20021924 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 4_20130212

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 3 (2012)
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORTION SITE
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 243, Contract No. 004499)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
i�0W p
;.z
2-0'.3
r�
t � ���C'(1`VtitClll
i
Dr=NR - I TOT--R QUALITY
� 'A�etlai1 Stc nwate? Branch
November 2012
a z- �qzy

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 3 (2012)
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORTION SITE
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 243, Contract No. 004499)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Design Firm:
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center I, Suite 200
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
hr.,e
I��cosystem
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
November 2012

1 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 0 METHODOLOGY
2 1 Vegetation Assessment
2 2 Stream Assessment
2 3 Wetland Assessment
3 0 REFERENCES
Table of Contents
Appendices
APPENDIX A PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -213 Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Fixed - Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9A 2012 (Year 3) Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 913 Annual Totals and Planted Stems by Species
APPENDIX D STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Table l0a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table lOb Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment
Parameter Distributions)
Table 1 la Monitoring Data— Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —
Cross Sections)
Table l l b Monitoring Data— Stream Reach Data Summary
APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
2012 (Year 3) Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Figure 3 Annual Climatic Data vs 30 -year Historic Data
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
4
4
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) has completed restoration of 5178 linear
feet of stream at the McIntyre Creek Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") to assist in
fulfilling stream and wetland mitigation goals in the area This report (compiled based on EEP's
Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Version 1 4 dated 11/7/11)
summarizes data for year 3 (2012) monitoring
The goals and objectives of this project focus on improving local water quality, habitat, and stream
stability These goals were accomplished by the following
1 Restoring stable channel morphology capable of moving flows and sediments provided by the
watershed
2 Improving water quality by reducing soil and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral
erosion and bed degradation
3 Improving aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in- stream structures
4 Stabilizing tributaries draining into McIntyre Creek
5 Providing educational opportunities through Mecklenburg County
6 Improving the natural aesthetics of Hornets Nest Park
7 Enhancing vegetation to provide habitat/food sources, shade the stream, filter overland runoff,
and remove soil particles and other nutrients from stormwater
8 Protecting a Site identified in a watershed that is listed as impaired for elevated levels of copper
and turbidity (NCDWQ 2010)
The Site is located in Hornets Nest Park on the northern side of the City of Charlotte in Mecklenburg
County The Site is located in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit
03050101170020 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasm 03- 08 -34) of the
Catawba River Basin and will service USGS 8 -digit Cataloging Unit (CU) 03050101 The Site is located
within a NCEEP Targeted Local Watershed within the Long Creek watershed targeted for restoration
Waters in the Site dram approximately 2 5 mules into Long Creek (NCDWQ No 11- 120 -[2 5]), which is
listed as impaired for elevated levels of copper and turbidity negatively affecting aquatic life (NCDWQ
2010)
Prior to construction, the Site contained a degraded stream channel with a disturbed riparian buffer
located within Hornets Nest Park Site streams were characterized by eroding banks, channel widening,
high sediment inputs from construction occurring in the upstream watershed and onsite bank erosion, and
channel incision as indicated by bank- height - ratios ranging from 14 to 1 9 Surrounding land uses
include commercial and residential areas with narrow riparian corridors adjacent to streams Greater than
50 -55 percent of the contributing watershed had been cleared and developed
Project construction was completed between March 2007 -May 2008 and remediation construction to
repair structures, stabilize banks, provide grade control, and dissipate stormwater energy was completed
between August 2009 - January 2010 The project restored 5178 linear feet of stream using Priority I
restoration by constructing a new meandering channel within the McIntyre Creek floodplain,
incorporating in- stream structures, installing grade control structures at the confluence with two
tributaries, and planting with native forest species Site activities provide 5129 Stream Mitigation Units
(49 linear feet of the restored channel is located within a utility easement and therefore was not included
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 1

in the available mitigation credit) The Site will be protected by a permanent conservation easement held
by the State of North Carolina
Success criteria for stream restoration will be assessed using measurements of stream dimension, pattern,
and profile, site photographs, visual assessments, and vegetation sampling Cross - section measurements
should show little or no change from the as -built cross - sections If changes occur, evaluations will be
completed to determine whether changes are minor adjustments trending towards a more stable channel or
if changes indicate movement towards an unstable condition Annual measurement should indicate stable
bedform features with little change from the as -built survey Pools are expected to maintain depth with
lower water surface slope and riffles are expected to remain shallower with steeper water surface slopes
Substrate measurements should indicate maintenance of distributions from the design phase and baseline
measurements In addition, there should be an absence of any significant aggradation or degradation of
the stream channel
Several areas of bank erosion are located throughout the project as the result of high stream flows, vertical
banks, urbanized watershed, flashy flows, and tight radius of curvatures These areas are depicted on
Figures 2 and 2A -213 (Appendix B) and should continue to be monitored closely Due to the extensive
impervious surfaces located within the upstream watershed the Site has periods of flashy flood flows even
during smaller rain events Flashy flood flows, compiled with minor bank instability has resulted in some
degradation of the channel including eroding outer bends and slumping banks with loss of planted
vegetation and reduced integrity of several structures The loss of planted stems due to sloughing banks
will most likely make the banks, particularly outer bends, more vulnerable to erosive flows and continued
bank loss Degradation is anticipated to continue to occur due to the characteristics of the watershed
Success criteria for stream restoration will include documentation of two bankfull channel events during
the monitoring period In the event that less than two bankfull events occur during the first five years,
monitoring will continue until the second event is documented In addition, bankfull events must occur
during separate monitoring years A crest gauge is located within the Site to assist with documentation of
bankfull events (Figures 2 -2A, Appendix B) Two bankfull event were documented during the year 3
(2012) monitoring season for a total of six bankfull events
Vegetation success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the
first three monitoring years Subsequently, 290 stems per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260 stems
per acre in year 5 Stem counts will be based on an average of the evaluated vegetation plots Based on
the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 494 stems per acre surviving in year 3
(2012) The dominant species identified at the Site were planted stems of river birch (Betula nigra),
green ash (Fraxrnus pennsylvanica), cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), and silky dogwood (Cornus
amomum) Seven of the ten individual plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone Plots 2, 4,
and 7 were below success criteria based on planted stems alone, however, when including naturally
recruited stems of appropriate species such as box elder (Acer negundo) and green ash (Fraxrnus
pennsylvanlca) these plots were well -above 320 stems per acre Planted stems and recruits are growing well
throughout the Site, in general vegetation is doing very well
Vegetation problem areas within the Site include a large patch of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) and
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) north of the stream near cross - section 3, a large patch of kudzu
(Pueraria lobata) north of the stream near cross - section 2, and scattered smaller patches of multiflora
rose, Chinese privet, and kudzu (depicted on Figures 2A -2B, Appendix B)
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 2

Two groundwater gauges (Gauges 2 and 3) were installed within the Site within wetland areas created as
the result of stream restoration activities An additional gauge (Gauge 1) was placed dust outside of
delineated wetland areas created as the result of stream restoration activities Success criteria for wetland
groundwater hydrology at the Site require inundation or saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface
for a consecutive period of 10 percent of the growing season or greater than 23 consecutive days (the
growing season in Mecklenburg County begins March 22 and ends November 11 [233 days]) Gauge 2
was considered successful in year 3 (2012) Gauge 3 was dust shy of success criteria with 9 4 percent
inundation/saturation, however, rainfall in January 2012 was 0 5 inches below 30 percent historic data
and February 2012 was 0 97 inches below 30 percent historic data
A large beaver dam is located downstream of the project, this is currently not affecting the Site, however,
beaver are beginning to cause problems within the Site and build dams Proactive measures to control
beaver are recommended to occur as necessary
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and
figures within this report's appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found
in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEPs website
All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Ten vegetation plots were established and marked after construction with four foot metal U -bar post
demarking the corners with a ten foot, three- quarter inch PVC at the origin The plots are 10 meters
square and are located randomly within the Site These plots were surveyed in June for the year 3 (2012)
monitoring season using the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008)
(http //cvs bio unc edu /methods htm), results are included in Appendix C The taxonomic standard for
vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(Weakley 2007)
2.2 Stream Assessment
Annual stream monitoring will be conducted following procedures established in the USDA Forest
Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson et al 1994) and methodologies utilized in the
Rosgen stream assessment and classification system ( Rosgen 1994 and 1996) Four permanent cross -
sections, two riffle and two pool, were established and will be used to evaluate stream dimension,
locations are depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix B) Cross - sections are permanently monumented with 4-
foot metal garden posts at each end point Cross - sections will be surveyed to provide a detailed
measurement of the stream and banks including points on the adjacent floodplain, top of bank, bankfull,
breaks in slope, edge of water, and thalweg Data will be used to calculate width -depth ratios,
entrenchment ratios, and bank height ratios for each cross - section In addition, photographs will be taken
and pebble counts will be conducted at each permanent cross - section location annually
Three approximately 1000 - linear foot monitoring reaches were established and will be used to evaluated
stream pattern and longitudinal profile, locations are depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix B) Measurement of
channel pattern will include belt - width, meander length, and radius of curvature (only in year one)
Subsequently, data will be used to calculated meander -width ratios Longitudinal profile measurements
will include average water surface slopes and facet slopes and pool -to -pool spacing Ten permanent
photo points were established throughout the restoration reach, locations are depicted on Figure 2
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 3

