20051680 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20130212

�S 100
Roquist Wetland
Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 312
EEP Contract # 004476
Monitoring Year — 05
Submitted to:
REC.EIVF
FE3 I tit .3
JA N ,. 3 2013
aENR - WATI=R QUALITY
Weiland s 3 St�rnyvate, Branch - E Co Stem_ NC ECOSYSTEM
11,4114d ENHAI!CEMENT PROOF
PROGRAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: 2008
Data Collection: August 2012
Submitted: January 2013

Monitoring Firm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller(a)kci.com
KCI Project No: 16121789_MY05
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc.
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 120
Cary, NC 27518
Roquist Wetland KG Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 312 2012 - MY05

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT ................. ..............................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................ ............................... 2
Appendix A — Project Maps and Background Tables
Figure 1
Vicinity Map 4
Figure 2
Site Asset Map 5
Table la
Project Restoration Components 6
Table lb
Project Component Summations 6
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History 7
Table 3
Project Contacts Table 8
Table 4.
Project Attribute Table 9
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Current Condition Plan View
11
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
.16
Vegetation Monitonng Plot Photos
17
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Cnteria Attainment
23
Table 7
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
24
Table 8
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
25
Appendix D — Hydrologic Data
30/70 Monthly Rainfall Data 28
Precipitation and Water Level Plots 29
Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table 41
Roqulst Wetland KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012- MY05

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored and preserved wetlands and
preserved streams at the Roquist Wetland Site in Bertie County, North Carolina. The 3,920 -acre site is
located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03010107 of the Roanoke River Basin The project restored 36 5
acres of wetland and preserved an additional 3,781 acres of wetland and 4,000 linear feet of stream
channel Project construction was completed in 2008 The project objectives are listed below
Project Objectives
• Restoration of 36 5 acres of previously ditched and filled non- npanan wetlands.
• Preservation of 3,000 acres of non - riparian wetlands.
• Preservation of 759 acres of high quality non - riparian wetlands
• Preservation of 22 4 acres of riparian wetlands
• Preservation of 4,000 linear feet of stream channel
The restored wetlands were planted with fifteen different species of bare root trees and shrubs Baseline
vegetation monitoring was delayed until the end of the first growing season Ten vegetation monitoring
plots were established during the first monitoring year, following the CVS -EEP protocol Because of this,
the data reported in the Roquist Wetland Restoration Site Phase I Mitigation Report is first -year
monitoring data and not baseline data as would typically be found in the baseline report The first year of
monitoring also reported that wild hogs significantly damaged the planted vegetation, resulting in
increased mortality The fifth year of monitoring found a site average of 101 planted stems /acre Eight of
the plots had planted stem densities less than the five year success criterion of 260 stems /acre The site's
average stem density including volunteers is 1,016 stems /acre, with four of the ten vegetation plots having
total stem densities less than 260 stems /acre. Four plots have no planted stems in them and two of those
plots have no volunteer stems either
To monitor wetland hydrology, 12 gauges were established Seven of these gauges (2, 3b, 5, 9, l lb, 14,
and 15) were installed in restored wetlands The remaining five gauges (1, 4, 6, 13, and 12) are reference
gauges that were installed in existing wetlands, and are paired with a gauge in an adjacent restoration
area Two of the restoration gauges (14 and 15) are not paired with reference gauges During the fifth
growing season, all of the restoration gauges met the success criteria of having saturated soil conditions
occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum of 12.5% (29 consecutive days) of the
231 -day growing season (March 22 to November 8) during average climatic conditions, or having the
hydropenod in the restoration areas be within 20% of the corresponding reference hydropenod during
drought conditions The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had
average rainfall during the 2012 growing season The months of February, March, April, May, July,
September, and October experienced average rainfall Rainfall was less than average in January, June, and
November, while August experienced above average rainfall
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
Roquist Wetland j KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05

2.0 METHODOLOGY
Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation
data from the Roquist Site this year
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T., R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 0 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Weakley, A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(hqp / /www herbarium unc .edu /FloraArchives /WeakleyFlora 2006 -Jan pdf)
Roquist Wetland
EEP Pr4lect # 312
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2012 - MY05

Appendix A
Project Maps and Background Tables
Roquist Wetland 3 KC/Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - AIY05

HERTFORD
HALIFAX
BERTIE
MARTIN
Birch Rd
Lewiston Woodville
,0
BERTIE
COUNTY
CHOWAN
INGTO
indiaq
e^
ss
Ry
f1
� Jach Rd
L
N
C1
h hire Rd
0
1 oa
�m
�a
w q�r
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Property Boundary N
— Major Roads E
5
— Other Roads
F,c•t�s stcnl 1 0.5 o t ��
y — Major Rivers KC1
Cities and Towns

a

Table Ia. Protect Restoration Components
Project Number and Name. 312 -Ro uist Wetland
iStream(lf)Wetland
L
Non -Ripar
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
o
BMP
Non -
Rivenne Rrverme
36 5
224 3,000
759
224
Restoration
Fnhancement
Y
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
4,000
HQ Preservation
Totals (Feet/Acres)
R
C `
OD
bn
0
Project Component
w
a
800
4.5
7883
Comment
Non-Riparian Restored
Restored wetland hydrology and
00
R
365
1 1
I
365
Wetlands
planted native trees and shrubs
Riparian Preserved Wetlands
224
P
224
5 1
45
In conservation easement
Non-Riparian Preserved
3,0000
P
3,0000
5 1
600
In conservation easement
Wetlands
Non-Riparian Preserved High
7590
P
7590
5 1
151 8
In conservation easement
Quality Wetlands
Jack's Branch Stream
4 000 1
P
1 4,000
1 5 1
800
In conservation easement
R - Restoration P - Preservation
Table I b, Component Summations
Project Number and Name: 312 - Roquist Wetland
Restoration Level
iStream(lf)Wetland
Riparian
Ac
Non -Ripar
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Non -
Rivenne Rrverme
36 5
224 3,000
759
224
Restoration
Fnhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
4,000
HQ Preservation
Totals (Feet/Acres)
4,000
22.4
3,796
0
0
MU Totals
800
4.5
7883
0
0
Roquist Wedand 6 KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 312 2012 - MY05

Table 2. Protect Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name: 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 4 yr 1l months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete. 4yr l 1 months
Number of Reporting Years 5
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
N/A
Aug 05
Final Design - 90%
N/A
Jul 06
Construction
N/A
Jan 08
Permanent Seeding
N/A
Jun 08
Bare Root Planting
N/A
Jan 08
Mitigation Plan / Record Drawings Year 1 Veg Monitoring Data
Oct 08
Nov 08
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 09
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 10
Dec 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct I 1
Dec 11
Year 5 Monitoring
Aug 12
Dec 12
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
KCI Associates gfNorth Carolina
2012 - MY05
•

Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name: 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Design Firm
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 120
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Sawyer's Land Developing, Inc
275 Higgmsport Road
Belhaven, North Carolina 27810
Contact Mr Len Hunt
Phone [phone]
Aggregate Supplier
Hanson Rocky Mount Quarry #017
10471 NC -97
West Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27801
Phone [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Holland Landscaping, Inc
953 Blackrock Road
Merry Hill, North Carolina 27957
Contact Mr Randy Holland
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor /
Emerald Forest, Inc
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
4651 Black Woods Road
Chesapeake, Virginia 23322
Contact Mr Peter McClintock
Phone [phone]
Bare -Root Plant Supplier
Int'I Paper SC Super Tree Nursery
5594 Highway 38 S
Blenheim, South Carolina 29516
Phone [phone]
Survey Contractor
H C Harris, Jr, Engineering & Surveying, P A
216 Main Street
Wmterville, North Carolina 28590
Contact Mr Cliff Harris, Jr
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -01
HSMM of North Carolina, Inc
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 120
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Contact Mr Rick Prosser
Phone [phone]
MY -02 - MY -04
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Speller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Rogarst Wetland 8 KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Project Number and Name: 312 — Ro uist Wetland
Project County
Berne County
Drainage Area
214 rm
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate %
<5%
Ph sio ra hic Region
Inner Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Mid- Atlantic Flood lams and Low Terraces
Plant Communities
Nonriverme Swamp Forest and
Nonriverme Wet Hardwood Forest
Dominant Soil Types
Leaf Sandy Loam
Reference Site ID
On Site
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03010107
Any portion of the project segment 303d listed'
No - not rated
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
% of Pro ect Fenced
0%
Roquist Wetland 9 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - W05

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Rogaist Wetland 10 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr4lect # 312 2012 - MY05

i
a
CROP FIELD
CROP FIELD —I000 —SOO O IOOO ZOOO
>S
GRAPHIC SCALE z
z
„ z � APPROX PROPERTY
4z JACKS BRAN H �ls-� = REMAINING ROAD BOUNDARY, TYP
CROP FIELD 4 ♦�
PINE PLANTATION
LLJ
3 RESTORATION AREA
1 ' M1 --```
\\ EXIST WOOD �-'--- a / h
\\ LINE, TYP
IL\ Y `
APPROX PROPERTY—,,,
BOUNDARY a \� \
REMAINING
ROAD t ref
41
P E
rr
On
rc0
wo
r--r'
L SME� Q
SITE ENTRANCE
NNE PLANTATION
\\ i ,o
RESTORATION AREA Q a N
Q A1_ o
Indian Woods Rd i i 1 i ROQUIST CREEK g
w
m
SHEET ` i w Z D
Ln 5
%NE PLANTATION �/ O O
0 0
INDIAN CREEK i i a
RESTORATI AREA
i WETLAND RESTORATION/
ROAD REMOVED E I =20D010Z
CURRENT
' CONDITION
- -___ PINE PLANTATION CONDITION
VIEW
SHEET 1 OF 5

GAUGE t-
_• - .s_ Vim:. �� 4*�' .l"�r,y �,�;.:.+iti�._ " � !.,`. 4l!� l� �\
GAUGE 5
VEGETATION PLOT 5 \
GAUGE 4 �` REMAINING ROAD
GAUGE 1
GAUGE 313
VEGETATION PLOT 6
GAUGE 2
VEGETATION PLOT 7
EXISTING WETLAND
rc J
d..
Q
WETLAND RESTORATION.
ROAD REMOVED
VEGETATION PLOT 10 VEGETATION PLOT 9 ,
PRppERTY
Cp1.1SER�ATION EASEMENT BOUNDARY

EXISTING WETLAND
'V
I
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND RESTORATION,
ROAD REMOVED
1\1 ,P
m
Q
O
z
J
O
m
ti
w
W
z
O
J
W
z
0
Qf
Qf
a
O
Q
WETLAND RESTORATION,
ROAD REMOVED
VEGETATION PLOT 8
EXISTING WETLAND'
i
'V
I
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND RESTORATION,
ROAD REMOVED
1\1 ,P
m
Q
O
z
J
O
m
ti
w
W
z
O
J
W
z
0
Qf
Qf
a
O
Q

r
i
•
i
i

EXISTING WETLAND
REMAINING ROAD GAUGE 14
—°" VEGETATION PLOT 3
GAUGE 13
GAUGE 9
VEGETATION PLOT 4
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND RESTORATION.
ROAD REMOVED
EXISTING WETLAND
63
s
`sf .
I

EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING WETLAND
7.
i
GAUGE 15
VEGETATION PLOT 1
REMAINING ROAD
M
O�
J�
h
h
h�
t r y� J�IS
a(�'ii1
Z
•wk
_
Lr
ti h. •.
O
Al
WETLAND RESTORATION.
.
ROAD REMOVED'
GAUGE 11b
EXISTING WETLAND
VEGETATION PLOT 2
Y
GAUGE 12
7.
i
GAUGE 15
VEGETATION PLOT 1
REMAINING ROAD
M
O�
J�
h
h
h�
GAUGE 15
VEGETATION PLOT 1
REMAINING ROAD
M
O�
J�
h
h
h�

Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 312 - Roquist Wetland
Planted Acreage 36.5 Easement Acrea a 3,920
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Cate o
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
%of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
1 Bare Areas
0 1 acres
Pattern and Color
0
000
00%
and herbaceous material
Woody stem densities clearly below
Not Depicted
2 Low S tem Density
target levels based on M Y3, 4, or 5
0 1 acres
Covers a Large Part
0
2540
696%
Areas
stem count criteria
of Restoration Area
Total
0
2540 "'
696%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3 Areas of Boor
class that are obviously small given
0 25 acres
Pattern and Color
0
000
00%
Growth Rates or Vigor
the monitoring year
Cumulative Total
0
2540
696%
4 Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
1000 SF Pattern and Color
0
0 00
0 0%
Concern render as polygons at map scale)
5 Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale)
none
F
Pattern and Color
0
000
00%
Rogmst 6Vedand 16 KCI Associates ojNa th Carolina
EEP Pr oject # 312 2012- MY05

`_ � ".: � �', ' 014`.' �`-•
"At 4 ,
•.rte t �, �` (, i �� �. �
Plot I ' 1
. 1
-i
+„fir

ol
a.
•
I
' 1
I ,

Plot 5 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Plot 6 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Rogaist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
19 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
1011 - MP05
n
u

Plot 7 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Plot 8 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Roquist Weiland 20 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05

Plot 9 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Plot 10 Photo — 8/14/12 - MY 05
Roquist Wetland 21 KC /Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Rogatst Wetland 22 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05

a
C,1
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Project Number and Name: 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Vegetation Plot ID
Stem Dens Year a Planted
Stem Density (stems /acre)
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met? (260 planted stems /acre
after MY05)
Monitoring Year 05
Total Stem Density
(stems /acre)
1
40
No
202
2
364
Yes
607
3
0
No
121
4
0
No
324
5
0
No
0
6
0
No
0
7
283
Yes
4,249
8
40
No
728
9
121
No
2,711
l0
162
No
1,214
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 312
23 KCI Associates of North Carolina
2012 - MY05

Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Project Number and Name: 312 - Ro uist Wetland
Report Prepared By
aril helms
Date Prepared
10/30/2012 9 11
database name
KCI- 2012 -A mdb
database location
M \2007\12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Ve database
computer name
12- CV76KF1
file size
59768832
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT----- -
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer
stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Slip
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY--- - - -_ -- —
Project Code
312
project Name
Ro uist
Description
areas m
35000
Required Plots calculated
10
Sampled Plots
10
Roquist Wetland 24 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 - MY05
to
Cl

a
Table 8. CVS Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name: 312 — Roquist Wetland
Current Plot Data (MY5 2012)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Tye
E312 -A -0001
E312 -A -0002
E312 -A -0003
E312 -A -0004
E312 -A -0005
E312 -A -0006
E312 -A -0007
E312 -A -0008
E312 -A -0009
E312 -A -0010
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -ail
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
6
6
70
3
2
25
Baccharis
bacc harts
Shrub
Clethra alnifolia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
Diospyros virgintana
common persimmon
Tree
Fraxtnus pennsylvantca
green ash
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
Itea virginica
Virginia sweetsplre
Shrub
Leucothoe axillarts
coastal doghobble
Shrub
Liquidambar styractflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
2
2
1
1
13
1
7
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
29
4
1
1
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
51
Quercus laurtfolta
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus michauxtt
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
]
1
l
1
1
1
]
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
wlllowoak
Tree
l
1
l
l
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
l
l
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
Ulmus amertcana
American elm
Tree
4
4
4
Paccinium corymbosum
hlghbush blueberry
Shrub
1
1
l
Stem count
size (arcs)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
1
5
9
9
15
0
0
3
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
105
l
1
18
3
3
67
4
4
30
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
1
I l
2
5
1 5
6
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
1 0
10
0
1 0
0
4
4
5
1
l
4
3
3
7
4
4
5
40
40
202
364
364
607
0
0
121
0
0
324
0
0
0
0
0
0
283
283
4249
40
40
728
121
121
12711
162
162
1214
Roquist Wetland
EEP Project # 3 /2
P -LS — Planted Live Stake Stems P -all — Planted Stems Total (with Live Stakes) T — Total (Planted Including Live Stakes and Volunteers)
25
KC/ Associates of North Carolina
2012 - MY05

Table 8. CVS Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Tye
MY5 (2012)
MY4
(2011)
MY3 (2010)
MY2 (2009)
MYl (2008)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P-aIll
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
116
46
17
54
19
Baccharts
baccharis
Shrub
4
Clethra alnifolia
coastal svveetpepperbush
Shrub
l
1
I
1
1
Dtospyros vtrgtntana
common persimmon
Tree
36
1
1 43
Fraxtnus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
3
3
3
10
3
3
12
3
3
15
3
3
Itea vtrgtntca
Virginia svveetspire
Shrub
1
I
Leucothoe axtllarts
coastal doghobble
Shrub
I
1
Ltqutdambar styractflua
sweetgum
Tree
24
1
12
2
1 1
12
Nyssa btflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
l
I
I
1
1
Nyssa sylvaltca
blackgum
Tree
7
7
40
7
7
12
7
7
7
9
9
9
12
12
Quercus
oak
Tree
51
76
76
Quercus laurtfolta
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus mtchauxu
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
vvillowoak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
2
3
3
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
115
Quercus shumardtr
Shumard's oak
Tree
l
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
59
3
3
Rhus copalltnum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
13
5
Saltx ntgra
black willow
Tree
l
1
1
Taxodtum dtstechum
bald cypress
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
Ulmus amertcana
American elm
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
Vacctntum corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
l
1
1
1
5
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
25
1 25
251
27
27
176
28
28
136
33
33
225
0
39
234
10
10
10
10
10
025
0 25
025
025
025
11
1 11
1 15
11
1 11
14
10
1 10 1
13
12
12
18
0
12
18
101 1
101
11016
109
1 109
1712
113
1 113
550
134
134
19111
0
1 158
947
Roqutst Wetland 26 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 311 2013 - AfY05

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
Roqutst Wetland 27 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project A 312 2012 — MY05

0
v
s
� O
Q.
l7
O
v
V
T
R
0
e
0
a
C
n
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1 -Mar-12
16 -M ar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
29- .tun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27-Oct-12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
C, th o � o v. o v o v o
-------------------------
--------------- 6
c
� as
-------- ----- ------ ----- L-
(UP IIUJUIeII
to
a
n
a
oe rn
N a
O
GZ
O
C
D
0
0
�+ o
a�
c
QQ
0
rD
0
z
C:
m
c
vc
N

10
5
0
-5
c
CL_ I 0
v
A
L
3 -15
e
3
0-10
V
-25
-30
-35
-40
Roquist MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #2
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season;
3/22/2012 11/8/2012
t IL
;
I ,
' 99 Days ;
LL
1 '
1 '
1 '
1
1 ,
;
;
;
I ,
I ,
I ,
;
1
;
N N N N N 2.1 N N N N N N hl N N N N N N N N N
@ 9
¢ ¢ z z
00 ^ r ^
Date
Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
4
3
X
o'
2
0

I- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1 -Mar-12
16 -Mar-12
' 31 -Mar-12
Al
15- Apr -12
} 30- Apr -12
v
n 15- May -12
30- May -12
v
14- Jun -12
�• A
5 29- Jun -12
m
v
14- Jul -12
s
29- Jul -12
0
C 13- Aug -12
0
a
28- Aug -12
w
0
CD
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12 -Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
W W N N
11� O cn C ,s O c.n O t!i O
(ul) IIr.Julum
W
r�
r
.7
A'+
■s o
4.02
°o
o' o
vo �
W
m
c
orq
w
c
------------------------
— — ----------
W
WW
rJ ` N G)
l,J
O oa
N
re
0
a
'o
8'
oa
00 W
N m
0
N 7
(ul) IIr.Julum
W
r�
r
.7
A'+
■s o
4.02
°o
o' o
vo �
W
m
c
orq
w
c

1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
w 15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
v
o-
15- May -12
30- May -12
v
o. d 14- Jun -12
�• ee
m
29- Jun -12
CD
v
14- Jul -12
s
29- Jul -12
C)
a
c 13- Aug -12
a
28- Aug -12
w
n
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
V1 O 'Ji O v. C 's O V1 O
----------------- - - - - --
------- - - - - -- - - - - - --
w W
00 N LQ•
� N R
O
N
fA
0
R
trl
R
a.
0
F
.• a4
0o v�
N N
O w
-- o
N R
-------------- - - - - --
- ------------ -----------
4.
(u!) IluJulum
w
C
C�
G
r,
z
O
0
r•
� o
�.a
A� C
U�Q .yr
� O
A
n
0
■s
A�
c
va
w

I
v
c`
c.
0
0
v
s
°c
a
c
W '..� N N
t1i O cn O
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
cn O v. O v� O
(ui) 1lujulell
W
R
0
c
a
m �
� o
R �
� c
o �
�• o
va �
4
m
c
-------------------------------
e --------------
A WW
kli
a^
N �Ot
h c
00
• o
rte'
to
o.
.. 5.
..• o0
2�
N 7
(ui) 1lujulell
W
R
0
c
a
m �
� o
R �
� c
o �
�• o
va �
4
m
c

5
-5
e
s
a
0
z -15
s
c
0
-25
-35
-45
Roquist MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #6 (Reference for Gauge #5)
Begin Growing Season
i 3/22/2012
i
i
i
' 26 Da vs
30 Days
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
End Growing Season
11/8/2012
i
i
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
C C
C C
C A
AL i
iL i
i. >
>,
Date
Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
4
3
x
2
0

1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
m 15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
Cl
15- May -12
30- May -12
c
p 14- Jun -12
o'
29- Jun -12
m
d
14- Jul -12
s
I
29- Jul -12
n
0
= 13- Aug -12
CA0
n.
28- Aug -12
CD
m
CD
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
O cn O cn O cn O to O lA O
w LO
N 04
N
N �
� O
O N p
d �
O N w A
(ul) 118julmd
R
0
0
c.
A�
� O
C
�• o
va �'
2
m
C
vq
�e
UQ
•v
C
a
as
O N w A
(ul) 118julmd
R
0
0
c.
A�
� O
C
�• o
va �'
2
m
C
vq
•v
a
as
a
n7
5
a
C i
F I
Q
o0
N O
O N w A
(ul) 118julmd
R
0
0
c.
A�
� O
C
�• o
va �'
2
m
C
vq

a
1
pl.
7
>y
v
CD
s
C
C
a
n
a�
d
a
R
O
c
0
a
0 n
n
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Pcb -12
I- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
m 14- Jun -12
i9
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27-Oct-12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
(m)118jule1
W2
0
O
O
a.
A�
`s O
o
o R
C a
O
vq �,
i
C
e�
C
-------- - - - - -- - - -41GD
N �
N 5.
N
O_
N
f
ao
o �
iv
d o
H
A
O
N �
to
0
a
n
E
.• as
N �
O
N 7
i
(m)118jule1
W2
0
O
O
a.
A�
`s O
o
o R
C a
O
vq �,
i
C
e�
C

I
A�
7
fy
O
CD
S
c
c
o�
0
m
d
rn
a
s
N
0
c
n.
C
w
ro
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15 -M av -12
30- May -12
v
14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
_ _ _
W W N N
cn O cn O
r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — y.
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - —
(N W
N �
N �
N � �
O
N �
cn
co
v
0 c
00
d
m
m
c
a
G1
0
a
-- as
00 cn
o_o
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -118a
o — N w 4�.
(ul) 11e3ulea
2
Q
O
O.
fD
-s
0
0
QQ^^
4, O
a+ 'n
C =
or4 r
N �
es
R
to
O
G�
C
ora
C

