20051877 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20130212

05- Inq
Dye Branch II
Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 92255
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Contract Number: 004523
2012 Final Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 2012
Ecosystem
DO
IF Fg 1 9. 20PROGRAM R - WaTEK DUALITY
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RECEIVED
FEB 5 - 2013
NC EC(QA��YSTEM
ENHANCEML'NT PROORAM

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Kevin Mitchell
Email: [e-mail]

Dye Branch II Stream Restoration
2012 Monitoring Report (MY 2)
Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
20 Methodology
30 References
I
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3

1
Appendices
' Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Vicinity Map and Directions
' Table la Project Components
Table lb Component Summations
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
' Table 3 Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
' Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
' Photo Station Photos
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
' Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
' Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
' Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table l Ob Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 11 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table l lb Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
' Figure 3 Dye BranchWater Level Logger Chart
Figure 4 Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina
1
M

II
�I
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as
follows
• Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while
maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed's
water and sediment load,
• Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste
inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass - wasting, and stormwater runoff
through stabilization of the stream channel and creation of a stormwater wetland, and
• Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through
establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species
The site includes a diverse assemblage of 21 planted species of native trees and shrubs Planted
species range from 3 to 6 per plot with 4 to 10 species observed when volunteers are included
Between the baseline and year 1 (MY 1) monitoring vegetation data collection efforts, two
monitoring plots were impacted by repairs made to the stream channel in summer 2011 A
significant number of planted stems were damaged in VP7 and all plants in VP8 were destroyed
Based on the MY2 vegetation data from plots 1 through 7 the project is not on track to meet the
320 planted stems per acre criterion that must be achieved by the end of the year three
monitoring period Average stem density for planted stems in MY2 is approximately 266 stems
per acre Of the seven remaining plots, six plots ( -86 %) will not meet the year three interim
success criteria numbers per acre These include VP 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, which had 202, 283,
283, 202, 202, and 283 stems per acre, respectively However, when planted and natural stems
are combined, the average stem density is 885 stems per acre, which is above the minimum
established criterion Six of the seven plots meet the year three interim success criteria when
planted and natural stems are combined There are also approximately 32 isolated patches of
high threat invasive plants that are distributed throughout the project area
Stream longitudinal profiles within the Cemetery Branch reach have remained stable among
monitoring years with the exception of a few isolated areas of bed degradation and aggradation
The primary stream issues observed during MY2 along Dye Branch include structure
degradation, bank erosion, bed degradation, and bed aggradation Significant portions of the
downstream reach on Dye Branch appear to have downcut between monitoring years A water
level logger was installed in December of 2010 and has since recorded a total of six bankfull
events including three during the MY2 monitoring period
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and
figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

�I
2.0 Methodology
I
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY2 replicate those employed during the
previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996, USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the '
standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level H, Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008)
LI
Dye Branch II Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc '
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

F
3.0 References
' Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2005 Dye Branch Stream
' Restoration Plan Raleigh
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books Pagosa
' Springs, Colorado
I
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines U S Army
' Corps of Engineers, U S Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality Wilmington District
� I
J
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

� Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

�' • 1 ,k: +f r ? - r `'1 The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of
•," - ,;'�.�, (� + '. �d' t r S� :; the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
+ ` J - -•I �'•- `�� /� '' encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by
��� /x ',3 i*', i .+ �t t '•'+f •t,,.,. Y land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing
areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor access by the
4 general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the
a
development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is
permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
�^_A r �- + �,X.• .T h rr1- intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
' '+ •v, j / previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with
...x1.' t �•' t
l 115
a o
„ll
1 P.9 1
Dye Branch 11
1s— Stream Restoration Site
d , ale 1 I
3
1 1. *Oa�{1S rt >�,� \� `�ia <115 )v ..,�\ �� ' � + .�� t 4 �, i r :J.• i JI `� I�`Fy'
) • 4 � s ,rt , W A_
ilCD,
� 1 � e• j�; �I e,f` ,4 �`'' Y ' � YJJ � �� gip' `'� t
_ 1 / ✓' 4 btu ``� '. Y h^ `j 14 J t r,, \.�! :ti ' ll� a- ) _
ell
;'�) s '`.:�i ,(s, t 1 - ,f.r"' • 1 '; + $vJ`.r a s,Yv'gka..+4r v 1."
� •y+t, i F °: � i :iCS� �,, -'fit ?a 1. rf �•,
cows anwrrr• o�.»
°°"" c" """ "" Figure I - Vicinity Map
Douny
Dye B—ch II Cow11y �:.
�• Slreem RenoraUan site r'd
cauory % ` Cr•xo•
CO"" Dye Branch II EQUINOX
KNV1R0RMt: 0Sayl'stem
Stream Restoration Site �•w ° ° ° °• ° ° °• J lallCl Ir
r
CMNwtl � PROGRAM
Gas1m
/
� ° ' `""" Project No. 92255 N
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on 1 -40 towards 0 0.5 1 2
Statesville. Take Exit 152 A (1 -77S) towards Charlotte. Mlles
Proceed on 1.775 to Exit 36 (NC -150) towards Mooresville. Iredell County, North Carolina
From NC -150 turn slight right onto McLelland Avenue/NC -152
for approximately 1.2 miles. The site is located on the west 7.5 Minute Series Mooresville
side of McUlland Avenue/NC -152. Quadrangle

