The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20130142 Ver 1_More Info Received_20130213Z0 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , l h ", DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION areR "[! r �.,,/ li PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR January 30, 2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office P.O. Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890 ATTN: Mr. Ronnie Smith NCDOT Coordinator Dear Sir: Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit 14 (Minor Road Crossing) NCDENR 401 WQC 3886 Culvert Replacement SR -2309 (LeAnna Lane) Harnett County State Project Number: 6C.043110 ANTHONY J. TATA S13CRETARY The, North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) has scheduled to clear, grade, drain, base and pave SR -2309 (LeAnna Lane), Harnett County. The total project length is 0.31 miles. The roadway will be improved from an existing 18 feet wide gravel/dirt road within a limited 50 foot maintenance limit, to a paved 20 foot width, with 4 foot stabilized shoulders. The project will require the replacement of two (2) wet cross lines and fill in adjacent wetlands as shown below: Crossing Roadway Station Existing Culvert Proposed Culvert Permit Site #1 Sta. 9 +46.09 16 LF 18" RCP 40 LF 24" RCP Permit Site #2 Sta. 11 +49.61 16 LF 18" RCP 40 LF 24" RCP New Stream Impacts = 48 linear Leet: (24LF Tributary/24LFIntermittent Stream) Wetland Roadwa Station I Wetland Impacts Permit Site #2 Sta. 11 +44 to Sta. 13 +24 0.037 acres New Wetland Impacts = 0.037 acres Construction of this project will require impacts to the waters of the United States in the Middle Cape Fear River Basin. Both permit sites convey drainage to Beaverdam Swamp Canal; Class C. The project is located within the 03030006 Hydrologic Unit, sub basin 03- 06 -13. P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302 -1150 - Telephone (910) 437 -0207- Fax (910) 486 -1959 SR 2309 is a road serving several residences. Land use is either residential or is clear cut Non - Riverine Swamp Forest Wetlands. There is one home site that does have horses; the lot is adjacent to the road bed. Permit Site #1 is located at Station 9 +46.09 and is an unnamed intermittent tributary of Beaverdam Swamp Canal. There is an existing 16LF 18" RCP, NCDOT proposes to install a 40LF 24" RCP to accommodate the increased roadway length. The intermittent tributary was ranked a 25.5 utilizing the NCDENR Stream Assessment form l OLF of temporary tributary impacts (10 LF downstream) is required for dewatering purposes. Permit Site #2 is located at Station 11 +49.61 and is also an unnamed tributary of Beaverdam Swamp Canal. This intermittent stream was ranked a 22 with the Stream Assessment form. The existing 16LF 18" RCP will be replaced with a 40LF 24" RCP. There are wetlands located both up and downstream of the tributary from Stations 11 +44 to Station 13 +24. l OLF of temporary stream impacts (10 LF downstream) is required for dewatering purposes. RESOURCESTATUS In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of the replacement of the culvert along SR -2309 (LeAnna Lane) in Harnett County. This culvert site has undergone human manipulation. A Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3886 is required for the project. Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of September 22, 2010, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists four federally protected species for Harnett County. FederaRv Protected Species for Harnett Count SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS Picoides borealis Red - cockaded woodpecker E Notropis Melcistocholas Cape Fear Shiner E Lyimachia asperulaefolia Rough - leaved loosestrife E Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle BGPA "E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range). T(S /A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and Are not subject to Section 7 consultation. A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the May 22, 2012 survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat for each species identified. REGULATORY APPROVALS Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3886 as required by the above - described activities. The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for significant historic features. The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while accommodating the 25 -year design storm. There is no record within the NCDOT District 2 Office (Harnett County) that the road experiences flood overtopping. By utilizing the erosion control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's will be utilized during construction. Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad location map and photographs. If you should have any questions, or need additional information please contact James J. Rerko, PWS at (910) 437 -0207. 1 cerely, ! V � /to James J. erko, PWS Divisio 6 Environmental Officer ArrACEMENTS Cc: Amy Chapman, Division of Water Quality (4 copies) Mason Hendron, Division of Water Quality (1 copy) Greg Burns, P.E., Division Engineer - ' O�O� W A TF9OG � C O 'C Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre - Construction Notification C Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 3886 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ® No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: SR 2309- LeAnna Lane 2b. County: Harnett 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Erwin 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: WBS: 6C.043110 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NA 3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): NA 3d. Street address: NA 3e. City, state, zip: NA 3f. Telephone no.: NA 3g. Fax no.: NA 3h. Email address: NA Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Greg Burns, P.E./ NCDOT /Division 6 Engineer 4c. Business name (if applicable): NCDOT 4d. Street address: PO BOX 1150 4e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302 4f. Telephone no.: (910) 486-1493. 4g. Fax no.: (910) 486 -1959 4h. Email address: gburns @ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: James J Rerko, PWS 5b. Business name (if applicable): NCDOT/ Division 6 Environmental Officer 5c. Street address: PO Box 1150 5d. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302 5e. Telephone no.: (910) 437 -0207 x 26 5f. Fax no.: (910) 486 -1959 5g. Email address: jjrerko @ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version f- B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA Latitude: Longitude: - 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): PS #1 35.3152 - 78.7135 PS #2 35.3144 - 78.7130 (DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 1.9 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT of Beaverdam Swamp Canal proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Middle Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Surrounding land use is residental properties or clear cut Non - Riverine Swamp Forest. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.037 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 48 LF: (24 Tributary/ 24 Intermittent Stream) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: By Statute NCDOT is required to pave all unpaved secondary roads. NCDOT purposes to bring SR 2309 up to the minimum standard. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Impacts will be minimized as much as possible. Front end loaders will place fill material. Eventually a motor grader will finish grade the project prior to paving. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: perliminary included in PCN 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ® Preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: NCDOT Name (if known): Helen Miller, DES II Other: NA 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. NA 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. NA Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. NA S Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b: 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T ❑Yes El Corps WI [_—] P ❑ T NA ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ® P ❑ T Fill Non - Riverine Swamp ❑ Yes ® No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 0.037 ac ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ No ❑ DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ Corps W5 ❑ P [IT [:1 No [I DWQ El Yes ❑ Corps W6 E] ❑ P T ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.037 ac 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g• Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) ❑ PER ❑ Corps S1 ❑ T ❑ P ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S2 ®P ®T Culvert UT of Beaverdam Swamp ❑ PER ®INT ❑ Corps ®DWQ 4 ft 24 LF (10LF Temp) ❑ PER ❑ Corps S3 ❑ P [] T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ E] PER ❑ Corps S4 ❑ P FIT ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S5 E] P [] T ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps S6 E] P [IT ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 24 LF 3i. Comments: 10 LF of Total temporary stream impacts due to dewatering. Page 5of11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (iF applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ®P ® T UT to Beaverdam Culvert Tributary 0.002ac Swamp 02 ❑ PEI T 03 ❑P [IT 04 ❑P ❑T 4E Total open water impacts 0.002ac 4g. Comments: 0.0004ac temporary impacts for dewatering 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 NA P2 R Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes 0 N If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): NA 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): NA 5k. Method of construction: NA Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. NCDOT proposes to bring this secondary road up to Statute utilizing obtained Right of Way from property owners. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT proposes to bring SR 2309 up to the necessary minimum standard. All construction BMP's shall be utilized. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank El Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: NA 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: NA linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): NA square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres 4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: NA acres 4h. Comments: NA 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. NA Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ y 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 _ NA 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). NA 6h. Comments: NA Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified D Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. El Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 33% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: I 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached Stormwater Management Plan ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ® DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Harnett County ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ®No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. if you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes El No letter.) Comments: NA 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): NA 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this project, this project will neither influence land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulation study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office -you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS Endangered Species website, Natural Heritage GIS data layer (updated constantly), Preliminary Ground Survey 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? USFWS website- http: / /www /fws.gov /nc -es /fish /fish.html 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? In accordance with Programmatic Agreement an Internal NCDOT State Historic Preservation review was conducted. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping website- (Tile #0586 & #0587) Greg Burns, P.E. � ` %, Jan 30, 2013 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date is rovided. Page 11 of 11 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version N Site Information W E WBS# 6C.043110 0 950 1,900 3,800 Feet LeAnna Lane, SR 2309 S Harnett County 1 inch = 2,000 feet YW III III YOf u_� I I �"~ CL I 1 ► III NN12 +00 J °a° od STREAM - - - - - -- STREAM I U � 11 +00 � �, � � � ccoo � co 0 Z J O To PINC STA. 10 +18.84 I •— (� J O m= 1 -49-05 RT I I Q" '� Lo o tea. j �� j 0 cM �U O' -� O O V v�U � NU QQ M •� (i) CL o o I I �co �� t� N N U- --------- Cf) U) STREAM _D . N I I CIS 9 +00. �F+ L 0. co Q c ® o C6 Y = 70 m u rn I IN I �� W CL m�E -i CIO W CO I I N ain:3 O 0 C,, O m LR a ; 0 Q L Li 0 W a fA N Permit Site Impacts 'Trr b ufl r� Impact = 24 LF 'fA a, ft'r-1 .'yV6 q'-/j 6 1l�i�f /3 D 'o Q dCl �tlb A 4 Z44, 7L S IS JOHN WELLONS co 0 0 STA. 9 +46.09 @ Flowline — — — — — ofD'itch - - - - -- - - -- Edge of /' - - - -- Pavement 6U - -_50' RAN tvanablej - ` — — — Shoulder Point 40 LF of Proposed 24" RCP IS:\ CURTIS G. MCKOY I W10.1 49K � D 6 ao bo 0 0 16LFof Existing 18" CMP WILLIAM WOMACK Eiasting Edge of Gravel CURTIS G. MCKOY Plan View Existing Pipe / Proposed Construction Harnett County, NC SR 2309 (Leanna Lane) - Permit Site #1 05/09/2012 Revised: 07/16/2012 Scale: 1 " = 60' \ Horne tt- Secondar y \LeonnaH \leannahJs ml.dgn K", 91 0 0 0 0 4 CL m 0= 'ID J a! � O - " 4) rnz co= C r-tm — CL LL o w E M, `�t N g MI to C-> hoc to �.*� °' ----- - - - - -- (41 1010- fl.+' L6 O� �> W W X: � O C) LO o C) VII 0) CD • • CD v> > i _ 0 CD 4. CL E 'a m O.- CL- -aEcD CL v, o0)ip m o` p CD a:c m i� a�� ai0-o UL Z t O O (D� Z 91 0 0 0 0 4 CL m 0= 'ID J a! � O - " 4) rnz co= C r-tm — CL LL o w E M, `�t N g MI to C-> hoc to �.*� °' ----- - - - - -- (41 1010- fl.+' L6 O� �> W W X: � O C) LO o C) VII 0) CD • • 0 0 r c o �- V c C) i� UL (D� o > C: = oa) ch �r- O to 1- o =c� as M� LO1..1. cDc`) E N a /M/I1 ■ii ►o L C C �. I ^Y O m i 2 W ° C 0 0 r F With Tenlo or --I-- large, grey i lenlarlas t Crane F! Larva eerie -Like beck i Sa. 1. Pre., Di B( large mi "spines i I i I i Doh! La NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.0 N(- nituo Sfream Identifinnfinn t` v Date: A 2z zO I Project/Site: s 2 Latitude: Evaluator: � iQ Q �^`, County: Longitude: -.'79 , -7 l 3 Total Points: 3 3. In- channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-pool sequence Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or erennial if? 30` Z5 5 Stream Determination (circle one) Intermittent Perennial: Other _ e.g. Quad Name: L- e- �/- A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ) 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank Absent Weak 0 1 Moderate Strong 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In- channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 Q 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3 5. Active /relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 5 1 1-5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel a F..:..1 .1.4.. L..... ,. No = 0 Yes = 3 B. Hydrology (Subtotal= _ 9,5) 12. Presence of Baseflow 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 3 14. Leaf litter VN.E=O 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? Yes d3 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 1 0 19. Rooted plants in streambed 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ID 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish ® 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0 75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 34 of manual Notes: Sketch:�JL1UlwG 'Zn Cc -Pt.-Id &� htrd b� /�1i3 V Q Clt ►�M�hECJ T`t4�S/ 4h� /s 40 Permit Site Impacts Stream Impact = 25 LF Wetland Impact = 0.037 Acres in RNV 0 STA. 11 +49.61 0 Flowline _Pl of Ditch - - - - - Edge of �' SR 2309 Pavement -50' R/W (Variable)- - - - - - - Shoulder Point 16LFof Existing 18" CMP N O O 40 LF of Proposed /24" RCP JOHN WELLONS FRANK TAYLOR Tf CURTIS G. MCKOY Existing Edge of Gravel FRANK TAYLOR Plan View Existing Pipe / Proposed Construction Harnett County, NC. ,SR 2309 (Leanna Lane) - Permit Site #2 05/09/2012 Revised: 07/16/2012 Scale: 1 " = 60' 0 0 0 N 0 0 E a JI 1 Lo _ Lb CD bo Nm s> o t� acv a, j a m o _ fl.— . EL -0 E n CD v) o. c ma o'c=3 3 n - 2 cl - m Z � � jL X LLJ Z t° s o °- z 0 0 0 N 0 0 E a JI 1 Lo _ Lb a 'a LL o� J d a N �t: bo Nm co t: p. m m N .«� c o. c rn +, Lo CD 0 � a 'a LL o� J d a N O N M i0 O O V 01 O O r O vl- O C*-4 � O -�-� ♦ ) O� U N � a- ��OII 00�0� O O' 0 ca O� ai .i lid a 0) �co N X Co W O O r �t: � X LLJ �. 0)om O a L a0 O N M i0 O O V 01 O O r O vl- O C*-4 � O -�-� ♦ ) O� U N � a- ��OII 00�0� O O' 0 ca O� ai .i lid a 0) �co N X Co W O O r oivo F With Tonto or 4 large, gfey i Jenlorles Crane FG Larva eetle -Like bau'i se. 1. . Pred Di Bi large mi 'spines DoL, La NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.0 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Vominn e. n Date: 5 /L Z-11/2- Project/Site: S/2- j b Latitude: 3 S l(/ Evaluator: /�i t�rir( County:' Longitude: Total Points: 3 2Sinu osity of channel along thalweg Mse Streamisatleastintermittent if? 19 or erennial if? 30' Stream Determination (circle one) Intermittent Perennial: Other e.g. Quad Name: L9i�l/Ujti A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-L, -5) a Weak Moderate Strong 1 Continuity of channel bed and bank 1 Q 3 2Sinu osity of channel along thalweg Mse 1 ® 3 . In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- ool se uence 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate Q 2 3 5. Active /relict floodplain 0 2 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches Q 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 .5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes = 3 B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 12. Presence of Baseflow 3 2 3 IN 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 3 14. Leaf litter "=O 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 1 15 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? Yes 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae tJ 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5, FACW = 0.75; OBL = .5 Other = 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 34 of manual. Notes: Sketch: �� - 40 o N 0 :3 c E 0 0) , 'o co 00 (D o im r- (U tp Sl jy A tm Oa N 0 CL 0 Lo ui -0 2 4L,.,'l5:t!,�'. �Ys (D CN cc: '4X E 0 co > 0 J-R 2 or- Coo 0 0 0 w z co a) Z IF > 6 .0 C lz M d) co 0 cv) o CD �D M o C, -TIE IL �o co >1 o . C C� :L- 4) w to (a u) LL -E V, CD co (D M �E a) Im 0 E 0 > — — — V t, cl c (U 'D -Ni E a in ca A) UJ 0 V:1 to C12 0 a c C C N 'Fa E' m ct, 0 E 0 2, c 0 0 0 r= c o 0 0 tj-', C 0 0 CD Z (L U L) z BVE'A' <• P3i m > -0 m CL r U) N 0 a ca Z C: 0,; > O 3 0 r 0 I m C to r_ U) a) m a) CD -0 -Cl 0 > m o 4) o E CL NO 0 CL CD m Ch 0 U) N C) > L) Cl) a 00 cx Co. > 0 E (D > W co V- z C) 0 to CL 0 CD '5 C 0 LL C '5 9 r C (a LL co U) (D > (D 0 E 0 cu C=l e M E () 0 ca C, w LL Y) 5 L) co C -4 z L) F ms x� C o V = CL LU to U) .0 > m N 4!zj 0 0 0) CL U) 0) E m U) 0 0 E I gn 'D IX z a rn 0 m LO a) p �r ti 0 CL > Mm a. IL o } �X "as',' 'x,cn N z z z fife - _•.:.Y ur:rs �'s P?Ca X ui s# O. E > > 17L a O O O 'D CL Z z z :.• •a m �S�a Na `O of s; U U U c; :+ y c ' Zz Eo of W c` E' j v o • p C, ; 0 (I C N N N 'C AV Ln z U144 , 0 i- CML uJ 1'`.V �gx cu LU it- cl d a iFa O 'tin 2 E Z E E 10 3y c - f�•t ".c.. ii %ij O :', t;. ��,'z{ ^ "T. ;F. -c' '`«', -r C L~ ..N+ m~ 'C -O m a m m •O U 7 C O i f `% m �`t. Jpp a im CL sYE,;5( asi• ;., t,�;r, M CL %�i;.i C> H m a y3 `'''-� m s� q a: 0 O j r. Y .. Yhz'. CO N• L) n •E L 7 m m cc 10 _ LiCL E U) 3 ca �•`k 0. vi( ➢i'.gti gym.. -O N {CD D N 'o t >,. ��jj .7F CL N co r� w o- — ". N ' ;-fie. �i '• ? w' L z :J W Q l` i L co