10
5
0
c
s -5
a
D
-10
3
c
0
0
V -15
-20
-25
-30
Roquist MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #13 (Reference for Gauge #9)
4
3
77
>v
5'
a
2 c
-35 I 1 1 +1. ' 1 . 1 L ■ 1 # ■ L 4 1LbL L . _ =P L I E {1 A 0 ■ M. 0 LL I I I.L r_
N N N N N N N N N b ON 1 1 0
N N N N N N N N N N N
N N nl
ro cCC cCd 'n cad c�O cLC p, p, ro, ro
2 2 —4 C7 4
¢ ¢ z z
to
Date
Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

1
w
O
s
c
a
o'
w
d
rD
G1
0
c
0
a
c
w
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
I -Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
v
14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12 -Oct -12
27- Oct -12
II- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
O c.n O cn O v� O v� O cn O
-------------------------
--- - - - - -- - - - - - - --
w py
CD
M N
N �
G)
N �
0 't
aQ
"
m vn
W
00
---------------------- - - - -4—
(u!) I1e3uleb
0
0
m
a
C)
0
E
.- as
o !n
N 7
2
0
C
C.
•s O
4C
o►
p o
vq �
2
C
OQ

10
5
1
e
-5
z
-10
D
L
Y
3 -15
c
0
�j -20
-25
-30
-35
Roquist MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge #15
4
3
d
o'
Chi
2
-40 1 r }1. M 1.1 X10 Ll 0 !1 r �r ■ rT ■ u 1 1& E 1 T� ��� � 0
N N rV N N N eel cJ N N N N N cV N N N N N N N N N
7 7
ro ro v `a `a a ro ro c c > > Ob ou a a > >
Q ¢ v v O O Z Z
�p Cl) .^1 O 6 7 N ,� rV M o0 N ry N
Cl) M N -- N
Date
Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
•

9
8
7
6
c �
w
a
4
3
I
Roquist 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2011 -2012
Edenton, NC Monthly Rainfall
N N rJ N c! I N N N ('1 N r
N d >
O cO U
z o Q ' ¢ o z o
Date
2011 Rainfall � 2012 Rainfall 30th Percentile -i— 70th Percentile

Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Protect Number and Name: 312 - Rogmst Wetland
Gauge
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Year l 2008
Year 2 2009
Year 3 2010
Year 4 2011
Year 5 2012
Gauge 1
Yes /90
Yes /95
Yes /108
Yes /87
Yes/] 00
(Reference for Gauge 2)
39%
41%
47%
38%
43%
Gauge 2
Yes /79
Yes /71
Yes /85
Yes /74
Yes /99
32%
31%
37%
32%
42%
Gauge 3b
Yes /76
Yes /44
Yes /40
Yes /73
Yes /232
33%
19%
17%
32%
100%
Gauge 4
Yes /79
Yes /65
Yes /46
Yes /71
Yes /89
(Reference for Gauge 3b)
34%
28%
20%
(31%)
38%
Gauge 5
Yes /79
Yes /69
Yes /51
Yes /74
Yes /86
34%
30%
22%
32%
37%
Gauge 6
Yes /85
Yes /73
Yes /101
Yes /74
Yes /30
(Reference for Gauge 5)
37%
32%
46%
32%
13%
Gauge 9
Yes /78
Yes /67
Yes /103
Yes /74
Yes /90
34 %)
29%
45%
32%
39%
Gauge 13
Yes /98
Yes /93
Yes/ 108
Yes /87
Yes /105
(Reference for Gauge 9)
42%
40%
47%
44%
45%
Gauge I I b
Yes /92
Yes /73
Yes/ 114
Yes /87
Yes/ 101
40%
32%
49%
44%
44%
Gauge 12
Yes /96
Yes /97
Yes/ 112
Yes /100
Yes /105
(Reference for Gauge 11 b)
42%
42%
49%
100%
45%
Gauge 14
g
Yes /83
Yes /73
Yes /51
Yes /94
Yes/] 08
36%
32%
22%
41%
47%
Gauge 15
Yes /76
Yes /66
Yes /48
Yes /73
Yes /92
33%
29%
21%
32%
40 %)
Roquist Wetland 41 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 312 2012 — MY05