20051997 Ver 1_Application_20051031

a„i STAT[o
~~~__
~.~ .~
aM,. ~.
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
Q-~T ~ ~ ~~~ «l ~~j
~SgNp sTU.,, l
kit46vSEF~B
~`Cy
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 27, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
051997
Subject: Proposed replacement of Bridge No. 41 (over Tooles Creek) and Bridge
No. 42 (over Lynch Creek) on SR 1235 (Dyking Road) in Franklin
County; NC Moving Ahead Bridge Replacement Program, NCDOT
Project Nos. MA05017B and MA05018B.
Reference: USACE Action ID. 200520078
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 41 over Tooles Creek and Bridge No. 42 over Lynch Creek on SR 1235 (Dyking
Road) in Franklin County with new bridge structures (see Photographs 1 and 2, Figures
1-2, Permit Drawings sheets 1-15). The referenced USACE Action ID. 200520078, was
given for a Jurisdictional Determination dated 01/12/05 (see Appendix One for copy of
notification of JD).
The length of existing Bridge No. 41 is approximately 79 feet long and 25 feet wide and -~-,,~
the length of existing Bridge No. 42 is approximately 103 feet long and 25 feet wide. The
project proposes to remove the existing bridges and replace them with an approximately
120 x 36 foot bridge for Bridge No. 41 and an approximately 154 x 36 foot bridge for
Bridge No. 42 in the same locations. The project proposes a combination of asymmetrical
and symmetrical widening improvements along the approaches of SR 1235. The existing
approaches will be raised to meet the proposed grade of new bridges over Tooles Creek ~--
and Lynch Creek. The total project improvements along SR 1235 are approximately
1,125 feet in length.
<-
The purpose of the project is to improve safety on SR 1235 as it crosses Tooles Creek
and Lynch Creek in Franklin County. The proposed project will reduce the potential for '
accidents since the proposed replacement bridges will be of greater structural integrity ..,
than the existing bridge structures. Bridge No. 42 has a sufficiency rating of 31 and
Bridge No. 41 has a sufficiency rating of 28.
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

z
:~
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Bridge replacement maintenance activities at these sites will impact Lynch Creek
NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 28-21-(0.7) and Tooles Creek NCDENR-DWQ Index No.
28-2-3, Best Usage Classification WS-IV NSW, HUC 03020101 in the Tar-Pamlico
River Basin.
Removal of the existing bridges will not result in the placing of fill material in Tooles
Creek or Lynch Creek. In order to avoid disturbance to Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek,
the bridge piers (drilled shafts) will be located outside of the streams and the new
abutments will be offset from the top of the stream banks. SR 1235 will be closed during
construction. No rip-rap will be placed along the existing top-of--bank of Tooles Creek
and Lynch Creek. No permanent stream loss is proposed with this project.
Temporary Fill for Dewatering -Work surrounding the interior bents will require the
use of cofferdams (fill in surface water) for temporary dewatering along both stream
edges of Tooles Creek and along only the western stream edge of Lynch Creek.
Temporary dewatering impacts total 0.008 acre at Site 1 (Lynch Creek) and 0.011 acre at
Site 2 (Tooles Creek). All materials used for the cofferdams will be removed once this
work is complete.
Fill in Wetlands -Construction associated with the improvements to the approaches of
the replacement bridges will result in impacts to forested wetlands. Construction impacts
total 0.074 acre at Site 1(Lynch Creek) and 0.1 acre at Site 2 (Tooles Creek)]. (See
Appendix One for USACE Wetland Delineation forms).
Riparian Buffer
Site 1 -Buffers
The maintenance activities at these sites involve bridge crossings of streams that are
subject to the Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Rules. Lynch Creek and Tooles Creek are
depicted on the most recent version of the Ingleside (USGS 1979) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) and the Soil Survey of Franklin County (USDA-SCS, 2004)
(Figure 2). Maintenance impacts to buffers adjacent to Tooles Creek total 3,872.0 ft2 in
Zone 1 and 987.4 ft'` in Zone 2 [totalin~ 4,859.4 ft'` (0.112 acres). Impacts to buffers
adjacent to Lynch Creek total 2,935.2 ft` in Zone 1 and 1,790.1 ft` in Zone 2 [totaling
4,725.3 ft'` (0.108 acres)]. All practicable measures to minimize impacts within buffer
zones were followed. Measures used to minimize impacts to the buffer zone include
using the current alignment. According to the buffer rules, bridges are ALLOWABLE.
Temporary erosion control measures will be placed within the permitted footprint of this
project.

3
` Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
f
Avoidance:
Permanent impacts to Tooles Creek (Bridge No. 41) and Lynch Creek (Bridge No. 42)
from the proposed construction have been avoided. Complete avoidance of wetlands
associated with Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek is not possible for the project. There will
be no disturbances to aquatic life movements associated with project construction.
Minimization:
The construction of this project has minimized the extent of the built-upon area by using
the existing alignment for new construction. The proposed replacement structures over
Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek will not have piers, bents, or footings in the stream and
will not have deck drains over the creek.
Compensatory Mitigation:
Unavoidable impacts to 0.174 acre of non-riverine wetlands will be mitigated (at a 1:1
ratio) by providing 0.174 acre of restoration equivalent non-riverine wetlands within the
Tar-Pamlico River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03020101). All compensatory
mitigation requirements will be assimilated on a quarterly basis and provided to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for their acceptance with a copy provided to the
USAGE for verification and accounting purposes.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 29, 2003, there are three federally protected species
listed for Franklin County. They include dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon),
Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii). The
roadway shoulders along Dyking Road are heavily maintained, eliminating the possibility
for Michaux's sumac to exist in this area. Additionally, a review of the Natural Heritage
Program database (last updated July 2005) revealed no occurrences of Michaux's sumac
within the project area. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat observed during the
06/22/05 site visit and the NHP database review, a biological conclusion of No Effect
have been rendered for this species. Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek provide habitat for
the dwarf wedgemussel and the Tar spinymussel. However no specimens were observed
during the 08/24/04 and 09/14/04 surveys by biologists with The Catena Group.
Biological conclusions of May Affect-Not Likely to Adversely Affect were rendered for
these species. Since both species have been recorded in the Tar River, it is possible that
these species may occur within a few miles downstream of the proposed project, thus
measures should be taken to avoid/minimize impacts to mussel populations occurring
within, and downstream of Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek. NCDOT received
concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on this conclusion dated 07/27/05
(see Appendix Two).

4
Summary
The NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 41 over Tooles Creek and Bridge No. 42
over Lynch Creek on SR 1235 (Dyking Road) in Franklin County with new bridge
structures on the same alignment. SR 1235 will be closed during construction.
` Permanent wetland fill associated with improvements to approaches and temporary fill in
surface water for dewatering by using cofferdams is proposed. Compensatory mitigation
requirements for unavoidable impacts to wetlands will be fulfilled by payment through
EEP. Please note no permanent stream loss is proposed with this project. Additionally
impacts to adjacent riparian buffers are proposed. According to the buffer rules, bridges
are ALLOWABLE.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 3, NWP 33, and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water Quality Certification
(WQC) No. 3376, WQC No. 3366, and riparian buffer authorization for above-described
activities. An automated payment procedure has been implemented between the NCDOT
and NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the Division to apply for the 401 WQC without
submitting a check for this permit application. This procedure will provide payment to
the NCDWQ by charging the permit application fee of $200.00 directly to the appropriate
NCDOT Project Nos. MA05017B and MA05018B. Apre-construction notification
(pages 1-9), permit drawings (sheets 1-15), and erosion control plans (sheets 1-6) are
attached with this request. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Mr. Chris Murray at [phone].
Sincerely,
~ . ~ ~~>3
Jon G. Nance, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Tracy Parrott, NCDOT
Mr. Chris Murray, NCDOT
Ms. Katie Simmons, NCDOT
Mr. Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT
Mr. Mike Summers, NCDOT
Mr. Mike Kneis, NCDOT

~~
Photograph 2. View underneath Bridge No. 42.
Br. 41 over Tooles Crk and Br. 42 over Lynch Crk on SR 1235 (Dyking Road) in Franklin County.
Photograph 1. View underneath Bridge No. 41.

~~ ~~~r
. __
;~. 1`~
~` T
p . ~.. , . r~ ~ ~,..$23 : 1
f _
_. _
y ...~
~: fG n ,~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- ~' r ~ r i'~ {
a
~ ~ ~ '~ ~ r
'~` `1 e ' "J '1 ~ r l
.. _
,~
. _ ,
" SRC ~ ~ ~~ ~ ` fr / v
99i
~5 ~ ~, i ~
~._ ~ ~... _ ~ i :~ L
- , ~~~ ~
~ ~ - ,
-P" ~ ._.-
~`~ 'Ij % ~
t_ -~ ~. ~ ~ - ~ .. ,_
.~ ~ ,,~ ~ ~ `f o_ r ~,
4 -- '~ "J _
~,,,,
.. ~ ._ .
a-
~ t Y -~ I i ~~ 0 .,. ~~~~ ~ r* - _ .. ~ ~ . _ _
~, '. .,
i '~ _. A' 't' -/
~~ ..
'~ ' -- ' ~ ~ .' ~ ~ C
~ - ~ „~ ~ a ~)~ _ ~} y
.. ~ / "
s+
~~ ..,...:,. ~ ~; ~ z `SITE 1 ~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~~ -~~ ,
• ~ ' ~~
( ~~ ' ' ~~ TE '-~ ~ U,;
r ~ ~. /{l is ` ~~, y.C ,, ~~ /.~,rt,~ ~~ ~,
j ~-~
~ .~
v ~~
~ a
`'
1
'- ~ ~.
,..
~-
-" r ,~
t r
l
I
--_ -. E' ..~._ ~ ,• ~ ~ ~ ~' f
~~ ~ ~. ~ r' . 1 r r, ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~.
\ jt, r
~ -
,~
€ , . ~ '~.
,. .~ ~_., ~ ./ ft .__~ ~•,_ ~. ~ ~ ~~
~(
,,_ ; ~
-_ __
~..~
•~. - ~ r"
~~
~~ ~-
__
~ ~,`
fi ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ~
,. __. ~ __
~~
- _
~ ~
~ ~ ~~
~.. .
{{
~ ~~
~jc
~, , ;, ~ ..~ ~ ,; ~ . 1 ~~
,.
~~
,~
..
~ ~~
-_ ~ ,~
L-- - ~,~ ~_ ,~ ~ 1,. ,~
a
t ~ ~ ~ ',,, ~-,.- , G ~ ,~ ~,
~'.
+ H
~~ a ~~,~ ;~ d ~. ~ '~r, ~ L _ i "{
,_~.
r..
--
f ~,
~, - - _
~`~
..
_: _ ~ - - -
~--
E
d 1
. ,
d
~ ]
i
y.~ '
w ~.~..'
Y,. ~ ~
_ ' . ( i
~ ~
i
~1 ~~ ~ ~
t~ ~~ ~
J
.., ,
3 ~. ~ ;z s
4, ~ ~
~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~~
_y„/(J`t%j'~ ~ ~'~ fi'r' `~ ~ r ~,j~~ .. ( 9 ...
i
,; ~, `~,:
~ ~
~ h1%tchiners' ~ ~'`' ~ '~
~ Po~acl ~ v f ~ `'~ )) ~~. C
,-
a .. 'r' . ~ ~' J . r_'~ _
Project Study Area
SR 1235 Dyking Road
Franklin County
Ingleside
USGS Topo Map (1979)
Figure 1 1:24,000

-a
0
0
°o
N
W
"d o
~a~~o
;xUv~
~ ~~~
~+ ~ ~, ~ N
~ M ~ ~
Qr ai ~ A ~
~ ~ W
~z
Z
O
F
Y)~ a
U
~ O
r Z~
`~ I Q
p
¢~
O
HL210N
n
O
0
O
ch
0
M
N
N
W
n
N ~
v o~ ~
