20140554 Ver 2_USACE Email Verification of PJD_3August2019_20210512

Bob Zarzecki
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 7:39 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Subject: RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
Hey Bob,
Considering all features on -site were considered jurisdictional and I did provide a concurrence email, it is not my
intention to provide a PJD, especially, if you will be submitting a permit for this area. It is very unlikely I will be able to
get to the JD prior to your permit application submittal based on my crazy workload right now. It has generally become
standard for us to issue the permit and not the JD. Let me know your thoughts.
I hope you're well,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 4:25 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
Sam:
Hey, heads up that we submitted the pre -filing request to DWR last Friday. We've got until May 10th before we can
submit the application to them and plan to submit it to the USACE the same day. Attached is the PJD email verification
that you did for this property back in July 2021. I never did get the official PJD tearsheet from you though. Any chance
you can get that to me before I submit on May 10th?
BOB ZARZECKI
Wetlands Department Manager/Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Original Message
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 11:30 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
1

Thank you!
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 4:37 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
Sam:
Attached is the DWR stream determination letter for your files.
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Original Message
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 11:35 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
Got it. Thanks. And I can say the same to you. Looks like the sun is finally coming out!
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2019 11:21 AM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park

Probably before September if that's possible. Thanks Sam! Don't work too hard today. It's a Saturday. Have fun in
Asheville!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 3, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
wrote:
>
> Sounds good. Please let me know when you need the JD and I'll get in my cue.
>
> Samantha Dailey
> Regulatory Project Manager
> U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
> Regulatory Division
> 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
> Wake Forest, NC 27587
> [phone], Ext. 22
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
> Original Message
> From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2019 11:14 AM
> To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
>
> Most likely just the JD. They are trying there darndest to avoid all impacts. Looks like they can based on preliminary
sketches, but they're surveying everything now and designing the retaining walls, etc. So, they're hoping to avoid the
need for permits.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
» On Aug 3, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
wrote:
» Hey Bob,
»
> I'm perfectly fine with you revising the stream to the origin established by the DWR. As such, I concur with the Figure
3 - Sketch Map dated 08/02/2019. Will there be a permit application submitted for this project? Or are you only
requesting the JD? Please advise.
» Samantha Dailey
» Regulatory Project Manager
» U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
» Regulatory Division
» 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
» Wake Forest, NC 27587
» [phone], Ext. 22
» [e-mail]
»
»
3

»
» Original Message
» From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
» Sent: Friday, August 02, 2019 3:26 PM
» To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
» Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
»
» Sam:
» Attached is the updated sketch map reflecting the intermittent stream origin as determined in the field today by
Gary. I'll pass along his letter as soon as I get it.
» Bob Zarzecki
» Wetlands Department Manager
» Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
» Original Message
» From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
» Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 12:48 PM
» To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
» Subject: RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
» That sounds good. Thanks, Bob!
»
» Samantha Dailey
» Regulatory Project Manager
» U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
» Regulatory Division
» 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
» Wake Forest, NC 27587
» [phone], Ext. 22
» [e-mail]
»
»
» Original Message
» From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
» Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 12:45 PM
» To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
» Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
» Sounds good Sam. I'll forward you the DWR determination as soon as I get it, most likely next week. The Town will
push them for the PJD and they are trying to avoid all impacts, so please just pass it along as soon as you're able. Thanks!
» PS ... I have another one in the area that I plan to submit soon. I think you'll probably come to the same conclusion.
I'm just waiting to submit it until we get back the DWR letter which we anticipate back soon.
» Cheers!
»
» Bob Zarzecki
» Wetlands Department Manager
» Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4

»
» Original Message
» From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
» Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 12:30 PM
» To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
» Subject: SAW-2019-01403 Hinton Oak Industrial Park
» Hi Bob,
»
» Knightdale is my area these days. I've looked at the map and truly don't believe a site visit is warranted just based on
the location in the watershed, and the small scope of the site. I know you mentioned Gary was going out to look at the
site this week, so if you wouldn't mind passing along his notes on the stream call - I would appreciate it.
» Thanks,
» Sam
»
» Samantha Dailey
» Regulatory Project Manager
» U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
» Regulatory Division
» 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
» Wake Forest, NC 27587
» [phone], Ext. 22
» [e-mail]
5

