results are provided in Table 3 Complete hydrologic monitoring data are provided in Appendix C NC Division of Water Resources Drought maps are provided in Appendix D The Palmer Drought Indices are included in Appendix E 5.0 Conclusion Based on the data collected in conjunction with the Year 2 monitoring event, the site appears to be progressing well towards the target pocosin (Carolina bay) community Hydrologic data confirm the re- establishment of hydrology characteristic of the target habitat as a result of the earthwork and plug installation completed during the early 2011 growing season While there was a significant groundwater deficit during the growing season, a hydrologic response was evident with normal precipitation in the mid -to -late growing season Water table depths were observed at levels at or near the surface for extended periods Restoration and enhancement wells exhibited similar hydropenods to that of the reference wetlands Though a total of five wells (including one reference well) did not meet the 15% criterion, all but one exhibited a 6% or longer wetland hydropenod during the growing season These data support the restoration of key hydrologic functions relating to water storage and groundwater recharge within the system Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 12 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) Plot monitoring within the restored roadway pocosin corridor indicates low mortality rates of planted trees and shrubs While average stem densities on all of the plots are sufficient to meet the applicable success criteria, pond pine experienced the highest mortality out of the planted trees (likely as a result of drought and overtopping by dense grass during Year 1) However, the surviving individuals exhibited good vigor at the Year 2 monitoring event, and all other planted species exhibited an increased in observed stems (due to the ability to more readily locate and identify during monitoring) The vegetative component of the project appears to be progressing well as evidenced by the growth and survivorship of planted species and the recruitment of characteristic volunteer species Each of the seven (7) plots exceeded the minimum success criteria during the Year 2 monitoring event Observed heights ranged from 1' to 15' among the planted and volunteer individuals, suggesting that conditions within the restored pocosin are suitable for healthy vegetative composition and growth The prevalence of red maple along the edges of the plots will continue to be monitored Herbicide treatment may be considered (in consultation with the IRT) if it is believed that red maple will adversely affect the vegetative structure of the restored pocosin At this time, it is the opinion of LMG that red maple will not significantly impact the long term vegetative composition of the target wetland community since it is a pioneer species and prevalent in nearly all pocosin wetlands Overall, Year 2 monitoring indicates that the site is trending toward success as evidenced by the survivorship and growth of planted species and the hydrologic response subsequent to the earthwork performed during the early 2011 growing season Barra Farms Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank 13 Year 2 — Annual Monitoring Report (Section One) FIGURES LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP — E-- nmental Consultants March 2013 ' -- ( BIKE ' .�Y� `— U 'r .*�~ \ o CID VIA SITE KE IX RU IL BIKE *Boundaries are approximate and are Lno meant to be absolute. Map Source: North Carolina Atlas & Gazetteer. Pg 84.2003 SCALE 1" 1 Mile apm Barra Farms Wetland Mitigation Bank - Phase 11 Section One South Figure 1 Cumberland County, NC vvww.LMGroup.net Vicinity Map October 2011 Phone: 910.452.0001 -1.866.LMG.1078 Fax: 910.452.0060 40-07-568 P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 Section One Boundary Section Two Boundary Section Three Boundary Section Four Boundary Section 1 (291 ac. - 80.5 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Restoration (33 ac. - 33 credits) )n- riparian Wetland Enhancement (31 ac. - 15.5 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Preservation (225 ac. - 32 credits) Section II (777 ac. - 364.7 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Restoration (246 ac. - 246 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Enhancement (136 ac. - 68 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Preservation (355 ac. - 50.7 credits) Section III (455 ac. - 431 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Restoration (431 ac. - 431 credits) Long Leaf Pine Restoration (Non - Wetland) (24 ac. - 0 credits)` Section IV (315 ac. - 283.3 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Restoration (277 ac. - 277 credits) K -)n- riparian Wetland Enhancement (8 ac. - 4 credits) Non - riparian Wetland Preservation (16 ac. - 2.3 credits) Barra I Mitigation Bank (610 ac.) L. \WETLANDS \2007 WETLANDS FILES \40 -07 -568 - -- Barra Farm Mitigation, Howard\As -Built and x- 5� 2000 4000 1 \Project Phase Ma PRELIMINARY LMG Z LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP. . En i,wn enfal Consultants Post Office Box 2522 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Telephone 910- 452 -0001 Project: ." IF NOTE: This Is Not An Engineered, Survey, or Architectural Drawing NOTE: Parcel Boundaries From Cumberland County GIS. Date: Revision Date: Barra Farms - Phase II 9/24/09 2/6/12 Scale: Job Number: 1" =2000' 40 -07 -568 Project Phase Map Plan Drawn By: Figure: GSF /CBM 2 EA DB- LEGEND Section One Boundary Lateral Ditch Limits of Disturbance (14.4 ac.) Temporary 10" X 15' Coir Fiber Wattle Permanent Ditch Plug /Backfill (Lateral Ditch) Permanent Ditch Plug /Backfill (Collector Canal) 300 600 1200 \WFTI AN572557 WFTI ANUS FII FR \40 -57 -SRS - -- Rarr PRELIMINARY �LMG Z LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Environmental Consultants Post Office Box 2522 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Telephone: 910-452-0001 mits \Barra Farms SEC.dwc LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (ACCESS ROAD) Project: Barra II Wetland Mitigation Bank - Section 1 DITCH /PLUG LOCATION MAP Date: Revision Date: 11/2/2010 1/31/2011 Scale: Job Number: 1" =600' 40 -07 -568 Drawn By: CBM Figure: 3 i .� 1 /` e f 0E4 4 R2 3/ r� R1 i� qV LEGEND - Vegetation Plot w/ Paired Well ' "•''� - Enhancement Well o - Reference Well 0 - Pocosin -Bay Restoration 0 - Pocosin -Bay Enhancement - Pocosin -Bay Preservation NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site planning. Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography SCALE 1" = 600' Stewart Precythe Barra Farms www.LMGroup.net Figure 4 Section One - South LMG Phone: 910.452.0001 •1.866.LMG.1078 Well and Plot Cumberland County, NC ;A(A, %1L'N CR(AT Fax: 910.452.0060 Location Map April 2011 — f "' " " " " " ° " "'' " " "' " " "" P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 40-07-568 APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOS LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP. - Environmental Consultants March 2013 (1) View of project (looking Northwest) (2) View of main collector plug (looking Southeast) Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank LMG Site Documentation LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP ivc Section 1 - Year 2 E^ ° ^^e ^' ° " ° "' ° " ° "`= Photos Annual Monitoring Report (3) Plot #1 Looking North (Year 2 Monitoring) Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank Section 1 - Year 2 Annual Monitoring Report (4) Typical Cypress Growth (Plot #1) LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP — — Environmental COns0—fs Site Documentation Photos (5) Typical Black Gum Growth (Plot #2) Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank Section 1 - Year 2 Annual Monitoring Report (6) Typical Pond Pine Growth (Plot #2) LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP.w - Environmental Consultants Site Documentation Photos (7) View of Black Gum and Pond Pine in Plot #3 Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank Section 1 - Year 2 Annual Monitoring Report (8) View of Plot #3 (looking Northwest) LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP,- Envi--1.1 Cuns I—ts Site Documentation Photos (9) Monitoring Plot #4 (10) View of Bald Cypress growth in Plot #5 Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank LMG Site Documentation LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP rvc. Section 1 - Year 2 — E" ° "Re "` ° " ° "' " "° Photos Annual Monitoring Report (13) Typical Growth of Pond Pine (Plot #6) Barra Farm Phase II Wetland Mitigation Bank Section 1 - Year 2 Annual Monitoring Report (14) Plot #7 looking Southeast LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP nc Environmental Consultants Site Documentation Photos APPENDIX B: INDIVIDUAL PLOT DATA SHEETS LMG LAND M4NAGEMENT GROUP me Environmental Consultants March 2013 PLOT 1 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS I'WK01fh`Illu 1:1 of R SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Black Gum T 1 0 5 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 7 1 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 7 1 5 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 27 2 ft Planted 27 Black Gum T 12 2 5 ft Planted 12 Black Gum T 6 aft Planted 6 Black Gum T 1 35 Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 0 5 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 10 1 ft Planted 10 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 1 5 ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 8 2 ft Planted 8 Atlantic White Cedar T 6 2 5 ft Planted 6 Atlantic White Cedar T 15 3 ft Planted 15 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 3 5 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 7 4ft Planted 7 Pond Pine T 1 2 ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 3 2 5 ft Planted 3 Pond Pine T 1 aft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 1 0 5 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 3 2 5 ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 2 3 ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 35 Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 5 4ft Planted 5 Bald Cypress T 1 4 5 ft Planted 1 PLOT 1 Bald Cypress T 1 5 ft Planted 1 Red Bay T 4 2 ft Volunteer 4 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 1 8 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 2 1 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 5 6 ft Volunteer 5 Sweet Bay T 2 7 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 8 ft Volunteer 8 Sweet Bay T 1 loft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 12 ft Volunteer 1 Blueberry SH 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Gallberry SH 15 2 ft - Avg Volunteer 15 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 7 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 7 Dusty Zenobia SH 15 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 15 Red Maple T 40 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 133 (PLANTED SPECIES 1330 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 63 (VOLUNTEER 630 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 40 >50% OF TOTAL (YM) NO VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 236 (PER ACRE) 1960 PLOT 2 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM 17, SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 3 2ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 6 3ft Planted 6 Black Gum T 1 3 5ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 1 4 Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 0 5ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 4 2ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 3ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 3 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 4ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 4 5ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 2ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 2 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 16 3ft Planted 16 Bald Cypress T 5 3 5ft Planted 5 Bald Cypress T 19 4ft Planted 19 Bald Cypress T 1 4 5ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 6 ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 3 1 ft Planted 3 Pond Pine T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 PLOT 2 Pond Pine T 5 2 ft Planted 5 Pond Pine T 2 2 5 ft Planted 2 Pond Pine T 12 3 ft Planted 12 Pond Pine T 4 3 5 ft Planted 4 Pond Pine T 1 4 ft Planted 2 Sweet Bay T 1 1 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 3 4 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Bay T 3 5 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Bay T 3 6 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Bay T 2 7 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 3 S ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Bay T 2 loft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 1 12 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 15 ft Volunteer 1 Cherrybark Oak T 1 15 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Red Maple T 60 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 TOTAL PLANTED SPECIES 111 OBSERVED DENSITY (PLANTED SPECIES PER ACRE) 1110 TOTAL ACCEPTABLE VOLUNTEERS 24 OBSERVED DENSITY (VOLUNTEER SPECIES PER ACRE) 240 TOTAL UNACCEPTABLE VOLUNTEERS 60 SINGLE VOLUNTEER >50% OF TOTAL (YIN) NO TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 195 OBSERVED DENSITY (PER ACRE) 1350 PLOT 3 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 3 1 5 ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 3 2ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 1 2 5 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 9 3ft Planted 9 Bald Cypress T 2 3 5 ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 7 4 ft Planted 7 Bald Cypress T 1 4 5 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 2 1 5 ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 15 2 ft Planted 15 Black Gum T 7 2 5 ft Planted 7 Black Gum T 3 3ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 2 5 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T B 3ft Planted S Atlantic White Cedar T 1 3 5 ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 Oft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 2 1 5 ft Planted 2 Pond Pine T 1 2ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 5 2 5 ft Planted 5 Pond Pine T 10 3ft Planted 10 Pond Pine T 2 3 5 ft Planted 2 Sweet Bay T 2 3ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 PLOT 3 Sweet Bay T 3 6 It Volunteer 3 Sweet Bay T 3 8 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 5 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 5 Red Maple T 20 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 87 (PLANTED SPECIES 870 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 17 (VOLUNTEER 170 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 20 NO >50% OF TOTAL (Y/N) VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 124 (PER ACRE) 1040 PLOT 4 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 2 2ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 13 3 ft Planted 13 Bald Cypress T 6 3 5 ft Planted 6 Bald Cypress T 19 4ft Planted 19 Bald Cypress T 3 4 5ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 3 5ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 1 6 ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 1 1 5ft Planted 1 Black Gum T 5 2ft Planted 5 Black Gum T 2 2 5ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 1 aft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 2ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 2 5 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 3 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 4ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 1 1 5ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 2 2 5ft Planted 2 Sweet Bay T 2 4ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 1 5ft Volunteer 1 PLOT 4 Sweet Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 2 7 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 1 loft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 O ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 8 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Red Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 8 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 9 3 It - Avg Volunteer 9 Red Maple T 25 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 Sweet Gum T 1 2 ft Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 72 (PLANTED SPECIES 720 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 25 (VOLUNTEER 250 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 26 >50% OF TOTAL (YM) NO VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 123 (PER ACRE) 970 PLOT 5 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 1 1 5ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 2ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 6 2 5ft Planted 6 Bald Cypress T 18 3ft Planted 18 Bald Cypress T 1 3 5 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 6 4ft Planted 6 Bald Cypress T 1 4 5ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 1 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 2ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 2 5ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 4 3 ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 3 5 ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 4ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 5 2ft Planted 5 Black Gum T 2 aft Planted 2 Pond Pine T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Pond Pine T 2 2ft Planted 2 Pond Pine T 4 2 5 It Planted 4 Pond Pine T 8 3ft Planted 8 Pond Pine T 1 4ft Planted 1 Red Bay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 4ft Volunteer 1 PLOT 5 Red Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 6 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 2 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 4 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 5 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 8 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 9 ft Volunteer 1 Water Oak T 1 20 It Volunteer 1 Fetterbush SH 20 3 It - Avg Volunteer 20 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 9 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 