820036_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210413

Cility Number'
d�
34.
&ifivigitimof Water Resource
Dwision,of Soil,and
I"Other Agency
ter Conservation
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: V tcoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: .441,--"elArrival Time:
Farm Name:
//: /Jr
/44' n r /'/mj rre
Owner Name: 2; zJ ' OWY--- terra wy, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
4Z ! 3D
CountyL e5V -s- Region: i /-- 0
54 Mar/
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
s�-
tcdt eve
Owner Email:
Title: QWn-- --
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Elo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Er i° ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
4-- 3b
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes [/] No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
9.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes ErNo 0 NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Er No 0 NA
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public. health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes 21lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
O PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): -arm ttal4c. /a o ./ Ir r et
13. Soil Type(s): /9-u, T
❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No 0 NA 0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes dNo ❑ NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes j "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes Er. -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 0 Yes Eirco 0 NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes Olio 0 NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes [7 "No ❑ NA 0 NE
O Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
O Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑/ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: S- 31.
Date of Inspection: 4-/3 2C74
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes h.o 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
At
7 f u time r €S trots ,5L& error- s? ,_ 2Ate-i__1-47D,.-.. aa._k
O� fa9n Aar,16 rid-- Ra:.,_ Ile rofarr 8�'�- its.V icr i 11 Srnot i
l 76 Tnvt.
5,r.K. Ail 1l r pW.'e- S`k S'oa"-
L s'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ,d r3D3—evi /
f
Date: . y /3—.090 —/
2/4/2015