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Samuel Bratton
Wake Stone Corp
PO Box 190
Knightdale, NC 27545
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 6, 2019
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-222
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
Hinton Oaks Industrial Park (East)
0 Hinton Oaks Blvd Raleigh, NC
Beaverdam Creek
Determination Date: 08/02/2019
Staff: Gary Kreiser
Stream
Feature
E/UP(1)
Not Subject(2)
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
1 USGS
Topo
A
X
DWR flagging
"Start Stream
A"
approximately
35.808549, -
78.510004
Off project
review area
X
C
X
Not subject east of Hinton
Oaks Blvd
X
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Presen
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Wake County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
D. E
uo.ara Enammanui UuMisly\sjole"'
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628

Hinton Oaks Industrial Park
Wake County
08/06/2019
Page 2 of 2
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Gary Kreiser at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ric : olich, Assistant Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC, PA, (electronic copy) bzazeckina,sandec.com
�.MA�wl al inwrrmrriW qeM,
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

NRCS Soli Survey Sheet 51
Wake County NC 1970
Legend:
-project boundary
Hinton Oaks Industrial Park (East)
Wake County, NC-DWR Project # 19-222
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::

Hinton Oaks Industrial Park (East)
Wake County, NC-DWR Project # 19-222
7::11'4‘1‘
11L—
A &C not depicted on USGS map
r'1Jv r\L� VS
USGS Topographical Mac.
Raleigh East Quadrangle 2016
Legend:
-Project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
t

i/ i
/ e ♦\ 1 \ I1 I 1 II I1 / // /i / 1 j1/ 1 /
/ I
//
1/� ,...---
/--\ \v♦ j f
1 III III1 1'I.\//// / 11 f�
/ // \\.\/11 II /1// // 11 1 I 1 I I 1
/ / / \, \ / 1 I 1 `1 1 I 1 1 1
/ 1 /I 1 \ 11/ /1 1\ Irl % 1
I / 1 I I II 1'1 1 111 1 1
I I
/1 '' /.i 1 j 1 / 1 / / 1 1 .':I 1 1 1 11 1 1 /l1 /1 / t t 1
l /' / / / I I 1 1 11 I I\\\ I \ 1 .1 \
1 \ • .I.'/,. //1 /; / l I 1 1, .1 I I I 1 1111/l11 \ \\\ \ 1 I j I I 1
\\` ; /i // / 1/ 1 1 / 1 I I 11////I/11 \ \\r ,, I 11 I I..
1 / //// / /� / / // / 1 .'. � :. /1 I. ' l 111 /%l11111 1 /f ;/ : `�1 j '
1 // i // / / l I • 1 I I' 1/ l Will,/ l,l l l /ii ,,--, 1 1 1 ► 1
1 / /// l / 1 / "d 1 1 1/ 1Will
1111 1 1 1 /ice / I I\ I 1
1 / 1.,/ / / I I 1'' 1 1 I �li l l 1 / /. , / / `I \ \ / 1 / l
I / i / / / / l 1 1 1 1-11/�} 1�. // — �\` %\\ \ \\ 1 I 1 1 I /
F1 / / / / A 1 l 1/ 1 1►/ i lid ��.� ♦ J \ \ \. \ I 1 I I 1
,I / I I I' 11 /// I/ I i IWi ' 1 / ^"� �� t \\\ I i r
1 �, 1 I % % / / I % / / 1 I I 1 0 / ---.`♦\ ♦ `ss 1 \ \� \ \ 1 I
1 -.•-_= , / / / 1 ./ , i : / . I 1 1 /' �♦ ♦ ♦♦ I \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 1
��-:r1�'>■ T ■ ^ ■,�^ �% ��■/fir MI,/_' ! I``♦♦♦` \ \ \\ \\\ ` \\ \ \ I
/
/
/
•
/i %I ' I/ l 1 1 / // / / / j / / /1 / 11 / /
/ / / /
I / 1 / /• / I
•�___�� j I I l 1 % l/ /i
/ • / / 1/. J 1 1 l I // i /.:
, % /l I• l 4. 1► 1 /iI/�//
/ / \\lr--/ // / /
i / / r / / / \' '/'/ //
_ / / / \1 /
71 l 1 '_ / / // / / / / 01 ' /\\�\ ; /
/ / /
I \\ / r 1 / / / j3 /
/ 1 `ham i / , / / / r % ./•/ i
/ 1 `t`♦ / / / / / / / / /j
i l I ♦1 / I/ / / / / r11/
/•/ 1 1 1 l l I I 1 1
/ i /1 / / 1 I' I I/. I I I
// / / / / / / / / J. I
// --// / / / 1 / / 1 I \
rI %/-- ---J / �^ / ., / i / ! 1 1
1 I \ `l ` // / / / / 1 —
1 c
1 .__
I 1 I \ I
\ 1 1 I LI 1 1 / 1♦ �♦
- \ \ 1 \ 1 1 1 r• ` •-O •`\
\ \, \\ \\ i i I —. `\ `.
`\ , \ \\ \\\ \\ 1 i �, _ W '\\ \,.: \\
\ I
• I 1
/ 1
/ 1 •
/ . 1
I j
1• \
• 1. \
' \\ \
1
1
■
1
1
1
/---♦ \ `♦ ♦ `� \ \♦ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 1
/ / •\♦`♦ `♦`\ `♦ ♦ �•� \ \\ \\ \\ `\ \\\ \ \ 1
/ / , ^—\ ‘' ' `♦ `♦ - \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \
----♦ .\ ♦♦ \ 1 I \ \\ \ \\ • \
•
REVISED PROJECT t,\\\\,
%; - AREA BOUNDARY (new ; \ \�
-- LOT 8 property line) 1
' ,/ ,-, 45 TT 01 -' 1
7 II /11 / / j ' . 1'-- \� • .♦ . ♦\ \ \ ,,\ \.. I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 I l `� `♦ \ ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 I I\ \
/ 1 ■ / / / . I I ♦.
\\ \\ \\ \\ \ I \ \ ,\ \ / 1 /
11 1 1 1 / % \ \ \ : \ \ ► \\\ \' 1 1
I 1 I I I \. i i i i i► I i1 1 1 1
1 \ / ` ) I I I I 1 1 1 l 1 / 1 / i
1 ■ / 1 1 \1 t\\ �. li;iii
� / i 1 /l l 1 ;://://://:///:
/ ; i'I I 1 1 \11 / I////\I11 1/I \\//I'll:
lI1 /�// ://///11
/,\\\ttI\\11 I / 1► \\l 1; \ 1 1I\/♦Y\I/ } II 1 L I / //1 II1 �/1I I `1/■ 1 \ \ l / l 1 .1 /�/ / / / 1
•
\I\\\_\IrI\I1I1\ \ 1. / / / �/ 1 I
1 �\� \\ \\ \\ji
\ \\ \v � DP1 ■ // � i i 1 1 l 1 1 1 � l %— —`,j /
\ \ \ \ \ / / / / 1 \ \ / /
•
,,, , . \ 1 . ‘ . 1._ \..1 ifr:, /
♦\
\ \\\ \ 1 / / - I /
' \ • \ 1 / ♦ \.
..,
\ \ i1 / . i \\ A „ . \ \ 1 / / I 1
. .. I. ,:' �• \ \ \ \1 , 1 1 I
I
\ \ \\ \ 1 1 t 1
\ \ \\ \�/ 1 \\ 1
\\} \\\, \\ ` 1 I
/ 1
. \ ♦ / 1
DWR Start Flag
9
FN. N
i / 1 , /' i d
1 / /-A 4r
/ /-n-�
•
} 1 i \\
■ ./
S /
1%
//■
/ 1
/ ■
\ 1
N. iVial'
/
• •
/
/. - ♦ _ - ./ i - < —� � - ■ /
/ ii / - 1 - /
F1 14 I: / 1 / 1
7 1/ 1 I •....// � r I. / /
4-7 //1i I I I �.
/ � --��
1 / /�II t 1 \ 1 / / ,
I I 1' / /
1 / 11 \ \ \ ♦ _ _ i / / ; .
` / I 11f Il,' \\ ``_--♦. . \ 4 . ♦ /, i �II'r I•r`\ i t —. i�r .t 1 / ug
Stream "C" Origin
(per NBRRO#14-150)
Stream "C"
Not Subject east of
Hinton Oaks Blvd.
/
%. I . 1
/ I I
/ /
/ 1
/ / I I
1
1
'I
1 / '
1 1
1 / J
11 / / / 1 /
1 1 / /
I / %/ // �/
Legend
C51 Evaluation Area
coo Potentially Jurisdictional Stream
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
% --
♦
Stream origin and start of Neuse Buffers determined by
Gary Kreiser of the DWR-RRO on 8/2/2019 & Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) desk -top verified by
Sam Dailey of the USACE on 7/31/2019.
/
Potential 50' Buffer
/
/ /
/
/ /
Figure 3 - Sketch Map
Wake Stone Hinton Oaks
0
125
250
500 Feet
Project No.
12181.W4
Scale:
1"=125'
NC OneMap
Wake County GIS
Project Mgr.:
BZ
08/02/2019
Prepared by:
JL
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
x412 Falls of Neuse Road, Salle 104, Rakei£h. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.eom
N
A

