Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0008778_Renewal Application_20210601Initial Review Reviewer Thornburg, Nathaniel D Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.)* r Yes r No Permit Number (IR)* WQ0008778 Applicant/Permittee Town of Farmville Applicant/Permittee Address 2884 Chinquapin Rd, Farmville, NC 27828 Is the owner in BIMS? r Yes r No Is the facility in BIMS? r Yes r No Owner Type Municipal Facility Name Town of Farmville RLAP County Pitt Fee Category Minor Fee Amount $0 Is this a complete application?* r Yes r No Complete App Date 06/01/2021 Signature Authority Signature Authority Title Signature Authority Email Document Type (if non -application) Email Notifications Does this need review bythe hydrogeologist?* r Yes r No Regional Office CO Reviewer Admin Reviewer Below list any additional email address that need notification about a new project. Email Address Comments to be added to email notfication Comments for Kendall Comments for RO Comments for Reviewer Comments for Applicant Submittal Form Project Contact Information Rease provide information on the person to be contacted by N B Staff regarding electibnittal, confirmation of receipt, other .......................................................... electronic surece, aner correspondence. _ - Name * Chris Wynne Email Address* cwynne@synagro.com Project Information ........ ......... .......................................................................................................................................... Application/Document Type* r New (Fee Req ui red) r Modification - Major (Fee Required) r Renewal with Major Modification (Fee Required) r Annual Report r Additional Information r Other Phone Number* 13369098627 O Modification - Minor G Renewal C GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1, NDAR-2 r Residual Annual Report r Change of Ownership We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form. https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report Permit Type:* r Wastewater Irrigation r High -Rate Infiltration r Other Wastewater r Reclaimed Water r Closed -Loop Recycle r Residuals r Single -Family Residence Wastewater r Other Irrigation Permit Number:* WO0008778 Fbs Current Existing permt number Applicant/Permittee * Town of Farmville Applicant/Permittee Address* 2884 Chinquapin Rd, Farmville, NC 27828 Facility Name * Town of Farmville RLAP Please provide comments/notes on your current submittal below. Please find attached all documents required for the renewal of the Town of Farmville WWTP RLAP (WQ0008778). Let me know if you have any questions and I'll be glad to help. Thanks! At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg at nathaniel.thornburg@ncdenr.gov. Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here.* (Application Form Engineering Rans, Specifications, Calculations, Rc.) Farmville WWTP �renewal _05312021.pdf 82.59MB upload only 1 Rdocurrent (less than 250 W). Miltiple documents nest be corrbined into one RJFfile unless file is larger than upload limit. * V By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has been received by the Non - Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order and made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts of the application in correct order (as specified by the application). Mail payment to: NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources Attn: Non -Discharge Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Signature �� Submission Date 5/30/2021 05/31/2021 4A(3FZ YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD NCDENRv-DWQ Land Application Permitting and Compliance Unit Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-w 1636 ATTENTION: REFERENCE: Dear Mr. Thornburg: Mr. Nathaniel Thomburcy MODIFICATION OF PERMIT NO. W!20008778 Town of Farmville Synagro is submitting, on behalf of the Town of Farmville, an application to modi�'y the Town's residuals land application permit. Listed below are the changes to the existing permit as they pertain to land application sites: • Renewing 1 application site (NC-PI-1) No other modification to the permit is requested at this time. This package should captain the information that is necessary to complete the requested modification of the Town's permit. However, if you require ad 0 ditional information or have further questions about the included information, please contact me immediately at 336-,909-862'/. you to ensure that this is an efficient review process, and I will Sincerely Chris Wyhnc-ol Technical Service s Specialist Cc : David Hodgkins; Town of Farmville Enc: Application Package (4) I look forward to working with provi de any further assistance if Division of Water Resources State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALSLAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original, and two copies of the -application and supporting documentation For more information., visit the Water Qualify Permitting Section's Non-Disc&Lrge PermittiLig Unit General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that are generated from a water treatment plank or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under 15A NCAC 02T.1 1 Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed below. A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) Application: (All Application Packages); � Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land. Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) form. Please do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer. The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T ,Q 10 b . An afternate person may b e designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T ,Q 106�b�. If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit. � Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to operation of proposed faciffity(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units. B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages) ❑ Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). _ _YJY.#YK M4Vl14"J�Gt*JY �awaz.arr_+sa--+�� _-_�•_. _�:-+T�_____,+x—: _r_ .__.__.. .. _ _ _ __.. _.... _. __ __ __ _. ___ _ -_ �-����YF�+.4� �'tY1+�w�4 -�.�t _ _ _- - r=— .- ._ _ = f�"4aC�" � sr� _ c-+4 C�'�iScnC�rk �s.na�+r��+'-wrn� -r - "- -- �a--.a-}-+a+�i-�za � S � S T 7 } Facility Classification New Fermi major Modification Major (land are pennitted for 300 acres) $L310 $395 1 ,y . _ ... .... .. .. .. .__'.+r_,.___r�.-� --r'Sir:�a�rnwo-v���arrrn��'}�aY'u'1�7F.�+.. •. _. ... ;._. . ._..____ .__; _._._�.___._'_ ._trlx�lr�r*h MFM ._._. }�a M1Y�'��MrTFhrfih:"h WinnhT.T___�_. _. ___ 40Mr+G+F�M7+Y Wrir�+/nt Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres) $810 $245 1 - A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage; adds additional hand application areas not previously approved for that particular program [including transferring of field(s) from one program to another]; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new treatment or storage units/processes not previously permitted. There is no fee for minor modifications to a permit. C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages) � List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action. D. Environmental Assessments (May be Required — See 15A NCAC I C .0300) ❑ Submit a copy of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include information on any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals treatment and storage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for the construction of the subject facilities. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Pagel of 3 10 E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages) For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan. � Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1110 and include at a minimum: � Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to function and by whom the functions are to be conducted. � Mam*tenance schedules; may include equipment calibration, maintenance of signs, etc. safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc. j� Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc. � inspection plan including the following information; Names and titles of perso el responsible for conducting the inspections. Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program. Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the event that noncompliance is observed. � Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information.; � Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring. � .Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored. Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,, flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that hand apply multiple times per year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most likely to be negatively affected bvcold temperatures. THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to 1VA ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY. F. Program Determination Dedicated residuals land application programs are ones in which land application sites meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .11.02(12). Specifically, a residuals land application program is designated as dedicated if any of the following are applicable: ❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or ftequencies greater than agronomic rates. [] Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance. [] Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system. Q Please contact the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit if you need any assistance in detennining whether your residuals program falls under the dedicated program defmitions. G. Program Information ❑ Provide an explanation of why a dedicated system is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system. ❑ Provide an explanation of the dedicated system and its operation. H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages) Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of 1 ITO by 171' plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modification(s) only. ❑ Plans must include the following minimum items: A general location map, a vici�uty map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site relief and shawina all. facility related structures and fences within the land application area - The location of all wells (including usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial), springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application siie(s). � Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T 110 8 [] Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site{s}. [] A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's evaluation. The irrigation. plans shall shoes each nozzle/emitter and witted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray irrigation zones as they will be operated. ❑ Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans maybe labeled with the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 3 �. Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites) Submit a project evaluation and a receiver site management plan (if applicable) with recommendations concerning cover crops and their ability to accept the proposed application rates. J. Hydrogeologic Report (Ali New Application Packages or Modifications involvin g- increasing the total design capacity) ❑ Submit a detailed hydrogeologic evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(4) and current Division Policy available at: ft://www.ncwater.org/Rules Policies and Reeulafions/. The document shah be signed, sealed and dated by a qualified professional, K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation facilities fed through fixed supply system) Q Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional engineer and/or Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15ANCAC 02T J 104(d)(2). For Modifications, submit an updated site map specific to the modification(s) only. ❑ The design documents must include the following minimum items: ❑ Engineering plans for the facility and equipment except those previously pemiitted unless they are directly tied into the new units or are critical to the understanding of the complete process; ❑ Specifications describing materials to be used, method of construction, and means for ensuring quality and integrity of the finished product fficluding leaking testing; and [] Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head curve analysis for each pump, and irrigation design. ❑ Soil, mapping units shown on all disposal sites. L. Water Balance (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites utilizing fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation facilities fed throughfxedsu ly systems) u Submit a completed and accurate water balance in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T available at: htt-v-://www.ncwater.om/Rules Policies and ReLyulafio-ns/. .1 104Ld)5 and current Division Policy M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment or irrigation components) Q .Property ownership documentation shall consist of one of the following-, Legal documentation of ownership (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporaiion), or [] Wr"tten notarized intent to purchase agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or [] An casement running with the land specifically indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of 15A NCAC 021--, .O I 07f f1_ or ❑ A written notarized lease agreement signed by both part survey map,, ies, indicating the intended use of the property, as well as a plat or ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT Bv U.S. Postal Service: 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 807-6464 Courier/Special Delivery: 512 N. SALISBURY STREET RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604 FAX NUMBER: (919) 807-6496 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FOR-M.- RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of.) State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM FORM.* RLAP 06-16 L APPLICANT INFORMATION: I - Applicant's name: Town of Farmville Applicant type: ❑Individual �] Federal ❑ Corporation �# State El General Partnership Mun�cipal Signature authority's name per iSA NCAC 02T .0106: David Hodgkins Applicant's mailing address: PO Box 86 City: Farmville State: NC Zip,.- 27828- Privately-Owned Public Utility ❑ County Title:.Town Manager Telephone number: (252)753-6700 Email Address: dhodekins@farrnvi11e-.r 2. Consultant's name: ChristWher Wvnnve License Number (for P,E,): Affiliation: On Staff Retained (Firm; } Consultant's mailing address: 284 Boger Rd City: Mocksville State-, NC Telephone number: (L36) 909-8627 Zip: 27028- Email Address: cwynne@synajzro.com 3. Agronomist's License Number; Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑ On Staff Q Retained (Firm: } Agronomist"s mailing address: C i State: Zip: Telephone number: Email Address: 4. Soil Scientist's name: G. Christopher Murrqy License Number: 1284 Affiliation: [] NIA On Staff Retained (Firm: Piedmont Environmeni Sail Scientist's mailing address: 216 S Swing Rd, Suite I City: Greensboro State: NC Zip: 27409- Telephone number: (L3 -662w5487) 5. Fee submitted: $395.00 (See Instruction B) II. PERMIT INFORMATION: Email Address: Chris _ iedmontsoil.c Associ P.A 1. Application is for (check all that apply): Q new, Q modified, renewed permit 2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing pen -nit, provide the following: Pen -nit number: W00008778 Date of most -recently issued permit: 12/7/2416 Dade ofmost-recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit}; Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the pennit): FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page] of 5 IIL RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION: i. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 2$84 Chmquvin Rd, City: Fannvffle State*- NC Coordinates: Latitude-, 350 351 17" Datum: NAD 84 Method of measurement: Map Zip: 27828- Longitude: 770 32'42'r Level of accuracy: Second 2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Pitt 3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table: Designation Name Affiliation Certifleation Number ORC Robert N. Roth Synagro 1001672 Back -Up ORC John A. Culp Synagro 1000733 Additional Back -Up ORCs (if applicable) If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school and certification test: 4. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program: a. Plant Available X#roeen SUMMOEE, Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals source -generating facilities as currently certified and pro -posed for certification with this annlicatior, and liqt the ,-pv,ittC ;n rho following table: Ma ximuni amount of residuals to be certified: 500 dry tons per year. PAN Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton Pounds of PAN per Year (Weighted Average) Surface Incorporation Surface Incorporation or Injection or Injection First -Year 27,42 27.42 13710 13710 Five -Year Maximum Adjusted 44•98 44o98 22489 22489 b. Land Application Site Use Summ Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and proposed for certifcation with this application: Category Use Acres Comments Crops Forest or Plantation 0 Row Crops 76.1 Hay p Pasture 32.7 Total: 0 Methods Surface 108.8 Incorporation or Injection U Total: 108.8 FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 5 c, Residuals Land A lication summa Determine the minimum acreatie required to land annly the recichialc nc n,,,-rP„th, certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios fisted in the following table: Assumed Acres Required Using Acres Required Using Application Rate First -Year PAN Concentrations Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN (Ibs PANlac-yd Concentrations Surface Incorporation or Surface Incorporation or Injection Injection 50 274.2 274*2 44998 449*8 too 137ol 137,1 224o9 224*9 150 91A 91.4 149.9 149.9 zoo 6846 68.6 112.4 112.4 b. If applicable, provide a plan and a schedule to resolve any known issues that would prevent land application of the proposed residuals due to the violation of North Carolina AdmiDjStratiVeCode(e.g. not enough storage, not enough land, vector reduction practices not in place, etc.): 7. Specify type of residuals program (See Instruction F): Non -dedicated Dedicated If Dedicated, specify the following (check all that apply): D Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomic rats, explain, ❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that is used. primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance, explain; ❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain; IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified residuals source) Complete and submit the following Residuals Source Certication and all associated documentation. Residuals Source Certification V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified land application site) Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all. associated documentation. Land Application Siite Certification. doc FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 5 Note: item VI. Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed i9 rrigation system OnIv. VI. DESIGNINFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATIONSYSTEM 1. The irrigation system is: Q Spray ❑ Drip 2. Disposal system is: ❑existing proposed. 3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high water table (S below ground surface. Rules 15A NCAC 02T .050kwww" S{� surface. HWT) within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: feet requires at least one -foot vertical separation between SHOT and ground 4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area? [] Yes or ❑ No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist report addresses artificial structures and please indicate if structures are to be maintained or modified: 5_ Loading rates recommended by the Soil Scientist Evaluation: Recommended Recommended Soil Series Fields within Soil Area Loading Rate Loading Rate in/hr 6. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If No, explain why 15A NCAC 02T .050 is not met. 7. Non -dedicated System Design Mill in the appropriate information for ether a spray or drip irrigation system): Field Zone Design Area Number of Maximum Application Design Annual Loading (ft Z Nozzles Rafe (gallons/hr) Rate ..(gallonsf r} Total Spray Irrigation Design Element Plan Sheet I Specification Number Pa e Number Wetted diameter of nozzles ft Wetted area of nozzles fit' N'ozzle capacity 9PM Nozzle manufacturer / model I Elevation of highest nozzle ft FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 4 of 5 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778 (Farmville WWTP) Inspection Plan Inspections for the land application of residuals will be conducted on a weekly basis at the land application site during the land application activities of this project. The inspection frequency is based on the time frame that it is going to take to complete the project and the amount of dry tons to be Land applied from this facility. The inspections will consist of inspecting a current field that is being applied as well as inspecting random fields that have been completed. These inspections will consist af: 1. Verifying that the Pre -Operations Check list has been completed and signed by both operations and Technical staff. z. Checking the calculated loads to ensure the correct amount of residuals are being hand applied. I Ensure that all manned equipment has a Copy of the spill control plan, the permit, and the operations and maintenance plant. 4. Ensure that the field has been flagged properly and that all buffers are being adhered to. 5. Ensure that the Crop and landowner Verification form has been filled out. 6. Verifying that the correct number samples of the residuals have been taken and that it meets the criteria for land application. 7. The records will be kept in the project filesIn the respective office for the project. S. The Permittee or Inspector shall report by telephone to the Washington Regional Office by Telephone at 252-946a.6481 as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after or the next wanking day following the occurrence or the first knowledge of the occurrence of the fallowing. � Any occurrence with the distribution program resulting in the land application of significant amounts of material that is abnormal in quantity or characteristics. • Any failure of the distribution system that results in the release to surface waters. � Any time that self -monitoring indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance with the permit. • Any process failure that results in the system not adequately treating the residuals. • Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation. • Any release that requires immediate reporting outside of narmal business hours shall be called in to DENR at 1- 800-662-7956, 1-800*k,858,-0368,, or 252-946-6481. These numbers are to be called in the event of a release to surface waders, imminen#failure of a storage system when the event occurs outside of normal business hours. � Within 5 days of the first notice of on occurrence a written response in the form of a letter shall be sent to DENR outlining the actions taken or purposed actions taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. Persons responsible for inspections on this project are as follows: Johnathan Maize, operations Manager or his designee Nate Roth is the designated land application ORC for this project and his designees are the backup ORC's for this project. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778 (Town of Farmville) Operational Functions The operation function of this project is going to involve mixing the basins thoroughly with the WWTP mixers to achieve 45 a well mixed and consistent material that is suitable for land application, It is going to be spread at agronomic rakes that are determined by the nutrient and metal S2mple that is current for that monitoring period. It is going to be spread with a liquid applicator that will use pressure to spread the material in such a way to achieve a consistent spread pattern. The material is going to be land applied on fields that have established grasses that are going to either be grazed or cut for hay for animal feed or rvv►r crops used for animal feed. SAFETY MEASURES Synagro believes in operating in a safety conscious manner and is has all employees participate in quarterly online safety course that are designed to help its employees recognize safety issues and take steps to prevent accidents from occurring, in addition all Synagro employees have the authority to stop operations if they think any aspect of the operation is going to cause environmental or personal harm. Maintenance Schedule Synagro will follow the maintenance schedule as recommended by the Synagro fleet manager for the equipment necessary to complete the fob. Applicant's Certification (signing authority must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 02T ,OIQG): The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility with.ou� proper closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC .O 105. Ow I, ❑ No, Explain; ww� David Hodgkins (Signature Authority's Name — PLEASE PRINT) attest that this application for Farmville WWTP (Facility Name) Town Manager (Title) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Resources may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in. an immediate enforcement action, which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete_ Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.6A and §143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to exceed $1.0,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. Signature: Date: � 2 7/7( FORM: RLAP 06-m 16 Page 5 of 5 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778 Sampling Plan Sampling for this project costs of sampling the residuals during the time that lanunsiapplication is occurring. This will result in one round of sampling to occur before land application commences to ensure that the residuals are suitable for land application. Based on the dry tonnage of this plant, there will be one sample for all parameters per year. The residuals shall be sampled annually for the following: (Regulatory level in milligrams per liter in parentheses.) Arsenic (5.0) Barium (100.0) Benzene (0.,S) Cadmium (1. 0) Carbon tetrachloride (0.5) Chlordane (0,03) Chlorobenzene (100.0) Chloroform (6.0) Chromium (5.0) M-Cresol (200.0) o-Cresol (200.0) p-Cresol (200,,0) Cresol(200.0) 24=1) (10n0) 1, 4-Dichlorobenxene (7,S) 1, 2-Dichloroethane (0*5) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (03) Nitrobenzene (2.0) Pentachloro henol (100.0) Pyridine (5.0) 2, 4-Dinitrotoluene (0.13) Selenium (1.0) Endrin 0.02 Silver (S.,0) Hexachlorobenzene (0.13 e rac oroet y ene (01.7) Heptachlor (and its HydroxideM (0.5) Hexachlorow-1 3"butadiene (O.S) Trichloroethylene (0-5) Hexachlorethane(3.0j 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol(400.0) Lead (5,,0) 2,4,6-Trichlarophenol (2,90) Lindane (0.4) 2,AS TP (Silvex) (1.0) Mercury (0.2) Vinyl Chloride Methoxychlor (10.0) Methyl ethyl ketone (200.0) The residuals will also be sampled based on the chart below for the following constituents: Dry Tons Generated (short tons per year) <319 =>319w<1,650 =>1,p650w-<16,500 =>36,500 Aluminum Ammonia -Nitrogen Arsenic Cadmium Calcium Copper Lead Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) Monitoring Frequency (Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111) 1 time per year 1 per Quarter (4 times per dear) i every 60 days (6 times per year) 1 every month (12 times per year) Magnesium Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Nitrate-RNitrite Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium pH Plant Available Nitrogen (calculation) Selenium Sodium Total Solids Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Zinc To meet pathogen and vector requirements, the material will be sampled for fecals to prove that the residuals have met the pathogen requirements of the permit. The material will be tested for vector attraction by using a 30-day bench test. The samples will be pulled from the basins and/or cake pad that are currently holding the residuals. The samples that will be pulled are a TCLP1 nutrient and metals sample, a fecal sample and a 30-day bench test to prove that the material is suitable for [and application. The nutrient and metal and TCLP sample will be collected randomly and consist of at least 30 individual samples mixed in order to get the composite sample for these parameters. This material is very consistent because the residuals will be mixed thoroughly with aerators and mixers. This should take care of any seasonal fluctuationsin the material. The following people are responsible for sampling: Chris Wynne Technical Services Spec*I allst or his designee. State of North Carolina go Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Please use the fallowing instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and rev40 iew time for the permit application. Unless otherwise noted the AIR121icant shall submit one original and two co ies of the a lication and supAortinLr documentation For mope information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischatge Perinittj!Zg Unit General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15ANCAC 02T .11.00. Do not submit this certification for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 1.145, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SIR 11-15). Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed below. A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15): � Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FARM: RSC 11-15) foam, Please do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the application may be made, as Tong as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer. � For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility. � for modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification. � Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities. B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information: For each source facility, attach the following: Vicinity map - A vic�nity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for Residuals Land_ Application Permits". � Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals are to be generated, heated, processed, and stored at the facility, �j quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8. Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be hand applied, distributed, and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during processing. � Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. insure that the plan identifies sampling points, sampling frequency, sample hype, as well as the Divi si on- certified laboratory to be used. In addition, ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be competed on the residuals as they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed. C. Residuals Quality information: � For each source facility, attach the following: � Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification. Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. � For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two facilities. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 1 SPILL RESPONSE PLAN PROJECT: Farmville WWTP Permit W00008778 IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A SPILL THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY: L MANAGEMENT OF SPILL CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES• The Operations Manager shall take immediate charge and initiate clean-up activities. Synagro labor and equipment 4P is to be utilized. In the event additional labor and equipment is required, assistance may be requested from the Town of Fannville, the NC Department of Transportation, and other private contractors as necessary. 2. HALT THE SOURCE OF THE SPILL• Such as a ruptured container or damaged transport unit. I CONTAIN THE SPILLL:_ Form a barrier. Sufficient quantifies of straw shag be used for such purposes. Earthen barriers may be constructed to augment the straw bale containment area of the spill. The Operations Manager or the person in charge on the spill site will advise the clean-up personnel where to get the straw, lime, and other items necessary to complete the clean-up operation, i.e., local farmers, farm supply centers, nurseries, etc. 4. CLEAN-UP: Employ front-end loaders, vacuum equipment, sludge app�icatian vehicles, and/or local septic tank service to remove as much of the spilled material as possible. Straw and/or sand should be scattered in the spill area to soak up the remaining material. "I'he straw- and sand -soaked material will be collected and removed to a disposal area approved by representatives of the state regulatory agency. 5. FINAL CLEAN-UP: Employ rotary brush sweeper if needed and apply line to the spill area upon the approval of the clean-up efforts by the state regulatory representative. If the event occurs on private property, the clean-up will be completed to the satisfaction of the property owner and state regulatory representatives. The goal will be to restore the spill area to its original condition if possible. 6. NOTIFICATION: As soon as possible after the spill occurs, the Synagro operations Manager or assistant wail notify the Synagro Cenral Office, and they will then be responsible for notifying other key S ynagro personnel. 7. REPORTING: ffihm� Synagro Central personnel will notify the Washington Regional Office by Telephone at 252-946-6481 as soon as Possible,, but not more than 24 hours after, or on the next working day fallowing the occurrence. The Qpera�ions Manager shall provide a written repot within 48 hours of the spill to the Technical Services Director. The report shall list all relative information and actions taken. Synaorro Central personnel will file a written report to the Washington Regional office of the NCDENR within 5 days of the occurrence. For after hours reporting the Division's emergency number shall be tailed to report all incidences (800-662-7956 or 800-858-0368 or 919-733-33001 RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY Applicant's name: Town of Fannville RLAP Status Facilityermiolder Facility Name County Permit 1MlumberMaximum Dry Tons Per Year CodeaCurrent b Proposed R Town of Farmvifle Fannville W-WTP Pitt WQ0008778 500 500 a Status Code for source facility are. ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted) b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land. application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility). SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 page 1 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.): L Facility Name: Farmville WWTP 2. Facility permit balder is: Federal, State, Local Government, or .Facility permit issued by: Div. of Water Resources, �] or ❑ Other (explain: }, 3. Facility contact person and title:.James Shoulders, Plant ORC Complete mailing address: P.O. Box 102. City-, Fannville State: NC a. 5. Telephone number: (252) 753-3919, Facility physical address: 2884 Chinquapin City: Fan-nville State: NC Coordinates: Latitude: 35' 35' 17.11 Private. Div. of Environmental Health, E-mail address: James.Shoulders Zip: 27828-T Longitude770 32".42 Datum: NAD 83. Level of accuracy: Second Method of measurement: Ma), Zip: 27828-— �.suez-n co Purpose of the facility: � treatment of municipal wastewater, treatment of 100% domestic wastewater, treatment of potable water, treatment of 100% industrial wastewater, [� treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater, (approximate percentages: % industrial and I % domestic) [� other (explam::.). 6, Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: Yes No 7. Facility permitted/design flow-, 3.- 5 MGD and facility average daily flow: 1.6 MGD 8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility 38.6 dry tans per year. 9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility: Type and volume of residuals treatment: Aerobically di liciui'd, 1 -million gallon tank Type and volume of residuals storage {i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): Aerobicall gallon. tank II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.): 1. Specify if residuals are regulated under: 40 CFR Part 503 or 40 CFR Part 257, FORM: RSC 0646 digested ILquid. I -million Note. Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated undex 40 CFR Past 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Park 25 7. 2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15ANCAC 02T.1102(6) as: Biological Q Non -Biological FORM: RSC 06,-16 Page 1 of 5 4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables {i.e., as applicable} to demonstrate that the residuals do not violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 1 SA Ni��C,1:1111111�� 0?T .110�. a. For Distribution/Land Application* Fill in the, following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following metal parameters.- Laboratory.- Pace Anal-vticalerviees., LLC and. Date of analysis: 01/26/2021 Parameter Ceiling Monthly Average Result Concentration Limits Concentration Limits (ClassA & ClassB) (Class A Only) (m.glkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Arsenic 75 41 6.1 Cadmium 85 ;9 0.73 Copper 47300 17500 310 Lead 840 300 30 Mercury 57 17 ND Molybdenum 75 n/a 5.9 Nickel 420 420 23 Selenium 100 100 7.1. Zinc 7500 23,800 760 b. For SurfaceDL"Mosal Unit (landfill): Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following metal parameters; Laboratory:..... and Date of analysis: Distance from Disposal Arsenic Chromium Nickel Unit to Boundary to Closest Property Line ' (meters, check one) (inglkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kph ❑ > 0 but <25 30 200 210 ❑ > 25 but < 50 34 220 240 ❑ ? 50 but < 75 39 � 260 270 > 75 but < 100 46 300 320 ❑ > 100 but< 125 53 360 390 0 1 d >_ 125 62 450 420 Result (mg/kg) FORM,: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5 Note,: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed elm systems), 3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat 100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only} a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: [] yes no, If yes, list the numbers): b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21- 261.240- yes o r Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity: characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as Laboratory: Summit Environmental Technologi es Inc.and Date of analysis: 1/25/2021 Passed corrosivity test: yes no. pH-, s.u. (2 < pH < 12.5) Passed ignitability test: yes no. Flashpoint.- >140 °F (> 1400F) Passed reactivity hest: yes [:]no. 14CN* ND mg/kg (<250) & HAS: ND mg/kg (<500) TCLP Parameter Limit Result TCLP Parameter Limit Result (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) Arsenic 5.0 ND Hexachlorobenzene 0013 ND Barium 100.0 ND 14exachloro- I 1,3-Butadiene 0.5 ND Benzene 0.5 ND Hexachloroethane 3.0 ND Cadmium 1.0 ND Lead 5.0 ND Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 ND Lindane 0.4 ND Chlordane 0.03 ND Mercury 0.2 ND Chlorobenzene 100.0 ND Methoxychlor 10,0 ND Chloroform 6.o ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 ND Chromium 5.0 ND Nitrobenzene 2.0 ND m-Cresol 200.0 ND Pentachlorophenol 1004.0 ND o-Cresol 200.0 ND Pyridine 5.0 ND p-Cresol 200.0 ND Selenium 1.0 ND Cresol 200.0 N D Silver �.0 ND 2,4-D 10.0 ND Tetrachloro ethylene ND IA-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 ND Toxaphene 0.5 ND 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 ND Trichloroethylene 0.5 ND l,l-Dichloroethylene 0.7 ND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 ND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 ND 274fi-Trichlorophenol 2.0 ND Endrin 0.02 ND 2A5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 ND Heptachlor and its Hydroxide 0.008 ND Vinyl Chloride 0.2 ND FORM.- RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5 5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determinatiow, Complete the following: a. Total solids: 3.57 %. b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses {i.e., on a. dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and micronutrient parameters. Laboratory: Pace Anal kcal. Services.,.LLC and Date of analysis: 0 1/26/2021 c. Using; the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 0.60 [Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service. a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall address the sodium application rate, soil amendments e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity and conditions conducive to crop growth, d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plank mailable nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: �� This rate is a (check one): default value, or � actually established. If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals: e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table: Application Method First (I't) Year PAN Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN (mg1kg) (mglkg) Surface 13710 22489 Injection/Incorporation 13710 22489 6. ether Pollutants Determination;. Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide the results of the latest analyses: N/A FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5 7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 1.06, specify how residuals will. meet the pathogen reduction requirements: a. For DistributionlLandAmlicatio� o Class .A or Equivalent: A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids, or A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids. AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals): 0 Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(A)] - Thne/Temperature Compliance. Alternative 2 [IS Alternative 3 [15 ❑ Alternative 4 [15 A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(B)l - Alkaline Treatment. A NCAC 02T. 1106 b 3 C Prior Testing for Enteric i*wusjViable Helminth Ova. A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova. Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Patho ens PFRP . Specify one: composting, [� heat dry ingi heat treatment, [] thermophilic aerobic digestion, beta ray irradiation, [� gamma ray irradiation, or 0 pasteurization. b. For LandApprieatio� of Class B: Alternative 1 [I SA NCAC 02T. I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration. Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(c)(2)] -Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP). Specify one: � aerobic digestion, a� diryffig, anaerobic digestion'. composting, or lime stabilization. c. For Surface Disposak Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7a. above. El Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7b. above. Exempt - If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in item 11, 8. below [I5A NCAC 02T. I 106(a)(2)]. �Q Not Applicable -Non-Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution. 8. Vector Attrae-finn Rednrtinn /VARI• PPr sae rTrer nIT i ins Atraie 2 [5 Atraie 3 [5 Atraie 4 [5 ----- - , Ly%....y ..mow .w�uua„ wui „�cc� uic vruc requirements: A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(1)] - 38%Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion). A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(2)] - 40-Dav Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion). A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(3)] - 30-DII Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion). A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion). Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.ll07(a)(5)] - 14-Dwv Aerobic Processes. Alternative 6 [1 5A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization. ❑ Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(7)] -Drying of Stabilized Residuals. Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(8)] -Drying ofUnstabilized Residuals. Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(9)] -Injection. Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(1. 0)] - Incorporation. Ej Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only -Soil/Other Material Cover [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(b)(2)]. �] Not Applicable -Non-Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution. Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface. FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 5 of 5 r z 6diklg r i I< L � � � +.� err air �� : '�• rt pp -IT i Fl11^ik ` 4 y ip AD = •.riF � •+ a 4t F x {r i At F # t wr i1 ■}+ air r� +# _ 4 V-Pi rY I Residuals Sampling Plan Town of Farmv111e Land APplication Program (WQ0008778) FarmviIle Wastewater Treatment Plant Nutrients and Metals Analysis Sampling Point: Basin Sampling Frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied Sample Type Composite Lab: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pathogen Sampling Pont; Basin Sampling frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied Sample Type: Grab Lab: Cameron Testing Vector (30-day benchtop test) TCLP piing Point.* Basin piing Frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied Sample Type.* Composite Lab: Cameron Testing Samp Samp ling Point*, Basin ling Frequency: Annually Sample Type: Composite Lab: Summit Environmental Tcchnologics,Inc Quantitative Justification for Residuals Production The Town of Farmville's WWTP1"S currently permitted for 500 dry tons per year of land applied blosolids, There is no request t o change this dry tonnage justification is based on the number of dry tons applied in the pas Facility: Fannville WWTP Requested permitted rate0 : Current: 500 dry tons/year Proposed: 500 dry tons/year Just ification: 2018 — 33.24 dry tons 2019 — 23.58 dry tons 2020 — 59.02 dry tons Average — 38.6 dry tons applied . Quantitative t 3 years,. Chris Wynne Technical Services Specialist Summit Environmewal Technologies, Inc. to nil* IT 3310 Win St. U 1IR NM NT : , TECHNOLOG !F S. INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Anw1yMcM tabora January 25, 2021 Alex Fox Synagro 284 Boger Rd. Mocksvi'lle, NC 27028 TEL: FAX4- RE: Fannville WWTP Dear Alex Fox: TEL: (330) 2534211 E4X.• (330) 253-4484 Website: htW:Ilwww.settek.com Order No.: 21010359 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 1/8/2021 for the analyses presented in the following report. There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted in the Case Narrative. Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits except where noted. If you have any questions regarding these bests results, please feel free to call the laboratory. Sincerely, Jennifer Woolf Project Manager 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Fails, Ohio 44223 Arkansas 89-0735, Catifomia 2943, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0108, FloridaNELAC E87688, Idaho OH00923, Mims 1, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Undergound Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Maryland 339, Michigan 9988, Mi e ota 1780279, Nevada -1, New Hampshire 2996., New Jersey OH006, New York 11777, Now Caroha 39705 and 631, Now Dakota R.,201, Ohio DW# Ohio VAP CLOO52, Oklahoma 2019-155,OrcgonOH200001, Pennsylvania 011, Rhodc Island LA000317, South Caroms 92016001, Texas T 1 4 -1 --1 , Utah 0 -1 , Virginia VELAP 103 8 1, Wcst Virginia 9957C Page 1 of 36 CLIENT: nWytka oral Synagro Project; Fannville WWTP Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St, Cuyahoga , Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 W # htW://www.settek.corn WorkOrder Narrative: 21010359,p, This report in its entirely consists of the Analytical Results, QC Summary Report, Applicab Case Narrative WO#: 21010359 Date: 1/25l2021 following documents: Cover Letter, Case Narrative, le Accreditation Information,, Chain -of -Custody, Cooler Receipt Form, and other applicable forms as necessary. All documents contain the Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., Nark Order Number assigned to this report. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom of the cover Letter that may or may not pertain to this report. Please refer to the "Accreditation Program Analytes Report" for accredited analyses list, The information contained in this anal�ical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc, or the customer for which this report was issued. The results contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at different times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsible for use or interpretation of the data included herein. All results for Solid Samples are regorged on an "as received' or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as "dry weight" using the "_dry" designation. on the reporting units, This report is believed to meek all of the requirements of the accrediting agency, where applicable. Any comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below. Analytical Sequence Sample Notes: 21010359-001a CYANIDE, REACTIVE S(9014): Below detection level data was reported based on Total CN data. 21010359-00 la TCLR-SVOC-CPest(808 1B): High recovery(ies) in the CCV indicate high bias. Data deemed acceptable as no target analytes were observed in the field sample(s). Analytical Sequence QC Notes: CCV VOC-MSTR NPW(8260): are ND for this analyte_ CCV exhibits high recovery for Vinyl chloride. All reported samples LCS-47331 TCLPwwVOC=MSTR TCLP(8260): Possible high bias for Vinyl chloride due to high recovery in CCV. Associated samples are N.D. for this analyte. Original Page 2 of 36 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 I;URR...11 11T Win St. O14ME NT ` t h y. , 4 Cuyahoga 'a , Ohio 44223 9- (330) 253-4489 .4 "4101"t TEL 330) 253-8211 FAX. Website: &MI.-Ili.mw.settek.com CLIENT: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP Case Narrative WO#: 21010359 Date: 1/2512021 210103 59-001 ams TCLP-SVOC-CPest(808 I B) a. Possible high bias for Heptachlor and Methoxychlor due to high recoveries in bracketing CCV's. Parent sample is N.D. for these analytes. 21010359-001amsd TCLP-SVOC-CPest(8081B): Possible high bias for Heptachlor and Methoxycblor due to high recoveries in bracketing CCV's. Parent samnle is N.D. for these analvres LUS-47347 "1'CLY-SVOGCPest(80818): Possible hig high recoveries in bracketing CCV's. h bias for Heptachlor and Methoxychlor due to MBw47347 TCLP-. SVOC-CPest(80 8 1 B): High recovery(ies) in the CCV indicate high bias. Data deemed acceptable as no target analytes were observed in the field sample(s). Original. Page 3 of 36 Summit Environmental Techgies, In 3310 Win ,( CuFulls, Ohio 2.9 , TEL: (330) 25.3-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-446 Qualifiers and Acronyms These commonly used Qualifiers and Acronyms may or may not be present in this report. Qualifiers Wo#: 21010359 Date 1/25/2021 U The compound was analyzed for but was not detected. J The reported value is greater than the Method Detection Limit but less than the Reporting Limit. H The hold time for sample preparation and/or analysis was exceeded. D The result is reported from a dilution. E The result exceeded the linear range of the calibration or is estimated due to interference. MC The result is below the Minimum Compound Urnit, � The result exceeds the Regulatory Limit or Maximum Contamination Limit. m Manual integration was used to determine the area response. d Manual integration in winch peak was deleted N The result is presumptive based on a Mays Spectral library search assuming a 1:1 response_ P The second column confirmation exceeded 25°/p difference.. C The result has been confirmed by GUMS. X The result was not confirmed when GUMS Analysis was performed. BfMB+ The analyte was detected in the associated blank, G The GCB or CCB contained reportable amounts of analyte. QC-/+ The CCV recovery failed low (-) or high (+). R/QDR The RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits. QLm/+ The LCS or LCSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+). QLR The LCS/LCSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits. QM-/+ The MS or MSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+). QMR The MS/MSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits. QV-,/+ The ICV recovery failed low (-) or high (+). S The spike result was outside of accepted recovery limits. Z Deviation; A deviation from the method was performed; Please refer to the Case Narrative for additional information .acronyms ND Not Detected RL Reporting Limit QC Quality Control MILL Method Detection Limit MB Method Blank LOD Level of Detection LCS Laboratory Control Sample L Q Level of Quantitation LCSD Lra oratmy Control Sample Duplicate P L Practical uantitation Limit. QCS ualit Control Sample C QL Contract Required Quanfitation Limit i P Duplicate PL Permit Limit MS Maw Spike RegLvI Regulatory Limit MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate MCL Maximum Contamination Limit RPD Relative Percent Different MinCL Minimum um Compound Lln-�t CV Initial Calibration Verification RA Reanalysis ICB Initial Calibration lank RE Reextraction CCU' Continuing Calibration Verification TIC Tentatively Identified Compound CCB • *- Continuing Calibration Blank RT Retention Time ILC Reporting Licit Check CF Calibration Factor DF Dilution Factor RIF Response Factor This list of Qualifiers and Acronyms reflects the most commonly utilized Qualifiers and Acronyms for reporting. Please refer to the Analytical Notes in the Case Narrative for any Qualifiers or Acronyms that do not appear in this list or for additional information regarding the use of these Qualifiers on reported data. original Page 4 of 36 CLIENT: Project: Summit Environmental men ch olo s, Inc. U ill"#% IT 3310 Win s. aayr" synagro Farmville WWTP Lab SamplefD Client Sample M o lizzi DEL: 33 2 -2 X- 3 253-4489 Workorder Sample Summary Tag No Date Collected Date Received W: 21010359 254an-21 Matrix Slu su Page 5 of 36 F ..-I */yftaJ bor4e Client: Project: Sample I 21139-1 Synagro Farmville WWTP Client Sample ED Fannville WWTP TSuinmit Environmental Technologies, Inc. DATES REPORT 33 10 Win St. 4 wr Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX- (330) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359 1 i : ham.- w w. corn 25-Jan-21 Collection Date Matrix Test Name 1 2 21 1230:00 PM Sludge 1gnitabi11t Solids SW- : 1030) pH (SW9045D) Reactive Cyanide (901 .3.3,2 -Solid Reactive Sulfide 37.3.4.2 TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8 32 1 TCLP Herbs cides by EPA 8 321 Leachate Date TCLP Mercury Analysis S W 1311 1 1 2 021 : PM TCLP Metals Analysis SW 131.1 6 1 ' 1 1 2 21 6:00.-Oo Pm TCLP Pesticides Analysis (Svc 13117 1 1 2 21 6:00:00 PM TCLP Pesticides Analysis SW 1311 1 1 2 21 6.00:00 PM TCLP Semi -Vol tiles Analysis (SW /8270) TCLP Volatiles Analysis Prep Date Analysis Date 1 13 2 1 11:1 :5 AM 1 1 2021 12 t 1: 1 3 PM 1 1 2 21 :2 :0 PM 1 19221 1 1 72 21 . : PM 1 23 2 21 2: 3. AI 1`1221 2:3: PM 11221 1:19: AM 11 2 1 1:1 : PM 1192 1 1:3:33 AM 1 1 2 21 11: : M. .1. 1 2 21 : 1: PM 1 1 2 1 11: : AID 1 1 2 21 6:1 : 1 M 11 2 1 : : P1 11 221399: 00 AM Original Page 6 of 36 !11;u .. R-1vilir Jyic ENVIRONMENTAL TtL:riANc)torpr'-4; nasytiC CLIENT: Matrix: Lab ID: Synagro SLUDGE 21010359-OOIA Project: Farmville WWTP Client Sample ]ED Farmville WWTP Analyses Summit Environmental Th o o ie , 171c. 3370 Win St. Cuyahoga Falk, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 Websi : .III. ttk. core Result TCLP METALS, VOCj BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID TCLP PESTICIDES ANALYSIS (SW131118081) Chlordane, total Toxaphene ndrin gamma -BHA Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Methoxychlor Surr: TCMX Surr: DCB TCLP HERBICIDES BY EPA 8321B 2 v- 21,'T Surr: 2,4-Dichlorophenylacefic aci Analyt0' ical Report (base report) WO#: 21010359 Date Reported: 1/25/2021 Tag Number: Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12:30:00 PM RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SW8081 SW3510C Analyst: CSS ND 0.0250 mglL 1 1/19/2021 8:31:00 PM ND 0.0500 mg/L 1 1/19/2021 8:31:00 PM ND 0.00250 mglL 1 1119/2021 8;31:44 PM Na 0•00250 m9/L 1 1f19/2021 8:31:00 PM ND 0.00250 QC+ mg/L 1 1/19/20218:31 .00 PM ND 0--00250 mglL 1 1119/2021 8"31000 PM ND 0.00250 QC+ mg1L 1 1l1912021 8:31:00 PM 71.4 10 - 119 %Rec 1 1119l2421 8:31:00 PM 83.9 10 -119 %Rec. 1 1/19/2021 8.-31A-00 PM SW832 S nalyst: JPG ND 0.500 L 50 23 20 1 2:43:00 AM ND 0.500 50 1 2 2o21 2:43:00 AM it o- 13o %Rec 50 132 22:43:00 AM TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID TCLP VOLATILES ANALYSIS -Dichloroethene e e 1 .2-Dichloroethane MK Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chloro enzen Chloroform Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Vinyl chloride Surr: - r mo uoro en ene Surr: Dibromoflucromethane Burr: Toluene-d8 SW1 311 M Analyst: MES ND 0.250 m91 0 f2021 3:29:Q0 AM ND 0.250 mglL 50 1/19120213:29-00 AM ND 5,00 mglL 50 I119/2021 3:29:00 AM ND 0.250 mg/L 50 1/19/2021 3:29:40 AM ND 0.250 mg/L 50 1/19/2021 3:29:00 AM ND 2.50 mglL 50 1119l2021 3:29:00 AM ND 0.250 mglL 50 1/19/2021 3:29:00 AM ND 0.250 mg!!. 50 1 119f202 1 3:29:00 AM ND 0.250 mglL 50 1/19/2021 3: 29:OQ AM Nth 0.100 QC+ mg/L 50 1/19/2021 3:29:00 AM 96.4 70- 130 %Rec 50 1/19l2021 3:29:00 AM 97.9 70 - 930 %Rec 50 111912021 3:29=00 AM 99.4 70 - 1 3Q %Rec 50 7119f2021 3:29:00 AM Qualifierse,Aaalyte detected in the associated Method .flan Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded AW Value is below MI*nimum Compound limit. ND Not Detected PL Pennit Limit L Reporting Detection Limit Vatue above an it ti range M Manual Integmtion used to determine area response N' Tentatively identified. compounds Second colunm confwmation exceeds 1-7 a�%;QY� ;uvlUven Linul5 On'ginal U Samples with CalcVal c Ml}L Page 8 of 36 CLIENT: Matrix: Lab ID: Synagro SLUDGE 21010359-OOIA Project: Farmville WWTP Client Sample 11D Farmville WWTP Analyses SumrnitEnvironmental Technologies, 111c. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Fails, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX. (330) 253.4,489 Wi - hunt-1.settee Result TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -,SOLID TCLP MERCURY ANALYSIS (SW1 311/7470) TCLP Mercury ND TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB-I)LID TCLP METALS ANALYSIS (SWI 31116010) TCLP Arsenic(As) TCLP Barium(Ba) TCLP Cadmium(Cd) TCLP Chromium(Cr) TCLP Lead(Pb) TCLP Selenium(Se) TCLP Silver(Ag) An alytical Report (base report) WO#: 21010359 Date Rennrted Tag Number: Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12E,30-000 PM RL Qual Units 0.00200 rL SW7470A 1 / 1 DF Date Analyzed SW7470A Analyst: ERA 1 111912021 10:1 :00 A SW3010A Analyst: EAM ND 0,500 mglL I191202170;35,33AM ND 5.00 mglL 1 1/19/2021 10:35:33 AM ND 0.100 mg1L 1 111912021 1 0:35:33 AM ND 0.2E70 mg/L 1 1/19/2021 1035,33 AM ND 0.500 mglL 1 1/19/2029 10:35:33 AM ND 0.0500 m gIL 1 1/ 19/2021 10 :35:33 AM ND 0.500 mg1L 9 9/19/2021 10:35:33 AM TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERBmSOLID TCLP SEMInVOLATILES ANALYSIS (SW1311/8270) SW8270 SW3510C Analyst: SFG 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.200 mg/L 2 1l1912021 6:19:00 PM 2,45-Trichlorpphenol ND 0.500 mg/L 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM 2,4, 6-Trichlorophenal N D 0.500 mgfL 2 1 f1912421 6,19-00 PM 2,4-Dinitrotoiuene ND 0.100 m9/L 2 1119/2021 6:19:D0 PM Cresols, Total ND 10.0 mglL 2 1/19/2021 6:'! 9:00 PM Nexachloro-1,3-butac�iene ND 0.0400 mg/L 2 1/19/2Q2'# fi:19:00 PM Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.100 mglL 2 1/19/2021 6:19:00 PM Hexach►loroethan� ND 0.200 mg/L 2 1l1912021 6:19:00 PM Nitrobenzene ND 0200 mg/L 2 1/19/2021 6:19;00 PMPe�tachloraphenol ND 0.504 mg/L 2 1/�i 9/2021 6:19:00 PM Pyridine ND 0.500 mglL 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM Surr: 2-Fiuorophenol 71.4 10- 157 %Rec 2 1/1912021 6:19:00 PM Surr: Phenol-d6 79.6 10-169 %Rec 2 1119/2021 6:19:00 PM Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 74.1 32.1 - 130 %Rec Z 1/19/20216:19:00 PM Sum., 2,4,6-Tribromaphenol 93.2 45.4 - 1fi5 %Rec 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM Surr: 2-F1uorobiphenYl 66.1 35.7-130 %Rec 2 1/1912021 6:19:00 PM Sum p-Terphenyl-d14 103 74.7 - 345 %Rec 2 1/19/2021 6:19:00 PM Qualiffierso, B A al to detected In the associated Method Blank Holding th-nes for preparation or analysis exceeded MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit. ND Not Detected L Permit Limit RL Reporting DIetection Lint Value above quantitation range ----� _ M Manual Integration used to determine area response N Tentatively identified compounds P Second column confirmation exceeds RPD outsidcaccepted recovery ts 0 .g in a . Samples with CalcVal < MDL Page 7 of 36 CLIENT: Matrix: Lab ID: Project9 : Summit Environmental TTech o o i , Inc. UM41" lot 3310 Win A Synagro SLUDGE 21010359-OOIA Farmville WWTP Client Sample ED Farmville _WWTP Analyses o ir Unio qqZZJ EL: (330) 2 - 2 Fes• (330) 253-4489 Analytical Report (base report) WO#: 21010359 Date Reported; 1/25/2021 Tag Number: Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12:30:00 PM Qual Units DF Date Analyzed RCI SW9014 Analyst: JAP REACTIVE CYANIDE (90141733*2)mSOLID Cyanide, Reactive ND 0.962 mg/Kg 1 1 /1 7f2021 4:20_00 PM IGNITABILITY OF SOLIDS (SWw846:1030) SW1030 Analyst: SEE Igr1ltability nonflammable mm/sec 1 1l13/2021 11::5fi AM RCI SW9045D Analyst: VVK PH (SW9045D) PH 6.7 s,u.@20.00 'I 'l113I2021 12:15:93 PM RCI SW9434 analyst: JAP REACTIVE SULFIDE (9034)/7.3,,4.2 Sulfide, Reactive ND 25.0 mg/Kg 1 �119l2Q21 Qualifiers: B Anaiyte detected in the associated Method Blank -- -- --- E Value above quantitative range H Holding; times for preparation or analysis exceeded M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit. N Tentatively identified compounds ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit R R.PD outside accepted recovery limits Original ItL Reporting Detection Limit U Samples with CalcVal < MDL Page 9 of 36 Su J;UI RM41T A -rwWyrEcsq L,raIafts Client: Synagro Project: Farmvffle WWTP Sample JID 21010359-OOIA Matrix Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Mudge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Mudge Sludge Sludge Sludge Lodge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Sludge Key NC—WW.SCM A Accredited mmit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) -- 2 FAX.- Wi : httRL1www.settek.com Test Name Ignitability of Solids (SW-846: I 030) pH (SW9045D) Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.3-2)-Solid Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.4.2 TCLP Herbicides by EPA 83215 TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8321 B TCLP Mercury Analysis (SWI 311/7470) TCLP Metals Analysis (SWI 311/6010) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/60 10) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/60 10) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311 /6010) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/6010) TCLP Metals Analysis (SW13 i 1/601 U) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 13 11/8 0 8 1) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311/808 1) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808 1) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808 1) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/808 1) TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808 TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311/8 08 1) TCLP Semi-Voiatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SWI311/8270) TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Volaiiies Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-VoIatiles Analysis (SWI 311/8270) TCLP Semi-Voiatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270) TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SWI 311/8270) Key NC VVW SCM N Not Accredited Accreditation Program Anal ytes Report WO#* 21010359 25-Jan-21 State: NW Program Name: NC ww SCM Analyze Ignitability Hydrogen Ion (pH) Cyanide, Reactive Sulfide, Reactive 2,,�-Tp �+ Mercury Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Dead Selenium Silver Chlordane, total dri gay-C Heptachlor Reptachlor epoxide Met ,oxyc ilor Toxaphene 1, - is hlorobc ne 21., -Tric loco e of Cresols, Total Hexachlorobenzene e.c lorobt adi e c Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol Pyridine Status A A N 1 0 0 V Fj F1 0 0 4 _,a M 0 M 0 0 0 0 A A 0 Original # 1 Page 10 of 36 AneVy"" LsbOr'&ll~ Client,: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP Sample I 21010359-OOIA NC—WW—SCM Matrix Summit Environmental Tec no ogle , Inc. 3 310 Win S. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-82I1 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 W si : &W--11www.settek.com rrr��. Test Ne Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis Sludge, TCLP Volatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP Voatile Analysis Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP VolatileVolatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP VolatileVolatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis Sludge TCLP Volafiles Analysis Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis Key -- A Accredited NC WW SM Key N Not Accredited Accreditation Program Analytes Report WO#% 21010359 25-Jan-21 State: NW Program Name: NC WW SCM Alyt 1 11-ielorote 1,2 - i l r tan 2-taoe Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Cloone Cirm Tetrachloroetbene rielroetee Vinyl chloride Status An W 01 W- 0 _a 0 M 0 Original # 1 Page 11 of 36 Client: ENVIAONWENTAL Synagro Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 33 10 Win St. Cuyaho Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL.- 2 - 2 FAX.253-4489 Website." htW:Ilwww.settek.com QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 2-Jan-2 u..:..tiin. eeqai Project: Farmvil e W W TF aiLu.��. Sample ID.- 1 Client ID: PBS Analyt 12-Dichloroethane MK Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Ch lorobenzene Chloroform Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Vinyl chloride Sum. 4-Bromofluorobenzene Suer: Dibromofluoromethane Surr: Toluene-d Sa Ty : M BLK Batch ID: 47331 Result ND ND ND ND D N ND D D 2360 2410 2450 T tCod : TCLP - C-M Units: mqJL TstNo. SW8260 SW1311 M PQL S K Value SPK Ref Val 0.250 0.250 .00 .25 0,250 2.50 0,250 0.250 0.250 0.100 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J Analyte detected below q antitation limits ID Not Detected. PD outside accepted recovery limits Prep rate: Analysis Date: 1/1712021 1 12021 %REC Lo Llr it HighLimit R D Ref Vail 20 94.6 70 130 2500 96.4 70 130 2500 .1 70 13 RunNo: 122624 SIB: 303 %R D RPDLi it Value above q a titatio range ldir times for preparation a.li Manual Integyation used to determine area, response MC Value is below Minimum Compound Second column confirmation exceeds Reporting Detection Limit PL Pen -nit Lini t S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco Qual QC+ Original Page 12 of 36 cuents ENVIAO-NMENTAL TICCHNOLOGIFSINC AMo�O$c* Lah�owmtftwios Synagro Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TES.: 2 -- 2 FAX.253-4489 QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#-. 21010359 25-fan-21 Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: 47331 Sample ID: 211 3 40'CAMS Client I: Analyse BatchQC Same ype: MI5 T stC de: TC1. P-VOC.-1 Units. r L Batch ID: 47331 TestNo: SW8260 SW1311M Result P L SPEC value S K Ref Val Prep Date Analysis Date: 1/1 2 2 %REC LowLimit Hi hl-imit RPD Ref Val 1 1 -Di hl r ethene 1.07 0.2501.00 0 107 13.6 202 12-Dichloroethane 0.954 0.250 1.00 0 95.4 . 13 MEK IUD 5.00 5.00 0 91.3 65.3 11 Benzene 1.03 0,250 1.00 0 103 49.2 1 45 Carbon tetrachloride 0.933 0.250 1.00 0 93.3 26.7 1 56 Chlorobenzene ND 2.50 1.00 0 94.2 33.7 1 59 Chloroforrn 0.986 0.250 1.00 0 98.6 48.51 45 Te r e ler ethene 0.880 0.250 1.00 0 88.0 19.2 1 91 Trichloroethene 0.897 .2 o 1.00 0 89.738.4 167 Vinyl chloride 1.31 0.100 1.00 131 27.3 161 S rr. 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2520 2500 101 91.7 109 S rr: Dibromofluoromethane 2470 2500 98.7 76.5 11 Burn Toluene-d8 2530 2500 101 94.1 105 Sample ID; 21010360-001AMSD S rnpT pe: MSD Client ID: BatchOC Batch ID: 47331 Result Te tC de: TCLP-VOC- 1 Units, t L Te tl o: SW8260 PQL SPK value SW S P K Fief Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 1 2 21 %REC Lowl-i it Hi hLi it IT'D Ref Val RunNo: 122624 SegN : 3160964 %RPD RPDLimit RunNo: 122624 Se N : 3160965 %RPD RPDLimit 1.12 0.20 1.0 0 112 13.6 22 1.0.72 2 ``k`k r thane F . 0.250 1.00 5. 55.7 13 0.954 0,314 2. Benzene 1.05 0.250 1.00 0 105 49.2 145 1.03 1.39 2 Qualifiers: B AnalAnalyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H , Holdingtips for preparation or analNo J Analdetected belov quantitationlimits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Pen -nit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Repoiling Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted l tern Qua] QC+ Original Page 13 of 36 AOil Mfg" Client: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP Sample ID: 21010360-001AMSD S pTy : MSD Client I D: BaC An l yt Carbon tetrachlohde Chlorobenzene Chloroform Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Vinyl chloride Surr 4-Bromofluorobenzene S rr: Dibrornofluoromethane S rr. T luen -M Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falk, Ohio 44223 L: 2 1 ,SAX. 253-4489 Batch ID: 47331 Result T s C d:TCLP-11 C- Units: r L T tN : SW8260 PQL SPK value SW1311M SPK Ref Val QC SUMMARY REPORT W0#-. 