o °~ 5 m
~ ~,~ ra~ro
c
5~,a~~o o ~oa~
~ ~ (U G P ~ Q L
O.~ TV ~ j Cn ttl~~~
~ CO ~ ~ ~ ~ '~n V ._
.oar ~ N U N (6 N
~~roE.Sa •~~~
Qa ~U M °~~ ro
~ m a~~ N 9~ ~ ~ ro
~ dom.= U ~l j'y .D
TVL>U~ ZC.S~
N ` ~ c
.Q O Q~ L Q ~ ro ~
EN~a,mm o~~~
N~oooro ~~~nc°
m~~ °' ~Z ~o~Y -
3~o~~m Oiri'oo
Tro ~ 02~ c x~ aai
>z~~;,E ~'p~~m
7NN`~L,k NNORf~
N ~ aC d
-~~-mom EEm~Ero
o~E°~,~ dE._X~
N U y"'i 4.= ~O~ ~ ~
N'C f/1 d0 Q O ~ afn
~QmO aro Z~V ro£

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20051 997
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
~u auy panicuiar irem is not appiicanie to tnis project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a,.c urtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5, Jon G. Nance
Mailing Address: 26__12 N. Duke St., Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number:~919) 560-6851 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:.. JNance(a,dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed replacement of Bridge No 41 over Tooles Creek and Bridge No.
42 over Lynch Creek on SR 1235 (D~king, Road) in Franklin County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
NCDOT Project Nos MA 05017B and MA 05018B
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Franklin Nearest Town: Louisburg
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Louisburg take
Hwy 39 North out of town approximately_1 0 mile Make a left onto SR 1235 (Dyking Road)
and travel west approximatel~3 6 miles to project site.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum):
Site 1, Br. No. 42 over Lynch Creek 36.1488 °N 78.3416 °W
Site 2, Br. No. 41 over Tooles Creek 36.1489 °N 78.3406 °W
6. Property size (acres): approximately 2 8 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Tooles Creek and Lunch Creek
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h~o enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing land uses along SR 1235 are primarily rural and
forested.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 41
over Tooles Creek and Bridge No. 42 over Lynch Creek on SR 1235 in Franklin County with
new bridge structures. The existing Bridge No. 41 is approximately 79 ft x 25 ft as it crosses
Tooles Creek and the existing Bridge No. 42 is approximately 103 ft x 25 ft as it crosses
Lynch Creek. The project proposes to remove the existing brides and replace it with an
approximately 120 ft x 36 ft bridge (No. 41) and an approximately 154 ft x 36 ft brid eg (No•
42) in the same locations. The total project improvement length along SR 1235 is
approximately 1,125 feet. This section of SR 1235 will be closed during construction. The
existing bridge approaches will be raised to meet the grades of the new bridges over Tooles
Creek and Lynch Creek. Class `B' rip-rap will be placed along the new bridge approaches..
No rip-rap will be placed along the existing top-of--bank of Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek.
Equipment may include excavator, backhoe, bulldozer, ~-ader, and crane.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to improve safet~on
SR 1235 as it crosses Tooles and Lynch Creek in Franklin County. The proposed project
will reduce the potential for accidents since the proposed replacement bridges will be of
greater structural integrity than the existin bridge structures.
IV. Prior Project History
V. If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Action ID. 200520078, Jurisdictional Determination dated 01/12/05 (see attached for copy of
notification of JD).
A Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist, which determines whether the NCDOT is required to
prepare environmental documents for state-funded construction and maintenance Rroject, has been
prepared and submitted September, 2005. Based on the checklist, the proposed project qualifies as a
Minimum Criteria project; and therefore, the preparation of an environmental document is not required.
VI. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
Page 3 of 9

VII. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
.. wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent Impacts: Construction of the
replacement Bride Nos. 41 and 42 and the associated improvements to the approaches will
result in 0.174 acres of impacts to wetlands adjacent to Lynch Creek and Tooles Creek
Temporary Imapets: Work surrounding the interior bents will require the use of cofferdams
(fill in surface water) for temporary dewatering_along both stream edges of Tooles Creek and
along only the western stream ed eg of Lynch Creek.
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flnndinu
Wetland Im act
p T
ype of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
Site 1 - Br. 42

(Lynch Creek) Fill Forested Yes 10 ft 0.1
Site 2 - Br. 41
(Tooles Creek) Fill Forested Yes 10 ft 0.074
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.174
~. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.174 ac
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply leneth X wihth_ then divide by 4~ SFi~
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or
' Stream Width Length Im act
(indicate on map) Intermittent
? Before Impact (linear (a ces)
feet)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A
Page 4 of 9

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredgin ,flooding, drainage, bulkheads etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) T e of Im act
~ P
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Site 1 - Br. 42 Lynch Creek Temp fill Natural stream 0.008
Site 2 - Br. 41 Tooles Creek Temp fill Natural stream 0.011
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.019
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): NONE
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.174
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.019
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.193
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): NONE
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stotmwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VIII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 5 of 9

Avoidance•
In order to avoid permanent impacts to Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek the bride piers will be
located outside of the streams and the new abutments will be offset from the to of the stream
banks. Complete avoidance of wetlands adiacent to Tooles Creek and Lunch Creek is not
possible for the project. There will be no disturbances to aquatic life movements associated with
project construction.
Minimization:
The construction of this proiect has minimized the extent of the built upon area b using the
existma ah~nment for new construction The proposed replacement structures over Tooles Creek
and L ch Creek will not have iers bents or footin s in the stream and will not have deck
drains. NCDOT will implement best mana ement practices for the protection of surface waters
m accordance with the most recent version. of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" during design and construction phases of the~roject
IX. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 1 SA NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider, the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnn~ide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as
much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or
map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of
mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
Page 6 of 9

preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description
of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate
sheet if more space is needed.
NCDOT proposes to meet mitigation requirements by payment into the North Carolina
- Ecos~tem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Compensatory mitigation requirements will be
assimilated on a quarterly basis and provided to the EEP for their acceptance with a copy
provided to the USACE for verification and accounting purposes.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http~//h2o enr.state.nc.us/wip/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.174 acre
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
X. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
XI. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9

l . Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within I SA NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Site 1 - Rr_ 42 (i,vn~h f rPPkl
Zone
* Im act
(s uare feet)
Multiplier q
Miti uation
1 3,872 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 987.4 1.5
Total 4,859.4
c.vuc ~ cxienus out w ree[ perpenmcular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Site 2 - Br. 41 (Tnnlec f'repkl

Zone* Im act
s uare feet
( )
Multiplier
Required
Miti ation
1 2,935.2 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1,790.1 1.5
Total 4,725.3
c.unc ~ ex~en~s our ~u ree~ perpenmcwar from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XII. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is approximately 0.56 acre existing
impervious surface within the 2 8 acres project site No additional impervious surface is
proposed with this maintenance project
XIII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
_ This protect will not >;enerate wastewater
Page 8 of 9

XIV. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (ISA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This maintenance pro,~ect will not result in additional development.
XVI. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

'-''__________________~___ '"-39
1'-- - ~~
SITE
68
i
~ 491
96
FRANKLIN COUNTY `~~'~-- -_
561 56
96 ' ~
~~
- ,~~~ ~;
..
~.
`,
.,
~'.
' `~o
181
`~, 1234 ;'
".,, ;~
:,
~~ `~I
\ ;.
,1 ~
'` / \ 1 ~ ~
.\ ~f '
~` ` /
,` 1 .`
~~ ~~, IEN~ ,.
.,
,•'~ ',
--
___
~,
.'
~I % • / i
:' ;'
'~, j" i i
1235 ~:~---- 3ridgc %"
~Oi ~~~~, No. 41
I3r~i g ;'
IDR®J]EC~ `~ r' ~.
'~.
'~,
,: •,
••,
o ~~, ~~,
~~, ~~,
~"
. `.,
River
'~,
~~
N.C. DEFT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
FRANKLIN COUNT
PROJECT: MAO5017B-®5018B
BRIDGE NO. ~1 AND ~2
ON SR 1235 (DYKING ROAD)
OVER LUNCH CREEK
sheet 1 of 9 s // 31 % 05

w~°~~.~~~ ~~~~~~
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
,.~~
WETLAND
WL
"/_~~ DENOTES FILL IN
//%/~/j WETLAND
~J~/L~ DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
~111111~ DENOTES FILL IN
11~ SURFACE WATER
(POND)
~~~~i//~/aDENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
~1!LLL~L4DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
~~j%L1~~7~ DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
* * * DENOTES MECHANIZED
* * ** * * * CLEARING
-~ FLOW DIRECTION
TB
TOP OF BANK
i~r
EDGE OF WATER
----~ --- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
---- F--- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
--- NG---- NATURAL GROUND
___ PL __. PROPERTY LINE
TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
PDE PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
--EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-------Q-------------- WATER S U R F A C E
x x x x x LIVE STAKES
x x x
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
~~~®~
DIVISI®N ®E HIGHWAI'S
FR.~NKLIN C®UNTY
I'R®JECT: M~050178-05018E
FRIDGE N®. 41 AND ~2
®N SR 1235 (DYI~ING R®AD)
®VER LYNCH CREEg
sheet 2 of 9
8 // 31 // 05
~~~
~--~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12"-48°
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54" PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET

ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE

Z
O ,~
F~ pa x ~
Q ~ ~
o
va OU x
o
~
aQ
~ U
fix' ~~~
~~ p~ I-.
hx~~ ~
w~~oo~,
O
O;-~aNN

WO ~~~~

? W ~ ~
W
bA
q a~ a

Z ~

0
lrvV
rv
N
K
E
0

~ ~ c
~ .m
~
~ V
o
~
zoo
~
~
fq
f- U +~
c
in m n
v O
Q .
W U ~
a

~
w -

w _
Q O_ (n U
:fl O
~ C
H
W
a
LL
~ ~ C U
C
O
~ d v
.
.
..
LL
~ O
~ O r
C ~ ~ O O _
O
Z V 0 O O
LL ~-'

~ -
-a .
~
N ~
C O U O
~ U U ~ m
~
i- ~
U
Q
c ~
a v~ s
.
g F- ~ m

~. a ~ a~ o
.. °
0. X ~
~ ~_ w c
W p

a
0

J w
_
LL N

Z
E.. .-.
a ~ ~
o
J W N ~ ..
~
~ ~
W

o ~

~
~
d-
~'
.
.
~ m ~ ~
~ Q o
Q.~v O o
E ~

~ w
W m
X
m O
a~ n O m
~ ~`
~ [D N
U
.C
N i()
N
r
-
N
~ ~
O
~
i!7
V ~
in
r. N
N
~ ~"
O ~ ~

~ Q
i
i ~
m ~
+
i
~
r c
o
r
UJ
J
(~ Z ~ N O
F-

I"_ N
Z w~
w Z
....
C
C
w G O
W

Q

m r
~ W (^
Z w
O ...

J 0
~

..
H
W
J
CO N O
O
Z ~...
f'- O ...

O
W N O
Z w
O ...-
N
~/
L
L c7 V ~
J
5 ~ V.-
~ `~
V
V
~
G
~ U W
~

~
[~
j
N
W N_ _

O
7
r~
t(7
t~

O ZO v m rn ~
N
'^ J N
H Q N
~ O N
~
U Z~ N f
Q Q "' N c'7 CO
a "

5 J
r W 1-
-~ U
~ d
w a~
LL w
~
LL ~
~ H ~
m °~
prn x x
~o

U

Z ~ +
0 +
0
`
O ~ + +
O
~ ~
~~ ~
J ~
J
W
N
~ N
W W
~a
~ ~ m
U -° -°
~ - -
~ CD 0]
F

O J
z Q
W N ~"'
H 0

Z L(~
o
O N
~ ~
~ M
O ~

~ ~
Q
M
O
~ O T
f
~ N
LL. U Q Q-'
~
O
~
2Um
`
Zp ~'~~ o
W ~C O ~
~
~~~iQ
U
~ ~ ~
a? m ~
W ~ U ~,

~t
~ ~
I~ ~
ti ~
O
~ ~
t J
p N
~

~ N N N p ~
~ ~ U
O
~ >
Z
w JN °Z ,~Z ~Z o~N O
cn >. U
Y
U
Z ~
~ rn
~ co
c c U
Y
z
W
~ O
~= O O
m~ O O
m~ O N
m m ~
~=
~
0
~ L1~ ~ O ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ti
O~
~

Q _
~ Y
d J
a J
d Z _
N Y
N
a U
~
=
J
J
~ ~ O J
W ~ Y O ~ ~' A
Z (0
- ~ ~ (B E
O ~ f0
C
O _
O ~ W ~_ u- N c

~ -p
o L `
~ N c f6
U
I-
~ m c
o c
ii ~ o
m ~
U U

W
~ c
Q m
mo
m
LL-~
E
a ~ ~ Q ~ o din
N
L
d

0
J
~+
d W
U
~
*k
~
~
~
~
Q. a
o
a
0
...
N
J
O~
~«.~
O
.C

v .
o
~,
o
~ '
'
O S8SUSERNAMESSSS '
U7 SSSSSESSSSSSSSSDGNSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ~ '
O SDATESS SSSSSSSYSTIMESSSSS '
6
I
d
I
I
m
a
(Q
~ .
W
N
O
O
CJi
N
W
C31
W
P y
1~ = H m
m ~ ~
o k ~?g go p
~i ti~~ ~o~`tPi~ ~ y
~~Q~~~°a~a~~~ O
o~~g~~~°~`~o`~~~~ ~
~ ~ H ~ g ~ w % ` m ~ ti
~ ~° iaz ~~ ~
o ~ in~m ~x
~~~ ~~
~ ~~~ ~~
N ~ m~
<~
N ` 2
~~~rn
mm~ ~,
r ~crr~ u ~
I I I I~ C
~PAAo~
°~*~~
~ANI•NV~n
~ ~ ~ N rn y
~n
-to-I-I~
O I U O~ A
U7 ~ .p .q ~cc
+ I } -1- ~
~ y ~ ~ ~ ~
~A~~
'~~r n
~~~~ m
"' o
m ~
r Ut
~I O
rn
-T A
~ ~
^' ~
O O
~h
~ ~
r ~ ~
I ~_ ~
02
ti ~
N
0 0 0
U ~ x
N ~ ~ ~ BEG GRADE Sta. 10+00.00 /0
D x I
I:
O m I I I
~ y .~ x I I
~ ~
g ~ c x ~ I I Z I
~ a
,~ :I I w I . o
I~ I ~ `
' x `"
~ w a, N
2 x ~ ~ w
°m 2 /
0 0~ x ;II I A ;~
" I
_ I'v m
~~ ~~ I s~ /
+ N r t ~~ I a
m : rnU+ o
xtn D °o ' /
O N ~~~ b a ~ x I ~ to
N ar ~
i ~~, ~
nm; ~ LI ~I/ I ~~ ~~~ ~/
n

BY 1 ~~ I
'~`R~
m~
n
N
/
.
R^ m
y
SY ~ -
/
T
m .
~
IF
!
M9~x ~
~X~~X .. m µ.
~~NaN~~ ~~~ ~ r O
--.- ~~~~tl ~ _ ~~`8 ~ 2 0 ~
O ti -
a ~
v)
~„
N j a
I
~ I ~ BY ~ g
O ~~
I It
~o (~
~ p ~
n O -A °m
~ m
~ ~ -BY1

m I B e~
z
~ ~ z N
p ~ m
Wnn"'i
U
I.~,

~` .~

~
' '^
~ v
6 ~
m IU
Ip~
~ -

O 1 <~ym ~
VI N~a~ 8 ice' i l
s ~ C5 ~ N
li +
~
N s
c
+~+ ~ o
Y ~~ ~ I~j W

° ~ ~
m
m m
cx
~ ~ ~
I
I
W ~
y° ~ __-~ --~
GRAU 330~~-
m
O ~
~
yak
~ ~~
€ ~ -
-Y- ~~~ ~~ ~--
~~-~~vrs~rw nirt
_
^~