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
- Inlormatlon unavailable
Non- Apphcable
ab s.
ject Csomponents
Activity or Report
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
ranch
/ P.ro' _et No. 91f155
Upland
(ac)
Buffer
(ac) BMP
Protect
Aril 2006
Ravenne
Non- Rivenne
Footage
-
--
Dec 2010
Restoration
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
-
Stationing
Buffer
BMP Elements
Comment
or
Feet/Acres
Level
-
or
0. --'N
Acres
Jan 2013
Year 3 Moni
Reach ID
-
Enhancement II
0
Acreage
Year 5 Monitorm
-
-
-
Creation
00
00
Cemetery Branch
9681f
R
P3
1,0141f
0+00-10+14
■
Stormwater wetlands
HQ Preservation
Dye Branch
1,772 If
R
P2
1,500 If
0400-15+00
Stormwater wetlands
00
-
Upstream
Totals
3,685
0
0
0
Dye Branch
1 232 If
R
P2
1 171 If
16 +00 - 27 +71
Downstream
- Inlormatlon unavailable
Non- Apphcable
=Non - applicable
a le c c vi 1, & g
I reach I / e o. 92 +2-
lis Co
5
l mnn Summations ranch 1 /Pro act No. 9255
Activity or Report
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Riparian Wetland (ac)
Non-
Riparian
ac
Upland
(ac)
Buffer
(ac) BMP
-
Aril 2006
Ravenne
Non- Rivenne
-
-
--
Dec 2010
Restoration
3,685
00
00
-
-
-
Enhancement
Feb 2011
00
00
Aug 2011
Year 1 Monitormiz
-
Enhancement I
0. --'N
Dec 2012
Jan 2013
Year 3 Moni
-
Enhancement II
0
Year 5 Monitorm
-
-
-
Creation
00
00
-
Preservation
0
00
00
HQ Preservation
0
00
00
-
00
00
--
Totals
3,685
0
0
0
0 3
=Non - applicable
a le c c vi 1, & g
I reach I / e o. 92 +2-
lis Co
5
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
Oct 2005
Final Design - Construction Plans
-
Aril 2006
Final Des - Repair Plans
N/A
July 2010
Construction Re Irs
N/A
Dec 2010
Temporary S &E mix a hed
N/A
Summer 2010
Permanent seed mix ariphed
N/A
Stemmer 2010
Plantm
N/A
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitorm - Basehne
March 2011
Aug 2011
Year 1 Monitormiz
Nov 2011
Jan 2012
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec 2012
Jan 2013
Year 3 Moni
Year 4 Momtorin
Year 5 Monitorm
- lntormation unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
able 3.
ro'ec Contacts
D e ranch
tI / ro' ct 255
Designer
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC, 27518
Primary Project Design POC
Emmett Perdue (919) 858 -1874
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134
Planting Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P O Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky (919) 605 -6134
Seed M ix Sources
Hanes Geo Components
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
Nursery Stock Suppliers
North Carolina Forest Service
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream M onitonng POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (YI) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream M onitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitonng POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream M onitonng POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2013
Stream M onitonng POC
Vegetation MonuonngPOC
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2014
Stream M onitonng POC
Vegetation M onitonng POC
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2015
Stream M onitoring POC
Vegetation MonitonngPOC
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
A -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012
�1
FI
1�
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4.
e Branch
Project Attributes
iI / ct No. 225_5
Project County
Iredell
Ph siogra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ton
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin - Pee Dee
USGS HUC
03040105010010
NCDWQ Sub -Basin
03 -07 -11
Within Extent ofEEP Watershed Plan
Upper Roc
River Local Watershed Plan
W RC Clas s
Warm
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1000/0
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
No
Restoration
Com onent Attributes
Dye Branch
Cemetery Branch
Drainage Area (sq rm)
060
006
Stream Order
First / Second
First
Restored Length (feet)
2,671
1,014
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Other
85%
15%
Watershed Impervious Cover
-
NCDWQ AU /IndexNutnber
13 -17 -2
NCDWQ Classification
C
303d Listed
Yes
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
Yes
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
Poor Btoclassification
Total Acreage of Easement
120
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
120
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
89
Ros en Classification of Pre- Emstmg
64 G4c
E4
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
C
C
Valley Type
-
Valley Sloe
0 0097 / 0 0125
00217
Valley Side Slope Range
-
Valley Toe Slope Range
Cowardin Classification
N/A
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
No
No
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc
None
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax
- Information unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

d
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

t
1
t
F'
ii
1

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
iviA - item ooes not appiy
Dye Branch I1 Final B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye ranch II I Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch
Assessed th 1 0!1.4 )teat
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number
Total
Number of Amount of
% Stable,
vath v4th for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
n
Performing
As-built
Segments Footage
as Intended
Woody Woody Woody
nt
as s Intendeed d
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Agpradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0
100%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14 14
100%
i Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth a 1 6)
14 15
93%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Length appropriate ( >300/ of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
I S 15
100%
I Thalweg centenng at upstream of meander bend (Run)
15 15
100%
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centenngat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
14 14
100%
2 Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1 Scoured /Eroding
and/or scour and erosion
0 0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that irasss wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0 0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
0 0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Effiff
0 0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
32
32
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control strictures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
27
28
96%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
Bank
4
4
100%
15%
Pool forming structures maintaining - MaxPoolDepth Mean
4 Habitat
lBankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
13
13
100%
base -flow
iviA - item ooes not appiy
Dye Branch I1 Final B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch I1 / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Upstream
Assessed Len th 1,500 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Perforimng
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Subcategory
Performing
As-built
Segments
Footage
as intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Ag radatxon - Bar frrination/growth sufficient to significantly
4
227
85%
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2 Degadation - Evidence of downcuttmg
2
83
94%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
15
17
88%
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth z 1 6)
18
20
90%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tad of
18
20
90%
upstream riffle and head of downstream nffle)
I Thalwegcentenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
14
17
82%
4 Thalweg Position
88%
2 Thalwegcentenngat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
14
16
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
5
167
94%
5
50
96%
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wastingappears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providmg habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
2
62
98%
2
0
98%
Totals
7
229
92%
7
50
94%
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
26
30
87%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
6
8
75%
3 Bank Protection
Bank
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
18
23
78/
15%
Pool forming structures maintaining - MaxPoolDepth Mean
4 Habitat JBankfull
Depth Ratio ? 16 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
4
5
80%
base -flow
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
i,, + - uem Does not appiy
Dye Branch II Final B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II /Project No. 92255 -Dye Branch - Downstream
Assessealmeng th 1 17r1 Leet
Number Footage Adjusted%
Number
Total
Number of Amount of
% Stable,
with with for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Category
Sub.-Category
Ps
As-built
Segments Footage
as intended
Woody Woody Woody
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Aparadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2
55
95
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
3
184
84%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate- Riffle maintains coarser substrate
I i
i l
100%
3 Meander Pool
i Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth a 1 6)
10
10
100%
Condition
2 Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
10
10
100%
1 Thalwegcentenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
8
10
80%
4 Thalweg Position
90%
2 Thalwegcentenngat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
9
10
2 Bank
Bank lackingvegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1 Scoured/Eroding
and/or scour and erosion
2
63
97%
2 30 99%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving or collapse
2
117
95%
1
22 96%
Totiil -s
4
180
92%
1
1 22 1 93%
3 Engineered
i Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
16
22
73%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
6
8
75%
2e Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus
4
8
50%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
12
14
86%
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow
i,, + - uem Does not appiy
Dye Branch II Final B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
ye Branch II / roject No. 92.255
0
Planted AcrLe� e 9 �0
% of
Vegetation Category Definitions CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous matenal
SWhrte
1
0 01
<1%
Black Dots Background
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, N/A
0
000
0%
4, or 5 stem count criteria -
otals
1
0 01
<1%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small N/A
0
000
0%
given the monitoring yew
–IMEMMOMELt—Ed Toials
1
001
<1%
Easement Acreage 12.01
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons
ns at map scale)
ross Hatch
33
260
22%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
ns at map scale)
Areas or points (If too small to render as polygons
tipple
Orange Dots White Background
1
0 06
°
0 5 /o
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Downstream
B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

i
1
1
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Upstream
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Downstream
B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Downstream
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Upstream
B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Upstream
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Upstream
B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

t
1
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Downstream
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 8
Upstream
B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 9
Upstream
B -11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

u
t
F,
1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
1
Ij
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
nmnT
VetiII / ProjenNa Aa,-
Vegetation Plot
ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
14%
2
Yes
3
No
4
No
5
No
6
No
7
No
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 2 —June 11, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 2 — June 11, 2012
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 2 —June 11, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 2 — June 11, 2012
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Monitoring Year 2 —June 11, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 2 —June 11, 2012
C-4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 2 — June 11, 2012
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
I
Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. CVS FIRMt IF 21a
e Branch i /Pro ect No. 92.255
Report Prepared By W ilham Carson
Date Prepared 8/9 /2012 14 55
Database Name Equmox 2012- A- DyeBranch MY2 mdb
Database Location Z \ES \NM &M \EEP Monitonng \Dye Branch \DB -MY2 -2012 \Data \Veg
Computer Name D16TNK71
File Size 51560448
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN TIES DOCUMENT
���
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary ofproject(s) and project
data
Project Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live
stakes
Project Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes,
all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List ofplots surveyed with location and sunmmary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Species
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List ofmost frequent damage classes with numberofoccurrences and percent oftotal stems
impacted by each
Damage by Species
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Species
A matnxofthe count of PLANTED hvmg stems of each species for each plot, dead and
Missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and Species
A matnxof the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers
combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
92255
Project Name
Dye Branch
Description
River Basin
Yadkin-Pee Dee
Length(ft)
Stream- to-Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
7
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Momtonng Year 2 of 5
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot Witis Annual Mema)
Dye Bramb H Project No. 9255
��oa
®aaaaaaoaoaa
®������mmmmmmmmm
®������
000
©aa���ooao
©00000000
©©
®���a000
©o������00000
©oom000000
o
©ommmoomoomo
©oo
©m00000
®mmmmmo
000aa00000
o ©000000000mo
©vo
©oA
©ommommm
®mm
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
C -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

r
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
840
839
838
837
a�
w
0
0 836
W
835
834
833
832
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 1 - Pool
Station I + 04.27
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY16/13/2011 --dr-- MY2 12/12/2012 - - --Bkf
Dye Branch I1 Final D -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 1 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
830
829
828
a�
w
C
0 827
6�
W
826
825
824
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 2 - Riffle
Station 6 + 40.40
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY 16/13/2011 --*-- MY2 12/12/2012 - -- Bkf
0 +35
Dye Branch II Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 2 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — December 12, 2012
D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
825
824
823
w
w
c
0 822
w
c�
W
821
820
819
0 +00
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 8 + 77.10
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/13/2011 f MY2 7/25/2012 - - -- Bkf
Dye Branch II Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Cemetery Branch — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
829
828
827
826
w 825
0
0
> 824
d
W
823
822
821
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 4 - Riffle
Station 1 + 15.75
820 1 I I f I -i i ' - i I I F- ----I
0 +00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
As -built 5/10/2011 MY1 6/13/2011 _*— MY2 7/25/2012 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch 11 Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
822
821
820
819
a�
w 818
c
0
a 817
a�
W
816
815
814
813
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45
Station (feet)
As -built 5/11/2011 MY16/14/2011 —*— MY2 7/25/2012 - - -- Bkf
0 +50
Dye Branch II Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
821
820
819
818
817
a�
816
C
O
815
W
814
813
812
811
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Station 10 + 75.57
810 ii Ii i i I I I i I i i '� '
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY16/14/2011 --*-- MY2 7/25/2012 - -- Bkf
Dye Branch II Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
819
818
817
816
a�
815
w
C
g 814
w
es
as
W 813
812
811
810
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 13+ 85.87
809 1 i i i i I I ii —i ' ' i —___4
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MVO 6/14/2011 } MV2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch 11 Final D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Upstream Reach — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — July 25, 2012
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

M M M M M M M M M M M M r M M M M M M
Appendix D
815
814
813
812
+^� 811
a�
w
c
0 810
w
a�
W 809
808
807
806
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 27.43
805 ; I f I i i ii I I i i i i i
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 - - -- Bkf f MY2 8/1/2012
Dye Branch II Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

i
1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
812
811
810
809
808
as
807
0
0
806
a�
W
805
804
803
802
801
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 19 + 80.80
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 - - -- Bkf --*—MY278 /1/2012
Dye Branch 11 Final D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 9 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M r M M M
Appendix D
810
809
808
807
806
805
a�
0
804
0
w
803
W 802
801
800
799
798
797
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 24 + 85.22
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
As -built 12/6/2010 MY1 6/14/2011 —dr,-MY2 8/1/2012
Dye Branch I1 Final D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Dye Branch Downstream Reach — Cross - Section 10 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 2 — August 1, 2012
D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
840
839
838
837
836
835
834
833
832
831
830
^. 829
a
828
0
827
w 826
825
824
823
822
821
820
819
818
817
816
815
Stream Survey Data
Cemetary Branch
Longitudinal Profile
0 +00 to 9 +89.93
19,019
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
r�
0
IN0
1%0
%a
1%0
r/,
-'-&19
im
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW -MY1 6/13/2011 - TW -MY2 12/12/2012 WS • BKF o Structure
D -31
-0-00
[a
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
XS1
Misse,
•
Vegetation
- - - - -- - •
Shot Due
- _
'
' -
--
•
-P
Average Ban
ull Slope
71
- m"--
XS2 - R
- - - - -- -
•
X -R
4
_
19,019
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
r�
0
IN0
1%0
%a
1%0
r/,
-'-&19
im
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW -MY1 6/13/2011 - TW -MY2 12/12/2012 WS • BKF o Structure
D -31
-0-00
[a
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
826
825
824
823
822
821
820
819
818
w
c 817
816
W
815
814
813
812
811
810
809
808
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Upstream
Longitudinal Profile
0 +30.36 to 15 +03.3
*190
8
�o �o �o 'bo 'bo
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW MY16 /14/2011 TW -MY2 7/25/2012 WS • BKF 0 Structure
Dye Branch II Final D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
•
-
Average I
gankfuR Slop,,
•
•
•
•
"M S ------- N--
•
XS5 -P
------ - - - - --
V '
XS6-
XS7 -R
*190
8
�o �o �o 'bo 'bo
Station (feet)
TW- MY012/6/2010 TW MY16 /14/2011 TW -MY2 7/25/2012 WS • BKF 0 Structure
Dye Branch II Final D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
810
809
808
807
806
805
y
J! 804
C
O
y
803
W
w
802
801
800
799
798
797
16.
X19
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Longitudinal Profile
16 +52.72 to 25 +34.71
l>X&o r�o 190 0 2ro 1jX-to
ap
Xo
Station (feet)
TW MY012 /6/2010 TW- MY16/15/2011 - TW MY2 8/1/2012 WS • BKF C Structure
-2
o
�s
�o
Dye Branch I1 Final D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
•
1„
1
-- ---- -- --" - --
I
Average Bankful.
Slope
-- - - - - --
•
XS8 - R
'r
_ I
I
VV
1
1
•
XS9 - P
----- - - -
•
- --
V1-
- - - - - --
-
•
1
_
_
I
1
1
1
XS10 -R
l>X&o r�o 190 0 2ro 1jX-to
ap
Xo
Station (feet)
TW MY012 /6/2010 TW- MY16/15/2011 - TW MY2 8/1/2012 WS • BKF C Structure
-2
o
�s
�o
Dye Branch I1 Final D -33 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
t ye rant / jest No. 922�5'S
C MEN, ranch - Cross- Section 1 - 00
If Count , ummary
D50
Mo ormg Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
0
0%
0%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
0° /U
very coarse sand
200
39
39%
39%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
6
6%
45%
fine gravel
57
11
11%
56%
fine gravel
80
8
8%
64%
medium gravel
113
6
6%
70%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
83%
coarse gravel
223
13
13%
96%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
99%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
0%
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very lar a boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
S ar►y Da>�a
D50
48
D84
16
D95
21
Dye Branch II Final
ProjectNo 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

