20070744 Ver 1_More Info Received_20070613

~~
~~ _ __
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 13, 2007
S&EC Project # 4605.W2
To: US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Monte Matthews Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, N.C. 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
t,:~~ ~"
From: Debbie Edwards --,+~
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. ~.--®
11010 Raven Ridge Road ~ 3
Raleigh, NC 27614 2 0 0 7 0 7 4 4 ~~"~`~ ;~~ ~ , _ ~ a~
Re: Watson Tract .`t.r~
Knigtdale, Wake County, NC f 4`
yf ~~h ~ \~ ~~(e41 d
"TLA~3R;>~,'L` is.~,~'~'`°'~~~~i`{'ifbAhlGN
On behalf of the owners, Carter Development (Attn: Mr. A. Trent Germano), ase fend attached
a complete, revised application and information requested in a meeting with the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) on May 25, 2007, again requesting written concurrence from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the NCDWQ that the activities proposed below
may precede utilizing Nationwide Permits 3, 12 & 39. In addition, written authorization from the
NC-DWQ is again requested for activities proposed to impact Neuse River Buffers. Please
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PRrI IG('T cl Inenenw
Pro~ect Name Watson Tract
Pro~ect T e Commercial/Institutional Develo ment
Owner / A licant Carter Develo ment
Count Wake
Nearest Town Kni htdale
Waterbod Name Milburnie Creek
Basin /Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-31
Class C; NSW
II IRICIII(`TI(l~lAl InA~er~T ci inenenov
Stream Impact (acres): Permanent-0.223
Tem orar -0.012
Wetland Impact (acres): Permanent-0.235
Temporary-0.023
Open Water Impact (acres): Permanent-0.016
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): Permanent-0.474
Tem orar -0.035
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Permanent-445
Temporary-20
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet): 87,404
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

S&EC Project No. 4605.W2
Page 2 of 2
Attachments:
Revised Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Revised Impact Maps-sheets 1-11 (11x17)
Revised Overall Wetland Impact Map-24x36 (DWQ only)
Revised Schematic Land Use Plan-24x36 (DWQ only)
Revised Justification General Statement-Priest, Craven & Associates, Inc.
(dated June 8, 2007)

Office Use Only: Fonn Versiorrn~~ March OS
2 Lf u 1 V 7
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Processing ''
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3. 12 & 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
~~ ~,~ s _
II. Applicant Information ~sc~ l~~
JU~'~ ~ ~ ZUC%
1. Owner/Applicant Information
r~ ;~~ - ~~~,ar~-r~ c~a~~: r ~,
Name: Carter Development (Attn~ A Trent Gerrrr~a~~•,1~,,,,,,,,,,.
Mailing Address: 171 17th Street. Suite 1200 ~~
Atlanta, GA 30363
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Debbie Edwards
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Mailing Address:__ 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: dedwardsCc~sandec.com
Page 1 of 13

III. Project Information
2
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Watson Tract
T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1744-37-2735
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Knightdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located in
the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 540 and Highway 64
(business).
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8061 °N 78.5178 °W
6. Property size (acres): ± 184 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Milburnie Creek and UT to Milburnie Creek:
27-31; C:NSW
8. River Basin: Neuse (03-04-02) HUC 03020201
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is currently an agricultural farm with some area forested There is a single
family residence within the property boundaries The general land use in the vicinity
is in the process of being highly developed with Interstate 540 just being completed
Page 2 of 13

on the eastern side of the property_ and several residential developments and
commercial developments being built up along Highway 64 business.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The final product of this project is intended to be mixed use with some commercial,
some institutional and some residential development. Impacts associated with this
development result from construction of an access road, utilities and pond
maintenance. Heavy equipment typically used for grading and excavation will be
utilized for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed development is to construct a mixed use development
for the existing residential area and new residential for the developing area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Spangler Environmental, Inc. conducted the detailed delineation, Neuse River Basin
Buffer Determinations and USACE/NCDWQ field verifications. A USACE jurisdictional
determination was issued for the property on June 22, 2006 (AID# 200620349). On
January. 24, 2006, Mr. Eric Kulz of the NC-DWQ conducted a site visit to verify Neuse
River Buffers (NBRRO 06-027) and at a later date, Mr. Kevin Martin of S&EC met with
Cyndi Karoly onsite to conduct an intermittent/perennial determination on feature W1
Impact #1 ).
In addition, Environmental Services Incorporated identified a population of Michaux's
Sumac on the property. This population was confirmed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service on November 15, 2006. Since that time, S&EC has again confirmed that
population onsite and has met with Dale Suiter with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Additionally, the developer has consented to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
recommendations and has designed a development plan that will preserve and
minimize impacts to the population in the future. As per the US Department of Interior,
Fish and Wildlife Service letter dated November 27, 2006 outlines and as per a meeting
on April 12, 2007 with Dale Suiter, the developer has done the following:
Avoided the existing population; 2~ Provided a 100' undisturbed buffer; 3) Provided
additional preservation in the adjacent area that has suitable habitat; 4) Will provide
fencing of area around existing population and buffer; 5) Will later provide "restrictive
covenants" document to Dale Suiter for review and schedule meeting with future
Page 3 of 13

Homeowners Association with Dale Suiter so he can discuss the future maintenance of
the area. Dale Suiter is content with the developer moving forward in the manner
outlined above and requested a copy of this application. Dale Suiter was sent a copy
of this application.
A meeting took place on May 25, 2007 with Cyndi Karoly Amy Chapman Annette
Lucas of the NCDWQ, Jack Rhodes and Jerry Penson of Carter Development Tommy
Craven and Gary Meadows of Priest, Craven & Associates Inc and Debbie Edwards
and Kevin Martin of S&EC to discuss the overall site plan and stormwater mans ement
plan. The outcome of this meeting included providing detailed justification for impact #1
(see attached, Priest, Craven &Associates-General Statement dated June 8 2007,
the completion of section #1 of the BMP worksheets (see attached sheet 5 of 6~,
designed to suite the projected land use statistics as shown on sheet 1 of 11 and a
qualitative discussion on cumulative impacts with main focus being "stormwater" (see
section XIV).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
S&EC is not aware of any future permit requests anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed permanent impacts include 295 linear feet of important/perennial stream
channel for road crossings and dam repair 150 linear feet of unimportant/intermittent
stream for a road crossing 0.235 acres of wetlands for a road crossing and dam repair
and 0.016 acres of open water for the extension of a pipe within the footprint of the pond
associated with dam repair. Proposed temporary impacts include 20 linear feet of
important/perennial stream for a sanitary sewer crossing and 0 023 acres of wetlands
associated with dam repair and stormwater bypasses (all fringe wetlands within
fluctuating pool levels).
Page 4 of 13

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to
Nearest ,e,~-ea of Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Floodplain
Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact #3 Temporary-Dam Riparian No 0 0.019'
(NWP 39) Repair
Impact #5
(NWP 39) permanent-Fill Riparian No --110' 0.141
Impact #6 Permanent-Dam Riparian No --25 0.094
(NWP 3) Repair
Impact #9 Temporary-
(NWP 39) Stormwater Riparian No 0 0.004'
Bypass
Total Wetland Impact (acres) Permanent-0.235
'
Temporary-0.023
`
*TEMPORARY IMPACTS-FRINGE WETLANDS AT FLUCTUATING POOL LEVEL
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 13.89 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.