~ °
I
~ _,_, SR /234 WARNER W/NN RO 20'BST
--
„
N ~~d3~
~~ ' - --__"~, E
a

'^ ~ ° tti ~
~m mN e
p /
m
m ~
+ m+ ~
~° ~ =
~ °

cxisrwc xis
ti0
• ss~ n o
w I O

~`~+ m ~ d 9 ° Q n
y=

.~ Oyu H~ o \ C y
~ nn
~ n
~ $
v
~ ~
~ ~
_ ~~~
~ k ~n m H
~
r~-i j
~ rCC• U
m t IB G = N
~ ~ ~ , ~
A ~
O
~
rn .iy ~I
/• ~'0 r

v
~
•

`
'p

I ``,,
.~ 19 m -1t J
m / ma ~
g
n
tt N
~

~
i
o ~ n
N ~~ I
o
I rn
~ ~ o M I ~ i N
~ ~
I
~
o '~ ~ ~
°
m I
T
~ mm
m ~ a
I
;_ °m w
O
~ 'p ~ ! ~
I ! I n~ Da
I m can
°' a
~ v
°
s °m
mo
N j
l0 I
I
I I I I m
mE ~
'I ~ N
I O
n ~ I I
I I I
~I ~
o
o IC I ~
I
k I
I K'
I
°
II 'Im
~
I

~
~ END GRADE Sta. 19+75
r
I Z ~~
o '
-- ~
o ~ o0
y O
cn RI
~
o
0
a
o
o ~
°
0

n
O
o

M
~=m~
o~-~iZ
~ N n
m• rn
\o=~m
-~-+<~
=v~o
Vf CZ
-Im••
Z p
m A

Z ~
r
.
T
1
~°

a
~ 0
o
.
~ ~
$~ ~g
m~~
A
m o

~ V1

~ QQ
~1 f'1
C ~
~ py
Z Z p
m
°~
c
_
n
~~
n mZ
~ ~
_ Z
^
„
Z pO
n ,17 ~
9
~°
O w
p ,
yr
(] Z C
~ r
~ ~ a~

i
z,
~
O
z
~~-0
~
z
0

~ ~

m
o
~ ,
o
,
16 ~

3 ,
'
v '
O SSSUSERNAMESSSS '
(JISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDGNSSSSSSESSSS53SSS '
O SDATEBS SSSSSSSYSTIMESSSBS
O
~
I m
'G ii
W =<f
m -~
O
~ ~
-iZ
m N -
~
.3 N
X

41
Q
Q
(fl
_W
N
O
O
cn
N
N
v
y
= vl ^_'
m ~ ~~
m ~ ~ ?.,~ i
~ ~ y t~~ ~2. O Z p O
~h°o '~cch ~m au`Oi~a=Y
o~~Q^~mo~~~~~m ~i
~~n ~~~oser"~ `~ m i
~~ N y c t~ O TR m ~b C~ s
o~r.ii$oin ~i~r~+i n
m omo m~ ~
~~~8~-1-1' ~oe'om~s ~
~~ Ingo x~~,,~ 'rno" O
a $ ~$m ~_ ~
~~~ ~~
"~ ~ " ~ o ~
.~ ~ ~~
~=~m
~ =-iD~
°cz
F gym..
r~ Z Q
~2 c m A
y ~ w
(/) O I °
n'I i
~ ~ „ ~, BEG GRADE Sto. IO+00.00
10
° m I ~I I
~ y n x I I
_~ m ~ - i~
~ - W ~X ~ I I Z I'~ g
:i.~~~I~=~ m
X ~~
N
~~ I ~ ~ ,
~ m rn 2 x I ~, `~
m ~~ a~ XmII I
O ~ U
0 o m~z (r i s
iv ~ it ~I r ~ ~ ~~~ m
nrn~ '-I / 1~6t9 to ~/
a ~~ ~- a
~o O
~ m ~ ~' m N
'D~ ~m ~ I ~ x~~ nm~J
O Z ~it~ G~iNn
T
m . inr '~ F
~IE
M9~X - ~
X
-x~ ~aN~N~1 ~~~ ...

~ ~

I z
°
-f ~ m
I
r
z rn ~ ~

~ ~a~
~
I ~mw
`~lo o D O~ m
O II {
n ~ Z ..q n O
o °
~ '_ ~
~'"
~N N~ _
N
~
_
-I- C / ~' m
y N ~ o
y
I .A
°
wl
~ O ~ I
~ ~ _ ~ € F tiN
k u
i
ti
m ~ k Q ~ 1 € I ( ~ ~
g ~ __` GR~O~~
-_
o
~ N ~ ~ o
O ~ _
-~- ~~~ \ _ ----__
-~~E%ISiINC fl
/~
m ~
° I
r _~ __~_ --
'-r~~
- SR /234 WegNER W/NN AO ~yBy~
N ~Q4' 08
3" E
n
9 ~ f
i _
- ..-.
-- .
g
~m m~ N ~
Z
O m+m+ ~
~ ~ k N~ ~ ~ =
`"yam °°c ~
~ °
E.CIS7INC pily
on
~ ~ O
0
v
~ n
_

y V
V
N
m _
V ~~ y
N r Q~
~ 41
F
~
Q
y
\ C
I a
m
mHrn k N
y ~ / ~ ~ ~ ^' ~ Y° o C~~7
(/~ ~ m
Zn ~ ~
~b b A
1 V
o O
rn ~ N
~ T
m
~
g
~
N
v %
c»"
ct"
` ~
,i "' k~~ ~ ~
i O ~^~. ~~ I "
~ m
m
o m I N ~
rn m
O ~ N M I
~ I
~
~ ;N
~
m ~,
m
r
O
~ ~ ~
~
~ T
°
3
mm n
-
O
r
~ r
oln,
m
~
~
~ A I ~
~ ~ x~ ~
n°
~

° ~ I
~ °m
z
m
m
I '^~ W ~

~
~ N
A
O ~
~ I
W
II A
~
~
I

~ o I 0
~
K, I
I I

I c 1t

c
~
I
I m
~ ~
END GRADE Sta. 19+75
i rn
~
z ~
~ , ~
O -
~
~ ~
O a+
40
~ O
~rn
N~ k
I ~~

Q~
~- n
00
j

g
o ~
m
rn
~"
CD
O
n
z ov
~~
r~4 .Z

rn
(Z^'
V
r
2 ~
gJ
0
8~ i$
~ m ~
s ~ p= ~ ~
07. Z n
~ m
x° ~C
u
c 'i7
ar ~~
=z Z~ _
~ A^ ~
N Z
0

~ ~
3
m
o
cn
o
I~
v
O SoRUSERNAMES9te
C.71S®S99Sf6o4S®8B9UGNSSSESSS398t59SS8
O 6UATE80 8t06BOSYSTIMEa6tS0

