20110364 Ver 2_401 Application_20130313

1k -03(-A va-.
►,
PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 14,
GENERAL WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION NUMBER 3886 &
NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER AUTHORIZATION
HONEYCUTT CREEK GREENWAY
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APPLICATION BY:
CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
AGENT: WSP USA CORP.
�.wsP
FEBRUARY 28, 2012
WSP SELLS PROJECT NO. 107-4029.000
ORIGINAL USACE ACTION ID NO: 2012 -00094
ORIGINAL NCDWQ PROJECT NO: 11 -0364

February 28, 2013
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attention: David Shaeffer
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — 401 /Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
SUBJECT: Honeycutt Greek Greenway
Raleigh, North Carolina
WSP Project 107- 4029.000
Action ID 2012 -00094
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins:
00,wsr
WSP USA Corp.
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway
Suite
t I I 1 I) Cary, NC NC 27513
�1 �tJJ Tel: [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.wspgroup com/usa
On February 17, 2012, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) Wilmington District issued a
Nationwide Permit Number (NWP) 14 verification to the City of Raleigh for the 5.5 -mile Honeycutt Creek
Greenway Trail. On February 24, 2012, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issued
Water Quality Certification approval and Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules authorization for the
project. Reference Attachment A for copies of the USACE and NCDWQ approvals. The USACE permit
verification and NCDWQ approvals expired on March 18, 2012. Unforeseen project delays prevented
commencement of project bidding and construction prior to the expiration of the approvals.
Furthermore, no construction has been conducted to date, and work will not be completed by March
18, 2013. Therefore, on behalf of the City of Raleigh, WSP USA Corp., formerly WSP, SELLS, is submitting
the enclosed information to request Nationwide Permit Number 14 Authorization from the USACE for
the project under the 2012 NWP program, and a corresponding Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Authorization from NCDWQ.
Previous Submittals
The previously approved design has not changed since the February 17, 2012 NWP 14 verification and
February 24, 2012 401 WQC approval and Buffer authorization.
The following submittals were previously made to USACE and /or NCDWQ:
• September 28, 2011 — Original Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) package;

Mr. David Shaeffer and Ms. Karen Higgins
February 28, 2013
Page 2 of 10
• December 8, 2011 — email correspondence to Lauren Witherspoon of NCDWQ from Ralph
Troutman of WSP, including Plan Sheet C7.2 showing the greenway with buffer impacts color
coded;
• December 14, 2011 — email correspondence to Lauren Witherspoon of NCDWQ from Ralph
Troutman of WSP, including color Figures 1 -12 and impact areas plotted on color plan sheets;
• January 12, 2012 — letter to NCDWQ, in response to NCDWQ's November 2, 2011 comment
letter, including Table 1 of potential streams and wetlands in the project corridor;
• January 12, 2012 — Revised PCN Package; and
• January 16, 2012 — Revised PCN Pages 7 and 9.
The previously approved Revised PCN Form and supporting information, submitted January 12, 2012,
including permit drawings and tables, are included in Attachment B for your review and approval. An
agent authorization letter is also included in the PCN package. Revised PCN pages 7 and 9, submitted on
January 16, are included in Attachment C. The color copies of Figures 1 -12 and the color plan sheets
submitted on December 14, 2011 are included herein in Attachments D and E, respectively.
Proiect Purpose
The Honeycutt Creek Greenway Trail is a public greenway trail for pedestrians and bicycles, connecting
the existing Mine Creek Trail at Longstreet Drive to the Falls Lake Trail at Raven Ridge Road in the City of
Raleigh.
Proiect Description
The 5.5 mile trail will be paved from Longstreet Drive north to Durant Road, including "wayfinding"
segments using existing sidewalks, and dirt trail from Durant Road north to Raven Ridge Road. Bridges
or boardwalks will be installed at stream and wetland crossings where needed on all segments. The
traditional paved greenway and boardwalk trail segments (south of Durant Rd) will be 10 feet wide and
require a temporary cleared construction corridor 25 feet wide along off -road segments. The dirt trail
and boardwalk segments north of Durant Rd will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and clearing -for construction will
not exceed 6 feet wide. This portion of the project is entirely off -road through woods.
The project includes construction of 12,400 feet of new "traditional' 10 -foot wide paved trail (Type 1),
mostly along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek between Newton Road and Durant Road; 7,900 feet of
"way finding" segments (Type 2) along existing or proposed sidewalks between Longstreet Drive and
Chatterson Drive; and 8,500 feet of dirt trail (Type 3) following Honeycutt Creek from Durant Road to
Raven Ridge Road. Clearing, construction, and restoration methods vary based upon the type of
greenway trail, and are described in detail on the PCN form.
Avoidance and Minimization
WSP carefully designed the project to avoid wetland, stream and buffer impacts wherever practicable.
The majority of the proposed 22 stream and 11 wetland crossings will use boardwalks or bridges, or

Mr. David Shaeffer and Ms. Karen Higgins
February 28, 2013
Page 3 of 10
existing sidewalks to avoid and minimize impacts. There are only three wetlands where permanent fill
or piping is needed (total = 0.0409 acre) and four stream segments that require a permanent culvert
and /or riprap (impacts ranging from 2.0 to 56 linear feet, total =162.5 ft). Mitigation was determined to
be required for 0.0409 acre of wetland impact and 103 linear feet of stream impact (see Compensatory
Mitigation discussion, below).
Existing development and steep slopes pose tight constraints along much of the stream -side corridor
segments, where riparian buffer impacts are unavoidable, especially from Newton Road to Honeycutt
Park. Between Newton Road and Clear Brook Road an existing cleared sewerline right -of -way will be
used for some segments, rather than clearing a new corridor through forested land farther from the
stream. Trail alignments in these areas were selected on a site -by -site basis, considering proximity of
the sewer to the streambank, streambank stability, riparian forest habitat quality, adjacent wetlands,
availability of land beyond the zone 1 buffer, connectivity with streets, schools and parks, and other site -
specific decision criteria.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. and Riparian Buffers
The proposed temporary and permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. are unavoidable given the nature
of the project and the location of these wetlands and streams in the project corridor. Previously
approved impacts to water of the U.S. have not changed and include the following:
Wetlands
• 0.0409 acre of permanent fill or pipe wetland impacts
• 0.0157 acre of permanent boardwalk wetland impacts
• 0.0486 acre of temporary wetland clearing impacts
Streams
• 102.5 linear feet of piping impacts
• 60 linear feet of riprap impacts
Open Waters
• 0.0037 acre of temporary impact
Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts
In addition to impacts to waters of the U.S., previously approved impacts to riparian buffers have not
changed and are as follows:
• 75,290 square feet of permanent impacts to Zone 1
• 15,705 square feet of temporary impacts to Zone 1

Mr. David Shaeffer and Ms. Karen Higgins
February 28, 2013
Page 4 of 10
• 83,702 square feet of permanent impacts to Zone 2
• 22,513 square feet of temporary impacts to Zone 2
Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation for impacts to waters of the U.S. was previously approved by the USACE and
NCDWQ and has been accomplished through the City's purchase of 103.00 stream credits and 0.0409
acre of wetland credits from EBX's Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank. Reference Attachment
F for the Affidavit of Credit Sale and the stream and wetland credit ledgers. Mitigation for buffer
impacts is not required.
[Note: the attached PCN forms identify in -lieu fee payment to North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program as the proposed method of compensatory mitigation. However, subsequent to the Revised
PCN submittal date of January 12, 2012, EBX's Neu -Con Bank was utilized].
Closing
Your prompt review and processing of this application would be greatly appreciated. The project has
been bid and awarded, and a notice to proceed of April 1, 2013 is anticipated. The construction schedule
is for 365 days. Your expeditious approval will allow the City to meet this critical schedule. Please
contact Brian Dehler at 919 - 678 -0035 with questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
WSP USA Cor .
4� �_
Brian Dehler, P.E.
Project Manager
Adam Karagosian, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: A— USACE and NCDWQ Approvals
B January 12, 2012 Revised PCN Package, including Agent Authorization letter
C — Revised PCN pages 7 and 9
D — Color Permit Drawings Figure 1 -12
E — Color Plan Sheets C7.2 — C7.5; C7.8 — C7.11; C7.14 — C7.15
F — Mitigation Bank Affidavit and Credit Ledger
cc: Lisa Potts

ATTACHMENT A
Previous USACE and NCDWQ Approvals

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Aon"'Opy
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2012 -00094 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -WAKE FOREST
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: City of Raleigh — Parks and Rec. Dept. Agent: WSP Sells Inc.
Attn: Vic Lebsock Attn: Ralph Troutman
Address: 333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 360 Address: 15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27601 Cary, NC, 27513
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.):. 5.5 -mile Honeycutt Creek Greenway Trail,
Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road - Latitude 35.901 Longitude - 78.627
Description of projects area and activity: Public greenway trail for pedestrians and bicycles.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) )
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: ,ULJ F 17
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated January 18, 2012 . Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or
ADpropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regar ' g this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Jamie Sh m t 919 -55 A 3
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 2/17/2012
Expiration Date of Ver ication: March 18, 2012 - Your activities within jurisdictional
areas must be completed by March 18, 2013. If not a new PCN application will need to be
submitted for us to verify the use of the 2012 NWPs.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http:// per2 .nwp.usace.armv.miUsurvev.html to complete the survey
online.
Copy Furnished:
Gerald Pottern
"' 1 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
.eigh, NC 27610

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A.'® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID =
Basis For Determination
The site exhibits wetland criteria as defined in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate Regional
Supplement. Streams exhibit a'def -coed be and bank and other indicators of an ordinary high water mark.
Remarks
Attention USDA Program Participants
is delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
_- entified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. Ifyou object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it ust be received at the above address by April 15, 2012
* *It is not necessary to submit A form to Div 'on ffice if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official:
a: 2/17/12 Expiration Date: 2/17/17

_. JT' IFICATION; OF- ,ADMINIS'TRATIVE,APPEAL'OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST °FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Vic Lebsock- COR Parks & Rec. Dept, File Number: SAW- 2012 -00094 Date: 2/17/12
Attached
is:Hone cuff Creek Greenway
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http: / /www.usace. army .miYinettfunctions /cw /ceewo /reg or
Corns regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
W

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
G APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
3rd.
rOINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: James Shern
CESAD -PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investi ation, and will have the OPDO rtuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Attn: James Shern
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
71ivision Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
?eal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

Special conditions:
Compensatory mitigation for this greenway's unavoidable permanent impacts, 103 feet of (piping) perennial or
intermittent streams and 0.0409 acre of (filling) jurisdictional wetlands, is required at a 1:1 ratio to ensure the
losses of aquatic habitats are not more than minimal. The City of Raleigh has proposed to use their contract
with EBX / EarthMark to purchase mitigation credits. Construction cannot commence until a receipt for
mitigation credits has been provided to the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office of the US Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attn: Jamie Shern or james.f [e-mail].

Action ID Number: SAW- 2012 -00094 County: Wake
Permittee: City of Raleigh Parks and Rec. Dept. - Vic Lebsock
5.5 -mile Honeycutt Creek Greenwav Trail, Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road
Date Permit Issued: 2/17/2012
Project Manager: James Shern
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attn: James Shern
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
9ccordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

AN4,I.K�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, PE Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 24, 2012
Vic Lebsock
Raleigh Parks & Recreation Department
333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27601
DWQ Project # 11 -0364
Wake County
Subject Property: Honeycutt Creek Geeenway Trail, Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road
Honeycutt Creek [030401, 27 -20 -1, WS -IV; NSW]
Mine Creek [030402,27-33-14, C; NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill or otherwise
impact 0.0486 acre of 404 wetland (temporary clearing), 0.0566 acre of 404 wetland (permanent impacts), 162.5
linear feet of stream channel (permanent impacts), 0.0037 acre of open water (temporary impacts), 75,290 square
feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (permanent impacts), 15,705 square feet of Zone 1
Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (temporary impacts), 83,702 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse River basin
protected riparian buffer (permanent impacts), and 22,513 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse basin protected riparian
buffer (temporary impacts) for a greenway project, as described in your application received by the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) on September 28, 201 l(dated September 28, 2011), and additional information received
December 14, 2011, January 13, 2012 (dated January 12, 2012), January 18, 2012, and February 21, 2012. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3820 (GC3820). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW14 when issued by
the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate
for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval
to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h).
Nkrially onehCarolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Page 2
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of
this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental and/or temporary impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved nits
Plan Location or Reference
404 Wetland
0.0486 acre temporary clearing impact
PCN
page 6 — revised January
12, 2012
404 Wetland
0.0566 acre ennanent impact
PCN
page 6 — revised January
12, 2012
Stream
162.5 linear feet permanent impact
PCN
page 7 — revised January
12, 2012
Open Water
0.0037 acre temporary impact
PCN
page 7 — revised January
12 2012
Buffers Zone 1
15,705 (square ft. temporary impact
PCN
page 8 — revised January
12, 2012
Buffers Zone 2
22,513 (square ft. temporary impact
PCN
page 8 — revised January
12, 2012
Buffers Zone 1
75,290 (square ft. permanent impact
PCN
page 8 — revised January
12, 2012
Buffers Zone 2
83,702 (square ft. permanent impact
PCN
page 8 — revised January
12, 2012
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect
surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all
construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased
borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior approval
from the Division. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in dis- equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream

Page 3
and down stream of the above structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed and
the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally
delegated program has released the project;
5. Diffuse flow
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected stream
buffers and will not re- concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B
.0233(5) or if this is not possible, it is necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to
remove nitrogen.
6. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or
similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer,
wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15 NCAC 2H, Section
.0500.
7. Notification of Project Commencement
Please notify Lauren Witherspoon at (919) 791 -4251 or [e-mail] of the proposed
start date of the project.
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of
completion to the Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (WeBSCaPe), North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the
404 or CAMA Permit.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is
considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The
Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:OOam and
S:OOpm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed- provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center

Page 4
Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714
Telephone: (919)- 431 -3000, Facsimile: (919)- 431 -3100
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Unless such a petition is filed, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse River basin riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any
questions, please telephone Lauren Witherspoon, at 919 - 791 -4251.
incerel ,
Danny Smi
Surface Water Protection Section Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Enclosures: GC 3820
Certificate of Completion
cc: DWQ Central Office — WeBSCaPe Unit —1650 Mail Service Center
RRO File Copy
Jamie Shern — USACE Raleigh Field Office
Ralph Troutman — WSP Sells, Inc., 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100, Cary, NC 27513
Filename: 11-0364—Honeycutt Creek Greenway 401 NBR Approval

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
Water Quality Certification Number 3820 Is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401, Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 213
.0200 for the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas
that are not a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the
United States (as described to 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (8) (14) of the Corps of Engineers
regulations (Nationwide Permit No. 14 and Regional General Permit 198200031) and for the
Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 213 .0200.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Any proposed fill or modification of wetlands and/or waters, Including streams, under this General
Certification requires application to, and written approval from the Division of Water Quality (the
"Division ") except for the single family lot exemption described below.
Application and written approval Is not required for construction of a driveway to a single family lot
as long as the driveway involves less than 25 feet of temporary and/or permanent stream channel
Impacts, including any in- stream stabilization needed for the crossing. This activity must meet all
of the Conditions of Certification listed below. If any of these Conditions cannot be met, or if the
activity is associated with or in response to a Notice of Violation from the Division of
Water Quality or the NC Division of Land Resources, then written approval from the
Division is required.
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143- 215.3D(e), written approval for a
401 Water Quality General Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a project also
requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted and will be the higher
of the two fees.
Conditions of Certification:
1. No Impacts Beyond those Authorized in the Written Approval or Beyond the Threshold for
Use of this Certification
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts authorized in the written approval or beyond the
thresholds for use of this Certification, including incidental impacts. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control
Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
2. Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices:
Water Quality Certification No. 3820 I

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
a. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the
most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The
devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil)
projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
c. Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the
Mining Act of 1971.
d. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control measures
and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times, except for publicly
funded linear transportation projects when materials can be accessed offsite in a timely
manner.
e. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas
(PNA's), Trout (Tr), SA, WS -I, WS -II, High Quality (HQW), or Outstanding Resource
(ORIN) waters, then the sediment and erosion control requirements contained within
Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 04B .0124) supercede all other
sediment and erosion control requirements.
3. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or waters outside
of the permitted impact areas without prior approval by the Division. if placement of sediment
and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, design and placement of
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis- equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down
stream of the above structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed
and the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.
4. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program,
an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCG010000) administered by the Division Is
automatically issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged
during land disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your
project is covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan,
self- monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this
permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su /Forms Documents.htm.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) shall be required to be in full
compliance with the conditions related to construction activities within the most recent version
of their individual NPDES (NCS000250) stormwater permit.
Water Quality Certification No. 3820 2

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
5. Work in the Dry
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved
best management practices from the most current version of the NC Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual, or the NC DOT Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as
sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, and other diversion structures shall be used to minimize
excavation in flowing water. Exceptions to this condition require submittal to, and approval
by, the Division of Water Quality.
6. Construction Moratoriums and Coordination
If activities must occur during periods of high biological activity (Le. sea turtle or bird nesting),
then biological monitoring may be required at the request of other state or federal agencies
and coordinated with these activities. This condition can be waived through written
concurrence on a case -by -case basis upon reasonable justification.
All moratoriums on construction activities established by the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (WRC); US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), NC Division of Marine Fisheries
(DMF), or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to lessen impacts on trout, anadromous
fish, larval /post - larval fishes and crustaceans, or other aquatic species of concern shall be
implemented. This condition can be waived through written concurrence on a case -by -case
basis upon reasonable justification.
Work within the twenty -five (25) designated trout counties or identified state or federal
endangered or threatened species habitat shall be coordinated with the appropriate WRC,
USFWS, NMFS, and /or DMF personnel.
7. Riparian Area Protection (Buffer) Rules
Activities located in the protected 50 -foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands
or not), within the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman, and Jordan (or any other basin
with buffer rules), shall be limited to °uses° identified within and constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2B .0233, .0259, .0250, .0243, and .0267, and shall be located, designed,
constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water quality to the
maximum extent practicable through the use of best management practices. All buffer rule
requirements, Including diffuse flow requirements, must be met.
8. Water Supply Watershed Buffers
The 100 -foot wide vegetative buffer (high - density development) or the 30 -foot wide
vegetative buffer (low density development) shall be maintained adjacent to all perennial
waters except for allowances as provided in the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules
[15A NCAC 2B.0212 through .0215].
9. If concrete is used during the construction, then a dry work area should be maintained to
prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently
contacts uncured concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for
elevated pH and possible aquatic life /fish kills.
10. Compensatory Mitigation
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h), compensatory mitigation may be required for
losses of 150 linear feet or more of streams (intermittent and perennial) and/or one (1) acre
or more of wetlands. For linear, public transportation projects, impacts equal to or exceeding
150 linear feet per stream may require mitigation.
Water Quality Certification No. 3820 3

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
Buffer mitigation may be required for any project with Buffer Rules in effect at the time of
application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as "Allowable with Mitigation"
within the Buffer Rules or require a variance under the Buffer Rules.
A determination of buffer, wetland and stream mitigation requirements shall be made by the
Division for any application to use this Certification. Design and monitoring protocols shall
follow the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(April 2003), or its subsequent updates. Compensatory mitigation plans shall be submitted
for written Division approval as required in those protocols. Alternatively, the Division will
accept payment into an in -lieu fee program or credit purchase from a mitigation bank.
Finally, the mitigation plan must be Implemented and/or constructed before any permanent
building or structure on site Is occupied. In the case of public road projects, the mitigation
plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the public whenever practical or at
the earliest reasonable time during the construction of the project. Proof of payment to an in-
lieu fee program or mitigation bank must be provided to the Division to satisfy this
requirement.
11. For all activities requiring re- alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be included
for written Division approval. Relocated stream designs should include the same dimensions,
patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a stable reference reach if the existing
channel is unstable), to the maximum extent practical. The new channel should be
constructed In the dry and water shall not be turned into the new channel until the banks are
stabilized. Vegetation used for permanent bank stabilization shall be limited to native woody
species, and should include establishment of a 30 -foot wide wooded and an adjacent 20 -foot
wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated channel to the maximum extent
practical. A transitional phase Incorporating appropriate erosion control matting materials
and seedling establishment is allowable. Rip -rap, A- Jacks, concrete, gabions or other hard
structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the stream,
however, the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip -rap coverage. Please note that if the stream relocation Is
conducted as a stream restoration as defined in the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington
District, April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines, the restored length can be used as
compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation.
12. Stormwater Management Plan Requirements
A. Linear public transportation projects will be required to treat stormwater runoff to
the Maximum Extent Practicable In accordance with the practices described In the
NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual.
B. All other projects shall comply with the requirements set forth below. In addition,
the applicants shall follow the procedures explained in the version of Protocol for
Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) Approval and Implementation that is In place
on the date of the submittal of the SMP.
i. Project Density: Projects with SMPs that require 401 Oversight/ Express Unit
approval shall be classified as either Low or High Density according to the
criteria described below.
a. Low Density: A development shall be considered Low Density if ALL of
the following criteria are shown to have been met.
1. The overall site plan, excluding ponds, lakes, rivers (as specified in
North Carolina's Schedule of Classifications) and saltwater wetlands
Water Quality Certification No. 3820

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
(SWL), must contain less than 24% impervious surface area
considering both current and future development.
2. All stormwater from the entire site must be transported primarily via
vegetated conveyances designed in accordance with the most recent
version of the NC DWQ Stormwater BMP Manual.
3. The project must not include a stormwater collection system (such as
piped conveyances) as defined in 15A NCAC 2B.0202(60).
4. if a portion of project has a density equal to or greater than 24 %,
then the higher density area must be located in an upland area and
away from surface waters and drainageways to the maximum extent
practicable.
b. High Density: Projects that do not meet all of the Low Density criteria
described above are considered to be High Density, requiring the
Installation of appropriate BMPs as described below.
1. All stormwater runoff from the site must be treated by BMPs that are
designed, at a minimum, to remove 85 percent of Total Suspended
Solids (TSS).
2. Projects located in watersheds that drain directly to waters
containing the following supplemental classifications shall meet
these additional requirements:
Water Quality
Supplemental
Stormwater BMP Requirement
Classitrcation
§303(d)
Project - specific conditions may be added
by the Division to target the cause of the
water quality Impairment.
NSW
A minimum of 30 percent total
phosphorus and 30 percent total nitrogen
removal, or other applicable nutrient
reduction goal for the watershed as
coded in thel5A NCAC 2B .0200 rules.
Trout (Tr)
A minimum of 30 percent total
phosphorus and 30 percent total nitrogen
removal; BMPs should also be designed
to minimize thermal pollution.
3. All BMPs must be designed in accordance with the version of the NC
Division of Water Quality Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual that is in place on the date of the submittal of the SMP. Use
of stormwater BMPs other than those listed in the Manual may be
approved on a case -by -case basis if the applicant can demonstrate
that these BMPs provide equivalent or higher pollutant removal and
water quality protection.
Vegetated Setback: In areas that are not subject to a state Riparian Area
Protection Rule, a 30 -foot wide vegetated setback must be maintained
adjacent to streams, rivers and tidal waters as specified below.
a. The width of the setback shall be measured horizontally from:
Water Quality Certification No. 3820

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
I. The normal pool elevation of impounded structures,
2. The streambank of streams and rivers, and
3. The mean high waterline of tidal waters, perpendicular to shoreline.
The vegetated setback may be cleared or graded, but must be planted with
and maintained in grass or other appropriate plant cover.
The DWQ may, on a case -by -case basis, grant a minor variance from the
vegetated setback requirements pursuant to the procedures set forth in
15A NCAC 02B .0233(9)(b).
d. Vegetated setbacks and filters required by state rules or local governments
may be met concurrently with this requirement and may contain coastal,
Isolated or 404 jurisdictional wetlands.
iii. Stormwater Flowing to Streams and Wetlands: Stormwater conveyances
that discharge to streams and wetlands must discharge at a non - erosive
velocity prior to entering the stream or wetland during the peak flow from the
ten -year storm.
iv. Projects Below Written Authorization Thresholds: Projects that are below
written authorization thresholds must comply with the version of Protocol for
Stormwater Management Plan {SMP} Review and Approval that is in place on
the date of the certification for the project.
Phased Projects: The DWQ will allow SMPs to be phased on a case -by -case
basis, with a final SMP required for the current phase and a conceptual SMP
for the future phase(s). If the current phase meets the Low Density criteria, but
future phase(s) do not meet the Low Density criteria, then the entire project
shall be considered to be High Density.
13. If this Water Quality Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the
applicant must be buildable without additional fill. For road construction purposes, this
General Water Quality Certification shall only be utilized from natural high ground to natural
high ground.
14. Placement of Culverts and Other Structures in Waters and Wetlands
The application must include construction plans with cross - sectional details In order to
Indicate that the current stability of the stream will be maintained or enhanced (i.e., not result
In head cuts).
Culverts required for this project shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows.
Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal
profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Placement of culverts
and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the elevation of
the stream bed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48 inches,
to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life unless otherwise justified and approved by
the Division
Water Quality Certification No. 3820

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions. Additionally, when
roadways, causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA- designated
floodways or wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain
the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may
result in destabilization of streams or wetlands.
Any rip rap required for normal pipe burial and stabilization shall be buried such that the
original stream elevation is restored and maintained.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip -rap or other bank hardening
methods.
15. Additional site- specific conditions may be added to the written approval in order to ensure
compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent standards.
16. If an environmental document Is required under the National or State Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA or SEPA), then this General Certification is not valid until a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse.
17. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland,
water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place at the time of recording of
the property, or of Individual lots, whichever is appropriate. A sample deed notification can
be downloaded from the 401Metlands Unit web site at
http:// portal.ncdenr.ora /webtwo /swp/ws /401 /Certsandpermits /apply /forms
The text of the sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to a specific
project.
18. Certificate of Completion
When written authorization is required for use of this certification, upon completion of all
permitted impacts included within the approval and any subsequent modifications, the
applicant shall be required to return the certificate of completion attached to the approval.
One copy of the certificate shall be sent to the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh at 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
19. This General Certification shall expire three (3) years from the date of issuance of the written
approval from the Division or on the same day as the expiration date of the corresponding
Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Permit 198200031. In accordance with General
Statute 136 - 44.76, certifications issued to the NCDOT shall expire only upon expiration of the
federal 404 Permit. The conditions in effect on the date of issuance of Certification for a
specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project, regardless of the expiration
date of this Certification. If the construction process for approved activities will overlap the
expiration and renewal date of the corresponding 404 Permit and the Corps allows for
continued use of the 404 Permit, then the General Certification shall also remain in effect
without requiring re- application and re- approval to use this Certification for the specific
impacts already approved.
20. The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of
State and Federal Law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being
met, Including failure to sustain a designated or achieved use, or that State or Federal law is
Water Quality Certification No. 3820 7

Water Quality Certification No. 3820
being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, then the
Division may reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
Non - compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project may
result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity , if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality Including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: April 6, 2010
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
k s
Director
History Note: Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3820 issued April 6, 2010 replaces
WQC Number 3704 issued November 1, 2007, WQC Number 3627 issued March 2007, WQC
Number 3404 issued March 2003, WQC Number 3375 issued March 18, 2002, WQC Number
3289 Issued June 1, 2000, WQC Number 3103 issued on February 11, 1997, WQC Number 2732
Issued May 1, 1992, WQC Number 2666 Issued January 21, 1992, and WQC Number 2177
issued November 5, 1987. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re- authorizes
Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Permit 198200031 or when deemed appropriate by
the Director of the Division of Water Quality.
Water Quality Certification No. 3820

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
FRA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, PE
Director
County:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 40I/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division
of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant,
the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certif Callon
I, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
Intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I, ' hereby state that to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Cert fed Professional
1, . as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer, Landscape
Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time)
the construction of the project, for the Permitee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature:
Date
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Location: 512 N Salisbury St Floor 9 Raleigh North Carolina 276041170
Phone. [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwatefquagty.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 A(finnative Actlon Employer
Registration No.
te Ca rolina urallr�

ATTACHMENT B
Revised PCN Package, including Agent Authorization letter, submitted January 12, 2012

f0j9WSP 13 SELL)
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
T: 919.678.0035
F: 919.678.0206
MMw wsaselis.com
TO: ACE Raleigh Regulatory Office
u
erl a a nve ge
e
a e
ores ,
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE January 12, 1012
PROPOSAL NO.
JOB NO. 07 -4029
ATTN: Jamie Sherri
RE: Pre- Construction Notification
Honeycutt Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
WE ARE SENDING YOU Q Attached Via FedEx ing items:
8 Via Mail Samples E] Specifications
Prints [] Plans ❑
Shop Drawings Change Order
Copy of Letter g
Photographs Control Photographs ❑ Contact Prints
Diapositives x See Below
ation
COPIES DATE NO.
1 1112/12 Pre - Construction Notific
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED a
x For approval
For your use
As requested
For review and comment
Control survey required
S below remarks
❑ Manuscripts E] Diskettes
DESCRIPTION
checked below:
Approved as submitted Resubmit
Approved as noted Submit
Return for corrections Return
For your records
Analytical aerial triangulation required
For review and comment
,
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
. ee
20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑
FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
COPY TO: Lisa Potts, City of Raleigh
Gerald Pottern, RJGA
SIGNED: Ralph Troutman, RE

