WQ0016247_More Information (Received)_20210507

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
❑ For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
® For modified permits, submit the requested information for only those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification.
B. Land Application Site Information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table 1. The
status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the following in accordance with each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
County Board
Notification. doc
✓
✓
✓
Land Owner
Agreement
(If applicable)
✓
✓
✓
✓
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vicinity/setback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Permits"
✓
✓
✓
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policy"
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1 of 3

An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
pollutant loading rates CPLRs
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
✓
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
✓
be permitted to multiple Permittees over the same timeperiod)
* This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment `B" of the existing permit, or
name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please
note that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
® For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
® New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the soils report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
® Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD) • Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER) • Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR) • LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Conversion from Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Remote Sensing (RS)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Merc (UTM) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.
® Surface water body classifications information may be found at: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
® Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
® A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hlt2:Hdeq.nc.gov/contact/reizional-offices
® General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet showing the project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to stream name" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link hllp:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications.
® Stream Classification Process: One of the options below may be used depending on the known initial project information.
® KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2 of 3

2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in county, hydrologically report.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin map to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC 02B .0301(i).
❑ Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
❑ The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified "B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the
classification "C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bays which shall be classified "SC."
Pas uotank River Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3 of 3

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont
Land application sites currently certified: 1,191.2 net acres and Total to be certified: 1838.4 net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Codes
Site/Field ID
Landowners
( �
Lessees or O s
(� perator ��
Net Acres
Coun �
Cro s
p()
Predominant Soil
Series Name'
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope'
T
LT-23-1
Lawrence Heafner, Marie Michael
22.1
Lincoln
Fescue
Cecil
_
T
j. T-23-2
Lawrence Heather, Marie Michael
27.7
Lincoln
Fescue
Cecil
`
T
LT-35-1
Ottman Jarrett
35.4
Lincoln
Fescue
Cecil
T
CA-06-01
Dennis Lutz
16.8
Catawba
Fescue
Cecil
T
CA-06-02
Dennis Lutz
13.3
Catawba
Fescue
Lloyd
T
CA-06-03
Neil Properties LLC
19.6
Catawba
Fescue
Pacolet
N
AI-16-2
Kevin Daniels
18.3
Alexander
Corn, Wheat, Beans
Fairview
N
LT-53-1
Howard Goodson
34.3
Lincoln
Fescue
Pacolet
i
N
LT-53-2
Howard Goodson
24.6
Lincoln
Fescue
Pacolet
N
CA-53-3
Howard Goodson
13.3
Catawba
Fescue
Cecil
N
CL-21-1
Luke Beam
38.0
Cleveland
Fescue
Pacolet
N
LT-50-1
Gary Miller
27.5
Lincoln
Fescue
Cecil
N
LT-50-2
Gary Miller
8.8
Lincoln
Fescue
Cecil
N
CL-52-1
Edward parker
32.00
Cleveland
Fescue
Pacolet
N
CL-52-2
Edward Parker
30.6
Cleveland
Fescue
Pacolet
N
CL-52-3
Edward Parker
42.3
Cleveland
Fescue
Pacolet
N
CL-52-4
Ron Parker
22.6
Cleveland
Fescue
Cecil
N
IR-37-1
Norris Fox
Andy Fox
46.2
Iredell
Corn, wheat and beans
Clifford
N
IR-37-2
Josh Sloan
Andy Fox
18.2
Iredell
Fescue
Fairview
N
IR-37-3
Josh Sloan
Andy Fox
26.3
Iredell
Fescue
Fairview
N
IR-37-4
Aaron Fox
Andy Fox
12.5
Iredell
Fescue
Clifford
N
IR-38-1
Daniel Lackey
26.5
Iredell
Corn and Beans
Tomlin
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
IR-39-1
ona Clodfelter
28.0
Iredell
Fescue
Cecil
M
ST-03-3
Robert Ridenhour
25.4
Stanely
Fescue
Badin
N
ST-03-1B
Robert Ridenhour
10.5
Stanley
Fescue
Misenheimer
a Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
C Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is Ce132)
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
p
Class
Al-16-2
35.975
-81.1848
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Muddy Fork 11-69-4
C
C
LT-53-1
35.536
-81.1557
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Lippard Creek 11-119-1-3
C
C
LT-53-2
35.551
-81.154
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Lippard Creek 11-119-1-3
C
C
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
CA-53-3
35.56
-81.1151
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Ballard Creek 11-119-2-2-1-2
C
C
CL-21-1
35.471
-81.622
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Stoney Run Creek 9-50-16-2
WS-IV
WS-IV
CL-52-1
35.483
-81.50
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Buffalo Creek 9-53-1
WS-111
WS-111
CL-52-2
35.477
-81.497
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Buffalo Creek 9-53-1
WS-111
WS-111
CL-52-3
35.475
-81.493
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Buffalo Creek 9-53-1
WS-111
WS-111
CL-52-4
35.481
-81.50
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Buffalo Creek 9-53-1
WS-111
WS-111
IR'r-i
35.932
-80.889
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Patterson Creek 12-108-11-3
IR-37-2
35.952
-80.954
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Patterson Creek 12-108-11-3
C
C
IR-37-3
m
-80.948
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Patterson Creek 12-108-11-3
C
C
IR-37-4
=5 �$
-80.978
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Snow Creek 12-108-9-.6
WS-IV
WS-IV
IR-38-1
35.844
-81.048
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Third Creek 12-108-20-4
C
C
IR-39-1
35.707
-80.905
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Hicks Creek 11-83-.5
WS-IV
WS-IV
LT-50-1
35.483
-81.461
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Glenn Creek 9-53-1.3-1
WS-III
WS-III
LT-50-2
35.485
-81.463
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Glenn Creek 9-53-1.3-1
WS-III
WS-III
ST-03-1B
35.361
-80.377
NAD83
MAP
Nearest Second
Pole running Creek 13-17-31-5-1-1
C
C
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3

