20071843 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report PH 2-3_20130415

Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Annual Monitoring Report — Year 1
(Phase Two and Three)
Brunswick County, NC
Lumber River Basin
(Cataloging Unit #03040207)
Prepared on behalf of-
Stone Farm Mitipation Bank, LLC
(Sponsor)
Prepared by.,
A�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Environmental Consultants
Wilmington, N.C.
March 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.0. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2
A INTRODUCTION 2
B. MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2
C. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 2
3.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
6
A. WETLAND RESTORATION SUCCESS CRITERIA
6
4.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 1)
7
A. PHASE it
6
1. VEGETATION MONITORING
6
2. HYDROLOGIC MONITORING
10
3. STREAM MONITORING
12
(a) Photo Documentation
12
(b) Ecological Function
12
(c) Channel Stability /Survey Procedures
13
(1) Cross - Sections
13
(2.) Longitudinal Profiles
14
(3.) Pebble Counts
14
(4.) Stream Flow Monitoring
14
4. CONTINGENCY MEASURES
19
B. PHASE III
19
5.0 CONCLUSION 22
LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES
Figure 1
Phase II Restoration Plan /As -Built
Figure 2
Phase III Restoration Plan /As -Built
Figure 3
Phase Boundary Overview Map
Figure 4
Phase II Plot and Well Location Map
Figure 5
Cross Section Location Map
Table 1 Phase II Planting List (March 2011 /February 2012)
Table 2 Summary of Tasks pte#ed, Phase
Table 3 Vegetation Plots an E �e rtity Tip
Table 4 Annual Monitoring Data Sheet l, rar — an a pe 2s R — ?_013

Table 4A Annual Monitoring Data Sheets, Year 1 — Volunteer Species
Table 4B Annual Monitoring Data Sheets, Year 1 — Unidentified Volunteer
Table 5 Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring (Phase II — Streams)
Table 6 Stream Lengths and Cross Section Stations
Table 7 Longitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Table 8 Summary of Year 1 Bankfull Event Monitoring (Phase II — Streams)
Table 9 Summary of Year 1 Hydrologic Monitoring — Phase III
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Site Photographs
Individual Plot Data Sheets (Year 1 Monitoring — 2012)
Hydrographs (March 2011 — December 2012)
NC Division of Water Resources Drought Maps
Cross - Section Photographs
Ordinary High Water Mark Indicators
Longitudinal /Cross - Section Surveys
Stream Flow (Discharge) Measurement Forms

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of the Bank Sponsor (Stone Farm Bank, LLC), Land Management Group (LMG) has completed
Year 1 annual monitoring of Phase Two and Phase Three of the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Phase Two consists of 418 acres of the total 968 -acre mitigation bank site and includes 15,338 linear feet
of stream restoration, 103 acres of Riparian (Non- Riverine) Wetland Restoration (i a small stream swamp),
28 acres of Riparian (Non- Riverine) Wetland Preservation, 40 acres of Riparian (Non- Riverine) Wetland
Restoration (i a headwater swamp forest), 66 acres of Non - Riparian Wetland Enhancement, 160 acres of
Non - Riparian Wetland Preservation, and 21 acres of upland buffer (Figure 1) Phase Three consists of 192
acres and includes 7 40 acres of Riparian (Non- Rivenne) Wetland Restoration, 315 acres of Non - Riparian
Wetland Restoration, 68 acres of Non - Riparian Wetland Enhancement, and 85 acres of Non - Riparian
Wetland Preservation (Figure 2)
The Phase Two project area connects the 145 -acre Carolina bay on the southern portion of the tract to the
Little Caw Caw Canal (a third -order tributary of the Waccamaw River) on the north boundary of the Bank
site The Phase Three project area comprises the entire headwater wetlands of the South Tributary As
was documented in the Mitigation Plan, the streams and wetlands of these watersheds had been
historically impaired by agricultural and silvicultural practices for over a hundred years The wetlands of the
Main Stem and its tributaries (North Tributary and South Tributary) had been cleared and drained for rice
production A network of dirt roads and canals dissected the site and resulted in the disconnection of first -
order tributaries from adjacent, former floodplam wetlands Restoration work in Phase Two and Phase
Three involved the removal of over two miles of dirt roads, backfilling of four miles of canals, plugging of an
approximate 5,000 -If section of canal, 15,388 -If of Priority I stream restoration, restoration of valley grades,
and planting of approximately 96 acres of restored wetlands Construction of the South Tributary of Phase
2 was completed in October 2011 The remaining areas of Phase Two and Phase Three were completed
in February 2012
The following Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) presents the findings of the first year of monitoring for both
Phase Two and Phase Three
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 1
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
A. Introduction
As approved by the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT), the bank Sponsor began implementation of
Phase Two of the restoration project in September 2010 Figure 3 depicts the location and extent of the
three phases of the project One remaining phase (Phase 4) consists of stream restoration within an
independent watershed (Hunters Creek) on the western portion of the site Implementation of Phase Three
of the restoration project began in January of 2012 Placement of fill material within existing ditches (Figure
2) was authorized under Nationwide Permit 27 issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on
January 25, 2008 (Action ID# 2003- 00682) and the corresponding 401 Water Quality Certification issued on
January 2, 2008 (DWQ Project #20071843)
B. Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The larger Bank restoration project is intended to provide suitable, high - quality wetland and stream
restoration to mitigate for authorized impacts within the Lumber River Basin (USGS 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit
03040207, DWQ Subbasin 03- 07 -57) The objective of the project is to restore natural vegetative and
hydrologic conditions throughout the nonnpanan, riparian, and Coastal Plain stream habitat that have been
compromised by previous land use activities The primary functions to be restored or enhanced as a result
of the restoration project include surface water storage (i a flood attenuation), sediment/nutnent retention,
organic carbon transport to downstream food -webs, and wildlife habitat The project provides an invaluable
opportunity to restore an entire watershed within a region currently experiencing acute development
pressures
C Project Implementation
Earthwork initially included the construction of a dry Priority I stream channel The first stream channel
restored was the South Tributary As construction progressed downstream, existing ditches and canals
were filled Clay plugs were used at prescribed intervals to reduce potential subsurface drainage within
backfdled ditches Soil removed for the construction of the Priority 1 channel was used to fill in the existing
channels Existing roadbeds and adjacent spoil piles were removed, and the material was used to backfill
the road -side canals Construction of the Main Stem and North Tributary was implemented in a similar
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 2
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

manner Stream valleys were restored through converted agricultural fields to re- establish the natural
hydrologic connection of small stream swamp and headwater bay forest (Carolina bay) and swamp forest
wetlands to the first -order reach of Little Caw Caw Canal Restored wetlands were planted with
characteristic wetland trees corresponding to the targeted community type (headwater swamp forest and
small stream swamp)
Approximately 63,250 hardwood tree seedlings were planted throughout the restored small stream swamp
and swamp forest communities between March 2011 and February 2012 Seedlings were planted on
approximate 9 -ft centers, corresponding to an average density of 659 seedlings per acre Planting was
supervised by LMG personnel to ensure proper spacing and planting depths Swamp black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) and bald cypress (Taxod►um distichum) comprised a majority of the seedlings planted, totaling
approximately 30,400 Species such as swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michaux►►), tulip poplar
(L►nodendron tuhpifera), Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecypans thyoides), pond pine (Pinus serot►na), and
river birch (Betula nigra) were also planted (See Table 1 for seedling quantities by species) Tulip poplar,
Atlantic white cedar, and pond pine were planted in slightly higher landscape positions in the swamp forest
communities, while the remaining species were planted in the small stream swamp communities that will
likely experience longer flooding durations The transition between the small stream swamp community
and the swamp forest community in the outer Coastal Plain represents subtle shifts in composition rather
than distinct breaks between wetland types An overlap of planted species occurs along the boundaries
between the two wetland communities In addition, live stakes were planted on approximate 4 -ft centers
and interspersed along the top of bank and side bank of the stream channels to provide for enhanced bank
stabilization and vegetative cover
Restoration work for Phase Three consisted of the installation of four (4) armored earthen clay plugs at
prescribed locations and backfilling 200 -ft upstream of each plug along a channelized ditch upstream of the
Southern Tributary Given the limited amount of earthwork required for the hydrologic restoration and the
existing forested condition, there were no additional planting requirements for Phase Three
Refer to Table 2 for a list of tasks and associated completion dates for the implementation of Phase 2 and
Phase 3
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 3
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Table 1. Phase Two Planting List (March 2011 /February 2012)
Non - Rlverine Restoration
(2011) Southern Tributary
Swamp Forest
6 -ac
Common Name
Scientific Name
# Planted
Yellow Poplar
Linodendron tulipifera
1,000
Pond Pine
Pmus serotina
1,350
Green Ash
Fraxrnus pennsylvanrca
1,200
Bald Cypress
Taxodium dishchum
2,000
Swamp Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatica
2,000
Total
7,550
Rlverine Restoration (2011)
Southern Tributary
Small Stream Swam
14 -ac
Common Name
Scientific Name
Ironwood
Cafprnus carohnrana
1,000
Green Ash
Fraxrnus pennsylvanrca
800
Bald Cypress
Taxodium dishchum
1,000
Swamp Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatrca
1,000
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
2,000
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentahs
2,000
Total
7,800
Non - Rlverine Restoration
(2012) Malnstem /North Trlb.
Swamp Forest
20 -ac
Common Name
Scientific Name
Yellow Poplar
Linodendron tulipifera
4,300
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
6,000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus mrchauxu
3,000
Swamp Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatrca
3,500
Pond Pine
Prnus serotina
2,400
Atlantic White Cedar
Chamaecypans thyoides
2,000
Total
21,200
Rlverine Restoration (2012)
Malnstem /North Trlb.
Small Stream Swam
56 -ac
Common Name
Scientific Name
Bald Cypress
Taxodium drstichum
10,000
River Birch
Betula nrgra
2,000
Swamp Black Gum
Nyssa sylvabca
4,900
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus mrchauxu
2,000
Yellow Poplar
Linodendron tulipifera
2,000
Silky Dogwood
Comus amomum
500
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
2,300
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentahs
500
Black Willow
Salix nrgra
1,500
Silky Willow
Salix sencea
1,000
Total
26,700
Grand Total
63,250
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Table 2. Summary of Tasks Completed on Phases Two and Three
Description of Task
Date
within Limits of Clearing
September 2009
—Logging
Completion of Earthwork Southern Tributary)
October 2010
Site Planting Southern Tributary)
March 2011
Completion of Earthwork Mainstem & Northern Tributary)
October 2011
On -site Meeting with COE Staff — Construction Review
November 2011
Site Planting Mamstem & Northern Tributary)
February 2012
Completion of Earthwork Phase III
February 2012
On -Site Meeting with COE Staff
March 2012
Year 1 Monitoring
November 2012
Year 1 Monitoring Report Submitted
March 2013
Per the approved restoration plan, monitoring of Phase Two Includes the assessment of both hydrologic
and vegetative conditions over the course of a five year monitoring period Following the completion of the
earthwork, a total of twenty -nine (29) permanent 010 acre plots were established throughout the planted
and restored (I a former) small stream swamp and swamp forest communities (Table 3) A total of fourteen
(14) automated shallow groundwater monitoring wells were Installed within the Phase Two project area
(Table 3) In addition, a total of seven (7) automated water level gauges have been Installed within the
stream banks to document bankfull and normal flow events (Table 3) Wells and gauges have collected
data from January 2012 through the present
Table 3 Vegetation Plots and Wells by Community Type
Community Type
Acreage
Vegetation Plots
Monitoring Wells
Stream Gauges
Phase II - Swamp Forest
315
15
6
0
Phase II - Small Stream
103
14
8
7
Phase III - Swamp Forest
190
0
8
0
TOTAL
608
29
22
7
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 5
Phase Two and Three —Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Monitoring of Phase Three includes the assessment of hydrologic conditions over a five year monitoring
period Following the completion of earthwork, a total of eight (8) automated shallow groundwater
monitoring wells were installed within the project area (Table 3) Wells have collected data from mid -March
2012 through the present
3.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Annual monitoring is being conducted near the end of each growing season for a period of five years The
monitoring includes both a vegetative and hydrologic component per the approved mitigation banking
instrument The specific success criteria for the bank are listed below
A Wetland Restoration Success Criteria
(1) Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 320 trees per acre at the end of 3
years (post - planting) and 260 trees per acres at the end of 5 years (post - planting) 1
(2) No single volunteer species (most notably, red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise
more than 50% of the total composition at year 2 or 3 If this occurs, remedial procedures will be
implemented During years 4 and 5, no single volunteer species, comprising over 50% of the total
composition, may be more than two times the height of the planted trees If this occurs, remedial
procedures will be implemented
(3) Hydrology during the growing season must be sufficient to at least meet the guidelines set forth
within the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y -87 -1)
Therefore, the hydrologic criterion will be the establishment of a static water table at, or within, 12"
of the soil surface for 12% of the growing seasonz (equivalent to 32 days based upon SCS-
established growing season March 7h through November 28th) during penods of normal rainfall
1 Volunteer species may be counted toward meeting the success criteria upon evaluation of site - specific conditions and
concurrence by IRT members
2 As defined by the Sod Conservation Service, the growing season for Brunswick County is 266 days
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 6
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

The vegetative component for Phase Two includes an assessment of the conditions within each of the
twenty -nine (29) permanent monitoring plots that have been established throughout the project area (Figure
4) Hydrologic monitoring is being conducted via fourteen (14) automated shallow groundwater monitoring
wells for Phase Two and eight (8) for Phase Three recording on daily intervals (refer to Figure 4 for location
of the monitoring wells) Data from the wells are downloaded on approximate three -month intervals and
imported into graphing software for analysis Phase Three monitoring consists of collection of groundwater
level data (once daily) over the course of the five -year monitoring period through the use of eight (8)
automated wells
Monitoring reports are being submitted annually to the USACE and the IRT These reports include results
of vegetative and hydrologic monitoring and photographic documentation of site conditions Monitoring
reports also identify any contingency measures that may need to be employed to remedy any site
deficiencies (e g major stream design failures)
4.0 MONITORING RESULTS (YEAR 1)
A. PHASE TWO
1. Vegetation Monitoring
Year 1 monitoring data were collected in November and December 2012 over a four -day period (November
21 st, December 3rd, 4th, and 5th) A total of 3,875 stems were counted throughout the twenty -nine (29) plots
(Table 4) Inclusive within this total were 1,543 stems of planted species (correlating to a mean density of
532 stems per acre) (refer to Table 4) Bald cypress (Taxodium dist►chum) and swamp black gum (Nyssa
sylvat►ca) were the most abundant woody species, with a total of 749 and 241 individuals, respectively
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxn) and tulip poplar (L►nodendron tulipifera) were also prevalent
within certain plots
In addition to the planted species, numerous volunteers were observed within swamp forest plots (Table
4A) A majority of these individuals, such as fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), redbay (Persea palustns), wax
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 7
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

myrtle (Morelia cenfera), and gallberry (Ilex glabra) are considered desirable volunteers since these plants
are representative of the target wetland community type It should be noted that a majority of pines were
undistinguishable between loblolly pine and pond pine due to the relatively young age of the seedlings and
lack of identifiable pine characteristics (resinous buds, needle bundles, rounded cone, stem foliage
sprouts) Unidentified P►nus spp have not been counted toward the success criterion (Table 4B)
The mean stem density observed for both planted and characteristic (desirable) wetland species for the
project area is 1,024 stems /acre Note that this observed density excludes individuals of the following
species (1) red maple (Acer rubrum), (2) sweet gum (L►qu►dambar styrac►flua), (3) horse sugar (Symplocos
tinctona), (4) bacchans (Bacchans halim►folia), and (5) unidentified P►nus spp Individual plot data sheets
are provided in Appendix B
The most abundant volunteer species identified within the restored small stream swamp and swamp forest
communities are (in order of abundance) (1) fetterbush (605 total stems), (2) red bay (413 total stems), (3)
sweet gum (310 total stems), (4) gallberry (254 total stems), and (5) wax myrtle (121 total stems) Refer to
Table 4A for volunteer species identified by plot In general, the observed volunteer species are
considered characteristic of the target wetland community type (small stream swamp and swamp forest)
The most prevalent non - target species observed during Year 1 monitoring was unidentified P►nus spp and
sweet gum While considered non - desirable (due to their potential to out - compete planted species), both
loblolly pine and sweet gum are commonly occurring as early successional species in the Outer Coastal
Plain Based upon the data, the predominant volunteers (e g fetterbush, red bay, gallberry, etc ) are
desirable and consistent with the restoration goals of the project (i a characteristic of the target vegetative
community) While certain volunteer species can potentially out - compete planted species, the overall
composition of the species observed is characteristic of small stream swamp and swamp forest wetlands of
the outer Coastal Plain and appear to be well- adapted to the restored wetland hydrology
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 8
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

TABLE 4. YEAR 1 STEM COUNTS (PHASE TWO - STREAM) - PLANTED
SPECIES
PLOT 1
PLOT 2
PLOT 3
PLOT 4
PLOT 5
PLOT 6
PLOT 7
PLOT 8
PLOT 9
PLOT 10
PLOT 11
PLOT 12
PLOT 13
PLOT 14
PLOT 15
PLOT 16
PLOT 17
PLOT 18
PLOT NT1
PLOT NT2
PLOT NT3
PLOT NT4
PLOT NT5
PLOT NT6
PLOT ST1
PLOT ST2
PLOT ST3
PLOT ST4
PLOT ST5
TOTAL
Bald Cypress
23
20
12
27
26
5
20
40
32
17
16
26
4
14
33
56
33
15
25
37
16
33
28
54
28
19
24
34
32
749
Black Gum
12
20
8
7
20
8
11
0
12
2
3
13
3
3
4
4
8
4
11
6
4
9
22
3
0
9
7
8
20
241
Atlantic White
Cedar
0
0
2
1
0
5
0
0
0
8
11
0
18
13
0
4
0
7
0
0
8
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
80
Pond Pine
0
0
11
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
15
0
6
0
4
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
8
0
0
0
73
Tulip Poplar
20
6
17
0
4
3
0
25
0
1
1
4
4
2
5
0
2
10
5
8
3
0
8
4
0
0
2
0
0
134
Swamp
Chestnut Oak
8
6
5
7
10
0
3
0
8
7
10
7
4
2
9
0
8
3
11
7
0
5
5
11
0
0
0
0
2
138
River Birch
0
23
0
0
0
0
14
0
3
0
0
1
4
0
7
0
2
1
0
4
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
Green Ash
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
7
22
1
40
Ironwood
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
6
TABLE 4A YEAR 1 STEM COUNTS (PHASE TWO - STREAM) - VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES
PLOT 1
PLOT 2
PLOT 3
PLOT 4
PLOT 5
PLOT 6
PLOT 7
PLOT 8
PLOT 9
PLOT 10
PLOT 11
PLOT 12
PLOT 13
PLOT 14
PLOT 15
PLOT 16
PLOT 17
PLOT 18
PLOT NT1
PLOT NT2
PLOT NT3
PLOT NT4
PLOT NT5
PLOT NT6
PLOT ST1
PLOT ST2
PLOT ST3
PLOT ST4
PLOT ST5
TOTAL
Water Oak
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
16
Tulip Poplar
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
4
Gallberry
4
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
254
Sweetbay
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Red Bay
19
0
150
2
0
60
0
1
0
4
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
30
4
0
25
0
5
15
10
25
35
8
0
413
Wax Myrtle
7
0
0
6
12
0
0
2
5
1
0
4
8
7
7
0
0
15
3
1
13
0
0
5
5
5
10
5
0
121
American Holly
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Fetterbush
3
0
200
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
605
Red Maple
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
Sweet Gum
6
2
25
0
0
50
0
20
0
0
25
0
10
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
7
0
15
25
10
20
40
20
0
310
Highbush Blue
Berry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
Horse Sugar
0
0
1 5
0
1 0
1 0
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Bacchans
0
0
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 2
1 0
1 0
2
1 0
0
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
TABLE 4B YEAR 1 STEM COUNTS (PHASE TWO - STREAM) - UNIDENTIFIED VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES
PLOT 1
PLOT 2
PLOT 3
PLOT 4
PLOT 5
PLOT 6
PLOT 7
PLOT 8
PLOT 9
PLOT 10
PLOT 11
PLOT 12
PLOT 13
PLOT 14
PLOT 15
PLOT 16
PLOT 17
PLOT 18
PLOT NT1
PLOT NT2
PLOT NT3
PLOT NT4
PLOT NT5
PLOT NT6
PLOT ST1
PLOT ST2
PLOT ST3
PLOT ST4
PLOT ST5
TOTAL
Unidentified
Pine
4
3
15
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
15
0
20
0
7
0
0
40
0
0
45
0
0
5
10
50
35
10
2
561
rTOTAL
h��
;4�
�:
3
15
fl
0
300
0
0
0
0
1a
0
20
0
7
0
0
40
4
0
45
0
0 �
r,5
1fl
Q
35
10
2
561
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 9
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