PRE - CONSTRUCTION
NOTIFICATION
HONEYCUTT CREEK GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Applicant: City of Raleigh
Prepared Sy: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, N.C: 27610
Revised PCM: January 12, 2012

Table of Contents
A. Title Page & Table of Contents
B. PCN Form, signed by agent
Agent Authorization Letter & Property Owners Table
C. 9
D. Project Vicinity Map, USGS Topo and USDA Soil Maps
E. Table 1. Potential Stream and Wetland Crossings
F. Table 2. Buffer Impacts by Zone & Temp or Perm
G. g
Figures 1 -12. Buffer, Stream and Wetland Impact Maps
H. Figure 13- 20. Wetland Impacts Close -Up Maps
I. Boardwalk Plans: 10 -ft Traditional Paved and 6 -ft Unpaved
J. Unavoidable Buffer Impacts Discussion
K. US -FW S Protected Species Response Letter, 02 Feb 2011
L. SHPO
Cultural Resources Response Letter, 11 April 2011
M. FEMA CLOMR Approval Letter, 09 Sept 2011
N. ACE Wetland Data Forms
O. DWQ Stream Data Forms
14

Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form — version 1.3 - Dec 2008
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
® Section
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all tha
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
n 401 Water Quality Certification — Express
le. Is this notification solely for the record
For the rep
Certificatic
because written approval Is not required?
El Ye
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program
of impacts? if so, attach the acceptance letter from mit
fee program. (EEP coordination is pending)
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal cou.
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Envirorn
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Honeycutt Creek Grey
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
NA
project no:
3. owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Raleigh, US -,
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
See attached list of pi
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
or General Permit (GP) number:
t ® Yes (J.Shem) ❑ No
t apply):
Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
® Riparian Buffer Authorization
*rd only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
n:
S ® No ❑ Yes ® No
proposed for mitigation ® Yes ❑ No
gation bank or in -lieu
sties. If yes, answer 1 h I ❑ Yes ® No
nental Concern (AEC)? I ❑ Yes ® No
.nway Trail, Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road
\CE, and greenway easements on many private properties.
operty owners and PIN numbers * **
1

A. Applicant information (if different from owner)
�] Agent ®Other, specify: City
4a. Applicant is:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Ag
ent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
Mr. Vic Lebsock
Raleigh Parks & Recreation Department,
Design Development Division
333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27601
919- 996 -4786
919 - 807 -5125
victor. [e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. property Identification
1a. Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): -
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c River basin:
Parks & Recreation
See Attached List of Properties and PIN Numbers * **
South End: Latitude: 35.8742 Longitude: -78.6475
North End: Latitude: 35.9285 Longitude: - 78.6060
Trail length = 28,800 ft x 25' ave.corridor =16.5 acres
Honeycutt Creek (trib to Falls Lake) and Mine Creek (trib to
Crabtree Creek)
Honeycutt Cr = W S 1V NSW; Mine Cr = C -NSW
Neuse River 03-04-01 (Honeycutt Cr) & 03 -04 -02 (Kline Cr)
3. Project Description lication:
3a. Describe existing conditions on the site and general land use in the project
m northern Raleigh northeastward to
The proposed 5.5 mile greenway trail extends from Longstreet a Mine Cr from ix Forks
Dr to Strickland Rd) contains a mix of
Raven Ridge Rd in Wake County. The southern half (following
residential development and and
density residential and commercial development, wi Ra �n�� mostly low density bong the creek. Falls inorthern
low ( high tY
half (following Honeycutt Cr from Strickland Rd to Raven Ridg
with generally wider forested buffers along most of the creek. The northernmost mile is on US ACE
forest laic,
property which is managed as p ublic game land.
2
Ralph Troutman
5a.
Name:
5b.
Business name
WSP Sells, Inc.
(if applicable):
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
5c.
Street address:
Cary, NC 27513
5d.
City, state, zip:
919 - 678 -0035
5e.
Telephone no.:
919 - 678 -0206
5f.
Fax no.:
ralph.troutman(awspsells.com
5g.
Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. property Identification
1a. Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): -
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c River basin:
Parks & Recreation
See Attached List of Properties and PIN Numbers * **
South End: Latitude: 35.8742 Longitude: -78.6475
North End: Latitude: 35.9285 Longitude: - 78.6060
Trail length = 28,800 ft x 25' ave.corridor =16.5 acres
Honeycutt Creek (trib to Falls Lake) and Mine Creek (trib to
Crabtree Creek)
Honeycutt Cr = W S 1V NSW; Mine Cr = C -NSW
Neuse River 03-04-01 (Honeycutt Cr) & 03 -04 -02 (Kline Cr)
3. Project Description lication:
3a. Describe existing conditions on the site and general land use in the project
m northern Raleigh northeastward to
The proposed 5.5 mile greenway trail extends from Longstreet a Mine Cr from ix Forks
Dr to Strickland Rd) contains a mix of
Raven Ridge Rd in Wake County. The southern half (following
residential development and and
density residential and commercial development, wi Ra �n�� mostly low density bong the creek. Falls inorthern
low ( high tY
half (following Honeycutt Cr from Strickland Rd to Raven Ridg
with generally wider forested buffers along most of the creek. The northernmost mile is on US ACE
forest laic,
property which is managed as p ublic game land.
2

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.10 acre) of wetlands exist within the proposed construction corridor, which is generally 25 feet wide from
Newton Rd north to Durant Rd (paved trail) and 6 feet wide from Durant Rd north to Raven erennial) on the trail). property:
3c. List the total as linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent is p were determined to be perennial or
The Honeycutt Greenway project corridor crosses e0 drama l features, mwater channels. Of the 24 perennial or intermittent streams
intermittent streams and 16 were determined to be P no new construction) and two are in areas where construction
in the project corridor, three have existing sidewalk crossings ( 19 erennial or intermittent stream segments that cross the
will affect stream buffers but not the stream channel• of approximately m mina 19 p renni ear feet of streams•
greenway construction corridor have a combined length
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is a public greenway trail for pedestrians and b 1 be paved from Longstreet DMine north to Durant Rd including
The to
the Falls Lake Trail at Raven Ridge Rd. The 5.5 mile trail P
dge Rd. Bridges or
"wayf nding" segments using existing sidewalks, and dirt trail from Durant Rd north to Raven Ri
cleared construction corridor
boardwalks will be installed at stream and wetland crossings
ill be 10 feet wide and require a temporary traditional pave greenway
and boardwalk trail segments (south of Durant R) ents north of Durant Rd will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and
25 feet wide along off -road segments. The dirt trail and boardwalk of the roject is entirel Y off -road through woods,
clearing for construction will not exceed 6 feet wide. This
P
r�or Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
400 feet of new "traditional" 10 -foot wide paved trail (Type 1), mostly along Mine
The project includes construction of Newton ' ents e 2 along existing
e 3 following
Creek and Honeycutt Creek between cct Dri a and Durant erson Drive; and 8,500 feet of dirt trail (Type
proposed sidewalks between Long construction, and restoration in
vary based upon the
Honeycutt Creek from Durant Road to Raven Ridge Rd. Clearing,
type of greenway trail, as described below. es at stream and
• Type 1 "traditional" greenway trails are mostly paved surfaces, interspersed with boardwalk and bridges
Type I greenways extend
wetland crossings. Paved surfaces are 10 feet wide withH.1V or flatter as either
recommendd by DWQaTyP gegre d boardwal ek
surfaces will also be 10 feet wide. Side-slopes will be 3 Honeycutt Park trail, and from Clear Cre ek
from Newton Road to Clear Brook Drive, from Chatterson Drive to the existing Y
Farm Drive (entrance to Honeycutt Park) to Durant Road.
Type 2 "wayfinding" greenway trail segments use existing sidewalk, except along Strickland Road where an existing 5-
dm greenway segments are those along Longstreet Drive, Six e Tour
foot wide sidewalk will be widened to 10 feet. Wayfin g gT Cedar Trail, Strickland Road, and Carriage Road, Newton Road, Clear Brook Drive, Mourning Dove Road, Running with minimal construction.
Lane to Chatterson Drive. These segments mainly require signage and pavement markings,
• Type 3 "natural trail" greenways are soil surfaced trails where ground disturbance is minor, except for bridges or
all of which is forested. This type of trail was selected in consultation
boardwalks at stream and wetland crossings and steep nearilopes. Type 3 trail will extend from the comer of Durant Road an
Honeycutt Road northward to Raven Ridge Road, Y public elands.
with US -ACE and NC -WRC staff to minimize user conflicts on the US -ACE p gam
on the a of trail. For Type 1 paved and boardwalk
Corridor Clearing: Clearing for greenway trails will vary depending up type tree an
greenways, the trail alignment and construction access has been selected to avandan abud ffmertnimize mplearing will be performed
wetlands; and to provide as much separation as possible from streams and rip
by mechanical equipment. The cleared corridor will be generally 25 feet wide to allow to feet t thoseettrees of scheduled for
temporary equipment access. Tree protection fencing will be installed prior to clearing P s removed where
trees will be cut down first and then the s and Tree removal will be
removal. Because of the narrow construction corridor, working in
necessary in uplands. In wetland areas, trees will he end of
ach work dayto cover the area cleared that day. By g
scheduled such that silt fence can be installed by to
short segments and installing silt fence daily, impacts to streams and wetlands will be minimized. As an added measure le
protect wetlands, the contractor will be required to use mats des of all streams. crossing we Silt and areas. oNo comb'nation silt feence/tree clearing
equipment is planned, as the contractor has access to both
protection fence will be placed between the work area anndN adjacent arr Brook Drive will occupy an existing City-
stream and wetland area. Much of the greenway betty xi tin and/or steep slopes
maintained sanitary sewer right -of- -way built prio7eNee Buffer Rules.
impacts to the remaining forest between the sewer
preclude shifting the trail farther beyond the buff project design. corridor and stream bank (Mine Creek) have been minimized in P ro J
3

wire clearing including one block of
Clearing for Type 2 wayfinding greenways will be minimal. Several short sections re Cedar Trail to Carriage Tour Lane. This
Running Cedar Trail adjacent to Strickland Road and Strickland Road from Running feet
line between East Fork Mine Creek and Honeyccutt buffers nor stream landsareas Still erosion control
ontrol
area sets on theridge
away,and thus clearing for sidewalk in this area will impact neither
measures will be employed to contain any sediment within the cOnstruction limits.
Type, 3 dirt trail greenways will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and limited to trees less than ent other than chain saws will be
Clearing for Typ ed to avoid larger trees. No mechanical equipment
m both wetlands and uplands)
alignment was selected in the field and survey s left in the ground
used for clearing these trails. Trees will be cut at ground level and stump t at stream/wetland will be lean crossings
remnants will be left in the woods beyond the trail
for 1 excavation is propotsed except at will be cleared away own
and the cut
to the mineral soil surface, to define the otrail eloa construction are necessary.
where concrete foundations for bridge the contractor will
Following corridor clearing and staking
for e 1 greenway instruction,
Constructing the Greenway: walls where specified. Underground utilities will be reinforced to support
begin rough grading and building retaining trucks, and sheep's foot type
hydraulic excavators, front end loaders, dump
elevation, storm drainage pipe with outlet protection
additional loads where needed. Small bull dozers, grade approaches design e 1 trails will be installed during or just after
equipment will be used. As the greenway subgrad pp
measures will be installed. Bridge and boardwalk concrete foundations aloong ' the stream bed to maintain the natural
e. Where stream crossings use pipes, the pipes will es partly buried in
the subgrad dissipation downstream of pipes will be bedded on geotextile fabric.
gradient. Rip rap used for energy P segments.
dens along proposed asphalt surface trail halt.
t m b dump truck and spread by motor graders paving equipment will place the asp
Crushed stone will be brought ' Y action, then
Vibratory compactors will compact the stone base to the required comp
e the subgrade to design
face is sued, the 2 -ft wide shoulders and slopes will be dressed and seeded. Side - slopes will be 3H:1V or flatter
once the surfs P proposed, the contractor will grad
as recommended by DWQ• Where concrete trail surfacee _ forc, steel, and then pour concrete. Because of the remoteness
elevation, construct forms to contain the concrete, place
ort the concrete from the delivery truck to each
to the concrete greenway from public roads, the contractor will need ent transp
point of use using a Bobcat or similar small, maneuverable equip
(Type 1 and 3 greenways), silt fence will be installed between the work area and the inured
At stream and wetland crossings or support the bridge. The remaining
will be excavated for bridge or boardwalk foundations
11 be formed and poured to s pp a concrete foundations P larger stream
Soil wt
Bridge bent piles will be installed, and concrete no bent
further ground disturbance' Prefabricated steel support bents. For the timber
bridge and boardwalk construction will require
crossings along Moe Creek) will be delivered by truck, off loaded and set upon the bridge foundations and handrail system-
will (Honeycutt Creek and smaller Mine Creek tributaries), r Support beams, installe
and, the contractor
boardwalk crossings (H elevation, install pp girders,
will cut timbers or helical anchors to the design
will collect all construction debris daily for disposal. dAl�ernoevent, and immediately after othe event.
The will be
The contractor immediately before a forecaste
regularly monitored at least weekly, performing as designed.
Remediation measures will be employed to keep the measures p
Restoration and of construction. Following fine
Maintenance: Restoration of the disturbed area will commence Eros on and sedimentation control m as e'
grading, all remaining disturbed areas will be stabilized by seeding an g s No fescue or other non - native loc
will remain in working order until disturbed areas have been stabilized with new gins 's and take measures to mitigate any
perennials will be seeded o wetland areas. City Parks staff will maintain the gr Y t -of -wa These trails will no
problems that may occur. The 2 -ft trail shoulder will be, kXptt f °f tre s, b sewer �mder of he s trails
erosion pro significant source of road run
corridor will be left to regenerate in natural forest (except m e at most of the stream wetlan
carry motor vehicle traffic (other than maintenance vehicles) and f Bridge r boardwalk crossings
pollutants, other than minor hydrocarbons from the asp
crossings will minimize impacts to flow, aquatic life passage, soil compaction and vegetation.
0

4a
4b.
4c.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: No, not by Raleigh Parks & Recreation. There may
have been previous wetland or stream determination project corridor,
utility projects or private development along the p j
but Parks & Rec has no information on any previous delineation or
permitting requests.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
n Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
0 Preliminary❑ Final No JD prior to PCN submittal
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
Name (if known): Gerald Pottern
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project Histo � Unknown
5a. Have permits o:ceyr:t:fica tions been btained f Yes ® No
this project (inc prior phas
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to °help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
M Yes ® No
6a. Is this a phased project?
If es explain. The Honeycutt and Mine Creek greenway is parts f independent utility. Greenway system, but this project and
6r y ,
the existing trails at each end - to which it connects -each have tY p

��I.Proposed Impacts Inventory
.Im pacts summary ect check all that apply):
I a. Which sections were completed below for your proj ( en Waters ❑ Pond Construction
®Wetlands
Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ® P
Wetland impacts I t this question for each wetland area impacted.
A.
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then comp e e 2d
2c.
Ze.
Type of jurisdiction
L1. 1
2a.
Wetland impact
2b
Type of impact
Type of wetland
YP
Forested
(Corps - 404,10
DWQ —non -404, other)
Area of impact
(acres)
number —
(if known)
Permanent (P) or
® Yes
0 Corps Sta 67 +00
0.0203 T
Tern ora
W -GA
Alluvial Hardwood
[] No
DWQ
W1 [:]POT
Land clearing
®Yes
® Corps Sta 67 +00
0,0161 P
W2 ®P ❑ T
W_t}A
Filled for Trail
Alluvial Hardwood
Alluvial Hardwood
❑ No
0 DWQ
® Corps Sta 68 +50
0.0060 T
W -GB
Alluvial Hardwood
®Yes
[] No'
❑ DWQ
W3 []POT
Land clearing
Oyes
® Corps Sta 68 +50
0.0203 T
W -GB
Alluvial Hardwood
No
❑ DWQ
W4 ® P ❑ T
Filled for Trail
2 -3' Ditch in
Yes
®Corps Sta 70 +70
0.0011 P
W5 ®P ❑ T
W -GC
Culvert
Alluvial Hardwood
Alluvial Hardwood
® No
DWQ
Corps Sta 166 +10
0.0019 T
W -GF
Hillside Seep
Hardwood
Yes
❑ No
DWQ
W6 []POT
Land clearing
Alluvial
Yes
s Sta 166 +10
® Corps
0.0008 P
W7 ®P ❑ T
W -GF
Boardwalk
Hillside Seep
Alluvial Hardwood
❑ No
11 DWQ
® Corps Sta 175 +30
0.0165 T
W -GP
Alluvial Hardwood
® Yes
No
DWQ
W8 ❑ P ®T
Land clearing
® Yes
® Corps Sta 175 +30
0.0087 P
W -GP
Alluvial Hardwood E] No
[] DWQ
W9 ® P ❑ T
Boardwalk
® Corps Sta 201 +70
0.0039 T
W10 ❑ POT
W_GQ
Land clearing
Alluvial Scrub
UnderPowerline
® No
❑ DWQ
® Corps Sta 201 +70
0.0034 P
W11 ®POT
W GQ
Wingwall+Riprap
Alluvial Scrub
UnderPowerline
No
E] DWQ
®Corps Sta 308 +90
0.0017 P
W -GN
® Yes
Alluvial Hardwood No
DWQ
W12 ®P ❑ T
Boardwalk
® Yes
Corps Sta 329 +70
® rp
0.0015 P
W -GM 15,20
Alluvial Hardwood No
❑ DWQ
W13 ®P ❑ T
Boardwalk
® Yes
® Corps Sta 331 +70
0,000 P
W -GM 6,102
Alluvial Hardwood E] No
DWQ
W14 ®P T
Boardwalk
0.1052 T +P
2g. Total wetland impacts:
o Clearing Wetland Impacts = 0.0486 acre; Permanent Fill or Pipe Wetland Impacts = 0.040 acre;
2h. Comments: Temp rM Cie
Impacts= 0.0157 acre. Total permanent impact = 0.0566 acre. >> See attached Table 1 for sequential
Permanent Boardwalk Wetland = channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor from south to north.
listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral
6

3: Stream Impacts
intermittent stream impacts (including
temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
If there are perennial or
question for all stream sites impacted.
3e
3f.
3g.
3a. 3b.
Type of impact
Stream impact TYP P
30'
Stream name
3d
Perennial
(PER) or
a of Jurisdiction
Type j
(Co rps: 404,10
Average
stream
Impact
length
(linear
number -
intermittent
DWQ: non-404)
width
(feet)
feet)
Permanent (P) or
(INT)?
Temporary (T)
Mi neCrtrib
E] Per ® Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
4.0
45.0
S -8 ® p ❑ T Culvert, Sta 67 +50
Alluvial Hardwood
Honeycutt Cr trib
® per Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
4.0
8.5
201 +70
S -26 ®P ❑ T KiPraP, Sta Alluvial Hardwood
Honeycutt Cr tdb Corps DWQ 5.0 56.0
S -28 ®P ❑ T
Culvert, Sta 238 +70 Alluvial Hardwood Per Int ® rP ❑
Honeycutt Cr trib ® per ❑ Int ® Corps ❑ DWQ 5.0 22'0
S -29 ® p ❑ T Culvert, Sta238 +70 Alluvial Hardwood
131.5 ft
31h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
31. Comments: Bridge or boardwalk crossings proposed on Perennial or Intermittent streams at S5, 15 5, S14, S22, 523, 524, S25a-
rosy
b, S3 1,S32, S33, 534, S39, 540. Foundations will e outside OHW c thus No stream
d impact tat crossi crossings in the project corridor.
Table 1 for sequential listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4d 4e
4a. 4b. C.
Open water Name of waterbody Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
d applicable)
Type of impact
impact number - C
Permanent (P) or
Tern ora Pond, Sta 172 +25 0.0037 T
01 []PST Bent Tree Pond Replace existing wooden bridge
02 ❑P ❑T :f!!�
03 ❑ P ❑ T 0.0037 acre
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Boardwalklbridge footings will be installed on uplands beyond normal pool in approximately the same location as the
existing bridge; no footings or other fill in waters. This impact is considered temporary •
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed tt
5a. 5b.
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
P1 NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
5d.
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream impacts (feet)
Flooded I Filled I Excavated Flooded I Filled I Excavated
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5e.
Upland
Flooded
7

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then
_,,. —ro mrttnation. then y(
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
6b. Buffer impact
# Permanent (P)
or Temporary m
B1 ❑PNT
B2 NP[]T
B30 POT
6c.
Reason for impact
Temporary Clearing
Permanent Trail
or Boardwalk
6d.
Stream name
the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
ill out Section D of this form. 0 other:
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico
El Catawba ❑ Randleman
6f. 6g'
6e. Zone 2 impact
Buffer mitigation Zone 1 impact feet)
required? (square feet) (square
neycutt Cr
® No 15,705 22,513
segments
ardwood
oneycutt Cr
ardwood
P
EFIyes
N No 75,290 83,702
ardwood
[]No
❑ No
B4 LJ t' 1J I
6h. Total buffer impacts 90,995 sq.ft 106,215 sq.ft
each with Temporary and Permanent impact
Riparian Buffer imip t mn b act in the project corridor from south
6i. Comments: * *There are 117 Zone 1 or Zone 2 Rip acts and
measurements. See attached Table 2 for sequential listin See also the attached Discussion of Unavoidable Imp
to north, by zone and temporary vs permanent impact.
Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment" for site - specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impac .
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
Avoidance ovov dance and Minimization project.
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing fanners and
eenwa
mapped all streams and wetlands along the project corridor and consulted with City gr y
RJG &A delineated and acts wherever practicable. Existing
design to avoid and minimize wetland, stream and buffer imp arian buffer impacts
W SP Sells engineers during se t constraints along much of the stream -side corridor l Brook where rip cleared
development and steep slopes pose tight clearing forested land farther from the
are unavoidable, especially from Newton Rd to Honeycutt Park. Between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Rd an existing
roximity of the sewer to the stream -bank,
sewerline right -of -way will beused for �°e e selected on ats t by s t basis, considering pu
stream. Trail alignments in these adjacent wetlands, availability of land beyond the zone 1 buffer, connectivity
stream -bank stability, riparian forest habitat quality, of the proposed 22 stream and 11 wetland majority
with streets, schools and parks, and other site-specific (Type 1 Traditional Greenways and Type 3 Natural Trails) or existing siddeweallkss (Type 2
crossings will use boardwalks or bri dges (Typ four areas where permanent fil piping ging from 8s to 56
Wayfinding Segments) to avoid and minimize impacts. There are only
needed (total = 0.0409 acre) and four stream segments that require a permanent culvert and/or riprap (impacts
engineer's determinations explanations of efforts o`mini umize Neuse Bufferimlpacmtspacts See also the
lin. ft., total =131.5 ft), based on the design gin
and Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment" for site-specific
Specifically ally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts th rough construction techniques.
1b. p clearing widths,
construction include minimize
Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers during P equipment and stocked materials on
using existing cleared lands and sewerline rights- of-way for access and staging areas, keeping
the off - stream
side of the construction corridors, and using modular or stick -built ion methods and sequeof vehicles needed in
remote forested areas. See also section B.3.e above for detailed discussion of cons

2. Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes No
Waters of the State?
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or
2b. H yes, mitigation's required by
check all that apply): ❑DWQ Corps
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
3. Complete to if Using a Mitigation Bank — NA
Name of Mitigation Bank:
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Paymentto In4leu Fee Program
Approval letter from in -lieu a
Stream mitigation requested:
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
(pending)
132 linear feet
warm ❑ cool
Buffer mitigation requested (DW4 only): 0,0409 acres
Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
�.Commenl:S:
I a permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan NA
[]cold
5. Complete if Us ng proposed mitigation plan.
ermittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the
If using a p g
S. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ s JO No
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Ye
buffer mitigation?
If yes, then n? the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required. rmnact Multipller 6e. Required mitigation
Zone
(square feet)
(square feet) _
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
ation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
If buffer mitigation Is required, discuss what typ e of mitigig into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment
Comments:
9

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. DIffUSB It riall
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Paved trail segments are only 10 ft wide, so runoff will be diffuse without
level spreaders or other special
diffusion ndevices. r Paved shoulder and bicycle use, so
l be
3HAV or flatter to prevent gullying. 1 ble.
pollutant runoff from trails should be negligible.
2a.
2b.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
ct require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
E] Yes ® No
NA
�] Yes ® No
Does this proje
See response lb. above
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: narrative description of the plan:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, edified Local Government
pc
pWQ Stormwater Program
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 0 DWQ 401 Unit
mt Stormwater Kewew
3 Cetfi cGvm Raleigh (south of I -540) and Wake
is project? County (north of I -540)
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is th
Phase II
® NSW
3b. Which of the following a locally-implemented stormwater management program ❑ USMP
apply (check all pp IQ Water Supply
Note: Both Mine Cr and Honeycutt Cr are NSW waters. Honeycutt Cr is also a Water � Other I Watershe
Supply Watershed
approval been ❑ Yes ® No
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with response lb. above
attached? NA —Not required for greenway trail. See resp
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review Coastal counties
HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply n Session Law 2006-246
(check all that apply). C] Other:
ved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Yes ❑ No
4b. Has the appro
attached?
5, DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review E] No
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ®Yes
Annette Lucas reviewed] ®Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? [
10

F. Supplementary Information
1, Environmental Documentation
DWQ Requirement)
project involve an expenditure of public (federaVstatellocal) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No
la. Does the pr
use of public (federallstate) land? preparation of an
"yes" to the above, does the project require prep ❑ Yes No
1 b. If you answered Y pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
environmental document
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
has the document review been finalized approval
E] Yes
❑ No
1c. If you answered "yes' to the above, of the NEPA review SEPA final app
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy
letter.) Comments: NA
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DW2HWeiland 00), DWG1 Surface Water o Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)? ❑ Yes ® No
2b. Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
dyes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
2c. If you Y
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
Will this pr( (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes No
3a. W P
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quay ative impact analysis in accordance with the
3b. If you answered
,yes" to the above, submit n ," provide a short narrative ve description.
most recent DWQ policy if you answered no, p tl raise property
Greenway trails provide recreational opportunities and may slightly e values, but do not induce urban developmen
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Req uirement) a or discharge) of wastewater generated from
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate ava table capacity of the subject facil ty. n NA (non-disc
the proposed project, or s Requirement)
s. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corp ® No
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑yes
habitat? ❑ No
you checked with USFWS concern ing Endangered Species Act impacts? ®Yes
Have
5b. Y ®Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville
our site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
assessment of expected impacts to USFWS on 14 Jan 2011 =o We is ,,notlikely to response
5d. What data sources did you use to deter
mine whether y cuff Greenway p J
Habitat? RJG &A submitted a biological p ce concurring with our opinion that the Honeycutt * **
from John Ellis at the Raleigh listed species. The FWS response letter is attached to the PCN
adversely t'
affec any federally P
11

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6 Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes
® No
a.
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat.
The project area is more than 100 miles from areas mapp
ed by NMFS or N
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal ® No
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation Yes
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)? or archeological resources?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic 011 is waiting a response from SHPO.
WSPSeIIs submitted a scoping letter to the State Historic Preservation Office on 24 Marc corridor between Newton
Given the degree of existing urban development and disturbance from roads and utilities along the project
Rd and Durant Rd, the insignificant nature of proposed trail impacts north of Durant Rd, and RJG&A's consultation of SHPO GIS
data, we do not expect any impacts to significant cultural resources, no recommendation USAGE and NCDWQ conduct a cultural resources
field survey. If the SHPO response letter indicates otherwise, we will promptly
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? 10 Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: flood-prone areas mapped by FEMA. including
Portions of the greenway corri dor along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek are in t affect subconsultant for
e Jul 30, 2010 report prepared by Alpha &Omega Group ( submitted Wake
several proposed stream crossings. The crossing of East Mine Creek does not affect published flood elevationsA No -Rise
Certification was submitted to the City of Raleigh s i y also prepared by Alpha & Omega Group, was
bridge design). A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR),
County and to FEMA in late 2010. FEMA issued a CLOMR Approve Letter on 09 Sept 2011, which is attached to this PCN..
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The source of flood plain determination was published the FEMA floodplain maps depicting East Mine Fork Creek and
Honeycutt Creek.
Ralph Troutman, P.E., /- l2 Z� /Z
WSP Sells, Inc.
pplicant/Ag nt's Signature
Applicant/Agenfs Printed Name (Agent's signature Is valid only if prov uthorization letter from the applicant is Date
12

March 2, 2011
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality Wetland / 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Authorized Agent for PCN Application
To Whom It May Concern,
orizes WSP Sells (consultant) to act as authorized entway in Wake of
This letter auth application for the Honeycutt Creek G
Raleigh in submitting a PCN
NC. This letter authorizes the Consultant tWater ActSect Section submit 404 /401 for
and
county, Clean
proposed project with the intent of securing Corp of Engineers and NC Division of
Riparian Buffer Authorization from the US Army
Water Quality.
ou have questions, please contact me -at 919- 996-4785 or via email at
Should y
Lisa. Potts @raleighnc.gov.
Sincerely,
Lisa Potts
Park and Greenway Planner
City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department
cc: Mr. Ralph Troutman, WSP Sells

