20020991 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 4_20130212

C)I- 0 i
IJ
Kings Creek
Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 208
Monitoring Project Number: D09082S
Monitoring Year 4
2012 Final Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 2012
Ecosystem
p L/ PROGRAM
! rB 1 DOUALIr( 1619 Mail Service Center
NR - tNATEM� Raleigh, NC 27699
v
F.
Rqfc"eveJ V-3 1.2o 13

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Kevin Mitchell
Email: Kevin @equinoxenvironmental.com

Kings Creek Stream Restoration
2012 Monitoring Report (MY 4)
Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
20 Methodology
30 References
I
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3

n
Appendix A Pr
Figure 1
Table la
Table lb
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Appendices
:)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Components
Component Summations
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table l la Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
M

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
' The goals and objectives stated in the Kings Creek Mitigation Report (NCEEP 2006) are as
follows
' • Restore 2,119 linear feet of channel dimension, pattern, and profile to the extent possible,
• Improve floodplam functionality by matching floodplam elevation with bankfull stage,
thereby increasing watershed attenuation and reducing peak flows,
• Establish native floodplam vegetation, which will allow treatment of diffuse storm flow
and nutrient uptake while establishing part of a wildlife corridor in the watershed,
• Remove invasive exotic vegetation species from the stream corridor,
' • Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridor, and
• Improve the water quality in the Kings Creek watershed by reducing bank erosion,
increasing nutrient storage and uptake, and increasing dissolved oxygen of the system
The monitoring year four (MY4) vegetation plot data indicate that the project is on track to meet
the final established criterion for planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 260
' planted stems per acre at the end of the year five monitoring period Average stem density for
planted stems in MY4 is approximately 594 stems per acre Additionally, when planted and
natural stems are combined, the average stem density is 2,037 stems per acre, which is well
' above the minimum established criterion Of the 45 planted stems recorded within the
monitoring plots, almost all (90 %) had vigor codes of good or excellent The site includes a
diverse assemblage of 14 planted species of native trees and shrubs Planted species range from
5 to 6 per plot with 8 to 9 species observed when volunteers are included Problems with
vegetation consist of areas of low stem densities adjacent to the stream reach as well as
approximately 16 currently isolated patches of high threat invasive plant species that span the
project area A supplemental live stake planting occurred on March 16, 2011 in those areas
noted with low stem densities and eroding banks Dominant invasive non - native plants include
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonccera japonica), privet (Lcgustrum
' sp ), and kudzu (Pueraria montana var lobata) Invasive plants on site are scheduled to be
treated during 2013 and 2014
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained relatively stable among monitoring years The
primary stream issue observed during MY4 was bank erosion resulting from thalweg migration
and low woody stem densities In particular, thalweg migration has continued at station 2 +00
' (83 feet) and 5 +25 (38 feet) causing further bank erosion These two areas of concern have
continued to actively erode between monitoring years All other morphological metrics
indicated performance percentages averaging between 88 and 100% One beaver dam was noted
at the lower end of the reach during separate monitoring visits EEP was informed and a beaver
removal request form was submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspections Service's
(APHIS) on both occasions APHIS removed the beaver dam and two beavers from the lower
' reach of Kings Creek on October 29, 2012 Based on the presence of wrack lines and crest
gauge monitoring two bankfull events were documented In MY4
' Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures In the report appendices Narrative background and
' Kings Creek Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and
figures In the appendices Is available from EEP upon request
Kings Creek Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc '
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

F1
,,I
2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in 2012 replicate those employed during previous
monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents (Rosgen 1996
and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al 2008)
' Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

3.0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2006 Mitigation Report
Kings Creek Restoration Project Raleigh
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, Colorado
USACE (U.S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
Kings Creek Final 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

