20210968 Ver 1_DocuSign_R-6003D_US_17_at_Old_Folkstone & NC 172_20210524

MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Depai liiient is
required to prepare environmental documents for state-funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either
"Yes" or"No".
TIP Project No.: SS-6003D
State Project No.: 48874.1.1
Project Location: US 17 at SR 1518 Old Folkstone Road and US 17 at NC 172 in
Onslow County
Project Description: The project would make the intersection of US 17 and SR 1518
Old Folkstone Road into a temporary Reduced Conflict Intersection(RCI) and
accordingly provide a U-turn bulb-out and four section Flashing Yellow Arrow for the
US 17 northbound to southbound U-turn at the existing signalized intersection of US 17
and NC 172.
Purpose & Need: The need for the project is to provide for better safety and mobility in
the project area. The purpose of the project is to satisfy the need.
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
A USACE Nationwide 18 permit and corresponding NCDWR Section 401 Water Quality
General Certification (GC 4139) will likely be required for wetland impacts associated
with the construction of the U-turn bulb out. No impacts are anticipated for the signal
improvements.
Special Project Information:
Jurisdictional Resources
This project is within the study limits of STIP project U-6065. Field delineations for U-
6065 identified one jurisdictional wetland(WF) and no streams within the project limits
of the SS-6003D project.
Cultural Resources
Archaeological and Architectural surveys for the U-6065 study area identified no
historical resources within the project limits and no surveys were required. The SS-
6003D project will be constructed within the existing and maintained right of way.
Protected Species
As of October 8, 2020, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists fifteen federally
protect species for Onslow County and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration
—National Marine Fisheries (NOAA-NMFS) list two additional species. Surveys within
05/19/21 1 of 5

the U-6065 study area identified habitat present only for Rough-leaved loosestrife,
Golden Sedge and Cooley's Meadowrue, however habitat for these species was not
identified within the SS-6003D project limits and a"No Effect"biological conclusion
was made for all listed species in Onslow County for the SS-6003D project limits.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion
(PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat(NLEB)
(Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT
program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect,Likely
to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will
ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for ten years for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Onslow County,
where SS-6303D is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective
date of a final listing determination through December 31, 2030.
Estimated Cost
Construction: $97,200.00
Right-of Way $0
Total: $97,200.00
05/19/21 2 of 5

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under ® ❑
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?
If the answer to number 1 is"no",then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes,under which category? 6, 8d
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS*
YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative ❑
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact_to human health
or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed ❑
activity have such widespread implications,that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands; ❑ ❑
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries;parklands;prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic,recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the ❑
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑ ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
05/19/21 3 of 5

YES NO
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on ❑
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish,wildlife, or their
natural habitats
*If any questions 2 through 8 are answered"yes",the proposed project may not qualify as a Minimum
Criteria project. A state environmental assessment(EA)may be required.
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its habitat, ❑
likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent fill in ® ❑
waters of the United States?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of fill in ❑
high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as mountain bogs
or pine savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental Concern, as ❑
defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes? ❑
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an"effect"on a property or site listed on the ❑
National Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of way ❑
from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
PART D
Additional Documentation as Required from Sections B & C
Question 10: It is anticipated that the project will impact approximately
0.07 acres (ac) of jurisdictional wetlands (0.04 acres of permanent impact
and 0.03 acres of temporary impact).
05/19/21 4 of 5

Approved By:
,-DocuSigned by: nn� ���� I
5/20/2021 Sf Mt wALL lam. LS
-8FP7A844818C4AB_
Date Stonewall Mathis, PE, Deputy Division Traffic Engineer
North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation
,-DocuSigned by:
5/19/2021 ICI. saA, ikt,VlattetA,
�P13C7FBF00534BF_.
Date Mason Herndon, Division 3 Environmental Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Transportation
05/19/21 5 of 5

NCDOT PROJECT COMMITMENTS
STI P Project No. SS-6003D
US 17 at SR 1518 and NC 172 Intersection Safety Improvements
Onslow County
Federal Aid Project No. N/A
WBS Element 48874.1.1
No Commitments
May 2021 SS-6003D

Figure 1: Location Map
/
7 l
t
if
1 Irs
Folkstone! FO1kalOne
Rapt Ch 151F1
r1
l
M r:
tL? C
1 \ y
eh.
,, „
<7- i , a, r.s.6 `.�-1
,,,,,-- .,
\,[
Figure 2: SHPO Map
i
i . _.
# one 4
if'-
• SLO
z
ON039@ Ned1111 J d.81 Serv1ce 51ahan -0
i
Haxd FOX1e} iGonef v
4:1337 H. Hcuse
{Gme
INd
F
134,
4e
+ta

Figure 3:Aerial Map
y
•
•
c • •a= ,•'_
•
. f
_ - T �
i.
•
-
_
•
. .. - ,• J _
.44r:. . .
+ r - ♦ 1 _ tir
4
... ;.4 ::;
'ti•
yv • .04 '
` +ice' 'L'Sx' • 44, [, j.. * k
' _ •
lir
t •
" • . V a like. ` ' it ti`
- fit,
. frig","fir , . .-.: '.. . . • . - : • •'2 .1_1, -..;. 'W1_1, ..,76.,,,ft .., 1p... _ ,.. .
Y Jam. _ _ • '1 -. 'n. * + + ri
•
N.
....... .., .
. .. .
� try,' ....
• . _._
_... . . • -._
_ -I .
•
• ..
• ._
. .
. •
. ..
.• ,
-
r

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
PHASING DIAGRAM DRE FAILURE PREEMPT 5 Phase SS-6003D sig. 1.0
Fully Actuated
Isolated
TABLE OF OPERATION TABLE OF OPERATION OASIS 2070 LOOP & DETECTOR INSTALLATION CHART
PHASE INDUCTIVE LOOPS DETECTOR PROGRAMMING
INTERVAL o NOTES
P L P C P C P DISTANCE z o a
SIGNAL 0 2 2 0 e E e E e E e W L SIGNAL SIZE FROM ? m STRETCH DELAY 6
LOOP TURNS PHASE � z w FACE 5 6 5 6 $ i R i a 7 a 7 s FACE 1 2 FT STOPBAR z a W TIME TIME Y z
Pre 7 / Pre 8 8 1 8 2/3 8 H (FT) LL v 1. Refer to "Roadway Standard
Clear 1 11 .- F F -R--R-�F-'--F - 1 Y Y - - 15 - - Drawings NCDOT" dated January
02+6 (08) _ v v 23,25 ON OFF 1A 6X40 0 2-4-2 - 6 Y Y Y 3 2018 and "Standard
21 R R G G R R R G Y Y 24,26 OFF ON - Specifications for Roods and
22 R R G G �R R G Y Y _ 1B 6X40 10 2 4 2 1 Y Y 15
,� 51 v y n v 63,65 ON OFF _ _ _ Structures" dated January 201 8.
2A 6X6 420 5 - 2 Y Y -
64,66 OFF ON _ 2. Do not program s i gna I -For I ate
Pre 7 / Pre 8
61,62 R G R G R R G R Y Y 2B 6X6 420 5 5 Y Y 15 Y night flashing Operation
Clear 2 unless otherwise directed by
(01+6) 81,83 R R R R G G R R R R 5A 6X40 0 2 4 2 2 Y Y Y 3
02+5 82 R R R R G G R R R R the Engineer.
11110 6A 6X6 420 6 6561
Y Y 3. Phase 1 and/or phase 5 may be
SIGNAL FACE I.DC-1 6B 6X6 420 6 6 Y Y lagged.
8A 6X40 0 2-4-2 - 8 Y Y - - - - - 4. Set all detector units to
101 08 All Heads L.E.D.
presence mode.
Pre 7 / Pre 8 O © 5. Activate beacons 23. 24. 25. 26
C�02+5)3 Q 3 seconds prior to the end of
01+6 ( 12" ® 12" Q L� phase 2 green.
O 12 . © 6. Activate beacons 63. 64. 65. 66
® r, r, 3 seconds prior to the end of
FLASH © r, r 112" phase 6 green.
O O 0
Pre 7 / Pre 8 Dwell 11 51 21 22
(Flesh) 61,62 82
01+5 81,83
N --,{
PHASING DIAGRAM DETECTION LEGEND tILB C ?-� WLB 55 MPH 0%Grade WLe+ 450'
t--■ DETECTED MOVEMENT US 17 ---_------ 81 1 t82 © �66 0
-4- UNDETECTED MOVEMENT (OVERLAP) - - - - - - - F - 62 - F - - dg J J�R Lane _ _ ©J_ _
.0--- UNSIGNALIZED MOVEMENT _ _ _ _ - 61 an R rJ lJ R Lane 2 6 F
F---> PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT 11 --- © .0 SYSTEM ® O J
---------------------------------
------------8--
ii
-- ��63 O
64
O 23 .
24
0, - 51
rJ CO ®TJ r-J® Lane 1 21 - - - - - - - -
E) ®�J rJ®Lane 2 - 22
- - -8--------- SYSTEM 1 US 17
A �j�/
O26W-� et. 1 I I ////J� �
f I WLD---
+7_450'/ ALB-
55 MPH 0%Grade r • \��83 f 1��� // /
'NLB \\ I la m i LEGEND
\ 11� I 23,25 12„ PROPOSED EXISTING
DRE FAILURE PREEMPT \\ II IE` II 63,65 0-->. Traffic Signal Head H
FUNCTION PRE 7 PRE 8 \ II 1 1 12"Minimum (}-0- Modified Signal Head N/A
Interval 1-Green Clear 15 15 \\ I 1 \\ -I Sign -I
Interval 1-Yellow clear 0.0* o.0* \ t I I BE ❑ Pedestrian Signal Head11
Intervals-Red Clear o.o* o.o* to \ \ With Push Button A Sign
Interval-Green Clear 15 15 \ \ PREPARED Signal Pole with Guy 0-I
\ \
Interval 2-Yellow Clear o.o* o.o* \ \ TO STOP Signal Pole with Sidewalk Guy
ye,\ ' \.5, W3 4 I 1 Inductive Loop Detector C--D
Interval 2-Red Clear 0.0* 0.0* '\ \a• r-
-71
OASIS 2070 TIMING CHART
Interval-Green Clear 15 15 N\ s \lo >< Controller &Cabinet 12'f
Interval 3-Yellow Clear 0.0* 0.0* /gym\ \\ �, FLASHING W16-13P E Junction Box ■
PHASE Inrerval3-Red Clear o.o* o.o* 0s\ \ `m -- --- 2-in Underground Conduit - - -
FEATURE 1 2 5 6 8 oX , \P 77
12"Minimum N/A Right of Way
Interval 4-Dwell Green 255 255 DYNAMIC RED EXTENSION 1LDRE) SYSTEM \ \
Min Green 1' 7 14 7 14 7 NORTHSTAR NO4 LOOP & DETECTION I TALL TION CHART 9 24 26 O 12" Directional Arrow
Interval4-Dwell Yellow 0.0* 0.0*
Extension 1* 2.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 Interval 4-Dwell Red 0.0+ 0.0* INDUCTIVE LOOPS DETECTOR UNITS dam\ 63,65 N/A Tree
Max Green 1• 30 90 30 90 25 a
Interval 5-Exit Green t 1 O E -1r-
Yellow Clearance 3.0 5.2 3.0 5.2 3.0 DIST.FROM W = s M ! TM i RLACE INHIBIT A� Signal Ahead Sign (W3-3) �A
SIZE v a Eu NEMA TIMING cALL DELAY SIGN
Interval5-Yellow 0.0 0.0 LOOP NO. TURNS STOPBAR c
ff z '�" T a Z T a- PHASE DURING DURING Be Prepared to Stop Sign
( ) K E E J 0.R u FEATURE TIME PHASE GREENi FIGURE 1 ® (W3-4 with W16-13P) 0)
Red Clearance 3.2 2.5 4.7 2.5 3.5 Inrerval5-Red 0.0 0.0 Ift) W M R See Figure W11
walks' ExitPhase(s) 2,6 2,6 DR1 6X6 5 256 X - 1 1 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO
Don't Walk 1 - - - - - Priority High High DR2 6X6 5 240 X - O 1 1 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO
Seconds Per Actuation a - 1.5 - 1.5 - Delay Time o 0 DR3 6X6 5 256 x - 2 2 1 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO
DR4 6X6 5 240 X - 2 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED
Max Variable Initial - 46 - 46 - Min Green Before Pm 20 20 Signal Upgrade Corr. File: 0 3-19-5 5 8 61 FINAL USLESM ALL
Time Before Reduction a - 15 - 15 - Ped Clear Before Pm o o DR5 6X6 5 256 X - 1 1 NONE - SEC. ALL NO SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared In Ate Offices ofx
rime To Reduce' - 30 - 30 - Yellow Clear Before Pre 0.0* 0.0+ DR6 6X6 5 240 X - 1 1 NONE - SEC. ALL NOUS 17 SEAL
DR7 6X6 5 256 X - 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO dp°tNlly°A'r
Minimum Gap - 3.0 - 3.0 - Red Clear Before Pre 0.0* 0.0* 2 - 6 A.
at s t`
Dwell Min Time 20 20 DR8 6X6 5 240 X - 2 2 NONE - SEC. ALL NO a' :o (Snead's CARO!%
Recall Mode - MIN RECALL - MIN RECALL - NC 172 (Snead s Ferry Road) Q ••^ESS/'•••fr',
SET SPEED 2 00 � '.� :O::QpF oN9••�Flash Dwell Interval? Y Y 50
Vehicle Call Memory - YELLOW - YELLOW - (MPH) 'g� :--i a `';v a
Enable Backup Protection N N a SEAL S =
Dual Entry - - - - - c P SET LENGTH (FT) 1 2 6 - F,t `d. Division 3 OnsioW Folkstone = 030530
Simultaneous Gap ON ON ON ON ON Ped Clear Through Yellow N N oe'Design 5eaign�'5'� PLAN DATE: October 2020 REVIEWED BY: % f P.:;'
ALARM TIME(SEC) 5* ZML - 1'•.,.NGINEE, 4,
Omit Overlaps - - 6 750 N.Greenflend Pkwy.Gorner,NC 27525 PREPARED BY: KGP, Jr. REVIEWED BY: 'ir"4C/I,'•......•.��,'
_ "These values may be field adjusted. Do not adjust Min Green and Extension times for r.,4RY U._\��
phases 2 and 6 lower than what is shown.Min Green for all other phases should not 'Time defaults to Ame used for phase duringnormal } *If output is present during associated phase's red clear, SCALE REVISIONS INIT. DATE cesssiom y-
P P P no a operation
be lower than 4 seconds. place stop time on red clearance interval. / 0 50 2--.4.4A 41w4 -4/15/2021
0 11
a$o. SIG. INVENTORY.NO. 03-0299-1

