20061483 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20130212

d� (�i3
UT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream
Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 283
EEP Contract # 004475
Monitoring Year 05
Submitted to:
�-1
10;3 S SAN 3 .209
NC ECp
—� E1VHgNCE S " ti9
we ands svSiara,wa ec' an h a �'Nr pG'�!r j
_.....�. �. �_ _ u0system.
PROGRAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Data Collection: 2012
Construction Completed: February 2008
Submitted: January 2013

Monitoring Firm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.syillera),kci.com
KCI Project No: 16121788_MY05
Design Firm
[JEcoEngineedng
EcoEngineering, A Division of the John R. McAdams Company Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
UT Pembroke KC1 Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT .................. ..............................1
�I)iu 1 911 li: [IZIZIZIL�Z ' a
3.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................. ..............................2
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
4
Table 1 a
Project Restoration Components.
5
Table lb
Project Component Summations
5
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
6
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
7
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View
9
Table 5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
12
Photo Point Photos
13
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
17
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6
Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
26
Table 7
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
27
Table 8
CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
28
Appendix D — Hydrologic Data
30 -70 Percentile Graph.
32
Precipitation
and Water Level Plots
33
Table 9
Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
52
UT Pembroke KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 283 2012- MY05

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored, enhanced, and preserved wetlands
and restored a headwater wetland valley, which is analogous to a stream in this setting, at the UT
Pembroke Site in Chowan County, North Carolina The 59 -acre site is located within the USGS 8 -digit
HUC 03010205 of the Pasquotank River Basin These assets and their acreage totals were revised by the
EEP during the summer of 2009, with the revised totals reflected in Table 1 of this report The project
goals and objectives are listed below
Goal: Modify the channelized water features, based on reference conditions, with the intent to restore the
site's primary wetland functions such as nutrient cycling, flood storage, and wildlife habitat
Objectives:
• Improve water quality in the basin by filtering nutrients through on -site wetlands.
• Buffer flood flows downstream by increasing infiltration and storage areas
• Design a waterway through the wetland complex with appropriate cross - section, slope, and
pattern as to provide nutrient filtering, flood storage, and wildlife habitat while meeting the
appropriate success criteria for the wetland
• Improve terrestrial and aquatic habitat diversity
• Establish a contiguous buffer along the project that can serve as a migration corridor for local
fauna
The restored wetlands and headwater wetland valley were planted with one of three different planting
zones, each with various species of bare root trees and shrubs Following the CVS -EEP protocol, sixteen
vegetation monitoring plots were established during the baseline data collection immediately after the site
was planted Plot number 14 was damaged during road maintenance and was reset in the same location
during the second year of monitoring The fifth year of monitoring found a site average of 215 planted
stems /acre, with nine of the sixteen vegetation monitoring plots having planted stem densities less than
the five -year success criteria of 260 stems /acre The site's average total stem density including volunteers
is 1,495 stems /acre.
Volunteer trees that are sporadically present throughout the site are, black willow (Sala nigra), sycamore
(Platanus occidentahs), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracii lua), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) The only
exotic species identified at the site are parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum), which is present in areas
of open standing water, honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), which is scattered throughout the site, a few
Chinaberry trees (Melia azedarach), and privet (Ligustrum sinense), which is predominantly found in the
enhancement wetland and has been shown on the CCPV Some parts of the site have large cattail (Typha
latifolia) populations, which may out compete desirable vegetation and become problematic There are
also areas where the Juncus effusus is growing so vigorously that there are no planted stems in the
surrounding area Supplemental planting of the site was conducted in December of 2011 An open water
area that is approximately 0 3 acres is located near vegetation plot 12, which results in a bare area of 0 9%
of planted acreage for the site
The restored headwater wetland valley is stable In the parts of the site where there are large areas of
standing water, the feature becomes less visually defined, but there is still active flow of water across the
site A maintenance plan was implemented in the fall of 2011 to enhance the movement or water through
the headwater stream and prevent ponding along the existing farm road This maintenance included
adding a new road crossing and the removal of the top level of the drop down structure For further
details, please see the UT Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream Restoration Site Repair Baseline Report
(KCI, 2012).
UT Pembroke I KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 283 2012 - MY05

Nineteen groundwater monitoring wells have been established to monitor wetland hydrology Of these
wells, five (4, 5, 6, 9, and 13) were installed in restored wetlands, two (2 and 3) were installed in
enhanced wetlands, five (7, 8, 10, 11, and 15) were installed in the headwater wetland valley, and two (12
and 16) were installed in the preserved wetlands as reference wells An additional monitoring well,
Monitoring Well 17, was installed in the restored wetland in April 2009. In June 2010, four more
monitoring wells, Monitoring Wells 18, 19, 20, and 21, were installed During the site's fifth growing
season, 12 of the 17 wells in the restoration and enhancement areas met the success criterion of having
saturated soil conditions occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum continuous
penod of 5% (13 days) of the 263 day growing season (March 10 to November 28) during average
climatic conditions The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had
average rainfall dunng the 2012 growing season The months of February, March, April, May, July,
September, and October experienced average rainfall Rainfall was less than average in January, June, and
November, while August experienced above average rainfall
The wells that did not meet the success critena - Wells 5, 6, and 13 each had water above the
jurisdictional depth for a maximum of ten consecutive days Monitoring Well 5 experienced two gauge
malfunctions which resulted in the gauges being replaced twice during the end of the growing season
Monitonng Wells 2 and 3 are in the enhanced wetland and Wells 5, 6, and 13 are in the restored non -
riparian wetland. KCI is currently investigating the areas that are not meeting the hydrologic success
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the EEP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from the EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods.htm) was used to collect
vegetation data from the UT Pembroke site
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M. T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 0 (http•//cvs bio.unc.edu/methods htm)
Weakley, A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(http: / /www herbanum unc edu/F1oraArchives/WeakleyFlora 2006 - Jan.pdf)
KCI, 2012 UT Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream Restoration Site Repair Baseline Report
UT Pembroke 2 KCI Associates offorth Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and
Background Tables
UT Pembroke 3 KC/ Associates of North Carohna
EEP Project # 283 2012 - MY05

Directions to the Project Site:
From Raleigh, travel on US -64 E.
Stay straight on US -17 N. Take
exit 224 and take a left at the top of
the ramp. Then take a left onto
Emperor's Landing Rd. Then take a
right onto Tip Toe Rd. Then take a
right onto Macedonia Rd. The site
will be on your right.
Chowan River
W,3 1 Rd.
Albemarle Sound
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
UT Pembroke Creek Chowan County, EEP Pro'ect # 283
mmwmmb�
Project Easement Boundary �-Osysteni WK C I
;
05 025 0 05
M.i� s ASSOCIATES OF NC

Table Ia. Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek
Stream
00
Riparian
Wetland (Ac)
Non -Ripar
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
tverme
on- iverine
;
Restoration
4,488
13 81 446
526
895 2592
0 2276
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement Il
Creation
Preservation
A
Gz
Totals
Feet /Acres
4,488
22.76
35.64
Segment/
MU Totals
4,488
15.60
1 12.27
0
Reach ID
W w
a
Q
,j Q
Stationing
m
Comment
Headwater
This feature is 100 feet wide
00+00 to 34 +73 and
Wetland
-
R
-
4,488 if
1 1
4,488
-
for its entire length,
40 +00 to 58 +72
Valley
encompassing 9 96 acres
Riparian
_
R
-
13 81 ac
-
1 1
1381
-
Wetlands
Non - Ripanan
_
R
-
4 46 ac
-
1 1
446
-
Wetlands
Non - Riparian
E
-
5 26 ac
-
2 1
263
-
Wetlands
Riparian
Wooded
-
P
-
8 95 ac
-
5 1
1 79
-
Wetlands
Non - Riparian
Wooded
-
P
-
25 92 ac
-
5 1
5 18
-
Wetlands
R = Restoration E = Enhancement P = Preservation
Table lb. Project Component Summations
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek
Restoration
Level
Stream
00
Riparian
Wetland (Ac)
Non -Ripar
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
tverme
on- iverine
;
Restoration
4,488
13 81 446
526
895 2592
0 2276
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement Il
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals
Feet /Acres
4,488
22.76
35.64
0
MU Totals
4,488
15.60
1 12.27
0
UT Pembroke 5 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012 - MY05

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 4 yr 10 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yr 0 months
Number of Reporting Years: 5
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Com lete
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
2006
Sep 06
Final Design - 90%
Mar 07
Construction
Feb 08
As -Built Survey
Nov 07
Bare -Root Planting
Dec 07
Baseline Monitoring (Mitigation Plan
Oct 08
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 08
Mar 09
Year 2 Monitonng
Nov 09
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 10
Dec 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 11
Dec 11
Site Maintenance and Supplemental Planting
Dec 11
Year 5 Monitoring
Aug 12
Dec 12
UT Pembroke 6 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke
Design Firm
EcoEngmeermg, A Division of the
John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Contact Mr James M Halley, P E
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
PO Box 1654
119 Ilex Court
Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312
Contact Mr Adam McIntyre
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Phone (252 ) 482 -8491
Site Maintenance
Design Firm
KCI Associates of NC
Contact Mr Adam Spitler
see below for additional contact information
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs, NC 27592
Contact Mr Lloyd Glover
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems
PO Box 1197
Fremont, North Carolina 27830
Contact Mr Charlie Bruton
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Mitigation Plan and MY -01
EcoEngmeermg, A Division of the
John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Contact Mr James M Halley, P E
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
MY-02,03104
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spitler
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
UT Pembroke 7 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 283 2012 - MY05

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke
Project County
Chowan County
Drainage Area
0 4 mi
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<5%
Physiogra hic Region
Outer Coastal Plain
Easement Acreage
59 4 ac
Planted Acreage
32 6 ac
Total Vegetated Acreage
59 4 ac
Ecoregion
Chesapeake-Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes
Plant Communities
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp,
Nonnvenne Wet Hardwood Forest, and
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
Dominant Soil Types
Cape Fear, Conetoe, Dragston, Portsmouth,
Roanoke, and Tomotle
Reference Site ID
Reference Sites 1, 2, 3, and 4
USGS HUC for Project and References
03010205
Any portion of the project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
% of Project Fenced
0%
UT Pembroke 8 KC1 Associates of North Carohna
EEP Pr4ject # 283 2012- MY05