� Appendix A
' Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
1
1

li .� ..>~ i ^.i a-a ,i h �N.''T r vat•- r 1 ti r '� ""rr �'l 1 � 4; r � � � rte'= ;
1 i
280
+ �(
_- .1 276 _~
4.
64 1
1
,...... «....., ,.,.,,.. � t t o... .,' ( 276 � .x;, �` L •{ S r.
•_. ,_ r-, i .. d� 't � t, " � it �wrrL. J d,'
Kings Creek a a
Stream Restoration Site
64
,215'
:
r•
�,., � .,: •" .�. ` ,1.; 276 � � _,� _
ter';
! j
NdyaDDtl l /
`- Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
CDDM� r
' rl,,,>vr T•dnclMdrrrs
` -q " "' Kings Creek EQ UINox
Kmp9 Creak SNVl It 11 R11 n NA 1• Ecosystem
Stream Reamrauon Site
' .. P.— G,...1� S­U� Stream Restoration Site " "'" " " ° "' ° "w" PROGRAM
Project No. 208 N
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1 -40 W to Asheville. 0 0.5 1 2 3
'Take the Sweeten Creek Rd/US -25 A exit (Exit 51). Proceed i Miles
south on - 25 -Alt to NC -280 S in Fletcher. Continue on NC-
280 S towards Brevard. NC -280 S becomes US -276 S/US -64 Transylvania County, North Carolina
in Brevard. After passing Brevard College turn left on E French 7.5 Minute Series Brevard
Broad St and continue to Park Ave. Turn left on Park Ave for Quadrangle
approximately 1/4 mile and project site is on the left.

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
K' s Creek /Pro' ct No. 208
Project
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
a
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
B M P
Riverine Non- Riverine
0 0
'n
1,928
Enhancement
Component
Enhancement I
a
191
Creation
Stationing
ca
L1
HQ Preservation
Comment
or Reach ID
W
2,119
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BMP
Count
*Anticipated
SMUTotals
1,631
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
Reach 1
824
R
P2
990
840
1+00- 10 +90
1 : 1
840
N/A
Excavated new off -line bankfull channel and
constructed floodplain at lower elevation.
Reach ll
191
El
191
0
10 +90 - 12 +81
2.5 : I
0
N/A
Excavated floodplain on left bank and stabilized
left bank slopes. No work on right bank.
Reach 111
800
R
P2
936
791
12 +81 - 22 +17
1 : 1
791
N/A
Excavated new off -line bankfull channel and
constructed floodplain at lower elevation.
3 me anticipated mitigation units are nased on the expectea yields due to the iacx of a tun su -root riparian butter on portions of the stream
Information unavailable
Table lb. Component Summations
Kings Creek /Project No. 208
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non -Ripar
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
B M P
Riverine Non- Riverine
0 0
Restoration
1,928
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
191
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals
2,119
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BMP
Count
*Anticipated
SMUTotals
1,631
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
= Non - Applicable
*The anticipated mitigation units are based on the expected yields due to the lack of a 11111 30 -foot riparian buffer on
portions of the stream
SS�35ig��,j
Kings Creek Final A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
HapsedTime Since Grading Complete: 6 Years
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 6 Years
Number of Reporting Years: 4
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Final Dest - Construction Plans
Set)-04
Construction
N/A
2006
Live Stakes and Bare Root Trees Planted
N/A
2006
Nfitip,ation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitonn - Baseline
Nov- 05/Dec -05
Ma -06
Year 1 Monitorinp,
2008
2008
Year 2 Momtonn
Nov -10
Nov -10
Su lemental Live Stake Planting Effort
Mar -11
Mar -11
Year 3 Monitorin
Nov -11
Nov -11
Beaver and Beaver Dam Removal
Oct -12
Oct -12
Year 4 Monitonn
Nov -12
Dec -12
Year 5 Monitonn
- imormanon unavanaDie
N/A - Item does not apply
Kings Creek Final A -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
K rnmm s Creek / Project No. 208
Designer
Buck Engineering / Michael Baker Corp
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Primary Project Design POC
Andrew Bick (828) 350 -1408
Construction Contractor
L -J, Inc
220 Stonendge Drive Suite 405
Columbia, SC 29210
Construction Contractor POC
Richard Goodwin (803) 929 -1 181
Survey Contractor
Joel Johnson Land Surveying
Survey Contractor POC
Joel Johnson (828) 586 -6488
Planting Contractor
Unknown
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Unknown
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Seed Mix Sources
Unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Unknown
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2006
Buck Engineering/ Michael Baker Corp
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Stream M onitonng POC
Unknown
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Unknown
Monitoring Performers (Y1) - 2008
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
171 Southern Cross Road
Weaverville, North Carolina 28787
Stream M onitonng POC
Jeff Ferguson (828) 231 -3517
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Jeff Ferguson (828) 231 -3517
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Sarah Marcmko (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream MonitonngPOC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation MonnonngPOC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream MonitonngPOC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2013
Stream M onitonng POC
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Unknown - tntormation was unknown at time of report submittal
' Kings Creek Final A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Momtonng Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Attributes
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Project County
Transylvania
Physiojuaphic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Broad Basms
Project Rrver Basm
French Broad
USGS HUC for Project 14 di t
06010105010050
NCDW Sub -Basin for Pro ect
04 -03 -01
Withm Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
No
WRC Class Warm CooL Cold
Cool
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
100%
Beaver Actmty Observed Durmg Design Phase
Unknown
Restoration Component Attributes
Km s Creek
Drama e Area (sq mi
4 2
Stream Order
Second
Restored Length feet
2,119
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
-
Watershed Impervious Cover
-
NCDW AU / Index Number
6 -30
NCDWQ Classification
C / Tr
303d Listed
No
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for 303d Listm or Stressor
N/A
Total Acreage of Easement
6 11
Total Vegetated Acreage withm Easement
5 66
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
556
Ros en Classification of Pre-Existing
-
Ros en Classification of As -Built
C4
Valley Type
-
VaRey Slope
-
Valley Side Slope Range
-
Valley Toe Slope Range
-
Cowardm Classification
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
Yes
Species of Concern Endangered, Etc
-
Dommant Soil Senes and Characteristics
Series
-
Depth
-
Cla %
-
K
-
T
- information unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
Kings Creek Final A -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