(Appendix B) and are included in Appendix B In addition, visual stream morphology stability
assessments will be completed in each of the three monitoring reaches annually to assess the channel bed,
banks, and in- stream structures
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Three groundwater monitoring gauges were installed at the Site in February 2011 and have been
maintained and monitored throughout growing season Two gauges (Gauges 2 and 3) are located within
delineated wetlands created by stream restoration activities and one gauge (Gauge 1) is located dust
outside of wetlands created by stream restoration activities Graphs of groundwater hydrology and
precipitation are included in Appendix E
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T , R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 2 (online) Available http / /cvs bio unc edu /methods htm
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2004 Climatography of the United States
No 20, Monthly Station Climate Summaries, 1971 -2000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National
Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2010 Final North Carolina 2010 Integrated
Report Category 4 and 5 (303(d) List EPA Approved August 31, 2010) (online) Available
http //portal ncdenr org/c /document_ library/ get_ file ?uuid= 8ff0bb29- 62c2- 4b33 -810c-
2eee5afa75e9 &groupId =38364 [December 1, 2010] North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2007 Catawba River Basin Restoration
Priorities Available http //www nceep net / services /restplans /RBRPCatawba2007 pdf [June
2010] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina
Weakley, Alan S 2007 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online)
Available http Hwww herbarium unc edu/WeakleysFlora pdf [February 1, 2008] University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Weather Underground 2011 Station at Charlotte Douglas International Airport (KCLT) in Charlotte,
North Carolina (online) Available
http //www wunderground com/history/airport/KCLT /2011 /11 /09 /CustomHistory html
[November 9, 2011 ]
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitonng Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 4

APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Directions to Site (from Charlotte):
N "
��,
-> Take Interstate 77 North ; ,4, s
-> Take Exit 16 onto Sunset Road
traveling west
-> Travel —0.5 mile and take right
on Beatties Ford Road 1
-> Travel —1 mile to Hornets Nest '
Park entrance on the left y
Latitude /Longitude at Entrance to
Hornets Nest Park: 4 e
35.319972, - 80.865133 Entrance to
Hornets t
p _' Nest Park /
A.
rdj
' ' � Li
l' �U )ti StC'l l l � , � � : �
t t
.t�' �%
'
re Creeks ♦ • ♦
ILE cn Sty18t i ,
`h..tx
•t t. ,` �� \n (�.
Goy yl•.
�J
G
ek ,. C
•
°' Son
� .��. ...
Road ,. �
•t
._ _,' _ .. i�,j
,i Ridur 1 yQtS I
/ a�
1 =.WT ■ J ",.b Seh
Oakdale C r N ]n�
H
5• I' - XOtritN i1.wmF mil _
.atavi6t kftd
/-
i It
• f cnnps Mi.l,.
e
z
Ld
i Northern Edge,
of the.,
Cwa> City'of Charlotte 0 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 7,500
ttv
I Feet
D—. by.
FIGURE
20 Enterprise Street
Sake 7
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919(215 -1693
VICINITY MAP
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
CLF
Date:
Nov 2010
�n�eaio
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
-oos

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mrintvre C..reek Restaratinn Site at Hnrnets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Mih ahon Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Type
Restoration =Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Totals
5129* 1
--
—
To be Determined **
156,816
Projects Com onents
Project
Component/
Reach ID
Station
Range
Existing Linear
Footage/
Acreage
Priori ty
Approach
Restoration/
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Linear Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Comment
McIntyre
Creek
—5000
I
Restoration
5178*
11
Priority I stream restoration along the entire protect,
installation of in- stream structures, stabilizing the
confluence of two incoming tributaries, and planting
with native forest vegetation
Wetland
-
0
--
Creation
To Be
Determined**
31
-
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Buffer (square footage)
Restoration
5178
-
156,816
Creation
--
To Be Determined **
--
Totals
5178
156,816
Mitigation Units
5129 SMUs*
156,816 BMUs
*Site activities restored 5178 linear feet of stream, however, 49 linear feet is located within a utility easement and is not included in the SMU calculation
* *The wetland creation boundary will be determined after gathering gauge data for at least two years
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 3 years
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 4.5 year
Number of Reporting Years
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
--
December 2002
Construction Plans
--
March 2005
Site Construction and Planting
--
May 2008
As -built Construction Drawings
--
February 2008
Remediation Construction
--
January 2010
As -built Remediation Construction Drawings
--
November 2009
As -built Record Drawings
--
February 2010
Baseline Monitoring Document
July 2010
December 2010
Year 1 (20 10) Monitoring Document
December 2010
December 2010
Year 2 (2011 ) Monitoring Document
November 2011
December 2011
Year 3 (2012) Monitoring Document
I November 2012
November 2012
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park EEP Project Number 243
Designer
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P A
Landmark Center 1, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Gary cza 919 - 783 -9214
Construction and Planting Contractor
United Construction, Inc
6000 Old Pineville Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
704 - 679 -9229
As -built Surveyor
CSC of NC PC
4455 Morris Park Drive, Suite F
Charlotte, NC 28227
Mohammad Zamani 704 -573 -0112
Baseline Data Collection and
Axiom Environmental, Inc
Monitoring Performers
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243
Proiect Information
ect Name
ect County
ect Area
ect Coordinates
Proiect Watershed
Proiect River Basin
USGS 8 -digit HUC
USGS 14 -digit HUC
NCDWQ Subbasin
Proiect Drainage Area
Proiect Drainage Area Impervious Surface
CGIA Land Use Classification
Reach Su
Restored length
Drainage Area
NCDWQ Index Number
NCDWQ Classification
Valley Type /Morphological Description
Dominant Soil Series
Drainage Class
Soil Hvdric Status
FEMA Classification
Native Vegetation Community
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasives
Waters of the U S — Sections 404 and 401
Endangered Species Act
Historic Preservation Act
CZMA/CAMA
FEMA Floodplam Compliance
Essential Fisheries Habitat
Creek Restoration Site
urs? County. North Carolina
17 acres
35 319972, -80 865133
mary Information
Piedmont
Southern Outer Piedmont
Catawba
03050101
03050101170020
03 -08 -34
2 55 square miles
>50%
Urban High
Information
5178 linear feet
2 55 square miles
11- 120 -3 -(1)
C
VIIl/E5
Monacan
Moderately well- somewhat poorly
Contains 5% h dric Wehadkee soils
00033
100 -Year Floodzone
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
5 9%
Considerations
Applicable
Yes - Received Appropriate Permits
No
No
No
Yes - Received a No Rise Certification
No
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Proiect Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -213 Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Fixed- Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
Cross - sections
Monitoring Reaches
Stream Fixed - Station Photo Points
Groundwater Gauges
Structures
Streams
W. �
s y s
y
Y.' ! too,
4.
7
i,
L
s
Orr ;,w-q
_.
Via..
F
2009 Mecklenburg County Aerial Photography :A+ _<
1 245 4.1 9:1 1,470 1,960
fig i�
fig i� I Feet
_ .. :a��t�P"'�r�3irf►:Z�'t�•'� ya`;:'a: - 'Imm � e.; ;'"- �i�,�;:��•_' . °1. _ ,
Photo Point Bearing Latitude Longitude
1 154 35.32065 - 80.87796
2 140 35.32022 - 80.87791
3 324 35.31867 - 80.87613
4 188 35.31823 - 80.87550
F9 5
135 35.31823 - 80.87550
78 35.31802 - 80.87389
90 35.31835 - 80.87224
120 35.31841 - 80.86887
90 35.31839 - 80.86747
-260 35.31927 - 80.86491
V}
w
�
�_'r :.' #L a ,y .- :'.t n _,1 y N
Feature Latitude Longitude
plot 1 origin 35.31901 - 80.87667
lot 2 origin 35.31859 - 80.87602
plot 3 origin 35.31784 - 80.87533
plot4origin 35.31792 - 80.87444
plot 5 origin 35.31851 - 80.87234
plot 6 origin 35.31847 - 80.87068
plot 7 origin 35.31824 - 80.86931
plot 8 origin 35.31837 - 80.86792
lot 9 origin 35.31873 - 80.86621
lot 10origin 35.31895 - 80.86570
xsect 2 right bank 35.31820 - 80.87568
xsect 2left bank 35.31816 - 80.87581
xsect 1 left bank 35.31922 - 80.87688
xsect 1 right bank 35.31929 - 80.87679
xsect 3 right bank 35.31859 - 80.86774
xsect 3left bank 35.31849 - 80.86773
xsect 4left bank 35.31893 - 80.86579
xsect 4 right bank 35.31901 - 80.86584
Prepared for:
r_l�j
hu )SYSto i 1
Project:
MCINTYRE
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
County, NC
Title
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by:
Amoin Fn'w;Ctn4'enlid,
Inc,
Prepared for:
r_l�j
hu )SYSto i 1
Project:
MCINTYRE
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
County, NC
Title
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by:
CLF
Date:
FEB 2011
Scale:
1:360C
Project No.:
10 -009
FIGURE
2

Legend N
- - --° Conservation Easement
Q(� - Streams
�h� rza Wetlands
y Cross - sections --
`.� r]
ro �j
Monitoring Reaches
19 Axgm Enwronmen,ai, mc.
Approx. Stationing :y
• .� O - Structures Prepared for:
Crest Gauge
6v {T Groundwater Gauges
Stream Fixed - Station Photo Points
Vegetation Problem Areas
Rosa multiflora ."CmNC))t
Kudzu
_ Chinese privet
Stream Problem Areas Project:
® Bank Erosion MCINTYRE
j Beaver dams ', ® Bank Slumping CREEK
b - Reduced Integrity Structure RESTORATION
r
� (/ Vegetation Plots SITE
z^' - Met Success Critera Based on Planted Stems HORNETS
a..
Did Not Meet Success Criteria Based on Planted Stems Alone NEST PARK
/
*Based on planted stems alone, these plots don't meet success Mecklenburg
criteria; however, when Including naturally recruited stems of County, NC
appropriate species such as box elder (Ater negundo), river birch
.� 5�OO (Betula nign), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and gum Title
t
- (Nysee sp.) these plots were well -above 320 stems per acre.
3
O
1+ Cl)
7t
�\ .y C e e9 9ho
Lli 44Q
,50.00
i a
a 3 ('r� 7
/ 6.
1! I r)
2010 CGIS Leaf -of Aerial Photography
120 240 480 720 960
Feet
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by
CLF
Date:
June 2012
Scale.
1:1 S00
Project No..
12- 004.03
FIGURE
2A