9 Dusty Zenobia SH 9 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 9 Red Maple T 20 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 76 (PLANTED SPECIES 760 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 48 (VOLUNTEER 480 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 20 >50% OF TOTAL (YM) NO VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 144 (PER ACRE) 1240 PLOT 6 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 1 1 ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 3 2 5ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 6 3ft Planted 6 Bald Cypress T 3 3 5ft Planted 3 Bald Cypress T 7 4ft Planted 7 Bald Cypress T 2 4 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 1 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 4 2 ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 4 2 5ft Planted 4 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 3ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 3 5ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 4ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 1 2 5 ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 1 1 5 ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 3 2 5 ft Planted 3 Pond Pine T 3 3ft Planted 3 Pond Pine T 3 4 ft Planted 3 Pond Pine T 1 5ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 1 4ft Planted 1 Loblolly Bay T 29 0 5ft Volunteer 29 Loblolly Bay T 8 1 ft Volunteer 8 Loblolly Bay T 2 4ft Volunteer 2 PLOT 6 Loblolly Bay T 1 8 ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 5 2 ft Volunteer 5 Sweet Bay T 2 3 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 4 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 2 5 ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 1 E ft Volunteer 1 Red Bay T 1 3 ft Volunteer 1 Fetterbush SH 7 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 7 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 15 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 15 American Tits SH 5 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 5 Red Maple T 25 6 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 Sweet Gum T 1 8 ft Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 55 (PLANTED SPECIES 550 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 80 (VOLUNTEER 800 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 26 >50% OF TOTAL (Y/N) NO VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 161 (PER ACRE) 1350 Plot 7 BARRA FARMS PHASE II, SECTION ONE (SOUTH) ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS PLOT NUMBER SPECIES STRATUM T SA or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Species Number of Individuals Counted toward Success Criteria Bald Cypress T 2 0 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 2ft Planted 1 Bald Cypress T 2 2 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 7 3ft Planted 7 Bald Cypress T 4 4ft Planted 4 Bald Cypress T 2 5ft Planted 2 Bald Cypress T 1 6 5ft Planted 1 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 1 ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 2ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 3 2 5 ft Planted 3 Atlantic White Cedar T 9 3ft Planted 9 Atlantic White Cedar T 2 3 5ft Planted 2 Atlantic White Cedar T 1 4ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 1 2ft Planted 1 Pond Pine T 2 3ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 2 1 5ft Planted 2 Black Gum T 3 2ft Planted 3 Black Gum T 2 2 5ft Planted 2 Red Bay T 2 3ft Volunteer 2 Sweet Bay T 1 2ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 3ft Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 8 It Volunteer 1 Sweet Bay T 1 12 ft Volunteer 1 Loblolly Bay T 1 40 1 1 ft - Avg I Volunteer 1 40 Plot 7 Fetterbush SH 3 3 ft Volunteer 3 Sweet Pepper Bush SH 5 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 5 Gallberry SH 5 3 ft - Avg Volunteer 5 American Titi SH 5 3 It - Avg Volunteer 5 Red Maple T 20 5 ft - Avg Volunteer 0 OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL PLANTED 49 (PLANTED SPECIES 490 SPECIES PER ACRE) OBSERVED DENSITY TOTAL ACCEPTABLE 64 (VOLUNTEER 640 VOLUNTEERS SPECIES PER ACRE) TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER UNACCEPTABLE 20 >50% OF TOTAL (Y/N) NO VOLUNTEERS TOTAL OBSERVED DENSITY INDIVIDUALS 133 (PER ACRE) 1130 STEM COUNTS BY YEAR (Barra Farms Phase II - Section One) - PLANTED SPECIES YEAR PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 PLOT 7 TOTAL Survivorship Rate (by year) Bald Cypress 0 16 59 26 52 48 29 23 253 N/A 1 13 39 22 41 34 29 21 199 079 2 14 52 26 50 37 25 19 223 088 Black Gum 0 82 21 49 13 12 3 9 189 N/A 1 54 13 25 4 14 4 8 122 065 2 61 13 29 9 9 1 7 129 068 Atlantic White Cedar 0 105 28 22 21 15 24 30 245 N/A 1 42 9 7 12 12 17 25 124 051 2 53 17 12 9 13 17 20 141 058 Pond Pine 0 19 59 44 37 31 22 16 228 N/A 1 3 20 25 7 15 14 8 92 040 2 5 29 20 4 17 12 3 90 040 BARRA FARMS PHASE 11 SECTION ONE (SOUTH) APPENDIX C: HYDROGRAPHS LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP me Ennronmental Conmlmnrs March 2013 Wells maintained 2 -7 -12 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record �► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 1, 2, & 3 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► January 1, 2012 - ► March 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am d L V c c 0 A CL L 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 W d t 0 v -6 m m J -12 m -18 d -24 1= fA -30 c -36 cs -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment March 2012 It � ti L ' l . ` hex Few FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total -30% —70% 8 7 6 v 5 (D n 'O w 4 2) 0 3 2 ... 1 0 )ate Sao Jam Sao ,�`�° ly +Plot 1 (13D4B664) +Plot 2 (13D4A99D) >� Plot 3 (13D4ACC4) 1 2i below surface MKFAY Raingauge Slide A -4 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 1, 2, & 3 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► April 1, 2012 - ► June 30, 2012 ► One reading per day at 7:OOam N d L 2 'a a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 June 2012 �ti �Z, �q, �2 �al �aA bA �a� �a� �a� �aA K, �JK� � Q� �JK< � Q �J < .' co �.' ��o' L.' �� • 6 ��• �6 �� • gyp' �h �p QV gyp' NKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% N d L 0 V E d -6 d J -12 m -18 d -24 t 3 Cl) -30 c C -36 c7 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net 8 7 6 5 CD A 4 0 3 2 v 1 0 �P�` 6PQ�• ��P�`• 1 �.