20071009 Ver 1_Application_20070611

•~~ ~
e "` STAT~
~ ~r
~^
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
f ~~`//~
1~'~'~~1
t/~ ~
'V
qN~,S*~~``k 0~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Y~~'~R~~,~c
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
June 6, 2007
Attention: Ms. Sue Homewood
071009
Subject: Application for General Major Variance and Randleman Buffer Certification for the
replacement of Bridge No. 73 over Bull Run Creek on SR 1549, Guilford County. Federal Aid
Project No. BRZ-1549(4), State Project No. 8.2497601, WBS Element No. 33481.1.1, Division
7, T.LP. No. B-4128.
Please see the enclosed Categorical Exclusion (CE), Pre-Construction Notification, stormwater
management plan, General Major Variance Application Form, permit drawings, design plans, and
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) acceptance letter for the subject project. The North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 73 over Bull Run Creek with a
new single span, plate girder bridge approximately 100-feet in length. This will provide for two 12-foot
lanes, two 14-foot lanes, and 5.6-foot sidewalks. The approaches will be widened to 52 feet to provide
for two 12-foot lanes, two 14-foot lanes, and a 2-foot curb and gutter section. Ten foot (14-foot where
guardrail is required) grass shoulders will be provided on each side. The project involves replacing the
current bridge in its existing location, using a temporary on-site detour bridge located north of the
existing bridge to maintain traffic during construction.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
The project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin (sub-basin 03-06-08) in Guilford County. This area
is within the Randleman Lake watershed and is part of Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03030003 of the
South Atlantic-Gulf Coast Region. Bull Run Creek is the only water resource within the project area.
Bull Run Creek is a perennial stream, with a width of approximately 15 feet. The average depth ranges
between 1 and 2 feet. The substrate is composed of cobble, silt, and sand. Bull Run Creek has been
assigned Stream Index Number 17-5-(1) by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) from its
source to Swift Creek. Bull Run Creek has a best usage classification of WS-IV.
No designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply I (WS-
I), or Water Supply II (WS-II), waters occur within 1.0 mile of the study corridor. Bull Run Creek is not
listed on the 2004 List of impaired waters [Section 303(d)] for the Cape Fear River Basin nor does it
drain into any 303(d) waters within 1-mile of the project area.
There are no wetlands located within the project area
MAILING ADDRESS: LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: [phone] Of 2728 CAPITAL BLVD. SUITE 240
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 919-715-1335 RALEIGH NC 27604
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER FAX: [phone]
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
WEBSITE: WWWNCDOT.ORG

! r
The replacement of Bridge No. 73 will result in no permanent or temporary impacts to jurisdictional
streams.
RANDLEMAN BUFFER IMPACTS
The proposed project will impact areas protected by the Randleman buffer regulations. Under the
Randleman buffer regulations bridges (Buffer Site lA), road crossings (Buffer Site lA), and utility
crossings (Utilities Site 1 and 2) are generally exempt from riparian area protection requirements.
However, because construction of the proposed project requires a major variance and the impacts
associated with these activities excede 150 linear feet, they are considered allowable with mitigation.
An on-site detour bridge will be used to maintain traffic during construction (Buffer Site 1 B). Impacts
associated with the temporary bridge are exempt from riparian area protection requirements.
Table 1. Randleman Buffer Im acts to Bull Run Creek (S uare Feet)
Impact Bridge Road Crossing Standard Temporary Utility
Construction* Impacts Base Ditch* Detour Crossing*
(a roach fill)* Bridge
Zone 1 Im act (sq. ft) 3238 1408 1307 4411 568
Zone 2 Impact (sq. ft) 0 2684 781 2425 144
Totals (s . ft.) 3238 4092 2088 6836 712
Mitigation requirements Allowable with Allowable with Allowable Allowable Allowable
(exempt, allowable, or mitigation mitigation with with
allowable with miti ation) miti ation mitigation
*Mitigation is proposed for these impacts (total impacts not associated with the temporary detour are 172 linear feet and 0.24
acre).
The inability to disperse concentrated runoff into sheet flow prior to entering the buffers will require a
variance. The proposed bridge replacement will require the use of two standard base ditches to convey
concentrated flow to Bull Run Creek and prevent erosion of the riparian buffers. One standard base ditch
will be permanently located east of Bull Run Creek, north of the bridge (Buffer Site 1C). A second
standard base ditch associated with the temporary detour bridge will be located west of Bull Run Creek,
north of the bridge. Following the removal of the temporary detour bridge, a preformed scour hole,
located outside of the buffer area, will be used to reduce stormwater impact (see attached stormwater
management plan).
Utility Impacts
The proposed project will impact power, telephone, cable, water, gas, and sewer utilities within the
project area. Relocation of the existing utilities will require the placement of a pole within buffer zone 1.
The pole will be utilized temporarily by telephone and cable television lines and permanently by power
lines.
Existing overhead telephone and cable television lines north of the existing bridge will be removed.
During construction a series of temporary overhead telephone and cable television lines will be
necessary. Prior to construction of the detour bridge, temporary overhead lines will be installed south of
the existing bridge (Move 1). After the traffic is placed on the detour bridge, the lines will be
temporarily installed north of the detour and crossing the detour and crossing east of the new bridge
(Move 2). Finally, after completion of the new bridge, the permanent overhead lines will be located on
the south side of the bridge (Move 3). Move 2 will require placement of a utility pole within buffer zone
1 (Utility Site 2). The proposed pole will be also be utilized by the permanent overhead power lines.
B-4128 Permit Application
Page 2 of 4

Existing overhead power lines located east of the existing bridge will be removed and relocated. Prior to
construction of the detour, a temporary overhead power line will be installed further east of the existing
line. After completion of the new bridge, the permanent overhead power line will be installed close to
the east end of the new bridge and joining the permanent overhead telephone and cable television lines
located southeast of the new bridge. The permanent power lines will cross the Mackay Road and connect
to the pole placed within buffer zone 1 during Move 2.
The existing underground gas, fiber optic, sewer, and water lines on the south side of the existing bridge
will be abandoned. New gas, fiber optic cable, and water lines will be directionally bored on the south
side of the new bridge. The existing 18-inch sanitary sewer line will be relocated beneath the new
bridge. The relocation of the sanitary sewer line will result in impacts to riparian buffers (Utility Site 1).
No Practical Alternative Analysis
The project area has been evaluated and there are no practical alternatives to establish sheet flow prior to
entering the riparian buffers. Due to the steep topography of the project area and right of way
constraints, there are no practicable methods of treatment or attenuation of the stormwater runoff before
it enters the buffer. Therefore, the General Major Variance request is attached as part of the buffer
certification application.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
Avoidance and Minimization and Compensatory Mitigation: The NCDOT is committed to
incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts,
and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts.
Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and NEPA compliance stages; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
• Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters will be implemented.
• Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be implemented and revegetation of the riparian
buffers will occur within 15 working days of completion of the project.
• Bridge No. 73 will be replaced on its existing alignment, minimizing impacts to the riparian buffers.
• The proposed bridge will span the creek with no bents placed in the water.
• Storm drainage is being discharge as far away from the stream as possible.
• Preformed scour holes are being used to reduce stormwater impact to Bull Run Creek.
• The proposed bridge will be 60 feet longer than the existing bridge, increasing the floodplain under
the bridge.
Compensatory Miti atg ion:
NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as
described above. As discussed with NCDWQ representatives Sue Homewood and John Hennessey on
October 20 and November 16, 2006, the major variance requires mitigation for all impacts, except those
associated with the detour bridge (Buffer Site 2A), exceeding 150 linear feet or 1/3 acre. Mitigation will
be required for unavoidable impacts of 10,130 square feet associated with the construction of the bridge
and approaches (Buffer Site lA), eastern standard base ditch (Buffer Site 1C), and utility relocations
(Utility Sites 1 and 2). Compensatory mitigation will be provided through the EEP. All non-maintained
riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the
preconstruction contours and revegetated with native woody species. The EEP acceptance letter is
attached.
SCHEDULE
B-4128 Permit Application
Page 3 of 4

At this time the project is scheduled to let December 18, 2007 (review date November 20, 2007) with a
date of availability of January 29, 2008. It is expected that the contractor will choose to start
construction in January.
REGULATORY APPROVAL
This project has been designed to comply with the Randleman Riparian Buffer Regulations (15A NCAC
2B.0250). NCDOT requests written authorization for a Randleman Riparian Buffer Authorization and a
General Major Variance from the Division of Water Quality. Five copies of the permit application are
provided for your review. This project has been reviewed for jurisdiction under the Federal Clean Water
Act (CWA). There are no impacts to Waters of the US, therefore none of the actions of this project fall
under jurisdiction of the CWA. Therefore, no permits pursuant to the CWA are required.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please call Erica McLamb at 715-1521.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Erica McLamb at 715-1521.
Sincere
(~/ Gregory J. horpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/attachment
John Hennessey, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Ms. Sue Homewood, NCDWQ
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
Mr. Jerry Parker, Division 7 Environmental Officer
w/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. John Conforti, PDEA
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
B-4128 Permit Application
Page 4 of 4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ ~ r ~ ? ~ ~ 9
(1t any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe Ph; D Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Page 1 of 9

Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Re lap cement of Bridge No. 73 over Bull Run Creek on SR1549
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4128
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): see map in permit
drawinus
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0179 °N 79.9125 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Deep River
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at httpa/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project is located in a residential community consisting
of primarily residential and disturbed areas with some forested area
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bridge No. 73 will be replaced on existing location with an onsite detour. Heavy duty
excavation equipment will be used such as trucks, dozers, cranes and other various
equipment necessary for roadway construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To replace a deteriorating bridge
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision). in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: none
Page 3 of 9

Z. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
T e of Im act
yp p Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) Q
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: none
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Q
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dred~in~_ floodin~_ draina~e_ hulkheadc etc_
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact

(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) Q
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U_S. resulting from the nrniect•
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 5 of 9

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Please refer to the attached
cover letter
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/;h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Page 6 of 9

Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation is proposed for impacts to riparian buffers associated with construction of the
bride, roadway approaches eastern standard base ditch and utility relocations
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:%/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 24977 sq. ft.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
Page 7 of 9

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone ~~,,...,.o r ot~ Multiplier
1 10,932 3 (2 for Catawba) 19563
2 6,034 1.5 5414
Total I 16,966 I I 24977
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Mitigation will be conducted through EEP.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 8 of 9

L
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I SA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:%/h2o.enr.state.nc.~ls/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
F,

~, ~-~~-
Applid~nt/A~ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

DRAFT VERSION 2
02/26/02
FFICE USE ONLY: Date Received Re uest #
State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources., Division of Water Quality
"General" Major Variance Application Form -
From the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas
Rule (Randleman Buffer Rule) for PUBLIC ROAD CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT &
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (As approved by the Water Quality Committee of the Environmental
Management Commission on February 14, 2002)
NOTE:
To constitute a complete application, aN of the information requested in this form
must be provided. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant. The
original and iwo copies of the completed "General" Variance Application Form and
any attachments musf be sent to the DWQ 401/Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650, [phone] and one copy needs to be sent
to the Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority (PTRWA), 2216 W. Meadowview Rd.,
Wilmington Bldg., Suite 204, Greensboro, NC 27407, [phone] to constitute a
complete submittal. This form maybe photocopied for use as an original. .
Part 1: Gelr~eral Information
(P'lea~e inc+de attachrrien#s if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the Division Engineer, project manager, person responsible for project):
Gregory Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Mangement Director
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: _
Title:
treet address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone: ~_)
Fax: ~_)`
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
.Name: Erica McLamb
Telephone: [phone] _ _ _
Fax: 919 }715-5501
Email: emciamb(a~dot.state.nc.us
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name -consistent with project- name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
B-4128 Guilford Countv
"General" Variance Application Form (RANDLEMAN)

DRAFT VERSION 2
2/26/02
7

5. Project Location:
Street address: SR 1549
City, State, Zip: Greensboro, NC
County: -Guilford
Latitude/longitude: _36^ 01' 79" 55'_
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach art 8'/Z x 11 copy of the portion
of the USGS topographic map and soil survey indicating the location and boundaries of the
site):
Take SR 154Fi sc3uth from I-4t) approximately 3 miles. Turn left onto SR 1549. Project is
t~pproximately 0.75 miles from intersection.
Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
-Bull Run
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 26
.0311 (Cape Fear River Basin)]: _WS IV
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
ns, Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
X 401 Certification/404 Permit
a3~e~ _X____ Others (specify) -Buffer Permit
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as
construction or site plans) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in
carrying out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ftz for each zones.:
This project involves the widening of 5R 1549 from a two lane shoulder section to a four lane
curb and gutter section. Buffer Impacts: 12,811 sq. ft. Zone 1, 8,039 sq. ft. Zone 2.
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
_A four lane facility is needed in this area due to present and proposed traffic volumes.-
"General" Variance Application Form {RANDLEMAN), page 2

DRAFT VERSION 2
2/26/02
3. If sheet flow of concentrated runoff cannot be achieved prior to entering the buffers, then
please provide information on any on-site stormwater management facilities (e.g., grassed
swales, extended detention wetlands, etc.) that will be used to control nutrients and attenuate
flow (attach construction details and site locations of these plans):
Sheet flow of concentrated runoff cannot be achieved prior to entering the buffers on the
east side of Bull Run due to topographical and right of way constraints. It is proposed to
construct a ditch through the buffer to convey the concentrated flow to the stream.
4. How do you intend to provide mitigation if required under Condition No. 7 of the variance?
(Attach a Mitigation Plan if you intend to satisfy the mitigation requirement through the
restoration of riparian buffers.)
Com~ensat~mitic~a#ion will b~~rov_ided through EEP_
Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
The difficulty that would result from the strict application of this rule is that there are no
practicable methods of treatment or attenuation of the stormwater runoff before it enters the
t~c~ffer.
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result ftom conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
The difficulties in treating the runoff from the east side of this project arise from the steep
terrain and the right of way constraints. The close proximity of houses and apartment
buildings to the proposed roadway eliminates the possibility of using grassed swales to treat
the runoff before entering the buffer. The topography in this area is also a limiting factor as
the proposed grade in this area is between 5°lo and 6.5% which is too steep to get the
velocities necessary far treatment. There is difficulty also in putting a device adjacent to the
buffer to treat and attenuate the runoff before entering the buffer because the natural ground
is sloping toward and into the buffer at a 20°I° grade.
Part 3: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm):
Mailing-address:.
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
"General" Variance Application Form (RANDLEMAN), page 3

DRAFT VERSION 2
2/26/02
Part 4:, Applicant's Certification
I, (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans.
Signature:
Date:
Title:
NC Division of Water C~uaiity (DWQ)
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. (LOCATION)
1650 Mail Service Center (MAILING AQDRESS)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
[phone]
I'icdnaont Triad Regional ~~'ater.Authority (PTR4~':1)
2216 1~'. Meado~~~-iew- Rd.
Wilmington Bldg.. Suite 2t)4
Greensboro, NC 27-I07
[phone]
"General" Variance Application Form (RANDLEMAN), page 4

,'
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
B-4128, State Project 33481.1.1 Date:2/07/06
Guilford County
Hydraulics Project Engineer: R.C. Henegar, PE
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves replacing Bridge No. 73 over Bull Run on SR 1549 in Greensboro.
The overall length of the project is 0.338 miles. The existing 19-foot paved road is a two-
lane road with 4-foot grass shoulders. The existing structure is a 40 ft single span bridge
with 25 feet of clear roadway width of 25 feet. The project will be a four-lane, 56-foot
face to face, curb and gutter section. All sections include 14-foot outside lanes to
accommodate bicycle travel and sidewalks on both sides of the road. The proposed
bridge will be a 100 foot single span structure with a clear roadway width of 64 feet. An
on site detour with an 85 foot detour bridge is proposed for this project.
ENV/RO,NMENTAL DESCRIPTION
This project is located in the lower Randleman Reservoir watershed, part of the Cape
Fear River Basin. There is one stream crossing on this project, which has a WS IV
classification. No wetlands will be impacted by the proposed project.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The Best Management Practice (BMP) and measure used on the project to reduce the
stormwater impact was a preformed scour holes. The proposed bridge is a single span
structure eliminating the need for a bridge bent in the creek. There will be no deck drains
on the proposed structure. Also the storm drainage is being discharged as far away from
the stream as practicable.
The following summarizes where the BMPs will be used on the project:
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLES
The north side of the roadway at station 23+10 -L-

(~ ~ 7 ~/
o
o
v~•
I ~ p ~.
I~ `~
(I \ B9o u
~~` I~~
U ^\
~. \\
. ~~
/9.
m ~~~ v
90
0
` II 9
I `-~~l
ro
~ i~`. ~. y
/J i
8,>Q 0J
o.
~I \
~ Sm Q • 0 0
~-~, • '
);. 9po
<~
e
50
e
a
r'
:" '®
~ ~ ; ,. , o o
,C\\\~ w
(-~
Aso o ~ '~
•,
o g60 ~ C u I
II a•
•~ \
-"_____ `~__ li ~\
~~ n
n
o ~o
i ~
~ \`
a hN o
~e B ~ O
\~~ ~ o
-- p
'~' I
~~~ o
O l7 ~
f 7 _
a • _~ p) I o
O ~~` ~o
r O •
850.
s
s0 8t`O '
~.,
~~~ ~~ ~~\
`-,moo ~/G ~ , ~ ~~ ~
~~ ,
~ ~ I
1 '[~ ~(~ \
'~ ~. ~r~~
o~~~,"~ ` ~, ~o
~~
t~~A~
t a-, \ ~ .
~n cI' ~
~~~
u °o ^~
n
...
~/v i I ~~
U r.
~.
8 >'y I • o b _
~/~, ~

0
8 •~
~\
7 `?37:P L v
> ~- ~~ O.i

• :~
850 v
,I
g0
g

111E

~ • r
~ /:
OB52
iy x O I
II ~ t

O li~
\``a~
~ ~ B O /
•~

Q0~ n

,
~
o o •
h
m {~
~ '~U • ~'

•
790

y
D
p
_ o
~
, ° /
2
T
e

~ ~
- - ~~

\ \~ 850 i ~ O ~
~
~ ' i ~
r.
~

~ 8 0..
o ~.
ii ~
uo
i~
i, •I
~~ fi d ~

~---~~ ~ ~ r-, ge
ntry°
_ ~
~
826/ _ ~ 1

4
1 1WQ \
4~
1~1 ~ 4~ i
~ ~ ~-
J1 s
166!
l .
I _ L
''~1 + ~~ ~r'~ I END PRO ( ~, ~,
1651 I I i ~ / 4121
1424
J ~
1
,~ ' nzsf
~+ ~ -~ 4 ~
J i
,648 ~ ~ ~ i _/
1 U (Yj
14ra ~`
3 aTi edgefield, z ~; -- _ _
~` 3 .. 4~z1 ~ t -
,>es
B PR~9J - `~
lass uez - ~~
~ j / 1 1 ~
T r
VICINITY MAP
Ut~~~ty
~V~~~~Tg7C~
~~~~
~T~~®~°
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
PROJECT:33~481.1 (B-128)
BRIDGE No. 73 OVER
BULL RUN CREEK ON
SR 159 IN GREENSBORO
SHEET ~I OF G 2 ®07 ®06
NORTH CAROLINA

N
Z w ,^
W Z ~~..
W ~ O
V.. w

~ J
m d W N
w o~
N

J
Q 0
~
n° 0
~

o
F
-
O ~
H ~
W
J
m N O
W "^ V O
_
f- Z ~
O ~
~
N
_
Wry
Z ~ 0
~
~ 0
°
o
~
~/ O v
li N u'

Q J
~
C
C ~
~ v o
o
_ ~ W
J
~
V/ U Q N
~/~
A
Q
~ W rv
~
O
. p
N
V -
a
Q w~
°
a o~ 0
N
~ J
~
J
~ U
LLJ ~ a
~
V- a
LL
W

m
~ o

~ ~
m
H ~
°°
J Q
~
_
H ~ ~•
U
H

~ J
~
~ ~ ~
_
H ~ ~ ~
Q O ~, N
~
N N
W N
N c
~ J
~ a 3 ~
~ d
U ~
~ ~
~ 3
~
~
~ o
d

z N
J
w ~ Q
~ ~
~ O
H

Il v5
A
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
iJNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMII~tISTRATION
AND

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~~
FEB 17 ?_005
Approved:
Guilford County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1549
Over Bull Run Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1549(4)
State Project No. 8.2497601
W.B.S. No. 33481.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4128
~ J. Thorpe, PhD, Environmental Manager
Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
v
2 ~~~ ~ _ ~~ ~ ~. ~
Y
DATE ~` c John F. Sullivan, III, P.E. Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