Q ao=mTn
Op~~
~ mNnZ
S V1 r
~~~~
p~ r- m ~ ~~ =~ED--~
~ m g = ~k HCZ
~m••
o.. ~ ~ ~~g ~ag o ~rn ~ Z o
~ ~ix.+:~Ox~~ q~~"ia C ~2
~ ~~~y~~'oo~~~~~ ~ y~ c
N GnN~~~O T~~~'^T ~ ~n x 't.
00 o N E•, o ~' o + A~+ ~ ~ i~~n ~ = c7 ~ '~ ~ ~ BEG GRADE Sto. 10+00.00 10
Ul v"'io xom°~"a'~~o~ ~ D x
x 2SpO ~~~ h'v x ~
(O o~h'~v~~oen~~~ ~ O °m I I
O 8i~1V ;~o ~~~i+'~o •~°~ O CO y ~ ~x I I
~N ~o ~ ~8m ~_ ~ i' c~+ c"
D ~ c ~`~ ~~ $ `"
m ~ o=~ ~ x m l I~ ~
~ ~ ~~ I s
~ I I N m
i w m i.
~ ~ ~ I .A \ °
~ ~ z X I \V
02 0~ II I ` :oa /
m O ~~ NO _ I ~ 11 O
ag ~= I ,
~ b / /
~ IU R7 a cn
oA x~* ron 8 ° to /
N r l * /
ni^~ ~ I r~ I~~ u°j, ~
a_ _
~ ~m O
-fir X~N nm~N N
. ~ r_- ~NdJ
T
m~
~~
x ~~~~~ Nal~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r zo
~„ 'O~o
Z ~,
~ ~ ~ k ~p ~N °m
~ rn o ~ O O
p~ £m' I ~~, o .p L N ~ w
~ O
~. o ° ~ ~ ~ ~ N Tn- -
~- w I
~~
m ~ Q o $ ~-_
Q° EMISi
n ~ O ~ _
R /234 WMNER WI RO 2(TTBST
° ~ r - 6-Q4~08~3' a"
~ i r•- 4
Z o kN~~
N p ~ = EkIS TNG flits
~ _I g ~
~~O m °0 0
`~ °° gay "~ 4' ~ ~
l " N o
~^Opy ~ ~ m 's ~ ~ C cn
r 2 ~~ ~~~~~ d ~ ~ mNm m 2 `a ~ ~ = N
~I~ ~~m :o ~Q°O !ASV
~ ~ ~D I A `
O OO .. m ~'
~j. m m 9 u- N
~ d I hl ma I ~ m
N T'a o0
~ ~
~~ m
~ ~ k ~ Z°m c~ r3
q rn ~ ~ am nF^o$
~ ~ ~ "~ ~ w
Vl ma
~ °m
m m rn~ W °
a Q, A
~o
° ~ ~ ~ I III `
~N o
° ~ E µ
o
rn ~
W W
m END GRADE Sta. 19+75 rn
r! z
i p
~ ~ ~o V •
y O
~rn k* r
ro~ ~$ ~
o~ T
g g I -L ~f
~ ~
~ I s
g ~? o 0
^ ~ a ~ _' ~ a
;~ N 'y ~F~y~1 A m m ~o
YID ~ ~ yF~1 Z
° m ~ .y Z A
x Z
n n ^ a m
~ N~ ~~ ~~ ~
~• ,_ ~z ~r Z~ N
O vz, ~ ~
~ o
~o

----------------------------I-------------------------------------------•---------------------------------I------------------"-•------;
n~
0
rs
0
In 8DATEEb
SSbbbSYSTIMEbbbbb
"O bb$bESSSSbbbEBSDGNbbbbbbSESSbbbbBb
I
SSSU SEflNA MEbbb b

O mwW
rDcmi
II H
~
~
A=r~r N
~

~ om NDZ
J o ~ m
vl

~ r m
~c~~~
3~ ~ ~~~~
~o m ya -r =oD-_I

j
n i
..
ate `~
~ Z
n

DO m
~ A W
o
' ym m
_
~ n~ ° gg~mm
mooo ~

, ~
~ a
cncn ~ w
J rn m ~~yrnmrn~
O
~ - -
mwm O
r c7 c7 G~ N o

r O 000 222 Z
R
° ~N
DO
II ~
li ~ ~~~~~
- ~
a rnrnrn In~rnO r ~_••
~"' ~<mv
cu
l-I
° O m r
N
~ ~ ~o ~ aianT
i mn Z
c~ c~ c~ I- c °
~~ m I ° n u u oS!
o -` D .~ r~ o z
z~
z m
rn g g
w.+im ~ ~ < ~~o~
~~z~ ~
~
~'C
m N o1N
ONt ~~
Vm D1l
~
~~n
`Z N O
`aoo +~
~ ~c~~ o
Z a o.
I Oz~ 2 ,c
2 ~ "' _ - -- ~OO ~
N ~ w

I / I
c / I
II II II II II II II II II II II ~_
/ -
I N N Nln ~lNp~nNN W n
~
6 A ~
06
0 ~
O ~~0~ -- ~- - -N
i
N
\ I
~ ~ I
~I W ~~~~~~
~~ ~
<
3 31Wfi '~rH
~<
~ Z II II II
N 1 C
'f •y
•• •• _• A -+ N 1

33
N
O0
1 _
mZ ~ 9m Z2 Zy
r rw~r owD~o y
oPa I ..
0 .
,• 1
OO
II ~ r~o n -Irr+7C
u n rm _
o
H
°1.a -

' 07 N N CD O
NV-iNVNV ZNN ~
~ O
OWD11-INW -Im -
AV y7CVV • D-1
W1 RI Nr
~NA
p
~ • A
~ A
p
~ NNt
fl
+2
_ - -
N~N•ml NSOA70f Q E

D
fO F
S
-IV
mao
w mI
~
OWZ
Z
T r
rI
•I
II
II ~ 1
~asw mz
`"
j~~a 1 1m ~ -

ooo
-n
b ° 2ggmmrn mxx m
~-,'~~ ~ ~
~
i
~ ~I rn rn rn In t/1 (~ (n In VI ~ 10 O) ul ~ m
O
H rn ~~~mmrn~~~ ~ alANm Di N
O
222
~ - --
~
I~ O 0000
rn
rn
~ ~ fONO -+
{' ~
I
n
~~b
~~ ~1O ~
~ _ ~ I
m~ r;
aiin,oi
°o
c
~~~ cAr,
o
z
~
Z
~rn'mm~ _
-~
I
# ~
~ ~ ~o~~~`mnzm ~
~
~ -n
rn~2
~ `
l
~
o
m -- = --
~
~ I^,
C v

r_
II II II II II II II II II II II
•
O ~ NO~OpWOINnN ~ o~tn Ip ~nfm'N
N ~ ~O~~
O O
~ '1=~ I O II II II II
.l
W _
° ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ °£m °'iojv
1' 1n cn cn cn to vl .
N +
o
_
m
_ ~ I o m •°
~o
00 0
I°
I~

~L7rM
~ riZ II -
II II II
II aG NyNy \
II G! V O 110
N 9 O 1 +
wmv coo
• +m
O V w•
'O
NN O

` ~~ o
<
tyrl y
r~
`d ~
Zg V
g
o

~ ~~
`
_
~
~ g~

s ~ ~

'° ~
o ~

~ ~

~
A

o ~~
Hz Z ~ Z
~n
z
n
m
~w
V _ U= a
m
A r
O x~
y ~
N
/w -- ~ NNNy
yNN ro
~p ~ ~ ~ "_
p N ~ Z
~~ ~
"~ + • o
~

~
~

/

U ~
"~
'~
~
ca

Q
-BL• J 1920.91 RNC
~ ~ ..:'~
~~o
~~~~~

~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~R
W ~Y ~
O ~ YY
m 5~ y
8

^ryi
~
h
N
o t
~

®
$ *
~~~
y

N
~~ 2 1 ~~

.
~~~
9'
y .>9.~ m _~..., ~
-~'~
y,,.,
, o ~

(
] Sl

~ ~ev.
1~.rw~+~~.~
u
~ \ ~
~yz ~+ ~ 3 ' 3
g~~s
(Ml O
:Y p ~ ~
£"'` o
a ~ a H ~ i L
~ ~~

~
y
~~

m
~ w

W~ `
® _\
~~~
~i~y Y
8
O ~
J
®
~«
y'"a E

