HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0008778_Renewal Application_20210601Initial Review
Reviewer Thornburg, Nathaniel D
Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.)*
r Yes r No
Permit Number (IR)* WQ0008778
Applicant/Permittee Town of Farmville
Applicant/Permittee Address 2884 Chinquapin Rd, Farmville, NC 27828
Is the owner in BIMS? r Yes r No Is the facility in BIMS? r Yes r No
Owner Type Municipal
Facility Name Town of Farmville RLAP
County Pitt
Fee Category Minor Fee Amount $0
Is this a complete
application?*
r Yes r No Complete App Date 06/01/2021
Signature Authority
Signature Authority Title
Signature Authority Email
Document Type (if non -application)
Email Notifications
Does this need review bythe hydrogeologist?* r Yes r No
Regional Office
CO Reviewer
Admin Reviewer
Below list any additional email address that need notification about a new project.
Email Address
Comments to be added to email notfication
Comments for Kendall
Comments for RO
Comments for Reviewer
Comments for Applicant
Submittal Form
Project Contact Information
Rease provide information on the person to be contacted by N B Staff regarding electibnittal, confirmation of receipt, other
.......................................................... electronic surece, aner correspondence.
_ -
Name * Chris Wynne
Email Address*
cwynne@synagro.com
Project Information
........ ......... ..........................................................................................................................................
Application/Document Type* r New (Fee Req ui red)
r Modification - Major (Fee Required)
r Renewal with Major Modification (Fee
Required)
r Annual Report
r Additional Information
r Other
Phone Number*
13369098627
O Modification - Minor
G Renewal
C GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1,
NDAR-2
r Residual Annual Report
r Change of Ownership
We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report
Permit Type:* r Wastewater Irrigation r High -Rate Infiltration
r Other Wastewater r Reclaimed Water
r Closed -Loop Recycle r Residuals
r Single -Family Residence Wastewater r Other
Irrigation
Permit Number:* WO0008778
Fbs Current Existing permt number
Applicant/Permittee * Town of Farmville
Applicant/Permittee Address* 2884 Chinquapin Rd, Farmville, NC 27828
Facility Name * Town of Farmville RLAP
Please provide comments/notes on your current submittal below.
Please find attached all documents required for the renewal of the Town of Farmville WWTP
RLAP (WQ0008778). Let me know if you have any questions and I'll be glad to help. Thanks!
At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg
at nathaniel.thornburg@ncdenr.gov.
Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here.*
(Application Form Engineering Rans, Specifications, Calculations, Rc.)
Farmville WWTP �renewal _05312021.pdf 82.59MB
upload only 1 Rdocurrent (less than 250 W). Miltiple documents nest be corrbined into one RJFfile unless file is larger than
upload limit.
* V By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be
accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has been received by the Non -
Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order
and made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts
of the application in correct order (as specified by the application).
Mail payment to:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
Attn: Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Signature ��
Submission Date 5/30/2021
05/31/2021
4A(3FZ
YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD
NCDENRv-DWQ
Land Application Permitting and Compliance Unit
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-w 1636
ATTENTION:
REFERENCE:
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
Mr. Nathaniel Thomburcy
MODIFICATION OF PERMIT NO. W!20008778
Town of Farmville
Synagro is submitting, on behalf of the Town of Farmville, an application to modi�'y the Town's
residuals land application permit. Listed below are the changes to the existing permit as they
pertain to land application sites:
• Renewing 1 application site (NC-PI-1)
No other modification to the permit is requested at this time. This package should captain the
information that is necessary to complete the requested modification of the Town's permit.
However, if you require ad
0
ditional information or have further questions about the included
information, please contact me immediately at 336-,909-862'/.
you to ensure that this is an efficient review process, and I will
Sincerely
Chris Wyhnc-ol
Technical Service
s Specialist
Cc : David Hodgkins; Town of Farmville
Enc: Application Package (4)
I look forward to working with
provi
de any further assistance if
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALSLAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original, and two copies of the -application and
supporting documentation
For more information., visit the Water Qualify Permitting Section's Non-Disc&Lrge PermittiLig Unit
General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that
are generated from a water treatment plank or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under
15A NCAC 02T.1 1
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) Application: (All Application Packages);
� Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land. Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T ,Q 10 b . An afternate
person may b e designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15A
NCAC 02T ,Q 106�b�.
If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit.
� Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to
operation of proposed faciffity(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages)
❑ Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ).
_ _YJY.#YK M4Vl14"J�Gt*JY �awaz.arr_+sa--+�� _-_�•_. _�:-+T�_____,+x—: _r_ .__.__.. .. _ _ _ __.. _.... _. __ __ __ _. ___ _ -_ �-����YF�+.4� �'tY1+�w�4 -�.�t _ _ _- - r=— .- ._ _ = f�"4aC�" � sr� _ c-+4 C�'�iScnC�rk �s.na�+r��+'-wrn� -r - "- -- �a--.a-}-+a+�i-�za �
S � S
T
7
}
Facility Classification New Fermi major Modification
Major (land are pennitted for 300 acres) $L310 $395
1
,y . _ ... .... .. .. .. .__'.+r_,.___r�.-� --r'Sir:�a�rnwo-v���arrrn��'}�aY'u'1�7F.�+.. •. _. ... ;._. . ._..____ .__; _._._�.___._'_ ._trlx�lr�r*h MFM ._._. }�a M1Y�'��MrTFhrfih:"h WinnhT.T___�_. _. ___ 40Mr+G+F�M7+Y Wrir�+/nt
Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres) $810 $245
1 - A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage;
adds additional hand application areas not previously approved for that particular program [including transferring of field(s) from
one program to another]; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new treatment or storage units/processes not
previously permitted. There is no fee for minor modifications to a permit.
C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages)
� List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
D. Environmental Assessments (May be Required — See 15A NCAC I C .0300)
❑ Submit a copy of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include
information on any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals
treatment and storage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for
the construction of the subject facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Pagel of 3
10
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages)
For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan.
� Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1110 and include at a minimum:
� Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to
function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
� Mam*tenance schedules; may include equipment calibration, maintenance of signs, etc.
safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc.
j� Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc.
� inspection plan including the following information;
Names and titles of perso el responsible for conducting the inspections.
Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the
selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program.
Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the event
that noncompliance is observed.
� Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information.;
� Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring.
� .Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored.
Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,,
flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The
sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that hand apply multiple times per
year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most
likely to be negatively affected bvcold temperatures.
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to 1VA ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY.
F. Program Determination
Dedicated
residuals land application programs are ones in which land application sites
meet
the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T
.11.02(12).
Specifically,
a residuals
land application program is designated
as dedicated
if any
of the following are applicable:
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or ftequencies
greater than agronomic rates.
[] Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal,
and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance.
[] Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed irrigation
facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system.
Q Please contact the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit if you need any assistance in detennining whether your residuals program
falls under the dedicated program defmitions.
G. Program Information
❑
Provide
an explanation
of why a dedicated system is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system.
❑
Provide
an explanation
of the dedicated system and its operation.
H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages)
Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of 1 ITO by 171' plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ Plans must include the following minimum items:
A general location map, a vici�uty map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site
relief and shawina all. facility related structures and fences within the land application area -
The location of all wells (including usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
perennial), springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application siie(s).
� Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries
Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T 110 8
[] Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site{s}.
[] A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
evaluation. The irrigation. plans shall shoes each nozzle/emitter and witted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray
irrigation zones as they will be operated.
❑ Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans maybe labeled with
the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 3
�. Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites)
Submit a project evaluation and a receiver site management plan (if applicable) with recommendations concerning cover crops
and their ability to accept the proposed application rates.
J. Hydrogeologic Report (Ali New Application Packages or Modifications involvin g- increasing the total design capacity)
❑ Submit a detailed hydrogeologic evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(4) and current Division Policy
available at: ft://www.ncwater.org/Rules Policies and Reeulafions/. The document shah be signed, sealed and dated by a
qualified professional,
K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through fixed supply system)
Q Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional engineer and/or
Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15ANCAC 02T J 104(d)(2). For Modifications, submit an updated site map
specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ The design documents must include the following minimum items:
❑ Engineering plans for the facility and equipment except those previously pemiitted unless they are directly tied into the new
units or are critical to the understanding of the complete process;
❑ Specifications describing materials to be used, method of construction, and means for ensuring quality and integrity of the
finished product fficluding leaking testing; and
[] Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head
curve analysis for each pump, and irrigation design.
❑ Soil, mapping units shown on all disposal sites.
L. Water Balance (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites utilizing fixed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed throughfxedsu ly systems)
u
Submit a completed and accurate water balance in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T
available at: htt-v-://www.ncwater.om/Rules Policies and ReLyulafio-ns/.
.1 104Ld)5 and current Division Policy
M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment
or irrigation components)
Q .Property ownership documentation shall consist of one of the following-,
Legal documentation of ownership (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporaiion), or
[] Wr"tten notarized intent to purchase agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or
[] An casement running with the land specifically indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of
15A NCAC 021--, .O I 07f f1_ or
❑ A written notarized lease agreement signed by both part
survey map,,
ies, indicating the intended use of the property, as well as a plat or
ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
Bv U.S. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 807-6464
Courier/Special Delivery:
512 N. SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
FAX NUMBER: (919) 807-6496
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FOR-M.- RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of.)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
FORM.* RLAP 06-16
L APPLICANT INFORMATION:
I - Applicant's name: Town of Farmville
Applicant type: ❑Individual
�] Federal
❑ Corporation
�# State
El General Partnership
Mun�cipal
Signature authority's name per iSA NCAC 02T .0106: David Hodgkins
Applicant's mailing address: PO Box 86
City: Farmville State: NC
Zip,.- 27828-
Privately-Owned Public Utility
❑ County
Title:.Town Manager
Telephone number: (252)753-6700 Email Address: dhodekins@farrnvi11e-.r
2. Consultant's name: ChristWher Wvnnve License Number (for P,E,):
Affiliation: On Staff Retained (Firm; }
Consultant's mailing address: 284 Boger Rd
City: Mocksville State-, NC
Telephone number: (L36) 909-8627
Zip: 27028-
Email Address: cwynne@synajzro.com
3. Agronomist's License Number;
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑ On Staff Q Retained (Firm: }
Agronomist"s mailing address:
C i State:
Zip:
Telephone number: Email Address:
4. Soil Scientist's name: G. Christopher Murrqy License Number: 1284
Affiliation: [] NIA On Staff Retained (Firm: Piedmont Environmeni
Sail Scientist's mailing
address: 216 S Swing
Rd, Suite
I
City: Greensboro
State: NC
Zip:
27409-
Telephone number: (L3 -662w5487)
5. Fee submitted: $395.00 (See Instruction B)
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
Email Address: Chris _ iedmontsoil.c
Associ
P.A
1. Application is for (check all that apply): Q new, Q modified, renewed permit
2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing pen -nit, provide the following:
Pen -nit number: W00008778
Date of most -recently issued permit: 12/7/2416
Dade ofmost-recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit};
Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the pennit):
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page] of 5
IIL RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
i. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 2$84 Chmquvin Rd,
City: Fannvffle State*- NC
Coordinates: Latitude-, 350 351 17"
Datum: NAD 84
Method of measurement: Map
Zip: 27828-
Longitude: 770 32'42'r
Level of accuracy: Second
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Pitt
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
Designation Name Affiliation Certifleation Number
ORC Robert N. Roth Synagro 1001672
Back -Up ORC John A. Culp Synagro 1000733
Additional Back -Up
ORCs
(if applicable)
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test:
4. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available X#roeen SUMMOEE, Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and pro -posed for certification with this annlicatior, and liqt the ,-pv,ittC ;n rho
following table:
Ma
ximuni amount of residuals to be certified: 500 dry tons per year.
PAN Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton Pounds of PAN per Year
(Weighted Average)
Surface Incorporation Surface Incorporation
or Injection or Injection
First -Year 27,42 27.42 13710 13710
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted 44•98 44o98 22489 22489
b. Land Application Site Use Summ Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and
proposed for certifcation with this application:
Category Use Acres Comments
Crops Forest or Plantation 0
Row Crops 76.1
Hay p
Pasture 32.7
Total: 0
Methods Surface 108.8
Incorporation or Injection U
Total: 108.8
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 5
c, Residuals Land A
lication summa
Determine the minimum acreatie required to land annly the recichialc nc n,,,-rP„th,
certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios fisted in the following table:
Assumed Acres Required Using Acres Required Using
Application Rate First -Year PAN Concentrations Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN
(Ibs PANlac-yd Concentrations
Surface Incorporation or Surface Incorporation or
Injection Injection
50 274.2 274*2 44998 449*8
too 137ol 137,1 224o9 224*9
150 91A 91.4 149.9 149.9
zoo 6846 68.6 112.4 112.4
b. If applicable, provide a plan and a schedule to resolve any known issues that would prevent land application of the proposed
residuals due to the violation of North Carolina AdmiDjStratiVeCode(e.g. not enough storage, not enough land, vector reduction
practices not in place, etc.):
7. Specify type of residuals program (See Instruction F): Non -dedicated Dedicated
If Dedicated, specify the following (check all that apply):
D Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomic
rats, explain,
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that is used. primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop
production is of secondary importance, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain;
IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified residuals source)
Complete and submit the following Residuals Source Certication and all associated documentation.
Residuals Source
Certification
V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified land application site)
Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all. associated documentation.
Land Application Siite
Certification. doc
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 5
Note: item VI. Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed i9 rrigation system OnIv.
VI. DESIGNINFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATIONSYSTEM
1. The irrigation system is: Q Spray
❑ Drip
2. Disposal system is: ❑existing proposed.
3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high water table (S
below ground surface. Rules 15A NCAC 02T .050kwww"
S{�
surface.
HWT) within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: feet
requires at least one -foot vertical separation between SHOT and ground
4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area?
[] Yes or ❑ No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist report addresses artificial structures and please indicate if
structures are to be maintained or modified:
5_ Loading rates recommended by the Soil Scientist Evaluation:
Recommended Recommended
Soil Series Fields within Soil Area Loading Rate Loading Rate
in/hr
6. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If No, explain why 15A NCAC 02T .050 is not met.
7. Non -dedicated System Design Mill in the appropriate information for ether a spray or drip irrigation system):
Field Zone Design Area Number of Maximum Application Design Annual Loading
(ft Z Nozzles Rafe (gallons/hr) Rate ..(gallonsf r}
Total
Spray Irrigation Design Element Plan Sheet I Specification
Number Pa e Number
Wetted diameter of nozzles ft
Wetted area of nozzles fit'
N'ozzle capacity 9PM
Nozzle manufacturer / model I
Elevation of highest nozzle ft
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 4 of 5
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778 (Farmville WWTP)
Inspection Plan
Inspections for the land application of residuals will be conducted on a weekly basis at the land application site during the land
application activities of this project. The inspection frequency is based on the time frame that it is going to take to complete the
project and the amount of dry tons to be Land applied from this facility. The inspections will consist of inspecting a current field
that is being applied as well as inspecting random fields that have been completed. These inspections will consist af:
1. Verifying that the Pre -Operations Check list has been completed and signed by both operations and Technical staff.
z. Checking the calculated loads to ensure the correct amount of residuals are being hand applied.
I Ensure that all manned equipment has a Copy of the spill control plan, the permit, and the operations and maintenance
plant.
4. Ensure that the field has been flagged properly and that all buffers are being adhered to.
5. Ensure that the Crop and landowner Verification form has been filled out.
6. Verifying that the correct number samples of the residuals have been taken and that it meets the criteria for land
application.
7. The records will be kept in the project filesIn the respective office for the project.
S. The Permittee or Inspector shall report by telephone to the Washington Regional Office by Telephone at 252-946a.6481 as
soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after or the next wanking day following the occurrence or the first knowledge
of the occurrence of the fallowing.
� Any occurrence with the distribution program resulting in the land application of significant amounts of material
that is abnormal in quantity or characteristics.
