820378_Inspection_20210505

Type of Visit: 'compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: "'tontine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Si 5 21
oh en form at ENC. LUC
Arrival Time:
Owner Name:9oChen fain 111 o eNc
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
10=n0 I
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:AIT60N Region: fro
Deno KennedH
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: TEcH t p.eC . Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Longitude:
u ,t (NQ'ected 61 BILL.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layer
Non-Laye
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: A7ot - "7," l !�
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: 615I ai
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
i a
NO Na
•
al 17
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes jj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9, No ❑ NA El NE
❑Yes yNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [ /'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10°/ or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Clop Window
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): coact& Sttmuda,OV&Geed, U a , (VoeaJ
c
13. Soil Type(s): \Or /iK WQ9raxnKalmrai
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste T ns ers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? . ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: yjra - -237 p)
Date of Inspection: GI C2 2!
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes S] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes l❑ No ❑ NA D NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a nnunents (refer to question #). Explain any VES''answers-and/or anyadditionai recommen
Use drawil,gs of facility to.betterexplain situations (use:additional pages as:neecsaxy;
iRrm 3 ocoHs IoejCDQ inol
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Katie Fontenot
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
#-tot
Phone: 91 (J11( I/IS
Date:
2/4/2015

FACILITY #:GQ '512) FARM NAME: g1v11€,N — i r9
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL a f,
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPESN®rfO,wgig ram Ka(�,Ia
CROP TYPESC U PBQxvnud CL pk/Pr,P•
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT (#21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
- MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
ZONE ACRES
FLOW RATES
120 Min inspection initialed
Commercial Fertilizer
IRR2 (#21)
PAN CROP TYPE
NITROGEN (N)
Weather Codes
Chicken Litter

Type of Visit:' 9.Qompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 'SRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
5I5
G( ddens �wi�ne
ai
Arrival Time:
ot,ao
Departure Time:
Owner Name: deweJ omd; 9l41-e11S
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: n /1�
Facility Contact: 9en 0 K-enp' ►G`1Y
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: `,'la m rboN Region: Fro
Title: {' On Qfe C
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
isiCr
IN 'ecte4
b' b(U'
Wean
a
��
to Finish
ID
®1
1��
1I',
Layer
�� t
y
��
��
!
�# j
&
alaiy�
1
a
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La
er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
',ilil(1t
j
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
t .
#
;
!)
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
t
`'
I'1
qy
I
ig
Non-Dair
Beef Stockerq
I#;
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
1 i Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
$ I
„
i
Turkeys
yy
t..
)4
+llllli
I
�
r[1
�`t
b! l I! `r.
,
tlt,
! �1
{I
l,i
TurkeyyPoultsIu�I
Other
Other
ri
-:.uilua ^ •a
a
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Was the conveyance man-made?
Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes I\ I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
• No ❑NA NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued