20210947 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210511

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYes r No
Change cnly if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20210947
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
6 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Johnnie Hill
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/11/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Reddicks Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-IV
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.988869
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
SAW-2020-01942
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
9/3/2020
Longitude:
-79.894164
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
Woodcroft_meeting_request.pdf
Pre_filing_docu mentation.docx
Rev -Greensboro Woodcroft Cir Alternatives Analysis-20200709.pdf
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
32.37KB
108.91 KB
1.97MB
A. Processing Information

County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Guilford
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes 6'No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
f7 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
I Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
(' No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
f7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I- Regional General Permit (RGP)
n Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
6 Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 13 - Bank Stabilization
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
I7 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
n Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
n Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes ('No
n 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
17 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes ( No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes (-No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes (' No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner 17 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
s Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
David and Kathleen Lambeth
2b. Deed book and page no.:
PB 51, PG81
✓ Yes 6 No
✓ Yes 6 No
2c. Responsible party:

2d.Address
Street Address
4902 Woodcroft Circle
Address Line 2
(Sty State / Province/ legion
Greensboro NC
Rstal / Zip Code Country
27407 United States
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Sheila Norwood
2b. Deed book and page no.:
PB51,PG81
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
4900 Woodcroft Circle
Address Line 2
Oty State/ Province/ legion
Greensboro NC
Postal / ZLp Code Country
27407 United States
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Koury Ventures Limited Partnership
2b. Deed book and page no.:
N/A; Parcel Number is 7831755627
2c. Responsible party:
Richard Vanore
2d.Address
Street Address
2275 Vanstory Street
Address Line 2
Suite 200
Cay
Greensboro
Postal / Zip Code
27403
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Johnnie Hill
3b. Business Name:
City of Greensboro
3c. Address
State/ Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:

Street Address
2602 South Elm -Eugene Street
Address Line 2
atY State / Province / legion
Greensboro NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27406 United States
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Benjamin Cogdell
4b. Business Name:
Atkins
4c. Address
Street Address
1616 E. Millbrook Rd.
Address Line 2
Suite 160
(Sty State / Province / Region
Raleigh NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27609 United States
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent_authorization_from Woodcroft_Circle_PJD_Signed.pdf
899.43KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Greensboro, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
7831564073
2c. Project Address
Street Address
4902 Woodcroft Circle
Address Line 2
atY
Greensboro
Postal / Zip Code
27407
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Reddicks Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-Iv
2b. Property size:
1.38
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
United States
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300030105
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The purpose of this project is to construct stream bank stabilization measures along portions of Reddicks Creek. Stabilization will occur along the existing stream generally paralleling
Trailwood Road from approximately 144 linear feet north of Woodcroft Circle to approximately 267 linear feet north of Woodcroft Circle.
The site has vegetative cover of grassland and woods with the stream serving as the principal drainageway for the site. The slopes are generally 4-6% around the stream. The existing
stream channel slopes are generally 100-200%. There is evidence of significant erosion along the existing stream.
Land use in the vicinity of the site is residential. Reddicks creek runs offsite and serves as the outlet for runoff discharge. Approximately 3,200 acres of area contributes runoff to the
construction area.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
✓ Yes r No C' Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig03_Topo.pdf 7.06MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig04_Soils.pdf 1.79MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.24 Acre
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
237 Linear Feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The City of Greensboro has tasked Atkins with streambank stabilization along Reddicks Creek in the vicinity of Woodcroft Circle. Streambank erosion at all these sites have resulted in
loss of private property. In order to prevent further loss to the private property, Atkin team is preparing hydrologic and hydraulic modeling flood study (No -Rise or CLOMR/LOMR),
conceptual plans, construction plans, erosion and sedimentation control plans, 401/404 permitting, technical specifications, engineers opinion of probable costs, and bidding support.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This projects goal is stabilizing Reddicks Creek, located in the vicinity of Woodcroft Circle in the City of Greensboro. The current conditions along this reach are exhibiting significant
erosion along both banks of the creek. The extent of the erosion has become so extensive that it is threatening existing residential structures located on the south western side of the
creek.
Atkins has developed a design that will stabilize the creek bed and banks. Due to the velocities and incised nature of the creek, it has been determined a naturalized design is can help
achieve a stable reach. The proposed design will utilize two (2) J-hooks installed to maintain energy within the center of the channel. Graded and laid-back banks to allow for floodplain
access. Installation of High Performance Turf Reinforcement Matting (I-ITPRM) and revegetation to maintain bank stability and reduce erosion. There are two (2) drop structures
proposed that have been configured to replicate in -stream natural structures. These structures will be implemented in the design to help dissipate the velocities and shear stresses that
are creating the existing erosive condition. The channel side slopes will be stabilized with Scourlok to account for the nearly vertical creek banks.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Woodcroft Circle 100% Plan Set.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
( Yes r No
Comments:
Agency concurrence site visit conducted December 3, 2020.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
( Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01942
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Ben Cogdell
Atkins
14.66MB
r Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The Woodcroft Circle site was verified during a December 3, 2020 agency concurrence meeting with David Bailey (USACE) and Ben Cogdell (Atkins).
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Woodcroft_Memo_reduced. pdf
Agency_correspondence_USACE.pdf
Agency_correspondence_NCDENR.pdf
1.5MB
180.28KB
172.25KB

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
'Yes (•'No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
J
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
[ Wetlands 17 Streams -tributaries
[ Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
fJ Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
length*
S1
J-Hook
Permanent
Fill
Reddicks Creek
Perennial
Both
15
Average (feet)
3
(linear feet)
S2
J-Hook
Permanent
Fill
Reddicks Creek
Perennial
Both
14
Average (feet)
3
(linear feet)
S3
Scour Pool
Permanent
Excavation
Reddicks Creek
Perennial
Both
11
Average (feet)
21
(linear feet)
S4
Scour Pool
Permanent
Excavation
Reddicks Creek
Perennial
Both
11
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S5
Temporary channel
excavation
Temporary
Excavation
Reddicks Creek
Perennial
Both
17
Average (feet)
163
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
57
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
220
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
163
3j. Comments:
Entire channel within the Limits of Disturbance will be dewatered and then excavated, with in situ material removed and replaced in channel bed to
embed HPTRM fabric along the length of the stream.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
r Neuse
r Catawba
r Goose Creek
I— Other
r Tar -Pamlico
7 Randleman
I— Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Grading/Replanting
T
Reddicks Creek
No
2,879
0
Clearing/Replanting
T
Reddicks Creek
No
7,247
1,759
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Total Temporary impacts: 10,126.00
Zone 1
Total Permanent impacts: 0.00
Zone 2
1,759.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2

Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
Impact _Map _Full.pdf
Impact_Map.pdf
10,126.00 1,759.00
15.63MB
12.68MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
LU'
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The aim of this project is to stabilize and restore a reach of channel to a more stable cross-section configuration. This stabilization approach is not
anticipated to result in additional development which could impact downstream quality, on the contrary the aim is to reduce erosion and mass wasting
of the channel banks. This remediation will improve lateral and vertical stability as well reduce the overall sediment load.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction access corridors have been refined through an iterative process to avoid wetland impacts on site entirely. By utilizing existing utility
access roads from the east, via Dover Park road, wetlands WC and WD can be avoided entirely. Additionally, wetland WA will be avoided by routing
the construction access road between the wetland boundary and property boundary. Impacts to the stream channel will be temporary with the
exception of the installation of J-hook structures and scour pools. Areas within Buffer Zones 1 and 2 will be revegetated back to their existing
conditions following construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes a No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
This project is seeking an authorization of Nationwide Permit 13 for bank stabilization and is our contention that there will be a no net reduction in jurisdictional resources associated with
this project.
Due to the excessive erosion and limited aquatic habitat present within this relevant reach, a naturalized approach to support bank stability will ultimately result in a protection of aquatic
habitats within adjacent stream reaches as well as protect infrastructure and surrounding properties.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
6 Yes rNo
What type of SCM are you providing?
I— Level Spreader
n Vegetated Conveyance (lower SMNT)
n Wetland Swale (higher SH1NT)
n Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
I7 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes f No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
G Yes r No
Comments:
This project will be low density based on the calculation for project density. The project design will have little (if any) built upon areas within the project limits.
The current design has been refined from a previous rip -rap only, hardened -approach to a refined model, integrating natural channel design elements (such as J-hook and scourpool
features and bank grading) as well as the Scourlok product. Scourlok serves as a pervious treatment designed to resist extreme hydraulic stresses and add protection to the stream
bank. This product can be filled with mulch or other media to promote and sustain vegetation.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
( Yes r No

1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
✓ Yes RNo
Comments:*
With the passage of SL 2015-90, two key criteria must now be considered to determine if a proposed action may require a SEPA review. The first is
the funding source. If a proposed action involves more than $10,000,000 of funds provided by the State of North Carolina for a single project or action
or related group of projects or actions a SEPA review may be necessary. This is a change over the previous requirement which included any public
funds (i.e. city, county, bonds, etc.).
The second involves direct impacts resulting from the proposed project. If the proposed action will result in substantial, permanent changes to the
natural cover or topography greater than or equal to ten acres of public lands a SEPA review may be required. This is a change over previous
requirements that required a SEPA review for impacts to any type or amount of public lands.
This streambank stabilization project does not meet either of the two above listed criteria.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes (No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes f No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The aim of this project is to stabilize and restore a reach of channel to a more stable cross-section configuration. This stabilization approach is not
anticipated to result in additional development which could impact downstream quality, on the contrary the aim is to reduce erosion and mass wasting
of the channel banks. This remediation will improve lateral and vertical stability as well reduce the overall sediment load.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes 6*Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes (•'No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes ( No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes 0' No
6 No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
6 Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes f No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes F No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes f No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
On February 28 and June 10, 2020, Atkins biologist Ben Cogdell conducted a thorough visual survey to identify suitable habitat for all Threatened and
Endangered species listed for Guilford County.
The majority of the project study area is comprised of a frequently maintained/mowed utility easement (to be used for construction access). Riparian
areas surrounding the proposed streambank stabilization were dominated by dense understory stands of invasive bamboo and Chinese privet.
Suitable habitat for small whorled pogonia and Schweinitz's sunflower was not present.
The Cape Fear shiner and Roanoke logperch known range is beyond the limits of the project study area according to USFWS critical habitat gis
spatial data.
Canopy trees suitable for potential bald eagle nesting locations within the project study area were surveyed and no nests were identified.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database for small whorled pogonia, Schweinitz's sunflower, Cape Fear shiner,
Roanoke logperch, and bald eagle in Guilford County revealed no known occurrences of these species within 1.0 mile of the project study area.

Consultation Documentation Upload
Memo_reduced.pdf
Crit_Hab.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes (No
818.28KB
9.47MB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The project location is within Guilford County, North Carolina beyond the limits of any designated Essential Fish Habitat according to the NOAA
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper service.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
( Yes rNo
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources has identified one occurrence within a half -mile of the project study area which also
intersects the project study area. The record list The Gardner House including a gold mine site to the north east. The location of the Gardner House
itself is beyond the limits of the project study area and is not anticipated to be impacted by any activities associated with this project. The gold mine
site is shown intersecting the project study area, but is not anticipated to be affected by the stream stabilization techniques. The construction access
road (which crosses the limits of the gold mine record) is not expected to have any significant grading or drilling, and is not anticipated to affect this
gold mine site or the associated shafts.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Woodcroft_Fig01_Cultural.pdf 19.37MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
( Yes rNo
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The proposed design, based on hydrologic and hydraulic analysis will not result in increases in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood.
The City of Greensboro will also be obtaining an approved Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the FEMA/NCFMP prior to the
construction of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) upon completion of the proposed project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMAeffective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Miscellaneous
L.'
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
*
CJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Benjamin E Cogdell
Signature
Date
5/11/2021

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Table 1, see Figure 1
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: See Table 1, see Figure 1
Please print:
Property Owner: City of Greensboro
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Ben Cogdell
, of
Atkins
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
2602 South Elm -Eugene Street, Greensboro NC 27406
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Author.'ed Signature
Date: to1Z'Iz
Authorized Signature
Date:

rl
% ..se- . ,e• . "tp•P'00 41 k a yi • %iv% ,-.e. ,ii`;
4; 441fril
' ' Wit' .i , . O �••'�_ + ►' -' e , . �+�►'- r _ri ,[ '
' -I I ' 1 ",i
LAMBETH, DAVID S;LAMBETH, KATHLEEN a . '- i' / ' 1` e' +' • 4,. 4. .� •'• e ' ► tt F. i S �' ! r '
7831564073 '�!•. ,,,,„„... As. = i • •.• . , `- • ► •;�I j �+'` itr* f' 1 y14
4902 WOODCROFTQRGREENSBORO, % ►'• r r •ak , - ,fry.fi•
e JP
tletks
Am
y NORWUUD, SHEILA
7831556932
ir 4900 WOODCROFTQRGREENSBORO, G@ 27407
► - -
r'• r ` w
• • •• . • .4 le '.641i }
f�.ti� �� T } ' KOURY VENTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
' • ► ti Oa i • 7831557359
ti+� 4916 GRANDOVER PKWY GREENSBORO,
: .' . ad.." f it „.4, .- ,., . , . ,
t.
i •i•f s • - k i i ■ -
ff .J • t ,
, •se "' { ' t' +
.� . t f p -
: t I d }/* s� E 1
• • •
�. f r -•KOURY VENTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP J ±., 9, '• i ■
err 7831755627 _ i .
e 1 � 5 Q,' off', GREENSBORO, M . o'
s ` f
A..:
: #
-4.
, 1T - • ` - i••
` •,
•
•4• '4.
'_ '
• r • ► + .
it rw • , 1J
Vr
••'_' lk• ►,.. ,.
ti
+ j 1- •)
,• ., - -• .. r r
r •
Owner Name
Parcel Number
�,
.•
`
NORWOOD, SHEILA D
7831556932
OW-'.'t �� ---
LAMBETH, DAVID S;LAMBETH, KATHLEEN K
7831564073
• a"r4•" • • •.i.*
` .` ` :
•
J
7831755627
~• `f�,. {
� •
KOURYVENTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7831557359
N . _
1' r ►� 0, ► aleSTAI 1
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
Property Owner Information Map
DWnBy. RLG
FIGURE
� Project Study Area
N
0 150 300
Ckd By:
BEC
lIT KI N
S
Guilford County Parcels
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
Feet
Date: 9/14/2020
GREENSBORO
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ProjectNo.:
100068937
D:\W ood crofl\F ig01_P arce Is. mxd