Guilford County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1549
Over Bull. Run Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1549(4)
State Project No. 8.2497601
W.B.S. No. 33481.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4128
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
February 2005
Documentation Prepared in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
~, Z~~
o .Willi , PE
B dge Replacement Planning Unit
William T. Goodwin, Jr., P nit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit

PROJECT CONIlVIITMENTS:
Guilford County ,
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1549
Over Bull Run Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1549(4)
State Project No. 8.2497601
W.B.S. No. 33481.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-0128
Office of Natural Environment, Hydraulics Unit -Randleman Buffer Rules
Bull Run Creek is located within the lower Randleman Reservoir watershed and all appropriate
buffer rules are applicable.
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
August 2004

Guilford County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1549
Over Bull Run Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1549(4)
State Project No. 8.2497601 .
W.B.S. No. 33481.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4128
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 73 is included in the 2004-2010 North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Pmgram and is eligible for the Federal-
Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The location is shown in Figure 1. No
substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal
"Categorical Exclusion".
I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge No. 73 has aone-span superstructure composed.of a one-inch asphalt-wearing surface, a
timber deck on steel I-beams. The substructure includes timber caps and piles behind a timber
bulkhead.
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 7.0 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure. According to FHWA guidelines, the bridge is both structurally
deficient with a structural appraisal of 2 out of 9 and functionally obsolete with a deck geometry
appraisal of 2 out of 9. The combination of all these factors indicates the bridge is qualified for
FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation. Program.
Wear and tear resulting~~rom increasing traffic, aging (42-year-old) timber bridge components, a
narrow cross section and increasing maintenance costs warrant replacement of this bridge.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located in the southwest corner of the City of Greensboro. The area has mixed
development with homes, apartment complexes and businesses.
SR 1549 (Mackay Road) is classified as an urban major collector in the Statewide Functional
Classification System and it is not a National Highway System Route. This route is not a
designated bicycle route.
In the vicinity of the bridge, SR 1549 has a 19-foot pavement width with 4-foot grass shoulders.
The bridge is located in a sag vertical curve. There are no horizontal curves within the project
limits. The roadway is situated approximately 16 feet above the streambed.
The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1962. The length of the structure is 40 feet.
The clear roadway width is 25 feet. The bridge is posted with weight restrictions of 17 tons for
single vehicles and 21 tons fortruck-tractor semi-trailers.

Utility impacts are anticipated to be moderate. The City of Greensboro has a 12" water line
along the north side of SR 1549 east of the existing bridge. The line reduces to an 8" line west of
the bridge. The City of Greensboro has an 18" sewer outfall that parallels the eastern side of Bull
Run Creek. The sewer crosses SR 1549 just east of the bridge. Overhead utility lines are located
along the south side of SR 1549. The lines cross SR 1549 just east of the bridge. Overhead
telephone lines are located on the north side of SR 1549. Fiber optic markers indicate
underground cable located along the south side of SR 1549.
The cun~ent traffic volume of 7800 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to 20000 VPD
by the year 2025 assuming the eventual widening of Mackay Road. The projected volume
includes one-percent truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and two-percent dual-tired vehicles (DT).
There is 40 mile per hour posted speed limit in the project area. The School Bus Transportation
Director has indicated there are thirty-five school bus crossings per day.
There were no accidents reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 73 during a check ~ of a recent
three-year period.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The replacement structure .will consist of a 100.foot long bridge on the existing alignment.
NCDOT has coordinated details of this project's typical section with Greensboro Department of
Transportation (GDOT) to accommodate for potential future widening..
The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing facility.
The bridge will be of sufficient width to provide for two 12-foot lanes, two 14-foot lanes, and
5.6-foot sidewalks. Roadwork will begin approximately 1050 feet to the west of the existing
bridge and extend approximately 730 feet east of the existing bridge.
The existing roadway approaches will be widened to 52 feet to provide two 12-foot lanes, two
14-foot lanes and a 2-foot curb and gutter section. Ten-foot (14-foot where guardrail is required)
grass shoulders will be provided on each side. This project is being designed with a 40 mile per
hour design speed.
A design exception will be required for vertical sight distance. To improve beyond the proposed
becomes impractical considering impacts that would result to multiple apartment buildings
surrounding the bridge and in consideration of the fact that there is no indication of an accident
history resulting from the alignment.
2

B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
There are two build alternatives considered to be feasible. Both replace the bridge on
approximately the existing locationwith afour-lane curb and gutter typical section.
Alternate 1 maintains traffic using phased construction (See Figure 2A). Asymmetrically
widened to the north.
Alternate 2 maintains traffic with an onite detour (See Figure 2B). Symmetrically widened on
the centerline of the existing alignment.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Furtber Consideration
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service currently provided by SR 1767 and due to increasing traffic
demand.
Timber bridge components typically do not last beyond 30 to 40 years due to the natural
deterioration rates of wood. Past a certain degree of deterioration, structures with timber piles
become impractical to maintain or rehabilitate and are programmed for replacement, as is the
case for this bridge. In addition maintenance/ rehabilitation does not meet the increasing traffic
demand.
There is not an acceptable offsite detour. Traffic on all area roads is highly congested.
Attempting to detour traffic offsite would amplify the situation creating unacceptable delays and
safety concerns to Emergency Services, School Busses and road users. Given there are no
particulaz environmental concerns with maintaining traffic offite, am offsite detour was
eliminated from further consideration.
D. Preferred Alternative
Bridge No. 73 will be replaced on the existing alignment with afour-lane curb and gutter typical
section. Traffic will be maintained with an onite detour during construction as proposed in
Alternate 2.
There were five primary factors considered in selecting the proposed alternative:
• Maintenance of traffic offite is required.
• The offite detour represented fewer construction complexities.
• The onite detour posed faz fewer safety concerns to construction personnel.
• Both alternatives have similaz costs.
• While phased construction would have a smaller footprint during construction, there
are no particulaz environmental concerns with the footprint of the onite detour.
NCDOT Division 7 concurs with this proposed recommendation.
3

IV. ESTIlVIATED COSTS
The estimated costs for the build alternative is as follows:

Item
Alternate 1 (Preferred)
Alternate 2
Structin~e $ 702,000 $ 585,000
Structure Removal 10 000 10,000
Onsite Detour Construction 8c Removal N/A 194,000
Roadwa A roaches 662 000 557000
Utili Construction 132,000 131,000
Mobilization & Miscellaneous 319,000 323,000
En . & Contin encies 275,000 300,000
Total Construction Cost $ 2 100,000 $ 2,100,000
Ri t-of-wa Costs $ 166,000 $ 170,000
Total 1'ro'ect Cost $ 2,266,000 $ 2,270,000
Note: The cost estimate includes sidewalks on both sides assuming the City will
participate.
V: NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Physical Resources
Water Resources
The proposed project is situated in NCDWQ Sub-basin 01-00.30 and the Hydrologic Unit Code
(H[JC) is 03030003 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The project study area contains approximately
452 linear feet of Bull Run. Bull Run is a perennial stream that flows north to south underneath
the bridge proposed for replacement. No other tributaries or water resources are located within
the project study area.
The best usage classification of Bull Run is class "WS-IV" waters. No High Quality Waters
(HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-I)7, or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within
the project vicinity. Bull Run is not listed on the DWQ 2000 Draft 303 (d) list of impaired
waters.
Biotic Resources
Three plant communities were observed in the project study area: piedmont alluvial forest, mesic
mixed hardwood forest, and a utility right-of-way. Also, located within the project study area are
maintained-disturbed areas that include the grassed shoulders on both sides of SR 1549 and
residential lawns. The following table describes the acreage of plant communities within the
project study area; however, actual impact acreage within the construction limits will be less.
4

Land Use within the Project Studv Area.
Community Type Acres
ectares Percentage of Project Study Area
Piedmont Alluvial Forest 2.1 0.8 8%
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 5.5 2.2 20%
Utili Ri t-of-Wa 1.3 0.5 5%
Maintained-Disturbed Area 18.8 7.6 67%
B. Jurisdictional Topics
Surface Waters and Wetlands
Bull Run is a jurisdictional surface waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). No
jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the pmject study area. It is anticipated that the
bridge replacement over Bull Run Creek will likely impact less than 1501inear feet of stream and
mitigation will not be required.
Currently, the only buffer regulations in the Cape Fear River Basin apply to the
Randleman Reservoir (15A NCAC 2B .0250 -Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer
Requirements). Bull Run is located within the lower Randleman Reservoir watershed.
Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 73 is composed of timber, steel and concrete. It is likely that the bridge can removed
without dropping components into the water.
Permits
In accordance with the Federal Register (January 15, 2002), Part II, Volume 67, Number 10, the
project will likely require authorization under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit #23 (Approved
Categorical Exclusions). A Nationwide Permit # 33 (Temporary Construction, Access, and
Dewatering) may be needed for temporary construction access if that is not addressed in the
NEPA document. A final permitting strategy cannot be developed until a design alternative is
selected.
Section 401 General Water Quality Certifications for NWP #23 and #33 are No. 3361 and 3366,
respectively. Written concurrence from the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is not
required provided all standard conditions of these Certifications are met. Final determination of
permit applicability lies with USACE. NCDOT will coordinate with the USACE after the
completion of final design to obtain the necessary permits.
Mitigation
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h) and 40 CFR 1508.20, mitigation will be required for
impacts to jurisdictional streams when these impacts are equal to or greater than 1501inear feet
per stream. It is anticipated that the bridge replacement over Bull Run will likely impact less than
1501inear feet of stream and mitigation will not be required.
5

Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T~, Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act. According to the current USFWS listing, there is one federally listed
species for Guilford County. .
BALD EAGLE THREATENED
Bull Run Creek has a narrow channel with some tree cover that occludes access to the stream
channel. No suitable habitat was observed within the project study area. No known bald eagle
nests occur within the project study area and no individuals were observed roosting, foraging, or
in flight during field surveys.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106
requires Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings (federally fimded,
licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register
of Historic Places and afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such
undertakings. ~ ,
B. Historic Architecture
The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources has reviewed this project and determined
that no structures of historic significance will be affected by the project (see attached letter).
C. Archaeology
The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources has reviewed this pmject and determined
that there are no likely archaeological resources of historic significance that could be affected by
the project (see attached letter) and a survey is not required.
6

VII. PUBLIC IIWOLVEMENT
All property owners affected by the proposed project have been contacted and no comments have
been received to date. A public workshop was not deemed necessary for this project in
consideration of accommodations made to maintain traffic onsite, minimal inconvenience to road
users and no relocatees.
VIII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate bridge
will result in .safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and
lack of substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse. effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of Transportation standards
and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in
land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of--Way acquisition will be
limited. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The proposed project will not require right-of--way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
The Farmland Protection Policy .Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to
consider the potential impact to prime farmland of all land acquisition and construction projects.
There are no soils classified as prime, unique, or having state or local importance to be affected
by the project.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the regional
emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required. If vegetation is disposed of by
burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the
North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. This evaluation completes
the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National
Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required.