21010359 25-Jam-21 BatchID: 47331 Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 1 /2 1 % EC L rLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val I I : 122624 Sgfo: 3160965 %RPD RPDLimit 0.977 02501.00 0 9T7 26.7 156 0.933 4.61 25 IND 2.50 1.00 0 95.2 33.7 159 0 0 2 1.01 0.2501.0 101 48.5 145 0.986 2.21 2 0,867 0.250 1.00.7 19.2 1 .49 2 .912 0.250 1.0091.2 38.4 167 0.897 1.60 2 1.40 0.1001.0 140 27.3 161 1.31 6.05 2 2470 2500 98.9 9*1.7 109 2 2500 20 9. 75.5 118 2 2560 2500 94.1 105 2 Qualifiers: 13 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H J Amatyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response M ND Not Detected P Second column eonfin tion exceeds P RPD outside accepted recovery 1 imits RL ReportingDetection. Limit S Holding times for Preparation or anal* Value is below Minimum Compound Permit Limit Spike Recovery outside accepted reco al QC+ original Page 14 of 36 Ctient.0 #will ENlrii70 MAEw7 P.lKY U 16w HNOi': bf kilf 5r 44'M AnsIy L49bW*p~ Synagro Suinmit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 W s: : wo w., :.#om QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#q 21010359 25-Jan-2I Project: Fannville WWTP BatchID: 47345 Sample ID: TCLP BLANK 1 146 S Ty : MBLK T s C d: M-TCLP.7 Units: mg/L Client ID: PBS Balch ID: 47345 Tes#No: SW6010D SW3010A Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val TCLP Arsenic(As) ND 0.500 TCLP Bariurn(Ba) ND SAfl TCLP Cadmium(Cd) NO 0•100 TCLP Chromium(Cr) ND 0•200 TCLP Lead(Pb) ND 0.500 TCLP Selenium(Se) Na 0.0500 TCLP Silver(Ag) ND 0.500 Sample ID: TCLP BLANK 2 1.16 S m Ty : MBLK T tC l : Mt1-TCLP- Units: mg Client ID: PBS Batch ID; 47345 TestNo: SW6010D SW3010A Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val TCLP Arsenic(As) ND 0.500 TCLP Bariurn(Ba) ND 5.04 TCLP Cadmium(Cd) ND 0.100 TCLP Chromium(Cr) ND 0.200 TCLP Lead(Pb) ND 0.500 TCLP Selenium(Se) ND 0.0500 TCLP Siiver(Ag) ND 0.500 Prep Date: 1118/2021 Analysis Date: 1 1 1 1 °S EC LowLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val Prep Date: 1 2021 Analysis Date-, 1 1 1 %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val R nNo: 122637 S I o: 3161701 %RPD RPI Urnit Qua] R 1 : 122637 SeqNo.- 3161702 %RPD R DUmit Qualffiersq& B Analyte detected in the associatedMetbod Blank E Value above quantitationo preparation or analk J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Intention used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound ND Not Detected. P Second column confirmation e ce ds PL Pennit Limit RPD outside accepted recovery liniiis RL Reporting Detection Umit S Spike Recovery outside accepted repo Quaff Original Page 15 of 36 Client: Summit Environmental Technologies, U JV1 rA 111 3310 Win St_ ENVIRONMENTAL TIC - G; , W y1JCtom Synagiro 'uuyanoga tabs, urno qLf .z LO 2 Y 2 1 Fes- , _ -4489 Website2:11www.settek.com QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 25-Jun-21 D,.a,.1.iT. A^I'SAG Project: Farmville W W'1'F NNW - Sample ID- III 34 STp: MBLK TestCode-. Mtl-TCLP.7(6 Units: mg/L Client ID: PBS Bach ID: 47345 TestNo; SW6010D SW3010A Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val TCLP Arsenic(As) ND 0.504 TCLP Barium(Ba) ND 5,00 TCLP Gadmium(Cd) ND 0.100 TCLP Chrorniurn(Cr) ND 0.200 TCLP Lead(Pb) ND 0.500 TCLP Selenium(Se) ND 0.0500 TCLP Si1ver(Ag) ND 0.500 Prep Date. Analysis Late: 12 '1 % EC LowlLimit Highl.imit RPDRef Val Sample ID: LCS 345 S pT . LCS T stC d . l#TCLPUnits: L Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 47345 TostNo: SW601 OD S 3 1 Anal to Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Prep Date: 1 2 2 Analysis Date: 1/7812021 LowL.ir 'ft HighLimit RPD Ref Val TCLP ri 0-500 2.000 0 88.4 80 120 TGLP ri* 5.00 2.000 o 120 TCLP C m 1 uCd) 1.95 0.100 2.000 o 97.4 80 120 TCLP Chromium(Cr) 2. 2 0.2 1 80 120 TCLP Lead(Pb) 1.92 0.500 2.000 o 95.8 80 120 TCLP Selenium(Se) 1.98 0.o o 2yo o o 98.8 80 120 TCLP Silver 2.02 0.500 2.o o o 101 80 120 Qualiffers: 1B Analyte detected in the associated Method. Blank. E Value above quantitation r Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL RPD outside accepted recovery limits Reporting Detection Limit S nNo 122583 S Igo: 3160416 %RPD RPLiit S : 3160417 %RPD RP[ Limit Holding times for preparation or anal Value is below Minfinum Cornpound Pennit Limit Spike Recovery outside accepted reed Original Page 16 of 36 Client: Arwyftw � - - . - IF 6WW Synagro Summit nirm . a Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 4422 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489 Website: ha://www.seUek.com QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 2-Jun-2 Project: Farmville WWTF ID Line 47345 4M P "01 Ipm Sample ID: 21010699-OOIAMS Sam T p : MS T Co : Mt1,,TCL . Units: r L Prep Date: 1118/2021 Client ID: SatchQC Batch ID: 47345 T tN : SW6010D SW3010A AnalysisDate. 1/1812021 Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val °a1 EC L 1 Limit Hi hL1mIt RPD Ref Val TCLP r nl ) 1.84 0.500 2.000 Or00292491.7 70 13 TCLP u ND 5.002.000 0.1995 87.670 130 TCLP Cadmium C 1.85 0.100 2z000 o 92.5 70 130 TCLP Chrorni Cr 1.82 0.200 2.000 0 91.2 70 130 TCLP Lead(Pb) 1.64 0.5002.000 0 82.0 70 13 TCLP Selenium(Se) 2.21 0.0500 2,000 0.01535 110 70 13 TCLP Silver 2.00 0.500 2.000 o 1 70 130 r Ll!" Now 122 S q1 : 3160422 %RPD RPDLimit Qual Sample 1D_ 21010699401AMSD Sara . MSD TestCodef. 1 t1-TCLP. Units: /L Prep Date: 1118/2021 1 u nNo. 122583 Client 1D: BatchQC Batch ID: 47345 T st1 . SW6010D SW3010A Analysis Date. 111812021 S c No. 3160423 Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit 1 PD Pet" Val %RPD RP Li 1t TCLP Arsenic(As) 1.76 0.500 2,.oo 0.002924 88.1 70 130 1.837 4.02 2 TCLP ND 5.00 2.000 0.1995 83.2 70 130 0 o 2 TCLP Cadrnium(Cd) 1.7 0.100 2.000 0 88.8 70 130 1.850 4--092 TCLP {dry 'F 1.75 0.200 2.000 0 87.3 70 130 1.823 435 2 1iP Lead(Pb) 1.59 0.500 2.000 0 79.4 70 130 1.639 3.17 2 TCLP l r ids 2.14 0.0500 2.000 0-01535 106 70 130 2.207 2.91 2 TCLP Silver(Ag) 1.91 0.500 2.000 0 95.6 70 130 2.002 4.62 20 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Btank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anab, J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Conipound ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Repoiling Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted r co Qual O1 riginal Page 17 of 36 ut INC AsIMy��iil cat: Summit nv o r Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls., Ohio 44223 TEL.- (330) 2- F.X. 253-4489 SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 25- Tan-2 Project: Farmville WW'L'Y BtchID47346 Synagro Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS Client ID: n l t BatchQC Sam pTyp : NIS To tCod : SVOC-BNAT Units: /L Batch ID., 47346 T st lo: SW8270 S 3 1 C Result PQL SK value SPK Re# Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1/1812021 1 /18 2 21 %REC LowLi it HighLimit RPDRefVal 14-Dichlorobenzene Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS Client ID: n l t BatchQC Sam pTyp : NIS To tCod : SVOC-BNAT Units: /L Batch ID., 47346 T st lo: SW8270 S 3 1 C Result PQL SK value SPK Re# Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1/1812021 1 /18 2 21 %REC LowLi it HighLimit RPDRefVal 14-Dichlorobenzene 0.624 0.200 0.8000 0 78.0 15.2 12 -Trichl rr h I 0.864 0.5000.8000 08 30.6 152 2,4,6-Trichicrophenol 0.833 0.500 0.8000104 27.6 1 50 21 -D i it ro olu 0.920 0.100 0.8000 0 115 58 1'1 -Cresol 0.802 0.500 0.8000 0 10 26.9 132 Hexachl cro-1 3~b t di ne 0.651 0.0400 0.8000 1. 1 Hexachicrobenzene 0.740 0.100 0.8000 0 92.6 54.3 142 Hexachloroethane 0.612 0.200 0.8000 0 76.51.92 131 Nitrobenzene 0.762 0.200 0.8000 0 95.2 21 135 Prrd' r D 0.500 0.8000 o 26. 10 13 Surr: 2-Fluoropherol 0.859 1.000 85.9 .77 1 46 Burr. Phenol--M 0.962 1.000 96.2 20.7 130 Surr: Nitr n-d5 0.869 1.000 86.9 13.9 156 Su r. -Tri r m o hen l 1.25 1.000 125 27.3 183 Sint 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.743 1.000 74.3 21.4 153 Sum-. p-TerphenyW14 1.14 1.000 114 54.8154 Sample ID: 1'i 3-OOIAMSD S pT p : MSD Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID: 47346 Analyte Result T tCod : S oC N T Units: m /L T t l: SW8270 SW351 C PL SK value SPK Ref Val Qualifiers: B Anatyto detected in the associated Method Blank Analyte detected below quantitation limits M ND Not Detected P RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Prep Date: 111 /2 2 Analysis Date: 111812021 %REC LowLi it HighLi it RPD Ref Val Value above quantitation range Manual integration used to determine area response Second colum-n confirmation exceeds Reporting orti Detection Limit RunNo: 122610 S eq No: 3161396 %RP[D RIDDLimit Qual RunN : 122610 Sq Igo: 3161397 RPDLi it Holding times for preparation or anab 40 MC 'value is below Minimum Compound L Pen -nit Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted tern Original Page 18 of 36 Client: Amoimll~ L." 41 .. - syna,gro Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 33oWin St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL.- (330) 253-8211 FAX- (330) 253-4489 Websi*te: htW,-11www.settek. con? QC SUMMARY REPORT Project: Farmville WWTY BatchID: 47346 WO#*W 21010359 2, _ n-2 Sample ID: 191 ►MS Sara T . MSD T tC d _ SVOC-BNA T Units: Ong/L Prep Date. 111812021 F 1 . 122610 Client ID: Bate C Batch ID: 47346 TestNovp SW8270 SW351 C Analysis Date: 11 /2 21 S N : 3161397 Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RP Umit A-Dichlorobenzene . o .20 M 0 5. .2 124 41 23 .5 o i nol 0.9080.500 0.8000114 30.6152 0.8640 4.97o 2,4,6-Trich [crop he n# 0.873 0.500 0.8000 0 109 27.6 150 0.8332 4.64 3 - r o 0,800D 0 107 26.9 132 0.8020 6.33 3 Hexachloro-1 3--b t d i n 0.0400 . 000 0 84.8 10 156 0.6512 4.09 3 Hexachlorobenzene 0.779 0.10097.4 54.3 142 0.7396 5.21 3 .`;�+'�E bane 0.679 0.200 0.8000 0 84.81.92 131 0.6116 10.4 3 Nitrobenzene . 44 0.200 0.8000106 21 135 0.7616 10.3 3 Pthlrpb col 0.924 0.500 0.8000 0 116 47.4 134 O�8760 5.33 30 Pyridine Sum. 2-Fluorophenol 0.946 1.000 94.6 9.77 14 rr: Phenol- 6 f 0.966 1.000 96.6 20.7 13 Su rr, -T ri brornophenol 1.38 1.000 138 27.3 183 Surr. -1u r bibey l 0.767 1.000 76.721.4 153 urr, -Ter ben l- 14 1.21 1.000 121 54.8 154 Qualifiers: Anal detected i the associated Method Blank E Value above an#i# .ti range H ldi� ��� forpreparation. �-0 J Analyte detected below quantitationlimits M Manual Int g ti n used to deter-minearea response MC Value is below Minimum Compound ID Not Detected P Second column confirination exceeds PL P nit Limit D 1u.t i .e accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted. reco Original Page 19 of 36 Client: Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. lu III" A 3310 Win St. r CuyahogaFalls, Ohio 22 ENVIRONMA OWWv""i Loborstoo0a E 2 - Fes• 253-4489 W fi rt h . �► w- com Synagro QC SUMMARY REPORT D.. a..l.iT. AP72A4 Project: Fann-vil e W WTY aM.u��. Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS Client ID: Aiyt BatchQC Cresols, Total SampType: MS Batch I D : 44 Result ND Sample ID: QC SUMMARY REPORT D.. a..l.iT. AP72A4 Project: Fann-vil e W WTY aM.u��. Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS Client ID: Aiyt BatchQC Cresols, Total SampType: MS Batch I D : 44 Result ND Sample ID: 3 -PlAMS sa Tp : MS Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID49 47346 Ana I t Cresols, Teti Qualiffiters: Result T stC d : SVOC-BNAT Units: L P L SPIN value SPK Ref Val % REC 50.0 1.600 o 347 T stCod : SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L Testa : SW8270 SW351C PL SPK value SPK Ref Val WO#: 21010359 Prep Date: 1/1812021 R nNo. 122695 Analysis Date: 1 12 21 Set : 3165442 LowLimit Hi h Limit R D Ref Val Prep Date: 111812D21 Analysis Date: 111912021 ° S EC LowLimit HighLimit R D Ref Val 2-Jan-2 %RPD RPULirnit Qual Rol I : 122695 SeI : 31644 %RPD RPDLi it IUD 50.0 1.600 o 330 10 148 o Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitatim range H Holding times for preparation or anah J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual hategration used to determinearea. response MC Value is below Minimum Co i ound ND Not Detected. P Second column co rn-lation exceeds PL Pen-nitPen-nit Limit outside accepted recovery limits RL ReportingDetection Limit S Spike Recovety outside accepted r co 30 S Qual S Original Page 20 of 36 S;U A rm0VNroW LA6tW01041" Client; Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP Sample ID: Client I: PBS Analyte 1, --1 lohlorohenn 2, , -Tri oh l o roph e l 2,, -rie l orohel 2+[ l itr tol orye o-Cresol Cresols, Total H exachlor - 1 , 3-buta d iene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol Pyridine Sum 2-F luorop he nol Sure: Ph noW Surr: 2-lorob ihel Sum p^T r enyi- 1 Summit Eilm1 Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 EL 2 - 21 FAX.- 253-4489 W ,5 ." ham.* www. k. om SampT e: MBLK Batch I: 47346 Result D ND N ND ND D N D N N N 0.875 0.931 T tCo e: SVOC-BNAT Units: L Tetlo: S1` P,L 0.100 0.250 0.250 0.0500 0.250 5.00 0.0200 0.0500 0.100 0.10 0.250 0.250 SPK value Qualifiers: B Analytc detected in the associated Method Blank E J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M ND Not Detected R RPDoutside accepted recovery line t.s RL 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 SW31C S P K Fief Val Prep Date* Analysis Date: QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 25-Jan-21 BatchID: 47346 1 12 2 1 111812021 °S EC Lo Limit HighUmit RPDRetVal 87.5 10 130 .1 10 130 89.8 19 130 109 10 130 .1 22 130 110 34 130 Value above quantitation rainge Manual Integration used to delennine area response Second column confirtnation exceeds Reporting Detection Limit RunNo: 122610 Selo: 3160440 %RPD RPI Limit Molding times for preparation or anab MC Value is below Minimum Cotilpound PL Permit Limit S Spike . co cr outside accepted t r co Qua# Original Page 21 of 36 ENVIRONWNTAL Client: Synagro Project; Fannville WWTP Sample I C : LCS 3 6 Client ID: LCSS Anllt 1 , 4^Cicb Iro benzene ,45-Tri h1 r eno1 .4,6-Tricb1 hanot 2,4-U ni ro lu n c-Cresol Cresols, Total He chloro- #3-but dien e t chi ro en erne Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Pentach lorophenol Pyridine Surr: 2- luoro henol Srr: Phenol - Sum Nitr b eneA Surr: 2, 4 a -Tri rcr Ise o1 Surr, 2- l oro i henyl S urr: -r b nl- l Swnrnit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 EL: 330 2 3-FAX- 33 2534489 BatchI D : 47346 Result 0.4 0.982 .942 0.997 0.838 C 0.656 0.778 0.4 0.828 0.902 0.319 0.965 1.06 0.923 1.3 0.768 1.21 T tCo le: SVOC-BNA T nits: r lL T ti : SW8270 PQL 0.100 0.250 0.250 0.0500 0.250 .o o.o oo 0.0500 0.100 ,100 0.250 0.250 S PK value Quits: B Analyte detected In the associated Method Blank E J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M ND Not Detected. P : . RPD outside accepted recovery linaits RL SW3510C S PK Ref Val 0 0 0 0 Prep Cate: Analysis Late: QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#-* 21010359 2-Jan-2 BatchID: 47346 1 12 1 1/1812021 %REC LowL.inn it HighLimit RPDRefVal 0.0 36.4 130 123 31.7 13 118 31.1 13 125 43.3 130 105 32.9 130 107 31.7 130 82.0 31.4 130 .3 43.1 13 80.6 36.5 130 103 39.5 13 13 34 130 39.9 o 130 .5 17.1 130 106 10 13 2.3 32.6 13 139 .3 130 76.8 41.8 130 121 36.4 130 Valueabove quantitation range Manual Integration used to detem-nne area response Second column confirmation exceeds Reporting Detection Limit nNo: 122610 Se lo: 3 441 %RPD RPDLimit Holding times for preparation or anaIN MC Value is below Minimum Con-ipound PL Permit Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco Qua[ S Original Page 22 of 36 Client: l4mOyft* L"-00f'IM Synagro Summi't LnWromnentalTechnologies, Inc. 3310 Wig'. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX., (330) 253-4489 QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 2-.n-2 Project: FarmAlle WWTP BatchID: 4'7347 Sample 1D: 2 1 S r T yp : MS TestCodeff. TCLF -SOC- Units: mq1L Client ID: Farmv1l1 VVWTP Batch ID: 47347 T I o: SW8081 SW351 C Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC ndrin gamma-C Fleptachlor Heptachbr epoxide I I thoxy for Surr: TCIX Surr: DCB Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1/1 2 21 L wL1 it Hi hLi it RPD Ref Val 0.00751 Do oo 0.0100 o 75.1 10 22 O*00798 0.0005000.0100 o 79.8 10 192 0.00971 0.000500 0.0100 0 97.1 1 1 97 0,00868 0.0005000.0100 o 86.8 10 208 0.0115 0.000500 0.0100 o 115 10 251 1 3. 1 20.00 65.5 10 157 16.1 20.00 80.4 10 194 Sample ID: 21010359-001amsd Sam pT r : MS Client 1D: Farmville WVVTP Batch ID: 47347 A1yt Endrin gamma-BHC Heptachlor Fleptachlor epoxide Methoxychlor Surr: TCII Surr: DC Qualifters: J ND Result T C : TCLP-SC-m Units: Ong/L TestNo: SW80 81 P L SPK value SW3510C SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 /1 2 21 %REC LowLi It Hight-lt It RPD Ref Val I I o: 122687 Sq 1: 3165893 % PD RPDLimit Run N : 122687 SegNa: 3965894 %RPD PDL.i it 0.00968 0.000500 0.0100 o 96.8 10 224 0.00751 25.3 0.00837 0.000500 0.0100 0 83.7 10 12 0.00798 4. 77 0.0102 0.000500 0.0100 o 102 10 197 0.00971 4.72 0.002 .00 o 0.0100 92.9 10 208 0.00868 . 1 0.0124 0.000500 0.0100 124 1 251 0.0115 7.1 141 20.00 71.2 10 157 o 17.4 20.00 86.8 10 194 Analyte detected In the associated Mood Blank Analyte detected below quantilation limits M Not Detected L outside accepted recovery tin -fits RL Value above quantitation range H Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Second column confirmation exceeds PL Reporting Detection Limit S Holding times for preparation or anali Value 1s below Minimum Compound Permit Limit Spike Recovery outside accepted reeo Qual M QC+ QC+ ul QC+ QC+ Qriginal Page 23 of 36 Client: Synagro Summit ronmen Technologies, Inc. o Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 EL 25 - FAX: o 253-4489 W i t : hLw.