~
O ~~~SY ~
f„c
~~Y
~~g
~~ a
<3~<i
FQ ~ <C
~~ g oz p
F dd
Fpm < U ~ W=
~<~ ~ ~Y #~
OF=i °y ~~ ~S
So'O~ ~ 4 ~~
~ac S iQ ~~
os a
~ ~~o
~d
g ~
~i
O ~~~
r~~S
Y
0
Z 1 -
~ J
m p 1
~ U ~
O Ih
~ ~I
1 ~
Q Z +' -
~ H ~
J
Z
o~ o
Z ~ H
F-
V7 Q
CO
~ N n
B~
~u+ue+a~~wa~~e
i ~,
`Yr
O $~Y
~a$
m
h
b
i~ 4
y ~ o "~
~, ~ ~
O ~ Y 8 ~w~~'~^g
~ v~
i q NN ti
P
e~~W ~ a~x°s'"
sr~ ~ ~~d~
3- ~~ ~~~,
~ ae~ ~~
~~~ ~,aa
_ ~,
~a
`n /
~: r '
~ ~~
~®
J F
4
F' U
v y
y 9 C
F z F
a~ ~ ~ ~
EC sheet 1 of 6

4
N
~Y3 ~ ~ Z Y4~~_
~ ~ ~ J o O N~"e~^
~ m O ~ `' _
~,. ~ ~ o _
ti ~ o ~-- °'
~. ` nl i MI ~a Z i Ian ~;
Q Z t ; 4~~ 3
i 9 Y :z H ~"
I ~ Z o w ~ ffi o
JJ__ Q Z ~ Q ~
SAVN,~ix ~ Inoiinla ' o O LY O ~ ~ w
NDI1N19asNtltll io •ltl3a _ ~ z !1, F-1 W a ~
vxtT0tlv0 x/tlaN I ,Y, 3dAl 3103H0 11I8 YDOtl AYYtlOdN31 P+ ~ LI-I U ~~
i0 31V19 tl0i lNINVIq OtltlONY13 NBIlON3 ~ m Q ~
3 In
~ M Y ~{M
~~g. Wi~. ~ y ~~ h,. a[~[
~ ~ 5 COSY
~~~~~~~ N'L. ~ ~
~~~g~~~~
~e~~~~~
``t
;~s Cot ~ ,
4Slt 4.~
~~ ~ CCR44s,'s F
,P.P, C!t<t[4EEP 333
~ `k~~`' ~ s ' G
"s,'`de ' rqe
Y~f
,J
g ~ aL
® N
STATE DF ENGL29N BTANIWIO DRAWIMB FOR
nEPT.~aFTirw a I~ AT T[oN ~ro~Y ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE 'A' b °•
DIVIBIgI DF NIGN^AY! ~ ~
MLEIBN, N.C. o
® 'D'N 'IMJI3TW -O BAVIWOIN i0 NOI9 AIO 'D
BAw191N i0 MDTBIAIO NDI1Vltl(Id9NV91 i0 1d30
NDI1NitlOd9NY111 io ~1tl30 ~ vxnowa N19p1 3]N3i 1lIS AtlYY0dW31
Yxi'IOSVO x1tl0N ,0, 3dAl dYtll 1N3WI03S 1311NI IIOOY w tloi DNIMVtl0 atlvaNVis NBIlON3
i0 31V16 tloi lNINMIO DtlNTIlY13 NBI10N3 ° i0 azv~ ''
C
f RR
f d> ~
n
~~ ~ ~~~I ~ ~ - ~ ~
® `'~ ~ ~i
~ o P ~ ~ ~~
r/ ~ ~ ~ 6
® ~ ='
~ y'y~ Y~ ; ~ e >x
QY~~ y~~~a ~ a~~p~~x~~ve
~:~~9 ~ ~~a~~~~i~~E~~;~x~ 9
Fo D 0~. ~i~ e ~ W6 Q~b~~W k
F y ~ (~~i ' ~ o Aron o6Q..:'L. _.40.'. ~ Fa.}r ~
Z ~ v ~m c..._ gg~ ~ g~
ofay w ~ 9~ a~
g t O ~ STATE Df ENOLIBX STANDARD DRAVINO FOR STATE Of ENBLISN 9TANIWIO IM1AelIN6 Fp1~
m m ' x9xTx uRalxA a NDRTX CAROLINA TFIIPORMY SILT FENCE
a E ~ DEPT. OF TRAN9PORTATIg1 ROCK INLET SEDI•ENT TRA- TYPE 'C' Pi DEPT. DF TRANlPORTATIWI '^ >i sl
E ~ DIVIBIDII DF NIOHWAVS DIVilIDN DF XIBXNtYS O e~ i
a C a Za RALEIOx, N.C. m PALEIOI, N.C. i
~ R I I ..
0
~F~la-n•'Pe-vuosu.=~~.D~i.o~P~uwi+ua+t~,wa~a ne rnvnzl so9zinn
F +
EC sheet 2 of 6

^
M
'~ Z J Q J n ~.~ ~Tm
E ~
CO o ~ < O
~ ~ m
9 ~ _ ~ ~ ~~
9 ~ ~ ~ I
O M :a Z ~ ~
~~~ ~ in ~ri ga ~ }
i r7 ~ 3 V a
3
~_~ ~ J ~ eon ~ Qoy--
st
e~~ Y c z H ~ w
Z cn
Q
~I$i ~ o ~ o a ~ w :L:
i Z~ ~ a W u
VI Q ~
m t- 'D
a V1 ~ €~w,'4r
y a~
~ ~ 1~~~~F
R!,_~
1.
o e ,g ~ ~ o L ~
mnr, ^ 5 g_
E8 ~ .•s y. ao'~3,E ~~k ~ ~ ~ ~o~.y ° '.~c .p i'-a°
.E2~`= ~= ~ Fg~ ~~~~° 9 ~~a 3' Sa''8~ ~B °~ ~~~o °~°n ~~aeg~a
~~P ~ ~~c ~S~ ~'a~ ~ y ~v~^^H .E°~ ~~p~ ~g~.E ~E_ °~cno~o
,. ~~,~ = .F= ao °~°s E~ ~'F a5 ~gc° !'.s$ '2EO Eif Sorg
_ ,~ ~_. €g
® ~8g i ~~ i0 P gi.°8o `~ ~" ~SeY~ ~3e ~~g ~gE~g~5
P cg 2 ¢'~i~ ~qq A ~ c °g ~ 1pr~~;g `3c~g: ~° ~P ya°Eo
~ a a ~' E E BS° E~~3cF-
~_ o,c_° °~' E Uzi ~P!E:E ~ .E #4y 8~~' boS
3 §°3~'~`~` ` 'FF E 'E^_B_€iO ~ p ~ ~F 3 'E'sc $S'~.. ••€o.~~osg
6.~~ ~ua°. «o g°"~'S `oc a°g~° ps ~a °~o ~ ~'~W° i`o
• y
N C
a°
o
® U
`c p
L~1 -'~ € =
~ m° $ O
`o 0
o y
® Z m E a
.'°n
Q ~ 9
a
m a = ~~
,~ z
~ ~
Z V E
s -
J O m° aE
~, CC €' r ~u
N
~ OHO
O ^R_
U ~ ~
W
O"
N
.~
c a
t c '~
u oi~
zf i
~~~ F it
~~a` ~
~s°~ s Z s
z
may z
c ~ <
~ I ° 3i
0~4
< ~'
0
~~ ~:
~~
u..~ia'c..'o•-auoww~~•.w•.~.ciwm".~~~~a~~° n^ ^4zei s°ozrtvt

EC sheet 3 of 6

V
O
T ~
~ I
J
} CO OU I
~~ ~ N
Q
Z g ~ ~n
~--{ ~ 1 Q'
~S Q Z +
~ 1--1 ri
J
W ~ Z I ^-•
~ e Q Z
~° O~ O
Z ~ 1-i
~--
t/i Q
f1] I-
3 to
;R
CS ^Y
t
~3 ~~RHbE:.:

p ~~ ~
O o~ I ~YY
O g~~
o~ ~ .84

~ By .S 4 F ~ S
W
x
I
1 • ^
p1
~
~"Y ~~
•~
I ~
~+ W
~~~
~ _
v~
o
~ o

q

N -h
~3 * ry"
~ • ~

r E ~ :
`fit\V- ~
`~ m a
1
J a
® H
~ ~ W~~
~
o. `,+,`

y
~ W ~~ h
¢
4 wm a ••iw• rcz~ -, O ~ Y
~eY a
d
aW~evlg
a~b ' -A- ; 3 x ~~ ~ Tl ~ S B 3 ~ T ~1

®
~

g
• ~ ~
,.
3.
p '^""1
~ W~b6N
*
~~g QQ
Y '
Q
u C N t
¢mtVNe~
'
p W
g3 _
W N aa
*Q~
l
) ~g
O ~ ° p ce p a_ u.~
'~ i~p"
y ~ ~ ~ ~~~n vit'n 1n
~Inl
~l N
~N$ ~ Y
<
o o .
~s
Ur ~ 1.
~W 1
~ 1
~
1'// ~ i 1
aW
~
4
¢ pp
4 \~
P . W
~~
Q
titi