2. Hydrologic Monitoring (Wetlands)
Per the approved mitigation plan, a total of fourteen (14) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were
Installed throughout Phase Two Following the completion of stream construction, discharge rates
decreased throughout the site, and static water table depths have remained within 12" of the surface for
extended periods Of the fourteen (14) wells within Phase Two, thirteen (13) wells exhibited hydropenods
greater than 12% (corresponding to 32 consecutive days) of the growing season between March 7th and
November 28th, 2012 (Table 5) The observed mean hydropenod duration for these wells was 62 days
During Year 1 (2012), moderate to extreme drought conditions persisted throughout the entire growing
season (refer to Appendix D) As a result, one (Well #12) of the fourteen wells did not meet the 12%
success criterion
Well #12 exhibited elevated water table levels through much of the late growing season However, during a
brief one -day and four -day period, water levels dropped dust below 12 inches from the soil surface On
either end of this one -day and four -day period, water levels were within 12 inches of the soil surface for 18
consecutive days, 5 consecutive days (between periods), and 7 consecutive days, respectively In addition,
data from this well appears to be Inconsistent with observed conditions of the area Readings may be
influenced by the material of the former road bed which may be potentially Influencing lateral groundwater
movement Observations from unlined bore holes (i a observed water tables within 12 inches of the soil
surface) and other primary Indicators of hydrology (water - stained leaves, saturation, sediment deposits,
etc ) suggest this may be the case Based upon the observed field Indicators, hydrology in the area of Well
#12 appears to have been restored (particularly in light of the drought conditions persisting throughout the
2012 monitoring period) This area will be closely monitored to determine whether the well data is an
artifact of compaction of soils within the former roadbed or representative of actual groundwater levels In
the area
A summary of these results are provided in Table 5 Complete hydrologic monitoring data are provided in
Appendix C NC Division of Water Resources Drought maps are provided in Appendix D
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 10
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Table 5 Summary of 2012 Hydrologic Monitoring (Phase 2)
2012 Growinq Season March 7 - November 28
MS = Mainstem ' - MS & NT wells installed on January 5, 2012
NT = Northern Tributary ST wells date range is Jan 1 -Dec 31, 2012
ST = Southern Tributary
SS = Small Stream
SF = Swamp Forest
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 11
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report
Total
Longest Number
Number of
Of Consecutive
12%
Community
days within
Days Meeting
Dates of Longest Number of
Percentage
Success
>6
125
2 _
Well Number
Type
12
Wetland
Days
Consecutive Da s Meeting Wetland
of Growing
g
Criteria
°
12 5/°
-
0
75/°
>75%
(Jan 5 thru
Hydrology
Hydrology Criteria
Season
(32 Days)
25%
Dec 31)'
Criteria (in
growinq season)
MS -1
SS
219
101
Aug 20 - Nov 28
378
Yes
--
--
X
--
MS -5
SS
202
59
Oct 1 - Nov 28
221
Yes
--
X
--
--
MS -7
SF
289
101
Aug 20 - Nov 28
378
Yes
--
--
X
--
MS -8A
SF
116
33
Aug 24 - Sept 25
124
Yes
X
--
--
--
MS -8B
SF
1 325
101
Aug 20 - Nov 28
378
Yes
--
--
X
--
MS-10
SF
286
82
Aug 20 - Nov 9
307
Yes
--
--
X
--
MS -12
SS
121
18
Aug 20 - Sept 6
67
No
X
--
--
--
MS -17
SS
281
101
Aug 20 - Nov 28
378
Yes
--
--
X
--
NT-2
SS
240
38
Mar 7 - Apr 13, May 15 - Jun 21
142
Yes
--
X
--
--
NT-3
SF
246
47
Aug 20 - Oct 5
176
Yes
--
X
--
--
NT-6
SS
134
34
Aug 22 - Sep 24
12 7
Yes
--
X
--
--
ST-1
SS
269 **
80
Aug 20 - Nov 7
300
Yes
--
--
X
--
ST-3
SS
222 **
38
Aug 20 - Sep 26
142
Yes
--
X
--
--
ST-4
SF
168 **
1 34
Aug 22 - Sep 24
127
Yes
--
X
--
--
MS = Mainstem ' - MS & NT wells installed on January 5, 2012
NT = Northern Tributary ST wells date range is Jan 1 -Dec 31, 2012
ST = Southern Tributary
SS = Small Stream
SF = Swamp Forest
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 11
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

3 Stream Monitoring
The primary success criterion for the stream portion of the mitigation bank is identified below
No less than two bankfull flow events must be documented through the monitoring period These
events will be documented through the use of well monitoring data and on -site photo
documentation If less than two bankfull events occur during the first 5 years, monitoring will
continue until the second bankfull event ►s documented The bankfull events must occur during
separate monitoring years In the event that the required bankfull events do not occur during the
five-year monitoring period, the MBRT may determine that further monitoring is not required
Level 1 Monitoring was implemented for the stream portion of the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank as
detailed in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003 Monitoring will occur every year for the five year
monitoring period
Level 1 Monitoring includes Sections (a), (b), and (c) listed below
(a) Photo - Documentation
Extensive photo documentation was implemented during Year 1 for the stream monitoring phase of this
project Site visits were conducted and photographs were taken within 24 hours of a 0 5, 10, and 2 0 inch
rain event at each gauge location during Year 1 monitoring Photographic and video evidence of Ordinary
High Water Mark indicators and flow evidence were also collected Photos of riparian area plantings (live
stakes) are provided in Appendix A Photos were taken at all permanent cross - sections and are provided
in Appendix E Ordinary High Water Mark indicators are provided in Appendix F Please refer to the
enclosed CD for video evidence of flow
(b) Ecological Function
The health of the riparian vegetation was documented as part of the wetland restoration monitoring efforts
Multiple 0 10 ac permanent monitoring plots were established throughout the nvenne wetland restoration
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 12
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Including areas directly adjacent to the restored channel Reference the vegetation monitoring section for
monitoring results
Subsequent to communication with the Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Branch in February
2012, macroinvertebrate sampling will no longer be required as part of the Phase Two monitoring
requirements
(c) Channel Stability /Survey Procedures
1 Cross - Sections
The Stone Farm Phase Two area has restored 15,338 If of Coastal Plain stream The restoration has
mimicked low gradient, low velocity stream reaches characteristic of the outer Coastal Plain No hardened
materials (i a rock structures) were used Rather, natural materials (such as root wads and log vanes)
have assisted with channel stabilization and grade control Given the size, uniform design, and gentle
slope (0 005) of the project, cross - sections were established every 1,000 feet of stream length (totaling 14
permanent stations) Placement of these stations was designed to assess the performance of potential
problem areas (i a severe erosion, structural failure) These stations were also evenly distributed between
riffles and pools throughout the project Refer to Table 6 for the number of cross - sections and Figure 5 for
the locations of the cross - section monitoring stations Year 1 cross - section surveys are provided in
Appendix G
Table 6. Stream Lengths and Number of Cross - Section Stations
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 13
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report
Proposed (10
Final Design
Reach Name
Mitigation
Length
As -Built Length
Cross - sections
Plan
Mainstem
8,073
8,609
8,613
8
Northern Tributary
2,668
1 3,473
1 3,474
3
Southern Tributary
2,641
3,288
3,251
3
Total Length
13,382
15,370
15,338
14
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 13
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

2 Longitudinal Profiles
Guidelines regarding longitudinal profiles for projects totaling over 3,000 If suggest that 30% of the area be
surveyed on an annual basis Based on this guideline, a total of 4,200 If of profile is required for the Stone
Farm project The 4,200 If of survey was divided throughout the individual reaches and includes the
permanent cross - sections (Table 7) Reference the longitudinal surveys in Appendix G in comparison to
as -built conditions
Table 7. Longitudinal Profiles by Stream Reach
Reach Name
Proposed (10
Final Design Length
As -Built Length
% of Project
Profile (10
Mainstem
8,073
8,609
8,613
356
2,400
Northern Tributary
2,668
3,473
3,474
144
900
Southern Tributary
21641
3,288
3,251
134
900
Total Length
13,382
15,370
15,338
634
4,200
3 Pebble Counts
Streams in the Stone Farm Phase Two project area are composed of sandy substrates typical in the outer
Coastal plain Since all sediment falls into the sand category, gravelometer readings were not conducted
All sediment in the constructed stream beds is less than 2mm and would be placed in the <2mm category
for Wolman pebble count analysis
4 Stream Flow Monttonng
As indicated above, the 1st -order streams of Phase Two occur within three distinct valleys that connect the
145 -acre Carolina bay on the southern portion of the tract to the Little Caw Caw Canal on the north side (a
third order tributary of the Waccamaw River) The three valleys are identified as the mainstem, the
northern tributary, and the southern tributary A total of 5 gauges were installed in the stream beds to
document the elevations of surface water in the channels on a daily basis These gauges capture the
upper end of each stream reach (3 gauges in the mainstem, 2 gauges in the northern tributary, and 2
gauges in the southern tributary) Refer to Figure 3 for a map depicting the location of 1st -order gauges
Indicators of Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and video documentation were also used to identify the
presence of surface water flow
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 14
Phase Two and Three - Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Mainstem (MS)
Surface water and flow was documented in each of the three (3) gauges over several periods during the
monitoring event The valley exhibits a very gradual slope (0 005 %) from the upper end (Carolina bay) to
the lowest end (Little Caw Caw Canal) Gauge MS -1 was placed the furthest up- gradient (second stream
meander from source) in order to capture bankfull events at the head of the restored stream reach
Guages MS -2 and MS -3 were spaced approximately 1000 -ft apart further down the stream All three
gauges were placed within the stream segment solely charged by the Carolina bay (Phase One) Refer to
Figure 3 for the gauge locations
The amplitude of the surface water varied at each gauge Gauge MS -1 exhibited a bankfull event once
during the monitoring period, while gauges MS -2 and MS -3 recorded five (5) and six (6) bankfull events,
respectively (Table 8) Despite the drought conditions of the first half of 2012, the gauges exhibited a
significant increase in the duration and amplitude of flow events during 2012 (post - construction Year 1)
Video evidence of flow was recorded following rainfall events during the spring and summer over multiple
site visits Flow can be readily seen at each gauge located within the stream valley With increasing
watershed size (downslope), the duration of surface flow increased within the valley In addition to this
data, velocity measurements were collected within 24 hours of significant rain events at each gauge
location during Year 1 monitoring Measurements were collected using a FLOWWATCH, FW450, Impeller
type flow meter at 1 -foot intervals across the restored channel at depths of 0 6 ft above the bottom Flow
meter readings ranged from 2 cm /s to 5 cm /s for the mainstem across the monitoring period Refer to
Appendix H for stream flow discharge measurement forms
Observed physical indicators of an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) within the mainstem consisted of the
following (1) natural line impressed on the bank, (2) presence of litter and debris, (3) wracking, (4)
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent, (5) sediment sorting, (6) scour, (7) deposition, (8) water staining,
(9) and multiple observed flow events Photographs of the mainstem are provided in Appendix A Ordinary
High Water Mark photographs and physical indicators are provided in Appendix F Video evidence of flow is
provided on the attached CD with site hydrographs
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 15
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Northern Tributary (NT)
Surface water and flow was documented in each of the two (2) gauges over several periods during the
monitoring event Gauge NT -1 was placed the furthest up- gradient in order to capture bankfull events at
the head of the restored stream reach Gauge NT -2 was placed approximately 1000 -ft further down the
stream Refer to Figure 3 for the gauge locations
The amplitude of the surface water varied at each gauge Gauge NT -1 exhibited five (5) bankfull events
during the monitoring period, while gauge NT -2 exhibited seven (7) bankfull events (Table 8) Despite the
drought conditions of the first half of 2012, the gauges exhibited a significant increase in the duration and
amplitude of flow events during 2012 (post - construction Year 1) Video evidence of flow was recorded
following rainfall events during the spring and summer over multiple site visits Flow can be readily seen at
each gauge located within the stream valley With increasing watershed size (downslope), the duration of
surface flow increased within the valley In addition to this data, velocity measurements were collected
within 24 hours of significant rain events at each gauge location during Year 1 monitoring Measurements
were collected at 1 -foot intervals across the restored channel at depths of 0 6 ft above the bottom
Measurements were collected using a FLOWWATCH, FW450, Impeller type flow meter at 1 -foot intervals
across the restored channel at depths of 0 6 ft above the bottom Flow meter readings ranged from 2 cm /s
to 11 cm /s for the Northern Tributary across the monitoring period Refer to Appendix H for stream flow
discharge measurement forms
Observed physical indicators of an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) within the northern tributary
consisted of the following (1) natural line impressed on the bank, (2) presence of litter and debris, (3)
wracking, (4) vegetation matted down, bent, or absent, (5) sediment sorting, (6) scour, (7) deposition, (8)
water staining, (9) and multiple observed flow events Photographs of the northern tributary are provided in
Appendix A Ordinary High Water Mark photographs and physical indicators are provided in Appendix F
Video evidence of flow is provided on the attached CD with site hydrographs
Southern Tributary (ST)
Surface water and flow was documented in each of the two (2) gauges over several periods during the
monitoring event Gauge ST -1 was placed the furthest up- gradient in order to capture bankfull events at
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 16
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

the head of the restored stream reach Gauge ST -2 was placed approximately 1000 -ft further down the
stream Refer to Figure 3 for the gauge locations
The amplitude of the surface water varied at each gauge Gauge ST -1 exhibited seven (7) bankfull events
during the monitoring period, while gauge ST -2 exhibited two (2) bankfull events (Table 8) Despite the
drought conditions of the first half of 2012, the gauges exhibited a significant increase in the duration and
amplitude of flow events during 2012 (post - construction Year 1) It should be noted that the duration of the
bankfull events at both gauges sometimes extended for several days, with the maximum duration being 6
days (Table 8) Video evidence of flow was recorded following rainfall events during the spring and summer
over multiple site visits Flow can be readily seen at each gauge located within the stream valley With
increasing watershed size (downslope), the duration of surface flow increased within the valley In addition
to this data, velocity measurements were collected within 24 hours of significant rain events at each gauge
location during Year 1 monitoring Measurements were taken at 1 -foot intervals across the restored
channel at depths of 0 6 ft above the bottom Measurements were collected using a FLOWWATCH,
FW450, Impeller type flow meter at 1 -foot intervals across the restored channel at depths of 0 6 ft above
the bottom Flow meter readings ranged from 2 cm /s to 33 cm /s for the Southern Tributary across the
monitoring period Refer to Appendix H for stream flow discharge measurement forms
Observed physical indicators of an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) within the southern tributary
consisted of the following (1) natural line impressed on the bank, (2) presence of litter and debris, (3)
wracking, (4) vegetation matted down, bent, or absent, (5) sediment sorting, (6) scour, (7) deposition, (8)
water staining, (9) and multiple observed flow events Photographs of the southern tributary are provided in
Appendix A Ordinary High Water Mark photographs and physical indicators are provided in Appendix F
Video evidence of flow is provided on the attached CD with site hydrographs
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 17
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Table 8. Summary of 2012 Bankfull Event Monitoring (Phase Two)
Gauge Number
Total Number of Bankfull
Events
Longest Number of
Consecutive Days During
Bankfull Event
Dates of Bankfull Event(s)
3 -Day Antecedent
Rainfall (Inches)
(On -site Rain gauge)
MS -1
1
1
August 29
186
MS -2
5
2
May 14
279
June 12
249
Aug 22
171
Aug 29 -30
189
Dec 29
212
MS -3
6
2
May 14
279
May 30
188
June 12
2 49
Aug 22
171
Aug 29 -30
189
Dec 29
2 12
NT -1
5
2
May 14
279
June 12
249
Aug 23
2 91
Aug 29 -30
189
Dec 29
212
NT -2
7
3
May 14
279
June 12
249
Aug 22
171
Aug 23 -24
356
Aug 29 -31
189
Sept 9
201
Dec 29
212
STA
7
6
May 14
279
June 12 -13
258
Aug 22
171
Aug 23 -28'
4 05'
Aug 28 -29
186
Aug 29 -Sept 3
195
Dec 29
212
ST -2
2
4
Aug 23 -25
3 56
Aug 29 -Sept 1
189
- Includes 3 -day antecedent rainfall from Aug 231d, and rainfall totals from Aug 24th & Aug 28th
** MS= Mamstem, NT= Northem Tributary, ST= Southem Tributary
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 18
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

4. Contingency Measures
Stream banks and in- stream structures (i a root wads, log vanes, etc ) were monitored for evidence of
surface bank erosion (i a down - cutting) subsequent to above normal rainfall and high flow events Some
down - cutting of the floodplain was noted in areas where surface water in the floodplain flows back into the
stream channel However, these features have not resulted in any significant deposition within the channel
and do not appear to adversely affect stream function In fact, these features are common within natural,
unimpaired streams and are evidence of the connectivity between the stream and its floodplain Most of
the areas in which this has been observed appear to have met a point of equilibrium and have become
increasingly stable with the growth of stream bank vegetation No re- grading or reinforcement of the
stream banks are recommended at this time
Grading work conducted during initial project implementation resulted in a discernible increase in
groundwater levels throughout the streams and adjacent small stream swamp and swamp forest
communities Restoration of the stream channels helped reduce surface water outflows Upon further site
assessments (including a November 2011 site meeting with the Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory
Branch), it was determined that certain meander bends of the stream needed to be reinforced with
additional root wads in order to provide enhanced bank stability during high flow events In January 2012,
these additional root wads were installed and coir fiber matting was reinforced in the selected areas per the
recommendation of the USACE
B. PHASE THREE
Per review and approval by the USACE, a total of eight (8) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were
installed throughout Phase Three Subsequent to the earthwork, static water table depths gradually rose to
within 12 inches of the soil surface, particularly in response to discrete rain events Plugging of the main
outlet ditch for this phase reduced the rate of groundwater discharge from the adjacent wetlands The
observed mean hydropenod duration for the eight (8) wells was 38 days Of the eight (8) wells within
Phase Three, four (4) wells exhibited hydropenods greater than 12% (corresponding to 32 consecutive
days) of the growing season between March 7th and November 28th, 2012 (Table 8) (Note that wells were
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 19
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

installed on March 21, 2012) One (1) well exhibited a hydroperiod equal to, or greater than, 8% of the
growing season The remaining three (3) wells exhibited hydropenods of less than 3% of the growing
season (with an observed mean hydropenod duration of 6 days) During Year 1 (2012), moderate to
extreme drought conditions persisted throughout the entire growing season (refer to Appendix D) Given
the very poorly drained soils and the depressional landscape of the restoration area, it is likely that the
shorter hydropenods of the three wells is an artifact of the timing of the completion of the earthwork (in
February) and the subsequent drought conditions The surrounding headwater wetlands receive hydrologic
input primarily via precipitation In the absence of sufficient groundwater recharge post - restoration work,
groundwater levels can remain lower for greater periods of time
These areas will be continued to be monitored over the next four years Patterns of hydrologic response to
normal precipitation periods will therefore be able to be more thoroughly evaluated to determine hydrologic
success A summary of the groundwater monitoring results for Year 1 is provided in Table 9 Complete
hydrologic monitoring data are provided in Appendix C NC Division of Water Resources Drought maps are
provided in Appendix D
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 20
Phase Two and Three — Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

Table 9. Summary of 2012 Hydrologic Monitoring (Swamp Forest - Phase Three)
2012 Growinq Season March 7 - November 28
Well Number
Total Number of
days within 12"
(Mar 21 thru Dec
31)'
Longest Number Of
Consecutive Days Meeting
Wetland Hydrology Criteria
(in growing season)
Dates of Longest Number of
Consecutive Days Meeting
Wetland Hydrology Criteria
Percentage of
Growing
Season
12%
Success
Criterion
(32 Days)
>6 -
125%
12.5
-
25%
25 -
75%
>75 %
1
148
65
Aug 20 - Oct 23
243
Yes
--
X
--
--
2
209
98
Aug 23 - Nov 28
367
Yes
--
--
X
--
3
150
39
Aug 21 - Sept 28
146
Yes
--
X
--
--
4
168
61
Aug 22 - Oct 21
22 8
Yes
--
X
--
--
5
23
7
Aug 29 - Sept 4
26
No
--
--
--
--
6
81
23
Aug 24 - Sept 15
86
No
X
--
--
--
7
24
7
Aug 30 - Sept 5
26
No
--
--
--
--
8
9
5
Aug 30 - Se t 3
1 9
No
--
--
--
--
* - Wells installed on March 21, 2012 Data not collected for first three weeks of growing season
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 21
Phase Two and Three —Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

5.0 CONCLUSION
The implementation of Phase Two and Three completes an integral component of the watershed
restoration effort of the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank Removal of large outlet canals and the re-
contouring of the stream valleys has resulted in the connection of vast headwater wetland areas to the
upper first -order reaches of the Little Caw Caw Canal There has been a discernible hydrologic response
within the stream valleys and the adjacent riparian wetlands Vegetation and hydrologic monitoring of the
Phase Two and Three project areas indicate that the site is progressing well during the first year following
the implementation of the restoration activities Overall, the site exhibited a diverse assemblage of
characteristic trees and shrubs Vegetation data document high rates of survivorship among the planted
species (R stem density = 532 stems per acre) As anticipated (due to the drought conditions of the first
half of 2012), some of the restoration areas in the swamp forest community of Phase Three did not meet
the target hydrologic criteria However, a majority of the wells did meet success criteria, and overall, the
site exhibited increased hydropenods It is anticipated that static water table elevations will continue to rise
across the site particularly during normal rainfall periods during the early growing season
Overall, Phase Two and Three appear to be progressing well toward the targeted wetland community
types No contingency measures are recommended at this time The restoration site is already providing
key wetland functions by reducing sediment/nutrient runoff, increasing floodwater storage, and re-
establishing wildlife habitat The site will be continued to be monitored over the next four years (through
Year 5), and the findings of such will be provided in subsequent annual monitoring reports for agency
review and concurrence
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank 22
Phase Two and Three —Year 1 Annual Monitoring Report

FIGURES

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
i -%wFTI AN25t2002 WETtAND5 FILEW 1 -02 -240 - -- 5wne Farm M+t•gat,o< 51te. DeCarol W,%amr j MCAEWnace 2. FINA!
Legend
Property Boundary
404 Wetland Line
Stream Restoration (15,338 I.f. )
Riverine Small Stream
Swamp Restoration (1 03 ac.)
Non- Riverine Swamp
Forest Restoration
TIONIIM1
(40 ac.) 0
nd Enhancement (66 ac.)
ie Pre5ervatlon (28 ac.)
;lverine Preservation (I 60 ac.)
d Buffer (2 1 ac. )
N- x-
,
14 lIJ,
LAND MANACEMENT GROUT' a,
f— i,onmenrnl C— ulfanh
Post Office Box 2522
nington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone]
Project:
Stone Farm Mitigation Phase II
Re5toratlon Plan
Kevi5lon
2/15/20131
Incale: .�, ,, 1, .
1 "= 1000 40 -09- 1 908
wn

• PLUG 1
' ` .,. yl. ,,i►' .tom g ~. 0
300-ft
Aj.� 150 -ft
�y \\ • ;rr `��� �` fit �j,F� 11 d � 4�a� ' •�: t:
PLUG 2
rY
yam.
Legend
N
Preservation Areas = 85.0 Acres W E
L'
Enhancement Areas = 68.0 Acres s
Restoration Areas (Non- Riparian) = 38.9 Acres
Ditch Corridor - No Credits (6.16 Acres)
k/&'
Nil
n� 1 f _,irf .L tJ . •� jay -l�
ip
M
r
4
* tO�Si�i
PLUG 3 a?.
1
van
4
.•q iwj
i •
l/ a
PLUG 4
V7,
• tir
,
. _ < +, ,'r1+_rw `,a?..h�..'f4'�r .ct • �'• _:- ,�U�C•R�fi1c�•� - itiC�in ?.� _..,ar.. �1slti't., _
L: \WETLANDS \2002 WETLANDS FILES \01 -02 -240 - -- Stone Farm Stone Farm Mitigation Bank j N'1( i
Mitigation Site, DeCarol Williamson\Annual Monitoring\ ocean Isle Investment Company
Phase III - Upper South Trib \Maps\As -Built Brunswick Count NC ww 2.0001 - 1.866t
County, Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
01 -02 -240 Fax: [phone]
Map Source: NAPP 2010 Aerial Photography. P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
Figure 2 -
Phase 3
Headwater Wetland
Mitigation As -Built
.�l71 r
'r. , 9• � t
cr
s. ra.Yb
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400
Feet

NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate.
This represents portions of a Conservation Easment Map surveyed by Tompkins Land Surveying,
P.A. AutoCAD layers have been overlaid onto an aerial photograph.
Map Source: NAPP 2012 Aerial Photogra
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank
Ocean Isle Investment Company
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
—Z'I_, M G
WWW.LMGroup.net
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Fax: [phone]
P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
N
W E
Figure 3
Stone Farm Regional
Mitigation Bank - S
Phase Boundary Overlay 1 0 625 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000
FE

' say,. ��`y�-''� } ^'�.. f �yc* •R '�� i i a }
. v; i
"PLO
PLOT 16' ���tir,�t�` ��M� • '�!,•�i 1 M/: �° �.
j {'yri e"ri• aaaFF� fl� .s -.r: '•ir:': y
s, Z y
M _ a"y • it'Y"f r-
r � ff• 1.
`r�..:�.
li. `r�'.�. � ��}''' -✓�, .=mil•,
f3x,
it
x:
T:.ro
South Tributa
M.d
A
Mainstem
.
AK
6M
Legend NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes.
Rain Guage Wells Stream data provided by Steve Norris, PLS.
Stream Guages Well / Plot Combination
Permanent Cross Sections Plots
Map Source: 2010 NAPP aerial photography SCALE 1" = 400'
L: \WETLANDS \2002 WETLANDS FILES \01 -02 -240 - -- Stone Farm Mitigation Site, DeCarol Williamson \Well Stream Data \Well Plot Map_2012
Stone Farm Regional www.LMGroup.net Figure 4
Mitigation Bank - Phase II Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078 Aerial Photograph w/
Brunswick County NC LMG
February 2012 �n�YYnl:+�ncem�rsarcxuf:I" Fax: [phone] Plot and Well Location
rY ` `" "" P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
01 -02 -240

0 M It,
� x
Worth
��� ;s t7t�► . � ., x x
r• r � �
cl air
Aw� ,
Jb
� Y '4 7j'IE: b . ♦ rte. `'` �,
X X
x " _
K�IA
!!�
,�y ty"
Wb-
x x x
x.
F .�• '4 ,
a.• ,
JD
.''mot• � yl �` .�
t
' Mainstem
r
,� •re X
i9'• m�� �. - d �;' L� -i' ,� . .�A �� l `f YMii.. •r Z � i � ' � l � / .
r }
Legend NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate, This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes.
X X Permanent Cross Sections Stream data provided by Steve Norris, PLS.
X X Longitudinal Profiles
X As -Built Cross Sections
3 Source: 2010 NAPP aerial photography SCALE 1" = 400'
VETLANDS \2002 WETLANDS FILES \01 -02 -240 - -- Stone Farm Mitigation Site, DeCarol Williamson \Well_Stream Data \Well_Plot Map_2012
Stone Farm Regional www.LMGroup.net
Mitigation Bank - Phase II Figure 5
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Brunswick County, NC LMG Aerial Photograph w/
2012 IANDAIANAGEAHNTGROUP— Fax: [phone]
February ` ' ' `"" P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402 Cross Section Location
01 -02 -240

APPENDIX A:
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

`.,., 544
�f
View of planting crews along Mainstem (MS)
View of planting crews along Mainstem (MS) planting live stakes
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
LAND Phase II $ III -1-1 - l"tC"', GROUP ,,. Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of Plot 7 at baseline monitoring along Mainstem (MS)
View of elderberry live stake growth in early growing season (MS)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
' """" "` Site Photographs
Phase II & III
Year 1 AMR March 2013

S! i4
l
AW
View of guage 3 along Mainstem
View of Mainstem during late growing season (looking south - upstream)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III "v " "'� "w'i N `'I r Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of planting crew along North Tributary (NT)
View of Plot Nt2 at baseline monitoring along North Tributary (NT)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III LANI)MANAGEMIiN717HUUVc,i Site Photographs
Envi,onmenrnl ��nsuhm,rc
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of upper end of North Tributary (NT)
i
z�47� 574-
G 1.�_
16
4
View of flow at guage NT1 along North Tributary (NT) in late growing season
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III ANDMA""""""NI Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of top end of Southern Tributary (ST) immediately post construction
View of Southern Tributary (ST) and live stake plantings
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Site A.
Phase II ° III i1��UM�INAGF:Mf.NTf,NiAiP�e� Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

4
View of flow along Southern Tributary (ST) during early growing season
t t,
Y y Y °'' :0
n
View of flow along Southern Tributary (ST) during late growing season
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase 11 & III "' "" "' " " "'" Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of Atlantic white cedar growth at Plot 4 (MS)
View of bald cypress growth at Plot 5 (MS)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II $ III LANUM eritaiCo- vra,ti Site Photographs
Envirnnmenlal Cons uirant�
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of black gum growth at Plot NT1 (NT)
View of swamp chestnut oak growth at Plot NT1 (NT)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III IANhMANAGISMENTGHOIIPw Site Photographs
.. nrnrnl (nn wlrnnrc
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of bald cypress growth at Plot ST4 (ST) (11/20/2012)
View of black gum growth at Plot ST4 (ST) (11/20/2012)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III VUM`A...... NTGNUUI i.: Site Photographs
Year 1 AMR I March 2013

View of plug 1 at lower end of Phase 3 immediately post construction
View of plug 1 at lower end of Phase 3 in late growing season
with saturated floodplain
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III I.ANUM— ,talM1llN "fGROUPm Site Photographs
Envrtnnmen hrr Lnn su ho nt+
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of plug 3 of Phase 3 immediately post construction
View of plug 3 of Phase 3 in late growing season
with saturated floodplain
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III `"V""— walConwlr— Site Photographs
Enri�onmeninl Con �u�ta nts
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of plug 4 of Phase 3 immediately post construction
View of plug 4 of Phase 3 in early 2013 growing season
wth saturated floodplain
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix A.
Phase II & III LANUMANAGF.MI ?NTGftllllPi >, Site Photographs
lxrvuonmenral Consuhartr
Year 1 AMR I March 2013

APPENDIX B:
INDIVIDUAL PLOT DATA SHEETS

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 1

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 2
SPECIES STRATUM Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs Volunteer Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH) Species Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress T 10 1 ft Planted 10
Bald Cypress T 10 2ft Planted 10
Black Gum T 13 1 ft Planted 13
Black Gum T 7 2ft Planted 7
River Birch T 7 1 ft Planted 7
River Birch T 16 2ft Planted 16
Tulip Poplar T 6 1 ft Planted 6
Swamp Chestnut Oak T 1 1 ft Planted 1
Swamp Chestnut Oak T 5 2ft Planted 5
Unidentified Pine T 3 1 ft Volunteer 3
Sweet Gum T 2 2ft Volunteer 2
TOTAL PLANTED OBSERVED�DENSITIf
SPECIES 75 I (PLANTED SPECIES 'p 750
PER ACRE) h
il
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE OBSERVED DENSITY
VOLUNTEERS 0 (VOLUNTEER 0
SPECIES PERIACRE)
= ',t
TOTAL SINGLE VOLUNTEER
UNACCEPTABLE 5 a50 °k OF =TOTAL (YM) N
VOLUNTEERS - yF?T0T
x
OBSERVED DENSIT1f:
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 80 ., ( PER ACRE 750
'�

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Bald Cypress
T
9
2ft
Planted
9
Black Gum
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Black Gum
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
Atlantic White Cedar
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Tulip Poplar
T
17
1 ft
Planted
17
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
2 It
Planted
2
Pond Pine
T
9
1 ft
Planted
9
Pond Pine
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Red Bay
T
150
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
150
Gallberry
SH
250
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
250
Fetterbush
SH
200
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
200
Horse Sugar
SH
5
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
5
Sweet Gum
SH
25
4 ft - Avg
Volunteer
25
Unidentified Pine
SH
15
4 ft - Avg
Volunteer
15
TOTAL PLANTED
�OBSERVED,DENSITY'.
55
`"(PL'ANTED SPECIES .
550 •b `3
SPECIES
i PER
� - BSER VE D DENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
VOLUNTEERS
600
(VOLUNTEER6000
�5
S,PECIES PE_iRIA _R�E_)�
,
TOTAL
)SINGLEYOLUNTEER*Y
UNACCEPTABLE
45
`F` 0 AL
- I N0
VOLUNTEERS
�rpg5'
r ,���
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
700
OBSERVE�D'DENSIT>Y
- � - ' Y H���
6550

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
8
1 It
Planted
8
Bald Cypress
T
19
2 It
Planted
19
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
5
2 It
Planted
5
Wax Myrtle
SH
6
1 It
Volunteer
6
Red Bay
SH
1
1 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
OBSERVED DENSITY
-�
r `
o t
TOTAL PLANTED
42
mil''h
(PLANTED SPECIES
420 f
SPECIES
-PER A�CRP)�
,
OBSERVED DENSITY;
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
8
(VOLUNTEER
80
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER ACRE)y
'
TOTAL
5
UNACCEPTABLE
0r
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
NO
VOLUNTEERS
I>50% OF TOTAL (YM)
°W
'
4
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
50
OBSIER'VED D SITY
- ; n,J-
(PER ACRE)
500
j

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
12
1 ft
Planted
12
Bald Cypress
T
14
2 ft
Planted
14
Black Gum
T
10
1 ft
Planted
10
Black Gum
T
10
2 ft
Planted
10
Tulip Poplar
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
6
2 ft
Planted
6
Wax Myrtle
SH
3
1 ft
Volunteer
3
Wax Myrtle
SH
6
2 ft
Volunteer
6
Wax Myrtle
SH
3
3 ft
Volunteer
3
� OBSERVED,DENSI ♦T Y
�4
jl•
TOTAL PLANTED
60
u"Y+.A -°�LL`a mss' -F`�
(PLANTER SPECIS;
{-� • '
`; »- 600 R
SPECIES
N�PER ACRE)
A
DENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE°.
12
OBSERVED
t(VOLUNTEER 's
120 �n
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER^ CREj +y�}y'
)
TOTAL'"
,
UNACCEPTABLE
0
SINCiLE1VOLUN, FE
a
NQ
>50 °k'OF IOTA (YM)"
=—
VOLUNTEERS
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
72
OBSERVED DENSITY
F
0 `
(PER{ACREI

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Bald Cypress
T
4
2 ft
Planted
4
Black Gum
T
5
1 It
Planted
5
Black Gum
T
3
2 ft
Planted
3
Atlantic White Cedar
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Tulip Poplar
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Pond Pine
T
11
1 ft
Planted
11
Pond Pine
T
1
2 ft
Planted
1
Red Bay
SH
60
2 It - Avg
Volunteer
60
Fetterbush
SH
300
3 It - Avg
Volunteer
300
Sweet Gum
SH
50
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
50
Unidentified Pine
SH
300
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
300
s
TOTAL PLANTED
;OBSERVED DENSITY;
spa x�
SPECIES
33
(PLANTED SPECI ES'
t ' PER ,
= �PERiACRRE) E),�`
330 n4
�PF
:yam.
�! y - .t}M-1w
OBSERVED DENSITY'
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
360
(VOLUNTEER 1
X3600
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER,ACRE)'
'af
TOTAL
SINGLE VOLUNTEER,
�' w
UNACCEPTABLE
350
>50°�b OF�TOTAL ll�
(Y
� • _ ;� : �, �
VOLUNTEERS
4" %c F'
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
743
:OBSERVED DENSITY
�, W- « - 1, -- �
A y 3930
,A(PER ACRE)
i

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Bald Cypress
T
15
2ft
Planted
15
Black Gum
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
Black Gum
T
5
2ft
Planted
5
River Birch
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
River Birch
T
B
2ft
Planted
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
TOTAL PLANTEDrj
48
OBSERVE DENSITY,
;,(PLAN PIXIES ?
0
=�y{�R48;s
SPECIES
OBSERVED'DENSffY,
TOTAL ACCEPTABLEt
0
(VOLUNTEER
VOLUNTEERS
jSPECIES,P,ER ACRE)
°�:�� ^`%, ✓f
TOTAL
SINGLE-VOLUNTEER
UNACCEPTABLE
0
OF
VOLUNTEERS
S�(OB RVED�DENSITY�
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
48

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
12
1 it
Planted
12
Bald Cypress
T
27
2 It
Planted
27
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
23
1 ft
Planted
23
Tulip Poplar
T
2
2 ft
Planted
2
Wax Myrtle
T
2
i ft
Volunteer
2
Water Oak
T
1
1 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
4 ft
Volunteer
1
Sweet Gum
T
20
4 It - Avg
Volunteer
20
Red Maple
T
5
4 it - Avg
Volunteer
5
OBSERVEDOENSITY
TOTAL PLANTED
65
(PLANTED S_P,ECIES ,
s650 t
SPECIES
E ACRE)gy,j
-,�
d`
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
4VOLUNTEER;�
OBSERVED DENSITY
;+ *140 t
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER ACR�Ey),g
TOTAL
"
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
NO
UNACCEPTABLE
25
>50°Yo OF'TOTAL
VOLUNTEERS
,��;
�
r
OBSERVED DENSIT& Y
F -ate
, -
�', � tr
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
94
^ * -'
4(PER ACRE) ;
�;

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
T SA or SH
Bald Cypress
T
7
1 ft
Planted
7
Bald Cypress
T
24
2ft
Planted
24
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
8
1 ft
Planted
8
Black Gum
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
River Birch
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
6
2 ft
Planted
6
Wax Myrtle
SH
3
1 ft
Volunteer
3
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
6 ft
Volunteer
1
Bacchans
SH
1
1 ft
Volunteer
1
Baccharis
SH
1
2 ft
Volunteer
1
i
TOTAL PLAN
55
OBSERVED DENS
-k
(PLANTED "SPECIES]
' } 4 'r
; >� �_ ,550
ESTED
TERACRE),j
j,
�
- s
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
5
r�
(VOLUNTEER
j -'' ��-v 50 r
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER ACRE)°
i^ "`
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
2
�'"�
f SINGLE VOLUNTEER
IN
-
VOLUNTEERS
.
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
62
OB$ERYED DENSITY
Tf
.

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 10
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
T SA or SH
Bald Cypress
T
7
1 ft
Planted
7
Bald Cypress
T
9
2ft
Planted
9
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Atlantic White Cedar
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Atlantic White Cedar
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
Tulip Poplar
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
6
2ft
Planted
6
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
5 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
1 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
4 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
5 ft
Volunteer
1
OBSERVED.DENSITY'
TOTAL PLANTED
35
(PLANTED SPECIES 9
SPECIES
PE ACRE)
ED D SITY
OBS41*
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
*
VOLUNTEERS
5
� (VOLUNTEE_R
w._ Y
5
SPECIES PER,ACRE)�
4 ff''_
TOTAL
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
;
UNACCEPTABLE
0
>50350FTOTAL°(YM)'
�•
NO
VOLUNTEERS
; _ - n" 1,
1
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
40
400 '
(PER ACRE)
'` '

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 11
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
T SA or SH
Bald Cypress
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Bald Cypress
T
14
2ft
Planted
14
Black Gum
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Atlantic White Cedar
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Atlantic White Cedar
T
7
2ft
Planted
7
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
5
2ft
Planted
5
Pond Pine
T
9
1 ft
Planted
9
Pond Pine
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
American Holly
T
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
Red Maple
T
20
2ft
Volunteer
20
Sweet Gum
T
25
6 ft - Avg
Volunteer
25
Unidentified Pine
T
15
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
15
TOTAL PLANTED
OBSERVED DENSITY
SPECIES
53
(PLANTED S PECIES.
s ,
' 530
PER ACRE) ,z
OBSERVED DENSITY '
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE'
1
°{
ii
10
VOLUNTEERS
,(VOLUNTEER
SPE61ESrPER ACtRyE)«
y I
I
bay
TOTAL
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
r r
UNACCEPTABLE
60
>50 %OFTOTAL (Y)N)
I NO
VOLUNTEERS
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
114
,OBSERVED DENSITY,
,
',
_ J540
APER ACRE} ,
,;

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 12
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
6
1 It
Planted
6
Bald Cypress
T
20
2 It
Planted
20
Black Gum
T
10
1 It
Planted
10
Black Gum
T
3
2 It
Planted
3
River Birch
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Wax Myrtle
SH
2
1 ft
Volunteer
2
Wax Myrtle
SH
2
2ft
Volunteer
2
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
3 It
Volunteer
1
Bacchans
SH
1
1 It
Volunteer
1
Baccharis
SH
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL PLANTED
51
�
(PLANTED SPECIES,
;
SPECIES
�-
. f ER ACRE)
OBS ERVED DENSITY
,'
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
5
= _*
' "(VOLUNTEER ' °`.
°Y-50 ;
VOLUNTEERS
ZW ff. -,-- .2
SPECIES PER ACRES)
TOTAL
�' t
UNACCEPTABLE
2
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
� > ,� ,.- • % >- j
>509 OF TOTAL (YIN)
;,
NO
VOLUNTEERS
�'
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
58
&L--_ ° . -
�(PER ACREj
560-

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 13
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
4
2 It
Planted
4
Black Gum
T
2
2 It
Planted
2
Black Gum
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Atlantic White Cedar
T
10
1 ft
Planted
10
Atlantic White Cedar
T
6
211
Planted
6
Atlantic White Cedar
T
2
3 It
Planted
2
River Birch
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
River Birch
T
2
2111
Planted
2
Tulip Poplar
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Wax Myrtle
SH
8
3 ft
Volunteer
8
Red Bay
SH
20
3 It - Avg
Volunteer
20
Sweet Gum
SH
10
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
10
Unldentified Pine
SH
20
4 ft - Avg
Volunteer
}yy h(
��A T�r imp 11114 T'
,'OBSERVED'DENSITY'
}20
r •'��EC �s _
TOTAL PLANTED
37
(P TEDISSPECIESv
370
SPECIES
Z,y.�PpELR�ACRE)
yyllI
�>rll
I L'4ii
�'MS i
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
28
OBSERVED DENSITY•
UNT �(VOL` UNTEEfi =
y � '
�' �'• �' 1�+a�
VOLUNTEERS
= AEA R
SPECIES PER ACR
,280
�, I
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
30�
SING E VOLUNTEER
VOLUNTEERS
I>50% °OF TOTALS(�1fM)
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
95
OBSERVED DENSITY -_
a'=�
g ��� 1
i3 t350'
,�� �'
,(PER ACRE)

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 14
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
5
1 It
Planted
5
Bald Cypress
T
9
2ft
Planted
9
Black Gum
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Black Gum
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Atlantic White Cedar
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
Atlantic White Cedar
T
7
2ft
Planted
7
Tulip Poplar
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
i ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
2 ft
Planted
1
Pond Pine
T
11
1 ft
Planted
11
Pond Pine
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Wax Myrtle
SH
3
1 ft
Volunteer
3
Wax Myrtle
SH
3
2ft
Volunteer
3
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
3 ft
Volunteer
1
OBSERVED DENSITY
?
TOTAL PLANTED
49
n °- --x
'(PLANTEVSPECIES
SPECIES
=PER ACRE)
`41
OBSERVED DENSIT('
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
7
r(VOLUNTEER
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PER ACRE)
j
__- -, -- - _, = 4
TOTAL
SINGLE ,'VOLUNTEER,
UNACCEPTABLE
0
X5096 OF TOTAL (YM)
ENO
VOLUNTEERS
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
56
�� (PER ACRE) 1
,_,560;
1

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 15
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
10
1 It
Planted
10
Bald Cypress
T
23
2 It
Planted
23
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
River Birch
T
7
2ft
Planted
7
Tulip Poplar
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Tulip Poplar
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
8
2ft
Planted
8
Wax Myrtle
SH
7
2ft
Volunteer
7
Unldentified Pine
T
7
3 ft
Volunteer
7
OBSERVED"DENSU
TOTAL PLANTED
SPECIES
58
:(PLANTED SPECIES
PER ACRE)'
580
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
7
09SERVEDDENSITY
E
(VOL "UNTER
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES�I?ER,AGRE)�
g
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
7
OL
SINGLE XU ER
OF�TOTAL
=NO
VOLUNTEERS
X5096 (Y/N)
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
72_;n(p,ER
ACRE)
650
,,

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 16
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
14
1 it
Planted
14
Bald Cypress
T
42
2 it
Planted
42
Black Gum
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
3
2 ft
Planted
3
Atlantic White Cedar
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Pond Pine
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
TOTALPLANTED
SPECIES
70
i OBSERVED.DENSITY.
�*
(PLANTED SPECIES
x-r rdl
wr�700 =
ACRE);-
�
OBSERVED DENSITY
n °_
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
VOLUNTEERS
0
(VOLUNTEER,
°
4t�
SPECIES PER ACRE)r
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
0
SFINGLE YOLU„NTEER
�` NO
VOLUNTEERS
>50x �, F TOTAL (oYM)
�t�`�
�'
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
70
OBSERVE E D D NSITY
00'

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 17

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - MAINSTEM
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER 18
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
4
1 It
Planted
4
Bald Cypress
T
11
2ft
Planted
11
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
1
211
Planted
1
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Atlantic White Cedar
T
5
2ft
Planted
5
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
6
i ft
Planted
6
Tulip Poplar
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
i ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Pond Pine
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
River Birch
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
American Holly
T
1
1 It
Volunteer
1
Fetterbush
SH
100
3 It - Avg
Volunteer
100
Red Bay
SH
30
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
30
Wax Myrtle
SH
15
3 ft -Avg
Volunteer
15
Water Oak
SH
10
2111
Volunteer
10
Sweet Gum
SH
35
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
35
Unidentified Pine
SH
40
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
40
TOTAL PLANTED
OBSERVED, DENSITY
(PLANTED
% 37 F'
'h'
'1440
SPECIES
44
SPECIES
, I
_
12i . �
OBSERVEDDENSITzIf
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
156
(VOLUNTEER
'1560
VOLUNTEERS
SPISFPE
TOTAL
SINGLE�VOLUNTEER
- rt
UNACCEPTABLE
75
> OF TOTAL (YM)
�fi i
e
VOLUNTEERS
OBSERVED DE STY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
275
(PER ACRE)"
R ; 2000 j

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 1
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Bald Cypress
T
22
2ft
Planted
22
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
8
2ft
Planted
8
Tulip Poplar
T
4
i ft
Planted
4
Tulip Poplar
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
i ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
9
2ft
Planted
9
Wax Myrtle
SH
2
2ft
Volunteer
2
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
6 ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
2
1 ft
Volunteer
2
Red Bay
SH
1
2ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
SH
1
4 ft
Volunteer
1
TOTAL PLANTED
SPECIES'
52
r -a-�aE ENSI
-
�(P NT ED D ITaY
, (PLANTED SPECIES
k
+' '
PER
OBSERVED DENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
7
(V�OLUNTER
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES, FR�ACRE)'
TOTAL.
UNACCEPTABLE
0
SINGLE - VOLUNTEER
+�
VOLUNTEERS
550 FsTOTAL',(YlN04'P
li
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
59
OBSERVED,DENSITY,.,`��F`�
i 7'(PER ACRE)``x,,
_590 A ,k

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 2
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Bald Cypress
T
33
2 ft
Planted
33
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
3
2 ft
Planted
3
River Birch
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
River Birch
T
3
2 it
Planted
3
Tulip Poplar
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
Tulip Poplar
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
6
2ft
Planted
6
Wax Myrtle
SH
1
5 ft
Volunteer
1
DENSITY,
TOTAL PLANTED
62
-MR
E SPECIES"
q ;62:0
SPECIES
II,OBSE
n
s-.Tn
iOBSERVED DENSITY,
y.--
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
1
r' ^'`�
i(VOLUNNTEEER y
`` I
VOLUNTEERS
L�
1
SPECIES PER ACRE)
ry' fpY"
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
0
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
' ' =' w� "max
;N0
>50% OF TOTAL(YIN)
y4_
`a
VOLUNTEERS
x;�
' t f�'"=
s
1 f +�"�3 ��`+ Fie'a44 :. �
� •+
yam,
OBSERVED DENSITY'
}�TT
Y
a �'
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
63
I' t r—' -, 41- -, � -• i
;(PER ACRE) z
630
w

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 3
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Bald Cypress
T
11
2ft
Planted
11
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Black Gum
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Atlantic White Cedar
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Atlantic White Cedar
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
Oft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
3
t ft
Planted
3
Pond Pine
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Red Bay
SH
25
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
25
Wax Myrtle
SH
8
2ft
Volunteer
8
Wax Myrtle
SH
5
3 It
Volunteer
5
Water Oak
T
3
3 It
Volunteer
3
Unldentified Pine
T
45
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
45
Sweet Gum
T
7
2ft -Avg
Volunteer
7
10615ERVED DENSITY,+
TOTAL PLANTED
35
F
(PLANTED SPECIES+
' 50
SPECIES
;PER ACRE)
"*
I'll 1
OBSERVED�DENSI,TY,
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
41
r a, f
',(VOLUNTEER
:410
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES PERACRE),
I
i
--
-f
TOTAL
;SINGLE VOLUNTEER
;% I I
NO ,
UNACCEPTABLE
52
oc .��
>50% OF TOTAL (YIN),
t
VOLUNTEERS
a
OBSERVED DENSITY
`
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
128
.1 , °
(P.ER ACRE)
1 760
_
-
a

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 4
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Bald Cypress
T
26
2ft
Planted
26
Bald Cypress
T
2
3ft
Planted
2
Black Gum
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Black Gum
T
5
2ft
Planted
5
River Birch
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
River Birch
T
18
2ft
Planted
18
River Birch
T
2
3ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
OBSERVED DENSITY,
�N s
TOTAL PLANTED
70
(PLANTED SP CIES
zA 100=
SPECIES
'etPERACRE
r17"
4-`
OBSERVED "DENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
0
(VOLUNTEERS
VOLUNTEERS
PER ACRE),
SPECIES
?"� •may ��
• °i, . , ' } :,� ,rP
•
-,4c �r -r I"`
•.
�- 3r"���r- -k �gpr N
717 l
; s P w
TOTAL
. §s ;�
SINGLE VOLUNTEER
��d
= by
UNACCEPTABLE
0$
>SU96 OF TOTAL -(YM)
tNO
VOLUNTEERS
.;g f;��1
�.
g «
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
70
OBSERVED ^ DEN SITT
a'I(PE SAC E 4,1
—�

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 5
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Bald Cypress
T
23
2 ft
Planted
23
Black Gum
T
16
1 ft
Planted
16
Black Gum
T
6
2 ft
Planted
6
American White Cedar
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
American White Cedar
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
6
t ft
Planted
6
Tulip Poplar
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
5
2ft
Planted
5
Pond Pine
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Red Bay
T
5
1 ft
Volunteer
5
Sweet Gum
T
15
5 ft - Avg
Volunteer
15
TOTAL PLANTED
66
"v
(PLANTED,SPECIES
660_{
SPECIES
PER All"1129%
��� Iil b L��' al
il r��i� �. • ti4����+
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
OBSERVED DENSITY
Wk
T f
5
VOLUNTEERS
5
(VOLUNTEER
SPECIESPERACRE)q
:,_ �-
=� ��,�',•G�s�
TOTAL
SINGLE VOLUNTEERt
UNACCEPTABLE
15
,
=� a�'�
>50% ON71 AL
VOLUNTEERS
rL * �i`ym�}'S1�
k .`�•'�'44' = "nLAl�y+�
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
86
OBSER VEM DEqSTY
;(PER ACRE);

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - NORTH TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER NT 6
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
9
1 ft
Planted
9
Bald Cypress
T
44
2ft
Planted
44
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Black Gum
T
1
2ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Tulip Poplar
T
2
2ft
Planted
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
7
2ft
Planted
7
Red Bay
T
15
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
15
Wax Myrtle
T
5
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
5
Sweet Gum
T
25
5 ft - Avg
Volunteer
25
Unidentified Pine
T
5
1 ft
Volunteer
5
TOTAL PLANTED
72
SERE DEN TY
OBSERVE
(PLANTEDSPECIES
�{ 27N
,SPECIES
PEfl ACRE)'`
r
Z
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
20
s' ate+
,OBSERVED'DENSITY
(V0 UNTEER
Ilk .
w
200`
VOLUNTEERS;
SPECIES, PER
-A�CRE)
; ¢
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
VOLUNTEERS,
30
SINGLIVY 'LUNTEER
>50OF TOTAL (YIN)
s
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
92(pER
OBSERVED DENSITY,
ACRE)`
.;�
a= s

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER ST 1

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER ST 2
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
4
t ft
Planted
4
Bald Cypress
T
12
2ft
Planted
12
Bald Cypress
T
3
3ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
6
1 ft
Planted
6
Black Gum
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
Green Ash
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Green Ash
T
2
2 ft
Planted
2
Pond Pine
T
1
2 ft
Planted
1
Pond Pine
T
2
3ft
Planted
2
Pond Pine
T
3
4 ft
Planted
3
Pond Pine
T
2
7 ft
Planted
2
Red Bay
SH
25
7 ft - Avg
Volunteer
25
Wax Myrtle
SH
5
7 ft - Avg
Volunteer
5
Unidentified Pine
T
40
2ft
Volunteer
40
Unidentified Pine
T
10
6 It - Avg
Volunteer
10
Sweet Gum
T
20
8 ft - Avg
Volunteer
20
TOTAL PLANTED
OBSERVED DENSITYo
`
39
(PLANTED SPECIES
zr 390a`'°
SPECIES
PER ACRE
sY
OBSERVED DEN SITY
x
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
30
(VOLUNTEERS,
i 30t) `•
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIES,PER,ACRE)�
�
' " "'
TOTAL^
}.
SINGL'E:VOLUNTEER
UNACCEPTABLE
70
>SO °k "OF TONAL (YIN)yy
;;
VOLUNTEERS
OBSERVEDyDENSITY
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
139
(PER ACRE)
`�, a

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER ST 3
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
5
1 ft
Planted
5
Bald Cypress
T
18
2ft
Planted
18
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
3
1 ft
Planted
3
Black Gum
T
4
2ft
Planted
4
Green Ash
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Green Ash
T
3
2ft
Planted
3
Ironwood
T
1
2 ft
Planted
1
Tulip Poplar
T
2
1 ft
Planted
2
Red Bay
SH
20
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
20
Red Bay
SH
15
4 ft
Volunteer
15
Wax Myrtle
SH
10
1 It
Volunteer
10
Highbush Blueberry
SH
10
3 It - Avg
Volunteer
10
Sweet Gum
T
40
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
40
Unidentified Pine
T
35
2 ft - Avg
Volunteer
35
�OBSERVED, DENSITY
TOTAL PLANTED
41
^sue 4.�w. as r �'
(PUNTED SPECIES
SPECIES
ACREE
�')PER
°OBSERVED DENSITY,
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
55
� (VOLUNTEER, -j
;r 1550 -
VOLUNTEERS
s e
ta -
SPECIES PER ACRE)
,
a -!
TOTAL
J�y��,�r-
�. j
uSINGLE NOL' UNTEERI
�� T` >i� v-"
UNACCEPTABLE
75
OF�TOTAL
N
N
550°/ ((Y
VOLUNTEERS
„ �+
EN
i E D DENSITY'
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
171
A} (PEER " "`
e Y 50 4i

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER ST 4
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Bald Cypress
T
28
2 ft
Planted
28
Bald Cypress
T
5
3ft
Planted
5
Black Gum
T
4
1 ft
Planted
4
Black Gum
T
4
2 ft
Planted
4
Green Ash
T
14
1 ft
Planted
14
Green Ash
T
8
2 It
Planted
8
Tulip Poplar
T
4
1 It
Volunteer
4
Sweet Bay
T
1
3ft
Volunteer
1
Red Bay
T
8
3 It - Avg
Volunteer
8
Wax Myrtle
T
5
1 it
Volunteer
5
Sweet Gum
T
20
4 ft - Avg
Volunteer
20
Unldentifted Pine
T
10
3 ft - Avg
Volunteer
10
O S RVED DENSITY
"aP T - R�G
TOTAL PLANTED
64
(PLANTED SPECIES
640
SPECIES
y PER ACRE)
OBSERVEDOENSITY
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE
18
r (VOLUNTEER
180
VOLUNTEERS
SPECIE, PER ACREJ ji,
TOTAL
IS NGLE VOLUNTEER
UNACCEPTABLE
30
>50%OF TOTAL (J(M)
NO
VOLUNTEERS
DY
I' BSERV1�E)
i
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
112,
PER C_
11
8Z0 $
Y -
,

STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK - SOUTHERN TRIBUTARY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER ST 5
SPECIES
STRATUM
Number of Individuals
HEIGHT
Planted vs. Volunteer
Number of Individuals
(T, SA, SH)
Species
Counted toward
Success Criteria
Bald Cypress
T
8
1 It
Planted
8
Bald Cypress
T
23
2 It
Planted
23
Bald Cypress
T
1
3 ft
Planted
1
Black Gum
T
8
1 ft
Planted
8
Black Gum
T
12
2 It
Planted
12
Green Ash
T
1
1 it
Planted
1
Ironwood
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Ironwood
T
4
2 ft
Planted
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak
T
2
2 ft
Planted
2
Atlantic White Cedar
T
1
1 ft
Planted
1
Unidentified Pine
T
2
i ft
Volunteer
2
xY��4�3eYr'ais3'1'
TOTAL PLANTED°
61
'OBSERVED DENSITY
(PLANTED SPECIES I
'
w 610
SPECIES
jPERACRE.
�p
~ +r- cad -fiy J�� �r�'� � >Ye
� ✓
DENSITY
pp
TOTAL ACCEPTABLE''�*�
0
,OBSERNED -"�ri
NAT
VOLUNTEERS
-EER
SPt:CIES,PER
TOTAL
UNACCEPTABLE
2
SINGLE- VOLUNTEER
!>50 %FOFTOTAL`,(YIN),
VOLUNTEERS
af�
5. a» "R�f ^x-51
f•- T�'- -• .. 3
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
63
OBSERVEDDENSIT.Y
a.a+�vrna±t
610 �•
,(PERACRE)-

APPENDIX C:
HYDROGRAPHS

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► South Trib
► Plot Wells 1, 3, & 4
► WM20 &40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
d
t
c
0
�a
U
a�
M
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
March 2012
& N� N", Nti N'Z' N",
aK a� ac a� a� a� a� eo e'° e'O
�� Y� ,�'
monsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
U)
d
0
-6
d
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
L
rn -30
a
c
a -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
8
7
6
-o
5
4 of
0
3
7�
2
1
0
Fe`O xe� tea, 'a�"
16� lt5 15 NV —Plot 1 (13D4C94F) -+-Plot 3 (13D4ACD2)
-Plot 4 (13D4A988) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -5

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
I
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► South Trib
► Plot Wells 1, 3, & 4
► WM20 &40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
N
r
U
0
'a
U
m
a.
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
June 2012
PQ� PQ� PQ� PQ� P�� PQY a� e� �� a� �� a� �� �c �R �R �� ��
�1. N�, 2� 9Y '� , N "� �'v �1: '1 t5 �: '� �o� NV 20,E QV
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total = 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
N
d
t 0
U
C
6
a�
J -12
d
-18
a�
-24
(A -30
-36
0
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
8
7
6
M
5
n
4
0
3
5'
2
1
0
.�2 .�`L
PQt' Phi' P��' PQi' PQi' Pit' �a� eaA ��1 ��1 ��� ��1 ��A
'v 'j>' by ','•
F mPlot 1 (13D4C94F) -+-Plot 3 (13D4ACD2)
Plot 4 (13D4A988) 12in below surface
Onsite Raingauge Slide A -6

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► South Trib
► Plot Wells 1, 3, & 4
► WM20 &40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
t
U
0
'c
d
a.
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
U)
t 0
-6
J -12
m`
-18
a�
-24
i
7
N -30
a
-36
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
monsite Raingauge —30 day total — 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
September 2012
�& eQ eQ eQ eQ
—Plot 1 (13D4C94F) +Plot 3 (13D4ACD2)
Plot 4 (13D4A988) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -7
8
7
6
-o
5
4 W
0
3
7
2 v
1
0
G
II,
�& eQ eQ eQ eQ
—Plot 1 (13D4C94F) +Plot 3 (13D4ACD2)
Plot 4 (13D4A988) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -7
8
7
6
-o
5
4 W
0
3
7
2 v
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► South Trib
► Plot Wells 1, 3, & 4
► WM20 &40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
y
d
L
V
c
0
'a
d
a
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
OG� OG'C OGti OG� OGti OGti OVt: J' J' J' J" 4' J' C G G G G G
�° �° �° �° 1° 1° Oe Oe Oe O° Oe Oe
1' 6 ,\1 1R• ,L1' ,��' 11 V 1O" 1� gyp• 1�• 'p V 1� NV 1O• It gyp•
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total -- 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
N
s 0
v
as
6
m
J -12
m
-18
a�
-24
i
7
U) -30
a
C -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
■ ■ ■ _ ■
■ _ ■ ■ ■
'�R' 12 1� 1� 1� 1� 1� N� 1R'
O °t OG`� OGti OG1f OG'l' O °`C OG\: J' J' J" J" J" J" G G G G G G
�° �° '° '° �° '° Oe Oe Oe Oe Oe Oe
1• Cp 11' 1� �1' 2ca �1' Lj 1�" NV l f• �, §Y h 1�" \V IV 2t5 '�,
—Plot 1 (13D4C94F) -+- Plot 3 (13D4ACD2)
-- Plot 4 (13D4A988) 12in below surface
ImOnsite Raingauge I Slide A -8
8
7
6
M
5
n
4 a;
0
3
3
v
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
January 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► North Trib
► Plot Wells 2, 3, & 6
► WM20 &40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
0 at 7:00 am
H
d
t
U
0
'a
m
(L
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
U)
t 0
v
d
-6
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
U) -30
a
-36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
KYA
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
�0 �z �eO
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
�e'O
,yo' rt�
—Plot 2 (14E19DE1) 4- Plot 3 (14E1951 F)
Plot 6 (14E19549) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide B-1
8
7
6
5
n
-a
4
0
3
2 v
1
out

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
►
Stone Farm Mitigation
►
Brunswick County, NC
►
01 -02 -240
►
North Trib
►
Plot Wells 2, 3, & 6
►
WM20 &40
►
April 1, 2012 -
►
June 30, 2012
►
One reading per day
►
at 7:00 am
m
t
U
C
0
'a
d
M
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total -30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
N
d
L 0
v
a�
-6
a�
J -12
i
a�
-18
a)
-24
U) -30
_
Q -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
June 2012
PQt" PQt" PQi Phi" PQ�" Q�t' a� 'A
v NV
—Plot 2 (14E19DE1) -+-Plot 3 (14E1951F)
Plot 6 (14E19549) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide B -2
8
7
6
5 CD
n
R
4 0�
0
3
5
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► North Trib
► Plot Wells 2, 3, & 6
► WM20 &40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
m
t
U
S
0
'a
U
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
N
r 0
U
C
6
76
Q
J -12
L
a�
-18
a�
-24
M
fA -30
a
c
o -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
N", N2 N�
J� Ja eQ eQ eQ eQ eQ eQ
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 1111111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
e� eQ eQ e� eQ e�
V 0 0� '5 �5 �5 �5
ti 2 N ' 2 ti
—Plot 2 (14E19DE1) +Plot 3 (14E1951 F)
-Plot 6 (14E19549) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide B -3
8
7
6
5 CD
0
-is
4 c+
0
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► North Trib
► Plot Wells 2, 3, & 6
► WM20 &40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
m
t
U
C
0
.a
U
d
a.
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
OGti OG\: OG�: OG�; OG� OG OGti �pA' �pA' �pA �p,' �pA' �pA' OeG OeCi Geri Oeri Oe6 OpG
'�' � ,��.' ,��o' ��.' ��o' ,5'.' c� ,gyp- ,�c� gyp• 2c�• �a- 5 ^p• �� gyp• �c�• �p-
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total — 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
N
Q
L 0
v
5
-s
a�
--j -12
as
-18
as
-24
i
N -30
a
c
C -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
—Plot 2 (14E19DE1) -+-Plot 3 (14E1951 F)
Plot 6 (14E19549) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide B -4
8
7
6
5
n
4 W
0
3
2
1
0
�`� 1`L
OGti OGt OG� OGti OG� OG� OGti �a �OJ ' Op ' Op ' Op ' Op O0G OeCi OeG OeG OeG OpG
4j \p• \V 20- 1 31 1�5 NQr NV 26- rev lf•
—Plot 2 (14E19DE1) -+-Plot 3 (14E1951 F)
Plot 6 (14E19549) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide B -4
8
7
6
5
n
4 W
0
3
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
January 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 1, 5, & 7
► WM20 &40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
d
t
S
r-
.2
'a
U
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
�2 <2 <ti 1� 1ti '� '� -2 r� -ti N� r�
a< a� ac a� a� e°
ti 2 y V 2 ti 5 N, rol", � NV ti 1�
m nsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% 1111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
1� '� \� 1ti \ti 1� 'ti \ti Nti \1 1r �2 �q �2 �ti �� �ti 'ti
"\' ac a�'\' a� ac a� ac e'° e'° e'O e'O z'O ai' a- a a a a a
o Q �L . Nly r§y 2 9 2 3
• Plot 1 (14E1 ABD3) -+- Plot 5 (14E1 A330)
°Plot 7 (14E16007) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide C-1
8
7
6
5 CD
n
4 of
0
3
7�
2
1
0
6
0
v
c
-6
d
>
m
-�
-12
a�
w
-18
-
M
d
L)
-24
i
7
fA
-30
a
c
0
-36
c�
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
1� '� \� 1ti \ti 1� 'ti \ti Nti \1 1r �2 �q �2 �ti �� �ti 'ti
"\' ac a�'\' a� ac a� ac e'° e'° e'O e'O z'O ai' a- a a a a a
o Q �L . Nly r§y 2 9 2 3
• Plot 1 (14E1 ABD3) -+- Plot 5 (14E1 A330)
°Plot 7 (14E16007) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide C-1
8
7
6
5 CD
n
4 of
0
3
7�
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 1, 5, & 7
► WM20 &40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
w
a�
t
U
0
'a
m
a.
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
PQt PQi Phi P�� PQt PQ� A �a� �a� �a'A �aI �a� a �a� Nv
NN NV FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total — 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
m
t 0
U
_
-6
a�
a�
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
t
7
fA -30
a
a -36
c�
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
June 2012
8
7
6
5
n
-a
4 ort
0
3
2 v
1
0
a� �
—Plot 1 (14E1ABD3) -+-Plot 5 (14E1 A330)
Plot 7 (14E1 6007) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide C -2

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cI!mate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 1, 5, & 7
► WM20 &40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
L
U
0
.Q
U
d
a
Hydrology Assessment
IV
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
September 2012
�J� �J� �J� �J� �J� �J� J�' J�' Jam' J�' Jam' Jc" e� �Q e� eQ eQ e�
N- �� �� �� 2� �� �P oP �P oP �P OP �0 �5 �0 0e �6 �5
ti
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% MIShallotte Ag Raingauge
s 0
U
d
6
a�
J -12
as
-18
Q
-24
i
3
N -30
a
C -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42 - - - — — - — - - '
�rt, ti ti Nr� Nti N111
'g 0Q
MVP '�oP rx� 0� 5 N1:55 �0 1y
Plot 1 (14E1ABD3) -+-Plot 5 (14E1A330)
µ Plot 7 (14E16007) 12in below surface
�Onsite Raingauge Slide C -3
8
7
6
5
n
.a
4 or
0
3
7
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 1, 5, & 7
► WM20 &40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
r
U
E
C
0
'c
U
m
IL
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
N
v
0
_
Z
6
a�
J -12
Q
-18
a�
-24
U) -30
a
-36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
December 2012
,' ,' 1e fie,' 1p,' 1 e 1 e ped 1 e' e pec
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total =30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
+Plot 1 (14E1ABD3) -+-Plot 5 (14E1 A330)
Plot 7 (14E16007) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide C -4
8
7
6
M
5 CD
n
.a
4 M
0
3
z v
1
0
Opt pJ' pJ'
pJ'
pJ'
pA' pA
eCi eCi eCi eCi eCi eCi
Op`� Opti Opt Opt: Opti Opti
I 1C �o' � \
h
�
� \
O
O O O O O O
h
N 2 2 3 1�
N
16
r� 1
1� N IV 2� rO
+Plot 1 (14E1ABD3) -+-Plot 5 (14E1 A330)
Plot 7 (14E16007) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide C -4
8
7
6
M
5 CD
n
.a
4 M
0
3
z v
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
January 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 8 and pairing
► WM20 &40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
H
d
t
U
c
C
0
.Q
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
N
Q 0
t
c
-6
J -12
a�
-18
-24
L
N -30
a
c
O -36
L
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
lac SN SV S6 sa� <'o '<e� /'e� 'ya�"
wOnsite Raingauge —30 day total -- 30% —70% NShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
,a° Sb- ,a° �a° ,<0 �!0° lea �e0 � jai jai �a
• Plot 8 (14E19528) +Plot 8 pair (EBD7674)
1 2i below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide D -1
8
7
6
5
n
4 of
O
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 8 and pairing
► WM20 &40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
rn
d
t
U
E
r-
0
.Q
U
m
a.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Hydrology Assessment
EL
June 2012
PQ� P�� PQ� PQy P�� PQY a� aA aA a� a� aA aA
�, , , 2> �� �� �� ��� ��� ��� ��� �� N Nom, If ,J
o nsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% 1111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
U)
t
0
U
C
-6
J -12
d
-18
m
-24
C/) -30
O -36
L
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42 — — — - - ! 0
�2 N2 .ti 2 1ti 2 2 2 N0' .2 �2 �2 ,ti
': J� � C 2o,1-JC ���
2 2 3
+Plot 8 (14E19528) -+-Plot 8 pair (EBD71374)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide D -2
8
7
6
5 M
n
.o
4 a)
0
3
3
2
1

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 8 and pairing
► WM20 &40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
m
U
0
.a
U
d
CL
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
d 0
t
c
@ 6
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
i
to -30
.a
O -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
p,Q P,Q 0Q 0Q
'p, rp �aP �0 �5 1�5 1�5 r�0 1P
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
J�
J� J� J� J� J� J� p Q
QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ CD
Q Q Q Q Q
re 5e 5e �z �e
,,�
�� ��� ��� �� 6J ��
2 � �O' �� �O '4�' qQr b �, NV Nq. q�
—Plot 8 (14E19528) -+-Plot 8 pair (EBD7B74)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge I Slide D -3
8
7
6
M
5 CD
n
-i3
4 rt
O
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cIimate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 8 and pairing
► WM20 &40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
y
d
L
U
E
C
0
'a
U
d
CL
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
N
L
0
Z -6
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
N -30
o -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
December 2012
Dom �o~ 0& O& �c� ��, �U,• 4' J• �U,• ,' Qec Oec Oec O�c Oec Oec NIZ, NV IV lt5 1§Y
w nsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42 - -
- _ . . — .
OG~ OG�'
`pA' `pA' \pA' pJ'
\pA,
eCi �Ci eCi eCi eCi eCi
OG�' QG� OG�'
1 \ 1 �
5
`p-4
\ 1
Q Q Q Q Q
h h
`L `L NIZ 1V 16
2h l f
N� 16 2� �O
—Plot 8 (14E19528) -+-Plot 8 pair (EBD71374)
I 12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge I Slide D -4
8
7
6
5 M
n
4
0
3 ..
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
January 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01-02-240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 10, 12, & 17
► WM20 &40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
m
t
U
c
0
.Q
d
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
N
d
L 0
v
d
-6
m
J -12
i
d
-18
a�
-24
i
7
fA -30
c
=O -36
a
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
e° e° a ai aI"
V� �'� 6� �� h� p� h� �' �' \' NV �� ��
r 95 � . ti 0 N 2 rt. 1
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total --30% —70% 1111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42 - - _ - — . r I
�ti 2 '�� N2 �0 N� Nti �ti N2 �r' �2 12
�a� lac Sao Sao Sao �a� �a� Feo
x 'k 'Ceo jai jai at
'c, gyp• rc 11: 6 1:1k' ��-
-Plot 10 (EBD4EB3) -+-Plot 12 (14E1A282)
7: -Plot 17 (14E1 62C6) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide E -1
7
6
M
5 CD
n
.a
4
0
3
7
2
1
W

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
Mainstem
► Plot Wells 10, 12, & 17
► WM20 &40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
L
U
c
0
�a
m
(L
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
U)
d
s 0
v
N 6
a�
J -12
a�
-18
(D
-24
L
rn -30
a
-36
c�
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
June 2012
'ti 'Z' '2 'ti '� " '2 '� "
PQY aA aA aA a�
w nsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
*ago* ...
8
7
6
5 CD
0
4 0�
0
3
3
2 v
1
0
15 Nl� NV 2�� ��� l��
—Plot 10 (EBD4EB3) 4-Plot 12 (14E1A282)
-Plot 17 (14E162C6) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide E -2

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
Plot Wells 10, 12, & 17
► WM20 &40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
H
d
5
U
c
0
U
d
(L
Hydrology Assessment
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
September 2012
JJ\ JJ\ JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' eQ eQ eQ 2Q eQ eQ
, ' \ ' P oP V P oP v P oP V0 �5 V C
NN 2 2 3 \ \ 2 2
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total — 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
see* -------
••�.- -`- - --
6
f/1
d
v
0
d
-6
as
J -12
a�
-18
m
L) -24
U) -30
C
o -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
—Plot 10 (EBD4EB3) -+-Plot 12 (14E1A282)
-Plot 17 (14E162C6) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide E -3
8
7
6
5 (D
n
.a
4 a
0
3
3
z v
1
0
�J\ ,J\ JJ\ ,J\ �J\ JJ\ �J\ JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ'
JJ' JJ' 0Q
6Q 0Q 0Q p,Q 0Q
\' \�
\\
l�5 rp
—Plot 10 (EBD4EB3) -+-Plot 12 (14E1A282)
-Plot 17 (14E162C6) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide E -3
8
7
6
5 (D
n
.a
4 a
0
3
3
z v
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem
► Plot Wells 10, 12, & 17
► WM20 &40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
t
U
0
'a
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
d
c 0
v
a�
-6
a�
J -12
a�
w
-18
a�
-24
i
fA -30
a
c
-36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
K,%,
Hydrology Assessment
December 2012
'L 'ti " " N", "- N", N", �`b �L �ti �L 1L �2 �7
OG\; OG� �OJ' ��4" �pA" ��J" �QJ" ��-4 OeC; OeCi oeCi OeCi OeCi Oer
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total : °30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
pJ" pJ" pJ" pJ• pJ" aJ" eCi eCi �Ci eCi eCi eCi
�. �. �1, �L � � ��• 1`O• R�• 2� g�, `, ��• �`� ��, �`�, gam•
—Plot 10 (EBD4EB3) 4-Plot 12 (14E1A282)
°Plot 17 (14E162C6) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide E -4
8
7
6
M
5
n
4 a«
0
3
2 ....
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► January 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a -6
a�
_
-12
d
J
6.
d
M -18
d
V
i
C/) -24
0
i
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
all
-42
January 2012
��O ��O ��O X20 \20 �,ti0 �,ti0 ��O ��O ��O X20
�, ��°' p �rR p �2� �`L�o p \rvO �rL X31
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -11
8
6
5
CD
0
d
4
0
0
3
CD
3
N
2
1
0
��O ��O ��O X20 \20 �,ti0 �,ti0 ��O ��O ��O X20
�, ��°' p �rR p �2� �`L�o p \rvO �rL X31
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -11

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► February 1, 2012 -
► February 29, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
a�
c
-12
J
i
d
-18
d
U
t0
i
-24
a
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
February 2012
8
6
fro fro \15, Grp \1P �tio ��O ��O 41 \rp 4P 4P
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -12
5
CD
n
.a
d
4
0
3
7
n
3
3
y
2
1
0
fro fro \15, Grp \1P �tio ��O ��O 41 \rp 4P 4P
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -12

Stream Hydrology Assessment March 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► March 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm J
-6
a�
t
v
c
-12
N
J
d
-18
d
V
l0
i
N -24
a
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
36
-42
01 \`tO 01 \`5, \`tO
\`^' \`D 'q \'', ' \`� \tip \`y�l \`L^� \`tib \`tiro \`L'� \`L� \`L0
3 3� 3� 3��� 3� 3"�� 3 3
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -13
8
6
5
(DD
n
r.:
0)
4 0
_
_
n
3
3 W
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment April 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► April 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
-6
a�
-12
d
J
i
d
-18
v
N -24
a
0
L
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
�ti �2 �� �2 �� �� 1� 12 �ti �� �� �2 �� �ti �� �� 12 �� �� 1ti �ti .ti �2 N�
\rp \� \�o \�o \�o \lp \�o \�o \tio \p \�o \po \�o \rp \�yo \�o \rp \p \�o \p \�o \ro \yo \0
b \� t.\ t.\ ��a \� t.\ ��� t�\ \,'. , �' " �.'�o �.,1 ��� ��0 fir' \'I, p \'V \'V X' ��v X20
R b b b D� D� b b D� A b b R D� D� D�
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
+South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -14
8
6
5 CD
n
Gl
4 0
7
7
0
3
3 cD
0
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► May 1, 2012 -
► May 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment May 2012
6
0
F -6
t
U
C
-12
d
J
d
r
-18
d
U
cv
L
-24
Cn
a
0
L
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
� �2 �� � N111 � � N11- � � 2
N
�R � 2 �2 �2 ,ti 1� �ti
�2 N111 N111 �2 ti ti
,P 20 rp 1 rp �O �O
�O �O rp �O rp �O IO O
O O O O O O
\�\ \1 \�'\ \�\ \�O\ \O\ \�'\ 1\ O \2 � \2 �O \2 \� � \� �' \� � \�
�'
h h h h 5 h�\ h h \'`�\ \'`� \'`O\ \'`�\
4 h h
\'��O\ \'��\ \'�O\ \'��'\ \ \ \ \
h h h h ' h� 4' 1�
\ \� \ \ \
�� �2 h2 41 h�
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -15
8
6
5 CD
n
r.:
01
4 O
n
n
3 N
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment June 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► June 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
R -6
as
c
d -12
d
J
i
-18
d
v
co
-24
in
a
0
L
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
99IV
-42
o o o
o o`�
'
0 0 0 '\ o 'b Q b\r 01 0r 0r, 411 01 ro"- 0rl
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -16
8
6
5 (DD
0
.a
d
.r.
4 O
0
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► July 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
a�
_
-12
d
J
U
-18
d
U
!0
r-
L
-24
En
a
0
L
C7 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
July 2012
-42
) �2 �� �ti �2 �ti
x�O ,�O 4�O Iry �p X20 \rP X20 fir( \r6
-\\C" ,�6 ,�� �. ',0 x\23 D� o � � � �.
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -17
8
6
5 CD
0
G1
4 0
7
7
0
3
3 CD
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► August 1, 2012 -
► August 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
s
U
C
d
J
L
d
r
t0
d
U
t0
i
N
0
L
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment August 2012
0
-6
-12
-18
-24
x1:1M
-36
-42 —
, 0
\,v X,v \�1 'bp 0 X20 \,1
•
8
6
5
A_
:i
d
4
0
3
0
3
CD
3
2
1
-42 —
, 0
\,v X,v \�1 'bp 0 X20 \,1
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -18

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► September 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
0
F -6
a�
t
_
-12
d
J
d
-18
d
U
L
-24
a
0
L
C7 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Ov
September 2012
-42
1ti \� \ti lti 12 1Q
2 N2 Nti �� �`� �`� �2 �0 �`� N2 \1
\,tio
\� 4 \3 �. D 0
0 0
\�o' \ \ \ \ \ \'1 \ \
0 0 0 0 � 0� 02 0�' 01 41 �� 01 02
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -19
8
6
5
_n
.a
.=i
4 0
0
=r
3 Cn
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► October 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
0
E
a -6
a�
s
-12
d
J
d
r
-18
d
v
ca
N -24
a
c
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
EM
October 2012
�2 2 Q- `� 12 `ti 2 2 ti ti 12 r r� 1`L
��O ��O ��O ��o ��O ��O ��O X20 APO Grp
0 " � ' R " � p\ A O� �O 'p ,\ ,\ ' 0 O� 1
2 2 �1. 2 2 `L �L �L `�
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -20
8
6
5
m
n
:.i
d
4 0
0
3 N
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment November 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► November 1, 2012 -
► November 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
R -6
t
v
_
-12
d
J
d
-18
d
U
t0
i
fn -24
.a
0
(� -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
KIPA
\IIf� \120 \10 \'p ��o ��o \17P \1P \1P ��o ��o ��o X20 ��o \1P \1P \'-p \�o
b 1 X23
*South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -21
8
6
5
(D
0
:i
01
4 0
3
7
0
3 (D
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Southern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► December 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
a�
U
C
7aj -12
d
J
L
r.+
-18
d
v
m
L
-24
0
(g -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
cIm
December 2012
-42
�\0 `i��� r1\' rP 4`1 � 0`1 0" li;�� r1 '
—South Stream 1 (13D491A2)
-+-South Stream 2 (13D4AA06)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide A -22
8
7
6
5
n
w
rF
4
n
3
3 U)
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► January 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
-6
d
t
v
C
Z -12
J
i
w
-18
d
V
i
N -24
a
0
-30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
January 2012
�ti N� 1� 1� 1� N2 N2 NI �2 N� Nti Nl2 1ti N� 1� Nti N2 N� 12 N2 N2 12 �2 N2 N2
�O 20 20 �o do �o
R\ \0\
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -11
U_'
3
7
0
3
3 N
2
1
0
8
6
5
0
.a
01
�ti N� 1� 1� 1� N2 N2 NI �2 N� Nti Nl2 1ti N� 1� Nti N2 N� 12 N2 N2 12 �2 N2 N2
�O 20 20 �o do �o
R\ \0\
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -11
U_'
3
7
0
3
3 N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
® Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► February 1, 2012 -
► February 29, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
DA
0
R -6
a�
s
-12
d
J
L
-18
v
ca
L
N -24
0
-30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
CPA
February 2012
N \ \ \ \ \_ \2 N2 \ \_ �2 �ti
\`t� \`L� \`tom \`tip \`Z� \`t� \`t�
�.� 2� �L2 �L�' �L2 �L2 '4
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -12
8
6
5
CD
n
•.F
4
0
3
0
3
3
N
A
2
1
0
N \ \ \ \ \_ \2 N2 \ \_ �2 �ti
\`t� \`L� \`tom \`tip \`Z� \`t� \`t�
�.� 2� �L2 �L�' �L2 �L2 '4
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -12

Stream Hydrology Assessment March 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► March 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
-6
a�
E
-12
d
J
L
d
rt+
-18
d
v
cfl
L
N -24
c
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
�� N� N� Nti NIL, N� .� �� �� 1ti N� �2 �2 .ti �� �2 �� '2 �2 �2 �� �2 �2 �2 ��
\�O \�o \20 \�o \�o \p \�O \tio \�O \�O \�o \20 \ \P \�o \�o \ \rp fp \20 \20 \�o \rp \�O \vo \,lo
� \, � \2 '5\3 'b\b o \0 01 4 ' \0 \ ' \' 3 \'D ' �o � \ �' ' � 1 \ \ o \ D \ �o p \ 0 \ 1
3 0 � 3 3 3 3 3 3� o� o� 32 32 ,� 3� 32 0b
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -13
8
7
6
5 T
M
n
d
4 0
n
3
3 M
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► April 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
R -6
t
U
C
-12
J
L
d
M -18
d
U
L
U)
-24
a
c
0
C) -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
April 2012
-42
012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
\'6 \p� \`L \`ti \`� \L \`ti \L \`L \�t
\rte \`L t.\ 1'
t -N t t t \11
\1y\`L \10 \1p \16 \1� \10 \10 \r \22
-North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -14
8
7
6
5
n
r:
n>
4 O
7
7
n
S
3 N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation 1
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► May 1, 2012 -
► May 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm J
Stream Hydrology Assessment
0
[on
rn -6
t
U
C
-12
d
J
d
-18
d
U
ca
L
N -24
c
0
Cj -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
c.1M
May 2012
-42
\,f, \�O ��O ��O ��O ��O \p \rp Krp X20 \1O \,LO Xrp P ��O Grp Xv P �p ��O ��O ��O ��O \rp
��3 h�R ��6 h� h�� 0 � 2 �`� �`�o �`\ �`� �`0 2 b
h h h ' ' h h h h2 h , J\ ;V h'V h� h� 41 hb
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
+North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -15
8
7
6
5
fD
0
'a
d
4 0
n
3
3
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► June 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
t
v
E
d -12
J
i
d
-18
d
U
f0
i
N
-24
a
c
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
June 2012
-42
012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
O \1 \2 O \L2 O \4 O \t\2 �o \�O\(L 01 \`ti O \$ \`L 0 \�' \(L \110 \1'L\ \114 \1� \� 1�0�2 X1\ \2 X14 �10\2 14 X1'2 312 \ \ 0�2 \,��2 \ 0�2 \
O 0 ' O O O O O 02 02 02 62 02 02 02 02
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
+North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -16
8
6
5 M
n
d
4 O
3
n
3 w
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment July 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► July 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
R -6
m
t
U
C
-12
J
d
w
-18
U
U
N -24
a
0
(� -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
119IV
-42
41 \LO 0 \`tip 0 \`LO \20 \`LO \`r \y0 1
'�\ '1 \�L '� \�' '� \� '� \�o '�1 '� \� '� \0 \�'� \�R, \•��' \•�� \��O \�1 \10 \��' \`L� \`L'y \`L'' \,L" \`L�o \`L'1 \`L� \�l°' \g�
1 1 A
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+- North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -17
8
7
6
5 CD
0
13
.=i
d
.w
4 0
3
n
3
3 CD
W
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► August 1, 2012 -
► August 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
J
a -s
a�
U
C
y -12
d
J
d
r
-18
d
v
ca
:3 -24
a
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
99IV
August 2012
-42 —
1� 2 r 12
Grp �y0 X20 �rLO �y0 X20 ��O �ti0 ��O X20 ��O X20 ��O \ p
0 0 q; 0 ' ' �� �2 0� , j ',r1. �2
+North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
4-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -18
8
7
6
5
CD
n
d
4 O
7
n
3
3 w
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation 1
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► September 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
A
in -6
a�
-12
d
J
L
-18
d
V
lC
L
fn -24
c
0
(j -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
September 2012
012 012 012 012 O ^� 012 012 012 012 012 012 ON2 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
O\1�2 0�4 0�0\`L O\t�\ 0\02 0�\2 O \0�2 0\0�L \112 \122 \10�`L \1��'1. \102 \11�2 \102 \102 1�2 \ tit 41 t�2 j �7 \2 j 0�2
0 0 O 0 0 0 0 '\ 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 0 L
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -19
8
7
6
5
n
:i
L1
4
O
3
0
3
y
2
1
0
012 012 012 012 O ^� 012 012 012 012 012 012 ON2 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
O\1�2 0�4 0�0\`L O\t�\ 0\02 0�\2 O \0�2 0\0�L \112 \122 \10�`L \1��'1. \102 \11�2 \102 \102 1�2 \ tit 41 t�2 j �7 \2 j 0�2
0 0 O 0 0 0 0 '\ 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 0 L
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -19

Stream Hydrology Assessment October 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► October 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
-6
a�
t
U
C
-12
d
J
d
w
-18
d
U
cfl
N
-24
c
0
(7 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
�7P � O X20 �r6' ��O
�L �I L `L
p� 6 p� �
+North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -20
8
7
6
5 CD
n
:.r
O1
4 0
7
n
3
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► WM 40
► November 1, 2012 -
► November 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
a
-8
as
t
c
-12
J
d
-18
d
v
�o
L
In -24
a
0
(j -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
xr:2
November 2012
-42
O�� O 01� O O O O ^� O O O O z O�� 'Z'
L� �R \2 �\6�2 ��' 1\��2 �\O�ti \���2 \�L2 \�^'�2 \�a�2 \�0�2 \�� \`L \���2 \�°'�� \`L��2 \L'1'2 \202 \2b�1' �`tio\L \b1�2 \`L��2 \�0�2
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -21
8
s
5
CCD
0
w
A�
4 O
n
zr
3 M
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Northern Stream Tributary
► W M 40
► December 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
jp -6
N
L
U
C
d -12
J
i
U
-18
d
U
cC
i
-24
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
December 2012
-42
—
�� N2
rp rp 1O rp ,ZO �O �O �O rO �O �O �O �O �O �O �O 20 rp
\.' \ \rL \r�\ \p\ \6\ �\ \�\ \p�\ ��\ \2 '�\ gyp\ 'Cp\ �.�\ ��\ �p�\ �\ �\ t�j\ �\ �\ .�\
< 'r <' <0 ,�0' �ti ,�`b �2 �0% N N " �.`1% "' "' "' "4 "4 ,� 4 �L2 ,ti L <ti' "0 "0
—North Stream 1 (A278C2A)
-+-North Stream 2 (A3BFE3A)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide B -22
8
7
6
5
n
d
4 0
3
n
3 CD
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► W M 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► January 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
N -6
(D
t
L)
E
d -12
d
J
i
d
r
-18
d
v
ca
L
Uj -24
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
EPA
January 2012
61 �O ti0
\� \� \� \��\ \��\ \�L \2�\ \2p\ \bra\ \r1 fig\ j�\
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -9
2
1
0
8
7
6
5
CD
n
:.i
01
4
7
n
3
3
N
61 �O ti0
\� \� \� \��\ \��\ \�L \2�\ \2p\ \bra\ \r1 fig\ j�\
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -9
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► February 1, 2012 -
► February 29, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
0
-6
Q
t
v
_
-12
J
d
-18
d
v
ca
i
n -24
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
February 2012
-42
1ti \2 Nti
41 T
�p ��O �p X20 \'p ��O \�O �� �1 DLO ��O \rl 41 X20 \rO X20 ��O ��O X20 X20 ��O \rl
' � � ° 2 �
ti� ti� zx 26 2� 2\ 2\ 2�
16" ti 1 rt\ � ,L 1 2 '`L' 'L\ 41 161
41��0 41 'L\ T\1P
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge ::1
Slide C -10
8
6
5 CD
n
GI
4 O
7
7
n
3
3 N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► W M 40
► March 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
N
N -6
t
v
C
d -12
J
d
-18
d
v
co
N -24
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
March 2012
-42
\ti0
'P
X20 �ti0 DLO X20 �ti0 ��O X20 ��O 4ti0 DLO DLO \�O ��O ��O ��O DLO ��O \�O b\ ��O �ti0 Grp
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -11
8
6
5
n
m
4 0
0
3
3 N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► April 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
s
0
N -6
a�
t
d -12
d
J
d
-18
d
U
f0
N -24
a
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
99iy
-42
April 2012
8
7
6
3
n
3 N
64
1
LO
ONE O'�
'� a '� -� NE NE 'er Nr Nl Nr N2 NE Nr NE NE
NE
\r \`L 2 O0O '��' O41, 0`\ 2 O`L2 O0 �O °O
D \� \2 � \`2 0 2 0 t \`2 � \` � b � \L rx \�\L\1�\2�� � L
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
OBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -12
5
0
'a
d
4
0
0
3
n
3 N
64
1
LO
ONE O'�
'� a '� -� NE NE 'er Nr Nl Nr N2 NE Nr NE NE
NE
\r \`L 2 O0O '��' O41, 0`\ 2 O`L2 O0 �O °O
D \� \2 � \`2 0 2 0 t \`2 � \` � b � \L rx \�\L\1�\2�� � L
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
OBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -12

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► W M 40
► May 1, 2012 -
► May 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
M
N -6
m
L
V
C
y -12
d
J
d
w
-18
d
v
N
-24
a
c
0
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
May 2012
8
7
6
5
n
'a
:i
d
- 4 7
*1- n
S
3 W
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
NBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -13
0
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
NBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -13

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► June 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment June 2012
6
0
rn -6
m
t
v
S
y -12
d
J
L
-18
d
v
co
L
U) -24
a
0
L
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42 '
012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012 012
\1��2 \10'1. \21\(L \2R'2 \202 \2��2 \202 42��2 \2��'1. \L°'�2
-*-Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -14
8
7
6
5 (DD
n
4 O
n
s
3 y
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► July 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
M
N -6
a�
c
-12
d
J
d
-18
v
co
to -24
a
c
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
July 2012
8
6
5
0
r.:
61
4
N =
0
3 N
2
1
-42 ' —
—
— ' 0
1 \90
A \b 1\1 o Al 1\1 i A, ���� � \�� 1 \�0 ���� � \��o � \�1 ���� � \�� -I\rl A \1 1 A \rl -I\rytx \ \rl \ti1 -I\r0 \ \r0 \ \I
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
WBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -15

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► August 1, 2012 -
► August 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
t
d
d
J
i
d
!9
d
U
(9
L
N
a
0
M
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
r�
6
0
-6
12
18
-24
-30
-36
-42
August 2012
O O�� 'Z � O�� C' O�� Z) 01� O�� O ^� O{� 01� O�� O�� O�� O�� O
���� ���� ���ti ��2 ���ti ��0 ���ti ���� 4' 4' ���� j '10 '0 �0 j Asti j q0 '\T
g\ O\ �� �� 4\ 4\ g \`ti '�`L 012 4V 'b\`L '�`L 4V J Oho
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
OBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -16
8
6
5 M
fD
n
0)
4 O
3
3
n
S
3 N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells
@
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► September 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
J
Stream Hydrology Assessment September 2012
6
0
N -6
m
t
v
E
Z -12
d
J
i
d
-18
d
V
t0
i
fn -24
a
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
C8 01\�' 4 Cb\D C\ Cb\
\L \'\L \ce�'N \2 `�1 1� \R � R �� \�L �� \R �� \L �� \2 �` \2 �r�1 O \R 2 �L CO �L �� \2 O L CO
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
OBF Onsite Raingauge ::1
Slide C -17
8
7
6
5
0
'a
:i
d
4 0
7
7
0
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► October 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
Av
7
N -6
d
t
v
C
d -12
N
J
(D
r-.
-18
d
U
l9
i
n -24
a
0
L-
0 -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
October 2012
-42
0
N2
6p � \p X20 DLO 420 \�O ��O X20 ��O X20 X20
's, "' "3 '�0 ", 's, N'3 ") ^0 \�1 �0 \�`L "0\,�� "0\,�b �0 \��0 N0\,\'1 �0 \�0 N'P �0 \�� 10 \rt- '0\`1� "ODD
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -18
8
6
5
n
G1
4 O
7
n
S
3 w
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► WM 40
► November 1, 2012 -
► November 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm J
Stream Hydrology Assessment November 2012
6
0
N -6
a�
d -12
(D
J
d
-18
d
v
co
L
fn -24
C
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
36
-42
�`ti 11L Nr2 �rL �rti �`ti .11, ,�`ti Nq' Nr2 Nl` �`z- �`ti Nr' �r1 -11ti
\tip \`tip \tip \`tip \`L� \tip \`tip \L� \tip \`L� \`L� \`tip \tip \L� \`tiz \tip \`ti6 \L� \` Z) \`L� \L6 \`L� \tiz
\� \L \� \D \�o � \0 �. �U �� �D ��o �1 �.
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
OBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -19
8
6
5
n
d
4
n
3 y
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge @
Brunswick Forest
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Stream Reference Wells @
Brunswick Forest
► W M 40
► December 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
0
0
N -6
d
t
v
C
y -12
d
J
i
d
-18
d
U
!0
i
N
-24
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
xl:
-42
December 2012
8
7
6
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -20
5
A
d
4
0
A
S
3
y
2
1
0
—Upper Stream Ref (A287224)
-+-Lower Stream Ref (EBD23B5)
MBF Onsite Raingauge
Slide C -20

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► January 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
t
v
c
m
d
J
d
w
N
v
m
cn
a
0
M
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
M
12
18
-24
-30
STy
January 2012
-42
1P ��O ��O X20 41 X20 ��O ��O ��O ��O �ti0 ��O ��O
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
�-Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -2
8
6
5
O
n
V
:i
01
4 O
n
3 CD
O
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► February 1, 2012 -
► February 29, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
E
d
J
i
N
lC
d
U
lC
L
7
N
a
c
0
L
U
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
M
12
18
ME
Em
-36
-42
February 2012
8
6
Y �
Y
5
CD
0
d
4
O
3
7
A
3
CD
0
2
1
0
\`p \` 41 ' � P \`p \p \P \p \� "\`p
\� \ \ \` \\ \ \ 41 41 41 rp
rP \�'
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -3

Stream Hydrology Assessment March 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► March 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
-6
d -12
J
-18
(D
L)
ca
N -24
_
0
k.
0 30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
�.�`L �.��L �,��L o.�2 o.�`L o.�2 o,�2 0�2 olti o,�`L ��2 ��2 ��2 Z�ti o.��L ��ti ��2 ��2 ��2
��, \`b \, '��1. 'fir �\g ",\, �\4' 4, \���L \�2`L \����b \����1. \� \,b \�,�\' \����L \�e�`L \���2 \��`L \����1 \2��`L \�6��L \�,��`b \2e��L \����L \" \2
3 3 ' 4 ' �
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
WOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -4
8
6
5
n
4 0
7
n
3
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► April 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
E
d
O
J
d
d
v
w
N
a
C
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
sm
-18
-24
-30
-36
April 2012
-42
O�ti O�ti O�2 01ti 0.�2 O'``L
��\� �p\� '.`O \2 ��\� ��\� �°'\1 ti� \r 2 \1 tip\' 2� \2 26 \� 2 -I\r 2� \�
�\ �\ �\ a� tk� a� �\ �\ '\ '\ a\ o\ �\ '\ a\ �\
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
r-Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -5
8
6
5
O
n
01
4 O
O
n
3
3 O
2
1
0

Stream Hydrology Assessment May 2012
6
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011 0
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► May 1, 2012 -
► May 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
-6
t
U
_
d -12
a�
J
d
r-.
-18
d
V
t6
i
fn -24
a
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
-42
O�� O�� 01� O 0�2 01� O�� 0�2 0'`� O�� O��
\`� 2 \`"' \�1 \�� \�t \��O \�1' \1 \�e \2 \�0 \�1 \ �\4' \ r6 \ 41-' \ N \1L \ o \�L \,� \�L
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
-),-Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -6
8
6
5
co
0
.p
r:
W
M
4 0
3
7
n
3
3 CD
0
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► June 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
d
t
c
c
d
J
a_
d
t0
d
U
R
w
7
N
a
c
0
Z�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
12
18
-24
Ritz
-36
-42
June 2012
0r� ONE O�� O�� 01� O�r� O r� O rl, ONE ONE O�� O�r� O�� O�r� 0 2 ONE ONQ_ 01" 0N12 O.1 0 2 Oar O.9 ONE
ro\0��1 \`��2 \\�'2 \`�'�L \\p�1 \`�0�2 \`,��2 \`��ti \\0'�2 ��2 \`L��1. \L��2 \`Lp�2 \`Ldr \rb�r \rL��2 \ 4r
�0 6 �o �o �o �0 0 �o '\O' �o �o �o �o ' 0 'o
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
,'; Mainstem 3 (14E1 88B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -7
8
6
5
cp
0
01
4 O
7
3
C'f
3 O
2
1
0
r
�.:ti....�
•'ti......
Y
1111i m1iwTTT1TTT11
�
1
, r
r_
r
r
r
0r� ONE O�� O�� 01� O�r� O r� O rl, ONE ONE O�� O�r� O�� O�r� 0 2 ONE ONQ_ 01" 0N12 O.1 0 2 Oar O.9 ONE
ro\0��1 \`��2 \\�'2 \`�'�L \\p�1 \`�0�2 \`,��2 \`��ti \\0'�2 ��2 \`L��1. \L��2 \`Lp�2 \`Ldr \rb�r \rL��2 \ 4r
�0 6 �o �o �o �0 0 �o '\O' �o �o �o �o ' 0 'o
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
,'; Mainstem 3 (14E1 88B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -7
8
6
5
cp
0
01
4 O
7
3
C'f
3 O
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► July 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
a�
t
U
_
d
d
J
L
d
f0
O
v
co
w
L
N
a
0
L
_V
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
0
Qy
12
18
-24
-30
-36
July 2012
8
6
5
CD
'O
01
4 O
3
n
O-
3 O
2
� 1
-42 — I
' 0
0�1 o�L ��`L ��`L ���L o�2 0�1. '��L o�2 0�1. ���L o��L O 012 o�ti o�2 0�2 012 012 ��ti o�`L o.12 �,,L oN111 oN2
\. \`ti2`ti\`L \p \`ti � \�o \`L 4 1 \`L,� \0 \`L,� \CPC \�. \ti \�2`l \�� \`ti \gyp \`L \�� \�L A \'L cb \�L \ ^� \�L \�� \'L \�\ \�� \\ \�� \`L \fie \�L \�" \�L \ b \�L ',' \�L \b� \�L
1 '\ '
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -8

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► August 1, 2012 -
► August 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
y
d
t
v
c
d
J
d
d
v
to
L
N
a
c
0
L
My
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
Q.l♦
12
M
-24
-30
-36
-42
0
7'c
August 2012
\rO 4P 1\1P '1O \ro 6 \10 ,\ \`L O O O O I\rO ,LO � \\,O
\�2O � �' 4' 4' � J\ � J\ I J\ J \r� O O O
2� \�b JO \'1' O,� \'1'
— Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -9
8
6
5
CD
4 O
0
3
3 CD
W
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► September 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
O
t
v
c
m
a�
J
L
d
r�+
d
v
m
L
N
a
c
3
O
L
V
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
VA
9.2
12
18
-24
-30
-36
-42 — —
September 2012
01� O��
\I0. ��0�`L ��R 0 L \���ti \1��2 \ {��2 \���2
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
* Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -10
8
6
5
cD
n
:.i
D)
4 O
7
A
S
3 (D
N
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► October 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
in -6
t
v
C
d -12
d
J
a.
41
r-.
-18
d
V
!9
i
N -24
.a
c
0
a -30
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-36
October 2012
-42
N2 \ti 1111 \2 \1ti �2 �2 �r �r �2 \2 NC 11' \1 \2 �� �2 �2 12 1r 12 �� .1 \2 \2
\rO \�O '\ \�O \ti0 \�O \�O \�O \�O \�O
� � � -Q1 \Q\1 _� \� 1P� 1P 1P 1P� 1P p\1� 1P e� p\ 'Q\1'11 4 p\ p\ p\� p\ p\ p \"
�L `1. 'L 2 �L �L 2 "
+Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -11
8
6
.D
5
n
.a
4 0
3
0
3
3 CD
W
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► November 1, 2012 -
► November 30, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:OOpm, and 7:OOpm
d
c
m
a�
J
d
r
l0
d
v
Cn
a
0
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
M
-6
12
18
-24
-30
-36
November 2012
-42
4�. 4 2 43 4� 0 0 41 \'V0 0 0,
—Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
WOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ")
Slide D -12
8
6
5
0
:i
d
4 0
n
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge
beginning September 2011
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Mainstem Stream
► W M 40
► December 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► Readings four times per
► day at 1:00 am, 7:00am,
► 1:00pm, and 7:00pm
y
N
t
v
C
d
J
i
d
d
V
t0
i
7
U)
C
0
I
'
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Stream Hydrology Assessment
6
0
-6
-12
MA
IN'!
-30
-36
-42
December 2012
'
6
5
1p
n
r.:
rt
4
0
7
3
0
3
3
M
Ch
2
1
0
�1L Nr0 <1 ��1%0 .`tip'�2� <62 1`1%3,�' lrr '019 11 �1L .L�11R�<P <r%''1 �r1;r%201���
— Mainstem 1 (14E162B8)
+Mainstem 2 (14E160BC)
;Mainstem 3 (14E188B1)
MOnsite Raingauge
— Ground Surface (0 ") Slide D -13

Monitoring Devices installed
March 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 1 & 2
► WM 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
� at 7:00 am
y
d
r
U
S
C
0
.Q
W
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
U)
s
0
c
@ 6
J -12
a�
-18
(D
-24
L
U) -30
a
c
O -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
a� a� e'O eO e�' e'° e° ai ai a a a
9Y 16; lt5
oonsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
Nti N N- N� �2 Nti N2 Nti N� Nti �2 �2 Nti N1� �2 N2 N2 ��
a� a° a� a� a� e'0 e'O e'° at a� a a a
Well 1 (14E19F68) -+-Well 2 (14E1AD78)
1 2i below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -1
8
7
6
5
n
.8
4 W
O
3
7�
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 1 & 2
► W M 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
y
d
t
U
0
1
S
U
m
CL
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
U)
0
U
C
-6
m
J -12
aD
-18
a�
-24
N -30
a
c
O -36
cD
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
Hydrology Assessment
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
Well 1 malfunction, replaced 5 -31 -12
June 2012
i
I
5 tD
A
-a
4 Ot
0
3
i
0
PQi '?q PQc PQc 2 PQi PQi ��a� ��a� ��'e 1�'e `Sad ��a� ��a� h�Ja A cd \�' N6 ' rd
2 ti �
— Well 1 (14E19F68) -+-Well 2 (14E1AD78)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -2
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 1 & 2
► W M 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
L
U
0
'a
U
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
N
t
0
c
a s
J -12
m`
-18
m
-24
i
U) -30
a
c
O -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
,J� ,J� ,J� ,J� ,J\ JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' eQ 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q
6 'N �c� �� 2� �� yP ��P ��P oP �P �P rx5 �5 �5 �5
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
�&
a5
—Well 1 (14E19F68) -+-Well 2 (14E1AD78)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -3
8
7
6
5 cD
n
a
4 0
0
3
2
1
0
i
Lai 1
16
,J� ,J� ,J� ,J� ,J\ JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' JJ' eQ 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q 0Q
6 'N �c� �� 2� �� yP ��P ��P oP �P �P rx5 �5 �5 �5
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
�&
a5
—Well 1 (14E19F68) -+-Well 2 (14E1AD78)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide A -3
8
7
6
5 cD
n
a
4 0
0
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 1 & 2
► W M 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
N
d
r
E
C
0
.6
'a
d
IL
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
OGti OGt OG`� OG\: OGL OG� OGt �oA, �oA• �oJ• �oA• �oA• �o4• OeCi OeCi OeCi oeCi oeCi OeCi
*Onsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% 1111111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
N
t
0
c
-6
m
J -12
m
-18
a�
-24
L
U) 30
a
c
O -36
L
C)
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
�ti N� 12 �� N2 �2 2 �2
OG`C OG� OGti OG� OGti OG� OG� �o, 0 �OJ �OJ �OJ �OJ OeG OoCi OeCi OeCi OeCi oeCi
�o `� �co � 2� �` �" 1p �4j IO" IV gyp" �" ^O" 1h �0• 2`7 3�
—Well 1 (14E19F68) -+-Well 2 (14E1AD78)
I 12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge I Slide A -4
8
7
6
5 m
n
w
4 CF
0
3
7
v
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
March 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 3 & 4
► WM 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
Vl
d
t
U
C
0
.Q
m
a.
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
March 2012
�' 1", 1� Nrl N111 \`ti 111' 1I,' 1R' 1 1 "' '.`
�a� �e'° �e'O fie° X$ �eX$
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
N
O 0
t
c
7@ -6
J -12
m
M -18
m
-24
L
C/) -30
a
c
O -36
L
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
.6
8
7
6
5 CD
n
4 N
0
3
2
1
. o
1ti 111, `� 12 111, .`� .`� .`� 111, 111' 1r' `� `� 1R' 1R' � 1 1r 12
Sao ��� Sao ��� ° )ate ��° Few <eO O '< ea .ea § jai ;p �a !R !P
1' 116' h 1p �V 1p• rL' 11: \11: 1� L1'
Well 3 (14E1 9E90) -+-Well 4 (14E141 E8)
12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide B -1
7

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cl!mate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 3 & 4
► WM 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
L
U
0
.Q
d
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
Hydrology Assessment
- - — ---- - - - -11 x _
June 2012
r' Nil Nl� 191 '�� 1r'
P�� PQ� ' Q9 P�� Ply aA aA aA aA aA aA aA
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
fA
L
0
c
c -6
as
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
i
U) -30
a
c
O -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
WA
8
7
6
4
5 CD
n
4 O1
0
3
s
0
PQ� PQ� PQ� Pq� PQi PQ� a� a� a� aA a� aA a�
Well 3 (14E1 9E90) -+-Well 4 (14E141 E8)
1 2i below surface MOnsite Raingauge Slide B -2
7

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
i
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 3 & 4
► W M 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
d
t
U
0
.Q
U
CU
M
lu
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
cn
O 0
t
-6
J -12
a
�
-18
m
-24
i
U) -30
a
c
O -36
c�
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
oti NL N2 <� <� <ti N� Nti Nti
J�' J�' Jam' 0� ZQ 0Q 0Q 0Q eQ
111 NAP 16X 2�P �oP rx� �5 ,�5 1cl5 2�5 1_05
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total = 30% —70% 1111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42 .
�.. �� .� _
��
P P
5
j NAP 2oP �
'�P NV5 NCY5 1P5
—Well 3 (14E1 9E90) -+-Well 4 (14E141 E8)
I 12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge I Slide B -3
8
7
6
5 O
0
-o'
4 W
0
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
Stone Farm Mitigation
Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 3 & 4
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
tll
d
r
0
.a
m
M
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
�2 \2
Oe� . Oe . Opt Oe CP spa' \pA' 'pA' 'pA' �pA' "p4' OeG �eC Oec �eC OeG �eG
�p ,�,� ,\gyp �,�' 2�p 1'1 4j gyp" N`5 IV lt:' rQ' 1 j 1�' \1 16 2�j �Q'
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 1111111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
L
0
U
C
-6
J -12
m`
-18
a�
-24
L
U) -30
a
c
O -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
�'I, 'Z' �� Nti N2 Nti N� N�
�2 1� N�
N2 N�
J"
& 0
J"
OGt OG� OOH 0 Opp 'pJ "a 'p
0 '
�pJ" 1pJ"
OeCi OeG OeG OeCi OeG QeCi
-*-Well 3 (14E19E90) -+-Well 4 (14E141 E8)
I 12in below surface MOnsite Raingauge I Slide B -4
8
7
6
5 CD
0
.8
4 G
3
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
March 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 5, 6, & 7
► W M 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
V1
d
t
U
C
0
'a
d
a.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
as
t 0
U
_
d
-6
a�
J -12
L
as
-18
m
-24
't
N -30
a
-36
cD
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
�� � 1� \ti \' 2 N", \2 \2 \Z 1'�' N2 \", <ti �2 � �
Sao Sao Sao Sao Sao Sao Few Qep Few �e� "0'
�a jai
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70°% 1111111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
Sb a° Sa° �a° �eO �e0 �e� 0 <<9, \Sa
—Well 5 (14E16DAD) +Well 6 (14E19EC9)
Well 7 (14E1605A) 12in below surface
NOnsite Raingauge Slide C-1
8
7
6
5 m
n
4 of
0
3 :1
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
i
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 5, 6, & 7
► WM 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
m
t
0
'a
m
a
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
Q
M 0
v
as
-6
a�
J -12
i
a�
-18
as
-24
N -30
a
c
Q -36
0
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
June 2012
r,: 9�P �� �� ���5 �6� ��� 26� ��� `5 ��J \1J r6� r�J §Y
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% 1111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
8
7
6
v
5 CD
A_
4 I
0
3
2
1
0
Nq, rj, �2 1� � , �q Nti ^2
PQ� PQi' PQi Phi' PQ�' Phi' ��� �I A I A ��� �a1 �aA �aA �J� �J� �J� �J� �JQ Q
F MWell 5 (14E16DAD) -+-Well 6 (14E19EC9)
Well 7 (14E1605A) 12in below surface
Onsite Raingauge Slide C-2

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 5, 6, & 7
► W M 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
H
d
t
0
'a
U
m
a.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
6
N
L 0
c
m
-6
a�
J -12
a�
-18
as
-24
t
M
Cl) -30
a
c
C -36
-42
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
J�' JQ' J�' eQ eQ eQ eQ �Q eQ
2oP IMP \V \C5 l�5 1�5
MOnsite Raingauge —30 day total - 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
'� '� 'Z' 'Z'
,& ,J� '0 eQ eQ eQ eQ
.• � �1 �6 ,L.• ti� ��• �P �oP ��P �oP ��P �oP a5 0� ��0 ��5 2�5 ��5
—Well 5 (14E16DAD) -+-Well 6 (14E19EC9)
'Well 7 (14E1605A) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide C -3
8
7
6
M
5 CD
n
-a
4 cr
0
3
3
2 v
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Wells 5, 6, & 7
► W M 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
to
G1
L
U
c
0
'a
U
m
a
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
OG1: OGt OG� Opti OGti OGti OGti l�U,' �aJ' �QJ' J' �pJ' �OJ' OeCi OeCi OeCi OeCi OeCi OeCi
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
U)
d
v
0
c
7@
6
a�
J -12
a�
-18
m
-24
fA -30
a
c
C -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
1R' 1IZ, 12 191 1111 1R' 1Q_ 111' 1IZ, 1"� 1l� 12 12 1l*� 1r� 111'
& & & ti G\: l' A, 4' A, A eC C Ci
OOOOO �p�Q0�0�OoeOeQe OeCi oeCi
—Well 5 (14E16DAD) -+-Well 6 (14E19EC9)
- -Well 7 (14E1605A) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide C -4
8
7
6
v
5 0
4 of
0
3
2
1
0

