NCG030636_DMR_20210430

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030636
Date submitted 04/30/2021
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030363
FACILITY NAME Systems Logistics
COUNTY Buncombe
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Scott Phillips
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # L1336899
Comments on sample collection or analysis: Total rainfall event 0.83"
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2021
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGINGTO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Watersupply [:]SA
®Other SDO
F_ ED
mg 2 � 20Z1
... ai git F.5
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
�WR SC_GTI�
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar 0&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics'
Benchmarks
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
002
3/31/2021
0.83
ND
7.8
0.01
0,005
0.05
12.8
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3 The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-10/31/2022 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Scott Phillips
Name (Print name)
Safety Manager
Title &4t title)
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQ,L, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format. "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note; If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 su
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date:11/1/2018-10/31/2022 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Moil an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitorina period
in the case o "No Discharge" Mports to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-10/31/2022
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

aceAnalyticai d ANALYTICAL REPORT
April 19, 2021
Appalachian Environmental Resources
Sample Delivery Group: L1336899
Samples Received: 04/10/2021
Project Number: Vertique
Description: VERTIQUE
Report To: Mike Fox
206 Princeton Rd
Suite 3
Johnson City, TN 37601
Entire Report Reviewed By: pttl�'P�
Jennifer Huckaba
:. Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall riot be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
AnalyWcal Nau'onal is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-50P-lVTJL-00675nd
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
M3
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEM ME: PAGE:
AppaEachian Environmental Resources Vertique L1336899 04/1912118:59 1 of 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page
1
FP
Tc: Table of Contents
2
Ss: Sample Summary
3
Cn: Case Narrative
Sr: Sample Results
4
5
�55
GRAB L1336899-01
5
A Cn
Cc: Quality Control Summary
6
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
6
Fr
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664A
Metals (ICP) by Method 200.7
7
8
tic
GI: Glossary of Terms
9
GI
Al: Accreditations & Locations
10
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody
11
CAI
RC
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEM M E: PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources Vert4ue L1236899 GVW2118:59 2 of II

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by Collected dateftime Received dateltime
GRAB L1336899-01 WW Scott Phillips 03131/2113:20 04/101211020 , Cp
Method
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664A
Metals (ICP) by Method 200.7
Batch
Dilution Preparation
dateltim e
WG1649446
1 04/11/21 03:10
WG1652092
1 0411512109: 06
WG1653146
1 04/16/2123:02
Analysis
Analyst
Location
datehime
0411/21 04:55
CAT
Mt. Juliet, TN
04/15/21 18:39
ERK
Mt. Juliet, TN
04A712119:34
EL
Mt. Juliet, TN
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME; PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources Vertlque L1336899 04/19/2118:59 3 of 11

CASE NARRATIVE
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOG) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, l affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
Jennifer Huckaba
Project Manager
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEMME: PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources VeWque L1336899 04/19/2118:59 4 or11

GRAB SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
Collected daleltlme: 03/31/21 13:20 L1336299
Additional Information - Results for field analyses are not accredited to ISO 17025
Result
Units
Analyte
pH (On Site) 7.8
su
Temperature (on -site) 20.6
Deg C
Gravimetric Analysis by Method 2540 D-2011
Result
Qualifier
RDL
Dilution
Analysis
Batch
Analyte m g11
m gA
date 1 time
Suspended Solids 12.8
To
5.00
1
04111/202104:55
WG1649446
Wet Chemistry by Method 1664A
Result
Qualifier
RDL
Dilution
Analysis
Batch
Analyte mgll
mgA
date 1 time
Oil & Grease (Hexane Extrj ND
5.83
1
04/1512021 18:39
WG1652092
Metals (ICP) by Method 200.7
Result
Qualifier
RDL
Dilution
Analysis
Batch
Analyte mg/1
mgA
date 1 time
Copper 0.0104
B
0.0100
1
04AY202119:34
WG1653145
Lead 0.00551
0.00500
1
04/171202119:34
WG1653446
Zinc ND
0.0500
1
04A71202119:34
WG1653146
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEMM E: PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources Vertique L1336899 0411912118:59 5 of 11