Property owners and Wake County PIN Numbers along the Honeycutt Greenway Corridor

vlulm
-/8vtIDGE
t, .1
is
I
Is
Nil
i-
E3
To 811yl881
To Baoeaf i
I m i Ukl!
1 0 g rood 2.500 FTA
It O J6
-at
got
mlamst a° sip
L
Igull
and
O
►vait
It.
Fxihll N
Sit
rph%
MOD ell At
101wir-A -
ha mv.°r
f six
FORK tglh
Whrm
N --
. 61
OF
a,FUg °sP... �C i� r jfc, awmm°e ro 4
040
. - a . — . ..
m Es 41 A Oki!
A
A Irsoqu
!4
Said
2 PAVE
TRAI
ES�
ss I Goll
UK
wt Um
b to
(left 1—
r IN Honeycutt Greenway Project Vicinity
Map: Raleigh, Wake County NC.
"Rik

rj
ME
Ay
Is Oda
Ch
te
MOM
err
rGo
Honeycutt Greenway, Southern Section
il USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970

d'
450
•
1 �� - d'% •A �O• r q
All
IN,
Vi
e.
1
&I

|
|
5.
Oe
T.
Ns
MR
ef
AA
WV
ell pp.
VLL
Ila
IN 79
AIN
ML
In
Honeycutt Greenway, Middle Section
USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970 x Ai.11

:l
0
��b
1.
3
N
Honeycutt Greenway, Middle Section
USGS Topo Quadrangle: Bayleaf NC
�r
�y
Honeycutt Greenway, Middle Section
USGS Topo Quadrangle: Bayleaf NC

' , •elf, :l ;1; h 1,,� '�S. ?�t.,i.''µ!' 1n.r�7.
Est' .; : 't,. r cM, ,,,,ft�1°��\ �,� ``. -.x�: �'..•, , t. , � \ "�(yj.
`Y • i�•"� r; � rybr :c�11�:��i; r.'��Q; _ j , .•s 1: �r t, .•.�
✓,t�ti''_r•� r'i '�r(:�ty�1'S7,•i:,,,�,,,`yT,) eR,• +!'�f,'';•.Si.�'��'rei:'1,7 ,�,.
V� �• "'� G `?'�. i`;If 1�:i''''i•rt 'i�. ^,.�%� , �1'•.ts�:t\ . k „'• ,•i
�P 5�.�. �� , ' �'!t ` �;t, tti��� • ^�u�'• �i,.-' i� ii`i,•-li., \•� {t,�ol•' v j�, _ ,,tY r' � •, v'h \•ipQl
• t. 'i!� "i, !.;�7 r.N:,7 1` • ' T viii �' '' ,: L ' •' j'CJ vh �?�_,}� .
\/ vi � 'j�,l i'J�i \�r 1^a� }' t'f'� ,l'p�u:• �p�, 1 � ,{. 5. � -• j.. "• :�� �'(!Ti.J^2r -'r} ,'r �1,y ` cF
XX•ss .��ft. �•' � ,��. ,, }Q�.t(tyjY :,• i• n•:- ••' a r t• •'7r'f '''ri \• y� ���Zy. tt ��
�yyi• w'. •J.`to t..' •. � '■ •{. }� /{� �r�.t . J :, Y' {Y '••� y.` - . ,,, 1^ ,, . �'.. h ��. }e : }•• ' f :,.• \
li�lr•' i l7 y^:• CIF'+.�,•Z�'. •.}'S U: �7.. .�•4'.._ •�<..i;+ f ''Y•,••v.. Y, f ,�': ., 't ,'' r
"6%, J. ,t•-V •I J )� k' yivM Lii: , I j �' * : , a ' C'p
is s n T S4O .`
'�ttrT.D'(,L',• �t.'Stti »i•A"i• 1L ;l- l,':, ",fix : - , +, f�- titr �. ��,•!;'• 7'•
':`r�7' hf, 1 :s, Cn Tl��:�Flr 'S •,i^•.. ' j}' � 15 y {• `t }'':�iyi =+ �: t;5�'�, d:1,:�tNL �,K • 1
IF
?`�>�' ,lli' .r '.s �'. -•,��l t:�t�\ - _ t- t!i.'�:_ r. sr• � ,R � Y '` ^9:A�;`, *•' ..1
r..,F' G01 ' t" fj ,'' ` a�'t � ^l•` �. t,+ ` "- �' Qr�'! .t s` � ,� ' '�,' GIB
tt r S35
:,� 1. r •" �, 'J Zt r" ,1 ;tip
Y li.'' �,� QGti . p eG'1...��';'•ai�:•;v� � -• '`; ; ..`� ?t� ' ��� •�•, t; ; - yfi.'^; �r�;, , ,T'' � ' ” .y \t�
�J i`t �, `,I�•r•,•:.. �� �• ,' 11) ��' ',�7A�,�t�It•Yt��rrli.�,C�•�J}' ''� 'C' j' •'r-�• .r•,'• '' •ti
�j, `'`\!(tj`t""' {Jt` '�'S,�y.,•_• j s ^.li�',� /'`.ya � 1Z''.. � .. i fr•. , J ��t;r' :.J � ' � .
�, a Gam• xv yst` "'t'. G�3 �F - `:� ,. ;► t� . f �''- '} �t S34
Z to
CIP
07 yj
CP
>�,4 r, ' t{' y'^ • - eT41. � '.� L •'i•y- S33 y � � '. 'tit;.•.' i
.t• c`�" '•. aaJ ?i�,ttS�- .•+}eSYtif 1s •'y�,m•.�ed_•i�� : Vv�V ,• ~G2` ',':.'N •. }.,'r'•• -'`'
c� . + ;'t :j„�`�i" '',I' ' .(')Pi• ',1nb�t"�� �: ' J,� r ;�T'jy, _t +'" %4 I ,9 :.•1'" irr, J:.
..• i. }. .�i:d' �.� P�,'1i�y, w,��1!�' GeQ''l, ,�. :a �G.�; i �r •� ti,;
r .;;' A�:• � •`��r'.r'',';:,, ,yet• .'�• t 'h., :•r1�' < C,�• � G�
' =� x �� .. tit .a• •t s+�.:� `• iYR /S'/. r• .t,j 4� � ``'�..'., ` •: ��' '• S,gt'� '
}7 ,f�•S"•,i1t'�Wx!' ! !]' � 'k��i i�•',i � trE•: - , ^'if�.� ,t: 4f `r 33�•`.T•'' ,'`W
R
1( -7Y
r
tt �dr�itiyFs' � '�, . �y,� r • y'�.• T: , • / . !G��`,`,�,' I��,L ''' '; . \� �•,; . ` �'• tGo-YI• Y \\ . �Ct� i'• y"• �''�t�'.
�'Y`t. � e'�t :�n'� i `r ,f! t• ' , `� 3py � �a •rt. �' f�� -'� ` 1i '�` , •''t I,1. c � : t }� . ter-;', � ''+ r ti , �:i S••''_r``",�," 1;
-• t; •� >;c 7, <�v�l �:j'ir�`} I• , •.�, .r}!� •t� e. •� ; ''�A•. `: n' ,(e Y •.e ,, �•r „t i.l. y` :i•? • .i `�' v,1
' + _ � '1` '+- 6h.,. (� , t/ t4 ice.. dY•ier•�”- � ;!,
� '} �: t .% P } Pt '+�t� s. •::,..• • {.'4S"•?t�f;. - s,4.� "�.� �r,� :f (' •• %a1+a� `- '
• v: f • `a4`� 1'I�'.•G -' i' �' , ^� ,?' 3S�t... ! s•. `• �:,. y r, � , � a �• cfe'^ac i� . � ° .k +•', , ,. c t.r. -
• tS4Ya-1• i'� M f , • ��(-aY• , {�� -�"' 1: •,. �y7��. ±,t,' r �! : s t''ii^2'` i1�. \t' •,7:' ,. N,. . -1\ r ��, �, � . n+.., � •
' �i::• t.,'r•''`"7�'t!`^ tt ,� '4'`•<"• �A.t'`��„ ,"�i? ?tM�'{°..�,S,�ir .�`.'"�,_•v�,i••'S ��'7•lr� `i_` '0�'�• R`��••1 1•�''', '\'�,r
a' ; � ,7i+" • �: ' , �•. :S '� 7 1'Y -��. K•r:it''�r. },,G.i �• ! ~ t t ��7�ir'JS ,t�y^t:, �1;' x{. , •,t,, L � ', G• : {' �`'' •
' i• i • . 'L 1. �` .�5,_ \,• ,� s' �: ?' i . y , i f w 'rj• a" J �Pf
r..% ; -. A at i 3 , �, "i T.•N .•t i� ;e, ,t q, _ is -.a' ��O�C , Y �(. ,'•.s•, +..o�S�•Geti;:; 'r�'; \ • •s x',;•'1-3 • �;4, �'
• /•#;•• J•, is 3' � t�`,T ,• • ,bn� ,•^ • } y7t,/�1j� �t• t a, ' ..\,.i., ii •• , l:W, ' �. �I'T `, ^�Y'i',•
{ G \J , ' •1,`h,.��\ • �J .l�jl 4,•tt `•a i / �',?�,'i'�5•:: }� •, r• ,7 %r';?iS• t ,43 ��i: `i� y „� : `,•f;: .i/
rte• 11ti,!•j�id _,5i'i�Ay� V�L�.�' °` _ _ �y�'�4�r ', �':i,',n�i, ��r5�,, a;`- J•t•••���5�,�.`,;L b •yS}''•9 ,,• „i~, ;•Jt .[j�' •;w ;`t,:'� �,�:
1 `c�G .1i7•`�:�y :+A`������h�•1�"" r� '.�,�J�,>••+,7�'�sG. rtiii'��'''��.taly - �Y'1 )• ;"' ,l?';•ii'= t''r,�7,,�i `'`' •.;t �,wj!�f Q��,.'e' + ';`''.(,
- `' • � ' �i s•,Fr1r�< ±��� . r. •.,,•., ^�-,}ty�.t,,,.. , • ,.r 'l. i ,4d k �j'p,'t� ,'l'�,� Q.Q v."
• 'Ci Crlo- "�,�} ' h i. _ "`, 3� [ �1" � ' � • .:7 _ ♦ � • 4]J:' rL`r 's! . 1 S _
•F ���• , 1 • Y t''�•1'�• •i�''�,��e ti, til :
Al.
cutt Greenway, Hone Y Northern Section
`�, '`, 1i:y 1. .11R•t;,.` r;1�, . {J �� "}a•_ •�•••
" USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970 fir; - tt_ :�, G= .,t lw ;, ) •,
,`t' �•.� tyf;T,'r• `1§•�c`:i(y�� ��`�"`, t•ZrY:�� .r,�'.a '•�• j�;�!(` �t ' Ste_
\\ f \ _ _ .. - �., ..v erM,.. . f `:,i?ty�+.'itf•s �'•7iri'C•Cte`rt.it •t `r1 v`'{��:••.i ` "'�'t'ri�rA ?•�jr� fl "
,

R
'� 30
Ul `\
� + O
1�
YX

Streams and Wetlands in the Honeycutt Creek Greenwaq Project Corridor.
Table 1. Potential
Approx Decimal Soil or
Stream Neuse
paa� *r
ACE Jurisdic Stream ion Wetland Wetland impacts
P
Stream or
Wetland #
Station Lat +Lon Str P
ID: Score Buffer
or DWQ
Isolated ?
Numbr
Paved TYail - Longstreet Drive north to Strickland Road
Mine Creek
Watershed:
Dry swain;
New sidewalk on
S -1
15+60
35.8746 Soil
Eph: 3.5 No*
None
channel indistinct
Longstreet Dr
25 +60
78.6457
35.8769 Soil +Topo
Per: 52.0 Yes
ACE 404 -401 bedr5coban� d
Exist sidewalk on
Six Forks Rd
S -2
78.6457
35.8789 Soil +Topo
Per: 45.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401 15-20' stream;
Exist sidewalk on
Newton Rd
S -3
39+00
58 +30
78.6442
35.8807 Soil
Eph: 7.0 No*
None s pomrinwater rditch
Culvert 3-pipe, 18"
HDPE, 1 .2 ft
S-4
61 +50
78.6421
35.8815 Soil +Topo
Per: 47.0 Yes
ACE 404 -401 15- 20'stream;
sand, grav, cobl
Bridge, erm
g e � no P
stream impact
3_5
63+00
78.6421
35.8820 Soil +Topo
Per: 47.0 Yes
ACE 404-401 15- 20'stream;
cobl
Bridge, nopenn
stream impact
S_6
sand, grav,
78.6420
No
None 2' non - wetland
Avoid; No Impact
S -7
east of
35.8820 neither
Eph: 10.0
floodplain ditch
63 +50
78.6418
ACE 404 -401 bottomland
W1 tem 885 sq.%
P =
W. -GA
67+00
35.8829, - - --
____
----
hardwood forest
W2 perm = 701 sq.ft
flag 1 -12
78.641.5
Soil
Int: 24.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401 at weans
-pipe, 24"
FIDP +rock, 45 ft
S_8
67 +50
35.8830
d edge
78.6415
ACE 404 -401 bottomland
W3 temp - 261 sq.ft,
68 +50
35.8832 - - --
---- ._:.
hard forest
W4 perm =111• sq.ft
flag, 1 -16
to 70 +00
78.6413
•wood
2 -3'non- wetland
Culvert 4 -pipe, 16"
S -9
70 +50
35.8838 Soil +Topo Eph: 12.5 No
•None
floodplain ditch
l IDPE, 29.2 ft
78.6413
ACE 404 -401 2 -3' wetl ditch in
WS perm = 49 sq.ft
W_GC
70 +70
35.8839 -" ""
- - --
' " ""
bottomland HW
IIDPE Culvert, 15"
flag 1 -3
78.6413
2 -3' non - wetland
Culvert 1 -pipe, 48"
S -10
83 +40
35.8863 neither
Eph: 11.5 No
Bp
None
ditch / swale
HDPE, 32.7 ft
78.6387
No
None 2-Trion-wetland
i e 16"
Culvert 1 -p p ,
S -11
85 +80
35.8870 neither
Eph: 10.0
ditch / swale
HDPE, 21.6 ft
93 +20
78.6388
35.8884 Soil +Topo Per: 48.0 Yes
ACE 404-401 6 -12' stream; sand, Bridge, no perm
cobl, bedr stream impact
S-12
78.6376
T non -wetld swale
Boardwalk, no perm
S -13A
93 +80
35.8886 neither
Eph: 14.5 No
Ep :
None
stream impact
78.6375
No
None 2 -3' non -wetld
Culvert 1 -pipe, 24 »
S -13B
97 +25
35.8891 neither
Eph: 17.5
Swale
HDPE, 19.8 ft
78.6367
Per: 34.0 Yes
ACE 404 -401 5 -8' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
S-14
99 +50
35.8892 Soil
silt, cobl, bedr
stream impact
78.6359
er. Yes
ACE 404 -401 5-8's tream; sand, Exist sidewalk on
S -15
119+10
35.8910 Soil
silt, cobl, bedr
Mourning Dove
78.6361
29.0
No*
None No channel,
Exist sidewalk on
S -16
128 +70
35.8930 Soil
Eph: 0
buried/piped
Running Cedar
78.6362

Neuse
ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland Impacts
Stream
Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or DID: Score Buffer
Top
or DWQ Description
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon
Isolated ?
Numbr Stream
Strickland Road
north to Durant
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Paved Trail -
ACE 404 01 4 -6' stream; sand, No crossing, just
161 +50 35.8985 Soil Per: 39.5 Yes
cobl, bedr buffer impact
5 -20
to 168 78.6312
ACE 404 -401 forested 3' linear W6 temp = 84 sq.ft;
W7 perm = 36 sq.ft
W -GF 166 +10 35.898 -- --
78.6313
seep wetland
Avoid; No Impact
flag 1 -3 ___
""
ACE 404 -401 marsh ree Pondf
W_GG 167 to 35.8990 - --
flag 1 -15 168 +50 78.6308
ACE 404 -401 open water Pon d Replace bridge, no
impact
Yes
Soil
Bent Tree 172 +25 35.9000 +Topo Pond
above spillway perm water
just
Pond 78.6308
35.9003 Soil +Topo Int: 28.0 Yes
stream; bedr, No crossing,
ACE 404 -401 3 -5' buffer impact
cobl, sand
S -21 dust west of
spillway 174 +00 78.6305
Per: 42.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401 4 -6' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
stream impact
S-22 174 +50 35.9004 Soil +Topo
grav, cobl,
W8 temp = 720 sq.ft;
78.6305 _ - -_
DWQ isolated forested wetland
W9 Perm =380 sq.ft
Gp 175 +30 35.9005 ---- ----
flag 1 -7 78.6304
depression
ACE 404 -401 4 -6' stream; sand Boardwalk, no perm
176 +20 35.9008 Soil +Top o Per: 49.0 Yes
grav, cobl, stream impact
S-23
78.6310
_.
wetland
se p + a p�O Avoid; No Impact
ACE 404 -401
W -GH south of 35.9012 - °-
flag 1 -10 179 +50 78.6319
Per: 46.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401 6 -9' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
stream impact
5-24 180 +70 35.9016 Soil +Topo
gray, cobl,
78.6320
_
ACE 404 -401 forested wetland Avoid: No impact
W GJ flag west of 35.9017 -- ---
seep + depression
1-5,50-54 181 +50 78.6322
(Existing I -540 Greenway Tunnel = Sta 181 +86 to 190+00)
1 stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
190 +30 35.9023 Soil Int 22.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401 -2'
cobl stream impact
S-25A
78.6312
ACE 404 -401 5�- sand, Boardwalk, no perm
191 +35 35.9024 Soil +Topo Per: 45.5 Yes
'BaVS�bam;
stream impact
S-25B
78.6310
Per: 35.5 Yes ACE 404 -401 mar h be ow culvt cut out, Perm 8.5 ft
5-26 201 +70 35.9014 Soil
78.6288
b W10 temp =171 sq.ft
____ ACE 404 -401 adjacent to S-26 W l l perm =148 sq.ft
35.9014 ---- ----
W_GQ 201 +70
flag 1 -18 78.6288
•
ACE 404 -401 ma�rsl>/ scrub seep; Avoid: No impact
_ �_
W -GK flag north of 35.9010 - -- ""
1-12,20-24 209+00 78.6274
No
* None Dry Swale; No structure at
209+20 35.9010 Soil Eph: 0 channel indistinct crossing
S_27
78.6274 1- i e 48" RCP +
ACE 404 -401 3 -S stream; bedr, p p
Int:25.0 Yes rock, Perm = 56.0 ft
p
S-28 238 +70 35.9085 Soil +To o
sand, grav,
78.6210
Per: 40.0 Yes • ACE 404 -401 4 -5' stream; sand,
1 -pipe 48" RCP ±
rock, Perm = 22.0 ft
S-29 251 +70 35.9117 Soil
gray, cobl
78.6216

Streams: This table
of mapped includes all
b USGchannels r USDA for hich RJG&A completed Quads a stream rating form, and all ri..�
other channels not Y
wetlands found during RJG&A field surveys in or adjacent to the project corridor.
* See Table in PCN Form for detailed Temporary, Permanent, and Total stream & wetland impacts.
Neuse Buffer: "No *" = Channel is ephemeral, piped or not present (RJG &A field determination), but is shown
on USDA soil survey map and DWQ must confirm that Neuse Buffer Rule does not apply.
Approx Decimal Soil or
Stream
sdic
Stream Wetland Proposed iImpacts 'r
Stream or
Wetland #
Station Lat +Lon o
Sre Buffer
or DWQ
Isolated ?
Numbr Stream
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Dirt Trail - Durant Road north to Raven Rid 2e Road
Eph: 17.5 No
None
nn -wetld
No structure at
5 -30
264 +90 35.9133
neither
Swale
crossing
78.6211
- - --
ACE 404 -401
forested 6' linear
No structure at
W GL
268 +50 35.9139
- - --
�-
seep wetland
crossing
flag 1 -7
78.6206
ACE 404 -401
4-51 stream; sand,
Boardwalk, t perm
S-31
277 +20 35.9159
Soil
Per: 39.5 Yes
beam;
78.6192
289 +50 35.9188
Soil +Topo
Per: 51.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401
12-18' s v, cobl
sand, gra
Boardwalk, no perm
stream impact
S-32
78.6177
Per: 51.5 Yes
ACE 404 -401
12-18
Boardwalk, no perm
S-33
301+00 35.9209
Soil +Topo
ra cobl
sand, gra ,
stream impact
78.6153
Per: 34.0 Yes
ACE 404 -401
3-5' stream; sand,
pew
S-34
308 +70 35.9216
Soil
stream impact
78.6139
78.6139
ACE 404-401
Forested alluvial
W 12 perm = 72 sq.ft
W -GN
308 +90 35:9217
- ---
____
---
wetland
Boardwalk
flag 1 -7
78.6138
Eph: 6.0 No*
EP
None
Dry Swale in
No structure at
S -35
311 +20 35.9220
Soil
ravine
crossing
78.6133
Eph: 9.0 No
EP
None
Dry swale in
No structure at
S -36
318 +35 35.9233
neither
ravine
crossing
78.6119
Eph: 10.0 No
None
Dry Swale in
No structure at
S -37
324 +50 35.9237
neither
ravine
crossing
78.6099
'
Eph: 18.0 No
ACE 404 -401
/ ft
wetland impact
S -38 &
329 +70 35.9236
neither
(wetland)
complex
No stream
W GM
78.6085
Boardwalk
flag 15, 20
Int: 20.0 No
Perm
ACE 404 -401 2-' sand,
S-39
330 +80 35.9237
neither
ray, co b l
stream impact
78.6083
ACE 404 -401 q ft
S -40 8c
331 +70 35.9239
Soil
Int: 28.5 Yes
(wetland)
No stream impact
wet and complex
W -GM
78.6081
Boardwalk
flag 6;102
Eph: 13.0 No
None
Dry Swale in
No structure at
S-41
342 +50 35.9266
neither
ravine
crossing
78.6071
Streams: This table
of mapped includes all
b USGchannels r USDA for hich RJG&A completed Quads a stream rating form, and all ri..�
other channels not Y
wetlands found during RJG&A field surveys in or adjacent to the project corridor.
* See Table in PCN Form for detailed Temporary, Permanent, and Total stream & wetland impacts.
Neuse Buffer: "No *" = Channel is ephemeral, piped or not present (RJG &A field determination), but is shown
on USDA soil survey map and DWQ must confirm that Neuse Buffer Rule does not apply.

Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
Table 2. Honeycutt
pacts Zone 2 Im
Zone 1 Im
Perm I Temp I Perm
I1 # Figure # Trail Type Stream Name Impa�► ..r - --
Mine Creek 1,213 211
1
3 10 -ft paved Trail
2
3 10 -ft Paved Trail Mine Creek
445 123
3 10 -ft Paved Trail Mine Creek
3
4
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
Mine Creek
10,230 1623
5
3 10 - ft Paved Trail
6
3 To-ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
692 0
7
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
579 47
3 10 -ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
8
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
9
10
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
608 254
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
0
11
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
628
12
13
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
3320 573
3,320
14
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
Mine Creek
702
15
3 10 -ft Paved Trail
15
4 10 -ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
88
74 88
17
4 10 -ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
467
18
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
943' 349
19
4 10-ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
Mine Creek
8202 1,265
20
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
21
22
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
303 140
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
23
24
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
105 145
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
25
26
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
437 128
27
4 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
82
5 10 -ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
28
5 10_ft paved Trail
Mine Cre ek
0
29
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
639
194
30
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
1194
31
T
5 10 -ft Paved rail
M ine Creek
32
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
74
33
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
252
34
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
69
35
5 10=ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
123
0
36
5 10 -ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
915
714
37
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
847
38
5 10-ft paved Trail
Mine Creek
39
40
5 10 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
190 89
5 1 0 -ft Paved Trail
Mine Creek
41
7
Temp
Impact
r 117
3 57S
6 2,03.
464
`l
15,456
714
Y5.0
,745
85

Table 2. Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
act # IF111
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
P
77
78A
78B
P78D 8C
Zone 1 Impacts Zone 2 Impacts
Perm Temp Perm Temp
N e Impact Impact Impact Impact
Trail Type Stream am , Q�� 421
re It
6
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
849 202
6
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
668 0
6
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
2,767 0
6
16 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
3356 0
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,388 211
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,478 26
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
925 229
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,663 1,276
6
10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
630 0
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,307 0
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,397 0
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
666 0
6
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
843 0
6
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
6
1CIA Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,7520 20 0
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
38
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
792 165
7
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
1,756 226
7
10 -ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
7
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
68 91
7
10-ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
g
10-ft paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
2,419 397
8
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
8
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
8
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
972 126
8
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
794 130
8
16 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
8
10 -ft Paved Trail Honeycutt Cr
75818
10 -ft Paved all Buffer Impacts 1 -78
732
706 0
911 0
401 0
756 134
652 114
109
359 90
62 74
617 BE
407 8,
85054

Impacts by Buffer
Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
Table 2. Honeycutt Green wa Y Riparian arian Buffer
Zone 11mpacts Zone 2 Impacts
Perm
Temp Perm Temp
Impact Impact
Buffer
Impact Impact
Trail Type Stream Name 1443 928
impact # Figure #
6-ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
541
79
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
826
838 685
80
g
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1825 1111
81
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
431 394
82
g
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
545 367
83
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1204 792
84
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
4
85
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
601 400
86
g
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
182 122 157 130
87
9
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
237 155
88
g
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
35 60
89
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1150 659
90
g
g
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
756 507
91
g
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
23
92
g
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
3615 2096
93
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
180 328
94
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
487 325
95
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
442 95
96
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
496 16
97
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
438 10
gg
6 -ft DirtTrail Honeycutt Cr
376 24
99
10
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
216 237
100
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1526 924
101
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1184 731
102
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
219 150
103
10
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
580 388
104
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
1111 265
105
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
0
106
10
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
491
61 420
107
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
323 0
108
10
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
46 48
109
11
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
206 48
110
11
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
170 50
111
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
42 42
112
11
11
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
45 47
45
113
12
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
23
114
12
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
324 32
115
6 -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
42 43
116
12
12
b -ft Dirt Trail Honeycutt Cr
15178 21159
117
6-ft Dirt Trail Buffer Impacts 79 -117

Table 2. Honeycutt Greenway Riparian arian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts
,
Zone 1 Impacts Zone 2 Impacts
Perm
Temp Perm Temp
Buffer
Trail Type Stream Name Impact Impact impact Impac'
15,705
Impact # Figure # 75,290 83.702 22'5
Perm vs Temp Imp 90,995
106,215
Zone 1 vs 2 Impact 197,210
Total Buffer Impact

S -3
N
n
0
I ?'
S-2
Greet
S-1
B -3
B -1
B-5
B -2
B-4
Figure 2. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland, I
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts
Wake County, NC.
---- Roads
EDPermanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
j Bridge
— Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
—Feet
0 100
200 400
• See table for stream Impact lengtNo Wetland impact
\
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
1
areas In buffers•

%GC
B-15
S-8
A�
B-14 W-GA yy��
Fs-
6 S -7 �m
i
Figure 3. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
S-4 Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.
m
Wake County, NC.
— Roads
B -5 permanent Trall Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp- & perm.)
Surveyed Top of streambank
B-3 - Boardwalk
B-4 ! i Bridge
B-1 — Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
— Feet
B -2 0 100
200 400
• mpact lengths' wetland impact
See table for stream i
acreage, and permanent versus temporary imps
areas in buffers.
NevAon Rd

a
o:
m
0
0
B -14
Figure 4. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.
Wake County, NC.
B -1 s
— Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
B -1s
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B -17
_--- Surveyed Top of Streambank
B -16
- Boardwalk
GC
%Gc
± } Bridge
— Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
s -s
Wetlands
B -15 �';�'r
m
400eet
100 200
�'+�
All
�,
0
• see table for act lengths, wetland Impact
versus temporary Impact
estream anent
acreage, and p
areas in buffers•
B -14

Figure Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts
Wake County, NC.
— Roads
Elpermanent Trail Footprint
BEZone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
ES-1:6
Surveyed Top of Streambank
Boardwalk
Bridge
— Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIs)
Wetlands
1MMI Feet
0
100 200 400
ireas See teb an permanent v rrsus temporary Impactact
creag , in buffers.
Mourning Dove Rd.
S -15
B -38
A B -37
�JC�S S -13B B -35 9
B -33
B -32
S -13A \ & B -34
B -31��� 5-12
B -30
B -29
Mal
S -14
B -40
B -41

C
Figure 6. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts:'
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. 8, Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIs)
`< Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
table see
acreage, and permane t impact
ersus temporary Impact
mporary i pactt
areas In buffers.
B -63
B -62
S -24
B -61
B -59
B -60
B -58
[B:-5:5
B -52
[:S-:21
E -51
FB -50 I
B X48
B -47
B-48
S -23
B -57
B -56
W-GP
GP 5-22
B -54
B -53
B49

B -65
MR
B -51
B -50
LB -4a
B -47
B -46
W-GG
W-GF
B -45
B -44
B -49
B -69
B-70
B -71
B -72 I 1 B -73
Fke oneycutt Greenway. Wetland,
d Riparian Buffer Impacts
ty, NC.
ads
rmanent Trail Footprint
ne 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
i M : Bridge
— Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
• See table for stream Impact ersus temporary impact
acreage, and permanent
areas in buffers.