Stream Impact Average
Impact
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length A'r'ea of Impact
(indicate on map) Intermittent? Before (linear feet) (acres)
Im act
Impact #1 UT to Milburnie Permanent-
(NWP 39) Creek culvert & Intermittent -13 150 0.045
dissipater
Impact #2 UT to Milburnie Permanent-
'
(NWP 39) Creek culvert & Perennial -26 120 0.087
dissipater
Impact #4 Permanent-
(NWP 39) Milburnie Creek culvert & Perennial --21 150 0.085
dissi ater
Impact #7 UT to Milburnie Temporary- "' '
'

(NWP 12)
Creek
Excavation Perennial -15 20
` 0.012
`
`
Impact #13 Permanent-Dam
(NWP 39) Milburnie Creek Repair & Pipe Perennial -5 25 0.006
extention
Page 5 of 13

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Perm-445 Perm-0.223
Temp-20** Temp-0.012**
""TEMPORARY IMPACTS-NOT INCLUDED AS PERMANENT, EXCAVATION OF CHANNEL
AND THEN CHANNEL RESTORED
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc.) acres)
Dam Repair-
Impact #3
(NWP 3) UT to Milburnie Creek Replacement and
Extension of Pond 0.008
Existing Pipe
Dam Repair-
Impact #6 Milburnie Creek Replacement and Pond 0
008
(NWP 3) Extension of .
Existing Pipe
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.016
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Permanent-0.223
Temporary-0.012**
Wetland Impact (acres): Permanent-0.235
Temporary-0.023*
O en Water Impact (acres): 0.016
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Permanent-0.474
Temporary-0.035
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 465**
*TEMPORARY IMPACTS-FRINGE WETLANDS AT FLUCTUATING POOL LEVEL
**TEMPORARY IMPACTS-NOT INCLUDED AS PERMANENT, EXCAVATION OF
CHANNEL AND THEN CHANNEL RESTORED
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no isolated wetland onsite.
Page 6 of 13

8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ®uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): future excavation in non-jurisdictional areas
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): future stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: agricultural & wooded
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
* see attached sheet 5 of 6, section #1 of BMP worksheets completed
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The developer has worked diligently on designing a plan to avoid and minimize impacts to
the maximum extent praticable. As outlined in the Priest, Craven & Associates, Inc. letter
dated June 8, 2007, Impact #1 is necessary as access to US 64 in the area of the
interchange of US 64 and I-540 is very tightly regulated by the NC Department of
Tr_a_nsportation. NCDOT will not allow a driveway access closer to the interchange than the
Hodge Road intersection where we currently derive access. The eastern propey line of the
tract abuts the off ramp from I-540 and can not be accessed by the proposed development
with either a public street or a private drive. The intensity of the proposed land uses on the
property located to the east of the drainage feature warrant two points of access for
emergency service vehicles and adequate traffic circulation. Given the control of access on
the south and east, the only way to provide this access is with a loop road, that inevitably must
cross the stream buffer and wetlands as illustrated in Impact 1. Impact #2 was selected in
order to minimize the impact to the wetland channel located downstream of the dam b rLplacing
the proposed roadway along the existing dam to the greatest extent possible. We are further
constrained in this location in order to keep all the construction physically on this property. It
should also be remembered that if the road were located outside of the buffer around the
existing pond, the buffer around the pond would still have to be disturbed in order to make the
necessary renovations and repairs to the dam. A four foot wide median is shown at this
location in order to continue the lane separation that is in place on both sides of the crossing to
the intersection located to the north of the crossing. The median is a significant safety feature
given the narrowing of the road width. The Town of Knightdale street plan calls for a street
designation of a boulevard, two 27.5 foot road sections with a 16 foot wide median on a 100
foot wide right of way. They have agreed to allow us to reduce the street section through the
cr_ossinq to a 47 foot road section on a 74 foot right of way. Impact #3 and #6 are necessary
Page 7 of 13

dam repair impacts because of development below the structure. Impact #4 is necessary to
access the northern portion of the property; it has also been aligned in a way to cross at the
Impact #5 location where an old farm road culvert crossing existed. Impact #7 is a sanitary
sewer crossing that has been designed at a perpendicular angle. Impact #'s 8, 9, 10, 11 and
12 are all proposed stormwater bypass outlets for future designed BMP's. Impact #13 is
some additional stream impact necessary for the maintenance of the dam and extension of the
pipe.
It is also important to note that this proposed plan includes any proposed and/or future impacts
to jurisdictional waters of the US/State. The applicant has designed an infrastructure plan
which includes roads, utilities and stormwater management facilities that is intended to capture
all necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters of the US/State for future development on this
184 acre parcel of land. The applicant would request deed restrictions to be included within
the 401 Water Quality Certification Approval to ensure that all future lot owners are aware that
no additional impacts to jurisdictional waters of the US/State can take place.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 8 of 13

description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because permanent impacts to perennial, important streams exceed 150 linear feet,
we are proposing stream mitigation for 295 linear feet of steam. In addition
because permanent impacts to wetlands and waters exceed 0.10 acres, we are
proposing 0.24 acres of riparian wetland mitigation. The Ecosystem Enhancement
letter accepting our proposed mitigation was attached to our original application.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 295
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.24
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neusc), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Page 9 of 13

2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
IMPACT #1-ROAD CROSSING
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 9750 3 n/a
2 4746 1.5 n/a
Total 14496 n/a
IMPACT #2-ROAD CROSSING
Zone* Impact
s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 7838 3 n/a
2 4394 1.5 n/a
Total 12232 n/a
IMPACT #3-DAM REPAIR-"EXEMPT"
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 7250 3 n/a
2 4364 1.5 n/a
Total 11614 n/a
IMPACT #4-ROAD CROSSING
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 9354 3 n/a
2 4516 1.5 n/a
Total 13870 n/a
IMPACT #6-DAM REPAIR-"EXEMPT"
Zone* Impact
s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 17037 3 n/a
2 10823 1.5 n/a
Total 27860 n/a
IMPACT #7-SANITARY SEWER CROSSING
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s uare feet) Miti anon
1 1228 3 n/a
Page 10 of 13

2 817 1.5 n/a
Total 2045 n/a
IMPACT #8- STORMWATFR BYPASS
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 621 3 n/a
2 406 1.5 n/a
Total 1027 n/a
IMPACT #9- STORMWATER BYPASS
Zone* Impact
s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 604 3 n/a
2 402 1.5 n/a
Total 1006 n/a
IMPACT #10-STORMWATER BYPASS
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 739 3 n/a
2 407 1.5 n/a
Total 1146 n/a
IMPACT #11-STORMWATER BYPASS
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 607 3 n/a
2 407 1.5 n/a
Total 1014 n/a
IMPACT #12-STORMWATER BYPASS
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti anon
1 643 3 n/a
2 451 1.5 n/a
Total 1094 n/a
* "Lone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
All activities proposed do not require riparian buffer mitigation.
Page 1 I of 13

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The. percent impervious for the site is expected to be greater than 30% therefore a
stormwater management designed to meet the NCDWQ General Certification 3631 and
diffuse flow is planned. However, at this time the specific use and layouts for each tract
that is being created is unknown. Please see Sheet 1 of 11-Schematic Land Use Plan
and the General Statement written on Priest, Craven & Associates, Inc. letterhead dated
June 8. 2007.
Since our original application submittal date of April 30, 2007, we met with Cyndi Karol
Amy Chapman and Annette Lucas of the NCDWQ on May 25 2007. At the request of
~rndi, Amy and Annette, sheet 1 of 11-Schematic Land Use Plan now includes the
proposed future BMP locations and stormwater bypass locations. In addition, sheet 5 of
6 includes section #1 of the BMP worksheets for the proposed future BMP's. The
applicant would like to request that a condition be incorporated into the 401 Water
Quality Certification Approval that requires future lot owners to submit a final & complete
Stormwater Management Plan, on a lot by lot basis, to the 401 /Express Permittinq_Unit
for review an approval as per condition #4 within Water Quality Certification 3631.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will connect to an existing sanitary sewer system. The Town of
Knightdale will ensure that this development does not exceed the available capacity of
the facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401
Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the
NC Division of Water Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that
most small commercial developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. The
Watson Tract does not meet any of the three criteria of private projects that can clearly
Page 12 of 13

result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative impact analysis is required.
In our meeting dated May 25, 2007, it was requested to include a qualitative statement
regarding stormwater for the Watson Tract. The stream classification for the proposed
Watson Tract development is C; NSW. This proposed project is located within the
Neuse River Basin and therefore is required to adhere to the Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules. In addition, this property is located with the ETJ of the Town of
Knightdale which has been designated a Phase II stormwater Community and will have
to implement a plan that includes the following: 1) Public education and outreach on
stormwater impacts; 2) Public involvement/participation; 3~ Illicit discharge detection
and elimination; 4) Construction site stormwater runoff control; 5) Post-construction
stormwater management in new development and redevelopment: and 61 Pollution
prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations. Furthermore, the applicant is
willing to accept a condition within the 401 Water Quality Certification Approval that
would require the future owners of the lots to submit a final stormwater management
plan to the 401/Express Permitting Unit for review an approval as per condition #4
within Water Quality Certification 3631. All three of the above will protect downstream
water quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
j` L
~-,
June 13, 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature _ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