`O P�`• (L�PQ�' 2�PQ� 1�,a� ��a� ��a NV�a1 ��'a � � � 26�a 11��a y�JO �o��o �V�JC •�,� �� I mPlot 1 (13D413664) -+-Plot 2 (13D4A99D) Plot 3 (13D4ACC4) 12in below surface KFAY Raingauge Slide A -5 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 1, 2, & 3 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► July 1, 2012 - ► September 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t E c 0 W a a` 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 tll 41 L 0 v d -6 d J -12 d -18 d -24 t N -30 c -36 U Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment September 2012 J0' eQ eQ eQ eQ eQ eQ 'V '6P 'tvP SOP tx5 �5 NV NC5 ly 105 FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% -42 °� eQ z z ' V \r°�J\ rL��J\ �6,J� �1,J� �P AV�eQ o0 s�PJp ��PJA noPJA nhPJq nOPJA Deep o0 -Plot 1 (13D4B664) -+-Plot 2 (13D4A99D) Plot 3 (13D4ACC4) 12in below surface IMKFAY Ramgauge I Slide A -6 8 7 6 v 5 n 1, 4 a) 0 3 3 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record 1 ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 1, 2, & 3 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► October 1, 2012 - ► December 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t U c r 0 a a` Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 December 2012 OOH OO<' OO\' OOti & & OO'l: 'p J' \p J' !p J' \.o "p J' 'pJ' Qz QecJ Qed Qed Qe� Qed N�' 9�' 9y r� h , p• , ,�• 16 tiV gyp• 'p• NV 16 2r j gyp• FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% N d t 0 v c d -6 d J -12 a� w -18 a� -24 't N -30 c G -36 a Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 — - - - - - - - — - - - OG~ OG~ OG� OG� OG~ OG'� OG�' �pJ �pJ �pJ �OJ C1p, �OJ Q00 Qe0 Qe0 Q20 Qe0 QQ'O -Plot 1 (1 31D413664) -+-Plot 2 (13D4A99D) Plot 3 (13D4ACC4) 12in below surface 1OKFAY Raingauge I Slide A -7 8 7 6 v 5 n R 4 Or 0 3 2 v 1 0 Wells maintained 2 -7 -12 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record �► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 4, 5, 6, & 7 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► January 1, 2012 - ► March 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d L V C C 0 m CL a` 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 W d t 0 v v -6 m J -12 aD -18 m -24 t fA -30 c -36 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment March 2012 Sao so sc Fey eo e'Q eQ e� �� 'a� mKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% Sao o ao eo o eo b o sz, S de Fe �a� 40 -Plot 4 (13D4131369) -+-Plot 5 (13D482D5) ,k- Plot 6 (13D47E92) ♦ Plot 7 (13D4C9B7) I 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge I Slide B -4 8 7 6 v 5 (D 2 4 0) 0 3 7 2 ... 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record �► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 4, 5, 6, & 7 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► April 1, 2012 - ► June 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N 01 t c 0 .a U m CL 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 6 y d L 0 V c 6 Z d J -12 as -18 d -24 1= U) -30 c C -36 c� Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment June 2012 PQ4 2 �`SaA ��aA ��A �6�aA A rte' ��a� y�a� �� h�J� �o�J� 'y�J� ry��JC JJC� NKFAY Raingauge —30 day total = 30% —70% -42 - - — - �aA �aA �aA �aA �aA �aA -Plot 4 (13D4BBB9) -+-Plot 5 (13D482D5) Plot 6 (13D47E92) ♦ Plot 7 (13NC9137) I 12in below surface OKFAY Raingauge I Slide B -5 8 7 6 5 n 13 4 a; 0 3 3 7 2 v 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 4, 5, 6, & 7 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► July 1, 2012 - ► September 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d L U C C 0 'a U d a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 N d t 0 v c v d -6 d J -12 m M -18 d M -24 't N -30 c -36 0 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment September 2012 eQ eQ eQ , N0 05 ^v '�( 115 1P MKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70°/ JD J� JA JO' J� JA eQ eQ �Q yQ eQ eQ +Plot 4 (13D4B669) +Plot 5 (13D482D5) A- Plot 6 (13D47E92) ♦ Plot 7 (13NC9137) 1 2i below surface 11111111111KFAY Raingauge Slide B -6 8 7 6 v 5 CD n 4 s« 0 3 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc -cli mate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record �► Barra Farms Mitigation 1 ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Veg plot Wells 4, 5, 6, & 7 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► October 1, 2012 - ► December 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N W L V C c 0 3 CL L 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 H d L 0 V c d 6 as J -12 as -18 m -24 3 U) -30 c -36 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment December 2012 OGti OG\t OGt OGti OGt OG: J" 4" J' .A' J' J' G G G G G G �o 'o �o �o Qe Qe Oo Qe Oo Qe FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% G O& O(\: %, G% Gt �\: J o J J J ' J ' G G Qe G QG OG O & �e � �D G Oo -Plot 4 (13D4BBB9) -+-Plot 5 (13D482D5) -A-Plot 6 (13D47E92) ♦Plot 7 (13NC9137) I 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge I Slide B -7 8 7 6 5 n 4 0 3 2 1 0 Wells maintained 2 -7 -12 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Enhancement Wells 1, 2, ► 3, & 4 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► January 1, 2012 - ► March 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t U C r- .2 'a d a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 March 2012 ao �Kl� a� �� a� aK ac eo e'o o� e'o FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% W d L 0 v c -6 a� v J -12 m w -18 d -24 3 Cl) -30 C -36 t7 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 — - - - - - - - �- �aN� lac )ate Sao Jam SS� Jam �e� �e� �z �e� lea c� ,gyp r� 9� Ily �� +E1 (EBD5035) +E2 (13D4BCC7) � E3 (13D482DC) ♦ E4 (13D47E6F) 1—n below surface mKFAY Raingauge Slide C-4 8 7 6 �o 5 C. a 4 C' 0 3 7 2 v 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc -cI imate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Enhancement Wells 1, 2, ► 3, & 4 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► April 1, 2012 - ► June 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d L C c 0 M a a` 10 s 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 b7 d t 0 v c a� -6 d -� -12 m -18 d -24 't Cl) -30 c C -36 0 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment June 2012 �ti .