I�1
CI
� Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
1
1
1
1
1
P,
1

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Kings Creek /Project No 208
Assessed Le th 2 119 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
mth
with
for
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Perfornung
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub - Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I Aegradation Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1
74
96%
1 Vertical Stability
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
- Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Wftle Condition
I Text ure/Subst rite Riffle maintains coarser substrate
13
13
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth z 1 6)
12
12
100%
Condition
2 Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
12
12
100%
I Thalwegcentenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
7
12
58%
4 ThalwegPosition
91%
2 Thalwegcentenng at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
10
11
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eliding
Bank lacking vegetative cover result mg sunply from poor growth and/or
7
314
93%
7
113
95%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable and are
2
119
97%
2
28
98%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
3
235
94%
2
155
98%
Totals
12
668
84 %
II
296
91%
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
14
16
88%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Guide control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
21
24
88%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
24
24
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
30
97%
15%
Pool forming structures maintaining— MaxPoolDepth Mean Bankfull
4 Habitat
Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -Flow
12
12
100%
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Planted Acreage 5.56
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depction
Number of
Combined
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
N/A
0
000
0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
Stipple
7
005
1 %
4, or 5 stem count criteria
Black Dots White Background
Totals
7
005
1%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
000
0%
given the monitoring year
Cumulative Totals
7
005
1%
Easement Acreage 6.11
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch
16
025
4%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as poly gons at map scale)
N/A
0
000
0%
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

C
1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Appendix C
1
1
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Vegetation
Vegetation Plot
Survival
Tract Mean
ID
Threshold Met?
I
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 4 — June 26, 2012
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 4 — June 26, 2012
Kings Creek Final C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 4 — June 26, 2012
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

r
1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Report Prepared By
Owen Carson
Date Prepared
7/24/2012 14 16
Database Name
Equinox- 2012- A- KingsCreek -MY4 mdb
Database Location
Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \Kings Creek \KC -MY4- 2012 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
D16TNK71
File Size
147652864
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Proj, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Proj, Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of \Agor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED liwng stems of each species for each
plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
208
project Name
Kings Creek
Description
On the campus of Brevard College
River Basin
French Broad
Length(ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
3
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Current Plot Data (MY4 2012)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Coni non Name
Species Type
E208 -01 -0001
E208 -01 -0002
E208 -01 -0003
MY4 (2012)
MY3 (2011)
MV2 (2010)
PnoLS
P-all
T
Pno1S
Pall
T
Pno1S
P -all
T
Pno1S
P-all
T
Pno1S
P -all
T
Pno1S
P -all
T
Acer rubrunt var. rubrunt
Red maple
Tree
7
4
37
48
116
113
Alnus serrulata
Haze lalder
Shrub
6
6
9
1
1
5
1
1
2
8
8
16
8
8
13
10
to
10
Aronia arbutifolia
Red chokeberry
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
Betula nigra
Riverbirch
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
8
8
8
7
7
7
8
8
8
Corpus amomum
Silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
19
2
3
3
21
3
3
8
3
3
5
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
Tree
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hamamelis virginiana var. virginiana
Arerican w"hchhazel
Tree
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
Black walnut
Tree
2
tiquidanbar styracinua
Sweetgum
Tree
-
I
2
Iiriodendron tulipifera var. tufipifera
Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood
Tree
t
3
6
13
12
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pinus strobus
Eastern white pine
Tree
I
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
5
19
3
3
3
4
4
6
12
12
28
1 16
16
27
15
15
39
Prunus serotina vac serotina
Black cherry
Tree
2
2
1
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
Tree
I
Salix nigra
Black willow
Tree
4
3
Sambucus canadensis
Conumn elderberry
JShrub
I
2
1
2
1
1
I
I
Stem count
22
22
71
10
II
25
12
12
55
44
45
151
47
48
204
47
1 48
1 209
Size (ares)
I
1
1
3
3
3
Size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.G7
Species count
6
6
5
6
9
676
8
9
10
14
9
10
14
9
IU
18
Stems per ACRE,
890
890
2,873
4115
445
I,UI2
486
486
2,226
994
6U7
2,037
1 634
1 647
2,752
634
1 647
12,819
Exceeds requirement, by 10%
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