PRIEST, CRAVEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND USE CONSULTANTS
WATSON TRACT -June 8, 2007
GENERAL STATEMENT
The Watson Tract is a 184 acre tract at the intersection of US 64 and I 540 in Knightdale.
The property is flexibly zoned for a variety of uses, allowing commercial, office and
institutional, high density residential, medium density residential and low density
residential. The Carter Company is proposing to construct the major public streets
through the tract, creating parcels of 2 to 70 acres that will be sold to separate users.
Each individual purchaser will then prepaze site plans for their intended use, and submit
those plans to the Town of Knightdale for permitting under the Town's Unified
Development Ordinance.
The construction of the streets and infrastructure to serve the proposed tracts necessitate
the permitting of the wetland and buffer impacts. Without the construction of these
streets and infrastructure, it is impossible to mazket the property.
At this time the specific use and layout for each of the tracts that aze being created is
unknown. Based on the zoning and our understanding of the market conditions, we can
estimate maximum impervious surfaces, but are unable to accurately or reliably
differentiate between buildings, parking azeas and roadways, or illustrate the site plan or
the drainage system. Based on the topography, we aze able to indicate the likely
locations for BMP's and their general size and shape, but are unable to realistically
design the devices.
For those reasons, we are asking to illustrate the general nature of the stormwater
management plan, and ask that as a condition of the permit individual devices be
designed, reviewed and permitted at a later date, when there is certainty regarding the
nature of the proposed development. Each site plan will comply with both the town and
state mandated stonmwater requirements, including detention for both quantity and
quality, diffuse flow measures, and Operation and Maintenance Manuals.
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPACT NO. I
Access to US 64 in the area of the interchange of US 64 and I-540 is very tightly
regulated by the NC Department of Transportation. NCDOT will not allow a driveway
access closer to the interchange than the Hodge Road intersection where we currently
derive access. The eastern property line of the tract abuts the off ramp from I-540 and
can not be accessed by the proposed development with either a public street or a private
drive. The intensity of the proposed land uses on the property located to the east of the
drainage feature warrant two points of access for emergency service vehicles and
adequate traffic circulation. Given the control of access on the south and east, the only
way to provide this access is with a loop road, that inevitably must cross the stream
buffer and wetlands as illustrated in Impact 1.
PLANNERS /LANDSCAPE DESIGNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS
3803-B Computer Drive, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

During the presubmittal meeting with DWQ the idea of accessing this area with two cul
de sacs rather that a loop road was discussed. However, in researching this approach, it
became evident that Chapter 9 of the Knightdale Unified Development Ordinance
prohibits this alternative.
Page 9-l, Section 9-1 states that the purpose and intent of the Ordinance is to "to support
the creation of a highly connected transportation system with the Town". A copy of this
page of the Ordinance is attached.
Page 9-3, Section C, prescribes a formula for calculating a "Connectivity Index", which
attempts to quantify the desirable nature of roadway interconnections. Our current plan,
approved by the Town, does not score high enough to qualify by code. The ordinance
allows for some consideration on the part of the Town for unusual site constraints, and
that was apparently given on this tract. But any plan, such as the dual cul de sac plan,
that would further decrease the Connectivity Index, would be in direct opposition to the
Town's written policy and ordinance.
Also on Page 9-4, Section 9.4 E states the importance of highly connected street
networks. This section of Ordinance is also included.
Page 9-4, Section 9.4 D states that in the NMX and HB zoning districts, which is the
zoning on this portion of the property, that cul de sacs are simply not allowed. A copy of
this section of the UDO is attached as reference.
A medical center is proposed to be constructed by Duke Hospital on this portion of the
site. While the plans for the facility are still being prepared, the nature of the use is such
that full and secondary access to the entire tract for emergency service vehicles is
imperative. The dual cul de sac plan does not provide this level of access, only a public
loop road can.
As part of the site plan approval for the tract, stating his concern for adequate emergency
access, the Fire Chief has also required that an additional emergency only access be
provided to this portion of the tract from US 64. The access will be gated, with access to
emergency service vehicles only, and surfaced with a reinforced turf matting, so as not to
appear to be a road to routine traffic. NC DOT has agreed to this. This emergency
access, in collaboration with the loop road, was necessary to provide adequate access in
the Fire Chief s professional opinion.
Constructing a water distribution system that provides flows and pressures adequate for
fighting fires is also a requirement of the local ordinances. Dead end water lines, such as
in a cul de sac, are hydraulically inferior to a continuous looping water line, which pulls
water from both directions. This looping system provides increased flows, at higher
pressures, along with the additional safety of two ties to the rest of the system, allowing
flow to the site even if there should be a break or blockage at one of the ties. Since
Raleigh Public Utility Department, which provides utility service to Knightdale, requires

that water lines be located within a public street right of way and not run "cross country",
this looping water distribution system can not be provided under the dual cul de sac
scenario. A copy of this portion of Raleigh's Public Utility Handbook, which is
incorporated by reference into Knightdale's Unified Development Ordinance, is attached
for reference.
The Town ordinances and NC DOT rulings require minimum street centerline radii and
intersection separations that cause the alignment of the loop road to impact the buffer
area.
For all of these reasons the dual cul de sac option is in direct violation of the Town's
Ordinances and is therefore not a viable option.
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPACT N0.4
The location of the proposed road at Impact 4 was selected in order to minimize the
impact to the wetland channel located downstream of the dam by placing the proposed
roadway along the existing dam to the greatest extent possible. We are fiuther
constrained in this location in order to keep all the construction physically on this
property. It should also be remembered that if the road were located outside of the buffer
around the existing pond, the buffer around the pond would still have to be disturbed in
order to make the necessary renovations and repairs to the dam. A four foot wide median
is shown at this location in order to continue the lane separation that is in place on both
sides of the crossing to the intersection located to the north of the crossing. The median
is a significant safety feature given the narrowing of the road width. The Town of
Knightdale street plan calls for a street designation of a boulevard, two 27.5 foot road
sections with a 16 foot wide median on a 100 foot wide right of way. They have agreed
to allow us to reduce the street section through the crossing to a 47 foot road section on a
74 foot right of way.

Chapter 9. CIRCULATION AND CONNECTIVITY
9.1 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of this section is to support the creation of a highly connected transportation
system with the Town in order to provide choices for drivers, biryclists, and pedestrians;
promote walking and birycling; connect neighborhoods to each other and to local
destinations such as schools, parks, and shopping centers; reduce vehicle miles of travel and
travel times; increase effectiveness of munidpal service delivery; and free up arterial capacity
to better serve regional long distance travel needs.
It is the intent of this Code to build streets that are integral components of community
design. Streets shall be detailed to compliment neighborhoods and commercial centers and
shall be pedestrian in scale. In addition to these standards, streets shall conform to the
provisions of Chapter 17. In certain situations, streets are encouraged to be designed with
on-street parking.
9.2 Arterial Plan
The street layout in any subdivision shall conform to the arrangement, width and location of
public streets indicated on the regulating Arterial Plan for the area. (See Arterial Map, Appendix
A). Whenever a tract of land included within any proposed development plan embraces any
part of the arterial system as designated on the Town Arterial Plan, the development shall be
required to dedicate and plat the arterial right-of--way, and shall be responsible for the cost
and the installation of the improvements in accordance with the Town's standards for
roadways.
Developments which embrace only one side of an existing or planned arterial right-of--way
will only be required to dedicate and plat additional right-of--way for that portion of roadway
with which the development has frontage, and shall be responsible for the cost and the
installation of the improvements in accordance with the Town's standards for roadways.
9.3 Collector Street Plan
The street layout in any subdivision shall conform to the arrangement, width and location of
public streets indicated on the regulating Collector Street Plan for the area. (See Collector Street
Map, Appendix B). Whenever a tract of land included within any proposed development plan
embraces any part of the collector street system as designated on the Town Collector Street
Plan, the development shall be required to dedicate and plat the collector right-of--way, and
shall be responsible for the cost and the installation of the improvements in accordance with
the Town's standards for roadways.
Developments which embrace only one side of an existing or planned collector street right-
oEway will only be required to dedicate and plat additional right-of--way, and shall be
responsible for the cost and the installation of the improvements in accordance with the
Town's standards for roadways.
New developments will also be required to provide a collector street to the outer perimeter
boundaries of the development based on the criteria below. If the street in question meets at
least two of the criteria, then the street must be built to an appropriate collector street
standard.
RPTIGHTDALE, NC UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 9-1