An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the North
Carolina Departrnent of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Guilford County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. There are no practical
alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. Any shift in alignment will result in an impact area of
about the same magnitude. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase the level or extent
of upstream flood potential.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental
impacts will result from implementation of the project.

h
/ ~' I ~ I
~' r ~ -

~~ I
//~~~~//~~~~ /
t
r
' ~

~ 1.~
- j~ I
i

'
~
\.. .7VO
'~~~. ~
I ~!
~ 1 I i
>f I ..~.._r ye ~ I ~
ss ~ f
I 1 !!H I ~~ 1~ \ ~ `
I I
~
~~ r~~ 1
~ ~
i
~ '

I --
Ja r 1 1
~
I r ~
I--I I J0 - -..
I ~! I
--- \

.:
-
i ~~ f
I
r~
1
.
~
- I I
~
~ •a
----- ~! I .ae 1
~ I , t
t ~ r8 f~ 1 l i

J!! I ,
]~ ~
I
I J~
~
~
~I ~ ~ f•--~ / r lie
~
I ~ I
I ~
J~ Js~ ~ 1 ~~
.. '• I ~

~ I ~ ~-
~
~I s s
~ _
1 ~ /~
~
~e!
~~-
~
~ I _
i -~ ~ ~
~1
1
--
1 +~-----~ ... ~'
1 r se: 401
I
i see
~~ ~
:; : srs
~ '~ ,.
s:a
-

i~ `
! ~
~ _
era
see
_
` '---
•'~ ~ - see ~ 402
.
` I '
~
~ I ~" ~
r I
~ ~
\ .,\ r
, ~ s~ sets s~ I 40+4r---
^
~ ~ '
C58
i
..,. s .'
.,~ ,
> -
\
sea see ~ i ~•
•:~
" ~ r ~
I
3
I/ I ~
r r I ~ I
-
~
' r i ~ 'te
_ _
• ~
r
~ )~ I ~
I ~
R81 1 ' I r ~~ ~ ,'. `~ ~
i c1

.` see ~. '~ _
.'~; \ ~ ~--
\ ~
~ v
.~---..~
~~ °+~\ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
+~ ~\ TRANSPORTATION
(~ " DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
_,~'` ENVtRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
~` ~ ar
GUILFORD COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.73 ON SR 1549
OVER BULL RUN
8-4128
Figure 1

w ~ti~ a''
~ y - '"r
1 3
~ ~
:~ ~ $
~
s -
s
~
r
~
,,,~
- ~~
_
qtr k
~
~,
»: nom".:.
~ - i
~ ~'
.~+5`s ~
'
.~mriaf.
~,
A
t
t

? ~~ f

.
_ , ..
~ .8'S ~~y~.,.,r ~~ r ~yS~a 1.' t
-i .
J.~, ?
~~
~
~t~
r t _
"
a ~
.a
_
j. .~ - h
~
,
~ ...
.
Y
~fim
- ii.":
h ~ ~. ~!k!

~.}'
,~.
..
.
ar. ,::.. ~,~,. ~.~.
~ ;~~_ ~_
>.
r j
4 ~ .. xR iy "_ f -~•.
7
~
~
i.~ ....1'~. ~ .
+r. ~ -
f
x
_
~ ~ 's_
~ ~ ~~t;~ .
~
r i~~~km ~ 'Y
~~~.. ~ ,
~~
y, .

~.~ .
~
y: l
'

, i ~ .
1~in;
~~ .

~~ `~
:a :'
i~2~ : .

~~, '_ ° j
~~ ~ ~i4
~ ~
~' .c. r a
:~
`~ 4r.a
y, ~ , ~_
{ ~ ~
F J
yp ~ lp
~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t~k~ y, 'C
r. ~}~k ~~~~ ~~4?y AFT ~ .
~ t5 t..
1 r u. ; -~
F» _ <

GElVFO
MAY 9 2003
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources'~~o av~loN Ica
State Historic Preservation Office ~ ~ ~T ~~ ~~ v~
David L. S. Brook, Administrator EVELO .~~-
~tAL Apl-~
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Reaouroea
l.isbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. Olson, Director
Jelliey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
May 5, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways ~~ ~~f
FROM:. David Brook ' ~y~~l~/(.,~C. ~~~ .
G~ U
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1549 over Bull Rua Crcek, B-4128,
Guilford County, ER03-0938
Thank you for your memorandum of Apri17, 2003, conceraiag the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have ao comment on the
undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Reece Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Fury
vwvw.hao.dcratate.nc.us
l.oaNoa Mdliag Addraa Tekphuae/Fa:
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St.. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Savior Cents, Raleigh NC 27699~61T (919) 733763 •733-8633
RESTORATION 31 S N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699613 [phone] •715-4801
SURVEY do !'CANNING S 1 S N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4618 Mail Savior Center, Raleigh NC 27699.4618 [phone] •715801

o stem
E a ement
PROGRAM
May 14, 2007
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
REE~~fED
MAY 21 2007
DIVIS"~?d OF HIGHV~AYS
P4EA•CFE!C: ~ '~- `'"_;'~kI ENVIRONMENT'
B-4128, Replace Bridge Number 73 over the Bull Run Creek on
SR 1549, Guilford County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the buffer mitigation for the subject project. Based on the
information supplied by you on May 7, 2007, the impacts are located in CU 03030003 of
the Cape Fear River Basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Zone 1 Buffer: 6,521 square feet
Zone 2 Buffer: 3,609 square feet
If the buffer impacts or the amount of mitigation required for this project increases, then
this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance
letter will be required.
All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the
Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that
appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon
method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization
Certification, EEP will transfer funds from Tri-Party MOA Fund into the Riparian
Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of transfer payment, NCDOT will have
completed its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for TIP B-4128. Subsequently,
EEP will conduct a review of current MOA mitigation projects in the river basin to
determine if available buffer mitigation credits exist. If there are buffer mitigation credits
RP~St'D~'U29... ~ ~ ... PI~OtEGt[.GC9 OGGf~ St"GLtL I~ ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-115-0416 / www.nceep.net

available, then the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund will purchase the appropriate
amount of buffer mitigation credits from Tri-Party MOA Fund.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Andy Williams, USACE-Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4128 Revised

May 14, 2007
Mr. John Hennessy
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4128, Replace Bridge Number 73 on SR 1549 over Bull Run
Creek, Guilford County, Cape Fear River Basin (Cataloging Unit
03030003)
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the buffer mitigation required for the subject project: The
buffer impacts associated with this project are located in Cataloging Unit 03030003 of
the Cape Fear River Basin. This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation
acceptance letter issued on May 2, 2006. As indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation
request dated May 7, 2007, the project will impact buffers only. The buffer impacts have
decreased from the previous acceptance to 6,521 square feet in Zone 1 and 3,609 square
feet in Zone 2.
If the buffer impacts or the amount of mitigation required from EEP increases or
decreases for this project, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid
and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required. All buffer mitigation requests
and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund (Fund
2982).
The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for
the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon
receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization Certification, EEP will transfer funds
from Fund 2984 (Tri-Party MOA Account) into Fund 2982 and commit to provide the
appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project.

W~.r6 f-....I:..., C..,.....~,,... C.,L............... D..,,..,.,.... ~tri Aa_:~ r_....:-- r-._.. n_i. _L -~r ~~inn i ire
~~n
NCDENR
~ non ~~. n~„

r ~ ,~9
`` b
L ~
'mil
,~ ~ 4~ ~ .
1 ,~ s
~ -.~.
ti
'~11 ,~ END PRO ( .:,
- Ur = I` ~ I 4121
155, , , ,
,~.
J ~
I
~ 1129
'r ~ --~
4 ~
J ~
,549 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
U ~'`
~ c 4 '~ 1479
~ c~rr afield ~ µ - - -
,~ .i-
~ e 4121
1-.' ~ l
B PR~9 "°3
1375 1392
~ ~ r 1 ( 2~
VICINITY MAP

~~.~~~
SHEET ~' OF ~~ 2 / 07 / 06 I
l~T~C~®7C
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
PROJECT: 33481.1 (B-4128)
BRIDGE No. 73 OVER
BULL RUN CREEK ON
SR 1549 IN GREENSBORO
NORTH CAROLIDJ:..

~ ~'-' J
II
II 85p
p ~ ~~ O ~~ ~ ~- Y
ro ~ °° l `. o
. ay o \ ;\ °
~ ° gso u
a ~ o oesa ii ee° ill2~ '"
S1 / ~ii x O I``\a` B 0 ~ ~
o O u~ , i ' ,O G
7 II ~ ~ i ,
$0~ II ~ c ' O 0
790 % ~ ~ _
~ o ~ ~ • 29a
o ~ y~- d 70a
r--, _ 0. ~ -_ ,~
°°° END __° - -- o
,,!: ~ PROJECT ;~a; ~ ~ ` ~ o m
O
e 4
~ ~ T:. :: tom'
q ~ s •° °
BEGIN ; ~' ..° ~ 'ae~~ '~ ~
PROJECT __ gefi d
r ~ ntry° y~7
4' ' ~ • ~25
V~v ~ua r
. `~ \ p • <
~~ ~ <' 1.
. ~ 2® ~ ~~ •Q 80
7 O ~ yOJ '~ ~ O ` ,z==== 8 ~ C
1 p
I$.~NII~1L~1~.~N ]~U]F]F1E]R
~~~~~~~~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. ®F TRANSP®RTATI®N
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
PROJECT: 33181.1 (B-1128)
BRIDGE No. 73 OVER
BULL RUN CREEg ON
SR 1549 IN GREENSBORO -
SHEET ~ ®F 2 d 07 d 06

Z
O ~
a
F
- ~ } ~*
~ a ~m
a = ~~ w
0
z ~ ~ ~ o
o
.
=
~ LL. ~ 7 N`\ .
~ O ~ ~ N
W Z O N
W
0 ~ J ~ W
F- cn j U
=
W ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O
~
v a
Z

H
W
w
~y

a~
w
¢
z
J N
~ N
~ O
r
N
F-

Q
a

F-
z
w
z
Q

w
a
W
F-
0
Z

F- N
Z z

W w

..
W ~ N
W

J
m
a wr
w
z
N ...