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
UT Pembroke 9 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
................................ ...............................
DENSITY CRITERION
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION .......... ...............................
WETLAND GAUGE ACHIEVING ....................................... ...............................
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
WETLAND GAUGE BELOW...
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
INVASIVE SPECIES .............................................. ...............................
(PRIVET)
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY .................... ...............................
s
AS -BUILT STATIONED CENTERLINE '=
PHOTO POINT . .................................... .........._..._ ............ _..._ a
CROSS - SECTION ..................................... ............................... 0_
-100-50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
■
C
C:1
PROJECT CONDITION DETAILS
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY_ 14951215
AWK9ESOUR0,67- N020l0 0R7H01&,4GERY
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2
U)
Z
0
W
i
E
oa=
Ug o
N M K
v CL Y Q
Z OW F i
XK
= J
Z
W
z
LO
r Q
Q z
Of J
Y0 0�
wF- aQ
ww �U
LLI
UPI=- z
w ~� o
O
ow
Z z
m , F
0
Cl) d z Y
W 1 o
W a Z w O rc
m
Q Z w
Q a
Z
J =
I- U
W
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
SHEET 1 OF 2

VEGETATION-,.
PLOT #10
!
MONITORING
,MONITORING
WELL #21
5
WELL#17
7",
rn
VEGETATION
LOT #12
ii -PHOTO POINTS
VEGETATION
rn
PLOT #9
CROSS-SECTION #4
VEGETATION♦
PLOT #13
-VEGETATION
PLOT #14
PHOTO POINT
VEGETATION
♦PLOT #11
'MONITORING
WELL #10
-------------
----CONSERVATION ----------------------- EASEMENT
--------- BOUNDARY .......
=CROSS-SECTION #3
VEGETATION 1
PLOT #16
MONITORING:
WELL #13
r
- FORD
CROSSING MONITORING
WELL #16
MONITORING
WELL #15
-VEGETATION
PLOT #15
HOTO POINT
9
\PHOTO POINT
10
---FORD
CROSSING
ro POINT
11
MONITORING
WELL #12
/-MONITORING
WELL #11
VEGETATION
LOT #12
ii -PHOTO POINTS
6 & 7
CROSS-SECTION #4
VEGETATION♦
PLOT #13
-VEGETATION
PLOT #14
PHOTO POINT
VEGETATION 1
PLOT #16
MONITORING:
WELL #13
r
- FORD
CROSSING MONITORING
WELL #16
MONITORING
WELL #15
-VEGETATION
PLOT #15
HOTO POINT
9
\PHOTO POINT
10
---FORD
CROSSING
ro POINT
11

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream
Planted Acreage 32.6 Easement Acreage 59.4
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Cate or
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Pol ons
Acrea e
% of Planted Acreage
Very Iimrted cover of both woody and
I Bare Areas
0 1 acres
Pattern and Color
1
030
09%
herbaceous material
Woody stem densities clearly below
Not Depicted, Covers
Low Stem Density
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0 1 acres
Most of Restoration
0
000
00%
Areas
stem count criteria
Area
Total
1
030
09%
Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class
that are obviously small given the
0 25 acres
Pattern and Color
0
000
00%
Rates or Vigor
monitoring year
Cumulative Total
1
0 30
09%
Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to render
1000 SF Pattern and Color 1
las
140
24%
Concern polygons at map scale)
Easement
Areas or points (if too small to render
Encroachment Areas
las polygons at map scale)
none
Pattern and Color
0
000
00%
UT Pen:bi oke 12 KCI Associates of North Cai ohna
EEP Pi 41ect 9 283 1012- MY05

Photo Point Photos
Photo Point 1 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward
Wildcat Road.
Photo Point 2 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing west toward
Macedonia Road.
downstream end of the project.
Photo Point 1 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Facing northwest
toward Wildcat Road.
Photo Point 2 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Facing west toward
Macedonia Road.
he Photo Point 3 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Facing south toward the
downstream end of the project.
UT Pembroke 13 KC! Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012 - MY05

Photo Point 4 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A —
Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 5 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A —
Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 6 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward
Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 4 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Road Crossing Type A
— Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 5 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Road Crossing Type A
— Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 6 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Facing northwest toward
Macedonia Road.
UT Pembroke 14 KC1 Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project 4 283 2013- MY05

Photo Point 7 — 12/2/09 - MY 02— Facing south.
Photo Point 8 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type
B — Station 30 +50
Photo Point 9- 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type C —
Station 32 +50
Photo Point 7 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 - MY 04 — Facing south.
Photo Point 8 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Road Crossing Type B
— Station 30 +50
Photo Point 9 — 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Road Crossing Type C
— Station 32 +50
UT Pembroke 15 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 283 2012- MY05

Photo Point 10 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Grade transition, facing
downstream.
Photo Point 11 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Grade transition,
facing upstream
Photo Point 10/30/12 - MY 05 — Grade transition, facing
downstream.
Photo Point 11 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Grade transition,
facing upstream.
UT Pembroke 16 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 283 2012 - MYOS

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site
Plot 2 — 11/28/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site
UT Pembroke 17 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