CHAPTER 9: CIRCULATION & CONNECTIVITY
A. The street intersects directly with an arterial street and provides access to an azea with an
overall density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre, or provides access to more than 150
dwelling units.
B. The street by its general configuration, in relationship to the existing development of the
azea, in effect serves a collector function.
C. The street extends into an undeveloped area in such a manner as to serve a future
collector function.
D. The street serves as primary access to a significant nonresidential, institutional, or
recreational land, as well as, an access to a residential azea of 20 or more acres.
9.4 Vehicular Connectivity
A. Stteet Arrangement
Streets should be designed and located so that they relate to the topography, preserve
natural features such as streams and tree growth and provide for adequate public safety
and convenience. Vehicular connections from adjacent property (street stub-outs) must
be utilized unless the Administrator deems the connection impractical due to
topographic conditions, environmental constraints, property shape or property
accessibility.
Where a through street or a series of streets establishes a connection between two (2)
public streets, such street shall be a public street. Local public and private streets may
incorporate traffic calming devices. Streets should be designed so pedestrians have
convenient and safe means to cross streets. Allowable treatments may include, but are
not limited to, roundabouts, raised pedestrian cross walks, multi-way stops, bulb-outs,
alternative pavement treatments, and sigaals at cross walks when warranted.
B. Block Length
Maximum block lengths inside proposed developments should be in accordance with
lengths shown in the following table. Short block lengths aze strongly encouraged in
order to create a better pedestrian-scaled environment. The Administrator may waive
this requirement if it is determined that this requirement is impractical due to
topograpMc conditions, environmental constraints, property shape or property
accessibility.
Block widths within neighborhoods should be sufficient to allow two tiers of lots except
where single tiers of lots will facilitate nonresidential development and the separation of
residential and nonresidential developments or the separation of residential
developments from arterials, railroad rights-of--way, linear greenways or parks.
Block Length n/a 11500 ft 1000 ft ~ 800 ft 660 ft 660 ft n/a
rnt ....:........~
9_`z KNIGHTDALE, NC UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 9: CIRCULATION & CONNECTIVITY
C. Connectivity Index
A Connectivity Index should be used to determine the adequacy of street layout design.
This is calculated as the ratio of the number of street links (road sections between
intersections) in the project's street layout divided by the number of street nodes
(intersections and cul-de-sac heads). For comparison purposes, a perfect grid has a
Connectivity Index of 2.0 or higher. The figure for a conventional cul-de-sac subdivision
is often 1.0 or less.
The accompanying illustradon exhibits a connectivity index of 1.2 (links aze shown as
circles and nodes are shown as stars). The illustration has 11 links and 9 nodes for an
index of 11 / 9 = 1.2
Any development shall be required to ~~ `~ , 1
achieve a connectivity index as shown in * ~J
the following table. The Administrator
may award connectivity index reductions
if it is determined that more than 60
percent of any "side" of a development
(4 sides total) faces impracticalities for
connectivity to adjacent properties due
to the presence of controlled-access
highways, railroad rights-of--way, Neuse
River stream buffers or existing
developments that have not provided
street stub-outs for connection purposes.
In addition, the Administrator may ~
awazd connectivity index bonuses where
pedestrian greenways are provided to
link any cul-de-sac to another street or
cul-de-sac within the development. Street links on existing adjacent streets that aze not
part of the proposed subdivision are not included in the connectivity index calculation.
Connectivity Index I n/a I 1.3 I 1.4 I 1.4 ~ 1.5 1.6 n/a
/AA:«.........1
KNIGHTDALE, NC UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE O_3

CHAPTER 9: CIRCULATION & CONNECTIVITY
D. Cul-de-sacs
In general, permanent cul-de-sac streets and dead-end streets are discouraged in the
design of street network systems, and they should be used only when topography, the
presence of natural features, and/or vehicular safety factors make a vehicular connection
impractical Where cul-de-sacs or dead-end streets are unavoidable, developments shall
incorporate provisions for future vehicular connections to adjacent, undeveloped
properties, and to existing adjacent developments where existing connections are poor.
No system of multiple branching cul-de-sacs from a single junction with a connected
street network is permitted, unless the Administrator deems it allowable due to
environmental constraints.
Any permanent dead-end streets or cul-de-sac shall comply with the length limits shown
in the following table, and shall be provided with a turnaround at the closed end of the
street as set forth in the Town's Standard Specifuationt and Details Manual
Cul-de-Sac Length I n/a 1 500 ft I 300 ft I 200 ft Not Not n/a
(Maximum) Allowed Allowed
E. Cross Access
Traffic studies have shown that highly connected street networks provide much greater
traffic throughput and mobility for a community, at less cost. A high degree of
connectivity should occur not only at the level of arterials, but also on collector, local
and other secondary roads. Such connectivity vastly improves a sweet network's
performance. The street pattern should not force short trips of one (1) or two (2) miles
onto arterials; it should be possible to make trips of this sort by using collector or other
secondary streets. With a highly connected street network, cross-town trips should be
possible using fairly direct secondary roads.
All development in HB and MI zoning districts shall be designed to allow for cross-
access to adjacent properties to encourage shared parking and shared access points on
public and private streets. When cross access is deemed impractical by the Administrator
on the basis of severe topography, environmental constraints or vehicular safety factors,
the requirement maybe waived provided that appropriate birycle and pedestrian
connections are provided between adjacent developments or land uses. Development
plans should provide cross-access easement and complete the connection if completing
the link can derive an immediate benefit. If no immediate benefit can be derived,
development plans should provide cross access and construction easements and arrange
the site design so when the adjoining property owner extends the connection to the
property line, the link will be completed. If the link is to be completed in the future, the
grade of the connection, parking, landscaping, and other improvements must be set to
allow for extension into the adjacent property.
9-4 KNIGH'TDALE, NC UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

WATER DESIGN STANDARDS
Unless otherwise indicated, all standards apply to both the public and private water
systems. Described in this section are the general design standards, which are to be
followed by all parties in preparing subdivision, utility extension, and utility replacement
plans for the City of Raleigh. These design standards will ensure that the citizens of
Raleigh will continue to have quality water facilities along with an adequate fire protection
system.
All engineering plans for public and private water systems must meet State and City
minimum design standards as indicated in the most recent amended Rules Governing
Public Water Supplies by the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services and/or the
Citv of Raleigh Public Utilities Handbook whichever is the more stringent. All projects
must be certified by the engineer of record or the City Engineer. The engineer shall be
responsible for determining the water pressure at the point of connection and adequacy
for services at the highest point of the project. Water pressure zone information is
available from the Public Utilities Administrative office.
Plan and profile drawings shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer signed,
sealed, and dated showing the various elements of the utility mains and shall include an
overall utility plan layout on a single sheet with scale no smaller than 1 inch = 200 feet.
The design of improvements must be based upon actual field verification by the engineer
of existing utilities. The utility drawings shall be on separate sheets, free of landscaping
and other details not pertinent to the utility plans. A separate landscaping plan must be
submitted with the utility plan showing any proposed landscaping and all water and sewer
utilities or easement. All adjacent tracts and topographic information must be shown on
the landscaping plan. The water drawings and sewer drawings may be on the same
sheets. Landscaping plans shall show all utility engineering drawings and shall be on
paper 24 inches by 36 inches.
Once installed, certified surveyed "as built" plans shall be provided to the City showing
the utilities. "As built" drawings for the utilities shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department prior to acceptance of the project by the City.
WATER DESIGN -PUBLIC
a. Location Conditions for Design
1) All mains are to be within dedicated street rights-of-way except major
transmission mains not affording direct service connection. Mains
within the street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the
outside of the pipe to the edge of the right-of-way. Greater
separation may be required for greater depth. Water mains as
specified by the City of Raleigh will be marked as indicated on Detail
W-13.
2) Water mains shall be located either in the north or east side of the
street pavement.
37 Effective 8/2/05

