20210863 Ver 1_401 Application_20210524

Staff Review Form
Updated September 4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
6* Yes r No
ID#* Version* 1
20210863
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Is this a DOT
project?*
Reviewer List:*
Yes r No
Select Reviewing Office:*
Yes
r No
Robert Patterson:eads\rdpatterson
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:*
✓ For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
✓ New Project
✓ Modification/New Project with Existing ID
✓ More Information Response
✓ Other Agency Comments
✓ Pre -Application Submittal
✓ Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
✓ Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as we will not
be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form is used in
accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project
proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency" and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section
121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click here to read
more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or here to view the form.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Date for Meeting Request 4/23/2021
ID# 20210863 Version 1
Project Contact Information
Name: Laura J. Meyer
Who is submitting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #:
20210863
20170001 (no dashes)
51.16KB
Existing Version:
1
Project Name: CSXT Bridge at MP 305.5 over Big Swamp #3
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
a No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)

Robeson
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
PCN-Butters_04.23.2021.pdf 23.86MB
Only pdf or krrz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
Attachments include the Pre -Filing Request Form and a PDF version of the Pre -Construction Notification
form, with figures, permit plan and cross -sections, supporting documentation (USFWS, NCNHP, HPOWEB,
FEMA).
Sign and Submit
rJ By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
,Aroeta, O%- _
Submittal Date: Is filled in autonatically.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
CSXT Bridge at M.P. SE 305.50 over Big Swamp #3
2b. County:
Robeson
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Butters
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
CSX Real Property, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed book recording not applicable; railroad property not recorded at local jurisdiction
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ammar Shubair (Senior Design Engineer)
3d. Street address:
500 Water Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
[phone]
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Laura J. Meyer, PWS (Senior Scientist / Natural Resources-NEPA)
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip:
Durham, North Carolina 27703
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
[phone]
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A. Railroad property not recorded at local jurisdiction.
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.56775665 Longitude: -78.87068176
1 c. Property size:
2.090 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Big Swamp
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw
2c. River basin:
Lumber (HUC = 03040203)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A jurisdictional forested wetland occurs along both sides of the railroad tracks at milepost (MP) 305.5 on the CSXT railway. The forested wetland at
the bridge crossing is characterized as a Bottomland Hardwood Forest. The wetlands within the footprint of the project encompass a non -forested
portion of the Bottomland Hardwood Forest, as they are in the maintained ROW of the railway.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.88
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 334.09
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace the existing CSX Transportation Bridge No. SE 305.5 along the CSX railroad over an unnamed branch of Big Swamp.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge at MP 305.5 is a timber trestle that has reached the end of its functional service life. It will be replaced by a concrete & steel bridge
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
(includingall priorphases)in the past?
project �
❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes X No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
No
Corps
0.013
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Unnamed branch
PER
Corps
12
4
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There will be concrete pilings for the new bridge, but it was designed to minimize the number of pilings in the stream and wetlands to minimize
alterations in stream flow. There will be less pilings in the new bridge than the current bridge, reducing impediments to flow that the stream currently
faces.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction equipment will be brought and stored along the railroad tracks in the right-of-way and staged in upland areas. Best management
practices will be established within the construction footprint to prevent impacts to downstream water quality.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes
X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite habitat evaluations, inspection of online GIS data from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (IPaC), Raleigh Ecological Field Services Office
website, and inspection of online GIS data and mapping from the N.C. Natural Heritage Program.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Inspection of online GIS data and mapping from the N.C. Natural Heritage Program.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Inspection of online GIS data and mapping from the N.C. State Historic Preservation website.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ No
X Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The property to the north and south of the railroad line is in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain, but the railroad track itself is elevated above the
floodplain. The new bridge will be within the footprint of the existing bridge with less pilings since the wood pilings are being replaced with steel ones.
Therefore, current FEMA flood elevations will not be impacted.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Maps. FEMA FIRM number 3720023900K.
Matthew Adkins
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
/(/(Ae -'-�
04-23-2021
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