LJ
F1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 -Pool
100%
90%
80%
C
W
Z
F'
70%
e
60% G.
G
d
a
40% >
30% E
0
U
20%
10%
0%
O O
d
LO
Particle Size (mm)
MY16/13/2011 — MY27/26/2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 -Pool
45%
40%
- —
35%
30
0
9
25%
20% a?
u
15% a
10%
5%
0%
O O
N 9
m
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/13/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

0
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye >Ganch / jec o. 2�ls55
C•eme>le Bra -h - • ss- Seotio 2 - e
P IF Couet Summmy
D50
Monitoring Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
00/0
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
0
0%
0%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
00/0
very coarse sand
200
17
17%
17%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
5
5%
22%
fine gravel
57
4
4%
26%
fine gravel
80
10
10%
36%
medium gavel
113
3
3%
39%
medium gravel
160
16
16%
55%
coarse gravel
223
25
25%
80%
coarse gravel
32
5
5%
85%
very coarse gravel
45
3
3%
88%
very coarse gravel
64
5
5%
93%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
94%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
95%
large cobble
180
4
4%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary D�a�
D50
14
D84
30
D95
130
Dye Branch II Final D -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
L
F'
70%
60% is
C
d
50
Q
a
40% i
30% E
U
20%
10%
N h V✓ VI r. N Y b 00 N Vi K X G
�D N N C .. � ry M � .O T S N•
N R S G Y
� Y T
0%
Particle Size (mm)
MY1 6/13/2011 —MY2 7/26/2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
L
45%
!
40 %
35%
I
30
0
9
25
c
20%
u
15% a
10%
5%
o%
O
N !r 9
O O
m
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/13/2011 E MY2 7/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
� y ranch / ;ject o. 92155
Us! eme ry RHOW - C3ross -Se -tio 3 - e
, btde Comet Summary
D50
Monitonng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sift/clay sift/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
mednun sand
050
0
0%
0%
coarse sand
'100
7
7%
7%
very coarse sand
200
28
28%
35%
Gravel
very fine aravel
40
7
7%
42%
fine gravel
5 7
15
15%
57%
fine gravel
80
10
10%
67%
medium gravel
113
11
11%
78%
medium grav8l
160
12
12%
90%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
93%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
95%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
96%
very coarse gravel
64
2
2%
98%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
�ff Summary Data
D50
5
D84
13
D95
32
Dye Branch 1I Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
I
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100
90
i
80
C
Z
E
70%
c
60
u
50
i
40% >
30% E
0
U
20
10%
I
0
N If1 In 1f! .•�
O N N O
O � C
N R b OD b N N Y O O � O O N N
.. .•. N � 7 `O O N o0 !, .O ..
� .•. N M h
e� OD O X
N O O• V
O O O O
CG
Particle Sue (mm)
MY16/13/2011 ---MY27/26/2012
Cemetery Branch
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
45
40
35%
30%
m
0
;o
25% a
20
V
15% a
10%
�16
5%
ME
11
Q0
N N kn W�
O N N N V O O O O N N_
N
V w 'O Y
N R T V
0%
M en h
O O O C
CC
Particle Size (mm)
■MY16 /13/2011 ■MY27/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye rant / jec o. 9 +255 4
Dye Branch - tream - Cross- Section 4 - lisle
P WHE CKount Summary
D50
Monitormg Year 1
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0 062
0
0%
00/0
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
8
8%
8%
fine sand
025
16
16%
24%
medium sand
050
10
10%
34%
coarse sand
100
6
6%
40%
very coarse sand
200
39
39%
79%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
10
10%
89%
fine gravel
57
8
8%
97%
fine gravel
80
1
1%
98%
medium gravel
113
0
0%
98%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
98%
coarse gravel
223
0
0%
98%
coarse Eavel
32
0
0%
98%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
98%
very coarse avel
64
1
1%
99%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
99%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
99%
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
12
D84
28
D95
54
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
L�
J
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
D41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
-
100
i
90
80
e
w
r
F'
70%
c
I
60
c
a
50%
i
40% >
a
U
20
10%
O
N
0%
v O O O O
Ci
O
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY16/13/2011 tMY27/26/2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
45
40
35%
30
:E
25
c
e
I
20%
u
�
15% d
10%
5%
0%
N h In
VI w. N 7 b X O 00 O O
N N 00 10 Y
m
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/13/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
D41 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
► yo ralnoh / ; ct o. 92+255
► y 1� � - - C�rnss Sec>fa 5 - ool
D50
Mo onng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sflUclay
0 062
8
8%
8%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
13%
fine sand
025
1
1%
14%
mednxm sand
050
2
2%
16%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
20%
very coarse sand
200
38
38%
58%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
3
3%
61%
fine gravel
57
9
9%
70%
fine gavel
80
8
8%
78%
medium,gravel
113
6
6%
84%
medium gravel
160
4
4%
88%
coarse gravel
223
1
1%
89%
coarse gravel
32
1
1%
90%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
91%
very coarse gravel
64
1
1%
92%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
96%
medium cobble
128
4
4%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
1000/0
100%
Summary Data
D50
17
D84
11
D95
83
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

I--,
F
1
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 - Pool
i
00%
90%
80% °w
F'
70%
L
e
60% W
e
d
50%
u
a
40% i
I
m
30% E
U
20
10%
r- -r
0
O
9
v
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY16/14/2011 -,*—MY27/26/2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Pool
45%
40%
35%
30% m
e
25% b
20
V
L
15% d
10%
5%
N -n to h
... 00 `O N N h ' O 00 O
I O� N 00
O N N R 00
h 10
10
a,
Y
V
0%
O
N
R
O O
9
CC
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/14/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye reach Project No. 255
D e Branch - pstream - Gross -Sectio 6 - Rule
ebble Count Summary
D50
Mo onng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
mednun sand
050
4
4%
4%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
12%
very coarse sand
200
21
21%
33%
Gravel
very fine gavel
40
13
13%
46%
fine gravel
57
14
14%
60%
fine gravel
80
4
4%
64%
medium gravel
113
10
100/0
74%
medium gravel
160
9
9%
83%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
88%
coarse gravel
32
3
3%
91%
very coarse gavel
45
5
5%
96%
very coarse gavel
64
1
1%
97%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
1%
98%
mednun cobble
128
0
0%
98%
large cobble
180
1
1%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
1 0%
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
I
1 100
100%
100%
Suma►ary Data
D50
45
D84
17
D95
42
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

t
n
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 -Riffle
-
100
90%
80%
e
m
t
F'
70%
e
60
e
d
50%
i
40% >
30% E
U
20%
10%
0%
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
- MY16/14/2011 -gh—MY27/26/2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
45%
40%
35%
30
25
20% c
u
15% i
10%
5%
0%
N
V1 VI
1f1 ..n ry Q 10 OD O N N h Q O W O
b N N Q d7 a
Y
O
N Q
O
O
V
Oi
Particle Size (mm)
• MY1 6/14/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

n
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dy rich l / jest o. 255
Dye Bra -h � ps am - C�'ross • ection 7 - ' piffle
e e C•ouat Summary
D50
Monrtonn Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum
Silt /Clay
sift/clay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
3
3%
3%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
7%
very coarse sand
200
10
100/0
17%
Gravel
very fine aravel
40
9
9%
26%
fine gravel
57
14
14%
40%
fine gravel
80
10
10%
50%
medium gravel
113
16
16%
66%
mednim gravel
160
18
18%
84%
coarse gravel
223
11
11%
95%
coarse gravel
32
4
4%
99%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
1000/0
very coarse aravel
64
0
0%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100 ° /a
medium cobble
128
0
0%
1000/0
large cobble
180
0
0%
1000/0
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
1000/0
100%
Sammary Data
D50
8
D84
16
D95
22
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
1
Stream Survey Data
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
D47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 7 - Riffle
Jr
100
90
80%
c
L
E'
70%
C
W/6
C
d
50%
i
40% >
30% E
e
U
20
10%
P
0%
N Q
O O
9
Y
6i
Particle Size (mm)
MY1 6 /14/2011 —MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 7 -Riffle
45%
40%
35%
30% a
t
25
a
20%
u
15% i
10%
4
5%
�
0%
m
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/14/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
1
D47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
� ye h II /Pro' ct o. X55
Dye ranch - ►owns am - C s - Secfion 8 - e
bole Count eurnnary
D50
Monitonng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0
0%
0%
medium sand
050
27
27%
27%
coarse sand
100
18
18%
45%
very coarse sand
200
30
30%
75%
Gravel
very fine gavel
40
10
10 °/U
85%
fine gave l
57
5
5%
90%
fine gravel
80
5
5%
95%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
99%
medium gravel
160
0
0%
99%
coarse gravel
223
1
1%
1000/0
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
1000/0
very coarse juavel
64
0
0%
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100 ° /a
small boulder
512
0
0%
100 ° /a
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/.
very larize boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/.
TOTALS
1
100
1000/.
100%
Summary Data
D50
1 1
D84
37
D95
8
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

C
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100
90
80
ca
r
70
60% Lr
c
a
50% i
a
40% i
i
a
30% E
0
At
U
20
i
10%
0%
O O N rn VI
O O
O O
O
d
00
Particle Size (mm)
MY1 3/2/2011 —MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
45
40
35
.30% a
9
25
C
20
V
15% a
10%
5%
0%
N Ln W1 W1 n.i N `G 00 = 10 N N V) ? O 00 O `D N N
`O N N ... N M `G O. N h `O
V 00
N 7
10 Y
O� U
t
O -: O O .� .+ N In VI
O O
N
O O
7
O O
p
m
Particle Size (mm)
■MY16 /14/2011 ■MY27/26/2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

1
1
Stream Survey Data
ye ranch / Project o. 92+255
Dy Bra ch - ownstrearo - 6w -Section - 0101
Co t Summary
I,
D50
Monitonng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
1%
fine sand
025
0
0%
1%
medium sand
050
0
0%
1%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
1%
very coarse sand
200
21
21%
22%
Gravel
very fine aravel
40
10
10%
32%
fine gravel
57
15
15%
47%
fine gravel
80
15
15%
62%
medttum gravel
113
12
12%
74%
medium gravel
160
13
13%
87%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
94%
coarse gravel
32
4
4%
98%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very larize boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
100%
100%
MOKSM-011 Data
D50
64
D84
15
D95
24
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 9 - Pool
100%
90%
80% e
m
r
P
70%
c
60% Ga
e
d
50% i
�
u
a
40% i
a
J
30
0
U
20%
10%
N
h h 1/1
N �tC iD �O N N 1f� Q O O b N N
Q
O Y 0%
d
CC
Particle Size (mm)
MY16/14/2011 tMY27/26/2012
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 - Pool
45%
40%
35%
30% m
i
;o
25% v
20% 6
V
15% a
10%
5%
0%
CO
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY1 6/14/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch II Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

Appendix D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stream Survey Data
I ' a 255
Dye B h 10,0 - IS ecti 0
e e Co Smnma>ty
D50
Monitoring Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
8
8%
8%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
9
9%
17%
fine sand
025
4
4%
21%
medium sand
050
16
16%
37%
coarse sand
100
16
16%
53%
very coarse sand
200
35
35%
88%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
4
4%
92%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
94%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
96%
medium gravel
113
2
2%
98%
medium gavel
160
1
1%
99%
coarse gravel
223
1
1%
100%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
100%
very coarse gavel
45
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
1
100
1000/0
100 0/.
Summate Data
D50
088
D84
1 8
D95
69
Dye Branch 11 Final
Project No 92255
Momtonng Year 2 of 5
D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

1
U'
1
1
n
1
1
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
100
90
80
e
m
A
F'
70%
c
60
c
u
50
u
a
40% i
30% E
0
U
20
10%
0%
N
Q
O O
7
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
MYI 6/14/2011 —MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch - Downstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
45
40
35%
30% m
0
t
25
20% e
u
V
d
15% a
10%
_5%
0%
N V1 1n h — N Y `O W `O N N N R O 00 O
10 N N ... .-� N M1 `O O� N DD
�O N N_ -V OD
kn
'O Y
O .� O .� .�.
O
N M V7 O O
N
O O
O O
7
da
Particle Size (mm)
• MY1 6/14/2011 ■ MY2 7/26/2012
Dye Branch Ii Final
Project No. 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2012

it r r r r r r r r r r r r �r r r r r r
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Date Summery
D e Branch II / Piro ct No. 92255 - Ceme_te . B_ranch 9�7i7 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension &TS.uLsirate - Rrfil�
M
LUL,+
LF4� Min
Man
Me'd
L�
SD
@a
MOO
MW
Me'd
IM-7
SD
®Nj
Lfffiffl
M_an
IMS
IMO
Wan
Md�
jl 1
S
"N�
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
70
70
70
70
N/A
1
89
11 1
113
141
1 8
7
100
55
72
72
89
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
—
i
14 2
142
142
142
N/A
1
190
540
360
1000
381
5
280
>30
>30
>30
>30
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
10
10
10
10
N/A
1
07
09
08
16
03
7
07
05
07
07
08
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
M
_
M
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
N/A
I
1 0
1 5
13
24
05
7
08
1 1
1 6
1 0
1 2
1 2
1 4
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft Z)
-
68
68
68
68
N/A
1
68
96
84
184
39
7
-
70
30
50
50
70
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
_—=
72
72
72
72
1 N/A
I 1
1 69
1 1121
1171
1501
NA
3
1
1 143
1
1 103
1 1081
1081
112
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
MIMIMI
20
20
20
20
1 N/A
1
1 3 8
1 68
1 77
89
1 NA
3
1 2 8
1
1 >3 41
>4 4
1 >4 4
1 >5 4
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
1 5
1 5
1 5
15
N/A
1
10
1 1
10
12
1 NA
3
1 0
10
10
10
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
r
-
6 8
23 4
53 9
14 84
l4
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
_ 0 012
0 034
0 088
0 006
0 027
0 026
0 052
0 016
6
-
0 048
-
000410023
0 049
001
14
Pool Length (ft)—__
47
82
119
35
193
196
328
115
6
138
207
276
58
162
F36
391
717
24
Pool Max Depth (ft)i_�
-
26
18
26
29
32
05
7
-
20
-
18
30
37
048
18
Pool Spacing (ft)
_ — r 228
860
2282
180
527
402
14081
41 7
7
184
27_6
322
45
38 7
1 11 0
2440
24
Patte
Channel Belt Width (ft)
r — —
53
108
226
260
49 l
400
1190
29 8
9
230
322
414
113
306
370
467
123
16
Radius of Curvature (ft)
_--
3 9
196
370
50
23 8
220
480
146
9
184
276
368
83
13 7
120
299
5 7
16
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
MIMI
06
28
53
06
2 1
1 8
43
1 3
9
1 8
2 8
3 7
24
24
24
24
N/A
I
Meander Wavelength (ft)
MIMIMI
136
420
7 1 0
260
729
690
1550
476
9
460
552
644
38 8
774
791
1670 36 1
11
Meander Width Ratio
08
75
32
25
47
36
101
27
7
23
32
41
49
66
66
82
N/A
2
Tt !r>inepert Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft'`
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
45-180
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m'-
—
%ditioaal Reach Parameten+
Rosgen Classification
®
E4
E4 / C4 / C5
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
66-78
4 1- 7 0
55-67
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
443-528
350- 128 1
384-466
Valley Length (ft)
IMIMIM
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
®
-
-
-
977
Sinuosity
1 14
1 15-222
1 14
1 08
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
00190
0 0057 - 0 0130
00190
-
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
®
-
-
00191
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Biological or Other
- miormauon unavaiiaoie
N/A - Item does not app 1
on -A cable
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Tetile Oa. Ba�ehne Stream Data Summary
_ Branch D /Pro tict o_. 9_2255 - D e Branch- t trleant Il 4 5 feet
Regional Curve Pre - Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design
Parameter Ur to Ostin Creek
Monitoring Baseline
Dimeasion &TS ubstrate - F flI�
L
L
ILEM - in
1Nwan
Med
IM1
SAD
ONA
Min
Mean
11'1eed
Mu
SD
I N�
Mio
1' a
(IYIu"'3
Min
Mean
' ed
(1Nu]
SD
(N�
Bankfull Width (ft)
112
160
185
206
-
20 1
-
257
284
269
327
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
_
_
_
895
672
702
728
709
769
88 8
544
649
586
818
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
16
16
16
17
15
11
13
13
14
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)—_—
28
15
19
24
15
18
22
22
28
25
36
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sect tonal Area (ft')
18 1
202
197
229
NA
3
274
303
334
31 0
295
363
325
469
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
—__ 62
1 70
1 70
1 79
1 NA
1 3
1 93
1 1141
127
1
1 1301
203
1 2261
228
1 246
1 N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
=MIMI >3 21
>4 4
1 >5 0
1 >5 0
1 NA
1 3
1 3 5
3 8
1
1 44
1
3 5
1 3 8
1 44 1
20
1 23
1 23
1 25
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
—__
10
1 0
1 2
14
1 0
1 0
1 10 1
10
1 10
10
10
N/A
3
,Profile
Riffle Length (ft) _ _ —
-
6 1
176
302
66
19 1
327 20 1
516
471
97
295
8
Riffle Slope (ft /ft) _ _ — 0 002
0 014
0 042
0 006
0 028
0 066
00071
0 030
0 070 0 002 0 006
0 005
0 016
0 005
8
Pool Length (ft) — _ _ -
-
183
35 1
62 9
19 9
38 1
68 I 8 76
24 6
22 4
66 4
13
20
Pool Max Depth (ft) —_— -
22
29
3 3
2 1
2 7
3 I 2 I
344
3 61
4 48
0 67
20
Pool Spacing(ft) _ _ _
50 3
78 9
105 8
54 5
85 5
t 14 7 24 I
66 8
65 3
125
28 6
19
iPattern
Channel Belt Width (ft) 66
243
569
360
670
1500
390
726
1626
450
484 54 1
834
17
Radius of Curvature (ft)
_ _ — 145
524
1488
190
490
1150
206
53 1
112461
31 3
31 2 39 6
4 75
14
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
—_— 1 3
4 7
13 3
1 0
2 7
6 2
1 0
2 7
]236
6 2
2 3
2 3 2 3
N/A
I
Meander Wavelength (ft)
_ 40 1
79 7
172 7
33 0
94 0
155 0
35 8
102
168 0 130 0
138 2 153 3
18 2
12
Meander Width Ratio
___ 0 6
2 2
5 1
1 9
3 6
8 1
1 9
3 6
8 1
19
19 2 1
0 21
3
tTrausport anmetere
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /tl'-
Max Part Size (trim) Mobilized at Bankf 111
—
30- 100
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/1111—
-
�llonai Reich Parameters
Rosgen Classification
—
E4
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
62-69
4 2
3 5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1122-1248
128
110
Valley Length (ft)
—
-
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
—
2,086
1,034
2,405
2,455
Sinuosity
—
104
1 20
1 20
121
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
—
00090
00088
00080
00080
Bankfull Slope (ft /fl)
—
-
-
-
00083
Bankf ill Floodplam Area (acres)
—
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Meinc
—
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
—
—
Biological or Other
—
- information unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
on- pp}ic'ab'le
Dye Branch II Final D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
M M M M� M w M M M M M M M M M M M M

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l0a Baseline Stream Data Summary
D� _e B_rancb U / P,ro _ct No. 9_2255 - D e BraoebiDowns_tre_W 8�7�0 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
U17 to Ostin Creek
Design
Mo-toring Baseline
Dime'nslon & EuffimteeRiffl�
1
UL
LE''ql Min
Mean
Med
I
SD
N A
MIn
Mean
Meedl
IM_zz
SD
N]
Nn I
oon
Ma:
Mn
Mean
MM
lYlaz
S'D
�N�
Bankfull Width (ft)
148
148
148
148
NA
1
160
185
206
-
20 1
-
184
186
186
188
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
_
_
_ 220
220
220
220
NA
1
672
702
72 8
709
769
88 8
487
618
618
748
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
NA
1
1 6
1 6
1 7
1 5
1 9
20
20
20
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)—__
24
24
24
24
NA
I
15
19
24
15
18
22
29
30
30
31
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
174
174
174
24
NA
1
274
303
334
31 0
340
36 1
36 1
38 1
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
—__ 125
125
125
24
NA
I
93
114
127
130
93
96
96
99
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
—_— 1 5
1 5
1 5
24
NA
I
3 5
3 8
44
3 5
3 8
44
27
34
34
40
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
—_— 4 9
4 9
4 9
1 24
1 NA
I
1 0
1 1 2
1
1 14
1 0
1 0
1 1 0
1 10
1 0
1 1 0
1 10
N/A
3
Proille
Riffle Length (ft)
_ _ _ -
-
-
-
61
176
302
66
19 1
327
15 7
503
55 7
793
202
7
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
— _ _ 0 003 0 021
0 121
0 006
0 028
0 066
0 007
0 030 0 070
0 001
0 006
0 006
0 014
0 004
7
Pool Length (ft)—__
29
248
120
183
351
629
199
381
681
101
199
159
396
891
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
_--
3 1
-
22
29
33
2 1
2 7
3 1
3 3
3 91
3 77
505
059
12
Pool Spacmg (ft)
— — _ 79 0
1620
2610
503
789
1058
5 45
855
1147
15 3
575
388
130
41 5
14
�P,attern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
_ — 15 6
306
677
360
670
1500
390
726
1626
283
492
575 654
154
9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
—_ 11 0
42 1
81 9
190
490
1150
206
531
1246
327
407
422 50 1
56
7
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
___ 07
29
5 6
1 0
2 7
62
10
27
62
1 7
1 7
1 7 1 7
N/A
I
Meander Wavelength (ft)
_ — — 620
1030
157
330
940
1550
358
102
1680
138 9
162 2
157 3 210 5
272
6
Meander Width Ratio
--_ 1 1
2 1
46
1 9
36
8 1
1 9
36
8 1
24
28
2 8 3 1
051
2
171�anBpo arame re
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ftZ
—
-
M ax Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
—
30- 100
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m-
—
rAWiIFH_111 lZe'ac6lP,arameteeti
Rosgen Classification
—
G4c
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6 1- 7 2
42
3 5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1054- 1260
128
110
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
—
-
-
-
870
Sinuosity
—
1 14
1 46
1 09
1 10
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
—
00110
00090
00095
-
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
—
-
-
-
00106
Bankfull Floodp lam Area (acres)
—
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
—
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
—
—
- imormauon unavauante
N/A - It does not a I
Non -A hca
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitonng Year 2 of 5
D -56 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A V Item L.'s -'not apply
Table lOb. Baseline Stream Date Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, snd Hydrologic C•ontailsment Parameter D_ istribution
D e Branch U / Rro ct No. 92255 - ClVel . ranch 9� 7 feet
Parameter
Pre -E ustmg Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design Monitoring Baseline
-
Ri% /Ru% /P % /G% /S%
-
-
-
-
__
-
__
-
-
-
__
�_
-
__
-
-
--
-
35%
4%
42%
13%
7%
34% 20%
3%
SC % /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Bc% -
-
-
-
-
SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Be%
-
-
-
-
-
-
_—_�_�__�_(♦�
d16/D35/d50/d84/d95 /diP /dPP(mm) 09
12
20
80
101
889
137
021
05
35
139
056
107
130
457
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
■■
■.
Entrenchment Class
■■■■■
■
■
■
■
■■■■■■■■■■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■
■
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 199 />20
.
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 1 99 >2 0
■■■
■■■
-
-
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■
-
■■.■■■■■■■■■■.■■■
N/A V Item L.'s -'not apply
miormauon unevauaoic
on- p i c
(Substrate, Bed,
e B_ Weh
Table l I Ob. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Bank, end Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
I / P.W et P,Io 9.2255 - D e Brsnclt_U Cream Q 465 test
Parameter
Pre- 6vsting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
wintonng Baseline
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S°/ -
-
-
-
-
__
-
-
-
__
-
-
__
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
28%
15%
34% 20%
3%
43% 6%
34%
SC% /So /G% /C% /B% /Be°/
3%
SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Be%
-
-
-
-
-
d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /diP /diP(mm) 015
04
33
103
137
457
dl6/D35/d50/d84/d95 /diP /di' (mm)
015
028
056
107
130
457
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
■.
Entrenchment Class
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■
■
.
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 1 99 >2 0
■■■
-
-
-
-
■■.■■■■■■■■■■.■■■
miormauon unevauaoic
on- p i c
N/A u Item s not s
I's ac 1
�loa- hw c
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012
Table III Baseline S am Data Summary
( Substtate, Bed,
Bank, and ydrologic Containmen P eter Distribuhaos
Branch
II /Pro ct No 92255 - D e Branch: _o�rnstream 17.0 feet
Parameter
Pre- E-shng Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S%
-
-
-
-
-
__
-
-
-
43% 6%
34%
13%
3%
SC% /Sa% /G% /C% /B% /Be%
-
-
-
-
-
dl6/D35/d50/d84/d95 /diP /di' (mm)
015
028
056
107
130
457
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
■.
■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99 >10
Incision Class
M.M■M■■■■■■■■E■■■
<12/12 149/15 199/ >20
■■r
-
-
-
-
N/A u Item s not s
I's ac 1
�loa- hw c
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table
Dye
lla. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Branch II /Project No. 92 *2�5'S - Cemetery Branch 0971 Feeh)
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8363
8363
8363
MY2
MY3
MY4
18263
8263
8263
8243
8243
821 7
821 7
821 7
8174
8174
Bankfull Width (ft)
97
102
94
8155
89
106
80
8125
55
60
65
238
229
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>50
168
>30
>30
>30
277
>30
>30
>30
21 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 9
15
1 5
528
08
06
05
47 1
05
05
06
782
BankMl Max Depth (ft)
3 1
27
24
14
1 2
1 2
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
21
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
189
152
143
70
63
39
3 0
28
40
21
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
50
68
62
11 2
18 1
164
103
127
106
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5 1
>4 9
>5 3
>3 4
>2 8
>3 8
>5 4
>5 0
>4 6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
10
Bank-full Width/Depth Ratio
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)
189
152
143
246
70
63
39
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3 0
28
40
d50 (mm)
N/A
57
48
25
N/A
84
1401
20
N/A
_60
50
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A - Item does not apply
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table a Baseline Morphology &Hydraulic Monitoring San>tmary
Dye Branch III / P.mject o. 92.255 - ye Buanch_Ups�tme_am 1,4t7� Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Cross Section 5
Pool
Cross Section 6
Riffle
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
N1Y1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8243
8243
8243
8174
8174
8174
815 5
8155
8155
8125
8125
8125
Bankfull Width (ft)
257
238
229
171
170
168
32 7
287
277
1 269
24 1
21 3
Floodprone Width (ft)
586
528
528
50
47 1
47 1
81 8
782
782
544
526
526
Bankfill Mean Depth (ft)
13
11
10
l7
14
21
14
13
13
11
10
09
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
25
20
21
34
28
36
36
32
32
22
20
21
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
325
27 1
23 1
288
23 7
350
469
375
362
295
242
199
Bank-full Width/Depth Ratio
203
209
226
102
122
8 1
228
220
21 2
246
240
229
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
23
2 2
2 3
29
28
28
25
27
2 8
20
22
25
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
10--
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
325
27 I
23 1
288
23 7
350
469
375
36 2
29 5
24 2
199
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 2
1 2
N/A
6 0
1 7
N/A
1 9
4 5
N/A
27
80
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch II Final D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
able lla. B ase line Mo To' I mmary
Dye ranch II /Project o. 92255 -Dye Branch- ownstream (869 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 8
Riffle
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYI
NIY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
8093
8093
8093
806 1
806 1
806 1
1801 1
801 1
801 1
Bankfull Width (ft)
188
188
196
263
263
243
184
18 5
177
Floodprone Width (ft)
748
73 5
73 5
1
1 >70
>70
>70
1
487
476
1 476
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
20
19
2 1
1 8
1 7
23
1 9
1 6
1 6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 1
30
39
35
3 5
35
29
24
25
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
38 1
35 9
41 0
484
436
553
340
295
278
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
93
99
93
143
159
107
99
11 7
11 3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
40
39
3 8
>2 7
>2 7
29
27
26
27
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)
38 1
359
41 0
484
436
55 3
340
295
278
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 1 3
1 1
N/A 1
072
64
N/A
1 0
09
N/A - Item does not apply
Dye Branch H Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
R, =RrfBe /Ru�Rw /P =Pool /G =(Lde /S =9ep
sC =Sih Clay /SA° Send /G =Gra.el /C= Cobble /B- fnWder /Be- Bcd'ock
Percentags braced nn nfBe end pool pebble cowls
Dye Branch II Final D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
®
��m�m000000000000000000000000000000
m®
����OO�OOOO
(��(�OOOOODOD�DDOI�OOOO�OO
m����o000000000000000000000000000�00
�����m000000000000000000000000000000
'
�m®
�® a�a00000000000000000000000000000
l �l
r.
1,
R, =RrfBe /Ru�Rw /P =Pool /G =(Lde /S =9ep
sC =Sih Clay /SA° Send /G =Gra.el /C= Cobble /B- fnWder /Be- Bcd'ock
Percentags braced nn nfBe end pool pebble cowls
Dye Branch II Final D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
-Pool / G -Gl.dc / S = 3ep
SL ^ SH Clay / S4 m $ond / G -Govel / C = Cobhle / B = RoWder / Be a Ekdrock
•Percentages bo don n(Ile and pool pebble coimrs
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012
MM=]Fff
It
]Mai
=J
�
®
®�F-ff-l®
®tomrMFO
=F
- •
mmmm
®
©mm
®mom
©mmmm
®
©������������������
���mm�OOO�00000�00�
(�O�OOOOl�OOOOOO�DO
�®®
�mmOO�OO�DOO
(�OOOOODOODOOOO0000��0
mmmm®
0000000000000000000000000000000
� r r
�®
�®
OOO�OOO���Ol�OOOOOOOOOOOOOl�O
[���
• •
® mmm®
©OOO�OOODODOO��OOOO�OOODODOOOO�
r rr
r rr•
rr
r .
rrr
-Pool / G -Gl.dc / S = 3ep
SL ^ SH Clay / S4 m $ond / G -Govel / C = Cobhle / B = RoWder / Be a Ekdrock
•Percentages bo don n(Ile and pool pebble coimrs
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Y
=Po1ol 11 /G- Gh& /S- Sep
SC = &It Clay I M = Sand / G - G,—] / C - Cobble / B = Boulder / B, — Bedroek
Percentages based on nFB. end pool pcbble count,
Dye Branch II Final D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
• ®m
®
®�
®
®mmmm
®mom
®m
®������������������
��®
��oOOO�Ot��O00000
(�OODODODOOODOOOO�
®
���m0(
�OI
� I�OO(�(�OOOO(�ODO�ODODOOOODO0�0
mmmm�0000000000000000000000000000000
-
��
®�®
0000000000000000000000000000000
mmmm�a0000000000000000000000000QOOOo
'
EEC
„ •
• • ••
000000000000000000�����o�����o�����o
Y
=Po1ol 11 /G- Gh& /S- Sep
SC = &It Clay I M = Sand / G - G,—] / C - Cobble / B = Boulder / B, — Bedroek
Percentages based on nFB. end pool pcbble count,
Dye Branch II Final D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