-Ilwww.seuek.com QC SUMMARY RIEPORT WO-#: 21010359 . -Ian- 2 Project: Farfn-v Ile WWTP Batch]OD: 47347 Sample I : LCS-47347 Sa p ype: LCS Te tCode: TCL � oCw- Units: mg/L Prep Date: 1 1 2 21 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 47347 TestNoo, SW8081 S' 351 C Analysis Date: 1/1912021 A ai to Result POL SPK value SPK Ref Val °SRC LowLimit Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val Endrin 0.00711 0.000500 0.0100 0 71.1 10 130 m a- HC 0.00808 0.000500 0.0100 o 80,8 10 130 Heptachlor o,-o9 3 0.000500 0.0100 0 98.3 10 13 Heptachlor epoxide 0.00867 0.000500 0.0100 0 86.710 13 M t o cyo l r 0.0111 0.000500 0.0100 0 ill 10 178 S rr: TCMX 13.4 20.00 66.8 10 130 Surr: DCB 16.6 o.00 82.9 10 13 Sample I : MB-47347 S pTyp : MBLK TestCod : CLP-SC-o Units: m Client ID: PBS Batch ID: 47347 `1" t o: SW8081 SW3510C Aalye Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Chlordane, total Toxaphene Endrin gamma -IC Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Ili etloy lr Burn; TCI X Burr* DCB Prep Date= 1/1812021 Analysis Date: 1/1912021 Lo Li It HighLimit RPD Ref Val 20.00 65.4 ao 119 20.00 82.6 10 119 RIo: 1' Seq i : 3165906 RP L! r R n o: 122687 SegNo: 3165908 Quaff nn QC+ QC+ %RPD RPDLimit Qual QC+ QC+ Qualifiters: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for reparation o anal) J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to dete rmine area response MC Value is below Minimum Cot you d Original ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit outside accepted recovery limits T L Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco Page 24 of 36 Suntnait Environmental Technologies, -Inc.3310 Win St. QC SUMMAR.�Pa1�T 1% .00 R.Y %11��+i�f.�I�F7'��. �"�C�:��#�4�I>���lir � �, :N�' Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 AI�r C.awb�' TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX:{330} 253-4459 WO#W- 21010359 YYebsite: &ttp.-Ilwww.settek.com 2S-Jan-21 Client: Synagro Project; Farrnville WWTP BatchlD. 47349 Sample ID: MS-47349 Client ID: PBS I Analyte TCLP Mercury Sample ID: LCS-,47349 Client I; LCss f Analyte TCLP Mercury Sample ID: LCs -4 349 Client ID: LCss 2 I Ana lyte TCLP Mercury Sample I Client ID: I Analyte D : M B2-47349 TCLP Mercury srpTye: MBLK Batch 111 47349 Result M# SamType.b LCs Batch I: 44 Result 0.00363 SampType: LCSD Batch ! D: 47349 Result 0.00359 Sa Typei MBLK Catch I D : 47349 Result ND Tes C de: HG TCL 4 Units: PP T t o: SW7470A SW747 A P L SPK value SPK Ref Val o}2o TestC : HG.TCL 74 Units- PPM TestNo: SW747A S 747 A PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val 0.0020 Prep Date: 1118/2021 Analysis Date: 1/1 /2021 °SRC Lo vLimit Hghl,l It RPD Ref Val Prep Date: 1/1 12 21 Analysis Date: 1/ 912 21 °SRC Lo vLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val O�00400 0 90.82 Te tCo e: HG TC L 74 Units: P M Test o : S 747 3A SW747 A L SPK value SPIN Ref Val Prep Date: 1118/2021 Analysis mate: 1 /1912021 ° REC Lot Lima Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val .0400 0 89.8120 TestCo : G�TCLP 74 nits: PPM T tl : SW7470A SDI'747A P L SPIN value SPK Ref Val 0.00200 Qualifiers; B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected R RPD outside accepted recovery limit Prep lute: 1118/2021 Analysis Date: 111912021 .o3 %R C Lo Li it Hi hLimit RPD Fief Val R n o: 122631 Se N : 3161072 %RPD RP Lirnit Qual Ru N 4 122631 Se o' 3161073 %FZPD # I Li 1t ] Ru ; I 122631 S No: 3161074 %RPD RPDLirnit Qual 1.11 20 RunNo., 122631 Selo: 3161090 %RPD RPDLimit Qual Value bo e quantitation range H Holding times for preparation. or anal-% 41, M Manual Integrafion used to d t rmi area response MC Value is below Minimum u Compound Second colurnn confirmation exceeds PL Perinit Limit RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco original Page 25 of 36 ENVIRONVENTAL tt, CHN0t(}QaF!';, ;fir: F! Art�lyMawf LA6arillf000rr Summil Environmental Technologies, Inc. 33Win St. Cuyahoga .falls, Ohio 44223 TEL, (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489 QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#-. 21010359 -Jars-. Client: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP BatchlD: 47349 Sample I D : MIB247349 SpTyp: NIBLK itCd: G..TCL units: PPI Client I: PBS Batch I* 47349 T tNo SW7470A S Analyte ResuIt PL SPK value SPEC Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 12 1 1 1 /2 21 °S EC L rrLimit HighLN it RPD Ref Val Sample ID: MIB347349 S Typ : M LK T tC : G.T L Units: PPIM Client ID: PBS Batch ID: 47349 T tNo SW7470A SW7470A Analyte Result P L SPIN value SPIN Ref Val %REG Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 1 I2 21 1 l2 2 LowLi mit Hight-ir it RPD Ref Val RunNov. 122631 Seq : 3161090 %RPD RPDLimit Qual R N = 122631 Su: 3161093 % PL RPDLimit Qual TCLP Mercury ND 0.00200 Qualiflemp B Auialyte detected tbt associated Method Blanktic above titrrange Holding mmotor- W J Analytc detected below quatifitation limiUs M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Conipound. ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit RPD outside accepted recovery fimits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco Original Page 26 of 36 - Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc, QC SUMMARY "PORT����331U Win St. f�i�t��l��4�1'��. �`'�(�€��.�����5, �M� Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 A�Af�rf#o� WO#: 21010359 L�11Mb�r►�iCgr*5 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX:(330) 253-4489 Wehsite.• lattp;//wvirw.settek.com 25-Jan-21 Client: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP Batchl]D: R122408 Sample ID: LCS-R122408 SampTyp . LCS tCode: I tabs ity,�,SUnits: mmlsec Prep Date:unI o_ Client ID: LOSS Batch I. R122408 T I l . SWI030 AnalysisDate. 1 /13 1 S No: 3152374 Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Loy Limit i hl-imit RIND Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Ignitability 6.87 7.240o 94.9 70 13 Sample ID: 3- DU S r pTypo: DUP Client ID: BatchQC Batch I: R122408 Analyte Iitabiiit Sample I: 21010307 Client ID: BatchQG Analyte Iitbi1ity T stC 3d : Ignitabillity.S Units: mmlsec T tl oa- SW1 030 Desalt P L SPK value SPK Fie# Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 3/2 21 %REC Lo Li it Hi Limit RPD Ref Val u o: 122408 S # o : 3152376 %RPD RPDLimit I 2.2 0 0 20 -002ADUP SampTy : DUP Batch ID: R122408 TestC d : 1 ref bility,,..,S Units: mmlsec P L SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 111 12 1 % REC LowLl r it HighLimit RPD Ref Val RunNo: 122408 SeqNo: 3152379 %RPD RPDLimit Quaff 2. 2 o o 2 Sample ID: 21010307.,003ADUP Sa Ty : DUP Client ID,,,, BatchQC Batch I[: R122408 Analyte iitbility Qualifiers: Result nonflammable T tC d: I i# "lli y,�� l r it : mmlsec }T stNo: SWI 030 H Analyte detected In the associated Method Blank J Analyte, detected below antitati limits N11) Not Detected R RPD outsideaccepted recovery limits P L SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 111312021 °DREG LowLimit it Hi hL.ir it RPD Ref Val l u N : 122408 S [o: 3152382 %RPD RPDLimit Qual Value above quantitation range Holding times for preparation or analk M Manual Integration aced to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Cot i - id Original Second column ration eyceeds PL Permit Lir ft RL Repmfing Detection Limit S Spike Recover outside accepted reco Page 27 of 36 Summit n it-0 m c nol gies, Inc.. QC SUMMARY "�]?ORT 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 EMqAOW,,AC- NTALTtCHNMOGIFSINC WO#1_ 21010359 ANAW"I L41bo"10-rol TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489 W i: : vvw . ttk m 25 -Jan-2 Client: Synagro Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: R122408 Sample ID: 1 1 3O - O ADUP S pT rp : DUP Client ID: BatchOG Batch ID: F 12240 Analyte Igni ilit Result T stC : I it billity�S Units: mm/sec TestNo: SW'I03 PaL SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 /131 0 1 %REC LowLimit HigbLir it RPD Ref Val u ow 122408 Seal : 3152394 % P D RPIDUrnit Qual 2r2 0 o 20 Sample ID: 21010307-009ADUP SampType.- Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID: R12240 Analyte Result T stCod : 1 ni Ilia � Units: m/sec TestNo: SWI030 PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 '1 1 021 %REC Lo Li it HighLlmit I PD Ref Val u No: 122408 Sll: 3152397 % PD RPDLimit Qual <2.2 0 0 20 Sample 10: 21010307.sOlOADUP SampT rp : DUP Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID: R122408 Ana fyte Ignitalilit Result TetCod: lniill1ty�,units: mmlsec TestNo: 030 PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 111 /202 %REC LowLirnit Hi hLir it I PD Fief Val RunNo: 122408 Se Igo: 3152400 % PD RPDLirnit Qual 2.2 0 o 2 Sample l D : 21010192-OOIADUP Say pTyp : DLL Client ID: BatchOC Baton ID: R122408 Ana lyte Iilility Result nonflammable T stCod y 19nitabillity S nits: mmlsec Te t l o: S1I 13 Qualiffiers: 1B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J Analyte detected below qa ti#a on firr*ts ND Not Detected R RPD outside accepted -recovery limits PL SPK glue SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Dante: 111 W2 2 %REC LowLirnit High Limit RPD Ref Val u o: 122408 Se: 31 240 %RPD F PI Li it Qual o Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anab M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minh r Con-io d P second column confirmation exceeds PL refit Limit L Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted r c 20 original Page 29 of 36 SumnzztEtzvirvnmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY RIEP(�RT . I - ; . ... in.. 11 3.�za Win st. F I A-1 ENt�lt',������t'tl`,�L ���I�Ni�:����'�, MCCuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 A�t}rt��f �.�i0r'�1i�K�s TEL: (330) 253-8.�I1 FAX- (330) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359 Website: iitlA:IlWINYV.Selt6k [:OTl1 25-Jan-2.1 Client: Synagro Project: Fannville WWTP BOOED: R122408 Sample ID: 21010307403ADUP S pTy : DUP TestCode.m Ignitability.S Units: mm/sec Prep Date: I unNo: 122408 Ghent I: BatchQC Batch I. R122408 T s N , SW1 030 AnalysisDate: 11 1 S I. 315238.2 Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val %REC L wLI it HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD F P Limit Q al Sample ID: 21010307-004ADUP S pTy : DUPE T tC . I ft iIity�,Units. /sec Prep Date: nNo: 122408 Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID. R122408 T stf . SW1 030 Analysis Date: 1/13/2021 S qNo* 3152384 Analyte Ignitability Sample ID: 21010307 Client ID: BC Analyte Ignitabifty Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val nonflammable .00!5ADUP S mpTy : DUP Batch ID: R122408 Result nonflammable T stC : l l it t " Units: mmfsec TestNoa. SWI 030 I QL SPK value SPIN Ref Val %REC L wLi it HighLi it RPD Fief Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 21 %RPD RPDLimit Quaff 0 Q 20 °DREG LowLimit HighLi it RPD Fief Val fuI: 122408 S N . 3152386 %RPD RPDLimit Qua[ Sample ID: 21010307406ADUP SarnpType., DUP T stC : l nit ilit ,S Units: mmlsec Prep Date: I u I : 122408 Client I C: BatchQC Batch ID-,., R122408 T tl : SWI 030Analysis Date: 1/1 2 2 Seq : 3152388 Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val °SI C L vLir it Hi Lir it RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit I nitabilit 2.2 0 0 2 Qualiriers: B Anal to detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anali fto Anatyte detected below quaintitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Co pound ND Not Detected P Second col confirmation exceeds PL Pen -nit Limit RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S spike Recovery outside accepted reco Qua! Original Page 28 of 36 Client: rj ect6 ENVIRONMENTAL tCHiht0l:.!bGi�S, lNC A nMIN M FF li L�"Ar�►r� Synagro Farrnviflle WWTP Su7ninit EnvironmentalTechnologies} Inc. 3310 Win St. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX (330) 253-4489 Website: httv.-Ilwww.settek.com Sample ID: 1'1 3 - IAC P Sa pT p : DUP Client ID: Farmville WWTP Patch ID: R122408 Aalyt Ignitability Sample ID: 21010360-401ADUP Client I L: Analyte Ignita ilit BatChQC T tC d : T i ll ity�.S TestNo.- SWI03 Units: mm/sec Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val nonflammable S a m Typ : DUP Batch ID: R122408 Result nonflammable T stCod : Ignitabillityl.,S Units: mm/sec PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank . alyte detected below qua tit Lion limits M ND Not Detected PD outside accepted recovery limits RL Prep Date. naf si Date: QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 BatchID: R122408 111312021 %R C Lo Limit HighLireit RPD Ref Val Prep Date: 2-Jan-2 122408 2 SNo: 311 %RPD RP Lir tt 0 o Zo Analysis Date: 1/13/2021 %R C LowLimit HighUmit RPD Ref Val Value above quantization range Manual Integation used to determine area response Second column confirmation exceeds Deporting Detection Limit .unN : 122408 SegNo: 3152413 %RPE) RPDLimit Holding times for preparatiroti or anal: MC Value is below Minimum Compound L Permit Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reeo Qual Original Page 31 of 36 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. *lit REP R 3310 Win St. QC SUMMARY 0 T Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio WO#: 1 359 + �r� : (330) 2.53- 2 FAX.- 33 253-4489 Wit; www_ee1. #ors 2-R-2 Client: Synagro Project: Fannville WWTP Batc6ID: R122408 Sample ID: 21010192.%001ADUP SarnpTy : DU Client ID: SatchQC Batch ID: R122408 Artalyte Result Sample 1 D : 21010278-OOIADUP Sa pTy : DU Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID: R122408 Analyte Ignit bllity Result nonfla mmable Sample ID: 21010279-001ADUP Sa Typ : DUP Client 1D: BatchQC Batch ID: R122408 Analyte 1gnit billty Result nonflammable Sample lD: 'ADP SarpTy: DP Client ID: BatchOC Batch ID: R122408 Analyte lgnit billty Qualifiers: T ND R Result nonflammable T Code: Ignit illi S Units: mmlsec Te t l o: SW 1 030 PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val TestCodem. lgnitabiilloit,S Units: /sec Teto: SW 1030 PL SPK value SPK Ref Val Te tCo : l nit bllit " Units: rim/sec TestNo,., S1 13 PL SPK value SPK Ref Val T tCo f lgnitabffltyS Units: m/sec ` estl o: SW103 L SPK value SPK Rat Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: / 13 2'1 %REC LowLi it HighLim it RPD Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: /1 21 %REC LowLi nit HighLimit RIND Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 /13 1 RunNo: o: 122408 Sql: 3152403 %RPD f PDL! it Qual Ruo: 122408 SgNo: 3152405 % P D RPDLImit Qual 0 0 20 %REC Lo Limit High! -unit RPD Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 2 '1 RunNo: 122408 Sgllo: 3152407 %RPD R I I-Imit Qual 0 0 20 %REC LowLimit Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above gatittion range Anal to detected below quantitation tits M Manual integration used to determine area. response Not Detected. ' Second column confirmation exceeds outside accepted recovery limits RL ReportingRepoiling Detection Limit Rulo: 122408 S q : 3152409 %RPD F PDLlnnit Qual a o 20 H Holding times for preparation or anal-i MC Value is below MirLimum Compotin L permit Limit S Spire Recover outside accepted r co Original Page 30 of 36 5urnniit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT 3310 Win St. F`��'��C�N ��+tT�t. �'�GC�i�i3t��3����, WCCuyahoga Fairs, Ohio d4223 Anima �� TEL: (33 0) 253-5211 FAX- (33 0) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359 Website: hM.•//www.settek. corn 25-Jan-2I Client: Synago Project: Farmvi-fle WWTP Sample IE : 21010545-OOIADUP Client IL: alyt BatchQG SampTyp : DUP Batch 1131., R122413 Result H 6.6 TtCo; H.il Units: .,@2.0 Qualiffiters: 13 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank L S K value SPK Ref Val I Analyte detected below quantitation limits M ND Not Detected RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL %REG BatchID: R122413 Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 322 LowL i it HighLimit RPD Ref Val u: 122413 So: 3153357 %RPD RPDLimit o 6.7 0.3 1 Value above quantitati on range Manual Intention used to determine area response Second column confirmation exoe e s Reporting Detection Limit Holding times for preparation or anal MC Value is below Minimum Coy- po nd PLPen-nit Lirnit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco ul Original Page 32 of 36 Client: U .11%,IA41T ENVIRONMENTAL ,VEi�Y:�1L7�fY��Ai''Lr� Tel Synagro Summit Environmental Technologies, -Inc. 3310 Win .fit. Cuyahoga hog a # Ohio 44223 L -21 `X 253-4489 Q *yy ��] /y: {� i QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#: 21010359 2-Jan-2 Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: RI-22413 0 P N Sample ID: S-11122 13 Client I: Analy#e LCSW Sa Ty : LCS Batch ID: R122413 Result T C . P . PW Units. s.u.@20.2C TstNo: SWL PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Cate: Analysis fate: 1113 2 21 %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val H 7.0 7.0 0 101 98.6 Sample ID: CHECK 7 Client ICE: 1.CSW I Anafyte S T pe: LCS Batch I D : R122413 Felt TestCode: PH.NPW(450 Units: sm.