Legend
•�°� Conservation Easement
Streams
Wetlands
Cross - sections
Monitoring Reaches
Approx. Stationing
- Structures
Crest Gauge
1�Z Groundwater Gauges
•(r Stream Fixed - Station Photo Points
Vegetation Problem Areas
Rosa multiflora
Kudzu
_ Chinese privet
Stream Problem Areas
Q Bank Erosion
Q Bank Slumping
® Reduced Integrity Structure
Vegetation Plots
Met Success Criteria Based on Planted Stems
Did Not Meet Success Criteria Based on Planted Stems Alone
*Based on planted stems alone, these plots don't meet success
enteric; however, when Including naturally recruited stems of
appropriate species such as box elder (Ater negundo), river birch
(Betuls nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and gum
(Nyasa sp.) these plots were wellabove 120 stems per acre.
ar lr .r N
�- r� w•ar I. ^:ante, mc.
Prepared for:
lit T
7 /
v_ Project.
* /* �' t MCINTYRE
4 # r
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
HORNETS
r ' NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
i
y to d J County, INC
ti ,
t , � . e;. aril / l., . x .:Y•.10 Ttie:
2
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by:
CLF
Date
...............
(...• y JAN 2012
At 3- Scale.
Project No.:
10 -009
T f•
a r
T ,
FIGURE
mn 2 aV

Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 1
Assessed Lenath 1000
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith Footagewith
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aggradation - Bar formatiordgrowth sufficient to signs icantly deflect
+"r �I1 Mr „q + i �� �9lir'
_ �, N . 4 o-
8
156
°
86 /o
' i�' ^ � ,ti „� +t 1 {. +'P`f�,Y
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutt rig
0 0
100%
4 =v„ji'
;1 b y
"L -��nf JR' tyf i. �]f�'
�M �'..• c a'+.
��Iy{
�� }hM��n�A i i �5. �.{�y
2. Riffle Condition
1 Texture /Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17 17
Iy.
1 '- � ` x3 ra.fl v f V
Iwlu
"III'
100 %
M e0 a R I d i`II u� f V w of �I�qI, N'� Y I r� y I +' �I I M " m{(k'��m f ' I•r a € P�III.; II ' I JI ,
o�
�
"'I'�
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth> 1 6)
17
17
00 /Condition
1' 4'.„ y IHtf Nhd� fl P 'II�I�ill {III
�hI�II4�y1r
a +{ 1111111 t� j< „,'ti V
„r al
2 Len h appropriate >30 % of centerime distance between tail of
t (
upstream raffle and head of downstrem riffle)
17
17
+)
4 yl�,v I� pl �P
'I;0 "I� •�I �P �•' +�
1
o
100%
• „�
� � 411',1 ��+•" � I ,�t;, I� r r � 'h „� q I ¶�Ifli.�l
� +�
<
i saSi4- ,u ➢„ Plil
4 Thalweg Position
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
17
17
0
100%
a
�” 94i`' f•+Ny � �5
cP*? €k
�«' `3 - aY1d�,� �,� < Ct� i t, �,
ys'nk^�,'illilR...=
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
17
17
to
'
k
100 %'
>
ah`^''.33”
r hS * *t '�f➢±y nikl�u ^�'
� s �' �?
x+
+ 4r "e '' . x`�
yl'ygy �y�,�
1t11a'lyF
� rir , �.¢� ck`"";I�r�` mot” a r; `i,M'
'h'Fa"$' I 1 ' *@
�`
a,
,p r
.s« ",s � x �c qm�
P ,Sa
Ws-
1 �� �q��.�r -u .� *�€•e,",c -�
6'lu 4` r i'
<�
$
x
dVl
K �1n u-u7y .i r Yo'r'4"�:
�': +I, 4 1������r
4
a
r 4 1671
9RIiI�Il�1114IYIrll'''
II
�� II „z:,r ��v +� *� ,
"
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/orI
scour and erosion
°P
Rtl`I
2
25
99%
2
15
100%
2 Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely
);il
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
I fl,II'
*i'y "f
IIII
tl
t�'��
2
40
98%
1
5
98%
and are providing habitatI,
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
fir„ Cf
6
155
92%
3
27
94%
�' zti's# q'
,�,
�" �fi
`£� -• : x > hg$ }
ru `s s 11
t� -a .pct ^s
t r1Tofa1
i V i IT
10 220
89%
6 47 91%
3 Engineered
g
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
5
7
' r� �
' �IIHI��IR1
s,l f�
°�I "�h41
71 %
�I �It1' "I,d „�I I II111f�1�1�'p� viii Ixr�rV)IV r
„u it "�B�rc '11
14I i'�4' u� 11 V' "lilts *111I��II,hVr',tl'�I "
Structures
��III�IIII'4I
�41I�
M
µy1
"I�
III',I 111'
9
14i'lluHf'I��1'1 � � I I�I�
Ili'il i aO W
ill l I�”
I�Pu't
„ "I d llt�rN' �I il'Ih iIIII IPJI�I,IItiI IIVI ,II'II7I,IW 3k i}1 #'1,r yi
u
ji �lll'llll;'il*;'*� 141W $i4 A`II u�'j'is}�I��IVI'1I141II' I '�IIIIIN'I �I � �a�l � i f Xyt' •� r
i� '” tlli'�I�% p Ili „1111 "I Ni 1�4�Vi a
�lf ' iM w 4 tV 1 II
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
5
7
71 %
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
5
7
4 f„ ,
71%
Bank the doesnot
3 Bank Protection
erosion within structures extent of influence exceed
15 % (See guidance for this table i
1 n EEP monitoring guidance document)
5
74
S at::
`���^ -' `
�� 4'h,. � ' ,�w'�^
71 %
�rr�`,�"`s. � � r'� 54„i� �•Ity7 ” I + _'+; s.s,�3'*� �';�'�
IX ',,,�+'�'y,..�.�I;�.;'.`y�j�r "r
4. Habitat
Pool forming tructures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
9 9 P
7
7II�;41�V
+. -. 11;111NN�
ICI�HI I�I� nIII
'�'I IN 1
100%
Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow
,n al ,ItigV „V f ,j

Table 5B Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 2
Assessea Lengtn
iuuu
Adjusted %
Number
Number with Footage with
for
Mayor
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Catenory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve etation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
Ky
r°
0
0
o
100 /o
(Rrffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
I�
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
d
J+
0
0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture /Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
18
94%
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Suffiuent (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth> 1 6)
1$
18
o
100 /o
L
Condition
2 Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
17
18
94%
upstream nffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4 Thalweg Position
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
18
18
100%
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
18
18
pl
100%
9
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
rl
0
0
0
100 /0
0
0
0
100 /o
scour and erosion
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
?I
5
80
96%
2
10
97%
and are p y5l habitat
N
�I�II
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
6
155
92%
3
40
94%
i, �Ifsx
V���
hIb�u
II "I "�I
�
Totals
11
235
88%
5
50
91%
f ��
a h u
w Ih4 4 tin Ii
-
v it
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
6
81
I
75%
�il�
f -0li
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
6
8
75%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
6
8
75%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
6
8
75 /o
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
�
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
8
8
100%
Depth ratio > 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow

Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 3
Assessed Lenqth 1000
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Mayor
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
22m o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aaaradation -Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
t la l; * „3 I ���',�'rl' '� `r �, 'I "I
0
0
100%
'II I "I �I "' ' '��
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
'w ,? ;���,
m” �O�r
"' q`ti
2 Degradabon - Evidence of downcuttin 9
", »;'��. ° ��
0
0
°
100%
n
=r£rs`µ'` °i3{�
��� !f tie •� YLM a�
'� 3 5.:.:
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture /Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
17
i"`
",a
+l "" ° B' :^
°0
94 /
a ` '4 11 = "; e' 41 }'
"SII�I,
1I Vr'
^'d
"� °u '�*.l �'� l "�,
A�c.,
11,11 +�
?1R hAll VIII IC �III��' i °11�I1i =mss^
"I I k r llll'dll
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth> 1 6)
—
2 Length appropriate ( >30% of centedme distance between tart of
16
161
4
atilt ���r�
fl)
I�
urh ° >N ry
l
III', "' I I III hIPI alu"� IIp1��� 1i'
1'PIi1I�111�I
{n1
100%
N I'p' »�y\ VIUVI
, ' pl'lIIl1Y11f I,I II �PI�p1.i4 ,i �1�._ '1 ^''I °PI '� ,�✓ -lu III , "�, 4�
g7 Q'1j1)Id111�1�d9 °111;11 t1 }1 II11 F ` rl,'III,
+11111'11
�II� PIS rs �,"l1
upstream nffle and head of downstrem nfle)
15
16
�,t
t �u111 a11I,1
94%
tllll
�^` F�
'I,�
4 Thalweg Positron
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
16
16
r�;
. n�'�
t?. P.^a yEY `�
�t, } ,.
100%
f- 1 'ti C'✓=:�1 „'..Y #" t`
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
17
17
^ ^
100%
' f i• -' Py
gt'x>
.�,y
Fn1+41xxidl"N"Eid, §F61if'1% �n'1�'i IIItl11
+., b w! 1. -°
'N"0i,.71y
r
�g
g
+. ,^^ n�P1 '�ti' y� .„.._ ,u +:-
°hut
a°°r>' `,N�y Iti e; "w r• 11 +
d ti liil '5r N tF n114�
X�"^�A4�IY.�fxk"^K7
Ir Q
etl.awn b�'�- al&'� -x{ �"y+C. ��Ii1ry rK.:I i -"ts ��✓+M14�i . "tlT s Bai' :4�* ICU MMu1�C
1.4w
`MXryI
Y�l'.I,I�M1 +�I�l'v�u✓'I
"
:«'.�.+a a wIrE�Y'�s�_' Iu it Ik�h i1'
a' dr
t> .4 h`}' - 111`
2 Bank 1 Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
�1'rn1"u1��11 '_k, 1
I "� °'.�' `, IE�II I�I� „i
3
30
o
99/0
0
0
0
99/0
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
Ir'k+ aY I 11'�� =��"�1
ri�4I�i1
X �' ppi111�11 t
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
and are providing habitat
L 1'111 "�E „r r, °- ".111 �'� r w "I*'ir'�
1 "III � � tlI" ^
��1111111�u'�fg'k
11
5
65
0
97%
1
10
97%
' S ��4L�1i4+y � • T�
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
_ -” >, a =� `
6
85
96%
2
15
97%
a N
s
s oFLOW
14 180
91 /
/oI
92
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
3 6
ry
UN z
7
50%
R )IIr11,'r p ,w;'' 1
q'x "1 +I�II "III" E' TO
^^ Ipf I f
1i1���gz
2 Grade Control
t�1
ffi�T %1�1j1 � "�I'�II�i11''Ia4
h r1 i���oII Iii 111�1�1 `w - fill „I �iil�' "�`
1� '1� q
1 ,.'�'' �1 � i �
0
S0 /o
p o
pk�� =a it l� ll4llll.:'�kXIY�'l��+'�1111 i
µl1 A Iil��ll �IIrIl1l11�Ir'��F 141111
'•g'�."� Ii1�II1�I�ll ll'�I�II YI�� ".11'��I�IIIII i',�If' #3 „; �'ti"g11l IS`'I111�1 �I�
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
3 6
"V
x.
ill III”
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus
3 6
50%
2a Piping
N it I
I k� rellr'I'i�9u ,. si'�r11
�'I "i" N "II'
�4P 4 ri T
9fa,
WIr �
ry�.+C,`F'�
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15% (See guidance for this table m EEP monitoring guidance document)
3 6
%t
°'" r
� _ � � ^�
50%
"[
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
>
ratio 1 6 Rootwads/lo s some cover at base -flow
6 6
� �{� '
p� w
h wI, a i
�41'ud11r "MN " ,
VI
100%
,m �Ir
,Depth providing
9 P 9
IIjmIP�oµ���
°'„ h1Ihl�l9' °I�1 � '
a, 4 I "'un b('
" "
11.11 u111'1V, „14,