u
J
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
a�
2109
w
2108
0
2107
a�
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross- Section 1 - Riffle
Station 6 +84
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0+40 0 +50 0 +60 0 +70 0 +80 0 +90 1+00
Station (feet)
• MY0 5/2006 N1Y2 6/22/2010 - MY3 2/17/2011 -MY4 2/8/2012 - -- Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
a�
2109
w
= 2108
0
2107
a
v
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
0 +00
M M= M M= M M M M M M r= M
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross- Section 2 - Pool
Station 7 +85
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0+40 0 +50 0+60 0 +70 0+80 0 +90 1+00 1 +10 1 +20 1 +30
Station (feet)
--+ — MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/22/2010 MY3 2/17/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 - --- Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
a 2105
w
O 2104
ea
W 2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
2098
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross- Section 3 - Riffle
Station 15 +13
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0+40 0 +50 0 +60 0 +70 0 +80 0 +90
Station (feet)
MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/24/2010 - MY3 2/18/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 — — — Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross- Section 3 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

= M = = M M = M M = r = = = = = = = M
Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
a 2105
w
C
0 2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
2098
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross- Section 4 - Pool
Station 16 +17
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0+40 0 +50 0 +60 0 +70 0 +80
Station (feet)
0 MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/24/2010 MY3 2/18/2011 -MY4 2/8/2012 - -- Bkf
0 +90
Kings Creek Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -I I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 4 — February 8, 2012
D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2120
2118
2116
2114
2112
2110
2108
2106
c
0
2104
W
2102
2100
2098
2096
2094
2092
2090
0
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 1 +14 - 22 +28
Ir S 6 > 8 9 Ip II I2 I� J6 X0o '�o �o �o
xoo X*o X*o >�qo �o �o �o �o �o >�qo
Station (feet)
Thalweg MYO Thalweg MY1 Thalweg M Y 2 Thalweg MY3 - ThaNeg M Y4 ♦ Bkf -- WS o Structures
Kings Creek Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5 November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross Section 1 - Pebble Count Summary
Riffle
D50
Mo onng Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
3
3%
3%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
1
1%
4%
fine sand
025
5
5%
9%
medium sand
050
6
6%
15%
coarse sand
100
3
3%
18%
very coarse sand
200
4
4%
22%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
23%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
25%
fine gravel
80
6
6%
31%
medium gravel
113
3
3%
34%
medium gravel
160
14
14%
48%
coarse gravel
223
9
9%
57%
coarse gravel
32
13
13%
70%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
75%
very coarse gravel
64
3
3%
78%
Cobble
small cobble
90
6
6%
84%
medium cobble
128
7
7%
91%
large cobble
180
9
9%
100%
very lar e cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
17
D84
90
D95
150
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final D-15
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
100%
V
90 %
80 %
O
70
d
60 %
i
f0.
i
u
50 %
lV
d
40 %
>
30
i
20
U
10
N `O D
6
0%
Y
V
Particle Size (nun)
MY2 6/16/2010 MY3 2/17/2011 --*--MY4 6/26/2012
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
25 %
20 %
I
I
15%
a
$
C
c
10 %
oC
5 .
0%
to
N
a,
Particle Size (mm)
s MY2 6/16/1010 0 MY3 2/17/2011 ■ MY4 6/26/201
Kings Creek Final D-15
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
V
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross Section 2 - Pebble Count Summary
Pool
D50
Mo oring Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
8
8%
12%
fine sand
025
0
0%
12%
medium sand
0 50
0
0%
12%
coarse sand
100
3
3%
15%
very coarse sand
200
5
5%
20%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
5
5%
25%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
27%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
30%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
34%
medium gravel
160
2
2%
36%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
41%
coarse gravel
32
12
12%
53%
very coarse gavel
45
19
19%
72%
very coarse gravel
64
11
11%
83%
Cobble
small cobble
90
11
11%
94%
medium cobble
128
4
4%
98%
large cobble
180
2
2%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
X4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
29
D84
66
D95
98
Kings Creek Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
i
100%
%
80%
C
r
70%
V
N
f.
60 %
w
50 %
c
d
- 4
40 %
- -
- 3
W
30 %
U
20 %
i
CO90
Particle Size (mm)
10%
MY2 6/16/2010 MY3 2/17/2011 �MY4 7/12/2012
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
—
-
2; c<
0%
u
20%
W
0
15%
C
v
10% V
0�.
0%
O O
W
Particle Size (mm)
MMY2 6/16/2010 OMY3 2/17/2011 ■MY4 7/12/2012
Kings Creek Final D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
i
I
r
60 %
50 %
- 4
40 %
- -
- 3
30 %
20 %
i
10%
- 0
0%
u

