20030909 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 4_20130212

' UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 92719
EEP Contract # 004828
Monitoring Year 04
FEB I " 2013
'et►anRda WaA
A ,, -. - ITY
Submitted to:
o tem
E a ement
PROGRAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Data Collection: 2012
Construction Completed: 2006
Submitted: January 2013
RECENED
JAN 1 8 2013
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Monitoring Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller(&kci.com
KCI Project No: 16121976_BC12
Design Firm
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Phone [phone]
UT Bear Creek KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 2012 - MY04

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT ................. ..............................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................. ..............................2
APPENDIX A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map
Table la. and b Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table .
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
APPENDIX B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a and b Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .
APPENDIX C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 9 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Table 10
UT Bear Creek
EEP Pr4lect 992719
APPENDIX D — Hydrologic Data
Verification of Bankfull Events
4
5
6
6
7
9
11
13
14
21
26
27
28
31
KC1 Associates of North Carohna
2012 - MY04

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
In 2002, the North Carolina Department of Transportation identified the Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Bear
Creek Site (Phillips) in Chatham County, North Carolina as a potential stream restoration project The
1 7- square mile watershed is located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03030003 and the NCDWQ Sub -
basin 03 -06 -12 of the Cape Fear River Bann The project restored approximately 2,378 linear feet of
channel - 1,921 feet on UT Bear Creek and 457 feet on unnamed tributary 2 (UT2) - and enhanced an
additional 935 feet of channel on UT2 The NCDOT completed project construction in 2006, after which
the project was transferred to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Project goals
and objectives are listed below
Project Goals
• Improve water quality
• Improve riparian and in- stream habitat
Project Objectives:
• Excluding cattle from the stream channels
• Increasing channel stability
• Restoring dimension, pattern, and profile to UT Bear Creek and UT 2
The riparian buffer was planted with five different species of bare root trees and two different species of
live stakes Seven vegetation monitoring plots were established in 2009, the first year of monitoring
These plots were set up following the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) vegetation monitoring protocol
Based on the seven monitoring plots, the fourth -year monitoring counted an average of 399 planted
stems /acre across the site Plot 7 is the only plot that has a planted stem density less than the year three
success criterion of 320 stems /acre and the year five success criteria of 260 stems /acre This plot has 202
planted stems /acre and 1,052 total stems /acre, including volunteers The site's average stem density
including volunteers is 1,549 stems /acre with all of the vegetation plots having densities above 320
stems /acre Three prominent exotic invasive species are found within the project buffer are Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and microstegium (Microsteglum
vlmmeum), with the privet being especially thick in certain areas The areas of privet have been mapped
on the CCPV Plot 4 contains one stem of princess tree (Paulowma tomentosa). The presence of this
invasive species is limited and is not widespread throughout the site
There are two hydrologic features on the site. The first, UT Bear Creek, has been restored by altering the
dimension, pattern, and profile and is controlled vertically by numerous bedrock outcrops and cross
vanes The second feature is UT 2 and it has been divided into two reaches, UT 2A, which was enhanced,
and UT 2B, which was restored UT 2A is a straight channel that begins at Station 30 +00. This reach
already had banks stabilized by the mature trees that line both sides of the channel for the length of the
reach This reach was enhanced by planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer beyond the top of
bank UT 2B begins where UT 2A ends at the ford crossing at Station 39 +75 This reach was restored by
changing the dimension, pattern and profile of the channel from the ford to the confluence with UT Bear
Creek
During the fourth -year monitoring the site was also examined for stream stability and potential problem
areas UT Bear Creek is predominantly stable throughout the project There is one area of floodplain
erosion that has been noted in previous reports and currently is no longer active The area has now filled
in with vegetation Also noted in last year's monitoring report and still present is a beaver dam
downstream of the site that is creating backwater conditions in the lower portions of UT Bear Creek up to
Station 23 +00 The downstream portion of UT 2 is less backwatered than the previous year UT 2 is
predominantly stable There are only two areas of erosion and bed degradation on UT 2 The first is at the
UT Bear Creek KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 1 2012 - W04

cross vane at Station 40 +00 and the second area is along the channel at Station 43 +00 where there is a
small head cut
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The Level 2 CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio.unc.edu/methods htm) was used to collect vegetation data
from UT Bear Creek
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 0 (http / /cvs bio uric edu/methods htm)
Weakley, A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(http / /www.herbarium unc edu/FloraArchives /WeakleyFlora 2006- Jan.pdf)
UT Bear Creek
EEP Project #92719
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2012 - MY04

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 3 2012 - A004

DIRECTIONS TO UT BEAR CREEK SITE:
From Raleigh, take US 440 West towards US 1 South.
Take the exit for 64 East, then take 151501 South towards
Pittsboro. At the circle take a right onto West St. Then take
a left onto NC 902. After going through the community of
Bear Creek, take a right onto Edwards Hill Church Rd.The
site is on the eastern side of the road. Enter the site through gate.
Project Location \ 1 I Bonlee School Rd.
Edwards Hill Church Rd.
NC 902
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
UT Bear Creek, Chatham County, EEP Project # 92719
r� N
��ll,' 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 1
11Ma Fht W E KCI
Miles
ASSOCIATES OF NC

Table la. Project Components
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Project
Wetland (Ac)
Non - Riparian
(Ac)
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Rivenne
Non- Rivenne
Existing
Restoration
Footage or
2,399
Buffer
BMP
Component or
Approach
Stationing
Comment
Feet/Acres
Level
Acreage
Acres
Elements
Reach ID
Enhancement I1
900
UT Bear Creek
1,926
R
P2
1,942
10 +00 - 29 +77
-
_
Linear footage does not include stream length in
HQ Preservation
easement exceptions
-
Linear footage does not include stream length in
UT2A
935
Ell
-
900
30 +00 - 39 +75
-
_
MUTotaisl
2,759
easement exceptions
LIM
420
R
P2
457
39 +75 - 44 +32
-
-
Table 1 b. Component Summations
Project Number and Name. 92719 - LIT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Restoration
Level
Stream
(if)
Wetland (Ac)
Non - Riparian
(Ac)
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Rivenne
Non- Rivenne
Restoration
2,399
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement I1
900
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
-
Totals
3,299
MUTotaisl
2,759
UT Bear Ci eek
EEP Pioject #92719
KCI Associates ofNoi th Carolina
2012 - MY04

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete. 6 yr
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 6 yr
Number of Reporting Years: 4
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Concept Plan
2002
Restoration Plan
Contact Mr Ron Spears
Jun 03
Final Design - 90%
Construction Contractor
Unknown
Construction
Unknown
2006
As -Built Survey
KCI Associates of NC
Mar 06
Live Stake Planting
4601 Six Forks Rd
Riparian Buffer Planting
Raleigh, NC 27609
Year I Monitoring
Oct 2009
Dec 2009
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 2010
Dec 2010
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 2011
Dec 2011
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct 2012
Nov 2012
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name. 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Design Firm
Environmental Services, Inc
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
Contact Mr Ron Spears
Phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Unknown
Planting Contractor
Unknown
Monitoring Performers
MY -01 -04
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 6 2012 - MY04

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
ro ect Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Project County
Chatham County
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030003070050
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -06 -12
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
U
WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during desiE2 phase'?l
Yes
Restoration Component Attribute Table
UT Bear Creek
UT 2
Drama a Area
17 sq mi
0 15 sq mi
Stream Order
Second
First
Restored length (feet)
1,921
457
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
I Perennial
Watershed Type (Rural, Urban, Developing, etc)
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Ag -Row Crop
Ag- Livestock
Forested
Water/Wetlands
U
U
U
U
U
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
<10%
NCDWQ AU /Index Number
U
NCDWQ Classification
C (UT Bear Creek)
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed se ment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
-
Total acreage of easement
119
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
119
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
1 l 0
Ros en Classification of pre-existing-
-
Ros en Classification of As -built
C4/5
C4/5
Valley Type
U
U
Valley Sloe
U
U
Valley side slope range (e g 2 -3 %)
U
U
Valley toe slope range (e g 2 -3 %)
U
U
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern, endangered etc 9 (Y/N)
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Cid- Lignum Complex
Depth Cla /o
-
-
K
-
-
T
-
-
"N /A" is for items that do not apply
" -" is for items that are unavailable
"U" is for items that are unknown
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 992719 7 2012 - MY04

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates offorth Carolina
EEP Project #92719 8 2012 - MY04

t
i
l
r
i
1
}
i
l
1
- �' r �' 'I. •' >. � • „
PHOTO �,�.�•_••_' 1• PHOTO
POINT -5 I POINT >: b
1
BACKWATER BEGINS FROM
qp�p DOWNSTREAM BEAVER DAM "11'1
.•,% ,
"
%c
BOULDER
o PHOTO 11'11
* t •�4.
STABILIZATION 1 ti
n4 +o
"' _
;
co POINT r7
clv
�o +oz
:V
/ I
i `£
1 am r si 41'
VEG 1 END REACH
/
•
3 '� •
-�• -
s
PLOT #3 c
:.� -tom � , � � r, -
,� o i � UT -26 BEAR CREEK
%
i
'
1
00 1. _
VEG /
PLOT ,. 4 /
END REACH
t
�.
—• UT BEAR CREEK
.f~a�.-
i BACKWATER BEGINS FROM
DOWNSTREAM BEAVER DAM
/ soon
a

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek
Assessed Length 1.921
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Structures physically mtact with no dislodged boulders or
Category
Category
Metric
1 Bed
I Vertical Stability (Riffle
and Run units)
I Aegradation -Bar fomiation /growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point
bars)
2 De ation- Evidenceofdowncuttm
1 0
across the sill
2 Riffle Condition*
I Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
3 Meander Pool
1 Deotli Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Banklu0
arms
N/A
Condition*
Depth > 16)
2 Length appropriate ( >30 %otcenterlme distance
3 Bank Protection
flol exceed 15% (See guidance for this table in EEP
N/A
between tad ofupstreamnffle and head ofdownstreani
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth
nf1e)
4 Thalweg Position*
l Thahve g centering at upstream ofineander bend (Run)
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing
2Thahveg centering at downstream ofineander(Cbde)
0
some cover at base -flow
0
2 Bank
1 Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
growth and /or scour and erosion
0
0
Banks undercut /overhangmg to the extent that mass
9
2 Undercut
wasting appears likely Does NOT include undercuts that
100%
6
are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Engineered
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically mtact with no dislodged boulders or
Structures
-/. Stable,
Performing as
Intended
logs
0
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgrade
0
1 0
across the sill
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
N/A
2a. Piping
arms
N/A
Bankerosion within the structures extent ofmfluence does
N/A
3 Bank Protection
flol exceed 15% (See guidance for this table in EEP
N/A
lmomtonng guidance document
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth
0
4 Habitat
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing
0
0
some cover at base -flow
Reach - UT Bear Creek
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amountof
Unstable
Footage
-/. Stable,
Performing as
Intended
0
0
100%
0
1 0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
1 0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
9
9
100%
6
6
100%
9
9
100%
9
9
100%
9
9
100%
' A longitudinal profile is not a component ofmomtonng UT Bear Creek The visual assessment found a diverse bed morphology with pools and riffles that are strongly
influenced by bedrock The bottom portion ofthe site lacked morphological features because ofbackwater conditions caused by a downstream beaver dam
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pi q/ect #92719 11 2012 - MY04

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name- 92719 - UT Bear Creek
Assessed Length 457 Reach - UT 2B
Number Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Cateeory
L&Lory
Metric
Intended
in As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
1 Bed
I Vertical Stability(Riffle
and Run units)
I Aggradation - Bar fomation /growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point
bars)
0
0
100%
2 Degradation -Evidence ofdowncutting
1
1 20
96%
2 Riffle Condition*
I Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains Coarser substrate
N/A
3 Meander Pool
Condition*
I Depth Sufficient (MaxPool Depth Mean Bankfull
Depth > 16)
N/A
2 Length appropriate ( >30 %ofcenterline distance
between tad of upstream riffle and head of downstream
N/A
riffle
4 Thalweg Position*
11 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
N/A
2 Thalwe centenngatdownstreamofineander (Glide)
N/A
2 Bank
1 Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting siniply frompoor
growth and /or scour and erosion
2
40
°
96/0
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
2 Undercut
wasting appears likely Does NOT include undercuts that
1
5
991/.
are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat
1
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, orcollapse
0
1 0
100%
Totals
3
45
95%
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or
logs
3
4
75%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgrade
across the sill
4
4
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
aims
3
4
75%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does
3 Bank Protection
not exceed 15% (See guidance for this table in EEP
3
4
75%
monitoring guidance document
Pool tomung structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth
4 Habitat
Mean Bankfufl Depth ratio > 16 Rootwads /logs providing
3
3
100%
some cover at base -flow
• A longitudinal profile is not a monitoring component for this tributary During the visual assessment the only water in the channel was fromthe UT Bear Creek backwater,
which made the evaluation ofbed features difficult
UT Bear G eek KCI Associates of North Car olina
EEP Pi q/ect #92719 12 2012 - MY04

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UTBear Creek (Phillips)
Planted Acreage 11.0 Easement Acreage 11.9
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polveons
Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody and
Pattern and
1 Bare Areas
0 1 acres
0
0 00
0 0%
herbaceous material
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2 Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0 1 acres
6
062
56%
Areas
Color
stem count criteria
Total
6
062
56%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3 Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given the
0 25 acres
0
000
000/0
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
mondorin ear
Cumulative Totall
6
062
56%
4 Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render
Pattern and
las
1000 SF
7Color
14
062
52%
Concern
polygons at ma scale
5 Easement
Areas or points (if too small to render
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
las polygons at map scale)
none
I
Color
0
000
000/0
UT Bear Ct eek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pi oject #92719 13 1012 - MY04

Stream Station Photos
PP#1 -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #2d -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #2u -MY01 - 11/17/09
UT Bear Creek
EEP Project #92719
PP#1 - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #2d - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #2u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
14 2012 - MY04

PP#3d- MY01- 11/17/09
PP #3u -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #4d - MY07 - 11/17/09
PP #3d - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #3u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #4d - MY04 - 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 15 2012 - W04

PP #4u - MY01 - 11 /17/09
PP #5d - MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #5u -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #4u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #5d - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #5u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project #92719 16 2012- MY04

PP #6 - MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #7d - MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #7u -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #6 - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #7d - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP #7u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 17 2012 - MY04

PP #8d— MY01 — 11/17/09
PP #8u —MY01 — 11/17/09
PP #9d — MY01 — 11/17/09
PP #8d — MY04 — 11/5/2012
PP #8u — MY04 — 11/5/2012
PP #9d — MY04 — 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 18 2012 - MY04

PP #9u - MY01 - 11/17/09
PP# ] Od - MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #10u -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP #9u - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP# I Od - MY04 - 11/5/2012
PP# I Ou - MY04 - 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KC /Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 19 2012 - W04

PP #I I -MY01 - 11/17/09
PP# 11 - MY04 - 11/5/2012
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 20 2012 - MY04

e7-
Gi

,ice � _.� ..yy '.• ',�, �� ' �
' .�•�•.V yr .l
lie
,ice � _.� ..yy '.• ',�, �� ' �
' .�•�•.V yr .l

J N '
�-
�_'J
t � ' . lid•
V I � � ,
► ,r

Vegetation Plot 7: 10/2/12 — MY -04
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project #92719 24 2012 - W04

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
UT Bear Creek KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #92719 25 2012 - MY04

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Vegetation Plot ID
Monitoring Year 04 Planted
Stem Density (stems /acre)
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Mom toring Year 04 Total
Stem Density (stems /acre)
1
364
Yes
4,209
2
364
Yes
1,093
3
324
Yes
1,821
4
405
Yes
809
5
526
Yes
931
6
607
Yes
931
7
202
No
1,052
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #91719 26 2012- MY04

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Pro ect Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Report Prepared By
April Helms
Date Prepared
10/30/2012 9 11
database name
KCI- 2012 -A mdb
database location
M\2007\12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Veg_database
computer name
12- CV76KF1
file size
159768832
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT ----- - - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Prol, planted
Each project is listed month its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This
excludes live stakes
Prod, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year 'this includes
live stakes all planted stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missm etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by SPP
Dama a values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY ------------------------------------
Project Code
92719
Project Name
UT Bear Creak (Phillips
Description
Stream Restoration and Enhancment in Chatham County, NC
River Basin
Cape Fear
length(ft)
33313
stream-to-edge width ft
40
areas m
22294
Required Plots (calculated)
17
Sampled Plots
17
UT Bear Creek KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Pr4lect #91719 27 1011- MY04

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name: 92719 — UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Current Plot Data W4
2012
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
T e
E92719- A-0001
E92719
-A -0002
E92719 -A -0003
E92719 -A -0004
E92719
-A -0005
E92719 -A -0006
E92719 -A -0007
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
cer rubrum
red maple
Tree
5
slmma triloba
Tree
2
-pawpaw
Baccharis
baccharts
Shrub
1
1
1
Baccharis hahmi olta
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Dios ros vtr tmana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
15
Fraxtnus enns lvantca
green ash
Tree
2
2
77
5
5
7
1
]
1
3
3
4
13
13
14
7
7
7
4
4
5
Ju lans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
3
Junt erus vtr tntana
eastern redcedar
Tree
14
LI ustrum stnense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Li uidambar siyracl ua
sweet gum
Tree
2
Morus
mulberry
Tree
Paulowma tomentosa
princesstree
Exotic
1
Platanus occidentahs
American sycamore
Tree
6 1
6
6
2
1
1
1
2
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
uercus alcata
southern red oak
Tree
1
uercus 1 rata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
2
uercus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
I
1
1
7
7
10
3
3
5
3
2
2
3
1
1
4
uercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus
sumac
shrub
5
Rhus co alhnum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
Robins pseudbacacia
black locust
Tree
6
2
1
Saltx m a
black willow
Tree
Sassafras
sassafras
1
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
4
7
3
7
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
g02
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
[607
Stem coup
9
9
104
9
9
27
10
10
20
13
13
23
15
23
5
5
26
size aces
1
1
]
size ACRES
0 02
0 02
0 02
0 02
0 02
0 02
S ecies count
3
3
9
4
4
9
5
5
9
1
1
5
3
4
2
2
4
Stems per ACRE
364
364
4209
364
364
1093
405
405
809
526
526
931
607
931
202
202
1052
P -LS — Planted Live Stakes
P -all — Planted Stems Total (with Live Stakes)
T — Total (Planted Including Live Stakes and Volunteers)
UT Bear Creek KC1 Associates of Na th Carolina
EEP Project #91719 28 2011 — MY04

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Project Number and Name: 92719 — UT Bear Creek (Philp s)
Annual
Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY4 2012
M 2011
MY2
2010
M 2009
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
cer rubrum
red maple
Tree
5
6
2
sunina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
2
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
3
3
4
Baccharis halimi olia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
Diospyros vir iniana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
16
1
1
15
1
1
1
1
1
17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
35
35
115
35
35
105
35
35
571
36 1
36
135
Ju lans ni ra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
3
1
1
6
1
1
1
9
Juni erus vir iniana
eastern redcedar
Tree
14
11
3
Li ustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
10
Li uidambar styraciflua
sweet gum
Tree
2
7
5
15
Morus
mulberry
Tree
2
Paulownta tomentosa
princesstree
Exotic
1
1
Platanus occidentahs
Americansycamore
Tree
7
7
11
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
2
uercus alcata
southern red oak
Tree
1
uercus/ rata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
uercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
12
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
14
14
27
14
14
31
14
14
23
14
14
23
uercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
Rhus
sumac
shrub
5
1
Rhus co allinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
5
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
1
Robinia seudoacacia
black locust
Tree
19
3
4
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
Sasso as
sassafras
1
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
30
47
1
3
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
4
Mmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
39
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
69
69
268
69
69
259
70
70
109
71
71
295
7
7
7
7
017
017
0 17
0 17
7
7
19
7
7
16
7
7
11
6
6
21
399
399
1549
399
399
1497
405
405
630
410
1410
11705
.i orth Carolina
Associates o N
UT Bear Creek
EEP Project 992719 29 2011 — MY04

Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
UT Bear Creek KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 992719 30 1011 — MY04

Table 10. Venficahon of Bankfull Events
Project Number and Name: 92719 - UT Bear Creek (Phillips)
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo
Number
11/17/2009
11/13/2009
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm events
N/A
10/8/2010
9/30/2010
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm
N/A
8/16/2011
unknown
Crest gauge
N/A
11/5/2012
unknown
Crest gauge
N/A
UT Bear Creek KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project #91719 31 1011— MY04