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project 243)
Planted Acreage' 17
Ve etation Cateciory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De action
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acrea a
% of Planted
Acrea e
1 Bare Areas
Very small area of limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material near vegetation plot 2
None
NA
0
000
00%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
NA
NA
NA
0
000
00%
Total
0
000
00%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
NA
NA
NA
0
000
00%
Cumulative Total
0
000
00%
Easement AcreaaeZ 17
Ve elation Cate o
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De action
Number of
Po ons
Combined
Acrea a
°% of Easement
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Coneem°
Large patch of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora ) and Chinese privet (I igusinim smense ) north of the stream
near cross - section 3, a large patch of kudzu ( Puerana lohala ) north of the stream near cross - section 2 and
scattered smaller patches of multiflora rose Chinese privet and kudzu
20 SF
Pattern and
Color
17
1 90
112%
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
NA
NA
NA
0
000
00%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory the channel acreage crossings or
any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and well therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment the
associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i a item 1 2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage Invasives of conceni/mterest are listed below The list of high concern spcies are those with
the potential to directly outcompete native, young woody stems in the short -tens (e g monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing more established tree/shrub stands over hmeframes that are slightly
longer (e g 1 -2 decades) The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity but can be mapped if in the
judgement of the observer their coverage density or distribution is suppressing the viability density or growth of planted woody stems Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of nsk factors by EEP such
as species present their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass and the practicality of treatment For example even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control but potentially
large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover
Those species with the "watch list' designator in gray shade are of interest as well but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme nsk/threat level for mapping as
points where isolated specimens are found particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history However, areas of discreet dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be
helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons particulalry for situations where the condilon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense discreet patches In any case the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to
describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary

McIntyre Creek
Stream Fixed - Station Photographs
Taken June 2012
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park
EEP Project Number 243
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
November 2012
Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Stream Fixed- Station Photographs
Taken June 2012
(continued)
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken June 2012
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken June 2012
(continued)
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park
EEP Project Number 243
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
November 2012
Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9A 2012 (Year 3) Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 9B Annual Totals and Planted Stems by Species
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
McIntvre Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 234)
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
70%
2
No*
3
Yes
4
No*
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
No*
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
*Based on planted stems alone, these plots don't meet success criteria, however, when including naturally recruited stems of
appropriate species such as box elder (Acer negundo) and green ash (Framnus pennsylvamca) these plots were well -above 320
stems per acre
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
McIntvre Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 234)
Report Prepared By
Corn Faquin
Date Prepared
7/18/2012 9 56
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2012 -A mdb
database location
C \Axiom \Business \CVS
computer name
CORRI -PC
file size
49704960
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data
Prol, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes
Prof, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems,
and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are
I excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
243
project Name
McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest Park
Description
stream restoration
River Basin
Catawba
length(ft)
5178
stream -to -edge width (ft)
130
area (sq m)
63120
Required Plots (calculated)
NA
Sampled Plots
10
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park
EEP Project Number 243
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc
Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
November 2012
Appendices

Table 9A. 2012 (Year 31 Total Planted and Natural Recruits Stems by Plot and Species
McIntyre Creek
Current Plot Data (MY3 2012)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E243- AXE -0001
E243 -AXE -0002
E243- AXE -0003
E243- AXE -0004
E243 -AXE -0005
E243 -AXE -0006
E243 -AXE -0007
E243- AXE -0008
E243- AXE -0009
E243- AXE -0010
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
10
10
3
3
3
6
13
6
6
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
19
10
11
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
21
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
1
1
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
2
3
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
14
14
161
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
Catalpa bignonioides
southern catalpa
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
31
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Euonymus alatus
Exotic
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
15
3
3
14
7
7
35
72
140
3
3
2
41
11
4
4
10
6
6
31
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Shrub
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
42
8
1
17
13
4
11
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
21
2
11
S
5
6
1
1
1
1
Morella
bayberry
shrub
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
4
11
9
13
17
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
3
1
2
7
Populus heterophylla
swamp cottonwood
Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
31
3
1
11
1
1
11
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
31
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
2
Ulmus
elm
Tree
21
2
2
1
1
1
1
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
3
3
3
Ulmus americans
jAmerican elm
Tree
1
11
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species coun
Stems per ACRE
19
191
98
71
71
36
201
201
71
0
0
107
10
10
16S
27
27
77
7
7
96
10
10
67
8
8
21
14
141
49
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
10
10
14
S
5
7
8
8
11
0
0
7
5
5
9
6
6
11
4
4
11
4
4
10
4
4
5
6
6
9
768.9
768.9
3966
283.3
283.3
1457
809.4
809.4
2873
0
0
4330
404.7
404.7
6677
1093
1093
3116
283.3
283.3
3885
404.7
404.7
2711
323.7
323.7
849.8
566.6
566.6
1983
Color for Density Pnol-S = Planted stems excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P -all= Planted stems including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% T = Planted stems and natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Total includes stems of natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 9B. Annual Total Planted and Natural Recruits Stems by Species
McIntyre Creek
Annual
Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY3 (2012)
MY2 (2011)
MY1 (20 0)
MYO (2010)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
31
3
55
3
3
156
3
3
58
3
3
127
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
40
16
50
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
9
6
6
7
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
6
13
8
1
22
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
33
33
36
35
35
55
13
13
29
14
14
67
Carya
hickory
Tree
11
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
Catalpa bignonioides
southern catalpa
Tree
T 2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
10
10
11
10
10
10
91
9
9
9
9
9
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
5
Euonymus alatus
Exotic
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2SI
25
397
27
27
513
27
27
278
25
25
1513
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
3
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
3
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
102
57
43
82
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
8
8
19
9
9
16
9
9
19
9
91
25
Morella
bayberry
shrub
I
1
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
5
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
571
54
40
76
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
61
1
1
8
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
13
261
35
Populus heterophylla
swamp cottonwood
Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
4
Quercus
oak
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
141
14
14
15
15
151
13
13
13
14
14
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
61
6
6
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
2
1
Ulmus
elm
Tree
3
3
4
5
5
6
4
4
4
5
51
9
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1 2
Ulmus americana
American elm
ITree
11
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1221
122
787
132
1321
978
1061
1061
538
104
1041
2115
10
10
10
10
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
181
18
24
18
18
27
18
18
22
17
1
17
34
493.7
493.7
3185
534.21
534.21
39581
4291
4291
2177
420.91420.91
8559
Color for Density Pnol-S = Planted stems excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10°x6 P -all= Planted stems including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% T = Planted stems and natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Total includes stems of natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Tables l0a -b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 11 a -b Monitoring Data
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

River Basin:
Elevation
Catawba
97.43
,.
Watershed:
4.8
McIntyre Creek
6.0
96.52
7.8
8.4
9653
9.4
XS ID
10.5
XS - 1, Pool
10.7
93.99
Feature
93.20
Pool
92.29
15.1
Date:
165
8/1/2012
16.9
91.03
Field Crew:
90.32
Perkinson, Dean, Jernigan
90.26
20.7
91.37
21.7
91.38
22.4
92.12
23.5
92.90
25.3
94.5
26.0
95.4
26.7
95.8
27.5
96.4
28.7
96.9
30.E
97.3
32.7
97.8
34.9
97.6
Stream Type E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 1, Pool
100
99
98 - --
11
- - -----
---- ----------
-------- ------ - ------ ------- -- - - --
o, 96
i
.402 95
3
- - - - Bankfull
0 94
W
-
- - - - Flood Prone Area
93
-
MY- 006/10/10
92
`.
-MY-01 w]on0
91
---� -- My- o21onon 1
90
--- MY -03 8/1112
0
10
20 30 40
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
97.43
2.8
97.30
4.8
96.66
6.0
96.52
7.8
Station
Elevation
0.0
97.43
2.8
97.30
4.8
96.66
6.0
96.52
7.8
96,76
8.4
9653
9.4
95.55
10.5
94.03
10.7
93.99
12.7
93.20
14.2
92.29
15.1
92.00
165
91.11
16.9
91.03
18.0
90.32
19.1
90.26
20.7
91.37
21.7
91.38
22.4
92.12
23.5
92.90
25.3
94.5
26.0
95.4
26.7
95.8
27.5
96.4
28.7
96.9
30.E
97.3
32.7
97.8
34.9
97.6
SLIMM.4RY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
965
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
70.0
Bankfull Width:
19.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
6.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Bois• •
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 2 Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
8/1/2012
Fleld Crew:
Perkinson, Dean, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.86
2.66
98.80
4.44
98.57
7.06
98.44
8.19
98.08
9.16
98.48
10.25
98.45
11.14
97.93
13.03
97.05
13.74
95.16
16.54
94.79
18.65
95.06
20.70
95.07
22.35
95.09
23.63
95.41
24.2
96.29
25.9
97.60
27.9
98.09
30.0
99.13
33.6
99.61
35.1
99.45
37.0
99.46
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
318
Bankfull Width:
16.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.0
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Nlax Depth at Bankfull:
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
7.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
StreAm E