~~
YQ~ym '~ ~W lr

Y.
/ ~ 6 I z W o !~

/~ ~
„ ~
N g
N IIII.
5
a9,
~ p i ~
Z ~ ~ , ~iis
~
--
U
~
~3a ~ e' : ~ la g 1 V

FQ ~ ~ ~~
~~ o
~g~ ~ ~
~3
~- ~p
ol°-mg °~
o
`o~ c ~
m5o Z ~~ ~~
""
iaF'
4~0 a
~~ 5
~e ~ ~ g~
R
~~
_~
unr~o.wwove
~z=
~I I'
d
U
= F
F .y
~ • N
~.
y h 0~.'
i i
F d F
~~~~~~
+ EC sheet 4 of 6
~ _~~
-Bl- 3 19.20.41 PIVO

V1
~ ~~~ i w
r LLO Z Y ~ =u'
m~ ~ I 6 ~ • ~ nYn
3 Cr ° 0O N o F- °' I
~I~
Q Y p Q' ~ L N Z
y, Z» II] Ul ~ a U r -
as F-i ~ i v ~ a C~ a .
G~yy ~g a z + e i,~~ o
' ~ H M no Z a
`~ W g Y W F-i ~ IY W
Z s ~ rr a
Q 2 m O
~` ~ sAww,c ~iH .w lriois[ncD ro ~s o(Y O ~ a ~ w ~--
xouvlNOdsxvNl io 'la3o N ~ Z I ~ ^'1 a IyJ -1
Yxnoxvo x1saN ,Y, 3dA1 N73N7 1TIS N70tl AtlVtlOdW31 c n ~
i0 31V38 tlOd 9MISVtlO DNVDRYI6 HSf l8N3 -Ib ~ Q h ~ ~ ~
H
2 N a ^''1 .F w
~~~~ ~~~ 3 I e ~~ A e~
~.- $ ~ ~ g ~' aIM a ~~~ ~Rr~x3
~ ~ ~ : $ ~I. Vii. ~ Clj~ sl,~$P?'
~="~ ~~~ L, --
g~8~
~~ffe~~~~ n_u
3~~`~
,nP.~s,~541 .r,4 ~ .~ <
_ .44 e,4441.444f,F ~I ~8 w Y
{qP . 4P,f
~~ s
J*
e
® ~
BTATf OF ENd.IBM BTANDAPO DMWING fON
xosrx LMDL[IM TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE 'A' N
DEPT, OF TNANSPOATATIDN
DFVIBINI Of XIWMAV9
AALEIDII, M.C. b
® 'D'N ' Wl3ltltl
'D'N 'NDI3lVS ' O BAVRIBIH i0 NOISNIO
BAVMNOIN i0 NDIBIAIO NO[1V11NId8NVS1 i0 '1d30 S O
NOIIV1NOdSNW1 d0 '1d30 _ ^ N - YNIlOtlV9 N1tlON 37N3d 11I9 AtlYtlOdM31 0
VNIIOtlq xtsox ,7, 3dA1 dYtll LN3gI03S 131NI K70N n
d0 31V18 tl0i BNtMVNO OUVONYIB NBIlDN3 Yf i0 31Y18 x0i flNtMMD [NhDNV18 NBitNl3 ~
a ~ €~
~ e ~a ~ ~L ~ o
s 9 Rho P= II- ~~ i
® ... W C, ~ W i ~
o Y
1D_ ~¢
~6RG+~ ~~E1 yRYi Y~K`1~~tlX~~y 3~ S '~ ~I
y77 d R .. Ic_ &
~yA~~~;~~p~p~~y~~C~t~~~~~gtat7 ~ ^a aa
~~~~ ~tl F`n~L '1' ~CR~2. ~ aY 4 ~ ~
`~~o.q: o:v'o.o- $~ ~ ~~n W~>fitn~ re0
,y 9o';OarOo'D. D o.oa ~ ~ ~ ;~E '~'~ W~
~a ~ G < C ~~~tA $"'3~
~ ~W ~~e ;~~~ ~
~Z s o o° ~~ ~;~ W a~ ~~~ ~a~~~~~Q$
zE°-~ I oI f ~ tl- W ~R.~W~~~~
F S~ U ~ - D ~e opOQ DO -Q~ ' C I I ~ J b~ '
Z m : ~ C 1-:-I-.R
z < vim, <--J ~
a F 1 °~
~ Z O Z STATE Of ENGL'SH BTANDMD DNARINO fOH 9TATE OP ENDLISN STANOAND ORAMIND FNI ^~ ,~ '~W'
xoxTx uawtnn ^ c NCNTN CANOIINA TEN-OMRY SILT FEMCE 8
p W ~ ~ DFPT. OF TNAM3PMTATtON ROCK INLET SEDIENT TRAP TYPE 'C' DEPT. DF TMNSPORTATION- -h
gi F ~ m DIVIB30N OF NIOINMYS ' ~ DIVISION Df x:ONINYB
t NALEIOX, N.C. al
~ K ~ ~ BALEIDN, N.L. b cl .~
46
SW
G m
~~
Vsrlo'F••"o•'DFIDEUOau~•Ou~.o~N~bMNxw~q~wGVD Wd a.NHn toouin
+ EC sheet 5 of 6

`~
V
i
s~ w~
® ~- y=~
di ~ O J o OJ o -~^
¢ Li ~ `^
~` QQ o I v 3a Z a
~ ~ z~ .n ti 4 a o r -
~~I~~ ~s alz ~+ ~' 6~: ~' e i
g ~'" ~ J ~ ~ bo. O a~9
~~ +~ Wg ZI~I o "Z ~ ~~:
~8 Q z m ? p a
~ O ~ O ~ 5 w
Z L.~ ~ a LiJ
N Q o
CD ~ ~
3 V1
:`
~~ a ^ ~$
~~~ ~R~ra~
~'AP i
~ ~~~a~se:
O O P4 ~ ~ V 9 POn1C ~G F E ` S_
g'm =t ~ ° ~ ba ~ 'a o .; ~ E og~m~°n b~ ~ '~ ~ i
€~_E ~ P a
$~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ °a~ s~ ~~ ~ P ~ ~ s~ g~~ o a o.~ ga ~
y y S;
g E° ~d 'ba aFg°EL.e• y~i.F~ ;,C~ ~ ef, o°~~ ~ p ~p°pt .dg~.-L`o~
E 3'S~ ~ C~ ~£b jE~E fr ~~a L as X cv '~~~~ 5e=fib oi~ .~E,'~P.~
'2v~e~ `o ~~ g§ k V~a~ ~~ ~ ~--g~ ig ~g ~ isi~ F~+; ~~~-~:3
y~ $ a 'v ~ ~ 3
~£'P $ ~€ { ~'s p.P ~~ ~ $E g ~''~~°o~.n g'' ~9P~~' ~~,E Eg ~`0~?'2 ~°
~ ~~ ~ ~ !~ 3~ _~ if D'Y gg Eo Sii i a~a~aa ~ ~ £g ~ ~ ~.~ easy ~ ~
a
~,.~'-
~~ • P °Se o ~ .~ - -
c ,E'ggP2i .~ ~ ~P yFaY y,g E;~ °oT i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~p~£~'q~~ ~o~M R.Po `c a~E..
Fg ~ F.eS4 3~~$ $~~~~.. ~ ~~ ~ p~=~' F ~ 3' X ~E E E~•g ppE-ZP 'S
gg Q F P ~.~ '29 ~~. X33 f.-F SQ
° ~ $ t$ 39Eg .~_ E `~ -x,r -~ o ° ~~€ ~'» g'f q~s ,c_°~~g` ~Po ~,c_°~.. `''a pc~Y.
.E ~i~dpq c S '$9yB Bk '£~cB_g~p ~t ~P2 d 3~2 8~ 3~ iX` v E._~ S$~_ `op~Er Bb
` ,Y c.4 ~'y ~o `eo ~ of yo_° G~ a ~° $pg ~~ °.2~~b' ~e o 3• ~8$
.a ~g.ge ° ~ E~ ~~ $~3 a'3~EA •E°~ u~€ 9`~g ~a~~E u°'2v~ Q'e3~°~'`ES
3r ~ ~~`s ~~ s~ ~iiiva ~'~~~~e~ ~~~. ~€•w ~~aF ~r~.€i ~~ro ~is.~~E~
~ EQQ
Q b
° .n
0
u
E 3
~ ~ O
a °
® ~ g E o
N ~ ~
Q ° o
o
'S
m ~ c i
4. o
ae m
Z Y ~
U ~ ~ E
~O
y = ~~
o,o
o ^ .'
V ~ ~
W
d
N
c
to Q ~
-~ h F ° ~ IL N ~I
s
~~~ s ~
mzx
z~°- S ~ i
xq
a.'o~ o
mtco ~ ^~
mo~~ ~
°F~ ~,
°«~ g ~~ia
~6 R
3
:~
a~
ueo~io'n.-o.-wms.nP~~.P.,oa~zwuw.~i~a,.~» n n n soexirvi
r
EC sheet 6 of 6

Appendix One
(USAGE Notification of Jurisdictional
Determination/Wetland Delineation forms)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Ill. 200520078 County: Franklin U.S.G.S. Quad: Ingleside ~~"""`'
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ,,a'' ~
Property Owner/Agent: NCDOT -Division of Highways f
Address: Attn: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Dir., PDEA -
1548 Mail Service Center rJQ~1 .F. ??1)(15
Raleigh, NC 27699 ' ` ~`
~; .T,
Telephone No.: [phone], ext. 237 ~4 f~ `` `-'iU'~~;IC,PJ OF ~~O
- ~, ~.~ r `~~aN~VAYS ~ ~
Property description: ~G~'`~F •{7r'r'L 1,Op ~'~~~, ~~
Size (acres) n/a Nearest Town Louisburg '~~A! ~ihlnl.`(~`~
Nearest Waterway Lynch and Tooles Creeks River Basin Tar
USGS HUC 03020101 Coordinates N 36.1488 W 78.3415
Location description Study area for two bridge replacements (MA05017B & MA05018B1 .
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of'this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetland on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on .Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
#~~~V~D
JAN ~ 4 2005
Page 1 of 2
P4EA-0FFk;E G~ i~T~OA! ENV_ ~

Action ID. 200520078
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this -
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer at [phone], ext. 23.
.. Basis For Determination: The study area contains stream channels of Lynch and Tooles Creeks. tributaries of the Tar
River, with indicators of ordinary high water marks, and wetlands adjacent to the tributaries.
Remarks:
Corps Reg
Date 01/12/2005 Expiration Date 01/12/2010
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial):1
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form.
~ A copy of the "Noti catio^ Of r'~dministrative Appeal Options And Process And Request F'or Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form.
• If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form.
Copy furnished (with drawings): Buck Engineering (George Bucholz)
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Page 2 of 2

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATI'`VE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
RE UEST FUR APPEAL
A licant: NCDOT MA05017B & MA05018B File Number: 200520078 Date: 01/12/2005
At tached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I -The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Co s re ulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may acceptor object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
aut.i.,.~.,.,.i.,n. If,~oa received .. Lett,,. o. Permiss:on (LO. ~, yeu may accep...,,, LO. any your work is uuihorizcd. `~ our stdnature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district en ineer will send ou a roffered ermit for our reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Pernlit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received b the division en ineer within 60 da s of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeai Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received b the division en ineer within 60 da s of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division en ineer within 60 da s of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - RE UEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of infornation t'r~at is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR UESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Eric Alsmeyer Mr. Arthur Middleton, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office CESAD-ET-CO-R
US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M 15
Ralei h, North Carolina 27615 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investi ations.
Date: Telephone number:
Si nature of a ellant or a ent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Moving Ahead/Bridge #41 (MA05017B) Date: 1/13/04
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Franklin
Investigator: Charlie Musser, RLA/Bill Hamilton, RLA State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ^ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ^Yes ®No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Plot ID: Point-1 (Non-
wetland)
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree - 5% FAC 9. Fraxinus pennsylvanica " - 30% FAC W
2. Betula nigra " - 45% FACW 10. Lonicera japonica Vione/herb -
20 /o FAC
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ' - 10% FACW 1 l . Rubus betulifolius ' - 15% FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua ' - 15% FAC+ 12. Smilax rotundifolia " - 30% FAC
5. Pinus taeda " - 5% FAC 13. Toxicodendron radicans ' - 10% FAC
6. Platanus occidentalis " - 20% FAC W- 14.
7 Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 15.
. - 15%
$. Carpinus caroliniana " - 50% FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC

(excluding FAC-). 50%+
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
uvnun>r.nrv
^ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
^ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ^ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Free Water in Pit: 20+ (in.) ^ WaterStained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 20+ (in.) ^FAC Neutral Test
^ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators not present.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla loamy sand variant Drainage Class: SPD
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? ®Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, ets.
1 - 0 O NA NA NA Litter
0 - 6 A l OYR 4/3 l OYR 5/4, l OYR common/distinct, LS
3/2 common/faint
6 - 12 B1 I OYR 4/4 l OYR 5/4 common/distinct L
12 - 18 B2 l OYR 4/4 L
18 = 20+ B3 lOYR 5/3 l OYR 4/6 common/distinct L

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ^ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ^Yes ®No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present? ^Yes ®No ^Yes ®No
Remarks: The center of this data point sample is located approximately 80 feet SE of the centerline intersect of SR 1235 and Lynch Creek.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

• DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETE1fMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Moving Ahead/Bridge #42 (MA05018B) Date: 1/13/04
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Franklin
Investigator: Charlie Musser, RLA/Bill Hamilton, RLA State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ^ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ^Yes ®No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Plot [D: Point-2 (Wetland)
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubum Tree-5% FAC 9. Fraxinus pennsylvanica " - 15% FACW
2. Betula nigra " - 25% FACW 10. Lonicera japonica Vine/herb - FAC
30 /°
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica " - 15% FACW 11. Rubus betulifolius ' - 15% FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua " - 15% FAC+ 12. Smilax rotundifolia ' - 15% FAC
5. Pinus taeda ' - 10% FAC 13. Toxicodendron radicans ' - 10% FAC
6. Platanus occidentalis " - 25% FACW- 14.
7. Acer rubum Sapling - FAC 15

30% .
8. Carpinus caroliniana " - 30% FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC

(excluding FAC-). 50%+
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
^ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ®Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ®Water Marks
® Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Free Water in Pit: 15 (in.) ®Water-Stained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) ^FAC Neutral Test
^ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

SOILS
Map Unit Name ~
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee loam Variant Drainage Class: PD
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents Confirm Mapped Type? ®Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, ets.
1 - 0 O NA NA NA Litter
0- 6 A 1 OYR 4/3 NA NA L
6 - 12 Bgl l OYR 4/2 l OYR 4/4 common/distinct SCL
12 - 18+ Bg2 l OYR 4/2 lOYR 4/4 common/distinct SCL, many fine quartz grains

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ®Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators aret present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ^ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ^ No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes ^ No ®Yes ^ No
Remarks: The center of this data point sample is located approximately 180 feet WSW of the centerline intersect of SR 1235 and Tooles Creek.
This is the same data point used for the adjacent Bridge #41 on Lynch Creek.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Fotm

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecdSite: Moving Ahead/Bridge #42 (MA05018B) Date: 1/13/04
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Franklin
Investigator: Charlie Musser, RLA/Bill Hamilton, RLA State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ^ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ^Yes ®No Transit ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Plot ID: Point-1 (Non-
wetland)
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
l . Acer rubrum Tree - 5% FAC 9. Fraxinus pennsylvanica " - 30% FAC W
2. Betula nigra " - 45% FACW 10. Lonicera japonica Vi
ne/herb - FAC
o
20 /o
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ' - 10% FACW 1 1. Rubus betulifolius ' - 15% FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua ' - 1 ~% FAC+ 12. Smilax rotundifolia " - 30% FAC
5. Pinus taeda " - 5% FAC 13. Toxicodendron radicans ' - 10% FAC
6. Platanus occidentalis " - 20% FACW- 14.
7. Acer rubrum Sapling - FAC 15.
-15%
8. Carpinus caroliniana " - 50% FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC

(excluding FAC-). 50%+
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
^ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ^ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Free Water in Pit: 20+ (in.) ^Water-Stained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 20+ (in.) ^FAC Neutral Test
^ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators not present.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla loamy sand variant Drainage Class: SPD
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? ®Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, ets.
1 - 0 O NA NA NA Litter
0 - 6 A I OYR 4/3 l OYR 5/4, l OYR
3/2 common/distinct,
common/faint LS
6- 12 B 1 l OYR 4/4 l OYR 5/4 common/distinct L
12 - 18 B2 lOYR 4/4 L
18 - 20+ B3 l OYR 5/3 1 OYR 4/6 common/distinct L

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ^ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ^Yes ®No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present? ^Yes ®No ^Yes ®No
Remarks: The center of this data point sample is located approximately 180 feet WSW of the centerline intersect of SR 1235 and Tooles Creek.
This is the same data point used for the adjacent Bridge #41 on Lynch Creek.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

-~ DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION '
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Moving Ahead/Bridge #41 (MA05017B) Date: 1/13/04
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Franklin
Investigator: Charlie Musser, RLA/Bill Hamilton, RLA State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ^ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ^Yes ®No Transit ID:
[s the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Plot ID: Point-2 (Wetland)
([f needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubum Tree-5% FAC 9. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ' - IS% FACW
2. Betula nigra " - 25% FACW 10. Lonicera japonica Vi
ne/herb - FAC
o
30 /o
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica ' - 15% FACW 1 1. Rubus betulifolius ' - 15% FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua ' - 15% FAC+ 12. Smilax rotundifolia ' - 15% FAC
5. Pinus taeda ' - 10% FAC 13. Toxicodendron radicans ' - 10% FAC
6. Platanus occidentalis " - 25% FACW- 14.
7. Acer rubum Sapling FAC 15

30% .
8. Carpinus caroliniana " - 30% FAC 16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC

(excluding FAC-). 50%+
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
^ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ®Saturated in Upper 121nches
® No recorded Data Available ® Water Marks
® Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Free Water in Pit: t 5 (in.) ®Water-Stained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) ^FAC Neutral Test
^ Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee loam variant Drainage Class: PD

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? ®Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, ets.
1 - 0 O NA NA NA Litter
0 - 6 A ] OYR 4/3 NA NA L
6 - 12 Bgl l OYR 4/2 l OYR 4/4 common/distinct SCL
12 - 18+ Bg2 l OYR 4/2 l OYR 4/4 common/distinct SCL, many fine quartz grains

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ®Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators aret present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ^ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ^ No Is this Sampling Point within a Wetland?
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes ^ No ®Yes ^ No
Remarks: The center of this data point sample is located approximately 80 feet SE of the centerline intersect of SR 1235 and Lynch Creek.
L:\Documents\Forms\Wetland Determination Form

Appendix Two
(USFWS concurrence letter)

United Stat-~es Department of the Interior
F[SH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 27, 2005
Chris Murray
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
~~ 12 348
s
~'~ ,~`~
" • J~a ~
~ ~ ~, h iN
~m ~~
~c ~ ~/
,~`i
~IZA~arAl.blr .~
This letter is in response to your letter of July 19, 2005 which provided the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) with the biological determination of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation that the replacement of Bridges Nos. 41 and 42 on SR 1235 (Dyking Road) over
Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek, respectively, in Franklin County may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Tar
spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). These comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to information provided, mussel surveys were conducted at the project sites on August 27.
2004 and September 14, 2004. The surveys extended 100 meters upstream and 400 meters
downstream of SR 1235. Neither of the federally listed species was observed. Based on the
information provided and other information available, the Service concurs with your determination
that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the dwarf wedgemussel and
Tar spinymussel. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied
for these species. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered
if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently
modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical
habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions regarding
our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincer y,
~~Pete~ en'amin
,J ~.
Ecologtcal Services Supervisor
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, USACE, Raleigh, NC
Christina Breen, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC

US l9 ~.1
~-~. n1U~ n
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 27, 2005
Chris Murray
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
~T~~°~F~~ J~ 2
9,LO ~~ 2
~~9~1/~`
~~
~~ti
This letter is in response to your letter of July 19, 2005 which provided the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) with the biological determination of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation that the replacement of Bridges Nos. 41 and 42 on SR 1235 (Dyking Road) over
Tooles Creek and Lynch Creek, respectively, in Franklin County may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Tar
spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). These comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to information provided, mussel surveys were conducted at the project sites on August 27,
2004 and September 14, 2004. The surveys extended 100 meters upstream and 400 meters
downstream of SR 1235. Neither of the federally listed species was observed. Based on the
information provided and other information available, the Service concurs with your determination
that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the dwarf wedgemussel and
Tar spinymussel. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied
for these species. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered
if: (l) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently
modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical
habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions regarding
our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincer y,
~~~ / ~'
Pete Benjamin.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, USACE, Raleigh, NC
Christina Breen, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
~i'
C~~
p0
~~~
S