820289_Inspection_20210520

Type of Visit: -0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: G'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
y/)-0/2r
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
,ticr�cd; /file palate 2 -
d, r! G 2&mmo GGC Phone:
;.?10
County: San
Region: tried
Owner Email:
Ge„a /67z4-1-e4
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator: ,.. _t.f
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
�6o
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
POS. 97
Ji+ A dt i Nf �t A# 4s6 1 M1
Design tpCurren
wine " acityr op. 1
ro i:A i J k lji aM /.� ixh fix{ t '4 i f T
'+ ;. vi x esign i4�' �IIts�'. s a u� Reslgdi C rrctlt,�''
+ H '`Wet Poultry Cape ` ,:Pop + ii1 Ciattle" '� fapaci VPop.
rr 'x i `'. ,. x ,... t r+u. td„
Wean to Finish
"
Layer
'
+
f
Dairy Cow
1`
Wean to Feeder
5
Non Layer
Dairy Calf_'.
Feeder to Finish
aricig
i';+ry"
« r ' , w „'. x" � ,D sign Curren
oul.CatiacfM�E'It}�' i
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
A, 00
I `C
,M.D[
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
i �
Non -Dairy
k t'
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker'.
2t6
Gilts
y • Non -La ers --
Beef Feeder
Boars
;=':Pullets --
Beef Brood Cow''
t X "Other
„ _
Turkey Poults
I„t•Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a.
b.
c.
d.
❑ Yes 1:SkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Was the conveyance man-made?
Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes \i] No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

'Facility Number: 50, -
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Stocture 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? trog U Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No 0 NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an ate immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Bite L ct.f .
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
O PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)\
❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
W7 fin
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
top
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps fl Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
O Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ['Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
0 Monthly and 1"
4 Ye . Ng 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -]No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes DI ❑NA ❑NE
0 Waste Trans ers 0 Weather Code
Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
O Yes In No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IR\No ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

'Facility Number: f2 - a- /
'Date of Inspection:
s/ea /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
AO,Gaz-e /14-te-d-ort
t /err e ,4' ,24 /Sa&)
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
E No
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Phone:(4OJt35 9 gS—
Date:�il//o2/
2/4/2015

FACILITY #: t? -;f59 FARM NAME:
yr/ l/hc, c?
FREEBOARD M ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE c:// 30 / ti NUMBER OF ANIMALS 9�
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD msR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES 1TherlAdatall 0,1414414,c!
CROP TYPESIi�au� /tiai�z� �vin G. uxt�
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A'(t) NEGATIVE NUMBER
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
4�/a{
�J
DATE
3 / ot/ NITROGEN LEVEL of / 3
EVERY 3 YEARS:
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE 1{(14,
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000)
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
ZONE ACRES
FLOW RATES in
120 Min inspection initialed
PAN
ZN
IRR2 (#21)
/33
CROP TYPE
NITROGEN (N) Ise
Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS CU//c//?-o
- FLOW RATES % -7 5'
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
LUDGE (#21 ate)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE /6 1q(/3-o /�
0: 3s7`) P: %S G % RATIO OF SLUDGE e C
3,47 /., d0 e t! q
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE