20130370 Ver 1_401 Application_20130413

201 30370
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP mc.
Environmental Consultants
April 5"', 2013 COURTESY
TO: Ms. Emily Hughes COPY
USACE - Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: NWP 12 Application: Kirkland Pump Station Capacity Expansion
Action ID# SAW- 2013 -00117
Dear Emily:
Enclosed is a Nationwide Permit 12 application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf
of Mr. Frank Styers of the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority for the expansion of a sewer line in the
northern part of New Hanover County. This project involves the installation of approximately 8,721 linear
feet of 8 -inch force main parallel to the existing force mains in order to expand the pumping capacity of
the Kirkland pump station and provide a redundancy for operation to limit impact due to spills in the case
of a force main break. The open cut installation of the proposed force main will require minor temporary
impacts to 0.032 acre of wetlands and 15 LF of stream. Due to the confined space available for
construction within the utility easements at the stream and wetland impact areas, trenchless methods such
as directional drilling are not feasible. Also, a shallower installation by open cut methods increases
response time and reduces impact in the event of future maintenance or repairs.
Please be aware that the alignment of this project changed slightly after you issued the JD in January of
2013. Part of the corridor now follows Grayson Park Drive instead of Abby Glen Way. Additionally, the
line just east of Impact #1 shifted slightly. LMG reviewed these areas and hung additional flags near
Impact #l. Please see our revised wetland map. It appears proposed wetland impacts decreased slightly
with this revised alignment. Please let us know if you would like to revisit these areas.
The Pre - Construction Notification form, associated maps, and site plan are enclosed for your review.
Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely, ,^_
" _,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
Cc: Mr. Frank Styers, CFPUA
Mr. Jeremy Blair, Paramounte Engineering
Mr. Chad Coburn, NC DWQ
Ms. Karen Higgins, NC DWQ
www.lmgroup.net • info @lmgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

o�ot WA, sF pG
0
O 'C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Kirkland Pump Station Capacity Expansion
2b. County:
New Hanover County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Wilmington
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Utility line is an easement that runs through various properties.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
-------
— inli
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
a
R. - wA �Ufu"" L11—, b
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner):
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Easement Holder
4b. Name:
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Go Mr. Frank Styers
4d. Street address:
235 Government Center Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
4f. Telephone no.:
(910) 332 -6670
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kim Williams
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
5d. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
(910) 452 -0001
5f. Fax no.:
(910) 452 -0060
5g. Email address:
kwilliams @lmgroup.net
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Easements and ROWs
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.301972 N Longitude: - 77.777471 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
Easement: between 30' and 50' wide x 9000' in length
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Futch Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
SA; HQW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Kirkland Pump Station, currently owned and operated by the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority is located off of
Tilbury Drive in northeastern New Hanover County. The existing pump station currently discharges through a six inch
diameter force main which runs primarily along maintained public utility easements and NCDOT rights of way(between
30' and 50' width), including Futch Creek Road and Market Street to a manhole located just south of Porters Neck Road.
An abandoned four inch diameter force main runs parallel to the six inch main.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.1 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—15LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to expand the pumping capacity of the Kirkland pump station and provide a redundancy for
operation to limit impact due to spills in the case of a force main break.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project involves installation of approximately 8,721 linear feet of 8 -inch force main parallel to the existing force mains in
order to expand the pumping capacity of the pump station and provide a redundancy for operation to limit impact due to spills
in the case of a force main break. The open cut installation of the proposed force main will require minor temporary impacts
to three wetland areas and one stream. Due to the confined space available for construction within the utility easements at
the stream and wetland impact areas, trenchless methods such as directional drilling are not feasible. Also, a shallower
installation by open cut methods increases response time and reduces impact in the event of future maintenance or repairs.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Corey Novak
Land Management Group, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Emily Hughes with the ACOE issued a JD (Action ID# SAW- 2013 - 00117) on 1/17/2013. Please note that the alignment
changed slightly after the JD was issued. Part of the corridor now follows Grayson Park Drive instead of Abby Glen Way.
Additionally, the line just east of Impact #1 shifted slightly. LMG reviewed these areas and hung additional flags near Impact
#1. Please see our revised wetland map. It appears proposed wetland impacts decreased slightly with this revised alignment.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
0 Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ®T
Installation of
utility line
Non - riparian
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.008
W2 [I P ®T
Installation of
utility line
Riparian
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.010
W3 []PUT
Installation of
utility line
Riparian
® Yes
E] No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.014
W4 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.032
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary m
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Open cut
installation of
Futch Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
15
utility line
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
15
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts: NIA
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction: NIA
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ): NIA
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The open cut installation of the proposed force main will require minor temporary impacts to three wetland areas and one
stream. Due to the confined space available for construction within the utility easements at the stream and wetland
impact areas, trenchless methods such as directional drilling are not feasible. Also, a shallower installation by open cut
methods increases response time and reduces impact in the event of future maintenance or repairs. Jurisdictional areas
will be returned to natural grade and wetlands will be seeded with a seed mix upon project completion.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be installed to prevent erosion into adjacent wetland /stream areas. Jurisdictional areas will be returned to
grade and seeded.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank: N/A
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program: NIA
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
N/A
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan: NIA
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required. N/A
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NIA
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? if no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
None
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No impervious cover is associated with the installation of the sewer line.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review: NIA
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review: NIA
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes E] No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review: NIA
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes No
❑
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This specific project will not directly serve any additional customers.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The pump station discharges to downstream infrastructure which eventually contributes to the Northside WWTP flow.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS layer was used to determine the presence of federally listed species. Several rare
species are known to occur in the general vicinity of the site, but none appear to be located within the specific project
area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat. While the project area itself is not considered EFH, the database shows the section of Futch Creek located
downstream of the site is habitat for coastal migratory pelagics. No impacts to these resources will occur.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The HPOWEB GIS website mapping resource was used to determine the presence of cultural resources. Several
surveyed houses are located off of Market Street between Porters Neck Road and Futch Creek Road. These structures
are listed as not eligible. No impacts to these sites will occur.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Kim Williams
04/05/2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agenfs Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Iiv �e, the undersigned, hereby authorze Land Management Group; Inc to act as our agent
in the determination of jurisdictional wetland boundaries on the subject property,
KIRKLAWb FORM MAW By way of this form, Ihue additionally authorize access to the
'SA . T
site by representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and/or the NC
Division of Coastal Management (NTC DCM) for the purpose of reviewing the flagged
wetland boundary and providing a final jurisdictional determination. Any questions
regarding the jurisdictional -,vetland determination should be directed to Land
Management Group. Inc.
Please n wide the following infornzation:
Property Address and Farce] ID Number: N�J _ C F P U A T ��.SFtwtt�
Current Property Owner Name: CkTrc � � GL�c Lij fr�
Owner Address &.Phone Number: a35 �- b��R��E� C�s� �2tvE
�IILMIh�.iool � Nc agyb3_
(�� Ala- 33a- tss o
Plea -e circle Yes or No for the follovving questions: _
Yes No
n e are the current owners:
No
INde are under contract to purchase the subject property: Yes
1AAle are under option to purchase the subject property: Yes
No /A
(NOTE: Site access will be restricted without notice /authorization by current owner)
,
Print Owner's Name Print Applicant s Name
r
O 'net's Si;•zlatme
r Applicant's Signature
(required for COE re ;nd delineation)
hate --
Date

MAR MV-3ffmE
$l K y G
E' C`�.
are •
r n r wo
�utch C.,rek 00,
'Qa
1 -140 ,
canp
a
V
z Cb jai
0
oa0 Q \ac oo �yS% FufCh Creak
o Wry Q-a
,pd C%
bye l�
yd�
s
°4 �l Pao Fa210 01
cagy
0 ° c4 !y
boys \\
ITE
S 6` aDunes Cir
OOy m
l
'COyet
Port",. U o0
0�� yNOn Cr
Ohs pr C' pOO''
cr'�S� Big 0� c
c e
n Horn! Dr °�
O ..
ly�A/ 4
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: World Street Map
SCALE 1" = 1,500'
Kirkland Pump Station
LMG
Capacity Expansion
LAND MANAGEMENTGAOUP. -_
` ° " °° �' ° °' " ° ° "' " " °"
p
Figure 1
New Hanover County, NC
www.LMGroup.net
Vicinity Map
March 2012
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
40 -12 -237
3 80 5 Wrightsvil le Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403

B.
Map Source: Scotts Hill Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic).
Kirkland Pump Station
Capacity Expansion
New Hanover County, NC
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP tv..
F—.onmrnrnr Con,uha�n
www. LM Grou p. n et
March 2012 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
40 -12 -237 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wihington, NC 28403
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 2
USGS Topographic Map

*Boundaries are approximate and
are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey GIS Data.
Kirkland Pump Station
Capacity Expansion
New Hanover County, NC
Do: Dorovan soils
Jo: Johnston soils
Ke: Kenansville fine sand
Le: Leon sand
Ly: Lynchburg fine sandy loam
Rm: Rimini sand
St: Stallings fine sand
Wa: Wakulla sand
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP w
www. LM Grou p. n et
March 2012 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
40 -12 -237 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Figure 3
Soils Map

IN
Map Source: 2010 NAPP Aerial Photography
Kirkland Pump Station
Capacity Expansion
New Hanover County, NC
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP fo- 0umentot Co"Wronh
www. LM Grou p. n et
March 2012 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
40 -12 -237 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wiknington, NC 28403
IHE
Figure 4
2010 Aerial Photograph

PROPOSED_
WETLAND
LI-
0101
PROPOSED i/ %>, '� j� — \ _ ca 3
WETLAND \✓ �/ / / / \ j U
�. /
,\ .,\ % • \\\ IM ACT #1 2 \� � - J �~ � \
OP ED
\\ \.� / \ \ ��•� j iJi� ���� WETLAND
IMP \ACT #
0.
X11 z
Pzz
\ \ v w A. �
,Qs i \::\ `\ �'� `y�'� /�\ i %' ;�, \� '�.\,•`'y ,� '`. % `�'�.,� / � ` mac/ \`�' � �. ,�
�y"
•rO�! �eejeeeui Z 1111 taill
Q SEAL s
v SCALE 1"=500' A
R. •`�```` INDEX
0 500 1000 1500

m
8"M A G-
__1
'n
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
FOR OPEN CUT CROSSING
F,
350 SF WETLANDS
EX SSMH
RIM 20 93
My IN(S) 1
CL MID 13
92
� 0
27_ 1
124'OAK
5'
PLAN VIEW WETLAND IMPACT #1
SCALE: 1"=50"
UPLANDS
30
25
20
15
10
64+00
65+00
PROFILE VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #1
HORIZONTAL SCALE. 1"=50"
VERTICAL SCALE. 1*=5*
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT�
FOR OPEN CUT CROSSING
422 SF WETLANDS/15 LF STREAM
20
15
10
A
111
I
PLAN VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #2
SCALE: 1"=50r
L
UK WIN
I
UI!LANDS
I G
RADE
N
'-EX
ISTING
-GRAD E
it
--
--
t
I
C=0 PVC FORCE I
MN- -
i
i
I�
I
1 7
G
NL
E
65+00
PROFILE VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #1
HORIZONTAL SCALE. 1"=50"
VERTICAL SCALE. 1*=5*
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT�
FOR OPEN CUT CROSSING
422 SF WETLANDS/15 LF STREAM
20
15
10
A
111
I
PLAN VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #2
SCALE: 1"=50r
83+00 84+00
PROFILE VIEW: WETLAND IMPACT #2-
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1'=50-
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=5'
Kill
15
10
5
—war ­­ I wwc I ww sm MACr
FOR OPEN CUT CROSSING
697 SF WETLANDS
PLAN VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #3
SCALE: 1"=50"
�X.6'
OR ErIK--
Ty- I
E x 4
17 r AIN--
FORC E
I G
RADE
N
--
--
t
I
i
i
I�
I
1 7
G
NL
E
.y
TF
I
J. -
DIPI —I--
I
2 FULL JOI
TS
P
PVC
ED E CL. ?5
FORCE MAI
_XS Wj _lT A R Y
J, --SEWE
83+00 84+00
PROFILE VIEW: WETLAND IMPACT #2-
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1'=50-
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=5'
Kill
15
10
5
—war ­­ I wwc I ww sm MACr
FOR OPEN CUT CROSSING
697 SF WETLANDS
PLAN VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #3
SCALE: 1"=50"
z
0
;z)
z
0
R
z
1
85+00 86+00 z
PROFILE VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #3
HORIZONTAL SCALE- 1"=50"
VERTICAL SCALE. 1"=5'
SCALE: 1'*=50'
L m -
0 50 100 150
L =0
L
CL
cc
ple
Z_ N 6
0; 1 g
re
z
V
0
r-. o Z,
F -A o
Z,� 24
Z 0
x u Z_
SEAL
FIG-1
7.m. —,2.m
"A�lw
1�
--
--
t
I
i
i
I�
I
1 7
G
NL
E
ED 8' DR-18
RO
C9(X
I PVC FORCE
z
0
;z)
z
0
R
z
1
85+00 86+00 z
PROFILE VIEW. WETLAND IMPACT #3
HORIZONTAL SCALE- 1"=50"
VERTICAL SCALE. 1"=5'
SCALE: 1'*=50'
L m -
0 50 100 150
L =0
L
CL
cc
ple
Z_ N 6
0; 1 g
re
z
V
0
r-. o Z,
F -A o
Z,� 24
Z 0
x u Z_
SEAL
FIG-1
7.m. —,2.m

8
8
S
8
g
0
ITI S
m
=/ a
0
m�
yD�n
�yD
D � �
MM + S
O 8
D
V
O
O r
O 8
iR
8
g
8
S
o rN g
T
8
T
a A 9 9 A' 59 Y A
8 8
PRELIMINARY DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
D�Uw NO
oMOZY
-=gm
NnN� � —DZ
DDDn2�ZpN2
i�00�mNC�yZ
-iiimz)3�rrxx�J��"�O
rr m0,p�CC1 -4=
��OTNrm«
vJO�zO��tny
7�J ;OmpOD�
���aFo3om
Tpp p M O —
am, > AM
M n 8 N
�m —
I '
UZI Od 888► 8O I EIZO Od 8
w 51-J oalloz I
SSBINUM s)-8 Da
I I
SHVAON3f OV31.SdWVH 3OW39 8
QO 00OYI0-190008z0U
w
z
) w r
i jtl I � � I
3 x e
U131S » I ,�� /i �r X_P I CO)
Mw w _
rn
�\al
g1� >'
�I X3$0 I Ip YES( h�l
II
I
/ gapes IIIII s
tz
tz
•I \ I I � � _ 1111
1 111111 I
o pH
J L
-zb Y
m n itt
mM
C)
O
z
z
in
i IOw
PROJECT STATUS
PLAN &PROFILE
STA.55 +00 - STA.70 +00
KIRKLAND PUMP STATION
CAPACITY EXPANSION
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
PARAMOUNTE
5911 Oleander Dnve, Swte 201
Virdmington, North Caroluta 28403
x x _ , x _
(J10) 7)1 6707 (U) (J10) 7I1 676110
CUENr INFORMATIM
jM
Cape Fear
Public Utility Authority
REVISIONS
1
\
-
�
Orre RAwING INFORMATION xx
•>
pExuo- am
y���
f
t� •.
279
E OF PAVEM
NT
oa
Tx?
g
SEE SHEET G2.4
\
I
289
k
6 PAVE
NT
I
(a yeya
m
/
28A
mN
I
nc
>m
I
27
9
I
2a
ze o
N'
�
I
II
r8
z
I
I
27.8
1
28.2
I
I
I
zP
wx
I
1
$
219,5
r
ze 5
I
I
25.2
I
I
/
24.7
/
/
238
7IUN I
I
zs
1
I
1
259
I
(
/
24A
I
1
I
23
/
r
(
/
21s
/
zI 7
\
21,15
\
\
\
\
233
\
\
\l
240
257
I
I
I
249
I�
252
, o
�z
25.2
I mn
Ipp
25.1
19
25
1
I
5
I
7 L01
I
I
50
I
8 8
PRELIMINARY DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
D�Uw NO
oMOZY
-=gm
NnN� � —DZ
DDDn2�ZpN2
i�00�mNC�yZ
-iiimz)3�rrxx�J��"�O
rr m0,p�CC1 -4=
��OTNrm«
vJO�zO��tny
7�J ;OmpOD�
���aFo3om
Tpp p M O —
am, > AM
M n 8 N
�m —
I '
UZI Od 888► 8O I EIZO Od 8
w 51-J oalloz I
SSBINUM s)-8 Da
I I
SHVAON3f OV31.SdWVH 3OW39 8
QO 00OYI0-190008z0U
w
z
) w r
i jtl I � � I
3 x e
U131S » I ,�� /i �r X_P I CO)
Mw w _
rn
�\al
g1� >'
�I X3$0 I Ip YES( h�l
II
I
/ gapes IIIII s
tz
tz
•I \ I I � � _ 1111
1 111111 I
o pH
J L
-zb Y
m n itt
mM
C)
O
z
z
in
i IOw
as
1
? 7 7
d) (Q
to
o ra
d 3 a+
G�
G Z
' � d
W
CL,
q [v
Is .
W
PROJECT STATUS
PLAN &PROFILE
STA.55 +00 - STA.70 +00
KIRKLAND PUMP STATION
CAPACITY EXPANSION
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
PARAMOUNTE
5911 Oleander Dnve, Swte 201
Virdmington, North Caroluta 28403
x x _ , x _
(J10) 7)1 6707 (U) (J10) 7I1 676110
CUENr INFORMATIM
jM
Cape Fear
Public Utility Authority
REVISIONS
-
�
Orre RAwING INFORMATION xx
•>
pExuo- am
y���
�`s I
o?
t� •.
- -- I
oa
Tx?
g
SEE SHEET G2.4
as
1
? 7 7
d) (Q
to
o ra
d 3 a+
G�
G Z
' � d
W
CL,
q [v
Is .
W
PROJECT STATUS
PLAN &PROFILE
STA.55 +00 - STA.70 +00
KIRKLAND PUMP STATION
CAPACITY EXPANSION
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
PARAMOUNTE
5911 Oleander Dnve, Swte 201
Virdmington, North Caroluta 28403
x x _ , x _
(J10) 7)1 6707 (U) (J10) 7I1 676110
CUENr INFORMATIM
jM
Cape Fear
Public Utility Authority
REVISIONS
�
Orre RAwING INFORMATION xx
•>
pExuo- am

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW - 2013-00117 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: Scotts Hill
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Applicant:
Pammounte Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Jeremy Blair
Address:
5911 Oleander Drive, Ste. 201
Wilmington. NC 28403
Telephone No.:
Property description:
Size (acres)
9,000 LF
Nearest Waterway
EHtch Creek
USGS HUC
03030001
Agent: Iged Management Groum Uc,
x805 Wrightsville Ave, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403-
Nearest Town Wilmington
River Basin White Oak
Coordinates N 34.301972 W - 77.777471
Location description Prolect area is a Cape Fear Public Utility Authority easement for a proposed force main.
located alone MarketSweet and Futch Creek Road. in Porters Neck, New Hanover Coutitt.-North Carolina,
Indicate Which of the Following Avviv:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are watemof the U.S. including wetlands on the above described prpiect area subiect to the permit
reaalrements of Section 404 of the•Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC $1344). Unless there Is a chaaee in the law or
our oublished regulations, this determination mav,be relled upon for a period not to exceed fiyeyears from the date
of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
areas subiect to CWA iurisdiction an your property which, provided there is no change in the law orriur published
relations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed: five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and a portion has been surveyed and accurately depicted
on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our

X
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Hughes at (910) 2514635.
C. Basis For Determination
This site exhibits wetland criteria as described In the 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual and Coastal Plain
Supplement and is adjacent to Futch Creek. a Navigable Water of the U.S. This determination is based on information
provided bvGand Management Group and a lite vislt by Emily Hughes on 1 M912412.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this.
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Emily Hughes, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 3/17/2013
* *It is not necessary to
correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official:
RFA form to the District
if you do not object to the determination in this
Date January 17.2013 �� �_� Expiration Date January 17, 2018