• Any failure of the distribution system that results in the release to surface waters.
� Any time that self -monitoring indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance with the permit.
• Any process failure that results in the system not adequately treating the residuals.
• Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
• Any release that requires immediate reporting outside of narmal business hours shall be called in to DENR at 1-
800-662-7956, 1-800*k,858,-0368,, or 252-946-6481. These numbers are to be called in the event of a release to
surface waders, imminen#failure of a storage system when the event occurs outside of normal business hours.
� Within 5 days of the first notice of on occurrence a written response in the form of a letter shall be sent to DENR
outlining the actions taken or purposed actions taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. Persons
responsible for inspections on this project are as follows:
Johnathan Maize, operations Manager or his designee
Nate Roth is the designated land application ORC for this project and his designees are the backup ORC's for this project.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778 (Town of Farmville)
Operational Functions
The operation function of this project is going to involve mixing the basins thoroughly with the WWTP mixers to achieve
45
a well mixed and consistent material that is suitable for land application, It is going to be spread at agronomic rakes
that are determined by the nutrient and metal S2mple that is current for that monitoring period. It is going to be spread
with a liquid applicator that will use pressure to spread the material in such a way to achieve a consistent spread
pattern. The material is going to be land applied on fields that have established grasses that are going to either be
grazed or cut for hay for animal feed or rvv►r crops used for animal feed.
SAFETY MEASURES
Synagro believes in operating in a safety conscious manner and is has all employees participate in quarterly online safety
course that are designed to help its employees recognize safety issues and take steps to prevent accidents from
occurring, in addition all Synagro employees have the authority to stop operations if they think any aspect of the
operation is going to cause environmental or personal harm.
Maintenance Schedule
Synagro will follow the maintenance schedule as recommended by the Synagro fleet manager for the equipment
necessary to complete the fob.
Applicant's Certification (signing authority must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 02T ,OIQG):
The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility with.ou� proper
closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active
compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC .O 105.
Ow
I,
❑ No, Explain; ww�
David Hodgkins
(Signature Authority's Name — PLEASE PRINT)
attest that this application for Farmville WWTP
(Facility Name)
Town Manager
(Title)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Resources
may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically
granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in. an immediate enforcement action,
which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water
Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed
and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as
incomplete_
Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.6A and §143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to
exceed $1.0,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature:
Date: � 2 7/7(
FORM: RLAP 06-m 16 Page 5 of 5
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0008778
Sampling Plan
Sampling for this project costs of sampling the residuals during the time that lanunsiapplication is occurring. This will
result in one round of sampling to occur before land application commences to ensure that the residuals are suitable
for land application. Based on the dry tonnage of this plant, there will be one sample for all parameters per year.
The residuals shall be sampled annually for the following: (Regulatory level in milligrams per liter in parentheses.)
Arsenic (5.0)
Barium (100.0)
Benzene (0.,S)
Cadmium (1. 0)
Carbon tetrachloride (0.5)
Chlordane (0,03)
Chlorobenzene (100.0)
Chloroform (6.0)
Chromium (5.0)
M-Cresol (200.0)
o-Cresol (200.0)
p-Cresol (200,,0)
Cresol(200.0)
24=1) (10n0)
1, 4-Dichlorobenxene (7,S)
1, 2-Dichloroethane (0*5)
1,1-Dichloroethylene (03)
Nitrobenzene (2.0)
Pentachloro henol (100.0)
Pyridine (5.0)
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene (0.13) Selenium (1.0)
Endrin 0.02 Silver (S.,0)
Hexachlorobenzene (0.13 e rac oroet y ene (01.7)
Heptachlor (and its HydroxideM (0.5)
Hexachlorow-1 3"butadiene (O.S) Trichloroethylene (0-5)
Hexachlorethane(3.0j 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol(400.0)
Lead (5,,0) 2,4,6-Trichlarophenol (2,90)
Lindane (0.4) 2,AS TP (Silvex) (1.0)
Mercury (0.2) Vinyl Chloride
Methoxychlor (10.0)
Methyl ethyl ketone (200.0)
The residuals will also be sampled based on the chart below for the following constituents:
Dry Tons Generated
(short tons per year)
<319
=>319w<1,650
=>1,p650w-<16,500
=>36,500
Aluminum
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Lead
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Monitoring Frequency
(Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111)
1 time per year
1 per Quarter (4 times per dear)
i every 60 days (6 times per year)
1 every month (12 times per year)
Magnesium
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Nitrate-RNitrite Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Potassium
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (calculation)
Selenium
Sodium
Total Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Zinc
To meet pathogen and vector requirements, the material will be sampled for fecals to prove that the residuals have met the
pathogen requirements of the permit. The material will be tested for vector attraction by using a 30-day bench test. The samples
will be pulled from the basins and/or cake pad that are currently holding the residuals. The samples that will be pulled are a TCLP1
nutrient and metals sample, a fecal sample and a 30-day bench test to prove that the material is suitable for [and application.
The nutrient and metal and TCLP sample will be collected randomly and consist of at least 30 individual samples mixed in order to
get the composite sample for these parameters. This material is very consistent because the residuals will be mixed thoroughly
with aerators and mixers. This should take care of any seasonal fluctuationsin the material.
The following people are responsible for sampling:
Chris Wynne Technical Services Spec*I
allst or his designee.
State of North Carolina
go
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the fallowing instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and rev40
iew time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the AIR121icant shall submit one original and two co ies of the a lication and
supAortinLr documentation
For mope information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischatge Perinittj!Zg Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15ANCAC 02T .11.00. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 1.145, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SIR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
� Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FARM: RSC 11-15) foam, Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as Tong as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
� For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
� for modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification.
� Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
For each source facility, attach the following:
Vicinity map - A vic�nity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land_ Application Permits".
� Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, heated, processed, and stored at the facility,
�j quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be hand applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
� Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. insure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample hype, as well as the Divi si on- certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be competed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality information:
� For each source facility, attach the following:
� Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
� For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 1
SPILL RESPONSE PLAN
PROJECT: Farmville WWTP Permit W00008778
IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A SPILL THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN
IMMEDIATELY:
L MANAGEMENT OF SPILL CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES•
The Operations Manager shall take immediate charge and initiate clean-up activities. Synagro labor and equipment 4P
is to
be utilized. In the event additional labor and equipment is required, assistance may be requested from the Town of
Fannville, the NC Department of Transportation, and other private contractors as necessary.
2. HALT THE SOURCE OF THE SPILL•
Such as a ruptured container or damaged transport unit.
I CONTAIN THE SPILLL:_
Form a barrier. Sufficient quantifies of straw shag be used for such purposes. Earthen barriers may be constructed to
augment the straw bale containment area of the spill. The Operations Manager or the person in charge on the spill site
will advise the clean-up personnel where to get the straw, lime, and other items necessary to complete the clean-up
operation, i.e., local farmers, farm supply centers, nurseries, etc.
4. CLEAN-UP:
Employ front-end loaders, vacuum equipment, sludge app�icatian vehicles, and/or local septic tank service to remove as
much of the spilled material as possible. Straw and/or sand should be scattered in the spill area to soak up the remaining
material. "I'he straw- and sand -soaked material will be collected and removed to a disposal area approved by
representatives of the state regulatory agency.
5. FINAL CLEAN-UP:
Employ rotary brush sweeper if needed and apply line to the spill area upon the approval of the clean-up efforts by the
state regulatory representative. If the event occurs on private property, the clean-up will be completed to the satisfaction
of the property owner and state regulatory representatives. The goal will be to restore the spill area to its original
condition if possible.
6. NOTIFICATION:
As soon as possible after the spill occurs, the Synagro operations Manager or assistant wail notify the Synagro Cenral
Office, and they will then be responsible for notifying other key S ynagro personnel.
7. REPORTING:
ffihm�
Synagro Central personnel will notify the Washington Regional Office by Telephone at 252-946-6481 as soon as Possible,,
but not more than 24 hours after, or on the next working day fallowing the occurrence. The Qpera�ions Manager shall
provide a written repot within 48 hours of the spill to the Technical Services Director. The report shall list all relative
information and actions taken. Synaorro Central personnel will file a written report to the Washington Regional office of
the NCDENR within 5 days of the occurrence. For after hours reporting the Division's emergency number shall be tailed
to report all incidences (800-662-7956 or 800-858-0368 or 919-733-33001
RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: Town of Fannville RLAP
Status Facilityermiolder Facility Name County Permit 1MlumberMaximum Dry Tons Per Year
CodeaCurrent b Proposed
R Town of Farmvifle Fannville W-WTP Pitt WQ0008778 500 500
a Status Code for source facility are. ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land. application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 page 1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
L Facility
Name:
Farmville
WWTP
2. Facility
permit
balder is:
Federal,
State, Local Government, or
.Facility permit issued by: Div. of Water Resources, �]
or ❑ Other (explain: },
3. Facility contact person and title:.James Shoulders, Plant ORC
Complete mailing address: P.O. Box 102.
City-, Fannville State: NC
a.
5.
Telephone number: (252) 753-3919,
Facility physical address: 2884 Chinquapin
City: Fan-nville State: NC
Coordinates: Latitude: 35' 35' 17.11
Private.
Div. of Environmental Health,
E-mail address: James.Shoulders
Zip: 27828-T
Longitude770 32".42
Datum: NAD 83. Level of accuracy: Second
Method of measurement: Ma),
Zip: 27828-—
�.suez-n co
Purpose of the facility:
� treatment of municipal wastewater, treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
treatment of potable water, treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
[� treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: % industrial and I % domestic)
[� other (explam::.).
6, Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: Yes No
7. Facility permitted/design flow-, 3.- 5 MGD and facility average daily flow: 1.6 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility 38.6 dry tans per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: Aerobically di liciui'd, 1 -million gallon tank
Type and volume of residuals storage {i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): Aerobicall
gallon. tank
II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
40 CFR Part 503 or 40 CFR Part 257,
FORM: RSC 0646
digested ILquid.
I -million
Note. Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated undex 40
CFR Past 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Park 25 7.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15ANCAC 02T.1102(6) as:
Biological
Q Non -Biological
FORM: RSC 06,-16 Page 1 of 5
4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables {i.e., as applicable} to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 1 SA Ni��C,1:1111111�� 0?T .110�.
a. For Distribution/Land Application* Fill in the, following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters.-
Laboratory.- Pace Anal-vticalerviees., LLC and. Date of analysis: 01/26/2021
Parameter Ceiling Monthly Average Result
Concentration Limits Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB) (Class A Only)
(m.glkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Arsenic 75 41 6.1
Cadmium 85 ;9 0.73
Copper 47300 17500 310
Lead 840 300 30
Mercury 57 17 ND
Molybdenum 75 n/a 5.9
Nickel 420 420 23
Selenium 100 100 7.1.
Zinc 7500 23,800 760
b. For SurfaceDL"Mosal Unit (landfill): Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters;
Laboratory:..... and Date of analysis:
Distance from Disposal Arsenic Chromium Nickel
Unit to Boundary to
Closest Property Line '
(meters, check one) (inglkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kph
❑ > 0 but <25 30 200 210
❑ > 25 but < 50 34 220 240
❑ ? 50 but < 75 39 � 260 270
> 75 but < 100 46 300 320
❑ > 100 but< 125 53 360 390
0 1
d >_ 125 62 450 420
Result (mg/kg)
FORM,: RSC 06-16
Page 3 of 5
Note,: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed elm systems),
3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only}
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: [] yes no,
If yes, list the numbers):
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.240-
yes
o r
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
Laboratory: Summit Environmental Technologi es Inc.and Date of analysis: 1/25/2021
Passed corrosivity test: yes no. pH-, s.u. (2 < pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: yes no. Flashpoint.- >140 °F (> 1400F)
Passed reactivity hest: yes [:]no. 14CN* ND mg/kg (<250) & HAS: ND mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter Limit Result TCLP Parameter Limit Result
(mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1)
Arsenic 5.0 ND Hexachlorobenzene 0013 ND
Barium 100.0 ND 14exachloro- I 1,3-Butadiene 0.5 ND
Benzene 0.5 ND Hexachloroethane 3.0 ND
Cadmium 1.0 ND Lead 5.0 ND
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 ND Lindane 0.4 ND
Chlordane 0.03 ND Mercury 0.2 ND
Chlorobenzene 100.0 ND Methoxychlor 10,0 ND
Chloroform 6.o ND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 ND
Chromium 5.0 ND Nitrobenzene 2.0 ND
m-Cresol 200.0 ND Pentachlorophenol 1004.0 ND
o-Cresol 200.0 ND Pyridine 5.0 ND
p-Cresol 200.0 ND Selenium 1.0 ND
Cresol 200.0 N D Silver �.0 ND
2,4-D 10.0 ND Tetrachloro ethylene ND
IA-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 ND Toxaphene 0.5 ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 ND Trichloroethylene 0.5 ND
l,l-Dichloroethylene 0.7 ND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 ND 274fi-Trichlorophenol 2.0 ND
Endrin 0.02 ND 2A5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 ND
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide 0.008 ND Vinyl Chloride 0.2 ND
FORM.- RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5
5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determinatiow, Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 3.57 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses {i.e., on a. dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
micronutrient parameters.
Laboratory: Pace Anal
kcal. Services.,.LLC and Date of analysis: 0 1/26/2021
c. Using; the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 0.60
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service. a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth,
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plank mailable nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: �� This
rate is a (check one): default value, or � actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals:
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method First (I't) Year PAN Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mg1kg) (mglkg)
Surface 13710 22489
Injection/Incorporation 13710 22489
6. ether Pollutants Determination;. Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses: N/A
FORM: RSC 06-16
Page 4 of 5
7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 1.06, specify how residuals will. meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For DistributionlLandAmlicatio� o Class .A or Equivalent:
A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
0 Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(A)] - Thne/Temperature Compliance.
Alternative 2 [IS
Alternative 3 [15
❑ Alternative 4 [15
A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(B)l - Alkaline Treatment.
A
NCAC
02T. 1106
b 3 C
Prior Testing for
Enteric i*wusjViable Helminth Ova.
A
NCAC
02T.1
106(b)(3)(D)] -
No Prior Testing
for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Patho ens PFRP .
Specify one: composting, [� heat dry
ingi heat treatment,
[] thermophilic aerobic digestion, beta ray irradiation,
[� gamma ray irradiation, or 0 pasteurization.
b. For LandApprieatio� of Class B:
Alternative 1 [I SA NCAC 02T. I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T. I 106(c)(2)] -Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: � aerobic digestion, a�
diryffig, anaerobic digestion'.
composting, or lime stabilization.
c. For Surface Disposak
Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7a. above.
El Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7b. above.
Exempt - If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in item 11, 8. below [I5A NCAC 02T. I 106(a)(2)].
�Q Not Applicable -Non-Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attrae-finn Rednrtinn /VARI• PPr sae rTrer nIT i ins
Atraie 2 [5 Atraie 3 [5 Atraie 4 [5
----- - , Ly%....y ..mow .w�uua„ wui „�cc� uic vruc requirements:
A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(1)] - 38%Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(2)] - 40-Dav Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(3)] - 30-DII Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.ll07(a)(5)] - 14-Dwv Aerobic Processes.
Alternative 6 [1 5A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization.
❑ Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(7)] -Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(8)] -Drying ofUnstabilized Residuals.
Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(9)] -Injection.
Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(1. 0)] - Incorporation.
Ej Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only -Soil/Other Material Cover [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(b)(2)].