ATTACHMENT 1 – PCN FORM
CSXT BRIDGE AT MP SE 305.50 OVER BIG SWAMP #3

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1.a. Wood performed a bridge hydrologic and hydraulic review of the proposed bridge
replacement project at Milepost SE 305.5. The proposed bridge work includes replacing the
existing 18 span timber bridge 225 feet in length with a three span steel and concrete bridge 154
feet in length. The subject bridge at SE 305.5 spans over a secondary channel within the floodplain
of Big Swamp. The effective HEC-RAS hydraulic model for Big Swamp was retrieved from the
North Carolina Flood Risk Information System (FRIS) to support the bridge analysis. The
calculations indicated the proposed bridge will result in an increase of approximately 0.04 feet to
the 100-year flood elevations upstream of the bridge. The increase meets the Section 60.3(c)(10)
of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations: Floodplain Management Criteria and
the North Carolina Floodplain Management criteria which allows up to one foot increase in base
flood elevations along rivers and streams without a mapped floodway. In addition no impacts are
expected to occur to upstream structures due to the increase in the 100-year flood elevation.
I 0 63Miles
Legend
I 0 4020Miles
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\FIgure 1 - Site Location Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
Site Location
I 0 1,000500Feet
Legend
Site Location
I 0 42Miles
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 2 - Site Aerial Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 2. Site Aerial Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
JT
BB
BB
BB
JOGoA
Jo
GoA
Pa
Ly
I 0 1,000500Feet
Legend
Site Location
NRCS Soils
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 3 - NRCS Soils Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 3. NRCS Soils Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
I 0 42Miles
I 0 200100Feet
Legend
Site Location
Wetlands
Wetlands (Inferred fromNCFMP Lidar)P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 4 - Jurisdictional Waters Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 4.Jurisdictional Waters Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
I 0 42Miles
I 0 1,200600Feet
Legend
Site Location
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 5 - USGS Topo Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 5.USGS Topographic Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
I 0 42Miles
I 0 1,000500Feet
Legend
Site Location
Zone AE (100yr)
I 0 42Miles
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 6 - Floodplain Map.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 6. Floodplain Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
I 0 1,000500Feet
Legend
Site Location
I 0 42Miles
\\dhm-fs1\projects\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Lumberton Bridges\Butters MP 305.50_2019\03 - GIS\PCN Figures\CSXT SE305.50\Figure 7 - Cultural Resources.mxdJob No. 546997048
Drawn By: JAH
Reviewed By: ---
The map shown here has beencreated with all due andreasonable care and is strictly foruse with Wood project number546997048. Wood assumes noliability, direct or indirect,whatsoever for any such thirdparty or unintended use.
Figure 7.Cultural Resource Map
Date: 1/29/2020
CSXT Bridge MP SE 305.5Butters, NC
BRIDGESE 305.50
Note: The nearest cultural resource (NCSHPO)is located 1.5 miles away from this project site location.
DRAWING NO.VAL. SEC.
CADD FILE:FILE:
REVISIONS
SUBDIVISION:
SCALE:
DATE:
DESIGN:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND DESIGN
MAINTENANCE OF WAY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
AS SHOWN
NC
09/26/19
904-730-9777
JACKSONVILLE, FL. 32256
5200 BELFORT RD., SUITE 400
MTC
SWC
MTC
ZONE:
BUTTERS
OVER BIG SWAMP #3
BRIDGE AT M.P. SE 305.50
ROBESON COUNTY
WILMINGTON
13
L-15
V.3-N.C.
AFE A50407
CAROLINAS
GROUND LINE
APPROX. EXIST.
(TYP.)
WALKWAY HANDRAIL
+0.048%
(05/2019)
WSE 89.80