River Basin:
Elevation
Catawba
107.97
3.34
108.25
Watershed:
108.31
McIntyre Creek
107.82
-
XS ID
104.72
XS - 3, Riffle
104.50
-:
rj. --
Feature
13.08
Riffle
15.06
104.86
A. t.
Date:
16.92
8/1/2012
17.94
}
20.10
Field Crew:
23.3
Perkinson, Dean, Jernigan
��•.
x
R. *.
mot,
Stream Type
C
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 3, Riffle
111
110
109
108
107
e
106
105
104
103
102
�- MY- 02 1
0
10
20
- -° MY -03 8/1/12 30
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
107.97
3.34
108.25
5.42
108.31
6.77
107.82
8.20
Station
Elevation
0.00
107.97
3.34
108.25
5.42
108.31
6.77
107.82
8.20
105.02
9.01
104.72
10.37
104.50
11.21
104.71
13.08
104.77
15.06
104.86
15.38
105.63
16.92
105.71
17.94
107.21
20.10
107 -76
23.3
107.43
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
107.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
22.4
Bankfull Width:
10.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
109.9
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
5.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
- -- Bankfull
Flood Prone Arm
MY-00 6/10120 10
�- MY -o1 12/10111

River Basin:
Elevation
Catawba
110.5
1.6
110.9
3.0
Watershed:
3.8
McIntyre Creek
4.9
7.2
105.4
XS H)
104.6
XS - 4, Pool
105.0
12.0
t
15.1
Feature
16.3
Pool
17.2
109.4
18.4
109.8
Date:
110.1
8/1/2012
110.2
24.6
1103
26.3
Field Crew:
Verkinson, Dean, Jernigan
�w
�-
`t
Y
�.
..
Stream Type
C/E
Catawba River Basin,
McIntyre Creek, XS - 4, Pool
112
111
110
109
108
c 107
106
w 105
104
103
102
0
10
20
30
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0?
110.5
1.6
110.9
3.0
110.8
3.8
110.4
4.9
Station
Elevation
0?
110.5
1.6
110.9
3.0
110.8
3.8
110.4
4.9
106.3
7.2
105.4
9.4
104.6
10.3
105.0
12.0
104.6
15.1
105.8
16.3
108.8
17.2
109.4
18.4
109.8
20.1
110.1
22.3
110.2
24.6
1103
26.3
110.3
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
109.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
46.2
Bankfull Width:
l3. I
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.5
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
- - - - Bankfull
_Flood Prone Area
tvly -oo 6/12/10
mtv- ollvlalo
rrty -oz 10/10/11
MY -03 8/1112
-- -

Name McIntyre Creek - Year 3
Reach 1 (110+00 - 11 +50)
Profile
8/1/12
2010
As -built Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatic
0.0
90.0
90.4
28.8
90.1
90.4
76.2
91.1
91.4
91.6
88.9
91.3
115.6
89.1
91.5
123.7
91.2
91.6
153.3
92.3
92.5
168.2
91.5
92.6
187.5
91.1
92.6
195.2
92.3
92.7
207.4
92.5
92.9
224.3
93.0
93.3
232.6
91.1
93.3
240.7
89.9
93.4
251.7
91.6
93.3
_54.7
93.5
93.7
_'60.4
92.3
93.4
'83.4
92.2
93.6
297.3
91.2
93.4
308.1
91.5
93.5
314.1
90.3
93.6
3268
89.3
93.6
341.2
92.5
93.7
347.8
92.5
93.7
357.9
91.9
93.8
369.2
91.7
93.7
376.7
92.9
93.7
99
97
m 95
m
v 93
v
c
0
m
v 91
w
89
87
2010
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
tation
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatio
-13.1
88.0
90.6
3.4
89.5
90.6
41.8
90.1
90,6
876
91.0
91.4
103.3
89.0
91.4
129.2
89.4
91.4
135.8
91.1
91,6
1659
92.3
92.5
184.9
91.2
92.5
199.3
91.1
92.5
211.6
92.6
92.8
2366
93.0
912
245.6
91.1
93.2
253.0
90.2
911
260.6
91.2
93.2
266.9
93.5
916
291 A
92.6
93.6
308.8
91.2
916
328.6
90.5
93.6
340.0
92.6
93.6
350.9
92.5
93.6
368.3
910
916
381.8
91.7
93.6
391.3
93.0
93.6
405.4
92.8
93.6
419.6
91.7
93.6
431.8
91.8
93.5
McIntyre Creek Year 3 (2012) Profile - Reach 00+00 to 11 +50
2011
2010
2011
2012
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0035
0.0042
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
0.0043
Riffle Length
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
26
27
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
0 0CY23
-23.8
88.0
90.4
-19.1
88.6
90.8
Avg. Pool Sloe
-17.1
88.0
90.4
-11.7
88.9
90.7
5.8
89.8
90.4
6.2
90.3
90.8
41.5
90.2
90.6
44.1
90.2
90.7
82.6
91.0
91.4
90.8
90.8
91.5
96.7
89.0
91.4
101.0
88.9
91.4
109.1
88.5
115.1
88.3
91.4
121.6
88.7
124.0
88.3
91.4
121.7
88.7
91.5
134.6
91.3
91.9
131.5
91.3
91.9
162.5
92.4
92.5
159.1
92.4
92.5
183.6
91.0
92.5
163.6
91.5
92.6
200.6
91.2
92.5
178.1
91_2
92.6
209.9
92.6
92.8
192.7
90.8
92.6
234.5
93.0
93.2
205.0
92.6
246.9
90.2
93.2
230.6
93.0
93.2
258.2
90.2
915
240.6
90.7
93.2
264.8
93.5
935
255.5
90.8
93.2
296.4
92.2
93.5
260.4
93.5
93.5
301.9
90.7
93.3
'_65.0
92.1
93.6
325.2
90.2
915
1_71.5
92.1
93.7
337.2
92.5
93.4
280.4
92.9
93.7
360.9
92.4
93.4
292.1
92.1
93.7
375.2
90.7
93.4
300.6
91.2
385.8
92.5
93.4
320.9
90.3
93.7
415.4
92.0
93.4
334.3
92.5
93.7
440.7
91.8
93.4
3528
92.4
93.7
4531
903
93.4
McIntyre Creek Year 3 (2012) Profile - Reach 00+00 to 11 +50
85
0
901.7 913 94.8
200
-4--As-built (2010) Bed
1064.1 95.5
400
- f-Year 1 (2010) Bed
863.0 93.3
600
Distance (feet)
Year 2 (2011) Bed
94.7 1125.8 95.5 95.6
-Year 3 (2012) Bed
800
--- -Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
1000
As -built
2010
2011
2012
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0035
0.0042
0.0041
0.0043
Riffle Length
32
26
27
34
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0042
0,0047
0 0CY23
0.0034
Pool Length
16
19
20
18
Avg. Pool Sloe
76
76
00023
0.0033
85
0
901.7 913 94.8
200
-4--As-built (2010) Bed
1064.1 95.5
400
- f-Year 1 (2010) Bed
863.0 93.3
600
Distance (feet)
Year 2 (2011) Bed
94.7 1125.8 95.5 95.6
-Year 3 (2012) Bed
800
--- -Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
1000

Project Name McIntyre Creek -Year 3 (2012) Profile
Reach Reach 2 (16+50 - 27 +50)
Feature Profile
Date 8/1/12
2010
As -built Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatii
1639.0
97.7
97.8
1660.7
98.0
98.2
1667.1
96.5
98.2
1680.9
95.5
98.0
16812
95.5
98.2
1691.8
95.9
983
1703.4
96.2
98.3
1709.4
95.8
98.3
1722.7
96.7
982
1735.8
95.1
98.2
1754.1
94.4
98.3
1762.1
96.8
98.3
1764.9
982
98.3
1766.3
969
98.3
1789.2
96.9
98.3
1805.7
96.9
98.3
1815.7
96.3
98.3
1822.0
96.7
98.3
1829.8
97.7
98.3
1856.8
97.4
983
1870.4
96.0
98.3
1876.9
96.4
98.3
1888.1
96.9
98.3
1898.7
98.3
98.4
1917.7
98.2
98.4
1940.5
97.8
98.4
1950.2
97.1
98.5
104
102
100
v
v
c 98
.2
t9
Q!
W
96
94
Station
2010
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
2011
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
2012
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
0.0035
1660.7
98.0
98.2
1660.7
98.0
98.1
1657.2
98.0
98.1
0.0042
16716
95.9
98.2
1673.5
95.4
98.2
1666.5
95.7
98.1
76
1681.9
95.4
98.2
1689.6
95.3
98.2
1683.0
95.2
98.1
1690.5
95.8
98.2
1700.4
96.7
98.2
1690.0
95.5
98.1
1700.6
96.8
98.2
1708.9
95.1
16960
96.3
98.1
1708.4
95.3
98.2
1737.9
95.0
1703.1
95.4
98.1
17120
95.8
98.1
1745.7
94.0
98.1
1714.1
95.4
98.1
1720.9
96.5
98.2
1760.1
95.6
98.1
1721.9
96.2
98.1
1734.4
95.2
98.2
1765.4
98.2
98.2
1732.2
95.1
98.1
17412
94.6
98.2
17876
97.0
1743.5
93.9
98.1
1763.9
98.2
98.3
1791, 8
96.9
1749.7
94.2
98.2
1773.9
96.9
98.2
1816.4
96.1
98.2
17615
98.0
98.1
1803.7
96.8
98.2
1825.5
96.9
98.2
1770.5
96.4
98.1
1814.3
96.5
98.2
1837.9
97.7
98.2
1790.5
96.7
98.1
1821.3
96.5
98.2
1856,1
97.3
98.2
1812.3
96.2
98.2
18305
97.8
98.3
1870,2
95.4
98.2
1824.4
973
98.1
1838.1
980
98.2
1890.0
96.1
98.2
1855.3
96.8
98.1
1855.6
974
98.2
1899.6
97.5
98.2
1863.9
96.4
98.1
1870.8
96.1
98.3
1919.2
97.6
98.2
1868.7
95.2
98.0
1876.9
965
98.3
1937.6
97.6
98.2
1876.0
96.2
98.2
1893.7
975
98.3
1951.4
96.9
98.3
1886.3
96.2
98.2
1912.5
98.1
98.3
1964.5
96.7
98.3
1890.5
97.3
98.2
1935.1
97.7
98.4
1972.2
96.8
98.2
1895.3
98.1
98.2
1953.4
96.9
98.4
1975.9
98.6
1917.0
97.5
98.2
1957.4
96.8
98.4
1990.9
97.7
98.8
1937.0
97.4
98.2
197110
96.9
98.4
1997.7
95.4
1942.9
97.2
98.2
1974.6
98.7
98.9
20065
96.4
1960.4
967
98.2
McIntyre Creek Year 3 (2012) Profile - Reach 16 +50 to 27 +50
92 _ _
1650 1850
-+-As -built (2010) Bed
2384.4 98.8 99.6 2464.0 99.1 100.0
2050
-Year 1(2010) Bed
2402.595262 99.103352
2250
Distance (feet)
Year 2 (2011) Bed
99.550821 22992 98.7
99.4
2450
-Year 3 (2012) Bed - --Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
2650
As -built
2010
2011
2012
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0035
0.0022
0.0020
0.0026
Riffle length
32
30
25
28
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0042
0.0010
0.0010
0.0012
Pool Length
16
15
10
15
Avg. Pool Slope
76
76
00000
0.0011
92 _ _
1650 1850
-+-As -built (2010) Bed
2384.4 98.8 99.6 2464.0 99.1 100.0
2050
-Year 1(2010) Bed
2402.595262 99.103352
2250
Distance (feet)
Year 2 (2011) Bed
99.550821 22992 98.7
99.4
2450
-Year 3 (2012) Bed - --Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
2650

Project Name
McIntyre Creek - Year 3 (2012)
Reach
Reach 3 (36 +00 - 47 +55)
Feature
Profile
Date
8/1/12
Crew
PerkirLson, Dean, Jemipan
2010
As -built Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatior
3595.8
103.8
103.8
3612.0
103.7
104.0
3620.2
102.5
1019
3629.0
102.4
103.9
3633.6
102.8
103.9
3650.1
102.7
103.9
3662.4
102.5
104.0
3674.4
102.4
104.0
3681.7
102.8
104.0
3695.1
103.2
104.0
3717.0
103.1
104.0
3730.2
103.0
103.9
3747.3
102.4
103.9
3751.6
102.1
104.0
3767.3
103.2
103.9
3788.1
103.4
103.9
3819.3
102.9
104.0
3830.3
102.8
104.0
3837.4
103.5
103.9
3844.1
102.6
104.0
3855.3
102.9
1019
3857.4
104.1
104.2
3882.6
103.4
104.2
3893.1
103.4
104.2
3911.6
102.8
104.1
3921.5
104.4
104.4
3944.6
?nce.c
103.5
_ -.--- -1-A-- . - -_.
104.4
- -- - ..._Jna_c
109
108
107
Z 106
105
104
c
0
103
LN
102
101
100
2010
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatior
3600.4
102.8
103.8
3611.1
103.4
104.1
3615.7
102.3
104.1
3626.9
102.0
104.1
3632.0
102.3
104.1
3639.3
102.3
104.1
3654.0
102.4
104.1
3662.0
102.6
104.1
3666.8
101.9
104.1
3674.6
102.0
104.1
3681.6
102.6
104.2
3692.8
102.9
104.2
3716.4
102.6
1042
3743.5
102.8
104.2
3749.0
102.0
104.2
3757.9
102.0
104.2
37616
102.2
1042
3770.2
102.0
104.2
3772.2
103.0
104.2
3795.8
103.0
104.2
3823.8
102.5
104.1
3836.0
102.6
104.2
3841.7
102.3
104.2
3853.8
102.4
104.2
3855.4
104.0
104.2
3871.7
103.3
104.4
3890.9
102.6
1043
McIntyre Creek Year 3 (2012) Profile - Reach 36 +00 to 47 +55
2011
2010
2011
2012
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0035
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
0.0025
0.0029
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
32
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
3594.1
103.8
0.0003
3588.8
103.5
103.4
3611.8
103.5
103.9
3604.6
103.2
103.6
3616.8
102.1
3608.6
102.9
103.6
3625.8
102.0
3614.2
101.7
103.6
3638.2
102.3
103.9
3622.9
101.8
103.5
3651.1
102.4
103.9
3631.1
102.0
103.6
3657.4
102.7
103.9
3638.1
102.2
103.6
3663.9
102.0
103.9
3645.6
102.3
103.6
3672.5
101.8
103.9
3650.3
102.6
3684.6
102.8
1019
3654.7
102.3
1035
3701.3
102.8
103.9
3662.8
101.5
103.6
37310
1018
103.9
3676.6
102.2
103.6
3745.5
102.2
103.9
36894
102.6
103.6
3756.5
102.0
3700.7
102.4
1016
3762.5
102.6
103.9
3709.4
102.4
103.6
3794.4
103.2
3719.2
102.3
103.7
3796.5
103.2
103.9
3735.4
102.4
103.6
3807.6
103.1
103.9
3746.3
101.3
103.6
3825.6
102.5
103.9
3752.9
101.3
103.5
3835.2
102.6
103.8
3761.7
1023
103.7
3851.0
102.3
103.8
3770.6
102.9
103.6
3855.4
103.9
3776.9
1017
1016
3877.3
103.0
104.0
3785.3
103.1
103.6
3884.3
103.0
103.9
3794.4
102.9
103.6
3892.8
102.6
3804.7
102.8
103.6
3903.4
102.5
1019
3812.9
102.6
103.6
3919.5
102.6
1040
3823.7
102.4
103.7
McIntyre Creek Year 3 (2012) Profile - Reach 36 +00 to 47 +55
99
3600 3800 4000 4200 4400
Distance (feet)
-o-As -built (2008) Bed - f&- Year 1(2010) Bed Year 2 (2011) Bed --Year 3 (2012) Bed
- - -- - -- - - - - -- - -,-- -- - - -iv�.�
1C7JU N ?.4 -- - iW�4.! - -' rOi -=i IVJ._ 4 f9U.7 - -- -
.1Ti
Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
4800
As -built
2010
2011
2012
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0035
0.0020
0.0025
0.0029
Riffle Length
32
35
28
29
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0042
0.0027
0.0003
0.0022
Pool Length
16
12
16
16
Pool to Pool Spacing
76
76
0.0005
0.0018
99
3600 3800 4000 4200 4400
Distance (feet)
-o-As -built (2008) Bed - f&- Year 1(2010) Bed Year 2 (2011) Bed --Year 3 (2012) Bed
- - -- - -- - - - - -- - -,-- -- - - -iv�.�
1C7JU N ?.4 -- - iW�4.! - -' rOi -=i IVJ._ 4 f9U.7 - -- -
.1Ti
Year 3 (2012) Water Surface
4800

Wei hted Pebble Count
Percent Riffle
Percent Pool
Percent Run
Percent Glide
Pebble Count,
100
Material
Size Range (mm)
Total #
#
#
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
# #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
#
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
#
#
#
#
—
silt/clay
0 0 062
520
very fine san
fine sand
medium sanc
coarse sand
very coarse sanc
0 062 013
00
—
013 025
80
Note
Cross Section 1 - Pool
025 05
40
Pebble Count, —
05 1
00
1 2
00
100%
90%
very fine grave
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse graVE
very coarse rav
2 4
40
4 6
40
(
I
I I
I
1
6 8
120
80%
70%
I
l
8 11
80
11 16
00
60%
m 50%
i
16 22
40
'
'
22 32
00
32 45
00
F
f
I
;
45 64
00
40%
LL 30%
�
I
small cobbl
medium cobbh
large cobbl
very large cobbl
64 90
40
90 128
00
c
I
I
I
I
128 180
0 0
U 20%
a 10%
180 256
0 0
small boulde
small boulde
medium boulde
large boulde
very large boulde
256 362
00
I l
0%
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) tCumulativePercent • Percentltem —Riffle —Pool —*—Run —• —Glide
362 512
00
512 1024
00
1024 2048
00
2048 4096
0 0
bedroc
0 0
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
IF True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble boulder
bedrock
25
#N /A
#N /A
#N /A
8
20
52%
12%
32%
4% 0%
09/6

