20052078 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20130212

Naked Creek Stream Restoration
Wilkes County, North Carolina
2012 Year 5 Monitoring Report - Final
EEP Project Number: 261
USGS HUC 03040101010100
EcoEngineering Project Number: EEP -08000
Prepared for:
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
116 West Jones Street
Suite G 111
Raleigh, NC 27603
A.i.,rs si •�")'� Gv. � • r •' �V _�� '� • yI ►AMP I
�3p �" r•.
CZ�L'���tf„y '�' ., <1�^'tt",�.�•f�i4: �.' �:• .C.!�. � •'4� _ � .� •`.� \'t �o'�:- s-V '
k .r '� �?'%aX'-• .,y. ,y _ '!.n i y��1. r•' - %v �� �• ,� I r. r..,
• .� #ate,, � �.�� .�c41 r� - f. 1� .• �'�. .�,.
rEcolEngineering
A division of The John k NIcAdams Company. Inc. _.
RESEARCH TRIANOLE PARK
P. 0. Box 14005 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
919- 287 -4262 FAX [phone]
www.ecoengr.com

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary /Project Abstract .................................................. ..............................1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................... ..............................1
1.2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison ......................................... ..............................1
1.3 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison ................................. ..............................2
1.4 Wetland Conditions and Performance ........................................... ..............................3
1.5 Narrative Background .................................................................... ..............................3
2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................ ..............................3
3.0 References ............................................................................................ ..............................4
Project Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A — General Figures and Plan Views
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix B — General Project Tables
Table 1. Project Restoration Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
ZM
i
DENR - WIAT1 -R OUALITY
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 1 Wells ids s S caster Branch
Table 6. Vegetation Metadata Table M
Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
— Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
— Vegetation Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
Appendix D — Stream Assessment Data
— Table 8. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
— Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events
— Stream Station Photos
— Cross Sections with Annual Overlays
— Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
— Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
— BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates Table (not applicable)
— Baseline Stream Data Summary Table [Exhibit Table VIII] (submitted electronically)
— Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary [Exhibit Table IX] (Cross Section and
Reach Parameters submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
aEcoEngineedng
A desimm or TTe kft R NkAd+ C np.W. IK-

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number 261 • USGS HUC 03040 10 1010 100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
Appendix E — Wetland Assessment
Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment (omitted, not applicable)
— Precipitation and Water Level Plots (omitted, not applicable)
[jEcoEngineedng
A dwww orThe John R McAdam Cmnp®y Inc

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
1.0 Executive Summarv/Proiect Abstract
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of the restoration project is to improve the water quality and biological habitat of
the site's streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers through the following-
- Restore (pattern, dimension, and profile) unstable streams using natural channel design
techniques
-Re- establish riparian buffers (Kimley -Horn, 2007)
1.2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring
Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the
baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a
vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Therefore, any additional
species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species The 2012
Monitoring Year 5 data was provided by Carolina Vegetation Survey and was not
manipulated for presentation within Table 7 - Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C.
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data. Interim density
targets (stems /acre) are 320 at year 3 and 288 at year 4. Final stem count criteria are 260
trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring. As for Monitoring Year 5, Naked
Creek had 5 vegetation plots encompassing 0 12 acres, containing a total of 50 planted stems
excluding live stakes In total, the 5 vegetation plots yielded a density of 405 planted trees
per acre excluding live stakes. These density totals exceed the requirements by 10% for
planted trees per acre excluding live stakes. With regard to each individual vegetation plot,
Vegetation Plot 5 failed to meet the requirements by less than 10% while Vegetation Plots 1,
2, 3 and 4 exceed the requirements by 10% when examining planted stems excluding live
stakes.
Exotic /invasive species were observed at the site. Exotic species observed at the site include
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and cattail (Typha latifolia). There are nine (9) areas in
which exotic /invasive species were observed totaling approximately 0.04 acres in size and
are approximately 1.03% of the easement acreage The extent of exotic /invasive species is
depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A.
Bare areas which exhibit limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material were
observed at the site. There were two areas considered bare areas which total approximately
0.23 acres in size and are approximately 9.06% of the planted area at the site The extent of
the bare areas is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A.
The restoration project includes within the conservation easement areas designated as
"Allowable Use Area ". Allowable Use Areas are areas in which mowing activities have
1
Fag]EcoEngineedng
A do ww ofTbe khn R \kAdmnCm:poay. Vr

Naked Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project Number 261 - USGS HUC 0304010 1010 100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
occurred and are permissible There are six (6) Allowable Use Areas located between
Stations 0 +05 and 5 +85, 6 +15 and 16 +40, 17 +15 and 18 +15, 22 +90 and 23 +60, 23 +65 and
25 +00, and 25 +55 and 26 +5. These Allowable Use Areas are noted within Table 6A —
Vegetation Condition Assessment Appendix C as Easement Encroach Areas. The
Allowable Use Areas total approximately 0.21 acres in size and are approximately 5.38% of
the easement acreage The extent of the Allowable Use Areas is depicted in the Consolidated
Current Condition Plan View Appendix A.
The conservation easement is shown on the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A and the acreage is 3.9 acres. The conservation easement is based on
information received from EEP on October 11, 2012 and is based on Deed Book 1019 Page
361, Plat 10 Page 486 Wilkes County and Deed Book 1019 Page 417, Plat 10 Page 486
Wilkes County, dated November 20, 2007 EcoEngineering did survey locate one EEP
Conservation Monument located at Station 26 +70 and is depicted on the Consolidated
Current Condition Plan View Appendix A. Many of the EEP markers and stakes were noted
to be within 10 feet of the restored stream's top of bank Areas have been mowed
immediately adjacent to the east of the stakes and EEP markers. As a result, approximately
60% of Vegetation Plot 5 has been mowed. However, EcoEngineering recreated Vegetation
Plot 5 and surveyed the vegetation within the plot It should be noted that a section of fence
has been removed between Stations 16 +80 and 19 +60.
Based on the survey conducted for the Naked Creek Stream Restoration project, the
restoration project is 2,652 linear feet and will provide a total of 2,652 stream mitigation
units
1.3 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison
Overall, the stream system appears stable and is not migrating toward lateral or vertical
instability. Based on the prior year comparison using longitudinal profile data, it appears that
minor systemic aggradation has occurred throughout the reach, although this condition does
not appear to pose an imminent threat to the overall stability of the system. To document
bankfull events a crest gage is located approximately 450 feet upstream of cross section 4
and is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A. Evidence of
a bankf ill event was observed this monitoring year.
On May 31, 2012, EcoEngineering conducted field investigations for the Fifth Year Initial
Assessment. During the Initial Assessment, (4) beaver dams were observed at Stations
19 +45, 20 +25, 21 +10, and 23 +95. The beaver dams were constructed after Monitoring Year
4 and before the Fifth Year Initial Assessment. All four (4) beaver dams were removed after
the Initial Assessment and prior to field survey activities for Monitoring Year 5 (conducted
August 7 and August 10, 2012). The four (4) removed beaver dams are located in the
Consolidated Current Condition Plan View Appendix A.
Bank erosion predictions utilizing Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and Near Bank Stress
(NBS) assessment were not conducted for the entire project pre - construction as part of the
existing conditions survey. Therefore, BEHI and NBS assessments are not applicable during
Monitoring Year 5.
2 [fEcoEngineedng
A&*ww of7he Jahn R McAdmms Cmnpaoy, Ioe

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • CEP Project Number 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
1.4 Wetland Conditions and Performance
No wetlands are being monitored for mitigation credits at this project site.
1.5 Narrative Background
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration
plan documents available on the EEP website All raw data supporting the tables and figures
In the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
2.0 Methodology
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by
EEP (EEP, 2006; EEP, 2009). Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus
FE -115 5.0 megapixel digital camera. GPS location information was collected using a
Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit. Stream and vegetation problem areas
were noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets.
The methods used to generate
techniques as
publications fro
(USACE, 2003).
described in
in US Forest
the data in this report are standard fluvial geomorphology
Applied River Morphology (Rosgen, 1996) and related
Service and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines
Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2008, Version 4.2 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation (Lee et. al , 2008). Vegetation plot photographs were collected for
each vegetation plot. Vegetation monitoring plots were re- marked in the field by replacing all
old flagging with new orange flagging. Monitoring taxonomy follows Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2007). Stem height was measured with
a folding one -meter rule. Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with
calipers.
3 [JI]EcoEngineering
A dims® afTbc Jdm R McAdams Camay. Irc

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
3.0 References
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2006. Monitoring Report Guidelines, November
16, 2006.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009. Monitoring Report Guidelines, June 1, 2009
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., 2007. Naked Creek Stream Final Mitigation Report.
Submitted to NCDENR -EEP, August 2007.
Lee, Michael T., R K Peet, S. D Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods htm)
Rosgen, D L 1996. Applied Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), 2005. Information Regarding Stream Restoration In
The Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina. US Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, December 1, 2005.
Weakley, A. S., 2008. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, northern Florida, and
surrounding areas University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina
Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, working Draft as of
April 7, 2008.
4 [aEcoEngineedng
A &u= of 7bc k1m R McA&= Company tw

APPENDIX A
General Figures and Plan View

VYr
1
IPROJ
" , - • �-
Ole
IL
fit
mo
te- r
�'� ►-.,
r - ; .. .
USGS, 7.5 MINUTE, TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE;
PURLEAR, N.C.; 1966; LAT: 36.1394315' N
LON: 81.3634822' W
® rRaECr r,o. EEP-08000
AEcoEngineedng
FILENAME : EEP -08000
n
�
D CREEK �
A divirim of The lahn R MoAdm Coapay, IMC.
SCALE: 1 n _ 1.000
MAP
ZNGt�'1 M • PIANN6RS - MAMIY= - ZNVOKWUNTA ,
RRSRARCR 7UMC12IMRE • CBARWTR
1�/ 1 1
DATE: 08 -20 -12
11 �i11 '�lllell
no:.i w
WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
16,33.60' 1, PC C—,

NAKED CREEK
CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW - YEAR FIVE MONITORING
Nitfll
'•
POINT TAG
NORTHING
a
1
VC1
978937.6305
1303595.7554
2
VC2
878989.8963
1303599.5650
r n, •
VC3
979967.2706
�ii
4
UQ6
978935.1639
130362 &2099
�=Wi
iM'1669W��
875716.9337
1303595.7108
6
�iFI•T�
878781.7716
Y7
7
VC7
978761.7462
1303611.9076
a
VCs
678715.3560
1303511L0404
9
VC9
87823ILW32
1303704.1393
10
VC10
878304.3131
1303701.2231
11
VC11
978305.6913
1303712.2540
12
VC12
878240.6355
1303720.0466
13
VC13
e7nnimm
1303764.5696
14
VC14
97797&1274
1303757.1446
15
VC15
977977.1997
1303772.6940
18
�fil
i
130377 &7246
17
VC17
�Iziirft
13039753137
1s
Me
875906.5974
1303941.6805
19
VC19
576917.52a8
13039552972
20
VC20
876861.4609
1303990.4754
��ir[�s'I•Tr����
�irlT��
•/
�fil��
•
it71
�ittr�iTi[��
/ •
�ir[•r�fIi��
- -1
�it7
➢�
'lti i �
�
.7 .
kLUU)
WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP PROJECT NUMBER: 261
DATE: AUGUST 20, 2012
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
NC -EEP CONTACT: JULIE CAHILL (828)230 -5172
VEGETATION PLOT MONITORING CONTROL POINTS
POINT NUMBER
POINT TAG
NORTHING
EASTING
1
VC1
978937.6305
1303595.7554
2
VC2
878989.8963
1303599.5650
3
VC3
979967.2706
1303529.8125
4
VC4
978935.1639
130362 &2099
5
VC5
875716.9337
1303595.7108
6
VCs
878781.7716
1303595.5887
7
VC7
978761.7462
1303611.9076
a
VCs
678715.3560
1303511L0404
9
VC9
87823ILW32
1303704.1393
10
VC10
878304.3131
1303701.2231
11
VC11
978305.6913
1303712.2540
12
VC12
878240.6355
1303720.0466
13
VC13
e7nnimm
1303764.5696
14
VC14
97797&1274
1303757.1446
15
VC15
977977.1997
1303772.6940
18
me
877912.3357
130377 &7246
17
VC17
676552 -8169
13039753137
1s
Me
875906.5974
1303941.6805
19
VC19
576917.52a8
13039552972
20
VC20
876861.4609
1303990.4754
(KHA)
PROJECT START
STA. 10 +00
LAT: 36.1394315' N
LON: 81.3634822' W
CROSSINGS
o° \ /
` 1
E W 1 8
,A .1 �� I
j.
/.
K L K �\ �• it ♦ `
lii '� st
VICINITY MAP
CONSERVATION NTS
EASEMENT
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 8/07/12 TO 8/10/12.
PROJECT END AftoEngineering STA. 26 +52
A division of The John IL McAdams Company, Inc.
is SHEET INDEX 1 ', l ENGINEERS- PLANNERS - SURVEYORS - ENVUtONMENTAL
I -5 CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS 1 I •OSSt�'IIl
PLAN VIEW .! RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK ■ CHARLOTTE
11 l i l l. l it 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27718
►N':LlAA 800. 733. 5646- wwwjohntmcadamu m-Lcense No.: C -0298

1 �
2.
►W CE
\ _ - A
y
I Y \
r �
r \
r \
ALLOWABLE USE AR
LOOSE BOU
FENCE
I\I
r� \
It �
--© PHOTO POINT (ECO)
_Q a—
VP/ VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT (KHA)
4 ROCK CROSS VANE (BAK) T
4 ROCK A —VANE (BAK) ou
iT RIP RAP (BAK)
ROOTWAD (BAK)
FENCE (BAK)
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT (CAV)
TELEPHONE LINE (CAV)
OVERHEAD POWER LINE (CAV)
YEAR FIVE STREAM CENTERLINE (ECO)
AS —BUILT TOP OF BANK (BAK)
Y CREST GAGE ® BEAVER DAM'
BARE AREAS
KHA — KIMLEY —HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (DESIGN BASED ON CAV MAPPING)
CAV — CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES, P.A. (BASE /PRE — CONSTRUCTION MAPPING)
BAK — BAKER ENGINEERING NY, INC. (AS —BUILT MAPPING)
CUR — CURRENT SURVEYING AND MAPPING, P.A. (STATE PROPERTY EASEMENT SURVEYOR)
ECO — ECO ENGINEERING YEAR FOUR MONITORING)
NOTES:
1) SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP —OF —BANK — 8/07/12 TO 8/10/12.
2) CONSERVATION EASEMENT ACREAGE IS 3.9 ACRES AND IS BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM EEP
ON OCTOBER 11, 2012 AND IS BASED ON DB 1019 PAGE 361, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, AND DB
1019 PAGE 417, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2007.
3) ALLOWABLE USE AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING ACTIVITIES HAVE OCCURRED AND ARE
PERMISSIBLE.
4) CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND INSTALLED BETWEEN
MY -03 AND MY -04 BY OTHERS.
5) DURING THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT (CONDUCTED MAY 31, 2012) FOR MY -05 PERIOD, BEAVER DAMS
WERE OBSERVED. THE BEAVER DAMS WERE CONSTRUCTED AFTER MY -04 AND BEFORE MY -05 PERIODS.
BEAVER DAMS WERE REMOVED AFTER THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT AND PRIOR TO FIELD SURVEY ACTIVITIES
FOR THE MY -05 PERIOD.
\ GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
inch = 40 ft.
SHEET I OF 5
lot
•C+ ei
LU
0-
W<
O
w
W Z
3a
U
V E—
w 0
� o
z
W90
� U
nI
U 3
O
Cn
U
O 0
00 00 b N
O pp I
1 C)I II N
CL
W =
w w 0
Z y
G 3
o z � F
HcADAMS
LOG VANE (BAK) `
+-
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT (KHA)
in M
MONITORING CROSS SECTIONS (ECO) A
ALLOWABLE USE AREAS
(— S
STREAM CROSSING /FORD (BAK) I
INVASIVE / EXOTIC VEGETATION
SURVEYOR'S BENCHMARKS (CAV, BAK) P
��� C
PHOTO POINT LOCATION AND DIRECTION
® M
MONITORING BENCHMARKS (KHA) �
CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT
BARE AREAS
KHA — KIMLEY —HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (DESIGN BASED ON CAV MAPPING)
CAV — CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES, P.A. (BASE /PRE — CONSTRUCTION MAPPING)
BAK — BAKER ENGINEERING NY, INC. (AS —BUILT MAPPING)
CUR — CURRENT SURVEYING AND MAPPING, P.A. (STATE PROPERTY EASEMENT SURVEYOR)
ECO — ECO ENGINEERING YEAR FOUR MONITORING)
NOTES:
1) SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP —OF —BANK — 8/07/12 TO 8/10/12.
2) CONSERVATION EASEMENT ACREAGE IS 3.9 ACRES AND IS BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM EEP
ON OCTOBER 11, 2012 AND IS BASED ON DB 1019 PAGE 361, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, AND DB
1019 PAGE 417, PLAT 10 PAGE 486 WILKES COUNTY, DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2007.
3) ALLOWABLE USE AREAS ARE AREAS IN WHICH MOWING ACTIVITIES HAVE OCCURRED AND ARE
PERMISSIBLE.
4) CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND INSTALLED BETWEEN
MY -03 AND MY -04 BY OTHERS.
5) DURING THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT (CONDUCTED MAY 31, 2012) FOR MY -05 PERIOD, BEAVER DAMS
WERE OBSERVED. THE BEAVER DAMS WERE CONSTRUCTED AFTER MY -04 AND BEFORE MY -05 PERIODS.
BEAVER DAMS WERE REMOVED AFTER THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT AND PRIOR TO FIELD SURVEY ACTIVITIES
FOR THE MY -05 PERIOD.
\ GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
inch = 40 ft.
SHEET I OF 5
lot
•C+ ei
LU
0-
W<
O
w
W Z
3a
U
V E—
w 0
� o
z
W90
� U
nI
U 3
O
Cn
U
O 0
00 00 b N
O pp I
1 C)I II N
CL
W =
w w 0
Z y
G 3
o z � F
HcADAMS
O 0
00 00 b N
O pp I
1 C)I II N
CL
W =
w w 0
Z y
G 3
o z � F
HcADAMS

I
1
\ 1
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
ALLOWABLE USE AR
BOX CULVERT—,
ROAD CROSSING
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
_OOSE BOULDER
Flom
I
11
I
r
I �
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 2 OF 5
C Y�
w�•
uj
zy� .
�i
z
'o
Q
U
Z
� l F-
V ts. O
Con z
Thy O >'
W gu a
O
7 x
3
Q
O
z
0
0
0 0 N
a i
o II N
w o �j I
w w o
i
, L .
Q z
E �
S
�IcADA.AS

M
f =:
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 3 OF 5
w�•
o
W
O
O
O
00
O
I
a
w
w
zz
a
9
O N
O
O
00 to
OI I N
_ I
w a
x
71
z
� � o
McADAMS
V
0
�w
0
W
Q
z
a0
�¢
U
V
� O
� z
�o
U
W
W
3
U
F
Q
a
0
z
0
O
O
O
00
O
I
a
w
w
zz
a
9
O N
O
O
00 to
OI I N
_ I
w a
x
71
z
� � o
McADAMS

q,
\C�l
�IGUSTRUM SINENSE \
/ ENCROACHMENT _
ti
-30 \
OWED AREA
\
1
BEAVER DAM #3
1�
1°
10
1�^
1
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
\� 1 ENCROACHMENT
REMOVED BEAVER DAM #2 \
\ 1
2 1
\ ct
-`E .
CE —CE CE
30
ALLOWABLE USE \AREA
IGUSTRUM SINENSE s
ENCROACHMENT \
2
EMOVED BEAVER DAM #1
s
SECTION REMOVED
v>.
v�
ALLOWABLE USE
�w
L-TYPHA LATIFOLIA
` ENCROACHMENT
`
419
1 GRAPHIC SCALE
' 50 0 25 50 100
inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 4 OF 5
.L ,
(COMM)
�
W
O�
u
W<
�S6
0
O O N
OD OD U) I
O N
I II I
w w o
zz
G
McADAMS
Q Q
z
' o
a
U
Z
H
^
z °z
0
I-1
o0
w
3
v
�Q
A
U
0
O O N
OD OD U) I
O N
I II I
w w o
zz
G
McADAMS

CE
302
W
U
CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONUMENT
SURVEY LOCATED BY ECOENGINEERING AND
INSTALLED BETWEEN MY -03 AND MY -04
BY OTHERS
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
CE
ALLOWABLE USE AR
rr 3J —
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
PIPING AT STRUCTURE
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT
29 CE
?r— CE — Be fig— s
4�
14 REMOVED BEAVER DAM #4 PIPING AT STRUCTURE
X30
FENCE
ALLOWABLE USE
J
30 33
(r
r
r
v \r
i
b
NIA
rr
� Q
r
r
r
r
REMOVED BEAVER DAM #3
1 x
REMOVED BEAVER DAM
�s I\
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET 5 OF 5
on
o18
W<•
0 0
N
O ( o
I C)j II N
a
w
w w o
zz
!1
a C 4 0
McADAMS
W¢
7
Q
Q
U
V
F-
r�
� 2
H
W
�O
O U
^�
cn
ua
3
U
Q
a
O
z
S
0 0
N
O ( o
I C)j II N
a
w
w w o
zz
!1
a C 4 0
McADAMS

General Project Tables

Table 1. Project Restoration Components
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Project
ffi
e
r
O
Segment or
o
o 6
Z
Y3
Reach ID
W
CL
0
p'
Stationing
Comment
UtNkd
12,652 1
R
I P2
12,652 [a
l
1 2,652
1 10 +00 - 26 +52
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonnpa ian
Stream
Wetland
1
Wetland
Total Wetland
Buffer
Comment
2,652
0
0
0
R= Restoration Ell= Enhancement II P 1= Priority I P3= Priority III
EI= Enhancement S= Stabilization P2= Priority 11 SS= Stream Bank Stabilization

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Summer 05
Nov -05
Final Design — 90%
Spring 06
Summer 06
Construction
Fall 06
Winter 06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire ro ect area
Winter 06
Winter 06
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments I & 2
Winter 06
Winter 06
Contamerized and B &B plantings for reach/segments l & 2
Winter 06
Winter 06
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
Spring 07
Aug-07
Year I Monitoring
Sep-08
Nov -08
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep-09
Nov -09
Year 3 Monitoring
Jul -10
Oct -10
Year 4 Mon itoring
Apr- I I
Nov -I 1
Year 5 Monitoring
Oct -12
12 -Nov
Note Timeframe estimated from information provided by EEP

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Designer
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc
P O Box 33068, Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Primary project design POC
POC name and phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions, Inc
PO Box 28749, Raleigh, NC 27611 -8749
Construction contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky, 919 - 605 -6134
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road, Edenton, NC 27932
Plantin contractor POC
Mary-Margaret McKinne 252- 482 -8491
Seeding Contractor
Contact Fluvial Solutions, Inc
PO Box 28749, Raleigh, NC 27611 -8749
Planting contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky, 919- 605 -6134
Seed Mix Sources
Contact Fluvial Solutions, Inc
Peter Jelenevsky, 919- 605 -6134
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen
843 - 851 -4129
Monitoring Performers
EcoEngineering - A Division of The John R McAdams Co
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
Stream Monitoring POC George Buchholz
919 - 287 -0890
Vegetation Monitoring POC George Buchholz
919- 287 -0890
Wetland Monitoring POC NA
INA
Note Information obtained from EEP documents and bid tabulation results Use contacts in table for aaai tonal
information or to verify data

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ' ect /EEP Project Number: 261
Project County
Wilkes County
Drainage Area- UTto Naked Creek
0.53 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
Estimated at 0 2%
Stream Order
1 st for UT to Naked Creek
Physiogra hic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Appalachian Highlands
Rosgen Classification of As -built
C
Cowardin Classification
R3UBH
Dominant soil types
Chewacla loam, Pacolet sandy loam
Reference site ID
UT Purlear, Upper Big Warrior
USGS HUC for Project
03040101010100
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Protect
12- 31- 3 -(0.5)
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
C
Any portion of any protect segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor INA
of protect easement fenced
80%

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ' ect /EEP Project Number: 261
Vegetation Plot
Summary Information
Plot N
Riparian Buffer
Stems
Stream / Welland
Stems2
Live Stakes
Invasives
Volunteers3
Total
Unknown
Growth
Form
VPI
n/a
8
0
0
0
8
0
VP2.
n/a
I5
0
0
0
15
0
VP3
n/a
12
0
0
0
12
0
VP4
n/a
9
0
0
1 0
1 9
0
VP5
n/a
6
0
0
1 0
1 6
0
Wetland /Stream Vegetation Totals
Stream / Wetland Success
Plot # Stems= Volunteers3 Total I Criteria Metz
VP1 - 0 1 324
243
Notes:
Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No
Buffer Stems vines.
Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live
2Stream/ Welland Stem stakes. No vines
I'Volunteers INative woodv stems. Not planted. No vines. I
Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl.

Table 6. Vegetation Metadata
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ' ect /EEP Project Number:261
Report Prepared By
Geor a Buchholz
Date Prepared
8/21/2012 11 30
database name
cvs -ee -ent ool -v2 3 0 mdb
database location
X \Protects \EEP\EEP -08000 (Naked Creek) \Storm \Design Fdes\2012 Naked Creek Final
Submittal
computer name
BUCHHOES
file size
70844416
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project
data
Pro j, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live
stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live
stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data live stems, dead stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems
impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and
missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
261
project Name
Naked Creek
Description
10 6 miles west of Wilkesboro and 18 4 miles east of Boone in Wilkesboro, NC One Reach
UtNkd approximately 2,800 linear feet
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
ten th ft
Yadkin-Pee Dee
.stream-to-edge width (ft)
2,652
area (sq m
25
.Required Plots calculated
0 01 sq miles 2 92 acres
,Sampled Plots
5

Table 6A. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Project Number:261
Planted Acreage 2.54
Easement Acreage 3 9•
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody and
0 1 acres
dash, pink
2
023
906%
1. Bare Areas
herbaceous material
blue &
Woody stem densities clearly e ow target
none
double
6
0 21
538%
2 Low Stem Density
levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
0 1 acres
- --
0
0
00%
Areas
criteria
green
3 Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class that
0 25 acres
—
0
0
00%
Rates or Vigor
are obviously small given the monitoring year
Easement Acreage 3 9•
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% Of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
1000 SF
diagonal,
9
004
1 03 /o
Concern
polygons at map scale)
red
zig zag,
blue &
none
double
6
0 21
538%
5 Easement
Areas or points (if too small to render as
hatch,
Encroachment Areas—
polygons at map scale)
green
Notes
' Easement Acreage is based on information received from EEP on January 24, 2011 and is based on DB 1019 Page 361, Plat 10
Page 486 Wilkes County, and DB 1019 Page 417, Plat 10 Page 486 Wilkes County, Dated November 20, 2007.
" Easement Encroachment Areas are "Allowable Use Areas" and are areas In which Mowing Activities have occurred

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project /EEP Project Number: 261
Pate I
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEnginecring from the Carolina Vegetation Survey Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineermg. Formatting of table was performed by EcoLngmeenng
b) Onginal baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems
within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species
c) Pnol-S = Planted Excluding Live Stakes, P -all = All Planted Stems. T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
d Cells hiRWW9ed in VIOLET bt ikm the pititisence of volunteers
Color for Density
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Current Plot Data
MY5 2012
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
1
E261 -01 -VP1
E261 -01 -VP2
E261- 01 -VP3
E261 -01 -VP4
E261
-01 -VPS
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol -S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
2
2
2
1
1
1
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Ce halanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
8
8
8
6
6
6
4
4
N ssa s Ivatica
black um
Tree
1
1
11
1
Persea borbonia
redbay
tree
1
1
1
11
2
2
2
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Quercus hellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
6
6
6
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species coun
Stems per ACRE 11,323351
8
8
81
15
15
15
12
12
12
91
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
4 4
4
5
5
5
3 3
3
2 2
2
323.75
607.0 3
82
485.62
485.62
- 364.22
364.22
24181 242.81
242.81
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEnginecring from the Carolina Vegetation Survey Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineermg. Formatting of table was performed by EcoLngmeenng
b) Onginal baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems
within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species
c) Pnol-S = Planted Excluding Live Stakes, P -all = All Planted Stems. T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
d Cells hiRWW9ed in VIOLET bt ikm the pititisence of volunteers
Color for Density
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Pate 2
Annual Means
Y5(2012)
MY4 2011
MY3(201
Y2(2009)
MY1 2008
Pnol-S
Pall
T
Pnol-S
Pall
IT
Pnol-S
Pall
T
Pnol-S
Pall
T
Pnol-S
Pall
T
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
22
22
22
20
20
2
22
22
2
22
22
22
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
21
2
13
13
13
9
9
1
9
9
1
11
11
11
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
21
2
1
1
1
1
50
!01
50
42
42
53
47
47
59
511
39
39
3
5
5
5
5
5
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
9 9 9
8 8
8
9 9
11
9 91
91
81 8
8
404.691 404.6
339.941
428.97
380.41
477.5
412.781
428.9
315.651
315.65
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEngineering from the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Data was not manipulated by EcoEngineering. Formatting of table was performed by
EcoEngineering.
b) Original baseline vegetation monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year I and 2008 is considered a drought year. The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered
the baseline datum because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a vegetation monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for. Therefore, any
additional species observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species.
c) PnoLS = Planted Excluding Live Stakes; P -all = All Planted Stems; T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems
4)C4ftbkWWAW In VIOLZrinilicateftPremm ofvoltmteem
Color for Densi

PHOTO VP1: LOOKING NORTH AT VEGETATION PLOT VP1.
PHOTO VP2: LOOKING NORTH AT VEGETATION PLOT VP2.
CT NO' EEP -08000
NAKED CREEK RESTORATION
®EcoEnginBering
YE: EEP -08000
N TS
�' Stelll
MONITORING PHOTOS
A dtvWon of The John R_ MMdm Cdr, Inc_
RESEARCH TRJANGLR PAR[. NC
C
11�R.��
�Sr NORTH CAROLINA
P.O. BOX 14006 ZIP Y77D9- 005
08 -20 -12
1�� 111
(919) 361 -5000

Q
d
v
s

APPENDIX D
Stream Assessment Data

Table 8. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Unnamed Tributary to Naked Creek: 2,655 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As -built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As -built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform.
Mean or Total
A. Riffles
I . Present ?
28
28
NA
100
2. Armor stable (e.. n o displacement)?
28
28
NA
100
3. Facet grade appears stable? (slope 5 design range)
22
28
NA
79
4. Minimal evidence of cmbeddin finin ?
28
28
NA
100
5. Length appropriate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
95
B. Pools
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to severe aggrad. or migrat. ?)
17
17
NA
100
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean Bkf>1.6 ?)
Design = 2.4 ! 0.8 = 3
17
Max Pool/ 0.8 >
1.6, 10 of 17
NA
59
3. Length ap ro riate? (pool-to-pool s cn)
15
17
NA
88
82
C. Thalwe
1. Upstream of meander bend (run /inflection) centering?
25
28
NA
89
2. Downstream of meander (glide /inflection) centering?
26
28
NA
93
91
D. Meander
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controllcd erosion?
27
27
NA
100
2. Of those eroding, H w /concomitant point bar formation
27
27
NA
100
3. Apparent Re within spec?
21
27
NA
78
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief?
27
27
NA
100
95
E. Bed General
I. General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
3/700
72
2. Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down -
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
86
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
NA
NA
NA
100
100
G. Vanes
1. Free of bank or arm scour?
34
34
NA
100
2. Height appropriate?
34
34
NA
100
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
34
34
NA
too
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
29
34
NA
85
96
H. Wads/ Boulders
1. Free of scour?
36
36
NA
100
2. Footing stable?
36
36
NA
100
100

Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Pro ' ect /EEP Pro 'ect Number: 261
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo # if available
On -Site Crest Gage located at Station
07/15/10
Between 09/16/09 and
10 +97 Observed elevation on gage at
Not Available
07/15/10
elevation 1297 81
On -Site Crest Gage located at Station
04/06/11
Between 07/15/10 and
10+97 Observed elevation on gage at
Not Available
04/06/11
elevation 1297 93
On -Site Crest Gage located at Station
08/08/12
Between 04106/11 and
10+97 Observed elevation on gage at
Not Available
08/08/12
elevation 1297 95
Note A crest gage was installed during the 2UU9 Monitoring Year 2 field Investigations so that banKtull events can De aocumentea
during subsequent monitoring years The crest gage is located at Station 10 +97 and is depicted In the Consolidated Current
Condition Plan View located in Appendix A

PHOTO 3: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM AT CHANNEL.
PHOTO 4: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM UPPER CROSSING AT CHANNEL.
EEP -08000
~
NASFD CREEK RFSPORA�ON
AEcoEngineering
A d;� of 7be John R. McAdsm Cody. Inc.
EEP - 08000
VDAATE:
4
MONn`ORING PHOTOS
NTS
In
Jtf:ill
y
I � ,
^AD
NORM CAROI M
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
08 -2D—� 2
(11wn�s.
(919) 351 -5000

r:
f
',�� � •r •�� ~� � ice',.
�, \ � �"' ��� 't- • � ` yr
Ir
00 11W4
"HOTO 9: LOOKING UPSTREAM AT CHANNEL FROM LOWER CROSSING.
u 4 i�F
Ov

d
v

FKWECT No' EEP-08000
"UNAMR!
0 EEP-08000
t=; SCALE:
NTS
DATE:
08-20-12

n
9
d
a
s

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT N 261
CROSS SECTION
1
Ye2r-0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station A
Elev, ft
Station ft
Elev. fl
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (R)
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev.
-2.50
1310.07
0.00
1309.99
-3.00
1310.02
-3.00
1309.84
-3
1309.8
-3
1310.1
-2.27
1309.80
3.84
1309.31
-2.79
1309.79
2.65
1309.45
0.76
1309.83
-2.84
1309.81
1.27
130987
5.55
1308.91
0.96
1309.82
9.53
1308.18
6.34
1308.73
2.45
1309.64
14.11
1307.42
7.47
1308.57
6.40
1308.75
14.04
1307.56
14.95
1307.38
11.11
1308.01
19.44
1306.68
9.77
1308.17
16.22
1307.24
18.47
1307.04
16.8
1307.3
19.19
1307,08
21.63
1306.18
12.46
1307.64
20.34
1306.50
23.03
1306.16
21.76
1307
25.8
1307.3
22.26
1305.94
14.84
1307.58
21.87
1306.44
25.95
1306.76
24.68
1307.06
27.19
1307.07
24.87
1305.55
17.94
1307.07
22.28
1306.22
27.52
1306.35
26.89
1306.92
28.02
1306.96
26.61
1305.03
19.02
1306.73
22.70
1306.01
27.85
1306.19
27.57
1306.53
28.27
1305.88
29.75
1304.70
20.68
1306.47
23.89
1305.68
29.81
1306.02
28.21
1306.5
28.51
1306.03
31.66
1304.67
2107
1305.93
25.50
1305.93
31.09
1305.89
28.96
1306.43
28.53
1306.46
33.44
1305.20
24.14
1305.68
26.69
1305.34
32.32
1305.88
29.72
1306.39
28.98
1305.65
34.89
1305.96
26.01
1305.55
28.26
1304.83
33.76
1305.75
30.41
1306.35
29.37
1305.67
37.15
1307.04
27.68
1305.11
29.75
1305.08
34.29
1306.27
31.24
1306.12
30.19
1305.73
41.68
1307.67
30.11
1304.68
31.57
1304.97
36.71
1307.17
32.09
1306.12
30.6
1305.84
56.53
1312.96
31.83
1304.77
32.55
1304.43
42.20
1308.02
33.02
1306.2
31.02
1305.83
63.35
1314.26
33.64
1305.59
33.47
1305.17
49.56
13 11. 16
33.78
1305.91
31.07
1306.29
34.98
1306.43
34.61
1305.82
63.11
1314.30
34,69
1306.73
31.74
1306.51
37.17
1307.25
34.61
1306.21
36.6
1307.11
32.29
1306.04
40.61
1307.57
35.35
1306.35
39.58
1307.54
34.45
1306.99
44.29
1308.81
36.20
1307.05
43.06
1308.27
37.08
1307.35
46.35
1309.66
40.72
1307.45
51.45
1311.74
48.53
1310.46
49.73
1311.14
46.54
1309.30
6314
1314.34
6152
131437
51.91
1311.94
52.87
1311.90
63.61
1314.71
56.58
1313.19
63.76
1314.26
60.05
1313.83
6199
1314.64
63.29
1314.30
rr�
i!m Il,l:ri�il�t,,,
®EcoEngineedng
A di.n+on or I h, K*A R. McAdv C« w- Inc.

1316
1315
1314
1313
1312
� 1311
.21310
> 1309
j 1308
1307
1306
1305
1304
1303
Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 030401010 10 100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section I - Pool
— — Bankfull
�- Year -0, 8/22/07
Year -1, 9116108
— Year -2, 9/16/09
— G Year -3, 7/16/10
CIE— Year-4, 04/06/11
—i— Year -5, 08110/12
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-5,2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
I1cciny%ten
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 1
FEATURE: Pool
25.2 sq. ft.
26.0 ft.
1.0 ft.
2.4 ti.
26.8 ft.
n/a ft.
n/a
1308.01 ft.
©EcoEngineering
A di%nm of the John R McAdam Comp n . IQ.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT 4 261
CROSS SECTION
2
Year-0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. (ft)
Station ft
Elev, (ft)
Station 11
Elev.
tin R
Elev. fl
Station (ft)
Elev.
Station fl
Elev. (fl)
Station Elev. f
-2.00
1309.25
0.00
1309.10
-2.80
1309.01
2.00
1308.94
2.53
1309.1
2
1308.92
-1.48
1308.98
2.10
1309.14
1.72
1308.88
2.28
1309.09
5.39
130968
2.23
1309.12
4.32
1308.96
4.94
1308.72
1.94
1309.02
4.39
1308.93
12.62
1307,11
4.72
1308.93
13.81
1306.89
8.49
1307.82
11,12
1307.28
12.48
1307 18
1746
130681
12.1
1307.19
17.81
1 306.65
10.81
1307.41
17.38
1306.80
17.67
1306.82
19.84
1306.42
17.89
1306.7
22.79
1305.52
13.10
1307.01
20.04
1306.12
21.02
1306.06
21.22
1306.26
203
1306.34
23.48
1305.41
16.30
1306.86
22.47
1305.73
22.82
1305.74
22.1
1306.03
2119
1306.12
24.93
1305.51
20.85
1305.88
22.89
1305.63
23.33
1305.65
22.96
1305.84
22.77
130601
26.27
1305.42
22.15
1305.67
23.72
1305.46
23.85
1305.04
23.47
1305.52
23.59
1305.7
27.00
1305.53
23.96
1305.57
24.70
1305.53
24.46
1304.77
24.01
1305.26
23.68
1305.16
28.69
1305.63
25.38
1305.51
25.65
1305.46
25.53
1304.80
2456
1305.18
23.73
1305.55
32.26
1306,67
26.58
1305.47
26.17
1305.52
26.20
1305.23
25.2
1305.2
24.1
1305.05
37.62
1306,86
28.38
1305.74
2675
1305.53
27.05
1305.61
25.82
1305.27
24.7
1304.79
49.96
1307.73
29.29
1305.97
27.38
1305.59
27.68
1305.66
26.48
1305.34
25.19
1304.81
64.39
1311.04
33.26
1306.79
27.98
1305.68
30.74
130637
27.26
1305.64
25.96
1304.98
69.12
1312.05
35.66
1306.85
28.13
1305.75
38.44
1306.99
27.92
1305.71
26.72
1305.34
69.52
1312.36
3993
1307.12
28.74
1305.91
52.41
1308.27
28.56
1305.89
27.33
1305.68
43.70
1307.30
29.98
1305.98
69.52
1312.17
28.98
1306.34
28.37
1305.83
49.37
1307.75
33.65
1306.79
69.64
1312.38
30.82
1306.29
29.14
1306.39
54.34
1308.84
44.29
1307.29
40.09
1306.99
30.88
1306.31
58.12
1309.64
51.58
1308.06
511
1307.97
32.81
1306.84
62.63
1310.72
62.15
1310.51
59.71
1309.94
39.83
1307
66.47
1311.70
69.48
1312.12
69.37
1312.15
50.04
1307.78
57.45
1309.33
63.85
1310.87
69.56
1312.15
69.68
1312.4
r
I�� crnytitcm
Fag�EcoEngineedng
A dig- of I W ),,n R. McAdY ConWmn Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project Number: 261 - USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report - Wilkes County, North Carolina - October, 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section 2 - Riffle
1313
— Bankfull
1312 —6— Year -0, 8/22/07
1311 Year -1, 9/16/08
— Year -2, 9/18/09
1310 a Year -3, 7/16/10
CIE— Year -4, 04/06111
1309 — Year -5, 8/10/12
0
ji 1308
1307
1306
1305
1304
1303
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-5,2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
lkx)s stenI
II l,ll t'iil� l l
•_.uk.�er._
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 2
FEATURE: Riffle
12.35 sq. ft.
14.64 N.
0.84 f1.
2.05 ft.
17.37 ft.
6.83 ft.
C
1306.84 fl
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
[JEcoEngineedng
Ad., t of the )W. R. %kAdn, Camay. 1 —

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
3
Year-0
Year
-1
Year
-2
Year -3
Ye2r4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev.
Station (fl)
Elev.
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft l
Elcv. 11
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. R
-3.20
1304.09
0.00
1304.18
4.03
1304.01
4.00
1304.19
-3.87
1304.07
4
1304.25
-3.00
1303.86
1.53
1304.20
3.27
1303.98
-3.87
1304.06
2.85
1304.05
-3.86
1304.2
1.35
1303.96
3.77
1304.04
11.12
1302.14
-3.87
1304.06
II 14
1302.17
1.37
1304.18
11.93
1301.96
6.55
1303.54
18.40
1301.87
10.41
1302.39
14
1301.89
3.91
1303.92
18.06
1301.71
11.86
1302.24
19.57
1301.75
14.15
1301.84
17.19
1302.15
8.71
130191
20.40
1301.49
14.12
1301.91
2037
1301.59
1983
1301.74
19.51
1301.96
11.62
1302.2
2163
1300.78
1940 .
1301.86
20.70
1301.46
22.50
1301.31
20.77
1301.47
15.28
1302.04
23.67
1300.61
21.34
1301.53
21.59
1301.37
23.08
1301.00
21.69
1301.35
17.69
1302.07
26.92
1300.63
22.85
1301.18
22.70
1301.36
23.49
1300.93
22.74
1301.33
19.57
1302
28.78
1300.76
23.95
1301.18
23.46
1300.95
24.64
1300.85
23.73
1301.14
2092
1301.63
30.30
1300.96
25.32
1301.10
24.34
1301.05
25.54
1300.77
24.4
1300.95
21.37
1301.51
31.29
1301.07
26.24
1300.99
25.60
1300.96
26.02
1300.80
25.12
1300.79
22.9
1301.42
32.81
1301.58
28.29
1301.23
26.77
1300.98
26.31
1300.77
25.76
1300.88
23.9
1301.03
34.80
1301.86
30.05
1301.34
28.46
1301.35
27.07
1300.87
266
1300.88
24.24
1301.04
38.00
130116
32.25
1301.55
29.33
1301.45
27.37
1301.12
27.3
1300.9
24.26
1300.87
45.53
1304.65
33.95
1301.89
30.93
1301.51
27.77
1301.45
2773
13011
24.71
1300.61
62.71
1309.43
35.38
1302.04
32.82
1301.98
28.57
1301.58
28.26
1301.68
25
1300.51
63.02
1309.72
37.72
1302.24
38.00
1302.49
31.63
1301.64
29.48
1301.51
25.65
130053
39.19
1302.76
44.96
1304.76
37.59
1302.36
31.4
1301.65
26.02
1300.61
4197
1304.00
62.29
1309.69
48.88
1305.85
33.07
1302.11
26.69
1300.76
45.07
1304.70
62.14
1309.69
37.58
1302.42
27.19
1300.96
50.00
1306.11
62.31
1309.91
46.94
1305.28
27.34
130133
5133
1306.93
57.21
1308.13
27.87
1301.54
59.33
1308.78
62.15
1309.67
28.9
1301.51
62.61
1309.67
32.33
1 301.93
37.76
130142
46.69
1305.12
57.39
1308.26
62.14
1309.71
62.35
1309.91
r�
l"4YnVS011
Il 1:11 11111'171
g]EcoEngineering
A m.,. If r W JOM R.«AA%� Copy. kx.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project Number: 261 - USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report - Wilkes County, North Carolina - October, 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section 3 - Riffle
1311
1310 — Bankfull
e Year - 0.8/22/07
1309 Year -1, 9/16/08
1308 Year -2, 09/18109
1307 a Year -3, 7/16/10
1306 Ill— Year -4, 04/06/11
1305 —'I--- Year -5, 8/10/12
> 1304
Uj 1303
1302
1301
1300
1299
1298
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-5,2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE, 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOL7/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
I' ny�teln ;
,ic` __.
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 3
FEATURE: Riffle
7.21 sq. ft.
14.30 ft.
0.50 ft.
1.56 ft.
28.37 ft.
2.10 ft.
C
1302.07 ft
©EcoEngineering
A dnn.n of 7M J tm R_ McAdoo- C—p—, Inc.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • REP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT 0 261
CROSS
SECTION
4
Year -0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Ulm (ft
Station (ft
Elev.
Station
El v.
Station (R)
Elev. (ft
Station (ft)
Elev. (fl)
Station
Elev,
Station 01 Elev. (ft)
-3.45
1294.08
0.00
129189
4.80
1293.87
-3.00
1293.94
-2.93
1293.76
4
1293.84
-186
1293.64
3.40
1294.15
1.22
1294.06
-2.82
1293.79
2.7
1294.01
-3.28
1293.69
4.04
1293.97
4.36
1294.11
2.91
1294.21
5.58
1294.04
5.49
1294.08
1.28
1293.85
11.02
1292.54
6.74
1293.76
9.52
1292.69
9.11
1293.37
9.66
1293.19
5.4
1294.05
14.67
129238
8.77
1293.28
14.07
1292.49
11.57
1292.64
14.82
12925
8.16
1293.53
17.74
1292.08
10.25
129173
16.77
1292 17
17.13
1292.25
19.87
1292
12.11
129147
19.86
1291.46
11.87
129154
19.32
1291.78
19.60
1292.02
20.54
1291.78
16.28
129142
20.04
1291.29
15.36
1292.41
20.24
1291.47
20.55
1291.62
21.73
1291.59
19.91
1291.98
26.31
1291.33
17.81
1292.14
2101
1291.48
20.65
1291.63
22
1290.64
20.53
1291.69
27.76
1291.43
19.39
1291.73
21.97
1291.56
21.32
1291.42
2236
1290.39
20.61
1291.05
29.18
1291.66
20.24
1291.40
22.72
1291.53
2236
1291.43
23.01
1290.37
21.16
1291.49
32.45
1292.24
20.69
1291.48
24.08
1291.48
23.28
1291.46
23.62
1290.37
21.26
1290.58
36.48
1292.38
21.74
1291.57
25.07
1291.62
24.02
1291.47
24.27
1290.41
21.37
1291.37
42.05
1293.42
23.44
1291.46
26.42
1291.55
24.97
1291.48
24.78
1290.41
21.73
1290.27
57.67
1298.07
2573
1291.54
27.94
1291.55
25.88
1291.51
25.22
1290.7
23.27
1290.25
66.66
1299.97
2762
1291.63
29.03
1291.81
27.47
1291.48
25.5
1291.45
23.77
1290.19
66.97
1300.23
29.10
1291.86
29.51
1291.87
28.15
1291.66
26.67
1291.57
24.28
1290.25
30.18
1292.07
30.31
1292.02
29.13
1291.82
27.67
1291.67
24.43
1290.36
31.82
1292.34
31.54
1292.28
29.64
129183
28.79
1291.76
25.78
1290.59
34.52
129242
39.72
1293.09
41.14
1293.23
29.65
1291.93
26.35
1291.27
37.08
1292.69
48.44
1295.18
54.60
1296.93
31.89
1292.38
26.9
1291.64
39.29
1293.14
59.63
1298.45
67,14
1299.92
40.72
1293.16
27.71
1291.65
41.90
1293.60
67.20
1299.97
67.32
1299.92
47.96
1294.98
29.07
1291.93
44.43
1294.23
57.7
1297.98
31.34
1292.18
48.88
1295.48
66.99
1300.01
37.09
1292.61
51.23
1296.11
43.4
1293.8
55.20
1297.48
52.73
1296.44
58.52
129834
66.94
1300.06
61.31
1298.85
64.99
1299.68
r=�
1�cYnystem
EEcoEngineering
A Oi,- of'Fhe kie R. WA b- Co ". I---

1302
1301
1300
1299
1298
c 1297
1296
.2 1295
1294
1293
1292
1291
1290
Naked Creck Sircam Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitonng Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section 4 - Riffle
— Bankfull
—� Year -0, 8122107
Year - 1, 9/16/2008
Year -2, 09/18/09
e Year -3, 7116110
CIE— Year -4, 04/06/11
■ Year -5, 8/10/12
-6 -1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR -5, 2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankf ill Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
� l� �c�n-ytitem
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 4
FEATURE: Riffle
10.31 sq. ft.
8.64 ft.
1.19 ft.
1.99 ft.
7.24 ft.
11.57 ft.
C
1292.18 ft
�EcoEngineedng
A Ai.isero onTe ra. R WA.b— Cdr• IM.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
5
Year -0
Year -1
Year
-2
Ye2r -3
Year4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev,
ion ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
-2.50
1282.92
0.00
1282.46
0.04
1282.46
0.00
1282.74
0.15
1282.4
0
1282.57
-1.88
128141
5.00
1282.37
12.00
1282.19
0.10
1282.41
8.94
1282.21
0.05
128158
7.47
1282.32
14.00
1281.99
2035
1281.82
10.77
1282.15
16.11
1281.92
5.47
1282.35
17.80
1281.78
20.00
1281.80
24.12
1281.38
17,42
1281.92
21.72
1281.62
11.58
1282.12
27.26
1280.63
24.00
1281.39
25.20
1281.26
26.92
1280.96
23.98
1281.45
16.62
128198
29.53
1280.17
2700
1280.95
26.56
1281.13
32.08
1280.38
27.55
1280.85
22.18
1281.63
32.35
1279.52
30.00
1280.50
28.23
1280.85
35.75
1280.45
31.53
1280.54
24.59
1281.36
40.12
1279.30
3140
1280.33
29.85
1280.72
36.22
1280.30
34.22
1280.6
28.48
1280.84
43.31
1279.43
33.00
1279.82
3133
1280.43
37.08
1280.11
36.66
1280.46
33.55
1280.81
43.41
1280.20
34.00
1279.69
3144
1280.33
37.12
1279.91
36.93
1280.28
351
1280.77
43.82
1281.02
35.00
1279.93
33.14
1280.33
37.64
1279.69
37.22
1280.02
35.4
1280.72
45.56
1281.95
36.00
1280.01
34.10
128041
38.79
1279.49
37.84
1279.96
35.82
1280.63
58.52
1283.68
37.00
1279.96
35.03
1280.43
39.90
1279.30
38.43
1279.86
36.15
1280.32
60.09
1285.21
38.00
1279.76
35.63
128037
41.00
1279.07
39.09
1279.63
37.09
1280.18
61.33
1285.56
39.00
1279.48
36.46
1280.27
42.68
1278.86
39.88
1279.57
38.08
1279.89
61.22
1285.86
40.00
1279.14
37.23
1280.12
43.68
1279.14
40.72
1279.4
38.81
1279.89
40.80
1278.91
38.58
1279.81
44.73
1279.38
41.46
1279.32
39.73
1279.69
41.00
1278.91
39.53
1279.53
45.55
1280.69
42.2
1279.34
407
1279.5
42.60
1279.07
4071
1279.08
45.58
1279.90
4195
1278.95
41.44
1279.36
43.50
1279.27
4163
1278.89
45.62
1279.63
43.74
1279.11
42.47
1278.79
44.00
1279.36
42.12
1278.81
46.51
1281.29
44.38
1279.2
44.17
1278.99
45.70
1279.81
43.66
1278.73
49.85
1282.26
44.94
1279.59
45.36
1279.47
46.00
1280.46
44.33
1279.23
58.74
1283.12
45.62
1279.9
45.91
1279.71
46.30
1280.90
45.00
1279.44
63.56
1285.36
46.13
1280.85
46.25
1280.4
46.80
1281.42
45.46
1280.24
63.74
1285.74
46.58
1281.24
46.56
1280.96
47.50
1281.65
46.07
1280.80
48.6
1282.01
46.95
1281.44
49.00
1282.08
4747
1281 54
51
1282.23
47.72
1281.62
54.20
1282.53
48.17
1281.79
55.94
1282.7
49.41
1282.11
5630
128178
48.93
1282.05
60.08
1283.4
53.34
1282.43
59.50
128118
50.03
1282.24
63.59
1285.28
59.22
1283.12
61.50
128386
53.67
1282.57
6151
1285.28
62.60
1285
58.07
1282.93
63.90
1285.39
61.15
1283.61
64.06
1285.55
r�
l�C�c>s��stcm
11 1<u ullt : i
©EcoEngineedng
A &- M The )oM R. NcAd1 C-4=y. la.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fitch Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October. 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section 5 - Pool
1288
1287 — — Bankfull
s Year -0, 8/22/07
1286 Year -1, 9/16/2008
--+�— Year -2, 09/18/09
1285 9 Year -3, 7/16/10
c 1284 CIF— Year -4, 04/06/11
1283 �— Year -5, 8/10/12
0
d 1282
1281
1280
1279
1278
1277 .
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
YEAR-5,2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZIPARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
c�
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 5
FEATURE: Pool
24.1 sq. ft.
22.0 ft.
1.1 It.
2.6 ft.
20.0 ft.
n/a ft.
n/a
1281.56 ft.
Faa�EcoEngineering
A d ­ of 7 he *A. R Mc1d® C—W-y. la.

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October, 2012
NAKED CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 261
CROSS SECTION
6
Year-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year4
Ye2r -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. (ft)
Station ft
Elev. (R)
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station
Elev.
Station fl Elev. (R)
0.00
1280.44
0.00
1280.34
0.00
1280.34
0.14
1280.27
0
1280.39
0
128042
1.02
1280.14
5.00
1280.30
5.00
1280.30
12.89
1280.24
7.15
1280.41
6.49
1280.42
5.49
1280.12
10.00
1280.20
10.00
1280.20
19.52
1279.55
119
1280.47
10.26
128049
14.07
1280.04
14.00
1280.16
14.00
1280.16
24.03
1279.67
18.14
1279.72
14.53
1280.29
24.46
1279.47
17.00
1279.65
17.00
1279.65
25.22
1279.37
23.69
1279.82
17.89
1279.84
26.73
1278.85
21.00
1279.60
21.00
1279.60
26.60
1279.06
26.88
1278.95
21.82
1279.84
27.19
1278.51
23.00
1279.61
23.00
1279.61
27.77
1278.70
28.47
1278.95
24.4
1279.83
29.33
1278.15
23.60
1279.63
23.60
1279.63
28.93
1278.55
29.21
1278.7
25.53
1279.53
30.64
1277.95
25.00
1279.44
25.00
1279.44
29.52
1278.26
293
1278.58
27.14
1279.03
31.47
127717
27,00
1278.94
27.00
1278.94
30.24
1277.90
29.5
1278.07
28.39
1278.75
32.13
1277.92
29.00
1278.42
29.00
1278.42
30.45
127751
29.8
1277.73
29.06
1278.51
33.79
1278.17
29.10
1278.33
29.10
1278.33
31.13
1277.37
30.4
1277.69
29.47
127836
36.00
1278,61
29.70
1278.10
29.70
1278.10
31.84
1277.48
31.26
1277.62
29.79
1277.87
39.47
1279.54
30.40
1277.84
30.40
1277.84
32.42
1277.66
31.7
1277.73
30.29
1277.52
51.65
1280.73
31.40
1277.83
31.40
1277.83
32.90
1277.79
32.25
1277.77
31.07
1277.52
59.31
1280.85
32.30
1277.80
32.30
1277.80
3319
1278.13
32.78
1277.97
31.66
1277.59
59.38
1280.96
33.20
1278.30
33.20
1278.30
33.42
1278.31
33.19
1278.31
32.37
1277.54
34.05
1278.33
34.05
127833
34.16
1278.51
33.63
1278.53
32.92
1277.78
34.70
1278.58
34.70
1278.58
36.33
1278.88
34.28
1278.85
33.39
1277.77
36.00
1278.77
36.00
1278.77
40.25
1279.80
35.21
1279.19
34.06
1277.91
39.00
1279.57
39.00
1279.57
50.72
1280.64
36.57
1279.2
34.3
1278.77
41.30
1279.90
41.30
1279.90
59.13
128099
39.87
1279.94
34.94
1279.04
45.00
1280.27
45.00
1280.27
48.99
1280.76
36.58
1279.05
50.00
1280.58
50.00
1280.58
58.96
1281,17
3939
1279.75
55.00
1280.84
55.00
1280.84
42.88
1280.17
59,00
1280.93
48.18
1280.73
59.40
1281.02
54
1280.88
59.37
1281.17
59.57
1281.06
r�
1' c)S Srem .
©EcoEngineedng
A d.-- of 'It. Jdn K. McAdam I..

Naked Creek Stream Restoration • EEP Project Number: 261 • USGS HUC 03040101010100
Fifth Year Monitoring Report • Wilkes County, North Carolina • October. 2012
Naked Creek Cross Section 6 - Pool
1282
1281
i 1280
e
0
1279 — — Bankfull
Year -0, 8/22/07
1278 Year - 1,9/16/08
Year -2, 09/18/09
1277 Year - 3,7/16110
— 3K Year4, 04 /06/11
—� Year -5, 8/10112
1276
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Width from River Left to Right (fl)
YEAR-5,2012 SURVEY DATA
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE. 8/07/2012to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
Bankfull Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Classification
Bankfull Elevation:
r�
I� Yry�tcm i
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS - SECTION: 6
FEATURE: Pool
14.4 sq. ft.
10.5 ft.
1.4 ft.
2.3 ft.
7.7 ft.
n/a ft.
n/a
1279.83 ft
FE_1]EcoEngineedng
A d ­­1 lh loan a_ WAmw cuea+y. t..

1311
1310
1309
1308
V
Z 1307
O
F
W 1306
J
W
1305
1304
1303
1302
0 100
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2012 (Year -5) Monitoring
200
STATION (feet)
300
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
400 500
®EcoEngineel ing
1 M�vwMTr Inln R IVM�mI �. Y[
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16108
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
A
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14111
X
YR-4 Structures
YR -5 TW 8/10/12
❑
YR -5 Structures
—
—YR -5 WS
400 500
®EcoEngineel ing
1 M�vwMTr Inln R IVM�mI �. Y[

1305
1304
1303
1302
1301
Z
O
F 1300
Q
W
w 1299
1298
1297
1296
1295
500
-------
600
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2012 (Year -5) Monitoring
700
800
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight ditFercnces in thalweg length. longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
900 1000
EcoEngineering
n a....,. � tar w... t •k.� i:.��. �
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
A
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
0
YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14/11
X
YR-4 Structures
YR -5 TW 8/10/12
❑
YR -5 Structures
—
—YR -5 WS
900 1000
EcoEngineering
n a....,. � tar w... t •k.� i:.��. �

1298
1297
1296
1295
1294
Z
O
F. 1293
Q
1292
1291
1290
1289
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2012 (Year -5) Monitoring
qqv
Wn,-vv
1288
1000 1100 1200 1300
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
1400 1500
®EcoEngineering
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
0
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
O
YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14/11
X
YR-4 Structures
YR -5 TW 8/10/12
❑
YR -5 Structures
—
—YR -5 WS _ I
1400 1500
®EcoEngineering

1292
1291
1290
1289
1288
z
0
E 1287
Q
W
W 1286
1285
1284
1283
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2012 (Year -5) Monitoring
1282 1 ,
1500 1600 1700 1800
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
V-2.
1900 2000
®EcoEngineedng
Mno HiY LbR 4�Af ®I.a��.V
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
0
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9116/09
0
YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7116110
0
YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4/14/11
SIC
YR-4 Structures
YR -5 TW 8/10/12
❑
YR -5 Structures
—
—YR -5 WS
1900 2000
®EcoEngineedng
Mno HiY LbR 4�Af ®I.a��.V

1285
1284
1283
1282
1281
1280
v
1279
> 1278
1277
1276
1275
1274
1273
1272
11
Naked Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2012 (Year -5) Monitoring
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally. Elevation data was not changed.
YR -0 TW 8/22/07
YR -1 TW 9/16/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/16/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 7/16/10
YR -3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4114/11
X YR-4 Structures
YR -5 TW 8110/12
❑ YR -5 Structures
— —YR -5 WS
i
ll ,It il,
©EcoEngineedng

5 -YEAR, 2012 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
TASK
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
FEATURE /FACET SLOPE REACH
NAKED CREEK
LENGTH, AND SPACING AND DATE
012012 to 8/10/2012
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE DA7 A CREW
BUCHHOLZIPARRISH
Overall water surface slope = 14% DESIGN MIN MAX
Riffle 00195 0 025
WS sta start= 36 32 ft Run - -- - --
WS sta end = 2702 97 ft p -p spacing 80 144
ELEV Start= 1309 83 ft msl
ELEV End= 1273 48 ft msl
Results
n = MIN MEDIAN AVG MAX
Riffle slopes measured = 32 01% 1 5% 18% 49%
Run slopes measured = 28 01% 1 7% 42% 249%
Pools measured = 36 17 74 70 166
All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified
Feature Station Length Slope
RIFFLE 6211 599 050% n = 32
RIFFLE
14261
1666
216%
MIN =
007%
RIFFLE
21689
1524
184%
MEDIAN =
1 54%
RIFFLE
25412
1913
078%
AVG. =
1.76%
RIFFLE
32959
3926
051%
MAX =
486%
RIFFLE
4413
1129
443%
RIFFLE
107517
RIFFLE
52242
8
275%
RIFFLE
71145
453
486%
RIFFLE
73263
2254
0.09%
RIFFLE
79828
1242
274%
RIFFLE
8637
701
428%
RIFFLE
89297
1724
081%
RIFFLE
94975
3681
122%
RIFFLE
107517
1972
162%
RIFFLE
115456
5215
079%
RIFFLE
127587
115
052%
RIFFLE
131927
253
134%
RIFFLE
142826
3599
270%
RIFFLE
148371
1363
367%
RIFFLE
153582
255
106%
RIFFLE
159476
22.47
347%
RIFFLE
169222
894
0.22%
RIFFLE
172387
1289
023%
RIFFLE
1792
3776
196%
RIFFLE
187947
34.02
176%
RIFFLE
217767
15.45
045%
RIFFLE
222558
1982
182%
RIFFLE
2386 79
2972
0.07%
RIFFLE
244563
838
298%
RIFFLE
249768
1985
1.46%
Naked Creek, 5 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 1 of 3

5 -YEAR, 2012 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
RIFFLE
255954
4631
188%
RIFFLE
267247
3029
145%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
RUN
68
2
754%
n =
28
RUN
159
46
024%
MIN =
01%
RUN
232
7
631%
MEDIAN =
1.7%
RUN
273
38
170%
AVG =
42%
RUN
369
35
283%
MAX =
249%
RUN
453
61
020%
RUN
530
65
118%
RUN
716
2
2486%
RUN
755
25
008%
RUN
811
40
028%
RUN
871
16
169%
RUN
910
8
753%
RUN
987
50
052%
RUN
1092
22
099%
RUN
1207
9
064%
RUN
1287
3
034%
RUN
1345
28
007%
RUN
1464
7
1521%
RUN
1497
10
4 51 %
RUN
1561
6
362%
RUN
1617
21
140%
RUN
1701
11
589%
RUN
1737
3
366%
RUN
1830
25
106%
RUN
1913
29
546%
RUN
2193
6
1697%
RUN
2518
17
230%
RUN
2606
32
106%
Naked Creek, 5 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 2 of 3

5 -YEAR, 2012 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME NAKED CREEK
Feature
Station
Length
p-p spacing
n =
36
POOL
77
11
MIN =
17 (p -p spacing)
POOL
120
9
43
MEDIAN =
74
POOL
210
8
90
AVG =
70
POOL
239
14
29
MAX =
166
POOL
404
44
166
POOL
430
12
26
POOL
516
66
86
POOL
639
119
123
POOL
701
11
62
POOL
718
4
17
POOL
793
40
75
POOL
856
50
63
POOL
918
12
62
POOL
941
7
23
POOL
1046
15
106
POOL
1125
25
79
POOL
1227
14
102
POOL
1303
18
76
POOL
1383
16
80
POOL
1471
14
88
POOL
1515
16
45
POOL
1581
29
66
POOL
1679
69
97
POOL
1712
20
33
POOL
1778
47
66
POOL
1866
47
88
POOL
1943
33
77
POOL
1980
29
37
POOL
2069
40
89
POOL
2164
19
95
POOL
2199
30
35
POOL
2273
57
74
POOL
2362
21
90
POOL
2435
23
73
POOL
2472
28
37
POOL
2538
35
66
Naked Creek, 5 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 3 of 3

EEP PROJECT ID: 261
CROSS - SECTION: 2 FEATURE: RIFFLE
r �
dj
�n StelI1
r vc.t.unra
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ. /PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm Count
Histogram
Naked Creek
sift/clay
100
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13 0.25
■Year 1
80
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
■Year 2
Rifle Pebble Count, Naked Creek
IM
1 2
2 4
100%
90%
0 Year 3
r
60
■ Year 4
1 ■Year 5
fine gravel
fine gravel
4 6
6 8
40
medium gravel
8 11
t 70%
0
20
60%
LZ 50%
0 _L
medium gravel
coarse gravel
�� �
0
0��� ���
N��
��fo ��� rLR�
coarse gravel
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 261
CROSS - SECTION: 2 FEATURE: RIFFLE
r �
dj
�n StelI1
r vc.t.unra
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/07/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ. /PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm Count
Naked Creek
sift/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13 0.25
Note:
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5 1
Rifle Pebble Count, Naked Creek
very coarse sand
very fine gravel
1 2
2 4
100%
90%
�. —.
'
fine gravel
fine gravel
4 6
6 8
�%
medium gravel
8 11
t 70%
60%
LZ 50%
medium gravel
coarse gravel
11 16
16 22
coarse gravel
22 32
very coarse gravel
32 45
iv 40%
very coarse aravel
small cobble
45 64
64 90
a 30%
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
90 128
128 180
180 256
20%
; ♦;
10%
• ;♦
0%
small boulder
256 362
small boulder
362 512
0.01 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulde
large boulder
512 1024
1024 2048
Particle Size (mm) —a— Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent hem
very large boulde
2048 40%
Size percent less than mm
Percent b substrate type
bedrock
D16 I
D35
I D50 I
D64
I D95
I silt/clay
sand
I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 1 100
#NIA r
#N /A
1 0.1
1 0
1 15
1 50%
r 36%
r 14%
1 0%
1 0%
0%

Histogram
80
70
°' 60
vs
0 50
40
c 30
20
10
0
000ti ti`' to �o
o•
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 261
CROSS - SECTION: 3 FEATURE: RIFFLE
rY
�system
�'�lll�ll �'I11�'11t
f'lUC:N AM
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/7/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH
Material
Size Range mm Count
Naked Creek
sift/clay
0 0.062
---
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13 0.25
Note:
medium sand
0.25 0.5
coarse sand
0.5 1
Riffle Pebble Count, Naked Creek
very coarse sand
very fine gravel
1 2
2 4
100%
50%A
80%
i
i
fine gravel
fine gravel
4 6
6 8
medium gravel
8 11
L 70%
i
_
medium gravel
coarse gravel
11 16
16 22
60%
coarse gravel
22 32
U_ 50%
very coarse gravel
32 45
d 40%
m
30%
very coarse qravel
small cobble
45 64
64 90
a
medium cobble
90 128
20%
large cobble
very lar a cobble
small boulder
128 180
180 256
256 362
10q%
0%
small boulder
362 512
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulder
large boulde
512 1024
1024 2048
Particle Size (mm) s Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
very lar a boulder
2048 4096
1 Size percent less than mm Percent by substrate type
bedrockH
I D16 I
D35
D50
I D84
I D95 silt/clay
sand
I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
I bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
1 WN /A 1
0.10
1 0.2
1 9
1 18 1 21%
r 59%
r 20%
1 O%
1 6%
1 6%
i
i
i

80
70
60
50
40
c 30
20
10
0
Histogram
■Year 1
■ Year 2
E3 Year 3
■Year 4
■Year 5
oo�ti ooh 1b N1b �ti rlc� N�� IV��
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 261
CROSS - SECTION: 4 FEATURE: RIFFLE
r�
�cos!stenl
l iIlk (I111Cl1
. cu..un a+
PROJECT NAKED CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH NAKED CREEK
DATE 8/7/2012 to 8/10/2012
CREW BUCHHOLZ /PARRISIi
Material
Size Ran a mm
Count
Naked Creek
silt/clay
0 0.062
very fine sand
0.062 0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
Note:
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
100%
Riffle Pebble Count. Naked
Creek
very coarse sand
1
2
yon°
very fine gravel
2
4
t
80°°
70%
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
4 6
6 8
8 11
. y .
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
11
16
22
16
22
32
609°
LZ 50%
; F';
very coarse gravel
32
45
m
40%
very coarse ravel
small cobble
45
64
64
90
a
30%
medium cobble
90
128
20°x°
large cobble
very large cobble
small boulder
128
180
256
180
256
362
10%
0%
4.
small boulder
362
512
0.01 01 1 10
100 1000 10000
medium boulder
large boulde
512
1024
1024
2048
Particle Size (mm)
Cumulative
Percent
♦ Percent Item
ve large boulder
2048
4096
Size percent less than mm
Percent b
substrate type
bedrock
D16 I
D35
DW
D84
I D95
I silt/clay
sand I gravel
I cobble
I boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count:
100
f #N/A r
#QUA
0.2
1
1 19
1 38%
r 46% r 16%
1 0%
1 0%
1 0%

BEHI and Sediment Export Extimates Table
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number: 261
Linear
«pss
Footage
6
p
S
Segment/
or
a
Time Point
Reach
Acreage
>
h
ft
%
ft
% ft
%
ft
71
ft
%
ft
%
Ton/
Note BEHI and NBS assessments were not conducted for the entire protect pre - construction as part of the
existing conditions survey Therefore, BEHI and NBS assessments are not applicable during Monitoring Year

APPENDIX E
Wetland Assessment
(omitted, not applicable)