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 0 Hinton Oaks Blvd.
City, State: Raleigh, NC
County: Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Portion of 1744592845
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Bob Zarzecki
Mailing Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 104
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
✓❑
EI
o
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone]
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Wake Stone Corp.
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
6721 Knightdale Blvd. PO Box 190
Knightdale, NC 27545
[phone]
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
El
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017
Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓
o
El
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 16.4 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓
❑✓
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.807681
Longitude: -78.511673
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑
❑
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: July 1 1 , 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Bob Zarzecki - 8412 Fails of Neuse Rd. Suiet 104 Raleigh, NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.807681
Long.: -78.511673
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaverdam Creek (east side of Neuse River) (Neuseco Lake, Beaverdam Lake), 27-29
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
W1
35.807725
-78.510264
0.40 acres
wetland
404
W2
35.808293
-78.510143
0.15 acres
wetland
404
35.807874
78.510354
500 If
non wctland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Wetland Sketch Map
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Raleigh East, NC Quadrangle
▪ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County Soil Survey Sheet 51
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Hinton Oaks Industrial Park S&EC Project #12181
Date: 2019
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Sam Dailey Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): portion of 1744592845
Site Address: Hinton Oaks Blvd. (0 Knightdale Blvd.)
City, County, State: Knightdale, Wake County, NC
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Wake Stone Corporation, 6721 Knightdale Blvd., PO Box 190, Knightdale, NC 27545
OFFICE: (919)266 — 1100 / FAX: [phone] / MOBILE: [phone]
EMAIL: sambratton(a;wakestonecorp.com
Samuel Bratton
Property Owner (please print)
July 11, 2019
Date
Property Owner Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Hinton Oaks Blvd Extension
Applicant/Owner: Wake Stone
City/County: Raleigh/Wake
Investigator(s): Bob Zarzecki - S&EC
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.807104
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 6/28/2019
State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3
Soil Map Unit Name: DuC2 - Durham loamy sand, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Long: -78.510227 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: N/A
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes x No
Yes x No
Yes x No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 90 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Arundinaria gigantea
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
70 Yes FAC
30 Yes FACW
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 160 x 3 = 480
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 190 (A) 540 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.84
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel
0-5 10Y R 3/2 100
5-20 10YR 5/1 100
Loc2
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Hinton Oaks Blvd Extension
Applicant/Owner: Wake Stone
City/County: Raleigh/Wake
Investigator(s): Bob Zarzecki - S&EC
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.807485
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 6/28/2019
State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3
Soil Map Unit Name: DuC2 - Durham loamy sand, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Long: -78.510826 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: N/A
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _ _
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FAC
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
30
10
Yes
10 =Total Cover
FAC
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Boehmeria cylindrica
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Polystichum acrostichoides
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
40
35
30
10
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
115 =Total Cover
FACW
FACW
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 58 20% of total cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0 x 1 = 0
75 x 2 = 150
60 x 3 = 180
30 x4= 120
0 x5= 0
165 (A) 450 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.73
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel
0-8 10Y R 3/2 100
8-20 10YR 5/1 100
Loc2
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Hinton Oaks Blvd Extension
Applicant/Owner: Wake Stone
City/County: Raleigh/Wake
Investigator(s): Bob Zarzecki - S&EC
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.804886
Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 6/28/2019
State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3
Soil Map Unit Name: DuB2 - Durham loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Long: -78.511277 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: N/A
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _ _
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Carya glabra
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Quercus stellate
4. Acer rubrum
5. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
25 Yes FACU
25 Yes FAC
20 Yes UPL
10 No FAC
10 No FACU
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Quercus alba
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
40
20
20
Yes
Yes
Yes
80 =Total Cover
FAC
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
(Plot size: 30 )
Herb Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
(Plot size: 30 )
50% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis vinifera
2.
3.
4.
5.
60
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Yes
60 =Total Cover
UPL
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 95 x 3 = 285
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
UPL species 80 x 5 = 400
Column Totals: 230 (A) 905 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.93
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel
0-15 2.5Y 3/2 100
Loc2
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Sandy Loam
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0