Plot 3 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road
Plot 4 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road on the northeastern portion
of the site
UT Pembroke 18 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

Plot 5 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on western portion of the site
Plot 6 — 11/28/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on the central portion of the site
UT Pembroke 19 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012 - MY05

ti .r
i � ♦ A
7B i4
Ae
L'
Plot 7 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road on the western portion of the
site
Plot 8 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on central portion of the site just north of the
main road
UT Pembroke 20 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 1012 - MY05

Plot 9 — 8/ 13/ 12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on western portion of the site near the pond
Plot 10 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road just southwest of the intersection of the main
road and the dirt access road
UT Pembroke 21 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

Plot 1 I — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of Plot 9 near the pond
Plot 12 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of the pond
UT Pembroke 22 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 1011 - MY05

Plot 13 — 11/28/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on southwestern portion of the site
Plot 14 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on southwestern portion of the site
UT Pembroke KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- W05

Plot 15 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing east on the southeastern portion of the site
Plot 16 — 8/13/12 - MY 05 - Facing Macedonia Road on the southwestern portion of the site
UT Pembroke 24 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 283 2012- MYOS

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
UT Pembroke 25 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 1011- MY05

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Protect Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke
Vegetation Plot W
Monitoring Year 05
Planted Stem Density
260 stems /acre
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Monitoring Year 05
Total Stem Density
stems /acre
1
121
No
1,416
2
0
No
1,700
3
405
Yes
2,226
4
405
Yes
445
5
364
Yes
647
6
0
No
121
7
405
Yes
526
8
405
Yes
647
9
0
No
0
10
324
Yes
2,104
11
162
No
3,804
12
121
No
121
13
162
No
2,104
14
81
No
1,376
15
324
Yes
4,492
16
162
No
2,226
UT Pembroke 26 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr4lect # 283 2012 - MY05
•

Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke
Re rt Prepared By
April Helms
Date Prepared
10/30/2012 9 11
database name
KCI- 2012 -A mdb
database location
M \2007 \12071067 2007 EEP OPEN E N D\Veg_data base
computer name
12- CV76KF1
file size 159768832
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Prol, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This
excludes live stakes
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
283
project Name
UTPembroke
Description
Stream and wetland restoration site in Chowan County, NC
River Basin
Roanoke
length(ft)
4,488
stream-to-edge width (ft)
50
area (sq m)
41,691
Re uired Plots calculated)
11
S ample Plots
16
UT Pembroke
EEP Project # 283
27 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
2012 - h1Y05

Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke
Current Plot Data
(MY5 2012)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
E283
-01 -0001
E283 -01 -0002
E283 -01 -0003
E283 -01 -0004
E283 -01 -0005
E283
-01 -0006
E283 -01 -0007
E283 -01 -0008
noL
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
18
2
4
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
2
Cara
hickory
Tree
1
1
Diospyros vir iniana
common persimmon
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
Itea vn inica
Virginia sweets ire
Shrub
Ju lans nr ra
black walnut
Tree
1
Juni erus vir iniana
Eastern red cedar
Tree
2
Li ustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Li uidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
32
16
4
1
4
1
Liriodendron tuli i era
tuli tree
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
7
7
7
3
3
3
1
4
4
4
Morella ceri era
wax myrtle
shrub
1
1
4
4
8
1
1
1
Morus
mulberry
Tree
2
N ssa bi ora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
I
1
7
7
7
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
22
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
19
Po ulus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
rus calleryana
Callery pear
Exotic
uercus
oak
Tree
1
uercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
l
ercus alcata
southern red oak
Tree
uercus laurt olia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
uercus 1 rata
overcup oak
Tree
uercus michauxit
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
uercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
uercus phellos
willowoak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhus
sumac
shrub
Rhus co allinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix ni ra
blackvvillow
Tree
1
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
I
1
1
3
3
3
Sambucus ni ra
European black elderberry
Shrub
Taxodium distichum 1
bald cypress
1 Tree
Ulmus americana
American elm
ITree
3
1 3
3
1
1 1
1
Stem count
size(ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
3
3
35
0
0
42
10
10
55
]0
]0
11
9
9
16
0
1 0
1 3
10
10
L13
10
10
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
002
3
=
4
0
Po
4
5
5
8
3
3
4
5
5
8
0
0
2
4
4
7
4
4
7
121
121
1416
0
1700
405
405
2226
405
405
445
364
364
647
0
0
121 1
405
1 405
1526
1 405 1
405
647
UT Pembroke
EEP Project # 183
U
28
KCI Associates of Noi th Carolina
1010 - MY03

