HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130274 Ver 1_401 Application_20130313awn
NCDENR
20130274
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Parks and Recreation
Pat McCrory, Governor Lewis R. Ledford, Director John E. Skvada, III, Secretary
March 19, 2013
Ms. Karen Higgins
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RE: Water Quality Certification Request (General Certification 3883) p T
Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvements
Pettigrew State Park (Washington County)
R
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Enclosed are five copies of a completed application submittal package requesting a Water Quality Certification
(No. 3883) which corresponds to US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) General Permit 197800056. This
application package consists of the following documentation: one completed PCN form, three project area maps,
eight boardwalk drawings, and three USACE Wetland Data Forms. Please also find the enclosed journal transfer
documentation indicating that payment of the $240 application fee has been transferred from the account of the
Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to the Division of Water Quality.
The proposed project involves construction of a six-foot wide, 1,860 -foot long wooden boardwalk, an 8'x12'
wooden platform, and a 100' long, six-foot wide wooden pier that will extend into Lake Phelps and connect to a
24'x18' wooden boat dock. The boardwalk will be manually constructed, and pilings will be driven to a minimum of
five feet below grade using a light -duty excavator. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be
utilized to minimize ground disturbance. A boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary. Approximately
0.26 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 0.012 acres of open waters will be impacted by boardwalk construction.
DPR is concurrently submitting one copy of this permit application to Mr. Josh Pelletier of the USACE Washington
Field Office to request a General Permit Verification under GP Nationwide Permit 197800056. Please contact me
if you require any additional information.
Sincerely,
0 T)aLJ>_-)
Amin K. Davis
Environmental Review Coordinator
Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Resources Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(919) 707 -9329 / amin.davis @ncparks.gov
1615 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1615
Phone: 919 - 707 -9300 • Internet: www.ncoarks.aov
An Equal opportunity • Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled • 10 % Post consumer Paper
MAR d 9 2013
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE PARS
ot W AT F9O�
o �
20130274
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification C Fojrm
A. Applicant Information,,
1. Processing ?
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 1b Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 197800056 wr
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Pettigrew State Park - Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvement
2b. County:
Washington
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Creswell
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information p iR (r-a- rQ r, r,
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
State of North Carolina ilk U L9 toll
N/A
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
MSC 1615 U,gLtn.
Raleigh, NC. 27699
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
(919) 707 -9363
3g. Fax no.:
(919) 733 -1431
3h. Email address:
sue.regier @ncparks.gov (c/o State Property Office)
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation (c/o Pettigrew State Park)
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street addre •
MSC 1615
4e. City, state, iip:
Raleigh, NC. 27699 -1615
•4f. Telep one no.:
(919) 707 -9329
4g. Fax no.:
(919) 715 -5161
4h. Email address:
amin.davis@ncparks.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7762 - 186 -640
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.789 Longitude: - 76.408
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
- 5,580 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Phelps Lake
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B;Sw,ORW
2c. River basin:
Pasquotank
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is located along the northeastern portion of Phelps Lake. The boardwalk will be constructed in a wooded
area an connect to an approximately 100 -foot section of wooden pier that will extend into Phelps Lake. General land use
in the vicinity of the project is primarily recreational within the Park boundaries. General land use beyond the Park
boundaries is agricultural and rural residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
-280 acres per NC DCM mapping.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
-17,200' per USGS GIS mapping.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The boardwalk, pier, and boat dock are being constructed to provide enhanced recreational opportunities for Park visitors.
These opportunities include hiking, boating, fishing, and swimming. Additionally, implementation of this proposed project
would complete the first looped trail in the Park.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project involves construction of a six -feet wide, 1,860 foot long wooden boardwalk, an 8'x12' wooden
platform, and a 100' long, 6' wide wooden pier that will extend into Lake Phelps and connect to a 24'x18' wooden boat
dock. The boardwalk will be manually constructed, and pilings will be driven to a minimum of five feet below grade using a
light -duty excavator. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be utilized to minimize ground disturbance. A
boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): N/A
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
& Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes [9 No El Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Shading -
Boardwalk
Swamp Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.26
W2 ®P ❑ T
Shading -
Platform
Swamp Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.002
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.262
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 [I P ❑ T
El PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and
tributary impacts
3i. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ® P ❑ T
Lake Phelps
Shading - Pier
Lake
0.014
02 ®P ❑ T
Lake Phelps
Shading - Boat Dock
Lake
0.001
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
0.015
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ® Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project team decided on construction of a wooden boardwalk instead of a natural surface trail to minimize ground disturbance
and wetland substrate compaction.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The trail will be manually constructed with the exception of pilings. Materials will be transported out to construction area using
carts on newly constructed boardwalk. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be utilized to minimize ground
disturbance. A boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to Indieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
❑
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
<1 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Well below required threshold.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
.