CUMULATIVE METAL LOADINGS (LBS/AC) AS OF 12/31/2021
The cumulative metals for this report come from HISTORY records (i.e. the monthly monitoring process has been completed for the State and County where the Fields are located)
In cases where a trace metal lab result was Not Reported to Synagro or tracking of metal loading was Not Required the loading on the report is displayed as "NR"
FIELDID
Last Date Applied
AS
CD
CR
CU
PB
HG
MO
NI
SE
ZN
NC-CA-00006-0-0001-
10/04/2019
0.09445
0.04943
0.98471
27.43734
0.17314
0.01353
0.14281
0.81885
0.11632
12.20942
NC-CA-00006-0-0002-
10/07/2019
0.10677
0.06020
1.10759
31.10922
0.19729
0.01480
0.17073
0.97520
0.13450
12.87363
NC-CA-00006-0-0003-
09/21/2018
0.06847
0.04536
0.39393
21.43263
0.14774
0.01406
0.13247
0.54914
0.12235
7.17891
Report Date/Time: 4/22/2021 1:28:25 PM Page 1 of 1

CUMULATIVE METAL LOADINGS (LBS/AC) AS OF 12/31/2021
The cumulative metals for this report come from HISTORY records (i.e. the monthly monitoring process has been completed for the State and County where the Fields are located)
In cases where a trace metal lab result was Not Reported to Synagro or tracking of metal loading was Not Required the loading on the report is displayed as "NR"
FIELDID
Last Date Applied
AS
CD
CR
CU
PB
HG
MO
NI
SE
ZN
NC-LT-00023-0-0001-
10/01/2019
0.02959
0.01092
0.67039
0.31865
0.05886
0.00202
0.05827
0.40578
0.03895
6.36208
NC-LT-00023-0-0002-
08/30/2019
0.05307
0.03288
1.72751
0.75357
0.18305
0.00675
0.15666
0.96378
0.07065
14.13048
Report Date/Time: 4/22/2021 1:30:05 PM Page 1 of 1

CUMULATIVE METAL LOADINGS (LBS/AC) AS OF 12/31/2021
The cumulative metals for this report come from HISTORY records (i.e. the monthly monitoring process has been completed for the State and County where the Fields are located)
In cases where a trace metal lab result was Not Reported to Synagro or tracking of metal loading was Not Required the loading on the report is displayed as "NR"
FIELDID Last Date Applied AS CD CR CU PB HG MO NI SE ZN
NC-LT-00035-0-0001- 10/03/2019 0.05569 0.02439 0.88893 16.19031 0.09998 0.00544 0.06644 0.56155 0.05485 8.19041
Report Date/Time: 4/22/2021 1:33:22 PM Page 1 of 1

APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
- —�— — - PRIVATE ROAD
— - - — STREAM
- DRAIN
.
X X X FENCE
❑
PROPERTY LINE
0
WATER
ONSITE HOUSE
OFFSITE HOUSE
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660'
660' 0 660'
NC-ST-03
Fields 1-3

SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=1,000'
1,000, 0 1,000,
- -
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
N C-ST-03
Fields 1-7

