20130157 Ver 1_401 Application_20130213

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919- 212 -1760 • FAX [phone]
www.environmentahervicesinc.com
February 14, 2013
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Re: 401 WQC and Buffer Permit Request
Beaver Pond Road
Nash County, NC
Ms. Higgins:
20130 157
On behalf of the applicant, ESI is submitting the enclosed PCN for a proposed road crossing in
Nash County. The project will entail 110 feet of intermittent stream impact and associated
buffer impacts. The City of Rocky Mount has approved the Stormwater Management Plan and
their approval letter is enclosed. The $240 application fee is also enclosed along with seven
copies of the PCN, one full size set of plans and calculations.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments. D 2 6-671 R Ole 11
Sincerely, �2
Enviro /m/ent I Services, Inc. FEB 1 8 2013
ro
wATER aJeff Harbour, PWS a Branch
Senior Manager
FLORIDA • GEORGIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • OHIO

ot WArF9oc
y
O <
20 130 15 7
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
1'
Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Beaver Pond Road
2b. County:
Nash
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Rocky Mount
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Four Griffins, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB 1725 Pg 245
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
J.R. Griffin �"'
$ems r'� c"vcv in) �-
.. � ss'�
,
3d. Street address:
6124 Chatford Drive _A6*Ck_t -`
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27612
3f. Telephone no.:
(757) 898 -6501
(757) 898- 6436;�r,;
onegdff38 @gmail.com
-�
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin Vamell
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Stocks Engineering
5c. Street address:
1100 Eastern Avenue
5d. City, state, zip:
Nashville, NC 27856
5e. Telephone no.:
252 -459 -8196
5f. Fax no.:
252 -459 -8197
5g. Email address:
kvamell @stocksengineedng.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
38510916843oU
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.9865 Longitude: - 77.8098
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
2.05 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Hombeam Branch (swamp)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C: NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar- Pamiico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is partially forested and partially a maintained field. The project vicinity is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
110
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Purpose of the project is to connect the existing portion of Beaver Pond Road to existing Northern Blvd. This will require
a stream and riparian buffer crossing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will connect existing Northern Blvd. with the stub of Beaver Pond Road. The road will be a standard, 2 -lane
roadway with curb and gutter constructed to NCDOT standards. Typical construction equipment will include graders,
excavators, dump trucks, pavers, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Yes ❑ No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: ESI
Name (if known): Jeff Harbour
Other: ESI evaluated the stream, but a JD review was not
requested due to the simple nature of the project.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary m
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P [--IT
culvert
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2.5
110
S2 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
110
3i. Comments: stream scored a 19.5 on DWQ Stream ID Form on November 14, 2012
Page 5of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P [IT
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts re uire mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ® Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required
61 ®P ❑ T
road
crossing
UT of Hombeam Branch
❑ Yes
® No
7405
2613
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
7405
2613
6i. Comments: Crossing is Allowable per Table of Uses
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The stream and buffer impact cannot be completely avoided. The engineer has designed the crossing to minimize the amount
of stream and buffer impact as much as practicable. Aquatic life passage will not be compromised and the culvert will be
installed according to the current regional conditions of the NWP
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used during all[ construction activities. Impacted areas will be revegetated per
requirements.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
Comments: Site is treated for 90% TSS through use of wet pond.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
43%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The site is treated through a wet pond that removes 90% TSS
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Rocky Mount
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
F[ZYes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /stateflocal) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetiand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from this road crossing
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP online search conducted on November 14, 2012. No federal T &E species reported within 2 miles of project
location.
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA - Fisheries data
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO clearance letter is attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Maps
FCM'l
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
A lican is Signature
Date
(Agent's signatu is lid only ' uthorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F CKY
UNT
.00L...
January 30, 2013
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Re: Beaver Pond Road
Dear Ms. Karoly:
DEPARTMENT OF
ENGINEERING
The City of Rocky Mount has reviewed and approved the stormwater management plan for the proposed
Beaver Pond Road as shown on the construction plans sealed by J. Michael Stocks, P.E. on October 22,
2012.. The City operates a Certified Local Stormwater Program under Phase II NPDES Stormwater
Program and is committed to requiring on -site stormwater management measures such as riparian
buffers, bioretention cells, constructed wetlands, and level spreaders for any new development within
our jurisdiction. All development is also required to meet stringent water quality requirements in
accordance with the City of Rocky Mount's Land Development Code, the City of Rocky Mount's
Stormwater Management Program, the Tar - Pamlico River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection Rules, and
the Tar - Pamlico Nutrient Management requirements.
If you have further questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
252/972 -1340 or Karen .Callaway @rockymountnc.gov.
Sincerely,
r&�A. C
Karen G. Callaway, P.E.
Planning/Stormwater Administrator
331 South Franklin Street w Post Office Box 1180 • Rocky Mount. North Carolina 27802-1180
Telephone [phone] w Fax [phone] • Website: www.rocAymountnc.gov
Email: [e-mail]

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11-19- aDI a
Project/Site: a�QVef
Latitude: 3 S, q S
i (o
II
Evaluator. Jeff Vi A m16, it
County: N
Longitude: T7, , B Dq T
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ' S
Stream Dote circle one)
Ephemera Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 219 or menial li 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = � j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1'
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
Q
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
CO-)
1
2
3
8. Headc uts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
=
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No f01
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = -1-6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1'
2
0.5
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
0.5
1 1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
V3)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
r 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
Cm
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
=1.5
Other
*perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
November 27, 2012
Terri Russ
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Connect Beaver Pond Road to Northern Boulevard, Rocky Mount, Nash County, ER 12 -2127
Dear Ms. Russ:
Thank you for your letter of November 14, 2012, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
lm/Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mat'ti'ng Address. 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax- (919) 807- 6570/807 -6599

�r e •
�••.. g- �•: ' � {jar � �,��R ...i _ ..
,�S•ls�ei�'•�a � =R
r • r r� g
HIS
- -..
ly
lk
Pit
7411 � Tw
10
$$ J
V
,
1,
,
.� Y�i�..: .mow. %y;. r !•
• t
'sit
f rr' • f •rte f• • .,_- ..i,.. t�
t ' t;l L't CIL
pc�
•,,'
,
,
t
a
,
,r
'�+... � •i• -�.� ,r'' �� 4 ' _ ' 9 ?.. j I, � "r �` ' � r � •• e1M • 3 »4ii -.
,
• rr7 �i,
,� • -, Cobb
ArcGIS
r
�. " °3 - •
r _
Jj
` T
_
http: / /mapper.acme.com/[10 /30/2012 11:15:46 AM]

Beaver Pond Road, Rocky Mount, NC
Site photographs showing the proposed stream impact area

co
��Q.)jj -
a r
or
30
W M_
0
j (,1 0
ID
cc
4 M
- tit
f
i a
jLj
iM
3�
l]
o
1177 �

BOB
` l;tSt? N
NoB R b
NuB
I ��P NuB Bo Ud
B 'o
Ud
Rb Q. P. h
a p �\
BOB GrB Ra O BoS
urw�E' $
!oB NuB h 2i)
/ -- NoA NoS
t<z
NoA 0 / GO m �� GrB Rb Ra BoB BoB
/ BOB NuB BoB Ra Bb'
NoB B
Nu
w Project � � BOB
NoA
ro�ect S NuB Rb
Ra
Ra NuB NuB T
oA \ NoB
r ,
` Nr.-)B Ud Ra Bb
Cut and
' FIII `
S Ra NOB �a Q
Ijr ch Bb
NuB
08 Ra o�
� Ud
BORROW PIT Ud
, GoA ;. � :, tea.
tad
N
NoB Na , �, Vv h
AaA BORROW PIT d
N �
Ra
j Ud NoB �, ` NaC
Cut and Fltt \- AaA
NaC_
AaA Nac tv,- -C
Ud
TO M e idle NaC pa
Uri 015441 NUB � \
C &F
NuE3 Me aca NaC
AaA
Ud
F, 2-7-01
I �._� , •�
1- GrB
we Wh
Ur NuB 3 W
Ud Me i_ WeB Ur wb."'' l
WeC wh
�l W
a�a Ur � d wh
NuB
Rb NuB i % Nub NuE
sm To
- - A
171
To `Beaver Pond Road , Rocky Mount, NC