J
1
Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
1
1
MmapnzaVerh.-115-30on
D
ofB vents
ranch / jest No. 9 5-
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above Average
BankM Elevation
7/8/2011
Water level logger
107
9/21/2011
Water level logger
114
9/24/2011
Water level logger
052
5/16/2012
Water level logger
163
7/11/2012
Water level logger
021
9/29/2012
Water level logger
022
' Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Hydrologic Data
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
n
45
4
3.5
3
a�
25
2
15
1
05
0
AverageB4nkfull 2.8 Feet
>r�
Ol
2
Dye Branch II Final
Project No 92255
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Figure 3. Dye Branch Water Level Logger Chart
s, s, c
lj�O,2 U, ��26 `2O1 050
Jp;;,8
1
?Ol2 �Of2 �Oj2 X022
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012
�O12
�Of2
201,2
Oft
E -2
Jp;;,8
1
?Ol2 �Of2 �Oj2 X022
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2012

Appendix E
2.5
2
1.5
u
c
i
0.5
Hydrologic Data
Figure 3. Precipitation for Mooresville, North Carolina
0 I P. Yom.. . .. I .. .,, . � . ■ ■ ■ u ---,m . a ■ ■+� ■ ■
r0lj '1�j'2 2pj2 11 rolj r�12 role rpjl roll r�l? ��12
NC CRONOS (North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database). State Climate Office of North Carolina. Version 2.7.2.
Mooresville 1.9 SSE (NC- IR -1). htti)://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos/ Accessed November 2012.
Dye Branch II Final E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 92255 November 2012
Monitoring Year 2 of 5