Street Address
Property Owner
Lot No.
Plat No.
Parcel ID
4902 Woodcroft Circle,
Greensboro NC, 27407
David and Kathleen
Lambeth
13
PB 51, PG 81
7831564073
4900 Woodcroft Circle,
Greensboro NC, 27407
Shelia Norwood
12
PB 51, PG 81
7831556932
4035 Live Oak Drive, Greensboro
NC, 27403
Koury Ventures Limited
Partnership
N/A
N/A
7831755627
Table 1. Property Ownership

Prepared By:
ATKINS
Prepared For:
GREENSBORO
NCDNCR Historic Properties
Project Study Area
Cultural Resources Half -Mile Study Area
NC Dept of Natural and Cultural Resources
Historic Properties
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0
1,000
2,000
Feet
N
A
Dwn By:
FIGURE
RLG
Ckd By:
BEC
Date:
2/1 /2021
Project No.:
100068937
D:\Wood roft\Fig01_Cultural.mxd

Prepared By:
ATKINS
Prepared For:
GREENSBORO
Data Form Locations
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US (Streams)
Project Study Area
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(Topographic Map)
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Dwn By:
FIGURE
RLG
Ckd By:
BEG
Date:
9/15/2020
Project No.:
100068937
D:\W o od cro ft\F ig03_Topo. mxd

Prepared By:
ATKINS
Prepared For:
GREENSBORO
Data Form Locations
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US (Streams)
Project Study Area
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(Soil Survey Map)
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0
200
400
Feet
N
A
Dwn By:
FIGURE
RLG
Ckd By:
BEC
Date:
9/9/2020
Project No.:
100068937
D :\ W o od c rof0F i g 04_S of Is . m xd

CITY OF GREENSBORO
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
WOODCROFT CIRCLE
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
PROJECT 100068937
ATKINS
VICINITY MAP
1" = 1000'
CONTRACT SHEET
1 OF 12
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
\ 0
ene C
App
D
Pe
es
D
R0
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
D D
DC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DES
G\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO. P —2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
G-1
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
E\GI\EEI\G DIVISIO\
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: AS NOTED
WOODCOFT CRCLE STHAV STA3 L ZAT O\
COVER
SHEET NO.
1 °F 12

CONTRACT SHEET
2 OF 12
EXISTING FEATURES
♦
+737.6
SS
CONTROL POINT - REBAR & CAP
SPOT ELEVATION
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
WATER ELEVATION
SEWER fvANHOLE
SEWER LINE
INDEX TO CONTRACT DRAWINGS:
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
G-1 COVED
G-2 DRAWING INDEX, SHEET INDEX NAP, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
G-3 GENERAL NOTES, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (E&S)
NOTES AND SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
C-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C-2 DEMOLITION PLAN AND E&S PHASE 1
C-3 SITE, GRADING PLAN AND PROFILE, AND E&S PHASE 2
C-4 CROSS SECTIONS
C-5 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C-6 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
C-7 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PROPOSED FEATURES
TP
LOD
SF
///
0
X
TEMPORARY SILT CHECK DAN
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTPANCE (COG STD 4368)
TPEE PPOTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTUPBANCE
SILT FENCE (COG STD 216)
ITEM TO BE PEMOVED
TPEE TO BE PEN OVED AS NEEDED
TPEE PEMOVAL
J-HOOK
ATKINS
ABANDONED
ASBESTOS CEN ENT
ASPHALT
BACK OF CURB
BACKFLOW PPEVENTEP
BASE LINE
BASEN ENT
BEARING
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
BOTTOM
CENTER LINE
CENTEP TO CENTEP
CITY OF GREENSBORO
CLEANOUT
CLEAR
CONCPETE
CONTROL DENSITY FILL
COP PUGATED METAL PIPE
CROSS SECTION
CUPB INLET
DEED BOOK
DEN OLITION
DETAIL
DIAN ETEP
DRAIN
DUCTILE IPON
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
EASEMENT
EAC H
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ELECTPIC (AL)
ELEVATION
ENGINEEP
EXISTING
FIBEPGLASS PEINFOPCED
POLYN ER MORTAR
FOPCE MAIN
FOUNDATION
GPEENSBOPO DEPT. OF
TRANSPORTATION
GPAD (E) (ING)
GROUND
HEADWALL
HORIZONTAL
INSIDE DIANETEP
INVERT
IPON PIPE
LINEAR
LINEAP FOOT
MANHOLE
MAXIMUM
MECHANICAL JOINT
MINIMUM
LOCATION MAP
1"=800'
ABBREVIATIONS
ABAND
AC
ASPH
BC
BFP
BL
BSMT
BRG
SNP
BOT
CL
C/C
COG
CO
CLP
CONC
CDF
CMP
X SECT
CI
D.B.
CEMO
DET
DIA
DP
DI
E&S
ESMT
EA
EP
ELEC
EL
ENGP
EX, EXIST
FRPM
FM
FND
GDOT
GP
GND
HDWL
HORIZ
ID
INV
IP
LIN
LF
NH
NAX
NJ
NIN
MONUMENT
NUN BER
OUTSIDE DIAMETEP
OVERFLOW
PAGE
PK NAIL
PLACES
PLAT BOOK
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
POUNDS PH SQUAPE INCH
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
PPOPEPTY LINE
PIEDMONT TRIAD AIRPORT AUTHORITY
QUANTITY
PEINFOPCE (D) (ING) (VENT)
REINFORCED CONCRETE
PEINFOPCED CONCPETE PIPE
REQUIRED
PESTPAINED JOINT PIPE
RIGHT OF WAY
SANITAPY
SEWER
SOIL BOPINGS
SQUARE FOOT
SQUAPE YAPD
STANDARD
STAINLESS STEEL
STATION
STONE
STORM
TAX MAP NUMBED
TELEPHONE
TEMPORARY BENCH MAPK
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEN
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TPAP
TEST BORING-XX (E.G. TB-1)
THICKNESS
TO BE ABANDONED
TO BE PEN OVED
TREE
TYPICAL
UNDERGROUND
UNLESS OTHEPWISE NOTED
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
VALVE BOX
VERTICAL
VITPIFIED CLAY PIPE
WATER MAIN
WATEP DECLAMATION FACILITY
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
MON
OD
OF
PG
PK
NO
PLCS
P.B.
PVC
PPSI
PS CONC
PL
PTAA
QTY
PEINF
RCONC
PCP
REQD
PJP
R/W
SAN
SWR
BODE
SQ FT
SQ YD
STD
SST
STA
STN
STM
TM N
TELE
TBM
ENT TCE
TST
TB-XX
THK
TBA
TBP
T
TYP
UND
UON
UT
VB
VERT
VCP
WM
WPF
WSE
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
D
Pe
es
D
R0
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
D D
DC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DDS
G\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P — 2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
E\GI\EEI\G DIVISIO\
G— 2
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: AS NOTED
WOODCOFT CRCLE STHAV STA3 L ZAT O\
DRAWING INDEX, LOCATION MAP, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
SHEET NO.
2 OF 12