a
Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Project Number and Name. 283 - UTPembroke
Current Plot Data (W5 2012)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
E283 -01
-0009
E283 -01 -0010
E283 -01 -0011
E283 -01 -0012
E283
-01 -0013
E283 -01 -0014
E283 -01 -0015
E283 -01 -0016
PnoLS
P -all
TI
PnoLS
P -all
I T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
I T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
7
6
2
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
4
5
Cara
hickory
Tree
Diospyros vir iniana
common persimmon
Tree
Ft axinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
Itea vir inica
Virginia sweets ire
Shrub
Ju lans nr ra
black walnut
Tree
Juni erns vir intana
Eastern red cedar
Tree
Li estrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Li uidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
1
11
72
11
Liriodendron tuli i era
tuli tree
Tree
1
1
1
Morella ceri era
wax myrtle
shrub
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1 16
1
3
7
3
Morus
mulberry
Tree
N ssa bi ora
swamp tupelo
Tree
3
3
3
Persea palustl is
swamp bay
tree
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
lobiolly pine
Tree
3
11
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
8
3
11
Po ulus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
2
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
P rus caller ana
Cal lery ar
Exotic
uercus
oak
Tree
2
2
1
uercus alba
white oak
Tree
3
3
4
uei cus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
uercus law i olia
laurel oak
Tree
uercusl rata
overcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
uercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
uercus nt ra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
uercus phellos
wtllowoak
Tree
Rhus
sumac
shrub
Rhus co allinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nr ra
black wiIlow
Tree
33
84
23
7
5
21
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Sambucus canadensts
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Sambucus ni ra
European black elderberry
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress 1
Tree
3
3
1 3
2
2
2
Ulmus americana
American elm ITree
2
2
2
2
2
2
]
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
Stem count
size(ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
0
1 0
0
8
8
1 52
4
1 4
94
3
3
3
4
4
52
2
2
34
8
8
111
4
4
55
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
002 1
002
002 1
002
002
002
002 -
002
0
0
0 1
3
3
7
3
3
7 1
1
1
1
3
1 3
8
1
1 1 1
7
4
=4
10
3
1 3
8
0
1 0
101
324
1 324
121041
162 1
162
138041
121
121
121
162 1
162
121041
81
1 81 113761
324 1
324
14492
162
1 162
2226
UT Pembr oke
EEP Project # 283
29
KCI Associates of Nor th Carolina
2010 - MY03

a
UT Pembroke
EEP Project # 283
Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Project Number and Name: 283 - UTPembroke
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY5
2012
MY4 2011
MY3 2010
MY2 2009
MYl 2008
MYO
2008
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
IP -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
IP -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer i ubrum
red maple
Tree
39
21
18
31
Baccharts
baccharis
Shrub
12
7
9
6
Ca rya
hickory
Tree
2
1
Diospyros vii iniana
common persimmon
Tree
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
I
1
Iteavir inica
Virginia sweets ire
Shrub
5
5
5
Ju lans nt ra
black walnut
Tree
1
4
2
3
Juni erns vii iniana
Eastern red cedar
Tree
2
Li ustrum stnense
Chinese prixet
Exotic
1
Li uidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
155
1 177
148
1 178
Liriodendron tuli t era
tuli tree
Tree
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
21
21
24
16
16
16
36
36
36
Morella ceri era
wax myrtle
shrub
9
9
42
9
9
22
9
9
13
9
9
11
11
11
11
17
17
17
Morus
mulberry
Tree
2
N ssa bi ora
swamp tupelo
Tree
11
] 1
1 1
1 1
11
11
11
11
11
14
14
14
16
16
1 16
34
1 34
34
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
1
3
3
3
7
7
7
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
36
2
Platanus occidentahs
Americansycamore
Tree
41
36
1
1
30
1
1
6
Po ulus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
2
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
3
P rus caller ana
Cal lery pear
Exotic
1
uercus
oak
Tree
6
5
2
uercus alba
white oak
Tree
4
4
5
3
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
uercus alcata
southern red oak
Tree
I
I 1
I
1
uercus lauri olia
laurel oak
Tree
2
2
1 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
34
34
34
uercusl rata
overcup oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
6
6
6
uercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
6
6
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
13
13
13
19
19
19
uercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
8
8
8
23
23
23
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
120
1
1
91
1
1
1
Rhus
sumac
shrub
4
6
Rhus co allinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
12
Salix ni ra
black willow
Tree
174
63
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
56
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
4
4
1 4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11 6
Sambucus nt i s
European black elderberry
Shrub
7
7
7
9
9
9
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5
5
5
1
Ulmus americana
American elm 1Tree
10
10
9
10
10
11
10
1 10
10
11
11
11
15
15
15
31
31
31
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACREI
85
1 85
591
82
82
470
84
1 84
396
95
95
468
100
100
100
225
225
225
16
16
16
16
16
16
040
040
040
040
040
040
14
14
26
12
1 12 1
19
13
13
21
14
14
28
11
1 11
1 11
12
12
12
215
215
1 1495
207
L207 111891
212
1 212
110021
240
1 240
11184
253
1 253
1253
569
1 569
1569
30
KCI Associates of Nor th Carolina
2010 - MY03

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
UT Pembroke 31 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05

9
8
7
6
c 5
w
C
a 4
3
2
1
0
UT Pembroke 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2011 -2012
Edenton, NC Monthly Rainfall
— N N N N N N N N N N N N
1 i i i i i i
ani " o avi
z w ¢ a CIO o z o
Date
2011 Rainfall � 2012 Rainfall 4 30% Less Than --*— 30% Greater Than