� -� '� ��a'A 6�a'A ��a'A 0�a'A ��a� �6��1 �� Q 9 `7 �JC o�J� IV ��J� 1 MKFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% ^�a� � a� A A 1 h�J� o�J� � h�J � C �o�Jc q 4`O � N �`Sa N 6� +E1 (EBD5035) +E2 (13D4BCC7) E3 (13D482DC) ♦E4 (13D47E6F) 12in below surface NKFAY Ramgauge Slide C-5 8 7 6 M 5 A R 4 0 3 z v 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record �► Barra Farms Mitigation 1 ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Enhancement Wells 1, 2, ► 3, & 4 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► July 1, 2012 - ► September 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t S r- 0 M a a` 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 6 N N t 0 V S -6 N N J -12 m -18 d -24 t Cl) -30 .0 c C -36 U -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment September 2012 geQ c,eQ FNKFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% �J ,J �J\ �J\ �J\ ,J JJ\ JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q ZQ 2Q 0 �� 6 ti� ti� 3� hP o'P hP �o'P �hP tioP Dom' ��' .�� .CO a`' CO +E1 (EBD5035) +E2 (13D4BCC7) -A-E3 (13D482DC) ♦E4 (13D47E6F) I 12in below surface WKFAY Ramgauge I Slide C -6 8 7 6 5 n 4 0 3 7 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Enhancement Wells 1, 2, ► 3, & 4 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► October 1, 2012 - ► December 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t U C r- 0 5 CL a` Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 December 2012 OG1 O OGti OGt; O °ti O °t O °ti °1' °Q" °A, � A, � °.1" � A, OeG oeG O12P O�G OTC, OeG ltv NKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% 6 (A d s 0 v c c d -6 G1 J -12 a� -18 a� -24 U) -30 n c C -36 0 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 � �ti �ti OGti O °t OGti �`l( OGt O °l: �'l: J" 1 J' 1� �ti �ti J" J" X A" G G G G G G '° "° Oe Oe Oe O° O° Oe +E1 (EBD5035) +E2 (13D4BCC7) - E3 (13D482DC) ♦E4 (13D47E6F) 12m below surface NKFAY Raingauge Slide C-7 8 7 6 5 n 4 w 0 3 7 2 v 1 0 Wells maintained 2 -7 -12 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Reference Wells 1 & 2 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► January 1, 2012 - ► March 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:OOam N d r U C 2 'a m a 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 6 d 0 L E -6 m J -12 as 18 d -24 ;r 3 N -30 v c `0 -36 0 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% March 2012 8 7 6 5 n .o 4 a) O 3 7 2 1 0 �a4�" �a� �a� �Z'0 �eO fie° �egs �e0 �a" �a�" �ya" +Reference 1 (13D49BEA) -+-Reference 2 (9DE6284) 1 2i below surface NKFAY Raingauc I Slide D -4 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station. FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Reference Wells 1 & 2 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► April 1, 2012 - ► June 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:OOam N d t U C c 0 co a a` Hydrology Assessment lu 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 June 2012 6 d 0 t c -6 m J -12 a� 18 d -24 Cl) -30 c 0 -36 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net MKFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 8 7 6 5 CD 0 .o 4 G' O 3 3 3 2 v 1 0 PQ� PQ� PQ� PQ� PQ� � PQ� ��a� `Sa� �a� ��a� a� a� a� N N N 6 9 � 6' � N� 6 - Reference 1 (13D49BEA) -+-Reference 2 (9DE6284) 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge Slide D -5 '?q -Q - Zc PQ .' PQq ?, .' 6 ��aA 6�aA ��a� ��aA �'e 1')� �J� 9 ��a� �6�a� ti ti 3 !oszc �� o�p 2v 6 d 0 t c -6 m J -12 a� 18 d -24 Cl) -30 c 0 -36 -42 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net MKFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 8 7 6 5 CD 0 .o 4 G' O 3 3 3 2 v 1 0 PQ� PQ� PQ� PQ� PQ� � PQ� ��a� `Sa� �a� ��a� a� a� a� N N N 6 9 � 6' � N� 6 - Reference 1 (13D49BEA) -+-Reference 2 (9DE6284) 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge Slide D -5 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Reference Wells 1 & 2 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► July 1, 2012 - ► September 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d r c 0 M a a` s 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 6 f/1 d 0 t c -6 5 J -12 d -18 m -24 Cl) -30 c 0 -36 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70 °/ -42 CY — Reference 1 (13D49BEA) -+-Reference 2 (9DE6284) September 2012 12in below surface MKFAY Raingauge Slide D -6 8 7 6 �o 5 (D n v 4 2) O 3 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc -cl i mate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Reference Wells 1 & 2 ► Ecotone - WM 40 and 20 ► October 1, 2012 - ► December 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d t S c 0 'a m a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 December 2012 Opt Op`l' Op'l' Opl( Opt Opt Opt A" o �" 1' A" C; C; 6 C; C; C; � �e Qe Qe �e �e FKFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% r, U) t 0 c -6 a� J -12 d -18 m -24 t M N -30 c O -36 0 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 .�2 .