~~

~
o ~
z~no
~
~
~~ ~ 66~6~r~-~r~-r~-m ~W
QQ~
~ v Q
~
~
m
~
`~
N m
W
m
mo
~_ ddddd0°ooo~d
~~~~z~~m~o.or=z~ ,~
'- =o
~~
w
Z ~ w
~d

v N
~Wd
~ ~ J
s
~ N
~ dddddrOrv- od
Z Z Z Z Z~_~~ ry Z -id
J U (Y
W
Q ~ °oZ
Q~~

~ O
O WSJ
~~~
d
~ O w
~ C~~Odddddd
OOOC
O ~ O ~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
~ z~

,nO
NNCV~-
m Q
w
~,(^~
V1 LL ~~J
Q

O~
0 6 m 6~ d d d d d d
O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dd
W
w Q
~ d ~ ~ ~Nj
zQ
z~
Z

d
`~
cy In
~
m~~r NUl~~r

~ J
Q
d Q z
~
U m
W
~Q
Z W ~
' 1 '
L~1--1 O = 2

~ ~
~~~~~ w~
Qom
Q d d o a o o" v
;Q
d d U Q U 2 LL 2 2 J~ u
~?~
V Q~ J~~~~
v v Jl JO
W
ww~wFO~00~w QQQ
W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i i i ~ ~ if ON
Q Q ~~zuzddddd'v
~ ~OWtK
~~
I I I
~
^ ~
~ W W° W° Z Z Z Z Z
~ l~ l~ W W W W W~ Q
Z~ J lL
r
v ~ Q
Q
Q
Q
~
J J~ J~ Q d~~~
H
Z
l
~ t1
~
U
..~
~ 7 ? 7 ? ~ 2' ~ ~ ~ N ~
W
Z
O _ ~ Z
~v~0
~' Q v

0
0 wz
ood~

0
~~~
~ p(~, J~
WL<
NZZZ
SO-
r-.n
~~
~w~
z
~~~
N
~ OC
~_~~~
FWFW~(V
~<ary
LL T
?~K~
R' W
ZOWZF
CWWZ~O
f Y~O
~«Fm'z
x~
~`)
\~
1\.,` ,
11 \~; ~~~
~1 ''
~ 'r
~~(~? ~~
r,
---;~
`:~ -
,~lti ~ ; `r,~,
i ~ ~ r
l.~ !~ ~ ! /
i
r~ \ J
__ --,l~l
:`~~`l~ t
~' ' -;
~~,
`~' `
/ `~ -
`~~_~
;-
'(I'~ I
"~ ~)
_ i ~'•~
~.
~,\
~~\;
-- ~ :,
it
~~
',~%%r~~
ii
~~ ,
~~~,
,~,,
,.~~ .1,,

i~+
'~ ~~ ~
,`_.. `.
~~~.
I`
'~~~
,C~
~f ~1
i
I / I~QQiiII1I((I
IM
i
I

S 8

&~s
~ ~ a ~
p ~ 6
~ a o o ~
o~PO s
0 o m o 0
3 2 ~ ~
~, u ~ j
~~
Q °~
a ^~
~~~
~ ~~
~ J ~
Q
- ~
s ~ ~
m
~ g
w
Z
~~
Q
JW
UJ (K
Z I-
Q N
2 J
U Q
Q
Q
~a ~
~ ~~ ~
B p ~ ~
~ ~ z~~y
-l ~O
W ~ 40
.~ ~-
- ~~-
~ ~ s s s
~ ~ ~
~ o g a o
o $ o 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0
o v v
z `~
iS ~ ~ ~ ~
4 0 & ~ ~ g
~l r^~
~, °ill
,_
i
^~

rv
~~i
YW i
~N

o

r =~
Y~
4=
-u~ YW
gN
r
w F
= w
w
< _
~ ~
~l n ~ f ~ ~~

t ~
Q
Q ~
~ ~
i o ?
U1 J
i o a
~ ~
0 0
~ >
a a
z_
w
w
z
w
c~
w
J
~ ® \ \ r
~
Q
(n J
Q ~___
~ _~
a. r
llJ
W ~
g O ~
~g W
Q F-
3 w.
m
Z
W Z ~ ~

. ~
O
Z W
~
W
Z

II ~ /±
T~ 1_~ ~ 1^ ~~n„/y/~
IIQ~ /~G ~~Itl obi
j~~~ /~~~~~~'~t
' Y I/1/YII/L/f/1/17 ~l/17~/1AIJ
VV v 7~/~/fs /J VOO wu~ir~uin)v~nei,]ISOU~I I~P~u ~i-N%ZIZRL!GI(~xT,i-OOf1YIxL/Glb ~u~'4.1-bOYLZ ~.)N~4~~~1r211111 '1~ny'~nuQ ~o~n~wii,~ fl'LUfii
tiT17JNl!)N:1/ti210X;lA~If1S/S~J;INDISiI(I ;~Id V:)SONV'1/ti21:
iNN V'ld S
L'lf1tiN0:)3Sf7 (7Nt~"I
LNV
d9 b1Nb'Zld 2l31?Jd'~ `1A13117 (,~~~~ ~
~
~ LOOL bZ H'32idW °3144 ~
.
.
c c
~~I~I
s~
1
~I~oss
~~n~x
zs~Ix
~ 3,d41H9~N~l ~NOUd70'i 17~L NOS1
dM ,~_.~ ~a-id~s I
.
,
~
d
~ ~
/ // // /
\ / // // / /
i // // / i
// ~'/ / / /
\ I ~ 1 ~~° / / / ~.
i
~ ~~/ /" / /
I ,I i / // // ~~
/~/ / Y/~//,,
`~ `I i / / //~~//~/ V
i~ i, i~ ~ In ~ J N
a0 U~ ~ I ~%~ '~~ ~ ~ Ll
1 ~ i~~~~i~ v ~ ~ Z Z
~~ ~ ~ ~ i~~~ii; Q ~ to Z
v~~ ~ ~ ~ '. ~1 ~ i~~',ii, ~ ~ - 1.1.1
.~
k ~ ~ (~/
~` ~ ~ ~~/ / / ~ ~ ~ n°i
i I ~ ~~
ii O N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (!~ In J (Y LL N
~,
1
\ ~ -
~`~~ ~ In Q UJ
LL ~ '~'~'~ ~ ~~ x - -
/ ~ ,~
~ ~ ~ ~~•~ ~ ~~ i i~ ~ iii i ~. ~~~ i
~ .~ 0 ~ ,~ ~ ~.~ f .~ i ~ , ~ iii i '' ~ `~,r, t.
1 ~ ~ I ~ ~~ i i i i i ~r,,~~,
C~ ,~, ~ ~ ~,` ~ ~,
'.~ ~: ~.'`~ ~, ~`, 4
~ ' ~~ ~ ~' ,~ ~ o
.-~
~~ ~ \
.~
~_ _ I :.. ~ \ I ~ LZ W ~
~, ~
~' ~ ~
`~ ~~ z W
..® ~ ~
_- ~ Q z
1 ~
`; > ~~ ~ ~
~~ ; ~ ~ N -
~ ~~s\ ~ ~
' [z w
~, ~,
'~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~
i ~ ~ ~ `~ `~
i ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ \~ ~~ ~ ~ O z
' '` ~ ~ N
'~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! _ ~ ~
i ~ ~ V \ \\ '^1/
~ i ~ ~
1 1 ~ (` \VI