�] Not Applicable -Non-Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 06-16
Page 5 of 5
r
z
6diklg
r
i
I<
L
�
�
� +.� err air �� : '�•
rt
pp -IT i
Fl11^ik
`
4
y
ip
AD
=
•.riF
� •+
a
4t
F
x
{r
i
At
F
#
t
wr i1
■}+
air r�
+# _
4 V-Pi
rY
I
Residuals Sampling Plan
Town of Farmv111e Land APplication Program (WQ0008778)
FarmviIle Wastewater Treatment Plant
Nutrients and Metals Analysis
Sampling Point: Basin
Sampling Frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied
Sample Type
Composite
Lab: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pathogen
Sampling Pont; Basin
Sampling frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied
Sample Type: Grab
Lab: Cameron Testing
Vector (30-day benchtop test)
TCLP
piing Point.* Basin
piing Frequency: Based on Dry Tons Land Applied
Sample Type.* Composite
Lab: Cameron Testing
Samp
Samp
ling Point*, Basin
ling Frequency: Annually
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Summit Environmental Tcchnologics,Inc
Quantitative Justification for Residuals Production
The Town of Farmville's WWTP1"S
currently permitted for 500 dry tons per year of land
applied blosolids, There is no request t
o change this dry tonnage
justification is based on the number of dry tons applied in the pas
Facility:
Fannville WWTP
Requested permitted rate0
:
Current: 500 dry tons/year
Proposed: 500 dry tons/year
Just ification:
2018 — 33.24 dry tons
2019 — 23.58 dry tons
2020 — 59.02 dry tons
Average — 38.6 dry tons applied
. Quantitative
t 3 years,.
Chris Wynne
Technical Services Specialist
Summit Environmewal Technologies, Inc.
to nil* IT
3310 Win St.
U 1IR NM NT : , TECHNOLOG !F S. INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Anw1yMcM tabora
January 25, 2021
Alex Fox
Synagro
284 Boger Rd.
Mocksvi'lle, NC 27028
TEL:
FAX4-
RE: Fannville WWTP
Dear Alex Fox:
TEL: (330) 2534211 E4X.• (330) 253-4484
Website: htW:Ilwww.settek.com
Order No.: 21010359
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 1/8/2021 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted
in the Case Narrative.
Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits
except where noted.
If you have any questions regarding these bests results, please feel free to call the
laboratory.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Woolf
Project Manager
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Fails, Ohio 44223
Arkansas 89-0735, Catifomia 2943, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0108, FloridaNELAC E87688, Idaho OH00923, Mims 1, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas
E-10347, Kentucky (Undergound Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Maryland 339, Michigan 9988, Mi e ota 1780279, Nevada -1, New
Hampshire 2996., New Jersey OH006, New York 11777, Now Caroha 39705 and 631, Now Dakota R.,201, Ohio DW# Ohio VAP CLOO52, Oklahoma
2019-155,OrcgonOH200001, Pennsylvania 011, Rhodc Island LA000317, South Caroms 92016001, Texas T 1 4 -1 --1 , Utah 0 -1 ,
Virginia VELAP 103 8 1, Wcst Virginia 9957C
Page 1 of 36
CLIENT:
nWytka oral
Synagro
Project; Fannville WWTP
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St,
Cuyahoga , Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
W # htW://www.settek.corn
WorkOrder Narrative:
21010359,p, This report in its entirely consists of the
Analytical Results, QC Summary Report, Applicab
Case Narrative
WO#: 21010359
Date: 1/25l2021
following documents: Cover Letter, Case Narrative,
le Accreditation Information,, Chain -of -Custody,
Cooler Receipt Form, and other applicable forms as necessary. All documents contain the Summit
Environmental Technologies, Inc., Nark Order Number assigned to this report.
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom of
the cover Letter that may or may not pertain to this report. Please refer to the "Accreditation Program
Analytes Report" for accredited analyses list,
The information contained in this anal�ical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental
Technologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent of
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc, or the customer for which this report was issued. The results
contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at different
times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsible
for use or interpretation of the data included herein.
All results for Solid Samples are regorged on an "as received' or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as
"dry weight" using the "_dry" designation. on the reporting units,
This report is believed to meek all of the requirements of the accrediting agency, where applicable. Any
comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below.
Analytical Sequence Sample Notes:
21010359-001a CYANIDE, REACTIVE S(9014): Below detection level data was reported based on
Total CN data.
21010359-00 la TCLR-SVOC-CPest(808 1B): High recovery(ies) in the CCV indicate high bias. Data
deemed acceptable as no target analytes were observed in the field sample(s).
Analytical Sequence QC Notes:
CCV VOC-MSTR NPW(8260):
are ND for this analyte_
CCV exhibits high recovery for Vinyl chloride. All reported samples
LCS-47331 TCLPwwVOC=MSTR TCLP(8260): Possible high bias for Vinyl chloride due to high
recovery in CCV. Associated samples are N.D. for this analyte.
Original
Page 2 of 36
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 I;URR...11 11T
Win St.
O14ME NT ` t h y. , 4 Cuyahoga 'a , Ohio 44223
9- (330) 253-4489
.4 "4101"t TEL 330) 253-8211 FAX.
Website: &MI.-Ili.mw.settek.com
CLIENT: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP
Case Narrative
WO#: 21010359
Date: 1/2512021
210103 59-001 ams TCLP-SVOC-CPest(808 I B) a. Possible high bias for Heptachlor and Methoxychlor
due to high recoveries in bracketing CCV's. Parent sample is N.D. for these analytes.
21010359-001amsd TCLP-SVOC-CPest(8081B): Possible high bias for Heptachlor and Methoxycblor
due to high recoveries in bracketing CCV's. Parent samnle is N.D. for these analvres
LUS-47347 "1'CLY-SVOGCPest(80818): Possible hig
high recoveries in bracketing CCV's.
h bias for Heptachlor and Methoxychlor due to
MBw47347 TCLP-. SVOC-CPest(80 8 1 B): High recovery(ies) in the CCV indicate high bias. Data
deemed acceptable as no target analytes were observed in the field sample(s).
Original.
Page 3 of 36
Summit Environmental Techgies, In
3310 Win ,(
CuFulls, Ohio 2.9
, TEL: (330) 25.3-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-446
Qualifiers and Acronyms
These commonly used Qualifiers and Acronyms may or may not be present in this report.
Qualifiers
Wo#: 21010359
Date 1/25/2021
U The compound was analyzed for but was not detected.
J The reported value is greater than the Method Detection Limit but less than the Reporting Limit.
H The hold time for sample preparation and/or analysis was exceeded.
D The result is reported from a dilution.
E The result exceeded the linear range of the calibration or is estimated due to interference.
MC The result is below the Minimum Compound Urnit,
� The result exceeds the Regulatory Limit or Maximum Contamination Limit.
m Manual integration was used to determine the area response.
d Manual integration in winch peak was deleted
N The result is presumptive based on a Mays Spectral library search assuming a 1:1 response_
P The second column confirmation exceeded 25°/p difference..
C The result has been confirmed by GUMS.
X The result was not confirmed when GUMS Analysis was performed.
BfMB+ The analyte was detected in the associated blank,
G The GCB or CCB contained reportable amounts of analyte.
QC-/+ The CCV recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
R/QDR The RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QLm/+ The LCS or LCSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
QLR The LCS/LCSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QM-/+ The MS or MSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
QMR The MS/MSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QV-,/+ The ICV recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
S The spike result was outside of accepted recovery limits.
Z Deviation; A deviation from the method was performed; Please refer to the Case Narrative for
additional information
.acronyms
ND
Not Detected
RL
Reporting Limit
QC
Quality Control
MILL
Method Detection Limit
MB
Method Blank
LOD
Level of Detection
LCS
Laboratory Control Sample
L Q
Level of Quantitation
LCSD
Lra oratmy Control Sample Duplicate
P L
Practical uantitation Limit.
QCS
ualit Control Sample
C QL
Contract Required Quanfitation Limit
i P
Duplicate
PL
Permit Limit
MS
Maw Spike
RegLvI
Regulatory Limit
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate
MCL
Maximum Contamination Limit
RPD
Relative Percent Different
MinCL
Minimum um Compound Lln-�t
CV
Initial Calibration Verification
RA
Reanalysis
ICB
Initial Calibration lank
RE
Reextraction
CCU'
Continuing Calibration Verification
TIC
Tentatively Identified Compound
CCB
• *-
Continuing Calibration Blank
RT
Retention Time
ILC
Reporting Licit Check
CF
Calibration Factor
DF
Dilution Factor
RIF
Response Factor
This list of Qualifiers and Acronyms reflects the most commonly utilized Qualifiers and Acronyms for reporting.
Please refer to the Analytical Notes in the Case Narrative for any Qualifiers or Acronyms that do not appear in this
list or for additional information regarding the use of these Qualifiers on reported data.
original
Page 4 of 36
CLIENT:
Project:
Summit Environmental men ch olo s, Inc.
U ill"#% IT 3310 Win s.
aayr"
synagro
Farmville WWTP
Lab SamplefD Client Sample M
o lizzi
DEL: 33 2 -2 X- 3 253-4489
Workorder
Sample Summary
Tag No Date Collected Date Received
W: 21010359
254an-21
Matrix
Slu su
Page 5 of 36
F ..-I
*/yftaJ bor4e
Client:
Project:
Sample I
21139-1
Synagro
Farmville WWTP
Client Sample ED
Fannville WWTP
TSuinmit Environmental Technologies, Inc. DATES REPORT
33 10 Win St.
4 wr
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX- (330) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359
1 i : ham.- w w. corn 25-Jan-21
Collection Date Matrix Test Name
1 2 21 1230:00 PM Sludge 1gnitabi11t Solids SW- : 1030)
pH (SW9045D)
Reactive Cyanide (901 .3.3,2 -Solid
Reactive Sulfide 37.3.4.2
TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8 32 1
TCLP Herbs cides by EPA 8 321
Leachate Date
TCLP Mercury Analysis S W 1311 1 1 2 021 : PM
TCLP Metals Analysis SW 131.1 6 1 ' 1 1 2 21 6:00.-Oo Pm
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (Svc 13117 1 1 2 21 6:00:00 PM
TCLP Pesticides Analysis SW 1311 1 1 2 21 6.00:00 PM
TCLP Semi -Vol tiles Analysis
(SW /8270)
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Prep Date Analysis Date
1 13 2 1 11:1 :5 AM
1 1 2021 12 t 1: 1 3 PM
1 1 2 21 :2 :0 PM
1 19221
1 1 72 21 . : PM 1 23 2 21 2: 3. AI
1`1221 2:3: PM 11221 1:19: AM
11 2 1 1:1 : PM 1192 1 1:3:33 AM
1 1 2 21 11: : M. .1. 1 2 21 : 1: PM
1 1 2 1 11: : AID 1 1 2 21 6:1 : 1 M
11 2 1 : : P1 11 221399: 00 AM
Original
Page 6 of 36
!11;u .. R-1vilir
Jyic
ENVIRONMENTAL TtL:riANc)torpr'-4;
nasytiC
CLIENT:
Matrix:
Lab ID:
Synagro
SLUDGE
21010359-OOIA
Project: Farmville WWTP
Client Sample ]ED Farmville WWTP
Analyses
Summit Environmental Th o o ie , 171c.
3370 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falk, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
Websi : .III. ttk. core
Result
TCLP METALS, VOCj BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
TCLP PESTICIDES ANALYSIS (SW131118081)
Chlordane, total
Toxaphene
ndrin
gamma -BHA
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Surr: TCMX
Surr: DCB
TCLP HERBICIDES BY EPA 8321B
2 v-
21,'T
Surr: 2,4-Dichlorophenylacefic aci
Analyt0'
ical Report
(base report)
WO#: 21010359
Date Reported: 1/25/2021
Tag Number:
Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12:30:00 PM
RL Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
SW8081 SW3510C Analyst: CSS
ND
0.0250
mglL
1
1/19/2021
8:31:00
PM
ND
0.0500
mg/L
1
1/19/2021
8:31:00
PM
ND
0.00250
mglL
1
1119/2021
8;31:44
PM
Na
0•00250
m9/L
1
1f19/2021
8:31:00
PM
ND
0.00250 QC+
mg/L
1
1/19/20218:31
.00
PM
ND
0--00250
mglL
1
1119/2021
8"31000
PM
ND
0.00250 QC+
mg1L
1
1l1912021
8:31:00
PM
71.4
10 - 119
%Rec
1
1119l2421
8:31:00
PM
83.9
10 -119
%Rec.
1
1/19/2021
8.-31A-00
PM
SW832 S nalyst: JPG
ND
0.500
L
50
23 20 1
2:43:00
AM
ND
0.500
50
1 2 2o21
2:43:00
AM
it
o- 13o
%Rec
50
132 22:43:00
AM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
TCLP VOLATILES ANALYSIS
-Dichloroethene
e e
1 .2-Dichloroethane
MK
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloro enzen
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: - r mo uoro en ene
Surr: Dibromoflucromethane
Burr: Toluene-d8
SW1 311 M Analyst: MES
ND
0.250
m91
0
f2021
3:29:Q0
AM
ND
0.250
mglL
50
1/19120213:29-00
AM
ND
5,00
mglL
50
I119/2021
3:29:00
AM
ND
0.250
mg/L
50
1/19/2021
3:29:40
AM
ND
0.250
mg/L
50
1/19/2021
3:29:00
AM
ND
2.50
mglL
50
1119l2021
3:29:00
AM
ND
0.250
mglL
50
1/19/2021
3:29:00
AM
ND
0.250
mg!!.
50
1 119f202 1
3:29:00
AM
ND
0.250
mglL
50
1/19/2021
3: 29:OQ
AM
Nth
0.100
QC+ mg/L
50
1/19/2021
3:29:00
AM
96.4
70- 130
%Rec
50
1/19l2021
3:29:00
AM
97.9
70 - 930
%Rec
50
111912021
3:29=00
AM
99.4
70 - 1 3Q
%Rec
50
7119f2021
3:29:00
AM
Qualifierse,Aaalyte detected in the associated Method .flan
Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
AW Value is below MI*nimum Compound limit.
ND Not Detected
PL Pennit Limit
L Reporting Detection Limit
Vatue above an it ti range
M Manual Integmtion used to determine area response
N' Tentatively identified. compounds
Second colunm confwmation exceeds
1-7 a�%;QY�
;uvlUven Linul5
On'ginal
U Samples
with
CalcVal
c
Ml}L
Page 8 of 36
CLIENT:
Matrix:
Lab ID:
Synagro
SLUDGE
21010359-OOIA
Project: Farmville WWTP
Client Sample 11D Farmville WWTP
Analyses
SumrnitEnvironmental Technologies, 111c.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Fails, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX. (330) 253.4,489
Wi - hunt-1.settee
Result
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -,SOLID
TCLP MERCURY ANALYSIS (SW1 311/7470)
TCLP Mercury
ND
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB-I)LID
TCLP METALS ANALYSIS (SWI 31116010)
TCLP
Arsenic(As)
TCLP
Barium(Ba)
TCLP
Cadmium(Cd)
TCLP
Chromium(Cr)
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
TCLP
Silver(Ag)
An alytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 21010359
Date Rennrted
Tag Number:
Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12E,30-000 PM
RL Qual Units
0.00200
rL
SW7470A
1 / 1
DF Date Analyzed
SW7470A Analyst: ERA
1 111912021 10:1 :00 A
SW3010A Analyst: EAM
ND
0,500
mglL
I191202170;35,33AM
ND
5.00
mglL
1
1/19/2021
10:35:33
AM
ND
0.100
mg1L
1
111912021
1 0:35:33
AM
ND
0.2E70
mg/L
1
1/19/2021
1035,33
AM
ND
0.500
mglL
1
1/19/2029
10:35:33
AM
ND
0.0500
m gIL
1
1/ 19/2021
10 :35:33
AM
ND
0.500
mg1L
9
9/19/2021
10:35:33
AM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERBmSOLID
TCLP SEMInVOLATILES ANALYSIS (SW1311/8270)
SW8270 SW3510C Analyst: SFG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.200 mg/L 2 1l1912021 6:19:00 PM
2,45-Trichlorpphenol ND 0.500 mg/L 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenal N D 0.500 mgfL 2 1 f1912421 6,19-00 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoiuene ND 0.100 m9/L 2 1119/2021 6:19:D0 PM
Cresols, Total ND 10.0 mglL 2 1/19/2021 6:'! 9:00 PM
Nexachloro-1,3-butac�iene ND 0.0400 mg/L 2 1/19/2Q2'# fi:19:00 PM
Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.100 mglL 2 1/19/2021 6:19:00 PM
Hexach►loroethan� ND 0.200 mg/L 2 1l1912021 6:19:00 PM
Nitrobenzene ND 0200 mg/L 2 1/19/2021 6:19;00 PMPe�tachloraphenol ND 0.504 mg/L 2 1/�i 9/2021 6:19:00 PM
Pyridine ND 0.500 mglL 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM
Surr: 2-Fiuorophenol 71.4 10- 157 %Rec 2 1/1912021 6:19:00 PM
Surr: Phenol-d6 79.6 10-169 %Rec 2 1119/2021 6:19:00 PM
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 74.1 32.1 - 130 %Rec Z 1/19/20216:19:00 PM
Sum., 2,4,6-Tribromaphenol 93.2 45.4 - 1fi5 %Rec 2 1/19/20216:19:00 PM
Surr: 2-F1uorobiphenYl 66.1 35.7-130 %Rec 2 1/1912021 6:19:00 PM
Sum p-Terphenyl-d14 103 74.7 - 345 %Rec 2 1/19/2021 6:19:00 PM
Qualiffierso, B A al to detected In the associated Method Blank
Holding th-nes for preparation or analysis exceeded
MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.
