HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0035904_Inspection_20060413rvucnaei r. nasrey, Uovernor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment'and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 13, 2006
William N Stovall, PE
NC Department of Correction -
4216 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 276994216
SUBJECT: April 12, 2006 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NC Department of Correction
McCain Correctional Hospital WWTP
Permit No: NC0035904
Hoke County
Dear Mr. Stovall:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report from the inspection conducted 'on
April 12, 2006 by Hughie White of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance
with permit NC00359.04.
- Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff has
any questions, please call me at 910-486-1541.Ext.708.
Sincerely,
Hughie White
Environmental Technician
cc: Darrel Cockman, ORC
No thCarolina
aurally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street — Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Phone (910) 486-1541 Customer Service
FAX (910) 486-0707 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data' System Coding (i.e., PCS).
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 1� 2 [1 31 NC0035904 111 121 06/04/12 1 17
Type Inspector Fac Type
181r1U 191g1 201 I
lJ
I L 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 11- 1 1166
Remarks
21I 1 I. I 1 I 1 1 1 I. 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved----------- ------ ---
671 1 69 70I 3' 711 D 721 NI 731 1 174 75I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 80
�,
Section B:' Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
McCain Correctional Hospital WWTP
NC Hwy 211 -
Raleigh NC 276994216
Entry Time/Date •
10:00 AM 06/04/12
Permit Effective Date
05/05/01
Exit Time/Date
12:00 PM 06/04/12
Permit Expiration Date
09/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Darrel C Cockman/ORC/910-944-2351/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
William N Stova11,4216 Mail Service Ctr Raleigh NC 276994216/Director
of Engineering/919-716-3424/9197163978 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement 1 Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Hughie White 4;4- ...FRO WQ//910-486-1541 Ext.708/
�G 'f --/.3 -D 6
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer
Belinda S Henson
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers ��jDate
/ li�'1(L,� FRO WQ//910-486-1541 Ext.726/ t - 11 3 - Q L
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1
J"
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0035904 11 12I 06/04/12. I 17 18U•
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
A Notice of Violation was issued during.the previous inspection for failure to have an alternate: power source
in the event of a power failure. 'That violation has since been corrected. A standby; generator. has been
installed that can run the entire plant. It is. setup to self -test sunder load on a:weekly: basis. -All records and
log books appeared to -be properly maintained. Laboratory data was' reviewed and all data, appeared to be
correct as reported on the DMR's. A review for the Field Parameter Certification' was performed during this . .
'inspection and all requirements for the certification appeared to be met. All units of the plant;appeared to be
operating satisfactory except for the secondary clarifier. That clarifier is out of service, at this time, due to
maintenance repairs on the units gear box,
Page # 2
Permit: NC0035904 Owner - Facility: McCain Correctional Hospital WWTP
Inspection Date:. 04/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean.With acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge
Judge, andother that are applicable? ' -
Comment:_
Permit .Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? 0 0 ■ 0
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any, special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted "to the general public?. ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Bar Screens Yes. No NA NE
Type of bar screen -
a.Manual ■
b.Mechanical ■
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ 0 '❑ 0
Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0
Is disposal of screening in compliance? NU 0 0 0
Is the unit in good condition? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment:
Primary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are. weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage? •
Is the site free, of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
sloop
■ aoo
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑0
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑-❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
Page # 3
Permit: Neo035904 Owner - Facility: McCain, Correctional Hospital WWTP
Inspection Date;04/12/2006 • . Inspection. Type: Compliance Evaluation
Primary Clarifier
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately '/<of the sidewall-depth)
Comment: .
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
A
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the`site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment: Secondary clarifier was out of service during the inspection. The gear box
was being repaired.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation.
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
Comment:
Aerobic Digester'
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Yes No NA
NE
❑ a❑.
Yes No NA NE
O 0011
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ❑❑■.
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
o a.❑..
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ❑❑■
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
❑❑a■.
Yes No NA NE
Surface
■ ❑ ❑❑
■ ❑❑❑.
❑- ❑ '■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑-❑■:
❑ ❑❑ mu'
.
• Yes No NA NE ..
■ ❑❑❑.
Page #
Permit: NC0035904 Owner - Facility: McCain Correctional Hospital WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ,
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 0 0
# Is the odor acceptable? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 • 0
Comment:
Drying Beds Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation? • ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge? 11000
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill? 0 0 • 0
# Is the sludge land applied? • ❑ ❑ ❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate? 0 0 • 0
Comment:
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? 0 0 0 11
Are UV bulbs clean? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is UV intensity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 •
Is there a backup system on site? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is effluent clear and free of solids? 111000
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 0 •
Comment:
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Page # 5
Permit: NC0035904
Inspection Date: 04/12/2006
Owner - Facility: McCain.Correctional Hospital WWTP
Inspection, Type: _ Compliance Evaluation
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standbypower available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator -tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have:adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? ,
Is there an emergency agreement With a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Cor-rimer*
Effluent -Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 ,❑ •
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ '❑ 0 0
Is proper volume collected? 0 0 Q •
is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑.. ■
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ❑ 0 0
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ 0 0 0
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling . Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ .❑, 0 ❑=
Comment:
Yes, No NA. NE ,
■o-
❑ ❑ ❑ -
°■ •,❑ :.❑ ❑ .
-❑.■❑❑.
■❑❑❑..
❑ ❑•❑ ■
■❑❑❑-
Yes No NA NE
Page # 6
Name of site to be Inspected
Field certification #. (if :applicable):
NPDES
I. Circle the arameter`or arameterS "erformed at this site.
Chlorine, Settleable Solids, Conductivity e o, • , .erriper
Residual� .
I. Instrumentation:
A Does the facility have the equipment necessary to analyze field parameters as circled above?
No
1. A pH meter
2. A Residual Chlorine meter
Yes , No
No.:
3. DO meter
4. A Cone for settleable solids
Yes No
5. A thermometer or meter that measures temperature.
t2� No
6. Conductivity meter
Yes No
Ill Calibration!AnalYsis:
1. Is the pH Meter calibrated with a 2 buffersarid
checked With a third buffer each day of use?
2. For Total Residual Chlorine, is a check standard
analyzed each day of use?
3. Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed
each day of use?
4. For Settleable Solids, is 1 liter of sample
settled for 1 hour?
5. Is the temperature measuring device calibrated
annually against a certified thermometer?
6. For Conductivity, is a calibration standard Yes No
analyzed each day of use?
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
es No
IV. Documentation:'
•
1..Is the date and time that the sample :was collected documented?
2. Is the sample site; documented
3. Is the sample collector documented?,
4: Is the analysis date and time documentec
5: Did the analyst sign the documentation?
6. Isrecord of calibration documented?..y
7. For Settleable, Solids;,is sample_ volume ,and
1 hour One settling time doCurnetlted?
8. For Temperature, is the annual' calibration of
the measuring device documented?
Comments:
s
No
Please submit a copy of this completed. form to the Laboratory Certification Program.
DWQ Lab Certification
Chemistry Lab
Courier # 52-01.-01
FIELD INSPECTOR CHECKLIST REV. 04/23/2002