II ~ L W~ ~~ ~~
~~ 1~~~ ~~ lOO'll/'LM/17 ,1/t~~/V11J
~/ 7~/~/CC~.. 1/77 w/0W0 uu~~'li'.w;n/u~~¢i,~u~u~liew~d-NHZI-ZHL/filfi xvd'(IIIEItIHC/fil6 ~u~'9d-6lN)LZ-.7'N ~4~W1~11 tnl nlinti :inu~~~.~ln~uici,l fl'EIl%E

d9 ''dJ.Nd'11d '2k3121d7 °1N31~1'~

'
~
IAOt bZ Ff~dW °3Ld4 sa3awona ; saoAaniins i saaHn~saa aav.~sarav~ i s~i~KHV~a s> KV> ~nsr~o.~ ~sn arw~
c c
s~i
I
1
o
~
~~~
~ 3NQtH9~N~l 'NOIld70~1 1~
d?~l NOS1
dM ,~_.~ ~a-~d~s ~I~n
~
~
ss~ ~
d2I ~ is~rxd
I
r
/I
III
II
/,
iau. '... w.. ~• au„ ~• .y
~
/ ~ ~
~ _ r. .. ,r. .. ,., .~ ~, .. ..
\ /
r
/
/

---

.. ... ` .YL ~ .v . ~ ,,, yY. y' .W. ten' ~W. 'a' .YY. ~~` JIL ~' .UL ~ dW. ~` ~W. ~' dW.
~ ~ ~'' 1W. .YY. .YL "'' aIL ~' .YY. r` dW. ~'' ~W.
.~~~~~~
~/
/_•
r ~
\ w At~ A6 r. AIL '~ J4 r" ai + /G ~
ti
\ ~ ~ A6 . '~ Ac . JL a d. /
~\ ~ _ ~~ ~ r
~ i
~ ~
\ \~ -
/~ .
.. ~ ..
~~
~.
a~
~.
r~
+IL ~
y y
.IG ~
... ~y
A. ~
r ~
,y r

~.
_- ~~ ~ / '~
.,, ~ ~
~.~ . ~
,,,
,-
r~
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
1 Z
-~
w
°z ~
w ~
c~
w c~
J Z
H
~_
X
W
~i
_
_
~
W
3 W
~ ~~

~ O
~ ~

m ~ C~
~ , ~ _ _
W

~; ~/~~il=; ~
~~ ~~ ,~ ~
~~., ~ ~~
(Y
w
~ i~

w
,,
~~
~w~.

I ~ t
W219 N~id?JO

~~ 1~~~ QN~~~ t
100'110-9002 1'xJ'O?Jd wo,~,r~un~i~~o~r,~i.,~~,d pR«c.i ~ axzrcx[ i aie <c,i ~ uoetr ix[ ~ r,ia ^~~oyd - eue[z ~.rN `ya~,i~'a vui ,nag ~~~uzi „mdwo_
? t. aixc
~

v9 burr '~~rd~ =lrem

~
~ooz az I+~adw t3~vo saaaw~n~~ i saoA:inans i sa:3KOisaa ~av:~saHVn i sa:aHKV
ia s~r~v~~nsKO.~ asn aNVn
.~~
<
s
~ 31Va1H91N~1 eNOUa~o-r 1~1 NOS1
dM ,a'5=.1 t~lv~s I
~~.~I~oss~ ~ ~~n~x~ .I,s~rxd
~. ~
~~ \\ ~ ~~ /
_ ~` `V ~~
~ ° •. /
~.. ` ~ \ /
\ ~ ~ / Qj2 /
O \`, / /
_ /
I ~ • ~N ~ /
V
`.
- ~
N Q U1 ~ ~\ ~°
.. `~ ~ ~~
Z cn
2~
O \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ LLJ 218
Z ~~
-~~ ~/
Q / ;; Y
,. ~ ~C
~ \ ~ ~ 2^
\\ .\ .` ~\\ \ Cv
,, ~,
~,~ ~ _ ~
~~ ~ ~
~ ~~
,~. r \ .,
~ ~ ~ ~ --
-+
~ ~
_ ~ ~.
.„ ~ ~ j
~ f
..
,.
~ ~.
~~
• ...
hr \ti - ""
-- ~ _.
_ ~ ~ ''1
__
- - - ~ .~- -
--- --- _ _____ ' __- ------ ~~%= t ~~~~: ..
---- - ------- ~ ~ t~ ~ d:
_- ~ ~ ___
~ ~ C.
~ ~: - Z
~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ,~, ~ _
,.
N Z 0 Z Z Z ~ z 2~~
o g ~ Q o o ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~n N ~ ~..
m ~ ~ ~
tY ~ z z ~.
,e
o ~
Z 0 ~ ~ ~ > ~~
Q ~ ~
J W
~.~.. G
...., `~ I ~ z ~
w ~ ~ ~ '.
~ ~ I
~ 20,E ~ . ~ .
W II I N N II I
J ~ N _,`~ m F-F-I F~ -+-• ~ - ~ ill
- Z Z ~ _ ~
c~i~ ~ cnw = w ~ _- --~~~ ~~~ ~-
vi / ~ ~ ~ l
z - -

II ~7
7 ~_~yn q1A ~~AJ11/I
Its/ /III ~rIVOLJ - y y ~I !_- _
c
~~J
' /
~w~
71~.~'
, I/1/YII/1._M/17 ,1/1T/1~IJ
VV V7~/V[i iJ~ VQ0 ~uu~'y'~u')u~ne~,~ie~~~d ~iewa'gRZI-ZNL/GI(r*T:1'lNIf1YIRL(Ifi ~~~~~4J'6U4LZ ~.)'N ~4~~~IHL bUI ~l~nti'_~nu~~~~~ndwu,l fl'£OHE
S21'~:~NIDN~/SNOA'dANIIS/SN'dNDIS8C79dV:~S(INV`7/SNBNNV'ld S
LNV
I:If1SNOJ1iSf1QNV'I
d9 -did ~~-~ .
J~
~~~
~~`
r
-
'
~ ,~ -~ -mod .
.
~~~T~i~l~oss ~~n~x `ss~lx
~,~~-~ ~~~ld~, 1~1 NOS1
dHl ,~-.~ ~~x I ~ ~ a a
~ W
~ ~O~
w ` IN U
~ Q
W
p ~ ~ Q ~ W N ~
p Z (n J W W
~ W Z ~ Z Z Q W ~
J z g Ug Z ~ ° o
~_ ~ ~_ ~ = Z
x ~ ~ ~ v ~ > ~
w ~ p ~ ~
I w
z ~
o ~
z w
z
v1. - 1W. s yr., r 1~ ~- au. _ .v1. -6 .w. "- .W. --~ aW. f .vs.
LL °i 1W. ~"' .Y4. a' aW. f aW. °" .YY. 'r' .1W. '"~' aW. '~' aW. "~' ~/ -~"
~- +IL r i r ~ r y, .- y. ~. ~. •r ay. ~- CIF ~ y4 /`w/••/ r.
111` ~' aW. "' 1Y. ~` .Yh. y' .YY. f 1W. '~'' aY. '"~' dl4 "r aW. '"~'~•."4. dID..
aW. '~' aW. "' dW. ~ 11Y. "' aW.~~Y-. -dW, ,1W~ _ W, /JW. w. ~y ~
v
1W. ~' aW. ~^ dW j'"
~ ~ ~ - ~
~~ _ ~
.. ~ o .. ~
~~~/ ~
~ ~ v ~ ~ UJ
~ v~ Q vz ~ , ~
~~~ ~~ ~
~~ ~
~• ,
~ ~ ~ _;
~'~
• • ^ O
~ Q
~~v
~~Q
~ ~
,
/,
.
/,
,~~
~ w
-~

w Q
O ~
~
z

w
w

z

~.. X
~
~ ~

V ~

tL l.~ Q ~

CQ ~ Q

.~
~ \
® - ~.~
~~ \ .
,,\ \\ _ ~ ~
~ \
--- -,, ,; i\ ~, ~

~~ 7V 9 W~ .~ I~YQi
~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~W ~~~/ 7~/~/z =l~VW wu~ii'.~umlu~nn~.)i~+-~ud l~vu~~~l~%XZI-~NL/(>16x^~-Oll£(YINL'(16 ouoyd'fiU9LZ'.)-N ~49~~I^Tl bfll .'~~nti ~anuQ i.~lnJiw~.l fl-fU%E
SN38NION~1 / SNOA7ANf1S / SNHNDISH(1 HdVJS(1
'
"
"
"

vs b~nrue '~t~v~ ~~m

'
woz nz ~r~avw =~vo Ntl
l / SN7NNtl
IJ S.LNV.L
1f1SNOJ;iSfl (1NV
1
.~~
<
s~i~l~oss
~~n
~~~-~ =~~ld~, 171 NOSl
dM ,~_.~ =mix I
~ ~
dx~ is~lxd
/ 1 ~~ i~ ~ ~
y" ~ ~~ I , ~I4,.
~ ~ ~ ,~
/ ~ ~~ w \ - ~
~ 1- ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~
~ ~ ~ -~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,
~~
,~ z
~ ~. ~. ~ ,.
~ / / - +~
~ ~ .+ ~y~
~ ~ ~ ~ _~
~.~
~ ! i ~ ~ ~
. ,~~~~,
~. .~
~~
/ dt~t .//A//A//A \, ~ ~ ~ ,~~
~~/~A/~A/~ ~\~
/ j\//j //j //\// //,MN /
/ ~ ~/~\/~\%\~i'
~V/~A/~~~ ~ ~ ,:~
.~ `~, ~~ ®~ ~°~ ~ s
~~
~ ,, ~ --~
,, I~ / ~ ~
,~~~~ ~ ~ i
/~~' /
,~
~~~\ r.
/
- ~~~~/
<~~~ / . w
.~
z
~, ~ ~
~~ ~ z ~
~o m
N 1J--1 ? • • ~ ~
~ ~ .. ~~ ~ Q
~ ~~
~ ~` ~r 1 ~ ~
/ ~ ~
~~~~
i .~ ~ 1.~. O cn
/ ~ /
~ / ~ ~ I~n -
_ 4J-~ V 1 Q
f~ ~ ~~
/ / /I
,.
,~ ,
r
,~
~ ~ - ,,
Z
W
W
J
,,
~~
~~
~ ~ ~~
r
W
~ ~N
``~
N
W
2
J ~ N
O Z ~ --~ W L~
Z ~ Z Z Q ~
~i o g Q ~ m
~ ~ ~ U ~ W
~ O ~
~ ~
I w
z
O ~
Z W
Z
U
Q
~C
G

00~
~ ~
g o
~j U
~ ~
w
o Q
~ ~
~ w
_~ ~
o O
J
W
z
Q
U
0
J
~~~~
~ J ~ u~ ;
~-~~~ ~
~~~~

W
0
N
m
z
N
W
z
0
m
z
LI..~
'~~,
W
z
I---
~_
X
w

II V1 1
3V J- 1_111L] ~ IPI \~I-J11/i
l~Q'~ /~C ~rltl O~3
~~~~ lOO`IIILM/1t ~1/1T/711J
a/ T/V iJ~J VOO w~~~'L-~u;n~u~nu~J~'~
Z
FIG xod'OOEO-ISiC/G16 ~uo4J'fi0~)LZ'.)~N ~4yul°21 t01 a1~n5 `hoop n. InJw~~.) fl'tiONf
~
~~ `