ND Not Detected
L Permit Limit
RL Reporting DIetection Lint
Value above quantitation range ----� _
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
N Tentatively identified compounds
P Second column confirmation exceeds
RPD outsidcaccepted recovery ts 0 .g in a
.
Samples with CalcVal < MDL
Page 7 of 36
CLIENT:
Matrix:
Lab ID:
Project9
:
Summit Environmental TTech o o i , Inc.
UM41" lot 3310 Win A
Synagro
SLUDGE
21010359-OOIA
Farmville WWTP
Client Sample ED Farmville _WWTP
Analyses
o ir Unio qqZZJ
EL: (330) 2 - 2 Fes• (330) 253-4489
Analytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 21010359
Date Reported; 1/25/2021
Tag Number:
Collection Date: 1/7/2021 12:30:00 PM
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
RCI SW9014 Analyst: JAP
REACTIVE CYANIDE (90141733*2)mSOLID
Cyanide, Reactive ND 0.962 mg/Kg 1 1 /1 7f2021 4:20_00 PM
IGNITABILITY OF SOLIDS (SWw846:1030) SW1030 Analyst: SEE
Igr1ltability nonflammable mm/sec 1 1l13/2021 11::5fi AM
RCI SW9045D Analyst: VVK
PH (SW9045D)
PH 6.7 s,u.@20.00 'I 'l113I2021 12:15:93 PM
RCI SW9434 analyst: JAP
REACTIVE SULFIDE (9034)/7.3,,4.2
Sulfide, Reactive ND 25.0 mg/Kg 1 �119l2Q21
Qualifiers: B Anaiyte detected in the associated Method Blank -- -- --- E Value above quantitative range
H Holding; times for preparation or analysis exceeded M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit. N Tentatively identified compounds
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R R.PD outside accepted recovery limits Original
ItL Reporting Detection Limit U Samples with CalcVal < MDL
Page 9 of 36
Su
J;UI RM41T
A -rwWyrEcsq L,raIafts
Client: Synagro
Project: Farmvffle WWTP
Sample JID
21010359-OOIA
Matrix
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Mudge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Mudge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Lodge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Key
NC—WW.SCM A Accredited
mmit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St,
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) -- 2 FAX.-
Wi : httRL1www.settek.com
Test Name
Ignitability of Solids (SW-846: I 030)
pH (SW9045D)
Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.3-2)-Solid
Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.4.2
TCLP Herbicides by EPA 83215
TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8321 B
TCLP Mercury Analysis (SWI 311/7470)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SWI 311/6010)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/60 10)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/60 10)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311 /6010)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/6010)
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW13 i 1/601 U)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 13 11/8 0 8 1)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311/808 1)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808 1)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808 1)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/808 1)
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SWI 311/808
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311/8 08 1)
TCLP Semi-Voiatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SWI311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Valatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Volaiiies Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-VoIatiles Analysis (SWI 311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Voiatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SWI 311/8270)
Key
NC VVW SCM N Not Accredited
Accreditation Program
Anal ytes Report
WO#* 21010359
25-Jan-21
State: NW
Program Name: NC ww SCM
Analyze
Ignitability
Hydrogen Ion (pH)
Cyanide, Reactive
Sulfide, Reactive
2,,�-Tp
�+
Mercury
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Dead
Selenium
Silver
Chlordane, total
dri
gay-C
Heptachlor
Reptachlor epoxide
Met ,oxyc ilor
Toxaphene
1, - is hlorobc ne
21., -Tric loco e of
Cresols, Total
Hexachlorobenzene
e.c lorobt adi e c
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Status
A
A
N
1
0
0
V
Fj
F1
0
0
4
_,a
M
0
M
0
0
0
0
A
A
0
Original # 1
Page 10 of 36
AneVy"" LsbOr'&ll~
Client,: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP
Sample I
21010359-OOIA
NC—WW—SCM
Matrix
Summit Environmental Tec no ogle , Inc.
3 310 Win S.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-82I1 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
W si : &W--11www.settek.com
rrr��.
Test Ne
Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Sludge, TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP Voatile Analysis
Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP VolatileVolatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP VolatileVolatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP Volafiles Analysis
Sludge TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Key --
A Accredited
NC WW SM
Key
N Not Accredited
Accreditation Program
Analytes Report
WO#% 21010359
25-Jan-21
State: NW
Program Name: NC WW SCM
Alyt
1 11-ielorote
1,2 - i l r tan
2-taoe
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Cloone
Cirm
Tetrachloroetbene
rielroetee
Vinyl chloride
Status
An
W
01
W-
0
_a
0
M
0
Original # 1
Page 11 of 36
Client:
ENVIAONWENTAL
Synagro
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
33 10 Win St.
Cuyaho Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL.- 2 - 2 FAX.253-4489
Website." htW:Ilwww.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
2-Jan-2
u..:..tiin. eeqai
Project: Farmvil e W W TF aiLu.��.
Sample ID.- 1
Client ID: PBS
Analyt
12-Dichloroethane
MK
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Ch lorobenzene
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Sum. 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Suer: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d
Sa Ty : M BLK
Batch ID: 47331
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
D
N
ND
D
D
2360
2410
2450
T tCod : TCLP - C-M Units: mqJL
TstNo. SW8260 SW1311 M
PQL S K Value SPK Ref Val
0.250
0.250
.00
.25
0,250
2.50
0,250
0.250
0.250
0.100
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below q antitation limits
ID Not Detected.
PD outside accepted recovery limits
Prep rate:
Analysis Date:
1/1712021
1 12021
%REC Lo Llr it HighLimit R D Ref Vail
20
94.6
70
130
2500
96.4
70
130
2500
.1
70
13
RunNo: 122624
SIB: 303
%R D RPDLi it
Value above q a titatio range ldir times for preparation a.li
Manual Integyation used to determine area, response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
Second column confirmation exceeds
Reporting Detection Limit
PL Pen -nit Lini t
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Qual
QC+
Original
Page 12 of 36
cuents
ENVIAO-NMENTAL TICCHNOLOGIFSINC
AMo�O$c* Lah�owmtftwios
Synagro
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TES.: 2 -- 2 FAX.253-4489
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#-. 21010359
25-fan-21
Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: 47331
Sample ID: 211 3 40'CAMS
Client I:
Analyse
BatchQC
Same ype: MI5 T stC de: TC1. P-VOC.-1 Units. r L
Batch ID: 47331 TestNo: SW8260 SW1311M
Result P L SPEC value S K Ref Val
Prep Date
Analysis Date: 1/1 2 2
%REC LowLimit Hi hl-imit RPD Ref Val
1 1 -Di hl r ethene
1.07
0.2501.00
0
107
13.6
202
12-Dichloroethane
0.954
0.250
1.00
0
95.4
.
13
MEK
IUD
5.00
5.00
0
91.3
65.3
11
Benzene
1.03
0,250
1.00
0
103
49.2
1 45
Carbon tetrachloride
0.933
0.250
1.00
0
93.3
26.7
1 56
Chlorobenzene
ND
2.50
1.00
0
94.2
33.7
1 59
Chloroforrn
0.986
0.250
1.00
0
98.6
48.51
45
Te r e ler ethene
0.880
0.250
1.00
0
88.0
19.2
1 91
Trichloroethene
0.897
.2 o
1.00
0
89.738.4
167
Vinyl chloride
1.31
0.100
1.00
131
27.3
161
S rr. 4-Bromofluorobenzene
2520
2500
101
91.7
109
S rr: Dibromofluoromethane
2470
2500
98.7
76.5
11
Burn Toluene-d8
2530
2500
101
94.1
105
Sample ID;
21010360-001AMSD
S rnpT pe:
MSD
Client ID:
BatchOC
Batch ID:
47331
Result
Te tC de: TCLP-VOC- 1 Units, t L
Te tl o: SW8260
PQL SPK value
SW
S P K Fief Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 1 2 21
%REC Lowl-i it Hi hLi it IT'D Ref Val
RunNo: 122624
SegN : 3160964
%RPD RPDLimit
RunNo: 122624
Se N : 3160965
%RPD RPDLimit
1.12
0.20
1.0 0
112
13.6
22
1.0.72
2
``k`k r thane
F
.
0.250
1.00
5.
55.7
13
0.954 0,314
2.
Benzene
1.05
0.250
1.00 0
105
49.2
145
1.03 1.39
2
Qualifiers: B
AnalAnalyte detected in the associated Method
Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H
,
Holdingtips for preparation or analNo
J
Analdetected belov quantitationlimits
M Manual Integration used to determine area
response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ND
Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Pen -nit Limit
R
RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL Repoiling Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside accepted l tern
Qua]
QC+
Original
Page 13 of 36
AOil Mfg"
Client: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP
Sample ID: 21010360-001AMSD S pTy : MSD
Client I D: BaC
An l yt
Carbon tetrachlohde
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr 4-Bromofluorobenzene
S rr: Dibrornofluoromethane
S rr. T luen -M
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falk, Ohio 44223
L: 2 1 ,SAX. 253-4489
Batch ID: 47331
Result
T s C d:TCLP-11 C- Units: r L
T tN : SW8260
PQL SPK value
SW1311M
SPK Ref Val
QC SUMMARY REPORT
W0#-. 21010359
25-Jam-21
BatchID: 47331
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 1 /2 1
% EC L rLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val
I I : 122624
Sgfo: 3160965
%RPD RPDLimit
0.977
02501.00
0
9T7
26.7
156
0.933
4.61
25
IND
2.50
1.00
0
95.2
33.7
159
0
0
2
1.01
0.2501.0
101
48.5
145
0.986
2.21
2
0,867
0.250
1.00.7
19.2
1
.49
2
.912
0.250
1.0091.2
38.4
167
0.897
1.60
2
1.40
0.1001.0
140
27.3
161
1.31
6.05
2
2470
2500
98.9
9*1.7
109
2
2500
20
9.
75.5
118
2
2560
2500
94.1
105
2
Qualifiers: 13 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H
J Amatyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response M
ND Not Detected P Second column eonfin tion exceeds P
RPD outside accepted recovery 1 imits RL ReportingDetection. Limit S
Holding times for Preparation or anal*
Value is below Minimum Compound
Permit Limit
Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
al
QC+
original
Page 14 of 36
Ctient.0
#will
ENlrii70 MAEw7 P.lKY U 16w HNOi': bf kilf 5r 44'M
AnsIy L49bW*p~
Synagro
Suinmit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
W s: : wo w., :.#om
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#q 21010359
25-Jan-2I
Project: Fannville WWTP BatchID: 47345
Sample ID: TCLP BLANK 1 146 S Ty : MBLK
T s C d: M-TCLP.7 Units: mg/L
Client
ID: PBS
Balch ID: 47345
Tes#No: SW6010D SW3010A
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
TCLP
Arsenic(As)
ND
0.500
TCLP
Bariurn(Ba)
ND
SAfl
TCLP
Cadmium(Cd)
NO
0•100
TCLP
Chromium(Cr)
ND
0•200
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
Na
0.0500
TCLP
Silver(Ag)
ND
0.500
Sample ID: TCLP BLANK 2 1.16 S m Ty : MBLK
T tC l : Mt1-TCLP- Units: mg
Client
ID: PBS
Batch ID; 47345
TestNo: SW6010D SW3010A
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
TCLP
Arsenic(As)
ND
0.500
TCLP
Bariurn(Ba)
ND
5.04
TCLP
Cadmium(Cd)
ND
0.100
TCLP
Chromium(Cr)
ND
0.200
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
ND
0.0500
TCLP
Siiver(Ag)
ND
0.500
Prep Date: 1118/2021
Analysis Date: 1 1 1 1
°S EC LowLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val
Prep Date: 1 2021
Analysis Date-, 1 1 1
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
R nNo: 122637
S I o: 3161701
%RPD RPI Urnit Qua]
R 1 : 122637
SeqNo.- 3161702
%RPD R DUmit
Qualffiersq& B Analyte detected in the associatedMetbod Blank E Value above quantitationo preparation or analk
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Intention used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected. P Second column confirmation e ce ds PL Pennit Limit
RPD outside accepted recovery liniiis RL Reporting Detection Umit S Spike Recovery outside accepted repo
Quaff
Original
Page 15 of 36
Client:
Summit Environmental Technologies,
U JV1 rA 111
3310 Win St_
ENVIRONMENTAL TIC - G; , W
y1JCtom
Synagiro
'uuyanoga tabs, urno qLf .z
LO 2 Y 2 1 Fes- , _ -4489
Website2:11www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
25-Jun-21
D,.a,.1.iT. A^I'SAG
Project: Farmville W W'1'F
NNW -
Sample ID- III 34
STp: MBLK
TestCode-. Mtl-TCLP.7(6 Units: mg/L
Client
ID: PBS
Bach ID: 47345
TestNo; SW6010D SW3010A
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
TCLP
Arsenic(As)
ND
0.504
TCLP
Barium(Ba)
ND
5,00
TCLP
Gadmium(Cd)
ND
0.100
TCLP
Chrorniurn(Cr)
ND
0.200
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
ND
0.0500
TCLP
Si1ver(Ag)
ND
0.500
Prep Date.
Analysis Late:
12 '1
% EC LowlLimit Highl.imit RPDRef Val
Sample ID: LCS 345 S pT . LCS T stC d . l#TCLPUnits: L
Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 47345 TostNo: SW601 OD S 3 1
Anal to Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
Prep Date: 1 2 2
Analysis Date: 1/7812021
LowL.ir 'ft HighLimit RPD Ref Val
TCLP
ri
0-500
2.000
0
88.4
80
120
TGLP
ri*
5.00
2.000
o
120
TCLP
C m 1 uCd)
1.95
0.100
2.000
o
97.4
80
120
TCLP
Chromium(Cr)
2. 2
0.2
1
80
120
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
1.92
0.500
2.000
o
95.8
80
120
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
1.98
0.o o
2yo o
o
98.8
80
120
TCLP
Silver
2.02
0.500
2.o o
o
101
80
120
Qualiffers: 1B
Analyte detected in the associated Method.
Blank.
