Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130274 Ver 1_401 Application_20130313awn NCDENR 20130274 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation Pat McCrory, Governor Lewis R. Ledford, Director John E. Skvada, III, Secretary March 19, 2013 Ms. Karen Higgins North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 RE: Water Quality Certification Request (General Certification 3883) p T Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvements Pettigrew State Park (Washington County) R Dear Ms. Higgins: Enclosed are five copies of a completed application submittal package requesting a Water Quality Certification (No. 3883) which corresponds to US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) General Permit 197800056. This application package consists of the following documentation: one completed PCN form, three project area maps, eight boardwalk drawings, and three USACE Wetland Data Forms. Please also find the enclosed journal transfer documentation indicating that payment of the $240 application fee has been transferred from the account of the Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to the Division of Water Quality. The proposed project involves construction of a six-foot wide, 1,860 -foot long wooden boardwalk, an 8'x12' wooden platform, and a 100' long, six-foot wide wooden pier that will extend into Lake Phelps and connect to a 24'x18' wooden boat dock. The boardwalk will be manually constructed, and pilings will be driven to a minimum of five feet below grade using a light -duty excavator. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be utilized to minimize ground disturbance. A boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary. Approximately 0.26 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 0.012 acres of open waters will be impacted by boardwalk construction. DPR is concurrently submitting one copy of this permit application to Mr. Josh Pelletier of the USACE Washington Field Office to request a General Permit Verification under GP Nationwide Permit 197800056. Please contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, 0 T)aLJ>_-) Amin K. Davis Environmental Review Coordinator Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Resources Program North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (919) 707 -9329 / amin.davis @ncparks.gov 1615 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1615 Phone: 919 - 707 -9300 • Internet: www.ncoarks.aov An Equal opportunity • Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled • 10 % Post consumer Paper MAR d 9 2013 NORTH CAROLINA STATE PARS ot W AT F9O� o � 20130274 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre - Construction Notification C Fojrm A. Applicant Information,, 1. Processing ? 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 1b Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 197800056 wr 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ® No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ® Yes ❑ No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Pettigrew State Park - Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvement 2b. County: Washington 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Creswell 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information p iR (r-a- rQ r, r, 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: State of North Carolina ilk U L9 toll N/A 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): MSC 1615 U,gLtn. Raleigh, NC. 27699 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707 -9363 3g. Fax no.: (919) 733 -1431 3h. Email address: sue.regier @ncparks.gov (c/o State Property Office) Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation (c/o Pettigrew State Park) 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street addre • MSC 1615 4e. City, state, iip: Raleigh, NC. 27699 -1615 •4f. Telep one no.: (919) 707 -9329 4g. Fax no.: (919) 715 -5161 4h. Email address: amin.davis@ncparks.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 7762 - 186 -640 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.789 Longitude: - 76.408 (DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: - 5,580 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Phelps Lake proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: B;Sw,ORW 2c. River basin: Pasquotank 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project site is located along the northeastern portion of Phelps Lake. The boardwalk will be constructed in a wooded area an connect to an approximately 100 -foot section of wooden pier that will extend into Phelps Lake. General land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily recreational within the Park boundaries. General land use beyond the Park boundaries is agricultural and rural residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: -280 acres per NC DCM mapping. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: -17,200' per USGS GIS mapping. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The boardwalk, pier, and boat dock are being constructed to provide enhanced recreational opportunities for Park visitors. These opportunities include hiking, boating, fishing, and swimming. Additionally, implementation of this proposed project would complete the first looped trail in the Park. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The proposed project involves construction of a six -feet wide, 1,860 foot long wooden boardwalk, an 8'x12' wooden platform, and a 100' long, 6' wide wooden pier that will extend into Lake Phelps and connect to a 24'x18' wooden boat dock. The boardwalk will be manually constructed, and pilings will be driven to a minimum of five feet below grade using a light -duty excavator. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be utilized to minimize ground disturbance. A boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Name (if known): N/A Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version & Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes [9 No El Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ❑ T Shading - Boardwalk Swamp Forest ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 0.26 W2 ®P ❑ T Shading - Platform Swamp Forest ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 0.002 W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P [IT ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.262 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) ) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P [IT ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 [I P ❑ T El PER El Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: N/A Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary 01 ® P ❑ T Lake Phelps Shading - Pier Lake 0.014 02 ®P ❑ T Lake Phelps Shading - Boat Dock Lake 0.001 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T 4E Total open water impacts 0.015 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5E Total 5g. Comments: N/A 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ® Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary T impact required? B1 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Project team decided on construction of a wooden boardwalk instead of a natural surface trail to minimize ground disturbance and wetland substrate compaction. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The trail will be manually constructed with the exception of pilings. Materials will be transported out to construction area using carts on newly constructed boardwalk. If unstable soils are encountered, removable mats will be utilized to minimize ground disturbance. A boat will be used to deliver materials when necessary. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to Indieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool []cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. N/A Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). N/A 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Yes No ❑ Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? <1 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Well below required threshold. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program . ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW ❑ ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ® Other: N/A 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)? 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N /A. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? GIS file of rare species occurrences and USFWS designated critical habitats provided by the NC Natural Heritage Program. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Email correspondence with NOAA -DMF staff on 2/22/13. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ® Yes ❑ No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Consultation with the Office of State Archeology on 8/26/11 and a letter from SHPO dated 12/6/11 indicating that they were not aware of any historic resources that would be impacted by our proposed project. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? —TO—Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? GIS data provided by http: / /www.ncfloodmaps.com/ Amin Davis 3/19/13 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version I P H R L11P S L A K E LEGEND Q Park Boundaries Proposed Boardwalk 0 0.375 0.75 1.5 Miles 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet Scale: 1" = 4,000' Sources: USGS (Creswell Tonoeranhic Ouad) I I K� i r Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess North Carolina Division of Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation Washington County, North Carolina / Date: AKD /3 -19 -13 Vicinity Map F1, Figure 1 1'. Jai_•-- _- .;L. _- NOTE: Structures Are Not Drawn To Scale 1 N Prepared / Date: AKD/3 -19 -13 Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess North Carolina Division of Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation Washington County, North Carolina Jurisdictional Impacts Figure 2 yy • 1'. Jai_•-- _- .;L. _- NOTE: Structures Are Not Drawn To Scale 1 N Prepared / Date: AKD/3 -19 -13 Somerset Boardwalk & Lake Acess North Carolina Division of Pettigrew State Park Parks and Recreation Washington County, North Carolina Jurisdictional Impacts Figure 2 j -k,;,tk ,-te-%r ra- 1.4- a,� ke-r5++ tnid a lo 0� i k' °ill "r i 7 z N 8bckf .,q 2x 6 7Jeck"rtj Pier with Viewing /Overlook Platform 18' NTS l� v ^4 -t S 0 _C 3 N x N 2 -r co r s y u d -5 - F11 r \nom( t � S I i � 1 O � IY` , I 1 , I• I Q.. ao x cli N v � I i G Q1 US Amry Corps of Engineers i_ L a Z v r- , t'X�6 -ia4 , of it d� L W � 1 a k 4 v, Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Projecvsite: PETT- Somerset Loop Boardwalk City«unty. CreswelUWashington Coud sampling Date: 4/24/12 Applicanvowner. NCDENR, Division of Parks & Recreation/State of NC state: NC sampling point WDP2 Investigator(s): A. Davis Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Basin Wetland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): <1 Subregion (­RR or Mmy LRR P Let: 35.7887 tong: - 76.4084 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name Fortescue mucky loam (Fo) NWI classification. PFO6/EM1 F Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No Of no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes i( No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V_ No Remarks: Area assessed in slight depression adjacent to lakeshore HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that awls) _ Surface Soil Cracks (36) Surface Water (Al) Water- Stained Leaves (89) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table 02) _ Aquatic Fauna 0313) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) �[ Saturation (A3) _ Mari Deposits (615) (LRR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) _ Water Marks (61) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _( No Depth (inches): 6° Water Table Present? Yes _V( _ No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (_ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No mcudes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring_well, aerial photos, previous inspedhons), if available: Remarks: Standing water observed in portions of depressional area. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 1. Liouidambar styraciflua ) Skies? SJaWs 25 yes FAC 2. Taxodium distichum_ yes OBL 3. Acer rubrum 10 yes FAC 4. x3= 5. 4. 6. x5= 7. (A) (B) Sapling Stratum ( ) 1. Liouidambar styracifiva 50 = Total Cover 25 yes FAC 2. Acer rubrum 1_ yes FAC 3. 4. 8. 5. 6. 7. 10. 50 = Total Cover Shrub Stratum ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. = Total Cover Herb Stratum ( ) 1. Carex so <5 yes 2. Juncus sp <5 ves 3. x3= FACU species 4. UPL species x5= 5. (A) (B) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 Woody Vine Stratum ( ) 1. Parthenocissus ouinouefolia 5 <5 = Total Cover yes FACU 2. ToAcodendron Pubescens _ <5 yes FACU 3. 4. 5. 5 = Total Cover Sparse herb layer. Sampling Point: WDP2 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 78 (A!B) Total % Cover of Multiply by: OBL species x1= FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ✓ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) I'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must be present. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 it (6 m) or more In height and 3 in. (7.