V9 ''dJ.NVZIV '?~31?1V'~ °1AI31"t'~

~
~
l.OOt bt H'h1dW '3L'da S~
?I~)/~~A~nS/
saaaK
or~~ i s
aNO~s~a ~av.~sarw~ i sv~Krw~a slrw.~~nsHO:~ asn aKV~
c c
sa
~~~
?
~ ~~~-~ ~-~ud~, l~
dZlL NOS1
dM ,~=.~ ~~x I
~~l~oss~
g ~~n~x~ is~lxd
^, ~ ,,
-_. `` ` \\
~__
~, ~ - -
~-~ _ ~ ~
\ ~.
~ -
~ ~
. \
~. ~
.~
,' ,
w .'
i
i
~ ~ ~-. /~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ i -~
.. .. ... -- .. r
1 i ~ ~
~,.
~ ~ ~ ~
.,
~ ~ ---
,,
~ ~ ~ ,.
~ ~
~ --, ` ~
~ ~
~ / i ~ / J ~
•.
Z ~~ ~ ,~
~ ~ \ ~ ~
,~/~,y~A/~A/~A/~A/~A/~\/ ~ ~/~A/~~ j~ '~ ~
- ~ - A~~~V//V//V//V//V//V//~ % ;':A//V~/~
0 ~ ~- !~// ~/~//~~/V//V//V//V'.~ ~V//~\/ V~~\~.
m ~ ~',~~}~~i/~~i/~/iii/~~i~~i~i/~~/~~i/~; ~ I
~~/~//~//~//~//~//~, ~ ~//~//~//~i, _ ~
W ~ ~ ~ ~'~j/i //~ //A/ ~//A/~~//A,r ~
~.
Z \/~\/~\/~ O
'~ ® ~
~ \ ` •• u~ ~'~~
~ "" ~ ~
x \ ~
w ~ ~, v U~ ~
\ ~ ~ _ ~ ~/
~ / ~' ~ l..l._ O
~ ~~
,__, ~
\ ,,, _ ~ ~

II ~ i7 ~ '/~ ~~~ l~~l IW IIV TJa/~ '~~VOO wo;r'.u'~u(!?)u~nP..l ~ls~u~llew'.I~NlfZ l-ZNL/616 xe.1 WLIr IXt /61o •~u•,4a ouvt,t .~rv v•,i•.a vvi •.~•••`•..•••.~•..,.._~-... ~~ w~~
SNHBNIDNH / S210A3A21fIS / SN7NOISH4 3dtlJSONtl'1 / SN~NNtl'ld S.LNtl.I'IfISN07 9Sfl ONtl"I
d9'dJ.N'd"LLd'~.L2Jd7 'J.N31"17 ,./„- Fr~~~ 1.002 bZ H'~2JdW '3144 s~l~d
I
~'I~~SS~ ~ ~~11~~
1
•~~
`5~
~ 3-~d41H9D~d 'i~loud70'"f 1~J. 1~1OS1~dM s~~dn '3,d~s ,
.
.,
I
.
1 ~/
(5~11~0?~d ~j1~4~1-d (`M•O'2k •l~ NOIl'd1~1~ QN?J9 '15X~
(~11~02~d 15) ~a'd~19 7/1 •d0?~d ('M•02! •1ZI) NOIl'd/\31~ QNZl9 •15X~
(Q310N 5"d 2}3d(1S 1~3-1/1H912~ ~Q'dZl9 7/1 'd02ld ~'i1~021d ~ '15X~
b
~ ~
~~
~~
W
tV V
N
N ~
~r ~
_ ~
b
r~ ~
u
n
LLI
V v
N ~
N ~
QC
~ >
0
X

I 1 ~
~ ~
~ ~
n ~ g
~

{
~
I

I
( ~
i
t ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
? ~ 4 0
3 ~ ~
~ •~ ~ ~P N
~ 4
1
I E ~ W
~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
! ~ ~
V' Z I ~
t l c H91 ~ j
~ ~ ~ ~ J / I
~
r~ ~
~ ~
~r~ o
_ ~ E

I

~ r
N~
~

~
- ~
~
1 ~
~
i
G ~ `~ ~ ~ {S
ails ~ J ~
~ ~ - ~ 1 i

~
~ ~
!
/ -
~ 3 a ~
C
~ Z
~
i ~ ~

~ 3 z ~ 0.
~ ~
• Z
1 ~ X I 1 ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~~ ~ pLL(
w~ 2 ~~
' ~ I N
~3 ~
*, If119
J

V
~
3 rv ~

~

~ ~
=
- LL O~
- ~?(
I
U
~
^ U

50~~
Y 0 ~

~

N

a
In
~
Q
`
.J

J ~
+ ~tJ

N
p4
~
~ ~ !uu>i~ o n I ~
3 ~
• ~ ~ ~ oc
~ o
7 oc
~ 0
oe ~ 7E ~ ~ z . Z f-

~ ~. ~
~~ ~
r~
i

I ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
8

~
I
~

o

~

~
I

~
~

g j

I
~ ~ a ~ I ~

'I ~ OI '_w^
L~~ ~~ ~
~ 1~~~ ~..~~ I~y~.ll~~
W ~l/~-~~/~~J
/7 VaG7 wcr~'L'~um)u~ne~;~ls~ud l~awfl'HRZI-ZXL/61fi"ad ~OU£IY ISL/filfi nu~t4d'G09LZ'J~N `49~~1a21 tUl nPny `~nu4 mmdwa;) fl-f11H£
sbaaKioNa i sxoAanans i s~aN~isaa aavnsaNVV saarlKV~a s.~Nd.c~nsKOn asn aKV~
V9'V1Mf11V'213L?ld7 '1N31Y~ ~~ 1_OOL bZ Ff'~dW '3LVC[ s~I~ T
I
~I~~SS
~ ~`~" n~a~
•
7~
~S~
I
,
~
,
I
.
.
.
~ ~