E Value above quantitation r
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual
Integration used to determine
area response
MC
ND
Not Detected
P Second
column confirmation exceeds
PL
RPD outside accepted recovery limits
Reporting Detection Limit
S
nNo 122583
S Igo: 3160416
%RPD RPLiit
S : 3160417
%RPD RP[ Limit
Holding times for preparation or anal
Value is below Minfinum Cornpound
Pennit Limit
Spike Recovery outside accepted reed
Original
Page 16 of 36
Client:
Arwyftw � - - . - IF 6WW
Synagro
Summit nirm . a Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 4422
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
Website: ha://www.seUek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
2-Jun-2
Project: Farmville WWTF ID Line 47345
4M P "01 Ipm
Sample ID: 21010699-OOIAMS Sam T p : MS
T Co : Mt1,,TCL . Units: r L
Prep Date: 1118/2021
Client
ID: SatchQC
Batch ID: 47345
T tN :
SW6010D
SW3010A
AnalysisDate. 1/1812021
Analyte
Result
P L SPK value
SPK Fief Val
°a1 EC
L 1 Limit
Hi hL1mIt RPD Ref Val
TCLP
r nl )
1.84
0.500
2.000
Or00292491.7
70
13
TCLP
u
ND
5.002.000
0.1995
87.670
130
TCLP
Cadmium C
1.85
0.100
2z000
o
92.5
70
130
TCLP
Chrorni Cr
1.82
0.200
2.000
0
91.2
70
130
TCLP
Lead(Pb)
1.64
0.5002.000
0
82.0
70
13
TCLP
Selenium(Se)
2.21
0.0500
2,000
0.01535
110
70
13
TCLP
Silver
2.00
0.500
2.000
o
1
70
130
r Ll!" Now 122
S q1 : 3160422
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sample 1D_ 21010699401AMSD
Sara . MSD
TestCodef.
1 t1-TCLP.
Units: /L
Prep Date:
1118/2021
1 u nNo. 122583
Client 1D: BatchQC
Batch ID: 47345
T st1 .
SW6010D
SW3010A
Analysis Date.
111812021
S c No. 3160423
Analyte
Result
P L SPK value SPK Fief Val
%REC
LowLimit HighLimit 1 PD
Pet" Val
%RPD RP Li 1t
TCLP Arsenic(As)
1.76
0.500
2,.oo
0.002924
88.1
70
130
1.837
4.02
2
TCLP
ND
5.00
2.000
0.1995
83.2
70
130
0
o
2
TCLP Cadrnium(Cd)
1.7
0.100
2.000
0
88.8
70
130
1.850
4--092
TCLP {dry 'F
1.75
0.200
2.000
0
87.3
70
130
1.823
435
2
1iP Lead(Pb)
1.59
0.500
2.000
0
79.4
70
130
1.639
3.17
2
TCLP l r ids
2.14
0.0500
2.000
0-01535
106
70
130
2.207
2.91
2
TCLP Silver(Ag)
1.91
0.500
2.000
0
95.6
70
130
2.002
4.62
20
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Btank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anab,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Conipound
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit
RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Repoiling Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted r co
Qual
O1
riginal
Page 17 of 36
ut
INC
AsIMy��iil
cat:
Summit nv o r Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls., Ohio 44223
TEL.- (330) 2- F.X. 253-4489
SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
25- Tan-2
Project: Farmville WW'L'Y BtchID47346
Synagro
Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS
Client ID:
n l t
BatchQC
Sam pTyp : NIS To tCod : SVOC-BNAT Units: /L
Batch ID., 47346 T st lo: SW8270 S 3 1 C
Result PQL SK value SPK Re# Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1/1812021
1 /18 2 21
%REC LowLi it HighLimit RPDRefVal
14-Dichlorobenzene
Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS
Client ID:
n l t
BatchQC
Sam pTyp : NIS To tCod : SVOC-BNAT Units: /L
Batch ID., 47346 T st lo: SW8270 S 3 1 C
Result PQL SK value SPK Re# Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1/1812021
1 /18 2 21
%REC LowLi it HighLimit RPDRefVal
14-Dichlorobenzene
0.624
0.200
0.8000
0
78.0
15.2
12
-Trichl rr h I
0.864
0.5000.8000
08
30.6
152
2,4,6-Trichicrophenol
0.833
0.500
0.8000104
27.6
1 50
21 -D i it ro olu
0.920
0.100
0.8000
0
115
58
1'1
-Cresol
0.802
0.500
0.8000
0
10
26.9
132
Hexachl cro-1 3~b t di ne
0.651
0.0400
0.8000
1.
1
Hexachicrobenzene
0.740
0.100
0.8000
0
92.6
54.3
142
Hexachloroethane
0.612
0.200
0.8000
0
76.51.92
131
Nitrobenzene
0.762
0.200
0.8000
0
95.2
21
135
Prrd' r
D
0.500
0.8000
o
26.
10
13
Surr: 2-Fluoropherol
0.859
1.000
85.9
.77
1 46
Burr. Phenol--M
0.962
1.000
96.2
20.7
130
Surr: Nitr n-d5
0.869
1.000
86.9
13.9
156
Su r. -Tri r m o hen l
1.25
1.000
125
27.3
183
Sint 2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.743
1.000
74.3
21.4
153
Sum-. p-TerphenyW14
1.14
1.000
114
54.8154
Sample ID:
1'i 3-OOIAMSD
S pT p :
MSD
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID:
47346
Analyte Result
T tCod : S oC N T Units: m /L
T t l: SW8270 SW351 C
PL SK value SPK Ref Val
Qualifiers: B Anatyto detected in the associated Method Blank
Analyte detected below quantitation limits M
ND Not Detected P
RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL
Prep Date: 111 /2 2
Analysis Date: 111812021
%REC LowLi it HighLi it RPD Ref Val
Value above quantitation range
Manual integration used to determine area response
Second colum-n confirmation exceeds
Reporting orti Detection Limit
RunNo: 122610
S eq No: 3161396
%RP[D RIDDLimit Qual
RunN : 122610
Sq Igo: 3161397
RPDLi it
Holding times for preparation or anab
40
MC 'value is below Minimum Compound
L Pen -nit Limit
S Spike recovery outside accepted tern
Original
Page 18 of 36
Client:
Amoimll~ L." 41 .. -
syna,gro
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
33oWin St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL.- (330) 253-8211 FAX- (330) 253-4489
Websi*te: htW,-11www.settek. con?
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Project: Farmville WWTY BatchID: 47346
WO#*W 21010359
2, _ n-2
Sample ID: 191 ►MS
Sara T . MSD
T tC d _
SVOC-BNA
T Units: Ong/L
Prep Date.
111812021
F 1 . 122610
Client ID: Bate C
Batch ID: 47346
TestNovp
SW8270
SW351 C
Analysis Date:
11 /2 21
S N : 3161397
Analyte
Result
P L SPK value
SPK Ref Val
%REC
LowLimit HighLimit
RPD Ref Val
%RPD RP Umit
A-Dichlorobenzene
. o
.20
M 0
5.
.2
124
41 23
.5
o
i nol
0.9080.500
0.8000114
30.6152
0.8640
4.97o
2,4,6-Trich [crop he n#
0.873
0.500
0.8000
0
109
27.6
150
0.8332
4.64
3
- r
o
0,800D
0
107
26.9
132
0.8020
6.33
3
Hexachloro-1 3--b t d i n
0.0400
. 000
0
84.8
10
156
0.6512
4.09
3
Hexachlorobenzene
0.779
0.10097.4
54.3
142
0.7396
5.21
3
.`;�+'�E bane
0.679
0.200
0.8000
0
84.81.92
131
0.6116
10.4
3
Nitrobenzene
. 44
0.200
0.8000106
21
135
0.7616
10.3
3
Pthlrpb col
0.924
0.500
0.8000
0
116
47.4
134
O�8760
5.33
30
Pyridine
Sum. 2-Fluorophenol
0.946
1.000
94.6
9.77
14
rr: Phenol- 6
f
0.966
1.000
96.6
20.7
13
Su rr, -T ri brornophenol
1.38
1.000
138
27.3
183
Surr. -1u r bibey l
0.767
1.000
76.721.4
153
urr, -Ter ben l- 14
1.21
1.000
121
54.8
154
Qualifiers: Anal detected i the associated Method
Blank
E Value above an#i# .ti range
H
ldi� ��� forpreparation. �-0
J Analyte detected below quantitationlimits
M Manual
Int g ti n used to deter-minearea
response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ID Not Detected
P Second
column confirination
exceeds
PL
P nit Limit
D 1u.t i .e
accepted recovery limits
RL Reporting Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery
outside accepted. reco
Original
Page 19 of 36
Client:
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
lu III" A
3310 Win St.
r CuyahogaFalls, Ohio 22
ENVIRONMA OWWv""i Loborstoo0a
E 2 - Fes• 253-4489
W fi rt h . �► w- com
Synagro
QC SUMMARY REPORT
D.. a..l.iT. AP72A4
Project: Fann-vil e W WTY aM.u��.
Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS
Client ID:
Aiyt
BatchQC
Cresols, Total
SampType: MS
Batch I D : 44
Result
ND
Sample ID:
QC SUMMARY REPORT
D.. a..l.iT. AP72A4
Project: Fann-vil e W WTY aM.u��.
Sample ID: 21010399-001AMS
Client ID:
Aiyt
BatchQC
Cresols, Total
SampType: MS
Batch I D : 44
Result
ND
Sample ID:
3 -PlAMS
sa Tp :
MS
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID49
47346
Ana I t
Cresols, Teti
Qualiffiters:
Result
T stC d : SVOC-BNAT Units: L
P L SPIN value SPK Ref Val
% REC
50.0 1.600 o 347
T stCod : SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Testa : SW8270 SW351C
PL SPK value SPK Ref Val
WO#: 21010359
Prep Date: 1/1812021 R nNo. 122695
Analysis Date: 1 12 21 Set : 3165442
LowLimit Hi h Limit R D Ref Val
Prep Date: 111812D21
Analysis Date: 111912021
° S EC LowLimit HighLimit R D Ref Val
2-Jan-2
%RPD RPULirnit Qual
Rol I : 122695
SeI : 31644
%RPD RPDLi it
IUD 50.0
1.600 o 330 10
148
o
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitatim range
H
Holding times for preparation or anah
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual hategration used to determinearea. response
MC
Value is below Minimum Co i ound
ND Not Detected.
P Second column co rn-lation exceeds
PL
Pen-nitPen-nit Limit
outside accepted recovery limits
RL ReportingDetection Limit
S
Spike Recovety outside accepted r co
30
S
Qual
S
Original
Page 20 of 36
S;U
A rm0VNroW LA6tW01041"
Client; Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP
Sample ID:
Client I: PBS
Analyte
1, --1 lohlorohenn
2, , -Tri oh l o roph e l
2,, -rie l orohel
2+[ l itr tol orye
o-Cresol
Cresols, Total
H exachlor - 1 , 3-buta d iene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Sum 2-F luorop he nol
Sure: Ph noW
Surr: 2-lorob ihel
Sum p^T r enyi- 1
Summit Eilm1 Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
EL 2 - 21 FAX.- 253-4489
W ,5 ." ham.* www. k. om
SampT e: MBLK
Batch I: 47346
Result
D
ND
N
ND
ND
D
N
D
N
N
N
0.875
0.931
T tCo e: SVOC-BNAT Units: L
Tetlo: S1`
P,L
0.100
0.250
0.250
0.0500
0.250
5.00
0.0200
0.0500
0.100
0.10
0.250
0.250
SPK value
Qualifiers: B Analytc detected in the associated Method Blank E
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M
ND Not Detected
R RPDoutside accepted recovery line t.s RL
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
SW31C
S P K Fief Val
Prep Date*
Analysis Date:
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
25-Jan-21
BatchID: 47346
1 12 2 1
111812021
°S EC Lo Limit HighUmit RPDRetVal
87.5
10
130
.1
10
130
89.8
19
130
109
10
130
.1
22
130
110
34
130
Value above quantitation rainge
Manual Integration used to delennine area response
Second column confirtnation exceeds
Reporting Detection Limit
RunNo: 122610
Selo: 3160440
%RPD RPI Limit
Molding times for preparation or anab
MC Value is below Minimum Cotilpound
PL Permit Limit
S Spike . co cr outside accepted t r co
Qua#
Original
Page 21 of 36
ENVIRONWNTAL
Client: Synagro
Project; Fannville WWTP
Sample I C : LCS 3 6
Client ID: LCSS
Anllt
1 , 4^Cicb Iro benzene
,45-Tri h1 r eno1
.4,6-Tricb1 hanot
2,4-U ni ro lu n
c-Cresol
Cresols, Total
He chloro- #3-but dien
e t chi ro en erne
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentach lorophenol
Pyridine
Surr: 2- luoro henol
Srr: Phenol -
Sum Nitr b eneA
Surr: 2, 4 a -Tri rcr Ise o1
Surr, 2- l oro i henyl
S urr: -r b nl- l
Swnrnit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
EL: 330 2 3-FAX- 33 2534489
BatchI D : 47346
Result
0.4
0.982
.942
0.997
0.838
C
0.656
0.778
0.4
0.828
0.902
0.319
0.965
1.06
0.923
1.3
0.768
1.21
T tCo le: SVOC-BNA T nits: r lL
T ti : SW8270
PQL
0.100
0.250
0.250
0.0500
0.250
.o
o.o oo
0.0500
0.100
,100
0.250
0.250
S PK value
Quits: B Analyte detected In the associated Method Blank E
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M
ND Not Detected. P
: . RPD outside accepted recovery linaits RL
SW3510C
S PK Ref Val
0
0
0
0
Prep Cate:
Analysis Late:
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#-* 21010359
2-Jan-2
BatchID: 47346
1 12 1
1/1812021
%REC LowL.inn it HighLimit RPDRefVal
0.0
36.4
130
123
31.7
13
118
31.1
13
125
43.3
130
105
32.9
130
107
31.7
130
82.0
31.4
130
.3
43.1
13
80.6
36.5
130
103
39.5
13
13
34
130
39.9
o
130
.5
17.1
130
106
10
13
2.3
32.6
13
139
.3
130
76.8
41.8
130
121
36.4
130
Valueabove quantitation range
Manual Integration used to detem-nne area response
Second column confirmation exceeds
Reporting Detection Limit
nNo: 122610
Se lo: 3 441
%RPD RPDLimit
Holding times for preparation or anaIN
MC Value is below Minimum Con-ipound
PL Permit Limit
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Qua[
S
Original
Page 22 of 36
Client:
l4mOyft* L"-00f'IM
Synagro
Summi't LnWromnentalTechnologies, Inc.
3310 Wig'.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX., (330) 253-4489
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
2-.n-2
Project: FarmAlle WWTP BatchID: 4'7347
Sample 1D: 2 1 S r T yp : MS TestCodeff. TCLF -SOC- Units: mq1L
Client ID: Farmv1l1 VVWTP Batch ID: 47347 T I o: SW8081 SW351 C
Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
ndrin
gamma-C
Fleptachlor
Heptachbr epoxide
I I thoxy for
Surr: TCIX
Surr: DCB
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1/1 2 21
L wL1 it Hi hLi it RPD Ref Val
0.00751
Do oo
0.0100
o
75.1
10
22
O*00798
0.0005000.0100
o
79.8
10
192
0.00971
0.000500
0.0100
0
97.1
1
1 97
0,00868
0.0005000.0100
o
86.8
10
208
0.0115
0.000500
0.0100
o
115
10
251
1 3. 1
20.00
65.5
10
157
16.1
20.00
80.4
10
194
Sample ID:
21010359-001amsd
Sam pT r :
MS
Client 1D:
Farmville WVVTP
Batch ID:
47347
A1yt
Endrin
gamma-BHC
Heptachlor
Fleptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Surr: TCII
Surr: DC
Qualifters:
J
ND
Result
T C : TCLP-SC-m Units: Ong/L
TestNo: SW80 81
P L SPK value
SW3510C
SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1 /1 2 21
%REC LowLi It Hight-lt It RPD Ref Val
I I o: 122687
Sq 1: 3165893
% PD RPDLimit
Run N : 122687
SegNa: 3965894
%RPD PDL.i it
0.00968
0.000500
0.0100
o
96.8
10
224
0.00751
25.3
0.00837
0.000500
0.0100
0
83.7
10
12
0.00798
4. 77
0.0102
0.000500
0.0100
o
102
10
197
0.00971
4.72
0.002
.00 o
0.0100
92.9
10
208
0.00868
. 1
0.0124
0.000500
0.0100
124
1
251
0.0115
7.1
141
20.00
71.2
10
157
o
17.4
20.00
86.8
10
194
Analyte detected In the associated Mood Blank
Analyte detected below quantilation limits M
Not Detected
L outside accepted recovery tin -fits RL
Value above quantitation range H
Manual Integration used to determine area response MC
Second column confirmation exceeds PL
Reporting Detection Limit S
Holding times for preparation or anali
Value 1s below Minimum Compound
Permit Limit
Spike Recovery outside accepted reeo
Qual
M
QC+
QC+
ul
QC+
QC+
Qriginal
Page 23 of 36
Client:
Synagro
Summit ronmen Technologies, Inc.
o Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
EL 25 - FAX: o 253-4489
W i t : hLw.-Ilwww.seuek.com
QC SUMMARY RIEPORT
WO-#: 21010359
. -Ian- 2
Project: Farfn-v Ile WWTP Batch]OD: 47347
Sample I : LCS-47347
Sa p ype: LCS
Te tCode: TCL � oCw- Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 1 1 2 21
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 47347
TestNoo, SW8081 S' 351 C
Analysis Date: 1/1912021
A ai to
Result
POL SPK value SPK Ref Val
°SRC LowLimit Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val
Endrin
0.00711
0.000500
0.0100
0
71.1
10
130
m a- HC
0.00808
0.000500
0.0100
o
80,8
10
130
Heptachlor
o,-o9 3
0.000500
0.0100
0
98.3
10
13
Heptachlor epoxide
0.00867
0.000500
0.0100
0
86.710
13
M t o cyo l r
0.0111
0.000500
0.0100
0
ill
10
178
S rr: TCMX
13.4
20.00
66.8
10
130
Surr: DCB
16.6
o.00
82.9
10
13
Sample I : MB-47347 S pTyp : MBLK TestCod : CLP-SC-o Units: m
Client ID: PBS Batch ID: 47347 `1" t o: SW8081 SW3510C
Aalye Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
Chlordane, total
Toxaphene
Endrin
gamma -IC
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Ili etloy lr
Burn; TCI X
Burr* DCB
Prep Date= 1/1812021
Analysis Date: 1/1912021
Lo Li It HighLimit RPD Ref Val
20.00
65.4
ao
119
20.00
82.6
10
119
RIo: 1'
Seq i : 3165906
RP L! r
R n o: 122687
SegNo: 3165908
Quaff
nn
QC+
QC+
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
QC+
QC+
Qualifiters: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for reparation o anal)
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to dete rmine area response MC Value is below Minimum Cot you d Original
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit
outside accepted recovery limits T L Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 24 of 36
Suntnait Environmental Technologies, -Inc.3310 Win St. QC SUMMAR.�Pa1�T
1% .00 R.Y
%11��+i�f.�I�F7'��. �"�C�:��#�4�I>���lir � �, :N�' Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
AI�r C.awb�' TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX:{330} 253-4459 WO#W- 21010359
YYebsite: &ttp.-Ilwww.settek.com 2S-Jan-21
Client: Synagro
Project; Farrnville WWTP BatchlD. 47349
Sample ID: MS-47349
Client ID: PBS
I Analyte
TCLP Mercury
Sample ID: LCS-,47349
Client I; LCss
f Analyte
TCLP Mercury
Sample ID: LCs -4 349
Client ID: LCss 2
I Ana lyte
TCLP Mercury
Sample I
Client ID:
I Analyte
D : M B2-47349
TCLP Mercury
srpTye: MBLK
Batch 111 47349
Result
M#
SamType.b LCs
Batch I: 44
Result
0.00363
SampType: LCSD
Batch ! D: 47349
Result
0.00359
Sa Typei MBLK
Catch I D : 47349
Result
ND
Tes C de: HG TCL 4 Units: PP
T t o: SW7470A SW747 A
P L SPK value SPK Ref Val
o}2o
TestC : HG.TCL 74 Units- PPM
TestNo: SW747A S 747 A
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
0.0020
Prep Date: 1118/2021
Analysis Date: 1/1 /2021
°SRC Lo vLimit Hghl,l It RPD Ref Val
Prep Date: 1/1 12 21
Analysis Date: 1/ 912 21
°SRC Lo vLi it HighLimit RPD Ref Val
O�00400 0 90.82
Te tCo e: HG TC L 74 Units: P M
Test o : S 747 3A SW747 A
L SPK value SPIN Ref Val
Prep Date: 1118/2021
Analysis mate: 1 /1912021
° REC Lot Lima Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val
.0400 0 89.8120
TestCo : G�TCLP 74 nits: PPM
T tl : SW7470A SDI'747A
P L SPIN value SPK Ref Val
0.00200
Qualifiers; B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limit
Prep lute: 1118/2021
Analysis Date: 111912021
.o3
%R C Lo Li it Hi hLimit RPD Fief Val
R n o: 122631
Se N : 3161072
%RPD RP Lirnit Qual
Ru N 4 122631
Se o' 3161073
%FZPD # I Li 1t ]
Ru ; I 122631
S No: 3161074
%RPD RPDLirnit Qual
1.11 20
RunNo., 122631
Selo: 3161090
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Value bo e quantitation range H Holding times for preparation. or anal-%
41,
M Manual Integrafion used to d t rmi area response MC Value is below Minimum u Compound
Second colurnn confirmation exceeds PL Perinit Limit
RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
original
Page 25 of 36
ENVIRONVENTAL tt, CHN0t(}QaF!';, ;fir:
F!
Art�lyMawf LA6arillf000rr
Summil Environmental Technologies, Inc.
33Win St.
Cuyahoga .falls, Ohio 44223
TEL, (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#-. 21010359
-Jars-.
Client: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP BatchlD: 47349
Sample I D : MIB247349 SpTyp: NIBLK itCd: G..TCL units: PPI
Client I: PBS Batch I* 47349 T tNo SW7470A S
Analyte ResuIt PL SPK value SPEC Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1 12 1
1 1 /2 21
°S EC L rrLimit HighLN it RPD Ref Val
Sample ID: MIB347349 S Typ : M LK T tC : G.T L Units: PPIM
Client ID: PBS Batch ID: 47349 T tNo SW7470A SW7470A
Analyte Result P L SPIN value SPIN Ref Val %REG
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1 1 I2 21
1 l2 2
LowLi mit Hight-ir it RPD Ref Val
RunNov. 122631
Seq : 3161090
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
R N = 122631
Su: 3161093
% PL RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury ND 0.00200
Qualiflemp B Auialyte detected tbt associated Method Blanktic above titrrange Holding mmotor- W
J Analytc detected below quatifitation limiUs M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Conipound.
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit
RPD outside accepted recovery fimits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Original
Page 26 of 36
- Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc, QC
SUMMARY
"PORT����331U Win St.
f�i�t��l��4�1'��. �`'�(�€��.�����5, �M� Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
A�Af�rf#o� WO#: 21010359
L�11Mb�r►�iCgr*5 TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX:(330) 253-4489
Wehsite.• lattp;//wvirw.settek.com 25-Jan-21
Client: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP Batchl]D: R122408
Sample ID:
LCS-R122408
SampTyp .
LCS
tCode:
I tabs ity,�,SUnits: mmlsec
Prep
Date:unI
o_
Client ID:
LOSS
Batch I.
R122408
T I l .
SWI030
AnalysisDate.
1 /13 1
S No:
3152374
Analyte Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Loy Limit i hl-imit RIND Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability 6.87 7.240o 94.9 70 13
Sample ID:
3- DU
S r pTypo:
DUP
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch I:
R122408
Analyte
Iitabiiit
Sample I: 21010307
Client ID: BatchQG
Analyte
Iitbi1ity
T stC 3d : Ignitabillity.S Units: mmlsec
T tl oa- SW1 030
Desalt P L SPK value SPK Fie# Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 3/2 21
%REC Lo Li it Hi Limit RPD Ref Val
u o: 122408
S # o : 3152376
%RPD RPDLimit I
2.2 0 0 20
-002ADUP SampTy : DUP
Batch ID: R122408
TestC d : 1 ref bility,,..,S Units: mmlsec
P L SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 111 12 1
% REC LowLl r it HighLimit RPD Ref Val
RunNo: 122408
SeqNo: 3152379
%RPD RPDLimit Quaff
2. 2 o o 2
Sample ID:
21010307.,003ADUP
Sa Ty :
DUP
Client ID,,,,
BatchQC
Batch I[:
R122408
Analyte
iitbility
Qualifiers:
Result
nonflammable
T tC d: I i# "lli y,�� l r it : mmlsec
}T stNo: SWI 030
H Analyte detected In the associated Method Blank
J Analyte, detected below antitati limits
N11) Not Detected
R RPD outsideaccepted recovery limits
P L SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 111312021
°DREG LowLimit it Hi hL.ir it RPD Ref Val
l u N : 122408
S [o: 3152382
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Value above quantitation range Holding times for preparation or analk
M Manual Integration aced to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Cot i - id Original
Second column ration eyceeds PL Permit Lir ft
RL Repmfing Detection Limit S Spike Recover outside accepted reco
Page 27 of 36
Summit n it-0 m c nol gies, Inc..
QC SUMMARY "�]?ORT
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
EMqAOW,,AC- NTALTtCHNMOGIFSINC WO#1_ 21010359
ANAW"I L41bo"10-rol TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
W i: : vvw . ttk m 25 -Jan-2
Client: Synagro
Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: R122408
Sample ID:
1 1 3O - O ADUP
S pT rp :
DUP
Client ID:
BatchOG
Batch ID:
F 12240
Analyte
Igni ilit
Result
T stC : I it billity�S Units: mm/sec
TestNo: SW'I03
PaL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 /131 0 1
%REC LowLimit HigbLir it RPD Ref Val
u ow 122408
Seal : 3152394
% P D RPIDUrnit Qual
2r2 0 o 20
Sample ID:
21010307-009ADUP
SampType.-
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID:
R12240
Analyte
Result
T stCod : 1 ni Ilia � Units: m/sec
TestNo: SWI030
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 '1 1 021
%REC Lo Li it HighLlmit I PD Ref Val
u No: 122408
Sll: 3152397
% PD RPDLimit Qual
<2.2 0 0 20
Sample 10:
21010307.sOlOADUP
SampT rp :
DUP
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID:
R122408
Ana fyte
Ignitalilit
Result
TetCod: lniill1ty�,units: mmlsec
TestNo: 030
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 111 /202
%REC LowLirnit Hi hLir it I PD Fief Val
RunNo: 122408
Se Igo: 3152400
% PD RPDLirnit Qual
2.2 0 o 2
Sample l D :
21010192-OOIADUP
Say pTyp :
DLL
Client ID:
BatchOC
Baton ID:
R122408
Ana lyte
Iilility
Result
nonflammable
T stCod y 19nitabillity S nits: mmlsec
Te t l o: S1I 13
Qualiffiers: 1B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below qa ti#a on firr*ts
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted -recovery limits
PL SPK glue SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Dante: 111 W2 2
%REC LowLirnit High Limit RPD Ref Val
u o: 122408
Se: 31 240
%RPD F PI Li it Qual
o
Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anab
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minh r Con-io d
P second column confirmation exceeds PL refit Limit
L Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted r c
20
original
Page 29 of 36
SumnzztEtzvirvnmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY RIEP(�RT
. I - ; . ... in.. 11 3.�za Win st.
F I A-1
ENt�lt',������t'tl`,�L ���I�Ni�:����'�, MCCuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
A�t}rt��f �.�i0r'�1i�K�s TEL: (330) 253-8.�I1 FAX- (330) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359
Website: iitlA:IlWINYV.Selt6k [:OTl1 25-Jan-2.1
Client: Synagro
Project: Fannville WWTP BOOED: R122408
Sample ID:
21010307403ADUP
S pTy :
DUP
TestCode.m
Ignitability.S Units: mm/sec
Prep
Date:
I unNo:
122408
Ghent I:
BatchQC
Batch I.
R122408
T s N ,
SW1 030
AnalysisDate:
11 1
S I.
315238.2
Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val %REC L wLI it HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD F P Limit Q al
Sample ID:
21010307-004ADUP
S pTy :
DUPE
T tC .
I ft iIity�,Units. /sec
Prep
Date:
nNo:
122408
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID.
R122408
T stf .
SW1 030
Analysis
Date: 1/13/2021
S qNo*
3152384
Analyte
Ignitability
Sample ID: 21010307
Client ID: BC
Analyte
Ignitabifty
Result PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
nonflammable
.00!5ADUP S mpTy : DUP
Batch ID: R122408
Result
nonflammable
T stC : l l it t " Units: mmfsec
TestNoa. SWI 030
I QL SPK value SPIN Ref Val
%REC L wLi it HighLi it RPD Fief Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 21
%RPD RPDLimit Quaff
0 Q 20
°DREG LowLimit HighLi it RPD Fief Val
fuI: 122408
S N . 3152386
%RPD RPDLimit Qua[
Sample ID:
21010307406ADUP
SarnpType.,
DUP
T stC :
l nit ilit ,S Units: mmlsec
Prep
Date:
I u I :
122408
Client I C:
BatchQC
Batch ID-,.,
R122408
T tl :
SWI 030Analysis
Date: 1/1 2 2
Seq :
3152388
Analyte Result P L SPK value SPK Fief Val °SI C L vLir it Hi Lir it RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit
I nitabilit 2.2 0 0 2
Qualiriers: B Anal to detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anali
fto
Anatyte detected below quaintitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Co pound
ND Not Detected P Second col confirmation exceeds PL Pen -nit Limit
RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Qua!
