The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20091224 Ver 1_DCM Permit_20130305Permit Class MODIFICATION/MINOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environment and Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission ,Permit for X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant to NCGS 113A -118 X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113 -229 Permit Number 24 -10 Issued to N.C. Department of Transportation, 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1548 Authorizing development in Beaufort County at Pantego Creek, Bridge No. 77 on NC 99, TIP No. B -3611 as requested in the permittee's application letter dated 2/28/13, including the attached drawiniz dated as received on 2/28/13. _ This permit, issued on March 4, 2013 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent:: with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may; be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void. Relocation of Grassed Swale 1} Unless specifically altered herein, this minor modification to Permit No. 24 -10 authorizes the following activities: a. Retain the existing pavement to allow vehicle access to the remaining causeway, b. Construct a 174' long pipe to convey bridge deck runoff to a relocated grassed swale, c. Relocate the grassed swale as described in the permit modification request and as shown in the attached drawing dated as received February 28, 2013. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or continuance as the case may be. This permit must be accessible on -site to Department personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunder requires further Division approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on No Expiration Date, pursuant to GS 136 -44.713 In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. Braxton C. Davis, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted. Signature of Permittee Sollod, Steve From: Lane, Stephen Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:55 AM To: Sollod, Steve Subject: FW: B3611 Belhaven Attachments: RtDitch &DriveRevisions of b3611.pdf Updated info. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Johnson, Jay B Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:34 AM To: Ward, Garcy; Steffens, Tom; Lane, Stephen; Wainwright, David Cc. Brame, Bill Jr. Subject: FW: B3611 Belhaven Sirs, Please find attached the revised drainage plan per Garcy's request to fully remove the original proposed swale from the plans leaving only the option three proposed swale. This plan in conjunction with this email is to request the minor modification to allow Option three and its improvements to be able to maintain the existing full access to canal. I have forwarded the email from Scott Vinson clearing storm water approval. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Johnson, Jay B Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:09 AM To: Ward, Garcy; Steffens, Tom; Lane, Stephen; Wainwright, David Cc: Brame, Bill Jr.; Bunn, Eddie J; Blankenship, Andrew; Eatmon, Bryce E; Kincannon, William C.; Brickhouse, Joseph W; Jarvis, Elwood C Subject: FW: B3611 Belhaven Gentleman, Please find attached a revised plan to address the concerns of retaining the existing pavement to keep access to the canal. "Option 3" was chosen over the other options as follows: Option 1: Build according to plan. This will not provide vehicular access to the causeway beyond the parking area, but we already have the permits. Option 2: Reduce or eliminate the 5' berm on the grassed swale detail. As long as the grassed swale dimensions, grade, length, etc. are not changed, it will still provide the required treatment. It looks like this would provide 12' of clearance from the back slope of the proposed swale to the ex. EP. The grassed swale would essentially begin and end at the same places as it does now on the plans. Option 3: Pipe flow from 2GI 4 line ahead to new JB C —L- Sta. 62 +00 Rt. + / -, and pipe it through the guardrail to release to a relocated grassed swale from —L- Sta. 62 +00 to —L- Sta. 63 +00 Rt. + / -. Again, grassed swale would need to have same dimensions, etc. as noted in Option 2 above, with min. length of 100'. The relocated grassed swale would then drain into the tidal canal on plan sheet 8. No redesign comps have been performed, but it appears that it would work. The changes in option three that we propose is that we will not be draining the grassed Swale directly into the canal, we are doing 115' of grassed swale instead of the minimum 100' and swale is designed so that if it overtops will sheet flow over vegetated uplands into the canal for additional treatment. Please lei me know if you need additional information. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Brickhouse, Joseph W Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:08 PM To: Johnson, Jay B Subject: FW: B3611 Belhaven Jay, let me know if you need any addition info. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Cox, Jimmy L Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:09 AM To: Johnson, Jay B Cc: Brickhouse, Joseph W Subject: B3611 Belhaven FYI. Let me know if this is ok. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.