Monitoring Devices installed
March 2012
Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
Well 8
► WM 40
► January 1, 2012 -
► March 31, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
tl!
d
t
S
0
.Q
a.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
U)
t
0
m
-6
J -12
a�
-18
m
-24
.a
-30
o -36
0
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
March 2012
xe� 'x e� �e� �e"pr
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
-42
N� �ti �ti �2 �2 \rl <1 12
lac �a �ap FeO Fe° �ep QeO �e� 'a
—Well 8 (14E1603E) 12in below surface
M-Onsite Raingauge Slide D -1
f
I
5 tD
n
4 OF
0
3
3
i
W

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Well 8
► W M 40
► April 1, 2012 -
► June 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
N
d
t
0
'a
U
d
M
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
June 2012
Q� QY Q� a' a' a' a' a' a1 a� a� o� a� o� ''p §Y ac
0 NN N 9>' 26 ' N ti 2 3 N N ti 't §
FOnsite Raingauge —30 day total •— 30% —70% MShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
t
0
U
C
-6
J -12
a�
-18
Q
-24
3
N -30
c
P -36
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
'N� N2 N1- N2 N� N2 N� �2 N2
PQ�' PQt' PQt' PQy' PQi' PQi' �a� �aA �a1 �aA �aA dal �a1
15 NV
—Well 8 (14E1603E) 12in below surface
M-Onsite Raingauge Slide D -2
8
7
6
5 CD
0
-is
4 Ol
0
3
3
2
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- cl!mate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Well 8
► W M 40
► July 1, 2012 -
► September 30, 2012
► One reading per day
at 7:00 am
d
t
U
C
0
'a
U
d
a.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
6
N
O 0
s
5 s
J -12
a�
-18
a�
-24
i
N -30
a
c
O -36
U)
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
Hydrology Assessment
September 2012
�J� CJs JC' J�' JJ' J�' J�' J�' eQ ZQ 0Q 0Q QQ 0Q
1`O �� �P NQ)' \`P ry IV ilP V 05 Nay \q5 r�5 ro5
oOnsite Raingauge —30 day total ­30% —70% WShallotte Ag Raingauge
Q Q
QJ QJ �e �e 5e �e �eQ CO'
—Well 8 (14E1603E) 12in below surface
MOnsite Raingauge Slide D -3
8
7
6
5 O
0
-a
w
4 m
0
3
3
3
2 `.
1
0

Precipitation data obtained
from: Onsite Raingauge and
Shallotte Ag station Coop -TP
317813
(www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data
obtained from the Longwood
WETS Station NC5116
1978 -2009
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)
Monitoring Well Record
► Stone Farm Mitigation
► Brunswick County, NC
► 01 -02 -240
► Upper South Trib
► Well 8
► WM 40
► October 1, 2012 -
► December 31, 2012
► One reading per day
► at 7:00 am
N
Gf
t
E
C
0
EL
U
m
a.
Hydrology Assessment
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
December 2012
, � �2 �� �ti �� �2 �� Nti Nti N2 <� �� �ti Nti
Op'� OpY Opt Opt Op\: Opti: Opt �pJ' �eJ" �pJ" �pl' �pJ' �pJ' OeCi oeC; OeCi OeCi OeCi 'Op
Ci
mOnsite Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70% 1111111111IShallotte Ag Raingauge
6
t
0
c
-6
J -12
m
-18
m
-24
V) -30
'a
O -36
a
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.lmgroup.net
-42
.t .L N.`ti N .`L .� �`� .`� .`L <. N`ti N`ti N`` r` Sri- �`�
Op\: Opti Opt: Op\: Op'L Op\: Opti Cep,' �pl' �p.1" 0 0 �pl' ' ep ' ep < ep 0 OeG 0
NV Ify IV 'p• h 'p N�, IV 2� 1 §"
—Well 8 (14E1603E) 12in below surface
IMOnsite Raingauge I Slide D -4
8
7
6
5
n
-o
4
0
3
2 `.
1
0

APPENDIX D:
NC DROUGHT MONITORING MAPS

NC D ht Status Map
North Carolina Drought Status Map WRISARS Monitoring
❑J 01/03/2012 A Layers
North Carol ina
SITE /1
U�
P, " of ]
Drought
Legend
/1/ State Boundary of HC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
6V Interstat Highway in HC
Roads in HC
Cities
M 04 - Exceptional Drought
M 03 - Extrene Drought
02 - Severe Drought
D1 - First Level Drought
08 - Abnornally Dry
0
1_......//.. ... - .,......--- fTIA4 -- ,11-- 1L.-.1M _.___- L.. ..:..... 0.1.,. ..._ 0--- ,...._,.:.- .,.- ^10_..._,. Tl. /......A... /A.......L- /1a ,7...... TTt 4 /....... '?/1 C/,)A112

NC D ht Status Map
North Carolina Drought Status Map
r�
❑ '' 02/07/2012 - Q
PE of I
WRISARS Drought
Monitoring
Lavers Legend
N State Boundary of HC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
A/ Interstat Highway in HC
Roads in HC
Cities
M D4 - Exceptional Drought
M D3 - Extrene Drought
M D2 - Severe Drought
Di - First Level Drought
D9 - Abnornally Dry

NC D ht Monitor Map
P4 " of l
North Carolina Drought Status Ma wRISARS Drouvht
g P Monitoring
03/06/2012 A Lavers Legend
e� � -
/V State Boundary of HC
State Boundaries
TVR States
Counties
Interstat Highway in HC
Roads in HC
Cities
M D4 - Exceptional Drought
D3 - Extrene Drought
02 - Severe Drought
D1 - First Level Drought
09 - Rbnornally Dry
1.. i/ /T�1 t /T11 .! t [1l 1 (tt n nn T / � /• 1 Al /T1!/ /T1 / /T•l 1/1 �/�1 /�1 '�

NC D ht Monitor Map
Pau Plot I
ht Status Ma wRISARS Drou ht
North Carolina Drought P Monitoring
rr , Lavers Legend
F-1 04/03/2012 ®
Korth Carolina
SITE
1
4
/V State Boundary of HC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
A/ Interstat Highway in HC
Roads in HC
Cities
M D4 - Exceptional Drought
M 03 - Extrene Drought
.D2 - Severe Drought
01 - First Level Drought
Do - Rbnornally Dry
,,,..,,pro,- --InX/f Inn T r,l�nilo,ra,ehacineR�la♦rc�r =nom Qi 7nnmci7P— iRimAn= n' /mCdVV/ Ana( hP /ht(ln( C /nM /mans /T)M /1 JM_.. 3/15/20] 3

NC Di it Monitor Map
Pa ' of 1
North Carolina Drought Status Ma wtuS Drou ht
g p Monitoring
PF] € 05/01/2012 A Layers Legend
SITE
Vw-
rJ
A/ State Boundary of INC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
Interstat Highway in INC
Roads in NC
Cities
D4 - Exceptional Drought
M D3 - Extreme Drought
02 - Severe Drought
D1 - First Level Drought
D8 - Abnormally Dry

NC D. ht Monitor Map
North Carolina Drought Status Ma WRISARS
g p Monitoring
_ 06/05/2012 - A Layers
SITE
North Carolina
)Vjr
Pa of 1
Droup-ht
Legend
n% State Boundary of NC
State Boundaries
TVR States
Counties
iV Interstat Highway in NC
Roads in NC
Cities
04 - Exceptional Drought
D3 - Extrene Drought
D2 - Severe Drought
D1 - First Level Drought
00 - Rbnornally Dry
1r +..• / /....,.. ... -- ,_ /T1%Xly -%1.1 �t- 'lt —t -- . - n i. n ,. I ,. — - . ' -- ..— - - - - - - - -

NC Dr it Monitor Map
Pa of 1
North Carolina Drought Status Ma WRISARS Drought
g P Monitoring
0 09/18/2012 - Layers Legend
b'
C
No tt) Caro 1 ina
e
r'
SITE
Cam]
%V State Boundary of NC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
%V Interstat Highway in NC
Roads in NC
Cities
D4 - Exceptional Drought
03 - Extrene Drought
D2 - Severe Drought
01 - First Level Drought
D8 - Rbnornally Dry
_. -- IT-% h A IT x 4 1 . _ nt - - 1 - 11 1 n n n T I n I I 1 n. 1 — . I I—. I— . •1 11 1 -- 1 1

NC D �ht Monitor Map
V,q m, I of 1
North Carolina Drought Status Ma wRISARS Drought
g p Monitoring
0 10/02/2012 - Q Layers Legend
— NCDWR
Ir --
NoYth Carolina
SITE
%V State Boundary of NC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
A/ Interstat Highway in NC
Roads in NC
Cities
M D4 - Exceptional Drought
M D3 - Extrene Drought
D2 - Severe Drought
D1 - First Level Drought
D8 - Abnornally Dry
L. rr..•(l,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.....InXA /T-)NA 3 /I5/2013)

NC D ;ht Monitor Map
P; Iof1
North Carolina Drought Status Ma WRISARS Drou ht
g P Monitoring
11/06/2012 - A Layers Legend
C-]
%V State Boundary of NC
State Boundaries
TVR States
Counties
Interstat Highway in NC
Roads in NC
Cities
D4 - Exceptional Drought
D3 - Extrene Drought
D2 - Severe Drought
01 - First Level Drought
Do - Rbnornally Dry

NC 1= zht Monitor Map
North Carolina Drought Status Map
Y' a 12/04/2012
F-
Naith Carolina
SITE
_r.,
P IofI
WRISARS Droueht
Monitoring
Layers Legend
A/ State Boundary of HC
State Boundaries
TVA States
Counties
/VInterstat Highway in HC
Roads in INC
Cities
D4 - Exceptional Drought
03 - Extrene Drought
D2 - Severe Drought
01 - First Level Drought
D8 - Abnornally Dry
L.♦ ♦.... / /........ ... a /T11,41TNAR._1_._rll__ _ 1 n1 n nn — .. .. . . — .

APPENDIX E:
CROSS SECTION PHOTOS

View of permanent cross section #1 (MS)
y.: Ott,
View of permanent cross section #2 (MS)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix E.
Phase II & III "` " "
IANDMANAG M ENT GROIIP. Permanent Cross - Section
° ° "' " "n" Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

`' ,1 is �,'s �� -'�' ��+ l� � � - �. � ,..t M ��' �' ;• ,
View of permanent cross section #3 (MS)
i _ . ,
View of permanent cross section #4 (MS)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix E.
Phase II 8� III "� "^ " " " " ° "" Permanent Cross - Section
_ P, 7, �,,,,, Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

1 �
View of permanent cross section #5 (MS)
AA
kill
View of permanent cross section #6 (MS)
Stone Farm Appendix E.
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG
Phase II & III %'IM AI Permanent Cross - Section
Year 1 AMR March 2013 Photographs

View of permanent cross section #7 (MS)
View of permanent cross section #8 (MS)
Stone Farm Appendix E.
Stone
Mitigation Bank LMG P.Oupl��, Permanent Cross - Section
Phase 11 & III Co'-dra"t, Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of permanent cross section #NT1 (NT)
' r
a
View of permanent cross section #NT2 (NT)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix E.
Phase II &III ' " " ° "P " Permanent Cross - Section
"' " °WI Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

View of permanent cross section #NT3 (NT)
View of permanent cross section #ST1 (ST)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix E.
Phase II 8� III ^ " °M1'^"^"'` Permanent Cross - Section
_ FR,,:,,,,,,,�,:, Photographs
Year 1 AMR March 2013

t .
hl�� . 1 L 4 � ✓ f� i,
•,'`� ti's
` , �
View of permanent cross section #ST2 (ST)
r
v
r"
i
Ile,_
it,
�I
View of permanent cross section #ST3 (ST)
Stone Farm Appendix E.
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG fNI6ROUP., Permanent Cross - Section
Phase II & III _ :,,,._ ............ C�,,,,,,_"
Year 1 AMR March 2013 Photographs

ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK INDICATORS

t ,er c
OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Presence of Litter &
Debris
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Sediment Sorting
(1) View of OHWM along Mainstem (Early growing season)
OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Presence of Litter &
Debris
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Sediment Sorting
(2) View of OHWM on Mainstem at Gauge 2 (mid growing season)
Stone Farm LMG
Regional Mitigation Bank Appendix F:
I. AND MANACEMF.NT 6ROLP
Phase II _ « mP�,,.��..,,.,„ , OHWM Indicators in
Year 1 AMR Stream Valleys

OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Shelving
4 - Sediment Sorting
5 - Water Staining
(3) View of OHWM on Mainstem at Gauge 3 (mid growing season)
OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Change in Plant
Community
6 - Multiple Observed
Flow Events
(4) View of OHWM along Mainstem (mid growing season)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix F:
I AND MANAUMFNT GROUP ,.
Phase II m. OHWM Indicators in
Year 1 AMR Stream Valleys

(5) View of OHWM along North Tributary (early growing season)
OHWM INDICATORS 1
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
(6) View of OHWM along North Tributary (mid growing season)
Stone Farm LMG
Regional Mitigation Bank Appendix F:
i nvi; MAnAGr.aiNT6krn r ,.
Phase II _ OHWM Indicators in
Year 1 AMR Stream Valleys
OHWM INDICATORS
Natural Line Impressed
I
On Bank
F r
=
2 - Wracking
_Y, : ,._
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Change in Plant
Community
(5) View of OHWM along North Tributary (early growing season)
OHWM INDICATORS 1
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
(6) View of OHWM along North Tributary (mid growing season)
Stone Farm LMG
Regional Mitigation Bank Appendix F:
i nvi; MAnAGr.aiNT6krn r ,.
Phase II _ OHWM Indicators in
Year 1 AMR Stream Valleys

OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Change in Plant
Community
6 - Presence of Litter &
Debris
(7) View of OHWM along South Tributary (early growing season)
OHWM INDICATORS
1 - Natural Line Impressed
On Bank
2 - Wracking
3 - Vegetation matted, bent,
Or absent
4 - Water Staining
5 - Change in Plant
Community
6 - Multiple Observed
Flow Events
(8) View of OHWM along South Tributary (late growing season)
Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank LMG Appendix F:
LAND MANAGEF1ENT GROLP .
Phase II E.,,•,• ,. ,,,� ., „ OHWM Indicators in
Year 1 AMR Stream Valleys

APPENDIX G:
LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS /CROSS SECTION SURVEYS

36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
0 1171 1176 13 54 19 49 30 23 33 27 36 38 49 77
Station
MAINSTEM (MS)
PERMANENT
CROSS - SECTIONS (PCS) -
YEAR 01 ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
MS -PCS #3
Elevation
MS -PCS #6
374
372 -
37 -
36 8
366
36.4
362
Elevation
36
358 -
35 6
35.4 �--,
0 977 1155 1285 14 94 17 56 3134
Station
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal survey data provided by Paramounte
Engineering, PA
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
0 13 8116 5417 26 25 913127 34 57 37 99 42 29 5175
Station
MS -PCS #1
35 5
35
34.5
34
335
33
325
I
32
0 10 3412 1813 9518 28 22 6128 39 29 9 31.9 46 74
Station
MS -PCS #4
38.5
38
375
37
365
36
355
35
345
34
0 1358 1521 1706 1948 21.01 22.06 3271
Station
MS -PCS #7
Stone Farm Regional
Mitigation Bank - Phase II
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
LMG
LAND AIAl, M.ENkNI 4aOVP -
wwvw LMGroup net
Phone [phone] LMG.1078
Fax [phone]
3805 Wnghtsvdle Avenue
— Elevation
— Elevation I
Elevation I
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
0 h� 3� 1h ,yR
titi ti� tiw ti0 tit .�0 3ti 4 Rti
Station
MS -PCS #2
— Elevation I
MS -PCS #5
365
36
355
35 — Elevation
345
34
0 1499 1708 191 20 94 22 09 33 85
STATION
41
40.5
40
395
39
385
38
37.5
37
365
36
0 12.62 14.48 15.72 17 97 19 27 20.44 23 46 40.96
Station
Appendix G:
Cross Section and
Longitudinal Surveys
MS -PCS #8
— Elevation I

NORTH TRIBUTARY (NT) AND
SOUTH TRIBUTARY (ST)
' PERMANENT
CROSS - SECTIONS (PCs) -
YEAR 01 ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
.-Jo t+
382
38
378
376
374
372
37
368
366
364
0 684 9 54 1139 13 99 16 05 18 84 29 02
Station
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
0 9 59 12 33 15 05 17 65 22 66 24 89 26 06 36 75
Station
NT - PCS #1
ST - PCS #1
— Elevation I
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal survey data provided by Paramounte
Engineering, PA
Elevation
37 5
37
365
36
355
35
345
34
335
33
0 4 43 13 0413 9415 8217 1218 53 20 56 23 9 35 21
Station
NT - PCS #2
38 5
38
375
37
365
36
355
0 6 89 8 53 9 68 12 76 16 08 17 08 19 03 25 42
Station
ST - PCS #2
Stone Farm Regional
Mitigation Bank - Phase Il
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
LMG
LARD MAM4kMtl1f 40.UVP -.
vwvw LMGmup net
phone- 910 452 0001 -1866 LMG 1078
Fax 910 452 o060
3805 wnghtsvdte Avenue
Elevation I
Elevation I
35
345
34
335
33
325
32
0 10 5 1185 13 02 15 46 17 55 18 51 2102 29 92
Station
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
0 11 13 12.35 1328 17.18 1973 22.41 2481 35.43
Station
Appendix G:
Cross Section and
Longitudinal Surveys
NT - PCS #3
ST - PCS #3
— Elevation I
— Elevation I

33.5
33
325
32
315
31
30.5
30
37
365
36
35.5
35
345
34
335
33
325
MAINSTEM (MS)
LONGITUDINAL
CROSS - SECTIONS (LCS) -
YEAR 01 ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
MS - LCS #3
Station
MS - LCS #6
0�'LIS
Station
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal survey data provided by Paramounte
Engineering, PA
Elevation
— Elevation
32
315
31
305
30
295
29
285
O h't �3 y1 ,L�i h'L h'�i �h 1ti hh yti hQ hh yh
tip• h�' 14i ,yo4' y'�i�` tiro°' 1�� �ti1 tih�' ti�i`O ,5'L�' .5h� h4h
Station
MS - LCS #1
Elevation
MS - LCS #4
34
335
33
325 — --
32
31.5
31 Elevation
305
30
0 0,0
Station
MS - LCS #7
38
375
37
365 PA
36
355
35
345 Elevation
34
335 _
0
Station
Stone Farm Regional LMG
Mitigation Bank - Phase II ` ° ° ^^• ° " ° ^' °" ° ^°
wwv LMGroup rtd
Brunswick County, NC Phone' 9104520001.1 BBB LMG 1078
01 -02 -240 Fax 91 o 452 ooso
3805 ftcnsvdle Avenue
33
32.5
32
315
31
305
30
295
3� ti hti ,�h• �°' �h ,�� Doti �h ti� �w �a
'y ti- ti '� ti ti ti 3 3 3
Station
MS - LCS #2
— Elevation
MS - LCS #5
36
355
35
345
34
335
33
325 — Elevation
32
315
31
o
STATION
MS - LCS #8
40
39 5
39
38.5
38 -- —
37.5
37 —Elevation
365
36
355
0 �% 0 %A#9a�p�,���,t�p�9��5���b��o� °6
Station
Appendix G:
Cross Section and
Longitudinal Surveys

I/
NORTH TRIBUTARY (NT) AND
SOUTH TRIBUTARY (ST)
LONGITUDINAL
CROSS - SECTIONS (LCS) -
YEAR 01 ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
38
375
37
365
36
355
35
345
34
0 61 b9 gp g6 s'� 64, 66 64 g9 y9 96 66 g4 �� oo 1.0 ,�'' Ap. ��' ag• �,�b '30 6 rOP'
Station
38
375
37
365
36
35.5
35
34.5
0-11,e "Ib -114, 1011
1011 069���%�
STATION
ST - LCS #1
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal survey data provided by Paramounte
Engineering, PA
— Elevation I
— Elevation
NT - LCS #2
365
36
355 - A A A^
35
345
34
335
33
325 0ae�9 ^1�9����u�,�1�
Station
— Elevation I
ST - LCS #2
37
365
36
355
35
345 Elevation
34
33.5
y�4
44), 6'I) yob
Station
Stone Farm Regional
Mitigation Bank - Phase II
Brunswick County, NC
01 -02 -240
LMG
w.vw LMGroup net
Phone [phone]W LMG 1078
Fax [phone]
3805 Wnghtsvdie Avenue
NT - LCS #3
34
335
33
325 --
32
315
31 —Elevation
305
30
295
Station
35
345
34
335
33
325
32
31.5
o 10 ' �D hR Qc) _y' �A 0 tD 41 tit �� oP
ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
Station
ST - LCS #3
Appendix G:
Cross Section and
Longitudinal Surveys
Elevation I

867
r °9
A
C °3
'TJ
MS # 1 LONGITUDINAL
A
°
/S
,Cr- ! 3•70 31
7
C' 3'02
QGG"
AY
GG �^�
Q
1.0
4
4
0
,
It ,�
CJ U
p
d'
d
QG GA
PGG
PCc'
PCC =
PCC a
AZ
e
'0R
c°
f
.�aQ-
V
°
?,3'
a
Yp_
A
C
�
4 2•
w
• p
.1
v
C1
�.
°�•
410
a4 "
4'
UU
Q
UU .�
Q
ms #1
"
��•
A
Q`G 4A
Poo. .
PCc m 1,
PCC f 1
PCC
ACC ,
f
Cf
'OR
C°
P4.CC° 7�7�
! 0
PCC 4883
.0•.5
37-yo
O
QGCA f •'�
Q "�V
4
"
0
L
Q" a
Project
Stone Farm Date 3115/13
"
LMGRegional
Mitigation Bank -Phase II
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP m
Title
Scale
1 " =40'
EnvirDnmental Consultants
°�st Office Box 2522
Cross Section Surveys
yyn B y
NOTE
Cross Section and Longitudir-'-St ��/ey Data
t iton North Carolina 28402
WF
Provided By Paramounte Engir A
�ephone 910- 452-0001
�
Y