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DBH Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - Ali herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: WDP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) �_ Tie Loe Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 SaCILM 9-16 10YR 7/2 70 10YR 7/6 25 RM M Sand 16+ 10YR 6/2 65 Sand Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric _ Histosol (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) �[ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR % T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (173) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Mari (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Defta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1150B) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 163D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U) Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes I/ No US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/site: PETT- Somerset Loop Boardwalk City/County. Creswell/Washington Coud Sampling Date: 4/24/12 Applicant/owner. NCDENR, Division of Parks & Recreation/State of NC State: NC Sampling Point: UDP Investigator(s): A. Davis Section, Township, Range: Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Manicured lawn Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (gb), <1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 35.788 tong, - 76.406 Dam: NAD 83 Soil Map unit Name: Roanoke loam (Ro) NWI classification: N/A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes y/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes V No Are Vegetation . Sal . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _� within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: Area assessed in maintained lawn area adjacent to Somerset Place driveway. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouured) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aooM _ Surface Sal Cracks (B6) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) FAG- Neutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No �_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ includes capillary illa hinge) _ Describe_Remrded Data (stream_gauge,.mopihoring_ well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UDP Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Taxodium distichum 75 yes FAC That Are OBI„ FACW, or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (AB) 6. 7 Prevalence Index worksheet Sapling Stratum ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Shrub Stratum 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 75 = Total Cover Total % Cover of Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2- FAC species x 3 = FACU species X4= UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index - B/A = = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index Is s3.0' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Herb Stratum ( ) 1. Fescue so 50 yes FACU 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 50 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( ) 1 2 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No !� Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations be low) Bald cypress was planted. Area assessed in maintained lawn area adjacent to Somerset Place driveway. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: UDP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confine the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Onchesl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe L Texture Remarks 0 -12 1OYR 3/2 100 Loam 13-18+ 1OYR 3/2 70 10YR 513 25 C M Loam 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrbc CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M--Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 163B) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (Fn _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophybc vegetation and _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 148A, 163C, 163D) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION MEMORANDUM TO: Tammy Dodd FROM: Brian Strong CC: Doug LeQuire Amin Davis February 4, 2013 SUBJECT: PETT Somerset Loop & Lake Phelps Access Improvements - Request for Funds Transfer for DWQ Water Quality Certification Pettigrew State Park (PETT) is in need of a DWQ Water Quality Certification (WQC) for impacts to wetlands and open waters associated with construction of a boardwalk, pier, and boat dock. The overall project consists of the construction of approximately 2,000 feet of wooden boardwalk that will provide enhanced recreational opportunities for Park visitors through wetland natural communities. The majority of proposed trail construction will be conducted by Park staff and seasonal employees, with assistance from volunteers on an as- needed basis. Please prepare a fund transfer form in the amount of $240 payable to the NC Division of Water Quality to cover the administrative fee for the processing of this WQC request. The WQC is required as part of a permit application that will be submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers for this project. ;._ , . OSC -313 REFERENCE9999- REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS BETWEEN BUDGET CODES DATE: 2/2212013 Please transfer funds between the budget codes indicated below: From: To: Budget Code: 14300 24300 Amount: $240.00 $240.00 Signature: Controller, DENR JOURNAL ADJUSTMENT CODE SHEET D E N R DOCUMENT ID: BATCH TOTAL. $ Page 1 of 2 240.00 ENTRY TYPE: BUDGET CODE 14300 OURNAL VOUCHER ❑ APP CODE m DEPOSIT NO. CASH TRANSFER TOTAL DEBITS- $ 240.00 BUDGET CREATION GL EFFECTIVE DATE: � TOTAL CREDITS: $ ENCUMBRANCE ADJ (current month) COMMITMENT ADJ DATA TYPE CODE. E1 CLOSED PERIOD ADJUSTMENT L #e coMPA ACCOUNT CENTER AMOUNT CR DESCRIPTION RULE 1 1601 535120 12802814 240.00 DR 401 Permit Pettigrew SP CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following- Type of Entry, Page, Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR /CR, Prepared By, Date and Justification. All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must be available prior to submitting the entry to be keyed. r7 Date: 2/22/13 All validations are complete. Entered by: Date: DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10 JOURNAL ADJUSTMENT CODE SHEET Page 2 of 2 D E N R DOCUMENT ID: BATCH TOTAL $ 240.00 ENTRY TYPE: BUDGET CODE. 24300 JOURNAL VOUCHER APP CODE: m DEPOSIT NO CASH TRANSFER TOTAL DEBITS: $ BUDGET CREATION GL EFFECTIVE DATE: TOTAL CREDITS- $ 240.00 IENCUM13RANCE ADJ E] (current month) 11COMMITMENTADJ DATA TYPE CODE: Q CLOSED PERIOD ADJUSTMENT Line DR LINE cCT # coMP ACCOUNT CENTER AMOUNT CR DESCRIPTION RULE 1 1602 435100095 2341 240.00 CR 401 Permit Pettigrew SP JUSTIFICATION: 401 PERMIT FOR DISMAL PETTIGREW STATE PARK Prepared by: r CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following: Type of Entry, Page, Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR/CR, Prepared By, Date and Justification All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must be available orior to submitting the entry to be keved. All validations are complete. Entered by: Date: 2/22/13 2/22/13 W DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10 JUSTIFICATION: 401 PERMIT FOR DISMAL PETTIGREW STATE PARK Prepared by: r CC: T.Ward & Original permit request being sent to appropriate DWQ staff INSTRUCTIONS: Preparer must complete the following: Type of Entry, Page, Budget Code, Deposit No. (if applicable), Total Debits, Total Credits, Line Number, Company, Account, Center, Amount, DR/CR, Prepared By, Date and Justification All forms must be reivewed and approved by authorized individual in the preparer's division. Every line must be valid and funds must be available orior to submitting the entry to be keved. All validations are complete. Entered by: Date: 2/22/13 2/22/13 W DENR OC2 rev. 1 -1 -10