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross Section 3 - Pebble Count Summary
Riffle
D50
Mo oring Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
6
6%
6%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
11
11%
17%
fine sand
025
1
1%
18%
medium sand
050
0
0%
18%
coarse sand
100
3
3%
21%
very coarse sand
200
9
9%
30%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
4
4%
34%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
36%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
38%
medium gravel
113
11
11%
49%
medium gravel
160
5
5%
54%
coarse gravel
223
6
6%
60%
coarse gravel
32
9
9%
69%
very coarse gravel
45
8
8%
77%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
84%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
88%
medium cobble
128
11
11%
99%
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very lar e boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
12
D84
64
D95
110
Kings Creek Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
—
100%
90%
80%
r
70%
W
60%
C
v
-
50% cv
G
-
40% >
E
_
30%
20%
i
_
10%
O N N � � M •1 � O. N 00 Vi
O
N 7
a
U
0%
d
W
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 -- MY3 2/18/2011 —0--MY4 7/12/2012
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
25%
20%
W
15%
c
10% ti
w
5%
N �n �!� in - tl ^Y ... 00 •O N N �f� 7 O CO O �O
�D N N C -. - N �, 7 �D O\ N 00 �
N
�O
N � 00
•+ N 7
�D
O�
Y
V
0%
W
Particle Size (mm)
■MY2 6/16/2010 MMY3 2/18/2011 ■MY4 7/12/2102
' Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
1
D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
J
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross Section 4 - Pebble Count Summary
Pool
D50
Momtonng Year 4
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
6
6%
6%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
17
17%
23%
fine sand
025
2
2%
1 25%
medium sand
050
15
15%
40%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
40%
very coarse sand
200
12
12%
52%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
2
2%
54%
fate gravel
57
1
1%
55%
fine gravel
80
4
4%
59%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
63%
medium gravel
160
4
4%
67%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
74%
coarse gravel
32
13
13%
87%
very coarse gravel
45
9
9%
96%
very coarse Eavel
64
2
2%
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
�6
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
1 8
D84
29
D95
43
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90%
—
80%
C
W
70%
W
60%
e
I
so%
w
40%
30%
U
20%
10%
0%
O O
N
7
d
P�
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 NlY3 2/18/2011 - NFV4 7/12/2012
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Pool
I
�-
25%
i
20
P
15%
A
c
10%
C6
5%
0%
N in to v:
C � N
-. N 7 �z 00 kt. ^f 00 O �O �Np
N R 00
'O
Y
m
Particle Size (nun)
■MY2 6/16/2010 OMY3 2/18/2011 6MY4 7/12/2012
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Kings Creek / Pro ct No 208
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curie
Pre- Dasting Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Mm
I Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
242
255
255
267
N/A
2
Floodp time Width (fl)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
>150
>150
> 150
> 150
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2 1
22
22
22
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30
3 1
3 1
3 1
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fl')
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
519
552
552
585
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11 3
118
118
122
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratiol
1
1
1
1 _
1
_
_
_
1
1 _
1
1
1
1 _
_
_
1
1 >3 601
>3 651
>3 651
>3 70
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratiol
I
I
I
I -
I
-
-
-
I
I -
I
I
I
I -
-
-
I
I
1 10
1 10
1 10
1 10
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
293
460
444
682
13 2
10
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 0026
0 0069
00059
0 0153
0 0039
10
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28 1
524
58 6
69 8
116
11
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
22
23
�22O
05
II
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
98 5
150 6
143 2
40 9
8
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
610
1108
1075
1730
352
12
Radius of Curvature (ft)
410
620
560
1390
267
11
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
231 0
2768
2400
4140
776
5
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
42
42
44
N/A
2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) (lb/ft2)1
1
-
Max part site (mm) mobilized at bankfuill
I
I -
I
I -
-
Stream Power (transport ca acity) (W /m'-)
-
-
-
Additional Reath Parameters
Rosgen Classification
-
-
_
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
-
_
_
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
1 694
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1 815
2,135
Sinuosity (ft)
1 07
128
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
00049
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
_
_
_
00044
Bankfull Floodplain Area(acres)
_
_
_
t% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
- information unavanaute
N/A - Information does not apply
Kings Creek Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Kings Creek / Project No 208 - Reaches I & IH
Pararneter
Pre- Easting Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Ri % /Ru % /P %/G % /S%
33%
10%
41%
16%
0%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B % /Bu%
-
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / d? / di'° (mm)
Entrenchmnt Class
<15/15 199/2 4 9 5 0 99/>10
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 199/>20
_ Kunt r _ _ = —p
SC =Silt Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobbll / B = Boulder / li = Bedrock
diP= maxpave /ch' =max sub pave
Information unavailable
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Dimension
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Crass - Section 2
Pool
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
2108 9
2108 9
2108 9
-
21081
21081
21081
Bankfull Width (ft)
267
268
268
275
31 1
303
298
296
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>I50
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
22
22
2 1
20
25
19
1 9
1 9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3l
33
33
33
47
37
35
34
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
585
580
573
561
766
585
556
550
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
122
124
125
135
127
157
160
159
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3 7
>5 6
>5 6
>5 4
>3 9
>4 9
>5 0
>51
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
10
1 1
1 1
11
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft)
-
596
584
566
-
61 6
574
57 1
d50 (mm)
24
13
17
16
17
29
Cross - Section 3
Riffle
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
2104 7
2104 7
2104 7
-
-
21041
2104 1
2104 l
Bankfull Width (ft)
242
257
256
258
283
258
259
241
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2 l
2 1
20
2 1
20
25
26
27
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
30
32
3l
3l
31
44
45
45
Bank-full Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
519
53 1
520
530
555
63 1
674
659
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
113
124
126
125
144
105
99
8 8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3 6
>5 8
>5 9
>5 8
>3 2
>5 8
>5 8
>6 2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
1 0
10
10
10
1 0
10
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pin's (ft -)
-
602
593
594
-
661
693
676
d50 (mm)
I -
33
24
12
13
2
2
- Intormation unavailable
Kings Creek Final D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2012
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
D: Data
m��mmom�mmmom�mmmom�momom�m�mom�mmmo
•
®
��®
ma������mm
®mma
®mm�ma
®
®�
®ma������
•
�®®®
ma������m
®
®m�ammm
®ma
®mmm�a������
•
mmmmma������mmmm�ammmmmammmmma������
,
N/A info —.. don not apply
R.= RdFle /R.= Run /P= Pool /G= GIWi /S =Step
SC = Sdt Croy / SA = Snod / G = G.,d / C = Cnbbk / B = Bnnld,T / & = &d—k
Pu —W, baud an of , and pmd p6h1e --1,
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

1
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table,1�2. Ve ifi a Vn- tof4Bt`anlzfM EVents�
=iKings�Cre'e t No. 208
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
6/15/2010
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lutes
11/9/2010
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lutes
1/20/2011
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lines
10/26/2011
9/6/2011
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
1/18/2012
11/29/2011
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
10/15/2012
9/19/2012
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
' Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
1
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012