O O O
J
H M
M 01
R GO
N O
~
~

V V
r m
W
J

CO O O

Q
~ N
W ~
Z ~ ~

N

~
~

~
~ `~ ?
f~7
C
C
O O O

Z ~ a0 CO
~ n
M O
~ • ~
v
~
N
Q .. ~ °
~
~

a
W O
~ ~ ~
J

U m
N O

~
~ Wry
O
" N Q
O .
.. N

J O

Q _

~
O
~ w •-
0 ~ ? R
U N
Q W
/~
/
li H
J Q
cL ~ a
a~
a
w
LIJ w
LL ~ ~ X X
LL m
~ ~
m ° vZ
i
0o
x
~
~
U

z0 J
'
~
~ ?
2 N
O
R
N

fA W f0

w
N ~

~ _ a
d
~ °~ ~ ~
a
~
19 r
~
~
U ,

m

m

`o
'o
~ ~ ~
H F
z Q Q J
~
w ~
O
H
0
0
N
l9
N
Q'

i
R/W REVISIONS: /////06 LUCr PROPERTY OWNER NAI/E CHAN6E5. /IDDED PLUSES AND OFFSETS FOR /IONUNENTS.
80ZB1uGa~np>,dcylgn
°o
~ '~-~ s
~ ~
~ ,:
~ __._F~ ~~; ~
•
,~~,
~~~ _ ti
8 --- -__- ~ 8 cl'd'~'E' I
'~ o
~~^1
0
~T1 2
~ I~ N

N
m ~~
~~"~
~
~
.s~
~~
~
~R~~
y
J GUILFORD COUNIY ~~`~
GREENSBORO
CITY LIMIT LINE
~~~r ~
rrrur ~
so
r ~„ rho
~
~'
~
r ~'
\ '\ 9?~i.
i
V
~

m
I...~J ~~~mv~
m "~~~
d NN ~M '
W 8 F
+~~
O ~ C ~ 76.1'
O 8 ~~ti ssv'~7'E
;~7~~711~°z°m + ° ~
1-I D I-I E O
r D -mi m -aa,
rrn~~.. ~m
~.y i
Mm410D r yam
DO~ai D$
n v, ~N~E!
(p M n
--1 O Z O D ~tQc~~~
N ~ m O r
~. ~ R~
m o
N
x ~ ~~~~w
~~n I sQa
a ae ~ ~~R~n
~~~~
w ~ ~ a ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ $ ~~$= a
.~~_
1~-IaDZ°m q~
-~ m z z ~aNa /
m u g ~ m
r~-<~~
n to ~' ~o D n~,~°20 ~ i ~i
m°r, A n '~=o~~ 80~ '
n:Tm~~ ~~~r ~ °S~
°z 1 °m ~m '
m m ,ems
O
N $~$~^ A Y
y G7I ~ °I.O m~
T Z T g v k... ~
A ~'a"~g
~ 2 ~ ~~$~
~:= f
y ~ >~~N
g ,~,~
~ ~ ~{, :~~
< Z I,
s~ ,~
~u
70 o~r ~~
~ ~~~yy~
T A~CI# C
^' ~~esx ~j; ° 1
~ I,V-~!L a ~ ~
~° ¢ ~ -lE
g~~a -

RECEIVED
MAY 23 2001
DmSbN OF t~GMMAYS
POEA•OFFIGE OF NA~~'~Al ENVIRONMENT

l
7
r 7 ~ ~ .'.~~c '-- -'- .~' ./N~
a ~ ~__ 41~A 61
wow I ~ qua =-•__.~
~ «~
~ ~~ x ~ ~ ~~~~~
"' ~ ~ y>~ rr
8 ;~ ,III ~/ ~~~
~ Ir x
9' s
_ Q)/
~.` ~ /// yea; ~ Aga rF
~-~t~ © ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~
I .Z6'SII
a ~~~ ~~•~
o s+ a
i~ 8 ~ /~ c~mC
n / ~. w
~ 1- 1 ( ° i
'~ o ~~~~
h ~gR;
v` o s g~
~o s~
} n g
S L ~$ o
g~~
' °.~i;~' ~14R E
1+ ~~1 s r79~S9•r ~~J~1
-1~9. S9• M
b 101.9E•~.~
~4>
m O ~~~'" .. m m M M
s = ~ o-rrzs
~' `•~ ~ N~2$~ ~7p D Z ~ C dga '~'
~,$ ~ m 3t~ m ~ ~~3 ~~ ~o
~ ~ ~ rrr
~ ~ m N ,~D'-' C ~ ~~ 4
O 38 y
= m
s 1 ~ 9
L j,r T + I~ ~ ~
~OO e. ~' - m 8
i s ~ m e
w + y
"' D _+ E - -
8 ~ g} ? g o s
~ v
~ ~ ~~
_+4, ass ~ ~ titi
yy ~ g $} ~~
O ~~ ~I
O °p S 'Or pr > ~~
~ ~ r7~-
N N • ~1~ a e
01
~ \ \\\ I
.~ ,~ a
` M
r.
J '~
_~_Tm_. ~
z ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~
mIN N
f4
M
Z / L m
~ /
N~rb2 O I
z

~„~ , 1g,''
o
7M(f14

~g
I ~ ~'
1
s Y
I ~
I
I
i

Y,
S~-~
i 4 ~ s

a ~
II ~ ~~.
1 ~I
;~
i
I'I ~ ~~
it I ~ ~~il
~;11 Ihll
~~ ~, I~'I
~~ ~ ~ '~ I
I
it I ~ I~

x~ ~
~ a I ~~ I
a ~ l i~ ~i i
.SZ, UZ•E ~~ ~I I~ 'I I
_ ~ ~ ~
II
~ I!
~8`~' 1 '1
'1pE
- ~ ~ ~ ~
f62, is
1 ~~•
~A I.I _ ~,;,j~
~. >~~ ~ I~I~I~I
m <`
N i
i' ,; ~ ra
oo '~ a , .. ~ou
~y~ ~ ~ "s 2 '°¢w
:.~, °
© ~o~
~ C .~ Y V ~b yh
g 8~ N ~7. OJ v4 0y1
d ' ~ I7, th
M \ 'rtes 9e. f ~• .
g g8 ~~~
>e \/
w~\
~ 8~~6 \\Q
~ ~~°~~ y
~ r
t! ~
Q I 1
i ~
J • i~ y
m 1 ~ `
8 ~ '
~~ I w
A ~ . '~ I
~ o©© I ~
~4 fi"
+ . O ~~ ~ ~
~. © } //
a
~ ~/ ~ ~ r
.// ~ + c ~ ash
g
~,
A
m
/~
T
0
ly ~
m
0
/~ in
s r'
0
C
A
0
m
t
~ o ~ ;
;~
~~~~ ^ ~ ~ ~
ITS
1 1 N ~
~~~+ ~+
~ A mil;
E~ ~°
a 8 '4~
~ C
-i
'? H
~ ~ „
% pA
gC

"1 Z ~
m
~ >
v
p ~
x o
A
>
~
l t~ °'° ° o v °
`J ~ -~ '_
~
~ °y
p~ .. ° m ..
N
<
ONE- D
>ZD
Z `Dr~ g~> ~ i ~
m

.Y -.
"-
..
~
'
~'
IZh~ `
~
~ ~
i:
-'
--~ ~$
~ : F ~
'~'
o `~
~ ~.~:
Z ~ .,....

~«
y

I- ~'": "I II I ~ ... v
I 11 '~ v ~
rn 1 I I I I ~(1J) I ~ ~6°ioi ~ ,
I w I r
D D o "m I~ i t ~11 I i rn C <~ .~yn
~~~° , _z I I ~IgIIi I I ~-~n ~
'O°D ~~ - ~ - ~ I I I r~
~ ~ ~ _ -----°D-o o ~~ M ~~ ~ ~ OI II II I r o ~
,~C~ -- -~rv~• I I I Qlli I o I ~ ~~
~-
~oz~ `j'oD ~' I I I ~ ~ ~
y
'z=~~ ~ I ~ooT,° I I ~ ~ L3l i
~~ ~ ~ ~ -
~co I 1 Q' ~ - I ~
'~ O p\ ~ ~ Do ~7 D I I I ~ I ~ / o .
o I
o ~° R W I / '`'= to r ~ ~
v9 iiIIII ~ + ti
~, ~ ~ ~ . ~ ti III 1 ~ ~o o I ~.
\ ~'- P71 .17' I' III i ~ ~ ~
so„ S01°q X00„ 11 I I o °o
F C W
~'-' ~- 11 II + °
~ ~ , ,9 m Vaoe 3 90 ~ _ - ..
y~~ LANDS
S ~ \/ u n
r a, ~ I 77.83 W ~ E`
~ \. H~ ~ '~ ~ II I` 1 00 p
\ ~ _ ~ II ~ X1 Co or
.\ \`\ \ o I III I ~ ~ 1 00 0
\ \~
~~\ ~~~~~ ~ ~ I , 081 ~ ~ 1 PD
o ~~~~~~ ~ ,~ ~ rn
~-~ ~~ ~ .\
o I ~ -
.~ I 3 "
\ -{-
~Ty ~ \ ~~•\ Vf~ Cn
\ \ ~,„ I I ~ o • c
s ,, D I - ~ v' tit %~ ~
~~~b ,b ~ m ~ ~ \ ~ ~ d
q 3"E a ~
~ 09 ~ o ~ ~ o
'~ oa. -A
\~ ~
O ` ~' ~, I
~ ~ o I ~ ~ \\\ ,\
'-• ,~ ~L~\`~~ d 101-I -
~, ~ S ~.
z W
~ .\
61 N ~ ,
m IT1 _ - ~
w ~6`° m D ~ N \ II O ~ ~S \~ O
m ~ i z n ~ I~ ~\\ ss ~~ ~ o
~ ~' Z O ~ I I
n - ~ ~ •\ ~ \
O > \ \.
~J \ - .~
~,Q ~ o +
6 r \
I ~ .S ° c
I Q N rn ~ o0 11 I ~I I ~"
II O H ~ °o 0o I I I III j I~ ~ "-~-- - ----- ~~'~ N
~ ~ \`~ `~ ~° ~, , ~/ _ I Ili i I I i ~ / Od
\~ -I or ~/ 111 ~ I/ ~ 3 ~~
~I7'I o V ~ / II R W I ~ , ?'
. r ~\ : / I I I I II III ~ -~ {~
i/ p I
1 o rn I n
m 11 ~/ i 141 III I ~ - N
~~/~ N I ~ I ~Io ~ op~
~ ~ /lj 11 ° I I III I I ~I o ~, --i cn
-- ~/ I I~III II III, Civ, AZ ~
~ / ~/ r T I I i11 III w ~ ti~(~
m / // ~ ~ I I I I III II ° ~ -" ~d c
(~ ~ ~ ~ Q° - 11,1 III II ~ ; ~, ~' -moo
D ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ I I I III III I ~ ~~
/~o I ~/ ~ I I I II u II ~ ~ ~ '~
C z ~ /~ o + ~/ _ ~ I I III III I I I ~ / ~ ~ ~ v,
p I I V
~~~~,~-~ ~ J~l °i i ~''' y rn i i I II i r . , ~I r ~ '~ ~ - i ~ ,/ ~ r
T ~

20-FEB-2007
r:\hudr aul~c
ff_psh_
8/]7/99
W cg
~_ 3
--I -~
G7 ~
D D
W W
r r
m m
~ ~
D
(7 D
--1 n
N --~
N
O N
Z p
m Z
N fn
H
rn
rn
rn
a
T
i
1
70
T
N N
N '"
a
e
`~g ~
~~ ~
~' ~g
~I~
~I to
a
S
;'
i
~~--- i ~- ~~_ ~~~_- si~l sly
•- -- ~ - --
00'OU+£L 'V1S ~1- S 133HS 33S 3NIl H~1VW ~ ~ >~ _`~ ~

i
~~
R/W REV/SlONS1//ll/Q6 OJCr PROPERTY OWNER NAME CHANCES. ADDED PLUSES AND OFFSETS FOR MONUMENTS.
8_hyd_prm_buff_psh_6.d n
8/l7/9'

D
r
r
0
E D
~
r-
0
E
D
~
r
rn D
~
r-
m O
3

D
(~
~ 3

D
~
n
~

N
N --I ~
~
N

z
°
m
Z
rn
rn
N ~-
/~~
~~
~~
R~
yJ •
~\J
~~~
a ~
~~~
~~~
.g
1 N
~~~
~~~
a$
H
N
m O
-1 y
~ r
t ~ ~ ~
~ a
+ ~ o o -
o
0
o,
u ~3
s
00
N
or°
~~ ~
±. S
ti
o
`° ~
v ~
F
µ ' '^

r m

m ~
n
~M n
~
~
°
~m
~i
p m o °''D
t n mr
bi Qs
m

8
0 ~ .~~
o n
L
p
~ " ? ~
~' mn v m^ ~
_
_
N
~O Iw Y
NOT
-~
~ T
~
rt ti ~ mAY
v
S g
d
ti ~
~ ~~G
~ L --1
+ ~~r
p ?gv
y} 1
+ I n
+ L _
0 2
v m o
H ~
N N
o b ~+
'~ ga
-f H i~
'~~ 83~- .
~_ ~_
X
Y N
1 ~
~ ~ -b
t
+ ~ ~~v

* ~ i
~~s
0

~
o

a
~~r
am
Lon

+
$ ~
~
z
my n
_
~
~ N '~
ou
rn
~ ~ 9
a
~~ ~ s
v
s
> N o n
p
pa
40~ v
N
P +
~O O
~~ ~

~ ~~~

'4
~o
8
~ y
~ ~,
~~
Y ~
~!
o.
.,
Z a
a
_ _
~ ~~
0

~ RECEIVED
04-MAYd-200y7~p0r8Ot 9
!lilUSERNAMESt~~b4128_rdy_tsh.dgn
"r-~ 7 2Ct~1
11."`I~~1j 1. lY. .Jlt.ll.I:~, `,jC
<:
- ---- - -- 09/08/99
C011 rTRA CT: C201586 TIP PR UJECT: 8-4128
o 0
wo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q
'+~ o~ o o n ~ ~ rn
f~ Q ~ A ~ Z w / Z
-~Oi N ~" H c" y ~ Q + J 70 ~ ti
o Q o o ~ ~
Q n OD - ~ q,~
Z m C \ m Ar ~>
b `~ Z
X71 X71
y II II h 11 II II ~ ~ ~ OT ~ \ ~ ~
Fc `n w ~ N °o c ~ "°~ u,n0 '~ ~ ~.~ Z ~~cn
a ~ ; 2R aR BR °o ° y ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ L~ ~ °~u'~
~ o
p ~ ~ ~ On ~, m m ~ a ~ ~ '~ ~ 8y
,S„ ~ a. m ~ ~ ~ m ~
Q N NAD ~ r
~ Z z = ~ oo ~ ~
1 ~_ r ~ ~ Sllwll ul~~„ - ~ ~
~ ..
m 3 ° ~
cZi ~ o ~ S ;~c ti° """ I v
~ ~ ~ = ceoRO cart war
.v m t''~
~ b ~ '~ C ,~
-~ ~ ~ ~
p ~ O y ~ ~~~ yam ` ~~ ~ ~ ~
m ~ `m ~ ~' 0 ~ ~ t~
m _ Q
o ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a v ~' ~ ~ ~
II ~ II N $ ~' = Nm ~ y ~ O ~~~
O ~ i .° ~ II VVj(' ~-i
o ~ ,_
_ y '~ ~ ~
m 3 3 ~ a ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
H
o _____ -- C tr1 e o ~ ~
~ oo i ~ n ^ ~
--i ~ ~ _ _ _-- ~ ~ W
m~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ o F
b ~' C ~
m/~ m~ ~ J~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~
VJ ~ ~y 0 1 ~ ~ µ~~ z
-~ K a ~ ~ +
~~ ci ° ~~ ~ 66 c~ ~ ~®
~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~\~ ~ b b ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ ~~ ~
'O =
b ,~ ' m
~_ k ~ Q °~ a ~~ ~ n
a
s o~y,IVmuA
Z ~' ~ ~, tZn ~ C ~ ~ ~
m ; ~~
~ Q A v
a~ o ~ o+ a y
m o m ~ __ o ~,S' s on
~ ~ ~ ~ rN ~ 0
m ~ - ~ ~~ O
~ D ~; u
~ ~ ` c
~a ~~
~• ~ o ~
m ~ y
x ~ Z ~ --
a a v _--- --- __ . ~
N _' ~
~ ~ -o ~,~.
7o a
rn
~ O _~
y ~ [1 a
xx ~~ ~ NAD 83 ~+ ~ ~
~~ ~
In ~ ~ ~ Cam"' ~ N ~~
~~ ~y ~ ~~~
~ ~x ~~

~ ~ N v T H
~~g3;•~~~~~
° a g 3
o T 1° ~ O° ° ° O
a * ~ ~- ~
3 0
°c s
v
n
S
~~
e T ~ (.
~I
ii
m I I
LJ
D S q y. ~ O o y` y~
3 c S ~ c °- ~
~. ~ ~ -
3 c
~ ~ s 0 c
~~ o s ~ ~ g
' a
u ~ ~ ~
' ~ o
' ~ O
0
a
c
ti
a+ ~ -« ~ ,~ =o ~o 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ A H
z ~+ n a c> > s
n n 7S ~ °~ S° S ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ ~ C ° ,
°o °o A 3 a > ~ C L' e3 '' ~ s '
0 0' C e Z~ ~ `1
o ~ ~ § p- s g
o ~
S 3 ~ ~ ~ S S ,
c g° a
4. '
~ o ~ b
~ ~
I
I I I
i

:
s
; I I
w
~~
so I I I
I i
I I ~ ~ x I~ li
~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~ o ~ a ~ ~ a a o ~ ~ ~ a a a a ~ o ~ a a' a ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
S A
o ~ s ~ u ~ c ~ O ~ ~ ~ N N e c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A o ~ Zo ~ zs zv, ° ° c ~ ~ ; O
c ., s o} o fl o s s o 0 70 0° 7n ~~~ 0 ° c
;~ o O ~ a n LT A rn H ~ ~ o s a a ~ ~, O ~, ~. ~, ~ ~ ~ ~, o ~?
°' a a ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ v v n ° ~ ~ : '~ a ~ S C rt ;'C
- 3 c -• ~>>~ ~ o s a o i ~'
o o
A '° ~ e °
° ~ ~ m
~ ~ ~ 3 3
~ ~ 3
I~I~ i r~ • I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ I~ ~A
IcI Q © `~ ~ II I' ~ ~ I+~ I~ I I 2 ~ ~ m m ~ ~ D~ } g~~o~
I I p b ~ i i I I I ~~
IJ I I I I V I I I I I ~
$ $ s s s e ~
0 o a. ~ a, s a o o~ a o
~~~~o~o~~~~~--~Z
o. s ° ~ o m
~I ~ u ~ a n -~ ~ ~ c c ~
T~ s s o s c~ g o n o
~i '' s a s a °~ ~ ° v
O ~
T ~ s• ~ ° o s
O~ ~ s~ s o e
~ R ° A ° A a
(l A o A o
e~ 3 a °~ o o
_~ s ~ c
s s
• r N i i
N N ~
c c ~ ;,,
m ~ ~ v
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,
~ i
I
I
v ~o q-o ~ ~ -v ~ -0 0
~ o ~ e 3 c
~ o ~
v o s
q ~ ~ o ~ ~ o s
o C ~ ~ ~ 0 0
n. s
~ ~ x I
0 0
C s
m i ' ~ '
.~~ i
I
I
I
i ©m®o~~-o-•-
I
I
0 o s ~ "~=Z~~~
~ ~ ~a ~~a~~ o P~
p ° a c o ~
e a
~ o ° ~ ' ~ ~
s e ~ g° ~ ~ a 1° ~ O
c# n o
C ~ ~ I ~ G =
s $ n C
a c
« ~ = n
;_ ~ a
v o a.
c
' ~ ° ~
a ,
i i i m i
' a '
o '
i _
I II
II
©l o I I ~ ' ~
a
a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ n o a ~ ~ n' o ~ o o' o ~ a
~' o 0 o C -i ~ a ~ a. o ~ ~ ~ ° ~ a. ~ c ~ o ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~'
o~ x ~ ~~ f o s m a to a ~` H a d ~ C~c. o s
° ~s ~ N ~ rt ' O N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 47 ~ S
o~ ~. H y T a g ~~ a 4447777 444W4T~ v
7 H i 0 p O T ~ N ` n; !A 97 ~ x ~ S
"' « ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ c o' bT c " v ~ '' A c a
~ s O O ~ x ~ ~ '~ s' ~ ° ~ ~ ~ O "o °~ u c
~ ~
_ - ~ ~ ~ o ~ a n s s '
n
' ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ m ~ s ~
.~ s ~ `, ~ ,
~ N i i i i y ~ i i i
i 0 i i i i i y ' ' ' ' '
i C i i
a m ~ c
V.
~,
r77 ~ I I I 9 I ~, I I I I I
-~ I " ~ I ~ j I
I ~ I ; I I I I i
n a ~' a ~ a ~
~ ~
~~p~~
3 ~ ~ a ° ~ o
°- ~ 3 ~ s
C g~ i i
~ ~` i
° c
c ~
o ~ o
in
C
' m i i ~
~ ~ i
i i
~~
,~~,
I
I
I
o I . ~
I
I
I
n
0
z
m
z
O
z
D
r
5
z
rn
rn
t/~
W
r
N
0
it
M
O
~:
~~
®®
~~
C1T~ -~-+

t
r
r
c
a
n
C
T
O
O
Z
m
r
-•I N H
Z D D
1 H ~ p
r ~
~„ O ~„ O
O
Duo °o
~N ~p
.-~
N; Z O
~,~v ~
o° N ~ ~
N
OOm +
~ ~ N
~O o°
c ~' D G1
O+ Z
W N p
O ~
m
O•
a3• r
N
70
O
.~
A
m
O ~
b
Z
w
H ~
~2
N1 `'
v ~
~ r
_ (/~
yrn
Z ~
v Q
°D Z
~ Z
m O
^^C
Y• ~~
m
m
-~~
c
ti
y
N
C
O ~
& ~
C
m
0
s
~p A
N
W

0
's A
N
i

~ a~
~~ i
N
N
~s
r
W
N
~
~ ~
~ i
N ~
\~~
I
r
C
N
m
D
y
m
~
-p O-

r
y ~

O
O D
~
y
O
z
~
~
N
O p
z
Z
~
N + r
O
O
0
O
0
r
N
7O
N
~:
I'
0
00
rn
Z1 '-•1
O~
3N
r O
~ Z
Dp
~O
±~
Orn
O N
~_
Q Z
~~
DO
a~
~- N
aD
O
O
N ~ m ~ a ~ ~ ~ A I too I a I ~
~mDv
xmia >v
-1a Dv~v
am ~~
a mDv rDv Dv rDv

> o
o a
mv~o
v o mia
o »a
~ o -1a
o Dia
~ o
zv>v D9 Dimv my vDV mDV Dv mDv
Dz• z• •
m= • rz• az- z- az-
a -+ w ~ m
~C'1>< >D a ~< iD O>< >> >> D>
am<> <~ -io> ov m<> <v <v <v
vma my 10• a v vma my my my
r+ a• as x o• oa a. as as as
2-+D DO >mm Fa0 w D DO >O >O
ZD G D X Z IIF v ~ X Z O O D X D X D X
m my m m m. m. m.
Av>v
- D
~ A ~
~ ~>_ > A -f
1 -1
> > a ~ a fo 77oo a N
xm1 1 '•'
O> sm m m~ a
amD mD zmzD 2D D > = m
D
S 0 ~ m
O 09 0
» D 09 O~ OD OD
zvx vx mw<x <x zmx vx vm vm
O> D vzmD m D O > D ~ v
-i~r +r -i ar Ar -1~r -+r ~x _
-I A 1 Sr >-i D -i ~ ~ O~ ~ O~ > W
rA to >O D -1N m mr Vr
m cf n lmo m 0 O n O V -•1
mro ro m o o ro ro r a
tpmz mz aaz az mmz mz mo 0
m0 GD O m>Cf D O X m n m 0 m O r o
~• a a ~a -ta o• a a z mz
m
~ m zmm mm m m m n mo
va v-1 o a -1 mv~ v~ va a
zmm mm ~Om om vmm mm mm m
a a T v a a am
w
m m r
.-~ •~+ N
m m mm
~> wa m-~z Az ac auc m a
vm am m~~ a~ .pa va vco m
.
.• m m aoAm am v ~ c me
_ C ~ o ~
<o <c~ 1rs r i< -t <r ~
vvo vo xmm mm vm vm v> >
m• c c >rov m y v• a .~ o
v s a z• ~+ -+ m n o m v m
~vm m D D v v o •-~ O
xmm m Nv-i v~ ~mc zc o 0
7°` "*am sm x~°
a ° °
0 o
a mm c z
c
a•+-i 1 n o + m D m a a
a< < MpDO m O _. O- to m
a
m m zac v 9 x m ~ m
v a v
»m m mom

' < m

v v v ~ v
x
mia a ~v =m -igym ~ ~~
a• x m m
o o v m oro -gy
Om m a ~
A o of a m T
m m

~
D

o m > ^ A ro
K ~ ~

2 m N Z m

< "' ° 0
v ~ m o
m m z v m -t o
m ~ ~ < w m >
o
1 x r ~ ~ w
.
. m y
m m
O ~ D ~ m
~ g
m D _ ~
~ m
1 ~
m m m
r >

m < ~ m

rA m o
~ D O
C
m z ~
-
i m m
a !^
m

m
c
~ ~

z
m
m
~
=
p v
z m

o v

i z
a

w °
m
m 1
m >
• M
r
v
~«
O
y
T
3
3
~.
s
0
a
~`+,
A
a
m_
3•
m

m
m
Z
x
m
v
C
r
m
~~
(i0 15:44
oy pro,j\64128_rdy_typ.dgn

Y-20Q7 08:37
:dNO~ Prod\64128_rdy_typ.dgn
s
J~
n ~
D 0--,
r
y ~'
m
o
O ~
N
C
Z `~
Z
Z m
O~
-I
a v
~ D
D
N
~ +
+ ~ N
~ ~` rn
w
o° co
~ ~°
rt, O
Z y
v
~ ~
~ ~ o
m ~ Z
O °o O
~ ~ ~
a~
N Z
O~
...F Q7
~O ~
w v
~' m
v

--~
o s m
o
=
;
N 70
J
~ Z ~ ~ ~,

` ~ g N
-~
-
'll o
s
N D it
r" II
II
n
N II
m II
l^1 I I C
`
~ ~ ~
N- I N
O II

~
v
II
II

~ ~,

I I _

~~
N
A
~ ~ C I ~~
O ~ I I Vs G
~'
v
°° ~ [~
~ N

~ ~
.
~
~
~
s
s
~
~
i
r
~ Z ~
~ cn D
N
D C r ~
rn ~ Z
o ~ D -n v
+ -v w ~o vi
°
c ~ + ~ o
~

~ r

N to
o
-1 ~
O
-i fi1 p N
O ~ ,~ Z `!~
cn ~
Z O O D
-•
D ww o
o O ~ -~
+o O +
cr
~ ~ ~ X O
;0 O N
O~ _I
Z
/~~
Y~
pry
V
O
F~

m
O
h
C
Z
m

rn /
D
r
N
rn
Z
O
w
r
0
~ iw
i
o~D
=
N
„ow
o~+
x V'
N
^' O
N~ CZ~
X00
~n ° ~ cn
~
~ ~~D
~ Zrn
N
~O ~ yy -~-
mN
~
C
O
O
1VI
P
3
SN
•I A
I~

D
r
N

Z
N-~

Z i
~ r
~ ~- N ~
C to
~ ~

m I Its
~~ ~
A
* A
N
1N
P
~ < C 1 m ~ ~ ~' N i N ~ W N ~
g
m w P N a ~ < ~ ~ D
X > a ;
~ ; ~
y r ~. s .. 0 9 0 o o a o rn <
v r m ~_ o ~
Lw a _
_ ~
_ -
_ m
;
2 2 w 2 ~ m
O O ~ _ O
O D O n ~ N ~ m y m ."~
A
~ ~ m
D s -+ Z m m o
w O n N fA =
~ ~ ~
m ; a m o
o
Oo
1 ~ ~ ~ m m

eflnsioNs
R/W REVISlONSr 5/0//A6 A!G REYlSfO DETQUR SLOPE STAKES ANO TCE ON PARCEL N0.'S 8.9 ANO !Z
128_rdy_psh_4.dgn

S+ /
//
!! b /

'/ ~ /
~ ,
g
~~
,,
~"g: / I
~s>P . 1 I
-
I //
l~y,~j.
x'99
: 1 1
U~U
/ ~ /
/ ~
~
;I ~
. ;
' ~
i
~
j~I b~
//I
w ~~//
= 1
~ $
N
lII

