20061780 Ver 2_401 Application_20070607

/~WK
rDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
June 6, 2007
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District -Regulatory Division
Washington Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
RE: Preconstruction Notification
Floogie Mitigation Site
Dear Mr. Biddlecome:
C~ ~ ~
~~ ~
U
JUN ~. ` 200%
~E~1R - b`dA7ER C2U,~i_1Tl`
'tAl£TL.q.NQp N.~lD aT'??fdPr~+.A7cR BRAt~JCH
i~~~
The attached NWP 27 PCN and restoration plan for the Floogie mitigation site is presented by WK
Dickson on behalf of Environmental Banc and Exchange (Applicant). The goal of the project is to
provide full-delivery mitigation to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program for impacts in
hydrologic unit 03010107 of the Lower Roanoke River Basin. The Floogie Site is located in Bertie
County, North Carolina approximately nine miles northeast of Windsor. The property is 827 acres
located west of Browns School Road (SR 1348) and is accessed via a farm road north of the Flat
Swamp Creek crossing.
The proposed mitigation includes 10,251 linear feet of stream restoration on Flat Swamp Creek and
25.19 acres of riverine wetland restoration. The proposed stream restoration reach was disturbed by
historic channelization and the proposed wetland restoration area is prior-converted (PC) cropland that
was ditched and drained. The Floogie Site has a history of agriculture and timber production. The site
currently supports agricultural production aclear-cudpine plantation.
Following the initial PCN submittal in November 2006 and subsequent vegetation survey and aquatic
habitat assessment, the Floogie project has been substantially re-designed to avoid and minimize
impacts to high quality wetlands while continuing to provide substantial functional uplift. Specifically,
Reach 3 has been shifted to the left bank to avoid mature hardwood wetland forest and Reach 4 has
been re-designed to stay within the existing channel. Also, temporary construction impacts have been
minimized by removing stockpiles areas and construction access corridors from the wetland areas.
These modifications have decreased stream mitigation units from 11,420 to 10,251. Permanent
wetland impacts have decreased 43 percent, from 2.12 acres to 1.21 acres.
Additionally, the Floogie Restoration Plan adheres to the SMART mitigation goals:
Specific The Floogie Restoration Pla
and the activities designed
parameters were
restoration.
:3"!{)1 ~{~>hr7 i~lut~r7~:~~~ri~:a~ V1~'yk~~~~~
l~alc~i~:,}~, ~C: 27f~12
i ~~x `~ I ~~.7f32.t}£3i 1
Gv~vGV.w (c<~ i c, i«c~n. cr~~~~
n and construction plans specify the target functions lost
quantified through special studies and replicated in the proposed
to restore those functions. Habitat and vegetation
*~r~rY4~ ~~~~r~~iir~r:~ S~~E~ti~ C~[:~r~~~liri<~ C:,r~t~~~~ia ~ I~iz~ricle.~

.,
Measurable The restoration plan clearly describes the measured parameters and the success criteria
are written to provide measurable milestones.
Attainable The Floogie Restoration Plan incorporates restoration activities that have been applied
and refined on many previous mitigation sites. The target functional uplifts are
innovative but attainable due to the application of standard restoration practices.
Reasonable The attached restoration plan is a result of collaboration between the Applicant, WK
Dickson, NCEEP, and regulatory agencies. All parties have had substantial input and
reached a consensus on goals, design parameters, and success criteria. The result is a
reasonable mitigation project.
Trackable The Applicant has made monitoring and pro-active management of mitigation sites a
priority in their business practice. The success of the Floogie mitigation project will be
tracked through clearly written goals and success criteria, implementing the monitoring
plan, and actively managing potential problem areas. The success criteria and
monitoring plan are described in the attached restoration plan.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important project and please contact me at 919-782-0495
if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc.
~/ _
Daniel P. Ingram
Attachments
CC: Norton Webster, EBX
NCDWQ 401 Unit
File 50431.OO.RA

Pr-~.
".~'„ ~
.;',>~ U
Office Use Only:
USAGE Action ID No.
No.