EEEEOMEEE
O
O
41 m Ul
M E N
i�
Q
U
O�
ui
a
W CTl -
0 �
Q

EEEZONOED
0
m m �2
f E
`m
c
O
W
3
E
U)
U
v
u
a
v
Q
E
0
cn
Q
a
c.�
_T
O
O
.D
J
Lo
U
J
C�
L
m
O
V
_T
O
ti
J
Q
m cR (14
Q �
K �p
61
m
W C -T:
J E m
w
d
2

-C �� Fo El M L. Fc) �F/
§ °
2 2
I @ § b d
§ f k \ k
E
§ \ § § co,
\
§
11,
Lo
\ <\ZF4
g
e
e
± E q §
6 6 6
I e R e
$ Ln )
�
$
j @ § � a,
G
3
R
q
k
\ f `
D 3 u

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Tlmes, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
Method Detection Limit.
ND
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
RDL
Reported Detection Limit.
Rec.
Recovery.
RPD
Relative Percent Difference.
SDG
Sample Delivery Group.
U
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
Analyte
reported.
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
standard, or if concentrations of analyses in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
Dilution
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. if a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
These are the target% recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
Limits
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful OC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
Qualifier
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
Result
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
Case Narrative (Cn)
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
Control
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
Summery
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
Sample Chain of
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
Custody (Sc)
chain of custody also documents ail persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
Sample Results (Sr)
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss)
This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier Description
B The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable,, the reported value is an estimate.
T8 Sample(s) received past/too close to holding time expiration.
RP
FC
FSSI
Fn
FSr1
FC
CAI
9Sc
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEMME: PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources Vertique L1336899 04/19/2118:59 9 of 11

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama
40660
Nebraska
NE-OS-15-05
Alaska
17-026
Nevada
TN000032021-1
Arizona
AZO612
Now Hampshire
2975
Arkansas
B804139
New Jersey-NELAP
TNO02
California
2932
New Mexico'
TN00003
Cc lorado
TN00003
Newyork
11742
Connecticut
PH-0197
North Carolina
Env375
Florida
E87487
North Carolina
DW21704
Georgia
NELAP
North Carolina'
41
Georgia'
923
North Dakota
R-140
Idaho
TN00003
Ohio-VAP
CL0069
Illinois
200008
Oklahoma
9915
Indiana
C-T N-01
Oregon
TN 200002
Iowa
364
Ponnsylvan W
68-02979
Kansas
E-10277
Rho& Island
LA000356
Kentucky16
KY90010
South Carolina
84004002
Kentucky'
16
South Dakota
nla
Louisiana
AI30792
Tennessee "
2006
Louisiana
LA018
Texas
T104704245-20-18
Maine
TN00003
Texas'
LABO152
Maryland
324
Utah
TND00032021-11
Massachusetts
M-TNO03
Vermont
VT2006
Michigan
9958
Virginia
11G033
Minnesota
047-999-395
Washington
C847
Mississippi
TN00003
West Virginia
233
Missouri
340
Wisconsin
998093910
Montana
CERT0096
Wyoming
A21-A
A2LA- ISO 17025
1461.01
AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
100789
A2LA - ISO 17025 s
1461.02
DOD
1461.01
Canada
1461.01
USDA
P330-15-00234
EPA-Crypto
TN00003
' Drinking Water ' Underground Storage Tanks ' Aquatic Toxicity ' ChemicaVMicrobialogical ' Mold `Wastewater n7a Accreditation not applicable
Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported In the attached report
' Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATElTIM E: PAGE:
Appalachian Environmental Resources Vertique L1336899 04/19/2118:59 10 of 11

u
14
�' �
H a a
N
E
O
SZ tl�
C
p
}
m
O
,�1
GI
Z}
y w u C
ato°"'•
m u �v�
u H W1 41
u L
QI
-�j
fa-p O O 3 Q u
J
�
�
v
o ?
a
�
7
V
d O
r
-
'CL