C) i..> ti
C) U. O v. o
1- Jan -12
16 -Jan-12
31 -Jan-12
15- Feb -12
1 -Mar-12
16 -Mar-12
' 31 -Mar-12
15- Apr -12
S'
m
30- Apr -12
} 15- May -12
d
° 30- May -12
C7 14- Jun -12
m
29- Jun -12
0.
n
5 14- Jul -12
d
c 29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
C� 28- Aug -12
'o
c
12- Sep -12
C)
CD 27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
cn O s
------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---------------- ---
W be
°Q
N
N
oa
W
0
0
O O N N w w A
if %� if CIi
Rainfall Depth (in)
A LA
in
O
C
� y
m b
i
� o
o.
arcs o
C �
N
b �
aB
n
oa w
a
o
N OQ
OD C/1
o�
N ,7
O O N N w w A
if %� if CIi
Rainfall Depth (in)
A LA
in
O
C
� y
m b
i
� o
o.
arcs o
C �
N

I -Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
7�
d
5'
°-'—' 30- Apr -12
} 15- May -12
v
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
a A
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
�d
-f Do
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
0
a
Q. 28- Aug -12
UO
a
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
1I- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
-- - - - - - - - - - - - -
w �y
0 5.
N
O
N p
F
w
H
a
a
a
—A
N.
� W
� A
O Ini,
-------------------- --------------------
N 5
Rainfall Depth (in)
4 ,
-s
O
C
= C
� O
� c
o �
ar°c o
Ut
U
w

Groundwater Depth (in)
W W IJ IJ
lA O Vi O In ._-. ✓
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- 1=cb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
I31- Mar -12
d 15- Apr -12
5'
m
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
d
�- 30- May -12
O 14- Jun -12
a
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
d
a
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
C1
0
c 28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
d
m
O to O
w b7
N �
2!"
N o
7
as
0
y
0
0
O O W 'r-I .P ? to
VI
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
G. C
� y
� ro
� o
O �
3
ar°a. o
A
'
0
0
zg
N
°0° f�D
o�
-r o
N 7
O O W 'r-I .P ? to
VI
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
G. C
� y
� ro
� o
O �
3
ar°a. o
A

1 -Jan-12
16 -Jan-12
31 -Jan-12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
5'
w
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
d
30- May -12
p 14- Jun -12
a �
29- Jun -12
o'
C7 14- Jul -12
Er-
a
29- Jul -12
C) 13- Aug -12
0
c
a
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
L L w L L -I
o
U. o v. o v. o v. o v o
--- -- --------------- - - - - --
------------------
w G1
m �
N �
� o
►+
O
N p
O
d
Q
OQ
0
0
O O -- N N W W ? P. lh
Uh C.n In LA 11�
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
>v b
C
� o
O �
3
QQ• O
efl
cn
m �
� o
a�
Q
0
d
to
5'
N �
00 r/1
o�
-- o
N p
O O -- N N W W ? P. lh
Uh C.n In LA 11�
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
>v b
C
� o
O �
3
QQ• O
efl
cn

0
I
m
5'
d
c
N�
a
o'
0
m
d
m
0
c
0
a
c
n
Groundwater Depth (in)
I- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
I -Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15 -Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
p 14- Jun -12
m
A
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
II- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ti O
N 'O
7
QO
m
H
O
'.7
,o
A
N �
OG
C
�
0
0
N �
� ry
N
O in
O
N O
O O — 7 N W -1�. A VA
in lh I-A VA lA
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
G C'
>v "b
� A
a �
0
O. 7
r1
� C
4t

1
X
5'
d
-6
0
c
3
a
c
m
n
W W N IJ
to O Cn O
I-Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
C 14- Jun -12
A
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
O In O
--------------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - - - --
w �
d �
� N p
y
dQ•
N
d �
a
v.
N (IQ
�Ln
N
O Pn
�O
N d
-r- 4-
V1
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
a C
� y
b
0 3
� O
O �
ao• o
C �
e�
r
J

I
A
m
d
0
Sr
c.
C)
0'
C
v
W
0
C
7
a
c
R_
Ql�
A
N
W
I11
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30 -May -12
W 14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
W ICJ IJ
Groundwater Depth (in)
Vi C V
d
d
y
----------------------
W
O U O
W W
� N O
O �
N p
R
00
0
Rainfall Depth (in)
to
0
N 00
CA
O lri.
O
N 7
W ? -Pb. to
ut ut
O
C
o. G"
� y
>v b
�t
� o
O �
mss.
0Q O
eo
00

1-Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
w
5'
w
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
d
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
C d
29- Jun -12
o'
0
° 14- Jul -12
C7
CD
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
0
c
n 28- Aug -12
rn
C
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
O In O to O Vi O v� O cn O
----- ---------------------
- - - - -- -------
w
A
- - - ---
W �
O �
N a
5"
oa
_
o
to
c.
C1
a
�Q
N OQ
0�0 N
O Pn
r p
N p
A to
'vi in v, %s in
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
O �
o �D
� rC
�+ O
C
�C

1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1 -Mar-12
16 -Mar-12
31 -Mar-12
' 15- Apr -12
X
m
5'
30- Apr -12
} 15- May -12
0
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
c` d
m
a i9 29- Jun -12
o'
m 14- Jul -12
d
v
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
n
0
a
28- Aug -12
a
w 12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12-Oct-12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
------------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- - - - --
N �
O_
N n
IJ
A
d
w
y
O O --- 1 `7 N W W J- U
V1 ' ✓i U U Vi
Rainfall Depth (in)
1` 1
0
O
� y
� b
� o
o �
orq o
0
a
C
y
N OQ
N
W
°o
N 7
O O --- 1 `7 N W W J- U
V1 ' ✓i U U Vi
Rainfall Depth (in)
1` 1
0
O
� y
� b
� o
o �
orq o
0