If
MI; :9 2 LONGITUDIONAL
�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Luc
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
igton North Carolina 28402
lephone 910 - 452 -0001
Stone Farm Date 3/15/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
1"=20' NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Rata
Cross Section Surveys Iwn By Provided By Paramounte Engineering, P,
WF

MS # 3 LONGITUDINAL
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP we
Environmental Consultants
lost Office Box 2522
gton North Carcona 28402
lephone 910 -452 -0001
Project Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Cross Section Surveys
3/15/13
Scale
wn By
WF
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Engineering, P

PCC =
1 1 ZIP
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENTGR
4-3032
Environmental Coosu,tants
Post Office Box 2522
ngton, North Carohna 28402
eteohone 910 - 452 -CO01
—Lu
Cross Section Surveys ,awn By
WF
# 4 LONGITUDINAL
NOTE Cross Section and final Survey Data
Provided By Paramou, _ ineernng, P A

�1
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUPivc
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
igton North Carolina 213402
- lephone 910 -452 -0001
Project Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Cross Section Surveys
3/15/13
cale
1.1=30'
twn By
WF
NOTE Cross Section and 11nal Survey Data
Provided By Paramot neenng, P X

I
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP u+c
Environmental Consultants
°ost Office Box 2522
t ton North Carolina 28402
I ephone 910 - 452 -0001
9h
"Cc,
QGG
<yGG
CQ
A
�b
e
PCC :
Gs'
Q
QGGe
A
�C
a
A
o�
u
� 6`y
PGG
v
ry
u
CIO U
a
MS # 6
� y
o P
1e81@� o
n
O
�6
C. 1
PCC
�A
e'
illy e
ACCe �•Cj�
'Dc �
c,
a�
`1J
VCCs 7113
dt q9
Stone Farm - - 3/15/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Scale
1"=20'
Cross Section Surveys "' n By
WF
J
S # 6 LONGITUDINAL
NOTE Cross Section and a`al Survey Data
m
Provided By Parao� eenng, P A

)LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP me
C v ^vironmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
ngton North Carolina 28402
:lephone 910 - 452 -]001
Project Stone Farm uate 3/15/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Cross Section Surveys
1"=20'
awn By
WF
MS # 7 LONGITUDINAL
NOTE Cross Section anc ^ final Survey Data
Provided By Paramour„- __ meenng, P A

R n
n
°r35 a
�
a
MS # 8 LONDITUDINAL
0
pCC = 3 +90 02
n U
U
0.
PCC °
PCC ; 3rg3
70
PCC ° Jx�
PCC _ 6"2
v
+lip
4n
n m
C` nO
li
r
M
ACC° J PC,C`
Jx
�h
AC
C�
�C
9 >
e
69
pCC `
°n
II II
N N N
O
N
N
11
a db
9
a PGGyryr,
Y>
N
PCC = 2r10 53
0
P
q PCC = 1.9051 q
e
�c
� 4
UU OU ,5
a
gC`° e
PCC.
n S�
PCC o
U
Irk
66
a
le
Irr
• r *Ps
xz19
m
92
� 9
s La
V Q
MS #8
CG
Q
Y PC r
a
C°
C.0
c � n
o
Qi
gn
4n
Project
Stone Farm
Date 3/15113
LMGRegional
Mitigation Bank -Phase II
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUPur-
Title
Scale 1" -ZOO
Environmental Consultants
oea office Box 2522
don North Carolina 28402
Cross Section Surveys
vn By
NOTE Cross Section and
ial Survey Data
aphone 910- 452 -000
_ WF
Provided By Paramou
_ eenng, P A
�j

KIT u -I I nkitNITI MIK1
LMGRegional
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP—
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington North Carolina 28402
Telephone [phone]
..- .......,�........, ...r....... ...- ....... o... .-."' �'_ ...
Project Stone Farm
Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Date 3/15/13
Scale _
1�� -Zt)�
Title
Cross Section Surveys
-..._. u. n_n_...n.nu._._ -_.. w.. ... u....n_-- .+rn....� a c......�..w__
Drawn By
WF
-.. u_�....._..a ...._ c... -_.
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Engineering, P A

NT # 2 LONGITUC" "' A
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP we
Environmental Consultants
lost Office Box 2522
aton, North Carolina 28402
echone 910 -452-0001
NT #2
Project Stone Farm Date, 3/15/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Scale
Title 1 " =20'
Cross Section Surveys wn By
WF
NOTE Cross Section and nal Survey Data
Provided By Paramot. ieering, P A

PC
PCC
1 1 1 1
K T 11 z I /lAIr'%ITI IMM AI
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Engineering, P A
LMG
LAND MANAGEMhNT GROUP,-
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington North Carolina 28402
Telephone 910 - 452-0001
Project Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Date 3/15/13
Scale
1"=20'
Title
Cross Section Surveys
Drawn B y
WF
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Engineering, P A

ST # 1 LONGITUDINAL
�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
fnvuonmental Consul(ants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington North Carolina 28402
0
'o
s�
Stone Farm 3/15/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Scale
1 " =20'
Cross Section Surveys Drawn By
WF
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Enoineennp, P A

ST # 2 LONGITUDINAL
�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP ,.�
Eovrronmenlal Consu/lants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington North Carolina 28402
Stone Farm 3115/13
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
Scale
1 " =20'
Cross Section Surveys Drawn By
WF
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Provided By Paramounte Engineenng. P A

ST # 3 LONGITUDINAL
LMG
ti
-p0
Project Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank -Phase II
3/15/13
LAND MANAGEMEN9 GROUP w 1 ° =20r
Envrronmental Consultants Title
Post Office Box 2522 Cross Section Surveys Drawn B
Immgton North Carolina 28402 y WF
V 1 V V
NOTE Cross Section and Longitudinal Survey Data
Prodded By Paramounte Enquneennq, PA

APPENDIX H:
STREAM FLOW DISCHARGE MEASUREMENT FORMS

IJ IY 4T � � s .• " - t � � (i ' L 7J lJ � 4^ — i
- - Ll- �,- - 7
a _ STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream,, Date f-
Station Description �5+,
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type
Observers Stream Width' Section Width
Observations fit, , ;a_ 1 _ ,� , ,,. `--I �,!`- 1•��,; t
r
Section
Midpoint
M(M)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft -m-cm
Veloci ty
Area W Z D
(if) (m)
Flow (Q)
V x A
3 3
(m /s) (ft 3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
{ j
K
1
t a -n
/
!
ff
Total Discharge (iQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
2Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
{
1

kLt R __
?„ STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream �' �� f '� , r -�� r Date
Station Description eJre-&L '24
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type
Observers ct Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depthz
ft -m-cm
Velocity
Area W x D
z
(ftz) (m)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m 3 /s)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
© i
///
'J
i R`
a•'
1
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
MMeasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
1

.t
_ y
STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Date��' "?
t
Station Description r',1
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type ��-
Observers Stream Wdth' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(IF) (m2)
Flow (Q)
VxA
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
MIS) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
ip r -
t ,'
, _
I t
r t
OO
OO
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
2Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
1

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Strea n2 F a Iti'L N. TY � I3 Date
Station Description S + Y tU- Vvk & �Ct .a P_ � - N) T 0 b
Time Begin Time Ended I Meter Type 1;) V\) a,-I C/k
Observers C N / w �- Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
({�) (m2)
Flow (Q)
V x A 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
MIS) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
.
Lj�7 i
�CrA-
t,( �
o1
_ f r
0/cmic,
' t
C , ' 1
Lo
n
Total Discharge (FQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
r

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream C -+ on C V
Station Description 5l f its /(
Tn, -
Date Gj Z
Time Begin Time Ended `' Meter Type ) o w ot i i^ k
Observers C N 1 w �c Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(fe) (m )
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
0
li'
0
Total Discharge (iQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream ,� �' 1( Y�,> C' 'j �� l,� Date
Station Description
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type F I hdV a-3 61
Observers (' I,,) / V\ l Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
z
( ) (m)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3/s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
MIS) (m /s)
p /cr�j�
0
4
� J
t�l f-A
L
r
n
0
I 0;
S
r
O I
1 (1
I I C,rA
L.
Total Discharge (FQ)(fP /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft. 20 measurements preferred
' iAeasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream ") fir} ' � cre i ! S Tr i ' Date
Station Description �)-1 K P �� ,rvi a roe ( - S i � I D CC on -{
Time Begin Time Ended `I Meter Type F I b YV Q H c
Observers j\ j / (��) F Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
DepV
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ft2) (ms)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft 3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
12
0
0
Total Discharge (FQ)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream - I i)(�jQ aY�nr, d S Ty � �o Date EV G/J Z
Station Description St recur yi (-7 u r ('; e Tr i 1q
Time Begin Time Ended J Meter Type F 10waO G )
Observers C Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Ve y
A W x D
Area rea (M)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m' /s)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
0 2
ZCrlj,
Z %cMIs
2- 9
IH/L
Lj L4
o
Ld Fk
Zu ,
2`ic,,,A 5
��r I�:
© ,,cf'''��
J
` ^
I
r ` `
L " �� �7
G
2- /Lro/ S
(6)
-'-I
0
Total Discharge (FQ)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft. 20 measurements preferred
Weasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
..t

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S-o nt i GI V"1 - Ill\ MV) C � e ylh Date Cj () 11-2
Station Description G� Y'p _(I nA, (-) (,k lL CI (� ) 0A U t n SA(VNA-
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type C �n
Observers N V Stream Width' Section Width
Observations 9 C 6Q{ S a (j� , I) _r I I>,N 'rvi C I C U. U 1 .Vik< Q D v\) a bS eY \lP
Section
Midpoint
M(M)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area WxD
(ft2) (ms)
Flow (Q)
V x A 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
ON (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
Q
O
O
s0
Total Discharge (XQ)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
IMeasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S--h ( Y)k f ait m tvt a 1 SAC i/Vl Date
Station Description SJ r e Q.UVI (, L(_o C o 2- - h/lGt, n S t r m
Time Begin Time Ended i Meter Type F1 GLi r k
Observers WV- Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(ftz) (m2)
Flow (Q)
VxA
(n'3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
Ws) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
k
oA/� s
lv
1 �
®
t i
C Ytil S
0
Total Discharge (iQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Date S
Stream ,�A I)`t_l�' f (d y 1,w`� ��` ! i�A 1 t�� �,�, �' � +;;
Station Description ,Ci 'r` Pit % , t E. !,, o(c W_k Vti c 1 f v1 �
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type OY\) 0..A C, V)
Observers Stream Width' Section Width
r)hecninfinne Ian _. .,C f t _ 1 -1 , . , r . . ( _ i _r . —I A l Cn9 %S I n}
v..vv� ..,.�...... 1- -LOKXA v Mj ` 1 b' - ) Y V I(' t ( V i Ul(/ ' -I I fiVU C +1. +5
4 ", 4 t,(A TUAM
Mi
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ft� (m�)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m/s)
OO
OO
0
Total Discharge (XQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 It deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S1--D � a � rA - N I r f yr Date S/)8/1 Z
Station Description
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type FjrM1,,k-
Observers V\1 Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ft2) (M2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
2�Cn -1
SGT
0
0
0
Total Discharge (2:Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
'Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
1

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream L)-`b o Q, iIm -� Y �� Date rj/ 1 E, % I Z
Station Description S-1 i P(d V Vl 2- - N -T y to
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type D A) a t CV)
Observers y\j Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
M(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft-m -cm
Velocity
(ea Area W x x D
Flow (Q)
V x A 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
MIS) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m/s)
OO
5c S
S /CwI�>
� (` !
�
•`�C'�
�' L tit i 1
� - , ,f
r
o-
v
O
Total Discharge (Y-Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
'Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
i

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S �n�, PO(V yyh , I r � L Date 5J 19, f I G
Station Description Q(, m (; u(4 o1 Q I ° , -T i s
Time Begin Time Ended J Meter Type f-t ")o Ac k
Observers V� Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
M(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
DeptV
ft -m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(ft2) (m2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m /s) (ft
At Point
MIS) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
J�
O
7I f
r !^ r
F` f i l J
a
43
S-�t
`� - < < tit s
l /S
Il
0 --2-
o- IJ
11
L
i Ur�1
Total Discharge (E0)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
�y
r

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream �;J D V)-�— C6( Y rye S - -T V IV) Date S Z Is A2
Station Description <,:)-j Y, () V\,k (:j- bCQ�? e I - S-� Y I j I (,6,11 (
Time Begin Time Ended - Meter Type F(w\) ij rh
Observers W Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft- m-cm
Velocity
Area rea ( ) W x D
Flow (Q)
V x A 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
(g/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/5) (m /s)
[ T
C-L
� � r �1 �
� /C
0
0
Total Discharge (f0)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
, Weasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S �b Date G�I� e5/►2
Station Description 34A Q 0, YEA 6 G' ao L 2- S I Y� \,,-)
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type (T-,\)n ( CL)
Observers F Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(Urn)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m-cm
Velocity
A W x D
Area rea (mZ)
Flow (Q)
V x A 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
Oo
L
2-f
1�r',
Z /Crv� 5
o
2, Ljf4
I q C/ry S
®
' 1 �
Ito s
Z� /cam JS
® 8 t
Z L) 4:-k,
1 '% Ural 1 S
0
Total Discharge (10)00s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Jleasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
x
l

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S j b Y )� , F C(Y N� MA k_ V 1 O U ,, ( Date S I 31/ 12
Station Description `
Time Begin Time Ended J Meter Type IF I dy\)(L -t C
Observers AD Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
M(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m-cm
Velocity
Area rea W x x D
Flow (Q)
V x A
(n'3 /s) W)
At Point
MIS) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
40
J
Loft
l
_ J
OO
Total Discharge (EQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
rAeasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 6 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Cob, , T I t � Cl r i'r� Y`n.G k,n ;4 Date S f 3 111 Z.
Station Description &
Time Begin Time Ended i Meter Type F (b"
Observers Al) Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
M(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
({F) (m2)
Flow (Q)
VxA
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(Ells) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
5c rn (5
5/c rnJ 5
02, r
�r > =t
5 r" I s
yam, /
s `
"l
r ✓1 %
?�i
Total Discharge (fQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
i

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Std n Q � o V y1,i (� } a,1 f 4 i YK Date
Station Description S+r p a v,` 6 �--, ?D - y,n a t v)r,-I Cv% (
Time Begin Time Ended -, Meter Type V-) p VN)p`-A C1-A
Observers AD Stream Width' Section Width
Observations \I i Ct .tr, C _( I n vm nt� ,�. It \10. -I . —/ 66 le, i., t ! 7 r rvrn 1 r,
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft-m -cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(ft2) (m2)
Flow (Q)
VxA
3
(m !s) (ft
At Point
(fVs) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (MIS)
O
O
O
f®
8
Total Discharge (1Q)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream 9mQ Cx INS S 1-r 1b Date S/
Station Description 'a ( ",\ r, m ml C � - �j � i Oo
Time Begin Time Ended `' Meter Type
Observers AD Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
({�) (m2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
MIS) (m /s)
c rA I S
/
0/ G�lS
0 --21 Yvi/k,
®
2 5
(r
+t
u
l
1
/
1 z (-
_ pro r
r
2 ti
I(
-Z/GY
F-1
Total Discharge (1Q)(fP /s) I
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 It, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
i

i
STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S- One, �ay PA 's I 6\0 Date =V 3 Iz I Z
Station Description oom (-:� vao Q- I - , - j r I ,'-j ((,I , 3 -
Time Begin Time Ended ) Meter Type O p v ') a � C �
Observers Ali Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m-cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(m2)
Flow (Q)
VxA
(m3 /S) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
I �
-2 em
p!Z %C �'t(c
0
0
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 1s) I
_ 'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
_j

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream sb�-k Fa ( ry C I Y 1 � Date S
Station Description ;A -( e(,L w C, i t ao Q, ,2
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type (() 1/1)0.,-I. C h
Observers AD Stream width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ft) (m?)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m/s)
I I C fV116
V;
v
I��
4f `
scram is
r
H 1_ -F+
2L1
©
-7A
B L _
3L15zt
Z? - -CMj
�r (f�
L r. l�
T (A r ,
0
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
1

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Store
� at r;�
N TV1�o
Date
Station Description
9 i ea vl
(�- LPL nr Z-
N `I Y &
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type q In \)y (U I
Observers AT) Stream Width' Section width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(Urn)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft -m-cm
Velocity
AreaWxD
(ft2) (m2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m/s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
°
L cm S
.q
ZcM 5
2 1 CIvl�S
S LP-K
q �
s �10 �
wrf�
`�
1� L�r
OO
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream sbn,c � -at M N) Ty \`p Date 5l �, t 112-
Station Description I
Time Begin Time Ended � Meter Type 'F Ip y-JC P-Cin
Observers Ap Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth'
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ftz) W)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft')
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
ID
S
00
j
.Z��t
Ilcn,'1 S
Ii CVVI�5
D
C rVI'r
12 4.4,
Total Discharge (7-Q)(ft /s) I
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
E

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Shl)Q Sch i `r i L1(t i , , ° L ,` Date 8110112-
Station Description S �-Y e i vk Gu a a e - Q, ( n Sk o t
Time Begin Time Ended � Meter Type
Observers C (y Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
z z
(ft) (m)
Flow (Q)
V x A
3 3
(m /s) (ft)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
MIS) (m/s)
W
_ y -f
2 c r`n (
2IC"") (S
3
• � � t E
r� ,1^l 7 '
/Cry
LA
e
Total Discharge (1Q)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream 9�1(2 I- a Y nn 0\ (U n S V' ! ' i Date N1 D / I Z
Station Description S�'(v.a ni % w.L ae _ Z- iY1C► t +n,l o-vt
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type
Observers G N Stream Width' Section Width
Observations n 1 n W n
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
DepthZ
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(�) (mz)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
O
OO
OO
s0
OO
Total Discharge (EQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
;Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S-h f )Q Camk ` NNWO Sill Date A11 D 1i L
Station Description S- 1
Time Begin Time Ended'" Meter Type
Observers CNN Stream Width' Section Width
Observations Nn 1-1 i n (0,n UY Pool P C,Lka(1,Q Y-,MP S AY � of w(, f
Section
Midpoint
00(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area (ms) a W x D
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
MIS) (m /s)
OO
Os
OO
Total Discharge (FQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
,Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream Srqne r -w M S� T \\j Date $ /l D/ 1 Z
Station Description �'iG 2Gl,m G y-(N M' t 11C,
Time Begin Time Ended Meter Type F f m a A i,6.
Observers Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ftz) (r2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft(s) (m /s)
� t
• LI-Fk
,2L
.f
— Zc,MIS
d- 2/Cr'vl/S
2C'm S
� Y t �
21C V,
© `I
I . I LI - r-k,
a -=' C r j (S
®
!
I. DB-[ -f
G- ? ry
t
'B
��
Total Discharge (EQ)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 It deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
I--,

Y \
STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream f) Q \ aY ,i A � I '( 1'10 Date � 4 j b / 12
Station Description C
Time Begin Time Ended � Meter Type rj0,V\)6j j �,
Observers Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Ve ty
Area W x D z z
(ft) (m)
Flow (Q)
V x A
3 3
(m /s) (ft )
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
I 2fJ
0
rJ- z /�+mjs
0
0
0
Total Discharge (EQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream J m) Q, V a'( (,/� � -� i 1,r' Date 8/ (o I I z
Station Description
Time Begin Time Ended) Meter Type a ( r
Observers C— NA Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth2
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
(ft) (m2)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(M%) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
.2L
N A
1 Yla�
© �
� -�
� 1 �� - A
corn
®
�7 4
i
li
Total Discharge (10)(ft%)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 it deep Measure at 20% and 80 % of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep
,/

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream S-hy)q- F a I rA S 15 1\9 Date P41 0�( Z
Station Description 9(Y20.," ( ,-Lka(1Q. 2
Time Begin Time Ended— Meter Type V 11) V\)a k C h
Observers GN Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
DepthZ
ft -m -cm
Velocity
Area W x D
z
(ft) (M)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (ft3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m/s)
1 -t
o7 +t
O )
1 f
L V-\-k I
9 5-k
1�j) C. VA S
LO f C w( /s
© �0 i+
JI {
r
.�
l
i l "k
_(
� �Y4
1 /�t C
a
OO
Total Discharge (EQ)(ft3 /s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft , 20 measurements preferred
Jleasure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream -Vrb nj . f'a V M K) I n V) Date r 1 t)
Station Description 9 T P—ck- 'k G u (kQ f. 2 � 11I0
Time Begin Time Ended ✓ Meter Type rhy0al�
Observers C Stream Width' Section Width
Observations
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft -m-cm
Velocity
Area
(ea ea (mz) W x D
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3�s) (ft3)
Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ftls) (m/s)
Jfk
o
—i
-2
—? r�\ is
Z C'P/� (S
Z' 'lv4 f
O
s I i „l
F
•�l t
'1- �, r.,S S
D-2 C�1
2(-r l S
2J C,r�;
O
ryry
°;
OO
Total Discharge (10)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 60% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep

r-Q
STREAM FLOW (DISCHARGE) MEASUREMENT FORM
Stream QA balV�[� `I`1 N � \YJ Date � /Ioh2
Station Description SA-1 U c' , , 6, 0, (+ri
Time Begin Time Ended J Meter Type
R 0-1n)(X
Observers C 4�,,A Stream Width' Section Width
Observations pYl k `-\ I C ff1 c, I t Cam' (.�� e
Section
Midpoint
(ft)(m)
Section
Depth
(ft)(m)(cm)
Observational
Depth
ft-m -cm
Velocity v
AreaWxD
(ft2) (mz)
Flow (Q)
V x A
(m3 /s) (f3)
At Point
(ft/s) (m /s)
Average
(ft/s) (m /s)
Q
OO
OO
s0
Total Discharge (112l)(0s)
'Make a minimum of 10 measurements when the total width is > 5 0 ft, 20 measurements preferred
Measure at 60% of depth from surface where < 2 5 ft deep Measure at 20% and 80% of depth in waters > 2 5 ft deep