Form Version March OS
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 27, WQC 3495
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
~,
II. Applicant Information ~ ~-- ~~ `;! ~ ~'~~
~~~
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN ~ ,~ 20D1
Name: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC ~~~~,+~ ,.___
WF,Ttn+~p,~,na~p.STn~a~~ ,
Mailing Address: South East Regional Office ~7~~ srbar~ci~
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC, 27606
Attention: Norton Webster
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: norton(a,ebxusa.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Daniel Ingram
Company Affiliation: WK Dickson
Mailing Address: 3101 John Humphries Wn_yd
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (919782-9672
E-mail Address: din rg am(c~wkdickson.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. if full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Floo ig e Mitigation Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): (6 parcels) 6836386851, 6837503535,
6836585672.6836781176.6836668225.6836636697
4. Location
County: Bertie Nearest Town: Windsor
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Windsor, drive
approximately 5.3 miles on U.S. 17 East. Turn left onto Wakelon Road (SR 1001 . Drive
approximately 5 miles on Wakelon Road to Bull Hill Road (SR 1301). Turn right on Bull
Hill Road and travel approximately 2.5 miles and turn left onto Browns School Road (SR
1348). Site is approximately 2.5 miles on left. Site is accessed from farm path
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.1183245 °N 77.8502890 °W
6. Property size (acres): Total property size is 827 acres. Enclosed in conservation easement is
74.45 acres.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Flat Swamp Creek
8. River Basin: Lower Roanoke River Basin (USGS HUC 030101071600511 and NCD
sub-basin 03-02-10
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/adminhnaps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Flat Swamp Creek has a drainage area of 2,150 acres (3.36
drainage area of 1,456 acres (2.28 mi`). The dominant land use is_a~ricultural production of
cotton and corn, pine plantation, and woodland. Local drainage patterns have been altered in
the past to drain wetlands and promote agricultural production. The USGS Merry Hill, NC
topographic quadrangle shows that drainage from the site flows in a southerly direction
Figure 2). The stream is a tributary to Hoggard's Mill Creek. There are numerous
agricultural ditches on the project property that are used to promote drainage to the adjacent
channel. The ditches and swales were constructed to route water off the site, drainin a
that were once wetland. NRCS soil mapping and aerial photography is shown in Figure 3•
On-site topog~phy, soils, and existing wetland areas demonstrate that the site historically
supported both riverine and non-riverine wetland areas. The restoration and buffer areas will
be protected by a conservation easement. Areas of the property outside the conservation
easement may continue to be used as woodland, pine plantation, agriculture, or wildlife food
plots (Fi urg e 4)•
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will involve the stream restoration of Flat Swamp Creek and the wetland restoration
of adjacent PC cropland and pine plantation. Stream restoration on Flat Swamp Creek in
reaches 1-3 will consist of excavating a new channel and filling the old channel. Restoration
of reach 4 will consist of adding revetment structures to the existing channel and increasing
access of channel to existing wetland. Native material revetments will be installed. Wetland
restoration activities will include plugging and filling existing ditches, relocating the existing
farm access road, and re-grading selected ditches outside the proposed conservation easement
to aid site drainage patterns. All wetland restoration activities are taking place in non-
jurisdictional PC-cropland or uplands. All disturbed areas will be stabilized and planted with
native vegetation. Equipment to be used includes track hoes, bulldozers, trucks, and other
earth moving equipment as necessary. The attached Restoration Plan discusses the project in
detail.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: T'he project is bein developed to provide
full delivery mitigation to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Pro r~EEPL
impacts in h~gic unit 03010107 of the Roanoke River Basin. The stream restoration will
restore a natural flow pattern and create a design that will allow flows that exceed the design
bankfull sta e~pread out over the floodplain. The design will provide for stable cross-
sectional eg ometr~ an increase in planform sinuosity, and restoration of sand-bed channel
features and stream bed diversity to improve benthic habitat. The wetland restoration will
create h.. d~gic retention and encourage species diversification that will provide a
continuous riverine wetland s,, s~ rig into riverine wetlands and the stream restoration
site that will enhance wildlife habitat, wildlife passage, and water quality functions. The
attached Restoration Plan discusses the nroiect in detail.