@203C TestNopSW 4 PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Prep Date: Analysis Date: 1 /1312 21 %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val RunNo: 12 413 Salo: 31331 %RPD RPDUmit Qua! Rondo: 122413 S I o: 3153801 %RPD RPDLimit H To To 0 100 98..6 101.4 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J Analyte detected below quantitation limits E Value above quantitation range M Manual Integration used to determine area response H MC Holding times for preparation or anah Value is below Minimum Con-ipound ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Pen -nit Limit RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spire Recovery outside accepted reco Original Page 33 of 36 Summit En v iron in en ta I Technologies, In. 3310 Win ,fit". ENVIAONNIENTAL TEC H NO t.- -1 Client: Synagro Project: Famvi'lle WWTP Sample I : 21010278-OOIAMS Client ID: Alyce BatchQC Cuyahoga Falls, Uhio 44223 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 QC SUMMARY REPORT WO#*0 21010359 R122714 SampT r : MIS T stC d : TCLP-S V C. Units: %Rec Prep p Date: N y 122714 Surr: 2,4-Oichlorophenylacetic acted Feint PQL SK value SK Ref Val 162 Sample ID: 21010278-001AMSD SampType: MSD Client J : 13atchQC Batch ID: R122714 Aaiye Surrr 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acid Result T s C de: TCL -S C-o Units: %Rec Testa : SW8321 P L S PK value S K Fie# Val Analysis Date: 1 12 2 1 %R C Lo ri it HighU it RPD Ref Val 108 70 130 'rep Date: Analysis Date: 111812021 %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val 164 150.0 9 70 13 25-Jan-21 SegN : 3166169 %RPD RPDLi it nNo: 122714 Sqi: 3166170 %RPD RPDLirnit Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above qua titan n range H Holding times for preparatioft or anal J Analyte detected below quantitation finilts M Manual Integration used to d t -ime area response MC value is below Minimum Compound IUD Not Detected P Second ncolumn confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit RPD outside td recovery limits RL Reporting to ti Limit s Spike Rty outside accepted ro Qual Page 34 of 36 CD Cn 0 h ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . PAR D -Ass !Ism 0 N tes/Com 1 ts* Mite u(I yellow paM shWW s=mpany srmpl" sp the laboratory. 7bd client febms Lei) the p-bik pap. or samOv. 0.0.. CExnv#vAn' ON R vro *40 o(L"PORT TO 13TAU (OW ONLY NO I ( p .10 pkIv PA h t p WO m, j r 4"WpWS A WN fond WA *it Mai" fewjk# #p pm 121414 t Page 1 of 1 Summit ,Environmental Technologies, Inc. IRIV11T 3310 Win St. J;U NV-IRNMEZINTAL TECMN0L0 a1F9. INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Sample Lai -In Check List on�r�tica�� t,�bor,�ro TEL: (330) 253-82I1 FAX.- (330) 253-4489 Website: http://www.settek.cam Ghent Name: SYN-NC-2702$ Work Order Number: 21010359 RcptNo: 1 Logged by: Jesseca E. Wesffall 118/202110:25;00 AM Completed By: Jacqueline Rasile 1/101202110:38:15 AM Reviewed By: Sara E. Kidd 111112021 1 -23:52 PM Chain of Custod,_v 1.4 Is Chain of Custody compete? Yes 91 2, How was the sample delivered? UPS L2Z.1n x�ana-lGi�. No El Not Present [] 3, Coolers are present? Yes �✓❑ No ❑ NA El 4., Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No F Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes ❑ No El Not Present DV No. Seal Date: Signed By: 5, Was an attempt made to cook the samples? Yes 0 No NA C g, Were all samples received at a temperature of >0° C to 6.0°C Yes +❑ No ❑ NA 7, Sample(s) in proper cvntainer(5)? Yes Ve No $, Sufficient sample volume for indicated tests)? Yes 0 No ❑ g, Are samples (except VOA and QNG) properly preserved? Yes No ❑ 10. Was preservative added to bottles? Yes ❑ No NA ❑ 11. Is the headspace in the VOA vials less than 1f4 inch or 6 mm? Yes ❑ No ❑ No VOA Vials FV-1 12, Were any sample containers received broker? Yes ❑ No 13. Does paperwork mach bottle labels? Yes No (Note discrepancies on chain of custody) 14. Are matrices correctly identified an Chain of Custody? Yes No F I 15. Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No ❑ 16. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No (If no, notify customer for authorization.) S ecia! Handfing.[i:f oipj2licablej 17. Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes El No El NA W Person Notified: Date: 18, Additional remarks: Cooker Information Cooler No Tem 3.5 °G Condition Good — --------- Sea# Intact. Seal No Seal Date Not Present Sianed Bv � Page 36 of 36 0Anal Report of Analysis Synagro 12701 Lancaster Hwy Pineville, NC 28134 Attention: Chris Wynne Project Name: Farmville WWTP Lot Number:WA08031 Date Completed:01/26/2021 01 /26/2021 11:59 AM Approved and released by; Project Manager II: Lucas Odom ANSI Hationt Accreditation Board �RE3ITED "BESTING LABORATORY The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature. This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.) 106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 Tel: 803-791-9700 Fax.-- 803=791 m9l 11 www.pacelabs_com Page I of 7 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC SC ��=_Ml 111 DHEC No,., 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639 Case Narrative Synagro Lot Number: WA08031 This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary following this Case Narrative. The sample receiving date is documented in the header information associated with each sample. All results fisted in this report reface only to the samples that are contained within this report. Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most current approved The NELAC institute (TNT) standards, the Pace Analytical Services, LLC ("Pace") Laboratory Quality Manual, standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Pace policies. Any exceptions to the TNI standards, the Laboratory Quality Manual, SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below. Where applicable, III soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "Ili" qualifier If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the cover gage. The pH analysis associated with the sample(s) in this report was/were performed after the method recommended 15 minute holding time. Metals by 1CP Due to low % solids the initial amount of these samples was 3 times the standard procedure amount per PM's request. The LOQ has been adjusted accordingly. TKN Samples run at decreased volume due to sample matrix. Pace Analytical Services, LLc (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services, Inc.) 106 Vantage a Point Drive vest Columbia, SC 29172 1-97 Fax 3 7 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com Page 2 of 7 Client: Synagro Description: Farmville WWTP Laboratory I : WA08031 -001 Matrix: Solid Date Sampled: 0 1 /0712021 7230 Date Received; 01I08/2021 Run Prep Method 350.1 I i 3 1 351 .4 Analytical Method (% Solids) SM 2540G (Ammonia - N ) 350.1 (Nitrate - N 9056A (Nitrite - N) 9056A (Phosphorus) 365.E (Soil pH mess) 9045D (TKN) 351.2 % Solids: 3.57 01/0912021 0052 Inorganic non-metals Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch 1 0110912021 0052 AAB 78939 1 01/13/2021 1306 CAG2 79167 1 01113/2621 1402 AMR 79439 1 0111312021 1402 AMR 79441 25 01122/2021 1055 DMA 01120/2021 1747 80124 1 01/08/20212321 AAB 78951 1 01/1912021 1236 DMA 01/16/2021 1242 79666 CAS Analytical Parameter Number Method Result Q L4Q DL Units Run Solids SM 2540G 3.57 Q/o I Ammonia - N (gas diffusion) 350.1 ND 28 15 mglkg '{ Nitrate - N (soluble) 9056A 210 14 2.8 mglkg 1 Nitrite - N (soluble) 9056A ND 5.6 2.$ mg/kg 1 Phosphorus 7723-74-0 365.7 14000 3500 700 mglkg 3 Solt pH measured in water @ 18.1 ° C 9045D 5.7 su I TKN 351.2 45000 700 700 mg/kg I L A ffIT, 1 Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch 1 7471 B 7471 B 1 41/13/2021 1 502 JAB2 Q 111 31202'! 0455 79069 CAS Analytical Parameter Number Method Result Q LQQ DL Units Run Mercury 7439-97-6 7471 B ND MEMOMWEPEPENEENEEMENNN 2.1 0.51 mglkg 1 ICP=AES Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch 1 3050B 6010D 1 01/13/2021 1319 KSH2 01i12/2021Q520 78979 CAS Analytical Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ DL Units Run Aluminum 7429-80-5 601 QQ 12000 ISO fig mglkg 1 Arsenic 7440-38-2 601 O!3 6.1 J 6t9 2.3 mglkg 1 Cadmium 7440•43-9 6010D 0.73 J 2.3 0.58 mglkg 1 Calcium 7440-704 601QD 8308 2340 290 mglkg 4 Chromium 7440-47-3 601Qa 33 4.6 1.1 mglkg 1 Copper 7440-50-$ 6014D 310 4.6 2.1 mglkg 1 Iron 7439-89-6 6{}10D 24000 46 21 mglkg 1 Lead 74391*92.9 6010D 30 4.6 2.1 mglkg 1 Magnesium 74391-954 601 OD 2700 2340 290 mglkg 1 Manganese 7439-96-5 609 QD 340 6w9 2.7 mglkg 't Molybdenum 7439-98-7 6010D 5.9 .l 18 4_6 rt'Eglkg 1 Nickel 7440-Q2-0 6010D 23 18 4.8 mglkg 1 LOO= Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit D = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GG columns exceeds % J = Estimated result < LOQ and > CAL H - Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis NO Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Fnvironmental Services., in -) 106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803)791-9700 Fax 7 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com Page 3 of 7 Client; Syr Description., Farmville WWTP Laboratory iD: WA08031-00'1 Matrix; solid Date Sampled:41107I2021 9230 Date Received: 01108/2021 L�3�i1 Solids: 3.57 0910912021 0052 Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch 1 3050B 601 OD 1 01l13l2021 1319 KSH2 O1112l2021 0520 78979 CAS Analytical Parameter Number Method Result 0 LOQ DL Units Run Potassium 7440-49-7 601QD 3600 2300 290 mglkg t Selenium 779249w2 601 OD 7.1 J 9.1 3,7 mg/kg I Sodium 7440-23-5 601OD 1300 J 2300 290 mg/kg I Zinc 7440-66m.6 601 OD 760 23 5,7 mg/kg 1 LOO = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit D = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% timat d result < LOQ and > QL H = Out of holding time IflrF = Reported on wet weight basis Pace Analytical Services, LL(formerly Shealy Environmental Services,, Inc.) 106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 3) 791-9700 Fax 3) 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com Page Chain of Custody and Miscellaneous Documents Pace Analytical Services, LL (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.) 106 Ventage Print Drive stet Columbia, SC 29172 (803)1- Fax 3) 791 - 111 www,pacelabs.com 'age PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC rill Aw� NO" V" RIP 40l AM� E 4Fj 0 O %. w 'W %Ordl tpppft Mr E L .1 U 0 4% Vol I Ow lh""el Oqvu N!) J r UL lid I e. ll IF 0 "M E 19- AWN, z Mi pa" V. ll, e=[Kad d1O. 1111Z f P -9 e tj edw J9100 X : rqrwaqwvpl"lp nhd".d L P2, OIL 'Mew#* i1w 4* 4Z Lp L M L3 Z-Al I If A AR IN- Opo at pop= 419t 341 F 4&' .11A ft- AM .1 Pete Analytical Servtces, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, inc.) 106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803) 791-9700 Fax (803) 791-9111 www.pacelabs.com Page 6 of 7 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC SaMplejS Receipt Checklist (Spt) iMIE001at-15) Issuing Avtborlty,," Sample'Receipt Checklist (S.RC) Coo �spm;led E -164 1.01 #-.- WW1 evida 912AI X20 Comm. — At v. Pace ►nalyti ] S ari , LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.) 106 Vant2gePoint Drive West Columbia, SC 2 03) 791-9700 Fax 3) 791-9111 www.pacelabs.com 'age Cameron Testing Services, Inc. arc aENR #6s4 - C t Projoct: 5ynagro Laba�ratory Report Facmviile WWTP Q, Wynne P, R Sample Information Atyses and Its Res ��.wr.ww..» iablX . Fig zlat-O43 -,-01 OAP FeG. Craifcrrs-s *02 4*0 .3 ,vO4. 4)5-- -.06 --mO7- GOOM"n 2101,w043 *01 i Gr iS (%i 1.-" -7 Pro SwAxd. W. 273" mO-3 u 2101*043 M. Suns Y" <29500 C" mm Ott03121 Mxx <29500 Vuv mw 29500 erwo 2um <294-0C3 w^ ............ 29SQ0 3.39% O-Ot 3.39% Col. 3,139% .001 340% oc+ 3.39% -0.01 3.40% owl 3,36% 00-1 011074-1 MARP NC PWS #37799 US EPAQ4ati1 D1N £Avt *37799, O1It1Tl21 aw. �ecis aer«�nc� z3eo G -Ts � �,1�1=� ��l�:sC l 919*2U4240 dV*Qtwwt*ft*i cm. It., 219 S. StWO -Sq' Sanfords NC x733u 11 LM4L t—Ln We A i Ysw C� Y 12 -4 WWLV*Itc� VJWTIP Cameron Testing Services, Ina. Ceti # SIO US 'A. �MG�i9t8 OK *U MC Pt�'!5 Vol Flo. L.1 — .04MOPOOMMOMMP. Sample baforms#brt `A� W X 0. jo E E 2 MAPOMPW YY 1.'7 11OP152 49 6 (C) (Y" Chain of Custody Page of CTS tab -'U"' t� 00 Number of I�' CTS HPA Sample (SK)4 HW.Pl� (#"ITMM 044ft. *OD$i 34 WOW' . . . . . ..... ..... Rows. n. 2AAft 4W ."O"A Rush work will require prior approval Additioflal charges will apply Aim WOAW*WOMr" M '04 "M ff Prelect: Client: Typer 2102-19841 Final Rasuft Notes.W Fam►ville Synagro ifi[} Report Shcci 30 Day Bench#tip T+�t (EPA 6Zsrr.-9zro,3, Ap�snaiix as IDue Rat. Mecno-cta r lab t[� An iS t � i' p� Start (< 2%) 1.73% -02a5/21 3.67% 314421 S, �6.i'96 3+t�2� 1.59% 84,�3�n V1121 End (+ 30j 1.63% 64.6"°YG6 03Q7121 Page t IFiSiR t-b.) L FVSR tm-b) R;m:b.} FVSR (m,b) CTS Pray. Regula#t►ry SM. #Aetif. I" ed., 2540 G !)* . . Ts ; 25Ai9 G - V.S. -11 V5^ 1a.ax% 11,8996 PMS, < 15% vaa GSGIERP 21,9 S. St"Ie Stv SsnfardNG 27330 Phaw: 1919-206-4240 Cameron Testing Services, InC. NC WWIGW Cert, #654 NC PHHS Ced # 37799 OS EPA N001 918 Chain of Custrxfy Pace of dk s L CTSfab use. 5 -Yki� 2": C*MP8,"YT _4 4 4C-j Samp4e TeoContact ph.onq6w. to�;: Ic) i• ice IN. Address lC�, d. I Stat*4,, 4M.P) J r *= Pem# (YN) Rush MN) Smp4e N401"40 lil 15 �j too. $Ort."O, UM Cl: Sample Information Number of bottles + preservative Required Testis /Anal sls CTS Z Ieeies'UPed, HC),CientSa a Sam le (SKM 5 H(N)O )ThiosWfa*j E E H2 t ID ID > Na(0)H. (P)hosphodc, OMer M, 1-friddmo 1 0 R a an C CIA Lot jjj� L t�­ 3 17 -145 L z Y I 1 .5 LW l�k� WW't APW N. e44, �� • as�A_ •­01ow-" Agwwa-w kl_�, K.J4 L.- k w _.P­.k�­ d,- J �T 211r %-fcL- V.F. L _b__MD"wN__ # _31ph --F 1 --1% L-t.W!-" ­f % 4' L I + ...PPLI. L f. d*� L 3 ­A� -.tp 4­iiikkk 4 1 r jVWLAd­&- ­ftM IF qp_p_r- _WW. V oft ftj�jj ,.sew—w � �.[Time inquish Received '. I io 24 r 4� r P C hck"I'n 11 MW , -we 00_ ? Rush work will require, ,ricer approval, Additional charges will apply State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Divis10 ion of Water Resources LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 0646 Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these instructions and checking the provided bores will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two co ies of the ajppfication and supnortins! documentation For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischafge-Permitting Unit General — This certification provides detailed infonnation of receiving sites for hand application of Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 1 SA NCAC OAT . I 10 0. Da not submit this certification for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16). 0 Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two capes of the application and supporting documentation listed below. A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16),. � Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form,. Please do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form, If necessary for clarity or due to space restTictians, atfiachments to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer. � For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites. � For modified permits, submit the requested information for on.l.v those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the proposed modification. B. Land Application Site Information: The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land. application program must be provided in table.l. The status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows: ♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) Transferred (T) Deleted (D) Attach the following in accordance with each status code: Required Item Status Cade N R T M County Board Notff ication. doc V/ Laid Owner Agreement (If appiicabie) Setback Waiver Agreement An updated vic�nitylsetback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance for Residuals Land Application Permit'' A sons and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist Evaluation PoIjgZ'. - INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Pagel of 3 An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative V0 V/ Hutant loading rates (CPLRS Status Code Required item N R T M For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indieated in the Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with the soil ma requirements in the "Sail Scientist Evalua�ion Poliev" Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not be__pennitted to multi le Permittees over the same time period) This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in determining attachment requirements. Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years). � Predomm'ant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment "B" of the existing permit, or name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist. � Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please note That the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly: � For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope by using the average slope provided in the bounty Soil Survey for equivalent). A sail type with a slope range of 4 - 8% would have a representative slope of 6%. � New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the sods report prepared by a licensed soil scientist. � Acceptable methods for deter -mining location coordinates {i.e., latitude and longitude} and their corresponding codes are as follows: • Address Matching (ADD) • Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER) • Cadastral Survey (SUR) • Conversion from Coordi"nate Plane (CP) • Conversion from. Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Conversion from Universal Trans Merc (UTM) • Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP) • Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT) • Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEC) • LGRAN-C Navigation Device (LOR) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS) • Remote Sensing (RS) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP) C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only) Q� Use an 8.5 by I I -inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.. � Surface water body classifications infonnation may be fond at: Lftp://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water- relann i nz/c lassifi cation -stan dards/c lass ifications � Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices. A list of the Division's regional offices, their county httv : Hdeq �zav/contact/reg Tonal-offices coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at: General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waierbodies with assigned subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications. 1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map {an 8.5 x I I -inch sheet showing the project area should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed}. 2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see Table, 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering ether Slates or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as "UT to stream name" as the waterbody name. I Open the link http://deq.ne.gov/about/didisions/water-resources/planning/classifcation-standards/classifications. Stream C I as s 1'fi c at i o n .Process: One of the options below may b e used depending on the known initial proj ect information. � KNOWNBASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE CATER IS LQCATED 0 l . Select pro -per basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide the proper location descriptions if multiple runs. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2 of 3 2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the lisp. 3. For multiple listings of the game waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The tee "source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point). 4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project. � KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURF, ACE WATER IS LOCATED 1. Select the proper county from the List a1.1 Waterbodies in county, hydrologically repot. 2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from Genera] Directions) on the list. 3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term "source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream paint). 4. Record all Basins!, Strewn Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project. UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED 1. Use the Clickable basin xnap to hydrologically sorted list report. 2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list. 3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list. 4. For multiple Listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. "source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (mostupstream point). 5. Record all. Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project. � Notes on index number and unnamed streams: Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC1 The tern � Any stream which is not named in the schedule of steam classifications carries the same classification as that assigned to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except: (A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications; (B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or (C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedffigs are conducted. The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other sates or for specific areas of the basin: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas Hiwassee River Basin. Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Little Tennesse River Streams entering; Georgia or Tennessee shall be cla.ssifflied "C Tr.." Such streams in the Savannah Basin And Savannah River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified "B Tr." Rives Drainage Area French Broad River Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B.°' Basin Watauga River Basin Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified Y. Broad River Basin Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C." New River Basin Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C." Catawba River Basin Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C." Yadkin -Pee Dee River Streams entering Virginia are classified. "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are Basin classified "C." Lumber River Basin Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C Sw." Streams entera�ng Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr .Reservoir and the Noah Carolina portion of steams tributary thereto not otherwise named or Roanoke River Basin described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall cagy the classification "C and. B," Chowan River Basin Streams entering Virgini*a are classified "C." Tar -Pimlico River All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw.ft except the main drainage Basin canals to Pamlico Sound and its bas which shall be classified "SC." Pasquotank Riper Basin All dramage canals not Hated in the schedule are classified "C." INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3 of 3 LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION Applicant's Warne: Town of Farmville Land application sites currently certified: 108.8 net acres and Total to be certified: 108.8 net acres, I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B): Predominant Soil Status Site/Field ID Landowners) Lessee(s) or Operator(s) Net Acres County Crop(s) Code!' Series Nameb Mapping Unit or Rep. Slope` R NGPI-14 Harold Flanagan 11.8 Pitt Pasture. Exum ExB R NC-P t-1-2A Harold Flanagan 15.8 Pitt Pasture Exum ExB R NC-Pl- 1-2B Harold Flanagan 22.8 Pitt Pasture Exum ExB R NC-PI-1-3 Harold Flanagan 6.5 Pitt Pasture Ocilla 0cB R NC-PI-1-4 Harold Flanagan 6.4 Pitt Row Crop Goldboro GoA R NGPI-1-5..Harold Flanagan 12.8 Pi tt Row Crop Goldboro GoA R NC-Pl-1-6 Harold Flanagan 31.2 Pitt Pasture Goldboro GoA Al IL a Status Code for land application sites are: * N (N env) ♦ K (Keneweci) ♦Zvi tIvIoa11iea) • i k i ransiexarea) TV kliUIU«,u) v Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.) 0 Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e, fora 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2) II. WATER13ODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C)4.p Site/Field ID Latitude Longitude Location Location Method Code Location Accuracy Waterbody Subbasin and Current and Proposed Datum Stream Index No. Class NC-PI-1-1 35"33'8.81 77033156.02 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 2.7-.86-.26-5 C;Sw,NSWI; NC-P1 -I -2A 35('33'Oo24 77033153.8011 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp;. 27-86-2C;-SW,NSW.6-5: NC-Pt-A-2B 35033'4.24 77°33'S2.58 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-26-5.C;Sw,NSW NC-P I - 1-3 35033'3035 77033'47.44 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-261,-5C'SWINSW NC-P I - 1-4 35°3324.43 77`33'4 1.00" NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 271%86-26-5 C.;Sw,NSW NGPI-1 5 35"33'42.49 77033'35*77 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-26-5. C-Sw,Nsw NC-PI-1-6 35"33'2.66 7703343-81 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86.,,26,5. q;..$.w,N SW Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page. FORM: LASC 06-16 Page Division of Water Resources State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality DivisIt ion of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT FORM: LOA 06-16 Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these instructions and checking the provided bores will help produce a quicker revises time and reduce the amount of additional information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the permit application. Unless otherwise noted. the ADnlicant shad submit one original and two conies of the annficatinn and suAnarting doe umentation For more information,, visit the Water Duality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit. General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for hand application of Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with I SA NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16). Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation. listed below. A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16)0& Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FARM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarify or due to space restrictions, attachments to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer. � Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are awned or operated by an entry other than the Applicant. � A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement mush be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator. AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits: Applicant's name; Town of Farmvi'lle ILLAP hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following faciffifty(ies) onto the following hand application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this Agreement: Lease Land Use or Residuals Source Special note Site/Field ID (yes/no) Cropping Patterns Intended Use of Crops (opfional) (no-till/over-seed! pasture) NC-PI-0 1-1 N Pasture Animal Feed NC-PI-0 l -02A N Pasture Animal Feed NC-PI-0 1-02B N Row Crop Animal F' eed NC-PI-0 1-03 N Pasture Animal. Feed NC-PI-01-04 N Row Crop Animal Feed NC-PI-0 1 -05 N Raw Crop Animal Feed NC-PI-01-06 N Pasture Animal Feed The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals. This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals hand application program and shall be renewed each time this permitis renewed. The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree fo abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement. FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3 I. STIPULATIONS: 1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement. 2. should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. I The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met. 4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Maid Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. S. The Permittee must request and obtain. a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land application site(s). 6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application prograrn, including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the equipment usedby the Permittee. 7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis. S. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil pH of at least b.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suiiable for the specified crop. 9. The Landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules loosed on crop pattems, results of soli samples, and the permitted application Limits. 10 The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients (e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the hand application site(s). 11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for the Land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application events at appropriate periods. 12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner., or his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event. 13. The Landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and Stake officials or their representatives to; enter and inspect any properly, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; flake necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement. Il. RESTRICTIONS: 1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application sites). 2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) fora 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application events. 3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested fora 30-day period following a residuals land application event. 4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested fora 14-month period following a residuals land application event. 5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 20-month period following a residuals land application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil. 6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 38mmonth period following a residuals land application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil. 7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested fora 12mmonth period following a residuals land application event. III.ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one) 15A NCAC 02L .O 1 07(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 1 SA N AG 02T,.0 t,OSth) allows the compliance boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following; � A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID: NC-PI-0 1-04 (Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance boundary to the application package) ❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site. We ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER,* (if needed) The land application field(s) III: is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: . The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program. and transferred into the new program; (Name of the new program) FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3 E Landowner's Certification: 0 I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced lend application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the hand application site(s) on behalf of the deeded landowners. I certify that the above- referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other pen-nitted entity. Furthennore, I certify that I have read this Agreement, understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to hand apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified herein., 0 Landowner name: Address: o on nI city: Phone: T ` Signature: Yam_ NORTH CAROLINA P, ti • �FIA, V%4a- cjz:�C- h S 'K2 State: Iv C Zip: -�a ress: I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that 0 Date: �'- � I COUNTY 4CtYeCR I_` - personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument. WIT'NESSm hand t y and officaa.l seal his the � l day Marcof � 20 .Z Signature and seal. My commission expires: Lessee's/Operator's Certification: I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. Lessee/operator name: Address: citys State: Zip. Phone: E-mail address: Signature: Date: Permittee's Certification: I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. Signing official name: Signature: o o�Glclnl5 .'�J k -1 WA eao'.. Wt Date; A15/27/7( FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD May 31 S`, 2021 N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Section —Non-Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 ATTENTION: Nathaniel Thornburg REFERENCE: Redefined complianceboundaries - WQ0008778 Town of Farmville RLAP Mr. Thornburg, I am addressing the redefined compliance boundaries due to on -site water supply webs for the affected fields. See below, (NC-PI-01-04) — The redefined compliance boundary on Harold Flanagan's property is located northeast of the on -site water supply well located to the southwest of field 4 and east of Arch Flanagan Rd. Please find that the hand owner Agreement form (LOA 06-16) is updated to reflect the redefined compliance boundaries. Please lei me knowif any further information is needed regarding the redefined compliance boundaries for an -site water supply wells for affected fields. Best regards, C111Z!, VV ylu� G Technical Services Specialist 1 APPLICATION MA 01%*X"'04101100' LEGEND APPLICATION AREA PRIVATE ROAD STREAM W UNSUITABLE AREA WATER ONSITE HOUSE ' DRAIN FENCE PROPERTY LINE OFFSITE HOUSE OUTBUILDING WELL The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. AJI locations are approximate. GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 660' NC-PI-01 Fields 1-216 1 APPLICATION MAP LEGEND WE APPLICATION AREA 1AA1 ANf PRIVATE ROAD STREAM F060 mailk FENCE PROPERTY LINE M UNSUITABLE AREA WATER ONSITE HOUSE OFFSITE HOUSE OUTBUILDING WELL The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundaryis established Midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 660' NC-PlmOl Fields 3-5 locations are approximate. CUMULATIVE METAL LOADINGS (LBSIAC) AS OF 5127/2021 The cumulative metalsfor this report come from HISTORY records i.e. the monthly monitoring process has been completed for the State and County there the Fields are located) In cases where trace metal lab result was Not Reported to Synagro or tracking f metal loading was Not Required the loading n the report is displayed as " "' FIELIDID Last Date Applied AS CD CFI Cis PB HG M0 ICI NC- I- -0001- 06/09/2020 0,514700.24261 8.96031 82.13659 4.54713 0.086461.07548 .2 721 PVC-- I~0 -- 2 11/09/2005 0.17289 0.12443 6.66013 55.12554 3.05806 0.06444 0.52962 3.34936 C-P I- - ^ 3- 08/31/2017 0.316170.19021 5.89631 64.830503.13435 0.06580 0.74918.7 Report t /Tim ; / 7 2 :2 ;12 P SE ZN 0.25624 59.95060 0.10651 357 2 .2 1 78 56-10061 0.16562 5. 2 4 0.21169 44.39283 0.23997 44.74750 0.04301 5.80390 0.02208 3.13647 Page 1 of 1