SYNAGRO, CLASS B PERMIT
WQ 0016247
SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil profile evaluations were conducted on the proposed application
sites for the Synagro Western Piedmont project by Piedmont Environmental Associates,
P.A. on behalf of Synagro Central, LLC. The evaluations consisted of hand auger
borings and descriptions of the soils on the application sites. All hand auger borings
included in this package were either performed by me or under my direct supervision.
All other work performed for this permit application was conducted by Synagro Central,
LLC.
For each application field site, representative soil borings were conducted to confirm the
soil series designation provided on the USDA/NRCS soil survey data. It was assumed
that areas unsuitable to slope or a seasonally high-water table are not included in the
application area for any of these fields.
Table 1 lists the dominant soil series mapped for each of the fields in this submittal, as
well as the soil series determined:
Table 1. - Soil Profile Descriptions Data, Synagro, Permit WQ 0016247
Field NRCS Mapped Series Field Identified Series
ST 03-1 Misenheimer Badin
LT 56-1 Lloyd Lloyd

Sincerely,
.Sp soil
' (0)P"IF
qP
G. Christopher Murray, L.S.S.
No. 1284
Synagro, Class B Permit, Various Fields

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro W. Piedmont (WQ 0016247) % Slope: 3%
Site: ST 03-1 Crop: Forage/Pasture
Field: Field 1 Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.3618 N Date: 4/23/2021
-80.3768 W Soil Series: Badin
rn
y
s
v
_O
_O
O
O
_
U
U
O t
x
d
N
5
= 0
5
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASS O C I ATE S, P A.
w
w
w a
la N r
` M H N
N_ O
Q to
m
a� a� o r i 0
O O 4 O K i L i p
5 5 W 5 � rn rn rn 5
Ap
0-3
7.5 YR 5/4
-
-
-
-
moist
sl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
E
3-14
2.5Y 7/4
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt
14-36
10YR 5/8
-
-
-
-
moist
Sid
wk
med
sbk
fi
s
p
C/R
36-44
2.5Y 6/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
structureless
fr
ss
sp
R
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Legend:
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
Structure Size
wk weak
gr
granular
f fine
m moderate
pl
platy
med medium
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
Moist Consistern
sg
single grained
fr friable
ma
massive
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro W. Piedmont (WQ 0016247) % Slope: 3%
Site: ST 03-1 Crop: Forage/Pasture
Field: Field 1 Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.5549 N Date: 4/23/2021
-81.2226 W Soil Series: Lloyd
rn
y
s
v
_O
_O
O
O
_
U
U
O t
x
d
N
r o
5
5
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASS O C I ATE S, P A.
w
w
rn Q w a
la 3 N r
` M H N
7 N C N C
N_ O
Q to
m
a� a� o r i 0
O O 4 O x i i i p
5 5 W 5 � rn rn rn 5
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistencv
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal Hiqh Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-SL031426
Client: Robert Ridenhour Advisor: Alex Fox
,u Heavy Metals 30349 Bridge Rd Synagro
" , s Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 284 Boger Rd
} Soil Report Mehllch-3 Extraction Mocksville, NC 27028
_ Sampled County: Stanly
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 305268 Advisor ID: 501947
Sampled: 04/23/2021 Received: 04/30/2021 Completed: 05/06/2021 Farm: St-03
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results. Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Although the above metals here are not believed to pose a concern for
plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P) is
very high (P-1 > 100), crops will not respond to additional P applied. Tissue testing is advised where soil pH is elevated and where soil zinc(Zn) and copper(Cu) levels are of
concern as in samples found here. Ja athi Kamalakanthan, Agronomist, 5/6/2021
Sample ID: I
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 - Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 0 10 0 0 pH$ 0 0 0
Note: 12 Note:
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 1.09 17.4 98 0.3 7.1 755 73 91 5 35 142 85 336 336 65 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.2 Chromium, 0.2 Lead, 4.3 Selenium, 0.0
North Carolina
TC&RCLY Trust Fmui cswnmisslan
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY21-SLO31426
Robert Ridenhour
Page 2 of 2
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at on
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-I
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.gov/apronomi/obpart4.htn7 fsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-I
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncapr.gov/apronomi/uyrst.htm

(2)
Waypoint, 7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 21-117-0005
Client Project Description: Robert Rodenhaur/Stro3
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Method Lab ID
76011 1B Solids 04/27/2021 SW-7471B WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 1 of 2

WavDointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville , NC 27028
Report Number : 21-117-0005
Lab No : 76011
Sample ID : 1113
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Project Robert Rodenhaur/Stro3
Information :
REPORT OF ANAL YSIS
Report Date : 05/04/2021
Received : 04/27/2021
TO.Wi-c 04 Gfpwr
Pauric Mc Groary Ph.D., CPA
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0320 mg/Kg 0.0137 1 05/03/2112:54 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ *
Outside QC Limit
B
Analyte detected in blank
Definitions C
GCMS Confirmation Analysis
E
Result above cal range
g
GGA Outside QC Limits
H
Beyond holding time
J
Estimated value
M
Minimum value
NA
Not on Scope of Accreditation
NC
Not confirmed
Q
RPD >40% dual column results
T
Sample exhibits toxicity
Page 2 of 2