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
® Other: N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N /A.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
GIS file of rare species occurrences and USFWS designated critical habitats provided by the NC Natural Heritage
Program.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Email correspondence with NOAA -DMF staff on 2/22/13.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Consultation with the Office of State Archeology on 8/26/11 and a letter from SHPO dated 12/6/11 indicating that they
were not aware of any historic resources that would be impacted by our proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? —TO—Yes
® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? GIS data provided by http: / /www.ncfloodmaps.com/
Amin Davis
3/19/13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
I P H R L11P S L A K E
LEGEND
Q Park Boundaries
Proposed Boardwalk
0 0.375 0.75 1.5
Miles
0 2,500 5,000 10,000
Feet
Scale: 1" = 4,000'
Sources: USGS (Creswell Tonoeranhic Ouad)
I
I
K�
i
r
Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess
North Carolina Division of
Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation
Washington County, North Carolina
/ Date: AKD /3 -19 -13
Vicinity Map
F1,
Figure 1
1'. Jai_•-- _- .;L. _-
NOTE: Structures Are Not Drawn To Scale
1
N
Prepared / Date: AKD/3 -19 -13
Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess
North Carolina Division of
Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation
Washington County, North Carolina
Jurisdictional Impacts
Figure 2
yy
•
1'. Jai_•-- _- .;L. _-
NOTE: Structures Are Not Drawn To Scale
1
N
Prepared / Date: AKD/3 -19 -13
Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess
North Carolina Division of
Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation
Washington County, North Carolina
Jurisdictional Impacts
Figure 2
j -k,;,tk
,-te-%r
ra-
1.4- a,�
ke-r5++
tnid
a lo
0� i k' °ill "r
i
7
z
N 8bckf .,q
2x 6 7Jeck"rtj
Pier with Viewing /Overlook Platform
18'
NTS
l�
v
^4
-t
S
0
_C
3
N
x
N
2
-r
co
r
s
y
u
d
-5
- F11
r \nom(
t �
S I
i � 1
O �
IY` ,
I
1 , I•
I
Q..
ao
x
cli
N
v � I
i G Q1
US Amry Corps of Engineers
i_
L
a
Z
v
r- , t'X�6 -ia4 , of
it
d�
L
W
� 1
a k
4 v,
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecvsite: PETT- Somerset Loop Boardwalk City«unty. CreswelUWashington Coud sampling Date: 4/24/12
Applicanvowner. NCDENR, Division of Parks & Recreation/State of NC state: NC sampling point WDP2
Investigator(s): A. Davis Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Basin Wetland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): <1
Subregion (RR or Mmy LRR P Let: 35.7887 tong: - 76.4084 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Fortescue mucky loam (Fo) NWI classification. PFO6/EM1 F
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No Of no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i( No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V_ No
Remarks:
Area assessed in slight depression adjacent to lakeshore
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that awls)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (36)
Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (89)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table 02)
_ Aquatic Fauna 0313)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
�[ Saturation (A3)
_ Mari Deposits (615) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (61)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _( No
Depth (inches): 6°
Water Table Present? Yes _V( _ No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes (_ No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
mcudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring_well, aerial photos, previous inspedhons), if available:
Remarks:
Standing water observed in portions of depressional area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot sizes:
1. Liouidambar styraciflua
) Skies? SJaWs
25 yes FAC
2. Taxodium distichum_
yes OBL
3. Acer rubrum
10 yes FAC
4.
x3=
5.
4.
6.
x5=
7.
(A) (B)
Sapling Stratum ( )
1. Liouidambar styracifiva
50 = Total Cover
25 yes FAC
2. Acer rubrum
1_ yes FAC
3.
4.
8.
5.
6.
7.
10.
50 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum ( )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum ( )
1. Carex so
<5
yes
2. Juncus sp
<5
ves
3.
x3=
FACU species
4.
UPL species
x5=
5.
(A) (B)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
Woody Vine Stratum ( )
1. Parthenocissus ouinouefolia
5
<5
= Total Cover
yes FACU
2. ToAcodendron Pubescens
_ <5
yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
5
= Total Cover
Sparse herb layer.
Sampling Point: WDP2
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 78 (A!B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
x1=
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
_ Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
I'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more In height and
3 in. (7.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast
height (DBH).