W W W N
v. c V. o
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16- Mar -12
I31- Mar -12
m 15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
v
15- May -12
30- May -12
a O 14- Jun -12
� R
o• A
29- Jun -12
d
14- Jul -12
C7 29- Jul -12
0
c
'a 13- Aug -12
c
28- Aug -12
N
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
v o v
C, cn o
0 5.'
0
N
(I
1�
�I
A
d
ti
N � �
N fp
a
as
G
c
O O — N N W W .A A N
V� Vi �f tll CA
Rainfall Depth (in)
W
0
c
0
�77 �
a �
p O
� c
N
d
v
rz
-s
1` O
�
O�
� N
N
VJ
�
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
r
� N p
- _ f _ _ _ _ _
O O — N N W W .A A N
V� Vi �f tll CA
Rainfall Depth (in)
W
0
c
0
�77 �
a �
p O
� c

1 -Jan-12
16 -Jan-12
31 -Jan-12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16 -Mar-12
31 -Mar-12
I15- Apr -12
7�
o'
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
v
v 30- May -12
T
p 14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
a
14- Jul -12
m
O
0 29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
c 28- Aug -12
C
7
a
12- Sep -12
fD 27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
W W N ICJ t
O cn O
V. O v. -A O cA O
-------------------- - - - - -- -
N
N
d
N
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W
• o d.
N
N tiQ
0
a
O O 1J IJ
Rainfall Depth (in)
W A ? (A
w
z
C
c
c
C.
o'b
� A
O CT
=• o
� O
es cn
c
to
L�
L�
N �
a
m
c
0
a
C1
3
N �
00 w
� fA
'+ Q
N 7
O O 1J IJ
Rainfall Depth (in)
W A ? (A
w
z
C
c
c
C.
o'b
� A
O CT
=• o
� O
es cn
c
to

1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1- Mar -12
16 -Mar-12
31- Mar -12
! 15- Apr -12
m
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
v
II
30- May -12
14- Jun -12
O
a.
n A 29- Jun -12
o'
0
m
C7 14- Jul -12
s
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
0
c
0
28- Aug -12
e
;v
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
Groundwater Depth (in)
o o o v, o o cn o
------------------------ - - - - -- -------
- - - - --
w �
o Q.
O
N
o
w
trf
a
a
00g
5'
N �
o In
N �
A cn
to v. � ✓, v, U
Rainfall Depth (in)
0
C
� y
O C
D �
O A
7
7Q O
C �
e�
it
w

10
5
0
°. -5
CL
d
C -10
v
3
-15
0
V
-20
-25
-30
-35
N
C
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #15
N N
N
N
N
N
N
(V
N
N
N
N
N N
M
N
^
ci+
16
i
�
^
O
N
_4 Ck
N
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
r
n.
2.5 C
w
c
2
1.5
0.5
�r u■i
■
i�
■ -�i
rJ 0
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E Q
o
o
z
z
N
Date
Rainfall —+ —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

m
5'
w1T
1
0
c
3
a
c
m
Groundwater Depth (in)
UN
1- Jan -12
16- Jan -12
31- Jan -12
15- Feb -12
1 -Mar-12
16 -Mar-12
31- Mar -12
15- Apr -12
30- Apr -12
15- May -12
30- May -12
p 14- Jun -12
29- Jun -12
14- Jul -12
29- Jul -12
13- Aug -12
28- Aug -12
12- Sep -12
27- Sep -12
12- Oct -12
27- Oct -12
11- Nov -12
26- Nov -12
---------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -!
o �+
N a
N
i
A
d
y
Rainfall Depth (in)
rrl
a
a
C
0
N UQ
W
o�
•- o
N p
W
�s
O
e
C
A
,.t
y
.� 3
0 0-
�' c
-C
-s o
� cn
r
a�

10
5
0
-5
C
-10
A
3
-15
C
0
V -20
-25
-30
-35
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #17
Begin Growing Season
i 3/10/2012
i
r ti
i
i
i
116 Days
i
End Growing Season
11/28/2012
20 Days
i
31 Days �
-40 ' . 1 • . �, .= 1 I 1 0 1 1 IN! Ell 1 0 1, 1 film I I 1 . 11 • I'T
N N N cal N N N c'J N N N cV N N N N N N N N N N N
>
`O `° cis cn O O o 0
¢ ¢ z z
r7 � O O 'V N NM,-� 00 N N
M M M N N N N
Date
� Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
s
a
2.5 O
w
C
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

10
5
0
-5
a
s
d -10
D
L
6�
e
0
0
L
V -•=0
-25
-30
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #18
Riparian Wetland Depression Area
Begin Growing Season
Woo 3/10/2012
i
i
i
i
i
119 Days
i
Gauge
malfunction
Replaced
9 -24 -12
End Growing Seaso
11 /28/201
29 Days
-35 I . I 1i ■ 11 i n! 011,1 ■ 1, 1 .1k I I i ■ 11 ■ 1 IN I r r
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C C C i• 4• T T C C 5 W Q U > >
Q Q z z
M 'A ^ M O 4 N N M ONO ^ r- N ^ N
Date
� Rainfall —Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface)
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 .5
s
a
w
2.5 G
w
C
2 Ce
1.5
1
0.5
0

10
5
0
-5
e
-10
w
a
D
L -15
6J
CQ
3
'O
7 -20
0
L
V
•
-25
-30
-35
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #19
Riparian Wetland Hummock Area ,
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 °_
s
a
v
2.5 Q
W
G
2 R
a
!,
0.5
Date
Rainfall -Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
M
^
6
^
=
M
O
M
N
N
=
00
N
N
.N-.
N
N
Date
Rainfall -Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

35
30
25
20
15
c
l0
a
A 5
cQ 0
3
c
-5
L
V
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #20
Riparian Wetland Depression Area
I ,
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/10/2012 11/28/2012 I
I
I ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
I ,
1 ,
�? Replaced gauge
9 -17 -12 �
I ,
� I
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
122 Days 31 Days
I
I
41 Days I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
1 ,
I
I ,
I ,
N N N N N N N N N
N N
N N N N
N N N N
N N N N
C C C L
bO 0. 0.
> >
z z
S2
fn M
M
Date
Rainfall
—Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
4.5
4
3.5
3 C-
2.5 G
w
e
2 4
1.5
1
0.5
0

5
-5
c
s
-15
A
L
LQ
3
C
o -25
L
LE
-35
Begin Growing Season
,3/10/2012
20 Days
UT Pembroke MY05
Groundwater Monitoring Well #21
Riparian Wetland Hummock Area
Replaced gauge
End Growing Season
11/28/2012
-45
I
..1
. ' .
T ..
. 1 .
. �_!
.
. ....
14
... � .
. a ..1.
.
. .
11
. .
Ip
.
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
Ca
—
q
M
v
_
ro
a
._
M
a
V1
a
C
f7
m
C'
M
c
c
N
_
N
ou
>
ou
>
00
N
ri
v
N
a
v
r-
N
N
r
N
> >
o 0
— N
Date
Rainfall -Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
i 5
1
1
4.5
i
4
i
3.5
3 .E
s
a
2.5 G
W
C
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Project Number and Name. 283 - UT Pembroke
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growng Season (Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 (2008)
Year 2 (2009 )
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 (2011)
Year 5 (2012)
No /0
No /4
No /4
No /4
No /0
Well
(0%)
(15%)
(15 %)
(15%)
(0 %)
No /0
No /4
No /5
Yes /13
No /3
Well
(00/0)
(15%)
(19%)
(50%)
(1 %)
No /0
No /4
No /6
No /10
Yes /141
Well 4
(00/)
(15%)
(23%)
(38%)
(53 %)
No/11
Yes /49
Yes /54
Yes /23
No /10
Well
(42%)
(186%)
(205%)
(87%)
(4 %)
No /12
Yes /46
Yes /50
Yes /17
No /10
Well
(46%)
(175%)
(190%)
(64%)
(4 %)
Yes /87
Yes /108
Yes /104
Yes /95
Yes /102
Well?
(331%)
(41 1 %)
(395%)
(360%)
(39%)
No/11
Yes /45
Yes /42
Yes /47
Yes/ 13
Well
(48%)
(171%)
(1600%)
(178%)
(5 %)
Yes /51
Yes /49
Yes /57
Yes /94
Yes /34
Well
(194%)
(186%)
(2170%)
(356%)
(13 %)
Yes /207
Yes/ 110
Yes /103
Yes /101
Yes/ 114
Well 10
(787%)
(418%)
(392%)
(383%)
(43 %)
Yes /107
Yes /263
Yes /138
Yes /147
Yes /194
Well II
(407%)
(100%)
(525%)
(557%)
(74 %)
Well 12
Yes /77
Yes /53
Yes /55
Yes /59
Yes /25
Reference
(293%)
(202%)
(209%)
(223%)
(10%)
No /10
Yes /31
Yes /39
Yes /37
No /10
Well 13
(38%)
(118%)
(148%)
(1400/.)
(4 0%)
Yes /174
Yes/ 107
Yes/ 133
Yes /146
Yes /83
Well 15
(662%)
(407%)
(506%)
(553%)
(31%)
Well 16
Yes /112
Yes /87
Yes /120
Yes /101
Yes /114
Reference
(43 %)
(33 1 %)
(456%)
(383%)
(43 %)
Yes /140
Yes /101
Yes/ 116
Well 17
N/A
N/A
(532%)
(383%)
(44 %)
Well 18
Yes /63
Yes /59
Yes/ 119
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(240%)
(223%)
(45 %)
depression area
Well 19
Yes /61
Yes /99
Yes /58
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(232%)
(375%)
(22 %)
hummock area
Well 20
Yes /63
Yes /99
Yes /122
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
depression area
(240%)
(375%)
(46 0/6)
Well 21
Yes /25
Yes /99
Yes /20
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(95%)
(375%)
(8 %)
hummock area
UT Pembroke 52 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2012- MY05