Original
Page 28 of 36
Client:
rj ect6
ENVIRONMENTAL tCHiht0l:.!bGi�S, lNC
A nMIN M FF li L�"Ar�►r�
Synagro
Farrnviflle
WWTP
Su7ninit EnvironmentalTechnologies} Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX (330) 253-4489
Website: httv.-Ilwww.settek.com
Sample ID:
1'1 3 - IAC P
Sa pT p :
DUP
Client ID:
Farmville WWTP
Patch ID:
R122408
Aalyt
Ignitability
Sample ID: 21010360-401ADUP
Client I L:
Analyte
Ignita ilit
BatChQC
T tC d : T i ll ity�.S
TestNo.- SWI03
Units: mm/sec
Result P L SPK value SPK Ref Val
nonflammable
S a m Typ : DUP
Batch ID: R122408
Result
nonflammable
T stCod : Ignitabillityl.,S
Units: mm/sec
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
. alyte detected below qua tit Lion limits M
ND Not Detected
PD outside accepted recovery limits RL
Prep Date.
naf si Date:
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
BatchID: R122408
111312021
%R C Lo Limit HighLireit RPD Ref Val
Prep Date:
2-Jan-2
122408
2
SNo: 311
%RPD RP Lir tt
0 o Zo
Analysis Date: 1/13/2021
%R C LowLimit HighUmit RPD Ref Val
Value above quantization range
Manual Integation used to determine area response
Second column confirmation exceeds
Deporting Detection Limit
.unN : 122408
SegNo: 3152413
%RPE) RPDLimit
Holding times for preparatiroti or anal:
MC Value is below Minimum Compound
L Permit Limit
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reeo
Qual
Original
Page 31 of 36
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
*lit REP R
3310 Win St. QC SUMMARY 0 T
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
WO#: 1 359
+ �r� : (330) 2.53- 2 FAX.- 33 253-4489
Wit; www_ee1. #ors 2-R-2
Client: Synagro
Project: Fannville WWTP Batc6ID: R122408
Sample ID:
21010192.%001ADUP
SarnpTy :
DU
Client ID:
SatchQC
Batch ID:
R122408
Artalyte
Result
Sample 1 D :
21010278-OOIADUP
Sa pTy :
DU
Client ID:
BatchQC
Batch ID:
R122408
Analyte
Ignit bllity
Result
nonfla mmable
Sample ID:
21010279-001ADUP
Sa Typ :
DUP
Client 1D:
BatchQC
Batch ID:
R122408
Analyte
1gnit billty
Result
nonflammable
Sample lD:
'ADP
SarpTy:
DP
Client ID:
BatchOC
Batch ID:
R122408
Analyte
lgnit billty
Qualifiers:
T
ND
R
Result
nonflammable
T Code: Ignit illi S Units: mmlsec
Te t l o: SW 1 030
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
TestCodem. lgnitabiilloit,S Units: /sec
Teto: SW 1030
PL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Te tCo : l nit bllit " Units: rim/sec
TestNo,., S1 13
PL SPK value SPK Ref Val
T tCo f lgnitabffltyS Units: m/sec
` estl o: SW103
L SPK value SPK Rat Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: / 13 2'1
%REC LowLi it HighLim it RPD Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: /1 21
%REC LowLi nit HighLimit RIND Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 /13 1
RunNo: o: 122408
Sql: 3152403
%RPD f PDL! it Qual
Ruo: 122408
SgNo: 3152405
% P D RPDLImit Qual
0 0 20
%REC Lo Limit High! -unit RPD Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 2 '1
RunNo: 122408
Sgllo: 3152407
%RPD R I I-Imit Qual
0 0 20
%REC LowLimit Hi hLimit RPD Ref Val
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above gatittion range
Anal to detected below quantitation tits M Manual integration used to determine area. response
Not Detected. ' Second column confirmation exceeds
outside accepted recovery limits RL ReportingRepoiling Detection Limit
Rulo: 122408
S q : 3152409
%RPD F PDLlnnit Qual
a o 20
H Holding times for preparation or anal-i
MC Value is below MirLimum Compotin
L permit Limit
S Spire Recover outside accepted r co
Original
Page 30 of 36
5urnniit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT
3310 Win St.
F`��'��C�N ��+tT�t. �'�GC�i�i3t��3����, WCCuyahoga Fairs, Ohio d4223
Anima �� TEL: (33 0) 253-5211 FAX- (33 0) 253-4489 WO#: 21010359
Website: hM.•//www.settek. corn 25-Jan-2I
Client: Synago
Project: Farmvi-fle WWTP
Sample IE : 21010545-OOIADUP
Client IL:
alyt
BatchQG
SampTyp : DUP
Batch 1131., R122413
Result
H 6.6
TtCo; H.il Units: .,@2.0
Qualiffiters: 13 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
L S K value SPK Ref Val
I Analyte detected below quantitation limits M
ND Not Detected
RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL
%REG
BatchID: R122413
Prep Date:
Analysis Date: 1 322
LowL i it HighLimit RPD Ref Val
u: 122413
So: 3153357
%RPD RPDLimit
o 6.7 0.3 1
Value above quantitati on range
Manual Intention used to determine area response
Second column confirmation exoe e s
Reporting Detection Limit
Holding times for preparation or anal
MC Value is below Minimum Coy- po nd
PLPen-nit Lirnit
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
ul
Original
Page 32 of 36
Client:
U .11%,IA41T
ENVIRONMENTAL ,VEi�Y:�1L7�fY��Ai''Lr� Tel
Synagro
Summit Environmental Technologies, -Inc.
3310 Win .fit.
Cuyahoga hog a # Ohio 44223
L -21 `X 253-4489
Q *yy ��] /y: {�
i
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 21010359
2-Jan-2
Project: Farmville WWTP BatchID: RI-22413
0 P N
Sample ID: S-11122 13
Client I:
Analy#e
LCSW
Sa Ty : LCS
Batch ID: R122413
Result
T C . P . PW Units. s.u.@20.2C
TstNo: SWL
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Cate:
Analysis fate: 1113 2 21
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
H 7.0 7.0 0 101 98.6
Sample ID: CHECK 7
Client ICE: 1.CSW
I Anafyte
S T pe: LCS
Batch I D : R122413
Felt
TestCode: PH.NPW(450 Units: sm.@203C
TestNopSW 4
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
Prep Date:
Analysis Date:
1 /1312 21
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
RunNo: 12 413
Salo: 31331
%RPD RPDUmit Qua!
Rondo:
122413
S I o: 3153801
%RPD RPDLimit
H To
To 0 100 98..6
101.4
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
E Value above quantitation range
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
H
MC
Holding times for preparation or anah
Value is below Minimum Con-ipound
ND Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Pen -nit Limit
RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL Reporting Detection Limit
S
Spire Recovery outside accepted reco
Original
Page 33 of 36
Summit En v iron in en ta I Technologies, In.
3310 Win ,fit".
ENVIAONNIENTAL TEC H NO t.- -1
Client: Synagro
Project: Famvi'lle WWTP
Sample I : 21010278-OOIAMS
Client ID:
Alyce
BatchQC
Cuyahoga Falls, Uhio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#*0 21010359
R122714
SampT r : MIS T stC d : TCLP-S V C. Units: %Rec Prep p Date: N y 122714
Surr: 2,4-Oichlorophenylacetic acted
Feint PQL SK value SK Ref Val
162
Sample ID:
21010278-001AMSD
SampType:
MSD
Client J :
13atchQC
Batch ID:
R122714
Aaiye
Surrr 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acid
Result
T s C de: TCL -S C-o Units: %Rec
Testa : SW8321
P L S PK value S K Fie# Val
Analysis Date: 1 12 2 1
%R C Lo ri it HighU it RPD Ref Val
108 70 130
'rep Date:
Analysis Date: 111812021
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
164 150.0 9 70 13
25-Jan-21
SegN : 3166169
%RPD RPDLi it
nNo: 122714
Sqi: 3166170
%RPD RPDLirnit
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above qua titan n range H Holding times for preparatioft or anal
J Analyte detected below quantitation finilts M Manual Integration used to d t -ime area response MC value is below Minimum Compound
IUD Not Detected P Second ncolumn confirmation exceeds PL Permit Limit
RPD outside td recovery limits
RL Reporting to ti Limit
s Spike Rty outside accepted ro
Qual
Page 34 of 36
CD
Cn
0
h
............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . .
PAR D
-Ass !Ism
0
N tes/Com 1 ts*
Mite u(I yellow paM shWW s=mpany srmpl" sp the laboratory. 7bd client febms
Lei)
the p-bik pap.
or samOv. 0.0..
CExnv#vAn' ON R vro *40
o(L"PORT TO 13TAU (OW ONLY NO
I ( p .10 pkIv PA h t p WO m,
j r 4"WpWS A WN fond
WA *it Mai" fewjk# #p pm
121414 t
Page 1 of 1
Summit ,Environmental Technologies, Inc.
IRIV11T 3310 Win St.
J;U
NV-IRNMEZINTAL TECMN0L0 a1F9. INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Sample Lai -In Check List
on�r�tica�� t,�bor,�ro TEL: (330) 253-82I1 FAX.- (330) 253-4489
Website: http://www.settek.cam
Ghent Name: SYN-NC-2702$ Work Order Number: 21010359 RcptNo: 1
Logged by: Jesseca E. Wesffall 118/202110:25;00 AM
Completed By: Jacqueline Rasile 1/101202110:38:15 AM
Reviewed By: Sara E. Kidd 111112021 1 -23:52 PM
Chain of Custod,_v
1.4 Is Chain of Custody compete? Yes 91
2, How was the sample delivered? UPS
L2Z.1n
x�ana-lGi�.
No El Not Present []
3,
Coolers are present?
Yes
�✓❑
No
❑
NA
El
4.,
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Yes
No
F
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Yes
❑
No
El
Not Present
DV
No. Seal Date:
Signed By:
5,
Was an attempt made to cook the samples?
Yes
0
No
NA
C
g,
Were all samples received at a temperature of >0° C to 6.0°C
Yes
+❑
No
❑
NA
7,
Sample(s) in proper cvntainer(5)?
Yes
Ve
No
$,
Sufficient sample volume for indicated tests)?
Yes
0
No
❑
g,
Are samples (except VOA and QNG) properly preserved?
Yes
No
❑
10.
Was preservative added to bottles?
Yes
❑
No
NA
❑
11.
Is the headspace in the VOA vials less than 1f4 inch or 6 mm?
Yes
❑
No
❑
No VOA Vials
FV-1
12,
Were any sample containers received broker?
Yes
❑
No
13.
Does paperwork mach bottle labels?
Yes
No
(Note discrepancies on chain of custody)
14.
Are matrices correctly identified an Chain of Custody?
Yes
No
F I
15.
Is it clear what analyses were requested?
Yes
No
❑
16.
Were all holding times able to be met?
Yes
No
(If no, notify customer for authorization.)
S ecia! Handfing.[i:f oipj2licablej
17.
Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order?
Yes
El
No
El
NA
W
Person Notified: Date:
18, Additional remarks:
Cooker Information
Cooler No
Tem
3.5
°G Condition
Good
— ---------
Sea# Intact. Seal No Seal Date
Not Present
Sianed Bv �
Page 36 of 36
0Anal
Report of Analysis
Synagro
12701 Lancaster Hwy
Pineville, NC 28134
Attention: Chris Wynne
Project Name: Farmville WWTP
Lot Number:WA08031
Date Completed:01/26/2021
01 /26/2021 11:59 AM
Approved and released by;
Project Manager II: Lucas Odom
ANSI Hationt Accreditation Board
�RE3ITED
"BESTING LABORATORY
The
electronic signature above is the equivalent
of a handwritten
signature.
This
report shall not be reproduced, except in its
entirety, without
the written approval of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172
Tel: 803-791-9700 Fax.-- 803=791 m9l 11 www.pacelabs_com
Page I of 7
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
SC ��=_Ml 111
DHEC No,., 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Synagro
Lot Number: WA08031
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative. The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results fisted in this report reface only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved The NELAC institute (TNT) standards, the Pace Analytical Services, LLC ("Pace")
Laboratory Quality Manual, standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Pace policies. Any exceptions to
the TNI standards, the Laboratory Quality Manual, SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or
discussed below.
Where applicable, III soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "Ili"
qualifier
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the
cover gage.
The pH analysis associated with the sample(s) in this report was/were performed after the method
recommended 15 minute holding time.
Metals by 1CP
Due to low % solids the initial amount of these samples was 3 times the standard procedure amount per
PM's request. The LOQ has been adjusted accordingly.
TKN
Samples run at decreased volume due to sample matrix.
Pace Analytical Services, LLc (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage a Point Drive vest Columbia, SC 29172 1-97 Fax 3 7 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com
Page 2 of 7
Client: Synagro
Description: Farmville WWTP
Laboratory I : WA08031 -001
Matrix: Solid
Date Sampled: 0 1 /0712021 7230
Date Received; 01I08/2021
Run Prep Method
350.1
I
i
3
1 351 .4
Analytical Method
(% Solids) SM
2540G
(Ammonia - N
) 350.1
(Nitrate - N
9056A
(Nitrite - N)
9056A
(Phosphorus)
365.E
(Soil pH mess)
9045D
(TKN) 351.2
% Solids: 3.57 01/0912021 0052
Inorganic non-metals
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 0110912021 0052 AAB 78939
1 01/13/2021 1306 CAG2 79167
1
01113/2621
1402
AMR
79439
1
0111312021
1402
AMR
79441
25
01122/2021
1055
DMA
01120/2021 1747 80124
1
01/08/20212321
AAB
78951
1
01/1912021
1236
DMA
01/16/2021 1242 79666
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q L4Q DL Units Run
Solids SM 2540G 3.57 Q/o I
Ammonia - N (gas diffusion) 350.1 ND 28 15 mglkg '{
Nitrate - N (soluble) 9056A 210 14 2.8 mglkg 1
Nitrite - N (soluble) 9056A ND 5.6 2.$ mg/kg 1
Phosphorus 7723-74-0 365.7 14000 3500 700 mglkg 3
Solt pH measured in water @ 18.1 ° C 9045D 5.7 su I
TKN 351.2 45000 700 700 mg/kg I
L A ffIT, 1
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 7471 B 7471 B 1 41/13/2021 1 502 JAB2 Q 111 31202'! 0455 79069
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q LQQ DL Units Run
Mercury 7439-97-6 7471 B ND MEMOMWEPEPENEENEEMENNN 2.1 0.51 mglkg 1
ICP=AES
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep
Date
Batch
1 3050B
6010D 1 01/13/2021 1319 KSH2
01i12/2021Q520
78979
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result
Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Aluminum
7429-80-5 601 QQ
12000
ISO
fig
mglkg
1
Arsenic
7440-38-2 601 O!3
6.1
J
6t9
2.3
mglkg
1
Cadmium
7440•43-9 6010D
0.73
J
2.3
0.58
mglkg
1
Calcium
7440-704 601QD
8308
2340
290
mglkg
4
Chromium
7440-47-3 601Qa
33
4.6
1.1
mglkg
1
Copper
7440-50-$ 6014D
310
4.6
2.1
mglkg
1
Iron
7439-89-6 6{}10D
24000
46
21
mglkg
1
Lead
74391*92.9 6010D
30
4.6
2.1
mglkg
1
Magnesium
74391-954 601 OD
2700
2340
290
mglkg
1
Manganese
7439-96-5 609 QD
340
6w9
2.7
mglkg
't
Molybdenum
7439-98-7 6010D
5.9
.l
18
4_6
rt'Eglkg
1
Nickel
7440-Q2-0 6010D
23
18
4.8
mglkg
1
LOO= Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit
D = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GG columns exceeds % J = Estimated result < LOQ and > CAL
H - Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
NO
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Fnvironmental Services., in -)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803)791-9700 Fax 7 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com
Page 3 of 7
Client; Syr
Description., Farmville WWTP
Laboratory iD: WA08031-00'1
Matrix; solid
Date Sampled:41107I2021 9230
Date Received: 01108/2021
L�3�i1
Solids: 3.57 0910912021 0052
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3050B 601 OD 1 01l13l2021 1319 KSH2 O1112l2021 0520 78979
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result 0 LOQ DL Units Run
Potassium 7440-49-7 601QD 3600 2300 290 mglkg t
Selenium 779249w2 601 OD 7.1 J 9.1 3,7 mg/kg I
Sodium 7440-23-5 601OD 1300 J 2300 290 mg/kg I
Zinc 7440-66m.6 601 OD 760 23 5,7 mg/kg 1
LOO = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit
D = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% timat d result < LOQ and > QL
H = Out of holding time IflrF = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LL(formerly Shealy Environmental Services,, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 3) 791-9700 Fax 3) 1- 111 www.pacelabs.com
Page
Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
Pace Analytical Services, LL (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Ventage Print Drive stet Columbia, SC 29172 (803)1- Fax 3) 791 - 111 www,pacelabs.com
'age
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
rill
Aw�
NO"
V"
RIP
40l
AM�
E 4Fj
0
O
%. w
'W
%Ordl
tpppft
Mr
E
L
.1
U
0
4%
Vol
I Ow lh""el
Oqvu N!)
J r UL
lid
I e.
ll
IF
0
"M
E
19-
AWN,
z
Mi
pa" V. ll,
e=[Kad d1O. 1111Z
f P -9
e tj
edw
J9100
X
: rqrwaqwvpl"lp
nhd".d
L
P2, OIL
'Mew#*
i1w
4*
4Z
Lp
L
M
L3 Z-Al I
If
A AR
IN-
Opo
at pop=
419t
341 F
4&'
.11A ft-
AM .1
Pete Analytical Servtces, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803) 791-9700 Fax (803) 791-9111 www.pacelabs.com
Page 6 of 7
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
SaMplejS Receipt Checklist (Spt) iMIE001at-15)
Issuing Avtborlty,,"
Sample'Receipt Checklist (S.RC)
Coo �spm;led
E -164
1.01 #-.- WW1
evida 912AI X20
Comm. —
At
v.