11
11
_.
u:w w
v V
~ ~
N ~
QC
_ >
b
~ ~
11
II

~ lL.1
V
to
N ~

~~ ~~ ~~ W(~9 '~9 NMHCyQ
S~ I'd13Q l~'ddW I QN'd~113M ~~~ ~~~-9~QZ ,lr~~rO~d woauou(n)ua+ei~lsoud l!ew'~I'88ZI-ZSL/616 xer!'OOCO-18L/616 ~~~4d'609LZ'~'N `4~NIpN b01 ~1!~S'~^P(!~~!^~w~J fl-£ONE
SNH0NI7NH / SNOA9ANf1S
/ SN9N71SH4 3dtl7S4Ntl"1 / SNHNNtl'id SLNV L'1f1SN
7 ~Sfl ONtl 1
0
d9 ''d1N'd~l'd '21~1?JH~ ~1N~1~~ '
' LOOZ 'bZ H~~HW '~1dQ ~
C
~
7~
~
~`3n~
•
S'3
1
~1~~s
~
1
5 `~" l~
S

~N '37'dQ1H91N~ ~NOIl'd~0~
d~l NOSl
¢M
1~
S~I?Jb'/~ `~ld~S I
.
.
.,
~
.
.
d
.
-
~ ~
1
0
00
~ 3
o;
~~
a~
N ~
\~
-- - a,
m
w
Z
0
w
J
O
V
L1J
cf~
I
Z

Zag ~
z
!!.
°
~VU
~`° V
0."i
Z -

J Q
w
timm fl
~

Z
z
Q
zz .
o-~
~w
p F- W
W 13 lL
Q V I
~-ZW
Ul ~ Z
z (Y -
- J
W UO
m-~
J3N
I=Inzz
VI -
J
Q30
O U~ (X
LLOO
~oz°
i -4
W ~~~
~ QU 3
W W
IU z ~ ~ In
~Joo ~ ~-o Qzw v
QQz~ (Y~ O (YOZ U) ~OF- W
p W W W O I- O W ~ - Z J ~
z (Y~> I-Wln(YJLl2 2 OJT -
QWWO-OWJLI~ ~-OJW~-- •f- --Q J
JSWWpCOCOWZWWfYWQm f- ~32~W
~~Q Q z0>ZW ~ (Y (Y>- - ~ZUI
W Ul W~~Z~JO> ~WWWIl p(Y O(Y
3z U12 OQW~ J =~>1112ZWLl-W
-WTI- ZSCQU~~~pI-QJ-f-O>W IU>
LL Z~ ~ V ~UWZ W~~(LU-I-WLI
OC~t-- 4Ll ~ ~ f-Q3(YVQW QQ~Q
W ZUIWJ~~ •W(YW Old lnClJ3fY
1f1L1W~W(Y~QWI-JO~fYJ W Q ~~W
l~~l-l~-~OWfYV ILQWW(YZJWZWIn-(Y
zJOrY~~11zcY~~~ -I-rSlOt-JZO=z=O
-UFO- tl)~InWQ~pW -~-~0~~
~z0 >W ~ ~ Q ~L10W3 iU ~ ~
tl)-fYU-2 _ W-pWZ4W~0 ~W W=ZZ
O LL-~I-.-.WZ W(k--J UIOtY Ll~-W
(YW ~U X21-LlJl- L1JJ~1-(Y IU ~
U[QJddIL(Y~ WJtIIUI QQW(YILtnZW3~Z
J~ OW W~~ Wzh-~F-W --CQ JO
pJ-C'Sz > IUO~~WZ-UlC'SW>(YZ~ p~CY
QJ3QOWJZ -~2U zW~JW~-ZZIn-
O- -J~-S~z~Ztn- Q» fY~-W>
(Y3~[L~-UZ~fY- -W Z-U-z3U~(YZ
QWUIL W(LW W ZW~LI Q- J W
~~~Z~O(YL1W(~WO~U(T111 Z3 z~~Ll
fYW~~CY(YO-p ~p ~tZ WWU to--~JU
WfY OI-LL 3 W f~ -F-pZ~dz O~-
»z to W W=JWZ Ul ~Q OCaILU01-
JInOLIzp(L~2~JCQQ~D~~ -W- 3Q
~Q-ZOZ-CQ~ - 2~t~ Wln .~~ ~ ~
UW~QUQfL IL3W1- OO~nz~~nL10zC'J
~U Lll~O 2 tl)tfl~ WOUWW OQ
J ~~~zQWZ ~~(YI-I- ~J--~~~-
J (YUl[Y(Y --ln~ WfYfY~Z~~ILC'SIn~~W
.. ~111~-WW3WU~~3~WWQWO--W~U-~
W QlnlL>~O-~-WOQ»WU~LIUfY-QLI~
F- LYWZ J~JL1L1~>JWJJ(Y(YI-ZW WZ
O O(YOI1_~QWOW-zW(Y»~WOOtLWW~00
z W~UOU(lp]~[YJ-CQ IUVVUI(LCQVU)[Q[Q_U~

C~
z
ua
J
D
~~ z
t LL
`~ ~
~
y ~.a_
t {~
1
+~ ~ ~ ,, z
O
~
/
~
.+1 V 1
~
rn ~ ,\ L ~ ~
i
~~ ~~
~ v
`
~ l.. O

~~ f~ :~ i~
~
~ ~
~
-- ~
~
~.
- ~,
~; p
~
1 r: ~%

2
~
w

`

~ J ~~'
~i
L'
ti., C1 zr UJ
. ~~ ~
~ ~' o
~ a
w ~
~, ~- ~
U
~
_~
`
°`
~~ ~

a~
d 4

S1

s~

~ 1 ~
- _
v m m
N -
~ W
s
c ~~ ~ c ~.!~
N
~
W ;
y L ~ ~ J! P
~ a c:_ ~ ~
U ~ C _~ [G
~ a
N= ~
~J
V ~'
ij
w ~ ((
~
~ ~./
w Q
J ~1

i) ~ -

~
tj
' y
c i` : n
\
~ AP
~
;i' ~ ~Jl .
~~t<
A
~G'~
~
` ~
, `
` )~
Q

~, ~
:, LL
,. cn

E t_
;

~ ~
r ~
~

~
~ ,L
~ v w- W
z ,~ ( ,
~ ~ J
_ _

~ ;
.~ .~
.
n
J
.
;u . vI c, o ? u

C O
m
~
L
W
~ ti:
m ' ~
a: c s. `'
- ~ s~ S1

~ ._
h x ~ ~ ~; ~-. © O

~~
- - -
_
-
-
Z