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CONTRACT SHEET
3 OF 12
PPOJECT DESCPIPTION
THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT IS TO CONSTRUCT STREAM BANK STABILIZATION MEASURES ALONG PORTIONS OF REDDICKS CREEK.
STABILIZATION WILL OCCUP ALONG THE EXISTING STPEAM GENEPALLY PAPALLELING TPAILWOOD POAD FPON APPPDXIMATELY 144
LINEAR FEET NORTH OF WOODCROFT TO APPROXIMATELY 267 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF WOODCROFT. IN ADDITION TO THESE NOTES,
ALL PPOVISIONS OF THE NOPTH CAPOLINA EPOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTPOL PEGULATIONS SHALL APPLY TO THIS PPOJECT. THE
TOTAL AREA OF LAND DISTURBANCE FOR THIS PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 0.61 ACRES.
EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION
THE SITE HAS VEGETATIVE COVER OF GPASSLAND AND WOODS. THE STPEAM SERVES AS THE PPINCIPAL DPAINAGEWAY FOP THE
SITE. THE SLOPES ARE GENERALLY 4 TO 6% AROUND THE STREAM. THE EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL SLOPES ARE GENERALLY 100
- 200%. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT EPOSION ALONG THE EXISTING STPEAM
ADJACENT PPOPEPTY
LAND USE IN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIAL. REDDICKS CREEK RUNS OFFSITE AND SERVES AS THE OUTLET FOR
PUNOFF DISCHAPGE. SEDIMENT CONTPOL MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO PPEVENT DAMAGE TO PEDDICK CPEEK. APPROXIMATELY
3200 ACRES OF AREA CONTRIBUTES RUNOFF TO THE CONSTRUCTION AREA.
OFF -SITE AREAS
NO OFF -SITE LAND DISTUPBING ACTIVITIES APE CUPPENTLY PLANNED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PPOJECT. IF THE NEED FOP
OFF -SITE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTAL E&S PLAN
COVERING THIS ACTIVITY FOP APPROVAL BY THE PLAN APPPOVING AUTHOPITY. ANY SOIL MATERIAL HAULED TO OP FROM THE SITE
MUST BE TO A PERMITTED SITE.
SOILS
ACCOPDING TO THE NATURAL PESOUPCES CONSEPVATION SERVICE (NPCS) WEB SOIL SUPVEY, TWO SOILS OCCUR WITHIN THE
PPOJECT APEA. THESE SOILS CONSIST OF ENON CLAY LOAM (EoD2) WHICH IS A WELL DPAINED SOIL ON NAP POW SIDE SLOPES ON
UPLANDS AND CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM (Ch) WHICH IS POORLY DRAINED SOIL IN LONG, FLAT AREAS PARALLEL TO THE MAJOR
STPEAMS ON THE FLOOD PLANS.
CPITICAL APEAS
THE AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO WATERWAYS ARE CONSIDERED CRITICAL. DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT
POSSIBLE AND EXTPA CAPE SHALL BE TAKEN IN INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING THE SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTPOLS.
PLANNED EPOSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTPOL PRACTICES
THE CITY SHALL ORGANIZE AN ON -SITE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBING PERMIT 48 HOURS
PPIOP TO THE STAPT OF ANY LAND DISTUPBING ACTIVITY. THE CERTIFIED PESPONSIBLE LAND DISTUPBEP (CPLD) MUST ATTEND THE
PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
THE UNITS OF DISTURBANCE MUST BE FLAGGED IN THE FIELD WITH OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY FENCE AND SUPER SILT FENCE WITH
OPANGE FABPIC PPIOP TO ISSUANCE OF LAND DISTUPBANCE PERMIT. FLAG ALL TPEES LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WHICH WILL REMAIN.
THE FOLLOWING ARE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE APPLIED.
1. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT -- PRACTICE 6.06
A TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED NEAR THE SOUTH-EAST CORNER OF THE SITE. DURING WET
WEATHER IT MAY BE NECESSAPY TO WASH VEHICLE TIRES AT THIS LOCATION. THE ENTPANCE WILL BE GPADED SO THAT PUNOFF
WATER WILL BE DIRECTED TO AN INLET PROTECTION STRUCTURE AND AWAY FROM THE RUNOFF TO THE STREAM. SEE
CONSTPUCTION DETAILS SHEET FOP SPECIFICATIONS.
2. T
PEE
PESE
PVATION AND P
POTECTION -- P
PACTICE 6.05
A MINIMUM 2.0 FT HIGH PPOTECTIVE FENCE WILL BE ERECTED APOUND TPEES AT THE DPIPLINE TO PPEVENT DAMAGE DU
CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT FENCE MATERIALS MAY BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE. SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SHEET FOR
SPECIFICATIONS.
3. SEDIN
ENT FENCE -- P
PACTICE 6.62
PING
A SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE CONSTPUCTED APOUND THE TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AND ALONG THE CHANNEL BERM ADJACENT TO THE
DEEP CUT AREA AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE CHANNELS. SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SHEET FOR
SPECIFICATION.
4. TEN
PO
PA
PY SEEDING -- P
PACTICE 6.10
PPOTECTIVE COVED MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL GPADED SLOPES AND FILLS WITHIN 21 DAYS AFTEP A PHASE OF GPADING IS
COMPLETED. TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING ARE THE MOST COMMON METHODS USED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. ANNUAL
PLANTS THAT APE ADAPTED TO SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT SHOUT AND GPOW PAPIDLY SHOULD BE USED FOP TEN POPAPY
PLANTINGS. PROPER SEEDBED PREPARATION AND THE USE OF QUALITY SEED ARE ALSO INPORTANT.
5. PERM
ANENT SEEDING -- PRACTICE 6.11
PERM
WATE
VOLU
ANENT VEGETATION CONTROLS EROSION BY PHYSICALLY PROTECTING A BARE SOIL SURFACE FROM RAINDROP IMPACT, FLOWING
P, AND WIND. VEGETATION BINDS SOIL PAPTICLES TOGETHER WITH A DENSE POOT SYSTEM, AND DEDUCES THE VELOCITY AND
E OF OVERLAND FLOW. IT IS THE PREFERRED METHOD OF SURFACE STABILIZATION WHEREVER SITE CONDITIONS PERMIT.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS.
2. FLAG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND MAP ANY TPEES AND BUFFER APEA FOP PPOTECTION.
3. HOLD AN ON -SITE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. CITY OFFICIALS
THE ENGINEER, AND CEPTIFIED PESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER MUST ATTEND. APPPOP PIATE OFFICIALS MUST DECEIVE 48 HOU
NOTICE PRIOR TO SCHEDULING.
4. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTPANCE AT THE TINE OF THE PPE-CONSTPUCTION MEETING. INSTALL REMAINING SEDIMENT
CONTPOL MEASURES (SILT FENCE, SILT CHECK DAN, PUN AROUND, DIVERSION PUN P, AND TREE PROTECTION). COMPLETE
SITE CLEARING AS SHOWN ON DEN OLITION AND E&S PLAN.
5. CLEAP WASTE DISPOSAL APEA, ONLY AS NEEDED.
6. COMPLETE STREAM BANK STABILIZATION MEASURES.
7. COMPLETE FINAL GPADING OF GPOUNDS, TOPSOIL CRITICAL APEAS, AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE, LANDSCAPE, AND MULCH.
8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS.
NEEDED PEPAIPS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
9. AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON
THE DISTUPBED APEAS.
10. ESTIMATED TINE BEFORE FINAL STABILIZATION-9 MONTHS.
PERMANENT STABILIZATION
ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE P
PLANS AND DETAILS.
POJECT A
PEA AND ST
PEAK
SHALL BE PLANTED AND
PESTO
PED IN ACCO
PDANCE WITH THE
EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER TO PROTECT THE SLOPES FROM EROSION AND
ALLOW THE SEED TO GERMINATE PDOPEPLY. BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCOPDANCE WITH THE DETAILS AND THE
MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.
SEEDED AREAS WHICH DO NOT CERN
AND TAKING THE NECESSAPY CO
MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED.
INATE OR WHICH DIE SHALL BE RESEEDED AFTER DETERMINING THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM
PECTIVE ACTION. AFTEP ADEQUATE STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED, ALL TENPOPAPY E&S
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. THE CEPTIFIED PESPONSIBLE LAND DISTUPBEP (CPLD) SHALL BE PESPONSIBLE FOP THE MAINTENANCE AND PEPAIP OF ALL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES. IN GENERAL, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE
CHECKED FOP STABILITY AND OPEPATION FOLLOWING EVEPY PUNOFF-PPODUCING PAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE
EVERY WEEK ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. TREE PROTECTION AND ROOT PROTECTION N
WHICH COULD PESULT IN DAMAGE TO P
ATTING SHALL BE CHECKED FOR EROSION, UNDERMINING, OR OTHER DEFICIENCIES N
POTECTED TPEES AND POOT SYSTEMS FPON CONSTPUCTION ACTIVITY.
3. SEDIMENT WILL BE PEN OVED FPON BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5 FT DEEP AT THE FENCE.
SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. SILT FENCE SHALL ALSO BE CHECKED FOR
UNDEPNINING, 'END PUNS' AND FABPIC INTEGPITY.
4. ALL SEEDED APEAS WILL BE FEPTILIZED, PESEEDED AS NECESSAPY, AND MULCHED ACCO
VEGETATIVE PLAN TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER.
PDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES (GUILFORD COUNTY, NC)
1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED INITIALLY AFTER THE GRADING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND PRIOR TO
CLEAPING AND GPUBBING. EPOSION CONTPOL STAFF WILL CHECK THESE DEVICES FOP PPOPEP INSTALLATION AND CON
WITH THE APPROVED PLAN. A DEVICE RELEASE IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CONNERCIAL BUILDING PERM
2. DURING DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE, THE PERSON FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAND -DISTURBING SHALL INSTALL AND
MAINTAIN ALL TEN POPAPY AND PEPMANENT EPOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTPOL MEASUPES AS PEQUIPED BY THE APPPOVED
PLAN OR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE GUILFORD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND APPLICABLE TOWN ORDINANCES.
ADDITIONAL DEVICES NAY BE PEQUIPED BY THE EPOSION CONTPOL INSPECTOP IF NECESSAPY.
3. IF FILL MATEPIALS APE BEING BROUGHT ONTO THIS PPOPEPTY OP IF WASTE MATEPIALS APE TAKEN FPOM THIS PPOJECT, THIS
INFORMATION MUST BE DISCLOSED AND SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN. BORROW AREAS AND DUMP
SITES APE CONSIDEPED TO BE PAPT OF THIS PLAN.
4. UNDEP THE GUILFOPD COUNTY SOIL EPOSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTPOL OPDINANCE (AND APPLICABLE TOWN OPDINANCES);
AGENTS, OFFICIALS, OR OTHER QUALIFIED PERSONS ARE AUTHORIZED TO PERIODICALLY INSPECT THE SITES OF
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. OBSTRUCTING, HANPERING, OR INTERFERING WITH SUCH INSPECTIONS CARRIES UP TO A $5000
PEP DAY CIVIL PENALTY. THE INSTIGATION OF THIS CIVIL PENALTY PEQUIPES NO PPIOP NOTICE.
5. IN AN EFFOPT TO MINIMIZE EPOSION AND EXPOSUPE TINE, EASEMENT APEAS SHALL NOT BE GPUBBED OP GPADED UNTIL
UTILITIES ARE READY TO BE INSTALLED. ALSO, THE IN MEDIATE SEEDING OF THE DISTURBED OF THE DISTURBED EASEMENT
APEAS AFTEP UTILITIES APE INSTALLED WILL ELIMINATE MANY PPOBLEMS. EASEMENT APEAS WHICH CPOSS OP APE ADJACENT
TO WATERCOURSES SHOULD RECEIVE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION.
6. NO LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL BE PERMITTED IN PROXIMITY TO A LAKE OR NATURAL WATERCOURSE UNLESS A BUFFER
ZONE IS PPOVIDED ALONG THE MAPGIN OF THE WATEP BODY OF SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO CONFINE VISIBLE SILTATION WITHIN THE
FIRST 25% OF THE BUFFER NEAREST THE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
7. SIDE DITCHES 2% OR STEEPER SHALL BE RIP -RAPPED; OR SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EXCELSIOR MATTING (OR OTHER
APPPOVED NATEPIAL); OP STABILIZED BY ANY OTHEP METHOD APPPOVED BY THE COUNTY SOIL EPOSION CONTPOL NSPECTO
P
8. IF A PEPMANENT POND IS USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTPOL DEVICE OP IS DESIGNATED AS A PEPMANENT WATER QUALITY POND,
IT MUST BE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT WHEN HALF FULL. IT MUST ALSO BE CLEANED OUT TO DESIGN VOLUME; ENGINEERING
CEPTIFICATION OF CON PLETION SUBMITTED AND FINAL INSPECTION PEPFOPNED BY COUNTY STAFF BEFOPE THE GPADING
PERMIT IS FINALIZED.
9. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DISTURBING 1 OR MORE ACRES WILL NEED TO CONCPETE AN E-NO1 TO OBTAIN COVERAGE UNDER
THE NCGO1 (AVAILABLE AT DEQ.NC.GOV/NCG01) UPON COUNTY'S APPPOVAL OF EPOSION CONTPOL PLAN AS PEQUIPED BY THE
FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT. WITHIN 24 TO 48 BUSINESS HOURS OF DEMLR RECEIVING PAYMENT WITH E-NO1 FORM, THE
APPLICANT WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL WITH THE CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE (COC) ATTACHED. SECTION B OF THIS PERMIT
PEQUIPES THE FINANCIALLY PESPONSIBLE OWNEP(S) TO PEPIODICALLY INSPECT ALL SEDIMENT AND EPOSION CONTPOL DEVICES
AND TO KEEP A RECORD OF THESE INSPECTIONS. FURTHERMORE, THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENEPGY, NINEPAL, AND LAND PESOUPCES (DEMLP) PEQUIPES THE FINANCIALLY PESPONSIBLE OWNEP(S) TO
SELF -INSPECT THE SITE AT VARIOUS PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT. THESE PHASES ARE OUTLINED ON THE CON BINED
SELF-NONITOPING, AND INSPECTION FOPN
10. THE ANGLE FOP GPADED SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GPEATEP THAN THE ANGLE THAT CAN PETAIN VEGETATION COVEP
OR OTHER ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. THE NPDES PERMIT REQUIRES THAT PERINETER SLOPES,
BEPMS, SWALES, DITCHES, SLOPES STEEPEP THAN 3:1, AND APEAS WITHIN HIGH WATEP QUALITY (HQW) ZONES TO BE SEEDED
WITHIN 7 DAYS. SLOPES LESS THAN 10 FEET IN LENGTH AND ALL OTHER AREAS MUST BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER
FINAL GPADE IS ESTABLISHED.
11. THE OWNER(S) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERN
COVEP MUST BE MAINTAINED TO A DEGPEE THAT P
MAINTENANCE OF THE GROUND COVER ON THE PROPERTY. GROUND
PEVENTS SOIL EPOSION AND SEDIMENTATION AT ALL TIMES.
12. ACCEPTANCE AND APPPOVAL OF THIS PLAN IS CONDITIONED UPON THE PPOPEPTY OWNEP(S) COMPLIANCE WITH FEDEPAL AND
STATE WATER QUALITY LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND RULES. IN ADDITION, LOCAL TOWN OR COUNTY ORDINANCES OR RULES NAY
ALSO APPLY TO THIS LAND-DISTUPBING ACTIVITY. THIS APPPOVAL DOES NOT SUPEPSEDE ANY OTHEP PEPMIT OP APPPOVAL.
13. NO TEN POPAPY EPOSION CONTPOL EASUPE(S) NAY BE PEN OVED WITHOUT APPPOVAL FPON THE SITE EPOSION CONTPOL
INSPECTOR. DEVICES REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE INSPECTOR MAY RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS INCLUDING
DEVICES BEING PEPLACED TO APPPOVED PLAN SPECIFICATIONS.
ATKINS
1. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL BE PESPONSIBLE FOP ADHEPING TO ALL PEQUIPEN
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS," UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY.
ENTS SET FO
PTH IN THE CITY'S "STANDA
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE CON PLETION OF
THE INTENDED IMP POVENENTS, SHOWN ON THESE DPAWINGS, OP DESIGNATED TO BE PPOVIDED, INSTALLED, OP
CONSTRUCTED, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE.
3. THE HOU PS OF CONSTPUCTION SHALL BE LIMITED TO THOSE DEFINED IN THE CITY'S 0
OF THESE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER.
PDINANCES. ANY HOU
PD
PS OUTSIDE
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCEPTANCE AND CONTROL OF ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE
FLOWS INCLUDING STOPM FLOWS IN AND ENTEPING THE CHANNEL. THE CONTPACTOP IS PESPONSIBLE FOP DEWATEPING AS
NECESSARY TO PERFORM WORK IN DRY CONDITIONS. DEWATERING METHODS SHALL BE SHOWN ON A WATER CONTROL PLAN
TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTPACTOP TO THE CITY PPOJECT NANAGEP FOP PEVIEW PPIOP TO CONSTPUCTION. THE
DEWATERING PLAN MUST PREVENT NUISANCE CONDITIONS AND EROSION.
5. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCIDENTAL TO THE WATER CONTROL & DEWATERING PAY ITEM
EASUPED OP PAID FOP SEPAPATELY: ALL LABOP, MATEPIALS, AND EQUIPMENT TINE NECESSA
REMOVE ANY WATER CONTROL AND DEWATERING WORK.
AND SHALL NOT BE
PY TO INSTALL, MAINTAIN AND
THE 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, AS SHOWN
ON THESE PLANS IS NOT TO BE PELTED UPON AS BEING EXACT OP CONCPETE. PPIOP TO CONSTPUCTION, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PERTINENT LOCATIONS, SIZES, MATERIALS AND ELEVATIONS, ESPECIALLY AT CONNECTION POINTS
AND AT POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICTS.
7. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL COOPDINATE AND COOPEPATE WITH THE CITY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED WITH
REGARD TO RELOCATIONS OR ADJUSTMENTS OF EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND TO ASSURE THAT THE
WOPK IS ACCOMPLISHED IN A TIMELY FASHION AND WITH A MININUN DISPUPTION OF SEPVICE. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL PARTIES AFFECTED BY ANY DISRUPTION OF ANY UTILITY SERVICE. ANY UTILITIES
DAMAGED BY CONTPACTOP SHALL BE PEPAIPED BY CONTPACTOP TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UTILITY OWNEP.
8. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL HAVE ONE (1) SIGNED COPY OF THE APPPOVED PLANS, ONE (1) COPY OF THE APPPOP PIATE
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND A COPY OF ANY PERMITS AND EXTENSION AGREEMENTS NEEDED FOR THE JOB,
ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES.
PLIANCE 9. IF DUPING THE CONSTPUCTION PPOCESS, CONDITIONS APE ENCOUNTEPED WHICH COULD INDICATE A SITUATION THAT IS
IT. NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR
TO CONDUCTING WOPK.
10. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL NOT DEVIATE FPOM THE PLANS WITHOUT FIPST OBTAINING WPITTEN APPPOVAL FPOM THE CITY
PROJECT MANAGER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER
IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVEPY OF ANY EPPOPS OP INCONSISTENCIES.
11. THE CONT
PACTO
P
SHALL BE
PESPONSIBLE FO
P
PEC0
PDING AS -BUILT
INFOPMATION ON A SET OF
KEPT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, AND AVAILABLE TO THE CITY PROJECT MANAGER AT ALL TINES.
PEC0
PD DPAWINGS
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A RECORD OF CONSTRUCTION THAT, AS A MINIMUM, SHALL INCLUDE: DAILY ACTIVITY
AND PPOGPESS PEPOPTS; ALL TEST PESULTS PEPTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION; PHOTOGPAPHS SUFFICIENT TO PPOVIDE A
RECORD OF FOUNDATION CONDITIONS AND VARIOUS STAGES OF THE CONSTRUCTION THROUGH COMPLETION; ALL GEOLOGIC
INFOPMATION OBTAINED; AND CONSTRUCTION PPOBLEMS AND PEMEDIES.
13. ALL PEN OVED ITEMS SHALL BECOME THE CONTPACTOP'S PPOPEPTY TO BE DISPOSED OF IN AN APPPOVED NANNEP IN
ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION BY THE OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE OWNERS, UNLESS SPECIFIED WITHIN
THE PLANS. NO CONCPETE OP PUBBLE SHALL BE BACKFILLED ONSITE.
14. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL BE PESPONSIBLE FOP THE CLEANUP ON A DAILY BASIS OF ANY T
OR ADJACENT STREETS AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION.
PASH 0
P MUD ON THE SITE
15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL REMAIN WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARY DEFINED IN THE PLANS UNLESS
OTHEPWISE NOTED. THE CONTPACTOP SHALL PESTOPE ACCESS APEAS, TO THEIP OPIGINAL GPADES AND PPE-DISTUPBANCE
STATE OF VEGETATION. THE COST TO RESTORE THESE AREAS SHALL NOT BE MEASURED AND PAID FOR SEPARATELY BUT
SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WOPK.
16. SUPVEYING CONTPOL WAS COMPLETED BY THE CH ENGINEEPING IN FEB
RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND STAKING.
PUA
PY 2020. THE CONT
PACTO
P SHALL BE
17. DIMENSIONS FOR LAYOUT AND CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT TO BE SCALED FROM ANY DRAWING. IF PERTINENT DIMENSIONS
APE NOT SHOWN, CONTACT THE CITY PPOJECT NANAGEP FOP CLAPIFICATION, AND ANNOTATE THE DIN ENSION ON THE
AS -BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS.
18. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE LABELED IN THE NAVD 1988 DATUM. ALL SLOPES ARE SHOWN AS
DIAGPAMNATIC AND SHALL BE POUNDED AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM, WHICH PPOVIDE POSITIVE DPAINAGE.
19. ACCESS MUST BE MAINTAINED FOP ALL SEWEP MANHOLES DUPING CONSTPUCTION. ANY DESIGN CHANGES TO NEW 0
EXISTING PUBLIC STORM OR SANITARY SEWER MUST INCLUDE PERMANENT ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC STORM AND SANITARY
SEWEP MANHOLES AND COULD PEQUIPE POLL-OVEP CUPB, CON MEPCIAL DPIVE, PEINFOPCED CONCPETE SIDEWALK, PITTE
PINGS OP CONCPETE PAD. MINIMUM ACCESS TO EACH MANHOLE IS A 20' WIDE LANE FPOM THE NEAPEST PUBLIC PIGHT
OF WAY, CENTERED AT THE MANHOLE INCLUDING A 10' RADIUS AROUND THE MANHOLE AND 22.0' VERTICAL CLEARANCE.
20. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONNEL, ALL SITE VISITORS, AND THE GENERAL
PUBLIC WHO NAY BE AFFECTED BY THE CONSTPUCTION. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT UNITED TO EXCAVATION, SHOPING,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, FLAGGING, AND SECURITY.
P
P
21. CONTRACTOR TO RESET ALL EXISTING SIGNAGE INPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF THE LOCATION OF THE SIGNS ARE
NEEDED TO BE PELOCATED THE CONTPACTOP WILL VEPIFY WITH THE CITY THE LOCATION THAT THE SIGN SHOULD BE
MOVED T0.
22. ANY DEVIATIONS OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS IDENTIFIED IN THESE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR
IS TO NOTIFY THE CITY AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE PPIOP TO WOPK. IF WOPK DOES OCCUP WITHOUT PPOPEP
AUTHORIZATION THEN ANY REPAIRS OR MODIFICATIONS TO RETURN IT BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE WILL BE AT THE
CONTPACTOPS EXPENSE.
23. CONT
COMfvENC
PACTOP TO COOPDINATE WITH THE CITY ALL
EN
ENT OF CONSTRUCTION.
PEQUI
PED STAGING AND LAYDOWN A
PEAS P
POP TO THE
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
\0
e\e c
A0 C
D
Pe
es
D
GRO
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
D D
DC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DDS
\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P - 2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
G- 3
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
E\GI\\G DI VISIO\
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: N/A
WOODCOFT CRCLE STEAV STA3 L ZAT O\
GENERAL NOTES, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (E&S) NOTES
AND SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
SHEET NO.
3 OF 12

PARCEL NO. 157034
PIN 7831562232
JERRY W. THOMPSON
DB 7987 PG 2591
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4803 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
/
PARCEL NO. 157035
PIN 7831562029
AMANDA N. LOWE & ROY D. LOWE
DB 7240 PG 2962
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4805 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
16.4 Nik
11111
4 iitik
1
f
•
/
/
PARCEL NO. 157036
PIN 7831552935
EUGENE H. MYRICK & PAMELA S. MYRICK
DB 2726 PG 567
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4807 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
•
/
:411I
A•avt•
/
/
/
/
/
COL POINT -
3A
& CAP
NC NC GRID (NAD83/NSS2007)
NORTH = 816,172.7578'
EAST = 1,735,420.1588'
NAVD '88 ELEV = 742.28'
CON/ 3INED FACTOR = 0.999924657
SEE NOTE NO. 4
11
'\ \ \\ `� �� �\
I \ \\\\
\1\ /
\\'\ II /
\ \ /
\\
\\ \ \ `�
di \
\\\ _`\\\\
� ,\
/ \ \�\ 1\ I \)�
i \ `�\\\ I /I \
— 1 \ I
\\�' //
/ \ \\. /
---APPR MATE DIRECTION \ \ -
\',INVEfRT--_737 \---\ .
, Ic` :,\ _f;__ HAINLINK F`E CE X
:---1—,,:7_,
ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
20 40 60
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
sse4
N --
4
VISIBLE BEDROCK
IN CREEK BED
TBM — SPIKE SET IN 20" SYCAMORE
NAVD '88 ELEV = 743.04' in
—
PIER
// / /��\
—/ // '/ `\
• yC I LINK FENCE
/
/
a
PARCEL NO. 157038
PIN 7831564073
DAVID S. LAMBETH & KATHLEEN K. LAMBETH
DB 7975 PG 1080
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4902 WOODCROFT CIRCLE
REVISIONS
x
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS —BUILT
AUTH. DATE
CONVENTIONAL SURVEY NOTES:
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
THIS MAP REPRESENTS A CONVENTIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF AN EXISTING STREAM AND STREAM CROSS
SECTIONS. OTHER SURFACE OR SUB —SURFACE FEATURES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN.
PROPERTY LINES AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM THE GUILFORD COUNTY GIS. NO
ACTUAL SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED TO ILLUSTRATE THESE LINES, THEREFORE THESE LINES ARE SHOWN FOR
REFERENCE ONLY.
NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN WERE DERIVED BY USING THE NC RTK NETWORK USING A TOPCON HIPER II
DUAL FREQUENCY GPS UNIT. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NC GRID (NAD83/NSRS2007) AND THE COORDINATES AS
SHOWN ARE EXPRESSED IN US SURVEY FEET. HORIZONTAL COORDINATE VALUES HAVE A POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF
0.06 FEET. THE COORDINATES AS SHOWN WERE LOCALIZED OR SCALED AROUND GPS NO. 2 N=816,172.7578'
E=1,735,420.1587' NAVD (88) ELEVATION = 742.28' COMBINED FACTOR = 0.999924657. TIES WERE MADE TO
PUBLISHED GEODETIC MARKS AS SHOWN TO VERIFY ACCURACY.
SURVEY PROVIDED BY CH ENGINEERING AND PERFORMED ON FEBRUARY 2020.
PARCEL NO. 157039
PIN 7831556932
SHEILA D. NORWOOD
DB 5763 PG 1257
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4900 WOODCROFT CIRCLE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P — 2021-0020
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
CHECKED BY XXX
SCALE: AS NOTED
.
CONTRACT SHEET
OF 12
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
111101
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
LEGEND:
♦ CONTROL POINT — REBAR & CAP
SEWER MANHOLE
+ SPOT ELEVATION
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
+ 737.6 WATER ELEVATION
FLOW ARROW
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
SHEET NO.
OF 12

PARCEL NO. 157034
PIN 7831562232
JERRY W. THOMPSON
DB 7987 PG 2591
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4803 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
PARCEL NO. 157035
PIN 7831562029
AMANDA N. LOWE & ROY D. LOWE
DB 7240 PG 2962
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4805 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
PARCEL NO. 157036
PIN 7831552935
EUGENE H. MYRICK & PAMELA S. MYRICK
DB 2726 PG 567
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4807 TRAILWOOD DRIVE
SILT FENCE
ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
20 40 60
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
■ RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
--CHAIN LINK
FENCE -TO BE
RELOCATED
REVISIONS
CONT
COL POINT -
NC NC CRID (NAD83/NSS2007)
NORTH = 816,172.7578'
EAST = 1,735,420.1588'
NAVD '88 ELEV = 742.28'
COIV 3INED FACTO = 0.999924657
SEE NOTE NO. 4
TREE REMOVAL AND PROTECTION
WILL NEED TO OCCUR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND APPROVED
BY THE CITY
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
viniLL utL)ROCK
IN CREEK BED
\REMOVE,
B.- K PATH'
PARCEL NO. 157038
PIN 7831564073
DAVID S. LAMBETH & KATHLEEN K. LAMBETH
DB 7975 PG 1080
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4902 WOODCROFT CIRCLE
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
WOODCROFT CIRCLE
AS —BUILT
NOTES:
1. ELEMENTS TO BE DEMOLISHED OR REMOVED SHOWN DARKENED. STRUCTURE REMOVALS TO BE COORDINATED WITH
OWNER.
LIMITS OF SURVEY DO NOT EXTEND TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL TREE DEMOLITION MAY BE NECESSARY FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. TREE REMOVALS TO BE IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF
GREENSBORO PRIOR TO REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. DUE TO LIMITED SURVEY THE EXTENT OF TREE REMOVAL MAY NOT BE
ACCURATELY DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY AND ACCOUNT FOR THE
NEEDED TREE REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR TREE REMOVAL.
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD ADJUST THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/HAUL ROAD TO MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE
AND PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL. PROJECT ACCESS SHOWN ON SHEET
C-3.
EXISTING THALWEG
SILT FENCE
sF,�<oo
b.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
AUTH. DATE
TEMPORARY
SILT CHECK DAM
PARCEL NO. 157039
PIN 7831556932
SHEILA D. NORWOOD
DB 5763 PG 1257
PB 51 PG 81
ADDR: 4900 WOODCROFT CIRCLE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO. P—2021-002a
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
CHECKED BY XXX
SCALE: AS NOTED
LEGEND:
TEMPORARY SILT CHECK DAM
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
ITEM TO BE REMOVED
TREE TO BE REMOVED AS NEEDED
TREE REMOVAL
CONTRACT SHEET
OF 12
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
DEMOLITION PLAN AND E&S PHASE 1
SHEET NO.