Wei hted Pebble Count
Percent Riffle
Percent Pool
100
Percent Run
Percent Glide
Pebble Count,
Material
Size Range (mm)
Total #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
#
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
l##
# #
#
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
#
—
silt/clay
0 0 062
11 8
-
very fine sanc
fine sanc
medium san
coarse san
very coarse sani
0 062 013
00
-
013 025
88
Note
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
025 05
59
Pebble Count, —
100%
90%
05 1
29
1 2
88
very fine grav
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse gravE
very coarse rav
2 4
00
4 6
00
6 8
0 0
80%
70%
8 11
11 8
11 16
11 8
°
16 22
00
60%
a 50%
(
1
-
22 32
59
32 45
29
L
H
45 64
29
°
40%
LL 30%
small cobbl
medium cobbl
large cobbl
very large cobbl
64 90
00
90 128
00
c
I
I
I
128 180
0 0
2 20%
10%
I I
Hi_
180 256
00
small boulde
small boulde
medium boulde
large boulde
very large boulde
256 362
00
4
362 512
00
0%
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) --a— Cumulative Percent • Percent Item —Riffle —Pool —Run —Glide
512 1024
00
1024 2048
00
2048 4096
00
bedroc
265
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
F_
True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/ ay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
34
0 125
046
1 8
16
41
12%
26%
35%
0%
0%
26%

ei hted Pebble Count
Percent Riffle
Percent Pool
700
Percent Run
Percent Glide
Pebble Count,
Material
Size Range (mm)
Total #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
# #
#
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
# #
##
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
—
silt/day
0 0 062
385
-
very fine sari
fine sand
medium sanc
coarse sand
very coarse sari
0 062 013
77
-
013 025
11 5
Note
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
025 05
00
Pebble Count, —
05 1
77
1 2
00
100
90%
I
H
�
very fine grave
fine grave
fine rave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse gravE
very coarse gravE
2 4
154
4 6
00
I
I
I I
6 8
38
80%
70%
I
�=
8 11
77
11 16
38
16 22
00
60%
m 50%
22 32
00
32 45
38
t
~
[
1
45 64
00
� 40%
LL 30%
[
I
small cobblE
medium cobbl
large cobbl
very large cobbli
64 90
00
90 128
00
Z °
128 180
0 0
4) 20 /°
a 10%
I
III'
[
180 256
00
small boulde
small boulde
medium boulde
large boulde
very large boulde
256 362
00
' 6
0 /0
0 01 0 1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) f- Cumulative Percent • Percent item —Riffle —Pool —Run —Glide
362 512
00
512 1024
00
1024 2048
00
2048 4096
00
bed roc
00
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Countl
100
D16 I
D35 I
D50 I
D84
D95
silt/clay
1
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
26
#N /A I
#N /A 1
02 1
8
14
38% 1
27%
1 35%
0%
0%
0%

Wei hted Pebble Count
Percent Riffle
Percent Pool
Percent Run
Percent Glide
Pebble Count,
100
Matenal
Size Range (mm)
Total #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
# #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
#
#
Note
—
silt/clay
0 0 062
538
-
very fine sanc
fine sand
medium sanc
coarse sand
very coarse san
0 062 013
00
-
013 025
154
Cross Section 4 - Pool
025 05
00
Pebble Count, —
05 1
00
1 2
77
100%
90%
111
V
very fine grav
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse rave
9
very coarse grav
very coarse gravE
2 4
23 1
4 6
00
6 8
00
0
80%
70% o
�
lj
m'
i
�I
8 11
00
11 16
0 0
,
I
16 22
0 0
60 /
c 50%
-
f
^'r
m
vp
22 32
0 0
32 45
00
r
45 64
00
40%
c a
S 30 /o
small cobbl
medium cobbl
lar a cobbl
9
very large cobbl
64 90
00
90 128
00
c
N
128 180
0 0
o
U 20 /o
10/� o
I,
180 256
0 0
small boulde
small bouldei
medium boulde
large boulde
very large boulde
256 362
0 0
362 512
00
0%
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) tCumulative Percent • Percent ftem —n- -Riffle — d—Pool —Run —Glide
512 1024
0 0
1024 2048
00
2048 4096
00
bedroclo
00
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silYclay
1
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
26
#N /A
#N /A
#N /A
2
3
54%
23%
23%
0%
0%
0%

Wei hted Pebble Count
Percent Riffle
Percent Pool
s0
Percent Run
Percent Glide
■1111111® ®
Pebble Count,
50
Material
Size Range (mm)
Total #
#
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
#
1##
1##
#
# #
# #
# #
# #
# #
#
# #
# #
# #
#
#
Note
—
-
silt/clay
0 0 062
381
very fine san
fine sanc
medium san
coarse sand
very coarse sanc
0 062 013
1 7
013 025
10 9
025 05
26
Pebble Count, —
05 1
25
1 2
45
100%
900
,
�/ I
IiiPiir��111111�1i111111101111111111
� ®Illllii 1
11111 .
very fine grave
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse gravE
very coarse rav
2 4
102
4 6
1 0
®11111 ®
®e11111i1
6 8
38
800
70%
��■ �
��0�����iI�11111ii��111iA1 ®
8 11
70
11 16
42
®11[llll�
® ®
®11l�. ■
®■111 I
I�IINIII,
16 22
1 0
60%
m 50%
-
■��IL.�i1111N1®■1111111 ®
�i '
22 32
1 7
32 45
1 7
■�Illlln �
�111111�1111111
45 64
08
40%
LZ 30%
small cobbli
medium cobbli
large cobbli
very large cobbl
64 90
1 0
90 128
00
c
128 180
05--
0
1 20%
a 100%
180 256
00
small boulde
small boulde
medium boulde
large boulde
very large boulde
256 362
00
362 512
00
0% �' '
0 01 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) tCumulative Percent . Percent ttem —Riffle —Pool —Run —• —Glide
512 1024
00
1024 2048
00
2048 4096
00
bedro
75
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count
Total Particle Count
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
111
#N /A
#N /A
0 2
9
25
38%
22%
31 %
1 %
0%
8%
� AIII 1111 ®�11111�1111111lI�1111�1 IIUII
�18�01111111 ®■IIIINI 11111�1111111�© 118
I®l�111111 ® ®1llAll® 111 IIAI ®111111
�11�111l�111 !��1111�1�l�!!!�I��I !All �® 111
IllAll® ■
■1111111® ®
®1111!!; �
�"rn�In��1i111 I
Illllil
■� I
I��1111111® �
�/ I
IiiPiir��111111�1i111111101111111111
� ®Illllii 1
11111 .
.I�NIi ►
►�®Illllli■ ®
®11111 ®
®e11111i1
��■ �
��0�����iI�11111ii��111iA1 ®
® ■
■ ®
®11[llll�
® ®
®11l�. ■
®■111 I
I�IINIII,
■��IL.�i1111N1®■1111111 ®
�i '
'1111 ®
®�IIIIAI ■
■�Illlln �
�111111�1111111

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Protect Number 243)
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design -7
Monitoring Baseline
Dimerision and Substrate - Riffle "Onl ° ,n °
LL
UL
Eq
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
SC % /SA % /G % /C %B %BE%
170
238
131
187
229
167
176
Flood rove Width (ft)
�` '
a` A� +t'� `
�° ��
/
100
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
300
0 2 -0 3
78
100
300
05
150
150
BF Mean Depth (ft)
r
25
27
16
Entrainment Class <1 5/1 5 -1 99/2 0 -4 9/5 0-
23
28
15
20
BF Max Depth (ft)
°�,,, ;,
,' "; , ✓'
3 1
3 7
2 8
3 3
4 0
2 9
Incision Class <1 2/1 2 -1 49/1 5 -1 99/h2 0
3 2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
300
421
586
21 3
420
700
264
329
Width/Depth Ratio`
�'
" u "� �a
o�� a
69
97
81
81
81
85
11 7
Entrenchment Ratio
45
175
5 9
50
160
85
90
Bank Height Ratio,
""
1 3
1 9
10
1 0
10
10
10
Profile' ��
Rife length ft
- - --
- - --
- - --
101
32 1
32 8
91 7
Riffle slo e ft/ft
''
, °s �'
"' "��m
"`� "' x `
0 003
0 006
00050
00110
00025
00065
0 0000
0 0012
0 0042
0 0313
Pool length ft
�,
- - --
- --
70
180
120
370
43
173
156
596
Pool Max depth (ft)
41
41
3 2
29
34
50
5 3
Pools acing (ft)
'''° '
,;
>, ` ,� ;
° , '
- - --
- - --
110
450
460
1150
480
770
760
1690
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft h 34
58
38 95 115 19 45 41 107
Radius of Curvature ft "' 603
1481 103
256 37 70 24 49 40 246
Re Bank-full width ft/ft) ^" " 2 6
63 08
2 2 4 14 28 2 3 143
Meander Wavelength ft) 4 1
73 60
71 90 230 88 132 128 220
Meander Width ratio 1 4
25 46
54 5 10 1 1 26 24 62
Trans ort ° arameters' �s' ° - e s
- -
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
r
u
Additional Reach Parameters A '
Ros en Classification
E5-type
E5-type
E5-type
E-type
Bankfull Velocity s
40-45
4 2- 4 4
- - - - --
Bankfull Discharge cfs
180-280
Valley Length ft
- - - --
240
Channel Thalweg Length ft
- - - --
300
5178
5178
Sinuosity
1 1-1 22
1 25
1 4
14
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0 0021 - 0 0027
00044
0 0021 -0 0025
00035
BF slope ft/ft
- - - --
- - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
Bankfull Flood lam Area acres
- - - --
- - - --
- -- --
------
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
- - - --
- - - --
Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc
34 - 39 BEIR
- - - --
- 4
Biological or Other
- - - --
- - - --
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Project Number 243)
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Desi2n Momtorin2 Baseline
Ri %/RU %P %G % /S%
45
14
25
15
NA
SC % /SA % /G % /C %B %BE%
_ `
/
`
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
0 2 -0 3
4 0 -12 0
05
3 0 -5 0
r
Entrainment Class <1 5/1 5 -1 99/2 0 -4 9/5 0-
Incision Class <1 2/1 2 -1 49/1 5 -1 99/h2 0
300
5178

Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
MC!!!! a Creek at Unr tc N—t Park tF.FP Prmeet Number 2431
Table llb Monfitonng Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Mefntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Proiect Number 243)
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY4 MY -5
Cross Section 1
Cross Section 2
Cross Section 3
Cross Section 4
Parameter
Pool
Rifle
Riffle
Pool
K
Max
SD
K
Mean
Med
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width
200
196
194
194
161
167
170
159
161
176
170
111
109
Flood prone Width ft
150
155
155
137
131
150
Floodprone Width (ft) (ap
jft
NA
NA
NA
NA
150
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
BF Mean Depth ft
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 5
BF Mean De t
28
30
32
36
21
20
20
21
21
15
21
21
31
30
33
35
32
BF Max De t50
1
53
61
63
26 1
32
30
32
31
31
29
26
27
53
52
41
48
264
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
55 4
58 5
613
700
33 8
238
329
33 8
33 5
33 8
224
264
N28
23 8
22 4
48 1
47 0
45 2
46 2
Width/De th Ratio
8 5
Wldth/D th Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
114
8 5
8 6
7 5
7 7
75
53
11 7
5 2
5 3
NA
NA
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
88
9 0
8 8
9 4
9 3
13 5
8 5
93
13 5
13 8
13 8
NA
NA
NA
NA
Bank Hei it Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
d50 mm
31
04
03
NA
Riffle length ft
156
117
04
18
109
259
136
1 87
44
02
27
21 1
768
63
O1
02
NA
993
257
Table llb Monfitonng Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Mefntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (EEP Proiect Number 243)
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY4 MY -5
f
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Onl' d
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width ft
167
176
170
17
111
159
109
161
Flood prone Width ft
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
BF Mean Depth ft
15
20
1 5
20
21
21
21
21
BF Max Depth ft
29
32
28
1
30
26 1
32
27
1
31
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
264
329
1
252 1
33 8
238
33 5
224
33 8
Width/De th Ratio
8 5
117
86
114
52
75
53
77
Entrenchment Ratio
85
90
88
88
94
13 5
93
13 8
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Profile - Reachll, D
Riffle length ft
10 1
32 1
328
917
109
259
245
50 5
74
27
21 1
768
15
412
33 8
993
257
Riffle slope ft/ft
00000
00012
00042
00313
00000
00047
00008
00296
00000
00023
00007
00126
00000
00034
00001
00221
001
Pool length ft
43
173
156
596
64
196
193
358
104
207
203
359
43
179
185
290
67
Pool Max depth ft
50
53
52
53
41
61
48
63
Poolspacing (ft)
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
Profile -F Reach 2
°4
Riffle length ft
10 1
32 1
328
917
119
30 1
30 1
582
47
247
22
612
59
28
194
1025
252
Riffle slope ft/ft
00000
00012
00042
00313
00000
00100
00001
00061
00000
00014
00010
00046
00000
00012
00005
00050
000
Pool length ft
43
173
156
596
40
147
95
433
25
107
99
222
42
146
131
321
87
Pool Max depth ft
5 0
53
52
5 3
41
6 1
41
6 1
Poolspacing (ft)
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
Profile -Reach 3 LL "
Riffle length ft
10 1
321
328
917
97
346
347
637
75
28
27
611
5 5
273
286
484
117
Riffle slope ft/ft
00000
00012
00042
00313
00010
00027
00011
00150
00000
00007
00003
00041
00000
00022
00008
00089
000
Pool length ft
43
173
156
596
45
122
121
212
13
155
115
422
51
159
156
337
80
Pool Max depth ft
5 0
5 3
52
5 3
4 1
6 1
41
6 1
Pool spacing (ft)
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
480
770
760
1690
Pattern t�k ti, r 1 "F.° r� r,a y < e ° +z °, �' _ q. N.f°
Channel Beltwidth ft 19 45 41 107
;� " °�, , ,g "> r, M- a ,�" "
"�°
Radius of Curvature ft 24 49 40 246 ,'4 s<,"
ii`� "v� �M J'il , a ,za
Re Bankfull width ft/ft 14 28 23 143
°'��`
e„ n , > i, a a `'n'�i, ^� • „„ +; ° '_
x
` t
�" r
m ,
Meander Wavelen ft 88 132 128 220 � f
�;i -
^ '`'sa " �" ;, � e% o-,
I
a R° � ,,
VT 9`.t, § YY 1 11
M°.
Meander Width ratio 1 1 26 24 62
Additional Reach Parameters az �r
a ° �� '
r-''`
Ros en Classification
E-typc
E- type
E- type
E- type
Channel Thalweg Len ft
5178
5178
5178
5178
Sinuosity
14
14
14
14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
00035
0 0020 - 0 0042
0 0002 - 0 0041
0 0026 - 0 0043
BF slope ft/ft
- --- --
—
- - - - --
--- ---
Rio /dRU° /aP %G %/S%
45
14
25
15
41
17
22
20
38
21
24
17
45
13
26
16
SC° /a/SA %/G° /a /C %/B %BE%
-
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
a` ,
�;
NA
018
0 3
7
15
NA
NA
02
9
25
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
2012 (Year 3) Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Figure 3 Annual Climatic Data vs 30 -year Historic Data
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
McInvtre Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 243)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available
Total of 2.14 inches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days
September 23, 2010
July 12, 2010
(July 11 -12, 2010), in addition to large wrack/debris piles
1-2
and evidence of overbank flows within the adjacent
flood lain.
Total of 1.1 inches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days
(August 18 -19 2010) after a total of 4.43 inches* of rain the
3
September 23, 2010
August 19, 2010
preceding 4 weeks, in addition to laid back vegetation and
evidence of recent standing water within the flood lain.
October 18, 2010
September 29, 2010
Total of 4.04 inches* of rain reported to fall over 6 days
(September 25 -30, 2010).
Total of 2.50 inches* of rain reported to fall on August 5,
4
October 21, 2011
August 5, 2011
2011.
Total of 2.77 inches* of rain reported to fall on May 8 -9,
August 6, 2012
May 8, 2012
2012.
Total of 2.71 inches* of rain reported to fall on May 13 -16,
August 6, 2012
May 16, 2012
2012.
* Reported at KCLT Weather Station at the Charlotte Airport (Weatherunderground 2012).
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

3/1/2012
3/11/2012
3/21/2012
3/31/2012
4/10/2012
4/20/2012
4/30/2012
5/10/2012
5/20/2012
5/30/2012
6/9/2012
6/19/2012
6/29/2012
7/9/2012
7/19/2012
7/29/2012
8/8/2012
8/18/2012
8/28/2012
9/7/2012
9/17/2012
9/27/2012
10/7/2012
10/17/2012
10/27/2012
11/6/2012
Water Level (inches)
1 1 j
W W W WNNNNN���. --. i . i - - - N
O A N O m O A N O w O A N O w M A N O N A m m o N A m m O
4
i
r
o
o
G�
0
cc
Cn
Ix-
�� co
� m
U!
O O -• N N W
Precipitation (inches)
9
n
w(D
N 0
oCD
N 7C
v�
cQ
CD

3/1/2012
3/11/2012
3/21/2012
3/31/2012
4/10/2012
4/20/2012
4/30/2012
5/10/2012
5/20/2012
5/30/2012
6/9/2012
6/19/2012
6/29/2012
7/9/2012
N
7/19/2012
7/29/2012
8/8/2012
8/18/2012
8/28/2012
9/7/2012
9/17/2012
9/27/2012
1017/2012
10/17/2012
10/27/2012
11/6/2012
Water Level (inches)
?WWWWWNNNNN-.���� I i I I - - - N
OODmANOO m -N"CD w m4NOODO�NON ?WO C)"-Nm m C)
.mss
�3
d �
O =
Gi N
0
ca
Cn
m
N
O
7
m
= O
CL
O 3
�Cr
m
O
U)
CD
d
N
O
0
O O N N W
U1 CJ7 Ut
Precipitation (inches)
3
EL
w�
N 0
CD
N X
v0
A) w
c
cD
N

3/1/2012
3/11/2O12
3/21/2O12
3/31CZO12
4/102O12
4/2U/2U12
4/302U12
5/1O/2812
5/2O/2O12
5/3U/2O12
8/0/2O12
6/102U12
O/2O/2U12
7/9/2012
�
7/19/2U12
7/2O/2O12
8/8/2012
8/18/2U12
8/28/2O12
9/7/2O13
0/17/2O12
9/27/2O12
1O/7/2O12
1O/17/2O12
102T/2O12
11/8/2O12
Water Level (inohes)
L L L L L -^— — — —w
omm�woMm+poM M�wo����ow4mMow�Mmo
Co ic
CD
Cn
CD C3 w w*
m � w
Precipitation (inches)
�
CD
� nr
to
CA)

Month
30th a /o*
70th %*
2010 **
2011 **
2012 **
Jan
2.79
4.76
4.88
1.36
2.29
Feb
2.27
4.28
3.79
3.44
1.30
Mar
2.84
5.28
4.37
4.52
3.89
Apr
1.85
3.57
1.44
3.32
1.67
May
2.34
4.41
3.37
4.73
5.92
June
2.02
4.16
2.89
3.10
1.02
July
2.38
4.58
2.48
3.53
3.98
Aug
2.29
4.51
4.75
5.18
3.11
Set
2
4.68
4.18
5.55
4.82
Oct
1 M7
4.52
1.13
3.04
1.21
Nov
2.3
4.01
1.38
3.34
Dec
1 2.09
3.81
1.74
3.41
*Charlotte Douglas International Airport 30 -year historic data (NOAA 2004)
* *Charlotte Douglas International Airport rainfall data (Weatherunderground 2012)
* ** October rain data through the 23rd
7
6
5
a,
r4
u
C
C
O
3
Y
.a.
'u
ail
a`
1
0
Figure 3. Annual Climatic Data vs. 30 -year
> ai T m +� > u
c a Q u
�i Q Q N O Z o
12010 ** 6w=12011 ** � 2012 **
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
McInvtre Creek Restoration Site (JN EF Project Number 243
* Note that gauges were installed in 2011 and no data is available for baseline, or year 1 (1u12)
monitoring periods
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Aaoom Environmental, Inc Momtonng Year 3 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 243 November 2012
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices