20071392 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20130212

Cat Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 71
Monitoring Contract Number: 004490
Monitoring Year 3
2012 Final Report
y
If' C ?0.y,. T!t!'Lj.1•
Y
r ..s
0�- /�qv-\'
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 2012
o � �
[Row Opm D Ecosvestem
PROGRAM
F-
W3
1652 Mail Service Center
OUALITY Raleigh, NC 27699
_� " /e�is r4.• S[O P�watw &anti
F INJ
Cr •e VJ
!a 40/�O 13 P6 a

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Kevin Mitchell
Email: [e-mail]

Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
2012 Monitoring Report (MY 3)
Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
20 Methodology
30 References
0
Page 1
Page 3
Page 4

Appendix A Pr
Figure 1
Table la
Table lb
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Appendices
:)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Components
Component Summations
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Protect Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 1 la Monitoring Data— Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table l lb Monitoring Data— Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
' Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 301h and 70`h Percentiles for
Macon County, NC
Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13 Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
1
1
m

' 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT
IThe goals and objectives stated in the Cat Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2007) are as follows
Protect Goals
• Provide a stable stream channel for the main channel and the unnamed tributaries to Cat
Creek that neither aggrades nor degrades while maintaining their dimension, pattern, and
' profile with the capacity to transport their watershed's water and sediment load
• Improve water quality and reduce erosion by stabilizing the stream banks for all streams
by improving riparian vegetation
' • Improve aquatic habitat of the main channel and tributaries with the use of natural
material stabilization structures such as root wads, rock vanes, woody debris, and a
riparian buffer
' • Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation or
enhancement of a riparian zone
• Create contiguous wildlife corridor and provide diverse amphibian habitat with added
' topographic and wetland features
• Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation is
mature
• Enhance wetland biochemical and geo- chemical processes over an extended area
Project Objectives
' • Restore or enhance over 8,881 feet of Cat Creek and its tributaries
• Restore a natural riparian buffer
• Restore or enhance 7 97 acres of swamp forest bog complex wetlands
' • Plant native trees and shrubs throughout the site
The monitoring year three (MY3) vegetation plot data indicate that the project meets the
' established criterion for planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 320 planted stems
per acre at the end of the year three monitoring period While the average living stem densities
for planted stems in MY3 is approximately 399 stems per acre, several plots (-29 %) did not
meet the year three interim success criteria numbers per acre These include VP 2, 7, 10, and 12,
which had 202, 202, 121, and 283, stems per acre, respectively
Of the planted stems recorded within the monitoring plots, nearly 10% were reported as dead or
missing Due to dead or missing stems there was an approximately 2% decrease in total stem
densities between MY2 and MY3 However, when planted and natural stems are combined, the
' average stem density is 1,084 stems per acre, which is well above the minimum established
criterion All plots met the established criterion when planted and natural stems are combined,
however, the additional stems were predominately alder (Alnus serrulata) and silky dogwood
' (Cornus amomum) The site includes a diverse assemblage of 23 planted species of native trees
and shrubs Planted species range from 2 to 7 per plot with 3 to 11 species observed when
volunteers are included While exotic invasive vegetation was treated in 2010, vegetation
' problem areas noted in MY3 consist of 43 currently isolated patches of high threat invasive plant
species that span the project area Dominant invasive non - native plants include multiflora rose
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
11

(Rosa multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), privet (Ligustrum sp ), and kudzu
(Pueraria montana var lobata)
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained stable among monitoring years Stream issues
observed during MY3 were minimal and consisted of six bank erosion areas and one area of bed
degradation, with all but one of these areas occurring within the Preserve project reaches
Additionally, beaver activity was noted in the lower end of the Preserve project reach EEP was
informed and a beaver removal request form was submitted to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspections Service's (APHIS) APHIS removed two beaver dams and two beavers from the
Preserve reach on October 29, 2012.
Data from the groundwater monitoring stations resulted in 15 of the 18 stations exceeding
saturation of the upper soil surfaces for eight percent of the growing season Of those that did
not meet the hydrology success criteria, monitoring wells three and seven were not within the
proposed wetland restoration or enhancement boundaries while monitoring well 18 was within
the Preserve wetland restoration boundary The groundwater monitoring stations were not
affected by the presence of beaver dams During normal rainfall years all groundwater gauges
are expected to meet criteria The monitoring protocol for the site specified that the automated
gauges be downloaded and checked for malfunctions on a monthly basis The Cat Creek rain
gauge malfunctioned twice resulting in data gaps during the growing season A replacement
gauge was installed on August 16, 2012 and again on December 9, 2012 Since project
completion one bankfull event has occurred within the project site This event occurred during
the Year 3 monitoring period based on the presence of wrack lines and crest gauge monitoring
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and
figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Additionally, due to inconsistencies with previous thalweg stationing, the baseline thalweg data
and 2010 aerial imagery were utilized to apply the corrected stationing for the project site
1
1
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc '
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1
2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY3 replicate those employed during the
previous monitoring year and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the
standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al 2008) Wetland
hydrology was considered established if groundwater monitoring data indicated saturated soils
within 12 inches of the soil surface for 8% of the growing season The growing season for the
site was based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) data set for Macon County
(NRCS 2011)
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of S
�J
3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

3.0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2007 Cat Creek Stream
and Wetland Restoration Macon County, North Carolina Restoration Plan Raleigh
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) Accessed June 2012 Climate Analysis
for Wetlands by County http //www wcc nres usda gov /climate /wetlands html
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, Colorado
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc ,
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
ri

� Appendix A
' Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
1
1

•,. o' \ \�. f�'.� Fi /�I :j(, '` i 111 `Irk be -�-'J/�/N `,I' aj �! ' J;�:'\'P
_ f �.• ' 1 , /: • I � ` I rr �7] it
• , �• r.✓J; �,�� t••-.. ; I ± l , r Jr, /; ,, : • I tr J:- _ I � Ir A �,_,,t+
A�Lt !r °,lY� t - i t }� \�ki� "•i. - fr �, / 1 f� ` J/- It,1 (�•,� f c er r '
' .y r. f rSah.^ � )•� � � `- 1 \( .� t � s � � \, f/ J � f r '� � r� J i; � J f., r �/ \.
• .4ot0� t '� ���(., - "w �n ' � ,) \ 1 r: ; r/ .- r' ` ;r1 .� ,it p� y i \r\
1{. : � ._ M'1,.= I -Y••�f �>~ - �,s � ') ' � - .C.-y` 'gr ` • � `� r / `\ �r j " ) � l �� �: ti, -,1 `
lip
�' .O a. - r - *+e9R \ r % J J \ \, (;_i " f ..-r / C ✓ I I/f t -+ •at _ -:,r
7.
f
d I ° �.i',,,1\\ ;r • r �t��t %1�C_ •• \� !'+ �'- � � % � JJ r, . -" (I r (( l \1 \,�` « � '' ti,`,/
a At '4 f ;J + .. " I a° / +� � f -r - i" , 1 '� r•' , \ .. t: f ! 1 � ♦. ,y,
Jl . i .•i i r- \1 ( xi3�. ' /i! r I �/ i ' r ��` - •k-�r, ( G.J ,-
4 � t' � >`�1T.'�g3 • � % •, � I Ks`�:; t r q�fl+ , � � , ^ f i a
1 IC
AZ_
_ .w• fir. r / ( i� /i( 1r ',ti r\ l
i` .* \rte I - (`•�_. "'1~ \ate,_ h��� ; / \� .�,/(���� i,� : _� ')'w3J'' ,.(� {r't�fl"
441 _ i �, }/ r ��� r/ �4�11 �1;. r� \''�"'.� ,;i 41`• .f r f�Jll�`
iq
9 \ L \.,\ � / // ,�' 'fin i ,•'f � y i / I ,r � r \' E`� r. >" t ( i '
\I � ti i '..t � } ' l /Yf, / 4 * -.y,., i j: '�_ _ �e_ , .•� . �� � 1 !r ('\ 1 I,. ' r � f% Sf
a„• � r - r'_ /fin �f i r - '�'. .4L( ) #,./ - ' I � ^1a l \l � / / ": � �. }; f i� t,� . lj
y. .,r ,s. 'hrrp�f•' 'a1 r i ', ` J; 0 6
I ( "SF/� / P l�t�� � -`- r,,,�, % \� / 'a' ~ � ^'\ { \':1 }tt • �/r .�I \}� C ~t\. -y. \����\t � �,��) I�,rt '�,
`, ' ��� ,,•t /-r �� .�li ,,,.y. \� ti. tl
pit br +Mp�ryAtd �r r f �*t< I j Jf�/ �f .r / ✓ , �, � r 'r� �\ } -!�'; :/, � � 1"1
Cat Creek Stream \ C
4r-
' ' ,... �'� f'�r` err` J `� &Wetland Restoration Site y�
17I�J`
�• Ill - __.% I �.: • ?I' r �. i�` I ' S • t "{ / �„i'r� - i )'I � ✓; �`' ,'\ \ �• J ,' r 1 %' f!-
j f �! •334 ' l ` r .l l j. ! f / \ ,C
41 II r i•_' �-:" ' /J'E9r i / / t f r '. :� i 1 � S i i � � `N
Vt I r r. �' r Pxt r 7 � , l f r i f. � 7 \ r' \ •"''� ', ♦/ �, 4 ((`. �� / i JOI .
r 64 r' �•,• ,Y . �
f✓ r� �C;i I r• f i�l, \�\ fj + ° -'• 'S, 1 _Jr) lj tI K,t-1yL, ri >`t� jy� / f r tt
;�,. 'i,,••x� /) •\�J. (_ f I , ! t.;` ;;r ! ' rt ,i'x:, \;1, T j(t;1 \'.�• /" /. __J.7tr SlJ�
I
6 < t. �,, ��1 1 � :Il� {�'. %�>] I rI .. / -'i �•�lr !''f .}•k ��� «�' %U1� \ \t '� r
�N �ii / i'% r cX -.� (r a�!`✓•(r \ \ \ tf11_.: l h�, x V( % �/ ~
1 s'M
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Cat Creek Stream & EQUINOX Ecosystem
am_ !' 1: \V 1111N1t E\T\I.
Cat C —k Wetland Restoration Site
St eem ° ° ° ° ° ° °•• ° °w•
Resto'no Ste - Pixnc.unrn
Project No. 71 N
0 0.25 0.5
' Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1 -40 towards Knoxville. mmmmmff==== Miles
TN. Merge onto US -74 (Exit 27) toward Waynesville. Follow US- /.
74 to exit 81 US- 2YUS•441. Proceed south on US -441 for 17 miles County, North Carolina
to Cut Creek Road. Turn left onto Cat Creek Rd. and follow -1 mile C
Macon
to Ferguson Road. Turn left on Ferguson and continue -0.1 mile n, 7.5 Minute Series Corbin Knob
the bridge crossing Cut Creek. The project site is upstream and
downstream /� of the bridge. Quadrangle

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland / Project No. 71
Project
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
F000r tage
BMP
Riwnne
Non - Riverine
Existing
Restoration
Restoration
4,066
Component or
Feet/Acres
Level
Approach
*Statlomng
BMP Elements
Comment
Reach ID
Acreage
Enhancement I
2,361
Cat Creek - Upper
1
Enhancement 11
2,454
Livestock exclusion buffer plantings
Swartwout
900 if
E2
900 If
00+00 - 09+00
bank stabilization at 3 locations
Cat Creek - Lower
Preservation
770 If
R
PI
818 If
09 +00 - 17 +18
Swartwout
Cat Creek - Upper
Totals 8,881
797
Equipment c,rossmg
0
0
1 438 If
E2
1 439 If
* *17 +49 - 32 +13
Livestock exclusion, buffer plantings
Waldroup
and wateringstatiom
CatCreek - Lower
Cattle crossing and
Livestock exclusion buffer plantings,
482 If
El
482 If
34+37 - 39 +19
and structure to provide enhanced
Waldroup
watering stations
profile
Cat Creek - Parker
1 750 if
R
P1
1 871 If
39 +19 - 57 +90
Cat Creek Preserve
1 765 If
Et
1 879 If
59 +24 - 78 +03
Grade control turbulent riffles to add
habitat, buffer plantings and invasive
UT1
100 if
E2
115 If
100+00 - 101 +15
Livestock exclusion buffer plantings
UTI
363 If
R
P)
4581f
101 +15 - 105 +73
UT2
210 If
R
PI
381 If
200 +00 - 203 +81
UT3
165 If
R
PI
294 If
300 +00 - 302 +94
UT4
110 If
R
Pi
244 If
400 +00 - 402 +44
R
111 ac
Swartwout
E
0 51 ac
Livestock exclusion removal of drain
Wetlands
pipe plantings
R
4 73 ac
Parker Wetlands
E
0 25 ac
R
071 ac
Preserve Wetlands
E
0 66 ac
^NN a,.-
* See Appendix B Fig 2 Stationing was Realigned in MY2 to Accurately Depict the Stream Reaches (See Executive Summary Page 2)
** Stationing Include, a 25 Foot Cro „utg
Table lb. Component Summations
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Restoration
Level
Stream
(1f)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Riwnne
Non - Riverine
Restoration
4,066
655
Enhancement
1 42
Enhancement I
2,361
1
Enhancement 11
2,454
l
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals 8,881
797
0
0
0
2
=IN on- ,vppucaote
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Cat Creek Stre am and Wetland / Project No. 71
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 2 Year 6 Months
Number of Reporting Years: 3
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
Jul -07
Final Design - Construction Plans
Jul -08
Jul -08
Construction
N/A
May- 10
Temporary S &E mix apphed
N/A
Jan -10
Permanent seed mix apphed
N/A
Feb -10
Plantin g
N/A
Feb -10
Imtial Wetland Monitoring Gauges & Ram Gauge Installed
N/A
Apr- 10
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Momtorin - Basehne
Jun -10
Mar -11
Year 1 Monitorin g
Dec -10
Mar -11
Year 2 Momtorin
Nov -11
Dec -11
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov -12
Dec -12
Year 4 Momtorin
Year 5 Momtorin
N/A - Item does not apply
- Information unavailable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final A -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Protect Contacts
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No. 71
Designer
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 475
Raleigh NC 27607
Primary Project Design POC
Ron Johnson (919) 854 -6210
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P 0 Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems Inc
P O Box 1197
Fremont NC 27830
Planting Contractor POC
Charlie Bruton (919) 242 -6555
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134
Seed Mix Sources
Mellow Marsh Farm Inc
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City NC 27344
(919) 742 -1200
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson [phone]
Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 475
Raleigh NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson (919) 854 -6210
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitonng POC
Kevin M itchell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3)- 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin MItLhell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y4)- 2013
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wetland Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y5)- 2014
Stream M omtonng POC
Vegetation M.mtonng POC
Wetland Monitoring POC
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4 Project Attributes
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No 71
Project County
Macon
Ph sto ra ha Region
Blue Ridge
Ecore ion
Blue Ridge Mountain, Broad Basms
River Basin
Little Tennessee River
USGS HUC
06010202040010
NCDWQ Sub Basin
04-0401
Within Event of EEP Watershed Plan
Franklin to Fontana Planning Area
W RC Clas s
Cold
% of Pm ect Fasement Fenced or Denercated
100%
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
Yes
Restoration omponent Attributes
Cat Creek
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
Drainage Area(s pin)
16
09
05
02
02
StreantOuler
Third
Second
Second
First
First
Restored Length (feet)
-7389
571
181
294
244
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed WLCDistnbution
Forest
Pasture/Managed Herbat.eous
Other
70%
70%
50%
90%
20%
30%
30%
50%
10%
80%
Ork
0%
0%
091,
0%
Watershed impervious Cover
1%
1%
1%
I%
1%
NCDW AU /Index Number
213-4
2 214
2 -214
2 -234
2 23 4
NCDW Classification
C
303d Listed
No
U streamof 303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for303d Listing orStressor
N/A
Total Acreage of Fasement
389
Total Ve etated ALtea a within Easement
189
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
20
Ros en Classification of Pre FAsting
G4
Ch4
Ros en Classification of As Built
C4
C4
C
C
Cb
Valley Type
Vll
VII
vll
VII
W
Valley Sloe
00062 0015
0021
0013
0011
0048
Valley Side Slope Range
15 30%
1530%
1530%
15 10%
15 3055
Vallev Toe Slo a Range
23%
23%
2 3%
2 -1%
21%
Cowardin Classification
Tmut Waters Designation
No
S eves of ConLem Endangered Etc
No
Dortanant Sod Series and Characteristics
Senes
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Nikwact
Reddies
Nikwasi
Nikwast
Udorthents
>60 inches
>60 inches
>60mches
>60 inches
>60 inches
518%
1 18%
518%
5-18%
N/A
05-20
05 20
05 20
05 20
N/A
1
1
1
3000
N/A
N/A V iiun dog. not apply
. Stationing Includes n 25 hoot Crossing
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final A -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1
I
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

r figure L. integrates current Uondition Flan view r lnal
Ilk
Legend
�' • • Boundary
Stream Alignment
Roads
JKl • w _ y .� if ► `{Ii :F Longitudinal
-k Cross Sections
IL, 0 7 "' ,yt' K �` F'1 f m - 1 (�■•. ice' t' �r t wC �A / Log Vane
Cross Vane
1
•/• •
1 - a!— - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - o - - - - - -
Rock Sill
Control Points
0 Crest Gauges
t Rain Gauge
`
Photo Points
Wetland Restoration
a Wetland Enhancement
Year 3 Condition
Criteria Met MY3
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Not Met MY3
Wetland Gauges
J I .� �' � �';�` \ • ` �;t�. _ �'�.���''.' mac- - � ��11 u' - � ."' �/'" �`>�S� <, n } Yea I
a
1 1 VI"14,
I'
Criteria Met MY3
Criteria Not Met MY3
Bank/Bed Conditions
Bank - Scoured / Eroding
Bed Degradation
Ilk
4, Beaver Activity
Vegetation Problem Areas
J Low Stem Density
Present
T >r �
i
'.
is .ty,. 'lMTc`'` Invasives
Prepared for Project: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo Prepared by
Year 3 Monitoring 2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 3 EQUINOX
E cosystem F. N N I o1 :N Ni F pE=,
Date Project Number
PROGRAM November 2012 NCEEP # 71

IFigure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View Final
t
l •
9 ,K
a �t tY
ri l
b N
x
M
Cat Creek (Upper Swartwout)
-
t
•f
• i
,
O R.
IN
><
JAL
Cat Creek Lower Swartwout
( )
t <
G aee
r
s ra
� C
Longitudinal
Pro61e Reach
Legend
— • • Easement Boundary
.��s +;_
•' ` • t c, '
xs+
- - -- Stream Alignment
[
Cat Creek (Upper Waldroup)
. v
Roads
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
�
�'�' •�
Cross Sections
Log Vane
a
Coss Vane
J-Hook
�^ `_'_
.+ ��+_
Root Wad
';
- - -- ;:.._ Y
`•
rv:;��_'
� Rock Sill
Cat Creek (Lower Waldroup)
-
� �s
:' ��
-
i�
�' ''••y�"
/•` Control Points
R
• Crest Gauges
�_ - _ j ., •.�
V •
}
r
• Rain Gauge
Photo Points
- y .� '
_.
�
` !,
' •�. ••
Wetland Restoration
'
® Wetland Enhancement
Year 3 Conditions
`
II
#
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met MY3
s.�
�: "`
_
_�
U•T1� � _
❑ Criteria Not Met MY3
•
i
+, •♦
'ter
v. ' x
Longite
Reach
Wetland Gauges
•.. ��
wwawsalt,
V
1.#�i ,
Criteria Met MY3
J
�'• a �
s
�dv �
� Criteria Not Met MY3
r
-
Bank/Bed Conditions
Bank - Scoured / Eroding
Bed Degradation
Vegetation Problem Areas
cal-
x:-
• it ,
a-
Low Stem Density
Invasives - Dense
25
500
-�
Invasives - Present
Prepared for
Project:
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 3 Monitoring
Notes:
1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
Prepared by
�
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 2 of 3
Ecosystem
EQUINOX
Date
Project Number
F. N V I u0 N M N T% 1.
• • •.•,a•
November 2012
NCEEP # 71
PROGRAM

re 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View Final
Prepared for
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
Project: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 3 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 3 of 3
Date
Novemberl 2012
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
Project Number
NCEEP # 71
Prepared by
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
SONSIISTOTION • OSSION

M M= M == M M r M M M M � � M M M=
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table S Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Pr41ect No. 71 - Cat Creek
Assessed Le th 7,389 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
vuth
vuth
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number
Number in
instable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I A anon - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
0
1 Vertical Stability
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Dearadal ion - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100 %
2 Riffle Condition
I TexturelSubsttate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
43
43
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth;! 1 6)
42
42
100%
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
42
42
100%
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
1 Thalwegcemermg at upstream of meander bend (Run)
42
42
100%
4 ThalwegPosition
100%
I Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Ghde)
42
42
2 Bank
1 Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
6
178
99%
6
80
99%
scour and erasion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slump mg, calving or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
6
178
99%
6
80
99%
3 Erigineeied
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
21
21
100%
S tructures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibnmg maintenance of grade across the sill
13
13
100%
2a Piping
Structures lackmgany substantial flow underneath sills or arms
18
18
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank rosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
17
17
Poolfommngstruc turesmaintaining— MaxPoolDepth MemBanktull
91()0%
4 Habitat
Depth Ratio ? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow
I4
14
rvrn - rccm oocs roc apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 t ' November 2012
Momtonng Year 3 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT1
Assessed Le ngth 573 feet
Moor Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As_bwlt
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
vwth
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 AWadation -Bar formal ion/growt h sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcuttmg.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
7
7
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 2 1 6)
6
6
100%
Condition
2 L.enpth appropriate (>30% of centertme distance between tad of
upstream nffle and head of downstream nffle)
6
6
100%
1 Thalwegcentenngat upstreamof meander bend (Run)
6
6
100%
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centenng at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
7
7
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%
3
3
1009c
Pool forming structures mamtatmg – Max Pool Depth Mean
[4_Z,t,t
B Depth Ratio> 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
base -flow
I— - item aoes not appq
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
B -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT2
Assessed IR ngth 381 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Mayor Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
U
Unstable
Perforrng
m
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I AWadation - Bar formalion/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting,
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Ihme Condition
I Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
5
5
100%
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
4
4
100%
Condition
2 Ixnah appropriate (>30% of centerlme distance between tad of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle)
4
4
100%
1 Thalwegcentenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
100%
4 Thalweg Position
100%
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
4
4
2 Bank
I Scoured / Eod ng
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhangmgto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Underrut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or log
2
2
100%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sdls or anus
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
N/A
N/A
N/A
exceed 15 %a
e
Pool forming structures maintaining ^Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
JBankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
N/A
base -flow
— iiem rues not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stabihty Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT3
Assessed I,e ngth 294 feet
Mayor Channel
Category
Channel
Subcategory
Metric
Number
Stable,
Perforrmng
as Intended
Total
Number in
As_btult
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adlusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
I Apgradation - Bar formatton/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2 Depladation - Evidence of downcutnng
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
I Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate
4
4
100%
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth SnffiLient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
3
3
100%
Condition
2 L.engh appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
3
3
100%
I Thalwegc entenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
3
3
100%
4 Thalvieg Position
2 Thalwegcentering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
3
3
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative Lover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intau with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath silts or arms
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exLeed 15%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean
4 tbbitat
F
JBankfull Depth Ratio> 16 RootwadsAogs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
N/A
base -flow
rvin uem Dues uui apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT4
Assessed Le ngth 244 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Anradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
v Degradation - Evidence of downcuttmg.
1
50
80%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
I TeuurelSubstrate- Riffle maim uns coarser substrate
5
5
100%
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
4
4
100%
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerlme distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle)
4
4
100%
1 Thalwegcentermg at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
100%
4 Thalweg Position
100%
2 Thalwegcentenngat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
4
4
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetativecover resultingsimply from poor growth
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the event that mass wastmg appears
2. Underrut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
S tructures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow undemeath sills or arms
2
2
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
2
2
100%
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean
4
HF abitat
16ankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs provhdingsome cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow
rvi.v ncm tomes noh appiy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Planted Acreage 20
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Planted
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous matenal
N/A
0
000
0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
Stipple
6
010
<1%
4, or 5 stem count criteria
Orange Dots While Background
Totals
6
010
<1%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
000
0%
given the momtonngyea
Cumulative Totals
6
010
<1%
Easement Acreage 38.9
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch
43
676
17%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Stipple
Purple Dots White Background
0
000
0%
NIA - Item does not apply
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station I
Station 3 +65 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 6 +30 - Downstream
B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 3
Station 15 +98 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 34 +70 - Downstream
B -I 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 50 +20 - Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 57 +36 - Downstream
B -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 61 +43 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
UT4 — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 402 +08 - Upstream
B -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 65 +80 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 67 +88 - Downstream
B -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 12
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 13
Monitoring Year 2 — June 21, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 14
Monitoring Year 3 — June 21, 2012
C -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Cat Creek / Project No. 71
Report Prepared By
Kevin Mitchell
Date Prepared
6/27/2012 15 33
Database Name
Equinox- 2012- A- CatCreek -MY3 mdb
Database Location
Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \Cat Creek \CC -MY3- 2012 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
D16TNK71
File Size
155304192
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Proj, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes lie stakes
Pro], Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
71
project Name
Cat Creek
Description
River Basin
Little Tennessee
Length(ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
14
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 3 of 5
C -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Spedes by Plot mM Annual Means)
t Creek Stream and Wedand ProJect No
����aam®
AO��000®
A®©
aio
®aaoeoo
©a
®ooaooa���ao
©mm
®mmmmm�
®
aoo���®
a®
ooa000������a
©a00000
©���ao
®���oo
©om
®mmmmm�
�������oo®
000®
a®
oo�
■���aa
©������oo
©���oo
©000mmmmmm
®mom
•
•
vv®©©
mmmmmmmmm�mmm©©
mmmm0000am
®m
®oomoom
®m
®��
®mm
®��o
000000��000�voo�v���
®©
v©®©
oo®©©
m00000©©©
as
®000000
©000000000000
®
®m
®mmmmo
Fa& to nibet mgtiemnu by n— umn 10%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final C -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Ij
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2113
2112
2111
w 2110
C
O
c�
2109
W
2108
2107
2106
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 11 + 16
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
—� As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 —April 11, 2012
D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

M M M M M M r M M M M M M M M M M M M
Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
w
2107
C
O
y
G�
a� 2106
2105
2104
2103
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Cross- Section 2 - Pool
Station 12 + 86
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
1s -built 2010 MYI 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 —April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
�y 2107
C
C�
as 2106
w
2105
2104
2103
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Cross- Section 3 - Riffle
Station 13 + 50
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 - - MY3 4/11/2012 --- 13kf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix 1)
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 —April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2078
2077
2076
2075
w
w_
C
0 2074
cst
a
a
W
2073
2072
2071
2070
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 4 - Pool
Station 40 + 96
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross- Section 4 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -1 I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2076
2075
2074
y
d 2073
w
C
O
a+
G�
2072
w
2071
2070
2069
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 5 - Riffle
Station 44 + 04
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MYI 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 • MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1
1
1
1
1 Appendix D
1
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
' Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
1
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
1
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
' Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2076
2075
2074
2073
a
w
C
0 2072
c�
a�
W
2071
2070
2069
2068
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 6 - Pool
Station 45 + 06
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 • MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 6 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2074
2073
2072
2071
W
6J
W
0 2070
i.+
i
6i
w
2069
2068
2067
2066
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 48 + 31
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 MY3 4/12/2012 --- B
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix 1)
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

M M M M M== M M r == i r M M == M
Appendix D
2072
2071
2070
2069
w
a�
w
a
0 2068
i
W
2067
2066
2065
2064
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 8 - Riffle
Station 51 + 17
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 • MY3 4/12/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2071
2070
2069
2068
w_ 2067
C
0
> 2066
W
2065
2064
2063
2062
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 9 - Pool
Station 54 + 10
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 MY3 4/12/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2069
2068
2067
w
w 2066
0
0
ai 2065
W
2064
2063
2062
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 55 + 48
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
ks -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 - " MY3 4/12/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2068
2067
2066
w 2065
0
c�
2064
W
2063
2062
2061
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross- Section 11 - Pool
Station 56 + 22
0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 NTYI 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ViY3 4/12/2012 — — — - Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -31 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section 11 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 12, 2012
D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2111
2110
2109
y
w 2108
C
O
i
CC
v 2107
W
2106
2105
2104
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
UT
Cross- Section 1 - Riffle
Station 102 + 68
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
T As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 • MY3 4/11/2012 - -- 11kf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
1
Sream Survey Data
UT 1 Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
' Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
1
UT1 Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1 Appendix D
1
Sream Survey Data
UT1 Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 —April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
' Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
UT1 Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 —April 11, 2012
D -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2108
2107
2106
a�
w
C
0 2105
e�
d
W
2104
2103
2102
0+00
Sream Survey Data
UT
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 104 + 09
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/25/2011 • MY3 4/11/2012 - -- Bkf
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT1 Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
UT1 Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 Appendix D
1
1
Stream Survey Data
UT1 Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
UT Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 3 — April 11, 2012
D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
2115
2113
2111
2109
2107
v
c
0
w
c�
,= 2105
2103
2101
2099
2097 1
8�
0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 09 +04 - 17 +23
T
I
Station (feet)
— r— As- Buil(2010 ThalwcgMY112/2010 ThalwcgMY25 /26/2011 +ThalwegMY34 /11/2012 a BkfMY3 WSMY3 0 StucturesMY2 LinearBkfMY3)
D -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
2078
2076
2074
2072
2070
c
0
y
CC
2068
W
2066
2064
2062
2060
,Fo
�o
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 40 +35 - 57 +07
v�X0o �p�o v6X90 A�X0o so Yoe o s��o s� oe
Station (feet)
' As -Built 2010 Thalweg MYl 12/2010 Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/12/2012 • Bkf MY3 WS MY3 o Structures Ml'2 Linear (Bkf W3)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
2115
2113
2111
2109
2107
w
C
O
LV
R
2105
W
2103
2101
2099
2097
10
I1
O
Stream Survey Data
UT1
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 101 +59 - 105 +53
I o2�o ror�o X&o lo�X116 I o��o jo9�o I or�o
Station (feet)
BAs- Built2010 ThalwegMY112/2010 Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 +ThalwegMY34 /11/2012 • BkfMY3 WSMY3 0 Suuctur%MY2 Linear(BkfMY31
10
SX
O
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No. 71
November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

� Appendix
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetlandt,IProject No. 71
Cat Creek - Swartwout -- Cross- Sectiowl - Ride
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
3
3%
3%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
6%
fine sand
025
0
0%
6%
medium sand
050
6
6%
12%
coarse sand
100
1
1%
13%
very coarse sand
200
12
12%
25%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
9
9%
34%
fine gravel
57
13
13%
47%
fine gravel
80
11
11%
58%
medium gravel
113
13
13%
71%
medium gravel
160
4
4%
75%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
78%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
80%
very coarse gravel
45
3
3%
83%
very coarse gavel
64
2
2%
85%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
89%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
94%
large cobble
180
5
5%
99%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
99%
Boulder
small boulder
362
1
1%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
65
D84
54
D95
140
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
1
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
-
100%
90%
80%
C
70%
F"
C
60%
Gi
e
d
50%
�
a
40%
>
30%
W
U
20%
10%
0%
O .N. N O
�• H C T 2 GD
L N Q O V
e o
T
M
Particle Size (nun)
—As -Built 6/9 /2010
MYl 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
- -- - - --
- - - -- —
80%
�
70%
60%
50%
1
40%
S
z
d
30%
y
d
i
20%
—
10%
N M o0
00 O
'O N N V 00 �c Y
0%
M N O O O IOC
N 7
O C
q
A
Particle Size (mm)
■As -Built 6/9/2010 - MY112/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek,Stream�, &;'Wetlands /�Prgject No. 71
Cat Creek - Skmur.twout,- tC,ross,'Seetibn,2 -Pool
P,e'lblileCountiSurnmary
D50
M ormg Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
3
3%
3%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
10
10%
13%
fine sand
025
4
4%
17%
medium sand
050
15
15%
32%
coarse sand
100
9
9%
41%
very coarse sand
200
9
9%
50%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
51%
fine gravel
57
4
4%
55%
fine gavel
80
2
2%
57%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
61%
medium gravel
160
6
6%
67%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
74%
coarse gravel
32
9
9%
83%
very coarse gravel
45
7
7%
90%
very coarse gravel
64
5
5%
95%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
2
D84
34
D95
64
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

i
1
�I
'1
F�
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross- Section 2 - Pool
-
- -- — - -
100%
I �
y
90%
80%
C
F,
70%
u
60%
L5
G
ar
50%
y
40%
>
A
�C-
30%
U
20%
10%
0%
Y
Particle Size (nun)
— BAs- Built6N /2010
MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011
— MY36121/2012
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 2 - Pool
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
c
u
30%
d
d
—
20%
c
10%
b 00
R 00 �c
w
0%
O
N R
O
O O
,9
Particle Size (mm)
F@A,-Built6Nf2O1O
.; MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

I
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat -Creek Stream.& WetlandIARroketallo. 71
Cat Creek - Smurtwout;- ACrosOSeetiblltO - Riffle
Pebble Count,Summary
D50
Momtonng Year 3
Description
Material
Size (nun)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sAt/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
5%
fine sand
025
6
6%
11%
medium sand
050
6
6%
17%
coarse sand
100
3
3%
20%
very coarse sand
200
16
16%
36%
Gravel
very fine jzravel
40
3
3%
39%
fine gravel
57
3
3%
42%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
45%
medium gravel
113
7
7%
52%
medium gravel
160
9
9%
61%
coarse gravel
223
8
8%
69%
coarse gravel
32
8
8%
77%
very coarse gavel
45
6
6%
83%
very coarse gravel
64
5
5%
88%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
92%
medium cobble
128
4
4%
96%
large cobble
180
3
3%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
7 4
D84
34
D95
83
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
- -
_. — -- - -- —
100%
90%
80% C
A
s
.
W
j
60%
e
50% W6
a
40%
30% E
U9
20%
-
10%
0%
Particle Size (mm)
O
— As- Built6/9 /2010 MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011 —MY36/21/2012
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
80%
t
70%
60%
i
50%
-
40% $
c
u
30%
-
y
C4
-
20%
10%
0%
O C
,�-
m
Particle Size (mm)
FMA;-Built6/9/2010 :i MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & WetlandYTroject -No. 71
Cat Creek - Parker - Crossa Section 4'.- Pool
Pebble Count Sununary
D50
Mo onng Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
3%
fine sand
025
9
9%
12%
medium sand
050
7
7%
19%
coarse sand
100
15
15%
34%
very coarse sand
200
20
20%
54%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
6
6%
60%
fine gravel
57
6
6%
66%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
69%
medium gravel
113
7
7%
76%
medium Eavel
160
10
10%
86%
coarse gravel
223
6
6%
92%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
95%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
1 100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
17
D84
15
D95
32
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 201
2
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross- Section 4 - Pool
100%
90
80 %
70
C
%
5
60%
r
50%
u
a
ao%
30 %
%
U
20
10%
0%
Particle Size (mm)
— As -Bullt 6/912010
MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/2
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 4 - Pool
80%
70%
60%
50%
A
40%
e
G
d
30%
u
u
d
20%
10%
fiJ
FEL
:
L
id.
'4
0%
00
R
'a
Y
N
fn Jn
N
Particle Size (mm)
■ As -Built 6/9/2011 ? MY112/2010 r MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 201
2
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat-,Creek Stream; &-l+Wetlands /AProject 0 71
CaA Irreek,-- Varker�- Ci!oss;;S *dtibhf%- 4R4iffle
Pebble CduiWAiiu aiy<
D50
M tormg Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very file sand
0 125
9
9%
9%
fine sand
025
2
2%
11%
medium sand
050
0
0%
11%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
11%
very coarse sand
200
2
2%
13%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
8
8%
21%
fine gravel
57
10
10%
1 31%
fine gravel
80
9
9%
40%
medium gravel
113
22
22%
62%
medium gravel
160
23
23%
85%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
92%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
93%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
93%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
93%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
93%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
93%
large cobble
180
3
3%
96%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
97%
Boulder
small boulder
362
3
3%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very larize boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
92
D84
16
D95
160
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
t
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
r-
90%
80%
s
F"
70%
�
I _f
F
60%
W
r
r-
50%
y
r
6ui
40%
a
30%
E
�
U
20%
10%
0%
d
Gi
Particle Size (mm)
—As-Built 6/9/2010
MY112 /2010 MY2 5/26/2011
+MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
S
C
a
u
-
30%
d
a
-
20%
10%
N v1 ��, in .- N 7 �D x —
G N N ..
L M N v, 7 � 00 O
-. n1 M -? �G T N 00
in N N 7 -v
�O r-1 N Q
aO Y
01
0 %r
N f7 V1 O N
N
0
07 V
C �
�
Particle Size (mm)
FEA;-Built6/9/2010 MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011 ■MY36/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetlands /lRroject No. 71
Cat{ Cree'k,- •iParker ,Cross= Sectibti,6 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
9
9%
10%
fine sand
025
9
9%
19%
medium sand
050
0
0%
19%
coarse sand
100
1
1%
20%
very coarse sand
200
33
33%
53%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
56%
fine gravel
57
5
5%
61%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
63%
medium gravel
113
10
10%
73%
medium gravel
160
8
8%
81%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
84%
coarse gavel
32
5
5%
89%
very coarse gravel
45
9
9%
98%
very coarse gravel
64
2
2%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
10001
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
1 9
D84
22
D95
40
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 6 - Pool
—
i
-
100%
90 %
80%
c
L
F
70%
6
e
60 %W
O
u
50%
V
u
ao%
30 %
U
20 %
10%
� I
N O �O O 1.NO /N VN O
.� - t . C IQ fi
�N ` 1 N N
� � � �G T
�
0%
Particle Size (mm)
J
+As-Built 6/9/2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 6 - Pool
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
.6a
i
40 %
C
d
u
-
i f
30%
d
.
-
20 %
10 %
— —
0%
V. vN
'� i
N �O D
��C 0 ..-n • �.�� G -G •
vO J . r 7 N N N rN �7 n T O 0 O
r� 1 N 00
O CO
a
kn
O
O
Particle Size (mm)
■ As -Built 6/9/2010 MY112/2010 - MY2 5/26/2011 ■ MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Cre ek Stream,& WetlandWIPiro "jkct No: 71
Cat Creek -- Parker- ,CrnssSe4c- tioni�7r -,�RiMl
Pebble CountYSummazy.
D50
Mo toring Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
12
12%
12%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
6
6%
18%
fine sand
025
6
6%
24%
medium sand
050
3
3%
27%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
31%
very coarse sand
200
7
7%
38%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
6
6%
44%
fine gravel
57
5
5%
49%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
52%
medium gravel
113
9
9%
61%
medium gravel
160
8
8%
69%
coarse gravel
223
4
4%
73%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
74%
very coarse gravel
45
3
3%
77%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
77%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
78%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
79%
large cobble
180
5
5%
84%
very large cobble
256
13
13%
97%
Boulder
small boulder
362
2
2%
99%
small boulder
512
1
1%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
66
D84
180
D95
240
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

�'J
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
- - - - -- -
90%
80%
r
70%
W
60%
C
d
—
50%
is
a
40%
>
30%
U
20%
10%
pppp
0%
d
Particle Size (mm)
—As -Built 6/9 /2010 MY1 12 /2010 MY2 5/26/2011 —•—MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
—
80%
70%
60%
50%
;o
40%
.�
u
30%
u
-
u
d
-
20%
10%
—
0%
m
Particle Size (nun)
■As -Built 6/9/2010 9 MY112 /2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stream Survey Data
CatCreek Streamt& LWe.tland�-/'►Pi4ct4Nb. 711
Cat Creek - $Parker•- ,Cross= Sectionk8 - Riffle
Pebble Count-,Summary
D50
Mo onng Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sAt/clay
0 062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
4
4%
8%
fine sand
025
3
3%
11%
medium sand
050
7
7%
18%
coarse sand
100
5
5%
23%
very coarse sand
200
18
18%
41%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
44%
fine gravel
57
6
6%
50%
fine gravel
80
6
6%
56%
medium gravel
113
9
9%
65%
medium gravel
160
9
9%
74%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
77%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
79%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
79%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
79%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
80%
medium cobble
128
7
7%
87%
large cobble
180
7
7%
94%
very large cobble
256
6
6%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
X4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
I
I 1
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
6
D84
110
D95
190
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
�1
D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek- Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
i
80%
70%
S
60%
v
50%
—
40%
>
30%
U
20%
10%
0%
V
W
Particle Size (mm)
—As -Built 6/9/2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 –+–MY3 6/217/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
80%
70%
60%
50%
7
40%
c
u
V
30%
d
a
–
20%
–
10%
o%
N Vl v,
.. N 7 Ic 00 N In t7 Oe O
IO N N 7 00
'O
a
0.l
Particle Size (mm)
■As- Built6/9/2010 MY112/2010 MY25/26/2011
■MY36/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
�1
D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stream Survey Data
Cat .Creek Stream &_ Wetlandi/ Project <No..71
Cat Creek, - �Parker= :,Cross= Section9s -Pool
�Peblile�^ �IWAWStu many
D50
M Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very foie sand
0 125
7
7%
8%
fine sand
025
4
4%
12%
medium sand
050
13
13%
25%
coarse sand
100
74
74%
99%
very coarse sand
200
1
1%
100%
Gravel
very fine aravel
40
0
0%
100%
fine gravel
57
0
0%
100%
fine gravel
80
0
0%
100%
medium gravel
113
0
0%
100%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
100%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
100%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very lar e boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
063
D84
087
D95
096
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
n
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross- Section 9 - Pool
-
100%
90%
80%
70%
W
60%
G
u
50%
tv.
a
40%
30%
E
U
20%
10%
yy
O N N � •� N Y C � � „�. N MN5 R G T N �
� � N N O
0%
a V
d
Particle Size (mm)
—As -Built 6/9/2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
so s�
70
60%
50%
:fl
40%
5
c
30%
y
a
20%
10%
0%
.w N
7
CQ
Particle Size (mm)
■ As -Built 6/9/2010 - MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■ MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stream Survey Data
Cat, Creek 'Streamw &Wetland /ProctN;o:,71
CatGreeik- llParkeIr= #Cross- Sje_ctiori�ll0� �R<ii�le
'Peb61e ?Count °Summa13'
D50
Mo toring Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum
Silt/Clay
sflt/clay
0 062
6
6%
6%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
4
4%
10%
fine sand
025
3
3%
13%
medium sand
050
2
2%
15%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
19%
very coarse sand
200
11
11%
30%
Gravel
very fine Rravel
40
2
2%
32%
fine gravel
57
5
5%
37%
fine gravel
80
1
1%
38%
medium grave 1
113
4
4%
42%
medium gravel
160
6
6%
48%
coarse gravel
223
2
2%
50%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
53%
very coarse gravel
45
7
7%
60%
very coarse gravel
64
15
15%
75%
Cobble
small cobble
90
8
8%
83%
medium cobble
128
7
7%
90%
large cobble
180
5
5%
95%
very large cobble
256
5
5%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS1
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
22
D84
95
D95
180
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
t Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
u
W
60%
C
d
50%
30%
E
U
20%
10%
O �
N r V1 O
OQ
O
0%
N
d
Pi
Particle Size (mm)
— As- Built6/9 /2010 MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011
— MY36/21/2012
Cal Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
-
80%
.70%
60%
50%
c
40%
�.
G
d
30%
V
—
d
a
20%
—
10%
o%
r4 to
�n OC
N N 7 w
vO
Y
C — -.
•.• •-. .+
N ery Vl O N
0 Q
L
•.
CC
Particle Size (nun)
■ As -Built 6/9/2010 4 MY112 /2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■ MY3 6/21/2012
t Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat-Creek Streams &s Wetland, /4Project No. 71
Cat Creek - iParkeri= ,Cross= Section*sltl -Vool'
Pebble - Count'Summary
D50
M Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
11
11%
11%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
6
6%
17%
file sand
025
0
0%
17%
medium sand
050
12
12%
29%
coarse sand
100
6
6%
35%
very coarse sand
200
37
37%
72%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
0%
72%
fine gravel
57
0
0%
72%
fine gavel
80
0
0%
72%
medium gravel
113
1
1%
73%
medium gravel
160
1
1%
74%
coarse gravel
223
2
2%
76%
coarse gravel
32
9
9%
85%
very coarse gravel
45
9
9%
94%
very coarse gravel
64
4
4%
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
13
D84
31
D95
49
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -63 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
A
70%
w
60%
c
50%
V
'
a
40%
30%
E
t
20%
10%
0%
N N VI nl -t L OC G H Q T ry x
O
r, C O
a
O
V
O
c
!d
Particle Size (mm)
—As-Built 6/9/2010 MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011
—MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
70%
.60%
I�
-
50%
40%
v
V
o.
20%
10%
I
N N V1 K oe O
N M R Ic ' N oo
O N N 7 OD
O
Y
N
Oi
Particle Size (mm)
■As-Built6/9/2010 MY112/2010 MY25/26/2011 ■MY36/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -64 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat'Creek,,Stream4 &UntlandI /dProjerctrNo. 71
UT `L - Cross= Section�ilF =iR,i> l'et ,
Pe`lilile Count °Summap
D50
Mo tormg Year 3
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
6%
fine sand
025
1
1%
7%
medium sand
050
5
5%
12%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
12%
very coarse sand
200
3
3%
15%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
18%
fine gravel
57
10
10%
28%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
33%
medium gravel
113
10
10%
43%
medium gravel
160
9
9%
52%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
57%
coarse gravel
32
5
5%
62%
very coarse gravel
45
10
10%
72%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
79%
Cobble
small cobble
90
9
9%
88%
medium cobble
128
8
8%
96%
large cobble
180
4
4%
100%
ve large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
15
D84
77
D95
120
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -65 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -66 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Pro
ject No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
UT1
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
I
100%
90%
I
80%
c
I
A
F
70%
d
5
60%
W
u
50%
u cV
.
4
40%
w
30 %
U
20%
10%
0%
N O
O
�
O O
O
C
d
Particle Size (mm)
— As- Built6/9/2010
MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011
— MY36/21/2012
UT1
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross - Section 1 - Rffle
60 %
70%
60%
50%
40%
c
c
u
30%
L
d .
PG
20 %
11h_TGTLfi1
lolld
IO N
N N O O
N GD
�4
In
b
R
0N
a,
0%
U
O
Particle Size (mm)
■ As -Built 6/9/2010
• MY1 12/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -66 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Pro
ject No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
ject No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek FStream,-&'�Wetland7 /,ftpjeet,No. 71
UT 1- Cross= Sectibn,2- -,Podf
P,e9bblb,Count Summary_
D50
Momtorul g Year 3
Description
Material
Size (nun)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sAt/clay
0 062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
11
11%
15%
fine sand
025
9
9%
24%
medium sand
050
32
32%
56%
coarse sand
100
28
28%
84%
very coarse sand
200
15
15%
99%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
0%
99%
fine gravel
57
0
0%
99%
fine gravel
80
0
0%
99%
medium gravel
113
0
0%
99%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
99%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
99%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
99%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
044
D84
1
D95
17
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -67 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -68 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
UT 1
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
r
F'
70%
V
d
60%
1!
u
so-
40%
30%
E
U
20%
10%
0%
N
V7 Iry y
nl K o aC — C N K1 •t O �0 O
ac
O N N Op
p Y
u
m
Particle Size (mm)
— As- Bui1t6/9/2010 MY112 /2010 MY25/26/2011
—MY36/21/2012
UT1
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-Section 2 - Pool
80%
I
70%
60%
50%
40%
F
I
V
—
30%
y
a
20%
10%
0%
O
.r O O
..i ti
N M N O N
7 Lei
in
Particle Size (mm)
■As -Built 6/9/2010 a MY112/2010 MY2 5/26/2011 ■MY3 6/21/2012
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -68 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland /Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Swartwout (926 %et)
Parameter
Regional Cure
Pre - hosting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Momtormg Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Id,
UL
I Eq
I Mn
Meanj
Med
I Max
SD
N
Nhn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
nn
Mean
Max
M[m
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
175
1971
1229
1 1 8
162
108
1 1 7
126
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
3320
>36 0
450
46 0
470
Bankfull Mean Depth (f�)
08
14
22
13
14
07
08
09
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
20
28
38
2 1
20
1 2
1 3
14
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft=)
167
283
403
153
224
79
9 9
1 1 8
Width/Depth Ratio
84
159
237
9 1
1 1341
141
147
Entrenchment Ratio
16
F-3-7—
69
28 1
>2 2
39
-
Bank Height Ratio
1 3
14
15
10
10
1 1
10
-
Protile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
610
742
949
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 006
0 016
0 030
0 01 1
0 017
0 021
0 01 1
0 017
0 020
0 013
0 019
0 024
Pool Length (ft)
57
237
467
130
180
209
297
433
502
267
398
57 1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31
-
21
25
30
Pool Spacing (ft)
254
595
1089
795
882
970
1100
1260
1340
764
1069
141 1
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
220
372
57 1
300
510
780
600
750
1000
Radius of Curvature (ft)
180
250
428
240
340
580
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1 5
2 1
36
-
21
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
786
107 1
1499
1070
1450
2050
2000
2540
3400
Meander Width Ratio
1 9
32
48
19
32
48
56
64
79
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft''
Max Part Slle (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4 - G4
E4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
200
690
682
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
832
926
Sinuosity
101 - 106
144
120
1 36
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0006-0015
0 012
0 012
0 014
Bankfull Slope (fUft)
-
-
-
0 013
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric,
Biological or Other
- mrurmauon unuvauauic
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Momtonng Year 3 of 5
D -69 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Pro ect No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,820 feet)
Parameter
Regional Cur*
Pre- i]nsting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq
Nhn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
185
260
12151
180
214
244
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
1400
2000
2800
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
22
25
1 8
12
13
1 5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
38
-
26
19
22
26
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
403
650
390
223
285
330
Width/Depth Ratiol
I
I
1
1 85
1
1
1041
1 1 9
139
163
21 3
Entrenchment Ratiol
I
I
1
1 5 7
5 0
1
72-2—
68
94
107
Bank Height Ratio
14
-
-.10
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
31 8
629
1168
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 009
0 007
0 016
0 009
0 010
0 010
0 005
0 007
0 009
0 01 1
0 017
0 035
Pool Length (ft)
177
292
407
539
905
1581
394
574
667
448
82 1
1121
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
-
26
36
47
Pool Spacing (ft)
543
723
902
-
158 1
-
1470
1670
1780
990
1680
2300
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
710
91 3
1180
40 0
680
10401
5301
880
112501
Radius of Curvature (ft)
236
483
730
327
1 456
778
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
09
19
29
21
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
820
2050
4840
143 0
194 0
L273
185 0
259 0
345 0
Meander Width Ratio
2 7
3 5
4 5
6 7
9 0
2 9
4 1
5 1
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ft'
Max Part Siie (mm) Mobihced at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m''
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4
C4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
2,150
142
1,480
1,120
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,280
271
1,809
1,820
Sinuosity
106
190
1 22
163
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0 006
0 010
0 005
0 006
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0 007
Bankfull Floodplafn Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
information unavailable
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -70 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012
M M M = = M M M M M M M M = = M M i

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek UT1 (457 feet)
Parameter
Regional Cure
Pre- Eushng Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
ILL
UL
Eq
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
160
1 1 8
150
166
Floodprone Width (ft)
540
3320
>33 0
950
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 3
1 3
1 3
08
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
22
21
1 8
16
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft'-)
202
153
189
131
Width/Depth Ratio
1271
91
119
21 0
Entrenchment Rauo
34
-
28 1
>2 2
5 1
Bank Height Raticil
I
I
1
1 14
1
1
10
1 10
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1 10
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
190
290
45 1
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0 009
0 040
0 100
0 011
0 017
0 021
0 01 1
0 018
0 021
0 017
0 029
0 048
Pool Length (ft)
99
130
162
130
180
209
275
401
465
193
330
491
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28
-
2 1
23
27
Pool Spacing (f)
434
688
91 7
795
882
970
1020
1170
124 0
45 1
653
956
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
220
372
57 1
47 0
72 0
35 0
49 0
55 0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18 0
25 0
42 8
135 2
54 3
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1 5
2 1
3 6
]280
9 0
-
-
-
M eander Wavelength (ft)
78 6
107 1
149 9
131 0
190 0
129 0
155 0
180 0
Meander Width Ratio
1 9
3 2
4 8
32
48
-
30
-
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft'
M ax Part Site (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) Wli
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Cb4
E4
Cb4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
440
200
490
400
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
470
288
581
457
Sinuosity
106
140
1 20
1 14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0 021
0 012
0 013
-
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0 015
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric.
Biological or Other
- iniormauon onavauaoin
Non - Applicable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -71 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Swartwout (810 feet)
*Cross- Section 1
Riffle
*Cross- Section 2
Pool
*Cross- Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2109 5
2109 5
2109 8
2109 8
2106 8
2106 8
2107 0
2107 0
2107 6
2107 6
2106 5
2106 5
Bankfull Width (ft)
108
120
127
129
183
220
186
184
126
133
127
149
Floodp rone Width (ft)
450
450
>1000
> 100 0
600
600
>1000
> 100 0
450
450
>1000
> 100 0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
06
06
05
09
08
08
07
09
09
08
06
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1 2
1 2
1 1
10
22
27
2 1
22
14
1 5
14
14
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
79
76
70
59
170
169
142
128
118
120
104
9 1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
147
187
23 1
283
197
286
243
266
134
148
156
243
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
42
38
>7 9
>7 7
33
27
>5 4
>5 4
36
34
>7 8
>6 7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1 0
1 1
-
-
10
1 0
-
-
10
1 0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
-
72
60 1
-
142
128
-
-
104
92
d50 (mm) 1
050
1930 1
150
650 1
1
1
0 21 1
0 06
047
200
030 1
0 19 1
400
1 740
- imormanon unavauaoie
*Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
D -72 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dunensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross-Section 5
Riffle
Cross-Section 6
Pool
Cross - Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
I MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2075 0
2075 0
2075 5
2075 5
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2073 1
2071 1
2071 2
12071 2
2071 2
Bankfull Width (ft)
249
260
313
322
244
24 1
260
255
284
286
279
282
225
240
230
23 1
Floodprone Width (ft)
800
800
>200
>200
1800
1800
>2000
>2000
1600
1600
>2000
>2000
2400
2700
>2000
>2000
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
10
1 7
1 7
1 6
1 6
1 5
15
14
14
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
25
25
1 30
31
19
19
20
20
1
33
33
33
34
26
27
26
29
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft'-)
289
282
382
376
282
266
278
258
479
480
455
445
310
348
333
33 5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21 5
238
256
276
21 3
21 7
243
253
168
170
1 171
179
153
165
160
1 160
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
32
3 1
>64
>6 2
74
75
>7 7
>7 8
56
56
>7 2
>7 1
107
113
>87
>8 7
Bankroll Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
10
-
-
10
10
-
-
10
1 0
-
-
1 0
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft'-)
-
-
382
376
-
-
278
258
-
455
445
-
-
364
365
d50 (mm)
0 36
0 14
044
1 70
0 46
0 24
890
9 20
0 29
0 14
0 56
1 90
1
1 80
0 1 1
006
660
—s iii apviy
Information unavailable
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
Crass - Section 8
Riffle
Cross-Section 9
Pool
Cross - Section 10
Riffle
*CrossSection 11
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2068 4
2068 7
2069 2
2069 2
2066 5
2066 5
2067 2
20672
20661
2066 2
2066 4
2066 4
20652
2065 2
2065 7
2065 7
Bankfull Width (ft)
180
207
326
324
157
185
306
297
206
236
259
267
236
237
373
359
Floodprone Width (ft)
1700
1700
>2000
>2000
2600
2600
>2000
>2000
1400
1400
>2000
>2000
1400
1400
>2000
>2000
Bankfull Mean Depth (f)
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
16
16
13
1 2
1 5
1 2
13
1 2
1 4
14
1 2
1 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
20
23
1 26
26
29
1 31
37
1 36
1
1 24
1 22
25
24
1 28
1 27
31
1 31
Bankroll Cross Sectional Area (ft')
223
238
355
347
257
297
408
369
304
288
332
315
330
324
450
427
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
145
180
299
303
97
115
230
239
139
194
203
226
169
173
310
302
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
94
82
>6 1
>6 2
166
14 1
>6 5
>6 7
68
59
>7 7
>7 5
59
59
>5 4
>5 6
Bankfull Bank HeigJtt Ratio
-
-
10
10
-
10
10
-
10
10
-
-
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft')
-
355
347
-
-
408
369
-
354
33 1
-
-
490
427
d50 (mm)l
1 33
1 200
200
600
034
026
041
063
045
3245
730
2200
1
0 18
005
036
130
*Elevation data was offxt to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -73 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross- Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek UT1 (396 feet)
*Cross - Section 1
Riffle
*Cross - Section 2
Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2107 9
2107 9
2108 6
2108 6
2105 8
2105 8
2106 2
2106 2
Bankfull Width (ft)
166
209
195
189
166
179
163
168
Floodprone Width (ft)
850
850
>1000
>1000
2000
2000
>1000
>1000
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
08
08
1 08
08
1
1
08
1 06
07
1 07
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1 6
1 8
19
16
22
1 7
2 1
2 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft`)
131
158
163
154
121
11 1
120
115
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21 0
275
233
232
21 8
289
222
244
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5 1
41
>5 1
>5 3
121
112
>6 l
>6 0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
10
10
-
-
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
16 3
15 4
l4 5
!27
d50 (mm)
019
2495
1 490
1 1500
1
033
0 44
*Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -74 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
b Monitortng Data - Stma
& Wetland / Prolect No 71
wdh
y
Bm
P,- R,ffk /Ru= Rw /P= P «il /G= Ghvc /S =gip
SL =91[ Clay /SA= Smd /G= Cr,,,I /C= C.Wk /R =Ro , /& =Bcd k
Perunlagea h�.cd nn n(fk and pool peH�k cow/<
In(ormm�on uoavmlade
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -75 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Momtonng Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
i
W= 10IIk /Ru =Run /P= P— l /G- G,,k /S =9up
`L ='ill City /SA= Sand /G= Gavel /C =Cftk /R= RnWd, /&- P,,bmk
•Parcemap+haaW nn nrfk and p.wl pehhk count.
InLrtmalmn unavmluhh
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Stream Survey Data
D -76 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
P. - N fe /R.= Rim /P= P- 1 /G= G,de /S =Sep
RC =SB Cl a, /S \= Sind /G= Gavel /C =C bbk /B =P.W , /Be =Be -k
Perttnlepe> h—d an nffk and pool pdtk rom�a
Infmmmum ,mavmlable
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -77 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

I�
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

1
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfiill Events
Cat Cre ek Stre am & Wetland / Project No.71
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
No Events in 2010
No Events in 2011
3/29/2012
11/28/2011
Crest gauge & wrack lines
' Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
C
C 6.0
O
to
C. 5.0
.0
4.0
a
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Jan -12 Feb -12 Mar -12 Apr -12 May -12 Jun -12 Jul -12 Aug -12 Sep -12 Oct -12 Nov -12 Dec -12
Montnly Precipitation Data Uompared to JU... and "Ill'° Percentiles for Macon Uounty, NU
�- 2012 Rainfall 30th Percentile ......••• 70th Percentile
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

�bn
_. FD n
CD
x
Go
v C'D
W U
s �
U
a
Tl
v
rn
w
.n
0
x
m
0
O
n
U
0
z�
o
N
C �
Precipitation (in.)
O O N N W W A A P
O Ul O Ul O Ul O al O Ul O
1- Jan -12
15-Jan-1 2
29- Jan -12
12- Feb -12
0
ms
26 -Feb -12
11- Mar -12
y O
25- Mar -12
8- Apr -12
22- Apr -12
i'.
6 -May -12
�C
20- May -12
0
3- Jun -12
0. -3
o
"a
C
3
17- Jun -12
8.
r'
1- Jul -12
C 0
15- Jul -12
� �
a
CU
CD
29- Jul -12
0
W
12- Aug -12
�-
O �'
C
26- Aug -12
A
N
9- Sep -12
:
0
p
23- Sep -12
c
c
�
7- Oct -12
0 r0°u
21- Oct -12
4- Nov -12
p o
M
o 9.m
7
O.
m
o
C
18- Nov -12
o
`-
m CL
c
�w a
2 -Dec -12
0
16 -Dec -12
30- Dec -12
Depth to Groundwater
(in.)
D
b
a
rr
a
0
rro
U

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -2 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
;
1
I
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
% ofHydroperiod During Growing Season:
26 ;
,
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
4.0
1
I
3.5
Required
-5.0
•L
Depth
-10.0
t=
3.0
3
�
O
;
-15.0
C
2.5
;
O
CL
-20.0
O
'V
2.0
Beginning of ;
GrowingSeaso
;
End of
April 15
Gra on
-25.0
a
October
1.s
a
-30.0
�
I
,
1.0
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
;
I
1
Malfunction
Malfunction:
,
,
-40.0
0.0
�
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N N N
T T T T T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N N
T T T T
N N N
T T T
N N
T T
C C
C
�p t0 Q
i.
>
1
T C C 7 7 a,
tm
C L G U V
> > C)
0
C) C)
LL LL r2 a
a
Q
Q
N N 0 0
Z O
t7 p
T r
N
O
N r N
N
^ T N
O
N N
to O
C)
N
N
T
T
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E
UU -s rrecipitation ann water Levei riot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ":
13
;
%of Hydrope6od
During Growing Season
: 7.0%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
�
4.0
--
--
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
.�
Depth
i
i
-10.0
`.
3.0
3
O
-15.0
M
2.5
;
7
a
'
.
-20.0
0
Z
2.0
Beginning of
Growing Seaso
;
;
End of
April l5
GrOctober
-25.0
L
17on
1.5
CL
-30.0
0
1.0
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge ;
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction
-40.0
<
0.0
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N
T T T
N
T
N N
T T
N N N N N
T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N N N
T T T T T T
C C
M cc
C
ca
i
d N
i i i
0
7 7 O
C
O. —1
C 1 d
U O > > O U d 6 V
d
LL LL
Q
Q
fn N 0
0 Z Z
T
N
N 4
N O N
O C7
r- N N
w
M
N CO N w O
T
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

w
0
Z
L
6�
CC
C
C
O
CC
U
OJ
it
It
.)
R
W
z
a
a
Q
O O
O^ l(! O
y�
U)
v
O
a
_N C
O
A 2
N a
� o
c
cg o
o '$
Ea
E°
O
0
o � o
In R C
(-ui)aalempunoa!D olyldaa
0
O O O O O
O O O
In
r N N M
M
ZL-Oaa-0£
Z l'Oaa-9l
mT
Z L-3a0-Z
o o
Z L- AON-8l
c
W 3 .2
00
Z L -AON -b
c7
-
- ---
------------ -- - - - - - -- --
-----5 ---- -
Z L-130- LZ
Z L-lOO-L
,
0 �
1
ZL- daS-£Z
c `
Z L -deS -6
Z L-bnV-9Z
c
Z l -bnd-Z l
� t
M c
0 w
Z l-Inf '6Z
C
m
ZL-Inf SL
ZL-Inf`L
Zl-unr -LL
Z l -u nr-£
Z L-AeW'OZ
Z L -Aew -9
Z L- idd -ZZ
OL - -
- - --
---------- - - - - -- -----
- - - - --
Z L-jdV-8
Z L'Jew-5Z
N
Z L-ae W- L l
0
Z L-4a=l-9Z
C g'g
Z l-4a:I-Z L
O
Zl -uef 6Z
ZL -uef Sl
Z L-uer- L
Ui
O Lq O Lq
O Iq O
M
M N N
O G
(•ui) uoile}idioaad
V N
rC- O
_ N
ov u
nE
O
qz
0
c
0
U
E
O
c
W
c
c
w
w
G
dry.
Ln
0
�z
U
� 0 0
Un,�

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UU -5 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
'
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12": 52
% ofHydroperiod During Growi rig Season :28.0% 1
Wetland Gauge
Malfunction
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
4.0
3.5
i
,
Required
-5.0
=
�
�
Depth
L
C
-10.0
L=,
3.0
'
AL
3
C
O
;
-15.0
2.5
O
CL
'
-20.0
O
�
Z
2.0
Beginning of ;
Growing Seaso
;
�
End of
i
April l5
!
GrOct
-25.0
ber17Season
1.5
i
/
O-
'
-30.0
N
0
1.0
I
,
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
I
Malfunction
Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
<—
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
N N
N
N
N N N N N N N
T T
N
N N N N
N N N
N N
T T
c c
ca
c
a
I
a
a a 0 Q
> >
7
7
t t
i i
Q
Q
? Q
Q
N t Q
o O
Z 2F
O O
T T
N
r N
r
N CD
N
(D
O M r T r N N
(
a) ~
N N
CO N
(p CO7
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix F. Hydrologic Data
CC -6 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ":
18
% of Hydroperiod During GrowingSeason:
9.7%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
--
--
—.
_.
- ......
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
.0
'
Depth
_
-10.0
3.0
3
C
O
-15.0
C
2.5
D.
-20.0
O
L
'V
2.0
Beginning of ;
Growing Seaso
End of
O
April 15
Growing
-25.0
=
L
Oc October 17�
1.5
Q
-30.0
N
'
O
1.0
'
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction
-40.0
< >
0.0
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N
T T T T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N
T T
c c
c
a) M
m c a
c > > 5 U
-7
c
a a
Q
> > b
b
L
L L
r Q Q
7 -7
n f
Q
a
Z Z
T
r
N
04 N
N 00 tD
N
T N
O M r N
(D
T N
Q7 N
(O
D
M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -7 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
1
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ":
% ofHydroperiod During GrowingSeason
12
:6.5%
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
4.0
-
-- --
_ —
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
S
�i
Depth
-10.0
:.
3.0
3
O
-15.0
C
M
2.5
O
a
'
-20.0
•�
2.0
Beginning of
Growing Seas
;
End of
O
L
April 15
Gr on
1
-25.0
Oct be 7
1.5
/
Q
-30.0
Q
1.0
;
-35.0
Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
jj,'LRain
function
Malfunction:
-40.0
0.0
�
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N N
T T T T
N N
T T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N
T T T T
N N
T T
C C
C
JZ M
fl. G
>
T C C > > > G
p7
Q Q U
V > > U
U
IL tL 2
Q Q
Q
Q
!n N 0
Z Z a
o O
T u7
r
O>
N
'
r N r N
N
f0
r-
cm M T T N N
(G
N n
N C co N
(TD M
N T
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E
UU -N Yrecipitation and Water Level Ylot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
65
% ofHydroperiod
During Growing Season
:34.9%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
1
'
4 .0
,
--
0.0
3.5
'
;
Required
-5.0
=
Depth
i
-10.0
:..
3.0
3
O
-15.0
C
2.5
7
CL
-20.0
O
'V
2 0
Beginning of
Gro so
�
End of
i-
April
on
GrOctober
-25.0
a
17
1.5
Q
-30.0
N
,
0
1.0
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction
-40.0
— >
0.0
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T
N
T
N N
T T
N
T
N N
T T
N N N N N
T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N
T T
c c
c
r
A
w
a a
i c
c > > j
° °
a s
a'
a'
i Q
Q
zz
o 0
T T
N
� 'L
N
N
N
tD
O M
N
r N N
T
N
M N
N
tD
Cl)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

0 0
R . CD n
rm
� J
G G
cn
a
-n
m
.n
5'
c
x
M
0
_
_
n
0
_
0
_
o °
r
q f.
N
C
O
1- Jan -12
15- Jan -12
Precipitation (in.)
O 1 N N
O �J1
W W A
O 611 O
A 611
Ln O
29 -Jan -12
G)
12- Feb -12
31
26 -Feb -12
v 3
O
11- Mar -12
y
°
25- Mar -12
8- Apr -12
22- Apr -12
6- May -12
0
0
'L
20- May -12
°
3- Jun -12
a c
b
a
17- Jun -12
o
c
0
oC
1- Jul -12
;.;
7
d
y
a
15- Jul -12
m
29- Jul -12
m
co °
A*
c
`�.�
M <
my
to
rs
12- Aug -12
m
o N
26- Aug -12
°o
m
�C
9- Sep -12
c
23- Sep -12
c
� c
7- Oct -12
0 m
21- Oct -12
4- Nov -12
G)
p a
m
G)
° ?.m
Om
a
c
18- NOV -12
o
Q
Q
o.
c
2- Dec -12
16- Dec -12
30- Dec -12
g P
o 0 0
0
0
o O o 0 0 0
0
°
Depth to Groundwater
(in.)
D
F
m
0
d
G:
L'

0 0
rD rD
p
= o
F
rro �
CD
rD F
c �
cn
^n
m
N
-c
0
x
m
_
o•
_
n
0
G
z�
� C
N�
N�
O O 1
O U1 O
Precipitation (in.)
N N W
U1 O UI O
W
U1
A A
O (n
U1
O
1- Jan -12
15- Jan -12
29 -Jan -12
G)�
12- Feb -12
°
_
26- Feb -12
11- Mar -12
� o
25- Mar -12
8 -Apr -12
22- Apr -12
r
6- May -12
c
20- May -12
3- Jun -12
c
'p
$
17- Jun -12
9°
A*
o
1- Jul -12
tp N
r±
G
15- Jul -12
Cu
29-Jul-12
n�i
o
>y
12- Aug -12
m
o ;
r
N
26- Aug -12
N
�_
9- Sep -12
o
a
o`
23- Sep -12
c
�
d
� c
7- Oct -12
m
21- Oct -12
4- Nov -12
o 9. 6
°$
`-
c
18- Nov -12
o
-40
c
2- Dec -12
16- Dec -12
30- Dec -12
W
W
1 1 1 1
UI O UI
1
O
° RolJ
O O
Depth to Groundwater(in.)
D
_
a
m
a
0