�2 Opti cf, : Opt Op`� ct Opti J" �0A ��A ��4 ��J" ��-A' OeCi Oer Oar OeCi Oe0 OTC; -Reference 1 (13D49BEA) -+-Reference 2 (9DE6284) I 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge I Slide D -7 8 7 6 5 CD n v 4 G� O 3 2 1 0 Wells maintained 2 -7 -12 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Plot 5 Comparison ► Ecotone - WM 20s ► January 1, 2012 - ► March 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am a m t c c 0 3 CL a` 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 Nl d 0 s c -6 m J -12 `m M -18 m M -24 't N -30 c 0 -36 0 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment March 2012 �e'o �e11$ �e'o del �e'D OKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% -42 = = _ I �a° lac Sb Sb sac �aP FeO "< 9, F-16 '<0 '< �e� �a �a� �a` �a� 40 6 �N. N� 2� tiro' �. h �p �ci �p � N: �6 11>, 9y 1 ' +Original (13D482D5) -+-Added Well (1130F119) 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge Slide E -1 8 7 6 M 5 n v' 4 O 3 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Plot 5 Comparison ► Ecotone - WM 20s ► April 1, 2012 - ► June 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d r U c c 0 'a d a Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 June 2012 4 0 � 0 � 0" � PQ� 2 PQ� �� a� �6�� 2��a� 26�aa ��a� h�J� 'o�J� � KFAY Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 6 N d 0 .0 c -6 d J -12 d -18 a� -24 i N -30 a c 0 -36 C7 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 8 7 6 5 (D n -a 4 m O 3 7 2 1 0 PQ�' PQ�• QQ�' PQ�' QQ�. PQ&' �'A �aA �a� �a� �a� �a1 �aA -Original (13D482D5) -+-Added Well (1130F119) 12in below surface ■KFAY Raingauge Slide E -2 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Plot 5 Comparison ► Ecotone - WM 20s ► July 1, 2012 - ► September 30, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am w m t U C r- 0 m 0. 0` 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6 N L 0 c -6 d J -12 a� -18 aD -24 t -30 0- -36 a Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net Hydrology Assessment MKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% September 2012 -42 - — - - 5Je C'yQ -*-Original (13D482D5) -+-Added Well (1130F119) 12in below surface NKFAY Raingauge Slide E -3 8 7 6 5 CD 0 -a 4 C'1 O 3 �. 7 2 1 0 Precipitation data obtained from: Fayetteville Airport (KFAY) (www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu) 30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from WETS Station: FAYETTEVILLE, NC3017 (wcc.nres.usda.gov) Monitoring Well Record ► Barra Farms Mitigation ► Cumberland County, NC ► 40 -07 -568 ► Plot 5 Comparison ► Ecotone - WM 20s ► October 1, 2012 - ► December 31, 2012 ► One reading per day ► at 7:00am N d r c 0 S CL 2 CL` Hydrology Assessment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 December 2012 <L � �� & �� o�' �a�' �oA ' �oA ' �oA' �o�' Oec O�c Oec Oec Oec Oec �" N NV . 1 11, NKFAY Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% N t 0 c -6 a� J -12 a� -18 as -24 i N -30 v c 0 -36 Land Management Group, Inc. www.lmgroup.net -42 �'�: dos 1o�' -'p 1o4' Oe c < eOec Oec O�G O�c +Original (13D482D5) -+-Added Well (1130F119) 12in below surface MKFAY Raingauge Slide E -4 8 7 6 5 (D n .o 4 w O 3 2 1 0 APPENDIX D: NORTH CAROLINA DROUGHT MONITORING STATUS MAPS LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP we Environmental Consultants March 2013 NC ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map 0 (i� G + a d�q'l �= F 1 of 1 WRISARS Drought Monitoring 3/2012 Layers Legend _.NCDWR -_ -- M •1''� _:y '"'�..,._� ._r~ ,' rj� -~� -_ �- „'lam -•� -� _ I SITE 4 k. ,•I y �I `•, I NNorth Caro 1 ina `� C-, i •, f, { SL %W State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties A/ Interstat Highway in NC Roads in NC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought M 03 - Extrene Drought D2 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought De - Abnornally Dry NC L ),ht Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map d P IofI WRISARS Drought Monitoring, 02/07/2012 Layers Legend SITE � J North Caro 1 it y� y, ti IV State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties 1V Interstat Highway in HC Roads in NC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought M 03 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought DA - Rbnornally Dry - r httn- / /xvxxrw nrwnter nra /T)M /frame-, rlhtml.html? laver= hasins& laver= nc &zoomsize =2& mat)= D: /ms4w /At)ache/htdocs /DM /ma... 2/27/2013 NC I ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map y, 03/06/2012 1 �I rr SL } F Iofl WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend %V State Boundary of NC State Boundaries TVA States Counties IV Interstat Highway in NC Roads in NC Cities M D4 - Exceptional Drought M D3 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought 01 - First Level Drought D8 - Rbnornally Dry I,tt- - //. -- - nauotar nrn /T)X/f /framac Abtml .._ 2/27/2013 NC I ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map ® Q 04/03/2012 - 0 P 1 of 1 WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend IV State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties /V Interstat Highway in HC Roads in HC Cities M D4 - Exceptional Drought M D3 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought D8 - Abnornally Dry lhttri•fl- znu-ty ni-wntPr nrrn /TIA/f /frnmac Alhtml 7/77/7(111 NCDWR rr — SL t +� 'i� SITE fr' ` } l .+ �••.,� _ - - - = �� '� it _ �`- 41` } North Caro 1 ina `r, I j j / '-fir! � -- c; � '�r�fl -: ca �' ~� —. �yy�'� +` �`5•_ I1 1r_ fr { SJ II P 1 of 1 WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend IV State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties /V Interstat Highway in HC Roads in HC Cities M D4 - Exceptional Drought M D3 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought D8 - Abnornally Dry lhttri•fl- znu-ty ni-wntPr nrrn /TIA/f /frnmac Alhtml 7/77/7(111 NC I ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map F loft WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend 05/01/2012 1 t SITE r �orth Caro 1 iria'-,,. 1' r a r`' • r State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties /V Interstat Highway in HC Roads in HC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought 03 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought 00 - Rbnornally Dry L,Fa..,. / /,......., „,..,..,�•,« .....+lTlAi(lF .,. -,-inn .71�4m1 l.t ml�lo., Ar= hoc�ncR�la��ar= n� ;P�vnnmciva= '�.Q�mar�= T�• /mc4w/ Anac:} 1P /}ltc�(1C:C /nM /171a... 2/27/20I3 NC I ght Status Map F 1 of 1 RS Drought North Carolina Drought Status Map WRISA Monitoring SA / a 06/05/2012 Layers Legend NCDWR _ � • ��, •�� rat �~ •', SITE I� h orth Carolina',,,. - S; �� ^',; fir_ `•!