0•
011
LEGEND:
W
ACCESS ROAD
PROPERTY LINE
WETLANDS BOUNDARY
PROJECT AREA
1o1s:
1
/
•
ACCESS DRIVEWAY
i
1
4*444444
Oftlit
\/iiil,r
►►
WETLAND
ono
•
WETLANDS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACI\VITIES.
ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
1
•
6
t
1
CONTRACTOR TO AVOID ENTERING OR
DISTURBING EXISTING WETLANDS. IF THE
_CONTRACTOR DAMAGES ANY WETLANDS THEY
WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WETLAND
REPAIRS WITH NO COSTS TO THE CITY OR
ENGINEER.
REVISIONS
-WETLAND
•
-WETLAND
WETLAND
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
4,0"
v*-
•
DEFINITION: GRAVELED AREA TO BE LOCATED AT POINTS WHERE VEHICLES ENTER AND LEAVE A CONSTRUCTION SITE.
PURPOSE' TO PROVIDE A BUFFER AREA WHERE VEHICLES CAN DROP THEIR MUD AND SEDIMENT TO AVOID TRANSPORTING IT ONTO PUBLIC
ROADS, TO CONTROL EROSION FROM SURFACE RUNOFF, AND TO HELP CONTROL DUST.
CONDITIONS' TO BE USED WHEREVER TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD OR
OTHER PAVED OFF -SITE AREA. CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHOULD LIMIT TRAFFIC TO PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED ENTRANCES.
DESIGN
CRITERIA.' AGGREGATE SIZE - USE "CLASS A" STONE WITH 6E0-TEXTILE LINER.
•
DIMENSIONS OF GRAVEL PAO - THICKNESS = 8" MINIMUM
WIDTH = 12' MINIMUM OF FULL WIDTH AT ALL POINTS OF THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE
AND EXIT AREA, WHICHEVER IS GREATER
LENGTH = 25' MINIMUM WITH GEO-TEXTILE LINER
LOCATION = LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND EXITS TO LIMIT SEDIMENT FROM
LEAVING THE SITE AND TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY ALL CONSTRUC-
TION VEHICLES. AVOID STEEP GRADES AND ENTRANCES AT CURVES IN PUBLIC
SITE CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE VARIATIONS FROM THESE DESIGN CRITERIA. VARIATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED OR APPROVED
BY THE APPROPRIATE CITY EROSION CONTROL AUTHORITY.
og
iony. as
flees :11009440
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
IN ADDI T ION THIS TEMPORARY GRA VEL ENTRANCE WILL REDUCE MPA C T OF TREE T FLUSHING FEE
EFFECTIVE JUL Y 1, 1997 . CI TY OF GREENSBORO ORDINANCE SECT . 26-27, "S TREE T FLUSHING FEES ".
CITY OF GREENSBORO
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
(RESIDENTIAL SITES)
,40
•
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CON ST. SURVEY BY XXX
CHECKED BY XXX
SCALE: AS NOTED
HE -
436—B
REV.
09/06
03/09
CONTRACT SHEET
OF 12
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
Cliy of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Ob jects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TNOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
PROJECT AREA ACCESS PLAN
SHEET NO.
OF 12

STA:2+24.95
OFF:13.59'L
STA:2+38.44
OFF:0.00'L
STA:2+38.44
OFF:2.75'R
J-HOOK STREAM
STRUCTURE JH-02
REFER TO SHEET C-7
N
P\ �\ OFP:0.87'R
POOL2
STA:1+85.95
OFF:O.
— HPTRM
STA:1 +35.39
OFF:0.00'
STA:1 +54.64
OFF:0.00'
STA:1 +64.44
OFF:0.76'R
STA:1 +67.42
OFF:0.00'
STA:1 +24.62
OFF:8.90'R
HPTRM REFER TO
SHEET C-6
FILL MATERIAL
STA:0+44.26
PROPERTY LINE
WOODCROFT STABILIZATION ALIGNMENT -LINE TABLE
LINE #
LENGTH (FT)
DIRECTION
START POINT
END POINT
L1
74.99
N46° 29' 58.71"W
(1735588.16,815961.86)
(1735533.77,816013.48)
L2
48.15
N88° 52' 28.38"W
(1735500.33,816027.20)
(1735452.19,816028.14)
L3
31.20
N2° 31' 52.54"W
(1735413.02,816066.37)
(1735411.64,816097.54)
WOODCROFT STABILIZATION ALIGNMENT -CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
RADIUS
LENGTH (FT)
CHORD DIRECTION
START POINT
END POINT
C1
5 .00
36.98
N67° 41' 13.55"W
(1735533.77,816013.48)
(1735500.33,816027.20)
02
40. 0
60.28
N45° 42' 10.46"W
(1735452.19,816028.14)
(1735413.02,816066.37)
—
OCCUR
JH-02
REMOVE
AND
r
AND REINSTALL NATIVE
COMPACT TO 90%
MATERIAL
PROCTOR
REMOVE AND REINSTALL NATIVE
COMPACT TO 90%
MATERIAL AND
PROCTOR
—
-
—
—
POOL 2
10:1 SLOPES
JH-01
N
—
—
-
NO WORK TO
REMOVE AND REINSTALL NATIVE
MATERIAL AND COMPACT TO
90% PROCTOR
—
-
N 7rIcv
POOL 1 -
10:1 SLOPES
—
f
uo
co
��
— co
— Q
(n
co
W
IA
u?
+
N
cA
ELEV:735.9C
STA:2+10.5
ELEV:736.4
STA:2+08.4E
ELEV:733.9C
STA:2+01.9E
Si
ti
W
rnrn
(n
M
Lu
W
o+
,
(n
ELEV:736.1 °
STA:1 +67.4.
ELEV:736.3
STA:1+65.4
ELEV:733.8
STA:1 +64.z
ELEV:733.E
STA:1 +54.64
N
i
W
0)
c+
V:735.58
:1+24.62
co
L.6
NO WORK TO OCCUR
0
—
—
r.
,
XISTING GROU
- -.�--�...art :.f_
<
:n_u_u_u_u_u_u_u_u_u_u
w
—
u=a=uu= = =uu=a=u=u=u=a=I�=�_�_I_�_�_�=I=I=ir.�''■,
-u=u=n=u=,
RIRAP
D50: 12"
-non=.q
DIVERSION STONE
_
„ „� ��_��_��_��_��_.-,_.
ii-,�-,�-,-,,-,,
— #57 STONE coo
— IMBRICATED STONE +
+
- 2'W X 4'L X 2'H
in —
ELEV:733.90
RECOMPACTED
NATIVE MATERIAL
DIVERSION STONE
�RECOMPACTED
NATIVE MATERIAL
IMBRICATED STONE
2'W X 4'L X 2'H
#57 STONE
RIRAP
D50: 12"
RECOMPACTED
NATIVE MATERIAL
—
-
—
0
I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
REVISIONS
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS —BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P — 2021-0020
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
CHECKED BY XXX
SCALE: AS NOTED
CONTRACT SHEET
OF 12
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
LEGEND:
SCOUR POOL
J—HOOK IMBRICATED STRUCTURE
HPTRM
FLOW ARROW
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
SITE. GRADING PLAN AND PROFILE, AND E&S PHASE
SHEET NO.

0+00.00
0+80.00
1+60.00
2+40.00
CONTRACT SHEET
OF 12
760
750
740
730
720
NO WORK
THIS CROSS
TO BE DONE
SECTION
AT
EXISTING
GROUND
-30
760
750
740
730
720
-20
-10
0
0+20.00
10
20
30
40
NO WORK
THIS CROSS
TO BE DONE
SECTION
AT
EXISTING
GROUND
-30
760
-20
-10
0
0+40.00
10
20
30
40
NO WORK
THIS
TO BE
CROSS SECTION
DONE AT
----,
\
EXISTING GROUND
40
0+60.00
ET: -17.55
740.75
0
u7
Dti
w
0
ti
c�
r`
LL LLL
O
W
Li_W
0
O
EXISTING
GROUND
40
760 760
750
740
730
750
740
730
720 720
SET: -27.27
L: 740.75
ET: -20.97
. 740.66
o
0
o
c)
IQ
LL
0
w
LL
LL
0
I J
U)
U_
0
Li
W
EXISTING GROUND
-30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
-20
-10
0
1 +00.00
10
20
30
40
ET: -21.04
T: -10.53
•
LL
LL
O
II
_
C
0
J
W
EXISTING
GROUND
-30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
-20
-10
0
1+20.00
10
20
30
40
ET: -17.14
740.71
ET: -8.34
736.17
LPLLJLI
0
OFFS
LiW W
EXISTING
GROUND
- 30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
- 20
- 10
0
1+40.00
10
20
30
40
'SET: -18.08
L: 740.53
0
'Di;
I—
CD
N
cc
SET: 8.69
• 7Qa QQ
SET: 17.71
: 741.45
u
LL
0
W
W
U)
U_W
O
N-
J
Li_
Li_W
0
J
LL
L_
0
W
GROUND
XISTING
- 30
- 20
- 10
ATKINS
0
10
20
REVISIONS
30
40
760 760
750
740
730
750
740
730
720 720
a
a
c
JL 1 . - 1 J. 1 V
_: 741.95
C9
ti
N
N
c\i
r`
o
N-
o
Co
_
;ET: 22.21
741.73
O
w
CO
U_
O
EL: 73
OFFSET:
ti
Li
LL'
OFFSET: 2
EL: 733.
OFFSE
EL: 7:
OFFSET: 1
EL: 737.z
\!
EXISTING GROUND
-30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
-20
-10
0
1+80.00
10
20
30
40
ET: -17.14
740.98
ET: -6.83
736.99
SET: 7.75
: 737.81
N
cd
2
ET: 23.07
741.51
VI
WiW
L
0
Li
OFFS
LiL_
w
oW
—100
OFFSET:
~
j
w
C/)
u
0
_1
in
EXISTING
GROUND
-30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
-20
-10
0
2+00.00
10
20
30
40
ET: -15.47
740.73
ET: -7.61
736.16
:T: -4.25
37.00
•n:n
r�
i000 co
CA
cc
00
Cr5Ll
ao
oN
,ET: 22.06
741.50
VI
Li_
LL
0
Li
W
OFFS
J (%j�W
W LL
LLWWJ
0
J Ul
OW
ti IjN-
U)
u_J
OwW
U,
ILL
C
EL: 7�
OFFSET:
EL: 738
U_J
W
0
W
EXISTING
GROUND
- 30
760 760
750
740
750
740
730 730
720 720
- 20
- 10
0
2+20.00
10
20
30
40
ET: -15.22
740.26
;ET: -11.55
• 7'R qn
!
i
=SET: 7.68
L: 737.71
0)
N
CA
37.75
ET: 17.59
741.45
_
�
O
.. w
WLL
O
W
Li_
0
W
u)
u
O
LiW
LLI
11
� J
W
2'
\
EXISTING
GROUND
- 30
- 20
- 10
0
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS —BUILT
AUTH. DATE
10
20
30
40
760 760
750
740
730
750
740
730
720 720
760
750
740
730
720
760
750
740
730
720
760
750
740
730
720
NO
THIS
WORK TO BE
CROSS SECTION
DONE AT
EXISTING
GROUND
-30
-20
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO. P—2021-002a
-10
0
10
20
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
CROSS SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 10'
VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 10'
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
CHECKED BY XXX
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NO.
°F 12

CONTRACT SHEET
9 OF 12
MIN 2' H: 1' V SLOPE
REFER TO
EMBEDMENT DETAIL
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR (TYP.)
REFER TO SEEDING
DETAIL
TOP OF BANK TIE-IN
PER MANUFACTURER
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR (TYP.)
SCARIFY A MIN. OF 6"
REFER TO NOTE 1
ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS
HPTRM
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR
NOTE:
1. ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED AND PROVIDED BY
THE MANUFACTURER.
2. TRENCHED TIE-IN TO FOLLOW MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS.
PLANTING BENCH WIDTH VARIES
2% SLOPE TOWARDS THE STREAM
MIN 2' H: 1' V SLOP
TOP OF BANK TIE-IN
PER MANUFACTURER
'Rog
®TYPICAL HPTRM BANK STABILIZATION DETAIL
STA: 0+44.26 - 1+24.62
STA: 2+24.95 - 2+38.44
N.T.S.
00
474
47,
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR (TYP.)
REFER TO NOTE 1
ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR
PROPOSED POOL
LOCATION
MIN 2' H: 1' V
SLOPE
1' OF NATIVE BED MATERIAL IN
POOL LOCATIONS
MIN 2' H: 1' V
SLOPE
TOP OF BANK TIE-IN
PER MANUFACTURER
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR (TYP.)
TOP OF BANK TIE-IN
PER MANUFACTURER
3703
��� �,� COMPACT SOIL TO
��fi 95% PROCTOR
SCARIFY A MIN. OF 6"
HPTRM
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR
NOTE:
1. ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED AND PROVIDED BY
THE MANUFACTURER.
2. TRENCHED TIE-IN TO FOLLOW MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS.
©TYPICAL HPTRM DETAIL EXTENDING FROM STREAM BANK TO
STREAM BANK W/ STREAM STRUCTURE
STA: 1+34.81 - 1+67.42
STA: 1+85.94 - 2+10.54
N.T.S.
ATKINS
IN 2' H: 1' V SLOPE
PLANTING BENCH WIDTH VARIES
2% SLOPE TOWARDS THE STREAM
MIN 2' H: 1' V
SLOPE
REFER TO NOTE 1
ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO
EMBEDMENT DETAIL
2'EMBENDMENT
MIN 2' H: 1' V
SLOPE
TOP OF BANK TIE-IN
PER MANUFACTURER
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR (TYP.)
HPTRM
SCARIFY A MIN. OF 6"
COMPACT SOIL TO
95% PROCTOR
NOTE:
1. ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED AND PROVIDED BY
THE MANUFACTURER.
2. TRENCHED TIE-IN TO FOLLOW MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS.
®TYPICAL HPTRM DETAIL EXTENDING FROM STREAM
BANK TO STREAM BANK
STA: 1+24.62 - 1+34.81
STA: 1+67.42 - 1+85.94
STA: 2+10.54 - 2+24.95
N.T.S.
EXTEND HPTRM 2' BELOW
STREAM BED SURFACE
TOE DOWN PER
MANUFACTURERS
SPECIFICATIONS
REMOVE AND RESET STREAM BED
MATERIAL TO EXISTING ELEVATIONS
AND COMPACT TO 95% PROCTOR
2.5' HPTRM TOE
/\//< //2\ i
/i ./ ./i,./i,\//
NOTE:
1. ANCHORING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED AND PROVIDED BY
THE MANUFACTURER.
2. TRENCHED TIE-IN TO FOLLOW MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS.
®LOG WEIR PLAN VIEW DETAIL
N.T.S.
VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT
1. PREPARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 50 TO 75 MM (2 TO 3 IN) OF SOIL ABOVE FINAL GRADE. APPLY SEED IN AN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO 60%
OF THE TOTAL MIXTURE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SOIL SURFACE TO SCARIFIED SURFACE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE
PYRAMAT® 75 HPTRM. SELECT AND APPLY SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZER TO SCARIFIED SURFACE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE
PYRAMAT® 75 HPTRM. A SITE SPECIFIC SOIL TEST SHOULD BE PERFORMED TO HELP DETERMINE WHAT SOIL AMENDMENTS, SUCH AS LIME
AND FERTILIZER, NEED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL TO PROMOTE HEALTHY VEGETATION.
2. THE INSTALLED PYRAMAT® 75 HPTRM SHALL BE SOIL FILLED AND SEEDED WITH THE REMAINING 40% OF THE SEED MIXTURE. DO NOT PLACE
EXCESSIVE SOIL ABOVE MATERIAL.
3. IRRIGATE AS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN VEGETATION UNTIL 75% OF VEGETATION HAS ESTABLISHED AND HAS REACHED A
HEIGHT OF 2 INCHES. FREQUENT, LIGHT IRRIGATION WILL NEED TO BE APPLIED TO SEEDED AREAS IF NATURAL RAIN EVENTS HAVE NOT
OCCURRED WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SEEDING.
BEFORE INSTALLATION BEGINS
4. COORDINATE WITH A PROPEX REPRESENTATIVE: A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS SUGGESTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM AND A
REPRESENTATIVE FROM PROPEX. THIS MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH AT LEAST A TWO WEEK NOTICE.
5. TOOLS NEEDED TO INSTALL PYRAMAT® 75 HPTRM INCLUDE A PAIR OF INDUSTRIAL SHEARS TO CUT PYRAMAT® 75 HPTRM AND TAPE
MEASURE.
6. DETERMINE HOW TO ESTABLISH VEGETATION: THE METHOD OF VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT SHOULD BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO THE
START OF INSTALLATION. DIFFERENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT METHODS REQUIRE DIFFERENT ORDERS OF INSTALLATION. REFER TO
ESTABLISH VEGETATION FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE.
7. CONSULT THE PROPEX WEBSITE FOR THE MOST UP TO DATE INSTALLATION GUIDELINES.
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
0
ene c
App
D
Pe
es
D
R0
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
D D
DC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DES
G\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO. P —2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
C-6
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
E\GI\\G DIVISIO\
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: N /A
WOODCOFT CRCLE STHAV
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
STA3 L ZAT O\
SHEET NO.
9 OF 12