146'-0" (FACE-TO-FACE OF BACKWALLS)ELEVATION (NAVD88)ELEVATION (NAVD88) STA. 2756+83.00
Ü INT. BENT NO. 1
ELEVATION
SCALE: „"=1'-0"
ELEV. 99.97
EXIST & PROP. T/R
ELEV. 100.00
EXIST. T/R
ELEV. 99.89
EXIST. T/R
ELEV. 99.90
EXIST. & PROP. T/R
ELEV. 94.90
LOW CHORD
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
RIPRAP
PILE BENT (TYP.)
EXIST. TIMBER ELEV. 90.16
PROP. GROUND LINE
TANGENT
(O-O CURBS)16'-4"CSXT R.O.W.
BRIDGE
Ü TRACK & 8'-2" 8'-2"CSXT R.O.W.RIGHTFLOWSTREAMHAMLET
TO
WILMINGTON
TO
PLAN
SCALE: „"=1'-0"
SPAN 1 SPAN 2 SPAN 3STA. 2756+25.29EXIST. END BENT NO. 0INSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL STA. 2756+38.79Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 1 STA. 2756+51.13Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 2 STA. 2756+63.92Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 3 STA. 2756+73.88Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 4 STA. 2756+87.04Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 5 STA. 2756+99.32Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 6 STA. 2757+12.11Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 7 STA. 2757+24.89Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 8 STA. 2757+37.18Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 9 STA. 2757+49.69Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 10 STA. 2757+62.30Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 11 STA. 2757+74.48Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 12 STA. 2757+86.76Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 13 STA. 2757+99.14Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 14STA. 2758+47.78EXIST. END BENT NO. 18INSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL2756+00 2758+50
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2758+51.20±
TBM 2
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2756+23.21±
TBM 1
MILEPOSTS
INCREASING
ELEV. 92.12±
STA. 2756+48.36
BORING B-3
ELEV. 90.58±
STA. 2757+56.72
BORING B-1
2758+00
ELEV. 90.58±
STA. 2758+19.72
BORING B-2
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
2758+002757+002756+50
ELEV. 90.16
PROP. GROUND LINE
2758+00
(TYP.)
2:1
(TYP.)
2:1
(TYP.)
2:1
(TYP.)
2:1
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
LIMITS OF RIPRAP AND PROPOSED 100'-0"100'-0"STA. 2756+46.00
END BENT NO. 0
OUTSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL
STA. 2757+92.00
END BENT NO. 4
OUTSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL(TYP.)2:1(TYP.)2:1(TYP.)2:1(TYP.)2:1FILLED STEEL PIPE PILES (TYP.)
36" DIA. REINFORCED CONCRETE
STA. 2756+25.29
EXIST. END BENT NO. 0
INSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL
STA. 2758+47.78
EXIST. END BENT NO. 18
INSIDE FACE OF BACKWALL
LEGEND
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED
AREA TO BE FILLED AND
AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED.
THEN BACKFILLED AND
AREA TO BE EXCAVATED
PIPE (TYP.)
6" DIA. DRAIN
2757+50
1
2
WALL (TYP.)
BALLAST RETAINER STA. 2758+11.28Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 15 STA. 2758+23.09Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 16 STA. 2758+35.12Ü EXIST. INT. BENT NO. 17SPAN 4
1
2
BEDDING STONE

36'-0"

36'-0"

37'-0"

