20191242 Ver 2_PJD docs_20210524

Scale 1 in = 100 ft

Distances are paced
and approximate
Project Area
(Limit of Study for Surface Waters)
Project Area
(Limit of Study for Surface Waters)
Stream/RPW (ie S1, S2, S3)
Summerdale II
Wetlands and Streams Map
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
30 Nov 2019
Wetland
Determination
Data Forms
Stream Form
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2)In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be” navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ___________________________________________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ___________________.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _______________________________________________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________________________________________________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ___________________________________________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _______________________________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ___________________________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ______________________________________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): _______________________________________________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ____________________________________________________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ________________.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ___________________________________________.
or Other (Name & Date): ____________________________________________.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________________________.
Other information (please specify): _________________________________________________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
iI •  Rr Serennial iI • 
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ______) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1ª. Continuity of bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0123
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
ª Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___BB)
. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0 1 2 3
2. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
2.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
2. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
7-13-19 Coley Farm 35.584315
A. Adams Wake -78.811823
34.00 ✔Fuquay-Varina
15.0
9.5
9.50
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)LRR-P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
A. Adams Fuquay-Varina
131 Coley Farm Road Wake 7/13/2019
Prime 1 Builders, LLC WA-UP
Side slope none
35.584714 -78.81199
FrB - Fuquay loamy sand, 0-6%PFO
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.25 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:11 (A)
2.25 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Acer rubrum 10 FACW Species Across All Strata:12 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:92%(A/B)
6.
7.
60 = Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )FACW species 40 x 2 =80
1.Nyssa sylvatica 5 Y FAC FAC species 70 x 3 =210
2.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC FACU species 5 x 4 =20
3.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
4.Column Totals:115 (A)310 (B)
5.
6.
7.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
10 = Total Cover 1. Rapid test for hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )2. Dominance Test is > 50%
1.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC 3. Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
2.Nyssa sylvatica 5 Y FAC 4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
3.Ligustrum sinense 5 Y FAC
4.1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
7.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
15 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
1.Lonicera japonica 10 Y FAC
2.Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FACU
3.Vitis spp.5 Y FAC
4.5 Y FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
25 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
1.5 Y FAC
2.Hydrophytic
3.Vegetation Yes No
4.Present?
5 = Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
WA-UP
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Acer rubrum
Pinus taeda
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.7
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Arundinaria tecta
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Vitis spp.
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-5 100 LS
4-9 100 SL
9-15+100 SCL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)Redox Dark Surface (F6)(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T) Marl (F10) (LRR U)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
Matrix Redox Features
WA-UP
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks
10YR 4/2
10YR 6/4
10YR 6/6
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:City/County:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.)Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)LRR-P Lat:Long:Datum:NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a wetland?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)Aquatic Fauna (B13)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Thin Much Surface (C7)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)Other (Explain in Remarks)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes No Depth (inches):11
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):9 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
Floodplain none
35.584605 -78.81196
BbA - Bibb sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded PFO
A. Adams Fuquay-Varina
131 Coley Farm Road Wake 7/13/2019
Prime 1 Builders, LLC WA-WET
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.30 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:12 (A)
2.30 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Nyssa sylvatica 5 FAC Species Across All Strata:13 (B)
4.Percent of Dominant Species
5.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:92%(A/B)
6.
7.
65 = Total Cover OBL species 10 x 1 =10
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )FACW species 55 x 2 =110
1.Acer rubrum 10 Y FACW FAC species 65 x 3 =195
2.Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC FACU species 5 x 4 =20
3.UPL species 0 x 5 =0
4.Column Totals:135 (A)335 (B)
5.
6.
7.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20 = Total Cover 1. Rapid test for hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )2. Dominance Test is > 50%
1.Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC 3. Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01
2.Nyssa sylvatica 5 Y FAC 4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
3.Clethra alnifolia 5 Y FACW
4.1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
7.Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
15 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
1.Arundinaria tecta 10 Y FACW
2.Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FACU
3.Vitis spp.5 Y FAC
4.5 Y OBL
5.5 Y OBL
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
30 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30-ft )
1.5 Y FAC
2.Hydrophytic
3.Vegetation Yes No
4.Present?
= Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Vitis spp.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Woodwardia areolata
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Acer rubrum
Liquidambar styraciflua
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.5
WA-WET
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
(inches)%%Type1 Loc2 Texture
0-4 95 5 C PL SL
4-9 85 10 C M SL
5 C PL
9-13+90 5 C M SL
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)Redox Dark Surface (F6)(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T) Marl (F10) (LRR U)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2
10YR 2/1 7.5YR 5/6
10YR 2/1 7.5YR 5/6
10YR 4/2 7.5YR 5/6
WA-WET
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)Color (moist)Remarks