Sapling - woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - Ali herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
SOIL
Sampling Point: WDP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) �_ Tie Loe Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 100 SaCILM
9-16 10YR 7/2 70 10YR 7/6 25 RM M Sand
16+ 10YR 6/2 65
Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�[ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR % T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Defta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 163D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I/ No
US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: PETT- Somerset Loop Boardwalk City/County. Creswell/Washington Coud Sampling Date: 4/24/12
Applicant/owner. NCDENR, Division of Parks & Recreation/State of NC State: NC Sampling Point: UDP
Investigator(s): A. Davis Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Manicured lawn Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (gb), <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 35.788 tong, - 76.406 Dam: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Roanoke loam (Ro) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes y/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation . Sal . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _� within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Area assessed in maintained lawn area adjacent to Somerset Place driveway.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reouured)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check all that aooM
_ Surface Sal Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAG- Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No �_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary illa hinge)
_ Describe_Remrded Data (stream_gauge,.mopihoring_ well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UDP
Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Taxodium distichum 75 yes FAC That Are OBI„ FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (AB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
Sapling Stratum ( )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
75 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2-
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
X4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A =
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Dominance Test is >50%
Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum ( )
1. Fescue so 50 yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum ( )
1
2
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
=Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and
3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast
height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No !�
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations be low)
Bald cypress was planted. Area assessed in maintained lawn area adjacent to Somerset Place driveway.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point: UDP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confine the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
Onchesl Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvoe L Texture Remarks
0 -12 1OYR 3/2 100
Loam
13-18+ 1OYR 3/2 70
10YR 513 25 C M Loam
'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrbc CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M--Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 163B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (Fn _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophybc vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 148A, 163C, 163D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tammy Dodd
FROM: Brian Strong
CC: Doug LeQuire
Amin Davis
February 4, 2013
SUBJECT: PETT Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvements - Request for
Funds Transfer for DWQ Water Quality Certification
Pettigrew State Park (PETT) is in need of a DWQ Water Quality Certification (WQC) for
impacts to wetlands and open waters associated with construction of a boardwalk, pier, and boat
dock. The overall project consists of the construction of approximately 2,000 feet of wooden
boardwalk that will provide enhanced recreational opportunities for Park visitors through
wetland natural communities. The majority of proposed trail construction will be conducted by
Park staff and seasonal employees, with assistance from volunteers on an as- needed basis.
Please prepare a fund transfer form in the amount of $240 payable to the NC Division of Water
Quality to cover the administrative fee for the processing of this WQC request. The WQC is
required as part of a permit application that will be submitted to the US Army Corps of
Engineers for this project.
;._
, .
OSC -313 REFERENCE9999-
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS BETWEEN
BUDGET CODES
DATE: 2/2212013
Please transfer funds between the budget codes indicated below:
From: To:
Budget Code:
14300
24300
Amount:
$240.00
$240.00
Signature:
Controller, DENR
JOURNAL ADJUSTMENT CODE SHEET
D E N R DOCUMENT ID: BATCH TOTAL. $
Page 1 of 2
240.00
ENTRY TYPE: BUDGET CODE 14300
OURNAL VOUCHER ❑ APP CODE m DEPOSIT NO.
CASH TRANSFER TOTAL DEBITS- $ 240.00
BUDGET CREATION GL EFFECTIVE DATE: � TOTAL CREDITS: $
ENCUMBRANCE ADJ (current month)
COMMITMENT ADJ DATA TYPE CODE. E1 CLOSED PERIOD ADJUSTMENT
L #e coMPA ACCOUNT CENTER AMOUNT CR DESCRIPTION RULE
1
1601
535120
12802814
240.00
DR
401 Permit Pettigrew SP
CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff
INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following- Type of Entry, Page,
Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line
Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR /CR, Prepared By, Date and
Justification. All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized
individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must
be available prior to submitting the entry to be keyed.
r7
Date: 2/22/13
All validations are complete.
Entered by:
Date:
DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10
JOURNAL ADJUSTMENT CODE SHEET Page 2 of 2
D E N R DOCUMENT ID: BATCH TOTAL $ 240.00
ENTRY TYPE: BUDGET CODE. 24300
JOURNAL VOUCHER APP CODE: m DEPOSIT NO
CASH TRANSFER TOTAL DEBITS: $
BUDGET CREATION GL EFFECTIVE DATE: TOTAL CREDITS- $ 240.00
IENCUM13RANCE ADJ E] (current month)
11COMMITMENTADJ DATA TYPE CODE: Q CLOSED PERIOD ADJUSTMENT
Line DR LINE cCT
# coMP ACCOUNT CENTER AMOUNT CR DESCRIPTION RULE
1 1602 435100095 2341 240.00 CR 401 Permit Pettigrew SP
JUSTIFICATION: 401 PERMIT FOR DISMAL PETTIGREW STATE PARK Prepared by:
r
CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff
INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following: Type of Entry, Page,
Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line
Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR/CR, Prepared By, Date and
Justification All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized
individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must
be available orior to submitting the entry to be keved.
All validations are complete.
Entered by:
Date:
2/22/13
2/22/13
W
DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10
JUSTIFICATION: 401 PERMIT FOR DISMAL PETTIGREW STATE PARK Prepared by:
r
CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff
INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following: Type of Entry, Page,
Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line
Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR/CR, Prepared By, Date and
Justification All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized
individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must
be available orior to submitting the entry to be keved.
All validations are complete.
Entered by:
Date:
2/22/13
2/22/13
W
DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10