37'-0"
STA. 2757+19.00
Ü INT. BENT NO. 2
STA. 2757+55.00
Ü INT. BENT NO. 3
PROPOSED END BENT 4
PILE - TO BE REMOVED AT
ABANDONED TIMBER22'-8" +/-
SPAN 1 SPAN 2 SPAN 3 SPAN 4
11:33 AM
SE 305.50-01
SE 305.50-01.dgn
NOTE:
1. FOR GENERAL NOTES SEE DWG. NO. 02.
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 1 (TBM 1):
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 2 (TBM 2):
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2756+23.21±
0.05" RIGHT OF Ü TRACK
NAIL WITH RED CAP & FLAG
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2758+51.20±
0.14" RIGHT OF Ü TRACK
NAIL WITH RED CAP & FLAG
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
1/19/2021CAMPBESW\\stvgroup.stvinc.com\v3\DGPA\Vol3\Projects\4017805\4017805_0024\90_CAD Models and Sheets\04_CJ_Bridge\progress\SE 305.50-01.dgn
DRAWING NO.VAL. SEC.
CADD FILE:FILE:
REVISIONS
SUBDIVISION:
SCALE:
DATE:
DESIGN:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND DESIGN
MAINTENANCE OF WAY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
AS SHOWN
NC
09/26/19
904-730-9777
JACKSONVILLE, FL. 32256
5200 BELFORT RD., SUITE 400
MTC
SWC
MTC
ZONE:
BUTTERS
OVER BIG SWAMP #3
BRIDGE AT M.P. SE 305.50
ROBESON COUNTY
WILMINGTON
13
L-15
V.3-N.C.
AFE A50407
CAROLINAS
WETLAND LIMITS
WETLAND LIMITS 2:1(TYP.)WETLAND LIMITS
2:1(TYP.)TANGENT
(O-O CURBS)16'-4"CSXT R.O.W.
BRIDGE
Ü TRACK &
CSXT R.O.W.RIGHTFLOWSTREAMHAMLET
TO
WILMINGTON
TO
PLAN
SCALE: „"=1'-0"
SPAN 1 SPAN 2 SPAN 4
2756+00 2758+50
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2758+51.20±
TBM 2
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2756+23.21±
TBM 1
MILEPOSTS
INCREASING
ELEV. 92.12±
STA. 2756+48.36
BORING B-3
ELEV. 90.58±
STA. 2757+56.72
BORING B-1
2758+00
ELEV. 90.58±
STA. 2758+19.72
BORING B-2
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
OF BIG SWAMP #3
APPROXIMATE EDGE
2758+002758+00
2:1
(TYP.)
2:1
(TYP.)
2:1
(TYP.)100'-0"100'-0"2:1(TYP.)2:1(TYP.)2:1(TYP.)WALL (TYP.)
BALLAST RETAINER
NO. 1 0.0002 ACRES
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
LIMITS OF RIPRAP AND PROPOSED
(TYP.)
5'-0"
SPAN 3 8'-2" 8'-2" 2:1
(TYP.)
2756+50 2757+00 2757+50
4 LF
STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT
0.0109 ACRES
IMPACT NO. 3
PERMANENT WETLAND
ACRES
IMPACT NO. 2 0.0023
PERMANENT WETLAND
10:48 AM
SE 305.50-08
SE 305.50-08.dgn1/19/2021NOTE:
1. FOR GENERAL NOTES SEE DWG. NO. 02.
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 1 (TBM 1):
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 2 (TBM 2):
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2756+23.21±
0.05" RIGHT OF Ü TRACK
NAIL WITH RED CAP & FLAG
ELEV. 102.70
STA. 2758+51.20±
0.14" RIGHT OF Ü TRACK
NAIL WITH RED CAP & FLAG
GENERAL PERMIT PLAN
0.0134 ACRES
LEGEND
WETLANDS
AREA IMPACTING\\stvgroup.stvinc.com\v3\DGPA\Vol3\Projects\4017805\4017805_0024\90_CAD Models and Sheets\04_CJ_Bridge\progress\SE 305.50-08.dgnCAMPBESWPERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
STREAM
AREA IMPACTING
4 LF
++rwrrr1111ffi
pd
96551
rn N��nlrat
IH
0
F
Z589+92 8" PVC• Water Pipe )(ins ° 3f 720
/ Ion• ^'5r90
• %ao` ti.
ADJ—KC
VPB
6 70
THIS vAP WAS DLOTT
DATE o 03-0L-2013
6
3
OTE vADS OLDER THA\
V0\THS S—E_L3 3E
-STROP 3
e6/0 Tr
11.
�I
96�'�
623
N
V
ti
62396.3-F
h
Q
Tr
Disclaimer
The CSX Real Property, Inc. GIS Department, its employees, agents,
and personnel, MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY
OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FORA PARTICULAR
PURPOSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THISMAP. Any user of this
information accepts the same AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and
assumes all responsibility for the use thereof, and further covenants
and agrees to hold the CSX Real Property, Inc. GIS Dept., its
employees, agents, and personnel, harmless from and against any
damage, loss or liability arising from any use of the information.
Any user should obtain independent verification of all information contained on this MAP.
CSX Real Property, Inc. GIS Department, its employees, agents, and personnel, disclaims,
and shall not be held liable for, any and all damage, loss or liability, whether direct,
indirect or consequential which arises or may arise from this MAP information or use
thereof' by any person or entity.
Proprietary Information:
The CSX RPI GIS Dept has copyrighted the map product and databases on this MAP
and they reserve all rights thereto. No portion of the products or databases on this
MAP may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the express written
authorization of the CSX RPI GIS Dept. or its authorized agents.
In o
/oo
62396 7U
4
269❑
.4_7700
INZMNMW
.7. 0
If'o Grit'/tQr.
Grar77iPe . �rrs>�r[�menf Oak IPecord .s/oolr7 fro.
davi 7e awe
/ 5/a/e of/Yon% Cnro/r7o. 1ft/ C r `PPP Co Cfiar/er. // /.fC .laiio/,7 f 64777..E
Y
c",<<" 0
h Y
lq
1
Ic
N i�
�73'O
co
2O5E3ON COUNTY N.C.
LD
nl
k
Z7 O
.Bari n zG2 ' ,$ .D Tresile - 2752# 94
77:o
27 O
/Go
RIGHT -OF -WAY AND TRACK MAP
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY CO.
WILMINGTON LINE
5TATION Z5O5+A.o To 51ATIoN 27 s" + 00
5CALE:1-IN = 400FT. 30,1.913.
I.913.
office of Val ualion Engineer
Norfolk,'v'a
To Wei rnrnstan
OA
r1,7?2 V04979
onme
NEP
Agerti

