20071035 Ver 1_401 Application_20070607

vM~IQM£~CREED
To: Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
ATTENTION:
,~
07- 1035
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: June 11, 2007
PROJECT NO: 01283.0003 TASK NO: 1 O
RE: Kildaire Farm Lake Repair
TRANSMITTAL NO: PAGE 1 OF 1
WE ARE SENDING: ~ Originals
^ Specifications
^ Prints
^ Calculations
^ Shop Drawings ^ Samples
^ Other -
Quantity Drawing No. Rev. Description Status
7 PCN Form and supporting narratives, maps, etc. G
1 Check for $475.00 for 404, 401, and Buffer Permits
Issue Status Code: A. Preliminary B. Fabrication Only C. For Information D. Bid
E. Construction F. For Review & Comments G. For Approval H. See Remarks
Action Status Code: 1. No Exceptions Taken 2. Make Corrections Noted 3. Other
4. Amend & Resubmit 5. Rejected -See Remarks
REMARKS:
CC:
200 MacKenan Court, Cary, NC 27511 919/233-8091 Fax [phone]
McKIM & CREED, PA
JUN ~ ,~ 200%
55~~ ~~~rrz w~r~a c~u,~l.i°rr
~?~ ,:n!tl~,{i~rr7~:~8~An~CW Signed_
Dale Hya I
C: \ Documents and Settings\ dhyattl \ Desktop\ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL_kildaire farm_dwq.doc
'Ddated Z-15-07

~' S
June 11, 2007
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Kildare Farm Lake Repair
Dear Sir or Madam:
M&C 01283-003
Please let this letter and attached exhibits serve as a request for Pre-
Construction Notification (PCN) for the Kildare Farm Lake Repair project
located in Cary, North Carolina. This permit and associated plans were
prepared by McKim & Creed, PA on behalf of the Kildare Farm 2 Home
Owners Association (HOA).
The project involves temporarily lowering the permanent pool for Kildare
Farm Lake (see exhibit) so that the eastern portion of the lake adjacent to
Brownfield Court may be accessed for dredging of muck and creation of a
permanent forebay berm to improve water quality. The project has been
designed so excavated material will be used for the creation of the berm
and a portion of the dredge material will be spoiled onsite as shown on
the attached exhibit. No material will be removed off-site. No
imperviousness will be created by this project.
The Home Owners Association (HOA) also wishes to stabilize a portion of
eroding stream which feeds this area (see exhibit). This work, designated
as Alternative A, will be pursued if contractor cost estimates allow the

US ACOE
6/11/2007
Page 3 of 3
NCR 287-301), Sub Item (7b) as defined by Sub Item (6), "protection of
existing structures, facilities and streambanks when this requires
additional disturbance of the riparian buffer or the stream channel.".
Access directly from Two Creeks Road is not feasible due to existing slope
and mature trees. McKim & Creed, PA believes there is "no practical
alternative' to temporary access directly from the stream without
permanent removal of the wooded buffer and therefore we are requesting
an Authorization Certificate on behalf of our client.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] or dhyattC~mckimcreed.com.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED, P.A.
Dale Hyatt, EI

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
07- 1035
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(Tf anv particular item is not annlicahle to this nroiect_ please enter "Not Annlicable" or "N/A"_l
I. Processing PAYMENT
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: RECE~VE~
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 13, 43.
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana ement Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here D ~,y ~~
II. Applicant Information J i J ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~
1. Owner/Applicant Information '~~~~ - war~;~ ~~,,; irY
Name: Kildare Farm 2 HOA ~ Attn: Andrew McCoppin ~N~4 ~~~o ~trr1?~'~ArER BRIWCN
Mailing Address: c/o York Properties Management
1900 Cameron Street
RaleighiNC 27605
Telephone Number:_919-821-1350 Fax Number: 919-828-9240
E-mail Address: andrewmccoppin(a~nc.rr.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Dale Hyatt, EI
Company Affiliation: McKim & Creed, PA
Mailing Address: 200 MacKenan Court
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-233-8091 Fax Number: 919-233-8031
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

E-mail Address: dhyatt(a~mckimcreed.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Kildare Farm Lake Repair
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0752998819
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Kildare Farm 2
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From SW Cary Parkway
drive north on Two Creeks Road and west on Brownfield Court to a dead end
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.76389 °N -78.78788 °W
6. Property size (acres): 30.1 (size of pond)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:_unnamed tributary of Swift Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_Eastern finger of Kildare Farm Lake (Two Creeks);
Lake bordered by housing subdivisions.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of sediment forebay at confluence of two creeks. Soil will be excavated to
maintain flooding conveyance storage and a portion of the soil will be used to construct
underwater berm. Select streambank stabilization is also part of the project. Large
machinery (trackhoes, etc) to be used for forebay; smaller equipment (mini-excavator)
to be used for streamwork.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:_Forebay to restore flood volume storage and
create future storage as well as to stabilize eroding stream banks.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. None.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Open Water Impact 1 will be
0.47 ac of area within the pond (Waters of the US) to place forebay berm. Stream
Impact 1 will be area necessary for the permanent placement of stone toe protection for
streambank stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None.

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
10 feet
Unnamed trib to
Stone toe wetted; 18
1 Kildare Farm
stabilization perennial feet top of 340 0.02
Lake bank to top of
bank

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

a ,
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 340 0.02
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
1 Kildare Farm Lake fill pond 0.47

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.47
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): na
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.47
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.49
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 340'
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation: Pond is existing; no new pond creation.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Footprint of forebay dredging
was kept to be within the pond `finger' as shown on plans and below'/z-acre of impact total.
Pond will be drawn down during construction of berm. Streamwork will also be conducted
when pond is lowered (although perennial, stream base flow is minimal). Streamwork was
located to best save mature trees and keep access from steep, wooded slopes.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http: //h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

. ~
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify ~? Yes ® No ^ (Meuse)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone ,,,~...,,.e ~ e+~ Multiplier ra,*;rt,+;~~
1 I 3,400 13 (2 for Catawba) I Not required
2 1.5
Total I 3,400
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA -meets definition of allowable
ri arian impact without mitigation per 15A NCAC 2B .0233
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
6 ~i a ~-
~ `applicant/A nt's Si~ature Date
(Agent's signatur 's valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

Kildaire Farms II
C/o York Properties, Inc.
°1900 Cameron Street, Raleigh NC 27605
Telephone:[phone] Fax: 919-$28-9240
MEMORANDUM TO: McKim & Creed, PA
200 MacKenan Court
Caiy NC 27511
Attn: Dale Hyatt
FROM: Nancy Richerson, Property Manager
DATE: June 5, 2007
SUBJECT: Kildaire Farms II HOA
0 l` ~
°3s
The Kildaire Farms II HOA (KFII Association) authorizes the design staff from the Cary office
of McKim & Creed, PA to act as agent on behalf of the Association regarding the preparation,
signature and submission of required federal and state environmental permitfiing.
If you have any questions, please email naticyricherson cr,yorkproperties.com or leave a message
in my voice mail at 8G3-$084.
NI2/irl203

~ ~;~.
-,~j_.'
_~
h/ s='~~ ~ 1 S~ .~~a1~J'~ ia

~l * , f ~^' ~ ~i:
~
~ ~ ~9 ~s " m ~ ~ii~f5°

.
ft
~
,/ ~ ~ y '
s
`
re
~
~ ,h I

~ ~
"t
a
~
/ ~
' " ~z ~ ~ "~
`' C
,
^ ~
~
~t` i a

r
a ?~
y
a
~
,
ii `
~'
~r
I
F
~
y ~ ~~ ry \
d'~'~
I~I
~L
~ F
i
~
~
~
>
~.:
L
~
, a R r~
'
~
~ .
.
~
J ~

~
,
~
`
~ ,
,
~ ~~~~ ~.
:-- : ;,
~~
>,< ~' f' =
~,~ ~.:
.:1
~''ry ,

~~ bI
)~.,
v N~IQM~C][ZEED
200 MocKenon Court, Suite 200
Cory, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
AAOOO2667 E8OOO6691
www.mckimcreed.com
Kildaire Farm Lake Repair
Vicinity Map
'"
,;
+.~

~ ~
DATE: SCALE
MCE PROD. A 1283-0005
DRAWN DNH HORIZONTAL: oeuat a
1~ ~
DESIGNED DNH
CHECKED VERTICAL:
PROJ. AIGR. EHK ~ 1 OF 8

STATUS REN90x

07-1038
LEGEND
~ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING TREE
-- EXISTING CONTOUR
~7Z0_ PROPOSED CONTOUR
--sF- SILT FENCE
STONE TOE
® EROSION CONII~OL MAT
PROPOSED STREAM CEN
~N
ALTERN E A: ST EAM WORK
NWS =
r~
NWS = 378
NWS = 378
PROPOSED BERM LOCATION
60' 0 60'

120'
v MCI~VI~ CREED
200 MacKenan Court, Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
AA0002667 EB0006691
www.mckimcreed.com
%;

P TIAL 10-ENGIN
STREA Ntf~
DATE:
UCE PROJ. f 1263-DD03
DRAWW DNH
DESIGNED DNH
CHECKED
PROJ. MGR. EHK

scALE "~ `~'"'®`
HORIZONTAL• qu,~ MABER
~._~,
VERIICAL•
NA 2 OF 5
STATUS:
~-PR OSED SEDIMENT F REBAY
TEMP RARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PER ANENT MAINTENANCE ACCESS
Kildaire Farm Lake Repair
Site Plan

O l - i ~
v McI~VI~CREED
200 MacKenan Court, Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone; [phone], Fax: [phone]
AA0002667 EBODD6691
www.mckimcreed.com
Kildaire Farm Lake Repair
DATE:
MCE PROJ. ~ 1283-0003
DRAWN DNH
DESIGNED DNH
CHECKED
PROJ. MGR. EHK

scA~ "~ ~'""~"
HORIZONTAL• de,~ ~
1• = sD'
VER7ICAL•
NA 2 OF 5
Site Plan STATUS:

SOIL SURVEY OF WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Kioldaire Farm Lake Repair
USDA nrRalxaoercec Web Soil Survey 1.1 6/7/2007
'~ Cwerrstion Smlee National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
Meters Feet
" ~"` 0 50 100 200 0 250 500 1, 000 1, 500 2, 000

SOIL SURVEY OF WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil Map Units
o cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsufVey.nres.usda.gov
Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
~~ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 7
~r~r~rp Escarpment, bedrock Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:15840
vnvnvmn Escarpment, non-bedrock
~~~~ Gulley
muwmno Levee
••••---•-• Slope
v Blowout
® Borrow Pit
~ Clay Spot
• Depression, closed
- Eroded Spot
X Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
~ Gulley
/~ Lava Flow
® Landfill
-J. Marsh or Swamp
p Miscellaneous Water
~ Rock Outcrop Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
+ Saline spot 3/15/1993
.. Sandy Spot
;~ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
~ Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
0 Stony Spot
m very stony spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
O Perennial Water digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. ''
~ wet spot As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
i
Q
U1
USDA tad Reu~en Web Soil Survey 1.1 6/7/2007
Grerr~tien Serrln National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

0 7- 1 0 3 5
Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina Kioldaire Farm Lake Repair
Map Unit L-egend Summary
Wake County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

AgB2 Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 16.6 4.5
percent slopes, moderately eroded
AgC2 Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 20.3 5.5
10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
ApD Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15 32.3 8.8
percent slopes
AsB2 Appling fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 34.0 9.3
percent slopes, moderately eroded

AsC2 Appling fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 25.3 6.9
percent slopes, moderately eroded
CeB2 Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent 13.9 3.8
slopes, moderately eroded

CeC Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent 6.4 1.7
slopes
CeC2 6 to 10 percent
Cecil sandy loam 16.1 4.4
,
slopes, moderately eroded
CeD Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent 6.9 1.9
slopes
CgB Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 0.3 0.1
percent slopes
CgB2 Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 2.9 0.8
percent slopes, moderately eroded
CgC Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 3.5 0.9
percent slopes
CgC2 Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 6.1 1.7
percent slopes, moderately eroded
CmA Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, frequently flooded 46.1 12.6
CnA Colfax sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent 1.4 0.4
slopes
GeC2 Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 0.0 0.0
percent slopes, moderately eroded
GeD2 Georgeville silt loam, 10 to 15 24.2 6.6
percent slopes, moderately eroded
HrB Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent 1.9 0.5
slopes

HrC Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent 14.6 4.0
slopes
USDA Nanvai Raourca
~~ Comennion Senke Web Soil Survey 1.1
National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/7/2007
Page 3 of 4

Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina Kioldaire Farm Lake Repair
Wake County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
uvyw, uavu~. wy v.v
NaE Nanford silt loam, 15 to 25 percent 1.3
slopes
PaF Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 45 14.8
percent slopes
PcE3 Pacolet clay loam, 10 to 20 percent 2.3
slopes, severely eroded
yci~cu~ ~ivyca, ucKucuuy uvuucu
WyA Worsham sandy loam, 0 to 3 18.6
percent slopes
Percent of AOI
n n
0.3
4.0
0.6
5.1

USDA lV.tnr.i Rewurcei
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 1.1
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/7/2007
Page 4 of 4