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 3 of 9

IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A previous PCN was submitted on 11/07/07. The project was
subsequentl ry edesigned to maximize wetland impact avoidance and minimization. A JD request
was submitted to USACE on 02/01/07. A site visit was performed by Bill Biddlecome on
03/13/07. A final wetland map is provided as Fi u
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
An Erosion Control Plan has been approved by NCDENR Land Quality Division on 12/08/06.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts resulting from the proposed
restoration include: filling_/plugging 5,553 linear feet of existing channel; excavating
linear feet of new channel resulting-in 1.21 acres of permanent wetlands impacts; temporary
stream impacts (in Reach 4) resulting from structures being added inside the existing
channel; and clearing 3.34 acres of temporary wetland impacts to provide construction
access. No impacts will result from wetland restoration activities.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain (yes/no) Stream (linear (acres)
feet)
Channel construction permanent Mid-successional bottomland No Adjacent 1.21
hardwood forest
Temporary Temporary Mid-successional bottomland No Adjacent 3.34
construction access hardwood forest
Total Wetland Im act (acres) 4.55
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 260 (estimated)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Intermittent? Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
Reach 1 Flat Swamp Creek Permanent Perennial 15 1,930 0.665
Reach 2 Flat Swamp Creek Permanent Perennial 15 1,920 0.661
Reach 3 Flat Swamp Creek Permanent Perennial 12 1,820 0.501
Reach 4 Flat Swamp Creek Temporary Perennial 17 615 0.240
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 6,285 2.07
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) T e of Im act
yP p lake and estua sound ba
( ' p ry' y' Im act
p
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Temp. Perm. Total
Stream Impact (acres): 0.24 1.83 2.07
Wetland Impact (acres): 3.34 1.21 4.55
Open Water Impact (acres): 0 0 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 1.21 5.17 6.38
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 615 5,670 6,285
Updated l l/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet).. Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation (N/A)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Due to the nature of this
project, avoidance is not possible. Impacts are minimized using a staged construction approach.
Where possible the channel will be constructed prior to turning stream flow into a segment. This
approach allows minimization of the impact of each sta e during the project construction.
Additionally all work in wetlands and streams will be conducted during dry conditions and/or
with mats to protect soil structure. Efforts will be made to preserve individual high value trees
located within the stream restoration area. The stream restoration along Reach 3 has been shifted
to the left bank to avoid impacts to high quality bottomland hardwood wetlands. Reach 4 has
been redesigned to avoid permanent impacts to high quality bottomland hardwood wetlands The
attached Restoration Plan discusses the nroiect in detail.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

USACE - h1 accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/!h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands%stnng ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htt~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Miti>?ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
Updated 11 /l /2005
Page 8 of 9

percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. N/A -No changes in impervious acreage proposed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIll. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us!ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is a stream and wetland restoration site that will be protected through a conservation
easement and will not facilitate or deter surroundin dg evelopment.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The attached Restoration Plan discusses the project in detail.
O b~o7 /~'7
~ Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

9
-~-~.~,...~ i ~
~`~ Powellsville ~ ~ '
a ~ ~Col'erain---~ I
~~
~ - ~~
~_, . ~--
~..
,, r
~,_
~..w-=:
i
~,tl1 a
Project Site ~"'-~ d~
~~_.~.
~.
`~~ _ ~ - ~' 45 m
13
-~
,'
~` '"°~ ~~
~-
~,,,,..
_~. ,
~ ~.
w~
z
..-
~ ~
_:
~, °:
~_~~
. /
~,
r.
,~ - ,a
17
`~ Windsor _ *~~~
~ .,
' ~~ ~' ~ ~;, FkU~3~901~~
~~
~ ~
t
~W~: RJTS
~ Figure 1. LEGEND
Road
Project Vicinity Map Existing Waterbody
Floogie Site HUC 03010107160050
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 ~EF~~KE "~E~~"FY
Miles ~~-<~fe ~T~

.~ 1 A
{ ~ 1 ~ l '~ 0~~ ~OiT
i' D ~I11~6 ~ , 11 ,pd/ Ooh ltd 1
~.. -, .