B-80
B -78C
B -78B
B -78A
B-79
S -30
B -78D
S-29
Figure 8. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.
Wake County, NC.
— Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. 8, Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
CL tL.n1k..- - Boardwalk
B -77
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
— S -28
�; Wetlands
B _76 �; Feet
B -75 0 100 200 400
• See table for stream m Im versus tempo wetland
impact
acreage, and permanent
areas in buffers.

RJ G &A
B-93
B-90 I // ,iy I B -92
B-88
B-86 " f/ 1 3-31
B -84 Lem,/" 1 B -85
B-83
B-82
B-89
B -94
W-GL
Figure 9. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
GL Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
8-81
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp- & Perm.)
® Zone 2 impa� (Temp. & Perm')
B ao s -3o Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIs)
B-79 ''., Wetlands
t Feet
0
100 200 400
'Sae table for streamimpact pat
acreage, and permanent veus temporary Impact
areas in buffers•

J,C &A
B-93
8-103
B -102
8 -108
B -105
8-104
B -107
S -33 I B -108
W-GN
*1131
B -
8-111
8-110
B -109
8-101
B -100
B -99
Figure 10. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Buffer Impacts:'
13-98
Stream, and Riparian
Wake County, NC.
S-32
— Roads
B -97
ED Permanent Trail Footprint
B -sa
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B -95
—.-- Surveyed Top of Streambank
U
- Boardwalk
_
Bridge
— Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
B -94
Wetlands
Feet
� 400
0 100 200
oA
c� • See table for stream Impact lengths, wetla Impact
versus temporary Impact
acreage,
and permanent
areas in burners.

S -36
8-113
8-112
S-35
S-34
W GN
8-110
B -111
S-37
Figure 11. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetiand,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts: `
Wake County, NC.
— Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
j Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
;�. Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
• See table for stream impact lengths, wetland Impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

Figure 12. Honeycutt Greenway. well
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts."
Wake County, NC.
— Roads
= Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
• See table for stream impact lengths, wetland Impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in bufrere.
S-41
a
a
J
.O
B -115 _ . 8-116 &117 S-40
W-GM1
1P
m7

•1. 1 • ;1 1 .
I 1': %
l� 'i I' I ''1t�y •''• it�z,,
yHl ` ;ai
Perm= .0011 AC w'5
Culvert
lfi �Ilfz,.
-G8 Term= .00(00 Ac W
Perm
rpI � .: f •. 'r A. •
y , �� I J 7 1• e
�•'4. t I• ��� I J 1 •��N
TL
0203 AC W' i
{gym .0161 AC U+1-2
.::::;::' tr.9l Fill
f : it .�z � ;• t .9a1R:.':: 1
i � Sze: • '', .}, �
,
CONS ,'UC-r1oN
coRRIVOR
t
Tit
to
:3�,_, p p Maps: Wetlands GA, , GC
`' Figure 13. Wetland Im act Close -u

OR FORMERLY
too
n
tit SENT TRIM
Po ND
coR,p.o
kNhi
,
f�f'
it
t,
NOW OR a t '
�;�
!Jun
�q�;
100,
Figure 14. Wetland impact Close -up Maps: Wetlands GF, GG
Vtv
NOW OR FORMERLY
PAW I" IM, V
NOW awA&LY
OR FORMERLY
too
n
tit SENT TRIM
Po ND
coR,p.o
kNhi
,
f�f'
it
t,
1 `I 1
�;�
!Jun
�q�;
100,
Figure 14. Wetland impact Close -up Maps: Wetlands GF, GG
Vtv
NOW awA&LY
f
NOV) OR �6
U
%4d
r
AVO IDEED
NOW OR FORVE.rt,�'I'
t14W Op FOOMEOLY
wr
Tfmvq,0011AG.11%�
&W-7 Pn�-.0008�ir:�, k
EWrdw-olk
kNhi
R:L
!Jun
14.
71OW OR FORMERLY
100,
Figure 14. Wetland impact Close -up Maps: Wetlands GF, GG
Vtv

II
,
I
I• .
f I
' it li�'Cf/ �!I oi: f 1
VOR
I c' � ;,; ,• �S ►� '.�,' •, L f acre
mr P= ;M5 W °8
• '' �,;,; ';,f �, !,1' .. • 1 ' ' ' 00% 7 VJ'�
'+ Fii:S,t'jt" Y�')�`5�•: "p. i . I `' Wl , • ' , I 1 .<t :,1,Q e�l+
• � ��r' �r� t � 7� Sr, i•• i � L`'� +1� , .14F�4P) '' .'
I ; t, } .pJf;{a #• l � .,t t•�. $��ai. ,•r,!,,. OP � •yP_Gp� tJl ffi�
I: .. rl . to ' ...,: �':.. •, ! e..
to ' .i' , ` . •,t •� �� • N p K4. ie: �
it tic.1
ff i 1
7 f ' I1 . L•.'•I f 2
A I ?It .f.:. �. .I� #t•rr , . { c:J �,`�� 117-• ~— '•`•,.- %�� }•r•7 _ ..
I i.1 ��,.,•. Cl. f, �';S�•F ,`v ..� :' t ^' �,M_, r `•�i 'L'!ri•
.••
"mor.,
Jc
IRM NO
UNT
•',•• F. ::f+•h •irlt i����_ i •�iv' r• t''�".�::r��,.,1 �''G:.y ta.. ,_,
Figure 15. Wetland Impact Close -up Maps: Wetland GP �k
'Y •1f: .W d•JI• N,

SO
vr
ADO; FT
Z
W
h.
+
Ak z
GREUWAY
4L
r Me
rwrli novie
A
OA
Figure 16. Wetland impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GH, GJ
. .... ......
t it
ADO; FT
Z
W
h.
+
Ak z
GREUWAY
4L
r Me
rwrli novie
A
OA
Figure 16. Wetland impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GH, GJ
. .... ......

bJ Pu I }aM :sdeW do -as o�� pedw� puE149M 'LZ aan�i� ; , :�� r j ! 1�;,• ::
1=) %: ;rat. _� , .:r:::<: �' r. .. r _'•'
_ ,s _ i��r% .r •ry , .. -i' - •J�•• ��•-v n��ix �Jt ./;'•::l; :t'i't,'[' '� ••t7�y�•
�.."�.•'•ty ~r r•! r!' � •L•,i rT w •• ' • ,:t •,. ',.� 'nt,.. ..:.t� � .._.. � •�� � _.. �r,.- :s�yrF r.,.s, t % • ` ' t. � - ,ij�i r ' 1�
, •r J
l� 001 i } ; k r •'ir I�• t t : J ;� ' :i
�' t�l �'t�� 4• / Jr
��• 4 1i ' N•'�jNl •1 �• t i� r
1`lQ 1.1,E 1 r�5 �07 ' •' j' �� i � 1' } I''
IA
II .� :." ,
t� ^� /•
OHA
rr
IJ
' '[;fit .lf�, t'••��' R j� � : % I
,�, ',�•� 11'1 �.� �••' r' JJ5 f� ,
�-11� • ��' ' . 1 1111 t� '' .fr 1 � , .' i
,, t��' - 71i.�[• ; 1,11 II ' ,C`- -�' 1 � e %
•i 4 ' 1 t ,I �• r

� t
1 � E•t � �' it
fj
dirt trail will
cross
bu� OD
needid
Dirt
100 FT
t
-up Maps: Wetland GL
Figure 18. Wetland impact Close

i
I
I � , � I .. •, •a,. : Ir . 7
I
I• ,'d,
0017 AG
y(F -GN3 OQfz?Wa�
W�1•GN4'f .y;` �} I I •, �
Tra
h
,L•ir1 � i ' , �'�,yr ! p Cr
•1 � I .
n 100 FT
.`fib ' � ' .• -
,�� `''' Figure 19. Wetland Impact Close -up Maps: Wetland GN

C
:r
i
•;i
• s 1 . ` it ?l •I
rp
Dirt Trail
. � 1 . •, vl: cHlol �,y`�'f J `• �1 �� per pQ(Pt�lltlq k
IN I
.•:.�... kH.-� `t.L��•.�. Vr GN4di
Z:'' I I=1. ...�• VF Do F GN3 :tti�tt,,
yVSi;t.Lhu�n uls..�i'tu .ski 't • • GNl3 \r .`yi'• `r )
ta .11 kqy V GH9 �p
32r-y'f Oo yr r t�.�!! .� 4 (��y}P43i °.r• `� q 1
v G14
term . 0015 Ac_
'
yr GH16QarZiwalk , ,
19 .
\ \C7 i l i •'�: A-
WF G1137 I t
160 FT '' ' ii S-38 +
` '' Flgure 20. Wetland Itnpact Close -up Maps: Wetland GM

swpXK I
gw. go
SUPERSTRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION
soma fr.l,-w
\lzf� WM I. FM WIM W AV M=- 'r-r' arse aaos (0
away map 2•
==1om
0mrom
214
7 aaw-e un UL
AVRM M9W
;_24 omm Or.)
arauq
as soolow \
ova NR Pa6t cawa�
�r raves
r" W BIL OW
arm
Im Vat
Law=*
sm OV4
TYPICAL FRAMING PLAN
Wawa
ocwm a=* ow Fmo FM gm = m ar-W)
OWN
=
"L =
ICP
G" PK
10-foot toude boardwalk farms adikordl
p&qect greeimays 1 rieu)fm -W 'Purg"t w
tar-r ow/0" OF MK
mm I sm
he on=
mm fm wwwo
am loop=
an IMAMN
o"o
I OD WL
MIME
swpXK I
gw. go
SUPERSTRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION
soma fr.l,-w
\lzf� WM I. FM WIM W AV M=- 'r-r' arse aaos (0
away map 2•
==1om
0mrom
214
7 aaw-e un UL
AVRM M9W
;_24 omm Or.)
arauq
as soolow \
ova NR Pa6t cawa�
�r raves
r" W BIL OW
arm
Im Vat
Law=*
sm OV4
TYPICAL FRAMING PLAN
Wawa
ocwm a=* ow Fmo FM gm = m ar-W)
OWN
=
"L =
ICP
G" PK
10-foot toude boardwalk farms adikordl
p&qect greeimays 1 rieu)fm -W 'Purg"t w

WM, -°�WEV
sums o ox LwAM
PAL SMM ON sao,
X-4, we. MW u some Kul-,
Fm danwo
csm eA
L pat aE MR)
`9
xcs2 a i � yr
SEE r�
I•I �•t rv"��
n TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION
s+ ; {aavtt cm
s SUPERSTRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION
sus tum svaas) scat %1-11-W
wu SO= w so,
s-s• nra MM as Ma
R& uraaWM
1 rss
On'J
4-r wide baaWaf k -6Ir
26 ,eor� Un '� ved *aJIS, Dum"f Rd lb
P
`x4 a Rmveiq Ridge Rd -
M
f-pmu wawa memoo
am tons 10
e r sa
t
e a LOOK=
ato, (
rant ems CM
xns moam+c
�, ava ear ca a
aw mM
1
1
ce,nas s� any erw
�.._s VAL
s SUPERSTRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION
sus tum svaas) scat %1-11-W
wu SO= w so,
s-s• nra MM as Ma
R& uraaWM
1 rss
On'J
4-r wide baaWaf k -6Ir
26 ,eor� Un '� ved *aJIS, Dum"f Rd lb
P
`x4 a Rmveiq Ridge Rd -
M

Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment.
Greenway Buffer Zones Reasoning for Unavoidable Impacts
Station No. Impacted
Sta 51 +19 to Zone 2 Buffer An existing apartment complex lays to the east of the proposed
Sta 52+08 greenway from Sta 50+00 to approximately Sta 67 +50. Moving
the greenway out of the riparian buffer will encroach into the slope
of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment building and
uotentially ieonardize cleanouts on an existine sewer service line.
Page 1 of 5
Sta 52 +50 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 52 +85
into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
building.
Sta 52 +85 to
Zone 1 and
Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 61 +00
Zone 2 Buffer
into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
buildings and pool complex. The selected route protects a number
of specimen trees.
Sta 61 +00 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 61 +80
Sta 61 +80 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway makes a near U -turn in an area void of trees.
Sta 62 +60
Sta 62 +50 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 63 +40
Sta 63 +40 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway makes perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek '
Sta 63 +80
Sta 64 +50 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway begins turning in order to minimize impacts to
Sta 66 +00
upstream wetland areas and occupy a sewer easement.
Sta 66 +00 to
Zone 1 Buffer.
Greenway occupies the edge of an existing sewer easement
Sta 70 +00
scheduled for clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer
easement eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to
construct the greenway.
Sta 70 +00 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway turns away from the sewer easement to avoid sensitive
Sta 70 +50
areas within the sewer easement
Sta 71 +00 to
Zone 1 and
Greenway occupies an existing sewer easement scheduled for
Sta 79 +25
Zone 2 Buffer
clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer easement
eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to construct the
greenway. At 74 +50 greenway begins following an existing
cleared area within the buffers.
Sta 79 +25 to
Zone 1 and
Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers and makes use
Sta 83 +50
Zone'2 Buffer
of an existing culvert pipe. Moving outside the buffers will require
clearing of existing trees.
Sta 84 +75 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers. Moving
Sta 86 +25
outside the buffers will require clearing of existing trees.
Sta 87 +00 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Greenway resides within an existing greenway easement while
Sta 89 +30
following a route that preserves specimen trees.
Sta 90 +40 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Greenway follows path of least resistance leaving Old Deer Trail
Sta 90 +90
to avoid specimen trees and residences.
Page 1 of 5

Sta 90 +90 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 92 +90
'
l
'
Sta 90 +90 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 94 +10
Sta 94 +10 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 94 +50
Sta 96 +75 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 96 +95
Sta 96 +95 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 97 +65
Sta 97 +65 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 97 +85
Sta 98 +35 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 99 +00
Sta 99 +00 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 100 +90
Sta 100 +90 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 100 +25
Sta 100 +65 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 101 +41
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 159 +92 to
Sta 161 +84
Sta 161 +84 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 162 +35
Sta 152 +35 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 164 +99
Sta 164 +99 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 165 +52
—2
Sta 165 +52 to
Zone Buffer
Sta 165 +85
Sta 165 +85 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 167 +25
Sta 167 +25 to
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 167 +73
Sta 167 +73 to
Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 169 +86
Grail placed in existing greenway easement. Proximity of
;asement to stream bank at upstream location requires crossing
East Fork Mine Creek. Buffer encroachment needed to begin
- rossin 3g.
Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Completing the perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek.
Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
End perpendicular crossing of tributary. of East Fork Mine Creek
Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
End perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Trail placed in existing greenway easement to avoid encroachment
onto private property and the house located on the property.
Steep lateral slopes are prevalent in this section of the greenway.
Specimen trees were selected for preservation and the greenway
alignment was selected to preserve these trees.
Like the previous Zone 2 encroachment, steep lateral slopes and
preservation of selected trees resulted in a greenway alignment
encroaching ipto Zone 1. Existing development prohibited shifting
the greenway further from the adjacent stream.
Existing development and steep lateral slopes necessitate the
encroachment into Zone 2. Boardwalk commences at Sta
163 +29.06 to minimize impacts and negotiate both lateral and
Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
traPa naneccitate encroachment into Zone 1 with boardwalk.
Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
trees necessitate encroachment into Zone 2 with boardwalk and to
commence crossing of stream feature.
Zone 1 encroachment necessary to cross a small stream.
Zone 2 encroachment necessary as the greenway works its way
from a stream crossmg
one 1 buffer encroachment needed to separate greenway from
existing residential lots. Greenway meanders through an area
adjacent to a small pond but absent of trees, thus eliminating the
need for clearing. Boardwalk, begun at Sta 163 +29.06, ends at Sta
169 +63.58 and paved greenway commences.
Page 2 of 5

Sta 169 +86 to
Sta 170 +39
Sta 170 +39 to
Sta 171 +04
Sta 171 +04 to
Sta 171 +38
Sta 171 +38 to
Sta 172 +82
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 172 +82 to
Sta 173 +05
Sta 173+05 to
Sta 173 +23
Sta 173 +23 to
Sta 173 +51
Sta 173 +51 to
Sta 174 +90
Sta 174 +90 to
Sta 174 +46
Sta 174 +46 to
Sta 177 +04
Sta 177 +04 to
Sta 177 +30
Sta 177 +30 to
Sta 180 +06
Sta 180 +06 to
Sta 180 +29
Sta 180 +29 to
Sta 181 +07
Sta 181 +07 to
Sta 181 +29
Sta 181 +29 to
Sta 190 +00
Sta 190 +00 to
Sta 191 +70
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 191 +70 to
Sta 191 +90
Sta 191 +90 to
Sta 192 +02
Sta 192 +02 to
Sta 192 +59
Sta 192 +59 to
Sta 201 +00
No buffer
encroachment
Zone -2 Buffer
Greenway encroaches Zone 2 as it makes its way out of the buffer.
encroaches Zone 2 in existing cleared area as it begins
Greenway s ill way of the small pond in
its alignment to cross the emergency p
the area. Begin boardwalk Sta 171 +30.32. ss the
Zone 1 encroachment necessitatl donin the the area and keep
emergency spillway of the s p
geenway within an area void of trees. End boardwalk at Sta
172 +69.28 and be ' aved eenwa .
Zone 2 encroachment necessary as geenway leave Zone 1 and
i buffers.
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Existing I -540
tunnel
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 encroachment necessary as geenway prepares to cross
another stream.
Zone 1 encroachment necessitat3+98 0 and b to Cross dw lk-
stream. End avement at Sta 17 eenway crosses stream but
as
Zone 2 encroachment necessary gr
then turns to cross another draina a feature.
Zone 1 encroachment ned fortateenwa a need to cross stream.
Boardwalk still em to
Zone 2 encroachment necessary as Geenway leave Zone 1 and
buffers.
Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to cross
stream on its wa to existing tunnel beneath 1-540.
ares to crosses
Zone 1 encroachment necessary gr
stream on its way to existing tunnel beneath I -540
Zone 'Al encroachment necessary as geenway leave Zone 1 and
buffers to tie to existing tunnel beneath I -540.
Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to tie to tha Sta existing
tunnel beneath I -540 and cross stream. Boardwalk begins
190 +15. Greenway occupies space beneath an electrical power
transmission line which is void of trees. eenway leaves Zone I.
Zone 2 encroachment necessary gr
eenwa y easement and staying
Trail will e placed in an b existing gr
within the cleared area of the electrical ower transmission line.
page 3 of 5

Sta 201 +00 to
Sta 201 +30
Sta 201 +30 to
Sta 202 +26
Sta 202 +26 to
Sta 202 +62
Sta 202+62 to
Sta 237 +84
Sta 237 +84 to
Sta, 238 +05
Sta 238 +05 to
Sta 239 +20
Sta 239 +20 to
Sta 239 +28
Sta 239 +28 to
Sta 261 +41
Sta 261 +41 to
Sta 263 +36
Sta 263 +36 to
Sta 263 +39
Sta 263 +39 to
Sta 263 +89
Zone 2 Butter
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 263 +89 to
Sta 265 +28
Sta 265 +28 to
Sta 265 +50
Sta 265 +50 to
Sta 267 +76
Sta 267 +76 to
Sta 268 +13
Sta 268 +13 to
Sta 271 +28
Sta 271 +28 to
Sta 271 +89
Sta 271 +89 to
Sta 272 +80
Sta 272 +80 to
Sta 274 +81
Sta 274 +81 to
Sta 275 +15
Sta 275 +15 to
Sta 276 +15
Sta 276 +15.65
to Sta 276 +55
Sta 276 +55 to
Sta 276 +80
Zone 2 encroachment essential as greenway prepares to cross an
existin drains ge feature.
Trail crosses stream using an existing access road and culvert
laced for electrical power transmission line maintenance.
Greenway leaves buffers.
Greenway needs to cross a small drainage feature as it prepares to
cross Hone cuff Roa ith a prepare for
Hone crossing of
Cross drainage feature p P
Hone cutt Road.
Complete stream crossing; tie to existing pavement of Honeycutt
Road.
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone —1B uffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees. Path to be six
feet wide, natural surface.
Trail route selected to minimize
emoval of trees. Path to be six
encroachment needed to dampen er feet wide, natural surface. Buff
C.
ffects of lateral slo e.
Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
effects of lateral slo e.
Trail route selected to minimize removal 0 out of bufferd dampen
effects of lateral slo e. Trail head
Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
effects of lateral slo e.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible.. rovide lateral
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal ­and
slo es as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slopes as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
clones as flat as possible.
Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
page 4of5

S to 276 +80 to Zone 1 Buffer
Sta 277 +58
Sta 277 +58 to
Sta 279 +71
Sta 279 +71 to
Sta 280+96
Sta 280 +96 to
Sta 287 +71
Sta 287 +71 to
Sta 285 +53
Sta 285 +53 to
Sta 288 +89
Sta 288 +89 to
Sta 290 +03
Sta, 290 +03 to
Sta 290 +34
Sta 290 +34 to
Sta 292 +45
Sta 292 +45 to
Sta 292 +78
Sta 292 +78 to
Sta 295 +36
Sta 295 +36 to
Sta 297 +42
Sta 297 +42 to
Sta '298 +04
Sta 298 +04 to
Sta 298 +40
Sta 298 +40 to
Sta 299 +37.17
Sta 299 +37 to
Sta 300 +58
Sta 300 +58 tc
Sta 301 +47
Sta 301 +47 tc
Sta 302+00
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
s13 lies as flat as ossible.
Trail route selectd rovide lateral
ed to minimize tree removal an p
slo ies as flat as ossible. rovide lateral
Trail route selected o minimize tree removal and p
slo es as flat as os provide lateral
Trail route selected to inimize tree removal and
slo es as flat as 3ossible
Trail route selected to minimize boardwalk Sta 288 +71331atera
slo es as flat as ossible. Begin to cross Honeycutt Creek.
Buffer encroachment necessary
Buffer encroachment necessary as greenway completes crossing of
umavcutt Creek.
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
No buffer
encroachment
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
Sta 302 +00 to en buffer ent
Sta 349 +32
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and I'
rovide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to miniiriize tree removal and provide lateral
slones as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible. 11
Trails route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible.
Trail route selected to minimize tree Ternm i a and provide 300 08 35lateral
slo es as flat as ossible. Be ' boardwalk
Trail route selected to minimize ttone utt Creek provide lateral
slo es as flat as ossible. Cross H and move greenway away
Complete Honeycutt Creek crossing
from creek. End boardwalk Sta 301 +49.35. Begin 2 feet wide
natural trail. a Rd.
End Trail at Raven Ridg
Page 5 of 5

' united States Depalrt'ne of the interior
�
E
ya
o � x1511 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh rield Office
Post Office Box 33726
�,q c a 'g ° • Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
February 2, 2011
Gerald Pottm
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Re: I.loncyoutt Grecnway
Dear Mr. Pottern:
• � inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered shnand threatened
W Wildlife
species ow available oil the Thts letter is to Y
with known occurrences in North Carolina is n .gov /raleigh, The efore, if you have projects no
Service's (Service) web page a P
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of reespt0nsi oftfederaliy prote t d species.
Y
longer recd to contact the Raleigh Field Ot•Lrcc, f endangered and threatened
our web page contains a complete and frequently ered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16t1
species protected by the provisions o
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of eoncernt that are known o Occur
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal regencies rothat ar y ac
tion fderally authorized,
representative); in consultation with the Service, insure
funded, or
carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopa assessn�ent or evaluation may rbe
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether ecies list, i iformat ton on tile
with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected fr tion it col se ralei Please check the
• ecies' life histories and habitats and information ot��WWwlfws.gav /biological assessment or
species"
evaluation and canupdated b f found nformtaton or ehanges.tP
web site often for
l n receive no legal protection and their designation doe
is trnn "federal species of conceal' refers to those
species which rho Service believes might be in necdr�a
I 1
concentraled conservation actions. Federal species of be co
not necessarily imply that the species will event cable n ensures be for taken to avoid or nimunize adverse impacts to
species. However, we recommend that all practi
federal species of concern.

project contains suitable habitat for any of the fede llylissteedt on has the t wn b to
If your it
present within the county where your project occutm, the d t proposed Nor t11 Carolina Natural
those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
adversely affect eet area. The us
the species' presence or absence within the prof
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys• not likely
lfyou determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not
adversely affect) a federally -protected species, Y °thodolo notify and
this an a alysis of the effects
toad Y
determination, the results of your surveys, survey rrie p determine that tile proposed
of the action o
t1 listed species, including consideration of direct, and cumulative effect's,
before conducting any activities that might affect the speetes. Y
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direcfo rconctn�ence (unless an record
listed species, tile', you are not requued a contact our office
act Statement is prepared), however, you should effect,
of qualified personnel
C�nvironmcntal Imp our determination of
of the assessment, including steps leading to y
CUn(luCtillg
the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
and to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks, Our comments are
Witl1 regard Species Act.
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Sp
s •
Based
on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the propose
• likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered fnd[isting under dth a Acl at 11en
action is not ilk y
2 of the Act have been satisfled for
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed
these sites. We believe that the r'1at obligation i,underr section 7 consultation must be affect
your project. Please remember tl
previously considered; (2) this action is
reconsidered if (1) new information reveals in�pacts of this identified action that may
listed species or critical habitat in r manner was r10
a new species
modified in a manner that was not considered e by the identified action.
subsequently
is listed or critical habitat determined that may e
• he Service is concerned about the potential impacts to tile pro ri at on`tTherefore, lwe
However, , t
one aquatic species. Aquatic resources are hi susceptible 1 uattc species'
recommend that all practicable measures be taken ds and avoid ttringent sediment and erosion control
including implementing directional boring methods by
measures, An erosion and sedimentation
Land uality Section prior to construction.
eantrl� ran � ould be submitted to and n
the North Carolina Division of
Land Resources,
� ion and sedimentation controls should be installed ddaio''tWe reeo m nd maintaining
to
Uos
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters- n
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has develohedQ address and mitigate
(a
The North Cat
copy cal be found on our website at (http:llwww•�s•gov /ralerl, projects and in
secondary and
cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife es your and water quality.
We recommend that you conside for rconsultation t(if necessaiy)•
completing an initiation package
2

We hope you
find our web page useful and informative and that following al cott►espondence for
'h�
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, contact John Ellis of this office at
species, lists. if you have any questions or comments, please
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
0;-� �% )61
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Pteservation Office
Claudia Brown, Ad g Administrator Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor David Brook, Director
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy secretary
April 11, 2011
Ralph Troutman
WSP SELLS
15401 Weston Parkway
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
Re: Honeycutt Greenway, Along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek, Raleigh, Wake County, ER 11 -0457
Dear Mr. Troutman:
Thank you for your email of March 24, 2011, concerning the above project. would be affected by
e of no historic We have conducted a review of the project and re °sect as proposed.�o resources which the project. Therefore, we have no comment o n project
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National sto is Preservation Ac 1II 06 odified t and at 3GCFR
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. Ireview cooxdinatorsat 919-807-6579. 1 In all futureent,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental e above - referenced tracking number .
communication concerning this project, p
Sincerely,
1'
Claudia. Brown
Location: log East Joaes Stmt, Raley NC 27601 Mailing
Address: 4617 Mail Service Cent., Ralergh NC 17699 -4617 Telephone /F. (919) 807- 6570/807'6199

Federal EnxiergencY Managemept 49eney
iii����panrxfi Washington, DC 204U
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
y Cooperating Technical State
September 9, 2011
C 4TIVIED MAIL
RUIURN RECEIPT R1;Qt%STLD
Mr. David C046
Manager, W6ke County
3 -)j South Sails" Street
Raleigh ?INC27601
IN REPLY REFER TO:
Case 0o.: 11- 04 - OV-R
Community Naive: ninco po ted Areas of-Wake
C
Community No -: 370368
Dear Mr. Cooke:
re ovldin our comFnents with this enclosed Conditional Lett05 d Mould revise the effective e flood
We a pr g
proposed.graject within and Flood Insu1ianceaRate Map for your eon munity.
Insurance Stady repo
0 1a }n mena .emenh reg6latlons for yogr cott�munity or tite N tiona}
If you have.any gttesFions re rdin$ $to ?
ahee Pro �rarrt �I�'IP) lh genertl, please contaCE the 'Floo�ottlaact�� 1No�tjaCaro }inaflaodpla nntty.
flood Insur g dement Agency
If you have any technical questions regarding this t,.LON}R, plciasa nc Manaa
Mapping l�to m (NCfMP) at (9 19) 715-571100, t 18, or the Federal Emerge y
a .Information P hange (FMIX) t4i)1'ree at t-877-336-16V (1- 977 -FEMA MAP). Additional
()MEMA) M p at
ormation abbot ?tie AII�IF is ayjtil�ble on FEMA's Website. / /w�vw.ncfloodmaan com tininess /nfio, an
inP
additional Information about the NCFNIP {s ttvatlabl¢ at httn
Sincerely,
L -6 "�
Betb A. Dorton, Program Speclalist
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Epgineeting Manogeffient'Branch
Federal Insurance and M#igation Administration
List of Enclosures:
Conditional Letter of Map Revision
John K. Dormun, Program Director
m
North Cprolina FW. 0#1ain M4pping
cc: Ms. Betsy Pearce, CFM, Wake County
Mr. Vfetar Ubsock, City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation
Mr. Ted L. atrettt'
Mr. Steve Ga , CFM, LQMC Manager. NCFMP
M