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -11 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
%of Hydroperiod During Growing Season:
Ilk
40
21.5%
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
4.0
,
,
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
C
Depth
L
-10.0
�.
3.0
�
'
3
C
-15.0
_O
C
M
2.5
_�
Q
'
,
-20.0
O
L
Z
2 0
Beginning of ;
Growing Seaso
�
End of
d
April l5
Growing
-25.0
October 17on
1.5
/
Q
-30.0
0
1.0
'
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction:
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N
T T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N N N
T T T T T
!O f6
M
y y l6
t0 G
C
1p
lC 7 7 7
7 3
7
y y U
r
U O O N d
IL V-
Q
Q
Q
Q
fR fn
Q Z Z O O
T r
N
04 to r
N
N
O M T r N N
t0
6 04 M r
N OD N 6 M
N r
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -12 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
4.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
% of Hyd ropedod During GroW ng Season:
46
24.7%
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
0.0
-- — — - - -- --
,
,
3.5
Required
-5.0
.�
Depth
i
-10.0
C=,
'
3.0
'
3
C
O
'
-15.0
�
2.5
CL
;
;
-20.0
O
0
'V
2 0
Beginning of
GrowingSeaso
;
End of
O
i
April 15
GrOct
-25.0
ber 17on
1.5
/
a
-30.0
0
1.0
'
,
-35.0
Rain Gauge
,
Rain Gauge
0.5
it
Malfunction
Malfunction;
-40.0
0.0
� >
-45.0
N N N
T T T
N N N N
T T T T
N
T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N
T T T T
N N
T T
C c c
M M m
a
a
c c > > j Cr
+a
I
a cl
I?
Li ti 2 2
a
a
q
q -'a ? ?? a'
Q'
T T o
Q z° z° o
0 0
T to N
r r
N N
N
O M r N N
O
N
N
N
- M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -13 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12 ":
186
%of Hydroperiod During GrowingSeason:
100.0%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
......
__.
0.0
4.0
,
,
3.5
'
'
Required
-5.0
t`
Depth
i
-10.0
M
C=�
3.0
3
O
-15.0
�
C
2.5
;
O
O.
-20.0
O
L
.O
2.0
Beginning of
GrowingSeaso
;
;
Endot
April 15
;
Growing Season
-25.0
O
d
'
October 17
L
1.5
a
-30.0
D
0
1.0
;
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction:
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
N
N
N
N N N
N N N
N
N N N N N N
N
N N N
N N N N
N
N
C
cc
C
ca
C
m
L
d a)
L L L
>
T C C
>
U
m m
U o > o > V
0 V
V
0
-?
-?
LL LL
-? �r
o N o
Q Z z
0
0
LO
N
N
N OD N
fh r N N
N r
lD
N
C) N
N C0 N
tD
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC-14 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
4.0
AEL
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
% ofHydroperiod During Growing Season
65
:34.9%
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
3.5
'
'
Required
-5.0
Depth
L
•- ••
�
1
-10.0
:.
3.0
3
C
O
-15.0
C
P
2.5
CL
'
-20.0
OL
-V
2.0
Beginning of
Growing Season
End of
0
April 15
\
GrOc
'25.0
is
�
October 17on
1.5
.,,
a
-30.0
O
,
0
1.0
'
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction:
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T
N N
T T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N N
T T T T
N N N
T T
N N
T T
l0 :0
fC
r
N � N L
L L
L
M6 '
%0 i 3 7 C 7 7 7
0
7
V V
d Q
r
i
O o
7
LL W.
Q
Q
:F
:? 7 7 Q
Q
h O
Z Z
T Lh
N
04 N
N
N
(D
a M N r N
W
a N r
N
a
M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC-15 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
73
% ofHydroperiod During Growing Season:
39.2%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
0.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
.0
Depth
i
C
-10.0
3.0
,
3
-15.0
_O
C
2.5
3
n.
-20.0
0
.O
0
2.0
Beginning of
Growing Season
End of
O
April 15
;
Growing Season
-25.0
'rr
d
'
'
October 17
i
1.5
'
Q
'
-30.0
d
1.0
'
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
<
-45.0
N
T
N N
T T
N N N
T T T
N
T
N
T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N N N N
T T T T
N
T
N
T
C
c0
C C
cc M
M M L
d d w
L
M
a
=
T C
7
7
d a V
d
6
� O
6
41
6
41
LL LL
Q
Q
N
Q Z Z
D
O
T
r N
r
A N
N
N
T r
O N N
w
T N �
N 4 b
6
O
M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

0 0
'n
^GJ
� � w
o �
a.
m
m
00
m
.n
0
m
3
n
0
c
v
0
zG
o�
� d
N
A (n
in O
0
0
C
a�
oc
�3
CL°
vo
10 4)
a z.
�o
f° W
U) m
R;
0 N
O
o0) rn
0
0
4- Nov -12
p 0
I G)
Precipitation (in.)
O
O
1
N N W W A
O
U1
O (71
O CTI O Cn O
1- Jan -12
0
16- Dec -12
30- Dec -12
15 -Jan -12
NO (n O C
O O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 O
°
29- Jan -12
12- Feb -12
26- Feb -12
=4
v�
v' w r°
O
11- Mar -12
y
0
1
25- Mar -12
8- Apr -12
22- Apr -12
6 -May -12
20- May -12
3- Jun -12
17- Jun -12
1- Jul -12
15- Jul -12
a
29- Jul -12
c
� c
12- Aug-12
00
m
26- Aug -12
9- Sep -12
23 -Sep -12
c
:3
� c
7- Oct -12
m
21- Oct -12
-
------- -
- - - -- ---------------
- - - - --
- - - - - --
A (n
in O
0
0
C
a�
oc
�3
CL°
vo
10 4)
a z.
�o
f° W
U) m
R;
0 N
O
o0) rn
0
0
4- Nov -12
p 0
I G)
5" o
�
18- Nov -12
43 o g
�a
2- Dec -12
V
0
16- Dec -12
30- Dec -12
NO (n O C
O O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 O
°
Depth to Groundwater (in.)
W,
I n
a
°5 i N !
a
C
"C
0
n.
S
a
0
0
d

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -17 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
5.0
4.5
;
Maximum# of Consecutive Days> 12": 186
%of Hydroperiod During GroW ngSeason : 100.0%
Ground Surface
10.0
5.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
Depth
i
C
-10.0
:-.
3.0
C
-15.0
_O
C
"�
O
2.5
C
Q
-20.0
0
.
O
2 0
Beginning of
Growing Seaso
n
Ed of
O
April 15
Growing
-25.0
Ill
,
October
t
1.5
/
Q
�
-30.0
0
1.0
-35.0
Rain Gauge
Rain Gauge
0.5
Malfunction
Malfunction:
-40.0
0.0
<
-45.0
N N
T T
N
T
N N N
T T T
N
T
N
T
N
T
N
T
N N N N N N N
T T T T T T T
N
T
N N N N
T T T T
N N N N N
T T T T T
C C
C
M
M M i
m d m
m
a
i
a
C 7 7
C C U V
d m
o > o > V m V V
d
u.
7 7
o
a
o 0
N
W
N
r
^
M N N
'7 00 N (D M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 71 November 2012
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

0 0
� � G
o �
G
a
m
m
N
C
.c
c
0
m
0
3
n
c
w
0
_
zG
o=
� p
N
O �
N n
y
m
2
n.
c
G
c�
Precipitation (in.)
O
O i N N W
W A
A Cn
O
X71 O Cn O b, O
in O
in O
1- Jan -12
i
15- Jan -12
i
29- Jan -12
12- Feb -12
26- Feb -12
—�
v.
11- Mar -12
y O
O
25- Mar -12
WO
8- Apr -12
22- Apr -12
6- May -12
OC
20- May -12
OR
3- Jun -12
$.
17- Jun -12
1- Jul -12
c0 o
W
15- Jul -12
m
29-Jul-12
�.
0
12- Auq -12
OQ
m
W m
v
!
I
0
26- Aug -12
N
N A
(�
9- Sep -12
3
o
T
23- Sep -12
C)
CU
r-
7-00-12
0 Cm
m
21- Oct -12
4- Nov -12
G
p o
x
i c)
o m
ma
18 -Nov -12
a C
=r
o
Cn
m
Ca
=
2- Dec -12
0
8
16- Dec -12
30- Dec -12
N
6T1 O <NJl O CTl
O � O
O
O
O O O O O O
O
O
Depth to Groundwater
(in.)
y
m
2
n.
c
G
c�

i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
Cat Cre ek Stre am & Wetland / Project No. 71
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge ID
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
(2013)
(2014)
Yes /31
Yes /42
CC -1
Yes/ 35 Percent
16 8 Percent
22 6 Percent
Yes /37
Yes /26
CC -2
Yes/ 16 Percent
20 0 Percent
14 0 Percent
Yes /24
No /13
CC -3
Yes/ 8 Percent
13 0 Percent
7 0 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /64
CC4
Yes/ 35 Percent
47 6 Percent
34 4 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /52
CC -5
Yes/ 32 Percent
27 0 Percent
28 0 Percent
Yes /25
Yes /18
CC -6
No/ 2 Percent
13 5 Percent
9 7 Percent
No /12
No /12
CC -7
No/ 0Percent
6 5 Percent
6 5 Percent
Yes /39
Yes /65
CC -8
Yes/ 33 Percent
21 1 Percent
34 9 Percent
Yes/ 186
Yes /186
CC -9
Yes/ 22 Percent
100 0 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /97
Yes /72
CC -10
Yes/ 9 Percent
52 4 Percent
38 7 Percent
Yes /27
Yes /40
CC -11
Yes /11 Percent
14 6 Percent
215 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /46
CC -12
Yes/ 41 Percent
27 0 Percent
24 7 Percent
Yes /118
Yes /186
CC -13
N/A
63 8 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /26
Yes /65
CC -14
Yes/ 30 Percent
14 1 Percent
34 9 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /73
CC -15
Yes/ 33 Percent
47 6 Percent
39 2 Percent
Yes /139
Yes /186
CC -16
Yes/ 100 Percent
75 1 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /117
Yes /186
CC -17
N/A
63 2 Percent
100 0 Percent
Yes /23
No /4
CC -18
No/ 3 Percent
12 4 Percent
2 2 Percent
N/A - Information does not apply
Hydrology Success Criteria = 8%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 71
Monitonng Year 3 of 5
E -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012