s"~ ~ 1 /~ 1
~ ~~ ~
~~
~o _
I
S
~~~~opv
b b bbb~/1
b ~o
~~~~s4~ r
~~
quo
y
.r ~,_~~, ~ r,
SOYIYOp,N ~ /
~~ ~5
~ ~ ~a a
•~ L Q / >\ _
I a
// 1. ~°~ / Q4d,
O ~ yr l 1I ~ + / ~ ©~ ~ ~~~~
~ ~ 1 I +I e' 1 ~ ® ~~i
O ~
~ 1I r Q Q ~.ss.9coarl ,YO.s, q ~
4 ~~ s r
r
a '
Q a
~~
I
N
~
~ ~
I
~O
D t0
ro ~
~ _
~~~
o y
A II
~6b
~ .j
~ qq~.
4~

I~ ~-
"~
~ +
~
V ~~ } I
~
P a ~ 7 4
~ ~ ~~
c
o+
a~
~ I
q
~
Hb g } ~
g+ 1,
I II
V I ~ 11
II
r;
• ~
~~1
~ +
~~ rl l
P`
~ I
~} I li
l1 1
w
e
' I
8 S .
~
!
f I
I ~~~
O
~$
~~ I y I
I ~I
I I
I I
~
~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~~
is ~
~~ + ~ i I
I

..
r ~~ 8 ~;
~ g
° ~
I

1
I o a
`
a o ; : I
!
~' ~ f?j ~~
Ya
~-Il
'
'`
~
~ ~a
I
g ~ !'' I
!
~~
~ ~~ i E

p'v Sp ~ w I I ~II
z
f i
~ ~~
m ~ j u
;

o a
a
O
4 I!I ~
U ~ ~ 1~ y ~a~~~
9 o S~ a
~' ~~ ~° A 4 N ~ s ~~~~
r fi ~€
/ y
__~- ~~
! ~~-O
~~ ~ . r
n ~~
,~ ° l RR~~
a ~~~~
1 A ~ 5c ~ a'~ a$
~+ ~~ ~~~~
ro ~aR~ .,8
.L1 j M.OY. LZON •00'B! ~ ~ EYE
.. ..
ro'ec. v. ~v,~,,,.
o• Y lpl ~
~• •~ .. III ~'~~ ya
.. .~ • .. A1Nl10J D
_. 31sT3dd sro gig ~ w- y 3NIl 11WI~ 0 0210 SN 3210
-~ _ -t9~E~~ S A1W
~ ~ ~~~~
M P y
m 1 '~
s
'~~ ~ / ~
~~ - ~J}
q ~ I ` ~i ~ ~
I ar7~-,g ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~~1 I ~~~~ =s ~ ~
=o = ~ ~ Q ~ c
r
/ ~ y~
~~~ 1, k a 9~ ~~~~
~ ~g~Pr
A ~8}~ ~; 7 Q/I ~~~~~
~ k \`/ / u ~
~~ ~~ u ~ ~~~~~
~~
~~ .~` of ~ / ~ ~ ~gp~F
,>•
~ m ~1$r~~ ~~
~ ~ b . ~~ / ~~g~~
/~
~}
N
~~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~
d
~8 ~~~
l ~ ~-~~ ~
t ~' ~~~
+~s ~
$~~~}
8/17/99
~ o ~ k
r,
%5 } ~~~~~
Ls'lol © 8 $ ~ II ~ga1'E
3• 8 % C~~Yb~i
GUILFORD COl1NTY sn~~K P } ~~~ ~ I O ~ _ ~aB~ a
GREENSBORD ~ $ + ~ ~ ~ I 1I c `" ~g H
CITY lM1T LINE S ~y~j ! PI Ism a o
~~~V"OD~ 8 : j I is \., ` ~Y,Oq ~~o
b b b II b b ~ \ ~ sa sW ei ;q' ~ I I I '~ "»QQ ,~'~' ~' }"e
~~d ~ I ~~ ~~ e I ,z I •3d.9o~ ~,
((~~~~1.p a r ws
~.~OV `~ ~ >i ~ I •i: ti ~i;. gi sl•79'SAM
pp'00+£L'r'1S -'f- 8 133HS 33S 3NI1 H~1WV ~~~~~ '
W
.~ ~ ~
U
o
~ $
Q ~
$~ I~I~

19-APR-2C(
128_rdy_psh_5.dgn
R/W REV/S/ONS:I/Il/OG OJG PROPERTY OWNER NAME CHANGES ADDED PLUSES AND OfFSETS POR NINUAIENTS.
00'00+£Z'I1S Ji- f J33HS 33S 3N11 H71WV
~Q~$ $~
9 N C9~~~ ~ ~~ ~ / ~ T O
N~~~
76TH ~r Y.C`'S 5 g ~ S~
sra o~ ero r $
h
v ~ 8 ~ ^~ s
= m ~ ~~.
~ 'y a
e ~ ' ~ O ~
s
_gN~
~~ ' ~
~ ~~~
\\ ~ v
~~ S~ ~~. ~~71
a ~~~
~~~~ 1
~~o~ ~j ~
~sF ~~ ~ll ~ G
g~~~ --
~~~` ~~~-
~ ~~~ ~ '~ ~
~~ ~~ ~
'~~
~~~_~ ~\
~8" ~ /
or3
IO~y ~ p 1
~ ~ ~ •
_ O
`s.5' 6
g..
app °6's,.\~

~
~ ~~S ~~ R
Cggg
~ z
a
~ s
f ~ _
~
~ s4
S~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~ m
9 O
~
o
! ~
2 ~ m
0
~ N
~
_
0

J r
m
~ ~
SIQ
~p ° ~Y
ng

a

S
y1JN~ ~
i qpp
I
. ~/\r,~
} /
Diu ~/
3~8 j/ ~ t
i~ ~ ~ „
.// o
i i~~~~• ~
~_ ~ ~
\ ' $ ~
'^~~~'~ ~ ro i \~ ~~ fl pp©pp
ao ~
N to \ Q ~ / / ~ \ ~~ ~- ` _ -.~
tmn m ~C=- / / ` ~ ~ ~
Ny ~ / p / / CQ ~
~-1 \~~~//oQp~ / /
v ~ p~ ~ n 1Q / / ..~ © pp
00 / l IQQ~ // // ):
Ok x ~ / / © i
Q~~ / / ~
~~, / / ~ ~~ Ql LQ
~WAp' g3~~
~~~ o ~w
M 'N Y'~i
7u• v O
_ _ a ~.
$~g ~$
$Is ~s~
s ~s~ ~g~s
6
3
~~ ~
~I~
s ~
&~~ ¢ o a n
~ ''~
N
M~
~°
~ ~
s
~~

N
rn
m
V!
m
00
. ~
-,o
O
m
REVISIONS
R/W REVISIONS 8/2//06 TRM:CHANGED PROPERTY OWNER NAMES ON PARCEL N0.4.6,7.AND l0.
0 ~ Ao dHa ~\ ~0~0\64126_rdy_psh_6.dgn
I
I p
n g
~rn
1
I
1
•
-~°
O ~~
.~

c
r
0
0
c°~
~ 3
Z '_
~o
~~u~g~
F
F

GUILFORD COUNTY 3
,~~~,8~~3
~wj
_ aAF
~s
~
GREENSBORO
CIiY LIMIT LINE
~~~~op~
tl tl11tltl~
\d•~s
tl
~,Q,wAA~~yo
N~~~`~~

~ o
r
\ ~
~
~~~~~V
~
~ ,
ti
t` a
O
~~~ ~
~~~
~~
s
i $ ® m !''
~~ ~
.yt 2
• ~
~@^~T~ I
prr rr C \~
~.~ g c~
irr Qq`
N.. •f ero .r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~„= m , ~ $
~ ~ $~
v ~e
~}s ~ Im ~
~ ~s;
a. im~-
• ~ ~1--- .
N
8>
~ ' ~~~~~
~ B ~~~~n
Q ~~~~ ®}~
+
~a i ~o !'
pp g
WT
7Q~ -
^~~_ ~ ~
~~~~
NN (~l~
W
I
~~ J
°~~~ ~-.
~~~ A + I7
~o
~~~a w
...o,.,.., ...,. -mnc~
97~C` T ' i~7=
~ ' 12 11 a. I
o~$~
~ 351$ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~
ll
~~~ i
~' $
>~~N a
N N ~

~ ~

e~ a °

©
~/
'
I
~
~~ ~ ~
ss
t
~
~
m=~
'°w~ ~
_
~$~ a o
~
Aas,~
'll l
Q~~-SB~'
~ ~:
u~um .
N

~_~~ l~'~ 0
ti 111 ~ I ° ~~.4. .

i

I
S~
1 ~s
\ 1
~~ r,
~I I
I ~I
I 11
of I
© ji Ii E
a I II
b II II/
a I I
R
'~ i
I I
II ~I .
I
ai I
I
II I ',
II ~
I
q I
L II
I
I
I ~
I
II , I
a~ VIII
II III
I III
~~ III
I
~= _
I-o a 1 ~l
~e
X11 I I ~~~
II
I
~~
al
11_
'19
I
~'-
I I
~-'-r----_~,_
'~' ~ I C?
~II
~~I~ ~~ I~I'~x
+
~~i ~~a N
11 a I 8. }~ m ' , fl.
~~ r;: g~g~ -~
'~.~
~$} a /~~
.. 8
s~ $ .I6'SGI /~
~~ y} ~} ~O
s1~i 4 $8 8+
0
,~~ S R

a
L
r
H
~' ;~~
~g~r;
~~~ rN--x-~rOp~
tl 4 II tl tl tl
O
y$ ~~ N o
~ rn~~~ A rn
a~g ~ '
~ N P
r ~ C9i~ y. .~.,
o ~
r
~~~~ tl II tl tl II tl~ ~: 1
~~~~ ~~~~°~~ I ~~
4"~ Q
y' ~ •'R UI ~ ITI ' g
iC ~ ~ v ~~ 1 +~~
~1w $~u
y ~ $
O t'1'9
~yy{ti~Ai
}~N ~{LrC~.~
_ N~~~Z O
t~i~~6 ~
~,x
~o' .oSo
N N
ti
ors, c
~~~~
~ ~ ~Q
y
~ r
~ $ ~ -_~
+ ~ o a
o ~
o
,,, o
+ oc
s M~ a
nv
ti
s
ry ~~
.. 3
H
w
O ~ § H
r $ n

m
n
:~ s
~ r,
~~°m
m
o -~
a'"a
~a~
gm
.~~
o ~ o n

x ~ m c

~'
mn v ~ ~
_
N
C 111 ~ NOT
T
w H H ~O Sy
s
~'A~
~ -,
S ~~ra--
o ,~ °oc
Y ~ ti
~ n
+ c =
o ~
v m v
~ ~~
N q
, ~ ~I _`~` yy O O L N',
ASGE~ ~~C1~ + -1 t ~_
+ 5 I•J9' 1111 v1
-~9' S9• N
C 701.5-,r
~~~ O ~eB~A " I'JB• 10• f
_~ ~ ~ B6.61
1 >yyy
q yy nCf umr
00 O a~ C1 m
r '' + ~~ I 2S~ R ~'
s~ $ $} L~ ~ ~ m m
Ro
_ ~ ~ rn
* ~1
s 1
m ~ B.
,! •e• ~
M b~ ~!• O `b b~5
r Z / N
+
'~ $ s o. a, ae• w ~,
~ ~.r ~ ~$ ~ 106.97 1
N ~t~~ia~~
J, r .. ~C1y~ ~ ~ Si
~a Q ~~~
~u ~
fl ~4 + ~ ~
• ~~ r ~ ~gm
i +
>an sr V q L c amD
~b: °~ Yppi'1nf-
,~+ Lm
o°
o
9J J) 9 . L0' $ m v
S 1 ~ \ ~~ L Ny p5 B f ~• ~ N ~~.
~8 ,e a \\~~/ w / ~ cb
,m $ $~ \ ~
G ~ ~~~ ~ a I
+ \ 1 S
$ g ~ $,~~~ ~\a '' ~ a ~ 3
a + . ,•
V~ ~~5~ ~ O O
+
~ r! ~ to rn~~~oD~ +~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~o
1 1 ~ I~1 tl II tl tl h tl ~ ~ .. -7 a e,~? -I
c .n° _
J ~ ^ U
~ y
m ,o ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ 8 'G
y ~
~' ~ N ~_ s ~Oy~ ~ I
S
m 8 rn~~l`~ b ~
q©©:~© I ~ tlutltlu'I~ ~ 4~
1 rn~ ° 8~ ~K
N$$ v Q~
x x // ~ ~,
1 ~ ~ / ~~~ ~'s7
ti // \ ~ ~ ~
8/17/9°
0
0