Federal. Emergency Management Agency
o Was'hington, D.G. 20472
$eptember 9, 2011
C1 R'I D MAIL, IN RE'FLy R1F BR TO:
te
R17TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ase .No.: 11 -Q4-13 82R
Mr. Duvid Cooke COPIMurlity: Uninemwa"ated Areas of Wake
County, NC
Manager, W&kO County Community No.: 370368
337 South S.ailsbury Street
Raleigh, NE 27601 t04
Dear 9r. Cooke.,
This responds to a request that th€ Department of Homproject n city' i have al Emero �ctty Management
Agency (AMA) comment on the effects that a proposed report for our community in accordance
Insurance Rate Mop (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) rep your itt<in October e
with Part.63 cif the National Flood Insur=ance Program (NF1P) regulations. In a request
2U
to, Mr. Ted L. Bartelt, p.G, of the Alpha odd Ornegd Group, PC. requested that FEMA evaluate the
effect,$ that the pyoppsed City of Raleigh Honeycutt Greenway project would have ot� fife flood Ward
Information shown on dre effective FIRM and FIS report, The project will include purpose cgs uctiOn Of trjon
pedefitrian bridges over Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream 31 i The primary
bridge crossings is to carry the City of Raleigh greenway frail .frdMihe intersection of Honeycutt Road and
Durant Road to its northertrt end at Ritvon Ridge Road. Also, the culvertg of Ioneycutt goad were updated
in the corrected effectivelexisting cotditions model. In 1980, the original tit ter bridge (built in 1,952)
was replaced by a triple- barret $4 -jitch eoMigatcd rxt tal culvert b�► the NorthH Carolina cuttDCreek (Bush 13,
Transportation (NCDOTF The. proposed prcdect will impact flooding ttiong y
Stream 31 } Itom a point approxlmatcly 2'j poet. downstream of the con f tae pr o1,$ $nsln 13. Stream 33 to a
point approximately 220 .feet upstream of Honeycutt Road, The of the Pt . p. sod project is showf} on
North Carolina FIRM numbers 3720171800) ant} 3720171900J, dated May 2, 2006•
All data required to complete our review of this regkiest for a CLOMR were. submitted with letters from
Mr. Bartek.
To detertttirte the chanties in flood Nzatds that will be caused by rite proposed project, we z 91npare the
hydraulic modeling reflecting ft proposed project (referred to 44 the proposed conditions model) to'tlw
hydraulic modeling used to prepare the FIS (referred a as the effectiveCtmodeciXisif g o inns model must
trot provide enough detail to evaluate the effects of the proposed praj
be developed to provide this detail. Th1s existing conditions model is thetl compaed to the effective
model and the proposed conditions model to di ffOrpntiatc increases or decreases in Rood)razards caused by
more detailed modeling ftotn increases or decreases In flood hazards that qtlt be caused by the proposed
project. '
We reviewed the submitted data and the data used to prepare the effective FIRM and FIS report for. your
com -mnity add deEeolned that the proposed project meets the minimum floodpla)n d Jr a feria
of the NFIP. The submitted existing tonditiods MEC -RAS hydraulic computer model,
2011, was used a.$ (lte base conditions model in our review of the proposed conditions model for thk
CLOMR request. We believe that, If the proposed project is cone fired b W91? SfiI S, Inc, submitted
the plans
entitled "Honeycutt Creek Gfeelaway," dated August 1, 2011, prepared Y
Y04

h work map entitled "Honeycutt Creek Flood Study dated June 2M d prepare
report by
certified topographic
Alpha & omega Croup. PC and the data listed below are received, a Levis on to
would be warranted.
The submitted existing conditions C- ve „yodel�i Also, the crossing at HonY rt Ro-Ad woos updated
information and survey data than the effects m conditions
in the model, as previously described. When cod ep t e �rcent an uat chanc ) Mood Elevations (BVEs)
model reflects % ncrease$ and decreases itt the I3 s ( p
along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 0, Stream 31),e with a axiu umaximum decrease Increase of t at feet iattu�p0' int
downstream of the confluence of Basin 15, Stream 33 Md
approximately 2,560 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road,
The proposed conditions model incorporates ►he prop( ee proposed conditionsSmodel, we determinnned•that
When we compared the existing conditions model t proposed
Stream
the proposed project will cause increases and decreases, 4,590 feet downstream f Honeycutt
31), with a maximum increase of 0.2 foot at a p roximatel -,560 Peet downstream of Honeycutt
Road and maximum decrease of 0.04 foot at a point app Y
[load.
The updated exIsting conditions and proposed project will have the following impacts;
Base 1' 20 )elevations
When compared to the effective .model, the prof 3 t d with a conditions increnase of l 0 foot at a point
BAs along 14OAeyeutt
Creek (Basin t5, Stream
and a ma
j}�st downstream of Honeycutt Road B�>cE decrease of 6.6 feet at u point approximately
Road
2,560 feet downstream of Honeycutt goad.
-Pie rce U a lAft area that
When compared to the effective data, the width of Sid rreas along Honeycutt Creek (Basin 15, Stream
would be inundated by the $qse flood, Will tttcreas nd
3 t). The maximum SFHA increase of 30 feet ilat a occurjust
approximately 2,540 feet downstream of
maximum SFHA decrease of 220 feet will occur F
fioneycutt Road.
�F o w
When compared to the effective data, the width of the floodway will increase decrease along
and approximately
Honeycutt Creek (Basin 13, Stream 3 o wiilt a maximum Increase crease of 0t20 feet point
point pproximately
1,060 feet downstream of 1'doneyeutt Road and a maximum
2,854 feet downstream of Honeycutt Road.
Upon, completion of the project, your community ust submit
a the ata listed below and request that we
make a final determination on revising the effective
• With this request, your cOihmun'ty leas comp fiied with ���b� also tis necessary before FEMA can
the NFIP regulations. Cornp }fiance with Par�igrap
issue a Letter of Map Revision when a come unity props $FE in excess of those perms ed under
effective regulatory floodway that will cu t to app roval of the
Paragraph 60.3(d)(3). g1eAso provide evidence that your community has, prior incorporate the increased
proposed encroachment, adopted floodplain management ordloances that

3
OFF—,s and revised floodway boundary delineations to reflect post project conditions, as stated in
paragraph 65.12(b7
Q Detailed application and certification fbrm � S hi�hh were used i npfe map revision request, mutt be
e
used for requesting i1nal revisions to the p
area covered by this letter is subm. itted, Form 1, entitled "Overview & Concurrence Form," must
be included.
o die detailed application and certktication forms listed below new orms o notated copies dof he
differ from the preliminary plans. If required, please submit
previously submitted forms showing Clie revised information.
Form 2, entitled "River#ne Hydrology & Hydraulics Form"
Form 3, entitled "Riverine Structures Form"
Ilytlraulic analyses, For as -6a'c9 coned the rof lh�base o floodway, together with a certified and
0,2- percent annual chance flvtx , e the ,,
topographic work map showing he revised floadplttin and �}oodtvuy boundaries; must be
submitted with Form 2.
FEMA teVised the Fee schedule for reviewing and p0cesOng requests
o Ef�ctive January 11, 1, _f}10,
for condidondt and final modificatkons to,publithed flood information and maps. ilttder this
schedule, FEMA has not changed s. The initial fee for this map t� lsionirequest requests
ill be $�5�,000
structural measures on alluvial fans.
and i}ust be received before we can begin %fie aya6le in tJ tindfi to the NationahF ooe
tn�de in the forth of a check o money order, P
fnsuEanc� aram, or by credit card (Visa or MasterCard only). The payment, along with the
revisions application, must be forwarded to the following mddress;
Usixr U.S. F -st al Serrtiee: K, .���rnigh{ Sery ce:
North CarolinaTVIT -2 LO MC Depot NC MT -2 LOW -Collection System Administrator
ip.0. Box 300025 cfo Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
l,alekgh, North Carolina 27622 -0025 2301 RexwoodA Drive, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
o As -bu #k plan.4, cerfifted by a registered professional engineer, of all -propo ed project elements.
SF1�4 widths,
o Evidence of notification of the property owners impacted by increases in the BFEsowners' written
and floodway widths along Honeeird for he LOMB to be once ,effective o pthe date of Issuance.
acceptance of the increases is req
e A copy of the public no( a distributed by your corrtmimg ty stating its intent to revise he regulatory
floodway, or a statement by your community that it has notified alt affected property owners and
affected adjacent jurisdictions.
gEMA will initiate
After receiving approp&te documentation to show that the project has
ie been co leted,m (NCFMIl) initiate
a revision to the FIRM and FIS report. The North Carolina Floodp
review all revision requests in accordance with an agreement signed with 1 EMA under the FWA

4
cooperating Technical Partners initiative. for more information an this initiative, we encourage you to
visit the Qedicated portion of the FEMA Flood How 1 Mapping websito at
htm: / /www.fema aov /nianMrevent/car s�cthe 1BrBs would change as a restftlPt of t etproject, a 90-day appeal
httn'Nvyww ncfloodmans.com. Because y cal the revised
period would be initiated, during which community officials and interested persons may app
BV& based on scientific or technical data.
The basis of this CLO1viIa is, in whole dr in party bridge p`be food rryiq Gap�ity within the altered or
Paragraph 60.3(b)(7), require that communities
relocated portion of anyVatercourse i$ rttaintained Tis provision
the ultimate p incorporated
si�'t1)tY your
or maintenance of
existing floodplain management, regulations. Consequently,
the bridges rests with your community ment
This CLOMR is based on minimum floodptai�n manttn develo mt ni and for r en uring all necessary permits
corttmunity is t�esponsible for approving all floodpIai p
required by Federal or State law have been received. State, cOu set higher standards for construction in the
knowledge of local cQnditiops and in the interest of ty, Y
1- perct;t�t gnnual chance tloodplain. If the State, County, or conamuoity has adoptid more restrictive or
comprehensive floodplain matag ment Criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NPIP
Criteria.
If you have any questions regarding floodptain manageme re CCO) for your community. community nfotrmatio Qn
y
general; please contact the Consultation Coordination officer
the CCO for your community may be obtained by calling the Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Division of FEMA in Atlanta, Georgia, at (770) 220 -54 If x . l lager ny tFEMA M• p Ions rew tints rng
this CLOUR, pleasd contact the NCVMP at [phone] I f
eNCharige (FMM, toll free, at t- 877 -FEMA MAP (1- 877 -336- 2627).
Sincerely,
Beth A. Norton, Program Specialist For Luis RodriguE�t P.13., Chief
gifteering Management Branch )rnglneeiing 1Vlanggemeht branch
En
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Ad
minlstrafron
Federal and Mitigation Administration

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GA wetland
Project / Site: Honeycutt Greenwav Wetland GA on Mine Cr Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant / Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009 Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes--2L_ No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No _X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GA 1 -12
Plot In:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species
Dominant Plant Species
- Stratum
Stratum
Indicator
Indicator
1.
Ligustrum sinense
shrub
FAC
9.
Ilex ouaca
sVlg
FAC -
2.
PI anus occidentalis
tree
FACW-
10.
Comus amomum
shrub
FACW+
3.
Liauidambar styraciflua
tree
FAC+
11.
Microstegium vimineum
herb
FAC+
4.
Betula nigra
tree
FACW
12.
Juncus effusus
herb
FACW+
6
Ulmus americana
tree
FACW
.
6.
Acer rubrum
tree
FAC
13.
7.
Liriodendron tulipifem
tree
FAC
14.
8.
Smilax rotundifolia
vine
_ FAC
15.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 92
Remarks: GA is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest east of Mine Creek, connected to
Mine Creek by ephemeral and intermittent channels. The wetland grades upslope into non - wetland alluvial
forest „mesic mixed hardwood/pine forest, and developed land (apartments) to the east, and non - wetland levee to the
west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12”
_ Water Marks
x Drift Lines
• Sediment Deposits
• Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (n•) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 -12 m.) x Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 _-6 (in.) _ FAC- Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks, Hydrology in GA is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S -8, plus infrequent over -bank flooding from Mine Creek.

GA wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm + Mantachie (M— Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No —x
Taxonomy (Subgroup): hEMIuentic Dystrudeots
Profile Description Mottle
Ion: Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl— Aeundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0 -8 _
A 10 YR 4/4
8 -16 B — 2.5 Y 4/2 l0yR 5/5 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators: Concretions
Histosol — High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
Histic Eplpedon Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
Suifidic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Solis List
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric Solis List
_ Reducing Conditions
X Gieyed or Low - Chroma Colors _Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydre soil patches in som�IIoddplai not ydrons such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is better drained, with higher
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Sampling Point
the
Is
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the a Wetland? Yes 3C No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
s GA Ito 12 is classified as a wetland based upon the
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flag
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GB wetland
Project / Site: Hone cutt Greenwa Wetland GB on Mine Cr Date' 08 Oct 2009
Applicant I Owner: Ralei Parks &Recreation County; Wake
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein &Assoc.
yes —X No
es exist on the site? Community ID:
Do normal circumstanc
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X alluvial forest
Yes No -X
Is the area a potential problem area? Transect ID: GB 1 -15
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Suec181 St_ ar tom &Wtor
1,
Fraxinus nennsylvanica
2.
Platanus occidentals
3.
r ;ouidambar styraciflua
4.
Lieustrun► sinense
5.
in M iaoonica
6.
Vitis rotundifolia
7.
Smilax rotundifolia
8.
Woodwardia areolata
tree
FACW
tree
FACW-
tree
FAC±
shrub
FAC
vine/herb FAC -
vine
FAC
vine
_ FAC
herb
_ OBL
Dominant Plant Saecles Stratum Indlcato
9. Onoclea sensibilis
10. Microstesium vimineum
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
herb FAC
herb FAC+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -
Remarks: GB is a thinly forested depression within allv a1 hardwood l 1 o non - wetland alluvial forest„mconnected c amed
Mine Creek by intermittent channel S -8. The wetland grades P P
hardwood/pine forest, and lawn to the east, and non - wetland levee to the west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ inundated
__S—Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
x Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (•) Secondary d 2 Indicators:
Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water to Pit: 0 -10 in.) Local SoillSurvey Data
0 4 (in.) FAC- Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: - _ other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GB is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S -8, plus infrequent over -bank flooding from Mine Creek.

GB wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Ci + Mantachie (Mel — Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ N0 _X
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluva uenticD strude is
pmflie Description• Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Colors pbundancelcontrast Structure etc.
Inches Horizon (Muns, _ eii Mclst (Munsell Moises
0 -8 A — 10 YR 3/2
8 -16 B —
2.5 YR 4/2 common/distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Concretions
_ Histosol _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Histic Epipedon Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Sulfldic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Aqulc Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Other (Explain in Remarks) .
___3_ Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors —
Remarks: Low chroma and red— concentrations indicate b better ned,awithh higher chroma, and depressions
o hys� such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Is the Sampling Point
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The ea enclosed by wetland boundary flags GB 1 to 15 is classified as a and based upon the
ar
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GA + GB U
Project Hone cuff Greenwa Wetlands GA G1
Applicant / Owner: Ralei h Parks & Recreation
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
situation)?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical
Is the area a potential problem area?
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S pecies
Stratu indicator
1.
F� °ennsylvanica_
2.
Quercus phellos -
3.
Liauidambar+raciflua
4.
Liriodendron tulipif,
4.
Li strum sinense
5.
Low !apOn�-
6.
Vitis rotundifolia
7.
Smilax rotundifolia
tree
FACW
tree
FACW-
tree
FAC+
tree
FACU
shrub
FAC
vine/herb FAC -
vine
FAQ
vine
_ FAC
I on Mine Cr
Date: 08 oct2009
County. __Wake
—
LQ
Yes --
X No Community ID:
Yes No _X
Yes No _X alluvial + mesic forest
Transect ID: GA. GB
Dominant Plant Species S- tratu r� Indicator
9. Pol stichum acrostichoides
10. Microsteeium vimineum
11. Cormus florida
12. Viburnum urunifolium
13.
14.
15.
herb
AFC
herb
FAC+
tree
FACU
shrub
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC - 6�
Remarks: The non - wetland alluvial hardwood forest adjacent to wetlands GA and GE grades upslope into,mesic
mixed hardwood /pine forest and lawn to the east, and non - wetland levee to the west along Mine Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tlde Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: —(in-) Secondary —Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
> 18 m
Depth to Free Water in Pit: —(- •) —_ Water - Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data
> 12 _(in.) FAC- Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ other (Explain in Remarks)
the wetland depressions appear to be
Remarks: Sediment deposits and drift lines on the floodplain outside of
ed is urbanized and probably has
from occasional events that do not result in prolonged saturation. The watersh
frequent but brief over -bank flooding events.

GA + GB Upland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cml + Cecil Sande is Cm eDl Confirm eMapped Type? Yesrl No _x loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvacauentic;:��stru n —
profiles ription• Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
Depth Abundanceicontrast Structure etc.
Inches Horizon iMunsell Molstl (Munsell Mo1stL
0 -8 A _JOY 4/3
8 -16 B 10YR 4/5
Hydric Soil Indicators: _Concretions
_ Histosol _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_Histic Epipedon Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Sulfldic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric Soils List
—Reducing Conditions Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Gieyed or Low- Chroma Colors
p ed as Chewacla &
as Cecil sandy loam). Soil profile description above is from the
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators on floodplain outside of depressions GA and GB mapp
Mantachie soils), nor on adjacent slopes (mapped
floodplain east of GB and northeast of GA.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Is the Sampling Point No
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No 7� - Within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes No X 1-15 ;e' classified as
Remarks: The areas outside of GA 1 -12 an Hand Delineation Manual. non - wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers We

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION GC wetland
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Date: 08 pct 209
Project/ Site: Hone cuff Greenwa Wetland GC on Mine Cr Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant I Owner: Ralei h Parks &Recreation County: Wake
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein &Assoc.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes --X– No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes NO —X alh'v'— al forest
Is the area a potential problem area? Transect ID: GC 1_3
(explain on reverse if needed) I Plot loo -
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant SD6c19S 1 Stratum Indicator
1.
Li strum sinense
2.
Woo la areolata
3.
Liauidambar stvraciflua
4.
Boehmeria cvclidrica '
5,
Lonicera iauonica
6.
Acer rabrum
7.
8.
shrub
FAC
herb
OBL
–wig–
FAC+
herb
FACW+
herb
FAC=
sa 1
FAC
neminant Plant Saecles Stratum Indicator
Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecles
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -
Remarks: GC is a linear wetland ad he t to 3 area upslope to the east. t 1GC receives flow from corrugated
prior to ditching and construction of GC -3 (end
plastic pipe under this developed area. Flag GC-1 (head of wetland) is at the outlet of this pipe, and flag
of wetland) is at the inlet of a short culvert beneath the sewer maintenance access road alongf the east bank of Mine
Creek..
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
.xSaturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
x Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: —(n•) Secondary o idized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 4 ln•) Water - Stained Leaves _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC - Neutral Test
Depth, to Saturated Soil: 0 —(i°•) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland GC was saturated at or near the surface during dry weather conditions, and apparently receives
constant flow from a drainage pipe under the swimming pool and recreational area to the east. It drains into Mine
Creek via a culvert under the sewer maintenance road.

GC wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Chewacla soils Cm Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No -x
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Flux uenticD strude is
e rofil D Sed o Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Structure etc.
Depth IM„nx c Moist- 1Munsell Moist- Abundance /Contrast
Inches orizon
0 -8 A_ _2.5Y 3/1
8 -16
_
B _-2—.5—Y 4/1
_--
Hydric Soil Indicators: _Concretions
Histosol _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
— Histic Epipedon Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric SOIIS List
_ Red'ucing Conditions Other (Explain in Remarks)
x Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors scent
Remarks: Mucky mineral texture and low chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adj
floodplain is better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION No Is the Sampling Point
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? yes _x No_
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: The ditch segment delineated by wetland flags GC Ito 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Cares of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Adjacent UPLAND vegetation, hydrology and soils indicators are the same as for GA and GB.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND D DETERMINATION rr aon Manual)
(1987 COE Wetlands GF wetland
Project I Site: Hone cuff Greenwa Wetland GF on Hone cuff Cr Date• 14 Oct 2009
Applicant I Owner: Ralei h Parks &Recreation County; Wake
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein &Assoc.
yes --X– No
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes NO —X Hillside seen forte
Yes NO —X
Is the area a potential problem area? Transect ID: GF -3
(explain on reverse if needed) L Plot ll)i�
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
ZMtua Indicator
�.
T iollStrnm sinerise
2.
Viburnum nudum
3.
Liauidambar styraciflua
4.
Lindera benzoin
5.
Loniceraianonica
6.
Acer rubrum
7.
8.
Percent of Dominant
shrub
—FAQ
shrub
FACW+
–MI-9–
FAC±
shrub
FACW
herb
FAC__
sa 1
FAC
Stratum indicato
Dominant Plant Species
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-
Remarks: Wetland GF is a ditched hillside Tree Pond. It t is bordered by me�c hardwoodforgst onothe slopes a
tributary of Honeycutt Creek above Ben
narrow band of alluvial forest along the creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
— Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _ —('n•) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels In Upp er 12"
Depth to Free Water In Pit: 0 - 8 in.) x Water- Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
—_(in.) FAC - Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: = Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GF is apparentlye maintained d eelevation of the cfrreek beloadjacent It was upland
aturated at the surface upper
half of this seep appears to be higher than th
dig dry weather in October.

GF wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): Wilkes soils (WwF) Conflrm Mapped Type? Yes_. No -x
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Profile Descrlotion: Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Colors
Inches Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist AbundancelContrast Structure a c.
0.8 p _2—.5—Y 3/1
8 -16 B 2.5 Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators: Concretions
Histosol _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Histic Epipedon Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Aqulc Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Reducing Conditions
X. Gleyed or Low - Chroma Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This seep is an unmapped hydric inclusion on a slope mapped as Wilkes and Cecil soils. Mucky
mineral texture and low chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adjacent slopes and narrow
floodplain are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The linear seep marked by wetland flags GF 1 to 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION GH wetland
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Date: 1919 Oct
Project I Site: Hone cuff Greenwa Wetland GH on Hone cuff Cr Date' 19 Oct_ 2
Applicant / owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation County: 'Wake
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert I Goldstein & Assoc.
yes —X No :allu3La mmunity ID:
Do normal circumstances exist on the situation)? Yes NO —X Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Yes No X forest Is the area a potential problem are a? ansect ID: GH 1 -10
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Stratum Domtnar+ Plant Soecles Ind
1.
Vaccinium corymbosum
shrub
shrub
FACW
A� CW
2 .
3.
Ilex verticillata
L1QIndamba r stt raciflua —
tree
FAC+
4.
Betula nit's
tree
FACW
5.
---
Woodwardia areolata
herb
OBL
6.
Acer rubrum
tree
FAC
FAC
7.
Wodendrontuliuifera
try
8.
Smilax rotundifolia
vine
_ FAC_
Sttu Indicator
Dominant Plant Species ra—�
9. Osm� galls __
10. Boehmeria cylindrica
11. Mi�r^stea_ ium vunmeum
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
herb OBL
herb FACW+
herb FAC±
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -
100
ssion within alluvial hardwood forest, east of a headwater tributary of
Remarks: GH is a thinly forested depre he
Honeycutt Creek, and connected to that stream by an epmeral channel. The wetland grades up p
wetland alluvial forest„and mesic mixed hardwood forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 00 Secondary Indicators: Upper 12"
x_ Oxidized Roots Channels In
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4 -12 in.) W cal S t l Sur Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
0 - 6 (in.) _ FAC - Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: — Other (Explain in Remarks)
apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands. It does not appear to
Remarks: Hydrology in GH is app Y
receive overbank flow from the creek to the west.

GH wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Bibb (Wol Drainage Class: poorly
(Series and Phase): Weh�ee _ Confine Mapped Type? Yes_ No x_
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvanuentic Endo a ue is
Profile Descriptlon: Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth
Inches o zon (h unsell Moist, (Nuns.,, Moist, AbundancelContrast Structure e .
0 -8 _
A 2.5 Y 3/2
8 -16 13 —
2.5 Y 4/1 10YR 5/4 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators: — Concretions
_ Histosol _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Histic Epipedon Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions other (Explain In Remarks)
x Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors —
Remarks: Low chrome and redox concentrations i belt i d�ra alwith highercbrOma, of hydric n
Adjacent portions of the floodplain toward tl►
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GH 1 to 10 is classified as a and based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
>> Wetland GP 1 -7, located 400 feet east of wetland GH = small depression, vegetation and soil
indicators similar to GH.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION G4 Wetland
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Date: 29 Jun 2010
Project / Site' Hone cutt Green wa Wetland on Hone cuff Cr Date' 29_ J_
Applicant/ Owner: Ralei Parks & Recreation County: Wake
Investigator: Gerald Po ,em Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc.
yes _X No
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes NO —X alluvia rest
yes NO —X
Is the area a potential problem area? Transect ID:
(explain on reverse if needed) Plot 10,
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indlcator
1.
S
shrub
FACW+
2.
Baccharis halirnifolia
shrub
FAC
3.
Liauidambar styraciflua —
tree
_FAC +_
4.
Pinustaeda
tree
FAC
FACW+
5.
Viburnum nudum
shrub
FAC
6.
Acer rubrum
tree
shrub
FACU+
7.
Rum °11
8.
Smilaxrotundifolia
vine
_FAC
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indtcato
9. Ludwil;ia aalustris
10. Boehmeria cylindrica
11. Juncus effusus
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
herb OBL
herb FACW+
herb F
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -
91
Remarks: GQ
is ascrubby marsh wetland beneath a powerline, periodically mowed or sprayed to c exclude trees.
It is adjacent to an intermittent or barely perennial
scrub and as probably c hardwood /pine forest-
HYDROLOGY or to clearing for e
powerline right -of -way. It grades upslope upland
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
X Drift Lines
—.2L Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
0 -1 (n.)
Secondary Indicators: Upper 12"
X _ oxidized Roots Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
0 - 8 in.)
Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil:
_(,)
_
FAC - Neutral Test
_ _ other (Explain In Remarks)
m is maintained by the creek flowing through it and lateral seepage from adjacent
Remarks: Hydrology' GQ � weather.
upland slopes. It was saturated throughout and inundated in several areas during dry

GQ wetland
vv�w
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee & Bibb (Wo)
Drainage Class: poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): FluvaQuentic EndoMuepts
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No ---&-
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Inches orizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance /Contrast Structure. etc.
0 -8 A 2.5 Y 4/2
8 -16 B 2.5 Y 511
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _
Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon _
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfldlc Odor
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aqulc Moisture Regime
Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
X Gleyed or Low - Chroma Colors —Other
(Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this alluvial wetland. Adjacent
uplands are mapped as Cecil sandy loam.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GQ 1 to 18 is classified as a wetland (excluding the 2 to 5
foot wide stream channel within the wetland) based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND ndsDee Em nati O
(1987 COE Wetlands on Manual) GM wetland
Date: 26_9
Project 1 Site: Hone cuff Greenwa Wetland GM on Bone cuff Cr pate: 26� 2009
Applicant 1 Owner: Italei Parks & Recreation County: w—
Investigator: Gerald Pottem Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc.
Yes X No Community ID:
Do normal circumstances exist on the ical situation)? Yes No X
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atyp Yes No X alluvial xl forest
Is the area a potential problem area? Transect ID: GM 1 -25
(explain on reverse if needed) and GM 100 -107
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary indicators:
_ Inundated
xSaturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
X- Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
—CM.)
Secondary Indicators:
oxidized Roots Channels in Upp er 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
4.16 in.)
x Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil:
0 - 9 (in.)
_
FAC- Neutral Test
— other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GM is app ar'cnktWly frommaintain
Falls Lake after large storms uplands and flow from three
small tributaries. It may also receive ba aters