IMBRICATED STONE
2'WX4'LX2'H
DIVERSION STONE
2'
poocucyU
oeoea
#57 STONE
//,\i/\\\\\
GEOTEXTILE
5' MIN EMBEDMENT OR MINIMUM
2 IMBRICATED STONES
NOTE:
1. IMBRICATED STONE TO WEIGH MINIMUM 400 POUNDS AND TO BE SIZED
APPROXIMATELY 2' W X 3' L X 2'H.
J-HOOK PLAN VIEW DETAIL
N.T.S.
J-HOOK DETAILED INFORMATION
ID
STATION
SIDE
CENTER ELEV. (FT)
ARM TIEIN ELEV.
(FT)
o
e, ()
V (FT)
J-HOOK-1
1+67.42
WEST
737.00
735.81
4
1.19
J-HOOK-2
2+10.55
WEST
737.97
735.90
7
2.07
ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
REVISIONS
TYPE
ROADWAY
SEWER
WATER
SIDEWALK
IMBRICATED STONE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
SCOUR POOL
10:1 SLOPE
c JOOO�
,0000�� / //
/ i �\�\,���i\4�!/z���//��/>//��/�//��\/ice\/ice\ce\�\/�50:12" -
\/i\\\�\\\/\ •\ \�,\\�,\\/\\./� j// i /\\ • 1 THICKNESS
RIPRAP \ \ \
D50: 12"
2' THICKNESS
NOTE:
1. GRAVEL SCOUR POOL BASE.
IN -STREAM STRUCTURE DETAIL INFORMATION
ID
STATION
X
Y
W
Z
L1
L2
A
B
C
D
E
JH-01
1+67.42
6.20
2.89
26.92
2.00
23
12
737.00
735.81
736.14
JH-02
2+10.55
6.20
3.33
23.26
2.00
23
4
737.97
735.90
736.93
POOL 1
1+64.44
737.00
735.81
736.14
733.82
735.58
POOL 2
2+07.62
737.97
735.90
736.93
733.90
736.95
IMBRICATED STONE
2'WX4'LX2'H
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION DESIGN
Q
E2 J-HOOK ELEVATION DETAIL
N.T.S.
J-HOOK ARM
TIE TO BANK
(VARIES)
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P -2021-0020
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
CONST. SURVEY
CHECKED
SCALE: N/A
BY XXX
BY XXX
CONTRACT SHEET
10 OF 12
SLNSI I IVL INF OI-MA I ION
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
NPDES
General Permit
Applies
DISTURBED AREA =
0.61 Acres
GIS DISCLAIMER
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
CITY OF GREENSBORO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WOODCROFT CIRCLE STREAM STABILIZATION
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
SHEET NO.

10 Oct 2007
* DIGITAL FILE
MAXIMUM AREA TO BE
RETAINED BY SILT FENCE
GROUND
SLOPE
(X) ,
SLOPE
LENGTH
(ft.) *
MAXIMUM
DRAINAGE AREA
(SG. FT.)
<2%
2%-5%
5%-10%
10%-20%
>20%
100
75
50
25
15
10, 000
7, 500
5, 000
2, 500
1, 500
S�G�ENG-H
COG STD. #432 STONE DITCH
CHECK TO BE USED FOR SILT
FENCE STONE OUTLET
- ALL SIDE SLOPES ARE 2:1
- STRUCTURAL STONE TO BE
'CLASS B' RIP -RAP
- 12" THICK LAYER OF #57
WASHED STONE FOR EROSION
CONTROL ON FACE
NOTES:
1. NON -EROSIVE OUTLETS ARE TO BE PLACED IN THE SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON
THE PROJECT PLANS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR.
2. NON -EROSIVE OUTLETS ARE TO BE L OCA TED AT ALL NATURAL DRAINAGE
AREAS AND DEPRESSIONS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PERENNIAL STREAMS.
3. THE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA IMPOUNDED AT EACH OUTLET MUST NOT
EXCEED 1/4 ACRE.
PAGE 2 OF 2
CITY OF GREENSBORO
SILT FENCE DETAIL
STD. NO.
REV.
430
12/06
03/08
03/09
* DIGITAL FILE
2
L
0
m
0
0
0
3
�0
O
Q
Ul
m
3
0
0
6
RIP -RAP SIZE
DETERMINED
BY C. F. S.
TOP OF BANK
MIN. OF CLASS I
RIP -RAP
m
ti
,41.1Ii".1110. • •A s FLOW
CREEK INVERT
CREEK INVERT
#4 WASHED
STONE, 6" THICK
SECTION A -A
-
III-II__
NOTE:
THIS DEVICE IS TYPICALLY USED 15' AWAY FROM PIPE OUTLETS LATER
TO BE SPREAD INTO A RIP -RAP APRON.
THIS DEVICE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR 36" CULVERTS OR LARGER.
CITY OF GREENSBORO
STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT
CHECK DAM, TYPE A
STD. NO.
REV.
433
03-97
09-10
* DIGITAL FILE
0
0
m
0
0'
0
CC
en
c
3
0
10
10
L
C
co
NOTES:
-SPACING
CONTROL
-SPACING
CONTROL
POST.:
FABRIC:
STONE:
co
METAL FENCE POST
14 GAUGE MINIMUM
HOG WIRE (OPTIONAL)
EROSION CONTROL FABRIC
MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DISTANCE FOR
SEDIMENT REMOVAL & MAINTENANCE
S�oPE I_1 I I II
FIIL III-II-1-11-
IIII-ILIA 111 III -III-
EX. EARTH
BACKFILL AND
COMPACT THOROUGHLY
SILT FENCE MUST BE ENTRENCHED AND
SECURED WITH COMPACTED SOIL. THE
"SLICING METHOD" MAY ALSO BE USED
TO INSTALL SILT FENCE (SEE NCDENR
"EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DESIGN PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL " SECTION 6. 62) .
USE COG STD#432 STONE DITCH CHECK
FOR FENCE OUTLETS AT A MAXIMUM 100 FT
SPACING AND AT ALL NATURAL DRAINAGE
AREAS. (SEE SHEET 2 OF 2) .
OF POSTS USING HOG WIRE WITH APPROVED EROSION
FABRICS TO BE 8"-0" ON CENTER.
OF POSTS WITHOUT HOG WIRE USING APPROVED EROSION
FABRICS TO BE 6 ' -0 " ON CENTER.
METAL T-POST 5 ' -0 " OR 6 ' -0 " IN HEIGHT DEPENDING ON FILL
SLOPE (MIN. 1. 33 L B/L F STEEL CONSTRUCTION) .
3 ' -0 " IN WIDTH (MUST BE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE - AS TM D) WITH 12" BURIED IN TRENCH.
(IF USED) #4 WASHED STONE PL ACED 1 ' -0 " DEEP AT SILT FENCE.
-SPLICES IN FABRIC SHOULD BE OVERLAPPED A MIN. OF 4 FT.
-MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA = 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF FENCE FOR 2% OR LESS SLOPE.
-SILT FENCE TO BE REMOVED AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AS DIRECTED BY
THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR.
PAGE .t OF 2
CITY OF GREENSBORO
SILT FENCE DETAIL
STD. NO.
REV.
430
12/06
03/08
03/09
ATKINS
0
0
O
a
N
* DIGITAL FILE
PLACE TREE PROTECTION
FENCE AT THE CRITICAL
ROOT ZONE, WHICH IS
A CIRCULAR AREA
EXTENDING OUT 1.0 FT
FROM THE TREE'S TRUNK
FOR EVERY 1.0 INCH
OF TRUNK DIAMETER
MEASURED 4.5 FT
ABOVE GRADE
WOOD OR METAL POST.
ORANGE SAFETY FENCING
IS REQUIRED. SPACE
POSTS ON 8' INTERVALS.
NOTES:
1. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCES.
2. ALL TREE PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE,
INCLUDING THE CUTTING OF ANY TREES, AND MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE URBAN
FORESTER OR HIS DESIGNEE.
3. NO GRADING, TRENCHING, FILLING OR STORING OF MATERIALS IS TO OCCUR
IN THE TREE PROTECTION AREA.
4. TREE PROTECTION FENCE MAY NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL
OF THE URBAN FORESTER OR HIS DESIGNEE.
5. THE TREE CONSERVATION AREA SHOULD BE DESIGNATED WITH "TREE
CONSERVA TION AREA " SIGNS POSTED VISIBLY ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE
FENCED -IN AREA. SIGNS MAY NOT BE POSTED ON THE TREES. SEE
EXAMPLE BELOW.
f
TREE
CONSERVATION
AREA
ZONA DE
CONSERVACION
DE ARBOL
EXAMPLE SIGN
16" X 12" SIGN
1" BLOCK LETTERS
BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND
1/4" BLACK BORDER
ALL WEATHER MEDIA
100' SUGGESTED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS
CITY OF GREENSBORO
STANDARD TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
STD. NO.
REV.
448
03-08
06-08
03-10
CONTRACT SHEET
11 OF 12
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
\ 0
e\e C
App
D
Pe
es
D
R0
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
S D
SC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DOS
G\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO.
P — 2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
C-8
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
E\GI\EEI\G DIVISIO\
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED
BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: N /A
WOODCOFT CRCLE STHAV STA3 L ZAT O\
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
SHEET NO.
11 OF 12

IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE DETAIL "G2")
INTAKE HOSE
DEWATERING
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
\
DISTURBED WORK
AREA LIMITS
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE DETAIL "G2")
DEWATERING BAG
(SEE DETAIL "G1")
PLAN VIEW
\
\
\
© TYPICAL PUMP AROUND OPERATION
N.T.S.
\
\
\
\
\
\
/
ATKINS
HIGH STRENGTH DOUBLE
STITCHED "J" TYPE SEAMS
BAG PLACED ON RIPRAP
TOP OF BANK
10'
INTAKE HOSE
PUMP AROUND
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
STABILIZED OUTLET
USING CLASS B RIPRAP
AND TYPE 2 FILTER
FABRIC (SEE DETAIL "G3")
DEWATERING BAG
15'
SEWN IN SPOUT
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE
HOSE
EXISTING TERRAIN
FILTER FABRIC
0 DEWATERING BAG
N.T.S.
NOTE:
1. PROVIDE STABILIZED
OUTLET TO STREAM BED.
SAND BAG (24"x12"x18")
STANDARD OUTLET USING CLAS B
RIPRAP TRNCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE
AND LOCATION TO BE DETERMINE
IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FILTER FABRIC
G2 IMPERVIOUS DYKE
N.T.S.
tem-
/\//
10' MIN.
DEWATERING BAG
�LI / �LI / �LI ►/ �LI / �LI M �LI / �LI
/V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\///\/\
15' TO 20' MIN.
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE
HOSE FROM PUMP
AROUND PUMP HELD IN
PLACE WITH SAND BAGS
AS NEEDED
it is -. /\/\/\/\/\/\/1.../\/\/\/\/\/\
@STABILIZED OUTLET
N.T.S.
NOTE:
1. PUMP AROUND PUMP AND HOSE SHALL ADEQUATELY CONVEY BASEFLOW. DEWATERING PUMP SHALL
ADEQUATELY DEWATER THE WORK AREA AT THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS BARRIER.
2. PUMP AROUND PUMP INTAKE END SHALL INCLUDE A FISH SCREEN TO PREVENT ENTRAINMENT OF FISH.
3. UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH
CONSTRUCTION PHASING IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE THE LENGTH AND DURATION OF PUMPING.
4. INSTALL TEMPORARY IMPERVIOUS BARRIER, PUMP, HOSE, AND STABILIZED OUTLET FOR PUMP -AROUND
OPERATION AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. PUMP AROUND MAY BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO THE
STREAM (NO SEDIMENT FILTRATIONS REQUIRED).
5. INSTALL DEWATERING PUMP, HOSE, DEWATERING BAG, AND STABILIZED OUTLET, AND OPERATE AS
NECESSARY TO REMOVE WATER WITHIN THE WORKZONE, DISCHARGING THROUGH THE BAG.
6. A CONTINUOUS FLOW PATH SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE STREAM CHANNEL AT ALL TIMES IN ORDER
TO CONVEY OVERFLOW DURING STORM EVENTS.
7. IF A FLOOD EVENT IS FORECASTED TO EXCEED THE CAPACITY OF THE FLOW DIVERSION, CONTRACTOR
MAY TEMPORARILY DISMANTLE THE PUMP AROUND OPERATION ONCE DISTURBED AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED THROUGH THE DURATION OF THE STORM EVENT.
►
8" OF CLASS B RIPRAP
STREAM BED
CONTRACT SHEET
12 OF 12
S \S V \=ORVA 0\
Not to be copied or
distributed without the
express written
permission of the City
of Greensboro.
City of Greensboro Underground
Locates Information/Requests
COG Water Resources Dept....373-2033
GDOT Traffic Signal 373-2606
COG/Guilford Co. Telecom....373-2084
COG Water Supply 373-5855
Tanks/Treatment Plants
GDOT Storm Water 373-2569
\ 0
e\e c
App
D
Pe
es
D
GRO
06
D AR- A
Aces
C
D D
DC
A
R
Objects on this map shown
with a dotted linestyle were
not surveyed, they were
compiled by photogrammetric
methods, available on the
Geographic Information
System (GIS) software used
by the City of Greensboro.
\A DDS
G\
NOT FOR CONSTUCTION
REVISIONS
TYPE
CONTRACT
CONTRACTOR
AS -BUILT
AUTH. DATE
BENCH MARKS
JOB NO. P —2021-0020
CITY OF GEE\SBOO
C-9
Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group
OFFICE: 1616 E. MILLBROOK RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PH: 919-431-5270
ROADWAY
DESIGNED MM/DD/YY BY KMK
E\GI\\G DI VISIO\
SEWER
CONST. SURVEY BY XXX
WATER
CHECKED BY XXX
SIDEWALK
SCALE: N /A
WOODCOFT CRCLE STHAV STA3 L ZAT O\
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
SHEET NO.
12 OF 12

ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lava Lin Group
Memo
To: David Bailey; Sue Homewood
From: Ben Cogdell
Email: [e-mail]
Date: 09 December 2020
Phone: [phone]
Ref: SAW-2020-01942
cc: Matt Cusack, Amit Sachan, Johnnie
Hill
Subject: Summary of Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization Jurisdictional Determination
Agency Concurrence Meeting
The purpose of this memo is to provide a record of the Woodcroft Circle streambank stabilization
agency concurrence meeting that occurred on December 3, 2020. Atkins' lead technical
professional for this assignment, Ben Cogdell, met on site with Mr. David Bailey (USACE) at the
west end of the "Preferred Access Corridor." Below is a list of locations visited and a summary of
pertinent discussion of jurisdictional features and permitting issues that took place during the
agency concurrence meeting. JD Package Figure 2 is incorporated in this memo for reference.
Wetland WC located at the south end of the study area within the maintained utility easement was
reviewed and confirmed by Mr. Bailey, he agreed that no changes would be required to the limits of
the jurisdictional feature. Mr. Cogdell informed Mr. Bailey that the southern end of the study area
(along Grandover Parkway) was initially proposed as the preferred construction access location,
however upon visiting the site it was determined that Wetland WC could potentially be avoided by
accessing the site from the north via, what is now labelled as the "Preferred Access Corridor" in
Figure 2. Mr. Bailey agreed that this approached seemed like the best alternative.
Wetland WA located within the utility easement and was reviewed and confirmed by Mr. Bailey and
agreed that no changes would be required to the limits of the jurisdictional boundary. Mr. Bailey
confirmed that Wetland WA was directly connected along its western boundary to Reddicks Creek.
Mr. Bailey and Mr. Cogdell then reviewed the swale along the upslope (eastern) end of WA
(designated as "X1" in Figure 2) and confirmed that this drainage was ephemeral and contained
upland soils. This confirmation prompted a discussion regarding connectivity and jurisdictional
reach as it relates to the June 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule and the definition of "waters
of the United States". During this conversation Mr. Bailey informed Mr. Cogdell that Wetlands WB
and WD would not be considered jurisdictional should the City of Greensboro (City) wish to apply
for an Approved Jurisdictional Determination rather than a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(as is currently submitted). Atkins will advise the City on this and will submit an Approved JD
package if potential impacts are needed to support access to the construction area when a Pre -
Construction Notification is submitted.
While reviewing Wetland WA Mr. Cogdell and Mr. Bailey discussed the optimal construction access
for equipment to perform the stabilization measures along Reddicks Creek. Mr. Cogdell suggested
that there may be a need for a temporary crossing at Wetland WA within the existing utility
Woodcroft_Memo_COGD3624_STEP03_12092020 1

ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lava Lin Group
easement. Mr. Bailey confirmed that this approach seemed reasonable and would be acceptable
under the guidelines of a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 33 if the fill was indeed temporary. However,
Mr. Bailey went on to say that it would need to be demonstrated that avoidance and minimization
measures were considered if impacts to WA are deemed necessary. If the crossing needs to be
permanent, then Mr. Bailey said that action would need to be justified and avoidance and
minimization measures would need to be demonstrated.
Mr. Bailey and Mr. Cogdell then reviewed Reddicks Creek and the limits of the proposed
stabilization. Concepts of stabilization actions were discussed, and Mr. Bailey provided his opinion
on potential permitting strategies. Mr. Bailey agreed that this project was a reasonable fit for NWP
13-Bank Stabilization as it was less than 500 linear feet in length, however a Pre -Construction
Notification (PCN) would be required in writing. Mr. Cogdell informed Mr. Bailey of the proposed
stabilization techniques for further clarity. Below is a summary of the techniques proposed:
• Installation of boulders armoring along the right bank of the upstream end of the
stabilization reach.
• Installation of J-hook opposite boulder armoring to maintain centralized flow.
• Provide floodplain bench on the inside bend (opposite boulder armouring) to
provide stream with better access to floodplain during larger flow events.
• Repair washout on downstream end of proposed stabilization reach to prevent
further erosion.
Mr. Bailey informed Mr. Cogdell that these measures seemed reasonable and were within the spirit
of NWP 13 authorization. He went on to say that should the volume of fill below the Ordinary High
Water Mark (OHWM) exceed the limits (>1 cubic yard of fill per running foot of stream) then he
would be willing to consider a NWP 18-Minor Discharges (limit of 25 cubic yards of fill per running
foot of stream) acceptable.
The final item discussed was the consideration of Riparian Buffer Rules since Reddicks Creek falls
with the jurisdiction of the Randleman Lake Buffer Rules. Mr. Bailey informed Mr. Cogdell that Ms.
Sue Homewood (North Carolina Division of Water Resources) would need to be consulted
regarding impact justification and any potential buffer mitigation.
Woodcroft_Memo_COGD3624_STEPO3_12092020 2

Prepared By:
ATKINS
Prepared For:
GREENSBORO
Data Form Locations
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US (Streams)
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Project Study Area
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(Aerial Map)
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Dwn By:
FIGURE
RLG
Ckd By:
BEG
Date:
9/15/2020
Project No.:
100068937
D:\W o od c ro ft\F i g02_Ae ri aI. mxd

Right bank of Reddicks Creek (looking downstream) at the proposed start of bank
armoring and J-Hook installation
(Lat/Long): 35.988934 ,-79.894334000000001
Right bank of Reddicks Creek (looking upstream) at the proposed start of bank
armoring and J-Hook installation
(Lat/Long): 35.988872999999998 ,-79.894278
1 of 2

Right bank of Reddicks Creek (looking downstream) at failing bulkhead. Proposed
armoring/boulder-toe installation
(Lat/Long): 35.988880000000002 ,-79.894281000000007
Right bank of Reddicks Creek (looking upstream) at end of the proposed
stabilization reach. Proposed repair of bank failure (foreground).
(Lat/Long): 35.988818999999999 ,-79.893906000000001
2 of 2

RE: SAW- Q 0-019 (4902 Woodlcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization j Greensboro ] Gold
IIBailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAVU (USA) <David.E.8ailey2 usace,a&my,mil>
To 0 Cogdell, Benjamin E
Cc • Sachan, Amit Hill, Johnnie; • Cusack Matthew T; Homewood, Sue
Hi Ben, and thanks for the meeting summary. Having read back through NWP 13, even if the project involves activities that exceed ai
treated bank, the project could be authorized via NWP 13 per criteria (c) if a waiver is requested and the District agrees. Further, NW
temporary mats, necessary to construct the bank stabilization activity, so impacts for a temporary access road as discussed during ou
being that you would still have to justify that the activities avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to w;
Condition 23{a}.
Since the activity would involve discharges of dredged or fill material into special aquatic sites {riffle and pool complex} a PCN will be
wetland impact for the access road, and another NWP would have to be used (e.g. NWP 18).
Hopefully the above is useful. Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: htt
Thank you for taking the tine to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Cogdell, Benjamin E <Beniamin,Cogdell@atkinsglobaicom>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:51 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<Davf[[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sachan, Amit <Amit.Sacha n @atkinsRloba l . com>; Hill, Johnnie <J oh nriie. H i ll @Rreensboro-nc.Rov> Cusack, Matthew T <matt, cu sa{
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] SAW-2020-01942 (4902 Woodcraft Circle Streambank Stabilization f Greensboro/ Guilford County) Agent
Hello David and Sue,
Please find the attached memo detailing the Woodcraft Circle agency concurrence that occurred last week.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or edits to this memo.
Thank you,
Ben Cogdell
Senior Scientist I
North America
Sciences Technical Professional Organization

ilford County) Agency Concurrence Memo
) Reply
] Reply All
Forward
Thu 1211412020 &40 AM
r average of one cubic yard per running foot, as measured along the length of the
P 13 also authorizes temporary structures, fills, and work, including the use of
r site visit could be authorized via NWP 13 as well. The main caveat to the above
3ters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable (per NWP General
requ ired. As you stated, additional justification would be required for a permanent
p://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apexff?p=136:4:01
:k atki nsglobaI corn>
:y Concurrence Ivterno
E.

ICE: [External] SAW- 0 0-019 (4902 Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization GreensL
41iHomewood, Sue <sue.homewood ncdenr.gov>
To 4 Cogdell, Benjamin E [e-mail]
Cc • Sachan, Amit: Hill, Johnnie; • Cusack, Matthew T
r i 7 Click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of some pictures in this message.
Thank you Ben. Please note that if wetland WB and WD are determined to not be jurisdictional by the IJSACE they are still regulated a
permitting in NC is complicated:
Current State permitting framevrorks for wetlands that are riot subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act by the USACE determinat
1, Isolated wetlands may be permitted in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .1300 et. seq.; or
2. There is currently no permitting mechanism to authorize impacts to wetlands that are not Isolated.
The Division has proposed temporary rules as a means of expediting a resolution to the current situation. The proposal was brought b
on November 18, 2020, however the Committee moved for the Division to bring the item back before them at their meeting on Januar
Stream stabilization is addressed within the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules but feel free to let me know if you have any specific due:
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
335 813 1863 mobile
Sue .Homewood [ern cden r.gov
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
to and from INS adCireSS 4 sect to me
tVor#1 Cati'ing Public Records Law and may be disclosed to rhiird penes
Flom: Cogdell, Benjamin E <Beniamin,Cogdell atkinsglobal.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3;51 PM
To: David.E.Railey2 usaoe.army.mil; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sachary, Amit <[e-mail]>; Hill, Johnnie ohnnie.Hill greerrsboro-ncgov>; Cusack, Matthew T <matt.cusacki
Subject: [External] SAW-2020-01942 (4902 Woodcroft Circle Streambarik Stabilization / Greensboro / Guilford County) Agency Concun
CAUTION: External email_ Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send alI suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.
Hello David and Sue,
Please find the attached memo detailing the Woodcraft Circle agency concurrence that occurred last week.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or edits to this memo.
Thank you,