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0607
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370
Project Name: CSXT Butters SE305.5
February 07, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0607
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370
Project Name: CSXT Butters SE305.5
Project Type: TRANSPORTATION
Project Description: Replacing the current bridge pilings.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/34.56688485769639N78.86938376725007W
Counties: Robeson, NC

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries'', as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Wood Stork Mycteria americana
Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
Reptiles
Threatened
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)

02/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01370 4
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

NCNHDE-13948
February 9, 2021
Laura Meyer
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive
Durham, NC 27703
RE: CSXT Butters SE305.5; 546997048
Dear Laura Meyer:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
CSXT Butters SE305.5
Project No. 546997048
February 9, 2021
NCNHDE-13948
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Freshwater Fish 31780 Enneacanthus
chaetodon
Blackbanded Sunfish 1996-07-17 H?3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S3
Natural
Community
19342 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Low
Subtype)
---2020-05-18 AB 2-High ------G4?S3
Natural
Community
39839 Cypress--Gum Swamp
(Blackwater Subtype)
---2019 AB 2-High ------G4?S4
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Big Swamp/NC 211 R4 (Moderate)C5 (General)
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on February 9, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
CSXT Butters SE305.5
Project No. 546997048
February 9, 2021
NCNHDE-13948
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33769 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S1?
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33737 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S1?
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33779 Stylurus ivae Shining Clubtail 2004-Pre X?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G4 S1?
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33789 Triacanthagyna trifida Phantom Darner 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G5 SH
Freshwater Fish 31780 Enneacanthus
chaetodon
Blackbanded Sunfish 1996-07-17 H?3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S3
Freshwater Fish 36951 Notropis chalybaeus Ironcolor Shiner 1973-10-21 H 3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G4 S2S3
Natural
Community
39841 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Low
Subtype)
---2020-05-18 C 3-Medium ------G4?S3
Natural
Community
19342 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Low
Subtype)
---2020-05-18 AB 2-High ------G4?S3
Natural
Community
39843 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Swamp
Transition Subtype)
---2020-05-18 C 3-Medium ------G3G5 S3
Natural
Community
39839 Cypress--Gum Swamp
(Blackwater Subtype)
---2019 AB 2-High ------G4?S4
Vascular Plant 23815 Eriogonum
tomentosum
Southern Wild-
buckwheat
1890 H 5-Very
Low
---Special
Concern
Historical
G4G5 SH
Page 3 of 5
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Big Swamp/NC 211 R4 (Moderate)C5 (General)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on February 9, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 5 of 5
+–↸-78.846 34.593 Degrees0.4mi0.4mi0.4mi0.4mi0.4miHPOWEB 2.0Buffer Toolbutters, nc⌧Show search results for but…Page 1 of 1HPOWEB 2.02/6/2020https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=773b7da94dc0478390cb0c3186b7a498
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
FEMA
Legend
74'.52'36"W 34°34'13"N
0 250 500
Feet
1,000 1,500 2,000
Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020
78'51'58"W 34°33'431N
1:6,000
SEE FIE REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zo„o A. V. A99
With BFE or Depth Zone 4E. At. AN. V. AR
Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone n
. Future Conditions 1% Annual
` Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes. zone x
'A." Area with Flood Risk due to Leveez°',r, o
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x
Effective LOMRs
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard znn= o
- — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
milli Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
20.2
17.5
—
OTHER
FEATURES
MAP PANELS
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Digital Data Available Nl
No Digital Data Available
Unmapped
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with F£MA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 2/9/2021 at 2:18 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image Is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernlzed areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.