� I ' i i- -- - - -- - -- _ - - - -- -- fff — - - -- IV State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States v., Counties IV Interstat Highway in INC Roads in NC Cities D4 - Exceptional Drought 03 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought D1 - First Level Drought D6 - Rbnornally Dry httn• / /x"Arxm nowntar nra /r)NA /frnmac rilhtml ')/77/7n11 NC: ight Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map 4-V a 09/18/2012 NCDWR SITE r Forth r� Caarolina c 1. -IJ T, I of I WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend /V state Boundary of NC State Boundaries TVR States Counties /V interstat Highway in HC Roads in HC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought M 03 - Extrene Brought 02 - Severe Brought DI - First Level Drought Be - Rbnornally Dry clhtmlhtm]9]qvi-r--hqqinqt,],qvf-.r=nC,&70OMgize=2&mat)=D:/ms4w/Ar)ache/htdocs/DM/ma... 2/27/2013 NC F ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map Carolina F 1 of 1 WRISARS Drou ht Monitoring 10/02/2012 Layers Legend %/ State Boundary of HC State Boundaries TVA States Counties %V Interstat Highway in NC Roads in NC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought M 03 - Extrene Drought D2 - Severe Drought 01 - First Level Drought DS - Abnornally Dry i-- _ - _ -- _ -- - - - - -- ter - - - -- - - -. - - -- - - -. -- - — - - - -- - - - - -- -- -_ � httn• / /www nnwnter pro /nM /frameq (lhtml html9laver= haRins&. laver= nc &�.onmsize =2& man= D: /ms4w /Apache /htdocs /DM /ma... 2/27/2013 NC I ght Status Map 41 North Carolina Drought Status Map 11/06/2012 -NCDWR SITE � orth Carolina -, F I of I WRISARS Drought Monitoring Layers Legend A/ State Boundary of NC State Boundaries TVA States Counties Interstat Highway in MC Roads in NC Cities IN 04 - Exceptional Brought M D3 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Brought 01 - First Level Brought De - Abnornally Dry --t- AUf»l 7/77/7(11 2 NC I ght Status Map North Carolina Drought Status Map f I of I WRISARS Drought Monitoring 12/04/2012 Layers Legend ---..NCOWR SITE ti rth Caro liiia', '14 '-% l tom. i6;41o� L i %) J 4 -- - -- --- — -- /V State Boundary of NC State Boundaries TVA States Counties /V Interstat Highway in NC Roads in HC Cities M 04 - Exceptional Drought M 03 - Extrene Drought 02 - Severe Drought DI - First Level Drought 08 - Abnornally Dry httn-//www nrwqtf-,r orcrIDM/frnmeq Atm] 7/77/7O1 *1 APPENDIX E: PALMER DROUGHT INDEX MAPS LMG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP vYc Enveronmental Consul ants March 2013 Nation Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions January 2012 extreme sevare moderate mid- moderately very extremely drought drought drought range motet moist moist 4.00 -3.00 .2.00 .1.99 +2.00 4x00 +4.40 and to to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 .299 +1.99 +2.99 4.99 above Natior% Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions February 201 2 extreme severe mode"Re mid- moderawy very extremely drought drought drought range moist m01st moist -4.00 -3.00 -2.,40 -1.99 +2.00 4M +4.00 and 10 to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 -299 +1.99 +299 +3.90 above r' Notion Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions March 2012 .,%% . R N extreme seVero moderate mid- moderately very extremely drought drought drought range moist molst moist - 4.00 400 -240 -1.99 +2,00 +3-00 +4.00 a11d t0 to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 -2.99 +1.99 +299 +3.99 above Nation Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Lang -Term (Hydrological) Conditions April 2412 extreme severe moderate mid- moderately very extremely draught drought drought range moist malat moist F 4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.99 +2.00 +3.00 +4.00 and to to 10 10 10 and below ,199 -299 +1.99 +299 +3.99 above Notion Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions May 2012 extreme drought drought moderately moist M -4.04 -100 and to below x.09 I moderate drought mid- range moderately moist very moist extremely moist L - - -� L= -200 -1.99 ;204 +3.00 +4.00 -299 +1.0 9 0 +298 +3.90 above Matiorw Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions June 2012 extrome severe moderate mid- modemely very extremely drought drought drought range moist malIt moist 4.00 -3.00 -2.0D -1.99 +200 +3A0 44A0 and to to 10 14 10 and below -3.99 -299 +1.99 +299 +3.99 above Wstiorw Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Lang -Term (Hydrological) Conditions July 2012 etxir+eme seven moderate mid- modemely very extremely drought drought drought range moist moist moist 4.00 -3.00 -200 -1.99 +2A0 4A +440 and to to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 .299 +11.99 +299 a3." above i Nation Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long-Term (Hydrological) Conditions August 2012 extreme drought WWI" drought moderate drought mid- range moderately moist very molst extremely moist -4.40 -3-OD .200 .1.99 +ZOO +3.40 +4.40 and below 10 -3.99 to -299 10 +1.99 10 +299 10 +199 and above Nation Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions September 2012 aL-111'. exln me severe moderate mid- moderelely very extremely drought drought drought range moist moist moist 4.00 -3.00 -1.00 .1.$9 +2.00 4M 4.00 and to to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 -299 +1.99 +299 +3.99 above Natiorw Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long-Term (Hydrological) Conditions October 2012 '°" `� .F extreme aever+e moderate mid- moderately very extremely drought drought drought range moist molst moist M M 17-. -. L� M M 4.00 -3.00 -200 -1.99 +2.00 4M ..4.00 arMd to to 10 10 10 and below -3.99 -299 X1.99 +2.99 4..90 above Notion Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions November 2012 extreme drought drought M 0�y0 -4.W -3.0 and to below -3.$9 6, moderate drought mid- range moderaleiy moist vera► molst extremely moist 'L.W '1.99 +2.00 4.00 A.00 to .2.99 10 +1.99 10 +2.99 10 A" and above Nation Palmer Hydrological Drought Index Long -Term (Hydrological) Conditions December 2012 extreme drought ,4.40 and below dery t 0 -.44 to -3.99 moderate mid- moderately drought range moist E-1 -1.$9 +240 to 14 to •99 X1.99 2 X299 my olyst r +3.40 10 4A 6�.- - extremely moist M +4.40 and above