P I'WPOSED INVIRONM :NT L, P AA-OUT IMPACTS LEGEND
,'®r US 17 at NC 172 PROPOSED - PROPOSED EOP
IlUL II OUT AND SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS _ PROPOSED SHOULDER LINE
in ONSLOW COUNTY
— PROPOSED FILL LINE
EXISTING EOP
SITE / - WETLAND "WE" WITHIN R/W SILT FENCE
WETLAND FILL AREA 0,036 AC. DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
HAND CLEARING 0.029 AC,
TOTAL AREA 0.065 ACo / F / DENOTES WETLAND
L IN
PROPOSED POLE AND GUY
EXISTING GUY ANCHORS ANCHOR LOCATIONS
EXISITING R/W A EXISTING GUY ANCHORS FROM W 5203T EXISTING R/W
:
Alp � a v�
V V V ► ,' .,[WAWA] i.[QI, ..r 1. !tip p� AFL / r 4,s4 v v v �"i v V V A7 V V
■ _ I -6 1A1 B / I I I I - I - I- L .
A 0
•
WETLAND WE
EXISTING POLE LOCATIONS
7—O*1ORTN US 17
at 0 SCALE 25
NC 172 (Snead's Ferry Road)
a ae Division 3 APRIL 2021Dnslow REVIEWED BY: SMFolkston
Gp TR RM94�e` PREPARED BY: DD REVIEWED BY: 1// 25'
REVISIONS INIT. DATE
2

Project Tracking No.(Internal Use)
18-03-0032
' 4p
,R HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
0:- NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: U-6065 County: Onslow
WBS No.: 47489.1.1 Document
_ Type:
Fed.Aid No: Funding: State X Federal
Federal X Yes No Permit USACE
Permit(s): Type(s):
Project Description: Install superstreet with green-t intersection on US 17 at NC 172
(Snead's Ferry Road and SR 1518 (Old Folkstone Road)(no off-site detour specified in
review request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEW ACTIVITIES,RESULTS,AND CONCLUSIONS:HPOWeb reviewed on 26 March
2018 and yielded no NR, SL, DE, SS, or LD properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Onslow
County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated a mostly wooded APE
with predominantly domestic, one church, and several commercial resources dating from the 1900s to
the 2010s, (viewed 26 March 2018). About one-third of the approximately 65 above-ground resources
pre-date 1970 and are all unexceptional examples (many are also altered)of their types. Google Maps
"Street View"confirmed the absence of critical architectural and landscape resources in the APE (viewed
26 March 2018).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THE PROJECT AREA: APE equates with the study area provided in the review request(see attached).
The comprehensive architectural survey of the county (1987) and related publication, as well as later
studies recorded no resources in the APE (3. Daniel Pezzoni, The Architectural History of Onslow County,North Carolina,
Richlands,NC: Onslow County Museum, 1998). County GIS and other visuals illustrate the absence of significant
architectural and landscape resources in the APE. No National Register-listed properties are located
within the APE.
Should any aspect of the project design change, please notify
NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Histo c Architecture and Landscapes --NO SURVEY REQUIRED
W r PAl,O- . /// .0 . .g0ii
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

Project"Tracking No.:
18-03-0032
•oo ... NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM .
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not +'` _
EQ1 P E+N'NiY 1 . [I�1pt'
G valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the 0
4-0$r Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. :t.e..
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: U-6065 County: Onslow
WBS No: 47489.1.1 Document: Federal CE
F.A. No: Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE
Project Description:The project involves the installation of a superstreet with a green T-intersection on US 17 from
NC 172(Sneads Ferry Rd)/SR 1518(Old Folkstone Rd)in Onslow County,North Carolina.The archaeological
Area of Potential Effects(APE)encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing activity as depicted on the
attached GIS mapping.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities,results of review, and conclusions:
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by
state and federal laws. Based on the submitted"request for cultural resources review"form,the project is
federally-funded with federal permit interaction.As such,Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will
apply and the Federal Highway Administration(FHwA)will serve as the lead federal agency. Next,construction
design and other data was examined(when applicable)to define the character and extent of potential impacts to
the ground surfaces embracing the project locale.
Once an APE was outlined,a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology
(OSA)on Wednesday,April 11,2018.No NRHP eligible archaeological sites or any other previously documented
archaeological sites are located within the APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places(NRHP),State Study Listed(SL),Locally Designated(LD),
Determined Eligible(DE),and Surveyed Site(SS)properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction
impact area.A cross-check of these mapped resources concluded that none of the above properties with possible
contributing archaeological components are situated within or proximal to the APE.
In addition,historic maps of Onslow County were appraised to identify former structure locations,land use
patterns,cemeteries,or other confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity.Archaeological/historical
reference materials were inspected as well. In general,the cultural background review established that no
previously recorded archaeological sites,cemeteries,or NRHP listed archaeological sites are located within the
APE. Based on cultural-historical factors,the APE is considered to have a low potential for the documentation of
archaeological resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
past occupation at this location. Aerial and on-ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google
Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of
disturbances,both natural and human induced,which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites.
Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of2

Project Tracking No.:
18-03-0032
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The entire project study area is largely disturbed based on aerial and soil data.There are no existing NRHP eligible
archaeological sites within the projects APE,and it is unlikely to contain significant,intact,and preserved
archaeological deposits.As currently proposed as a federally-funded project utilizing federal permits,no further
consultation is advocated.A finding of"no archaeological survey required"is considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ®Map(s) ®Previous Survey Info ❑Photos ['Correspondence
El Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
-*o &> ..1._.- I z?-2of
NCDOT
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2of2

Legend
U-6065 Study Area
.t.. _---11 12t- ri r 0 )
i
L16/
iii
EEOi161 t 14.,,,r,r)
U
4 c
r N
A
0 1,200 2,400
USGS The National Mapl National Boundaries Dataset, � Feet
......lL „,�._ STIP No.
y��^� '����������r�r US 17 at NC 172(Sneads Ferry Road) Figure: 3
4.1P. •+•'y + ��' •ter v Run /SR 1518 Old Folkstone Road U 6065
..,...�+�s4,__ ( ) Topographic
'1�, +�*+ Onslow County
^Torme/ i♦Onslow County rill' -+ Division: 3 Map