820305_Inspection_20210429

FACILITY #: /'a2 305---
FARM NAME: 47tec, 6_)6re�e�i�
FREEBOARD f
ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS //'NUMBEROFANIMALS
EXPERIATION-DATE Y'Cd
OIC CARD (V_EfrOR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
d"
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPE 'j% `,`j,.:.. a w
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST ES ® R NO
Irrigation Plan Maps l'F
cr u-i 47
=) NEGATIVE NUMBER
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 AYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE gem NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE / /3 /?O?
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) 3. PH (Note if 4 or Tess)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU 2 ZN�-
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
.35-1 p
IRR2 (#21)
ZONO_.6 ACRES -2. PAN CROP TYPE
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes A-'
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
PO alpObi

CALBRIATION (#24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED 1
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS / 76
- FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE-°, :22 c
O: :- P: ;: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM 1.7 CROP YEILDS MORTALITY L/-
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE

Facility Number
--e x`vision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservatio
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: -E5 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 2-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
G%r-Aafi
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
1/4..-erndP�
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: % /ej
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
41D-Z4-.
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: i1906 %(
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Sw
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
WW
%/)
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Cattle
Design Current'
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure LI Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ,, 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes .2.1'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ®.'"No 0 NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

..... ..„„.„„„
ldenti ficr:
Frechoo.itil CHI):
-^,
iefenboaid (h):
nuriftill) less thin acli„iicluatc?
(1 iti h iuctir1 frechoai-d?
Stri.ictLite 4 Structuri Structure (
5. Arn. there to
01 vimmycd t1-1.`;011L,r.h
Or Lui
q'f2ooil(,‘;',.t+ItcI.1 or 11,1000y
Li „
[a -ICJ°
NJ,
LI
k
1. es[11 No11 N.A [
_ I /
NI A
140 1\fl!,
r VesLO r T;')/s,
1 [ 1
req,Jlt-e cs
art,i t///'/H1-,,, iihi-iTclatryns that
t IV keOli tIC 7 :- .0 /. 01)1)I. 0 ri Fra OOl_ DC (P,,V.
I
tt:
th 1r o10 dilT irirort-/ too 101 n Cne C'AA/Vf',./11-'? -1 'fres
1- ikt
'•'
Ground -levy Metals ((d„Zn.(:„,„-tc)
l'hosi;,,hc.tres i-:al lore to iticorpotate
otitide Appteivi--2t1
.1 011' /./it-/c.j/ 0 la/"/cl1i 1 1 1sit(:!
1 (L 1 11 110 1-1cilay11111t(..) 411C
lack of'
I Lad hit
fall, it/ of ihe r.1,Vs't 11)/cs,
1.
l,(-si,,c
A
1.kka k k; 1,k," 1-)SI
k t;,
101k
1/ :„; ,‘,/ // • , /te. i
n-1
1
11
k ;
1
! 4.:1-0.:a...
, sl No
Ck, S kV, 1 alit,
kt I: I I t1/4/ :1)1 k I rtt I 1, 11.11pekri
e.
•
/-k.!-k, 0;1/ I 1 •!' ,1r,,1.1i, 1 (A 1 I tH1-111112,') 11?
k ; /
A._

Facility Number: - a Pc
Date of Inspection: V/5-9-4 /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ..,e'Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes _Eri o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ja o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes _,E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _,e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/1),a,e 67)-6d
ikeeZe * (,:,‘,"Thf4
ea4'
6-ect,e i
/ 3
12?-1/ L(}tee,-&-ej
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
-e // /Q,e/sew
Phone: qa).) 5 9,8.5`-
Date: r/ 9//
2/4/2015

Facility Number
to
atirDivision of Water Resources
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Vb96-1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
# 01-0,070
Q/#-ey
Departure Time:
/0:aplyi
Owner Email:
Phone:
Coun
Region: F/ed
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: / q 3a..3
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Sw
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .❑--No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection:
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑Yes ❑''lo 0NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes .No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
1_71-Nes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ..Q'No El NA ❑ NE
❑Y• es ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Y• es ❑"TI o (l NA ❑ NE
❑ Y• es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Y• es ❑—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑' {es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
.❑`Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [❑Weather Code
n Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections 1-1Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes .❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑,...No pi NA [1 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Y• es _El`Io ® NA ❑ N-E
❑ Y• es ❑ No [❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Y• es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection: '//d-- /v?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ,e10 ❑NA ONE
❑ Yes „1''Slo ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes ..❑'No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ,.No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ••e-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes __ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
O Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
7E-0 672-6e-/?s..6-77-1 „„(.7z,a
/92a ke_ C:a k) -0-17k-y,
`„ „zu ry„ , , z// � ,�G� / /tom CL-c-f' GL�L
biLety-I 4'del
et1830 64-,)-S/4-
f
(77 L,2A .4e727te
abk), 6Qifte-r,-64 ieTa/c-e. ce/Lece,2 &-)) /
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ggsep/6 e
Phone:
9/0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2/4/2015