Pace ►nalyti ] S ari , LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vant2gePoint Drive West Columbia, SC 2 03) 791-9700 Fax 3) 791-9111 www.pacelabs.com
'age
Cameron Testing Services, Inc.
arc aENR #6s4
- C t
Projoct:
5ynagro
Laba�ratory Report
Facmviile WWTP
Q, Wynne
P,
R
Sample Information
Atyses and Its
Res
��.wr.ww..»
iablX
. Fig
zlat-O43 -,-01 OAP FeG. Craifcrrs-s
*02
4*0 .3
,vO4.
4)5--
-.06
--mO7-
GOOM"n
2101,w043 *01 i Gr iS (%i
1.-" -7
Pro
SwAxd. W. 273"
mO-3
u
2101*043
M. Suns
Y"
<29500 C" mm Ott03121 Mxx
<29500 Vuv mw
29500 erwo 2um
<294-0C3 w^
............
29SQ0
3.39% O-Ot
3.39% Col.
3,139% .001
340% oc+
3.39% -0.01
3.40% owl
3,36% 00-1
011074-1 MARP
NC PWS #37799
US EPAQ4ati1
D1N £Avt *37799,
O1It1Tl21
aw. �ecis
aer«�nc�
z3eo G -Ts
� �,1�1=� ��l�:sC l
919*2U4240
dV*Qtwwt*ft*i cm.
It.,
219 S. StWO -Sq'
Sanfords NC x733u
11 LM4L
t—Ln
We
A i Ysw C� Y 12 -4
WWLV*Itc� VJWTIP
Cameron Testing Services, Ina.
Ceti # SIO US 'A. �MG�i9t8
OK *U MC Pt�'!5
Vol
Flo.
L.1 — .04MOPOOMMOMMP.
Sample baforms#brt
`A� W X
0. jo
E E 2
MAPOMPW
YY
1.'7 11OP152
49
6
(C)
(Y"
Chain of Custody
Page of
CTS tab -'U"'
t� 00
Number of I�'
CTS
HPA
Sample
(SK)4 HW.Pl� (#"ITMM 044ft.
*OD$i 34 WOW' . . . . . ..... .....
Rows.
n.
2AAft
4W
."O"A
Rush work will require prior approval
Additioflal charges will apply
Aim WOAW*WOMr"
M
'04
"M
ff
Prelect:
Client:
Typer
2102-19841
Final Rasuft
Notes.W
Fam►ville
Synagro
ifi[} Report Shcci
30 Day Bench#tip T+�t
(EPA 6Zsrr.-9zro,3, Ap�snaiix as
IDue Rat. Mecno-cta
r lab t[� An
iS t � i' p�
Start (< 2%) 1.73% -02a5/21
3.67% 314421
S, �6.i'96 3+t�2�
1.59% 84,�3�n V1121
End (+ 30j 1.63% 64.6"°YG6 03Q7121
Page t
IFiSiR t-b.)
L
FVSR tm-b)
R;m:b.}
FVSR (m,b)
CTS Pray.
Regula#t►ry
SM. #Aetif. I" ed.,
2540 G !)* . . Ts ;
25Ai9 G - V.S.
-11 V5^
1a.ax%
11,8996
PMS, < 15%
vaa
GSGIERP
21,9 S. St"Ie Stv
SsnfardNG 27330
Phaw: 1919-206-4240
Cameron Testing Services, InC.
NC WWIGW Cert, #654 NC PHHS Ced # 37799 OS EPA N001 918
Chain of Custrxfy
Pace of
dk s L
CTSfab use.
5 -Yki� 2":
C*MP8,"YT
_4
4 4C-j Samp4e TeoContact ph.onq6w. to�;:
Ic) i•
ice IN.
Address lC�, d.
I
Stat*4,, 4M.P) J r *=
Pem# (YN)
Rush MN)
Smp4e
N401"40 lil 15 �j too. $Ort."O, UM
Cl:
Sample Information Number of bottles + preservative Required Testis /Anal sls
CTS
Z
Ieeies'UPed, HC),CientSa a
Sam le
(SKM 5 H(N)O )ThiosWfa*j
E E H2
t ID
ID
> Na(0)H. (P)hosphodc, OMer M, 1-friddmo
1 0 R
a an C
CIA
Lot jjj�
L
t�
3
17
-145
L z Y I 1 .5 LW
l�k� WW't APW
N.
e44, ��
• as�A_ •01ow-" Agwwa-w kl_�, K.J4 L.- k w _.P.k� d,-
J �T 211r %-fcL- V.F. L _b__MD"wN__ # _31ph --F 1 --1% L-t.W!-" f
%
4'
L I + ...PPLI. L
f. d*� L
3
A� -.tp 4iiikkk 4 1
r jVWLAd&- ftM IF
qp_p_r- _WW. V oft ftj�jj
,.sew—w
� �.[Time
inquish Received '.
I io
24
r
4�
r
P
C hck"I'n
11 MW , -we 00_
?
Rush work will require, ,ricer approval, Additional charges will apply
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Divis10
ion of Water Resources
LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 0646
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided bores will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two co ies of the ajppfication and
supnortins! documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischafge-Permitting Unit
General — This certification provides detailed infonnation of receiving sites for hand application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 1 SA NCAC OAT . I 10 0. Da not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16).
0
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two capes of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16),.
� Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form,. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form, If necessary for clarity or due to space restTictians, atfiachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
� For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
� For modified permits, submit the requested information for on.l.v those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification.
B. Land Application Site Information:
The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land. application program must be provided in table.l. The
status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) Transferred (T) Deleted (D)
Attach the following in accordance with each status code:
Required Item Status Cade
N R T M
County Board
Notff ication. doc
V/
Laid Owner
Agreement
(If appiicabie)
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vic�nitylsetback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Permit''
A sons and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
Evaluation PoIjgZ'. -
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Pagel of 3
An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
V0
V/
Hutant loading rates (CPLRS
Status Code
Required item
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indieated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil ma requirements in the "Sail Scientist Evalua�ion Poliev"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
be__pennitted to multi le Permittees over the same time period)
This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
� Predomm'ant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment "B" of the existing permit, or
name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
� Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please
note That the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
� For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the bounty Soil Survey for equivalent). A sail type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
� New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the sods report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
� Acceptable methods for deter -mining location coordinates {i.e., latitude and longitude} and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR)
• Conversion from Coordi"nate Plane (CP)
• Conversion from. Township -Section -Range (TSR)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Merc (UTM)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
• Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEC)
• LGRAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Remote Sensing (RS)
• Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
Q� Use an 8.5 by I I -inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality..
� Surface water body classifications infonnation may be fond at: Lftp://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
relann i nz/c lassifi cation -stan dards/c lass ifications
� Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
A list of the Division's regional offices, their county
httv : Hdeq �zav/contact/reg Tonal-offices
coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waierbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area
on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map {an 8.5 x
I I -inch sheet
showing the project area
should be submitted with
the permit application regardless of whether a Stream
classification
was completed}.
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table, 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering ether Slates or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to stream name" as the waterbody name.
I Open the link http://deq.ne.gov/about/didisions/water-resources/planning/classifcation-standards/classifications.
Stream C I as s 1'fi c at i o n .Process: One of the options below may b e used depending on the known initial proj ect information.
� KNOWNBASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE CATER IS LQCATED
0
l . Select pro -per basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16
Page 2 of 3
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the lisp.
3. For multiple listings of the game waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The tee
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
� KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURF, ACE WATER IS LOCATED
1.
Select the proper
county from the
List a1.1 Waterbodies in county, hydrologically repot.
2.
Locate the name
of the identified
waterbody (from Genera] Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream paint).
4. Record all Basins!, Strewn Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin xnap to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple Listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description.
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (mostupstream point).
5. Record all. Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
� Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC1
The tern
� Any stream which is not named in the schedule of steam classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedffigs are conducted.
The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other sates or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin.
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Streams entering; Georgia or Tennessee shall be cla.ssifflied "C Tr.." Such streams in the Savannah
Basin And Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified "B Tr."
Rives Drainage Area
French Broad River
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B.°'
Basin
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified Y.
Broad River Basin
Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Streams entering Virginia are classified. "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
Basin
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams enterin South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Streams entera�ng Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
.Reservoir and the Noah Carolina portion of steams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
Roanoke River Basin
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall cagy the
classification "C and. B,"
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virgini*a are classified "C."
Tar -Pimlico River
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw.ft except the main drainage
Basin
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bas which shall be classified "SC."
Pasquotank Riper Basin
All dramage canals not Hated in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3 of 3
LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's Warne: Town of Farmville
Land application sites currently certified: 108.8 net acres and Total to be certified: 108.8 net acres,
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Predominant Soil
Status Site/Field ID Landowners) Lessee(s) or Operator(s) Net Acres County Crop(s)
Code!' Series Nameb Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope`
R NGPI-14 Harold Flanagan 11.8 Pitt Pasture. Exum ExB
R NC-P t-1-2A Harold Flanagan 15.8 Pitt Pasture Exum ExB
R NC-Pl- 1-2B Harold Flanagan 22.8 Pitt Pasture Exum ExB
R NC-PI-1-3 Harold Flanagan 6.5 Pitt Pasture Ocilla 0cB
R NC-PI-1-4 Harold Flanagan 6.4 Pitt Row Crop Goldboro GoA
R NGPI-1-5..Harold Flanagan 12.8 Pi tt Row Crop Goldboro GoA
R NC-Pl-1-6 Harold Flanagan 31.2 Pitt Pasture Goldboro GoA
Al
IL
a Status Code for land application sites are: * N (N env) ♦ K (Keneweci) ♦Zvi tIvIoa11iea) • i k i ransiexarea) TV kliUIU«,u)
v Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
0 Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e, fora 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
II. WATER13ODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C)4.p
Site/Field ID Latitude Longitude Location Location Method Code Location Accuracy Waterbody Subbasin and Current and Proposed
Datum Stream Index No. Class
NC-PI-1-1 35"33'8.81 77033156.02 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 2.7-.86-.26-5 C;Sw,NSWI;
NC-P1 -I -2A 35('33'Oo24 77033153.8011 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp;. 27-86-2C;-SW,NSW.6-5:
NC-Pt-A-2B 35033'4.24 77°33'S2.58 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-26-5.C;Sw,NSW
NC-P I - 1-3 35033'3035 77033'47.44 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-261,-5C'SWINSW
NC-P I - 1-4 35°3324.43 77`33'4 1.00" NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 271%86-26-5 C.;Sw,NSW
NGPI-1 5 35"33'42.49 77033'35*77 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86-26-5. C-Sw,Nsw
NC-PI-1-6 35"33'2.66 7703343-81 NAD 83 ADD Nearest Second Middle Swamp; 27-86.,,26,5. q;..$.w,N SW
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
DivisIt
ion of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided bores will help produce a quicker revises time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted. the ADnlicant shad submit one original and two conies of the annficatinn and
suAnarting doe
umentation
For more information,, visit the Water Duality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for hand application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with I SA NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation. listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16)0&
Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FARM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarify or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
� Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are awned or operated by an entry other than the
Applicant.
� A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement mush be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name; Town of Farmvi'lle ILLAP
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following faciffifty(ies) onto the following hand
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Lease
Land Use or
Residuals Source
Special note
Site/Field ID
(yes/no)
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
(opfional)
(no-till/over-seed!
pasture)
NC-PI-0 1-1
N
Pasture
Animal Feed
NC-PI-0 l -02A
N
Pasture
Animal Feed
NC-PI-0 1-02B
N
Row Crop
Animal F' eed
NC-PI-0 1-03
N
Pasture
Animal. Feed
NC-PI-01-04
N
Row Crop
Animal Feed
NC-PI-0 1 -05
N
Raw Crop
Animal Feed
NC-PI-01-06
N
Pasture
Animal Feed
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals hand application program and
shall be renewed each time this permitis renewed.
The undersigned landowner
or his
representative and the Permittee
agree fo abide with
the following
restrictions and
stipulations
until
such time as
written
notification, given 30 calendar days
in advance, modifies
or cancels this
Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3
I. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
I The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Maid
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
S. The Permittee must request and obtain. a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application prograrn,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment usedby the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
S. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least b.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suiiable for the
specified crop.
9. The Landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules loosed on crop pattems, results of
soli samples, and the permitted application Limits.
10 The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the hand application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the Land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner., or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The Landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and Stake officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any properly, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; flake necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
Il. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application sites).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) fora 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested fora 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested fora 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 38mmonth period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested fora 12mmonth period following a residuals land application event.
III.ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .O 1 07(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 1 SA N AG 02T,.0 t,OSth) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
� A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID: NC-PI-0 1-04
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
We ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER,* (if needed)
The land application field(s) III: is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit
Number WQ: . The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is
requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program. and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3
E
Landowner's Certification:
0
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced lend application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the hand application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above- referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other pen-nitted entity. Furthennore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to hand apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein., 0
Landowner name:
Address: o
on nI
city:
Phone:
T
` Signature:
Yam_
NORTH CAROLINA P,
ti • �FIA, V%4a- cjz:�C- h
S
'K2
State: Iv C Zip:
-�a ress:
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
0
Date: �'- � I
COUNTY
4CtYeCR I_`
-
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WIT'NESSm hand t y and officaa.l seal his the � l
day Marcof � 20 .Z
Signature and seal.
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
citys State: Zip.
Phone:
E-mail address:
Signature: Date:
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
Signature: o
o�Glclnl5 .'�J
k -1
WA eao'..
Wt
Date;
A15/27/7(
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3
YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD
May 31 S`, 2021
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section —Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTENTION: Nathaniel Thornburg
REFERENCE: Redefined complianceboundaries - WQ0008778
Town of Farmville RLAP
Mr. Thornburg,
I am addressing the redefined compliance boundaries due to on -site water supply webs for the
affected fields. See below,
(NC-PI-01-04) — The redefined compliance boundary on Harold Flanagan's property is located
northeast of the on -site water supply well located to the southwest of field 4 and east of Arch
Flanagan Rd.
Please find that the hand owner Agreement form (LOA 06-16) is updated to reflect the
redefined compliance boundaries. Please lei me knowif any further information is needed
regarding the redefined compliance boundaries for an -site water supply wells for affected fields.
Best regards,
C111Z!, VV ylu�
G
Technical Services Specialist
1
APPLICATION MA
01%*X"'04101100'
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
PRIVATE ROAD
STREAM
W
UNSUITABLE AREA
WATER
ONSITE HOUSE
'
DRAIN
FENCE
PROPERTY LINE
OFFSITE HOUSE
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. AJI
locations are approximate.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660'
NC-PI-01
Fields 1-216
1
APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
WE
APPLICATION AREA
1AA1 ANf
PRIVATE ROAD
STREAM
F060 mailk
FENCE
PROPERTY LINE
M
UNSUITABLE AREA
WATER
ONSITE HOUSE
OFFSITE HOUSE
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundaryis established
Midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660'
NC-PlmOl
Fields 3-5
locations are approximate.
CUMULATIVE METAL LOADINGS (LBSIAC) AS OF 5127/2021
The cumulative metalsfor this report come from
HISTORY records
i.e. the monthly monitoring process has been completed
for the State and County there the Fields are located)
In cases where trace metal lab result
was Not Reported
to Synagro or tracking f metal loading was Not Required
the loading n the report is displayed as " "'
FIELIDID Last Date Applied AS CD CFI Cis PB HG M0 ICI
NC- I- -0001-
06/09/2020
0,514700.24261
8.96031
82.13659
4.54713
0.086461.07548
.2 721
PVC-- I~0 -- 2
11/09/2005
0.17289
0.12443
6.66013
55.12554
3.05806
0.06444
0.52962
3.34936
C-P I- - ^ 3-
08/31/2017
0.316170.19021
5.89631
64.830503.13435
0.06580
0.74918.7
Report t /Tim ; / 7 2 :2 ;12 P
SE ZN
0.25624
59.95060
0.10651
357 2
.2 1 78
56-10061
0.16562
5. 2 4
0.21169
44.39283
0.23997
44.74750
0.04301
5.80390
0.02208
3.13647
Page 1 of 1