+r: ~+se3.~ . err owp h
~o `~eM o ~ a e a I~ ~ t~
/ _
--
~ - , ~?P- ~ --- - -- - r-----. ~
~_ ~r/
~. _ .,......~• -' i III
~.
rp - ~ ~,~... ~ .~~ 1
_-
'-.. .. .~
_ ~ _ •
"-I'~ Proposed Rlverine ~ • ~. , e`
} Wetland Restoration - ' °~ ••f ~ ~ ~ ]
III N • ~,, ~. ~g
°.
.-
i} .
~p r
fy r j -
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ _ -` : ~s° Proposed S eam ~"" - _.
tr
• 's 4 s + ~~ ~'~ Restoration ~
i
_. • ,. ~~
3
~' ~- Existing Wetland Boundary •, ~ ~ , __
,~ x -> ~ ,~ '~ N
,r ,
±I '"~ a
......
.. _.
____
~ ae '=~/
.
t ~..,
__ ~ i _
~. i ~ ~~ _
,^
i,
\ '
t
~...
d _
' ,
I
... ~ r
~"
j e _
.:~ -; Cem ; ,-.,,- a-- ~<--:
Note: Water;ztie~ B unary wag~deliogafed using LID R data and not SGS topo ~- ` ~~ ~- ~ "" e .
LEGEND
~ Figure 2. NcDOr Roads
USGS Quadrangle Map Stream
Foisting Wetland Boundary
Floogie Site ~ project Area
~ *„ Potential Riverine
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Wetland Restoration
Feet O
Watershed Boundary

*k .4i~~~ ~ ;.,~
,~ = _ p
4
F
,~.
, ,r
~
„
~ t
~
~
~
~ , ,~~,
~„
~
~~
~,
~~:; sa~~a~ 5..
GoA
Na GoA ~
"RlyMi'r _ .~c ar « ~'., kt/~6. yrpa,a ~*,.!

Proj ect Area - :~'`~ ~ <.~ ' ~
.
~
~_
' ~` ~f ~A.S... ~. jw':.'~.
~
~
E
A
.. ,,
x
~ M
a
ExA ~'~` _ ~ ~ ~ Na `~~ 1

,.

~ ,. .~ ~ „~
' GoA ,~' . ~ >a~
,.
~. o ~ . ~~

ExA ;~. ~~ -

+~.
e< ~ ~ ~`-
,
~
w
;
- - ~ .: , • ~, God ~ s, y« ~.~.
.
.
, -
~~..~+... ,- w.,,
a :.. .~
-
'
- ~
ExA
.. Na _~.~ ' ~
~ W
TT
., _-. ~`• .. ,gip 1i" .~. ~' ~~.

R °-~, `:` `~ -

.•
1-~
?'
.
x
y .'gSw4
b .:.'a'~1'a~ +kei ~ ~.. S M b Y ;A#
?.~

k
_
t ~
v
S
a ~~ ~
„Z
,
-
~

_~ r
k
- _ ExA
sue a rY
n
°~~'
~ ~..
s ~
"~
i'
.
~.T~„+~Yq
d~
_
1
~.;
f ~ r ~ ,, .,.~~' a .e ~ i

... a
~. ~
~
,n ~ r'It' i '~
. 6
.

~~
~° .. .,V .
M'
.....
_
..
, Am*`~
s
.
~
a v ...
,6 ~. .
. a - .A Y
+. 5 h :rv ~ ~ a .+ . n `

SOIL SERIES LEGEND
Hydric Soils
Non-Hydric Soils GoA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 3% slopes Na Nahunta very fine sandy loam
ExA Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 % slopes Gt Grantham silt loam Ra Rains sandy loam
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam WE Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded
® Figure 3. LEGEND
~ Soils Map NCDOTRoads
Stream
Floogie Site GoA Soil Series and Phase
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 ~ Project Area
Feet

~~ ~~ rte, ~: ~ ~~r~+i;'; =:: `~ Figure 4. LEGEND
i ~-=-~ `'%' i-~ to ~~' '~----~ ,~~,`Existing Stream Conditions NCDOT Roads
~~' Existing Stream Reaches
FI00 ie Site ProedArea
JUN ~ ~; ~OL~i g Q i
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
f1EtJFt - WATER C~UF.!.! ` . Feet
1~FPA~nq~~~nr ~~.t=n'.r,