GM wetland
5UIL5
Phase): Chewacla soils (Cm)
FTaxonomy me
Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
No
Subgroup): Fluvaauenti cDvst adepts
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_. __-&—
Profile Description: Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle
LMunsell Moistl (Munsell Molst) Abundance /Contrast Structure. etc.
Inches Horizon
0 -8 A 2.5 Y 3/2
8 -16 B 2.5 Y 4/1 1 V 514 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Histic Epipedon _
fi Odor
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Suidic
Moisture Regime
Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Aquic
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
x Gleyed or Low - Chroma Colors _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this floodplain depression.
Adjacent portions of the floodplain are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes --& No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area between wetland boundary flags GM Ito 25 and GM 100 to 107 is classified as a wetland
based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The wetland
continues northwest of GM-25 and GM -100, which is not a delineated wetland boundary
>> Wetland GN, located 2100 feet southwest of GM, has vegeattaion, hydrology and soil indicators similar
to GM.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S'
Date:
$ OCT 2 p p 9 prolect: Hoyeycui (sreewwa Latitude: 35'• 1-714
Evaluator: Gera
�� pd -Rem site: Lortsdreet Drive t- ongitude: �y5
Total Points: r,/ Other �a1 eo West
Stream is at least tntermittent �s tj County: Mai k e e.g. Quad Name•
2.7
2, Sinuosity
3 in- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5 Activefrelic floodplain
6. De positional bare or benches
7. Braided channel
8 Recent alluvial deposits
98 Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12 Natural valley or dralnagei! y _
13. Second or greater order channel on aht-b
UBGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions in
1% C .
°•':Weak ' .
`Moderate
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
— 1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
NO
Yes = 3
C. Bi01og Subtotal = __ "� 3 2 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 2 1
210 Rooted plants in channel 0 5 1
22. Cra h 0 1 2
23. Bivalves 0 0.5 1
24. Fish 0.5 1'
25. Am hiblons -- 0.5
1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance 0 1 2
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1
28. Iron o)ddizing bacterialfun us.
29 . Weiland Cants in streambed FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; t eq =1.5
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presenco of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or w
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this torn for addittonal notes) i
JA otaY1 rm soi �a
t..:ee ce S
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
3
1.5
= 2.0; Other = 0
d plants.
s
ss—trmt
i�s�

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form;
Version 3.1
Date: $ OCT aoo9 Project: Honeguff
&reenwy
Latitude:
�s. $r%b%
Evaluator: Ge�l4'Pa�terh site: t4}he Cr a 6forks
Longitude.
�yg. 6757
Total Points:
stream is at least Intermittent 502
County: VI/ ��
Wake,
e.g. Quad Neme: J F
1f 19 or erenniallf230
g
A. Geomo bolo subtotal = Z _
' •� Absenttt': ; :
�: �• Weak •..
:Moderate. '
2
�: •� Sir ' E
3
18. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
1
3
2. Sinuosi
0
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle- Pool sequence
1
2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
2
3
5. Act(ve/relfcflood lain
0
1
1
2
CM
8. De slUonal bars or benches
0
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
98 Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.5
1
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
.5
12. Natural valtey or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel one isU
No = 0
Yes
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
\J
evidence.
Manmade ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
�_
B. H drolo Subtotal = '
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
or
2
3
O
15. Water in channel and > 4B hrs slnce rein,
0
1
Water in channel - d or rowan season
1 5
1
0.5
0
17 Sediment on plants or ae!
18.Organic debris Ilnes or p
19 Hydrlc soils (redoximorph
C Biology (Subtotal = ._
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in ohanne
22 Crayfish
23. Bivalves
0 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5
No 0 Yes =1.5
0
0
0
cy. n�t� Q Et
25, Am hibians Q 28. Macrobenthos (note diversi and abundance 0
rill
27. Filamentous algae; era h on (0,
0.5 1
28. Iron oxldWng bactedalfungus.
29 . Wetland plants In streambed FAC ZO.6 FACW
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland Plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
PERT t Sol wions
Minp Cr �Veslf•ef . rx FMS Rd.
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
t
i
i
t
i
i
t
1 ,

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Project: ON Cuff 6reemwi Latitude: 95% V797.
Data: �` OCT Zvi � �
Evaluator: Ger al4 EotterK site: 1 110 CV' i0 �Qw7u+r �dLongitude: 7S', (pt{30
Total Points: O �4 y%q f
County. t'I
Stream Is at leastlntermutent �S. W
A. Geomor halo Subtotal
o
10. Continuous bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosi
0
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pools uenae
4. Soil texture or stream substrate coding
0
6. Adive/relic floodplain
0
0
6. De ositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
0
B. Recent alluvial deposits
0
9° Natural levees
0
io, adcuta
0
11. ntrols
EE
0
alley or drainagewa
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; soe discusslons in manual
B. H drolo 'Subtotal=
0
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rein, S
0
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
_ ,,a
V.
16.16. Leaf lder
0
17. Sediment on lants or debris
0
0
An nmanin dabd s lines or plies 1-1Nrack 11nes
,..
No =O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0_6
0.5
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
C. Biolog Subtotal = - l___ 3 2
200 Fibrous roots in channel 3 2
21 . Rooted lants in channel 0.5
22. Cra sh 0 1
23. Bivalves 0 0.5
24. Fish 0 0.
25. Am Nbians 0 0.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundances 1
S-3
30M �11
Yes 43
2 3
2 3
O6 0
1.5
1.5
Yes =1.5
1
1
27. Filamentous algae; eri h n 0 0.6 1 1
28. Iron oxidizing bactoda/fungus.
29 . Wetland plants In streambed FAC 0.6* FACW = 0.T5; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; t
items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 tocusee on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notga.)
j- 2MffI. Shovji+ Oki 0 f SOf S
rnn� Cit'
0
0
1.6
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
3
1.5
her = 0
sM3 .
iYearfohh
A

North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
aroject: oh cuff Csi'�ehwa Latltude: 3 S. S So 7
Date: $ oar zoo9 � .64x1
Evaluator: Gera« �8 rN
Site: yea*), i�Q Apts Longitude: 7g
Total Points:
Other 84JI of
County: �, / e.g. 4uadName:
Stream Is at leastlntermtftent 7 W A �,
14. Continuous bed and bank
2. Slnuosity
3 In- channel structure• riffle -pool sequence _
4. it texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active /relic fioodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Breided channel
B. Recent alluvial deposits
9 °Natural levees
10. Headcuta
11. Grade controls
V. Natural vaAe or dralnageway
13. second rN greater oroler Und111101 U11
USGS or RCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; sea discussions in rr
_B_Hydrolog r (Subtotal = a
14. Groundwater How /discharge
16. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, of
Water In channel -- dry or ttrowin0 season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on (ants or debris
18 [name. debris Ilnes or plies (Wrack lines)
19.
No 00
1.5
0
0
No
1
1
1
1
2— 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yea =3
2 3
2 3
0.6 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes =1.5
S-4
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
ewylEk l showw ON Soil a •
ri -ra di
ch... rb a r
NQw01

0
North Carolina Division of (Mater Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 �•��
Hate: 8 OCT 2009 Project Holz cuff tsreehw4 Latitude: 35.IV15' s�5
Evaluator: Get'al� •Pause -vt site: A1p{,6jtij�Q A cS Longitude:
Total Points: Other $423 lea
Stream is at least intermittent L� County: Wake, e.g. quad Name:
lfZ 19 or perennial if 2: 30
• _ _ -- - _._. _ 2S. S Absent'::: ._'::Weak
1°. continuous bed and bank
1
3
2.s
0
0
1
2
3
3. 1 channel structure: Me- ool se uence
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
5. Acflvelrelic flood lain
0
0
1
2
3
e. De sitionat bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
96 Naturai levees
0
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.6
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or dralnageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existinct
No = 0
Yes
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made dltohea are not rated; some discussions in manual
5'5
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwaterflowidischarge
48 hrs since rain, or
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and >
0
Wate In channel - d or rowln season
1 5
0.5
0
16. Leaflitter
0
0
1
15
17. Sediment on ants or debris
0
0.
1 �=1.6��
18 Organic debris tines or piles (Wrack lines)
No 0
Y19.
H ddo soils redoximo hic features resent?
,
C. Biol Subtotal = ____l _._
0
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
3
2
2
1
1
0
21 . Rooted lants In channel
3
0
1
16
22. Cra sh
0
1
1
2
3
23. 8ivalves
0
0.6
1
1.5
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Am hibians
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
0.5
2
1.6
3
27. Filamentous algae; pedphyton
0
0
1
0 5
1
16
28. Iron oxidizing bacterfalfungus.
29 Wetland lams In streambed
FAC 0.
FACW = O.M. OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
.
items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
�
s Le/ -Nf s
�ere�rw�aP, showv� o� �`npv
t soi/
x.20
3S• S
//
0
73. 6NZO
S�6
e
A
t,
S�5 �

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S -7
Date: $ o %- 2W7 Project: � f OWYCUff 6reehwa Latitude: 3S. T Z07 o
Evaluator. GrCl"a�cipAtem Site: A/ew�nA/4 A Longitude: 'j0. 6�i$
Total Points: other gQ� /eq f
Stream is at least intermittent to county: Wa ke,, e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 4.5 _
Absent::'..
0
` ::Weak
1
1
:Moderate;';
2
2
'.''i Strong '
3
3
18. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
0
0
1
2
3
3. in- channel structure: riff) oot sequence
1.5
0 0.6
1 1.5
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
Yes =1.5
3
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
1
2
2
3
6. De osidonal bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
B. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
98 Natural levees
0
0
1
1
2
3
10. Headcute
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Grade contro►s
0
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
.5
13. Second or greater order channel on a is
Yes = 3
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
Noe
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rates; See al5waaluna m mauves.
A C
B. N dr0l Av. SU0101di = �+-
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
3
1
2
3
15. Water fn channel and > 48 hrs slnce rain, _st
0 1
2 3
Water in channel - d or rowin season
1
0.5 0
16. Leaflitter
1.5
0 0.6
1 1.5
17. Sediment on lants or debris
0.5
1 1.5
1-19. .Organlc debris Ime�or&es rack lines)
0
No 0
Yes =1.5
H dric soils redox faatures resent?
0.5
C. 1310log 5uo1vta1 --
_j05.
3
2
1
0
Fibrous roots in channel
1
0
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
2
0.6
1
1.5
22. Cra sh
0
0
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0
0.6
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance )
3
27. Filamentous algae; erip on
1
0.5 '
2
1
1.6
28. Iron oxidizing bactedalfurt us.
In streambed
t=05]:
tFAC
0
29 . Wetland plants
u.
=FA ha resanco f a uatic or wetland PlantsOt-
in s
- items zu anu L 1 nncus us M,w in vov..........y.. -.._ ,.. --- _.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
s h� �ed c G�aand a t east edee of
Lt::rPNEMF, eAI , Mof Mapes on soil or to .
J
/ J
6 -7
a`/
t
1

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 9"• V
Date: 8' 0 e r 200`1 Project: f �oheycfri �sf eenwa Latitude: 99. 81 s i
Evaluator: Gerald po�tern site: 0 of ren,ty Pill In Longitude: 171K. ON
Total Points: {,' Other gay ��-�
Stream is at least Intermittent 2 � 5 County: W a � e.g. quad Name:
im io or erennial if 36
A. Geomorphology ( (Subtotal= i, _
0
1
Weak "
1
Moderate'•;
2
2
.:" :S
pitg
3
3
1°. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosl V
0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
2
3
3
0
3. in- channel structure: r(ffl ool sequence
1
1
2
3'
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1 •
1.5
3
S. Activelrelic flood lain
0
1
2
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Yes
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
1
3
3
8. Recent eliuvial deposits
0
1
2
3
90 Natural levees
0
0
29 . Wetland plants slreambsd
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
5
1
i.6
12. Natural valley or drainagewa
13. Second or greater order channel on exiSllnq
No
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
m.idnnrla.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
rw
B. H drol Subtotal = -L-)
3
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
0
1
0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1
1
3
Water In channel -- div.or grovAng season
0
0
1
0 5
0
16. Leaflltter
1.5
0
0.5
1 •
1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1,5
18. Organic debris lines or piles rack lines
0
0.
Yes
1.5
18. Hydrlc soils redox(morphic features) present?
No = 0
3
/_U,
C. 131010 bul)lolal =
3
2
1
O
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
1
0
21 . Rooted plants In channel
3
2Y-
0.
1
t.5
22. Crayfish
0
0
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0
0.5
1
1.6
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1'6
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
3
27, Filamentous algae; periph lon
0
2
1
1.5
28. iron oxidizing bac[eriaffun us.
to
.
0 0.5
FAC 0,5• FACW = 0.76; OBL =1.6
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 . Wetland plants slreambsd
wn a............., 66s nre- -n nt antlalln nr watland olants.
'Items 20 and 21 toouS on me Presence ul u1J1011v Mw..w.. - .. -- - - - - -- - - -
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
LA
.. tT
I�
.. tT
I�

}
t
z
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 s /
Date: Oct 2009 Project: Hwiejcuff 6reewly Latitude:
Evaluator: 6,,.14 p erg site: W of penrt Nip Pool Longitude: 79. 6413
'total Points: Other p,.yleW
Stream [sat least lntemtHtent 12.5 County: W% ke e.g. Quad Name; Oft
A. Geomor halo Subtotal
1
2
18. Continuous bed and bank
1
2
2. Sinuosity
0
0
1
2
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
2
2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
EIE_
2
6. Active/relic flood lain
0
2
6. De ositional bars or benches
1
2
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
8. Recent alluvial deposits
2
1
2
9° Natural levees
0
0
1
2
10. Reactors
5
1
ii. Grade controls
0
5
1
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0.5
1'
13. Second or greater order channel on e s
1.5
No
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
•0.6
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
5_
B. Hydrology Subtotal = _q.•
0
1
2
14, Groundwater flow /discharge
0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1
2
Water In channel - dry or growing season
16
1
-1
\u�•
16. Leaflitter
0
0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
Sketch:
i
18.Organic debris lines or Iles (Wrack lines)0
0
NcI
Yes = 3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
C. Bl01og Subtotal =
3
2
i
0
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
2
1
0
21 . Rooted plants In channel
3
0
0.5
1
1,6
22. Crayfish
1
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
1
1.6
24. Fish
0
0.5
1'
1.5
25 Amphibians
0
•0.6
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
2
3
27. Fflamenlous algae; erlphyton
0
1
1
1 5
28. Iron oxidizin bacterialfungus.
in streambed
0
FAC 0.
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 . Wetland lams
Items 20 and 21 focus on tine presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
pheN1 ,loins wet GC e'�0
YQ culye�ct iark�_ �•ly�rf 'IN es .het %
'�¢ tl1?d11? CK'PPu� �j'1AG1Y1 d� SOI� A�
1+
ttlnE
�e ek`�' S9

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Vdrsion 3.1 !9- 10
Date: 9 ocr 0?009 Project: HO)leycuff 6reeilWa Latitude:
Evaluator: 6et-41 t PdtterVl site: SW of ofd ker TO Longitude: 71, 6 91?
Total Points: Other
Stream is of least Intermittent 5 County: Wake, e.g. QuadName• $ayIn?f
ifz 19 or erennlat If a 30
A. Georno holo Subtotal
Absent.: ;
%Weak.
Moderate.?
;Strong';::'
10. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
w
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
5. Activefrelic flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
CO)
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9° Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0 1
gi.0
1
1.6
12. Natural valley or drainagewa
0
01
_ 1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No 90
Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; sea discussions in manual
R 14wimrnnv 1.Rnhtntal = .2 1
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
0
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or rowin season
O
1
2
3
16. Leaflliter
1.5
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
('01
0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Frack lines)
0.5
1
1.6
19. H dric soils (redo)dmorphic features resent?
No f-0)
Yes =1.5
C Rinlnnv (Suhtntal = 2.5 1
20P. Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
0
-i-16. Rooted plants In channel
3
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0.5
T
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance )
0
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
1
2
3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteda/fun us.
01
0.5
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
FAC 0. FA OW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item z9 tocuses on the presence or aquatic or wauana punts.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: fir'
gphemeo. ewskagAl bullu N&
If I
}
I PEI*
`t
, S -+o
�a,
k

4
'r
i
•
Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form;
Version 3.1
f
S" i
North Carolina
Date: q Oct 2009 Project: HoneycUff �SYt�Ei1Wa
Latitude:
�5'• �8'r0
Evaluator: GBI"a�� �0'��t'N site: 50,0f 0ld � Trail
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at toast Werrnttten! 10
County: ��(��
Other PN �P
e.g. Quad Name: PN
ira 19 or erennistUa30
6
• Absen't.. ;
--:-:.W- eak � _ '
Moderate , :
`•Strohg;
A. Geomo ho lo subtotal = -
0
2
3
1 °. Continuous bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosit
0
2
3
3. in- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1
---2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortie
1
2
3
5. Activelrellc ti dplain
0
0
1
2
3
6. Dwositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
2
_
3 -
8. Recent al{uviai de sits
0
1
2
3
9 °Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
]01
0
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0 5
1
1.5
12. Nature[ veils or drainageWa
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
No
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drol Subtotal = _ 0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
> 48 hrs since rain, or.
O
2
3
15. Water In channel and
0
Water in channel -- d or rowan season
1 5
1
0
0
18. Leaflitter
0
0.5
1
1.5
'17.lment on plants or debris
5ed
0 5
18.0 anic debris lines or Iles rack lines)
No
0
Yes =1.5
19. Hydric soils redoximorphir, features resent?
C. Biol Subtotal = a - 3
2
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
1
0
21 . Rooted tents In channel
015
1
1.5
22. Cra sh
1
2
3
23, Bivalves
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
R.,A
0.5
1'
1.5
.Am hiblans
0.51
1.5
28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
1
2
3
27. Filamentous algae; erf h n
O S
1
1.5
28. Iron ox{dtzin bacterialrungus.
FAC = 0; CW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
2g . Wetland tents in streambed
of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or weuand plants.
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
v
S -!l

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 S -11
Date: q OCr 2009 Project: HOheycuff 6r,
Evaluator: Ger4(4 PotterK site: NE of old Deer
Total Points: q% County: Wolke,
Stream Is at least lnterrnJttent
Nz 18 or erennlal J/2 30
!y Latitude:si �B�J
Longitude: �g, 6 377
Other s wf
e.g. Quad Name: y
A. Geomo holo Subtotal = 27
Absent
;
:Weak
Moderate' •
10. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
0
1
1
2
22. Crayfish
3. in•chann at structure: riffle- ool se uence
1
2
2
E#--
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
1.6
5. Activelrello floodplain
0
1
1
2
2
3
6. De osifionat bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9° Natural levees
0
0
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
1
1.b
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
V. Natural valley or drainagewa
13. Second or greater order channel on a Afe-IlIng
No = 0
Yes ;41
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man-mads ditches are not rateo; See u1bulubbIV110 .n1 -:...w.
B Hydrology (Subtotal = _ �_
14. Groundwater flowidischarge
4;; watar to channel and > 48 hrs Since rain, or
16. Leafiitler
17 Sediment on plants or debris
18 Organic debris lines or piles Mrack
19 Flydric soils (redoxlmorphic features
17
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 Q
1.5 1 0.5 0
0 0.5 1.5
0 0.6 1.6
No 0 Yes =1.5
G. t5jolog auUwiul - � • � �
3
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
Ef
1
0
21 Rooted Cants in channel
.
3
-E
0.6
1
1.6
22. Crayfish
0
0
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0
0.5
1
1.6
24. Fish
0
0.5
25. Am hiblans
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
3
27. Fiiamemous algae; periphylon
0
1
2
1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bactedalfun us.
fg 0.6
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.76; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
29 . Wetland ilants In streambed
'Items 20 and 21 roCUS on IDe Preserlw vl W.o..- r""w. •w••• �- •�� - - -
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
�i°reNhre.Q . /iecc�: So' Toro Maps
eJc erisNe bedrock Efe
Gt

Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
S i3 A
North
Date: 21 Suwe 2010 Project: Oh CU� iSiBPNWQ
Latitudo: 3�G'. g$$6
Evacuator: G@r414 'p6 -LtetK site: 250' 14 of 014 Deer Tr.
g -fig►, 63'15
Lon itude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least inleRntttent =14.5
ounty:�k�,
Other �gyieaf
e.g. Quad Name•
!/Z 9 of nnial !f z 30
A. Geomo hole Subtotal = _ g
Absent ..
Weak
Moderate
2
Strang
1 °. ConUnuous bed and bank
0
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle- ool sequence
0
1
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
1
2
3
5. Activelrelic fioodplain
0
1
2
3
6. DepoAona l bars or benches
9
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
2
3
8. Recent alluvial de osits
0
1
2
3
9° Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
12. Natural valley or drains laway
13. Second or greater order channel on exists
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
e No
""VV
Yes = 3
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
r
B. H drolo Subtotal =_ 0
1
2
3
% Groundwater flow /dischar e
15. Water In channel and > 46 1113 since rain, or.
0
U1
2
3
Water in channel - d or rowin season
115
1
.5
0
16. Leaflltter
0
1
1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0 5
j
1.5
18.Organic debris fines or ilea rack linos)
No
Yes =1.5
19. H drie setts redoximorphic fpalures present?
C. Siolo Subtotal = �P' S 3
2 1 `�
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2 -
0
21 . Rooted plants in channel
015
1
1.5
22. era fish
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
26. Amphibians
IFACH
0.6
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
1
2
3
27. Filamentous algae; pedphyton
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
C W
29 , Wetland in streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
613A y,
O'er
a s��
w

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream identification Farm; Version 3.4 S -l3 g
Date: g Oaf 2009 Proles: f �oh cuff &reenway Latitude: 35- $ tTV
Evaluator: Gera« *potterla Site: I1e5f of ClearbjWk Dr. Longitude:- 79.6 3'10
Total Points: Other O'
Stream Is at least Intermittent t'1 Jr County: �� �"e, e.g. Quad Name: 8.104f
A. Georno holo SuDtotal =
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. In- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Sort texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Activa/relic floodplain
6. De 3ositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8 Receni alluvial depos(ts
9 5 Nature! levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12. Natural voile or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; sue discussions In manual
B. H droto Subtotal = ' S
14. Groundwater nowidischarge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, -or-i
per..#.,. �r ^hmn�al ._ dN nr arowina season
0
0
[r]
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 22
1 _ 2
0
No -=0 Yes = 3
a
0
16. Leallitter 1.6
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0
IS. organic debris lines or illes rack Ilnes 0
19. H dric soils redoximo hic features resent? No 0
I-
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
2 3
1 02 3
1 0.5 0
i 1 1.6
1.5 1 1.6
Vaa c 1 _S
C. Biolog Subtota -- _
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel
22. Cra sh
3
3
0
2
0.5
1
1
2
0
3
23. Bivalves
0 0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0.6
1'
1.5
25. Amphibians
0 0.6
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
27. Filamentous algae; ed h ton
0
0.
1
1.5
28. iron oxidizing bacleriatfungus.
0
FAC 0.6• FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.6
SAV !1-2,1 Other = 0
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
I
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) S ^,N
�ej+ttenr.P 0f' hiCtc(e So or o`
S -tag
13A
v

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: q oef Z049 Project: HonayCUff &reehw4V Latitude:
Evaluator: Ger414 Pottervt site: -094 of CfegrbWk Longitude: 79-6360
60
Total Points: Other ga yle4f
Streem 1s at feast fntemrlltent 3 County: � e.g. Quad Name:
is> so of narannlal ►f z 30
S-14
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =�
:' Absent;';
0
...Weak' '
1
Moderate"
2
3
3
18. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3
0
0
1
1
2
3
3. In- channe! sWcture: dHle of se uence
=Z3
16. Leatiitter
0
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
0
0
1
0.5
3
5. Active /relic flood lain
No = 0
0
1
1
2
2
3
6. De sitional bars or benches
0
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0.5
0
1.5
-
3
8 Recent alluvial deposits
1
0
1
1
__C2) - -
2
3
9° Natural levees
1 .5
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
0
..n r .......... .... tia ,.wmnrva nr aauatio or wetland Giants.
10. Headcuts
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.6
1
1.5
12. Natural vaile or drainagewa
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No
evidence.
- Man.maoe oacnes and nw jacnu, aw v, " " "
B. H drolo Subtotal =
1
1
14. Groundwater flow /dischar e
0
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
=Z3
16. Leatiitter
0
0.6
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
18. organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines
0
0.5
19. H ddc soils redoximo hic features present?
No = 0
IA
1
1.5
Yes
3
3
0
1.5
1.6
C, Biology_ buototai = - I V
2
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
0
21 . Rooted plants In channel
=Z3
2
0.5
1
1
1.5
22. Crayfish
0
0
1
2
3
23, Bivalves
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.6
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; perliphyton
0
1
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteda/fungus.
0 0.5
FAC 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.6
1 .5
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
..n r .......... .... tia ,.wmnrva nr aauatio or wetland Giants.
" Items 20 and Z1 70005 on aid prosdnw y. upai �. r•.•. ••". •• -••• -- •- - - - -- -- --- - • -
Notes: (use bade side of this form for additional notes.)
pe�ennia� 5'• � � wick . Map//�ecl o�,
s'
e
J

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date:
Oct 2007 Project: Hoileycliff 6reemwaq Latitude: 35, 17/4
Get -alb Mthe Cr @ Moitntrn �/et- ongltude: 7g • .6361
Evaluator: eYVI 81te:
Total Points: Q
Steam is et leastlntertnJttent 2 /
County:
ke,
other
e.g. Quad Name:
14 y�Iewlfl
/xl
ifa i9 or ersnnlaf tf2 30
0
21 Rooted plants in channel
0
0.5 1
1.5_
I
� Absent'
:
'.:.,Weak
".Maderat ®; , :
,`.-Strong >' %.
1.6
A. Geomo bolo Subtotal =
0
:'
0
1.5
1
2
0.5 1
2
3
27. Filamentous algae; eriphyton
1 °. Continuous bed and bank
0.5 1
0
28. Iron oxidizing bactedwTun lus.
1
2
on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
3
Items and 21 focus on the presence
2, Sfnuosit
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
____ ____ _-
IG�
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
2
3
6. Active /reAc floodplafn
0
0
1
1
2
3
8. De sitional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
r
3
8. Recent alluvial de osits
0
2
3
9 °Natural levees
=:L--
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
LEFE?E
11. Grade controls
0 6
--
12. Natural valle or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on a sin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No ,n
v
Yes = 3
evidence.
Man -made dftches are not rated; see discusslons in manual
Jr. S
B. H dro I Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
or
1
©
3
15. Waier in channel and > 48 hrs since rain,
0
Water in channe{ •- d or In season
11.5
0 5
0
16. Leaflifter
0
0.
1
1.6
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0.6
1.5
18. organic debris lines or pUes rack lines
0
ti
n
Yes =1.5
C. Biol Subtotal = ___1__�
3
2 1_�____
0
200. Fibrous roots in channel
____
1
0
21 Rooted plants in channel
0
0.5 1
1.5_
22. Cra sh
1 2
3
23. Bivalves
0.6 1
1.6
24. Fish
0
0 1'
1.5
25. Am hibians
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance).
0
0.5 1
2
1.5
3
27. Filamentous algae; eriphyton
0
0
0.5 1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bactedwTun lus.
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; other 1
29 . Well and plants in streambed
tl
of upland plants, Item 29 focuses
on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Items and 21 focus on the presence
sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
•
a 5-S
iHrM ' r
IG�
f'ltwrn'atg Dove
5--- Mi S of YhAa
_ ��OWIA
r

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 -�f}
Date: Iq QCt 02009 Project: Hone ycuff &reenwirtj Latitude: 3S'. 898
Site: Longitude: 7 g - �rs 3 ie2
Evaluator. Gera��'Pofiteri� a Chulso►� Dr•
Total Points: Other gay(eaf
Stream rs at least intermittent 3�, y, County: Wot ke, a g. Quad Name:
1%
= i
Absent•;
`. , '::" :Weak•
*' Moderate; ` ::" !.Strpni
A. Geomor holo subtotal
0
1
2
3
18. Continuous bed and bank
1
2
3
2. sinuosity......
0
0
1
2
3
3. in-channel structure: riff) ool sequence
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
3
5. Activelrelic floodplain
0
0
t
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
0
1
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9B Naturel levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
:,:=I
6
12. Natural valley or dralnageway
13. Second or greater order channel on axis tin
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No t;�J
evidence.
Man made ditches Ware rated; see discusslons ..... in ... manual
B. H drol i9y Subtotal =
0
1
2
14. Groundwater flow /discha e
Jj
15, Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or.
0
1
2
Water in channel -- dry or growing season _
1
0.5
0
16. Leafiitter
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Sediment on lants or debris
0
1
1.5
18 Organic debris fines or piles (Wrack lines)
,5
No = 0
Yes !0.6,)-
19. Hvdde soils (redoxlmo hio features present?
C. Biol Subtotal = _____1 3 2 1 0 _
20 . Fibrous roots in channel cha -A- --- 2 1 0
21s Rooted plants in nnel _ _ 1.6
22. Crayfish 0 0.6 1
23. Bivalves 0 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5
1 1.5
0 0.6 ERE 1.5
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5
27. Filamentous algae; hyton 0 1 2 3
rf
28. Iron oxldWng bactedalfun us.
0 0.6 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5• FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items 20 and 21 tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence otaqualic or wetlsnd plants.
Sketch: `,� Po�D
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) gety � I
j¢p�et/cu Cr ,ad h i l" 6 ff T
� 2►lt'GIVIIO� ups a t� pB� -
0� �
I Qr,,
C4�o

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: I
0 aoo9 aroJect: Hoh Cuff 6reetlWil Latitude: 35'.9000
Evaluator: Get- *14 PAtetit . site: flV1�Tree awd outlet Longitude: �$, 63ab
Total Points: Other Ka y(�oa f
Stream is at least infanntttent �� County: W �'� e.g. Quad Name:
if 2! 19 or rennlatIfa30
- - - . i t. 5 , . 'ot�sent•.. _ ..'=.w�>i!k �: . •Mode'rat�:. ,:Strg
2 Sinuostty
3 In- channel structure: dffie-pool sequel
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5 Active/relic floodpiain
6 Depositional bars or benches
T. Braided channel
8. Recent aquvia{ deposits
9e Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
m Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on g
USGS or NRCS map or other docun
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discus
g w�r►l '
o 6
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since
Water In channel - d or rowing s1
16. Leaflitler
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18.organic debris lines of plies (Wrack
0
0
0
0
0 _
0
0
i9 N
id o
In manual
1
Yes = 3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
0 1 2 3
or 0 1 3
1 1.6 t 0.5 0
0 .5 1 1.6
0
_ .I,, n Yes ¢ 1.5
s -al
C. 810lo Subtotal = ___iV
3
2
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
1
0
210. Rooted lente in channel
0
0.6
1
1.5
22. Crayfish_
0
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
1.5
24. Fish
1
1.6
25. Am hibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diverslty and abundance
=0.76;OBL
1
2
1.5
3
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizin bacterialfun us.
FAG OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
29 ,Wetland Plants to streambed
of upland plants, Item 29 focuse of aquatic or wetland plants.
items 20 and 21 focus on the p resence
Sketch: Sfl 11 way
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
,
J i uu� y
%'" � tbrid ye
� -^'�40
` r
bid,
I Bern�;Tr�ee
pond
t,

North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
�0O9 Project: HoneyCUt+ &reenWR Latitude: 35. %�OJ
Date; 1q. Q� ry
Evaluator.
Get'a1� p0' �rVl . Site ; —K of E*Tree Polid Longitude: g, 63C)
' (, Other �7ar'lo f'
Total Points: a County: W a Ke. e.g. Quad Name: t� J
Stream is at least Intermittent
ifz gor erennlalXZ30
j %•�. :; Absent:• Weals. Mod ®rat ®.. Strgi
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2 Sinuosity
3. In- channel structure: difle -pool f
4. Soil texture or stream substrate
5 Activelrelic WONT"
6. Depositional bars or benches
8. Recent alluvial de osits
98 Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
12 Natural valley or are nageway
13. second or greater order channel one is
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see disa�sslons in man
B Hydreo)lo tSubtotal =
14. Groundwater flowldlscharge
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, os ,
u#..t... t.. nhenntal _ rlry or arowing season
16. Leaflitter
V. Sediment on plants or i
18.0 lo debris lines or
19. Hydrlc soils (redo)imor
C. 1310109Y (Subtotal = _
0 1 _ 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 0.5 1
p 0.5 1
No
0 1 2
0 1 2
I 1 0.5
0E.5 1
0 0.5
0 1
No = O
Yes =3
Yes
J
0
1.5
1.5
S -aa
' Items 20 and 21 focus on mo PF-t -w - ter- - . - -.._.---
-
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) •L
bbl
ev��W,al q cd� _�-
,t .

North Carolina Division of Water Quality
-Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
/� Protect: �{on cuff CSreellwa Latitude: 3 S`. 9009
Date: � � QL� a,Q� .
! �nrVi site: 0 L7 CUI Vert Longitude: jg. 6,110
Evaluator: Gerat4 P0" , . 1
Other 1?a yrea f
Tots{ Points: 9 e.g, quad Name: E�
Stream is at least Intermittent / County: �,(��( k�
ifZ 9or srennlalU230
'' tltieak':` '•: •`:Mod'e'rato::;
A r:ammnmhotot]V (Subtotal =_ 3K5 ' : Absent„ ; :''::< 3
2
� °, Co'- nt)nuous bed and bank �
2. Sinuosity
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool segue
4. Solt texture or stream substrate sortin
5 Activelrelic fl)odplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8 Recent alluvial deposits
9 ° Natural levees
10. Headcute
11. Grade controls
12 Natural Valle I or drainageway
13. Second or greater order the f el on
USGS or NRCS map r docu
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discu
Bu 1-T IR I rSubtotal = 10#5
. 11 X41 VIV •� - -��
R14. Groundwaterttowidischarge _ Water in channel and > 48 hrs sinc,
1., ,.1.�„nnt _ dry or arowin9 t
1
�a in manual
No =0
0 1
oC 0 1
1.5 1
0 0.5
17. Sedlment on lants or debris
oraanio debris Tines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
015
18.
19. Hyddc soils redwdmo hio features resent?
No = o
�S
C. Biolo Subtotal = _ -
3
2 _
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
3
2
21 . Rooted plants to channel
0
0.5 _
22. Crayfish
0
1
23. Bivalves
0
0.5
24. Fish
0
0.5
26. Am hiblans
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
0
0.5
1
27. Filamentous algae; penphyton
0
0.5
2a. Iron oxidW bactedalfun lus.
FAC = 0.6; FACW = 0.76; OR
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
on the presence of upland plants,
Item 29 focuses on the presence of aQi
Items 20 and 21 foCUS
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
pe= ; 6 fi sand /g��,►�J��o661e
So ' atiw(
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Yes =3
©`FS1
00 M
t'R M
S -g3
1 1.6
3
1 1.6
XSAV = 2.0; Other -- 0
or wetland plants.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 -at{
r 9 0 aooq Project: Hoh
Date:
cull' tSreento
Latitude:
3�.
y��C14 etoj G
Pdtt•
f /�
dm Sn
Longitude:
7�,
.Site:
Evaluator. Ger414
Total Points:
stream fsatteastlnfermi iOn=q6,5'
Coun: WA ke,
ty
Other 5gyteaf
e.g. Quad Name: U
if 2 f9 or erann(at (f a 30
aO.S
Absent : ••;:�
aNeatt' '.
tr'
st
A. Geomor holo Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosit
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
1
2
2
3
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
3
6. Active/relicfloodplain
0
0
1
2
3
S. tional bars or benches
2
3
d channel
0
t alluvial de osits
2
3
l levees
0
1
z
3
. cuts
0
0.5
1
1.6
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valle or drainagewa
or order channel on Misting
Yes 90
13. Second greater
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No = 0
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. H drmoioMf Subtotal= 1
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, 2r
0
1
2
3
Water In channel - dry or growina season
1 5
1.
0 5
0
16. Leaflitter
0.5
1
1.6
17 . Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
E[
1.5
18.Organto debris Ones or lies rack 11nes)
N0=0
Yes
19. H ddc soils redoximo hic features) present?
C. Blot Subtotal = ___ 5 --
3
2
1 0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
1
21 . Rooted lants in channel
0
0.6
22. Crayfish
0
1
2
3
23. Bivalves t'Q C aWfS
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0
0.6
1
1.6
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
0
0.6
1
1
2
1.5
3
27. Filamentous algae; eriphylon
0
0
0 S
1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacterie/fun us.
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.76; OBL =1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of squati0 or wetland plants.
Skalgt�..�,
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.),..0
D 6 -10 _r�1c� s�20ulw
Pr°r�•aE�c�lia.r --T
�l
ad
�_
ps
3 �
�v

i
n
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: a9 J"u )1e 010 Project: Honilcuff &reemwaq Latitude: 35. `/0023
Evaluator. Tuvtvt a Longitude: 7g„ 6
Ger414 Post
Total Points: f� 1 other
Stream last least Intermittent. County: M ke, e.g. Quad Name: 4
If 2 f9 or erennial Ua 30
Subtotal= �6 -•� ':Absent•' °':.'�::W��k�':'
A. Gaol no holo 0 1 2 3
1°. Continuous bed and bank 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
Act[ve /re
6. po flood lain 0 2 3
6. De ositionai bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Bralded channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent al(uvlal de osita 0 1 - 2 ' 3
8° Natural levees 0 1 - 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
V. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on xis No 40 Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented ���"JJ
evide ce. -
Man -made ditches are not ''sled; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = 0 1 2 3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge 3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, o f 0 1 2
Water in channel - d or rowin season N5__ 1 0 5 0
16. Leaflilter 1 1.5
17. Sediment on Cants or debris 0.5
0.5
18.Organla debris lines or (tes (Wrack tines jNo 0 Yea =1.5
19 H dric soila redoximo h� features resent?
M22.Cra Subtotal = .- 'U _ 3 2 _ 0
us roots in channel 3 1 0
d lams In channel 0 0 5 1 1.6
sh 0 1 2 3
23. Bivalves 1. 5
24. Fish 0 t76; 1 25. Am hibians 0 1' 1.S
0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance 0 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; periph on 0 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizin bacterla/fun us.
2g Weiland lants in streambed FAC 0.5• FACW L =1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) 6-25A +� n
-�i -berm r� 9 , od�, &!H RLv W d N G
seta
G'r'eenway
TUOVIA

t
i
. i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 9 fjG-r 2009 Project: Hoj eVCUff Cr eertwa Latitude:
Itf Evaluator:
Geraic� �Paiterw Site: Qhe C CYO 59� OqI Longitude: g'. (0 310
Total Points: Other �gyli°Q�
Stream Is at feast intenntttent -j/t'6' , County: Wa k� e.q. Quad Name:
AZ gorperanniaMS0
.- _ . _ __ . 1 �• Absent ....... `R1fVeajC;; ;Mditerate. Y - i 5 sprig °r;
1e. Continuous bed and bank U 2 3
2. Sinuosi 0 2 3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soll texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
8. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.6
12. Natural valley or drainagewa
13. Second or greater order channel on x s i No = 0 Yes 1
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches ere not rated; see discussions In manual.
13. H drolo Subtotal = j' S
0 1 2 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2 3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1
Water In channel -- d or row! n season 1-5-)_ 1 0 6 0
16. Leaflitter 0 FY.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 10E
18.Organic debris tines or Iles Wrack lines No = 0 19. Hydric soils (redoximo c present? C. Biolog Subtotal = �_
3 2 1 0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
2 . Rooted plants In channel 0 0.5
22. Crayfish 0 1 2 3
23. Bivalves 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hlblans 0 0.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; pedph on 0 0.5 1 1.6
28. iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us.
29 . Welland plants In streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatlo orwettand plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
shou>m dvi W -4 .� •�- =-.✓'
. D S
' 5-23

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
Date; aI Od%0- .2009 Project: �oneycuf� (sreeNwa Latitude:
Evaluator. GeraU �0 "lt -�hh . Site:' of Hpyy luf �tr(C Longitude: '�g. 6�8r$
Total Points: Other pQy(PaT
Stream is at least intermittent a0.01 County: Wake-, e.g. Quad Name: 1�
if 2 tg or perennial If a 30
alp
_ 16.
A. Geomo holo subtotal= _
0
'Absent:
iNet�K'
•:Mod '•rate::• �•�;�tr.Qri9.:..
11. Continuous bed and bank
1.5
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity
1.5
0
0
1
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool se uence
1.5
t
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
1.5
0
1
0.�a
3
5. Activelrelic floodplain
0
1
2
2
3
8, Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
T. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
9 8 Natural levees
0
1
1
2
3
10. Headouts
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
.5
12. Natural valle or drainagawa
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
Yes = 8
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No
evidence.
Man -mane aacnes are nut natou, co- -• • - --
B. Hydrology Subtotal = • 5
14. Groundwater flow /dischar e 0 1
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, gr 0
Water in channel - d or rows season
18. Leatlitter 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5
18. organic debris Ilnes or Was rack lines 0 0.5
1g. Hvddc soils (redoximorphlc features present? No 0
C. Blot Subtotal = y
fob.-Fibrous roots In channel 3 2
21 . Rooted p6as in channel 3
22. Crayfish 0 0.5
23. Bivalves 0 1
24. Fish 0 0.5
25. Am hibians f5urgcM, R4140. 0 0.5
no
M b thos (note diversity and abundance) 0
v
r 31�
�� ry
Z.
&ME
0
3
i -5
Kom I
2 3 4.
2 3
1.5 0 l
1 1.5 0.5
1.5 1
Yes C.B O
1
28. acrd en
27. Filamentous algae; erl h ton 0 1 2
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0 0• 1
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAG 0.5' FACW = 0.76; OBL =1.5
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or w
Sketch:
p�eVl Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes)
at �n�rim��xi�r �-5-�� ►l PVck� ,
,�Vosl j Orl9ulaks ivy Gle Aylai' povierlihe.
Soil
A
PO 4.laLi IY-k = t;� �a1P
S' _0( -1 UP m °r ,we y S / ��,M jusf 4I6Ve
t:Gtdr�o 11�0�15�71�U j %tOf �a 4 powerliKe yN_ay act
29 Ame 2t7T0
-, -.,.& - 21; [: perch
/ XM\.
Wet &K
I
0
2
0
2
1.5
0,S
3
0
1.5
0
1.5
i
1.5
t
3
1.5
= 2.0; Other= 0
0.�a
d plants.
35.5
S' _0( -1 UP m °r ,we y S / ��,M jusf 4I6Ve
t:Gtdr�o 11�0�15�71�U j %tOf �a 4 powerliKe yN_ay act
29 Ame 2t7T0
-, -.,.& - 21; [: perch
/ XM\.
Wet &K
I

i
t
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version M
�1 ocbher� x009 project: Honeycutt &reeHwa Latitude: 3�. 90g5
Date: .
Evaluator: GeraJ4 1'o- .teat . Site:' WOf Ane ctr/% /tovf1kerr
Longitude: $ e &RIO
Total Points: ry L other W rest
Stream is at teastlntermlifent a� �e U County: wa K t, e.g. Quad Name: y °a
i 7
A. Geomo holo (Subtotal= _
,
Q►bsent
0
' - Ma
1
1
,.Moilerat I SEroiii
2
3
3
1°. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
0
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riHie -pool sequence
1
1
2
3
4. Soft texture or stream substrate sorting
0 5
0
2
3
6. Activefrelic floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
0
1
2 _
3
8 Recent alluvial deposits
1.5
0
1
2
3
9° Natural levees
0
1
2 _ r
3
10. Headcuts
2
0
0.5
1
1.6
11. Grade controls
0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0.76; OBL =1.S SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Wetlan d streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upplandants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
13. Second or greater order channel on c stityq
No -l^`1
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
L/
evidence.
Manmade ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
dal 501 avid
%dDD �tOS-
3��
B. H drot Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater now /discharge
48 hrs since rain, ur
2
3
15. Water in channel and >
0
Water in channel -- d or rowan season
15
0.5
0
16. Leailitter
0
0
1
1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1 5
18, Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
No 0
V-
19. Hvddc soils (redoximo hic features) resent?
q'S
C. Biolo y Subtotal = r_
3
2
20 . Fibrous roots in channpl
2
1
0.
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
0 5
1
1.5
22. Cre fflsh
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0
5
1.5
24. Fish
1
1.5
25. Am hibians
0
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
t
2
3
27. Filamentous algae; pert hyton
LVFACEW=
0.5
1
1.5
2on oxidizin bactefla/fun us.
tents in
0.76; OBL =1.S SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Wetlan d streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upplandants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes. (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
dal 501 avid
%dDD �tOS-
OVfIke

,
North Carol
Ina Division of Water Quality - stream Identification Form; Version 3.4
0� Project: F{ON CUff -r
QeMWa Latitude: 3rj _ t l
Date: �9 OcT 2 i
pe t
y .s Longitude: '79- 6 216
Evaluator: Gera14 "Potte"A site: �itsrnNf
Total Points: ) Other 1, Wake
rest
Street" /sat least lntsrmittent ' l0 0 County: Woke, e.g. Quad Name: UV
-- - -- --1, H- OA '
A. O @01714 11010 Subtotal = �_ -- ' " ""
O-
1
2
3
18. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Slnuoslty
0
1
2
3. in-Channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
5. Activatrelic floodplaln
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
2
3
8. Recant alluvial de osits
0
1
2
3
,90 Natural levees
0
1
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valle or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on a is t
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No
Yea = 3
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
'Subtotal �'
3
B. H drolo :2
0
1
2
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, oJr
0
1
Water in channel -- dry or rowin season
1 5
1
0.5
0
16. Leallitter
0.5
1
1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 6
1
1.6
18.0 Ir, debris lines or des rack lines
No _ 0
Yes 1.5
19. Hyddc soils redoximarphlc features resent?
.5 a9
C. Blot Subtotal = 3 2 1 0
E20 . Fibrous roots {n channel 3 2 1 0
. Rooted plants In channel 0 0.5 1 1.6
22. Crayfish 0 2 3
23.8 0 0. 1 1.6
24. Fish 0 0 1 1.6
25. Am hibians C@� 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance) 0 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; riphyton 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us. OBL =1.5 SAV =2 Other = 0
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this forth for additional notes)
S01 VN 'Du12��
�eirP�w r�aQ ,
yW
S

s
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3A 5-,30
Date: al odobe Am Project: Ho;4cuff LCsreehwu Latitude: 35.9133
Evaluator: GeraJ4 Pot,uetK . Site:' Al W f7ti[ RC�.�t�b' Longitude: g• ba ! i
Total Points: Other 1'_
Stream la at least Intermittent 17, 5- County: wake, e.g. Quad Name: W Q 6
Ma t9 orperennial fl a 30
A. Geomorphology subtotal = �,'
``{ ;plbsent.,,°
? ., ,W.ea[c'
1
1
:.�i(dderatt3E
2
2
'`;Strong "Y
3
3
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
0
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
O
2
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
0
3
5. Active /relic flood lain
0
1
1
2
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9 a Natural levees
0
0
1 1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun -us.
10. Headcuts
0
0.5
1
5
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or dralnagewa
13. Second or greater order channel ones
No :0
Yes
= 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
" Man -made dttones are not rareu; aw u,awoo,v."
� n
B. N dr010 UM 1131 = 1 ="
3
1
2
3
14. Groundwater, flow/discharge
O
1
0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, p1
0
O
2
3
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
0
015
1
0 5'
0
16. Lea flitter
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1'
1.5
18.0 anic debris lines or Iias reck Ilnes
0
0.5
1
Yes 1.5
19. H drlc soils redoximo hic features resent?
No 0
3
n
G. siolo 5uotowl
3
2
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
1
0
21 . Rooted !ants in channel
3
2
1
1.5
22. Crayfish
0
015
1
2
3
23. Bivalves
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0.5
1'
1.5
25. Am hlbians
0
0.5
1
1.6
26. Macrobenthos (note divers1tv and abundance )
3
27. Filamentous algae; pnerlphyton
1
1 1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun -us.
0 0.5
FAC = 0.6; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
SAV = 2.0; Other 0
29 . Welland plants in streambed
... nn e_ ... -., nn Fhn nmcnnrn of Annflt[t or watland slants.
-items zo ena n roots on Ulu • r ".." r ".. -• .- .- -- - --
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
or S'd~
S'5o
- w
Z
-punt NT
��t

,
i
i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 19-31
Date: « L-u1y zolo Project: �{o�eycuif Csi'eeriwu Latitude: �5: 91✓�ai
Evaluator: Gerald PAtet -K , Site:'16661N ??urarl �d Long(tude: �g, 6 t !�
Total Points: other f� g''
Stream is at /east Intermittent County: County: Wake, e.g. qued Name: +rYa k Sir
it 2 8 or erenniat ft k 30
A. Geomorphology subtotal .2L.D _
1H. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. in- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
'Absent:
0
0
0
:dNeaK`
1
1
1
`Moderato? y;
2
2
2
: '.ivS>ir .1y
3
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
6. Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
3
6. De sitional bars or benches
0
1
0
3
T. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9 a Natural levees
0
1
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0
0.5
1
1
11. Grade controls
0
1
3
12. Natural valley or drainagewa
0
0.5
1
.6
13. Second or greater,omer channel on existing
No
Yes
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
"Man-made dltcnes are not rateoi sou uswoa,vna n,
rl t; .
IS. ri rol �UDIUtgI - Y -1��
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater now /discharge
_
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, RE
0
1
Q
3
Water in channel - dry or growing season
0
0.5
1
0
18. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
3
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
015
Ail
1.6
18, Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
19. Hydrlc soils redoximo hic features present?
0
No 40
Yes =1.5
1.5
ll? )
L.. otUiUy QUUivta, -
3
2
1
0
20P. Fibrous roots in channel
_
21b, Rooted Plants in channel
3
2
1
0
22. Cra h
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.6
1
1.6
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
01
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphylon
0
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterla/fungus.
0
0.6
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
FAC 0.6• FACW = 0.76; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
amm Lv a,lv c, wwa vu a.v pv.+ ........... ..r•^••_ r. -. -- ---- _ - -
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
PPre>?KPd, spa Iva ail

North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 c-39.+33
UO project: J�aheycuii' Csreeywa Latitude: 3S� 91 SS • S;�z
Date: as Oc t °Z y Site:' cuff6- S6f Longitude: 78.617'%
Evaluator: Gerald p6ftern l other • klala Fore'
Total Points: County: Mike, e.g. Quad Name.
Stream is at least lntennilten
jut z: 9 or rennla! tf Z 30
:: WeaK - Moderaxs� r ttrb fig
p►b'sent ;; . 2 3
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = -_ -- 0 1 3
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
1 2 3
2. Sinuost too uence 0 2 3
3. In- channel structure: rift% 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2
1 2 3
5. Acflve/relic floodplaln 0 2 3
6. De WTI bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2
1
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3 2 3
ga Natural levees 0 1 1.5
10. Headcuts 0 g 5 1.5
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
12. Natural valle or drainagewa Yes 90
13.S econd or greater order channel on isN No � 0
USGS or NRCS map or other documented -_ ..-
evidence.
Man -made ditches are nut rated; see discussions In manual
3
B. N ro l 1 2 o Subtotal = �-1- 0 3
U. Groundwater flow /discharge 0 1 2
15. Water in channel and >06 owing seasonor 1 0.5 0
Water In channel -- d 1.5 1.5
16. Leaflitter 0 0.5 5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5
Iles rack lines No 0 Yes -1.5
16 Organic debris lines or p_ (W _ - sent? --
19. Hydde soils redo Imo hic features resent?
1 0
C. 810110 Subtotal _ �- 3 2 1
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1.5
21 , Rooted lants in channel 0 0.5 1
1 2 3 w
22. Cra sh 0 1 1.5 �t
0.6 1 1.5
23. Bivalves t' a 0 0.5
24. Fish 0 1 1.5
25. Amphiblens 0 _.____.fi
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2
0.5 1 1.5 �
27. Filamentous algae; eriphyton 0 ,
28. iron oxidizin bacteria /fun us. FAC = O.b; FA = 0.76; OBL - 1.6 SAV 2.0; Other
29 ,Wetland lants In streambed %ante, Uea► 29 focuses on the presence of aquaU or wetland plants -
plants
Items 20 and 21 focus on the pre sence of upland p . --
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) � ' / s- 3
fYlh� � `fig WtGt<e' avid
brow �� ° -3a t�
,�taty! s`feM H�heacr Creep !
I
tr -�--. proposed Arai J
6153 '

i
i
Division Of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
North Carolina
e �ti CsnWQ
projct f OICU ree
Latitude:
Date: a6 0J Z 0 0
�QV�h �i "d G
Longitude: �% $ •
Get-ai�'o t'h site: o�r of
Evaluator•. 2
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent 3�, S
r,
county: W a Ke.
Other wa k R• reSt
e.g. Quad Name:
If z 9 or rennial ff a 30
j sent, < :ilyfl�k:° '.Mbd'elat�`: : trsaiig
A. Geomor polo Subtotal ___ - 0
1 2 3
18. Continuous bed and bank 0
1
2. Sinuosit 0
3. inuo it structure: difle-pool se uence
0
1 2 3
1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
3
1 2
5. Activelretic flood lain 0
1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
1 2 3
7. Braided channel
1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0
1, - 2 3
98 Natural levees
-"
- 2 3
- 1.5
10. Headcuts 0
0.5 1
11. Grade controls 0
0.5
12. Natural valle or drainageA'all
13. Second or grea e ter order channel on s n No
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not talet see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = 0
1 2
3 -
14. Groundwater flowidiacha e 0
15,W ter In channel and >48 hrs since rain, or
1 2
3
Water in channel -dryer rowin season 1.5
1 p
0
16.leaflitler 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0
0.5 1
0.5 - --
1.5
1.5
18.organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) No = 0
__ .__-ri
Yes 1.5
19. Hydrlc soils re0oxim0 hie features resent?
C. BIGIo Subtotal = _�� 1 - 3
1 0
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3
2
1 0
21 . Rooted Is in channel 0
0 5
1 1.6
22. Cra sh 0
1
2 3
1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0
0.5
1• 1.6
24. Fish 0
0.5
1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance 0
0.5
1
1 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; ad hyton 0
0 6
1 i.b
26, Iron oxldizin bacteria/fungus- FAC = 0.6; FACW = 0.76; OBL
=1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
29 . Wetiand lants In streambed
20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Items
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Lt S-3 5
�
.
etlavicR
Gtr

'
North Carolina Division of Water Quallty - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Protect: HoYteycuif &reejji Latitude:
Date: a 6 Oct Z007
Longitude: 79. 613 3
Evaluator: 6et"o« p0tt2Ch Slfe:'��p0�� of �avela Rfd�e
Other �Lq FO(�PSf
Total Points: County: Wake, e.g. Quad Name;
Stream ors intermittent 9_0
erennialNt 30
Mosle'ratc::' ' ::Strpii9 �y
�1 O :: ° Absent )llfea)t: 2 3
A. Geolno holo Subtotal =_ - -- 0 1 3
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2, Sinuosity 1 2 3
0 2 3
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2
5. Activelrellc floodplaln 0 1 2 3
, de ositional bars or benches 1 2 3
f;
0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 --- 3
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2
9a Natural II 1 3
1
10. Headcuts 0 0.6 .5
11. Grade con 019 0 0.5
12. Natural vatla or drafnagewa Yes = 3
13. Second or greater order channel on e At No0
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = b 1 2 3
0
14. Groundwater flowldischar e 1 2 3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, 01 0
Water in channel -- dry or rowin season 1.5 1 0.5 0
1 1.5
16. Leaflitter 0 0.5
17. Sediment on tents or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. organic debris lines or Iles Wrack lines) No 0 Yes =1.6
19. H ddo soils redoxlmo hic features present?
C. BI- 0 {o 'Subtotal= -0 - 2 1 0
3 1 0
20 . Fibrous roots to
channel 3 2
21 . Rooted tents in channel 0 0.6 1 1.5
22. Cra sh 0 1 2 3
23. Bivalves 015 1 1.5
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 --- 1.5
26. Am hibians 0. 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; ed hyton 0 0.6
28. Iron oxidizin bacterialfun us. FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 . Wetland tents to streambed lanta, {tem 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland p Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

North Carolina Division of Water Quality �-
Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
�y Latitude: 33
Project: �Sreehwa
Date: ao;t a0 10
7g. �Ir9
l� Po'� gVeti R Longitude:
/"�(e
Evaluator: Gt3ra eiVl stte:'a$00',5 of
Other k, Gorest
Total Points: q� O County: �,( f a k2, e.g. Quad Name:
Stmem is at feast lnterrnntent !(
IYltlllry {pVV v.... - --
B. H droto
14. Groundwater
16.
Water tehef
Water in chat
16.16. Leap_._
17. Sed_ i� n
18.0 b�
1A_ HVdfio SOiIS �
are not rated; seed discussions in manual
ubtot___ al =i • "- —�---
low/discharge
1181 and > 48 hrs since rain, or
„oi _ dry or Arowin season
or
or
C. Subtotal = --
3
2
3
0
3
2
3
1
EM2
0.5
1
22. Cra sh
0
1
1.5
0
0.5
Yes =1.6
C. Subtotal = --
3
2
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
20 Fibrous
3
2
1
21 . Rooted cants in channel
0.5
1
22. Cra sh
0
1
2
1
23. Bivalves
0.5
1
24. Fish
0.5
25. Am hiblans
26. Macrobenthos (rrote diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1
1
2
27. Filamentous algae; rl h on
0
0.5
1
28. Iron oxidizin I bacterla/fun us.
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBI. =1.b
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
of upland plants, Hem 29 focuses
° °0 p resents of
aquatic or w
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
emote rn
cillifti rve
0
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
3
1.5
= 2.0: Other
536
�.a

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 5 37
Date: � D �• 2p d Protect: 01� Ct/� �YeeYIWQ Latitude: 35, x a 3 7
y_6
erA , site:' Z700 *6 Or W'1�el� G Longitude: 78. h 099
Evaluator: GeiQi� P0'�
Total Points: other e.g. L�,A, !-
Stream is at least Intermittent 10.0 County: wo(� e.g. Quad Name: W aF"
A. Geomo ho lo Subtotal =_
o
2
18. Continuous bed and bank
1
2
2. Sinuosity
0
1
2
3. In- channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
1
2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
7. Braided channel
0
0
1
2
8. Recent alluvial de osits
1
2
9 ° Natural levees
1
2
10, He" outs
0
0.
11. Grade controls
0
O.b
1
12. Natural MR or C Inagewall
13. second or greater order channel on x sti
No
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; sea discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subiotat =
0
1
2
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
16. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
p
1
2
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
15
1
01
16, Leatiitter
0
0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.6
1
18, Organic debris fines or piles (Wrack lines
No 0
19. H dric Bolls redoxima hic features resent?
C. Biology Subtotal =,_Z•0 --
3
2
2Y. Fibrous roots In channel
2
21 . Rooted !ants In channel
3
0.5
1
22. Crayflsh
p
1
2
23. Bivalves
0
0.6
1
24. Flsh
0
0.5
1'
Yes = 3
Yes
25. Am hiblans 0 0.6 1
28. Maembenthos note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2
27. Filamentous algae; erl h ton 0 0.5 1
28. Iron oxidizin bacterialfun us,
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0;
items 20 and 21 tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
3
3
.1
1.5
1.6
0
0
1.6
3
1.6
1.6
1.6
3
Notes: (use back side of this torn for additional notes.)
0
r
r
t4- $ -37

0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1
S �$
q project: HoHPyGUff' &reeNWQ Latitude: 3s ya36
Dade: a 6 0 r,
Gel al�'Po site:' �Opp�,S o�I�GltreN�j��'Longitude: 78- b08
Evaluator: 2iN
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least Intermittent ' g. O county: Wake, e.g. Quad Name:
�fJ' =; Absent:..;.
7v'4 eak:' . , °•':ModeiatQ.
A. Geomor holo Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosii
0
1
2
3
re
3. In- channel structu: rlifte- ool se uence
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate soling
0
1
2
3
5. ActiveJrelic floodpialn
0
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
g a Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
0.6
1
1
11. Grade controls
0
1 0.6
1
1.5
12. Natural veils or drain eway
Sketch:
�1
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
13. Second or greater order channel on _ex-ir-JIM
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No V
Yes = 3
evidence.
Man -made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
fi(/>Q Iiv rn GIVJ Of r�/�DOPU
/
dill
�'
ofr
B. H drol Subtotal =
0
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1
2
Water in channel -- dry or rowin season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1,5
18.0rganic debris fines or lies (Wrack lines)
No 0
Yes =1.5
19. H dric soils redoximo hic features resent?
0
C. Blot Subtotal = I --
3
2
1
0
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
3
2
1
0
21 . Rooted lams In channel
1
1.6
22. Crayfish
1
2
3
23.8
0.5
1
1.5
24. Fish
0.6
1'
1.5
26. Am hibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundane)
JFAC=
I
0 5
1
2
1.5
3
27. Filamentous algae; pedphyton
1
0.5
1
1.5
28. iron oxldizin bactedalfun us.
= 0.75; OBI. =1.5
SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuse presence of aquatic or wefian IaLPND G N
Sketch:
�1
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
11 if u
•
fi(/>Q Iiv rn GIVJ Of r�/�DOPU
/
dill
�'
ofr
0
0

Version 3.1
North Carolina Division of Water Qualit y -- Stream Identification Form;
ZOO ; Project: Oh Ct11 6- r"aeNWa Latitude: ��, 9a3 �7
Date: a6 OCR' r
EiVI Site: j9D0� S GT�tQG(dfGt 4jP,Longitude:
Evaluator: Get a�� Pott
t' Other Wq��OrcSi
Total Points: County: Wa Ke, e.g, quadName:
Stream is at feast intermitten�0?0�0
- ,_us, en
= 15.a
bed
3. In- channel structure: nmeyv�"w uo,,,,..
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relle floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial de osils
98 Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
V. Natural Valle or dralini low a
13. Sgreater ed USGS or RCS map or other documented
evidence.
Man -made ditches are "101 rated; sea discussions in manual
B. H 1111dr010 Subtotal = v7- o
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
W. Waier in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, ,
Water In channel -- d or rowin se son
18. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
IS. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack lines)
19. H ddo Bolls rsdoximo hic features present?
No90 I Yes =3
0
o
i<' r
__jiR
No90 I Yes =3
0
3
__jiR
3
1.6
0
10
0
1.5
No
Yes =1.5
C. B1010 Subtotal __ &V -- 3 2 1 0
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted tarts in channel 0.6
22. Cra sh 1 2 3
23. Bivalves 0
24. Fish
26. Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1.6
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
27. Fllamentous algae; all n 0 0.6 1 1.6
28. Iron oxidlzin bacteria/fungus. FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
29 . Wetland plants in stmambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the pre sketch: f aquatic or wetland plants. G
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) k j V0.10
.E ► _- A CIS ar e "1,
urge Ar' s -39
e
f
e �
J

,
North Caro*
arolina Division of Water Quality — Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Latitude: %'�3q
Data: �� �G f @9 Project: Hon cuff' 6reolwa 3s•
Evaluator:
Gerald Poterw Site: j����,stt {% i/Prl�Prd e Longitude: 78� 6081
Total Points: ��) Other A6Aples
_ �$. 5 county: YV o ke, e.9. Quad Name: vv
Stream is at least intermittent
'Man-made ditones are nur lot—,
B. H drolo Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48
r.. A—not — dry or arm
17. Sediment on plants or oei
18. Organic debris lines or pii
18 Hyddc soils (redoximorph
C Biology (Subtot�
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
21 Rooted plants in channe
22 Crayfish
23. Bivalves
24. Fish
manual
�$_0 0 1 2 /3`�
hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 V
win season 1 0. 0
1.6 1 1.5
p 0.
p 0.5 1 CIS
grack lines Yes 1.5
atures resent? No ¢ 0
_ 3 2 FMO
2 0.5 1 0 5
25. Am hibians 0 0. 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; erlphyton 0 0.6 1 115
28. iron oxidizin bacteria/fungus. FAC - 0.5: FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 .Wetland plants In streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or ...and plants.
Sketch:
Notes.. (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
r rat crlf 5*#M W Nei' Glet kd GNt �
r� - ��, ...._..
c l S v
e ..
i
25. Am hibians 0 0. 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 2 3
27. Filamentous algae; erlphyton 0 0.6 1 115
28. iron oxidizin bacteria/fungus. FAC - 0.5: FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.6 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
29 .Wetland plants In streambed
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or ...and plants.
Sketch:
Notes.. (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
r rat crlf 5*#M W Nei' Glet kd GNt �
r� - ��, ...._..
c l S v
e ..
i

1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ,S f
Date: o7 0 C T -2 0 07 ProJect: YO Cuff Crreellw4 Latitude: 35- 9eq 6 6
Evaluator: Get -414 Pb+ter►i . site:' 700's 0 f A& Longitude:
76-
� g o
607
Total Points:
Stream is at (east Intermittent / 3' County. Other
If Z 9 or erenn1a1f a 30 a e.g. Quad fme: Wkke i
mm
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = 7,0
;Absent • ;
:.';; .Ylfeak:'; '. , ' N�odefiatQ'
k ;Str-pipg°
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
•
1 2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle ool sequence
0
1
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0 5 0
1 2
3
5. Active/relic flood lain
18.Organic debris lines or Iles rack lines)
1 2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
No 0
1 2
3
7. Braided channel
= 0.75; 013L a 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
1 2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 2
3
9 a Natural levees
1 2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
3
11, Grade controls
0 O.S 1.5
12. Natural valley or dralnagewa
0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
t1SGS or NRCS map or other documented
Noe Yes = 9
evidence.
---- --------- ••--- ••- •.�..w.vw,rvv ...uv...-,frI411a 111 IIIPII4OI
R_ l4vriminrn. fCiohfnfnr
-
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
I 70"Y--
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or.
22. Cra sh
0.5 1 1.S
23. Bivalves
Water in channel - d --or rowin season
Lo
1
2
3
16. Leaflitter
15 1
0 5 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris
0,5
1 1.8
18.Organic debris lines or Iles rack lines)
0 0.5
1 1.5
19. Hydric sob (redoximo hic features ) present?
No 0
Yes =1.5
C. Bininav 1Stfhtntal = 0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2 1
21 . Rooted lants in channel
3
0
2 1 0
22. Cra sh
0.5 1 1.S
23. Bivalves
1 2 3
24. Fish
0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians
0.5 T 1.5
28. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton
0
1 2 3
28. Iron oAdizin bacteriagun us,
0
0.5 1 1.6
29 . Wetland lams in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW
= 0.75; 013L a 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
(lama 9f1 -f 91 f.. n1, aA.. .......'..�� -s ..-'__.a -'_ ->✓ ..__
....._
.. _
Iayutwu yr weuana plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
S d Sty ` r
. � 11

ATTACHMENT C
Revised PCN pages 7 and 9, Submitted January 16, 2012

IN
NVSP °SEALS
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
T: 919.678.0035
F: 919.678.0206
www.wspsells.com
TO: ACE Raleigh Regulatory Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite
Wake Fuest, NC 27587
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE January 16, 1012
JOB NO. 07 -4029
PROPOSAL N0.
ATTN: Jamie Shern
RE: Pre- Construction Notification
Honeycutt Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section C3
1
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑x Attached RX Via Via Fed Ex the following items:
Mail
Shop Drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
Copy of Letter Change Order
Photographs Control Photographs ❑ Contact Prints ❑ Manuscripts ❑ Diskettes
Diapositives x See Below
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
1/16/12
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section C3
1
1/16/12
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section D4
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
X For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit
For your use Approved as noted Submit
As requested Return for corrections Return
For review and comment For your records
Control survey required Analytical aerial triangulation required
See below remarks For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
COPY TO: Lisa Potts, City of Raleigh
Gerald Pottern, RJGA
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED:
.E.

ALWSP °SELLS
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
T: 919.678.0035
F: 919.678.0206
www.wsosells.com
TO: NCDENR
Division of a er Quality
Mai ervlce Center
Raleigh, -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE January 16, 1012
JOB NO. 07 -4029
PROPOSAL NO.
ATTN: Karen Higgins
RE: Pre- Construction Notification
Honeycutt Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section C3
5
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑x Attached RX Via Via FedEx the following items:
Mail
Shop Drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
Copy of Letter Change Order
Photographs Control Photographs ❑ Contact Prints E] Manuscripts ❑Diskettes
Diapositives x See Below
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
5
1/16/12
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section C3
5
1/16/12
Pre - Construction Notification — revised Section D4
For review and comment
For your records
Control survey required
Analytical aerial triangulation required
See below remarks
For review and comment
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
x
For approval
Approved as submitted Resubmit
For your use
Approved as noted Submit
As requested
Return for corrections Return
For review and comment
For your records
Control survey required
Analytical aerial triangulation required
See below remarks
For review and comment
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO: Lisa Potts, City of Raleigh SIGNED: RalptfTroutmV, P.E.
Gerald Pottern, RJGA

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
(Corps: 404, 10
DWQ: non -404)
stream
width
(feet)
length
(linear
feet)
S -8 ®P ❑ T
Culvert, Sta 67 +50
Mine Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
❑Per ®Int
®Corps ❑DWQ
4.0
26.5
S -8 ® P ❑ T
RipRap, Sta 67 +50
Mine Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
❑ Per ® Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
4.0
18.5
S -26 ® P ❑ T
Headwall, St 201 +70
Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
® per ❑ Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
4.0
2.0
S -26 ®P T
❑
p Ra p , Sta 201 +70
RipRap,
neycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
® per Int
El
®Cor p s ❑ DWQ
4.0
6.5
S -28 ®P ❑ T
Culvert, Sta 238 +70
Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
❑ Per ® Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
5.0
56.0
S -28 ® P ❑ T
RipRap, Sta 238 +70
Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
❑ Per ® Int
® Corps ❑ DWQ
5.0
31.0
S -29 ®P T
❑
Culvert, Sta 238 +70
Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
®Per ❑ Int
®Corps El DWQ
5.0
18.0
S -29 ®P T
❑
Ri Ra
p p , Sta 238 +70
Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood
Per Int
® ❑
®Corps ❑DWQ
5.0
4.0
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts: Total Piped = 102.5 ft, RipRap -lined = 60 ft.
162.5 ft
31. Comments: Bridge or boardwalk crossings proposed on Perennial or Intermittent streams at S5, S6, S12, S14, S22, S23, S24, S25a-
b, S31,S32, S33, S34, S39, S40. Foundations will be outside OHWM, thus No stream impact at these 15 crossings. >> See attached
Table 1 for sequential listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑ P ®T
Bent Tree Pond
Replace existing wooden bridge
Pond, Sta 172 +25
0.0037 T
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
0. Total open water impacts
0.0037 acre
4g. Comments: Boardwalldbridge footings will be installed on uplands beyond normal pool in approximately the same location as the
existing bridge; no footings or other fill in waters. This impact is considered temporary.
6. Pond or Lake Construction -- NA
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
PCN Version 3.1 Dec 2008

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
RJG &A delineated and mapped all streams and wetlands along the project corridor and consulted with City greenway planners and
WSP Sells engineers during design to avoid and minimize wetland, stream and buffer impacts wherever practicable. Existing
development and steep slopes pose tight constraints along much of the stream -side corridor segments, where riparian buffer impacts
are unavoidable, especially from Newton Rd to Honeycutt Park. Between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Rd an existing cleared
sewerline right -of -way will be used for some segments, rather than clearing a new corridor through forested land farther from the
stream. Trail alignments in these areas were selected on a site -by -site basis, considering proximity of the sewer to the stream -bank,
stream -bank stability, riparian forest habitat quality, adjacent wetlands, availability of land beyond the zone 1 buffer, connectivity
with streets, schools and parks, and other site - specific decision criteria. The majority of the proposed 22 stream and 11 wetland
crossings will use boardwalks or bridges (Type 1 Traditional Greenways and Type 3 Natural Trails) or existing sidewalks (Type 2
Wayfinding Segments) to avoid and minimize impacts. There are only four areas where permanent fill or piping in wetlands is
needed (total = 0.0409 acre) and four stream segments that require a permanent culvert and/or riprap (impacts ranging from 8.5 to 56
lin. ft., total = 131.5 ft), based on the design engineer's determinations. See also the attached "Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts
and Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment" for site - specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers during construction include minimize clearing widths,
using existing cleared lands and sewerline rights -of -way for access and staging areas, keeping equipment and stocked materials on
the off -stream side of the construction corridors, and using modular or stick -built bridges to minimize the size of vehicles needed in
remote forested areas. See also section B.3.e above for detailed discussion of construction methods and sequence.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank — NA
a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
�Ype
Quantity
c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ (pending) " * *?
b. Stream mitigation requested:
103 linear feet
c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm ❑ cool ❑cold
d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.0409 acres
f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
PCN Version 3.1 Dec 2008

ATTACHMENT D
Figures 1 -12 in color

B -5
B -3
B -4
B -1 %
S-3 b
N�wn Rd B -2
T
O
F
N
a
S -2
Mine reek
Figure 2. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
S-1
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
tipc• — - -- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
ee
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
t ' See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
• acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B -3
I B-1 l
18-10
P B -9
B -8 j---�
S -5
—B-5
B-2
B -16
B -15
S-6
B� --144
1 S-6
B-4
GC J W -GC
1 W -GA 1
B -13
CI B-
r--
B-11
B -7
B -6
B-6
S-4
i B-51
Newton Rd
S-9
S -7
a
o�
y
yid
Figure 3. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts."
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

v
ir
m.
o�0
B -19
B-18
B -17
B -15
M.
41"
I B-16
GC W.: c
S -s
B -14
tip.
Figure 4. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

Figure 5. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank S -16
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
✓ Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
Mourning Dove Rd.
I S -15 I
a�
6
e
�o`��G B -37 B 38
0, S -13B B -35 B -39
B -32
S -13A
B -33
B -34
B -31 1 J S -12
B -30
B -29
B -28 f' /% BY --j B -26
��l S -14
B -40
B -41

R A
4
Figure 6. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
- - -- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
B -63
B -42
B -44
B -51
B -50
B -48
B -47
B46
"
B -43
W -GG
B49

B -44
1 B -72 1
B -ss
n -70
B -71
B -73
Figure 7. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
i
B -44
1 B -72 1
B -ss
n -70
B -71
B -73
Figure 7. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B -80
0
0
CD
c
I B -78C l
B -78B
B -78A
B -79
I B -78D I
B -77
S -28
B -75
S -29
S -30
Figure 8. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Bas' Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
" See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B-82
1 B-88 t
I B -87 L
B -93
B -90 \ // /� i B -92
B -86 L--_j // I S -31
B -83
W -GL
1 B -91 I
B-89
B -94
Figure 9. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
GL Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
B-81 E-1 Permanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B-80 S -30 Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
OD
Bridge
B -79 Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
k`= Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
Rd. areas in buffers.

B -99
B -98
B -97
QN
of
Z
B -93
W -GN
B -113
Lt �
. I
B -107
B -1os
B -1os
B -105
B -104
B -103
S -33
B -108
B -102
B -101
B -100
Figure 10. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
S -32
Wake County, NC.
Roads
e
F-1 Permanent Trail Footprint
MZone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B -95
ME Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
B 94
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
a�
�
Feet
�a
0 100 200 400
,moo
c�
'See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

S -36
B-113
B-112
IS-35 S -34
B -110
B -111
I S -37 1
Figure 11. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
` Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
. See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

Figure 12. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
QPermanent Trail Footprint
Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
® Boardwalk N
Bridge
-- — - Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
" See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
I S -37 I
B -115 ,\ a -116 --,/JB -117
B -114
W -GM1
n
1 W -GM2 1
I S-41 I
S -40
D
41
Qj
J
O
r
d

ATTACHMENT E
Color Plan Sheets

HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 W. HARGETT ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27M2
m
m
r
m
T '<
�WSPm SELLS
Transportation i Introstructurs
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 •919.878.0035
www.wspsob.com
License No.: F4MI
�O1
a
m
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 W. HARGETT ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27M2
m
m
r
m
T '<
�WSPm SELLS
Transportation i Introstructurs
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 •919.878.0035
www.wspsob.com
License No.: F4MI

�rf/n�i S � \Inlet OMVho'.,��i Sn �a \off -rmo Nne + rvr \w -nn... . \fir- 'se.� + \r'n uW rrwm�.�lm �t n�� \mM'ivHU� M.w
+
g02O V L CD
-
°9
W
.
m
g
v�
p5
O �
T_
1
/
T
T
�
�
T
1
1
T
/
N
n
x
z
i-
9 Z
o ��N
o m
0
• wwae,anu onsw��arw.®.wn waearaK rr:rwmucmwa�mKwuseor *w mwcur wrt�wr r�wr reureow rmu wraeas. ��vwraar no�nra
r
n
+
g02O V L CD
-
°9
W
.
m
g
MUNt Y UU I I UKttt'K
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 W. F AGM ST.
n/.LEIOH. NC 27M
�m
sy�T�
ZR0
�■WSP m S E L L S
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suke 100 • Cary, NC 27513 •919.878.0035
www.wspsens.00m
Loans No.: F-0891

�•nan •:m rv: u�rr«. aw�ao �, sn, n; ,.gym -•am ne•.K.ii a«. a«..r. -a �a•- x.,,�eo uro n�.�.ne� ii- minm.anaki nwx nw rnun�..«. cx
"Vm -4�1
9
y��NF
syFFT
-n
m
!�
c
�3
6XSO
o0
/
I
Ir T
g
I
I
°
T
T
i
T
T
1 �
W
01d
�N�1N
LO
�
.d ys
.O�x26
00
_ro
z�
nz
�v
e rry riuui roxn,vEiessw,m.�rr nemooueno•a•anEn ur: asnn ooarw<wrwrt,nurnraRxsarr,n, mou ris rnu,rFw+a�rr,ouim.
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
2=W ' R&AGM sr.
RALPION. NC 27M
0
1
p
■WSP•SELLS
Transportation & infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 r Cary, NC 27513 r 919.878.0035
WMNY.mrseils.COn1
License No.: F-0891
"Vm -4�1
9
-p
-n
m
!�
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
2=W ' R&AGM sr.
RALPION. NC 27M
0
1
p
■WSP•SELLS
Transportation & infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 r Cary, NC 27513 r 919.878.0035
WMNY.mrseils.COn1
License No.: F-0891

a�
7y
y�� 1
d
I
1
T
T
T
x
T
0
N
A �
2 �
II �
o a
U ti r/
~ �I
G
O MY �HIIALL NOM,{APE IEIF.T ®.AMY MOiYOL �EIMOOIY.'IIDIM011fA IIEOF TY ��Ellf'Mlltlllf ApM1'901�ON fi✓DY W! �EllR f E]O.EE�IY NIONRf ®.
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
2n W. KAAGM ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27M2
m iron
R6
H
pWSP`m SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 - Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0035
www.wspwb.com
License No.: F-0891
TN to -7
9
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
2n W. KAAGM ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27M2
m iron
R6
H
pWSP`m SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 - Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0035
www.wspwb.com
License No.: F-0891

M
ooh
V
O W
W
FT,
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
m W. HAMM Sr.
rwLErow, NC ZMM
W
H �
Cm
0
220
z
om
m
m
1�
a
a
M �tv�l
04 4
I�
Ua�) dl
1 1
F
M
JmWSPm SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0035
Www.W5P5d8.eom
L'toanse No.: F-0891

rzir.ixnrr .+ �: \wrult� \(�aV+okci, \Sent nokn. 0'/ -IOP4 Hie a oe.. c,.n..r\a, -n,.>, , w- s�.i,\r> oo r,.�am., +r- :ori \meana.0 nw ..w m�nc.ew: c
9
� 2
F
9
Gib h .106 soo
� v
as
u '
/
� r
/
w
4fi
0
L
n
2 �
biz
v� �y
m
ewv rua�uw�wrs,we �xm..vn wuwn. arena uEarnr ooa►F wmartnener��mwxa aau.rovwearnomw.
0
gig
�
rn
s
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
= W. HARSM sr.
RALEIGH, NC 2MM
A�
Z, EZ
co
0
ZAO
p
■ WS P• S E L L S
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Sulte 100 • Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0035
www.wspnos.com
license No.: F-0891

��.am�na�r,o .n,�„e, nar- ���o� -,me nm�KOi� c,.w e,.M., oo- aa.wn�ar- s�aro�rd oxo nhm�ena �i oii�rn.ra �ne.r. c
S�
i
i
i
I
i
I
r
MATCHLINE
f
I�
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
s �
d�
6®
�dy
gOti
O�x
00
0
'L
n
_ ^ N
m
e wereuu.w, norrt�,v� �wNrn..wr noa�ae�or+, rafrnoarcnowa�onEa ueor nr ooarExr wrtraur rwox reereiowmou wseFUS, a �wrrar rwa�srr9.
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
272 W. HARGErr ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27602
( O A AWN
-g '�N• .„
fVmWSPm SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 - Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0M
www.wamens.eom
Lk ense No.: F -0891
Q 0
0
n8w
m�
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
272 W. HARGErr ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27602
( O A AWN
-g '�N• .„
fVmWSPm SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 - Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0M
www.wamens.eom
Lk ense No.: F -0891

rx r. ri x» xry: ��r «ra ravva .io�rn rre�m -.me x «.,�ri a.K a...�..,�on- ao.ano�e.- sx «r,v> nw na.,rm�« rr- zorr�iaFnrrwu. o n.. um Farrel sn «r n.rr.n -c m.xn
MgT CHL/Ne SHEET 07 70 ®STq
204+50. 00
l - -4,
x
N
1
Z
Ll
M
m
rn
z
z
'a
a
n �
rl
rn
O
a
d
t
�z z
U A
" v
(7
O YAP lFL1JAlL10Xli NIE I�ID. Nr( IOiFLI(Mr4REArOCIIOMOM011ERUEOF TIM 006MENf WIIIOIR Rr011 f9YY�CW FROM MTOFIlI f FJVIFiY 1'1011rtd
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 w- HARGETr sr.
RALEIGH, NC 27W2
R■WSP • S E L L S
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 •919.676.0035
www.wsp"Ns.corn
License No.: F-Ml
-4
00aZ
T N r
r
�a
O -w
F= IN
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 w- HARGETr sr.
RALEIGH, NC 27W2
R■WSP • S E L L S
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 •919.676.0035
www.wsp"Ns.corn
License No.: F-Ml

0
OOZ
A
!�
�1
-n
m�
MAT�y��ye
�T q.
233%SO o0
f #I/
0 If
� l
� I
I �
00'04 +LVZ 'tl1S
yl'LO 133HS 3NI-jH3Jvri
z
n in
x„
Az
� m ° N1NON
ra `
m
v
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 W.HARGETT3r.
RALEIGH, NC 27802
A �
A
Z'r
ca rd
Co
�IT<
z ;0
/j\„
/
i
ALWSP m S E L L S
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513.919.878,0035
W W W.WWsens.com
Liioense No.: F -0891

IIR011 }59 MI; t: \�alan \<M \!pt' ,IU SMr laobclo 0] -1018 Mmt II Ptet G«nnv\pl -pmN . \pt_:fM.Var OW M- -- -lalbn II- 1011 \!MMIMMI.t t ttAw AXp PRplt[.tlw. n 101]00
00.09 +LbZ -y1S
£l'LO 133HS 3NIlHO1tlW —V
C' 1�1
l
n
2 N
N
O y
m
m
e wwruaAUwalns,vle IeesR.m.lwv 1oe7rnw, lewmi�ol a ones usEas Tw oonrr�eltr wrtwour man rrwwalon mou rva °,• a Fw�w�v nnnrlm.
--4
Z
00
V1
m
3
HONEYCUTT CREEK
GREENWAY
RALEIGH, NC
CITY OF RALEIGH
222 W. HARGEI T sr.
RALEIGH, NC 27002
Ir
Ee
T �
�o
jmpWSP m SELLS
Transportation & Infrastructure
15401 Weston Parkway Suite 100 • Cary, NC 27513 - 919.678.0035
www.wspsalls.com
License No.: F -0891

ATTACHMENT F
Mitigation Bank Affidavit and Credit ledger

AFFIDAVIT OF CREDIT SALE
NEU -CON WETLAND AND STREAM UMBRELLA BANK
NEUSE 01
TO: INTER AGENCY REVIEW TEAM MEMBERS (IRT)
The undersigned, EBX, the Bank "Sponsor" of the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank
(the `Bank"), hereby certifies the following:
The City of Durham, NC has deposited monies with the "Sponsor" sufficient to
acquire 103.00 Stream and 0.0409 Wetland Mitigation Bank Credits (the
"Credits ") from the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank for use as
compensatory mitigation for Honeycutt Trail Greenway Protect SAW -2012-
00094.
2. The Carver Street Extension project requires a total of 103.00 Stream and 0.0409
Wetland Mitigation Credits in HUC Neuse 01 as part of its mitigation
requirements.
3. Of this amount 103.00 Stream Credits has been deducted from the banks Howell
Wood Stream Credit Ledger and 0.0409 Wetland Credits has been decucted from
the banks Cox II Wetland Credit Ledger, both service areas include Neuse 01
River Basin. .
3. The Sponsor has deducted 103.00 stream credits and 0.0409 wetland credits from
the respected ledgers and provided for review. .
EBX,LLC
By: Mad . P
Matthew Fisher, Authorized Agent
Date: 03/25/12
Copies:
Monte Matthews, Regulatory Project Manager, US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Amy Chapman, DWQ Wetlands, Buffer, and Stormwater Compliance and Permits Unit, Buffer
Coordinator, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC 27604, Archdale Building - 9th floor
Eric Kulz: Environmental Senior Specialist, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604

HOWELL WOODS STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC01)
As or March 30, 2012
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited I Current I Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserve
3,633.0 I 3,633.0
594.0 3,039.0
103.0 2,936.0
Total 3,633.0 697.0 1 2.936.0 1 0.0
All Credits Released As Of 1131111
Contract
Purchaser
HUC
1/31111 1131111 3020201
Pulte Hone Corp. Raleigh Div. Alston Pond Subdivision 12/22111 1/27112 3020201
City of Raleigh Horeycut Graenway Project 3125/12 3125/12 3020201

NEU -CON UMBRELLA WETLAND AND STREAM M#TIGATION BANK
COX 11 WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER QIUC 01)
As of MWch so , M12
Credits
Reserved
Johnston Couty, Airport Authority Runway Safety Area
Johnston Couty Airport Authority Runway Safety Area
Total 15.40
Riverins
0.00
Transaction
Credits Released
Credits Debited
Number
To Bank
From Bank
1
10.00
2
10.00
3
3.24
4
2.16
Credits
5
5.40
NEU -CON UMBRELLA WETLAND AND STREAM M#TIGATION BANK
COX 11 WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER QIUC 01)
As of MWch so , M12
Credits
Reserved
Johnston Couty, Airport Authority Runway Safety Area
Johnston Couty Airport Authority Runway Safety Area
Total 15.40
15.40
0.00
0.00
5/12/11
6127/11
Total Credits
3/25/12
Non- Riverins
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited
Current
Credits
Number To Bank
From Bank
Credit Balance
Reserved
Purchaser
Project
1
3.00
NC DOT
2 4.10
3
0.97
Piedmont Natural Gas Company
PNG Wayne 37 Mile Pipeline
4
0.0409
City of Raleigh
Honeycutt Green way
Total 4.10
4.01
0.09
0.00
Total Credits
Anticipated Total Number Of Credits
To Be Released Based On As -Bulk Report
24.90
Credit Balance Based On
All As -Bulit Credits Fully Released
5.49
6/4/10
6/4/10
using Date
7/6/10
11/17/10
ntraet Date
Closing Date
10/17100
10/17/00
5/12/11
6127/11
325/12
3/25/12