)oro / Guilford County) Agency Concurrence Memo
] Repfy ) Reply AIL Forward • • •
Wed 12/9/2020 5405 PM
t the state level, As a result of the June 2020 NWPR, non -jurisdictional tivetlarrd
:ion are:
efore the Water Quality Committee of the Environmental Management Commission
y 13, 2021.
rtions about the rules.
yaticinsglobal.com>
-e n ce Memo

aa
-f F
■
4-401.' 4 4 ' T ' 1
- .
}IL
• * ■}
+
ititi4
+ i R a i
/!a — r *!e.
+fir •
-
•
I. i y■ It. 11 : ;_
•
i ,*• �l
+
F j :
+ • - •-
i
'
Crt r
• .1 •
ill . ila
,•#++ * ' �, s /
Yr - L`,k . * '': y
Ir+ } - yy � %
1 . • ... V .. 7t :# . - ' "
: °
J A. / '. it. 1 .rt ,
.: ' "F de ' ■ 1 F ...1
lir? '1.
•
[_ •
i i }'•
- - r ! }F,,..*R L. AI. ■
r+eyy � ! ,
�
, . f . '
L ' ••}
i_r -s
,` . - •f
y7 {rL
'•
_
i,
is V
a ! .
M1 r : �a •*-
..i" 0\ r°o) \I°
.."t t f
r �M . . 1
t 0 ? IT
jer
!' ■#, J#,11...........FL
cef T ti r-� s}
�,t -0 - ,j , r F•~f +• • +
T+
i + ;' i 'it' i-
T'a y. iT T.i•
- ``
. 1 • ' • . %ft. '.. • r. ; - t .0
•
•
'111•
$r. #"' • + a • r , ' . PT��r'
y *r, J a +_ A 1 •,. i J. • FM
i 1
~
°Y +{ -r - rP • l-
yea ' f' '•
.... . . 7 • 4 ir, ... .. i• .'
.. . A i •.
i r, . ,,,, . .
%.'• { aI'f •,��• '!•
! } ,
° ..r l�
er
Stream Impacts
•
;• . a s i' - 1; r
Type
Reason
Stream Width
Impact Length
`
1 # :•.} o� + t ! l •le
'
Permanent Fill
J-Hook
15 LF
3 LF
' • . - ••`
'! +el. r' ,,
Permanent Fill
J-Hook
14 LF
3 LF
- • - a °
I.
Permanent Excavation
Scour Pool
11 LF
21 LF
' `' j
`; + +
:`
Permanent Excavation
Scour Pool
11 LF
30 LF
; ,`111
, o . . r -
Temporary Excavation
Channel Excavation
17 LF
163 LF
P.
i.. _ •` { • if 641
■
- "a' a - F
Stream Buffer Impacts
-
.1 " .1 - - - A Ali
• ti
Type
Zone 1 Impact
Zone 2 Impact
s
R} : •..
a a + ` `=' ,
Temporary Grading and Replanting
2,879 SF
N/A
r '" '' ,.W " !` P WC f f, y
t. 'r
r T
Temporary Clearing and Replanting
7,247 SF
1,759 SF
46 WL
'
" _ + #-T.' a �! !1"14 . . • ` •
, r
Total
10 126 SF
1 759 SF
-_
T
- { f ` ,+� _ le
1 ■ ' !rt
* _ '1- d _ .- + aitlf ' .;� ` : . ' ° - 4 • - - i t r * of . r - ._
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
Limits of Channel Disturbance
Temporary Grading, Zone 1
Stream Channel and Buffer Zone Impacts
Dwn By: RLG
FIGURE
- Permanent Fill In Stream Temporary Clearing, Zone 1
(Aerial Map)
N
0 75 150
Ckd By:
BEC
A\T K I N S�
Permanent Excavation In Stream Temporary - Clearing, Zone 2
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
Feet
Date.
219/2021
GREENSBORO
Temporary Excavation In Stream i Potential Wetland WoUS
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ProjectNo.:
100068937
D:\Woodcroft\I m p act_M a p_FuII. mxd

Yinit
1111 i-' i
I ,.( 114 — Pk
i# Fr' 1 1 �1 44 •7P +
VA - • I.
re
lil e 11 P fa ill , •
■ �1 r ■ R P10 sp, i
•
_ IL:ingh.._
+a ■ ,r
1. iii
-41J F•lit.; fie::
-
•• intrl —
ihrilli41.-1. .1 h 4111 L .4,
,. L • frill a . M. 1 • i 4 P 1 • 'I* 9F • f .11;
ri-
IF 07
rli
•
1 P-1
? agli 14p.."11 •
)111,..1111e .1- i
.1 g, . 0O , •' , ' ` I. ' ii
• ri
ir - ' • ol . W.
F
IL
ir r ,' Iiiiiiipi, .? . r J ' .- ir
.I I . -. till 7
41(1...VL g ' .e. . o' 0,
I If jim% jet li, - 0
I.- .N. a flik: j •
Stream Impacts
::=:_ ti
r Ik. - 110 ,
1P
Type
Reason
Stream Width
Impact Length
_ -ir ; r �je► IC:
.- -i 1
1
Permanent Fill
J-Hook
15 LF
3 LF
1.� j - •
•' � '� - F
Permanent Fill
J-Hook
14 LF
3 LF
f ;� �jr • ;~� ■ '• ■
F
Permanent Excavation
Scour Pool
11 LF
21 LF
- _ - ■
��
111-
Permanent Excavation
Scour Pool
11 LF
30 LF
1 _ ,
, i
ir
Temporary Excavation
Channel Excavation
17 LF
163 LF
�,■ -
'� ' Pq11 rtqn
las
Stream Buffer Impacts
}
. 1 , i 4��
1101111r
Oil
Type
Zone 1 Impact
Zone 2 Impact
4.rA P' #1 r am_' ` ■+ 'oe
Wom.
'
Temporary Grading and Replanting
2,879 SF
N/A
* - I �O0
1
Temporary Clearing and Replanting
7,247 SF
1,759 SF
• -
+ i • • ■
Total
10,126SF
1,759SF
,I� * 10 ' - ■ ~ a1 0�0,
■
Prepared By.
Prepared For:
Limits of Channel Disturbance
Temporary Grading, Zone 1
Stream Channel and Buffer Zone Impacts
Dwn By. RLG
FIGURE
Permanent Fill In Stream Temporary Clearing, Zone 1
(Aerial Map)
0 75 150 N
Ckd By: BEC
AST K I N SFeet
Permanent Excavation In Stream Temporary - Clearing, Zone 2
Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization
Date.
219/2021
GREENSBORO
•
Temporary Excavation In Stream Potential Wetland WoUS
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ProjectNo.:
100068937
D :\Woodcroft\ I m p a c t_ M a p. mxd

ATKINS
Member of the SNC-Lava Lin Group
Memo
To: File
From: Ben Cogdell
Email: [e-mail]
Date: 27 January 2021
Phone: [phone]
Ref: 100069218
cc: Matt Cusack, Amit Sachan
Subject: Woodcroft Circle Streambank Stabilization -ESA Compliance
The purpose of this memo is to provide a summary of available protected species habitat and
coordination for the proposed streambank stabilization associated with Reddicks Creek in Guilford
County, NC (Figures 1 and 2).
As of July 17, 2020, The USFWS lists 3 Endangered species and 1 Threatened species in Guilford
County; Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Roanoke logperch (Percina rex), Schweinitz's
sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), Small whorled pogonia (lsotoria medeoloides), and one species
receiving protections under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus).
Cape Fear shiner
The Cape Fear shiner is associated with gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates, and has been
observed in slow pools, riffles, slow runs. These areas occasionally support water willow (Justicia
Americana). During the spawning season, May through July, the Cape Fear shiner adults move to
slower flowing pools to lay eggs on the rocky substrate. Juveniles are usually found in slack water,
rocky midchannel outcrops, and flooded side channels and pools. Cape Fear shiner is endemic to
the upper Cape Fear River Basin in the Central piedmont of North Carolina. The species is known
to inhabit tributaries and mainstems of the Deep River, Haw River, Rocky River, and Cape Fear
River in Chatham, Harnett, Lee, Moore, and Randolph counties.
Potential habitat for Cape Fear shiner within the Project Study Area was surveyed and no suitable
habitat was identified. The biological conclusion for Cape Fear shiner is "No effect".
Roanoke logperch
The Roanoke logperch typically inhabits medium -to -large sized warm, clear streams and small
rivers of moderate to low gradient. Adults usually occupy riffles, runs, and pools containing sand,
gravel, or boulders that are free of silt. Generally, the logperch exist in low -density populations.
Potential habitat for Roanoke logperch within the Project Study Area was surveyed and no suitable
habitat was identified. The biological conclusion for Roanoke logperch is "No effect".
Schweinitz's sunflower
Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in full to partial sun and is associated with areas with poor soils, such
as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. It is believed that this species once occurred in natural forest
openings or grasslands, but many of the remaining populations occur along roadsides.
Memo

ATKINS
Member of the SNE-LavaLln Group
Potential habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower within the Project Study Area was surveyed and no
suitable habitat was identified. The biological conclusion for Roanoke logperch is "No effect".
Small whorled pogonia
Small whorled pogonia is known to occur in habitats with sparse to moderate ground cover, a
relatively open understory, and proximity to features that maintain long persistent breaks in the
forest canopy. In general, too much shading is a limiting factor for this species.
Potential habitat for small whorled pogonia within the Project Study Area was surveyed and no
suitable habitat was identified. The biological conclusion for small whorled pogonia is "No effect".
Bald eagle
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to large bodies of open
water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of
open water. Trees suitable for potential nesting locations within the Project Study Area were
surveyed and no nests were identified.
A biological conclusion for this species is not required, but disturbance to the bald eagle associated
with the project is not anticipated.
Field Surveys
On February 28, 2020, Atkins biologist Ben Cogdell conducted a thorough visual survey to identify
suitable habitat for all species listed for Guilford county. Suitable habitat for Cape Fear shiner,
Roanoke logperch, Schweinitz's sunflower, and small whorled pogonia within the study area was
not present. Reddicks Creek, within the limits of the Project Study Area is void of cobble and
boulder substrates and lacks the associated vegetative component of Cape Fear shiner, water
willow (Justicia americana). Additionally, this reach of Reddicks Creek has a high shifting bedload
not conducive for Roanoke logperch habitat. Canopy trees suitable to support bald eagle nests
occurred within the Project Study Area, however no nests were identified. A review of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database for these identified species in Guilford
County revealed no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the Project Study Area.
The Biological Conclusions for the Threatened, Endangered, or otherwise protected species in
Guilford County are shown in Table 1.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Biological Conclusion
Cape Fear shiner
Notropis mekistocholas
Endangered
No effect
Roanoke logperch
Percina rex
Endangered
No effect
Schweinitz's sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
No effect
Small whorled pogonia
lsotoria medeoloides
Threatened
No effect
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Not required

ATKINS
Member of the SNE-LavaLln Group
References
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1988. Cape Fear shiner Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA 18 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) recovery plan.
Newton Dorner, Massachusetts.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Small Whorled Pocionia (lsotria medeoloides)
Recovery Plan First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Schweinitz's Sunflower Recover Plan. Atlanta,
GA 28 pp.

Reddicks Creek looking upstream. The majority of
the Project Study Area comprised of a degraded,
unstable stream channel with a shifting bedload
with no suitable habitat for the Cape Fear shiner
(Notropis mekistocholas) or the Roanoke logperch
(Percina rex).
Frequently mowed/maintained utility easement
to be utilized for primary construction access. No
potential habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) or small whorled pogonia
(Isotoria medeoloides).
1 of 2

Densely wooded area adjacent to the limits of
Reddicks Creek is choked out by dense understory
dominated by bamboo providing no potential
habitat for small whorled pogonia (Isotoria
medeoloides) or Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii).
2 of 2

_-
ba:
_ - �_
• tamest =�1
Woodcroft (MAID > ° � 9,, r , �,1
-Burlington Alamance
Rgnl Airport
- Reservoir
\ _ — liiistA�o
Atlantic pigtoe
• Critical Habitat (Proposed)
'
I l j Durh
Is"_R
h Poin L...... - - Please s nth ,_.t
a .. - r, Gard Gi r-I ,_rr,
�Aup.tt
'Archdale
Trinity-
49
CANE CREEK •SaXapahaW
MOUNTAINS
i,o�h ''''' '-,,
Pleasant Hill
y
40:
`.
Horace Willi aims A
54 - ,i
Carrboro. ',Chapel ill - 70'
Oid Greensb9�O'
5k?
----- - �22a
^� R.-rleigll Durham
r -
t
- Intl Air port
Liberty
•Randleman p<'
r
Franklinville
.Ramseur
. , „A
64i 'sheboro
1
-,, 1
-Asheboro
Muni Airport
Smith Air
Slit.
rl
BIPI.HEAG
F:10 U N TA I N S
Atlantic pigtoe 73
C0 Habitat (Proposed)
- "NORTH
f15'.
- B.fVEkE7T
JORDAN LAKE Morrisville
`:
87
i';a Citify
1421i. a
i.
� 64'..-
Slier City _ -- -__ - Pittsboro - B Everett •Apex
1 _orlon Lake
4 Tiler City
-- Muni Airport
Cape
(Q Habitat .Holly Springs
---_�
-1 =
1 AO
' S!I_ dron
Sanford Hams
!Lee Co Ron!
birport Fuquay-Varina•
'
CAROLI NA !� 2
AI
gape
C Habitat
'., Sanford
i
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
Critical Habitat - Final
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Dwn By:
RLG
FIGURE
Critical Habitat
0 5 10 N
Ckd By:
p
gEC
\TK� N S
Critical Habitat Proposed
Woodcroft Circle Stream Stabilization
Miles
Date. 2/18/2021
GREENSBORO
* Project Study Area
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Source: US Fish and Wildlife Service
Project No.: 100068937
D:\Woodcroft\Crit Hab.mxd